Yooo guys, I just released my best Lightroom presets ever (if I do say so myself lol) 🙏 you can get them at the top link in the description and if you see this you can use code SUB15 to get a cheeky discount! Thanks for all the support 🙌🏻
@@xslvrxslwt but the oversharpening could be solved by the software that caused it in the first place. The reason why smartphone shots are so oversharpened because the normies like it. Just like the pumped up contrast on Smartphones.
@@sleepyearth tbf the comparison on those very high contrast pictures wassn't that fair. he should've either disabled the hdr function on the s23 ultra or used a fixed lens on the a7. having a full frame with a zoom lens increases the quality of shadows, increasing the already present advantage of the bigger sensor. if he shot that pic with a fixed lens and the hdr disabled on the s23, the pictures would've looked way more similar, bringing the comparison down to the software being able to correctly elaborate the shadows. a phone has a small sensor, thus all the job in those details comes down to the software and the hdr function.
@@game9370x Whether the lens is a zoom lens or a prime makes no difference to the shadows. The only thing that affects how shadows appear is how good the lenses’ contrast is, which is unrelated to if it is a zoom or a prime.
I've seen countless S23 Ultra's Camera reviews and none of the photos taken by the other reviewers compare to the the photos taken by Tom. This actually confirms the fact that, it's not the camera it's the photographer!! Amazing review Tom, now I'm tempted to move on from my OP5T.
I've actually come to complain about how bad the video quality is on this video. It all looks like it's been shot on a 2012 phone. I'm watching on a 4k TV and it all looks very pixilated. Luckily I know the phones are good from other better image quality videos I've seen.
@@ItsTomRich I didn't mean it nastily mate, take it as constructive criticism. Maybe something to do with the quality rate you uploaded it as or something. Might be fine to watch on a phone maybe but on a full sized TV it renders it all useless as something to judge image quality by especially 👍🏻
The Samsung S23 Ultra is unbelievable! Some photos looked preferable than the Sony if you don't pixel peep too much. Something you dont get to hear a lot from smartphones. Great video!
That 200mp sensor from Samsung is really ahead of the game. Even the optical to digital zoom can compete the professional cam. It was a great review 👍🏼
Yeah 200 mp sensor but you never tell the truth as we count the megapixelx in the the result photo, the real dimension of the photo so compare of the same resolution of photo ...
One thing I think some people have overlooked which is particularly important to myself, is that, to resolve all that extra detail, Samsung have quietly also upgraded the lens, not the specs, but the quality. The refraction (spots) from lights in night shots, is noticeably improved and the overall natural sharpness in RAW shots seems improved. That, along with the overhauled speaker system and microphones, tells me Samsung are more focused on pushing the more marketable material. I personally think improved speakers/microphones on such a device, is a big deal! Especially as a content consumer/creator.
@@joelconolly5574 how ? Is there a setting for lowering down the sharpening? And if you say that I can even reduce noise reduction on the night shots, I'm gonna find you and give a bottle of nice whisky or rum! :D
It would be nice to compare unedited photos with both cameras set in RAW with matched shutter speed; ISO and aperture as well as the an edited side by side to see where the strengths and weaknesses truly are between the hardware/software sets.
@@bigherb That 99% are not the ones watching this kind of video, the ones that are looking at comparisons like this want to know details like the ones OP is asking for
so you're telling me you wanna cripple one of the main advantages that the phone has for the sake of "fairness" ? in that case we should only use like 10% of the pro camera's sensor to make it fair.@@ChaosRune
Рік тому
Why? it's super obvious which photo is the proper camera, colours alone give it away
That's quite pointless endeavor, considering RAW images, as the name implies, are just raw data that need to be processed; i.e. edited. Besides, apertures are not directly comparable either. Smaller sensor means smaller physical aperture, f1.4 would be more like f10 on a full frame camera (can't bother to calculate this exactly, but you get the point).
Agree with you 100%. Over the past 3 years I haven't taken my DSLR on vacation for this same reason, our pocket phones are nearly as good with less work to get good results.
This is crazy. I can't believe how well the s23 ultra holds up. The framing and composure also is key, which you nailed. (I wish I had the pixel 6a, or any free phone at that)
The Pixel 6a is such a good phone for the price... I have been using it as my secondary phone with my S22 Ultra as my primary phone. The Pixel 6a excels in battery life, I can routinely get more than 2 days of battery life if I'm not gaming (way smoother compared to my S10), has no bloatware, and absolutely love the "listening now" feature on it!
@@Jabrosky I never even knew that feature existed on pixels till I got it, and the speech to text/translation I use daily and Absolutely love these features!
Wow, what a fascinating review! Your comparison of the S23 Ultra's photography capabilities to a professional $5000 camera was truly eye-opening. I appreciate how you presented your findings in a clear and concise manner, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each device. Your side-by-side comparisons of the images and videos captured by both cameras were extremely helpful in showing just how capable the S23 Ultra is in producing high-quality content. Your expert analysis has not only provided valuable insights but also helped me make an informed decision when it comes to investing in a camera. Thank you for such an informative and thought-provoking video review, keep up the great work!
I have upgraded from the S21U to the S23U. The S23U is really the camera backpack for your pocket. The picture quality is awesome. The 50 MP mode is also interesting and the files aren't that huge. And there is still so much to try and discover in expert raw. Or film in 8k. Then you can also crop photos well. And the whole performance over all is so good. It's a real leap forward for Samsung.
One other consideration (more of a benefit to hobbyists, vloggers, etc.) is that when you pair the S23U to a handheld gimble stabilizer, you move the results slider even closer to the pro cameras. Additionally, the handheld phone gimbles are $100. While a decent gimble stabilizer for a D7500 is four to five times that much.
This makes me happy. I just got an S23U purely for photography. My daily phone is an iPhone 12 mini, which is sub-optimal for that, and all my research pointed to this Samsung slab being exactly what I need. You have confirmed that for me. Thanks!
Incredible how close the S23 gets to a professional camera! I'm curious how good these photos would be if the sensor was physically bigger, like even just twice as big
You'd run into sensor readout-speed limitations pretty fast. That's one reason professional cameras can't (yet) do a lot of the software-trickery cellphone cameras can. The Sony A7IV for example reads the sensor very slow (it's a budget/entry level camera), but even the Sony A1 flagship hovers around 15ms I think (in electronic shutter mode). It WILL be interesting to see what will be possible once APS-C and fullframe cameras have near-to-instantaneous readout. edit: then again; who knows what will be possible with tiny cellphone camera sensors then! :)
@@M0eRiyadh Not directly. The current BIONZ XR processing units in some Sony cameras for example are pretty beefy already (the A1 can handle up to 30 fullframe 50 MP images per second, which is pretty crazy), the limitations lie within the imaging sensor itself and the pipeline to the CPU as I understand it. Once you have read out let's say 12 or 30 or 50 MP of sensor data and the CPU goes to work, it doesn't really matter that much how large or small the sensor was. The amount and type of data is basically the same. I'm sure Sony BIONZ XR processors could run circles around a cellphones CPU but nevertheless it can't (yet) do what - for example - the S23 Ultra can achieve. But I'm not an expert, and I'm sure it's possible that Samsung is already doing some trickery before the image data has even left the pipeline to the CPU. Maybe there is some HDR processing already going on in that stage, just as the Canon C70 camcorder apparently does to boost dynamic range in certain modes...
@@finch-island I got a sony a7iv for my first camera and I've taken great pictures with it. Used a Viltrox 85mm lens which is surprisingly good for a 3rd party. I sold them all and now I'm trying to get the A7RV.
it depends what phone u have if u have 22 ultra or any new high end phone u should wait for another year cause like since this phone is first ever phone to have 200mp u never know s24 ultra next year gonna have better camera
I really like the 200MP. I'm not a good photographer, but I like taking photos. A lot of photos that would be throwaways are often saved by the 200MP camera because I can crop into the image without losing much details and change the look of it, which is can't do with the 12MP cameras I'm used to, because the quality quickly suffers. Obviously the answer to this is "just take better photos" but when I'm running and gunning with a phone, that often isn't an option, and being able to crop in without losing too much detail and saving the shot really helps.
It's astonishing how far we've come in terms of improving the capabilities of smaller cameras Im still using the iphone 5s and Galaxy s5 as my dailies, and it is absolutely insane how much of an advancement we made in a little over a decade
Yeah, it still works; it’s just a hobby of mine Using old phones haha I still have 4s as well; I can’t use that one though, but everything works on that one too still
I'm still using s8 plus. Not gonna change this phone for another 2 or 3 years. Hope I'll get the greatest phone that even s23 ultra would look less futuristic compared to my next phone.
Your photography-based phone reviews are a visual treat! The way you present the phone features through your lens helps consumers get a real sense of what to expect in terms of camera quality and versatility.🙌
Really excited to get the s23 Ultra. Upgrading from an S22 ultra, mostly because of the battery and UFS 4.0 fast storage. But the camera upgrade is going to be a big bonus!
I have been into photography for many years and have spent a ridiculous amount of cash on lenses, If I am photographing wildlife or air shows, I use the big white Canon lenses, but for everything else these days I usually use a smartphone, I always have it with me, the quality these days is awesome, and it takes seconds to take a pic or video and send it out there. They say the best camera is the one you have with you so you can get that unexpected unique shot, when you get it, it does not matter what it was taken on.
I bought the s23 ultra and I've been using it for a week and I have to say that the camera quality is amazing. I'm glad that it can compare even to professional cameras. Congrats for the great content!
Excellent job! This is a review I was hoping to see. I am a Nikon shooter but also have some Sony cameras and the one you have is a great camera! I will receive the S23 Ultra in a few days and purchased it primarily for photography and video usage. I am so impressed with the shots you got from it! TY and I will continue to follow your page.
I actually got the S23 ultra and I have been using it as my daily driver for the past 4 days..unfortunately, I have NOT been able to get out to fully test the camera yet - but this looks VERY promising.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts on the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra vs a $5000 pro camera. It's a fascinating topic that highlights the advancements in smartphone technology and how they're challenging traditional cameras. While it's true that smartphone cameras have come a long way in recent years, they still can't match the image quality and versatility of professional cameras. A pro camera is designed with a range of features and functions that allow for complete control over the image capture process, from the shutter speed and aperture to the lens and sensor size. That being said, the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra has some impressive features that make it a formidable competitor to a pro camera. Its high-resolution sensor, advanced autofocus system, and multiple lenses provide users with an incredible level of control and flexibility when it comes to capturing images. Ultimately, the choice between a smartphone camera and a pro camera will come down to your needs and preferences. If you're a professional photographer or someone who values the highest level of image quality and versatility, a pro camera will likely be the better option. But for most people, the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra will provide all the features and functions needed to capture stunning photos and videos.
nice for u to get the red one. The red one is only available through online order at Samsung Malaysia website. So i preordered a white one through one of the local retailer since i can get additional 1 year warranty and on top of that, i purchased additional warranty for it. All and all, i have 4 years warranty for the s23ultra.
@@neilmcguinness4422 You you are right and definitly you are a skilled photographer. I am simply comparing the quality of the photos, I know that taking a professional camera is not easy.
Lately I've learned to appreciate my phone as a daily walk around camera for some point and shoot street photography. Great to see the tech getting better and better!
I've been using my phone more than my Canon EOS D3 Mklll just because of weight. I still use the Canon for IndyCar races, weddings and wildlife. I'm too old, and have way too much invested in L glass, the switch to EOS R Pro camera now. So the S 23 Ultra fits the bill. After 2 days of playing with it, I'm in love
I think these camera advancements are great not just in ways most people expect. A friend of mine is visually impaired (I think classified as legally blind) and he uses cellphone cameras in place of digital magnifiers a lot of times
Thanks Tom for showing us the DSLR and S23 Ultra comparison. Hope to see more future content like this and also hopefully sample photos we can download and zoom in these photos too. keep up the good work
It's wild how far phone cameras have game. In the recent years I slowly stopped using my camera as much because it was more convenient to just take my phone out of my pocket vs carrying around my camera. Good video!!
The S23 Ultra is really good and it allows you to have all you need in a professional camera in your pocket. I still think professional cameras are not going to be replaced by smartphones anytime soon.
Great video, very interesting to see what the S23U can do. I have a Sony A7C with Tamron 28-200mm and also a Samsung S21U. The Sony auto uploads to my google photos, along with the phone pics, and for me the differnce in quality is very apparant even without zooming in. I think the main factors are the natral bokeh, lack of over-sharpening (while actually resolving more detail) and more natltral colours. Looks like the S23U has improved things further but still a little way off in my opinion.
I have had the chance to do my own tests on the s23 ultra, and let me just say... WOW! The night mode is amazing! It's like having night vision, the phone could see better in the dark than my actual eyes! I was walking around a pitch black room and I could use the camera to see. Very impressive. The 200mp camera looks amazing. The detail and amount of times you can zoom in on a photo and still get a clear image shocked me. 100x zoom of the s22 ultra lives on as well! The phone felt great, quality yet not heavy in the hand. It has a very clean look, the sides have a bit less roundness than the s22 ultra, as it has a bit of a flat spot on the sides which I think is handy for gripping the phone steadily. The s-pen was amazing as always, the phone was smooth and fast like the top of the line phone it is, and the selfie camera made me look great! Can't wait to get my own, and I highly recommend going in-store to feel the demos. You'll be impressed. Hope this helps!
I would be very interested if the 200MP pictures in sunlight can beat the details of the Sony shots because theoretically, with enough light, it should be able to retain more information.
Wow, really loved this camera comparison with my favorite combination (The Galaxy S23 Ultra and the Sony A7 V) can't wait to get my S23 U to capture some amazing content with.
Just bought the s22u two weeks before the s23u launch. Got it 500e cheaper than the s23u with the same memory. The camera upgrades are really impressive on the s23u and I would've waited for it but it turned out to be pretty expensive in the EU. Anyways, I feel like the way most people use the photos they take on their phones, the camera upgrades in mobile phones have been pretty insignificant for years already.
It's really amazing how the phone industry keeps improving when it comes to camera performance in comparison to professional camera, the evolution of tech 🙌🏾🙌🏾🔥
Is this a sponsored video? Really, because so much nonsense is going on here. 1- By comparing photos side by side, you are effectively showing us 540x405 pixel snapshots on a FHD monitor. Saying one is better one is sharper blah and blah. At that 0.2M target resolution, I can take exact pictures with an old S4 mini, run through lightroom to match color grading and add some NR, and it'd be indistinguishable from S23 or A7IV or even A7RV images. 2- WHY does everyone compare phone-vs-camera with two sub-par zoom lenses? If we are comparing versitility, put one single 24-240 to the camera, and do "fair" daily device vs device comparisone. If we are comparing two "systems" in image quality, night performance, then put an Sigma ART 24mm f/1.4 prime lens and then compare with its 23mm main camera. Put a 50mm f/1.4 to compare 2x 85mm for 3x.Because *NO* photographer (amateur or professional) will "prefer" taking an f/4 zoom lens for low-light photography or top image quality is required. Most will RENT faster prime lenses before going to a pre-planned shooting with that sorry thing. TBH, we all know the reason here: At 8:24, you've clearly demonstrated the 200MP main sensor/lens doesn't resolve much more than 12MPs even at optimal lighting conditions. Sigma ART is not only faster lens (which will drop ISO or speed up shutter on camera more), its sharp enough to optically resolve ALL 33MP of an A7IV's sensor, and camera will keep doing this at crazy high ISOs. So "Goliath completely destroying David as expected" wouldn't be a fun video isn't it? No shame here, we are comparing phone's f/1.7 lens on 72mm2 sensor vs f1.4 lens on 862mm2 full frame sensor. 3- You're just wrong (or terribly biased) about night mode explanations. Phone's don't go THAT low in shutter speeds. I've listed my entire phone picture library (comprised of a dozen phones) by shutter speed (just out of curiosity) and lowest (non-manual) shutter speed I have is on a dark beach, 1/5 seconds at 12k ISO (and picture is still terribly underexposed). Lowest shutter speed in a cityscape like that is 1/13. Question is WHY on earth do you need a tripod for this? We are talking about a pretty wide 24mm focal length here, with just a little extra care, you can use an 80 year old film camera to take razor sharp photos at ~1/15 (at 24mm focal length). ANY half-modern camera made in last 10 years (even entry models with their dirt cheap kit lenses) have at least as capable optical stabilisation as a phone. My 12 year old D800 with its 24-70 Tamron has 5 stops of OS, theoratically allowing me as low as 1-second shots hand held. Granted I'd need 3-4 shots to get a really sharp one at 1/2 or lower, but that is EXACTLY what phone does behind the scenes. Burst shoot many photos then pick the least shaky one, then apply NR/sharpening/color effects. With your A7IV, your body has 5.5 stops of in-body sensor-shift stabilisation plus, 4 stops of optical stabilisation in that 24-105 f/4 G OSS lens. Phones have tested have like 2 stops of OIS at best, If you really need a tripod to match a phone's shutter speeds with that setup, well... I'll just say problem is neither the camera nor phone. Don't get me wrong, I WANT phones to get as good as to proper cameras. I want to leave my gear at home and not regret my decision everytime I find something beautiful to photograph. But as you've demonstrated, even with wrong lens, we have to be careful in our "editorial choices" to claim they are "almost similar". With correct lens for the correct scene, Comparing an S24 Ultra to any modern full frame device is like comparing a webcam to an S24 Ultra. Only half-valid point you have is about phone's doing auto editing in software. Half-valid, because cameras can do editing too, its just phones can do it better.
I think that for the amateur photographer or camera enthusiast, they would go for the S22 ultra over a modern DSLR camera simply for the processing and ease of use.
I'm a camera enthusiast and will always choose my full frame mirrorless camera(mirrorless being the current & future technology, don't think camera tech is standing still!), cheers 👍
Photography is always based on personal preferences. Camera phones continue to move forwards in development. Nobody wants to carry around a heavy camera. I just purchased S23 and A33. Its disappointing to see the phones are made in vietnam. I dislike Apple products.
Love that smartphones grow more capable by the year and they never fail to disappoint with innovation. they use the trial and error to get the perfect balance between a brilliant camera and a wildly user friendly one that's easily integrated into a smartphone users day to day lifestyle. Love the vid man and goodluck to everyone with the pixel competition :)
In my opinion this comparison sucks a little bit, because youre lenses only have f4. With a Sony 50mm f1.2 or 85mm f1.4 you get more light in the sensor and also a realy blurry background. Meiner Meinung nach hinkt dieser Vergleich ein wenig, weil deine Objektive nur f4 haben. Mit einem Sony 50mm f1.2 oder 85mm f1.4 bekommt man mehr Licht auf den Sensor und auch einen wirklich unscharfen Hintergrund.
I really love tom's phone and pro camera comparison, it just shows that you don't need a expensive camera to get nice photos even with a phone and creativity you can create art.
i prefer the more subtle and natural camera look without the processing (specifically the sharpness and hdr) so i tend to use the pro mode in the camera app as my defacto everyday shooting mode. auto shutter and iso with exposure slightly tuned down rather than the fully automated photo mode. it's much harder to differentiate which shots are from a dedicated camera that way.
I took a photography class a year and a bit ago and I haven't been able to let myself take a bad photo. I loved taking photos to capture memories and I've filled up my phone for a few months. It's funny that phones have evolved so much that they can even be on par with a camera.
Truly great review! Nice to see a professional camera comparison. It can get a bit confusing with all the phone reviews. Am happy to have found you, will have to catch up on your videos. Tempted for the S23 Ultra, but can't justify it at the moment. Maybe the S24 Ultra will be perfect. I saw the pixel 7 instore the other day, so will watch your 6 + 7 reviews. Even the Pixel 6 would be an improvement for me, as my old Android is out of updates. Best wishes to you Tom 🙂
It's really crazy how our mobile devices are slowly replacing the necessity of most of the devices we used to spend a lot on. All in all the Samsung S23 ultra looks really good on paper.
yet none of these comparision channels are not using smartphones to make these videos. these are only just for content like phone vs camera but they never use phone as main camera
Awesome video! Did you try the pro mode in S23 ultra and compare that to a regular camera? I’m not sure, but you might not get the over sharpened/contrast images that you get by default.
Night mode photography on phone still isn't good enough yet. Nightmode pics always looks like painting to me. I hope pixel 8 does something about it. Awesome comparison video 👍 keep up the good work 👍
I' ve got amazed not only at Samsung Galaxy s23 ultra performance but also at how fast you speak and how easy is to understand you. You could be a great English teacher for non native speakers!!!👌👌👌
No doubt, the Samsung S23 ultra is a massive upgrade from several Android phones. Hoping to get one myself soon. I really can't wait to check out all this amazing features
Pretty amazing that the Samsung somewhat compares to big professional cameras. The zoom in particular has been especially impressive since the S20 ultra
I like that you are a guy that's so young and completely in photography world that you are an expert already, and that you view smartphone cameras as something that's not part of your daily life. That makes you able to be amazed by smartphone camera features that we all take for granted nowadays. I like seeing my daily device from a different perspective. Seems almost like magic compared to standard professional DSLR camera equipment.
Let's be real, DSLRs are still the gold standard when it comes to image quality and manual control. But, I gotta say, smartphone cameras have seriously stepped up their game in recent years. I mean, have you seen some of the amazing photos people are taking with their phones?! Your level of attention to detail and the thought you put in your work consistently impresses me, and I always look forward to your most recent content. Thank you for being such an incredible resource for anyone trying to decide between DSLRs and smartphones. Keep up the great work.
So glad this video helped me find your channel. No only a excellent video but even the comments section seems to have a professional or mature stance. After missing my note 10 for a while I held out on the s22 and pre-ordered the s23 ultra. After hearing how the new chipset would be quite a bit more advanced than the 22. Now knowing how the camera is measuring up is really quite fulfilling.. well helps me justify my purchase anyways 😉 fingers crossed for a pixel for my son 🤞
It's difficult to compare the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra to a professional camera that costs $5,000 because they serve different purposes and have different capabilities. The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra is a smartphone with a powerful camera that can take high-quality photos and videos. It has a quad-camera setup with a 200 MP primary camera, a periscope telephoto lens with 10x optical zoom, a telephoto lens with 3x optical zoom, and an ultrawide lens with a 120˚ field of view. It can shoot up to 8K video at 24 or 30 frames per second and has features such as auto-HDR, panorama, and super steady video. On the other hand, a professional camera that costs $5,000 would likely have even more advanced features and capabilities, such as interchangeable lenses, larger sensors, and more manual controls for adjusting settings such as shutter speed, aperture, and ISO. It may also be more durable and able to withstand harsher environments or shooting conditions. Ultimately, whether the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra or a $5,000 pro camera is the better option depends on your specific needs and preferences. For most casual photographers or videographers, the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra's camera will likely be more than sufficient, while professional photographers and videographers may require the more advanced capabilities of a dedicated camera.
Very interesting comparison. Certain things, like separation, will always be hard to do perfectly in software. But it's impressive to see just how much the gap has been closed between smartphones and cameras.
Seems a pretty good upgrade over the S22. However I prefer the colour tones on the Sony more. Insane amount of details in the shots though! Would be interesting to hear your thoughts on how the Samsung compares to the Pixel 7, especially photography wise. Great video!
Very nice, I have the Sony A7iii and the Galaxy S23 Ultra, and I'm amazed by this phone! The Sony still has this distinctive contrast/pop up look, but the AI on phones is improving very fast...
Though I am a big advocate for greater technology in smartphone cameras, I still think that they are a long way away from being a perfect substitute or alternative to a professional camera. Mainly geometry, lens interchangeability, reliability and editing flexibility just aren't on equal grounds yet, mostly due to the over-reliance on software over optics and hardware. For video especially the gap is substantially larger - colour science goes out the window, everything is fuzzy and dynamic range suffers severely. Without perfect lighting setups I have found that they are quite often unusable, though they are perfect (with the right lighting setups) for indoor work, for say, streamers or UA-camrs. The thing with a camera is, if you're doing it right, it's going to come out right. You may need extra equipment, say, a tripod, a star-tracker, good lighting, lenses, filters etc. or maybe even custom camera software to bring the most out of it for film-making, but at the end of the day it is still the best option, in my opinion. I will say, however, I am not a fan of all the new super-high resolution sensors that are coming out as someone that enjoys working at night. Moreover, for price vs. performance, I would still choose a mid-tier DSLR with a 50mm f1.8 lens over any smartphone of a similar price. It would be nice if you could demonstrate these two options in a serious setting, taking each on a dedicated photoshoot in challenging but likely conditions for photographers (i.e. at night) pushing the editing flexibility of each option much further. That is where I have never found a suitable smartphone option for the work that I do at night with continuous RGB lighting, as all options I have tried struggle to pick up enough detail than even my old Canon 800D, or worse yet, Nikon D3100 which is an entry-level camera from over 12 years ago. I understand that it's different for average consumers who are looking to buy a phone that HAS a good camera, but if I am to spend £1000+ on a smartphone FOR its camera, I think I would still prefer a Fuji or a Sony. And despite everything I hear about convenience, I remain hardly bothered to use my phone to take photos when I know I will get a better result from my camera.
The Sony camera gives you a raw image with excellent details for professionals to edit and processed it afterwards. The S23 Ultra is for the layman who doesn't want to go through all the steps so the phone does everything for you. However, you end up having less control of the final image and especially in zoom shots there is significantly less details.
At the end of the video you talked about night shot mentioning that you need tripod for professional camera to get good results. That is correct for long exposure. However phone takes reasonably long (or short) exposure and combine multiple exposures in one picture, as most of us know that. My point here is that Canon introduced the same principle in 2012. called handheld night scene in their DSLR line starting with EOS 650D if I remember correctly. So for more than 10 years we can take night scene without tripod and it works pretty good - I have used it. To be precise, it make low light photography much better, but it is not long exposure.
Back when screens weren't as good as they are today, I could barely notice the differences between smartphones and professional cameras. But now you can tell very easily
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Yooo guys, I just released my best Lightroom presets ever (if I do say so myself lol) 🙏 you can get them at the top link in the description and if you see this you can use code SUB15 to get a cheeky discount! Thanks for all the support 🙌🏻
Hello
@@gigahertzmedia hi
Can you do videos on how to use certain settings on the camera s22 for best lighting
@@360Adventures1 like astrophotography taking raw
👋🏼
I cannot believe that that small lens in Samsung gives such great details.
Zoom is great
It actually doesn't, there's actually tons of over-sharpening done and that's why it'll always be a smartphone cam 👍🏿
I'm not saying it doesn't look good, though.
@@xslvrxslwt but the oversharpening could be solved by the software that caused it in the first place. The reason why smartphone shots are so oversharpened because the normies like it. Just like the pumped up contrast on Smartphones.
@@xslvrxslwt No oversharpening or not. The image quality out of the 200 MP mode. Have a very high quality and information.
The HDR colors is a big giveaway. I prefer natural colors of a DSLR sometimes but it's hard to beat a camera that you always have in a pocket.
Yup. Samsung is kinda infamous for that overexposure pictures so it's quite easy to pick the right one out.
@@sleepyearth tbf the comparison on those very high contrast pictures wassn't that fair. he should've either disabled the hdr function on the s23 ultra or used a fixed lens on the a7. having a full frame with a zoom lens increases the quality of shadows, increasing the already present advantage of the bigger sensor. if he shot that pic with a fixed lens and the hdr disabled on the s23, the pictures would've looked way more similar, bringing the comparison down to the software being able to correctly elaborate the shadows. a phone has a small sensor, thus all the job in those details comes down to the software and the hdr function.
@@game9370x Whether the lens is a zoom lens or a prime makes no difference to the shadows. The only thing that affects how shadows appear is how good the lenses’ contrast is, which is unrelated to if it is a zoom or a prime.
.
Those times are frequent. I never carry a DSLR in my pocket.
I've seen countless S23 Ultra's Camera reviews and none of the photos taken by the other reviewers compare to the the photos taken by Tom. This actually confirms the fact that, it's not the camera it's the photographer!!
Amazing review Tom, now I'm tempted to move on from my OP5T.
I've actually come to complain about how bad the video quality is on this video. It all looks like it's been shot on a 2012 phone. I'm watching on a 4k TV and it all looks very pixilated. Luckily I know the phones are good from other better image quality videos I've seen.
Thanks so much dude 🥹
agree
@@ItsTomRich I didn't mean it nastily mate, take it as constructive criticism. Maybe something to do with the quality rate you uploaded it as or something. Might be fine to watch on a phone maybe but on a full sized TV it renders it all useless as something to judge image quality by especially 👍🏻
@@moss1066 This was shot on my Sony FX30 and Sony FX6 so I highly doubt the quality is bad bro haha. It’s more likely to be your internet
The Samsung S23 Ultra is unbelievable! Some photos looked preferable than the Sony if you don't pixel peep too much. Something you dont get to hear a lot from smartphones. Great video!
What’s pixel peep?
@@3Kiwiana means looking closely to the point where u can see actual pixels
I remember thinking the 2MP camera in my old LG C2200 was the coolest thing ever back in 2005.. How times has changed.
man i loved my LG enV2
But of course I thank LG top of QLED TV the best in TV industry.
Glad they quit the smartphone.
@@specialcookday 😥 i love lg smartphones.
i use a lg g8 right now and have a hard time finding another phone that can replace it.
@Tushar Ahmed hah, I didnt even remember that. I must have mixed it up with some other old Samsung SGH phone.
Now it's 100 times more lol
That 200mp sensor from Samsung is really ahead of the game. Even the optical to digital zoom can compete the professional cam. It was a great review 👍🏼
Yeah 200 mp sensor but you never tell the truth as we count the megapixelx in the the result photo, the real dimension of the photo so compare of the same resolution of photo ...
Am so late 😭❤nice video tho
@@lavluvlovye, I know most people see images on their phones but an image taken with your phone viewed on a monitor looks okay at best
One thing I think some people have overlooked which is particularly important to myself, is that, to resolve all that extra detail, Samsung have quietly also upgraded the lens, not the specs, but the quality. The refraction (spots) from lights in night shots, is noticeably improved and the overall natural sharpness in RAW shots seems improved. That, along with the overhauled speaker system and microphones, tells me Samsung are more focused on pushing the more marketable material. I personally think improved speakers/microphones on such a device, is a big deal! Especially as a content consumer/creator.
Well, I would love to see much less sharpening applied both in raws and jpgs.
The new mics are incredible!! Definitely going to mention this in my full review
Omg yes thank you
@@azjarosz you can lower it down.
@@joelconolly5574 how ? Is there a setting for lowering down the sharpening? And if you say that I can even reduce noise reduction on the night shots, I'm gonna find you and give a bottle of nice whisky or rum! :D
It would be nice to compare unedited photos with both cameras set in RAW with matched shutter speed; ISO and aperture as well as the an edited side by side to see where the strengths and weaknesses truly are between the hardware/software sets.
wouldn't really be reflective of real life results since 99% of users would keep the computational photography features on
@@bigherb That 99% are not the ones watching this kind of video, the ones that are looking at comparisons like this want to know details like the ones OP is asking for
so you're telling me you wanna cripple one of the main advantages that the phone has for the sake of "fairness" ? in that case we should only use like 10% of the pro camera's sensor to make it fair.@@ChaosRune
Why? it's super obvious which photo is the proper camera, colours alone give it away
That's quite pointless endeavor, considering RAW images, as the name implies, are just raw data that need to be processed; i.e. edited.
Besides, apertures are not directly comparable either. Smaller sensor means smaller physical aperture, f1.4 would be more like f10 on a full frame camera (can't bother to calculate this exactly, but you get the point).
It's crazy how much better smartphones have gotten over the years. Great video!!
@Brandon Gant true. I bet the smartphone tech nowadays already existed before 2012
Talk too much. We need picture comparisons!
nokia 808
As a hobbyist photographer, this is the time of content I was looking for as I just preordered my S23.
Same here. Its nice to have a B camera that can take excellent photos almost as well as my Sonys (in some cases better).
Same!!
the S23 camera looks so good compared to the S22. Dang it is getting closer to the pro cameras pretty quickly. Thanks so much for the comparison!
Giants like Samsung and Sony invest huge amount of money into these small sensors.
@@20puskinas1992 Samsony
Agree with you 100%. Over the past 3 years I haven't taken my DSLR on vacation for this same reason, our pocket phones are nearly as good with less work to get good results.
No... Please shut up
This is crazy. I can't believe how well the s23 ultra holds up. The framing and composure also is key, which you nailed. (I wish I had the pixel 6a, or any free phone at that)
Lol scammers will flock to any mention of free phones
The Pixel 6a is such a good phone for the price... I have been using it as my secondary phone with my S22 Ultra as my primary phone. The Pixel 6a excels in battery life, I can routinely get more than 2 days of battery life if I'm not gaming (way smoother compared to my S10), has no bloatware, and absolutely love the "listening now" feature on it!
@@johnliu6855 the now listening is one of the biggest reasons I want to switch to pixel
@@Jabrosky I never even knew that feature existed on pixels till I got it, and the speech to text/translation I use daily and Absolutely love these features!
@@RennieAsh yup Piss All sucks
Its just insane how good the phones got over the years
Not really
@@zulfika_ why
Wow, what a fascinating review! Your comparison of the S23 Ultra's photography capabilities to a professional $5000 camera was truly eye-opening. I appreciate how you presented your findings in a clear and concise manner, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each device. Your side-by-side comparisons of the images and videos captured by both cameras were extremely helpful in showing just how capable the S23 Ultra is in producing high-quality content. Your expert analysis has not only provided valuable insights but also helped me make an informed decision when it comes to investing in a camera. Thank you for such an informative and thought-provoking video review, keep up the great work!
Yeah, let's put the camera company's out of business ..and put people out of work as well
Closer and closer until you want a poster print.
I have upgraded from the S21U to the S23U. The S23U is really the camera backpack for your pocket. The picture quality is awesome. The 50 MP mode is also interesting and the files aren't that huge. And there is still so much to try and discover in expert raw. Or film in 8k. Then you can also crop photos well. And the whole performance over all is so good. It's a real leap forward for Samsung.
How does it compare to the s21 I'm trading mine in
@@aiming2shoot A "normal" S21, or Ultra?
Plus you get the S Pen for free with Bluetooth
@@aiming2shoot way better and you don't get Robbed of $60+ for the Inferior S Pen without Bluetooth on S23 Ultra
It's amazing how in just a few years, mobile phone cameras have evolved so much.😮
One other consideration (more of a benefit to hobbyists, vloggers, etc.) is that when you pair the S23U to a handheld gimble stabilizer, you move the results slider even closer to the pro cameras. Additionally, the handheld phone gimbles are $100. While a decent gimble stabilizer for a D7500 is four to five times that much.
This makes me happy. I just got an S23U purely for photography. My daily phone is an iPhone 12 mini, which is sub-optimal for that, and all my research pointed to this Samsung slab being exactly what I need. You have confirmed that for me. Thanks!
Incredible how close the S23 gets to a professional camera! I'm curious how good these photos would be if the sensor was physically bigger, like even just twice as big
You'd run into sensor readout-speed limitations pretty fast. That's one reason professional cameras can't (yet) do a lot of the software-trickery cellphone cameras can. The Sony A7IV for example reads the sensor very slow (it's a budget/entry level camera), but even the Sony A1 flagship hovers around 15ms I think (in electronic shutter mode). It WILL be interesting to see what will be possible once APS-C and fullframe cameras have near-to-instantaneous readout. edit: then again; who knows what will be possible with tiny cellphone camera sensors then! :)
@@finch-island would such issue be kinda resolved if they had a beefier processing unit?
@@M0eRiyadh Not directly. The current BIONZ XR processing units in some Sony cameras for example are pretty beefy already (the A1 can handle up to 30 fullframe 50 MP images per second, which is pretty crazy), the limitations lie within the imaging sensor itself and the pipeline to the CPU as I understand it. Once you have read out let's say 12 or 30 or 50 MP of sensor data and the CPU goes to work, it doesn't really matter that much how large or small the sensor was. The amount and type of data is basically the same. I'm sure Sony BIONZ XR processors could run circles around a cellphones CPU but nevertheless it can't (yet) do what - for example - the S23 Ultra can achieve. But I'm not an expert, and I'm sure it's possible that Samsung is already doing some trickery before the image data has even left the pipeline to the CPU. Maybe there is some HDR processing already going on in that stage, just as the Canon C70 camcorder apparently does to boost dynamic range in certain modes...
ua-cam.com/video/rZm4gg5CvWc/v-deo.html&ab_channel=Xiaomi
@@finch-island I got a sony a7iv for my first camera and I've taken great pictures with it. Used a Viltrox 85mm lens which is surprisingly good for a 3rd party. I sold them all and now I'm trying to get the A7RV.
I'm actually impressed with the specs on the Samsung S23 ultra, it's really fascinating
I'm soo tempted to get the s23 ultra. Those pictures looks so good for such a tiny sensor.
it depends what phone u have if u have 22 ultra or any new high end phone u should wait for another year cause like since this phone is first ever phone to have 200mp u never know s24 ultra next year gonna have better camera
i will buy it in this year.
I really like the 200MP. I'm not a good photographer, but I like taking photos. A lot of photos that would be throwaways are often saved by the 200MP camera because I can crop into the image without losing much details and change the look of it, which is can't do with the 12MP cameras I'm used to, because the quality quickly suffers. Obviously the answer to this is "just take better photos" but when I'm running and gunning with a phone, that often isn't an option, and being able to crop in without losing too much detail and saving the shot really helps.
It's astonishing how far we've come in terms of improving the capabilities of smaller cameras
Im still using the iphone 5s and Galaxy s5 as my dailies, and it is absolutely insane how much of an advancement we made in a little over a decade
Galaxy S5 have a very good camera. And I have s22 ultra.
Really?
IPhone 5s? lmao.
Yeah, it still works; it’s just a hobby of mine
Using old phones haha
I still have 4s as well; I can’t use that one though, but everything works on that one too still
I'm still using s8 plus. Not gonna change this phone for another 2 or 3 years. Hope I'll get the greatest phone that even s23 ultra would look less futuristic compared to my next phone.
We've come a long way with cameras on smartphones it's honestly insane
Wow, S23 Ultra seems to do more than enough for any non-professional photography enthusiast
Thanks for this great comparison
Your photography-based phone reviews are a visual treat! The way you present the phone features through your lens helps consumers get a real sense of what to expect in terms of camera quality and versatility.🙌
I never thought that one day smartphone cameras be that good compared with professional cameras.
I love s23 ultra.
This is crazy, I cant believe that small lens in Samsung give such great details. The framing and composure also is key, which you nailed.
Really excited to get the s23 Ultra. Upgrading from an S22 ultra, mostly because of the battery and UFS 4.0 fast storage. But the camera upgrade is going to be a big bonus!
The new cpu is gonna make everything a lot more efficient too
Does it really translate to real-life usage changes though? On paper, maybe, but does it warrant the upgrade?
@@trilla63 It is a significant upgrade, but personally s22u to s23u is a stupid upgrade.
Waisted money , sorry to say so...
@@joemama7388 couldn't agree more with you. To soon upgrade.
I have been into photography for many years and have spent a ridiculous amount of cash on lenses, If I am photographing wildlife or air shows, I use the big white Canon lenses, but for everything else these days I usually use a smartphone, I always have it with me, the quality these days is awesome, and it takes seconds to take a pic or video and send it out there. They say the best camera is the one you have with you so you can get that unexpected unique shot, when you get it, it does not matter what it was taken on.
I bought the s23 ultra and I've been using it for a week and I have to say that the camera quality is amazing. I'm glad that it can compare even to professional cameras. Congrats for the great content!
How did you get it? Isnt it releasing in 17th?
@@ferdoushridoy1021 i preordered it and it arrived on February 3rd
Lots of preorders have delivered early, I got mine on Tuesday
@@ferdoushridoy1021 I think these applies to folks that aren't in the US
@@TheBeatboxHitmanTwo isnt s23 releasing on 17th globally?
Excellent job! This is a review I was hoping to see. I am a Nikon shooter but also have some Sony cameras and the one you have is a great camera! I will receive the S23 Ultra in a few days and purchased it primarily for photography and video usage. I am so impressed with the shots you got from it! TY and I will continue to follow your page.
I actually got the S23 ultra and I have been using it as my daily driver for the past 4 days..unfortunately, I have NOT been able to get out to fully test the camera yet - but this looks VERY promising.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts on the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra vs a $5000 pro camera. It's a fascinating topic that highlights the advancements in smartphone technology and how they're challenging traditional cameras.
While it's true that smartphone cameras have come a long way in recent years, they still can't match the image quality and versatility of professional cameras. A pro camera is designed with a range of features and functions that allow for complete control over the image capture process, from the shutter speed and aperture to the lens and sensor size.
That being said, the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra has some impressive features that make it a formidable competitor to a pro camera. Its high-resolution sensor, advanced autofocus system, and multiple lenses provide users with an incredible level of control and flexibility when it comes to capturing images.
Ultimately, the choice between a smartphone camera and a pro camera will come down to your needs and preferences. If you're a professional photographer or someone who values the highest level of image quality and versatility, a pro camera will likely be the better option. But for most people, the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra will provide all the features and functions needed to capture stunning photos and videos.
Hi, chatgpt
I just pre-order my S23 Ultra (Red), and I'm blown away by your comparation! However, I think a camara will always be better!
Excellent Vid!
nice for u to get the red one. The red one is only available through online order at Samsung Malaysia website. So i preordered a white one through one of the local retailer since i can get additional 1 year warranty and on top of that, i purchased additional warranty for it. All and all, i have 4 years warranty for the s23ultra.
@@neilmcguinness4422 You you are right and definitly you are a skilled photographer. I am simply comparing the quality of the photos, I know that taking a professional camera is not easy.
Lately I've learned to appreciate my phone as a daily walk around camera for some point and shoot street photography. Great to see the tech getting better and better!
It is honestly insane how close the S23 is to the camera
I've been using my phone more than my Canon EOS D3 Mklll just because of weight. I still use the Canon for IndyCar races, weddings and wildlife. I'm too old, and have way too much invested in L glass, the switch to EOS R Pro camera now. So the S 23 Ultra fits the bill. After 2 days of playing with it, I'm in love
S23 Ultra camera system is mind blowing🔥
Great video, keep it up!
I think these camera advancements are great not just in ways most people expect. A friend of mine is visually impaired (I think classified as legally blind) and he uses cellphone cameras in place of digital magnifiers a lot of times
Woah this is so cool!! Thank you for sharing
I really never expected the camera to be such an improvement that's quite the feat
I was able to tell the difference on all the pics, but yes, they are getting better and better, and my phone covers my photos needs 90% of the time.
The improvements on the S23 cameras are insane
6:44 that s23 portrait mode is so satisfying to look at! I have no idea about photography techniques, but that photo quality is world class to me 😂.
Thanks Tom for showing us the DSLR and S23 Ultra comparison. Hope to see more future content like this and also hopefully sample photos we can download and zoom in these photos too. keep up the good work
That's not a DSLR🤦
@@sreejanspov :D :D :D
The s23 ultra is fantastic but there is a lot of work to be done in order to match Dslr camera especially in video
s23 ultra seems to be ticking all the right boxes everywhere
It's wild how far phone cameras have game. In the recent years I slowly stopped using my camera as much because it was more convenient to just take my phone out of my pocket vs carrying around my camera. Good video!!
The S23 Ultra is really good and it allows you to have all you need in a professional camera in your pocket. I still think professional cameras are not going to be replaced by smartphones anytime soon.
Great video, very interesting to see what the S23U can do.
I have a Sony A7C with Tamron 28-200mm and also a Samsung S21U. The Sony auto uploads to my google photos, along with the phone pics, and for me the differnce in quality is very apparant even without zooming in.
I think the main factors are the natral bokeh, lack of over-sharpening (while actually resolving more detail) and more natltral colours.
Looks like the S23U has improved things further but still a little way off in my opinion.
I have had the chance to do my own tests on the s23 ultra, and let me just say... WOW! The night mode is amazing! It's like having night vision, the phone could see better in the dark than my actual eyes! I was walking around a pitch black room and I could use the camera to see. Very impressive. The 200mp camera looks amazing. The detail and amount of times you can zoom in on a photo and still get a clear image shocked me. 100x zoom of the s22 ultra lives on as well! The phone felt great, quality yet not heavy in the hand. It has a very clean look, the sides have a bit less roundness than the s22 ultra, as it has a bit of a flat spot on the sides which I think is handy for gripping the phone steadily. The s-pen was amazing as always, the phone was smooth and fast like the top of the line phone it is, and the selfie camera made me look great! Can't wait to get my own, and I highly recommend going in-store to feel the demos. You'll be impressed. Hope this helps!
Please can you get me one please. I'm still using a old chappy Tecno spark 4 please I beg 😭🙏🙏
Man those results are insane. Crazy how far smartphone cameras have come in the past decade!
Yea fantastic performance and becoming more reliable camera
Imagine how far samsung would go after 3 or 4 years lol. They've already gone too far with their products compared to other competitors.
Mind is blown. The S23 is absolutely phenomenal.
Awesome review.
I would be very interested if the 200MP pictures in sunlight can beat the details of the Sony shots because theoretically, with enough light, it should be able to retain more information.
Wow, really loved this camera comparison with my favorite combination (The Galaxy S23 Ultra and the Sony A7 V) can't wait to get my S23 U to capture some amazing content with.
s23 Ultra is much better than $5,000 Pro Camera now lol
are you blind?
Just bought the s22u two weeks before the s23u launch. Got it 500e cheaper than the s23u with the same memory. The camera upgrades are really impressive on the s23u and I would've waited for it but it turned out to be pretty expensive in the EU. Anyways, I feel like the way most people use the photos they take on their phones, the camera upgrades in mobile phones have been pretty insignificant for years already.
I bought the S23 ultra for £530 in the UK not that expensive
where on earth you get it for 530?! no way it came with a warranty for that price @@mohammedqasim7147
It's really amazing how the phone industry keeps improving when it comes to camera performance in comparison to professional camera, the evolution of tech 🙌🏾🙌🏾🔥
They are not improving, they are catching up, and they throw all the fake blur and oversharpen they can in the process, sadly.
Samsung s23 is a beast ! Loved the portrait photos and ultrawide😍
Is this a sponsored video? Really, because so much nonsense is going on here. 1- By comparing photos side by side, you are effectively showing us 540x405 pixel snapshots on a FHD monitor. Saying one is better one is sharper blah and blah. At that 0.2M target resolution, I can take exact pictures with an old S4 mini, run through lightroom to match color grading and add some NR, and it'd be indistinguishable from S23 or A7IV or even A7RV images.
2- WHY does everyone compare phone-vs-camera with two sub-par zoom lenses? If we are comparing versitility, put one single 24-240 to the camera, and do "fair" daily device vs device comparisone. If we are comparing two "systems" in image quality, night performance, then put an Sigma ART 24mm f/1.4 prime lens and then compare with its 23mm main camera. Put a 50mm f/1.4 to compare 2x 85mm for 3x.Because *NO* photographer (amateur or professional) will "prefer" taking an f/4 zoom lens for low-light photography or top image quality is required. Most will RENT faster prime lenses before going to a pre-planned shooting with that sorry thing. TBH, we all know the reason here: At 8:24, you've clearly demonstrated the 200MP main sensor/lens doesn't resolve much more than 12MPs even at optimal lighting conditions. Sigma ART is not only faster lens (which will drop ISO or speed up shutter on camera more), its sharp enough to optically resolve ALL 33MP of an A7IV's sensor, and camera will keep doing this at crazy high ISOs. So "Goliath completely destroying David as expected" wouldn't be a fun video isn't it? No shame here, we are comparing phone's f/1.7 lens on 72mm2 sensor vs f1.4 lens on 862mm2 full frame sensor.
3- You're just wrong (or terribly biased) about night mode explanations. Phone's don't go THAT low in shutter speeds. I've listed my entire phone picture library (comprised of a dozen phones) by shutter speed (just out of curiosity) and lowest (non-manual) shutter speed I have is on a dark beach, 1/5 seconds at 12k ISO (and picture is still terribly underexposed). Lowest shutter speed in a cityscape like that is 1/13. Question is WHY on earth do you need a tripod for this? We are talking about a pretty wide 24mm focal length here, with just a little extra care, you can use an 80 year old film camera to take razor sharp photos at ~1/15 (at 24mm focal length). ANY half-modern camera made in last 10 years (even entry models with their dirt cheap kit lenses) have at least as capable optical stabilisation as a phone. My 12 year old D800 with its 24-70 Tamron has 5 stops of OS, theoratically allowing me as low as 1-second shots hand held. Granted I'd need 3-4 shots to get a really sharp one at 1/2 or lower, but that is EXACTLY what phone does behind the scenes. Burst shoot many photos then pick the least shaky one, then apply NR/sharpening/color effects.
With your A7IV, your body has 5.5 stops of in-body sensor-shift stabilisation plus, 4 stops of optical stabilisation in that 24-105 f/4 G OSS lens. Phones have tested have like 2 stops of OIS at best, If you really need a tripod to match a phone's shutter speeds with that setup, well... I'll just say problem is neither the camera nor phone.
Don't get me wrong, I WANT phones to get as good as to proper cameras. I want to leave my gear at home and not regret my decision everytime I find something beautiful to photograph. But as you've demonstrated, even with wrong lens, we have to be careful in our "editorial choices" to claim they are "almost similar". With correct lens for the correct scene, Comparing an S24 Ultra to any modern full frame device is like comparing a webcam to an S24 Ultra.
Only half-valid point you have is about phone's doing auto editing in software. Half-valid, because cameras can do editing too, its just phones can do it better.
I would love to have an S23 Ultra.
Really impressed by how far smartphones have come along!
I think that for the amateur photographer or camera enthusiast, they would go for the S22 ultra over a modern DSLR camera simply for the processing and ease of use.
I'm a camera enthusiast and will always choose my full frame mirrorless camera(mirrorless being the current & future technology, don't think camera tech is standing still!), cheers 👍
Photography is always based on personal preferences. Camera phones continue to move forwards in development. Nobody wants to carry around a heavy camera. I just purchased S23 and A33. Its disappointing to see the phones are made in vietnam. I dislike Apple products.
The rate at which smartphone cameras are improving is so crazy!
Love that smartphones grow more capable by the year and they never fail to disappoint with innovation. they use the trial and error to get the perfect balance between a brilliant camera and a wildly user friendly one that's easily integrated into a smartphone users day to day lifestyle. Love the vid man and goodluck to everyone with the pixel competition :)
CAMERA BATTLE TIME 💥
can you do S23 Ultra and 14 Pro vs say a $1000-1500 camera + lens? would be interesting for comparison :)
Which Won
Why didn't you use raw mode on S23U or is that for full camera comparison?
I did talk about it at the end - but yeah I’ll go over it fully in my full review!
@Michael Lewandowski no overheating for me so far!
In my opinion this comparison sucks a little bit, because youre lenses only have f4. With a Sony 50mm f1.2 or 85mm f1.4 you get more light in the sensor and also a realy blurry background.
Meiner Meinung nach hinkt dieser Vergleich ein wenig, weil deine Objektive nur f4 haben. Mit einem Sony 50mm f1.2 oder 85mm f1.4 bekommt man mehr Licht auf den Sensor und auch einen wirklich unscharfen Hintergrund.
I really love tom's phone and pro camera comparison, it just shows that you don't need a expensive camera to get nice photos even with a phone and creativity you can create art.
Oh you don't? $1200 isn't expensive?
i prefer the more subtle and natural camera look without the processing (specifically the sharpness and hdr) so i tend to use the pro mode in the camera app as my defacto everyday shooting mode. auto shutter and iso with exposure slightly tuned down rather than the fully automated photo mode. it's much harder to differentiate which shots are from a dedicated camera that way.
I took a photography class a year and a bit ago and I haven't been able to let myself take a bad photo. I loved taking photos to capture memories and I've filled up my phone for a few months. It's funny that phones have evolved so much that they can even be on par with a camera.
Wow, S23 Ultra seems to do more than enough for any non-professional photography enthusiast. Thanks for this great comparison.
Truly great review!
Nice to see a professional camera comparison. It can get a bit confusing with all the phone reviews.
Am happy to have found you, will have to catch up on your videos.
Tempted for the S23 Ultra, but can't justify it at the moment.
Maybe the S24 Ultra will be perfect.
I saw the pixel 7 instore the other day, so will watch your 6 + 7 reviews.
Even the Pixel 6 would be an improvement for me, as my old Android is out of updates.
Best wishes to you Tom 🙂
I'm new on your channel but honestly I love your honesty on how you review and make everything clear and easy to understand. Kudos 👏
Had to watch to the end, a great comparison vid!
It's really crazy how our mobile devices are slowly replacing the necessity of most of the devices we used to spend a lot on.
All in all the Samsung S23 ultra looks really good on paper.
yet none of these comparision channels are not using smartphones to make these videos. these are only just for content like phone vs camera but they never use phone as main camera
Awesome video! Did you try the pro mode in S23 ultra and compare that to a regular camera? I’m not sure, but you might not get the over sharpened/contrast images that you get by default.
Night mode photography on phone still isn't good enough yet. Nightmode pics always looks like painting to me. I hope pixel 8 does something about it. Awesome comparison video 👍 keep up the good work 👍
Gcam
@@stx7389 Using Gcam on flagship phones is just dumb, cause there is already camera app that best optimized for the internals that phone use
@@thealaris No
I' ve got amazed not only at Samsung Galaxy s23 ultra performance but also at how fast you speak and how easy is to understand you.
You could be a great English teacher for non native speakers!!!👌👌👌
The fact that they can even be compared so closely to the point where I couldn't tell which was which is amazing.
No doubt, the Samsung S23 ultra is a massive upgrade from several Android phones. Hoping to get one myself soon. I really can't wait to check out all this amazing features
I know you will be very happy with it. It a great phone.
Pretty amazing that the Samsung somewhat compares to big professional cameras. The zoom in particular has been especially impressive since the S20 ultra
I like that you are a guy that's so young and completely in photography world that you are an expert already, and that you view smartphone cameras as something that's not part of your daily life. That makes you able to be amazed by smartphone camera features that we all take for granted nowadays. I like seeing my daily device from a different perspective. Seems almost like magic compared to standard professional DSLR camera equipment.
Let's be real, DSLRs are still the gold standard when it comes to image quality and manual control. But, I gotta say, smartphone cameras have seriously stepped up their game in recent years. I mean, have you seen some of the amazing photos people are taking with their phones?!
Your level of attention to detail and the thought you put in your work consistently impresses me, and I always look forward to your most recent content. Thank you for being such an incredible resource for anyone trying to decide between DSLRs and smartphones. Keep up the great work.
So glad this video helped me find your channel. No only a excellent video but even the comments section seems to have a professional or mature stance. After missing my note 10 for a while I held out on the s22 and pre-ordered the s23 ultra. After hearing how the new chipset would be quite a bit more advanced than the 22. Now knowing how the camera is measuring up is really quite fulfilling.. well helps me justify my purchase anyways 😉 fingers crossed for a pixel for my son 🤞
This s23 ultra is an absolutely amazing camera for ita price. It's unreal that it's being compared to a professional camera.
It's difficult to compare the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra to a professional camera that costs $5,000 because they serve different purposes and have different capabilities.
The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra is a smartphone with a powerful camera that can take high-quality photos and videos. It has a quad-camera setup with a 200 MP primary camera, a periscope telephoto lens with 10x optical zoom, a telephoto lens with 3x optical zoom, and an ultrawide lens with a 120˚ field of view. It can shoot up to 8K video at 24 or 30 frames per second and has features such as auto-HDR, panorama, and super steady video.
On the other hand, a professional camera that costs $5,000 would likely have even more advanced features and capabilities, such as interchangeable lenses, larger sensors, and more manual controls for adjusting settings such as shutter speed, aperture, and ISO. It may also be more durable and able to withstand harsher environments or shooting conditions.
Ultimately, whether the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra or a $5,000 pro camera is the better option depends on your specific needs and preferences. For most casual photographers or videographers, the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra's camera will likely be more than sufficient, while professional photographers and videographers may require the more advanced capabilities of a dedicated camera.
Very interesting comparison. Certain things, like separation, will always be hard to do perfectly in software. But it's impressive to see just how much the gap has been closed between smartphones and cameras.
Seems a pretty good upgrade over the S22. However I prefer the colour tones on the Sony more. Insane amount of details in the shots though!
Would be interesting to hear your thoughts on how the Samsung compares to the Pixel 7, especially photography wise. Great video!
The fact that they are that close is really amazing
I can confirm. Day 1. Zoom & other features allow for 600 dpi large format prints that definitely do not look as if they were shot with a smartphone.
Have you tried taking a RAW file from the Samsung to see the differnce without the software?
Very nice, I have the Sony A7iii and the Galaxy S23 Ultra, and I'm amazed by this phone! The Sony still has this distinctive contrast/pop up look, but the AI on phones is improving very fast...
Can't beat Sony. Their phones are good too
Though I am a big advocate for greater technology in smartphone cameras, I still think that they are a long way away from being a perfect substitute or alternative to a professional camera. Mainly geometry, lens interchangeability, reliability and editing flexibility just aren't on equal grounds yet, mostly due to the over-reliance on software over optics and hardware. For video especially the gap is substantially larger - colour science goes out the window, everything is fuzzy and dynamic range suffers severely. Without perfect lighting setups I have found that they are quite often unusable, though they are perfect (with the right lighting setups) for indoor work, for say, streamers or UA-camrs.
The thing with a camera is, if you're doing it right, it's going to come out right. You may need extra equipment, say, a tripod, a star-tracker, good lighting, lenses, filters etc. or maybe even custom camera software to bring the most out of it for film-making, but at the end of the day it is still the best option, in my opinion. I will say, however, I am not a fan of all the new super-high resolution sensors that are coming out as someone that enjoys working at night. Moreover, for price vs. performance, I would still choose a mid-tier DSLR with a 50mm f1.8 lens over any smartphone of a similar price.
It would be nice if you could demonstrate these two options in a serious setting, taking each on a dedicated photoshoot in challenging but likely conditions for photographers (i.e. at night) pushing the editing flexibility of each option much further. That is where I have never found a suitable smartphone option for the work that I do at night with continuous RGB lighting, as all options I have tried struggle to pick up enough detail than even my old Canon 800D, or worse yet, Nikon D3100 which is an entry-level camera from over 12 years ago.
I understand that it's different for average consumers who are looking to buy a phone that HAS a good camera, but if I am to spend £1000+ on a smartphone FOR its camera, I think I would still prefer a Fuji or a Sony. And despite everything I hear about convenience, I remain hardly bothered to use my phone to take photos when I know I will get a better result from my camera.
The Sony camera gives you a raw image with excellent details for professionals to edit and processed it afterwards. The S23 Ultra is for the layman who doesn't want to go through all the steps so the phone does everything for you. However, you end up having less control of the final image and especially in zoom shots there is significantly less details.
At the end of the video you talked about night shot mentioning that you need tripod for professional camera to get good results. That is correct for long exposure. However phone takes reasonably long (or short) exposure and combine multiple exposures in one picture, as most of us know that. My point here is that Canon introduced the same principle in 2012. called handheld night scene in their DSLR line starting with EOS 650D if I remember correctly. So for more than 10 years we can take night scene without tripod and it works pretty good - I have used it. To be precise, it make low light photography much better, but it is not long exposure.
Back when screens weren't as good as they are today, I could barely notice the differences between smartphones and professional cameras. But now you can tell very easily