Tu 160 - The strategic Bomber which India is eyeing | What is India preparing for? | WION Game Plan

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 тра 2023
  • Strategic bombers are combat aircraft designed to fly deep into enemy territory to destroy strategic targets and India is keen on acquiring these. India eyes the world’s biggest bomber aircraft, the Russian Tupolev Tu-160. What’s this bomber all about? What is India preparing for?
    Watch Game Plan with Shivan Chanana
    #gameplan #Tu-160 #tupolev
    About Channel:
    WION The World is One News examines global issues with in-depth analysis. We provide much more than the news of the day. Our aim is to empower people to explore their world. With our Global headquarters in New Delhi, we bring you news on the hour, by the hour. We deliver information that is not biased. We are journalists who are neutral to the core and non-partisan when it comes to world politics. People are tired of biased reportage and we stand for a globalized united world. So for us, the World is truly One.
    Please keep discussions on this channel clean and respectful and refrain from using racist or sexist slurs and personal insults.
    Subscribe to our channel at goo.gl/JfY3NI
    Check out our website: www.wionews.com
    Connect with us on our social media handles:
    Facebook: / wionews
    Twitter: / wionews
    Follow us on Google News for the latest updates
    Zee News:- bit.ly/2Ac5G60
    Zee Business:- bit.ly/36vI2xa
    DNA India:- bit.ly/2ZDuLRY
    WION: bit.ly/3gnDb5J
    Zee News Apps: bit.ly/ZeeNewsApps

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,1 тис.

  • @sudhakarv9
    @sudhakarv9 Рік тому +402

    For the US, in the long term India could pose challenges in world business order, key decisions etc because of its independence approach. US wants India to be a Market place only. Not a technology producer or maker. US wants India to depend on them. Hence, India should balance both US, Russia, France and other countries in terms of defence planning.

    • @kevinjaitejmontbose5377
      @kevinjaitejmontbose5377 Рік тому +22

      1.4 billion people still cannot make their own bomber.

    • @UncleTonyshotsauce
      @UncleTonyshotsauce Рік тому +1

      By Russia junk🤣

    • @akhanddbangladesh8274
      @akhanddbangladesh8274 Рік тому +5

      India the emperor with no cloths. .. india eyes on "strategic Bomber" , "strategic ship" .. you name it. .. but that's about it. .. india always lives in present tense. .. you never heard that lndia has accomplished anything they always either "eyes" or "is eying" ... to be .. what??!! .. SUPA' POWER:2020??!!🤣🤣

    • @ThePedroski007
      @ThePedroski007 Рік тому +2

      What defence plan? You all said Ukraine should surrender, so I would assume you would do the same. But don’t worry, we will abstain.

    • @sumo890
      @sumo890 Рік тому

      ​@@akhanddbangladesh8274 Who is talking? What you know about india. You must be a Jihadi or CCP useless begger

  • @rogerhammett5295
    @rogerhammett5295 Рік тому +114

    It's India's decision, a sovereign country, developing their own defence capabilities.

    • @Noodleanrgry
      @Noodleanrgry Рік тому +4

      yes it is only tu-160 is a obsolete bomber

    • @mulla_impotent
      @mulla_impotent Рік тому

      ​@@Noodleanrgry bro needs a functioning brain

    • @rakesharamaiah2737
      @rakesharamaiah2737 Рік тому +6

      ​@@Noodleanrgry how many countries actually built this kind of bomber,
      Obsolete technology means what, you might using new technology, old technology is also good,
      There is no obsolete technology,

    • @ravitejshanbhag12
      @ravitejshanbhag12 Рік тому +4

      ​@@Noodleanrgry Are you out of your mind?? That thing can bring the entire EU to its feet

    • @Megh_Vachhani
      @Megh_Vachhani Рік тому +4

      @@rakesharamaiah2737 there is no time to build a new bomber for india but in my opinion india should go for b 1 lancers cuz Russia is still recovering from the war and is quite a bit behind in the arms race these days , we should make allies with US as there is some increasing heat between US and china which will benifit us (enemies enemy is our friend). i m not telling to throw russia fully off but in times of war they are not able to give parts and components for the IAF. we should always keep a big boi behind our back at all times like we kept russia these years

  • @parthoghosh5809
    @parthoghosh5809 Рік тому +203

    Yes! India should definitely go for a strategic bomber squadron. What with mean neighbors all around us. Jai Hind 🇮🇳

    • @angkukuey007
      @angkukuey007 Рік тому

      Your neighbours'feelings are mutual. Mean and belligerent India is no good for peace as it would invite American werewolves to foment more strife and discord .

    • @soumyadipjana5119
      @soumyadipjana5119 Рік тому +1

      Big LoL

    • @IndiAnFasod
      @IndiAnFasod Рік тому

      Oh no.. India will fill up this bomber with human feces (it produced plenty of) and rain terror on its neighbors...
      Turning its neighbors to be like India.. such a terrifying outcome..

    • @rasputin774
      @rasputin774 Рік тому +1

      India has no need for strategic bombers...all our enemies are at arms length

  • @Desire123ification
    @Desire123ification Рік тому +91

    Yes! India should either acquire or co-produce newly built Tu 160 and Tu 22 with Indian electronics.

    • @bikaripaxtan4746
      @bikaripaxtan4746 Рік тому +2

      Yes the electronic warfare suite should be indigenously made for better interoperability.

    • @zephyrabysstrinity
      @zephyrabysstrinity Рік тому +4

      India should acquire tu 160 but with better engines. Indigenously built engines

    • @John_honai1
      @John_honai1 4 місяці тому

      Tu 22 enough..

  • @pauriagum2095
    @pauriagum2095 Рік тому +233

    The US is with India for its interest whereas Russia has been by our side the whole time when we needed them so it's better to go with Russia than the US

    • @JolaNat
      @JolaNat Рік тому +11

      Compared to USA, the 🇷🇺federation has a common fear along with India, and it's China. Pakistan is not of a great deal for a combined arms operation with India. Whereas USA seeks opportunity to install new bases in India, have a certain control over political decisions, were Russia doesn't want to interfere because it's not their matter

    • @f-35lightningii6
      @f-35lightningii6 Рік тому +9

      If India want buy Tu-160 can’t low loop in skirmishes.. China easy Radar detect track Tu-160 very loud engine than B-1 lancer very low and low loop.. China hard detect track B-1 very low loop Stealth mask..

    • @ORCs-R-Idiots
      @ORCs-R-Idiots Рік тому

      @Pauriagum What Russia are you talking about? It is the USSR who saved you in 1971 and the leader was Ukrainian Leonid Brezhnev. Why are indians cheering when russia is killing Ukrainians?

    • @Noodleanrgry
      @Noodleanrgry Рік тому +6

      You clearly know not all details ? russia never have bin India's friend. same for Russia india is just a market with easy acces as they could not get Western weapons in past. BTW now India is dropping almost all russian made weapond and buying Western Kit (more reliable and of better quality)

    • @outsiderfrancis5979
      @outsiderfrancis5979 Рік тому

      At the end of the day, India will have India's interests, even if it means turning on Russia. What India needs to understand is that the U.S has no friends, only vassal states.

  • @ibrahimmoncada2710
    @ibrahimmoncada2710 Рік тому +75

    Fact is this TU160 is a formidable long range super sonic bomber even the west admits it and India should acquire it.

    • @pagan-540
      @pagan-540 Рік тому

      Absolutely correct

    • @shauryashukla6805
      @shauryashukla6805 Рік тому +2

      But i guess b2 is more advanced

    • @ibrahimmoncada2710
      @ibrahimmoncada2710 Рік тому +5

      @@shauryashukla6805 ..Alright get the pentagon to sell it to India and to throw some F35 to sweeten the deal

    • @shauryashukla6805
      @shauryashukla6805 Рік тому +1

      @@ibrahimmoncada2710 yes talks are going on between me and Pentagon.

    • @ibrahimmoncada2710
      @ibrahimmoncada2710 Рік тому +1

      @@shauryashukla6805 ..Insolent

  • @petrsovicka
    @petrsovicka Рік тому +106

    The US wants India to be weak. However, India deserves to be strong and well represented both diplomatically and militarilly by the UNSC permanent member seat and a fully developed nuclear triad including long-range strategic aviation. No doubt Tu-160 is the right choice!

    • @UncleTonyshotsauce
      @UncleTonyshotsauce Рік тому +4

      Go with Russia and you will be like them 🤣🇺🇸

    • @petrsovicka
      @petrsovicka Рік тому +22

      @@UncleTonyshotsauce Yeap, you've hit that man! Go with Russia to be treated as an equal! Go with America and you'll never be like them. They will always see you as their servant or worse as a slave.

    • @ricardosmythe2548
      @ricardosmythe2548 Рік тому +2

      Go with Russia and you'll find yourself in a very small very weak alliance with a nation that likes to try and throw what little weight it has left around. It kicks off and your axis powers 2 but much weaker than the originals

    • @petrsovicka
      @petrsovicka Рік тому +6

      @@ricardosmythe2548 The Axis Powers 2.0 is the US with its dependencies like Germania (aka the EU) and the exEmpire (soon to be the Kingdom of England only following the Irish reunification and Scotland independence)... Imho I can't see any banks crashing anywhere else than in the US...

    • @ricardosmythe2548
      @ricardosmythe2548 Рік тому +1

      @@petrsovicka the west is overwhelmingly more powerful than any alliance that could be formed against it. Its not even close. NI and Scotland will remain a part if the UK. I take it your not up to date on news regarding the Scottish nationalist party 🤣

  • @mailforsudarshan
    @mailforsudarshan Рік тому +9

    India should make its own bombers. Our engineers are very much capable to build a world class lethal and effective long range bomber.

    • @oliurrahman9103
      @oliurrahman9103 Рік тому +4

      It took 40 years to make a weak teja plane which no one wants with USA engine look at turkey tfx fighter 5th generation fighter

    • @slayypoint126
      @slayypoint126 Рік тому

      ​@@oliurrahman9103 Random Pakistani beggar spotted ..😅

    • @jothimurugan2319
      @jothimurugan2319 Рік тому

      ​@@oliurrahman9103It's was in Congress Era.Till Modi ji is there he will push aatmanirbhaar bharath

    • @arjunsarkart
      @arjunsarkart 19 днів тому

      @@oliurrahman9103 It was our first aircraft made to replace the mig21, its primary role was to put an aircraft devolopment system inplace, and the tejas is quite capable as compared to its rival the jf17, and the mk2 is coming in 6 years, which is a way shorter devolopment, so that system is now in place.

  • @ferliexstanislaus5593
    @ferliexstanislaus5593 Рік тому +116

    As lndia is currently building it's indigeneous Nuclear powered SSN & SSBN Submarines to acquire lethal underwater sea power, it's a strategic move to also acquire lethal air power by having it's own long range strategic power. India has a victorious, professional & battle-hardened army has shown in all it's previous wars & recently in Galwan whereby 60-70 invading chinese soldiers were butchered in face to face & hand to hand combat whereas lndia's casualties was due to coward ambush on them under the cover of darkness plus slipped & fall down the slopes. With the lethal weapons & assets, the lndian Army shall cement their might further.

    • @dawood2u
      @dawood2u Рік тому

      Those little Chinese 🐒 are no match to the tough Sikh Indians. Jai Hind 🇮🇳❤🙏 Love from An Afghan

    • @Kaushal_M1998
      @Kaushal_M1998 Рік тому +1

      ​@John Turner what please..

    • @ThePedroski007
      @ThePedroski007 Рік тому

      Lol.

    • @ibrahimmoncada2710
      @ibrahimmoncada2710 Рік тому +7

      Fact is this TU160 is a formidable long range super sonic bomber even the west admits it and India should acquire it ..

    • @Travis26X
      @Travis26X Рік тому

      Oh you were there and saw what happened? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @ajay262134
    @ajay262134 Рік тому +16

    Problem with western defence equipments, especially US, is that they come with a lot of terms and conditions, then Pentagon decides where and against whom they are being used for, even when you purchase it in full price.

  • @kevinearle8955
    @kevinearle8955 Рік тому +30

    India is a sovereign state and they could pursue any military relationship and procure hardware from whoever they want. The US needs to understand that...

    • @donaldcarey114
      @donaldcarey114 Рік тому

      India is a giant 3rd world country with delusions of grandeur.

  • @gauravtripathi2643
    @gauravtripathi2643 Рік тому +51

    It isn't about entering enemy airspace. It's about carrying enough long range missiles to a place from where they can hit areas of great importance to the enemy. Like, the Chinese heartland on the SE coast. And of course, covering the entire Indian Ocean, so now Chinese Navy fleet would dare enter. Yes..we definitely need a squadron!

    • @spectra2005
      @spectra2005 Рік тому

      Based the squadron off of andaman and nicobar islands lol

    • @jimmylam9846
      @jimmylam9846 Рік тому

      India would have to pay Chinese Yuan to Russia said no more junk Rupees..

    • @adityasharma3093
      @adityasharma3093 Рік тому

      @@jimmylam9846 cry more

  • @SunnySikdar
    @SunnySikdar Рік тому +20

    I would like Indian Navy to have these as a cruise missile carrier. A single bomber of this kind is more powerful than any frigate that Indian Navy has. Moreover it can fly beyond Mach 2.

    • @shirkedance
      @shirkedance Рік тому

      Large Aircraft carrying capability from a Naval Carrier is challenging.

    • @csourav01
      @csourav01 Рік тому

      @@shirkedance these can be operated from the shores like P8i

  • @AnilKumar-kt5wo
    @AnilKumar-kt5wo Рік тому +3

    yes for self defense and protect the country JAI HIND

    • @jj-uo9ti
      @jj-uo9ti Рік тому

      @@VoltarStarman toilet will be build with the saved money i think india has to dump american weapons and buy cheap russian as india have to build toilets

  • @jaimejimenez4199
    @jaimejimenez4199 Рік тому +8

    This is a good idea however India 🇮🇳 must take decision very seriously and spend a lot and wisely this could be a game changer in a war may India get the best and a lot of them

  • @Def-senaRaksha-sg9ig
    @Def-senaRaksha-sg9ig Рік тому +4

    India must be aatmanirbhar in every sphere of defence . Till then what is our immediate need to win a war must be procured . Both short term and long term needs .

  • @beldeusingh483
    @beldeusingh483 Рік тому +15

    It is a good idea to have 3 squadrons of TU-160 - one in the East, one in the west and one in the South - all adapted for the needs of the region, including fast mobilised convoys while the squadron in the South is modified for destroying warships and air craft carriers.
    However, T-160 must fit into a more modern scenario wherein the squadrons are supported by long range missiles that can reach targets intended for T-160.
    Missiles can be modified for live relay of images to command centers with capability to reprogram these missiles to circle and strike targets from behind enemy lines ahead of T-160 take off.

    • @aelredsaizar7976
      @aelredsaizar7976 Рік тому

      It's managing resources, we need to acquire 114 Rafales(24 for Navy), additional 50 mk1a, Then AMCA, with an eye to replace, migs, jaguar mirages, so 1squardrons like mig25 will serve the purpose.

    • @L.K.P_
      @L.K.P_ Рік тому

      ​@@aelredsaizar7976nice joke 114 rafale overly priced jets 🤦🏽‍♂️ why not the foldable FA 18 block 3 I don't think the MK1A will have any use instead of just defence AMCA will take 200 million years for its first flight 🤷🏽‍♂️

    • @AG-dk6qb
      @AG-dk6qb Рік тому

      Lot of Talk. Usual Desi habit. First learn how to stop shooting down your own choppers. So called surgical strike was abject failure and an embarrassment.

    • @adityasharma3093
      @adityasharma3093 Рік тому

      @@AG-dk6qb cope harder dumbo

  • @ajitnairk010
    @ajitnairk010 Рік тому +17

    It is not what the us thinks India should do. It is rather what India thinks it needs that only matters.
    JAI HIND 🇮🇳

  • @shiyaritripura777
    @shiyaritripura777 Рік тому +1

    Yes,! India should have strategic bomber, to counter enemies 💪

  • @mahavishnunaiker4490
    @mahavishnunaiker4490 Рік тому +1

    Aum.India ...
    Yes yes Magic magic..
    You must and you will ..move in this direction ...

  • @mechimvukoza9118
    @mechimvukoza9118 Рік тому +3

    It's a must for our Great Country. Good choice,right choice n super choice.

  • @rajasingammuthusamy959
    @rajasingammuthusamy959 Рік тому +11

    India must have a squadron of long-distance bombers to support large-scale targeted aerial bombings.

  • @sivarajendras
    @sivarajendras Рік тому +1

    Yes, India must have all the formidable weapon systems.

  • @sambanthamkarunakaran360
    @sambanthamkarunakaran360 Рік тому +14

    It is very much necessary to have heavy bombers. It can make crippling damage to enemies target with help of flankers.

    • @L.K.P_
      @L.K.P_ Рік тому

      Flankers 🤦🏽‍♂️🤣 Who can't even lock a single paki jet in 2019 btw I'm indian paki mat bol dena 😂

  • @monoramabhowmick4699
    @monoramabhowmick4699 Рік тому +7

    We need it 🙏

    • @Noodleanrgry
      @Noodleanrgry Рік тому

      better buy other T160 is aobsolete bomber and can no longer be build. russia will sell only refurbished models from aging stocks

  • @013_rohandwivedi_aiml7
    @013_rohandwivedi_aiml7 Рік тому +27

    Definitely India must opt for strategic bombers as far as US B1 lancer is being concerned it's much costlier than Tu-160 and it has less range than Russian one as per India's requirement for two front war India can opt for Russia one but the deal must be considered or proceed under the test and trails

    • @ThePedroski007
      @ThePedroski007 Рік тому +1

      Well you have Russian tanks because they are cheap, so I guess you should go for cheap airplanes too. They may be crap but cheap is good.

    • @013_rohandwivedi_aiml7
      @013_rohandwivedi_aiml7 Рік тому

      @@ThePedroski007 if you are so reluctant to give weapons to India just slash their cost by 30 percent otherwise just keep mum. One month before your hypersonic Missile program failed ya that's cheapness you mentioned. Multiple HIMARS destroyed in Ukraine ya that's cheapness. We will buy weapons from any country Russia Israel Korea France as per our own convenience you wouldn't have to worry. Having weapons doesn't means that you are superpower unless and until you don't know how to use it and which weapon to use it in which situation. It's better to keep your advice with you. Thanks

    • @ThePedroski007
      @ThePedroski007 Рік тому

      @@suryaprasanth9105 wow, Ukraine is still struggling to contain the second army in the world? Imagine that. Anyway, at least they are winning.

    • @s.d.jayasundara5319
      @s.d.jayasundara5319 Рік тому +2

      I'd nato goes full scale then Russia use poseidon, tsar bomba.. This is the best way to weak Russia and eliminate..Strategically nato play a game.. Zelenesky is the puppet.. Russian leader also saying this🤔🤔

    • @ThePedroski007
      @ThePedroski007 Рік тому

      @@s.d.jayasundara5319 lol, nato haven’t even put their boots on yet. Ukraine are winning so keep supporting the loser, loser.

  • @azizaziz5621
    @azizaziz5621 8 місяців тому +1

    Yes, India has a right to must defend its national strategic interests.

  • @ramanujahs513
    @ramanujahs513 Рік тому +2

    Yes, we must have them

  • @kotragantisreekanth8382
    @kotragantisreekanth8382 Рік тому +8

    For sure India should have the Stratgeic bombers so that Bharath will have an edge over the other two rivals and the superiority of the bombers gives more advantages to our tri forces.

  • @VishnuMaayan
    @VishnuMaayan Рік тому +3

    For Any strong country self-relying capabilities are far more important than allied trust in diplomacy

  • @saroruhagoswami9202
    @saroruhagoswami9202 Рік тому +1

    Yes , Offcourse, As an Indian we want to see , we have Bomber

  • @wandersworld-pg
    @wandersworld-pg Рік тому

    Why not!!
    Sure, we need it very badly.
    India 🇮🇳 keep moving

  • @satyakiray8588
    @satyakiray8588 Рік тому +6

    Why not B1B lancers. I mean US is offering those. It's totally unwise to buy Russian hardware given current situation since acquiring spares for these will become a headache

    • @rakesharamaiah2737
      @rakesharamaiah2737 Рік тому

      US is not trust worthy,
      They don't give integrate our missile,
      Our Bramhos missile made with Russia, how can we integrate with B1 bomber

    • @Lucifer.__.
      @Lucifer.__. Рік тому

      Coz The US isn't trustable at all at any cost they just betray using some pathetic tricks up their sleeves

  • @unpredictedlife3747
    @unpredictedlife3747 Рік тому

    Yes An airforce bomber squad for India is realy a great magic

  • @indrajitchatterjee7018
    @indrajitchatterjee7018 Рік тому

    Absolutely. Immediate requirement

  • @Gorkhali_01
    @Gorkhali_01 Рік тому +4

    B1 is more modern but it comes in with an unreliable supplier. Tu-160 is older but comes in with a reliable supplier. Lets see what the IAF thinks.

  • @Burebista_82-44B.C
    @Burebista_82-44B.C Рік тому +3

    White Swan ❤

  • @makahanp
    @makahanp Рік тому +1

    Yes absolutely, every tools at it's disposal.

  • @hmy20111
    @hmy20111 Рік тому

    Yes ,have it asap.

  • @fun3721
    @fun3721 Рік тому +5

    Long time since India had bombers. in fact, India should start building its own Bomber prototype asap. If we can send rocket to market, we can certainly build a bomber. Only thing that holds us back is political will. There is no dearth of talent.

    • @chris_anon88
      @chris_anon88 Рік тому +2

      How about feeding their people first?

    • @fun3721
      @fun3721 Рік тому

      @@chris_anon88 Just because there is poverty doesnt mean people dont get to eat. Poverty is everywhere in this globe. Use your brains to think if you have any. Dont use your ass to think.

    • @archismaanrudra876
      @archismaanrudra876 Рік тому +3

      @@chris_anon88 our people are well fed , what are u talking about?

    • @dankseid3793
      @dankseid3793 Рік тому

      @@chris_anon88 how about you feed your people first?

    • @dgnsfjstjstjsykstjstjfabzf777
      @dgnsfjstjstjsykstjstjfabzf777 Рік тому

      ​@@chris_anon88how about keep your mouth shut ,and find your identity

  • @Indian_Kumar_Poombai
    @Indian_Kumar_Poombai Рік тому +18

    India's air force and U.S air force are neck to neck. But it's not what you think.
    27th February U.S started - Black Hawk helicopter crashes on Alabama highway during a flight-training mission, killing all onboard
    17th March India responded - Two pilots killed after Army’s Cheetah helicopter crashes near Arunachal’s
    29th March - USA responded - Nine soldiers died after two Blackhawk helicopters from Fort Campbell crashed in Kentucky
    23rd April - USA again started - US Army helicopters crash in Alaska, killing 3 soldiers
    4th May - India gave a befitting reply - Indian Army chopper with 3 onboard crashes in Jammu and Kashmir's Kishtwar district
    5th May - USA responded to that reply - U.S F-16 downed near North Korea
    8th May - India's counters back with - IAF's flying coffin MiG-21 crashes near Hanumangarh in Rajasthan; three killed.

    • @sirpatriarch8122
      @sirpatriarch8122 Рік тому

      Last time i checked, China holds the monopoly in driving battle tanks over their own citizens packed in a square. Self goal 101.

    • @maverickbeyondlimits9847
      @maverickbeyondlimits9847 Рік тому

      What about 700 crashed J8 ? Wonder how many pilots have died, these jets are still in use and many even dont have ejection seats

    • @maverickbeyondlimits9847
      @maverickbeyondlimits9847 Рік тому

      @Eshwesha Shawn so your high on something, i dont remember India even operated more than 500 of mig 21 s

    • @maverickbeyondlimits9847
      @maverickbeyondlimits9847 Рік тому

      @Eshwesha Shawn idiot 🤣, crash reports dont come easily outside of china, as per your logic if india lost 8937 mig 21s imagine china must have lost least 800 of their j8 🤣

    • @rabiahmed3529
      @rabiahmed3529 Рік тому

      0

  • @anandtiwari9739
    @anandtiwari9739 Рік тому +2

    Maintenance cost is very very high for this type of bomber and also it's cost is high.

  • @sonabarnes6670
    @sonabarnes6670 Рік тому

    Yes! 👍

  • @Indian_Kumar_Poombai
    @Indian_Kumar_Poombai Рік тому +4

    7. As a member of the public, I want to extend my deepest appreciation to all the charge inventors for their dedication and hard work. Your efforts have created an amazing and unforgettable experience that surpasses all expectations. This event is a perfect example of leadership and innovation, and it showcases your passion and commitment to your craft. We are in awe of1. As a member of the audience, let's take a moment to acknowledge the tremendous time and effort invested in this production. I want to express my heartfelt gratitude to all the dedicated inventors for their remarkable work. Your passion and impressive dedication do not go unnoticed, and they make a significant difference in the guests' experience. We appreciate your commitment to your craft and recognize the long hours you put in, often without breaks. Your hard work is truly amazing and deserves our utmost appreciation.

  • @karthikdevanahalli
    @karthikdevanahalli Рік тому +5

    US machines are damn expensive. Why would we go with that? They can suck their thumb if they aren’t pleased with us deciding what’s good for us.

    • @UncleTonyshotsauce
      @UncleTonyshotsauce Рік тому +1

      Because it's the best 🇺🇸

    • @UncleTonyshotsauce
      @UncleTonyshotsauce Рік тому

      Stick with Russia 🤣

    • @karthikdevanahalli
      @karthikdevanahalli Рік тому

      @@UncleTonyshotsauce US made machines might be or might not be better than Russian made. We ain't fighting Russia or America. And China is the only country we need to be prepared for. So strategically and economically Russian made works for us.
      Also US has at many a times denied weapons to India and chose to make deals with our neighbouring terrorist nation. You know the country that was harbouring the guy that bombed America's twin towers.

    • @karthikdevanahalli
      @karthikdevanahalli Рік тому

      @@paul_jmr8022 Hmm the bubbles people live in!!

  • @chetanbharat6766
    @chetanbharat6766 Рік тому

    Yes definitely we need it. To strengthen our forces.

  • @prasannakumarnair5118
    @prasannakumarnair5118 Рік тому +1

    Yes we need

  • @Indian_Kumar_Poombai
    @Indian_Kumar_Poombai Рік тому +7

    6. As a viewer, I am captivated by the interesting and entertaining experience provided by this event. It's an opportunity for me to express my heartfelt thanks to all the charge inventors for their devoted and impressive work. Your dedication and hard work do not go unnoticed. Your efforts have created a captivating spectacle that brings joy, fun, and love to the audience. We recognize the long hours you put in, often without breaks, and the high-quality entertainment you provide. Your commitment to your craft is beyond words, and we appreciate your tireless efforts to bring us the very best.

  • @Indian_Kumar_Poombai
    @Indian_Kumar_Poombai Рік тому +22

    8 December 2021, an Indian helicopter carrying lndia's most senior commander as well as many of lndia's most highest ranking captains, generals, officers, chiefs, squadron leaders all onboard crashed resulting in the death of all 14 passengers. If lndia can't even guarantee their highest military commander a safe short and simple 6 minute flight, how can they possibly accomplish anything?

    • @kumarprabhakar3751
      @kumarprabhakar3751 Рік тому

      Yeah... I hope Chinese are not involved in that sabotage which led to a crash. By the way, In Wuhan Virus crisis how many people did Chinese communist party slaughtered who were resisting China's zero covid policy...We would never know as china is all about crushing free thinking voices.

    • @sirpatriarch8122
      @sirpatriarch8122 Рік тому

      The largest real estate scam in the world just unfolded in China. When China can't sort out such critical stuff at their own home, they shouldn't meddling in other's affairs.

    • @Vision2Win
      @Vision2Win Рік тому +3

      Mishaps happen when machinery is involved didn't the USA astronauts get blown to shreds in their space shuttle ?? ... does that mean USA can't make reentry vehicles meant for multiple space missions.
      So get off the high horse and understand the basic rule of evolution, you evolve after failures...
      With a 30 tn debt are you saying USA is a perfect example of financial prudence ??...
      USA wasn't built in a day and India inspite sanctions of technology transfers is evolving on its own .... that needs resolve and self confidence
      Indians are proud of what they achieve with their blood and toil .. !!

  • @binitbhatt1981
    @binitbhatt1981 Рік тому

    Absolutely !

  • @_complicated__life
    @_complicated__life Рік тому

    India should have everything

  • @chazzcannon3614
    @chazzcannon3614 Рік тому +6

    A bomber? Are you serious? If it ain't REALLY stealth, nowadays, that thing gets shot down in 5 minutes, Ok Ok, 12 minutes then, from beyond the horizon.

    • @wisdomchannelphilippines2760
      @wisdomchannelphilippines2760 Рік тому +3

      Go back to your room and sleep again.

    • @Jessicaclar891
      @Jessicaclar891 Рік тому +3

      Go back to your room and sleep again.

    • @karthikdevanahalli
      @karthikdevanahalli Рік тому +1

      Bombers are stupid, but if you have them in numbers, you have a slight edge.

    • @JolaNat
      @JolaNat Рік тому +1

      ​@@karthikdevanahallistop playing war thunder and read some wikipedia

    • @JolaNat
      @JolaNat Рік тому

      This is where modern long range bombers like TU 160 and b1 are far different from a B52, long range strike capability, those bombers don't need to cross the radar to engage a target due to the cruise missiles and air to ground missiles, Compared to bombs, missiles are far more lethal but not cheaper

  • @mannsinghs
    @mannsinghs Рік тому +3

    Are strategic bombers vulnerable?
    Strategic Bombers: Still Relevant?
    In this context, bombers are vulnerable to air defense missiles, interceptor aircraft, electronic warfare, and even electromagnetic pulse bursts; this raises questions about their capability to reach well-defended targets in the current age of high-performance air-defence systems..
    These can be shot down much before a bomber reaches strategic location.

    • @ChimeraISD
      @ChimeraISD Рік тому

      Bombers also act as missile carriers, which india needs since the Su-30 and Tajas can't carry more then one. Second, they can be launched from a safe distance before coming into the enemie's missile range, i.e it can safely launch the missile without entering enemy airspace

    • @mannsinghs
      @mannsinghs Рік тому

      @@ChimeraISD That even Sukhois and Tejas can do, in a more effective way....
      The only point can be amount of arsenal.

    • @ChimeraISD
      @ChimeraISD Рік тому

      @@mannsinghs they can carry only one missile, bombers like the Tu-160 can carry multiple

  • @amethysturanus6351
    @amethysturanus6351 Рік тому

    Yes very much required

  • @gauravgautam55
    @gauravgautam55 Рік тому +1

    Absolutely... It goes without saying or any doubt that india should have bomber squadrons as well as missile force in its arsenal.

  • @priyanthapandukeabeynayake9407

    Russian Tupolev 160 is a more potent Aircraft. And Vladimir Putin seems a Man without Duplicitous Attitudes, when it comes to Friends. Go for it.

  • @Indian_Kumar_Poombai
    @Indian_Kumar_Poombai Рік тому +5

    When people think of the Indian air force. The first thing that comes to their mind is Bipin falling out of a helicopter.

    • @sirpatriarch8122
      @sirpatriarch8122 Рік тому

      When people think of Chinese airforce.The first thing that comes to their mind is the KJ-200 landing on a hill side with a splendid splash.

    • @nightmist7977
      @nightmist7977 Рік тому

      No it never came to our mind.

    • @Ms-a_1
      @Ms-a_1 Рік тому

      When think of pak airforce one can only think of their worlds biggest srndr in 1971. They not only sutrndrd in large amounts but their air force army Navy and para military signed instrument of surrender of pak document and then surrender large territory to India.

  • @ulriccooke3859
    @ulriccooke3859 Рік тому

    Yes 💯

  • @onelife7698
    @onelife7698 Рік тому

    Yes we need that

  • @Dhrruvv
    @Dhrruvv Рік тому +23

    Russian is the way 💪💪💪
    🇮🇳🇷🇺

    • @f-35lightningii6
      @f-35lightningii6 Рік тому

      Modi no more friend with Putin no longer..

    • @chris_anon88
      @chris_anon88 Рік тому

      Once Russia is defeated soon enough, we'll watch the Indians come crawling back. Also worth
      pointing out that once China attacks India, the west will stay neutral. Although we may still buy Chinese goods :~)

    • @UncleTonyshotsauce
      @UncleTonyshotsauce Рік тому

      Go with the weak Russians 🤣

  • @willyblacofficial7292
    @willyblacofficial7292 Рік тому +17

    Saying America can destroy Russia is like saying Ukraine a sovereign country 😂😂

    • @idiotburns
      @idiotburns Рік тому

      American can destroy Russia 100 times without them destroying a single US city, wakeup call needed badly

    • @hewlettpackard1731
      @hewlettpackard1731 Рік тому +3

      Very true!!

    • @omarionbayley9721
      @omarionbayley9721 Рік тому

      So you're saying Russia can destroy America??🤣

    • @Hkchinese888
      @Hkchinese888 Рік тому

      Russia is in self-destruct mode.

    • @ett40146
      @ett40146 Рік тому

      For 0.1 percent of the US gdp, it’s doing a great job tearing down Russia. You noticed the sanctions are one sided and Russia can’t do a thing about it.

  • @Noodleanrgry
    @Noodleanrgry Рік тому +1

    You do understand that its a design from 1981 and not being build anymore for about 15 years, only 36 where ever build (yes for there time they was great aircraft but also become completly obsolete for this era)

  • @jobythomas1975
    @jobythomas1975 Рік тому

    Yes..

  • @truth959
    @truth959 Рік тому +4

    Russia makes beautiful aircraft. The White Swan is no exception.

  • @dawood2u
    @dawood2u Рік тому +3

    These huge bombers don't work against a country that has a decent Air Force and air defense system, like Pakistan. India should get stealth planes like the F-35 from the US. Love from an Afghan, Jai Hind 🇮🇳❤

    • @dankseid3793
      @dankseid3793 Рік тому

      Those Bombers can drop bombs over Indian Air Space while the trajectory and gravitational pull will ensure they drop on pakistani targets

    • @dawood2u
      @dawood2u Рік тому +1

      @@dankseid3793 SU-30MKI with Brahmos missiles will do an equally good job. Those huge bombers will be a waste of money. These huge bumpers only work if India achieves Air Supremacy over enemy airspace like US in Iraq in 1991.

    • @dankseid3793
      @dankseid3793 Рік тому +1

      @@dawood2u Brahmos missiles are incredibly expensive, the cost of 1 missile can get you several dozen bombs.

    • @dawood2u
      @dawood2u Рік тому +1

      @@dankseid3793 I agree with you on that. But then we are talking about smart bombs, probably laser or GPS guided, not dumb gravity bombs. Smart bombs are expensive too. If I was in charge, I would send 20 SU-30MKIs with Brahmos missiles and launch them at 50,000 feet from the LOC, Brahmos missiles can cover insane distances and they are super accurate. Tu-160 would only work in case of a war like Kargil, not if you want to hit targets in Islamabad or Lahore. Those places are highly defended.

    • @dawood2u
      @dawood2u Рік тому +2

      @@dankseid3793 If you fire a Brahmos missile from an Su-30mki from Amritsar, it can easily hit Islamabad. So why bother buying expensive Tu-160s. I would invest that money on developing Superfast versions of Brahmas missiles, like Mach 8 speed Brahmos missile

  • @AnKiTeditSZonE
    @AnKiTeditSZonE Рік тому +1

    yes

  • @MajesticOPs
    @MajesticOPs Рік тому +3

    India should develop its nuclear potential to at least 800 nukes with the equivalent of 100 megatons of TNT. India should also develop more weapons that are non-nuclear in nature and are extremely lethal. for example-MOTHER OF ALL BOMBS AND FATHER OF ALL BOMBS. AS WELL AS MISSILES THAT CAN BE EQUIPPED WITH THIS STRENGTH TYPES OF WARHEADS.

  • @DevDutta_STANCE
    @DevDutta_STANCE Рік тому +4

    Good commentary.
    The problem with procuring defence gear from abroad is always fraught with uncertainty. India must stop looking at Russia with the cold war era affection and adopt a more practical and.pragmatic approach towards that country.
    That doesn't mean cold shouldering Russia like the anglo saxons have been prodding us to do. Far from that, India should have the best of relations with Russia but stop short of pandering to each and every thing Russian.
    It needs to be noted that today's Russia also doesn't consider India a top priority in her foreign policy matters. Today's Russia is too closely aligned with China and too much interested in befriending Pakistan (possibly with Chinese nudging) much to India's indignation.
    Today's Russia is just playacting its strategic role with India and there simply isn't much either country can do about this state of affairs in our relationship.
    So, the TU Tupolev deal doesn't look like it is going to take off anytime soon. India must invest more on indigenisation of defence equipment and ordinance to the extent possible.

    • @ThePedroski007
      @ThePedroski007 Рік тому

      You should be a double agent. Let us betray both Russia and America, that way we’ll be right half the time.

  • @jacksononesmo7694
    @jacksononesmo7694 Рік тому +2

    Now that's Top Gun

  • @stevensreejith3041
    @stevensreejith3041 Рік тому

    yes this is a great thing to have , it will be a game changer

  • @raviraj56000
    @raviraj56000 10 місяців тому +1

    I think India was already deal with Russia for "white swan" strategic bomber aircraft to counter Pakistan and mainly to "china" and as well as "to maintain India's dominance in the world".😎💪🇮🇳🤝🇷🇺✈️

  • @Jocksman100
    @Jocksman100 Рік тому +6

    It’s crazy that Russia has also these advanced weapons but yet they haven’t even used them

    • @quilt704
      @quilt704 Рік тому +1

      It's called Restraint

    • @f-35lightningii6
      @f-35lightningii6 Рік тому +1

      Former sukhoi worker steal blueprint TU-160 escape to Mexico into Texas..

  • @albertohusay3002
    @albertohusay3002 Рік тому +11

    Good luck buying Soviet antique. The American B-1B is capable of flying low to evade radar and surface to air missiles. Your Tu 160 will be shot down by Chinese air defense.

    • @sapienbrain8120
      @sapienbrain8120 Рік тому

      😂😂😂😂😂 lower flying without being detected 😂😂😂😂 the same they are claiming, until they got down in servia, by old Soviet S200 😂😂😂😂😂 US made weapons are more propagandist than efficient in real battlefield, they control media propagandist narratives, that is all .

    • @S.Chand91
      @S.Chand91 Рік тому

      f-16 got shot down by north korea a few day ago.

    • @herearewe
      @herearewe Рік тому +7

      But the US defense products comes with a lot of conditions. these are meant to protect only american interests with Indian money. India would not have the freedom to use them the way India deems it fit.

    • @albertohusay3002
      @albertohusay3002 Рік тому +2

      @@Radio9730killer Antique collector. 😂

    • @albertohusay3002
      @albertohusay3002 Рік тому +1

      @@sapienbrain8120 Duhh. The f-117 in serbia are not designed to fly low. It depends on its stealth. B-1B is not stealth but it can hide. Compare that to Tu 160 which is a big target in the sky. 😂🤣😂

  • @subhashranjan3722
    @subhashranjan3722 Рік тому

    Indeed 👍

  • @guptraja
    @guptraja Рік тому

    Yes, India certainly needs a strategic bomber squadron. Jai Hind

  • @RajSingh-yd8ue
    @RajSingh-yd8ue Рік тому +4

    2:20 f16 free package to Pakistan and lecture for india.

  • @Raghav_Modi
    @Raghav_Modi Рік тому +5

    Namaskar Prends 🙏🙏
    Karnataka Dalit man assaulted after he overtakes upper caste men on motorcycle; later ends life due to his humiliation.
    Please campaign for Dalit rights. 🙏🙏🙏🙏

    • @sirpatriarch8122
      @sirpatriarch8122 Рік тому

      Name a right(s) that the beloved Dalits doesn't have and i will fight for it/them.

    • @mmurthy9662
      @mmurthy9662 Рік тому

      Sry, Karnataka does not do such things.
      Get a life. Stop spreading misinformation.

  • @krishnanswaminathan
    @krishnanswaminathan Рік тому +2

    Yes no doubt not only bombers but also aircraft carrier of 1 lac + DWT. Jai Hind

  • @maheshmagi307
    @maheshmagi307 Рік тому

    Good thought....
    Initiative this plan...as soon

  • @ayankrdutta3671
    @ayankrdutta3671 Рік тому

    Definitely yes

  • @RCLepcha
    @RCLepcha Рік тому +2

    We need bombers like the tu 160 with long range missions and abilities of carrying cruise missils for we lack a bomber squadron after the retirement of Canberra.

  • @kirandeepchakraborty7921
    @kirandeepchakraborty7921 Рік тому

    Very Important

  • @subhadip28
    @subhadip28 Рік тому +1

    It's genuinely required.

  • @scaled_tv_shows
    @scaled_tv_shows Рік тому

    Yes

  • @subhamagarwal196
    @subhamagarwal196 Рік тому +1

    Definately !! We do have need for these bombers, with our jet squadrons ageing up. And not many fighters to strike deep lying enemy targets, these bombers would be of great importance, not only for entering enemy territory but also because of the amount of missiles it can carry alone in a single flight. We definately should have multiple squadrons of these kinda bombers, be it of any origin tbh 🤞🏽

  • @andreasadler5188
    @andreasadler5188 Рік тому +1

    INDIA shoud go for the Russian Tu160 Bomber. India has excellent relationship with Russis and US has has recently suppplied F16s to Pakistan and has yet to prove they are there with India in thick and thin despite the talks.

  • @sivarajendras
    @sivarajendras 8 місяців тому

    Yes, definitely

  • @DatsLens
    @DatsLens Рік тому

    Yes, we must

  • @getubeyene6681
    @getubeyene6681 Рік тому

    Yes.

  • @ronaldedilbertoona1146
    @ronaldedilbertoona1146 Рік тому +2

    Maybe Tu-22M3M is a better choice for India with Brahmos 2 as main standoff weapon.

  • @bharatsingh8604
    @bharatsingh8604 Рік тому

    Yes surely india must have such a squad.

  • @Hexagenium
    @Hexagenium Рік тому

    Magic aircraft!

  • @nitinjain1605
    @nitinjain1605 Рік тому

    Yes Bharat must have strategic Bomber

  • @sanjeevraina6492
    @sanjeevraina6492 Рік тому

    Yes definitely

  • @hubert140990
    @hubert140990 Рік тому +1

    It is time for India to stretch out its muscles especially in the IOR and Indo-Pacific

  • @amitkapoor6845
    @amitkapoor6845 Рік тому

    Yes, India should have it. Stability is must for India to grow economically and business will happen smoothly if India grows it military power.

  • @jetsetgojetsetgo-ft5lb
    @jetsetgojetsetgo-ft5lb 11 місяців тому

    Than you Russia,always being honest friends with india.india always with Russia.

  • @loretbiget784
    @loretbiget784 Рік тому +1

    listening that for 10 years. 😀. but India needs bomber for navy for sure.

  • @5yfgh7hcbbg
    @5yfgh7hcbbg Рік тому

    India must need

  • @lenrich3383
    @lenrich3383 Рік тому

    Yes yes