Karen Read Murder Trial Explained | Jessica Benson Show
Вставка
- Опубліковано 25 чер 2024
- Jess and Bennett talk through the shocking Karen Read murder trial. They give a rundown of everything you need to know and then talk about their own ideas of what might have happened on that fateful night in Boston.
#jessicabensonshow
----
1-click Subscribe to GCM: bit.ly/subscribe2gcm
Discover the latest Memphis sports community news at: grindcitymedia.com/
~SOCIAL~
Instagram: / grindcitymedia
Twitter: / grindcitymedia
Facebook: / grindcitymedia
Follow the Memphis Grizzlies on UA-cam for exclusive team videos and player highlights: bit.ly/subscribe2memgrizz - Спорт
What got me was Higgins, after being told to preserve his phone, snapped the SIM card, and threw the phone and sim card away in separate dumpsters on a military base.
After he carefully curated the specific text messages he felt would be most
helpful to investigators. Def shady.
@@JosephBroughton absolutely. Not saying she's completely innocent or guilty. But there's definitely enough reasonable doubt in the case.
@@GamersOver30 Well, if you believe that physics exists then you would HAVE to agree she's innocent. The brain injuries come from blows to his temple areas and the FBI experts said that the laws of physics prove he was not hit by the car and the car didn't hit a person
He’s the 1 with motive and butt dials. Plus throwing away the phone. Who does that? 😂 there’s machines that give u cash for old devices. They were gaslighting us on the stand thinking we’re stupid.
hE ALWAYS USED THE MILITARY BASE, AS HE HAS NO RUBBISH SERVICE AT HIS HOUSE. He kept the messages on his new phone that he threw out , before he was asked to preserve it.
Brian Albert was not retired at the time of the offense. It was after John’s death that he retired, moved and rehomed his dog.
And did ‘renovations’ by removing some of the concrete floor in his basement and rehomed his phone the day before a court order to preserve said phone was to go into effect… and evidently had issues with ‘butt dialing’ one specific person.
Well isn’t that just a coincidence…. If you believe THAT then there is snow in H3LL !!!!
Ring footage camera was deleted that night from the Alberts’ house. Also, Karen Read’s tail light did not look SHATTERED when she went to get O’Keef early in the morning. According to the prosecution, at that time, she had already killed him and the tail light was shattered.
Then you have Jen’s search. Then you have the dog that was re-homed. They sole the house after remodeling their basement.
The alberts and all the other cops were calling each other all night long while O’keef had died, but they all pretended it was butt dialed. What are the odds they ALL butt dialed that night?
Idk man. Whether she did it or not, she cannot be convicted due to those facts that causes reasonable doubt.
The defence knew where the dog was, why didn't they take dna from the dog, ..I will tell you, it was nothing to do with the dog!
@@eileengilbert1384you will tell us? Hmm…. You must be close to the dog or scene?
I’d like to know what the neighbors REALLY caught on their ring camera
They might have caught ZERO on the ring camera. THose rings can be adjusted to only turn on if something is with in 20 feet. Saves on file size. I mean it could have been set to pick up all movements to the street. But we don't know that they never talked about it.
Static and a thin blue line?
We’ll never know bc he was a cop.
This is 1000% a case of a group of dirty cops eliminating the threat to their racket. I grew up near Canton and can affirm, those cops are corrupt af.
😂😂😂😂😂...fairy tale
@@angelbaybi997 No need to think its a fairy tale its been exposed for the world to see. Its in the select meetings its in the bullying of voters in the town its in the videos of Albert Thugs assaulting people, its in the history with Chris Albert killing a person drunk driving then fleeing one to have This Judges (Cannone) brother get him off.
Yes really a fairy tale of corruption, its been there so long its normal to them and maybe you too.
More like %1000 Speculation.
@@tonymontana4284 I will stick with the PHDs if he was not hit you mush Acquit. No need to worry about the rest as all charge rely on her car hitting him. Just not possible to hit a arm and fly that far. That is the prosecutions fault.
@@Physics072 She's guilty, the question is if she is found not guilty what kinda life will she have ? Many people will think she got away with murder, will you take her in ?
What a shit show this case is. The entire investigation or lack
Of investigation from start to finish
It wasn't supposed to blow up in the media. We can thank turtleboy for exposing these killer cops and getting attention on this
His brain injuries are consistent with blows to his temple areas, more pronounced on his left temple. His arm is undeniably cut due to multiple dog bites. And the FBIs experts (both have PhDs in physics related fields) testified that if the laws of physics prove that both his injuries couldn't have come from being hit by a vehicle and the damage to the vehicle wasn't from hitting a person.
Boston cops killed another Boston cop, refinished the basement flooring, gave away the dog after it attacked another dog and two people (and have no idea where the dog is apparently) and sold their house. Then changed their numbers, deleted calls and texts, denied verifiable calls, changed their lies multiple times under oath and will likely get away with the murder.
Go back and watch the testimony again. You’re incorrect.
PhD's were in Engineering not Physics. Engineer myself , not much difference between the labels. Engineering more applied Physics. The Trooper Paul was so dumb and making up the crime sense flipped me to Not-guilty. No way it happened that way. Case closed.
Jen McCabe is Brian Albert’s sister in law. 😂 her sis is married to Brian.
Yes, and when asked why he was at her house the next day when she was interviewed, he says, paraphrased:
Jenn had just been through a traumatic experience, I was there to support her ... I've known her since she was six years old ..... "
Brian Albert is a thug and he is covering for his nephew Colin who beat OKeefe up in the basement.
I heard someone say that the individuals who tore up the cement floor in Alberts basement before it was sold, are being interviewed. They could testify to seeing blood damage....
A lot to be exposed yet. Karen's verdict is just the beginning.
They may have planned on painting it on the snowplow driver, but then they saw that she had a crack in her tail light and thought that was even better
Yes, was about to type this. I believe that was the original plan. Granted, everyone was drunk. They dragged the body from the back gate to close to the road, but realize other homes have cameras. The next day Karen made a perfect Patsy, and if Karen hadn't hired great lawyers, they could have gotten away with it.
agree
Maybe they never meant to blame
Karen. Did they get Proctor involved first and let Proctor conjure up the narrative as his ego took over and imagined he was a super-sleuth? Proctor kept ignoring who he should be investigating bc he wants to be praised and top dog amongst his peers. Then all they had to do is just listen to his theories and then customize their stories around Proctors theory? Just a thought, I'm still trying to piece it all together as well but I definitely believe this is a conspiracy and Karen is being framed. Canton Police should be investigated on this one let justice prevail.
Proctor said horrible things about her. He claimed he was going to make sure she was guilty.
Don't forget the victims Apple health data shows him walking into the house and climbing up and down stairs, then walking another 80 steps after Karen Reed is already home.
I agree from our vantage point its clear she is innocent of the charges. But the jury does not have TV, NEWS, Chats, You tube etc. I can't assume how they will view it. They just need to focus on 1. Did a car hit him YES or NO. Right now its a big NO.
Once you know that the rest is just noise the charges fall apart. Should take 1 hour. But there will be at least 1 flat earth person in the jury. That will hold things up.
Thankfully the jury doesn’t have this misinformation.
@@owenandmzeebffs No all they needed is the Experts hired by the FBI PHDs that said he was not hit by a car. No car hit you must acquit. There is one flat earth type holding it up.
Ring camera footage was also tampered with at the Albert’s!!
Which Albert? If you're talking about Brian Albert, he didn't have a RIng cam. He testified that he'd gotten a Nest cam for Christmas but hadn't installed it yet.
All the cops were in on it. Full stop.
Yeah, all police, firemen, and EMTs were willing to risk their careers for a man.. that they didn't know. How many individuals do you think were willing to lie to pull this off? Use your common sense.
Really?
They know, that's why they deleted all that evidence. And why would one randomly seach how long it takes to freeze to death in the snow at nearly 3 am.
@debbiehall7016 Have you had your head in the sand and heard absolutely nothing about rings of dirty cops getting busted? Have you heard nothing about the goon squad trials? What about the sex scandal where various male officers slept with one female officer while they were on the clock? They're not risking their careers for a man they didn't know. They're covering up for their own people. This has happened over and over. Common sense says that this is what is happening here.
@@debbiehall7016there is no common sense in this case’s investigation. This is not a new issue they just picked the wrong person to frame and I don’t feel sorry for a single one of the McAlbert’s. They are definitely hoity toity entitled townies and it’s way past time they get taken down!
Brian Higgins giving investigator Procter a hard drive of his phone texts after deleting chosen texts is an indication of guilt.
i went into this case thinking she was guilty. Then i watched the trial & evidence or lack of. i believe she’s innocent.
Jenn pinned it on Karen by twisting the "did I hit him?" to "I did hit him!" So they all jumped in on the false narrative.
What about the others that heard it. She is guilty and unremorseful.
jen mccabe is brian albert’s sister in law. why would they cover it all up?
1) brian albert was a boston cop of like 29 years. he has a giant pension
2) bryan higgins is an atf agent.
3) chris albert, brian’s brother, is on like the city council and if i know the time line correctly was in the middle of an election cycle for like city council. he also owns a pizza joint in downtown canton.
4) they covered it up because they all had careers to protect. imagine if your months away from retirement or work for the feds and it gets found out that you killed a dude.
She is innocent. I don't understand what is taking so long
Personally I think it's that load of crap jury instructions that the judge first gave them but that is being corrected now
Even if she isn't innocent, it sounds like negligence from the cops will make it impossible to do anything.
And it's far too coincidental to be true.
They never planned to pint it on Read but when she was out of her mind at the crime scene the opportunity presented itself. That is exactly why 8 of them met at that house later that morning.
This was a great synopsis of the case! Great job!
I'm new to this case and was looking for a video exactly like this. Unbiased summary of the events that took place. Majority of other vids seem to be all over the place and cause confusion
@@zoso8818
Brandi Churchwell has a series 'Conspiracy in Canton' worth listening to.
@@zoso8818this is completely biased with a lot of misinformation. You might want to keep looking.
TurtleBoy was the first to brake this story wide open
Karen Read is innocent. Proctor, Higgins and Lally should be fired. The Albert’s, McCabe’s and Higgins should be charged with obstruction of justice and perjury! Unfortunately at this point they can’t say all who was involved with John’s murder so true justice will never be done for him.
It's worth looking up sandra birchmore case.
The judge should be fired
@@Neothefish yes, I agree
Yup, not only she not guilty, she is innocent.
Fired? I think maybe Jailed.
I don't know what killed John O'Keefe, but I can say beyond a reasonable doubt, to a moral certainty, it was NOT getting hit by a Lexus.
I agree
Proctor (Trooper) Text with mates: Home owner will get heat? Proctor replied: Nope ... He's a Boston Cop too.
They knew to blame it on her; possibly when John showed up, they asked where Karen was and he said she dropped me off and went home. Then they looked at the doorbell ring camera and figured where she turned around at.
A few items incorrect but overall an absolutely excellent summary of the case.
As to how they decided to pin it on Karen, I think it was just a matter of taking advantage of the opportunity. Original plan was probably to say he got hit by a snow plow. Then Karen shows up, hysterical, without a clear memory of what happened the night before, having cracked her taillight on John’s car, and Jen McCabe figured they had the perfect patsy...
Bumpers stick out further than a taillight, the bumpers would have touched, not the tail light. It's impossible for the taillight to break from John's suv. You could absolutely see the light was broken when she pulled out.
@@iamlrrrruleroftheplanetomi1799 theyve already scientifically ruled out him getting hit by the taillight at 25mph though. like the FBI investigator said, the CW theory here really doesnt make sense. I just cant get past the fact he was found 30ft from the curb. it just doesnt make sense if he was knocked out with that head impact. 18 butt dials is far fetched too.
@goonerinit the toyota/lexus car data show a lot of info that's hard to ignore, I saw a recreation video of the sideswipe theory that shows it's possible, I'm in the camp that she did hit him but I think she was drunk and didn't realize it or she didn't realize until she sobered up a bit. 9 drinks in a couple hours with a bac of .2ish, I know a lot of these people are dumb but I don't believe they're also cover up masterminds. Sucks for John and his family, there's no winner here.
FYI- There’s a difference between innocent and not guilty. No one is proving her innocence. It’s guilty, not guilty or a hung jury. If they find her not guilty that does not mean she’s innocent! It means the Common Wealth did not prove their case to the jury beyond a reasonable doubt.
Scary as hell that a jury can sit for months, listen to the same discrepancies that you outline in your video, and have yet to reach a verdict of not guilty after days of deliberations! Seriously, what are they debating? Any one of the evidentiary anomalies pointed out is enough to establish reasonable doubt, there are literally dozens of such anomalies. Unfortunately,a jury of our peers can often include members of very marginal intelligence!
The McCabes and the Alberts could have saved John O'Keefe's life, but they knew he would speak about how they beat him up, so they left him to die.
That sounds so far fetched. Why would they have wanted to beat up their friend?
The only one who hated him & wanted harm to come to him was his girlfriend as we heard her scream at him that very night as recorded on his phone.
And Karen too, she knew she had hit him.
@@CatholicCarnivoreHousewife He was not their friend and one of them wanted his GF. None of that matters. He was not hit by a car at all. The damage to his body was not from a car hit. The physics make no sense at all. I agree with the FBI hired experts. So if no hit you must acquit. Don't even think about why or why not they would kill him. That is for another future case. He was not hit by a car.
@@ficalli4743 you clearly don't believe in science
@@CatholicCarnivoreHousewife You must not understand the science
ummmm she is obviously not guilty… there is proof that the tail light was still intact on the camera… so, obviously someone broke it to try to frame her… why is there even a debate? 😂
Totally agree 👍
Jen McCabe came up with the KR story!! The players in this story have not kept their mouths shut!! Colin is involved and has been in on the assault with BH!!
Kerry roberts said whatever jen said to say so she is just as guilty
Karen had the same confusion as the guy in the movie My Cousin Vinny when he repeated what he was told. She didn't kill him.
They need to go after the real murderers and all their cases need looked into because this is disgusting.
Calls are not deleted, just erased from your phone. The call data is retained by the provider forever.
It only takes a *player,* and a *ref.* to *”fix”* a championship.. NOT the whole team.
In the case of Karen Read, it only takes a
*”Proctor,”* and a *”McAlbert,”* …once the fix is in place, the rest will lead the way…
*SHE. WAS. FRAMED.*
I’m not saying she’s innocent but she’s not guilty based off the evidence the commonwealth presented therefore she should get a not guilty verdict
Those dog bites on him look just like the wounds I had when I was mauled by a large dog. Exactly like my wounds.
It doesn’t even matter if she’s guilty or not. They can’t prove that she did jt. There are too many questions and too much reasonable doubt. The cops are corrupt, they need to let her go
Brian Albert and Higgins took iphones to military base, destroyed them.
Also he needs to know there wasn't a lot of snow when they found John's body their ended up being a lot of snow but there was no more than two to three inches which isn't that much considering they had a leaf blower and six people shoulder to shoulder searching and found zero tail light pieces
She landed in their laps. Luck of the Irish.
INNOCENT, NOT GUILTY
Reasonable Doubt 💯
The biggest problems for the prosecution are the ones where the evidence disproves their own theory.
1. They firmly stood by their claim that Karen's vehicle taillight struck John. Experts explained how the human body cannot break the polycarbonate on that taillight. Maybe karen hurt john in some other way, who knows, but the prosecution stuck to its claim that karen broke her taillight on John's body. It's not possible.
2. The prosecution stuck to its claim that John was wounded at Fairview at 12:45. Karen's cell phone would have already been gone as she reconnected to John's wifi at 12:36. The prosecution couldnt adjust their timeline because there were people that would have seen Karen strike john before 12:45.
Yes, there is ALOT more, but in a court of law facts are what matter and these two items squash the ability to find her guilty.
LMAO….Exactly! Prosecution sooooooo incompetent! Proctor and ALL the players, liars! I cant believe this ever made it to trial!
its simple: if the car didnt hit - you must acquit
Funny thing about that 24 mph backing in the snow, ever spin the wheels. 😂
This was a huge coverup
Thanks for the straight to the point summary of the case!
They were going to try and pin it on the snow plow driver first until Jen seen Karen's tailight cracked
Those two kids you mentioned lost their mom and their dad within two months and then this happens with their guardian. This family is going through hell.
It's not like they had to come up with some big elaborate plan to frame Karen Read. They knew the snow plow would be coming by once it started snowing, and if they left him out by the curb then they could just blame the plow driver. They weren't originally planning on framing KR, but when she called and showed up at the house looking for JOK in the early AM before the plow driver or some other person could discover his body, they had to change their story on the fly. Karen was in shock and didn't understand how her boyfriend was lying near the street, dead in the snow, when he was perfectly fine a few hours prior when she dropped him off. Obviously she's not going to automatically assume the friggin cops inside 34 Fairview murdered him and left him outside to die, so she's trying to come up with some logical explanation as to why he's lying there near the road, dead. So she asks "did I hit him? Could I have hit him?". Then Jen McCabe's evil ass hears her say that, and decides to run with it.
INNOCENT
Awesome summary thank so much ! New sub ❤
The injuries/wounds to Mr. Pledge do not correspond to being struck by a vehicle, but do correspond to being the victim of a beating and dog attack.
That Lexus did not hit John and Lally knows this. The tail light was cracked Jan 29 at 5:07 AM when Karen bumped into John’s Traverse. It was cracked, not yet shattered, as of Jan 29 afternoon in Dighton. It was destroyed by shattering it into dozens of pieces after Proctor had the Lexus brought back to the Canton PD sally port.
I can’t understand why the trial went on so long. I had hoped that the prosecution’s job is to find justice (and by “justice” I mean find the guilty person) but it appears to be gaslight the jury and win the case at all costs. The sally port picture shows hardly any lens remaining and it’s on the wraparound right hand side of the tail light. This taillight was only cracked, not decimated, all the way into Jan 29 afternoon. Lally, who is detail oriented, gaslights the jury by not acknowledging the two levels of tail light damage: cracked and missing a piece vs shattered into dozens of pieces AFTER the Lexus comes back to Canton.
At 5:08 as the Lexus is leaving Johns driveway (immediately after bumping into the Traverse) to meet up with Jen McCabe and Kerry Roberts, John’s security camera shows the running and brakes lights working with plenty of red light showing and a dark spot on the right tail light.
Kerry Roberts testified Day 16, May 22 (UA-cam, Law & Crime @3:15) observing the Lexus tail light at Jen McCabe’s house shortly before John was found the morning ofJan 29:
“And I looked and there was a piece missing… but it was caked on with snow… you could tell there was a little black hole…”
Dighton Police Sergeant Barros testified Day 22, June 10 (UA-cam, Law & Crime @2:04) about his observations in Dighton of the cracked tail light Jan 29 afternoon shortly before Proctor had the Lexus brought back to Canton:
“I saw there was some damage to the right rear tail light… um... to my best ability and recollection that tail light was not completely damaged. It was cracked and a piece was missing, but not completely damaged.”
So the question is who really did it.
My belief if I am free to say without being abused by the Read mob: Karen. She was pissed and backed up real fast. I don’t even believe she knew she hit him. She knew she hit something. She told her father that. Wasn’t til she realized he didn’t come home she put two and two together and realized he was what she hit.
@@SA-tx2kl On first read I would agree with you. But after seeing the wounds and where they found him it did not happen that way. Impossible to be hit on the arm tossed 30 feet and not have broken bones. If only the arm you will not fly 30 feet either and the arm could be broken and bruised. So that part is a No No.
She could have still killed him but not the way the state is saying they BOTCHED that up because the guy that did the reconstruction is a buffoon. I felt sorry for him.
So just using what the Jury saw she is 100 percent not guilty. Have to ignore you gut and use logic.
@@SA-tx2kl Did you happen to catch any of the scientific evidence, or are you a psychic?
@@SA-tx2kl facts over feelings. The CW presented no evidence to back that up..
True Crime Design, 22 minute documentary, points to Colin Albert, nephew of homeowner.
Not guilty real bad police work!!!!They drop the case all the way !!! Should have never been brought to many lies in state case!!!
Anyone who believes she's guilty is proof that there are people in this world who aren't too normal up there in the🧠
P.S, that includes the jury
That’s a pretty ignorant comment. Some believe guilty some not. Wait and see and stop disparaging others opinions. Some of you know nothing about the legal system and the elements needed to prove a case. The jury will decide. What will you do if they find her guilty? Will they be the next target of the Read mob?
5 percent of people think the moon is made of cheese. Of those 50 percent think its flat.
Think of how dumb the avg person is. Half are dumber than that
I believe Karen could be guilty of a lesser charge that is what I think will happen in this case if she was not guilty they would have already come back with that
My daughter was at this court today and was appalled at the circus they have created out of this. These are her words:Yeah well we had court today so I already experienced that fucking circus and I'm so over it.
Those people should be ashamed of themselves
Not enough evidence to proof her guilt
Maybe karen opened the narrative when she called Jen Mc Cabe looking for John …. The spotlight switched from the plow driver to Karen
Nice breakdown, thanks girl!
My daughter was at this court today and said: All the fucking people outside with party gear. A man fucking died and they have no respect
They are ready to celebrate beating the corruption and frame job. The real killers are the McAlberts, and when they are indicted then justice will be served.
Yeah an an innocent woman has been blamed! 🥴 Her life is a stake too! You people weird as hell
If you were falsely accused of a serious crime, you’d be grateful to have a whole community believe in your innocence and show up to support you. She didn’t kill him, she shouldn’t have to suffer.
A woman is being framed by obvious corrupt cops and people have had enough. Everyone wants justice for JO and that will happen when the real murderer are on trial.
And because of Proctor, and the rest of the investigators, either botching or corrupting (Take your pick, they did both) the investigations guarantees that JO will never get Justice because the actual perpetrators will not be charged or brought to justice since they tainted the case so badly. So if you want to blame anyone for the lack of respect being shown to the victim, there ya go.
They were going to blame it on the plow driver until Karen supposedly commented did I hit him and they then had their cover up and turned it into “I hit him, I hit him!” i cant wait for the Not Guilty and I pray they go after the McAlberts!!
So all those police, EMT's, Fireman, and others are going to risk their careers and risk heavy prison time to cover up an accidental death for someone many of them didn't even know; without any one of them deciding to snitch; and then pinning it on some innocent person. What a stretch.
Free Karen Read she is 100% Innocent 💕
New subscriber. You have a knack for true crime. Impressive critical thinking skills. ❤️🔥
Good summary from this host. Finally someone with brains
Excellent summary of the case.
I am not even considering the "hos long" because it may or may not be registered at 2.27 because thats the time the tab in Safari was opened. Even without this smoking gun it is absolutely impossible he was hit by a car. Solo cups, dog bites wounds and experts engineers confirmed my opinion.
I just hope the jury reads and understands the verdict forms and find Karen not guilty!
Definitely watch the town Select Board Meeting from last night (Chris Albert is a Selectman) is was insane. The town wanted the police chief gone- she recently hit a 67 year old man with a reflection vest on using a cane while he was in a cross walk and it was covered up for months.
Then there is the death of Sandra Birchmore. She was a pregnant 23 year old that supposedly killed herself, but after a reexamination it looks like she was murdered by a cop in the neighboring town that had sexually abused her from age 15, and passed her around to other cops.
She lived in Canton and a lot of the same cops are involved- including Kevin Albert.
There is also a group of McCabes and Alberts- including Colin and town selectman Chris Albert that harrased an assaulted a blogger known as Turtleboy and his girlfriend Sunday night on camera on the street. Two people have charges over this. This incident showed me who these people are in public, which leads me to believe in private and very drunk they are quite dangerous.
Don't forget about the FBI's investigation that basically provided all the additional evidence and the two experts
The friend and family network covered up John death to protect themselves and framed Karen (She is a outsider) Watch the closing statements, the defense went hard and Brian Albert was sitting behind the defense, trying to intimidate the jury, pissed off.😂😂Brian Albert didn’t come outside to check on the dead cop on his lawn but he came to court to see Karen be convicted, total coward.
Not GUITLTY
Karen Read Not Guilty
That's why I bought a Wyze Camera. And not a ring camera.
Great overview!!! 👌 Also, the dog had a history of biting/attacking people. And isnt it wild to think that without alcohol none of this would have happened? Alcohol is practically the root of all evil... Or at least it coaxes evil out and unleashes a lot of hell on this planet. An incredible number of terrible and unspeakable things would never happen if so many people weren't drinking. Furthermore, a lot of people are walking around with a slight case of undiagnosed fetal alcohol syndrome which doesn't have the physical markers of full blown FASD but causes severe emotional issues, impulsivity and negatively affects one's capacity to make sound life decisions. Sorry this turned into a rant about the perils of alcohol in our society lol ... 😆 Anyway, this case is the craziest one I've ever seen.
Look up the case of Sandra Birchmore in Canton!
No, it said “ hos long to die in cold”
idk if she did it or not. But the prosecution did not prove beyond reasonable doubt. I think Karen's story is odd. I think all the evidence the investigators have is odd. If I had to guess what happened, there was a lot of drinking going on and an argument ensued. John gets knocked out, left in the cold, isn't checked on by anyone at the party, possibly assuming his wife will be there to pick him up. Evidence gets set up so an officer, and possibly the people at the party aren't charged with voluntary manslaughter. If I was on the jury, I would immediately say not guilty based off the ring video "coincidentally" not working during the most critical time. Just like with the Epstein death situation for example, and how the prison cameras weren't working when he "committed" suey. It opens the path for reasonable doubt. In a world of surveillance. I don't trust any camera just coincidentally not working during the times of a crime, and then suddenly working again a few hours or half hour later. Bizarre case.
Exactly! I’m in the same boat and hope the jury thinks this way otherwise it wouldn’t be a fair trial at all!
Lucky 🍀 plow driver was the hero (knew Albert family for Decades) but told the Truth! He originally was the scapegoat.
Idk how the jury is hung this is a not guilty
Tail lights started at 3 , at all …..turned out 15 pieces in 3 weeks ‼️
I have trouble with her drinking that much because of her intestinal problem. With what she did drink, I believe she needed to go home and care for herself. If so, John was being so so selfish. Or he could have just wanted to make an appearance and then leave. He didn't get a chance to get away from them. Jen (as she testified) was the lookout, because she was reporting about karens movements with her car.
I'm sure, also, watching to see if karen would walk up to the house. Karen leaving, may have saved her life.
When Karen said did I hit him could u hit light bulb went off in Jen head!!!!
Turtleboy 🐢 broke the story. It went viral. His Blogs are great well researched.
Jen was looking out the window and saw Karen’s car in the driveway when she and John 1st arrived. She most likely saw John get out & Karen leave in a hurry due to a disagreement with her bf or saw John was upset when he 1st got in the house from the argument which in turn gave a premise to an alternative explanation to those who were desperate to hide what they had done
This case has too many dirty hands in it, and the evidence and police testimonies have been clearly manipulated and twisted....
It was, how long to die in the cold.
You are incorrect. The M.E. never gave a cause of death that's the whole point.
I just came across your video! I've been following this case for awhile and on verdict watch right now! But to answer a question you asked about why did the frame KR because she was a civilian!
How did Proctor even know about Karen's heath issues? Who told him about that?
Excellent breakdown.
She is being framed.
Reasonable Doubt 🙋♀️
Chris Albert is John O’Keefes neighbor and they were kinda feeding because their kid was cutting through his yard! Albert’s got all “Karen” on John.
My gut tells me Karen is Guilty but the trial tells me shes innocent if that makes sense😅..
Don't forget the snowblower and red solo cups!
I think the narrative started after they saw her tail light cracked when she backed into Johns car
Another scenario, John was at the Albert's house front door, the Albert's dog was let out the back of the house. Khloe came around the house, saw John and attacked his arm. John ran toward the street to get Karen's attention who was leaving in her SUV so he threw his drink glass at the SUV which broke the tail light and while running, John slipped on the snow covered road and hit his head on the curb. He drug himself to the flag pole. The blizzard conditions covered up this trail. 🤷🏼♀️
We are all innocent. Correction on your tag, not guilty or guilty. 😊
Karen had shown Jen McCabe her tailight was cracked when they were outside Okeefes house (missing Ring video) right before finding him on the Alperts lawn. Gave Jen the idea and she made up the rest?🤔
After tearing up a portion of the basement floor, the Alberts sold their home for $50K under market value.
I spent too much time this week watching hours of testimony. This case has so many details. Brian Albert says the call he made to the investigator at 2:27 am was a butt dial while he was having sex with his wife......
I think Colin Albert beat O'Keefe up in the basement where the dog then attacked him. Chris Albert, Colin's parents were next door neighbors to John OKeefe and John complained about Colin throwing beers cans in his yard .... you need to see the photos Chris Albert took of himself and his wife straddling OKeefe fence and then sent the photo to John with the text, look where we are.....
Alan Jackson is a genius. Alcohol played a major role in this tragedy. Camera footage shows how many vodka's Karen had ..... Brian Higgins left the party at Alberts because they only had beer.
The text messaging between him and Karen over a couple weeks is cringe adolescent .....
Not only did they use solo cups, but six of them they only tested one of them