They never planned to pint it on Read but when she was out of her mind at the crime scene the opportunity presented itself. That is exactly why 8 of them met at that house later that morning.
Right. They put him on their own front lawn, when they had the option to use the back gate and put him in a wooded area by the train tracks. 🙄"Nahhh, let's put him right out front!"
And did ‘renovations’ by removing some of the concrete floor in his basement and rehomed his phone the day before a court order to preserve said phone was to go into effect… and evidently had issues with ‘butt dialing’ one specific person.
Ring footage camera was deleted that night from the Alberts’ house. Also, Karen Read’s tail light did not look SHATTERED when she went to get O’Keef early in the morning. According to the prosecution, at that time, she had already killed him and the tail light was shattered. Then you have Jen’s search. Then you have the dog that was re-homed. They sole the house after remodeling their basement. The alberts and all the other cops were calling each other all night long while O’keef had died, but they all pretended it was butt dialed. What are the odds they ALL butt dialed that night? Idk man. Whether she did it or not, she cannot be convicted due to those facts that causes reasonable doubt.
They might have caught ZERO on the ring camera. THose rings can be adjusted to only turn on if something is with in 20 feet. Saves on file size. I mean it could have been set to pick up all movements to the street. But we don't know that they never talked about it.
@@Physics072oh come on even if the neighbors had the videos inside of the town a large percent are witch hunters towards Karen and call her guilty and don’t explain any evidence for it or counter the scientific facts that show she couldn’t have hit him (and therefore couldn’t have killed him based on what the prosecution said must have happened). That’s not great odds that the owner would want to incriminate their neighbors with tons of power. Then we know the police wouldn’t force it and would honestly say “no we don’t need it right now” so it self deleted. So the neighbor definitely could have had a video of it and been willing to hand it over while it was still available. also they could have lied to police and didn’t have any. We know they should have got a warrant for it extremely fast. Like FIRST thing ever besides saving John. Also they can’t call this just “negligence” because they hid, manipulated, created, and destroyed evidence MANY times. Almost all of the witnesses were caught lying or “not knowing” or change of story a LOT and those are the ones called out and proven wrong. Yet every single time it was always anything that could have proven the case or exonerated Karen. Really? Key evidence that would convict Karen? ALL evidence that showed up randomly and could have easily been faked with extremely sketchy background? Every single piece of the “key” evidence that objectively shows Karen is guilty. Yet every single piece of evidence that would have exonerated her (or convicted as well), EVERY SINGLE ONE, was either purposefully ignored, destroyed, dissapesred, or had some weird chain of custody where it was handled by a cop linked to the families and was unaccounted for. All of the unbiased witnesses made Karen look more innocent. All the ones with at least sketchy connections or clear bias are the ones that testified against Karen. Almost every single one of the family majoirty destroyed, altered, hid, and many times called out on that for evidence or testimony. Yet every time they “forgot” or “butt dialed” it’s always something that would help us convict one of them and exonerate Karen. They had to have done it. Statistically, it’s is likely that over 90% of those “coincidences” were ON PURPOSE before the bias started kicking in. With the selective bias it’s almost all of it. If we saw one or two for one or two people then maybe that would be okay if it’s not too big, like someone getting a new phone the day before. We’d say there’s a 0.1% chance that just randomly happened (it’s really around 0.02 I did the math) and we’d just chalk that up to freak coincidence. But we’ve seen every single possible key evidence missed only when it would exonerate Karen. None of the experts on prosecution got into any REAL physical evidence or recreation of the scene. None of their evidence at all was able to prove Karen was innocent by even a decent standard. By this point it’s impossible that Karen is guilty because the prosecution would have prosecuted her with only 1/20 things they fucked up or ignored despite the fact that outside people directly mentioned it or told them they should do it or they spoke about it. It doesn’t look like they were trying to convict Karen for the crime they think she did. I believe that’s impossible to believe now even before the unbiased FBI experts proved that it is scientifically, medically, and physically according to basic LAWS of Physics impossible for Karen to have hit John at any point, impossible that he died in a car wreck, and insanely impossible she hit him into the yard. There is a 99.99% chance or more that he was bitten by a dog before he died but he was bitten 5 min-2 hours before his death. He died in the morning according to medical science. Karen could not have killed him it’s proven without a doubt actually. Unless someone can explain how she could have hit him to kill him and explain how that’s physically possible to do from the end result then you must admit there is no doubt, no single possible way, that Karen hit John with her car and considering the evidence presented by the prosecution she could not have killed him any other single way due to the timelines and movement. Which means someone else killed him. Oh also he didn’t get rid of his dog he REHOMED IT! I think he may have play fighter and the dog jumped in and bit and some unfortunate fall happened. Even though there was no evidence that could be taken from Chloe he got rid of her literally that night and hasn’t brought her back and wouldn’t tell the jury. So there is a STRONG chance that he is hiding Chloe and could have been motivated by Chloe biting John. See Chloe had already bitten one person and so she would have been confiscated and put down. Usually for big/dangerous labeled dots it gets put down the first bite it takes. The first thing did after killing John (hypothetically) was to take Chloe somewhere she couldn’t be found because they KNEW they may get arrested and charged. I also think they didn’t plan the car hit theory I think they had him alive but really bad and then once they saw Karen was stressed out they decided to go around and pretend like he died in the yard. Then they manipulated her to wondering if she hit him and had her saying things that they could twist. They probably asked the EMTs if they heard her say “I hit him” and kinda tricked them in forgetting the first part which is extremely doable. But really she said “Did I hit him?”. Naturally if someone is busy they’re way more likely to miss the “did” question mark where as “I” and “Hit” “Him” probably grabbed their attention right away or at least if they didn’t catch the first part of it. Anyways there is zero evidence or even potential explanation where Karen kills John nevertheless hits him with a car and it’s impossible she made him end up in the yard. The taillight plastic had to be planted which means none of the physical evidence after the first morning can be considered.
@@angelbaybi997 No need to think its a fairy tale its been exposed for the world to see. Its in the select meetings its in the bullying of voters in the town its in the videos of Albert Thugs assaulting people, its in the history with Chris Albert killing a person drunk driving then fleeing one to have This Judges (Cannone) brother get him off. Yes really a fairy tale of corruption, its been there so long its normal to them and maybe you too.
@@JoeBuck207 I will stick with the PHDs if he was not hit you must Acquit. No need to worry about the rest as all charge rely on her car hitting him. Just not possible to hit a arm and fly that far. That is the prosecutions fault.
@@Physics072 She's guilty, the question is if she is found not guilty what kinda life will she have ? Many people will think she got away with murder, will you take her in ?
What got me was Higgins, after being told to preserve his phone, snapped the SIM card, and threw the phone and sim card away in separate dumpsters on a military base.
He’s the 1 with motive and butt dials. Plus throwing away the phone. Who does that? 😂 there’s machines that give u cash for old devices. They were gaslighting us on the stand thinking we’re stupid.
hE ALWAYS USED THE MILITARY BASE, AS HE HAS NO RUBBISH SERVICE AT HIS HOUSE. He kept the messages on his new phone that he threw out , before he was asked to preserve it.
@omaha-republicanIt wasn't supposed to blow up in the media. I 100% agree with this. That's why the "investigation" was so slipshod. None of this was expected to ever see the light of day. I think where they really screwed up was underestimating Karen Read's intelligence and willingness to fight. That's maybe one silver lining: if they did realize that, they could have easily done a much better framing. It just strikes me as terrifying that Massachusetts police drive around drunk all the time and that in the MOST flattering interpretation of this situation they are merely incompetent keystone kops. I literally have no trust in them at all after this.
and the fact that the jury pool/public, could be so adamant they believe karen killed him, when theres so much reasonable doubt. and evidence to the contrary, that he was not hit, don’t seem to matter. that’s what’s wrong with this country and justice system. according to jury instructions, and evidence presented, if the glove doesn’t fit, you must aquit. the fact that karen would go to prison when there’ssi much evidence of cover up, and injuries that experts say wasn’t caused bt a 3.5 ton suv, and there are people out there who’d be so unfair because they don’t like the cut of karen’s jib, is disturbing.
@@kjnestBecause the prosecution's own medical examiner didn't believe he was hit by a vehicle and that opinion was shared by defense's expert witnesses as well, two of whom who were independently hired by the Feds and weren't connected to either party in the case. Not that that was really needed. You don't get hit by a 3 1/2 ton vehicle and just have some scratches and no bruising.
Jess gave one of the best Karen Read case explanations i've seen on UA-cam. To her excellent summary, I'd add that the Prosecutor is saying that she hit his arm at 24mph in reverse, which caused him to be ejected 30 ft, and the guy doesn't have any body fractures AND NO BRUISES on his arm!!!!
Which Albert? If you're talking about Brian Albert, he didn't have a RIng cam. He testified that he'd gotten a Nest cam for Christmas but hadn't installed it yet.
The biggest problems for the prosecution are the ones where the evidence disproves their own theory. 1. They firmly stood by their claim that Karen's vehicle taillight struck John. Experts explained how the human body cannot break the polycarbonate on that taillight. Maybe karen hurt john in some other way, who knows, but the prosecution stuck to its claim that karen broke her taillight on John's body. It's not possible. 2. The prosecution stuck to its claim that John was wounded at Fairview at 12:45. Karen's cell phone would have already been gone as she reconnected to John's wifi at 12:36. The prosecution couldnt adjust their timeline because there were people that would have seen Karen strike john before 12:45. Yes, there is ALOT more, but in a court of law facts are what matter and these two items squash the ability to find her guilty.
Yeah, all police, firemen, and EMTs were willing to risk their careers for a man.. that they didn't know. How many individuals do you think were willing to lie to pull this off? Use your common sense.
They know, that's why they deleted all that evidence. And why would one randomly seach how long it takes to freeze to death in the snow at nearly 3 am.
@debbiehall7016 Have you had your head in the sand and heard absolutely nothing about rings of dirty cops getting busted? Have you heard nothing about the goon squad trials? What about the sex scandal where various male officers slept with one female officer while they were on the clock? They're not risking their careers for a man they didn't know. They're covering up for their own people. This has happened over and over. Common sense says that this is what is happening here.
@@debbiehall7016there is no common sense in this case’s investigation. This is not a new issue they just picked the wrong person to frame and I don’t feel sorry for a single one of the McAlbert’s. They are definitely hoity toity entitled townies and it’s way past time they get taken down!
It's worse than that. Higgins admitted to using that FBI tool to extract "text strings" of the (in his mind) relevant text messages... yet what was put in evidence was screenshots of the texts. Lol, wut? That tool didn't create screenshots. It just occurred to me... I would bet money that the FBI kiosk Higgins used logs absolutely everything done with it. But also... Higgins literally testified on the stand to several federal crimes even WITH his lawyer present. You would expect the lawyer to tell him to take the fifth. This strongly suggests to me Higgins has some sort of immunity deal with the Feds.
It only takes a *player,* and a *ref.* to *”fix”* a championship.. NOT the whole team. In the case of Karen Read, it only takes a *”Proctor,”* and a *”McAlbert,”* …once the fix is in place, the rest will lead the way… *SHE. WAS. FRAMED.*
Don't forget the victims Apple health data shows him walking into the house and climbing up and down stairs, then walking another 80 steps after Karen Reed is already home.
I agree from our vantage point its clear she is innocent of the charges. But the jury does not have TV, NEWS, Chats, You tube etc. I can't assume how they will view it. They just need to focus on 1. Did a car hit him YES or NO. Right now its a big NO. Once you know that the rest is just noise the charges fall apart. Should take 1 hour. But there will be at least 1 flat earth person in the jury. That will hold things up.
@@mserin27 No all they needed is the Experts hired by the FBI PHDs that said he was not hit by a car. No car hit you must acquit. There is one flat earth type holding it up.
Jen McCabe came up with the KR story!! The players in this story have not kept their mouths shut!! Colin is involved and has been in on the assault with BH!!
Yes, and when asked why he was at her house the next day when she was interviewed, he says, paraphrased: Jenn had just been through a traumatic experience, I was there to support her ... I've known her since she was six years old ..... " Brian Albert is a thug and he is covering for his nephew Colin who beat OKeefe up in the basement. I heard someone say that the individuals who tore up the cement floor in Alberts basement before it was sold, are being interviewed. They could testify to seeing blood damage.... A lot to be exposed yet. Karen's verdict is just the beginning.
Yes, was about to type this. I believe that was the original plan. Granted, everyone was drunk. They dragged the body from the back gate to close to the road, but realize other homes have cameras. The next day Karen made a perfect Patsy, and if Karen hadn't hired great lawyers, they could have gotten away with it.
Maybe they never meant to blame Karen. Did they get Proctor involved first and let Proctor conjure up the narrative as his ego took over and imagined he was a super-sleuth? Proctor kept ignoring who he should be investigating bc he wants to be praised and top dog amongst his peers. Then all they had to do is just listen to his theories and then customize their stories around Proctors theory? Just a thought, I'm still trying to piece it all together as well but I definitely believe this is a conspiracy and Karen is being framed. Canton Police should be investigated on this one let justice prevail.
A few items incorrect but overall an absolutely excellent summary of the case. As to how they decided to pin it on Karen, I think it was just a matter of taking advantage of the opportunity. Original plan was probably to say he got hit by a snow plow. Then Karen shows up, hysterical, without a clear memory of what happened the night before, having cracked her taillight on John’s car, and Jen McCabe figured they had the perfect patsy...
Bumpers stick out further than a taillight, the bumpers would have touched, not the tail light. It's impossible for the taillight to break from John's suv. You could absolutely see the light was broken when she pulled out.
@@iamlrrrruleroftheplanetomi1799 theyve already scientifically ruled out him getting hit by the taillight at 25mph though. like the FBI investigator said, the CW theory here really doesnt make sense. I just cant get past the fact he was found 30ft from the curb. it just doesnt make sense if he was knocked out with that head impact. 18 butt dials is far fetched too.
@goonerinit the toyota/lexus car data show a lot of info that's hard to ignore, I saw a recreation video of the sideswipe theory that shows it's possible, I'm in the camp that she did hit him but I think she was drunk and didn't realize it or she didn't realize until she sobered up a bit. 9 drinks in a couple hours with a bac of .2ish, I know a lot of these people are dumb but I don't believe they're also cover up masterminds. Sucks for John and his family, there's no winner here.
Scary as hell that a jury can sit for months, listen to the same discrepancies that you outline in your video, and have yet to reach a verdict of not guilty after days of deliberations! Seriously, what are they debating? Any one of the evidentiary anomalies pointed out is enough to establish reasonable doubt, there are literally dozens of such anomalies. Unfortunately,a jury of our peers can often include members of very marginal intelligence!
Have you listened to anything in this video. Doesn’t sound so cut and dry to me. I’m glad they’re taking their time. I’d hope they’d do it for me if I found my self in this situation and you would too I assume. I’m glad you can determine who’s innocent or guilty for your phone/ computer. It’s quite impressive
It doesn’t even matter if she’s guilty or not. They can’t prove that she did jt. There are too many questions and too much reasonable doubt. The cops are corrupt, they need to let her go
It's not like they had to come up with some big elaborate plan to frame Karen Read. They knew the snow plow would be coming by once it started snowing, and if they left him out by the curb then they could just blame the plow driver. They weren't originally planning on framing KR, but when she called and showed up at the house looking for JOK in the early AM before the plow driver or some other person could discover his body, they had to change their story on the fly. Karen was in shock and didn't understand how her boyfriend was lying near the street, dead in the snow, when he was perfectly fine a few hours prior when she dropped him off. Obviously she's not going to automatically assume the friggin cops inside 34 Fairview murdered him and left him outside to die, so she's trying to come up with some logical explanation as to why he's lying there near the road, dead. So she asks "did I hit him? Could I have hit him?". Then Jen McCabe's evil ass hears her say that, and decides to run with it.
Karen Read is innocent. Proctor, Higgins and Lally should be fired. The Albert’s, McCabe’s and Higgins should be charged with obstruction of justice and perjury! Unfortunately at this point they can’t say all who was involved with John’s murder so true justice will never be done for him.
Also he needs to know there wasn't a lot of snow when they found John's body their ended up being a lot of snow but there was no more than two to three inches which isn't that much considering they had a leaf blower and six people shoulder to shoulder searching and found zero tail light pieces
I'm new to this case and was looking for a video exactly like this. Unbiased summary of the events that took place. Majority of other vids seem to be all over the place and cause confusion
That sounds so far fetched. Why would they have wanted to beat up their friend? The only one who hated him & wanted harm to come to him was his girlfriend as we heard her scream at him that very night as recorded on his phone.
@@CatholicHousewife2017 He was not their friend and one of them wanted his GF. None of that matters. He was not hit by a car at all. The damage to his body was not from a car hit. The physics make no sense at all. I agree with the FBI hired experts. So if no hit you must acquit. Don't even think about why or why not they would kill him. That is for another future case. He was not hit by a car.
Thanks for the overview because I've just heard bits and pieces and remember it being reported on when it happened but not the details of the trial. Stay Blessed 🙏
24 miles in reverse. Is it possible that with them being corrupt, could they tamper with the device in her car? With a snow storm its almost impossible to find broken tail lights the next day on the surface of the snow. Prayers for Karen, John, and their family they both deserve Justice
Just want to know, how far down the roots of MSP dishonestly goes down? This type of behavior didn't just happen yesterday. This is systematic. An agency who seemingly has their own rules. Sandra Birchmore is just the tip of iceberg. How can MSP not find 3000 texts? It just boggles the mind!
Those two kids you mentioned lost their mom and their dad within two months and then this happens with their guardian. This family is going through hell.
That Lexus did not hit John and Lally knows this. The tail light was cracked Jan 29 at 5:07 AM when Karen bumped into John’s Traverse. It was cracked, not yet shattered, as of Jan 29 afternoon in Dighton. It was destroyed by shattering it into dozens of pieces after Proctor had the Lexus brought back to the Canton PD sally port. I can’t understand why the trial went on so long. I had hoped that the prosecution’s job is to find justice (and by “justice” I mean find the guilty person) but it appears to be gaslight the jury and win the case at all costs. The sally port picture shows hardly any lens remaining and it’s on the wraparound right hand side of the tail light. This taillight was only cracked, not decimated, all the way into Jan 29 afternoon. Lally, who is detail oriented, gaslights the jury by not acknowledging the two levels of tail light damage: cracked and missing a piece vs shattered into dozens of pieces AFTER the Lexus comes back to Canton. At 5:08 as the Lexus is leaving Johns driveway (immediately after bumping into the Traverse) to meet up with Jen McCabe and Kerry Roberts, John’s security camera shows the running and brakes lights working with plenty of red light showing and a dark spot on the right tail light. Kerry Roberts testified Day 16, May 22 (UA-cam, Law & Crime @3:15) observing the Lexus tail light at Jen McCabe’s house shortly before John was found the morning ofJan 29: “And I looked and there was a piece missing… but it was caked on with snow… you could tell there was a little black hole…” Dighton Police Sergeant Barros testified Day 22, June 10 (UA-cam, Law & Crime @2:04) about his observations in Dighton of the cracked tail light Jan 29 afternoon shortly before Proctor had the Lexus brought back to Canton: “I saw there was some damage to the right rear tail light… um... to my best ability and recollection that tail light was not completely damaged. It was cracked and a piece was missing, but not completely damaged.”
I am not even considering the "hos long" because it may or may not be registered at 2.27 because thats the time the tab in Safari was opened. Even without this smoking gun it is absolutely impossible he was hit by a car. Solo cups, dog bites wounds and experts engineers confirmed my opinion.
FYI- There’s a difference between innocent and not guilty. No one is proving her innocence. It’s guilty, not guilty or a hung jury. If they find her not guilty that does not mean she’s innocent! It means the Common Wealth did not prove their case to the jury beyond a reasonable doubt.
The thing about the inverted video was that it was intentional because, tho the video was inverted, the time stamp on the video was not. (No response from Judge Cannone.)
They knew to blame it on her; possibly when John showed up, they asked where Karen was and he said she dropped me off and went home. Then they looked at the doorbell ring camera and figured where she turned around at.
jen mccabe is brian albert’s sister in law. why would they cover it all up? 1) brian albert was a boston cop of like 29 years. he has a giant pension 2) bryan higgins is an atf agent. 3) chris albert, brian’s brother, is on like the city council and if i know the time line correctly was in the middle of an election cycle for like city council. he also owns a pizza joint in downtown canton. 4) they covered it up because they all had careers to protect. imagine if your months away from retirement or work for the feds and it gets found out that you killed a dude.
Also, there's a theory that Lucky, the plow driver was to be set up, but Karen inserted herself by being up early and franticly calling people. Karen unknowingly made it easy to shift the blame to her.
Jen was looking out the window and saw Karen’s car in the driveway when she and John 1st arrived. She most likely saw John get out & Karen leave in a hurry due to a disagreement with her bf or saw John was upset when he 1st got in the house from the argument which in turn gave a premise to an alternative explanation to those who were desperate to hide what they had done
How can cops family involved in this due such a bad job at investigating and controlling a crime scene, never even went in the house to investigate sounds very suspicious. There are many red flags that point a cover up
Great overview!!! 👌 Also, the dog had a history of biting/attacking people. And isnt it wild to think that without alcohol none of this would have happened? Alcohol is practically the root of all evil... Or at least it coaxes evil out and unleashes a lot of hell on this planet. An incredible number of terrible and unspeakable things would never happen if so many people weren't drinking. Furthermore, a lot of people are walking around with a slight case of undiagnosed fetal alcohol syndrome which doesn't have the physical markers of full blown FASD but causes severe emotional issues, impulsivity and negatively affects one's capacity to make sound life decisions. Sorry this turned into a rant about the perils of alcohol in our society lol ... 😆 Anyway, this case is the craziest one I've ever seen.
Definitely watch the town Select Board Meeting from last night (Chris Albert is a Selectman) is was insane. The town wanted the police chief gone- she recently hit a 67 year old man with a reflection vest on using a cane while he was in a cross walk and it was covered up for months. Then there is the death of Sandra Birchmore. She was a pregnant 23 year old that supposedly killed herself, but after a reexamination it looks like she was murdered by a cop in the neighboring town that had sexually abused her from age 15, and passed her around to other cops. She lived in Canton and a lot of the same cops are involved- including Kevin Albert. There is also a group of McCabes and Alberts- including Colin and town selectman Chris Albert that harrased an assaulted a blogger known as Turtleboy and his girlfriend Sunday night on camera on the street. Two people have charges over this. This incident showed me who these people are in public, which leads me to believe in private and very drunk they are quite dangerous.
This was an obvious frame up. Whether or not she hit him it would have been an accident . He was as drunk as she was therefore also responsible. The scene was not kept pristine and even destroyed. A bunch oof drunk a-holes.
They were going to blame it on the plow driver until Karen supposedly commented did I hit him and they then had their cover up and turned it into “I hit him, I hit him!” i cant wait for the Not Guilty and I pray they go after the McAlberts!!
That’s a pretty ignorant comment. Some believe guilty some not. Wait and see and stop disparaging others opinions. Some of you know nothing about the legal system and the elements needed to prove a case. The jury will decide. What will you do if they find her guilty? Will they be the next target of the Read mob?
I believe Karen could be guilty of a lesser charge that is what I think will happen in this case if she was not guilty they would have already come back with that
My daughter was at this court today and was appalled at the circus they have created out of this. These are her words:Yeah well we had court today so I already experienced that fucking circus and I'm so over it. Those people should be ashamed of themselves
Right from the beginning of the investigation I had reasonable doubt, they lifted the crime scene because they didn’t know officer O’Keefe passed, then when started the search they lifted the crime scene pretty quickly, let one of the witnesses on the scene go into the house, did not interview all the witnesses for months, did not go to every house within sight and asked if they seen anything. Found evidence after the crime scene was lifted. The lead Investigator Had ties to the family. Towed her car without even seeing it. Thought she was guilty 16 hours into the investigation. And all that was just the hours into the investigation…
Jessica you say you don't know why they decided to pin it on Karen. To me it seems like the logical thing to do seeing that Karen texted Jen saying that John didn't come home. They probably though she would of slept longer being drunk and John's body would be found much later after freezing to death. Afterall Jen did google how long to die in the cold prior to hearing from Karen looking for John, which again didn't expect to happen so soon. Just my opinion.
They decided to blame it on Karen when Karen said that morning to the two women that were driving them around to find John she said my tail light is cracked. I cracked my tail light. That is when Jim McKay got the idea to blame it on Karen.
Chris Albert is not a cop! He’s on the board of Selectmen in Canton. He also owns a pizza shop in Canton. Kevin Albert is a cop. Another Albert brother.
Shes innocent. I think that when he went up to the so-called party house and just walked in open the door and put his head in that they were surprised that somebody would just walk in the front door and maybe beat him up or did something to him and that's why he's dead in front of the house.
The cops fucked up and killed their friend by accident now the cops are trying to blame his wife. Everyone in that party is guilty and their just covering their asses. Stevie wonder can see this.
They never planned to pint it on Read but when she was out of her mind at the crime scene the opportunity presented itself. That is exactly why 8 of them met at that house later that morning.
I think they planned to make it look like the plow hit him or something.
The bottom line They PLANNED it and they Killed him and threw him out as if he was trash and are cowards!!!
They planned it after they kilked him in that house! The dog too!
Right. They put him on their own front lawn, when they had the option to use the back gate and put him in a wooded area by the train tracks. 🙄"Nahhh, let's put him right out front!"
Brian Albert was not retired at the time of the offense. It was after John’s death that he retired, moved and rehomed his dog.
And did ‘renovations’ by removing some of the concrete floor in his basement and rehomed his phone the day before a court order to preserve said phone was to go into effect… and evidently had issues with ‘butt dialing’ one specific person.
Well isn’t that just a coincidence…. If you believe THAT then there is snow in H3LL !!!!
Ring footage camera was deleted that night from the Alberts’ house. Also, Karen Read’s tail light did not look SHATTERED when she went to get O’Keef early in the morning. According to the prosecution, at that time, she had already killed him and the tail light was shattered.
Then you have Jen’s search. Then you have the dog that was re-homed. They sole the house after remodeling their basement.
The alberts and all the other cops were calling each other all night long while O’keef had died, but they all pretended it was butt dialed. What are the odds they ALL butt dialed that night?
Idk man. Whether she did it or not, she cannot be convicted due to those facts that causes reasonable doubt.
The defence knew where the dog was, why didn't they take dna from the dog, ..I will tell you, it was nothing to do with the dog!
@@eileengilbert1384you will tell us? Hmm…. You must be close to the dog or scene?
I’d like to know what the neighbors REALLY caught on their ring camera
They might have caught ZERO on the ring camera. THose rings can be adjusted to only turn on if something is with in 20 feet. Saves on file size. I mean it could have been set to pick up all movements to the street. But we don't know that they never talked about it.
Static and a thin blue line?
We’ll never know bc he was a cop.
@@bornfree0507yeah I'm afraid the evidence was lost to the wind by a deliberately botched police investigation.
@@Physics072oh come on even if the neighbors had the videos inside of the town a large percent are witch hunters towards Karen and call her guilty and don’t explain any evidence for it or counter the scientific facts that show she couldn’t have hit him (and therefore couldn’t have killed him based on what the prosecution said must have happened). That’s not great odds that the owner would want to incriminate their neighbors with tons of power. Then we know the police wouldn’t force it and would honestly say “no we don’t need it right now” so it self deleted. So the neighbor definitely could have had a video of it and been willing to hand it over while it was still available. also they could have lied to police and didn’t have any. We know they should have got a warrant for it extremely fast. Like FIRST thing ever besides saving John.
Also they can’t call this just “negligence” because they hid, manipulated, created, and destroyed evidence MANY times. Almost all of the witnesses were caught lying or “not knowing” or change of story a LOT and those are the ones called out and proven wrong. Yet every single time it was always anything that could have proven the case or exonerated Karen. Really? Key evidence that would convict Karen? ALL evidence that showed up randomly and could have easily been faked with extremely sketchy background? Every single piece of the “key” evidence that objectively shows Karen is guilty. Yet every single piece of evidence that would have exonerated her (or convicted as well), EVERY SINGLE ONE, was either purposefully ignored, destroyed, dissapesred, or had some weird chain of custody where it was handled by a cop linked to the families and was unaccounted for. All of the unbiased witnesses made Karen look more innocent. All the ones with at least sketchy connections or clear bias are the ones that testified against Karen. Almost every single one of the family majoirty destroyed, altered, hid, and many times called out on that for evidence or testimony. Yet every time they “forgot” or “butt dialed” it’s always something that would help us convict one of them and exonerate Karen. They had to have done it.
Statistically, it’s is likely that over 90% of those “coincidences” were ON PURPOSE before the bias started kicking in. With the selective bias it’s almost all of it. If we saw one or two for one or two people then maybe that would be okay if it’s not too big, like someone getting a new phone the day before. We’d say there’s a 0.1% chance that just randomly happened (it’s really around 0.02 I did the math) and we’d just chalk that up to freak coincidence. But we’ve seen every single possible key evidence missed only when it would exonerate Karen. None of the experts on prosecution got into any REAL physical evidence or recreation of the scene. None of their evidence at all was able to prove Karen was innocent by even a decent standard. By this point it’s impossible that Karen is guilty because the prosecution would have prosecuted her with only 1/20 things they fucked up or ignored despite the fact that outside people directly mentioned it or told them they should do it or they spoke about it. It doesn’t look like they were trying to convict Karen for the crime they think she did. I believe that’s impossible to believe now even before the unbiased FBI experts proved that it is scientifically, medically, and physically according to basic LAWS of Physics impossible for Karen to have hit John at any point, impossible that he died in a car wreck, and insanely impossible she hit him into the yard. There is a 99.99% chance or more that he was bitten by a dog before he died but he was bitten 5 min-2 hours before his death. He died in the morning according to medical science. Karen could not have killed him it’s proven without a doubt actually. Unless someone can explain how she could have hit him to kill him and explain how that’s physically possible to do from the end result then you must admit there is no doubt, no single possible way, that Karen hit John with her car and considering the evidence presented by the prosecution she could not have killed him any other single way due to the timelines and movement. Which means someone else killed him. Oh also he didn’t get rid of his dog he REHOMED IT! I think he may have play fighter and the dog jumped in and bit and some unfortunate fall happened. Even though there was no evidence that could be taken from Chloe he got rid of her literally that night and hasn’t brought her back and wouldn’t tell the jury. So there is a STRONG chance that he is hiding Chloe and could have been motivated by Chloe biting John. See Chloe had already bitten one person and so she would have been confiscated and put down. Usually for big/dangerous labeled dots it gets put down the first bite it takes. The first thing did after killing John (hypothetically) was to take Chloe somewhere she couldn’t be found because they KNEW they may get arrested and charged. I also think they didn’t plan the car hit theory I think they had him alive but really bad and then once they saw Karen was stressed out they decided to go around and pretend like he died in the yard. Then they manipulated her to wondering if she hit him and had her saying things that they could twist. They probably asked the EMTs if they heard her say “I hit him” and kinda tricked them in forgetting the first part which is extremely doable. But really she said “Did I hit him?”. Naturally if someone is busy they’re way more likely to miss the “did” question mark where as “I” and “Hit” “Him” probably grabbed their attention right away or at least if they didn’t catch the first part of it. Anyways there is zero evidence or even potential explanation where Karen kills John nevertheless hits him with a car and it’s impossible she made him end up in the yard. The taillight plastic had to be planted which means none of the physical evidence after the first morning can be considered.
This is 1000% a case of a group of dirty cops eliminating the threat to their racket. I grew up near Canton and can affirm, those cops are corrupt af.
😂😂😂😂😂...fairy tale
@@angelbaybi997 No need to think its a fairy tale its been exposed for the world to see. Its in the select meetings its in the bullying of voters in the town its in the videos of Albert Thugs assaulting people, its in the history with Chris Albert killing a person drunk driving then fleeing one to have This Judges (Cannone) brother get him off.
Yes really a fairy tale of corruption, its been there so long its normal to them and maybe you too.
More like %1000 Speculation.
@@JoeBuck207 I will stick with the PHDs if he was not hit you must Acquit. No need to worry about the rest as all charge rely on her car hitting him. Just not possible to hit a arm and fly that far. That is the prosecutions fault.
@@Physics072 She's guilty, the question is if she is found not guilty what kinda life will she have ? Many people will think she got away with murder, will you take her in ?
What got me was Higgins, after being told to preserve his phone, snapped the SIM card, and threw the phone and sim card away in separate dumpsters on a military base.
After he carefully curated the specific text messages he felt would be most
helpful to investigators. Def shady.
@@JosephBroughton absolutely. Not saying she's completely innocent or guilty. But there's definitely enough reasonable doubt in the case.
He’s the 1 with motive and butt dials. Plus throwing away the phone. Who does that? 😂 there’s machines that give u cash for old devices. They were gaslighting us on the stand thinking we’re stupid.
hE ALWAYS USED THE MILITARY BASE, AS HE HAS NO RUBBISH SERVICE AT HIS HOUSE. He kept the messages on his new phone that he threw out , before he was asked to preserve it.
Maybe he wants his damn privacy. Doesn’t mean he’s in on a murder with a bunch of adults, their kids, paramedics and firemen.
What a shit show this case is. The entire investigation or lack
Of investigation from start to finish
@omaha-republicanIt wasn't supposed to blow up in the media. I 100% agree with this.
That's why the "investigation" was so slipshod. None of this was expected to ever see the light of day.
I think where they really screwed up was underestimating Karen Read's intelligence and willingness to fight. That's maybe one silver lining: if they did realize that, they could have easily done a much better framing.
It just strikes me as terrifying that Massachusetts police drive around drunk all the time and that in the MOST flattering interpretation of this situation they are merely incompetent keystone kops. I literally have no trust in them at all after this.
I don't know what killed John O'Keefe, but I can say beyond a reasonable doubt, to a moral certainty, it was NOT getting hit by a Lexus.
I agree
and the fact that the jury pool/public, could be so adamant they believe karen killed him, when theres so much reasonable doubt. and evidence to the contrary, that he was not hit, don’t seem to matter. that’s what’s wrong with this country and justice system. according to jury instructions, and evidence presented, if the glove doesn’t fit, you must aquit. the fact that karen would go to prison when there’ssi much evidence of cover up, and injuries that experts say wasn’t caused bt a 3.5 ton suv, and there are people out there who’d be so unfair because they don’t like the cut of karen’s jib, is disturbing.
@@McQuizzicalWhy?
@@kjnest Because there no evidence to support this.
@@kjnestBecause the prosecution's own medical examiner didn't believe he was hit by a vehicle and that opinion was shared by defense's expert witnesses as well, two of whom who were independently hired by the Feds and weren't connected to either party in the case.
Not that that was really needed. You don't get hit by a 3 1/2 ton vehicle and just have some scratches and no bruising.
Jess gave one of the best Karen Read case explanations i've seen on UA-cam.
To her excellent summary, I'd add that the Prosecutor is saying that she hit his arm at 24mph in reverse, which caused him to be ejected 30 ft, and the guy doesn't have any body fractures AND NO BRUISES on his arm!!!!
Ring camera footage was also tampered with at the Albert’s!!
Which Albert? If you're talking about Brian Albert, he didn't have a RIng cam. He testified that he'd gotten a Nest cam for Christmas but hadn't installed it yet.
They didn’t have a ring camera they had a google camera that wasn’t set up “allegedly”
The biggest problems for the prosecution are the ones where the evidence disproves their own theory.
1. They firmly stood by their claim that Karen's vehicle taillight struck John. Experts explained how the human body cannot break the polycarbonate on that taillight. Maybe karen hurt john in some other way, who knows, but the prosecution stuck to its claim that karen broke her taillight on John's body. It's not possible.
2. The prosecution stuck to its claim that John was wounded at Fairview at 12:45. Karen's cell phone would have already been gone as she reconnected to John's wifi at 12:36. The prosecution couldnt adjust their timeline because there were people that would have seen Karen strike john before 12:45.
Yes, there is ALOT more, but in a court of law facts are what matter and these two items squash the ability to find her guilty.
LMAO….Exactly! Prosecution sooooooo incompetent! Proctor and ALL the players, liars! I cant believe this ever made it to trial!
Brilliantly explained
She is innocent. I don't understand what is taking so long
Personally I think it's that load of crap jury instructions that the judge first gave them but that is being corrected now
Ex cop on the jury. Thin blue line.
Lol
@@rad4579Medical actually but hey let’s not ruin a good story
All the cops were in on it. Full stop.
Yeah, all police, firemen, and EMTs were willing to risk their careers for a man.. that they didn't know. How many individuals do you think were willing to lie to pull this off? Use your common sense.
Really?
They know, that's why they deleted all that evidence. And why would one randomly seach how long it takes to freeze to death in the snow at nearly 3 am.
@debbiehall7016 Have you had your head in the sand and heard absolutely nothing about rings of dirty cops getting busted? Have you heard nothing about the goon squad trials? What about the sex scandal where various male officers slept with one female officer while they were on the clock? They're not risking their careers for a man they didn't know. They're covering up for their own people. This has happened over and over. Common sense says that this is what is happening here.
@@debbiehall7016there is no common sense in this case’s investigation. This is not a new issue they just picked the wrong person to frame and I don’t feel sorry for a single one of the McAlbert’s. They are definitely hoity toity entitled townies and it’s way past time they get taken down!
Proctor (Trooper) Text with mates: Home owner will get heat? Proctor replied: Nope ... He's a Boston Cop too.
Brian Higgins giving investigator Procter a hard drive of his phone texts after deleting chosen texts is an indication of guilt.
It's worse than that. Higgins admitted to using that FBI tool to extract "text strings" of the (in his mind) relevant text messages... yet what was put in evidence was screenshots of the texts.
Lol, wut? That tool didn't create screenshots.
It just occurred to me... I would bet money that the FBI kiosk Higgins used logs absolutely everything done with it.
But also... Higgins literally testified on the stand to several federal crimes even WITH his lawyer present. You would expect the lawyer to tell him to take the fifth.
This strongly suggests to me Higgins has some sort of immunity deal with the Feds.
It only takes a *player,* and a *ref.* to *”fix”* a championship.. NOT the whole team.
In the case of Karen Read, it only takes a
*”Proctor,”* and a *”McAlbert,”* …once the fix is in place, the rest will lead the way…
*SHE. WAS. FRAMED.*
Don't forget the victims Apple health data shows him walking into the house and climbing up and down stairs, then walking another 80 steps after Karen Reed is already home.
I agree from our vantage point its clear she is innocent of the charges. But the jury does not have TV, NEWS, Chats, You tube etc. I can't assume how they will view it. They just need to focus on 1. Did a car hit him YES or NO. Right now its a big NO.
Once you know that the rest is just noise the charges fall apart. Should take 1 hour. But there will be at least 1 flat earth person in the jury. That will hold things up.
Thankfully the jury doesn’t have this misinformation.
@@mserin27 No all they needed is the Experts hired by the FBI PHDs that said he was not hit by a car. No car hit you must acquit. There is one flat earth type holding it up.
@@mserin27Thankfully, you're not on the jury...
What I don't understand is the data is only right when it fits the prosecution brings it up but wrong when it disproves the their case odd that.
Proctor said horrible things about her. He claimed he was going to make sure she was guilty.
Funny thing about that 24 mph backing in the snow, ever spin the wheels. 😂
This was a huge coverup
Even if she isn't innocent, it sounds like negligence from the cops will make it impossible to do anything.
And it's far too coincidental to be true.
replace "will" with "should" and you're spot on:)
Jen McCabe came up with the KR story!! The players in this story have not kept their mouths shut!! Colin is involved and has been in on the assault with BH!!
Kerry roberts said whatever jen said to say so she is just as guilty
Jen McCabe is Brian Albert’s sister in law. 😂 her sis is married to Brian.
Yes, and when asked why he was at her house the next day when she was interviewed, he says, paraphrased:
Jenn had just been through a traumatic experience, I was there to support her ... I've known her since she was six years old ..... "
Brian Albert is a thug and he is covering for his nephew Colin who beat OKeefe up in the basement.
I heard someone say that the individuals who tore up the cement floor in Alberts basement before it was sold, are being interviewed. They could testify to seeing blood damage....
A lot to be exposed yet. Karen's verdict is just the beginning.
All sounds so intertwined these two families and not in a good way.
Its all over internet Jen had affair with Brian too. Theyre all gross.
They may have planned on painting it on the snowplow driver, but then they saw that she had a crack in her tail light and thought that was even better
Yes, was about to type this. I believe that was the original plan. Granted, everyone was drunk. They dragged the body from the back gate to close to the road, but realize other homes have cameras. The next day Karen made a perfect Patsy, and if Karen hadn't hired great lawyers, they could have gotten away with it.
agree
Maybe they never meant to blame
Karen. Did they get Proctor involved first and let Proctor conjure up the narrative as his ego took over and imagined he was a super-sleuth? Proctor kept ignoring who he should be investigating bc he wants to be praised and top dog amongst his peers. Then all they had to do is just listen to his theories and then customize their stories around Proctors theory? Just a thought, I'm still trying to piece it all together as well but I definitely believe this is a conspiracy and Karen is being framed. Canton Police should be investigated on this one let justice prevail.
@@joe19912 Karen made a perfect beeline to where she knew he was.
A few items incorrect but overall an absolutely excellent summary of the case.
As to how they decided to pin it on Karen, I think it was just a matter of taking advantage of the opportunity. Original plan was probably to say he got hit by a snow plow. Then Karen shows up, hysterical, without a clear memory of what happened the night before, having cracked her taillight on John’s car, and Jen McCabe figured they had the perfect patsy...
Bumpers stick out further than a taillight, the bumpers would have touched, not the tail light. It's impossible for the taillight to break from John's suv. You could absolutely see the light was broken when she pulled out.
@@iamlrrrruleroftheplanetomi1799 theyve already scientifically ruled out him getting hit by the taillight at 25mph though. like the FBI investigator said, the CW theory here really doesnt make sense. I just cant get past the fact he was found 30ft from the curb. it just doesnt make sense if he was knocked out with that head impact. 18 butt dials is far fetched too.
@goonerinit the toyota/lexus car data show a lot of info that's hard to ignore, I saw a recreation video of the sideswipe theory that shows it's possible, I'm in the camp that she did hit him but I think she was drunk and didn't realize it or she didn't realize until she sobered up a bit. 9 drinks in a couple hours with a bac of .2ish, I know a lot of these people are dumb but I don't believe they're also cover up masterminds. Sucks for John and his family, there's no winner here.
@@iamlrrrruleroftheplanetomi1799 Video shows the taillight intact when she got home, so no, she didn't hit him.
Scary as hell that a jury can sit for months, listen to the same discrepancies that you outline in your video, and have yet to reach a verdict of not guilty after days of deliberations! Seriously, what are they debating? Any one of the evidentiary anomalies pointed out is enough to establish reasonable doubt, there are literally dozens of such anomalies. Unfortunately,a jury of our peers can often include members of very marginal intelligence!
Have you listened to anything in this video. Doesn’t sound so cut and dry to me. I’m glad they’re taking their time. I’d hope they’d do it for me if I found my self in this situation and you would too I assume. I’m glad you can determine who’s innocent or guilty for your phone/ computer. It’s quite impressive
They need to go after the real murderers and all their cases need looked into because this is disgusting.
There is no mystery here. Everyone at that house party knows what happened and when.
It doesn’t even matter if she’s guilty or not. They can’t prove that she did jt. There are too many questions and too much reasonable doubt. The cops are corrupt, they need to let her go
Criminal street gang investigates itself and concludes that nobody in the gang did anything wrong.
American law enforcement is a disgrace.
Thanks for the straight to the point summary of the case!
TurtleBoy was the first to brake this story wide open
Aiden is a legend! 🐢
It's not like they had to come up with some big elaborate plan to frame Karen Read. They knew the snow plow would be coming by once it started snowing, and if they left him out by the curb then they could just blame the plow driver. They weren't originally planning on framing KR, but when she called and showed up at the house looking for JOK in the early AM before the plow driver or some other person could discover his body, they had to change their story on the fly. Karen was in shock and didn't understand how her boyfriend was lying near the street, dead in the snow, when he was perfectly fine a few hours prior when she dropped him off. Obviously she's not going to automatically assume the friggin cops inside 34 Fairview murdered him and left him outside to die, so she's trying to come up with some logical explanation as to why he's lying there near the road, dead. So she asks "did I hit him? Could I have hit him?". Then Jen McCabe's evil ass hears her say that, and decides to run with it.
Karen Read is innocent. Proctor, Higgins and Lally should be fired. The Albert’s, McCabe’s and Higgins should be charged with obstruction of justice and perjury! Unfortunately at this point they can’t say all who was involved with John’s murder so true justice will never be done for him.
It's worth looking up sandra birchmore case.
The judge should be fired
@@Neothefish yes, I agree
Yup, not only she not guilty, she is innocent.
Fired? I think maybe Jailed.
Brian Albert and Higgins took iphones to military base, destroyed them.
I’m not saying she’s innocent but she’s not guilty based off the evidence the commonwealth presented therefore she should get a not guilty verdict
Reasonable Doubt 💯
Also he needs to know there wasn't a lot of snow when they found John's body their ended up being a lot of snow but there was no more than two to three inches which isn't that much considering they had a leaf blower and six people shoulder to shoulder searching and found zero tail light pieces
This was a great synopsis of the case! Great job!
I'm new to this case and was looking for a video exactly like this. Unbiased summary of the events that took place. Majority of other vids seem to be all over the place and cause confusion
@@zoso8818
Brandi Churchwell has a series 'Conspiracy in Canton' worth listening to.
@@zoso8818this is completely biased with a lot of misinformation. You might want to keep looking.
This is the best breakdown of the case I’ve watched --and I’ve watched plenty specific to this case-- extremely well done!
@@rickmoncrieff indeed
Calls are not deleted, just erased from your phone. The call data is retained by the provider forever.
The last expert said that John was not hit by the Lexus
The McCabes and the Alberts could have saved John O'Keefe's life, but they knew he would speak about how they beat him up, so they left him to die.
That sounds so far fetched. Why would they have wanted to beat up their friend?
The only one who hated him & wanted harm to come to him was his girlfriend as we heard her scream at him that very night as recorded on his phone.
And Karen too, she knew she had hit him.
@@CatholicHousewife2017 He was not their friend and one of them wanted his GF. None of that matters. He was not hit by a car at all. The damage to his body was not from a car hit. The physics make no sense at all. I agree with the FBI hired experts. So if no hit you must acquit. Don't even think about why or why not they would kill him. That is for another future case. He was not hit by a car.
@@ficalli4743 you clearly don't believe in science
@@CatholicHousewife2017 You must not understand the science
Thanks for the overview because I've just heard bits and pieces and remember it being reported on when it happened but not the details of the trial. Stay Blessed 🙏
This whole thing sounds like a Hollywood movie about corruption in a small town 😢
Jenn pinned it on Karen by twisting the "did I hit him?" to "I did hit him!" So they all jumped in on the false narrative.
What about the others that heard it. She is guilty and unremorseful.
Quick. Call the FBI who is still investigating and let them know their experts have it wrong because Sharon Parker from youtube has cracked the case.
Seems that way that’s why others didn’t testify in the grand jury
Others said it too, not just Jen. Read made the false narrative and it hasnt been proven that anyone bashed John.
While others said they did not hear her saying so...do not forget that ;)
24 miles in reverse. Is it possible that with them being corrupt, could they tamper with the device in her car? With a snow storm its almost impossible to find broken tail lights the next day on the surface of the snow. Prayers for Karen, John, and their family they both deserve Justice
Just want to know, how far down the roots of MSP dishonestly goes down? This type of behavior didn't just happen yesterday. This is systematic. An agency who seemingly has their own rules. Sandra Birchmore is just the tip of iceberg. How can MSP not find 3000 texts? It just boggles the mind!
Free Karen Read she is 100% Innocent 💕
Turtleboy 🐢 broke the story. It went viral. His Blogs are great well researched.
Karen had the same confusion as the guy in the movie My Cousin Vinny when he repeated what he was told. She didn't kill him.
its simple: if the car didnt hit - you must acquit
@@williamthompson2941 the car hit. She did it and admitted it.
@@SA-tx2kl the neutral experts hired by the feds agree that he was not hit by a car
INNOCENT, NOT GUILTY
Those two kids you mentioned lost their mom and their dad within two months and then this happens with their guardian. This family is going through hell.
That Lexus did not hit John and Lally knows this. The tail light was cracked Jan 29 at 5:07 AM when Karen bumped into John’s Traverse. It was cracked, not yet shattered, as of Jan 29 afternoon in Dighton. It was destroyed by shattering it into dozens of pieces after Proctor had the Lexus brought back to the Canton PD sally port.
I can’t understand why the trial went on so long. I had hoped that the prosecution’s job is to find justice (and by “justice” I mean find the guilty person) but it appears to be gaslight the jury and win the case at all costs. The sally port picture shows hardly any lens remaining and it’s on the wraparound right hand side of the tail light. This taillight was only cracked, not decimated, all the way into Jan 29 afternoon. Lally, who is detail oriented, gaslights the jury by not acknowledging the two levels of tail light damage: cracked and missing a piece vs shattered into dozens of pieces AFTER the Lexus comes back to Canton.
At 5:08 as the Lexus is leaving Johns driveway (immediately after bumping into the Traverse) to meet up with Jen McCabe and Kerry Roberts, John’s security camera shows the running and brakes lights working with plenty of red light showing and a dark spot on the right tail light.
Kerry Roberts testified Day 16, May 22 (UA-cam, Law & Crime @3:15) observing the Lexus tail light at Jen McCabe’s house shortly before John was found the morning ofJan 29:
“And I looked and there was a piece missing… but it was caked on with snow… you could tell there was a little black hole…”
Dighton Police Sergeant Barros testified Day 22, June 10 (UA-cam, Law & Crime @2:04) about his observations in Dighton of the cracked tail light Jan 29 afternoon shortly before Proctor had the Lexus brought back to Canton:
“I saw there was some damage to the right rear tail light… um... to my best ability and recollection that tail light was not completely damaged. It was cracked and a piece was missing, but not completely damaged.”
I am not even considering the "hos long" because it may or may not be registered at 2.27 because thats the time the tab in Safari was opened. Even without this smoking gun it is absolutely impossible he was hit by a car. Solo cups, dog bites wounds and experts engineers confirmed my opinion.
See, when you stick together you can break the Law and get away with it, the same thing is going on with some Politicians too!😳🇺🇸
Sounds like their son and dog are responsible 🙄
Maybe their dog attacked him he threatened to sue them and a fight ensued Maybe with their son and they're covering for him?
i went into this case thinking she was guilty. Then i watched the trial & evidence or lack of. i believe she’s innocent.
Tammie you are not alone, just means you are a smart non biased person. I thought the same as you at the start.
New subscriber. You have a knack for true crime. Impressive critical thinking skills. ❤️🔥
FYI- There’s a difference between innocent and not guilty. No one is proving her innocence. It’s guilty, not guilty or a hung jury. If they find her not guilty that does not mean she’s innocent! It means the Common Wealth did not prove their case to the jury beyond a reasonable doubt.
Never underestimate what cops will do to protect themselves and their own. There is overwhelming reasonable doubt in this case.
They were going to try and pin it on the snow plow driver first until Jen seen Karen's tailight cracked
The thing about the inverted video was that it was intentional because, tho the video was inverted, the time stamp on the video was not. (No response from Judge Cannone.)
Jen is covering up what happened in that party and the dog had something to do with it
She landed in their laps. Luck of the Irish.
They knew to blame it on her; possibly when John showed up, they asked where Karen was and he said she dropped me off and went home. Then they looked at the doorbell ring camera and figured where she turned around at.
Chris Albert also killed a man! Auntie Bev’s brother was his attorney!! 🙄 Karen Read is Innocent ⚖️
Not enough evidence to proof her guilt
The neighbors ring video caught it all. As a retired prosecutor I believe this is spot on. Said it for weeks.
They ABSOLUTELY framed her
jen mccabe is brian albert’s sister in law. why would they cover it all up?
1) brian albert was a boston cop of like 29 years. he has a giant pension
2) bryan higgins is an atf agent.
3) chris albert, brian’s brother, is on like the city council and if i know the time line correctly was in the middle of an election cycle for like city council. he also owns a pizza joint in downtown canton.
4) they covered it up because they all had careers to protect. imagine if your months away from retirement or work for the feds and it gets found out that you killed a dude.
Not guilty real bad police work!!!!They drop the case all the way !!! Should have never been brought to many lies in state case!!!
Maybe karen opened the narrative when she called Jen Mc Cabe looking for John …. The spotlight switched from the plow driver to Karen
Awesome summary thank so much ! New sub ❤
Also, there's a theory that Lucky, the plow driver was to be set up, but Karen inserted herself by being up early and franticly calling people. Karen unknowingly made it easy to shift the blame to her.
"Hos long to die in the COLD".... NOT snow!!!
Jen was looking out the window and saw Karen’s car in the driveway when she and John 1st arrived. She most likely saw John get out & Karen leave in a hurry due to a disagreement with her bf or saw John was upset when he 1st got in the house from the argument which in turn gave a premise to an alternative explanation to those who were desperate to hide what they had done
How can cops family involved in this due such a bad job at investigating and controlling a crime scene, never even went in the house to investigate sounds very suspicious. There are many red flags that point a cover up
Great overview!!! 👌 Also, the dog had a history of biting/attacking people. And isnt it wild to think that without alcohol none of this would have happened? Alcohol is practically the root of all evil... Or at least it coaxes evil out and unleashes a lot of hell on this planet. An incredible number of terrible and unspeakable things would never happen if so many people weren't drinking. Furthermore, a lot of people are walking around with a slight case of undiagnosed fetal alcohol syndrome which doesn't have the physical markers of full blown FASD but causes severe emotional issues, impulsivity and negatively affects one's capacity to make sound life decisions. Sorry this turned into a rant about the perils of alcohol in our society lol ... 😆 Anyway, this case is the craziest one I've ever seen.
I just hope the jury reads and understands the verdict forms and find Karen not guilty!
Definitely watch the town Select Board Meeting from last night (Chris Albert is a Selectman) is was insane. The town wanted the police chief gone- she recently hit a 67 year old man with a reflection vest on using a cane while he was in a cross walk and it was covered up for months.
Then there is the death of Sandra Birchmore. She was a pregnant 23 year old that supposedly killed herself, but after a reexamination it looks like she was murdered by a cop in the neighboring town that had sexually abused her from age 15, and passed her around to other cops.
She lived in Canton and a lot of the same cops are involved- including Kevin Albert.
There is also a group of McCabes and Alberts- including Colin and town selectman Chris Albert that harrased an assaulted a blogger known as Turtleboy and his girlfriend Sunday night on camera on the street. Two people have charges over this. This incident showed me who these people are in public, which leads me to believe in private and very drunk they are quite dangerous.
Because she was the one to drop him off. Plenty of people saw her there dropping him off.
This was an obvious frame up. Whether or not she hit him it would have been an accident . He was as drunk as she was therefore also responsible. The scene was not kept pristine and even destroyed. A bunch oof drunk a-holes.
Nice breakdown, thanks girl!
I think the narrative started after they saw her tail light cracked when she backed into Johns car
They were going to blame it on the plow driver until Karen supposedly commented did I hit him and they then had their cover up and turned it into “I hit him, I hit him!” i cant wait for the Not Guilty and I pray they go after the McAlberts!!
Lucky 🍀 plow driver was the hero (knew Albert family for Decades) but told the Truth! He originally was the scapegoat.
Anyone who believes she's guilty is proof that there are people in this world who aren't too normal up there in the🧠
P.S, that includes the jury
That’s a pretty ignorant comment. Some believe guilty some not. Wait and see and stop disparaging others opinions. Some of you know nothing about the legal system and the elements needed to prove a case. The jury will decide. What will you do if they find her guilty? Will they be the next target of the Read mob?
5 percent of people think the moon is made of cheese. Of those 50 percent think its flat.
Think of how dumb the avg person is. Half are dumber than that
I believe Karen could be guilty of a lesser charge that is what I think will happen in this case if she was not guilty they would have already come back with that
My daughter was at this court today and was appalled at the circus they have created out of this. These are her words:Yeah well we had court today so I already experienced that fucking circus and I'm so over it.
Those people should be ashamed of themselves
Don't forget the snowblower and red solo cups!
I dont know all what they were hiding on those phones, but it wasnt nothing
Right from the beginning of the investigation I had reasonable doubt, they lifted the crime scene because they didn’t know officer O’Keefe passed, then when started the search they lifted the crime scene pretty quickly, let one of the witnesses on the scene go into the house, did not interview all the witnesses for months, did not go to every house within sight and asked if they seen anything. Found evidence after the crime scene was lifted. The lead Investigator Had ties to the family. Towed her car without even seeing it. Thought she was guilty 16 hours into the investigation. And all that was just the hours into the investigation…
No, it said “ hos long to die in cold”
Those dog bites on him look just like the wounds I had when I was mauled by a large dog. Exactly like my wounds.
I was bitten by a dog twice on the leg and it did not look like John's injuries.
Jessica you say you don't know why they decided to pin it on Karen. To me it seems like the logical thing to do seeing that Karen texted Jen saying that John didn't come home. They probably though she would of slept longer being drunk and John's body would be found much later after freezing to death. Afterall Jen did google how long to die in the cold prior to hearing from Karen looking for John, which again didn't expect to happen so soon. Just my opinion.
They decided to blame it on Karen when Karen said that morning to the two women that were driving them around to find John she said my tail light is cracked. I cracked my tail light. That is when Jim McKay got the idea to blame it on Karen.
💯💯💯
Don't forget about the FBI's investigation that basically provided all the additional evidence and the two experts
Mishandling of evidence, all charges dropped
Chris Albert is not a cop! He’s on the board of Selectmen in Canton. He also owns a pizza shop in Canton. Kevin Albert is a cop. Another Albert brother.
Justice will prevail, actions have consequences
Shes innocent. I think that when he went up to the so-called party house and just walked in open the door and put his head in that they were surprised that somebody would just walk in the front door and maybe beat him up or did something to him and that's why he's dead in front of the house.
💯💯💯
The cops fucked up and killed their friend by accident now the cops are trying to blame his wife. Everyone in that party is guilty and their just covering their asses. Stevie wonder can see this.