King William III - Prince of Orange Documentary

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 кві 2024
  • For early access to our videos, discounted merch and many other exclusive perks please support us as a Patron or Member...
    Patreon: / thepeopleprofiles
    Buy me a Coffee: www.buymeacoffee.com/peoplepr...
    UA-cam Membership: / @peopleprofiles
    or follow us on Twitter! / tpprofiles
    Check out our new channel People Profiles Shorts, on which we will be uploading 15 minute versions of all our documentaries, UA-cam Shorts, as well as interviews with historians and extra videos. / @peopleprofilesshorts
    All People Profiles scripts are researched and written by qualified Historians. The script for this video has been checked with Plagiarism and AI Detector software and scored 1% on Grammarly. In academia, a score of below 15% is considered good or acceptable. Please email us for script references and citations.
    All footage, images and music used in People Profiles Documentaries are sourced from free media websites or are purchased with commercial rights from online media archives.
    #Biography #History #Documentary

КОМЕНТАРІ • 125

  • @PeopleProfiles
    @PeopleProfiles  Місяць тому +14

    For early access to our videos, discounted merch and many other exclusive perks please support us as a Patron or Member...
    Patreon: www.patreon.com/thepeopleprofiles
    Buy me a Coffee: www.buymeacoffee.com/peopleprofiles
    UA-cam Membership: ua-cam.com/channels/D6TPU-PvTMvqgzC_AM7_uA.htmljoin
    or follow us on Twitter! twitter.com/tpprofiles

  • @pierre8654
    @pierre8654 Місяць тому +36

    Johan de witt deserves an episode

    • @pierre8654
      @pierre8654 Місяць тому +4

      @@theon9575 ​@theon9575 the fact that not many people know about him outside of the Netherlands is more reason to make a video. He and others like Grotius or oldenbarnevelt belonged to a movement that profoundly shaped the modern world. Huygens deserves a video of his own as well, truly one of the greatest, most interesting intellectuals and scientists in history, doesn't get the attention and praise he deserves.

    • @mauritsvanoranje6725
      @mauritsvanoranje6725 27 днів тому

      @@theon9575 fell to the english?😂

    • @mauritsvanoranje6725
      @mauritsvanoranje6725 26 днів тому

      @@theon9575 It all depends on what you consider to be lost. The Netherlands was no longer fighting for its survival during the Anglo-Dutch Wars

    • @mauritsvanoranje6725
      @mauritsvanoranje6725 26 днів тому

      @@theon9575 Lost, in my opinion, would be how Ireland ended up today, Netherlands not winning the 80-year war, not being their own nation, etc.

    • @mauritsvanoranje6725
      @mauritsvanoranje6725 26 днів тому

      @@theon9575 In the sense of being lost, England never conquered the Netherlands. Lost would be the British taking over India, South Africa from the Boeren. etc. It doesn't mean the English fell to the Dutch just because they invaded England or defeated the English in certain battles, Etc

  • @allenraysmith6885
    @allenraysmith6885 Місяць тому +23

    ❤Great documentary! Thank you for posting!❤❤❤

  • @marei7290
    @marei7290 Місяць тому +22

    William of orange was one of the most important "leaders" of the english people, and as you elaborated, by containing the french ambitions he practically is the founder of the english hegemony of the seventeenth century.

    • @franciscolima1762
      @franciscolima1762 Місяць тому

      Forgive my Portuguese interference here, but what's with the "leaders?"

    • @marei7290
      @marei7290 Місяць тому +1

      @@franciscolima1762 I mean with leader " a king, a queen, a prince, a military commander , a revolutionist, a prime minister >>>

    • @jemoedermeteensnor88
      @jemoedermeteensnor88 4 дні тому

      @@franciscolima1762 Probably because William wasn't the king or president of the Netherlands but something in between. The Dutch title Stadholder was 1 weird and 2 not known or comparable to any other position in any another country.

    • @nickjung7394
      @nickjung7394 День тому

      Isn't Max Jaffa a descendent of his?

  • @Votmeyer
    @Votmeyer Місяць тому +17

    "You are on this council, but we do not grant you the rank of Stadtholder."

  • @johanvanangeren6150
    @johanvanangeren6150 17 днів тому +4

    Thanks for this great video. I live in Hellevoetsluis, the port town in which William left with a huge fleet to England. It must have been an impressive sight. Greetings from Holland.

  • @legendborntoday8403
    @legendborntoday8403 Місяць тому +7

    Why don't you make playlists for old and new clips? Because sometimes it is difficult to find old clips Thank you for your videos This is awesome great work stay safe You are one of the best channels on UA-cam I hope you continue on this and I learn something new every video from you .

  • @jameswolfe9451
    @jameswolfe9451 Місяць тому +18

    James Wolfe the hero of Quebec would be a interesting profile

    • @thomasdonovan3580
      @thomasdonovan3580 Місяць тому

      Try saying that in a Québécois Pub

    • @jameswolfe9451
      @jameswolfe9451 Місяць тому

      @@thomasdonovan3580 Not something I would try on my best day, I would add Montclam would a great profile also.

  • @danielsantiagourtado3430
    @danielsantiagourtado3430 Місяць тому +16

    Love your English monarchs videos! Please do Queen Anne next!

  • @laneoswego6989
    @laneoswego6989 Місяць тому +5

    Very well done enjoyed this immensely thank you

  • @user-ni9ix7st9t
    @user-ni9ix7st9t Місяць тому +9

    Love the video can you do more World War 2 profiles❤

  • @ashgangtv2675
    @ashgangtv2675 Місяць тому +18

    Love this narrator

  • @fortunatemarrapodi
    @fortunatemarrapodi 20 днів тому +3

    My daughter attends William and Mary University, which was founded in 1693, in Williamsburg, Virginia. The second oldest University after Harvard in the United States.

  • @PeoplewithHatsGaming
    @PeoplewithHatsGaming Місяць тому

    I’ve been waiting for this episode!!

  • @danielsantiagourtado3430
    @danielsantiagourtado3430 Місяць тому +8

    YES! The co-monarch of Mary II thanks For this! 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

    • @JordanKahele
      @JordanKahele Місяць тому +1

      Yep that's it right there!

  • @theon9575
    @theon9575 Місяць тому +16

    It's misleading to suggest here that the originally- French House of Orange title was his family's traditional heritage. Not so !!
    The first line of Het Wilhelmus, our national anthem, says it clearly: 'Wilhelmus van Nassau, ben ik van Duitsen bloed!'
    The Orange title had been much more-lately inherited & tacked on by William the Silent, Father of the Dutch Fatherland, from his cousin who had married a Princess from the French House.
    William himself was of the Nassau family which had an important base in Breda (in now-Netherlands) but its true base, roots, tradition, wealth & influence derived from the powerful (now) German Nassau family. The princely Orange title was added later, really, and then he was properly referred to as "Willem III of Oranje-Nassau".
    The Nassau-bit was dropped MUCH later by the family when Wilhelmina became Queen (because it was a male-only line), when it would have finally became correct as you say,"Willam of Orange." Not here, though!
    It's not trivial in a vid focussing on English/Dutch King Billy's origins, because they were really (Lutheran) Nassau in what's now Germany. Not Orange in distant Southern France.
    Remiss in a video on him not to mention he was a Nassau 🧐❓

  • @TheJourneyman58
    @TheJourneyman58 Місяць тому +3

    I believe it was England and English before 1706/07 British were birthed when the signing of the political treaty with Scotland 1706 and treaty with England 1707 .
    The joining of the crowns had happened 103yrs earlier in 1603

    • @karriehall1064
      @karriehall1064 12 днів тому

      He also signed the Bill of rights 1668.that gave us our English freedoms for all time never to be removed. the British have been trying to hide this ever since, starting in 1707.

  • @brunolima7402
    @brunolima7402 Місяць тому +4

    Glad you're featuring lesser known figures instead of world war 2 related figures... there are way more interesting parts of human history besides world war 2. Love this narrator. Thanks for the video.

  • @darylwayne5307
    @darylwayne5307 Місяць тому +1

    I appreciate the tenor and tone of your work, a methodical deliberate presentation of the events/timeline. However, I would have thought that the relationship between William and the Bank of England with the City of London would reveal the less obvious power relationships that were primary motive forces in the real politics of the period. Outstanding narration, immensely listenable. Cheers

  • @LurganGoon91
    @LurganGoon91 11 днів тому +1

    We have King William of Orange to thank for the civil and religious liberties we enjoy today.

  • @martinxxxmartin
    @martinxxxmartin Місяць тому +2

    Great programme.
    Excellent narrator.
    Please note: At 19:43 in the video it is said "....to extend France's Western Border ......" . Should it not be : France's Eastern border ?

  • @katherinecollins4685
    @katherinecollins4685 16 днів тому

    Very informative

  • @JangianTV
    @JangianTV Місяць тому +2

    Superb as always! Not the most likable monarch, but interesting and complex.

  • @ImranSharif-hv6mn
    @ImranSharif-hv6mn Місяць тому +2

    I’d hope to see a documentary of king Hassan the 2nd. I’ve watched most of you’re documentary’s and I would love to see a Moroccan based documentary.

  • @janneman7710
    @janneman7710 Місяць тому +6

    I wonder what effect it would have had on world history if Mary and William had had children?
    that might have made the Netherlands part of the UK

    • @theon9575
      @theon9575 Місяць тому +1

      Or, for that matter, the UK could well have become part of the later Kingdom of the Netherlands, because it was a Dutch leader who saw off King James II, not the other way round. King William was, after all, just as English as he was Dutch, his wife Mary was the English Princess Royal, and the couple's focal palace became Het Loo (located in NL but largely financed by English taxpayers, as were his Dutch/English boyfriend's holdings conveniently nearby). The "Germans" including Victoria would never have ruled.
      The resolution of the Napoleonic Wars following Waterloo that resulted in the formation of The United Kingdom of The Netherlands (ie what is now NL, Belgium & Luxembourg) would have been in personal union with the UK (England Scotland & Wales) & would have formed a formidable country under 1 King, with far reaching consequences, and enormous colonial wealth when put together.

    • @theon9575
      @theon9575 Місяць тому

      Mary did become pregnant once, but miscarried the child. So it was a close call.

    • @willwhite1575
      @willwhite1575 23 дні тому

      Perhaps less well explored is if William had remarried after Mary's death and then had a child. He or she would have been the heir to the throne not Anne.

    • @jemoedermeteensnor88
      @jemoedermeteensnor88 4 дні тому

      It was already established that the house of Hannover would succeed. With pretty much the same agreement as the bill of rights. This wasn't that weird because the Dutch king was an elected position. The only reason that people of the house of Orange-Nassau was always "king" was because they knew their leader needed to have some prestige, since all monarchy's have that. (so also nephews instead of children could be elected for life).
      However with much struggle their child could claim both thrones and the differnces eventually would lead to internal collapse. The British empire as we have known it today would have been even more dominant. The only thing that was holding the Dutch down all their time was the lack of population.

    • @jemoedermeteensnor88
      @jemoedermeteensnor88 4 дні тому

      @@theon9575 The capital would probably moved to London at some point. Just like happened when the Franks conquered France. Which would always lead to a split in country.

  • @nicfreedman9873
    @nicfreedman9873 Місяць тому +3

    I live in Orange, named for the price of orange……👌🏼

  • @antoniocarlosjunior4688
    @antoniocarlosjunior4688 Місяць тому +10

    Ho Chi Minh, please!

    • @theon9575
      @theon9575 Місяць тому

      Yes, and then the whole truth and nothing but the truth, please, about this extraordinary man who led his people in a war against the United States and WON‼️

  • @herbertvonsauerkrautunterh2513
    @herbertvonsauerkrautunterh2513 Місяць тому +4

    Actually house of Nassau.. Germans are everywhere

  • @5thMilitia
    @5thMilitia Місяць тому +1

    Should have mentioned English naval defeats in the Third Anglo-Dutch War. It explains why parliament gave up hope of a quick victory.
    The narrative of the Glorious Revolution is also told from a very Anglo-centric perspective. Nothing about Dutch concerns for a second Anglo-French invasion and it is debatable how representative the Immortal seven were.
    And the British army and navy did want to fight. The navy just failed to intercept the Dutch fleet, while the army fell apart after James II fled

  • @johnbennett960
    @johnbennett960 Місяць тому +2

    Superb,and very informative video.,¿W & M. gave us our Constitution, the Bill of Rights, ending Monarchy by Divine Right,
    and this Bill of Rights,taken by the Pilgrim Father's to the 13 colonies in America later became the foundation of the American Constitution.

    • @pedanticradiator1491
      @pedanticradiator1491 Місяць тому +1

      The Pilgrim Father's settled in America long before the reign of William and Mary

  • @robertalpy
    @robertalpy Місяць тому +4

    England had a bad habit of deposing English kings and inviting more maleable foreigners to hold the big seat.
    James didnt have any of his older brothers survival skills or the sense to keep his catholicism in his heart if he intended to rule a protestant people.
    Charles II was undoubtably Catholic. He waited till he was on his death bed to make it public. Had James been a little more secretive he might have lasted.

    • @Wallace43266
      @Wallace43266 Місяць тому +1

      The modern politician will teach you that lying about your conscience is right if it keeps you in power for a few more years

  • @maviemac
    @maviemac Місяць тому +3

    Canadian history was so boring i fell asleep in school but I'd love some history from my homeland!

    • @theon9575
      @theon9575 Місяць тому +3

      It's not Canadian history that was boring 😂.
      It was your history teacher's inability to teach an interesting topic in an engaging way to uninterested students who needed more sleep!

    • @montrelouisebohon-harris7023
      @montrelouisebohon-harris7023 Місяць тому

      I'm from the USA and we have some interesting history but I really really enjoyed learning more about European history than anything . if you're Canadian and I'm from the USA our ancestors essentially came from Europe .last year I took a Heritage DNA test and I am 59% English, 21% Southern Italian and Greek and 20% Eastern European that's all it said on my test but my daughter took another DNA test and hers said Romanian ..I wasn't expecting that at all so I was quite shocked to see anything from Eastern Europe /Romania , however my dad's grandmother and my great grandmother had a French maiden name so we thought she was French but she was actually Southern Italian and Romanian .Now that I think back about her looks she definitely looked More Southern Italian and possibly Romanian because she had very dark hair and eyes and somewhat Olive colored skin , which fortunately I inherited. my mom's family were straight up and down English all the way .dad's family were here in the colonies prior to the Revolutionary War .

    • @montrelouisebohon-harris7023
      @montrelouisebohon-harris7023 Місяць тому

      ​@@theon9575most likely so because here in the USA we learned about Canadian history and I thought it was pretty interesting.we have the revolution a couple hundred years after becoming a colony of Britain, but even up to World War II I believe Canada was still part of the UK . when did Canada gain total independence from the United Kingdom ?

    • @theon9575
      @theon9575 Місяць тому

      @@montrelouisebohon-harris7023 .... mmm I think we're talking about 2 different things. It's not history itself that is interesting or uninteresting, but our own interests and attitudes that see it so.
      Your own background, age, what you're curious about determine what you think is interesting. In Canada, the history of white & European, the English & French squabbles to take-over the land and settlement in the last few hundred years bores you, but I find the history of the few thousand years BEFORE that, of the First Nations, who were they and how they got there, very interesting, because it's anthropology.
      On the other side, I know & work with some Chinese people living in the USA and they find European history trivial and not interesting.
      It's about you, not the history. History is just the story where you seek to understand yourself and "where you're coming from". That's the joy of it.

  • @waltertaljaard1488
    @waltertaljaard1488 23 дні тому

    He was first and foremost a good politician and diplomat, who also seemed to be quite brave in battle. The fact that the later Frederick II of Prussia saw him as an example can be regarded as a testimony.

    • @5thMilitia
      @5thMilitia 16 днів тому

      He was brave to the point of craziness. But his calvinism probably helped him to be so brave. He strongly felt that he was destined by God for his tasks

  • @alikamal3464
    @alikamal3464 Місяць тому +1

    He is known as King Billy.

  • @miyojewoltsnasonth2159
    @miyojewoltsnasonth2159 28 днів тому +1

    Oh, yes, William ... the beginnings of the Orange Order parades in Northern Ireland.

  • @mihaiazimioara6591
    @mihaiazimioara6591 24 дні тому

    Excellent and thorough production, as expected from this channel!! However, Bonnie Prince Charlie could have been briefly mentioned as the last Catholic pretender to the British crown.

  • @mango2005
    @mango2005 Місяць тому +1

    It's unfortunate the increase in Representative government came at the expense of religious toleration.

  • @iwatchDVDsonXbox360
    @iwatchDVDsonXbox360 Місяць тому +4

    Thanks, but i feel like "conqueror of Britain" would have been a flashier title.)

  • @VDP207
    @VDP207 Місяць тому +4

    Noooo, that's Dustin Hoffman in a wig. Yeah, definitely Hoffman;)

    • @jamesoneill2933
      @jamesoneill2933 Місяць тому

      There is perhaps even more in your well observed comment than even you realise. Good king Vilheim had certain, proclivities, if I may plagerise please. Tootsie.

  • @jec1ny
    @jec1ny Місяць тому

    One of the most important accomplishments of William's reign, which would have enormous long term significance for Britain's development as both a major political and economic power, was the passage of the Tonnage Act of 1694 which, among other things, established the Bank of England. The Bank received its Royal Charter on July 27, of that year. The BofE is generally recognized as the world's first national central bank, and it had a massive influence on stabilizing Britain's national debt and currency, thus contributing to a highly stable economy in a world where such was not altogether common. This was accomplished chiefly by minimizing the risks of a sovereign debt crisis which was a common event among the various European kingdoms of that era.

    • @5thMilitia
      @5thMilitia Місяць тому +1

      One of the many Dutch things William brought over

    • @jemoedermeteensnor88
      @jemoedermeteensnor88 4 дні тому

      True very overlooked and important economical change, but the introduction to the stock exchange was probably the number 1 change.

  • @user-kk4lw4mr6i
    @user-kk4lw4mr6i День тому

    33:15 these colonists were only 30y into it, they were still considered Dutch subjects up until the early 18th century when they became British 'subjects'. Boer (farmer) is a profession not and identity historically speaking. In 1707 Hendrik Biebouw (Bibault), a 1st generation huegenot I assume called himself an 'Africaander' which is when we first started seeing seperate identity other than Dutch. Boer only came during Anglo-Boer war, when Brits labeled us this.
    As a side note, my ancestors aren't from the two so called boer republics, they're from eastern part of cape colony (eastern cape) and up until the union in 1910 and little aftwards they could still speak Dutch pretty well maybe not perfect but passebly, my great grandma who lived during this time even had a dutch children's book which was printed in England a little before she was born, which I have now.
    There's virtually no difference between boer and Afrikaner today. (Only on social media, which tells you something).
    But historically speaking dont confuse an profession with an chosen shared identity of Africaander (Afrikaner) .

  • @jamesoneill2933
    @jamesoneill2933 Місяць тому +7

    To the little gentleman in black velvet 🍷🥃

  • @EGChurchofChrist
    @EGChurchofChrist Місяць тому

    It seems he did well in a very difficult period. Was the reign of William and Mary and William alone viewed as one or two reigns?

  • @jamesfohare
    @jamesfohare Місяць тому +2

    He as was never crowned King like Prinze Phillip of Greese who married Queen Elizabeth

    • @pedanticradiator1491
      @pedanticradiator1491 Місяць тому +1

      He was crowned king, he and his wife Queen Mary II were joint monarchs until her death then he reigned alone for a few years

    • @JordanKahele
      @JordanKahele Місяць тому +2

      Charles II had no children, and the crown passed to his brother James II and was declared, Roman Catholic.
      The English, however, they assumed James II would be succeeded by his Protestant daughter, Mary, and her husband William of Orange.
      By the way, in 1685 James II that time had no sons.
      In 1689, Parliament formally offered, the crown to William and Mary.
      And because both of them had no child, parliament passed an act of settlement in 1701 to regulate succession to the crown.
      However, the crown was to go to, Anne, younger sister of Mary.
      And if, Anne, dies without a child.
      The crown, was to go to Protestant Sophia of Hanover, or her issue .
      Sophia was grand-daughter of JAmes I, the Roman Catholic son of James II was, nevertheless, excluded from the crown.
      In 1714 the crown passed to Sophi's son, who became known as King George I..
      I may have to watch the video..

  • @Lasoundmusiq2023
    @Lasoundmusiq2023 9 днів тому

    Prince Mauricio Nassau a Prince of Orange was the Govenor of North East Dutch Brasil. His mother was a Danish-German Princess.
    Prince Nassau sailed with Danish colar of the Elepfant Order Danish monarque. Prince Nassau sended about 18-23 paintings to the Royal King of Denmark King Frederic 3th. Today the Albert Eckhout Dutch paintings of Brasil since 1600 century are transferred from Mauristadt Recife Ricardo Brennand Castle Museum to The Danish National Museum.
    Prins Nassau was part of the Royal Dutch Family House of Orange and his Danish German mother Princess Margrethe Nassau was from the Royal Oldenburg Family.
    Prince Nassau in Hollandese Brasil has a huge importance. He builded Recife Mauristad and Olinda was New Hollandia also known as Nova Amsterdam in North East Brasil. Today the city hold bridges build by Prince Nassau of Orange.
    Many schools and universities bear his name in Brasil. Prince Mauricio Nassau of Siegen is actually one of the Biggest history in Dutch Brasil.
    English infuence in North East Brasil was James Lancaster a privateur sailer for Queen Elisabeth 1th, James Lancaster who captured Recife the introducer of Hamlet Prince of Denmark in year 1607 on the ship Red Dragon.

  • @therabman_5606
    @therabman_5606 Місяць тому +15

    The orange sash is still worn

    • @alexgrayafc49
      @alexgrayafc49 Місяць тому +4

      For god and ulster 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧

    • @jamesoneill2933
      @jamesoneill2933 Місяць тому +3

      Yes there was a photo of a rather dashing Jeffrey Donaldson, in today's Sunday World, sporting a sash , his father's presumably. It's nice to retain such heirlooms in the family so to speak.

    • @jamesoneill2933
      @jamesoneill2933 Місяць тому +1

      No now I wouldn't have said he was gay , but if I'd dropped a shilling in front of him , I'd have kicked it for three miles before I'd bend to pick it up.

    • @therabman_5606
      @therabman_5606 Місяць тому

      @@jamesoneill2933 yeah it is beautiful, almost as beautiful as the ones worn by all the Catholic clergy who have touched up youths, Paudie McGahon kiddy fiddler, Jerry Adam’s covered up his brother fiddling his kids and that’s not to mention Glasgow’s very own Celtic and all their abuse claims

  • @tillylovesholland1161
    @tillylovesholland1161 27 днів тому

    Belgium was one of the liw countries together with Luxemburg. Nowedays they still hve a bond called the Benelux

    • @pedanticradiator1491
      @pedanticradiator1491 24 дні тому +1

      At the time most of Belguim and Luxembourg were called the Spanish Netherlands. Belguim did not exist as a country until 1830

  • @chrisderidder4087
    @chrisderidder4087 Місяць тому +4

    You aint much if you aint dutch!

    • @darbyohara
      @darbyohara Місяць тому

      Or if you Dutch yaint much 😂

    • @darbyohara
      @darbyohara Місяць тому

      Or if you Dutch yaint much 😂

  • @tillylovesholland1161
    @tillylovesholland1161 27 днів тому

    Its Stadhouder nit Stadholder which means citykeeper

    • @arnoroorda3201
      @arnoroorda3201 22 дні тому

      No! It has nothing to do with citykeeper or cityholder its a bastardisation from the German Statthalter wich means holder in sted of or instead of
      So the title is second in command or Deputy

  • @jobertus660
    @jobertus660 Місяць тому

    It is always surprising that English historiography differs from what national historiography indicates.

  • @keithradley5265
    @keithradley5265 3 дні тому

    He is one of the reasons that Prince Phillip and Prince Albert were never made king.

  • @alexgrayafc49
    @alexgrayafc49 Місяць тому +14

    REMEMBER 1690 KING BILLYS ON THE WALL 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧 NO SURRENDER 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧 SHANKILL ROAD 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧

    • @moraesneto9508
      @moraesneto9508 Місяць тому +3

      Why they/you say no surrender? For who? For what?

    • @domsmithsen
      @domsmithsen Місяць тому +4

      Why the union jack flag he was Dutch lol

    • @alexgrayafc49
      @alexgrayafc49 Місяць тому

      @@domsmithsen he was the king of Britain you absolute clown lol

    • @isisnmagic1812
      @isisnmagic1812 Місяць тому

      ​@@domsmithsenin Scotland they or some still celebrate him with the Orange Order March every year.

    • @isisnmagic1812
      @isisnmagic1812 Місяць тому

      ​@@domsmithsendont confuse him with facts, some English folk think England starts at Jobn O'Groats. 😅😅

  • @monty1864
    @monty1864 29 днів тому

    Check the guys track record

  • @cyndy2484
    @cyndy2484 Місяць тому +1

    So, Wales didnt have a king then?? Its always england, scotland and ireland and rarely a me tion of Wales. We are always forgotten. We may aswell go it alone 🤷‍♀️

    • @pedanticradiator1491
      @pedanticradiator1491 29 днів тому +1

      Wales was included in the Kingdom of England from the reign of Henry VIII and didn't legally become a seperate part of the UK for many purposes until the 1950s

  • @123SLM123
    @123SLM123 24 дні тому

    Clearly England belongs to the oranges. Give it back.

  • @user-jk4kx8kd1b
    @user-jk4kx8kd1b Місяць тому

    1:11:11 t

  • @kasiopeusgordon-clane110
    @kasiopeusgordon-clane110 16 днів тому

    As a Dutch studies scholar, this is rather well done factually but does the narrator know any other adjective apart from “preeminent”?

  • @simonmcshannon1209
    @simonmcshannon1209 14 днів тому

    Good progranmes, lots of info...downside is the drowsy boring automated narration

  • @msmolyansky
    @msmolyansky Місяць тому +2

    Why there is no mention of John Churchill ( Grand Duke of Marlborough ) ?

    • @pedanticradiator1491
      @pedanticradiator1491 Місяць тому +3

      Just Duke not Grand Duke and he was more prominent in the next reign

    • @5thMilitia
      @5thMilitia Місяць тому +1

      @@pedanticradiator1491 And he was only an Earl in this period