@@maplearrow1842 Falcon can be fun for being a lower br and smaller, therefore easier to hide, but amx30 dca is a lot more survivable and mobile, it can bounce apfsds in weird ways and it is resistant to 50cal (can be penned in small spots, but generally fine).
@@Mr-zo7bt They have the same top speed but the dca can also drive at full speed backwards. The falcon doesn’t have ammo belts linked to the guns in the damage model so it’s actually way harder to kill especially if it only shows its turret
@@maplearrow1842 DCA has much higher hp/t which leads to better acceleration and better handling in general. DCA's main advantage is the turret armor causing people trouble, it looks intimidating and people don't know where to shoot, apfsds often either bouncing or over-penning, while being immune to 12.7 in most of the turret bar right under the gun. Compared to the Falcon, where the Falcon can be killed by just spraying 12.7 at the turret.
Fun fact, The ItPsv 90 in game is wrong/ falsely named, that thing is actually just Leopard 2 Marksman, the original ItPsv 90 is the marksman turret on a T-55 chassis
@@gelatinoussire7772 That good old UA-camr bias. Whenever I'm playing the same way, the enemy counters perfectly. Like they know my fucking address. When they play recklessly, it's like they're fighting the deaf and blind.
Its because he has like 20k hours of experience in the game, so he basically knows every single timing and spot in every map dynamic. Which also makes his advice not very good...then again a sizeable chunk of players seem to be completely missing their W key barely getting out of spawn
You didn't even mention that it has a Laster Range Finder, so even on large maps it can be very effective. If anything, they should have added the earlier version of it, since it was on a T-55AM chassis instead of a Leopard 2. It would probably have made it a lot more balanced.
Itpsv 90 should be on t55 chassis in war thunder as they originally were until the turrets were changed on leo2a4's. Would make much more sense with 8.3br and its a fun mix of soviet and western equipment thats pretty rare to see.
Perhaps there should be both. One with the old T-55 chassis and one with the Leopard 2A4 chassis? Though if one can have the A4 chassis then why would anyone want the 55?
@@jonnekallu1627 with t55 chassis it could be dropped to 8.0 chieftain marksman is currently at 8.3 its just not that capable as an anti air at 8.7 so most people tend to just shred light armor with it instead. Vai mitä nää meinaat?
They need to fix the damage modeling in this game entirely. One round my tank can kill other tanks but in the next round my tank does 0 damage to the exact types of tanks I was playing against in the previous rounds. The whole thing feels like a dice roll to me and the winners are pre determined before the match even starts.
In that second game you really shattered their morale. Two of your enemies never spawned a second vehicle after you crushed their hopes and dreams some seconds after the start of the match. Some of their team mates also appeard to not have spawned in a second time.
Penetrations have been so weird recently, like the armor protection analysis on the Ho-Ri production, tiger 2 Hs can pen it, even though it is 624mm thick at certain spots. The m47 can be penned by the Sheman jumbo at 200mm, funny part is the jumbos gun doesn’t even have 150mm of pen…
I'll never understand why the 🐌 decided to add this rather than the ACTUAL itPsV 90, a marksman turret on a T-55 chassis. It would've been perfectly fitting unlike this unbalancable thing smh. Also the AP rounds on the 35mm autocannons are actually SAP rounds with 37g of filler, hence you can kill people with goofy optic/cupola shots 😩
I would really like to see you play the Pz.Sfl.Ic. It is a 2.3 premium TD and has one of the best guns for its BR while being very quick. It isn't super common and I think it's really underrated!
With so many new players, you ever think about making a "How to" guide? For example, I'd bet very few people knew you could guide NORD missiles, let alone how to do it. I've been playing for 10 years, and things like guided bombs still frustrate me. Took me a long time to figure them out. Helping newer players not have to deal with the frustrations we've dealt with for the past decade could help them enjoy the game more and stay.
I find it ironic that tanks like this are only 70-100 SP, but stuff like the AB 205 is 280-310 SP. 3-4 times more expensive while being 20% as effective.
@@ClumsyProto I know it does very well still, just the turret rotation and acceleration isn't as good as it used to be on release, still a crazy good vehicle though
Gaijin and their stealth patches...they recently did one in enlisted, you direct inpact (literally get a hitmarker for thr bomb) a 1941 T-34 with 500kg stuka bomb and that T-34 drives out of the gigantic crater with barely singed tracks...
Before watching this video I played a couple matches. First game, 7.3, we spawned in and within 30 seconds of the match starting this thing was in our spawn and killed 8 people.
The south African ZA-35 is the same vibe, except more speed and less armor. you do not get the APDS as an option in that but it still is a really good flanker
I'm so glad I started grinding sweden as my second main last year. The amount of good top tier vehicles they're getting is bonkers, and now I am researching this very tank!
ODDBAWZ THEY CHANGED THE SILVERLION BALANCE AND YOU CANT REALLY LOOSE SILVER UNLESS YOU TEAM KILL or in a more calm way. They changed the silver lion balance and added a new update. 😊
Faced that thing with the T-55AM-1 and I got one shotted from the side, killcam showed one single 35mm shell enter through my side and it looked like it had explosive filler cause it exploded inside my tank and killed my entire crew
Gaijin: *adds a oerlekon 35mm weapon system on a mobile chassis. Playerbase: “this is the new best tank in the game” This is like the 4th vehicle like it and they are all menaces in their br.
"The difference that this speed makes is insane." I mean, I understand why McKong says once you hit BRs with MBTs speed is the only thing that matters. Speed of movement and speed of reload, nothing else makes a difference.
I've always wondered how these guys see tanks that almost seem invisible. I started paying WT again recently and yesterday I realized it just happens. You start to notice trees that are awfully tank shaped. You take a shot and the tree explodes with a turret flying into the air. Lol
I've learned to identify some tanks based on the engine noises. Particularly kv1/t34, asu-57, pt76/object 906/bmp, tiger 1, m24, and m18. So basically, everything that's a rat tank or under-BR
I was in my BMP-1 face to face with one of these last night - it was only for a second. I seemed to be uptiered every game when I'm using my 7.3 line up. I suppose these destroyers of worlds need to be fed.
Advice ; GET IN THERE - drives straight into enemy lines. Yeah, nobody dares doing that. 95 % prefer the hide among the sheeps tactic, and avoid all caps.
I am unsure if you continue to do Challenges that viewers request but I would like to see you play Warthunder while driving in manual mode using any ground vehicle. I know you like cars so i'm sure it wouldn't be extremely hard to do lol
This vehicle is actually mislabeled (or misconfigured) in War Thunder. The ItPsv 90 used the same Marksman anti-aircraft turret and fire control system, but was mounted on Polish T-55 chassis. The Marksman turrets have since then been installed on Leopard 2A4 chassis, giving this vehicle a new designation of ItPsv Leopard 2 Marksman. This is the vehicle featured in War Thunder at the moment. Gaijin could probably add the original ItPsv 90 with the T-55 chassis. The firepower is the same, but the Leopard 2A4 chassis certainly improves the vehicle's mobility.
@@onnipoika1146 The Marksman is correct, that's the anti-aircraft system's name and basically covers the turret part of either vehicle. The Marksman turret was originally mounted on the Polish T-55 chassis to create the vehicle designated as the ItPsv 90 Marksman (after the year 1990). In 2015, the Marksman turrets were installed into new Leopard 2A4 chassis, and this vehicle is named the ItPsv Leopard 2 Marksman. In War Thunder, the vehicle labeled as "ItPsV 90" has the Marksman turret and the Leo 2 chassis so it should be labeled as the ItPsv Leopard 2 Marksman instead. Or Gaijin could switch the chassis to the T-55 if they wanted to retain the ItPsv 90 name, but honestly they should rather add the actual ItPsv 90 variant with the same turret but the older T-55 chassis. This would essentially have the same firepower and fire control systems, but with significantly reduced mobility.
6:46 mark is why I don't play realistic. Dudes just sit and camp in trees and never move. Then you got sweats who put bushes all over their vehicles too. Pay to win.
Classic case in poiint, Falcon. It was deemed too strong for 7.7 because it was too good at killing tank. So what did they do, remove the sabot round llike they shouldve? no, they just upped the b.r and made literally no damn difference, except now you have an AA with no radar at a higher b.r than atleast 2 others. GG gaijin
The fact that the Falcon in the British tree is 8.3 (though the Finnish Marksman is now 8.7) is a crime. Better guns, radar, better chassis, better engine, only downside is a larger profile. #justice4falcon
T32s, M26s, And anything on that hull can die to a flakpanzer 341 from the back. The engine deck is very weak and shells tend to travel across no issue
I think it has something to do with their geography that regular tanks just weren't as at-home. And they probably make them mostly as proof of concept designs considering there's only been a couple hundred STRV 103 and such made. Or they get Hella bored being a neutral country that stays out of wars if they can.
I have no idea how you can manage to guide your nords in manually while flying and avoiding AA. I have never been able to do it so I just aim where I want them to hit and let them fly on their own, works pretty good for me.
HELLO, MY ROUTER DIED SO I UPLOADED THIS FROM MOBILE DATA, TOOK ME 8 HOURS! LMAO WHO WANTS TO SEE ME PLAY WITH 2MB DOWNLOAD AND 2MB UPLOAD?
Yes please bro
God dam, how much data do you have
I wouldn't
8 hours is a long time 😂
😂 do it
Next step: AMX30 DCA
It has apds in the normal belt, and a lot more apds, with reasonable mobility and better survivability.
Falcon is even worse
@@maplearrow1842 Falcon can be fun for being a lower br and smaller, therefore easier to hide, but amx30 dca is a lot more survivable and mobile, it can bounce apfsds in weird ways and it is resistant to 50cal (can be penned in small spots, but generally fine).
@@Mr-zo7bt They have the same top speed but the dca can also drive at full speed backwards. The falcon doesn’t have ammo belts linked to the guns in the damage model so it’s actually way harder to kill especially if it only shows its turret
It has aphe too
@@maplearrow1842 DCA has much higher hp/t which leads to better acceleration and better handling in general. DCA's main advantage is the turret armor causing people trouble, it looks intimidating and people don't know where to shoot, apfsds often either bouncing or over-penning, while being immune to 12.7 in most of the turret bar right under the gun. Compared to the Falcon, where the Falcon can be killed by just spraying 12.7 at the turret.
Man, that turret rotation speed is extremely fast, Crew inside must be getting the joy ride.
More like whiplash
That Finnish SPAA in training live firing: ua-cam.com/video/yxPA-6Tb2es/v-deo.html
@@MrHarbotthat live fire training was beautiful
@@MrHarbot that's was sweet bro
Fun fact, The ItPsv 90 in game is wrong/ falsely named, that thing is actually just Leopard 2 Marksman, the original ItPsv 90 is the marksman turret on a T-55 chassis
partly true, originally it was on polish T-55 chassis but in 2015 they adapted same marksman turrets on leopard 2A4 chassis
the name is actually right. itpsv = ilmatorjuntapanssarivaunu = air defence tank
@@aaroviren Yes, but the one they have in the game isn't an itPsv 90
@@PiliFace yes it is, ITPSV 90 Marksman -ilmatorjuntapanssarivaunu
The original on T-55 chassis is ItPsv 90/Ilmatorjuntapanssarivaunu 90 Marksman. If it's on leo chassis it's Leopard 2 Marksman
Firm handshakes to odd for using his phones internet to upload a video 😎
🤝
@@hansiminator69 🤝
@@ExcavationNation 🤝
@@hansiminator69 🤝
🤝 07
"Don't wait on anybody else. Get in there."
"Okay"
**gets shot by literally the entire enemy team at once with no backup**
Flank them, not just charge directly into them.
And their "broken back" was due to 85 % LEFT the match after one death....
Me doing the same tactics as Odd only to get sniped from the enemy's spawn before I get a single kill
@@gelatinoussire7772 That good old UA-camr bias. Whenever I'm playing the same way, the enemy counters perfectly. Like they know my fucking address. When they play recklessly, it's like they're fighting the deaf and blind.
Its because he has like 20k hours of experience in the game, so he basically knows every single timing and spot in every map dynamic. Which also makes his advice not very good...then again a sizeable chunk of players seem to be completely missing their W key barely getting out of spawn
ItPsV stands for ilmatorjuntapanssarivaunu, which is finnish for anti-air tank
I like how tanks went from less armour to more armour to less armour again lol
Best armor is no armor ^-^
its not less, just different.
@@arl_winsyep,more armor in a proportionally advanced way
With composite armor i would say its now more armor again. Tanks of today have pretty thick armor actually.
@@quan-uo5wsit’s not conventionally thick, it’s just very advanced; very dense and specialised but much thinner and lighter than standard steel
ItPsV 90 = "Ilmatorjuntapanssarivaunu 90" which is roughly translated "Airdefense armored vehicle 90" or "AA-tank 90"
0:16 bless you!
Fun Fact: The Rb05A has a proxy fuse, so its extremely useful against helis
You didn't even mention that it has a Laster Range Finder, so even on large maps it can be very effective.
If anything, they should have added the earlier version of it, since it was on a T-55AM chassis instead of a Leopard 2. It would probably have made it a lot more balanced.
Gaijin: Trying to not add a SPAA that plays like a light tank (literally impossible)
22:14 ahahahaha that ZSU was shitting bricks while you were soap grinding a circle around them lol
Man OddBawZ got some SERIOUS good eyesight cuz no way can I spot out a tank from 1500 meters and almost 5km away , that's NUTZ
Itpsv 90 should be on t55 chassis in war thunder as they originally were until the turrets were changed on leo2a4's.
Would make much more sense with 8.3br and its a fun mix of soviet and western equipment thats pretty rare to see.
ItPsV-90 on päivitetty niistä t-55 alustoista Leopard 2A4 alustoille.
Perhaps there should be both.
One with the old T-55 chassis and one with the Leopard 2A4 chassis?
Though if one can have the A4 chassis then why would anyone want the 55?
@@jonnekallu1627 agree
@@jonnekallu1627 with t55 chassis it could be dropped to 8.0 chieftain marksman is currently at 8.3 its just not that capable as an anti air at 8.7 so most people tend to just shred light armor with it instead.
Vai mitä nää meinaat?
@@jonnekallu1627 tech tree tier.
They need to fix the damage modeling in this game entirely. One round my tank can kill other tanks but in the next round my tank does 0 damage to the exact types of tanks I was playing against in the previous rounds. The whole thing feels like a dice roll to me and the winners are pre determined before the match even starts.
In that second game you really shattered their morale. Two of your enemies never spawned a second vehicle after you crushed their hopes and dreams some seconds after the start of the match. Some of their team mates also appeard to not have spawned in a second time.
For the ultimate Funpackage take the SAAB105G as a Plane, individual dropped bombs, CCIP and Custom Loadouts are immense fun with the ItPsv
I agree they are 2 op vehicles
Best part is when you bring it in on a 10.0ish lineup and it still shreds. I've killed numerous T72 TURMS and Leopard 2s with it before.
At 16:57 when you killed the t-32, it did actually make sense because you shot through the engine deck down into the crew compartment
Penetrations have been so weird recently, like the armor protection analysis on the Ho-Ri production, tiger 2 Hs can pen it, even though it is 624mm thick at certain spots. The m47 can be penned by the Sheman jumbo at 200mm, funny part is the jumbos gun doesn’t even have 150mm of pen…
I'll never understand why the 🐌 decided to add this rather than the ACTUAL itPsV 90, a marksman turret on a T-55 chassis. It would've been perfectly fitting unlike this unbalancable thing smh.
Also the AP rounds on the 35mm autocannons are actually SAP rounds with 37g of filler, hence you can kill people with goofy optic/cupola shots 😩
Real ItpsV 90 has/had APDS-(T) or HEI-(T). And It can't shoot those APDS rounds in full auto like it can with HEI rounds.
I would really like to see you play the Pz.Sfl.Ic. It is a 2.3 premium TD and has one of the best guns for its BR while being very quick. It isn't super common and I think it's really underrated!
Don't sleep on the 105G, it got individual drops recently. 4x 1000lbs seems better than 2x awkward.
I've actually gotten a nuke from taking out the ItPsv 90 and then after that the Saab 105G, it was an absolutely amazing match
With so many new players, you ever think about making a "How to" guide? For example, I'd bet very few people knew you could guide NORD missiles, let alone how to do it. I've been playing for 10 years, and things like guided bombs still frustrate me. Took me a long time to figure them out.
Helping newer players not have to deal with the frustrations we've dealt with for the past decade could help them enjoy the game more and stay.
It’s literally called a guided missile. If ppl can’t read the description on the module they research - nothing will ever help them.
Its APDS has more pen than the Puma APFSDS at 0 and 30 degrees and more than double the firerate and 1.3 BR below it. What a great ""SPAA"".
15:10 - fastest J-out in the west
You just upset the whole nation of Finland by calling it Swedish in the intro.
Yes
All three of them are very angry
Always love to see what happens "in thes vedio"
I find it ironic that tanks like this are only 70-100 SP, but stuff like the AB 205 is 280-310 SP. 3-4 times more expensive while being 20% as effective.
So the maus can face stuff with a leo2 hull, awesome
Balanced
And this thing can't do shit to the maus and u can one shot it whit the 75
@@ISt0leYaCheese well, yea. It’s an SPAA meant for planes not tanks.
@@ISt0leYaCheese fairr enough, but how about a me262 facing that ?
@Dr Von Panzer planes/jets and tank have different mm. Plus, their br is made for air rb(even though almost all of them are overtired)
Well, that thing needs to go up a tier.
That turret 1000% looks like something out of Star Wars.
TurboLaser Battery?
@@Phantom_Of_Fury Drop it on an AT-ST chicken walker....would fit right in.
@@MrAcuta73
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣💀
You should play the Kugelblitz like this too. It's really strong too
Every time I hear these specific anti air guns it makes me depressed.
And people still complain about the R3. Stuff like this are way more evil than that thing.
r3 is at 5.0????
@@night7185 Yes. It's not as good for tank killing since everything there is a heavy tank.
@@night7185 people keep using it the same way they use an m18: rushing the cap and then being a rat that camps the spawn.
@@volteer1332 m18s are played like pak pumas not point rushers lol
@night7185 either way they're rats
22:25, odd just passing by the zsu and not seeing him XD
This thing is insane, grinded and spaded it first day it was released.
What tips do you have ?
Ilmatorjunta panssarivaunu 90
this reminds me of when the ZA-35 was first added
well being honest it continues th shred just as hard as before, its that nobody really plays it anymore
@@ClumsyProto i rarely see them even though it's really good
@@ClumsyProto I know it does very well still, just the turret rotation and acceleration isn't as good as it used to be on release, still a crazy good vehicle though
@@frazzle620 yeah outside of turret rotation, the mobility actually increased after the last mobility update for wheeled vehicles, stays amazing fr
I have more ground kills than air in my za-35
Gaijin and their stealth patches...they recently did one in enlisted, you direct inpact (literally get a hitmarker for thr bomb) a 1941 T-34 with 500kg stuka bomb and that T-34 drives out of the gigantic crater with barely singed tracks...
22:26 LMAO Sneak+10000
(I didn’t see it either the first time lol)
Before watching this video I played a couple matches. First game, 7.3, we spawned in and within 30 seconds of the match starting this thing was in our spawn and killed 8 people.
You can do the same shenanigans with the ZA-35
It's been 2 years since you made a vid on the Somua. It's time to revisit the French 7.3 beast!
In my opinion those missile/rockets are pretty fun and easy to use when you get used to it
top down attacks and no need to aim it at all
@@christianhansen6061 Yeah thats one way. It can be used as a bomber killer if you see any big bombers
"You will find a hole somewhere"
OddBawZ 2023
This is like playing red orchestra when everyone is using bolt action rifles and there's the one guy running around with the StG 44.
So, red orchestra 2 played on a bad pc Kappa
The way oddBawz says "Stupid" makes it funnier than it should be
At least I can play knowing that occasionally Odd is just as blind as me sometimes
The south African ZA-35 is the same vibe, except more speed and less armor. you do not get the APDS as an option in that but it still is a really good flanker
the turret on this thing looks like it was ripped off a mech or something. very cool looking vehicle in my opinion. Great video as always!
22:26 Blind as a bat...the power of bushes :D
Me: Ok so Chieftain Marksman
Oddbawz: B.R 8.3
Me: *_Eldritch Wailing_*
the kind of nerf gaijn will do is "mixed belts"
I'm so glad I started grinding sweden as my second main last year. The amount of good top tier vehicles they're getting is bonkers, and now I am researching this very tank!
I'm doing the same
Sweden is fun, it's a lot better with the Finns tanks now providing something that can survive getting strafed by Americans that buzz like mosquitoes.
ODDBAWZ THEY CHANGED THE SILVERLION BALANCE AND YOU CANT REALLY LOOSE SILVER UNLESS YOU TEAM KILL or in a more calm way. They changed the silver lion balance and added a new update. 😊
Faced that thing with the T-55AM-1 and I got one shotted from the side, killcam showed one single 35mm shell enter through my side and it looked like it had explosive filler cause it exploded inside my tank and killed my entire crew
Yeah the SAP rounds have quite a lot of filler.
Gaijin: *adds a oerlekon 35mm weapon system on a mobile chassis.
Playerbase: “this is the new best tank in the game”
This is like the 4th vehicle like it and they are all menaces in their br.
Ah, another fair and balanced AAA
PLS gaijin dont raise this things br, the swedish spaa line is already empty enough. And would break the line up once again.
You know UA-cam is on crack when it says there are zero comments on an Oddbawz video.
Imagine this thing got full APDS belts 🤣
"The difference that this speed makes is insane." I mean, I understand why McKong says once you hit BRs with MBTs speed is the only thing that matters. Speed of movement and speed of reload, nothing else makes a difference.
22:22 Me: Dude that's alive. What are you doing 😂
This the za 35, falcon and amx 30 DCA are the final bosses of Anti tank SPAA
00:14 the way you say it XD.....
I've always wondered how these guys see tanks that almost seem invisible. I started paying WT again recently and yesterday I realized it just happens. You start to notice trees that are awfully tank shaped. You take a shot and the tree explodes with a turret flying into the air. Lol
I've learned to identify some tanks based on the engine noises. Particularly kv1/t34, asu-57, pt76/object 906/bmp, tiger 1, m24, and m18.
So basically, everything that's a rat tank or under-BR
I was in my BMP-1 face to face with one of these last night - it was only for a second.
I seemed to be uptiered every game when I'm using my 7.3 line up. I suppose these destroyers of worlds need to be fed.
Rat on rat violence, as it should be.
Anti-Air vehicles should never be allowed to leave spawn, and Gaijin needs to fix that issue immediately. German AA roll teams even in lower BR's.
Advice ; GET IN THERE - drives straight into enemy lines. Yeah, nobody dares doing that. 95 % prefer the hide among the sheeps tactic, and avoid all caps.
I am unsure if you continue to do Challenges that viewers request but I would like to see you play Warthunder while driving in manual mode using any ground vehicle. I know you like cars so i'm sure it wouldn't be extremely hard to do lol
Can you make a video about ratel 20?
This vehicle is actually mislabeled (or misconfigured) in War Thunder.
The ItPsv 90 used the same Marksman anti-aircraft turret and fire control system, but was mounted on Polish T-55 chassis.
The Marksman turrets have since then been installed on Leopard 2A4 chassis, giving this vehicle a new designation of ItPsv Leopard 2 Marksman. This is the vehicle featured in War Thunder at the moment.
Gaijin could probably add the original ItPsv 90 with the T-55 chassis. The firepower is the same, but the Leopard 2A4 chassis certainly improves the vehicle's mobility.
It is and has always been the marksman
@@onnipoika1146 The Marksman is correct, that's the anti-aircraft system's name and basically covers the turret part of either vehicle.
The Marksman turret was originally mounted on the Polish T-55 chassis to create the vehicle designated as the ItPsv 90 Marksman (after the year 1990).
In 2015, the Marksman turrets were installed into new Leopard 2A4 chassis, and this vehicle is named the ItPsv Leopard 2 Marksman.
In War Thunder, the vehicle labeled as "ItPsV 90" has the Marksman turret and the Leo 2 chassis so it should be labeled as the ItPsv Leopard 2 Marksman instead. Or Gaijin could switch the chassis to the T-55 if they wanted to retain the ItPsv 90 name, but honestly they should rather add the actual ItPsv 90 variant with the same turret but the older T-55 chassis. This would essentially have the same firepower and fire control systems, but with significantly reduced mobility.
@OddBawZ the rumor is the BMPT Terminator will make it into the game next patch!
10:20 "rip and tear the enemies" where's the Doom music Odd?
I've got some serious skill issue with those missiles so I tend to default to using bombs and flying in like a speed demon
6:46 mark is why I don't play realistic. Dudes just sit and camp in trees and never move. Then you got sweats who put bushes all over their vehicles too. Pay to win.
Been doing this with the Falcon recently. It’s fun.
Hi my friend i just love to watch your videos can you play asu85. It's pretty bad and good at the same time
odd, pls do the "aaaaaaugh" sound effect more times, its funny
Classic case in poiint, Falcon. It was deemed too strong for 7.7 because it was too good at killing tank. So what did they do, remove the sabot round llike they shouldve? no, they just upped the b.r and made literally no damn difference, except now you have an AA with no radar at a higher b.r than atleast 2 others. GG gaijin
Or the r3 slowly climbing from 4.0 to I think 5.3 now and still facing WW2; if it had its sabot rounds it would easily be facing 6.0-7.7
The fact that the Falcon in the British tree is 8.3 (though the Finnish Marksman is now 8.7) is a crime. Better guns, radar, better chassis, better engine, only downside is a larger profile. #justice4falcon
im excited, this is my next unlock im working on
That SPAA is also in the Britain tech tree
I noticed playing that alot of people don't know how to handle aggressive players
T32s, M26s, And anything on that hull can die to a flakpanzer 341 from the back. The engine deck is very weak and shells tend to travel across no issue
Swedish vehicle designers: pass the doobie to the left hand side......"yeah that vehicle should work"
I think it has something to do with their geography that regular tanks just weren't as at-home.
And they probably make them mostly as proof of concept designs considering there's only been a couple hundred STRV 103 and such made.
Or they get Hella bored being a neutral country that stays out of wars if they can.
War thunder needs to adds sights for every tank and not just the basic ones
Plane wings are made of that fancy Ikea wood.
That T32 kill was super disrespectful 😂
The tech tree Saab-105 has CCIP for rockets and bombs
i love it we need it for swed
we need this tank but with 110mm chainguns.
A Leo 2 chassis at 8.3. What can go wrong?
"My teammate blew them to kingdom come" 😭🤣
Odd! You need to do a new video on the SU-57B! It is a crazy fun case mate! Day 37
You should do more vids with spookston and defyn
I have no idea how you can manage to guide your nords in manually while flying and avoiding AA. I have never been able to do it so I just aim where I want them to hit and let them fly on their own, works pretty good for me.
This thing is wild - I like it more than the gepard- day 17 of asking odd to play m48a2ga2 and il28 with fab 3000