Rome’s Greatest Challenge | The Dacian Wars (Part 1)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 2 тра 2024
- Sign up for online therapy with Betterhelp and get your 10% discount here: betterhelp.com/HistoriaMilitum
The Dacian Wars is a topic over overlooked due to a severe lack of sources, which is in stark contrast to the magnitude and importance of the conflict. However, with this video, we hope to create a series detailing everything we know about the campaigns until this point, based on the works of numerous researchers and archeologists. So sit back and enjoy our lively animated and epic series as it covers the forgotten wars in their entirety, with no details left out!
Each video will include the details about the cultural and social lifestyle of the Dacians, a deeply fascinating people who were later Romanized to extinction by the Romans.
Sources:
- Charles, B. “The Flavio-Trajanic miles : the Appearance of Citizen Infantry on Trajan's Column” in Latomus, 61, Fasc. 3, 2002, 666-695.
- Florea, G; Pupeza, P. Les Dieux tués: La Destruction du chief-lieu du Royaume Dace” in Die Römischen Provinzen: Begriff und Gründung Colloquium Cluj-Napoca 28. September - 1. Oktober 2006, Editura Mega: Cluj-Napoca, 281-295.
- Neamtu, C; Bârcâ, V; Buna, Z. “Promoting and Capitalizing on the Vestiges from Sarmizegetusa Regia by Modern Multimedia Methods” in Plural, Vol. 8, no. 1, 2020, 150 - 173.
- Oltean, I. A; Hanson, W. S. “Conquest strategy and political discourse: new evidence for the conquest of Dacia from LiDAR analysis at Sarmizegetusa Regia” in Journal of Roman Archaeology, 30, 2017, 429-446.
- Oltean, R. Dacia: La Conquista Romana. Desperta Ferro Ediciones: Madrid, 2016.
- Oltean, R. Tracios, Getas y Dacios. Desperta Ferro Ediciones: Madrid, 2021.
- Pupeza, P. “To see or to be seen: The Dacian fortresses from the Orăştie Mountains” in Annales d’Université Valahia Targoviste, Section d’Archeologie et d’Histoire, XIV, 2, 2012, 81-85.
- Richmond, I. A. “Trajan’s Army on Trajan's Column” in Papers of the British School at Rome, 13, 1935, 1-40.
- Rossi, L. “Dacian Fortifications in Trajan’s Column” in The Antiquaries Journal, 30-35.
- Soria Molina, D. Las guerras dácicas de Trajano Antecedentes, desarrollo, geopolítica, estrategia y consecuencias. Universidad de Murcia: Murcia, 2016.
- Stefan, A. S. Les guerres daciques de Domitien et de Trajan: Architecture militaire, topographie, images et histoire. Ecole Française de Rome: Rome, 2005.
- VV.AA. A Monumental Effort: Trajan’s Dacian Wars. Ancient Warfare Magazine VI.2, Karwansaray Publishers: Zutphen, 2012.
- Wheeler, E. “Rome’s Dacian Wars: Domitian, Trajan, and Strategy on the Danube, Part I” in The Journal of Military History, 74, 1185-1227. - Розваги
As a Romanian, I thank you for your dedication in research and editing this video. Epic.
I totaly agree with you
Dacii nu sunt stramosii nostrii. Ei erau foarte inalti, blonzi si cu ochi albastrii. Uitati-va cum arata poporul Roman si vedeti daca exista vreo asemanare. De asemenea despre Geti, Herodot a spus ca erau cei mai drepti dintre Traci, adica cinstiti. Poporul Roman de astazi a cam speriat Europa cu ''cinstea''. Stramosii nostrii au fost colonistii Imperiului Roman. Din acest motiv vorbim Limba Latina. Imperiul Roman nu a putut sa ii supuna pe Daci chiar daca i-a cucerit. Cam la fiecare 10 ani era cate o revolta, iar Imperiul Roman ii lua sclavi pe toti Dacii din acea zona, femei, barbati, copii, dupa ce ii invingeau. Scrieri vechi spun ca numai la doua revolte au luat cate 150 de mii si i-au dus prima data in Albania de astazi si a doua oara in Britania. Imaginati-va , in 170 de ani de stapanire cati sclavi au luat din Dacia. De asemenea nobilul Venetian de origine Greaca, Markos Antonios Katsaitis, care a scris despre calatoria sa in anul 1742 in Moldova si Valahia, a spus ca Imparatul Aurelian cand s-a retras din Dacia, de frica, ca Dacii sa nu devina din nou o forta de temut care sa puna probleme Imperiului Roman, i-a luat pe toti si i-a trecut dincolo de Dunare in Moesia aducand in locul lor Colonisti Romani. Gasiti acest lucru in cartea ''Saeculum'' la pagina 94. Markos Antonios Katsiris si-a facut studiile in Italia, deci a invatat Istoria Imperiului Roman si stia ce spune. El s-a documentat despre trecutul Transilvaniei, Tarii Romanesti si Moldovei pentru ca la comanda Ducelui Venetiei a scris o Geografie a Europei, deci cele ce a afirmat le-a gasit probabil in documente vechi care astazi nu mai exista sau sunt pe undeva uitate. Domnitorul Moldovei de atunci Constantin Mavrocordat l-a verificat pentru a vedea daca informatiile lui despre ce a fost pe teritoriul Moldovei in antichitate, scrise de el in Geografia Europei sunt corecte si a constatat ca sunt. Va rog terminati cu ineptia ca noi suntem urmasii Getilor si Dacilor si cinstiti-va stramosii latini, cetatenii celui mai mare imperiu ce a existat vreodata pe pamant, imperiu ce a adus civilizatie in Europa si in lume. Mandriti-va ca gena Colonistilor Imperiului Roman, nu a putut fi infranta timp de 1800 de ani de nici o natie care a venit pe aceste pamanturi. In final toate, ori au fugit, ori au fost asimilate, ca in final gena Latina sa se ridice din nou. Unde sunt Hunii, unde sunt Gotii, unde sunt Avarii, unde sunt Pecenegii, unde sunt Tatarii, unde sunt Bulgarii, unde sunt Cumanii, unde sunt Turcii, unde sunt Austro-Ungarii, unde sunt Germanii, unde sunt Slavii, unde sunt Rusii sau alte natii care au venit sa stapaneasca aceste pamanturi? Toti au fost invinsi de gena Latina. Voi ii preamariti pe amaratii de Daci, care au fost invinsi si dusi sclavi de stramosii vostrii, desi acestia nu aveau scriere, constructii marete, opere de arta, scoli, poeti, scriitori adica nimic, erau niste salbatici cocotati pe Muntii Carpati. Si unele din cetatile lor au fost facute tot de romani, doar sunt scrieri care spun acest lucru. Pentru ce preamariti un popor ingenunchiat de stramosii vostrii? Cred ca nici voi nu stiti. Ce merit au avut ei in dezvoltarea omenirii? Nici unul. Radeti singuri de voi ca fiind urmasii unui popor invins in loc sa fiti mandrii de gena voastra care nici astazi nu a fost invinsa de nimeni, ci a cuprins jumatate din planeta. Roma si astazi conduce prin Vatican aproape doua miliarde de oameni de pe acest pamant. Ca sa intelegeti ca noi poporul Roman nu avem aproape nimic de-a face cu Dacii sau Getii si ca ati fost mintiti de ''istoricii comunisti'' care de fapt s-au ocupat cu mistificarea istoriei si mintitul, va pun un link cu un studiu genetic al ADN-ului, facut pe majoritatea populatiei pamantului in 2014 in care se arata ca populatia de pe teritoriul Romaniei nu are decat 0,4% gena Daca sau Geta ( Dai este numita Gena Tracilor in Genetica. Dacii si Getii erau din neamul Tracilor). Dati click pe punctul rosu de pe harta Romaniei si in dreapta vor aparea doua tabele. In ele, ce este bifat cu albastru sunt genele majoritare din ADN-ul romanilor, iar cele ne bifate sunt genele minoritare. Genele majoritare au fost gasite la toti cei 1400 de romani de pe tot cuprinsul tarii ce au participat la studiu, cele minoritare numai la unii din ei. Romanii invata la scoala o istorie mincinoasa care le ascunde ca sunt urmasii colonistilor adusi aici de Imperiul Roman. Pentru ca erau rasisti, ne suportand sa fie sub conducerea altor neamuri Dacii se revoltau si Romanii i-au exterminat aproape complet. admixturemap.paintmychromosomes.com
Ce puternici eram o data
@@ioro7268Și încă suntem ,asa vor sa creadă toate popoarele din Europa ca suntem !
Când ei în sinea lor știu cu adevărat cine suntem!
Suntem copiii primordiarilor!
@@stensimisuveran adevarat
As far as I could think, the Dacian Wars was that one big gap that was never fully covered in a detailed documentary on UA-cam, and with good reason. Given the lack of sources, most of which is archeological, this series is and will be a big challenge to produce, but nothing impossible! This series aims to compile everything we know about this long lost conflict, from the combined works of numerous historians and archeologists, and make a fine addition to the already amazing arsenal of free Roman videos on UA-cam; thanks to the hard work of many great channels. Thank you all for making this possible!
i liked that you colorize the map , in blue, yellow, red ... it's obvious about what country live now in this region around The Carpathian Mountains :)
@@dand7763 Haha, I suppose I did unintentionally create the Romanian flag… what a coincidence!
@dand7763 Well, we Romanians are after all children of Rome, and still hold in our chest Rome's glory in Dacia as we still speak the language descendant from theirs
Loved this! As a Romanian I appreciate you trying to investigate my ancestors history. Decebal really did damage to Rome it's no wonder they carved him in the side of a huge mountain.
Dacia and the Getae are among my favorite cultures of the time and so I'm very pleased with the video. Great work
We Romanians thank you for this well produced, in depth analysis. Congrats and we wait for part 2! Thank you.
Thank you! Part 2 should be out by mid January!
@@HistoriaMilitum Any idea how long is left?
@@sticlavoda5632good news, it’s out now!
As a Bulgaria,I think we need finally to clarify the history.
@@antonival50 ?
Salut! As a Romanian I would like to thank you profoundly for creating this video. There is a enormous lack of investment into our history by the authorities. However, history still lives through our traditions, our lands and last but not least, our language.
Keep up the great work! 👏👏🙏🙏
As a Romanian I studied about Dacians a lot and I'd like to add the following details/facts:
1. Dacia won at Tapae and had a lot more small battles won at south of Danube, this being the main reason the Roman Empire wanted Dacia conquered as it was a rising power at its borders, constantly raiding its territories.
2. Roman Empire paid the Dacians tens of thousands of Denari tribute, which is the largest sum Romans ever paid in tribute. That was for Dacia to behave and not organise as a Kingdom, but Daecebalus kept unity and military training along with raids at south of Danube despite of the tribute being paid.
3. After the first Dacian-Roman war, because of the Dacian falx sword all the legions taking part in the conflict had to improve their helmets and armors as they were just being chopped off by Dacians, which led to a whole new armor type in the Roman Empire
4. Although the Roman Empire managed after the second large scale war to conquer Dacia, they didn't exterminate the Dacians as a lot retreated at north of the Carpathian Mountains and lived known as Free Dacians and kept trading, language and traditions with living Dacians left in the Roman province of Dacia.
5. Romans held a small part of Dacian territory for about 200 years and this time period it was considered till nowadays to be the end of the Dacian people (end of language, traditions, etc) and the start of a new nation (nowadays Romania) resulted from the converted Dacians to the Roman culture. But as you can see Dacia was a powerful kingdom at the time, its people considered by many historicals at the time as being brave, courageous, fierce warriors. Was it possible for Romans in 200 years to erase such a strong culture, considering that a large part of Dacian people lived free of any Roman occupation at the north of the province? Also Roman Empire inhabited England for over 400 years and English people are still speaking their own language and have their own culture.
6. Dacians had huge issues with alcohol. The first king, Burebista, had to burn all the grapevines and ban alcohol consumption in order to get Dacians to fight properly and not be constantly drunk af
7. The Dacians were religious people and they believed in one god, Zamolxis along with prophets as Daeceneus, Zeuta etc. In their religion death was seen as a relief from this world and a pass to the next world and they were celebrating every death. This is very similar to other cultures as Egyptians, Vikings. And my personal belief is that this made them fierce warriors as they were not afraid to die in battles.
Asa e ...n-a fost nici o romanizare . Oricat s-ar chinui istoricii sa explice asa zisa romanizare n-au cum sa explice triburile Traco-Gete din nord si din est. In Getia n-a calcat picior de soldat Roman si cum puteau reusi Imperiul Roman sa schimbe limba si obieiurile in 179 de ani si-o ocupatie partiala cand ungurii n-au reusit in 800 de ani si-o ocupatie tiranica ? Ce nu se spune in video-ul asta e ca Ilirii , Tracii , Moesii , Bastarnii , Costobocii si multi altii mentionati...erau de fapt tot triburi Geto-Trace desprinse din triburile originale Geto-Trace. Triburi care si-au format propriile state dar care aveu aceesi limba cultura si religie. Asa zisa Romaniare si descendenta din Roma a poporului Român a aparut in secolul 18 cand o multime de alte neamuri pretindeau ca noi Românii nu am locuit aici si ca ei au primul drept. Sti ca ma refer la Bulgari , Sârbi , Unguri , Polonezi , Ucrainieni , Rusi, Bielorusi si altii. Tari care n-au nici 1000 de ani in Europa. Adica eu n-am vazul sa existe la Vatican sculpturi de 2000 de ani cu capul lui Attila sau Sviatoslav I al Kievului. Uite-te la dinastia regala a Rusiei, incepe prin anul 1280 . Dar de Traco-geti exista foarte multe
nu mai bate campii
@@gundabalf cu ce bate ma campii? Pune dracu mana pe o carte de istorie!
@@gundabalf foarte bun argument....
Man just look at yourself for a second coz I don’t have time to read all your post [got an early flight to Romania (Kolozsvár) lol] so just look at your point at number 1: the Romans had to take care of the raising power (aka Dacia) who constantly raided their borders.
So long went the myth of your peaceful people growing peppercorn and cucuruz(corn on the cob) just minding their business and the ugly nomad Huns came 😂
These were epic wars. The Dacians were a fierce power. It took the Roman Empire at its height, with campaigns led by arguably its best military minded emperor in Trajan, fought by the Legions at their best during the Principate to beat Dacia.
The reward was worth it. The Dacian gold was the biggest war spoil that Rome ever took. Then they started mining the rest. When Trajan won, he decreed 123 days of holydays throughout all the Roman Empire, in celebration for its victory, the greatest victory that Rome had till that date. 123 days... Dacia was filthy rich in gold. So rich that it fueled the whole Roman Empire's war machine for over 100 years. 6 ships from the first cargo were so filled that they sink somewhere on the way to Rome. I don't remember who did the study, but there was a study that came to the conclusion that the catalist for the Roman Empire power expansion and maintenance was the Dacian gold.
If Rome didn't abandoned during Hadrians time great part of Dacia Traiana, the province might have had great places to be defended like Dnister river and Prut river to the east and Carphathian mountains in the north/west.
My village is on Serbian side 12km far from Trajan's bridge, where the Romans crossed the Danube in Dacia.
Hello neighbour. I miss seeing your shore, from Dacians part! My mother and her family were born and lived in Orșova.Great vacation,great places.And Vegeta was tasty,back then!❤🇷🇴😀
@@mirelairinapetre6503 Hello 👋, we still have a lot of visitors from Romania in our small town, they usually come to eat our BBQ in restorans and other delicious food and I think that they still buy vegeta 😁
@@mirelairinapetre6503 The original Vegeta actually comes from Croatia, from Koprivnica, from the company PODRAVKA.
I have vlach family in korbovo
@@utvm6748I'm from village Korbovo (but I feel much more as a Serbian)
Thank you so much for covering this, I had no idea just how powerful the Dacians where
romanians are their descendants ,the roots are from that period ,of course native dacians plus roman colonists (bring their civilization here, adopted quick by the local natives, plus the language - latin one)
@@dand7763😂
@@MajorCharlesCarringtonVCand shields.
In the times of Giulio Cesare the Dacians under Burebista had kicked out Gauls (Kelts) out of territory of recent-day Slovakia.
@@MajorCharlesCarringtonVC because of the falx, which is a type of curved sword.
Salut! 🇹🇩 Romanian here wearing the Dacian Draco as my channel image since 2011! Our ancestors were a great civilization of Antiquity, a fact with which not may nations can be proud of. I wish us romanians acknowledged our roots and be more confident in ourselves everywhere we are. And you help us do that, so you have my huge respect, and I declare a friend of the romanian people ^ ^. Mult succes în continuare prietene!! ❤💛💙🤗
Stop it with this we wuzzing shit. Jesus Christ.
Nu a fost nici o civilizatie, mai baiete ! Dacii ca si getii au fost o cultura , cu nimic diferita de alte culturi din jur sau aiurea .
Sa fii mai razboinic decat atii , nu inseamna civilizatie . Sper ca ai inteles din video ca cele mai avansate lucruri din viata lor, le-au primit de la Romani sau Greci . Aia erau civilizatii .
Si apoi , tot din video , Dacii nici nu au existat pana prin secolul 2 BC , cand au suspus locuitorii arcului Carpatic , ca invadatori de origine Getica , cel mai probabil amestecata cu multi altii. Cand sa faca o civilizatie ?
😂😂😂You're proud to be Romanian😂😂😂
@@nathanworthington4451 I'm proud of my ancestors, yes. What's the deal?
@@Tanu.90 Its just absurdly funny on several levels that's all. You had to go all the way back to antiquity and you said ancestors like you're related to those people who werent even Romanian🤣 Plus you're super proud to be Romanian. Again that's just ridiculously funny. Like what are you proud of? Dracula? 🤣🤣🤣
I'm a romanian and I'm born into Carpatian mountains and proud of my ancestors .
Well, they wouldn’t be proud of you 😂
@@SashaBaron112idiot...
@emiibbb, me too, but we are more romans than dacians, hence the name "Romania". And why tf do I reply u in english if we are both Romanians? Salut frate!
Our Roman ancestors wouldn't be proud of us for being bunch of Dacopaths. Treziți-vă românilor! Strămoșii noștri au fost domnitori Europei!
@@mihaifloares2503 because the YT page and the video is done in english? Tf? Salut si tie
Trajan wanted to remain in history like Caesar, and his conquests in Dacia to be equal to those of Caesar in Gaul. He wrote a description of the wars with the Dacians "De Bello Dacico" which has not been preserved, in the mirror of Caesar's "De Bello Gallico". In Rome, Trajan's Forum was right next to Caesar's forum and was wider.
So , Trajan conquered Dacia, because he wanted to remain in history , not because Dacians where a menace and didn't respect treaties , even though they were for their advantage .
Ata Romanian boy !
Mai invata istoria adevarata mai baiete ! Lasa nationalismul imbecil si dacopatia fara fundament !
That's just awfully unfortunate. I would've loved to hear Trajan's personal stories of conquering Dacia
its one of the greatest loses of history it would have speared us romanians of so much drivel spewed by our magyar friends.@@iDeathMaximuMII
@@neddhuhuh?
Dacii nu sunt stramosii nostrii. Ei erau foarte inalti, blonzi si cu ochi albastrii. Uitati-va cum arata poporul Roman si vedeti daca exista vreo asemanare. De asemenea despre Geti, Herodot a spus ca erau cei mai drepti dintre Traci, adica cinstiti. Poporul Roman de astazi a cam speriat Europa cu ''cinstea''. Stramosii nostrii au fost colonistii Imperiului Roman. Din acest motiv vorbim Limba Latina. Imperiul Roman nu a putut sa ii supuna pe Daci chiar daca i-a cucerit. Cam la fiecare 10 ani era cate o revolta, iar Imperiul Roman ii lua sclavi pe toti Dacii din acea zona, femei, barbati, copii, dupa ce ii invingeau. Scrieri vechi spun ca numai la doua revolte au luat cate 150 de mii si i-au dus prima data in Albania de astazi si a doua oara in Britania. Imaginati-va , in 170 de ani de stapanire cati sclavi au luat din Dacia. De asemenea nobilul Venetian de origine Greaca, Markos Antonios Katsaitis, care a scris despre calatoria sa in anul 1742 in Moldova si Valahia, a spus ca Imparatul Aurelian cand s-a retras din Dacia, de frica, ca Dacii sa nu devina din nou o forta de temut care sa puna probleme Imperiului Roman, i-a luat pe toti si i-a trecut dincolo de Dunare in Moesia aducand in locul lor Colonisti Romani. Gasiti acest lucru in cartea ''Saeculum'' la pagina 94. Markos Antonios Katsiris si-a facut studiile in Italia, deci a invatat Istoria Imperiului Roman si stia ce spune. El s-a documentat despre trecutul Transilvaniei, Tarii Romanesti si Moldovei pentru ca la comanda Ducelui Venetiei a scris o Geografie a Europei, deci cele ce a afirmat le-a gasit probabil in documente vechi care astazi nu mai exista sau sunt pe undeva uitate. Domnitorul Moldovei de atunci Constantin Mavrocordat l-a verificat pentru a vedea daca informatiile lui despre ce a fost pe teritoriul Moldovei in antichitate, scrise de el in Geografia Europei sunt corecte si a constatat ca sunt. Va rog terminati cu ineptia ca noi suntem urmasii Getilor si Dacilor si cinstiti-va stramosii latini, cetatenii celui mai mare imperiu ce a existat vreodata pe pamant, imperiu ce a adus civilizatie in Europa si in lume. Mandriti-va ca gena Colonistilor Imperiului Roman, nu a putut fi infranta timp de 1800 de ani de nici o natie care a venit pe aceste pamanturi. In final toate, ori au fugit, ori au fost asimilate, ca in final gena Latina sa se ridice din nou. Unde sunt Hunii, unde sunt Gotii, unde sunt Avarii, unde sunt Pecenegii, unde sunt Tatarii, unde sunt Bulgarii, unde sunt Cumanii, unde sunt Turcii, unde sunt Austro-Ungarii, unde sunt Germanii, unde sunt Slavii, unde sunt Rusii sau alte natii care au venit sa stapaneasca aceste pamanturi? Toti au fost invinsi de gena Latina. Voi ii preamariti pe amaratii de Daci, care au fost invinsi si dusi sclavi de stramosii vostrii, desi acestia nu aveau scriere, constructii marete, opere de arta, scoli, poeti, scriitori adica nimic, erau niste salbatici cocotati pe Muntii Carpati. Si unele din cetatile lor au fost facute tot de romani, doar sunt scrieri care spun acest lucru. Pentru ce preamariti un popor ingenunchiat de stramosii vostrii? Cred ca nici voi nu stiti. Ce merit au avut ei in dezvoltarea omenirii? Nici unul. Radeti singuri de voi ca fiind urmasii unui popor invins in loc sa fiti mandrii de gena voastra care nici astazi nu a fost invinsa de nimeni, ci a cuprins jumatate din planeta. Roma si astazi conduce prin Vatican aproape doua miliarde de oameni de pe acest pamant. Ca sa intelegeti ca noi poporul Roman nu avem aproape nimic de-a face cu Dacii sau Getii si ca ati fost mintiti de ''istoricii comunisti'' care de fapt s-au ocupat cu mistificarea istoriei si mintitul, va pun un link cu un studiu genetic al ADN-ului, facut pe majoritatea populatiei pamantului in 2014 in care se arata ca populatia de pe teritoriul Romaniei nu are decat 0,4% gena Daca sau Geta ( Dai este numita Gena Tracilor in Genetica. Dacii si Getii erau din neamul Tracilor). Dati click pe punctul rosu de pe harta Romaniei si in dreapta vor aparea doua tabele. In ele, ce este bifat cu albastru sunt genele majoritare din ADN-ul romanilor, iar cele ne bifate sunt genele minoritare. Genele majoritare au fost gasite la toti cei 1400 de romani de pe tot cuprinsul tarii ce au participat la studiu, cele minoritare numai la unii din ei. Romanii invata la scoala o istorie mincinoasa care le ascunde ca sunt urmasii colonistilor adusi aici de Imperiul Roman. Pentru ca erau rasisti, ne suportand sa fie sub conducerea altor neamuri Dacii se revoltau si Romanii i-au exterminat aproape complet. admixturemap.paintmychromosomes.com
It is tragic how so many details have been lost considering the magnitude of the campaign and the relevance it still has for both Romanians and Rome. This is a nice insight in the little there is left of their story.
Proud to be Daco-Romanian !!! 🇷🇴🇷🇴🇷🇴🇷🇴🇷🇴🇷🇴
Mee too❤❤❤
@@_UwU_92 It is written Daco-Roman not Daco-Romanian tho. And modern Romanian Academia argues we Romanians originated from both sides of the danube river, and were under Roman influence for 733 year's, which makes us Thraco-Romans and not Daco-Romans
@@InAeternumRomaMater 🥰😘💋💯👋🏻🙏🏻💪👍🏻
Esti sclavul europei, de acum 2000 ani si pana azi, nu te ai uitat la video sau nu iesi din casa? 😂
@@InAeternumRomaMater ha ha ,oricum,important e marele adevar ca ungurii sunt un trib nomad.Un popor nomad! Si ca noi dacii dupa cum rezulta si din acest video construiam cetati cu mult inainte ca anglo saxonii si germanicii sa coboare din copaci.Binenteles ungurii erau inca dinozauri
The fact that you used music from Praetorians, one of my childhood games that I played so much is even more impressive. Thank you for this!
Not as much Dacian war content as other parts of ancient history. Appreciate this
You didn’t mention that Crassus grandson managed to kill a Bastarnae chief in one on one combat and was eligible to be granted the Spolia Opima but was snubbed by Augustus
That's a secret we are keeping for the future 😉. If the series performs well he will get his own episode.
@@JonEtxebeberriaRodriguez are you the writer?
@@danielating1316 Yeap, I'm his right hand man 😉
What was Crassus's grandson name ?
@@tudorpatrascu2476 Marcus Licinius Crassus lol same name as his father and grandfather
As a romanian, THANK YOU!
Actually, thanks to you!! Romanian historians are doing a great job at uncovering the dacian history. One of our most trustworthy sources is a romanian historian, Radu Oltean. He does an amazing job at putting together all the info available in romanian and translating it to english. He is also an incredible artist. Without him these series would have been incredibly difficult to do
@@JonEtxebeberriaRodriguezare you a member of this channel too?
Fun fact: some of Rome's best auxiliaries were recruited in Dacia.
Just like that? You expect anyone to believe that?
@@harlequin7735 No. I expect anyone who is seriously interested in the topic to do their own reading and come to their own conclusion.
@@cerdic6586usually you need a source to say stuff like this
@@wankawanka3053have a look for Dacians in Britain. They even remained on the island after the Roman retreat from Britannia.
Also Batavians from the Netherlands
Greetings from the great country of Romania - Dacians are here
Nah, not the same
I HAVE NO WORDS TO EXPLAIN ME GRATITUDE . AS A ROMANIAN . ty ty ty ty god bless you and your work
Stramosii romanilor nu sunt Dacii. Dacii erau foarte inalti, blonzi si cu ochi albastrii. Uitati-va cum arata poporul Roman si vedeti daca exista vreo asemanare. De asemenea despre Geti, Herodot a spus ca erau cei mai drepti dintre Traci, adica cinstiti. Poporul Roman de astazi a cam speriat Europa cu ''cinstea''. Stramosii nostrii au fost colonistii Imperiului Roman. Din acest motiv vorbim Limba Latina. Imperiul Roman nu a putut sa ii supuna pe Daci chiar daca i-a cucerit. Cam la fiecare 10 ani era cate o revolta, iar Imperiul Roman ii lua sclavi pe toti Dacii din acea zona, femei, barbati, copii, dupa ce ii invingeau. Scrieri vechi spun ca numai la doua revolte au luat cate 150 de mii si i-au dus prima data in Albania de astazi si a doua oara in Britania. Imaginati-va , in 170 de ani de stapanire cati sclavi au luat din Dacia. De asemenea nobilul Venetian de origine Greaca, Markos Antonios Katsaitis, care a scris despre calatoria sa in anul 1742 in Moldova si Valahia, a spus ca Imparatul Aurelian cand s-a retras din Dacia, de frica, ca Dacii sa nu devina din nou o forta de temut care sa puna probleme Imperiului Roman, i-a luat pe toti si i-a trecut dincolo de Dunare in Moesia aducand in locul lor Colonisti Romani. Gasiti acest lucru in cartea ''Saeculum'' la pagina 94. Markos Antonios Katsiris si-a facut studiile in Italia, deci a invatat Istoria Imperiului Roman si stia ce spune. El s-a documentat despre trecutul Transilvaniei, Tarii Romanesti si Moldovei pentru ca la comanda Ducelui Venetiei a scris o Geografie a Europei, deci cele ce a afirmat le-a gasit probabil in documente vechi care astazi nu mai exista sau sunt pe undeva uitate. Domnitorul Moldovei de atunci Constantin Mavrocordat l-a verificat pentru a vedea daca informatiile lui despre ce a fost pe teritoriul Moldovei in antichitate, scrise de el in Geografia Europei sunt corecte si a constatat ca sunt. Va rog terminati cu ineptia ca noi suntem urmasii Getilor si Dacilor si cinstiti-va stramosii latini, cetatenii celui mai mare imperiu ce a existat vreodata pe pamant, imperiu ce a adus civilizatie in Europa si in lume. Mandriti-va ca gena Colonistilor Imperiului Roman, nu a putut fi infranta timp de 1800 de ani de nici o natie care a venit pe aceste pamanturi. In final toate, ori au fugit, ori au fost asimilate, ca in final gena Latina sa se ridice din nou. Unde sunt Hunii, unde sunt Gotii, unde sunt Avarii, unde sunt Pecenegii, unde sunt Tatarii, unde sunt Bulgarii, unde sunt Cumanii, unde sunt Turcii, unde sunt Austro-Ungarii, unde sunt Germanii, unde sunt Slavii, unde sunt Rusii sau alte natii care au venit sa stapaneasca aceste pamanturi? Toti au fost invinsi de gena Latina. Voi ii preamariti pe amaratii de Daci, care au fost invinsi si dusi sclavi de stramosii vostrii, desi acestia nu aveau scriere, constructii marete, opere de arta, scoli, poeti, scriitori adica nimic, erau niste salbatici cocotati pe Muntii Carpati. Si unele din cetatile lor au fost facute tot de romani, doar sunt scrieri care spun acest lucru. Pentru ce preamariti un popor ingenunchiat de stramosii vostrii? Cred ca nici voi nu stiti. Ce merit au avut ei in dezvoltarea omenirii? Nici unul. Radeti singuri de voi ca fiind urmasii unui popor invins in loc sa fiti mandrii de gena voastra care nici astazi nu a fost invinsa de nimeni, ci a cuprins jumatate din planeta. Roma si astazi conduce prin Vatican aproape doua miliarde de oameni de pe acest pamant. Ca sa intelegeti ca noi poporul Roman nu avem aproape nimic de-a face cu Dacii sau Getii si ca ati fost mintiti de ''istoricii comunisti'' care de fapt s-au ocupat cu mistificarea istoriei si mintitul, va pun un link cu un studiu genetic al ADN-ului, facut pe majoritatea populatiei pamantului in 2014 in care se arata ca populatia de pe teritoriul Romaniei nu are decat 0,4% gena Daca sau Geta ( Dai este numita Gena Tracilor in Genetica. Dacii si Getii erau din neamul Tracilor). Dati click pe punctul rosu de pe harta Romaniei si in dreapta vor aparea doua tabele. In ele, ce este bifat cu albastru sunt genele majoritare din ADN-ul romanilor, iar cele ne bifate sunt genele minoritare. Genele majoritare au fost gasite la toti cei 1400 de romani de pe tot cuprinsul tarii ce au participat la studiu, cele minoritare numai la unii din ei. Romanii invata la scoala o istorie mincinoasa care le ascunde ca sunt urmasii colonistilor adusi aici de Imperiul Roman. Pentru ca erau rasisti, ne suportand sa fie sub conducerea altor neamuri Dacii se revoltau si Romanii i-au exterminat aproape complet. admixturemap.paintmychromosomes.com
Absolutely great episode. I have written several scientific writings on the Dacian Wars in the course of my history studies and can only say that you have presented everything perfect so far. Cant wait for Part 2!
Thank you for the kind words!
Where can I find these writings if you don't mind me asking?
@@ionutpaun9828 Difficult topic. The ones I read were german and they are only avaible in libraries, not online. You can still give it a try searching for some online but I cant say if u will find something good
@@ionutpaun9828 communist propaganda. You got plenty of that in Romania
@@christiankeresztesy4450Hungarian mongol spotted! You can`t deny the Dacians that were living in Pannonia and in all Romanian territories!
Fun fact, it is beleived that due to the frequency and skill with which the dacians used falx swords, the romans started using the manica armor segments on their right hand, which usually got chopped off.
Actually that idea has began to be questioned by historians. They found a couple of tombstones of Roman soldier in the Rhine from the 40-60s AD that represent them with something similar to a manica. It's still a matter of debate of course. History is a very slow science when it comes to adjusting information 😂
@@JonEtxebeberriaRodriguez I’m skeptical of this claim as well, since the manica armor was worn even before lorica segmentata was widespread, and for that matter was previously used by Hellenistic Greeks and Iranian peoples for cataphract heavy cavalry, known as cheires. The Seleucids and Parthians were particularly fond of it. I’m not sure if the falx weapon used in the Dacian Wars specifically was the reason some Roman legionaries adopted manica more widely.
This was nice. The Dacian Wars were monumental and in their aftermath Dacia went through radical changes even though Roman rule only lasted under 200 years. A historical ripple effect ensued that led to the creation of us, the Romanian people, over the next 1000 years.
It needs to be said, unfortunately, that Romanians are native from times immemorial to Eastern Europe and don't share any kind of common origins with Gypsies (who for some unfathomable reason call themselves Roma since 1971) who are a nomadic people coming to Europe from India sometime between 1000-1400 AC.
Out of all cultural and organizational changes the Romans brought to Dacia, their (Vulgar) Latin language turned out to have the most fundamental impact. The Dacians started speaking this language and the old Dacian languages took a backseat being used mostly just to enrich the vocabulary.
After the Romans were gone, the new language, customs and massive DNA mix with the Dacians stayed. For centuries the new language evolved into what came to be called the Romanian language and its native speakers called themselves Romanians. Our name as a people literally comes from our language name and our language comes from Romans + Dacians. A great Romanian once said Romanians don't so much live in Romania as they live in the space of the Romanian language. It's in our blood.
Interestingly, I think, our present day national anthem doesn't mention the Dacians but it does mention and praises the Romans and Trajan as our ancestors and great conquerors (and curses the Ottomans and the Russians). The anthem also spells out what's worth fighting to the death for, as Christians: our people, our blood (our ancestry), our land and our language.
but before romanian you called yourself vallach, not?
@wanceterence835 No, we never called ourselves Vlachs. This is a name used by outsiders / strangers / foreigners (i.e. an exonym) in the Middle Ages to cover everyone who spoke Romance-derived languages in the Balkan peninsula. It includes not just the people who lived in what is present day Romania but also many others spread around the Balkans. Once Romanians became a people with a distinct identity, "Vlach" started to be used to denote anyone who is not Romanian but speaks a Romance-derived language in the Balkans (e.g. anyone South of the Danube). Vlach languages are related to 1000+ years old variants of Romanian so today Vlachs can't understand Romanian and vice versa. There are very few Vlachs left.
@@desild5869the argument of Romanians living through language when you just said that they basically gave it up to their colonisers makes me chuckle a bit… you know a high school level pupil can understand a text (Oh Marys cry) without help? I wonder when the text was written… yep, 1000 year ago a Hungarian mother (I think of jewish ethnicity) wrote a cry to her lost child.
@@wanceterence835nope, they didn’t call theirselves vlachs. I heard that’s how their neighbours were calling them. What was the language of the vlachs though? I never heard of ‘vlachian’. Is there a vlachian language? That’ll be so interesting if it’s the same as other Slavic languages
Tienes una respuesta en la opera de Strabon donde este dice que el hermano de Decenal,Diegis ha hablado en el senado romano y ha sido entendido, los dacios y los romanos hablaban quasi la misma idioma
Fantastic coverage of an often overlooked part of Roman History. Arguably the best narrative on Dacia I've seen on UA-cam yet. Brilliant job. I'm looking forward to part 2!
It's a fascinating period in Roman history. This one region they fought and fought and fought for, only to decide to leave afterwards because of how difficult it was to control 😅
many have come after them, greeks, turks, even russians... and they all left for the same reason :))) Romanians have a way of showing you the door :D
Preatorian ambient music in the background at the start??!!!!! Man I got goosebumps from that
Romans couldn't spell "AUDACIA" without Dacia.
Dacians and Getae were Thracian tribes. According to Herodotus "The Thracians are the biggest nation in the world, next to the Indians; were they under one ruler, or united, they would in my judgment be invincible and the strongest nation on earth; but since there is no way or contrivance to bring this about, they are for this reason weak. They have many names, each tribe according to its region. All these Thracians are alike in all their usages, save the Getae, and the Trausi.."
This is absolutely magnificent! Each and every one of your videos is worth the wait! I was beyond myself from joy when I saw that you are about to cover the Dacian wars in a way only you can! Thank you! By far my favorite channel on the entirety of UA-cam.
Thank you for the kind words! We are blessed to have such devoted history enthusiasts like yourself. As for the wait, we working hard to cut production time while still retaining quality.
@@HistoriaMilitum And we appreciate it! You are always worth the wait, continue with the awesome work and all the best to you!
Hmm very interesting. Big fan of Roman and Greek history but didnt know about Dacia being so difficult
Dacia will soon be the one of heir of the Romance language, although Rome just ruled it for just a century until the restitor orbis Aurelian pulled the legions and gave up the region. They're thoroughly Romanized as their language today reflects.
Welp, moving the entirety of the dacian fighting force into Britania, and then re-colonising the lands with roman citizens, tends to do that to a population.
We Romanians originated on both banks of the Danube river, so Moesia as well. That's why many people of the Proto-Romanian subgroup are still south of the Danube river
The centuries long proximity to first the Roman Empire and then the Eastern Roman Empire, aka Byzantine, also helped. When Latin is for so long lingua franca and has great prestige, people were proud to speak it and declare themselves romanus. Especially as this set them apart from the other, non-Latin neighbours.
How to be romanized,when it was conquered between 20-28 % of Dacia, what about the free Dacians ?? So the rest of the country these days speak the same language!! PS they were on that part of land 160 years . Romans were over 500 years for example on Palestinian side and so on , and nobody speaks the language there 😅😂😂😂 bro I studied everything on Dacia, but the most important things you didn't showed. 😊
Thank you for sharing this magnificent historical coverage video about Ancient Dacian, their political and militarily dominant, around the Danube river..their's Ancient civilization
Till now the best video on the Roman-Dacian Wars by far.!! Congratulation !!
As an roman legionnary reenactor myself I fought in battle against Dacians. This was ofcourse scripted battle, but still its hell of an adrenaline to stand against few dozens of dem dacians with their long deadly falx swords. These guys really look deadly and terryfying. Decebalus and his kingdom was indeed one of the TOP 5 greatest struggles Rome had to deal with. The mental and physical toughness of real historical legionaries who defeated dacians face to face in real full scale battles and destroyed Dacia in 106 CE is unimaginable for me
Imagine having to modify your equipment because of the Falx.
They never destroyed Dacia. They conquerd the capital and 15% of it's territory , enaugh to stop them from ever managing to gather a large enaugh army to pose a threat. Alltough , there are over 50 recorded uprisings in the province , most of them timed with outside attacks of free dacian tribes. The name of "dacians" come up in history up to 1600 when Michael the Brave of Vallahia was called "Malus Dacus" or "restitutor dacie" by the western leaders.
I imagine when reenacting you have to be careful to restrain yourself when you have that burst of adrenaline so you don't seriously hurt somebody
Gargara de dacopat . @@paulionescu4920
@@raulpetrascu2696 Yep. Especially when fighting half-naked barbarians
8:13 A big credit to Crassus' grandson who restored the honor of his family. I feel soo proud for him
He did! Unfortunately due to Octavian's own insecurities/ambitions he only got a triumph when he was entitled to spolia opima for killing a Dacian king during the campaign in single combat; which was the greatest military honour he could've and should've been afforded for that deed.
@@westout119I’m surprised he got a triumph as Octavian might have been paranoid about a new civil war
The 'Falx' , a weapon of Dacian origin, was a great tool for reaping the legions that tried to fight those wielding them one or two handed. it forced Rome to adjust how it fought.
Much love from Romania
In Romanian we can even form phrases of exactly the same meaning, in both Latin and Dacian
"E AMURG IN MAGURA DIN DEAL CATRE CODRU INEGURAT"/ Dacian
"S'A INSERAT IN CURBURA COLINEI LINGA PADUREA INTUNECATA"/ Latin
Borh meaning
"Its sunset in the hillock of the hill towards the dark forest"
Stramosii romanilor nu sunt Dacii. Daciii erau foarte inalti, blonzi si cu ochi albastrii. Uitati-va cum arata poporul Roman si vedeti daca exista vreo asemanare. De asemenea despre Geti, Herodot a spus ca erau cei mai drepti dintre Traci, adica cinstiti. Poporul Roman de astazi a cam speriat Europa cu ''cinstea''. Stramosii nostrii au fost colonistii Imperiului Roman. Din acest motiv vorbim Limba Latina. Imperiul Roman nu a putut sa ii supuna pe Daci chiar daca i-a cucerit. Cam la fiecare 10 ani era cate o revolta, iar Imperiul Roman ii lua sclavi pe toti Dacii din acea zona, femei, barbati, copii, dupa ce ii invingeau. Scrieri vechi spun ca numai la doua revolte au luat cate 150 de mii si i-au dus prima data in Albania de astazi si a doua oara in Britania. Imaginati-va , in 170 de ani de stapanire cati sclavi au luat din Dacia. De asemenea nobilul Venetian de origine Greaca, Markos Antonios Katsaitis, care a scris despre calatoria sa in anul 1742 in Moldova si Valahia, a spus ca Imparatul Aurelian cand s-a retras din Dacia, de frica, ca Dacii sa nu devina din nou o forta de temut care sa puna probleme Imperiului Roman, i-a luat pe toti si i-a trecut dincolo de Dunare in Moesia aducand in locul lor Colonisti Romani. Gasiti acest lucru in cartea ''Saeculum'' la pagina 94. Markos Antonios Katsiris si-a facut studiile in Italia, deci a invatat Istoria Imperiului Roman si stia ce spune. El s-a documentat despre trecutul Transilvaniei, Tarii Romanesti si Moldovei pentru ca la comanda Ducelui Venetiei a scris o Geografie a Europei, deci cele ce a afirmat le-a gasit probabil in documente vechi care astazi nu mai exista sau sunt pe undeva uitate. Domnitorul Moldovei de atunci Constantin Mavrocordat l-a verificat pentru a vedea daca informatiile lui despre ce a fost pe teritoriul Moldovei in antichitate, scrise de el in Geografia Europei sunt corecte si a constatat ca sunt. Va rog terminati cu ineptia ca noi suntem urmasii Getilor si Dacilor si cinstiti-va stramosii latini, cetatenii celui mai mare imperiu ce a existat vreodata pe pamant, imperiu ce a adus civilizatie in Europa si in lume. Mandriti-va ca gena Colonistilor Imperiului Roman, nu a putut fi infranta timp de 1800 de ani de nici o natie care a venit pe aceste pamanturi. In final toate, ori au fugit, ori au fost asimilate, ca in final gena Latina sa se ridice din nou. Unde sunt Hunii, unde sunt Gotii, unde sunt Avarii, unde sunt Pecenegii, unde sunt Tatarii, unde sunt Bulgarii, unde sunt Cumanii, unde sunt Turcii, unde sunt Austro-Ungarii, unde sunt Germanii, unde sunt Slavii, unde sunt Rusii sau alte natii care au venit sa stapaneasca aceste pamanturi? Toti au fost invinsi de gena Latina. Voi ii preamariti pe amaratii de Daci, care au fost invinsi si dusi sclavi de stramosii vostrii, desi acestia nu aveau scriere, constructii marete, opere de arta, scoli, poeti, scriitori adica nimic, erau niste salbatici cocotati pe Muntii Carpati. Si unele din cetatile lor au fost facute tot de romani, doar sunt scrieri care spun acest lucru. Pentru ce preamariti un popor ingenunchiat de stramosii vostrii? Cred ca nici voi nu stiti. Ce merit au avut ei in dezvoltarea omenirii? Nici unul. Radeti singuri de voi ca fiind urmasii unui popor invins in loc sa fiti mandrii de gena voastra care nici astazi nu a fost invinsa de nimeni, ci a cuprins jumatate din planeta. Roma si astazi conduce prin Vatican aproape doua miliarde de oameni de pe acest pamant. Ca sa intelegeti ca noi poporul Roman nu avem aproape nimic de-a face cu Dacii sau Getii si ca ati fost mintiti de ''istoricii comunisti'' care de fapt s-au ocupat cu mistificarea istoriei si mintitul, va pun un link cu un studiu genetic al ADN-ului, facut pe majoritatea populatiei pamantului in 2014 in care se arata ca populatia de pe teritoriul Romaniei nu are decat 0,4% gena Daca sau Geta ( Dai este numita Gena Tracilor in Genetica. Dacii si Getii erau din neamul Tracilor). Dati click pe punctul rosu de pe harta Romaniei si in dreapta vor aparea doua tabele. In ele, ce este bifat cu albastru sunt genele majoritare din ADN-ul romanilor, iar cele ne bifate sunt genele minoritare. Genele majoritare au fost gasite la toti cei 1400 de romani de pe tot cuprinsul tarii ce au participat la studiu, cele minoritare numai la unii din ei. Romanii invata la scoala o istorie mincinoasa care le ascunde ca sunt urmasii colonistilor adusi aici de Imperiul Roman. Pentru ca erau rasisti, ne suportand sa fie sub conducerea altor neamuri Dacii se revoltau si Romanii i-au exterminat aproape complet. admixturemap.paintmychromosomes.com
Those words aren't even Dacian in origin. We have almost zero words in Dacian, a lost language. We have no idea whether a word in Dacian exist in Romanian, but most likely doesn't exist
@@InAeternumRomaMater
Italienii spun ca nu suntem rude cu ei.
Poate cu 80% I2a Sardinians
Avem aproape 1000 de cuvinte Dacice.
De exemplu,Bulgare e vechi de 5000 de ani si vine din IE *bhalg' ( pile, gramada), balega la fel.
Deal din IE*dhol ( arch) si e misterios similar cu Jewish Tell ( Tell Aviv/ spring hill)
@@nestingherit7012 Tu confuzi limba PIE cu limba dacică, ceea ce este total greșit. Limba PIE sau „limba proto-indo-europeană” este o limbă dispărută care își are originea în stepa pontică caspică, dovedit de arheologie. Limba aceasta s-a vorbit cu peste mii de ani înainte de Daci Magni. Totuși, limba Proto-Italică, Thracică, Greacă antică, Proto Germanică, Proto Celtică (etc) se trag din PIE. Deci nu, noi nu avem nicio dovadă că vreun cuvânt în limba română (o limbă latină) are un cuvânt de origine dacică. Pentru că, limba dacică este dispărută, nu mai există niciun vorbitor de această limbă.
@@InAeternumRomaMaterși ce dovada avem ca limba ce o vorbim este de origine latina? Lingvistica,nu?ei bine,lingviști dovedesc faptul ca limba romana a moștenit mult mai multe cuvinte de origine dacica decât spune dictionarul,care dicționar (etimologic acceptat) e făcut pe genunchi,bunăoară cercetători unguri au stabilit ca maghiara conține vreo 4300 de cuvinte românești,iar lexiconul romanesc spune despre cuvinte curat românești ca sunt împrumuturi din maghiara.Studiati lucrările lui Paliga și Vinereanu,și veți avea o surpriza,cele "câteva cuvinte" dacice sunt de fapt o mulțime,desigur,noi rămânem romani,însă nici dacii nu au perit.
Many thanks for your work ! I can't wait to see the entire serie !
WE NEED PART 2!!!!
Thank You for these videos
Beautiful episode. Looking forward to the next one!
Excellent work and analysis. Looking forward to the next one.
It is always a joy when Historia Militum publishes a video. Looking forwar to part 2
very interetsing video. Thanks for covering this underrated part of Roman history
I'm actually upset I haven't seen you guys sooner. Excellent video, excellent channel, keep up the amazing work!
thank you for talking about this i feel like it hasn't been covered enough by modern historians and enthusiasts
Very very good video, I already can't wait for part 2! Great job
Let's gooooo! Give em the Tragan treatment, the Roman Jimmy Russlein, the Galatial Dacial, the Falx Romana
Jokes aside, love to see it covered in such grand detail. Thanks
Interesting, thank you. I'm eagerly awaiting part two.
Truly impressed by the exceptional quality and comprehensive nature of the information you've provided! Thanks for your thoroughness!
Very interesting video, although the First Battle of Tapae was a Dacian victory, so there was a slight mistake there.
Dacii nu sunt stramosii nostrii. Ei erau foarte inalti, blonzi si cu ochi albastrii. Uitati-va cum arata poporul Roman si vedeti daca exista vreo asemanare. De asemenea despre Geti, Herodot a spus ca erau cei mai drepti dintre Traci, adica cinstiti. Poporul Roman de astazi a cam speriat Europa cu ''cinstea''. Stramosii nostrii au fost colonistii Imperiului Roman. Din acest motiv vorbim Limba Latina. Imperiul Roman nu a putut sa ii supuna pe Daci chiar daca i-a cucerit. Cam la fiecare 10 ani era cate o revolta, iar Imperiul Roman ii lua sclavi pe toti Dacii din acea zona, femei, barbati, copii, dupa ce ii invingeau. Scrieri vechi spun ca numai la doua revolte au luat cate 150 de mii si i-au dus prima data in Albania de astazi si a doua oara in Britania. Imaginati-va , in 170 de ani de stapanire cati sclavi au luat din Dacia. De asemenea nobilul Venetian de origine Greaca, Markos Antonios Katsaitis, care a scris despre calatoria sa in anul 1742 in Moldova si Valahia, a spus ca Imparatul Aurelian cand s-a retras din Dacia, de frica, ca Dacii sa nu devina din nou o forta de temut care sa puna probleme Imperiului Roman, i-a luat pe toti si i-a trecut dincolo de Dunare in Moesia aducand in locul lor Colonisti Romani. Gasiti acest lucru in cartea ''Saeculum'' la pagina 94. Markos Antonios Katsiris si-a facut studiile in Italia, deci a invatat Istoria Imperiului Roman si stia ce spune. El s-a documentat despre trecutul Transilvaniei, Tarii Romanesti si Moldovei pentru ca la comanda Ducelui Venetiei a scris o Geografie a Europei, deci cele ce a afirmat le-a gasit probabil in documente vechi care astazi nu mai exista sau sunt pe undeva uitate. Domnitorul Moldovei de atunci Constantin Mavrocordat l-a verificat pentru a vedea daca informatiile lui despre ce a fost pe teritoriul Moldovei in antichitate, scrise de el in Geografia Europei sunt corecte si a constatat ca sunt. Va rog terminati cu ineptia ca noi suntem urmasii Getilor si Dacilor si cinstiti-va stramosii latini, cetatenii celui mai mare imperiu ce a existat vreodata pe pamant, imperiu ce a adus civilizatie in Europa si in lume. Mandriti-va ca gena Colonistilor Imperiului Roman, nu a putut fi infranta timp de 1800 de ani de nici o natie care a venit pe aceste pamanturi. In final toate, ori au fugit, ori au fost asimilate, ca in final gena Latina sa se ridice din nou. Unde sunt Hunii, unde sunt Gotii, unde sunt Avarii, unde sunt Pecenegii, unde sunt Tatarii, unde sunt Bulgarii, unde sunt Cumanii, unde sunt Turcii, unde sunt Austro-Ungarii, unde sunt Germanii, unde sunt Slavii, unde sunt Rusii sau alte natii care au venit sa stapaneasca aceste pamanturi? Toti au fost invinsi de gena Latina. Voi ii preamariti pe amaratii de Daci, care au fost invinsi si dusi sclavi de stramosii vostrii, desi acestia nu aveau scriere, constructii marete, opere de arta, scoli, poeti, scriitori adica nimic, erau niste salbatici cocotati pe Muntii Carpati. Si unele din cetatile lor au fost facute tot de romani, doar sunt scrieri care spun acest lucru. Pentru ce preamariti un popor ingenunchiat de stramosii vostrii? Cred ca nici voi nu stiti. Ce merit au avut ei in dezvoltarea omenirii? Nici unul. Radeti singuri de voi ca fiind urmasii unui popor invins in loc sa fiti mandrii de gena voastra care nici astazi nu a fost invinsa de nimeni, ci a cuprins jumatate din planeta. Roma si astazi conduce prin Vatican aproape doua miliarde de oameni de pe acest pamant. Ca sa intelegeti ca noi poporul Roman nu avem aproape nimic de-a face cu Dacii sau Getii si ca ati fost mintiti de ''istoricii comunisti'' care de fapt s-au ocupat cu mistificarea istoriei si mintitul, va pun un link cu un studiu genetic al ADN-ului, facut pe majoritatea populatiei pamantului in 2014 in care se arata ca populatia de pe teritoriul Romaniei nu are decat 0,4% gena Daca sau Geta ( Dai este numita Gena Tracilor in Genetica. Dacii si Getii erau din neamul Tracilor). Dati click pe punctul rosu de pe harta Romaniei si in dreapta vor aparea doua tabele. In ele, ce este bifat cu albastru sunt genele majoritare din ADN-ul romanilor, iar cele ne bifate sunt genele minoritare. Genele majoritare au fost gasite la toti cei 1400 de romani de pe tot cuprinsul tarii ce au participat la studiu, cele minoritare numai la unii din ei. Romanii invata la scoala o istorie mincinoasa care le ascunde ca sunt urmasii colonistilor adusi aici de Imperiul Roman. Pentru ca erau rasisti, ne suportand sa fie sub conducerea altor neamuri Dacii se revoltau si Romanii i-au exterminat aproape complet. admixturemap.paintmychromosomes.com
Very interesting period of history to explore. Happy to see it here
Thanks this is great! The Praetorian soundtrack at the beginning is a chef kiss.
Can't wait for part 2!
Thank you for making this mate
Thank you for making this series, just found you on youtube! SUBSCRIBED.
Very well made, good job guys!! 👌
THANKS FOR YOUR WORK!
Superb production and easy to digest presentation, Good job HM
Fantastic video! Excellent quality!
Great video! Dacians were super savage! Dacian Draco is legendary
finaly a detailed video on the biggest and most unknown campaing of Rome, best youtube channel
It's interesting that only Dacia would bear the name of its roman conquerors
That is largely the result of 19th century nation building and romaticization. Romania used to be called Wallachia or transylvania among other names up to the 19th century.
true@@nazeem8680
@@nazeem8680wallachia was an exonym. The name is Țara Românească a Ungro -Vlahiei, the Romanian Country of Ungro -Wallachia (the Wallachia near Hungary, as there were other Wallachias too). Vlach or Wallach is from the same root as Walloon, means a Romance speaking people.
2nd century @@nazeem8680
Google a little bit the Greek name of the Eastern Roman Empire, please.
Most excellent video, mate. Cheers!
CANT WAIT FOR PART 3. EXCELLENT VIDEO GOOD JOB
thanks, amazing work!
HM great video about Dacians ! Waiting on part two. Thanks
I have been waiting years for this episode!!!!!!!🎉
Amazing video and nice name change. Can't wait for part 2!!!
Interesting fact the Aromanian language also known as Vlach subgroup of the Romanian language is the most similar language to Latin that still exists.
A testament to the successful romanisation of the region. The Romanian language itself still bears one of the largest similarities to Latin!
Aromanian is a language of the Proto-Romanian subgroup, not of Carphato-Romanian. And Romanians were also referred as Vlach's. The Vlach's of Moesia formed and Empire in 1186-1190, as the two brothers of the Vlach revolt in Tarnovo [1185] were Vlach's. Ansber,t a Chronicler during Frederick Barbarossa's crusade, stated that Kalopetrus (the big brother) was called: _Kalopetrus Bachorum [Blachorum] dominus itemque a suis dictus imperator Grecie_ meaning: "Emperor of the Vlachs who was called by them the Emperor of Greece [Rome]".
I mean, no?? That's simply not true? Closest is Sardinian, followed by actual Italian... there are ways in which Eastern Romance is closer to original Latin but if you look at the vocabulary it's not even close. Think about all the Greek, Slavic, Turkish, Hungarian influences...
@@HistoriaMilitum Gheorghe Hagi and Simona Halep are aromanians
@@Bayard1503 you are right. If you look at the grammar though, it is a different story.
Great video! Glad the algorithm suggested you!
Cant wait for a part 2, this was such a fun and informative docu to watch!
Part 4 must be about the Dacian riots
Great video. Thank you
As a Romanian person, I want to thank you for this video that shows that us Romanians aren't so weak after all.
Fun fact: Dacia managed to resist the most agianst The Roman Empire.
😄😄
Stramosii romanilor nu sunt Dacii. Dacii erau foarte inalti, blonzi si cu ochi albastrii. Uitati-va cum arata poporul Roman si vedeti daca exista vreo asemanare. De asemenea despre Geti, Herodot a spus ca erau cei mai drepti dintre Traci, adica cinstiti. Poporul Roman de astazi a cam speriat Europa cu ''cinstea''. Stramosii nostrii au fost colonistii Imperiului Roman. Din acest motiv vorbim Limba Latina. Imperiul Roman nu a putut sa ii supuna pe Daci chiar daca i-a cucerit. Cam la fiecare 10 ani era cate o revolta, iar Imperiul Roman ii lua sclavi pe toti Dacii din acea zona, femei, barbati, copii, dupa ce ii invingeau. Scrieri vechi spun ca numai la doua revolte au luat cate 150 de mii si i-au dus prima data in Albania de astazi si a doua oara in Britania. Imaginati-va , in 170 de ani de stapanire cati sclavi au luat din Dacia. De asemenea nobilul Venetian de origine Greaca, Markos Antonios Katsaitis, care a scris despre calatoria sa in anul 1742 in Moldova si Valahia, a spus ca Imparatul Aurelian cand s-a retras din Dacia, de frica, ca Dacii sa nu devina din nou o forta de temut care sa puna probleme Imperiului Roman, i-a luat pe toti si i-a trecut dincolo de Dunare in Moesia aducand in locul lor Colonisti Romani. Gasiti acest lucru in cartea ''Saeculum'' la pagina 94. Markos Antonios Katsiris si-a facut studiile in Italia, deci a invatat Istoria Imperiului Roman si stia ce spune. El s-a documentat despre trecutul Transilvaniei, Tarii Romanesti si Moldovei pentru ca la comanda Ducelui Venetiei a scris o Geografie a Europei, deci cele ce a afirmat le-a gasit probabil in documente vechi care astazi nu mai exista sau sunt pe undeva uitate. Domnitorul Moldovei de atunci Constantin Mavrocordat l-a verificat pentru a vedea daca informatiile lui despre ce a fost pe teritoriul Moldovei in antichitate, scrise de el in Geografia Europei sunt corecte si a constatat ca sunt. Va rog terminati cu ineptia ca noi suntem urmasii Getilor si Dacilor si cinstiti-va stramosii latini, cetatenii celui mai mare imperiu ce a existat vreodata pe pamant, imperiu ce a adus civilizatie in Europa si in lume. Mandriti-va ca gena Colonistilor Imperiului Roman, nu a putut fi infranta timp de 1800 de ani de nici o natie care a venit pe aceste pamanturi. In final toate, ori au fugit, ori au fost asimilate, ca in final gena Latina sa se ridice din nou. Unde sunt Hunii, unde sunt Gotii, unde sunt Avarii, unde sunt Pecenegii, unde sunt Tatarii, unde sunt Bulgarii, unde sunt Cumanii, unde sunt Turcii, unde sunt Austro-Ungarii, unde sunt Germanii, unde sunt Slavii, unde sunt Rusii sau alte natii care au venit sa stapaneasca aceste pamanturi? Toti au fost invinsi de gena Latina. Voi ii preamariti pe amaratii de Daci, care au fost invinsi si dusi sclavi de stramosii vostrii, desi acestia nu aveau scriere, constructii marete, opere de arta, scoli, poeti, scriitori adica nimic, erau niste salbatici cocotati pe Muntii Carpati. Si unele din cetatile lor au fost facute tot de romani, doar sunt scrieri care spun acest lucru. Pentru ce preamariti un popor ingenunchiat de stramosii vostrii? Cred ca nici voi nu stiti. Ce merit au avut ei in dezvoltarea omenirii? Nici unul. Radeti singuri de voi ca fiind urmasii unui popor invins in loc sa fiti mandrii de gena voastra care nici astazi nu a fost invinsa de nimeni, ci a cuprins jumatate din planeta. Roma si astazi conduce prin Vatican aproape doua miliarde de oameni de pe acest pamant. Ca sa intelegeti ca noi poporul Roman nu avem aproape nimic de-a face cu Dacii sau Getii si ca ati fost mintiti de ''istoricii comunisti'' care de fapt s-au ocupat cu mistificarea istoriei si mintitul, va pun un link cu un studiu genetic al ADN-ului, facut pe majoritatea populatiei pamantului in 2014 in care se arata ca populatia de pe teritoriul Romaniei nu are decat 0,4% gena Daca sau Geta ( Dai este numita Gena Tracilor in Genetica. Dacii si Getii erau din neamul Tracilor). Dati click pe punctul rosu de pe harta Romaniei si in dreapta vor aparea doua tabele. In ele, ce este bifat cu albastru sunt genele majoritare din ADN-ul romanilor, iar cele ne bifate sunt genele minoritare. Genele majoritare au fost gasite la toti cei 1400 de romani de pe tot cuprinsul tarii ce au participat la studiu, cele minoritare numai la unii din ei. Romanii invata la scoala o istorie mincinoasa care le ascunde ca sunt urmasii colonistilor adusi aici de Imperiul Roman. Pentru ca erau rasisti, ne suportand sa fie sub conducerea altor neamuri Dacii se revoltau si Romanii i-au exterminat aproape complet. admixturemap.paintmychromosomes.com
After well over forty years of studying Roman military history I have anticipated a documentary covering this particular subject. Well it looks like you have delivered. Thank you all so much!
Looking forward to the next installment. You have my attention!!
Thank you for your interest and enthusiasm, we will try our best not to disappoint!
I am still here.
Your presentations could not possibly disappoint me.
Thank you my friend!!!
Wow-thrilling history, wonderful presentation!
U did a good job with the documentary .
Cant wait for the next one
Great documentary
Great episode
Much appreciate your support in unveiling one of the most important events in modern history.
Dacia ( Romania ) was undoubtedly the missing piece or Christian indo-European root. ❤
The TotalWar Rome 2 graphics add to this brilliant topic. Thank you for this.
Excellent work here.Please remember to always have a narrator who can cativate us listeners.
Not many sites know this.
Yours is great.
Part 2 pleease, this was awesome
You dont have long to wait! :)
It makes a lot more sense to call Trajan the Optimus Princeps in the context of just how powerful the enemies he conquered were.
He took on what was probably the only other strong nation in Europe and then went on to subjugate huge swaths of Iran, an enemy that Rome would never fully succeed in defeating.
EDIT: Mesopotamia was Iranian territory throughout the Classical Era. Iraq did not exist. Rome's conflict was not with a country that formed in the 20th Century, it was with the ancient and respectable Iranian culture, whose roots date back to the admirable conquests of Cyrus the Great. It was a conflict that defined the Classical Era, and Trajan came the closest to winning it. Only Heraclius had as much success, but he never got to enjoy it like Trajan did.
Iraq*
Iran is old Persia,Iraq is the land with Mesopotamia.
@@alexandrub8786
Back in the day, Iran controlled Mesopotamia. It was solidly Iranian territory. The Persians called themselves Iranians back then as they do today, so I'm calling them by their native demonym.
I know that Mesopotamia is under the control of the country Iraq today, but Mesopotamia was Iranian territory for the entire existence of the Roman Empire.
Well actually unlike what most people think, Trajan's achievements in Mesopotamia weren't as great as his victories in Dacia
He didn't even fight any battles there like he did in Dacia and faced no Parthian royal army or any army sent by the king of Iran
He just besieged cities with his large army
The Parthian empire at the time was divided in two with the eastern parts and some of the central provinces being taken by Vologases III and the western parts such as Mesopotamia, Atropatene, Media, Khuzistan/Elam and Armenia being taken by a usurper called Osroes I
Trajan attacked the Parthian empire when the Parthians were in a civil war (both because of the Parthian Osroes I who betrayed the treaty of Rhandeia) and were very weakened but still lost all the conquered cities to Iranian rebels after he left
Even during Trajan's invasion, the Parthians gained some victories
Trajan failed to take Hatra, which avoided a total Parthian defeat and he himself was wounded during that siege
The Parthian forces attacked key Roman positions, and Roman garrisons at Seleucia, Nisibis and Edessa were evicted by the local populaces and the Romans were pushed out of Mesopotamia with the defeat of Trajan's puppet king by the Parthians who reconquered all the territories that were lost during the invasion
This is making both proud: The romans and the dacians, and me, among dacians.
Briliant work !
The epic roman build up at the end of the video is exciting 😁
Looking forward to part 2
Nice work
Waiting for the second part. Eagerly.
Fast forward a few centuries, and the Visigoths entered the Empire through the same territory. Crazy.
That's because the Goths were a mix of Dacians and Goths. IF you read the chronicler Jordanes, he makes almost no distinction between the Dacian religion and history and that of the Goths. By the time he wrote the chronicle the two cultures had combined but speaking a predominantly Gothic tongue.
@@Metal0sopherJordanes is wrong, he confuses Goths with Getaes
@@doseofchill
Jordanes is quite correct. The archaeological record backs him up - the material culture of the getaes (as in geto-dacian tribes) and goths that invaded the Roman empire was mostly getaeic.
@@ABC-oz5zy Does that mean the Goths were thracic people, same as the Getaes? I kind of doubt it
@@ABC-oz5zy Yes, by the time the goths invaded Rome, it was possible that they have combined with the dacians and the getaes, but they're not the same people in the first place, they have different roots. That's why I said Jordanes is wrong.
Nicely done
This is awesome!!
very interesting thank you
Great work frater
Great history of an important part of SPQR
I must say, at first I was annoyed you didn't release a video about your series about how battles were actually fought..
But the Dacians are so very interesting! Such a powerful kingdom with a very interesting culture. Same as with the gauls, they were long seen as uncivilized barbarians. They were thought to only have proper architecture because Domitianus sent them along with the peace deal. But they were pretty advanced all along, really interesting video!
We will keep sharing details of the Dacian culture in the other parts of this series as well.
And fear not, we are already reading up on the next part of the “reality of battles” series! But it might take 1-2 months to publish it, due to the other interesting videos we will be releasing from now until then. Cheers!
They were barbarians being between the human sacrifice nations. Which the Romans deeply hated. A reason for the Romans to be... genocidal.
@@eedragonrThe Romans practiced human sacrifice as well, most notably during the campaigns of Hannibal.
Good job guys!
when will part II be uploaded? love your videos.