H-6K and H-6J | The new Chinese strategic bombers with long-range precision strike capability
Вставка
- Опубліковано 26 лип 2024
- China's new move to change the balance in the Far East, We are investigating the H-6K and H-6J. #h6 #bomber #plaaf #planaf
Does the H-6K have any real military value?
What are the differences between the latest ones and the previous H-6 models?
Why does China need a medium / long-range bomber?
Does this aircraft really pose a threat to the USA and its allies?
00:00 Introduction
01:18 H-6 Programme
02:15 H-6K and H-6J
02:33 Design
03:29 Air units and their location
04:05 Specifications
04:52 Powerplant
05:24 Combat radius
05:38 Armament
06:53 Operasyonel use
08:40 Analysis
Welcome to our channel. All the weapon systems are like books. They tell us their stories. The Weapon Detective investigates these books, reads between the lines, analyse, and tells the untold. At the dawn of the Second Cold War, the fruits of new projects give us clues about the future. But current weapon systems also have their own stories. In our videos, you can find technical information as well as historical backgrounds, what happened during the development processes, combat experience and political projection. While the Second Cold War rising, Let's investigate the weapons together.
© CCTV 13, CCTV, Global News, CCTV 7, GRTN, CGTN, AirForce Aris, SANDATAHAN NG PILIPINAS TV, US Air Force, CCTV +, Royal Air Force, Xinhua, US Navy, PeriscopeFilm, DNEWS CHN, David Weaver, Sina, 中國珠海航展, aerostars, Типо Мотор, Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation, Tonkatsu298, NORINCO, History (History Channel), People's Liberation Army Navy, Dylan Chang, oyazi49, RUNWAY FUN, Republic of Korea Air Force, Japan Air Self-Defense Force, Philippine Coast Guard, Northrop Grumman, ManteganiPhotos, US Marine Corps, Raytheon Technologies, Skipper Media, US Army, NATO, Japan Ground Self-Defense Force, sakkuri
Music: March of the Chinese Air Force
Performed by the Military Band of People's Liberation Army of China
Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective videos
• Weapon Detective
Please click the link to watch our other Chinese Systems videos
• Chinese Systems
Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective-Air videos
• Weapon Detective-Air
/ weapondetective
/ weapondetective
weapondetective@gmail.com - Наука та технологія
Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective videos
ua-cam.com/play/PLEMWqyRZP_LrdqB-XbqY2LocUVEaG_w7D.html
Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective-Air videos
ua-cam.com/play/PLEMWqyRZP_LrGyENf3nqsYKC9ZkWH414k.html
China's state media has always called it a weapons launch platform, or a bomber. Because it can launch hypersonic anti-ship missiles to strike US warships at a distance of 1500km. Old plane but new usage
That's the H-6N. The K can launch supersonic missiles though
H6K is an air carrier for carrying cruise missiles long sword 100. which is useful for attacking air carriers and military bases within a range approx. 5000km.
@@guongnlm5529 H6K is not a bomber, just a missile carrier, please do not mislead by its initial HONG.
This bomber also has the potential to be converted to an ECM, AWACS and reconnaissance platform.
High tech is generally a force multiplier, but quantity has a quality all its own. Super weapons are a double edged sword...
Perfect for its role. You don't need a Ferrari to do grocery shopping in real life do you
Are you suggesting the USAF, has over complicated things, with their b2 and soon to be b21
@@jonathantarrant2449 the average taxpayer will tell you YES
Why do you think North Korea still buys mig 21s
You do not need a Cadillac to get to seoul in 7 minutes.
@@jonathantarrant2449 hell yes
@@jonathantarrant2449 yes. That's why the b52 bomber doing the bombing roles. America is known to waste tax payers money and being inefficient
The H6 is a variant of the Tu 16, which premiered in 1952--just like the B-52.
@Pangpi Dawang But also significant smaller, so it can not transport as many bombs or cm as the B-52.
and can't cross the Pacific ocean!!
@Pangpi Dawang For which they have the B1 and B2... whilst China has... uh, lots of Badgers. Not invincible, nothing is, but not as impressive as the Chinese Military would like you to think.
@@geoffroberts1126 true, some of Chinese military hardware cannot be considered cutting edge. All those China threat theory circulating among western militaries are only mean to extract more money from taxpayers. Hahaha 😂
@@bfc666 Possibly true to some degree. Though China is acting far more aggressively these days. The whole South China Sea thing isn't sitting well with nations in the region whose territory she's literally stealing. They're doing a lot of sabre rattling these days, those I think there's still rather more rattle than sabre.
Sometimes, you don't need to be highly advanced to beat your opponent. Good enough is good enough.
Which this plane isn't.
@@terazoids2 hahah you're an expert.
@@dyong888I will not comment on that However, never subestimate your opponents. Yet, be able to see through their bluff and grandeurisation. There lies the ability to discern their real capabilities. Terrible aircraft since its introduction, and still is. Though, coupled with an elastic mind... Read the attack on the USS Nimitz, in Tom Clancy's "Red Storm Rising".
B-52's are just as old.
@@terazoids2 Go ahead and believe your amerikan propaganda. China has capabilities the yankees haven't seen too. Like dirty harry said, "go on. make my day".
I think they're a great idea! Cheap, versatile, long range, reliable & as deadly as your best cruise missiles.
The future will be H20, so there will be no primary upgrading plan for H6K anymore.
The latest H6-N can carry one air-launched hyper gliding ICBM.
Very cool to see an old plane design upgraded and updated.
B-52: am I nothing to you?
This is basically still Tu-16 with total improvement.
It has total different function than tu16. Tu16 dropped bombs and h6 doesn't
A very efficient and practical design and can be upgraded and upgraded and modified forever. Excellent aerodynamic design and efficient
A #copied design
Wait... you're a bot right!
@@RaveSharrma You are alien?
@@RaveSharrma Only a very smart people know a good design to improve on and not reinvent a less efficient design
@@RaveSharrma you should sue them for money.
Like B-52 same applies here. If the design works don’t fix it. This is a beautiful plane. 2025 its been 100 years of since US B-52 entered service, upgrading technology and engines it is still 100 years later a best platform of bomber technology. Same applies here. Chinese have upgraded it and it still works great.
TU-16:This is my illegitimate son
Interesting , Thanks for sharing
Simplicity is undervalued. This thing along with the B52s will be workhorses in a real war.
Only against those unable to defend themselves, other than that the B52 is a big slow sitting duck and easy prey , they will only ever be used for stand off weapons or attacks on countries with zero air defence, same applies to all the big slow bombers still in use.
@@georgebarnes8163 after standoff weapons have destroyed everyone's advanced defensive networks, taken down satellites, and obliterated the global supply chain required to replace advanced hardware. it'll be up to these things to end a war.
@@UD2 You are a bit of a dreamer, the B52s have been nothing but target practice since the Vietnam war, they can destroy nothing bar the use of stand of weapons, the B52 were and are big fat slow targets and easy to put down with 1960s tech.
As simply a ballistic and cruise missile platform all it needs to do is get to it's launch point. In fact it's only priority would be getting to it's launch point, they would be virtually disposable. So it looks capable enough to me.
And some, perhaps many, of those launch points will be within Chinese airspace.
Capable enough is a perfectly acceptable strategic doctrine
Really interesting video
Lots of info in your video! The Badger lives on.
Interesting video
These are really detailed reports nice work
Good analysis...
Denk geldigim ilk videon. Cok basarili olmus.
Sana basarilar dilerim..
1. It is not because China has bombers that neighboring countries need U.S. military power, but because of the long-term hostile and unfriendly reconnaissance operations of the U.S. military against China, China must maintain a strong force.
2. The so-called sovereignty dispute in the South China Sea was not a problem until oil was discovered there in 1980. It has always been China’s territory. International law of the sea is not the legal basis for resolving historical territorial waters. Many countries made sovereign declarations when signing this treaty. , China is the same, and the United States has never joined this treaty.
3. Taiwan is a Chinese territory, no matter what he claims to be the Republic of China or whatever, he is just a province in a civil war and rebellion, and foreign countries have no right to interfere.
When the United Nations was first established, it also tried to use force to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries. It was not until they encountered the Chinese army on the Korean peninsula that the United Nations changed its behavior.
Could you do a video of the J-20 and FC-31? :)
Nice video thanks for sending ..with clear explaining of its characters and abilities which its production copied in China. After that progressed in new versions ..its first design...produced in Russia..interests video...H-6 k .later H-6 J new strategic bombers
In today’s Morten battle field it a really Nice Target !! This is supposed to be a strategic weapon however if it is accompanied by a swarm of drones it could be a Game changer
If drones have the range to knock her out 😂
It's tasks are to launch long range missles in safe distance, so you have to flank it with interceptor/fighters I guess
Awesome looking
That thing has "target " written all over it !
yeah， try to immagine 100 H6 autopilote or contralled by J20. As allways， some one think too little and talk too much
@@xupaolo3820 I know that you Chinese believe that you exist in the middle kingdom , but how many of the little princess flying those things want to go to heaven so soon ?
@@philliplopez8745 I think you know，maybe you think you know better than anyone else as your TRUMP ， but indeed you know just as “ much” as Trump. By the way， this middle kingdom that you are talking about really scares a lot of yours， while we do not know who u r and what u want... what could you and yours want， a branch of white racists and imperialists？who care about？ Your days will get worse and worse，from now beginning
The plane is just platform for launching advanced weapons,so China's recent arsenal of very long hypersonic anti ship cruise missiles and super long air to air missiles will make the PLA air force very powerful in Asia.
The words “advanced” and “China” do not go together.
@@Ac22768 Hmmmm...says the crumbling murican 😂😂
The badger 🦡 is a leap? That's like modernizing a B-29 and calling it a leap.
Well... You can say the same about B-52...
b52
Look I've been shopping at Harbor Freight for a few years now.............I wouldn't be too worried about these bombers and their capabilities.
This is an underrated comment!
Parts are all knock off and spurious 😂
The analysis is fair enough i think
Excellent analysis
B-36, B-47, B-52, TU-95 and TU-16 (H-6K) were designed before the air refueling program, thus they were built with extra long and wide wings to glide and save fuel. B-52 regularly fly at sea level from Guam to Vietnam or Diego Garcia without being detected by ground radars. The Russian and Chinese bombers probably flew sea level from 2000 km away until 25 km to Alaska then rose to 10,000 m show up on US radars. It was a surprise detection near Alaska coast, no wonder NORAD scrambled fighter jets in a big hurry.
Just use drones to scout, and locate carriers or other ships, and provide targeting data for h-6k to shoot its long range anti ship missiles. Sure, the planes can shoot down the drones but I'll just send a Congo line of drones and trade them for a carrier or aegis destroyer. Job accomplished, 70 aircraft, carrier too basically taken out for cost of few drones and missiles.
These are more than enough to provide mobile air launch platform for China's big missiles. Ones that normally need truck to move around on and too heavy for normal fighters.
Jilin -1 satellites can live stream what's on the surface of the earth with HD quality.
Belongs to the 1960s when the Beatles reigned supreme.
The ageless B-52 has origins in the 1950s and many years of service left as a design.
@@shattered115 The B-52 or the H-6whatever is useless without air supremacy. That is something PRC airforce can never have.
@@fv1234 Didn't the US have air superiority in Vietnam? Vietnam took down a lot of B-52 anyway AFAIR...
@金英文二世 Junk
@金英文二世 We saved your sorry ass from the Japanese. Should have let the Japanese take you.
It's main use will always be long range mass deployment of stand off missiles, decoys and now drones against naval flotillas. To overwhelm the defences of an enemy and force them to expend all their antiair munitions. The second wave of bombers launching before air defences can be reloaded, if that is even possible at sea for vertical launch systems. H-6 use as a conventional bomber would be restricted to areas where the CCP have air superiority or better, supremacy.
The US would need more than one carrier battle group. Maybe three would be a much more overwhelming initiative against an onslaught from the Chinese.Losses on both sides but the US would prevail.
Where are these carriers going to be ? Outside first island chain? They will basically be useless from so far away.
If they come inside first island chain, they will be overwhelmed by China's superior numbers and China's numerous carrier killer missiles,including shore based ones. Don't even need h6k but of course they will use them too.
Like all these bombers its an option for dekivering a nuclear weapon. One in the air may get through when other delivery systems have been compromised.
Why do you assume that the H6 bombers would not have a fighter escort and wouldn't be accompanied with additional fighter jets also carrying antiship missiles to keep busy U.S. fighters and saturate ship defenses? What about the future attack drones?
Will work as decoys ?
Cool plane👍
"Have also badgered" haha
Boooo
No one wants to fly glass cockpit give me those dials in my 1950s jet any day.
This is more wing than plane, looks very much old school 70's Soviet Tech.
Hehe 50's is when they're really from!
H-6N and H-20 are the real deal.
@@AbdulRasyidPangrango-qr9dt China makes its own helicopters and stealth fighters. Where are you from Abdul? Can your country even produce screws?
Hey this is how I would Problem Solve.
profession thanks
nice plane
Add light missile also
Besides PLAAF would have their own early warning craft, their escorts and hypersonic drones to spot U.S. ships. They also have land based ballistic antiship missiles. So scores of fighters to keep F-18s busy. Bombers and more fighters to fire more antiship missiles, island based additional fighters AND antiship ballistic missiles would make short work of any carrier strike group with significant loses. Especially if China can deploy future J-35s, 15s, 16s and 20s reliably with hundreds of PL-15s and PL-20s. Plus the PLAN would be there with their own carriers. Currently U.S. would lose 2 carrier strike groups and still win a pyrrhic victory with %50 loss but within 10 years if China could keep up with the U.S. 6th gen fighter and SSN/SSBN program the U.S. would be in a worst position than it already is.
Nothing can beat UFOs…
question, why can't we lobe missles from a modified boeing 737, why do we have to use this?
भैय्या चाइना का माल है, चले तो चांद तक नहीं तो फिर शाम तक 😂😂😂😂
01:02 lower right corner of the screen, Russian letters РД, meaning taxiway. Ha?
These barely modern bombers could fly in formation over Manila uncontested.
heh... performance similar to H-6K (which itself is a Tu-16). well, hopefully, noone will see them in any war.
The H6 might be new but it’s just a Chinese built TU-16 Russian bomber first built in 27 April 1952.
Could you, please, do a video on Type 054 family of frigates from China?
In my opinion, latest H-6 variants combined with Type 054 frigates can be very effective for China to control nearby seas.
@@nicolaasjonkhart4660 nonsense the HK has twice the range of the SU30, 6,000 km compared to the SU30 @ 3,000 kM, the HK also has a larger bomb load @ 9,000 Kg compared to the SU30 @ 8,000 Kg
@@nicolaasjonkhart4660 LOL, I am happy to educate you, no need to Thank me for correcting you.
@@nicolaasjonkhart4660 Ballistic missiles on donkey-drawn carts are still ballistic missiles. Carry missiles, launch missiles, job done.
& yes, J-11 & J-16 (Su-30 variants for China) always accompany H-6. No weapon is used by itself.
I would like that. Taiwan's and US navies would love that, too.
@@nicolaasjonkhart4660 Let them be, my man. Let them think they are really on par with us, or better. They are in for a very rude surprise, if they believe their own lies.
Its a tu 95 bear with jet engines there class like
Chinese homemade strategic nuclear bomber develop to Install electronic advance warfare...a guided precision nuclear bomb..
Chinese aircraft still are a mystery (also the newer ones.) Is the H6 any good, a "poor man's B52", or pure crap? I think no other country had used the original sowjet aircraft for many many years.
It would also be an interesting question how good or bad the Chinese stealth fighter J-20 is and how the aircraft that were developed in China from the 90s onwards are in comparison to jets from other countries.
Well. it's lucky that they have ejector seats.
They can also have DF-10 and YJ-18. Good for them.
Yeah it's 60 year old Russian badger
Design yes. Material, avionics, engines and weapons are new. Its lighter than the original
Nato have no sense naming Russian/Soviet plane.
Probably sea patrol aircraft with anti ship and sub capabilities.
time to talk about the H-20 stealth Bomber.
What for?
Still shrouded in mystery though, not much to talk about.
Add turbo
Is it still called H-6x? Chinese does things her own way. This H-6 is completely different from that H-6.
With analog radar
来了来了
Me gusta mucho más que los feos B1 Lancer y el B1 Lancer ruso TU 160 o Ty 160,el El Cisne blanco. Un saludo. 👋
The Russians make very pretty planes.
Because the Chinese cannot
Actually they do/did. The Tu-160 'Blackjack' Белый лебедь, or Belyj Lebeď, 'White Swan' is quite a striking looking aircraft.
Самолёт просто красавец. От русского ту -16 остался фезюляж, там где у тушки находился штурман видимо находится радар в зади под килем нет кабины и пушки тоже нет, двигатели размером больше русского.
H20何时下水？
B-52s look more modern!
Chinese is running out of alphabet to name the aircraft's models
china have their own names in chinese,these h ,y, j stuff is for foreigners.
Can't say but having Bombers past its age and relevance servs no purpose in current times when worlds moving fast in military technology and China themselves have moved to Mars
Ready to go and this is what deterred America
bisayang manok ,
Yap that all they can do ..... be a nuisance nothing more ....By the way you should be thankful for China’s Hybrid Rice produced in the Philippines
bisayang manok ,
Shitty gratitude....are you jealous ?
bisayang manok ,
Not interested in your opinion I need my space ....build your own
Strategic bomber become a niche thing now days, only US and China are still developing new next gen strategic bomber.
It's a cheaper way of launching air to surface missile and bombs, it only works when you control the air space or beating some back water 3rd world country.
The latest H-6 is called H-6N, N stands for Nuclear. And for sure, its a brand new plane, new engine, new Avionics System, new radar and so on except looks litte bit like Tu-16.
and BTW, Taiwan is actually a province of China, KMT in Taiwan is locality separatist power
@@leipzigrb4910 Another wumao comrade unmasking. Taiwan wasn't even part of China when the KMT went there, it was ceded to a foreign nation in the late 19th Century. It is not now a province of China. But the CCP would like us all to swallow their propaganda and let them gobble it up like they did to HK. HK was leased, Taiwan is not part of China and probably never will be again. Don't forget to claim your 50c from Grand Dictator Xi.
LOL stop showing your brain level, just live your happy life dude, don’t judge if you don’t know the history. Best wishes 🙌🏻
Soviet Tupolev Tu-16
Its mainly used for mass missile launches at US carrier groups. Makes sense since the US is there main threat.
A pacemaker, artificial hips, and hearing aids don't make a 90 year old man any less than 90 years old.
Doesn’t make it any less then 90 years old but still functions the same
What if the 90 year old has cruise missiles?
@@testserver2054 You can say a 1950's Toyota better than a 2020 Tesla, but only in your dream.
@@stephenjoe653 functions as a car and it gets you places. The u2 spy plane warthog and the b52 all been around 50 years already and they are still great equipment. Their definitely not gonna be better but why would you compare a 90 year old man to a 15 year old?
Old age, by itself, does not make a weapon obsolete. Design shortcomings can break even a new one. More so an old one. The H6 is not a strategic bomber, and its ability to put an effective payload on target is questionable, at best. Even tactically. Furthermore, the H6, the J11, and even their newer designs, like the J20, the FC31 and H20, make patently obvious their inability to develop a native aircraft equal or better than those of their adversaries. Same goes for powerplant and sensors, since everything depends on copying an example, and developing a knockoff, with varying degrees of success.
# Men in Black SAID DON'T REPORT THIS.
With light missile
what if the E2 and the 2 hornet got shot down.. the HK wont fly alone unescorted.
You are absolutely right, they are protected by a large number of J-20 and J-16 fighter jets, and S-400 land-to-air missiles.
We will see ,H6 series can service another 60 years😂😂😂😂😂😂
When you look at the 1960's design features of this "thing", it's obvious that it has a radar cross section signature of a container ship. It will be detected before the landing gear doors are closed. Good luck with that!
In any peer to peer offensive weapons system conflict between the US Russia and/or China it will escalate within 20 minutes to all sides trading MIRVs. Those guys (what's left of them) can flourish on a diet of turnips in the cold and dark. Fat westerners (what's left of them), ....not so much.
B52 also 1960's design and USAF want to use them until 2060s
@@holyboxer2.072 B52 is a strategic bomber with a range unrefuelled of 10.000 km, with a payload of 30 tons. This thing is merely a tactical platform with very short legs and a small payload . Not counting the notoriously unreliable "made în China " engines.
@@tepesvoda464 2000km and 3 tons？
that make nonse，H6K is 6000km + range and 12 tons payload
The range and payload of H6 did less than B52, but China does not need to use bombers to bomb a middle east country 8000 kilometers away like the United States.
China only wants to conduct defensive operations within 2000 km of its own territory.
And H6 fully meets the needs
@@holyboxer2.072 LOL
Nowadays, it's all about the weapon systems.
Weapon carriers don't matter much.
Weapon carriers are part of weapon systems.
@@terazoids2 nah, tohse old bombers can carry ai cruise missile close enough to enemy borders/ships to be in 500 kilometer range. they dont need to be advanced at all.
It is never flown above India
can we just designate this aircraft a missile carrier instead of a bomber. its payload and range sucks.
I saw these on the clearance shelves at my local Walmart.
FarFrom Home Sorry to hear you so poor you have to shop at Walmart.
@@MrTnylam Awww...did I hurt your itty bitty
patriotic feelings commie? Don’t worry you’ll find a girlfriend soon-or boyfriend.
@@farfromhome6234 Haha...I'm not the one shopping at dollars stores fool.
@@MrTnylam you again tinker bell? Still aching for a boyfriend....all this for a plastic plane....petty little boy tinker bell.
They are copying a bit from USAF. When you are stronger you don't care attitude.
300 unit need
Looks like food to me.
yeah ， take all those BB
I just cannot see the use for these monsters anymore as they are huge targets in the sky! A modern rocket would take them down fast!!
The effective application of these aircraft are about 800-1000km away from the target. Besides that, some low altitude missiles will first take away the radars, and then these aircraft will be deployed. P.S. A nice chapter on How to make war (Dunnigan), section air warfare- describes the whole deployment paradigm.
So is the American B52.
@@lktan224 Lol! Definitely out of date!!
Underestimate China.......Yeah thatl be fun
留给H6的字母不多了
ABCDEFGHIJK, ok, there is still much room for improvement.