I know little about airplanes although aviation fascinates me. But in truth I probably watch this channel because I think the narrator has one of the most interesting voices I’ve heard. It’s different and endlessly engaging. This guy could make a mint selling almost anything because he’s so believable.
We just did a full Garmin panel with LED lights and O2 in an Arrow III. I really like these longer videos. Don't be scared of letting them be this long, nothing but nonstop nerdy goodness!
@ And I thought my Race Cars were expensive!!! I can get the aluminum and powder coating for $300 or so. But maybe your number includes remove and replace with new stuff? Can’t DYI that for sure but I could make a panel.
@Richard.Hybels if you operate as certified it would take an A&P at minimum if you argue it is a minor modification, an IA if you consider it a major modification. Yes that price was removal, redesign, labels, art work on the panel, and reinstallation.
As someone who has really only ever flew Cessnas, I was always kind of embarrassed that I couldn't recognize different Cherokees models. Now I don't feel so bad.
I never even flew a Cherokee until I got the job I'm at now. They still confuse me trying to keep them all seprated lol. I know what my Cherokee is. That's about it.
Same. I am a Cessna guy all the way. I can tell all the different 172's just by looking at them. I currently fly a 76 172M. The piper liniage has always baffled me.
I absolutely loved this video! I definitely hit the light, and subscribe to the channel. It was specifically helpful to me since I am currently trying to buy a piper Cherokee to 35. It was nice to see all the delineations between the Hershey bar wing, and the tapered wing.this is the video that every piper enthusiast should watch. Nicely done!
I think your drawings really add to your videos! I couldn’t look away while listening, I wanted to spot all the differences! It’s a lot cleaner than taking pictures off the internet
I've owned a few various model Cherokees, about 1000 of my current 1500 hours are in various PA28/32 models, and currently I own/fly a PA28R Arrow I. To me, one of the best things about any Cherokee, is once you've flown one, you can pretty much fly them all. There are some handling differences, but the differences are so minor they are not worth worrying about...even the hershey bar vs taper is a nothing-burger. The only time I noticed a difference between the standard vs t-tail was in landing flair, and that too wasn't a big deal. Learn in a PA28-140, and a PA28-180 is just the same except for a little more power, and PA28R is the exact same when the gear are down, and the PA32 is the same just needing more rudder on takeoff.
Agreed...I've owned a 180 and I've bounced back and forth between five or six different models in rental fleets, and I've never really felt much of a difference. I haven't tried any T-tailed versions though, and given what was said about the elevator authority, I'll have to admit that it has me a bit curious about the feel of that.
@@seawlf777 I haven't flown a T-tail Cherokee, but I have flown a Seminole which is basically just a twin-engine Archer. With the T-tail and two engines, it is noticeably more pitch-heavy than a Cherokee, especially during takeoff and landing.
Fun fact about the cherokee 140! While the engine was later sold with 150hp, a common STC given to her was to jam a 160hp up front by increasing compression and burning more oil! While it effectivly gave you (before resistances) 150 hp always available, that last 10 hp was pretty much just emergancy power, only allowing 5 minutes (I think, i'd need to check the papers) of continuous opperation. She's a beauty to fly but gets no where fast!
Wow, what a video. Like being in flight training and just having heaps of info thrown at you. But really well presented. I work at an airfield in the UK and when the chap on the radio says "the lance wants full tanks" or the "saratoga wants tabs" or "the "Dakota wants 60L per side" especially when multiple Pa28's/32's are parked alongside. It gets interesting quickly This will certainly help me a little more (and add to my nerdy knowledge collection) Thank you 😁✈️
I hope the effort in these long format videos pays off and makes producing more worth it. It’s extremely interesting to see all the differences (and screwups) that designers made and really makes deciding what your task and purpose is when buying an aircraft
Excellent video, loved the comparisons at the end. Longer format felt sorta like an animated episode of Skywagon University with a different accent. 😂 Thanks for all the hard work in putting this together!
This is fantastic! I remember researching this on my own years ago and just shaking my head at Piper's constant ridiculous name changes and model variations. Of course, it all comes back to marketing. Names are chosen for what will sell best, not what makes sense in a series.
If we hadn't seen his actual self in other videos, one could reasonably believe he was a benevolent AI, sent by the aviation deity to guide us. Preach brother! :)
OMG, that was awesome! Thanks so much. Just got my 25hrs/5 in model to let me fly our club's Lance. It is a nice flying plane, and first plane I can take friends flying that doesn't seem embarrassingly small in size.
Excellent video as always! I love my Cherokee 235 (Pathfinder). Pretty amazing how Piper made one design work for multiple planes, even the seminole has the same fuselage.
Whoa, heck of a video well done. I have briefly flown two different models, the (PA-28-161 & PA-32R-300) and have always been a bit confused by their naming scheme. The quick guide at the end was fantastic. Thank you!
the cherokee pa-28-181 is hands down my favorite plane ive ever flown in training, i loved her docile nature. the nickname around the school for the plane was "tuna can" because of the lack of hip room and the twin latching door.
This by far my favorite aviation related channel. Been with you since since the beginning and you never fail to provide very useful information delivered with the great comedic content and timing. The art work is excellent and your narration is superb. Would you consider a video on the Air Cam. I saw one at KFMY and found it a very interesting home build.
WOW!!!…I want to commend you for posting this! Piper aircraft are excellent! Problem is people are confused when it comes to their aircraft. I started out training in a Warrior a lil bit over 40yrs ago. When it came time to buy decades later I brought a Cessna because it was easy to figure out their models. lol Once again, thanks for taking the time to do this! You did an excellent job imo of breaking it down.
I started my Flying career in a PA28-140 with 160 hp, and today Cherokees are still my favourite planes to fly (mostly 161 and 181). Even they are not overperfomers, they are really simple to fly 🍾🥂
Holy moly, that’s a lot of Cherokees 😅 Probably my favorite line of aircraft, overall. But TIL that there are way more variants than I knew before! Great stuff!!
Amazing! Great video, I’m going to give this an A+, ❤ I have over 140 hours in the Warrior 2, specifically the PA.28.161. Recently I have been flying the 150 and the 140 both are really fun to fly. I really love the 140s ceiling mounted stabilator trim, when I 1st got into it I thought it was an older pike of junk, but I gave it another chance and it was love at 2nd sight 😂! Liked and subscribe, oh and thanks for not wasting my time by starting that in the video.
@@CompleteWalkaround I think UA-cam is lying. It says I watched the video but I didn’t like/dislike it. I like all of your videos I’ve watched. Thanks!
The Archer III actually received the redesigned cowling with circular inlets vs. the Archer II. The Archer II has the better useful load as the Archer III received extra equipment such as air conditioning. The TX/LX are still PA-28-181 models and sold today (with Garmin G1000 avionics).
Great job! We have a 6/260 and love it. It can haul a small home but has very little glide! Also fly a turbo lance 300 some and it is a great plane as well!!
Learned in a 1968 140, I kinda prefer it to the Cessna cult offerings. I remember a full flap slip with the rudder pedal to the floor during a power out exercise in the pattern. I greased the landing and have never forgotten the feeling. Plus the trim handle in the roof and the johnson bar flaps are great.
On the bit about the Arrows, around 6:35 mark ... shows Arrow II having range of 675mi, while the Arrow III is shown w/range of 695mi. What is NOT mentioned is Arrow III moves up to 70+ gallons of fuel, compared to 50 for all Arrows before... meaning the Arrow III has about 2 more hours of gas, even if you're not willing to sit in it six hours (bring some empty Gatorade bottles) I see Useful Loads exaggerated, esp for Saratogas...
There's something I don't understand. Why would they put a Lycoming O-540 which can do 300+ hp and downrate it to 230? Is it a maintenance thing? Or what's the justification in putting a heavier, more expensive enginer and then not using its full power?
Hi, generally a good video. Thank you. As an owner of a PA-28R-201T and a PA23-250T, I would say that the "poo-pooing" on turbo's is a little off :). If you understand your systems, have a good engine monitor (JPI for example), a turbo is a really great thing. On my Turbo-Arrow, (TSIO-360-FB) I've already gone 150 hrs past TBO, compressions are in the 70's and oil reports are clean. Recently did a flight from NM out to FL and it was great having full power capacity to get up and over weather systems. Plane is a smooth ride at FL160 to FL180. Power to climb, and then pull back for decent cruise. If you abuse your turbo / engine system, expect it to cost you in AMU's. From what I've seen, most that dump on turbo's are repeating what others have said, or have not taken care of their aircraft and have been bitten in the check book. Living in the Rockies, I wouldn't fly anything X/C without a turbo....
@@CompleteWalkaround I guess different flying experiences. I always have O2 onboard, and generally have to fly at FL140+ because of mountains and min enroute for IFR / safety, going over the WX…
Have had my Archer for 22 yrs and have flown it over much of this country. Not the fastest plane but very affordable for me and the thing has a better useful load than my friends 2006 Cirrus SR 22. And I can do much of the annual myself with the supervision of my IA which makes my annuals dirt cheap.
I was wondering when you were going to put out a new vid.... Now I see why it took so long. I've gotten to fly a lot of those birds... and you are right about the Arrow 4. It feels crazy heavy, and you fly it to the ground... where a warrior 2 is.... full flaps, idle, dive and point it at the runway. LOL. (Hopefully remembering to round out first) And... the Archer's always felt nose heavy to me (hard to flair) So thanks for the confirmation on that.
Arrow IV. The only thing I don’t like is needing a ladder to clean the snow off the t-tail. I don’t notice much difference in handling from other pipers I’ve flown. It gets the job done.
Great video with concise and rapid delivery as well as good organization especially considering the model complexity. I do think the book speeds you report on the early Cherokees 160, 180, Challenger and Archer I are not correct according to Piper spec. It's a bit of a problem since they usually don't make book speed anyway. I have a '72 Cherokee 180 and the book speed is 124 not 128. In real life it is usually a 120kt airplane on good days. Therefore, the others are off as well. I think perhaps Piper did a bit better with speed accuracy on the later models.
I know little about airplanes although aviation fascinates me.
But in truth I probably watch this channel because I think the narrator has one of the most interesting voices I’ve heard.
It’s different and endlessly engaging. This guy could make a mint selling almost anything because he’s so believable.
We just did a full Garmin panel with LED lights and O2 in an Arrow III.
I really like these longer videos. Don't be scared of letting them be this long, nothing but nonstop nerdy goodness!
I’m just starting. Care to share what the panel cost?
@Richard.Hybels we used Superior Aircraft Components out of Central Texas. We paid $5-6K to have them design, cut, powder coat and print the panel.
@ And I thought my Race Cars were expensive!!! I can get the aluminum and powder coating for $300 or so. But maybe your number includes remove and replace with new stuff? Can’t DYI that for sure but I could make a panel.
@Richard.Hybels if you operate as certified it would take an A&P at minimum if you argue it is a minor modification, an IA if you consider it a major modification.
Yes that price was removal, redesign, labels, art work on the panel, and reinstallation.
"I've been assured that size doesn't matter...clears throat" You have the best zingers.....
As someone who has really only ever flew Cessnas, I was always kind of embarrassed that I couldn't recognize different Cherokees models. Now I don't feel so bad.
I never even flew a Cherokee until I got the job I'm at now. They still confuse me trying to keep them all seprated lol. I know what my Cherokee is. That's about it.
Same. I am a Cessna guy all the way. I can tell all the different 172's just by looking at them. I currently fly a 76 172M. The piper liniage has always baffled me.
Talk about evergreen content. People will be coming back to this video for years
I may be a little biased, but I think the Cherokee is a great trainer! Great in-depth video!
Great for learners who are afraid of heights, Piper carefully designed the wing position so you can't see very much of the ground.
@@MCT72 Yet I'm flying pipeline patrol in one LOL. It's an odd choice, but that's what I was given, so game on!
Nothing beats my Ap-32 Vixxen
I’m starting with CFI Monday 1/12/25 so know diddly but 182’s can easily cost $150k anc it looks like Cherokees’ on up are more bang for the buck no?
I absolutely loved this video! I definitely hit the light, and subscribe to the channel. It was specifically helpful to me since I am currently trying to buy a piper Cherokee to 35. It was nice to see all the delineations between the Hershey bar wing, and the tapered wing.this is the video that every piper enthusiast should watch. Nicely done!
I think your drawings really add to your videos! I couldn’t look away while listening, I wanted to spot all the differences! It’s a lot cleaner than taking pictures off the internet
I've owned a few various model Cherokees, about 1000 of my current 1500 hours are in various PA28/32 models, and currently I own/fly a PA28R Arrow I. To me, one of the best things about any Cherokee, is once you've flown one, you can pretty much fly them all. There are some handling differences, but the differences are so minor they are not worth worrying about...even the hershey bar vs taper is a nothing-burger. The only time I noticed a difference between the standard vs t-tail was in landing flair, and that too wasn't a big deal. Learn in a PA28-140, and a PA28-180 is just the same except for a little more power, and PA28R is the exact same when the gear are down, and the PA32 is the same just needing more rudder on takeoff.
Agreed...I've owned a 180 and I've bounced back and forth between five or six different models in rental fleets, and I've never really felt much of a difference. I haven't tried any T-tailed versions though, and given what was said about the elevator authority, I'll have to admit that it has me a bit curious about the feel of that.
@@seawlf777 I haven't flown a T-tail Cherokee, but I have flown a Seminole which is basically just a twin-engine Archer. With the T-tail and two engines, it is noticeably more pitch-heavy than a Cherokee, especially during takeoff and landing.
Thanks! Saves me from watching the video!
I'm a simple man, new complete walkaround video and I watch it at least 3 times immediately! Thanks.😊
Great video. For someone who doesn't know this level of detail on planes you made it easy to understand
The first plane I bought was a 1969 PA 28-235. Loved that plane. It was almost an, "if it fits, it ships" airplane.
Fun fact about the cherokee 140! While the engine was later sold with 150hp, a common STC given to her was to jam a 160hp up front by increasing compression and burning more oil! While it effectivly gave you (before resistances) 150 hp always available, that last 10 hp was pretty much just emergancy power, only allowing 5 minutes (I think, i'd need to check the papers) of continuous opperation.
She's a beauty to fly but gets no where fast!
Brilliant. Wish I'd seen this 40 years ago.
Great breakdown of the family - my head is spinning now
Super informative. I'm in instrument training on a 100i and couldn't make sense of all of the Cherokee models but this video really cleared it up.
You’ve done an amazing job laying this all out! Aaaaaand I still have no sense of how to keep Piper models straight in my head.
Wow, what a video. Like being in flight training and just having heaps of info thrown at you. But really well presented.
I work at an airfield in the UK and when the chap on the radio says "the lance wants full tanks" or the "saratoga wants tabs" or "the "Dakota wants 60L per side" especially when multiple Pa28's/32's are parked alongside. It gets interesting quickly
This will certainly help me a little more (and add to my nerdy knowledge collection)
Thank you 😁✈️
Which airfield
I own a '73 Challenger. Great little bird, and yes, the Archer stabilator does help a lot especially in the flare.
I hope the effort in these long format videos pays off and makes producing more worth it. It’s extremely interesting to see all the differences (and screwups) that designers made and really makes deciding what your task and purpose is when buying an aircraft
I have 1000 hrs on Cherokees, as an instructor in the late 80's. This was a real nostalgia trip. :)
Excellent video, loved the comparisons at the end. Longer format felt sorta like an animated episode of Skywagon University with a different accent. 😂
Thanks for all the hard work in putting this together!
This is fantastic! I remember researching this on my own years ago and just shaking my head at Piper's constant ridiculous name changes and model variations. Of course, it all comes back to marketing. Names are chosen for what will sell best, not what makes sense in a series.
If we hadn't seen his actual self in other videos, one could reasonably believe he was a benevolent AI, sent by the aviation deity to guide us. Preach brother! :)
🤖
OMG, that was awesome! Thanks so much. Just got my 25hrs/5 in model to let me fly our club's Lance. It is a nice flying plane, and first plane I can take friends flying that doesn't seem embarrassingly small in size.
Excellent video as always! I love my Cherokee 235 (Pathfinder). Pretty amazing how Piper made one design work for multiple planes, even the seminole has the same fuselage.
Whoa, heck of a video well done. I have briefly flown two different models, the (PA-28-161 & PA-32R-300) and have always been a bit confused by their naming scheme. The quick guide at the end was fantastic. Thank you!
Hey, the drawing of the Lance II has the same paint job of the one I use to fly. Brought back memories. Great video!
Great job, excellent graphics, with a very good explanation of the Piper nomenclature.
I love my 1976 Piper Cruiser 140 with all the cool mods. Fun to fly, slow and barely climbs but easy and cheap to maintain.
just wow!
thank you for this comprehensive review of the Cherokee family❤
the cherokee pa-28-181 is hands down my favorite plane ive ever flown in training, i loved her docile nature. the nickname around the school for the plane was "tuna can" because of the lack of hip room and the twin latching door.
I felt like I just crushed a two part season finale of an amazing show! Way to go man this was an awesome video!
This by far my favorite aviation related channel. Been with you since since the beginning and you never fail to provide very useful information delivered with the great comedic content and timing. The art work is excellent and your narration is superb. Would you consider a video on the Air Cam. I saw one at KFMY and found it a very interesting home build.
I love my 1965 Piper Cherokee 140/150 such an easy airplane to fly!!!
Holy... more of these types of chronological breakdowns for models, please!!
Such a great comparison video! Must have been a ton of work, but I hope you keep making them!
Can you please make a video about an electric airplane?
What a great video! Tons of details and love the humor tossed in. A+ Hope to see more like this.
WOW!!!…I want to commend you for posting this!
Piper aircraft are excellent! Problem is people are confused when it comes to their aircraft.
I started out training in a Warrior a lil bit over 40yrs ago. When it came time to buy decades later I brought a Cessna because it was easy to figure out their models. lol
Once again, thanks for taking the time to do this! You did an excellent job imo of breaking it down.
Absolutely amazing video. Thank you for the effort and quality.
Think what you want about how much work that video was, but I hit the subscribe button because of it!
1983 Cherokee in Van Nuys CA owner. Love the Cherokee
Love the longer format videos, while keeping the information palatable.
hey hey ... you forgot about the Piper PA-32-3M. the tri-motor 😃
Prototype for what would become the PA-34 Seneca
Thank you, now I understand the differences of the many models 👍
The info is wonderful but the artwork is phenomenal. It’s always a good day when you release a new video.
I started my Flying career in a PA28-140 with 160 hp, and today Cherokees are still my favourite planes to fly (mostly 161 and 181). Even they are not overperfomers, they are really simple to fly 🍾🥂
Great video. I thought I knew a lot about cherokees and my warrior 74’ but this was helpful!
The biggest video yes, but also the most informative!
Always informative and an engaging delivery.
i saved this for the future so i can refer to it if and when i look to purchase a plane.
Holy moly, that’s a lot of Cherokees 😅
Probably my favorite line of aircraft, overall. But TIL that there are way more variants than I knew before!
Great stuff!!
I want to mention, in 1983 the PA-28-161 (WarriorII/III) got a max gross weight increase to 2440 lbs.
And on top of aaaaaallll that you have the Embraer/Neiva ones made here in Brazil under licence... A real mess.
Amazing! Great video, I’m going to give this an A+, ❤ I have over 140 hours in the Warrior 2, specifically the PA.28.161. Recently I have been flying the 150 and the 140 both are really fun to fly. I really love the 140s ceiling mounted stabilator trim, when I 1st got into it I thought it was an older pike of junk, but I gave it another chance and it was love at 2nd sight 😂! Liked and subscribe, oh and thanks for not wasting my time by starting that in the video.
Loved my 1966 PA28-180-C
Yay! My aircraft finally made the cut. Love the 235!
I got a whole 235 video yo
@@CompleteWalkaround I think UA-cam is lying. It says I watched the video but I didn’t like/dislike it. I like all of your videos I’ve watched. Thanks!
The Archer III actually received the redesigned cowling with circular inlets vs. the Archer II. The Archer II has the better useful load as the Archer III received extra equipment such as air conditioning. The TX/LX are still PA-28-181 models and sold today (with Garmin G1000 avionics).
Great job! We have a 6/260 and love it. It can haul a small home but has very little glide! Also fly a turbo lance 300 some and it is a great plane as well!!
This is the best Cherokee video I’ve ever seen. Awesome!!
Great video! Would love to see this for Mooneys. Keep up the great work!
The Piper Seminole and Seneca also have Cherokee fuselages albeit they have different model numbers PA-44 and PA-34 respectively
This was awesome! The Cherokee is such a cool aircraft.
Thanks man
Learned in a 1968 140, I kinda prefer it to the Cessna cult offerings.
I remember a full flap slip with the rudder pedal to the floor during a power out exercise in the pattern.
I greased the landing and have never forgotten the feeling.
Plus the trim handle in the roof and the johnson bar flaps are great.
welcome back man its been a bit!
Love the longer videos. I think you know this, but pilots are info hungry, give us more longer vids!!
What a fantastic rundown
On the bit about the Arrows, around 6:35 mark ... shows Arrow II having range of 675mi, while the Arrow III is shown w/range of 695mi. What is NOT mentioned is Arrow III moves up to 70+ gallons of fuel, compared to 50 for all Arrows before... meaning the Arrow III has about 2 more hours of gas, even if you're not willing to sit in it six hours (bring some empty Gatorade bottles)
I see Useful Loads exaggerated, esp for Saratogas...
Absolutely awesome, THANK YOU!!
Awesome video! I love how thorough it was.
Excellent video as usual, there is just a 0 missing in the price of the pa 28 180 Cherokee.
Yes I pay attention 😊.
I think I know this voice.... he also does instagram videos too. I love these videos. My starting of research always
I'm working on my ppl mostly in Warrior PA28-151s. I'm quite fond of them, but the 181 Archer II is my favorite.
This video my friend, hits it out of the park! Thanks! :) :;)
Cherokee is finally here!
I'm a PPL with about 100 hours, about 60 of that is in Cherokees. Absolutely great planes. I would gladly own a Warrior or Archer
Great Piper recap
Fantastic video! Thanks for sharing!
An absolutely epic review!
There's something I don't understand. Why would they put a Lycoming O-540 which can do 300+ hp and downrate it to 230? Is it a maintenance thing? Or what's the justification in putting a heavier, more expensive enginer and then not using its full power?
WOW...that's exceptional information!
Hi, generally a good video. Thank you. As an owner of a PA-28R-201T and a PA23-250T, I would say that the "poo-pooing" on turbo's is a little off :). If you understand your systems, have a good engine monitor (JPI for example), a turbo is a really great thing. On my Turbo-Arrow, (TSIO-360-FB) I've already gone 150 hrs past TBO, compressions are in the 70's and oil reports are clean. Recently did a flight from NM out to FL and it was great having full power capacity to get up and over weather systems. Plane is a smooth ride at FL160 to FL180. Power to climb, and then pull back for decent cruise. If you abuse your turbo / engine system, expect it to cost you in AMU's. From what I've seen, most that dump on turbo's are repeating what others have said, or have not taken care of their aircraft and have been bitten in the check book. Living in the Rockies, I wouldn't fly anything X/C without a turbo....
LOL I knew someone's feathers would get ruffled as I watched the video...don't insult a man's plane whether it's the truth or not! LOL.
Do all this extra stuff (the juice) and you can climb over weather once in 10 years if you happen to have O2 on board (the squeeze). :)
@@CompleteWalkaround I guess different flying experiences. I always have O2 onboard, and generally have to fly at FL140+ because of mountains and min enroute for IFR / safety, going over the WX…
Not so easy to navigate through Cherokee lineup in a short video. Very informative. Would be great to add a cost to operate comparison in a graph.
Great video! Can we have a complete walkaround on that new M700 Fury that we'll never be able to afford? 😂😭
You did an amazing job here! Kudos and thanks!!
Wow... you just created the Definitive Cherokee Guide! Very well done!
finally cherokee! thank you very much!
I've been flying for 30 years and have flown many of these airplanes, but I never knew about some of the details of the different models.
I love your videos dude. I’m also building an RV14 💪
Have had my Archer for 22 yrs and have flown it over much of this country. Not the fastest plane but very affordable for me and the thing has a better useful load than my friends 2006 Cirrus SR 22. And I can do much of the annual myself with the supervision of my IA which makes my annuals dirt cheap.
I was wondering when you were going to put out a new vid.... Now I see why it took so long. I've gotten to fly a lot of those birds... and you are right about the Arrow 4. It feels crazy heavy, and you fly it to the ground... where a warrior 2 is.... full flaps, idle, dive and point it at the runway. LOL. (Hopefully remembering to round out first) And... the Archer's always felt nose heavy to me (hard to flair) So thanks for the confirmation on that.
Arrow IV. The only thing I don’t like is needing a ladder to clean the snow off the t-tail. I don’t notice much difference in handling from other pipers I’ve flown. It gets the job done.
Loved this video. Now if only I can find somebody to let me buy one for a reasonable price.
Still looking to have a Saratoga for my first plane to buy
Love the longer video
A long one, nice!
Great work bud!
The difference between the Warrior II and III was a gross weight increase of 115lbs and is available as a paperwork STC for the Warrior II
150 entire pounds?
Warrior III gross weight is 2440. Not what you show
Great video with concise and rapid delivery as well as good organization especially considering the model complexity. I do think the book speeds you report on the early Cherokees 160, 180, Challenger and Archer I are not correct according to Piper spec. It's a bit of a problem since they usually don't make book speed anyway. I have a '72 Cherokee 180 and the book speed is 124 not 128. In real life it is usually a 120kt airplane on good days. Therefore, the others are off as well. I think perhaps Piper did a bit better with speed accuracy on the later models.
So out of all that, which versions need to have their wing bolt holes checked for cracks?