Comparison between Minelab Eureka Gold, Fisher Gold Bug 2 and Fisher Gold Bug Pro
Вставка
- Опубліковано 23 лют 2012
- This is a comparison between 3 well known and popular gold prospecting detectors, the Fisher Gold Bug 2, Fisher Gold Bug Pro and Minelab Eureka Gold. The detectors were air tested for depth on various size gold nuggets and some coins. The detectors were also compared as to how they react to hot rocks. See more at thaimetaldetectors.com
- Наука та технологія
though I had some problem with sea water It also ua-cam.com/users/postUgkxa-FNYUOM93a388gi9a4brtSCEVmrHgJH land for finding any things very easily. (thought it would work as normal due to it being water proof within certain parts of the detector), on dry land and sand worked well. My first one, so still have lots to learn
The Gold Bug 2. More depth on small gold and there is more small gold out there.
Yes I totally agree about the coil size! This was a quick test with what I had around to get some general ideas, but would be better to have the same size coil!
Would u still recommend me to buy a GP Extreme if that's what I can afford?
what is the best handset among these 3 you showed?
Would the Fisher Gold Bug pro detect deeper gold targets if you had an Eliptical coil on it versus the small round coil on it???
Nokta golden sense is that another you can compare to as well?
with the Minelab Eureka gold you only used 60kz mode... what depth could you get with the 20kz and the 6.4kz mode ? I'm thinking probably twice as deep with air testing coil size and shape is important too.
👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
Hi detecto guy I live in Bangkok, Thailand. So which part of Thailand are you living right now?
Do you have a Minelab Eureka Detector for sale?
I would love to buy one and enjoy it as my part time, hobby.
Are the coils interchangeable between the 2 fisher products?
Yes, it is also good for big nuggets. The surface VLF detectors however have some trouble with deep targets, for that something like the Minelab GPX-5000 (a pulse detector) is better (but more expensive!).
It seems like you did the ground balance in the last detector with targets near the coil. I think that is why the detector signal was weak.
hitch 77 exactly what happened. All targets were directly in front of the coil.
@@JesusOurKing aS qq a@qqq qq qqq qq we 1
First of all nice video, I admire your efforts and have a few questions and comments. You are probably like most people and don't have easy access to any three metal detectors of your choice and chose three good ones you could get your hands on. The Gold Bug models both score very high in their price range of $650 for the Gold Bug Pro and $750 for the Gold Bug 2 Vs The Minelab Eureka Gold for $1050. I had my heart set on getting a Gold Bug Pro but after watching this I am wondering why it has such a small coil. Do you think it would be better with a different coil and if so what would be the best.
Ron Smith OK, then look forward to your video on how to set them up!
Is it just me while he was testing the gold bug 2 on the hotrocks. I could hear the thresh hold then when flicked to discrimination you couldn't hear it.
Im wondering if he flicked the machine off as even while close to the camera it seemed to quiet fullstop
So do you own all 3 of these? If so, which do you use most?
***** Yes air tests aren't perfect but they do give an indication of relative performance. PI Detectors such as the GPX-5000 are the best gold detectors.
Muito bom seus testes, gostei
What's the best PI detector for under $1200
Wow...it look to me in all the test that the MineLab was best. It had clearer signals, very little problem with hot rocks. Although I couldn't tell where you were on the paper while measuring, it seemed better with the smaller targets than the gold bug 2. The gold bug 2 seemed like it was right there with the MineLab, but the target sound was not as good. The gold bug pro seems like it isn't near as good as the 2. But, it's what the person hunting with it Lowell's most comfortable with. Thanks
what is better Fisher Gold Bug 2 or Garrett At gold can you please help me to decide?..thanks
How about putting the specimens in ground? You'll find true results then.
I can only find strong signals with the eureka gold if I scan in a circle motion.
Gold monster 1000 vs gold matster 24k and gold bug 2.which is best
Nice bench testing video.
VCO technology is the way of the future in detecting.
The Gold Bug DP is what was needed in this comparison video with the 11" DD.
19khz and dual processors for unmatched recovery and target separation.
IMHO, it cant be beaten in the right hands.
I agree.
thats an awsome video. So what one would you pick to go detect gold nuggets with? If you had to pick just one.
easily the GBP (DP) for $299 with today's prices
@@JesusOurKing
DP stands for dual purpose. Comes with two coils !
@@flatheadfletch yes for the price it was a good deal
Are you in the phillipines rigth now?
Sir need ur help how much that fisher gold bjg pro i wnt to purchase that item tnx
le test en sol afnor daniel serai nieu pour comparaison qi a la plus grose plus les reglages la traduction et hou??
Bom dia
Nesses teste que tu fez qual é o melhor detector entre os 3 detectores para pepitas?
esse do gold bug. principalmente o Gold bug 2 ele acha pepita menor que um grão de arroz
@@gameplaydabagaceira.6220 obrigado pela atenção. .
Salts on The hand?
With gold. You want the coil to.be small. Around 3 to 5 inches is best
Jeffry Nelson Good point on the coil sizes, yes they should have the same size coils to make the comparison better.
I wont gpx5000 you can send me this machine DHL and I am send you money 0096550150514
fahad benahmed I don't think so
Your right, you can buy the X-Terra 305 and put a new 4.5 double D concentric coil, and it will find Gold just as good as a Eureka.
I love my GOLD BUG!
thanks
daniel Zanotto Fisher Gold Bug 2 but that is just my preference.
Harga berapa bos,
que pruebas tan estupidas con la vista desde atras de los detectores sin que se vean las distancias de cada objeto.....increible!!!
+Clair M actually gold has a very small halo effect.... 2. The length of time an object is buried: Various chemicals in the soil have a corrosive action on metal. Some metals corrode faster than others. A modern zinc penny is attacked by these soil chemicals quite easily, whereas the action on copper and silver is much less, and corrosive action on gold is hardly noticeable, if at all. As these chemicals eat away at the metal, oxidation (rust) takes place, which is absorbed into the surrounding soil. This causes the soil to become more conductive, which in turn makes the metallic object appear larger than it actually is and easier to detect. This is known as the "halo effect." (From the Fisher web site).
'Flour Gold around the gold target is not what is meant by the halo effect'.
I run tours, and have had all sorts of machines,people turn up to learn and plenty of people have gone home with their first piece of gold after a days listening and learning, also a friend owns and runs a detector shop with 25 yrs exp , so I guess i'll stick with what I have and know . 6.5oz's last trip
try panning the dirt from around your target and then see if there is no flour gold [its halo] in the pan
no I just go and find the gold, not sit around fixing the detector, also have a friend that does what you do,and also fitted the over the horizon radar system ,so I do know what I'm talking about, so maybe you stick to what you know best and so will I, I would rather a pocket full of gold than a pocket full of diodes and capacitors
***** cant teach stupid. someone should give you a job, considering your such a know it all, fucking cockhead
***** agree the GPX-5000 is the best gold detector for depth. For very small gold specs the VLF machines are very good though.
Strange stuff gold ,i had an hour spare so decided to try my 3 machines on some gold .
3 bits a part 9ct earring a 14ct pen nib and a 9ct chain ,my fisher f5 found all 3 bits but identified them as iron so would not be dug! My gold racer found all 3 but again identified them as iron so i wouldn't dig them but my f75 missed the chain but identified the others as foil so i would dig them!
The detectors shouldnt be judged on depth but on how well they discriminate IMHO ,in my land theres hundreds of years of iron use so in theory if you dug everything you would find the gold but is it worth thousands of hours digging nails? At the moment the only machine that has produced gold is the f75 merely because it thinks its foil lol
As a dedicated gold machine i had hoped the racer would somehow indicate gold differently to iron ,it has an advantage it sees gold deeper but if it saw it at ten feet but you thought it was iron its advantage is lost.
PS the best performer in depth is a 1980's cscope 3300 but that thinks its iron as well DOH
You shouldn't use your hand to run that across the detector because the salt in your hand will also set off the detector, you should be using a plastic scoop to do that! Just a FYI!
iam1inamil Especially if the detectors were turned on at the same time, that would be a serious problem. Otherwise it is OK.
Qual e o melhor ?
Gold bug 2
aren't the detectors too close together?
i thought you were supposed to keep electronic items away from a detectors for it to function properly???
Tom ohlrich toss up between the gold bug 2 and the minelab eureka gold.
disturbed gold has no halo
Gold Bug 2 rules.... nuff said... :)
Gold bug pro would done better if you never ground balanced with all targets directly in front of the coil
I I present an Indonesian metal detector
Mantab . Mampir bang...silaturohim
The eureka is twice the machine as the gold bug it has 3 settings and has a better range
@Tammy Ingraham what coil did you use on the Eureka?
@Tammy Ingraham to be honest, Eureka's release coil doesn't do very well with small Gold at 60k. and because of that it only produces a faint sound. But really listen with both ears, if possible get a headphone with impedance from 100ohm. and you will have to rethink the Eureka Gold. have a nice day.
gb2 700$ and gpx-5000 is 4k $ !
rhorca12 gold bug 2
cok cok oeuf brouiliet
Gold bug 2 no questions asked
April 22 2024, Just Bought one of these" What a "CHEAP MADE MACHINE" , Plastic Housing, Tiny Coil, Housing was LOOSE, Wiggles on Handle, (Have to Tie Down with Plastic Straps. Battery Compartment is Flimsy Plastic, may break. Will take it into the field and see how it works but if the Gold Kruser or the Garrett 24K works better, I'd not waste your money. There is a Lot of Hype in this market, so do your homework before you spend $500.00. Chris is probably sponsored by Fisher. Not Happy with my Purchase
Ponle bovinas ,iguales,😕
Я вообще не понимаю вот эту видео нам ничего не видно! да еще не по русский базарить!дурдом