OFFICIAL Canon EOS RP Hands On PHOTO SHOOT | a GAME CHANGING $999 Full Frame CAMERA?!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 вер 2024
  • NEW FroPack 1 Lightroom Presets froknowsphoto.... (40% off)
    This fix is brought to you by Squarespace. To get your 14 day FREE trial head on over to www.squarespace... if you decide it's for you use the code FroKnowsPhoto at checkout to get 10% Off.
    Camera Giveaway, sign up right here bit.ly/megafro
    Order the Canon EOS RP bit.ly/2N2zdRV
    Order a Canon EOS RP from Adorama bit.ly/2TbP3PK
    This is a HANDS ON Preview of the Canon EOS RP Full Frame mirrorless camera. I had a chance to spend a day using a full production camera with final firmware while in New Orleans.
    Download FULL-RES edited JPEGS right here froknowsphoto.c...
    I did not see Canon unleashing a $1,299 full frame mirrorless camera on the world. Did they cripple some of the features, yes, but I loved the camera for stills. Put good RF glass on it and you're good to go.
    Canon 6 New RF Lens Preview video
    • 5 NEW PRO Canon RF LEN...
    Download MyGearVault mygearvault.co...
    Get a FREE Guide To Capturing Motion In Low Light Situations froknowsphoto.... (look for the orange box)
    __________________________________________________
    Gear I USE
    I SHOOT RAW Camera Bag bit.ly/2scQRt7
    I SHOOT RAW T-Shirts bit.ly/2vG2igB
    Nikon D5 bit.ly/2OBrXNa
    Nikon Z7 bit.ly/2FfRPMY
    Nikon Z6 bit.ly/2FcKsWJ
    Nikon D850 bit.ly/2n54Xto
    The Microphone I use for Vlogging bit.ly/2LWGRPq
    Nikon 70-200 2.8 bit.ly/2OBsjmY
    Nikon 24-70 2.8 VR bit.ly/2LLHdsQ
    Nikon 14-24 2.8 bit.ly/2LK1NtU
    Nikon 105 F1.4 bit.ly/2vttwUq
    Sony a7 III bit.ly/2n3HaK8
    My Rolling Bag Of Choice For Flying bit.ly/2LNsHRK
    Follow me
    ►UA-cam: bit.ly/frotube
    ►Facebook: / froknowsphoto
    ►Instagram: / jaredpolin
    ►Twitter: / froknowsphoto
    USE CODE FRO at squarespace.com... to get your 14 day FREE Trial.
    Please help us continue to make FREE content
    by purchasing one or all of the FroKnowsPhoto
    Educational guides. To check out previews of
    each guide click here.
    ►froknowsphoto.c... . Canon EOS R
    #FroKnowsPhoto #CanonEOSRP #HandsOnPreview

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,6 тис.

  • @froknowsphoto
    @froknowsphoto  5 років тому +119

    Did you know i'm giving away a Camera when I hit 1,000,000 subs? Get entered right here froknowsphoto.com/megafro/

    • @czyruszamora5309
      @czyruszamora5309 5 років тому +1

      What's the name of the model..i just need for assignment

    • @THEMATT222
      @THEMATT222 5 років тому

      EOS RP VS M50 !

    • @THEMATT222
      @THEMATT222 5 років тому

      EOS RP VS M50 !

    • @THEMATT222
      @THEMATT222 5 років тому

      EOS RP VS M50 !

    • @charlesheinzphotography1637
      @charlesheinzphotography1637 5 років тому +1

      @@czyruszamora5309 i think on the site is written up to 3.300 so hope the winner can choose

  • @Scorehound
    @Scorehound 5 років тому +333

    I always laugh when I see people say "entry level." While I definitely understand that compared to, say the Canon EOS 1D mkII this camera looks like a toy. However, any pro on a budget who shoots stills and has no need for video can buy this and make a living off of it with no issues. Every year I visit the Royal BC Museum in Victoria where they have the National Geographic photo contest winners displayed, and every year most of the photos that are on the winners list were taken by Cropped cameras, entry level beginner cameras and older digital cameras with limited dynamic range and resolution. Despite that, these photos were amazing because the subject matter was powerful and the photographer had composed the image right and knew what they were doing. That is the difference. If you don't know what you're doing no amount of "pro" features in a camera will make you a pro photographer. What makes photography great is not the camera but the lens and the person behind the lens.

    • @bilcarter
      @bilcarter 4 роки тому +6

      Kinda. Sorta. A pro needs features that aren't usually on less-expensive cameras. I'm not a pro, but I am an advanced amateur. I never really understood the hype about two card slots. It's nice, but I've lived this long without them on my Canons, and I'm fine. But some professionals make their living off pictures of moving subjects. You need professional quality gear to make that happen. You need fast lenses that work better in low light. Some pro features are indeed necessary.

    • @k473r
      @k473r 4 роки тому +7

      Thank you. I was starting to get upset with all these reviews on a camera that is obviously more than enough for almost everybody.
      It is actually a pro model. I mean, entry level cameras cost like 500$ or less and they are not ment to be used with +1000$ lenses.

    • @ryanb8736
      @ryanb8736 4 роки тому +1

      The sensor in this camera is Canons worst sensor made this day.

    • @k473r
      @k473r 4 роки тому +14

      ​@@ryanb8736 No, it's not.

    • @ryanb8736
      @ryanb8736 4 роки тому +1

      Kater It’s embarrassing for a 2019 sensor. I’ve had over 20 cameras with multiple brands. I was the least impressed with the RP. The Dynamic range was awful.
      The R is a much better sensor.

  • @shekusheriff1438
    @shekusheriff1438 5 років тому +69

    This camera with the RF 35 1.8 lens is an excellent combination for street photography.

    • @chirag4
      @chirag4 5 років тому +9

      100% a deadly combo

  • @DawidDoesTechStuff
    @DawidDoesTechStuff 5 років тому +209

    Jesus Canon, Camera Conspiracy guy is going to be so disappointed.

    • @tomaskonkol8894
      @tomaskonkol8894 5 років тому +5

      Its already disappointed 😀

    • @98JamesNixon
      @98JamesNixon 5 років тому +2

      I think he will be happy to be fair, it has better specs then he was hoping for. Shame it hasn’t got 24fps though. But how many UA-camrs/ vloggers use 24? Would be more practical to shoot 30 or 25.
      Edit- that tiny battery though 🤔

    • @AdilAlsuhaim
      @AdilAlsuhaim 5 років тому +4

      Actually, Camera Conspiracy guy posted a video about the rumors of the RP. He seems very excited about the RF lenses like the RF15-35 f/2.8 IS.

    • @marvinbeatz6266
      @marvinbeatz6266 5 років тому +3

      No flippy scream?

    • @town3
      @town3 5 років тому +2

      No 24p is a death wish lol

  • @1lifeonearth
    @1lifeonearth 5 років тому +92

    Canon: "let's make a good camera but put a shitty battery in it."
    Canon: "good idea."

  • @SpeedfrkOne
    @SpeedfrkOne 5 років тому +21

    The 29:59 time limit on video functionality is not due to hardware limitations. It's done due to taxation / import reasons. See if the camera records longer than 29:59, the camera is classified as a video camera, not a still camera and therefore Canon is charged higher taxes and so is the customer.

    • @thommysides4616
      @thommysides4616 Рік тому +1

      WOW.... I've never heard that before, but it makes perfect sense. Thanks Rod!!!!

  • @donipotts
    @donipotts 5 років тому +158

    The model during the eye af test looked like she was having a lot of fun lol

    • @danny50582
      @danny50582 5 років тому +19

      her eyes took my soul

    • @yacno
      @yacno 5 років тому

      Does anyone know her name?

    • @hosenOne1
      @hosenOne1 5 років тому +1

      ​@@yacno found her from insta... /elle_wenzel/

    • @yacno
      @yacno 5 років тому

      @@hosenOne1 wow tyvm.

    • @zekkoukyo
      @zekkoukyo 5 років тому +2

      @@hosenOne1 Thats some FBI worthy skill right there haha

  • @BinhDong
    @BinhDong 5 років тому +81

    “Blazingly slow” LOL. I got to start using that one

  • @PinchesLowriders
    @PinchesLowriders 5 років тому +15

    Its the full frame at a good price is what i want

  • @binaryblog
    @binaryblog 5 років тому +31

    Best review so far and this camera is perfect for amateur photographers. 6d Ii must be selling disaster if Canon released this camera for 1299$

    • @maxwell5428
      @maxwell5428 5 років тому +2

      I thought it would have the same video specs as the eos r. I was highly dissapointed. Back to looking at used sony and lumix cameras

    • @binaryblog
      @binaryblog 5 років тому

      Maxwell *Personal Account* For hybrid shooters there are many better choices if you don't care about full frame. Aps-C cameras from Sony and Fuji offers much, much more for videographers.

  • @Sunrazor
    @Sunrazor 5 років тому +16

    it's a weird assumption that an entry level full frame should be simple like an entry level aps-c. I suspect most that buys the first FF camera has allready had a couple of aps-c. Probably an enthusiast model like the 80D.

  • @telemaq76
    @telemaq76 5 років тому +26

    Those lenses, with a future version of eosr more pro will be great combo

  • @CaptainJack63
    @CaptainJack63 5 років тому +34

    The EOS RP uses the same battery as the SL2/200. It's nearly the same weight and size. I was planning to buy a SL2 but the RP is like what the SL3 could have been keeping with the theme. That said, I think the RP is a good step up to ease into the new RF lenses and mirrorless.

    • @kevindiaz3459
      @kevindiaz3459 5 років тому +2

      SL2 is still a lot cheaper than this. Two different markets there.

    • @gothickah0
      @gothickah0 5 років тому +3

      I would buy M50 much more better then SL2. And have latest canon processor.

    • @BobFrostV
      @BobFrostV 5 років тому

      I know this is full frame but doesn't that awful autofocus drive people insane and make everyone want to go with an a6400 instead? People buying this probably aren't too invested in Canon lenses.

    • @jbmaru
      @jbmaru 5 років тому +2

      @@BobFrostV ? DPAF is great :)

    • @LouisLuzuka
      @LouisLuzuka 5 років тому +1

      Captain Jack I have a canon SL2 I love it

  • @ZaidsExperience
    @ZaidsExperience 5 років тому +30

    I really appreciate you putting out all of this content brother. Much appreciated!

    • @froknowsphoto
      @froknowsphoto  5 років тому +10

      took a lot of work on this . We are sitting here at midnight posting and stephen's been here since 8 am getting this video done.

    • @ZaidsExperience
      @ZaidsExperience 5 років тому +5

      Totally understand brother. I just wanted to let you know that many of us appreciate the work and the hard work does not go unnoticed! It take hours to edit, compile a vide and make sense of it all in a way that can get a clear message across. Your rock guys, thank you ALL! 😊👍

  • @johnchappe315
    @johnchappe315 5 років тому +168

    Am I the only one who doesn’t think the “entry level full-frame” argument is legit. Surely most people who are legitimately photo/camera illiterate and just want to shoot family trips, kids etc would just get a cheaper aps-c camera. Why would they care about full frame if they don’t even know the first thing about cameras. In my mind an entry level full frame user is someone who’s graduating from apc-s and wants to start taking photo or video more seriously. I don’t know the market research, but surely no one buys full frame as their very first camera (or only a very small minority do). This isn’t a dig at Jared. But camera manufacturers, specifically canon.

    • @TerraThink
      @TerraThink 5 років тому +9

      You have a great point. The only upside for a beginner I guess is that you can continue with the same glass as you upgrade to EOS R or the future top range canon mirrorless (the one that supposedly will have IBIS).

    • @Murphy252000
      @Murphy252000 5 років тому

      "Video more seriously," lmao, FF seriousness. Yet for years and still the GH5s has killed the video game :0

    • @scriptosaurusrex
      @scriptosaurusrex 5 років тому +20

      I think a lot of people are sold on the buzzword fullframe, the same way they are on megapixels.
      Neither is of any value unless you know how to use them, but the tech has become cheap enough for manufacturers to release cheapish ff cameras and sell them to those who don't really know.
      This camera will be great for people who know what they are doing but on a tight ish budget, but suspect it will be sold most to people who have a couple grand burning a hole in their pocket. Remember a lot of people will drop a grand on a phone because 'it has a good camera', when a 500 credit camera will outperform it and you have change for a 300 credit phone. Oh look and 200 credits left to spend on food and stuff.

    • @Murphy252000
      @Murphy252000 5 років тому +3

      @@scriptosaurusrex yeah, the footage I took on my shitty non professional xt3 can't compete with this FF beast......

    • @Weider63
      @Weider63 5 років тому

      i think that your fuji is a kid camera, if we're going to apply Jared's value system lol

  • @sammer2587
    @sammer2587 5 років тому +181

    Seems great for the price. Lots of folks like me care 0% about video. Might be a fun change from my 6D1.

    • @froknowsphoto
      @froknowsphoto  5 років тому +29

      I think it would be a good upgrade.

    • @jackchow4316
      @jackchow4316 5 років тому +7

      using 6D mark 1 ask well. Glad that I skip the 6D2

    • @DonAle_97
      @DonAle_97 5 років тому +1

      Jared Polin what about bayonet/ adapter weight resistance?, I have a 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM but i fear that it would fall into the floor while its hanging on my neck!

    • @-joedal-
      @-joedal- 5 років тому +2

      Careful what you wish for. The viewfinder on the rp will probably be not as good as the one you have in the 6d. 6d is a semi-pro body. You can upgrade to the 6d2 for the flip out screen.

    • @kullumphoto
      @kullumphoto 5 років тому +3

      I also don't care for the video features. This camera is an excellent upgrade from the 6D marki

  • @Arctyy
    @Arctyy 5 років тому +67

    I was waiting for this man! You’re the fastest photo UA-camr out there. Must I say faster than f1.4?! Lol, awesome video :)

  • @Speedbird447
    @Speedbird447 5 років тому +14

    Applause for the effort to put so much information in one video! Thank you!!!!!

  • @virendernegi3907
    @virendernegi3907 5 років тому +13

    Wow those pictures are damn sharp. esp.. 50MM 1.2 I can see the facial hairs and features of the model at 1.1 zoom.. No need for a macro.. eyes perfect sharp... seems like its time to say good bye to my 80D ! You served well!!!!!!!!

    • @foamphotos4105
      @foamphotos4105 5 років тому

      Had a look at the 1.2 today, just on the back of an EOS R but it looked lovely, background blur was crazy. Hefty lens too. Way out of price range for my needs but was fun to look

  • @scriptosaurusrex
    @scriptosaurusrex 5 років тому +10

    It's weird nikon don't do the touch af, as their entry level touch screen dslrs were the first to introduce that feature afaik.

  • @wesleychapman9001
    @wesleychapman9001 5 років тому +11

    This video is so well done and so thorough, Jared. Really love how much detail you put into this, especially as an initial review. Killed it man, thank you!

  • @IntothewestOkotoks
    @IntothewestOkotoks 5 років тому +5

    I don't know of any moms and dads chasing their kids around with a FF $1300 camera (not including the lenses!)...thats what phone are for now. As an 80D owner that is looking for my next camera (and not willing to lose a bundle to experiment with Nikon or Sony) I think this looks like a great option. The EOS R was way too expensive for all it was missing, and if the end is near for FF DSLRs, I'd like to get started with RF lenses. Great option Canon!

    • @dykemamechanical
      @dykemamechanical 5 років тому

      Most Moms and Dad don't know the difference between a full frame and a crop.... I thinkthis will be a flop with 4fps and crippled vid... IMHO

    • @IntothewestOkotoks
      @IntothewestOkotoks 5 років тому

      @@dykemamechanical I'm interested in it. I take pictures. And when I do video, I do 1080 anyways. I think its a good move by Canon.

    • @dykemamechanical
      @dykemamechanical 5 років тому

      @@IntothewestOkotoks the 3.5 fps break it for me...

    • @WuschelofDespair
      @WuschelofDespair 5 років тому

      I don’t see the connection between mom and dads and this camera? It’s an entry level full frame camera, which means it’s for people that have already used an APS-C camera and want to get into full frame. It doesn’t matter at all if those people have kids or not

  • @joaomarveloso1049
    @joaomarveloso1049 5 років тому +17

    This will be a historic camera. I say this because I'm sure this full-frame will go to more places than any full-frame before it.

    • @jmackultra
      @jmackultra 4 роки тому +1

      You ended up being right

    • @joaomarveloso1049
      @joaomarveloso1049 4 роки тому +1

      @@jmackultra really?...how do you know? :)

    • @zillajratomicray
      @zillajratomicray 4 роки тому +1

      @@joaomarveloso1049 It's sold out constantly where I'm at. I think that's an indication that it's selling well.

    • @joaomarveloso1049
      @joaomarveloso1049 4 роки тому

      I thought because it's the lightest full-frame Canon camera. So logically it could be a B camera or travel camera for a lot of people. I don't know if I was right. Just a guess :)

    • @joaomarveloso1049
      @joaomarveloso1049 4 роки тому

      @@zillajratomicray I might have been a bit too enthusiastic when I said this a year ago, but still it makes sense that a very light ( and fairly cheap ) Canon full frame camera will sell a lot.

  • @dlovisuals
    @dlovisuals 5 років тому +162

    $1299 for a Full Frame camera!? That’s insane! This is going to be a great year for cameras. Also congrats on almost 1 million Jared. You guys rock!

    • @NashvilleRebel
      @NashvilleRebel 5 років тому +16

      Have you seen 6D prices lately?

    • @dlovisuals
      @dlovisuals 5 років тому +1

      Brett Hait yeah they keep fluctuating around (assuming you mean 6DII)

    • @jschwalm9164
      @jschwalm9164 5 років тому +26

      Sony A7 and A7 II are below $1000.

    • @34CreAtive34
      @34CreAtive34 5 років тому +9

      jschwalm: but 5 years old...

    • @jschwalm9164
      @jschwalm9164 5 років тому +19

      34CreAtive34 yes...but the EOS RP is not $300 better ;)

  • @travelingtriathlete446
    @travelingtriathlete446 5 років тому +8

    Wait, there's a mic AND headphone input, but no 24fps in 1080p? What?

    • @djdavidbraz
      @djdavidbraz 4 роки тому

      Traveling Triathlete there is 24fps now 😉

  • @a1m153
    @a1m153 5 років тому +12

    A: "I want this camera!"
    B: "Stay calm! The men with the white coats are coming soon!"

  • @nicochiarappa9314
    @nicochiarappa9314 5 років тому +7

    Congratulations you really deserve that 1.000,000 very happy for you and your team. xxx

  • @seanlarkin5454
    @seanlarkin5454 5 років тому +31

    "Where are my grapes?!" should not have made me laugh as much as it did.

    • @spoolindsm127
      @spoolindsm127 5 років тому

      What's that in reference to?

    • @seanlarkin5454
      @seanlarkin5454 5 років тому

      @@spoolindsm127 I literally don't even know, haha.

    • @kane01337
      @kane01337 5 років тому +3

      @@spoolindsm127 Classic Roman / Greek ancient Harp mythology :)

    • @spoolindsm127
      @spoolindsm127 5 років тому

      @@kane01337 Haha okay that makes sense now thanks xD

  • @1lifeonearth
    @1lifeonearth 5 років тому +28

    mom and dads shouldnt be purchasing a $3000 camera-lens combo to film their kids in their backyard and not care about video settings. they would just use their phone. this old way of thinking makes no sense. it only made sense in the olden-days before phones.

    • @caodesignworks2407
      @caodesignworks2407 5 років тому +7

      Nah, it still makes sense. I get a lot of these types streaming through the gallery where I work. Phones can't really zoom in on their kids and they just want to get closer. Or wider at times. Mostly for photos though. Video still mystifies a lot of parents. It's pretty shameful that people born in the 80's/ early 90's have issues figuring some of the easier aspects out. But they do.
      But really, they're not just in the back yard, they're out in the park or at their sports games. Most of them really don't care about video. 4K is a foreign language and their televisions only display 1080. Actually, most people's televisions only display 1080.
      You're definitely right though, They shouldn't be spending $3k on a camera kit. They should just get a good point and shoot. But they're not going to, because some of them are also "aspiring photographers."

    • @1lifeonearth
      @1lifeonearth 5 років тому +1

      @@caodesignworks2407 hahaha so true

    • @RileySerola
      @RileySerola 5 років тому +2

      Chip Ormsby what you said makes no sense. So basically people from mid 20’s to late 30’s have issues dealing with video???? 🤔 Maybe if you had said ppl born in the 70’s but you lost me with that age range mate

    • @MilesAndHeights
      @MilesAndHeights 5 років тому +2

      @Riley Serola I know right. No respect. I’m in my 30s and I’m figuring it alright.

    • @TheIshikawaRin
      @TheIshikawaRin 5 років тому

      I don’t get the “photographing / filming your kids playing around” example, it’s oddly specific and I’ve seen several photography channels bring it up.
      Parents would probably just use their phone anyway.

  • @bmbfilmshd
    @bmbfilmshd 5 років тому +7

    Just watch they going to make a Canon 1dx Mark II mirrorless with full frame 4K 60fps

  • @StephenShreds
    @StephenShreds 5 років тому +10

    Jarod you are AMAZING! Honestly there isn't anyone else on youtube like you! I have been following you for quite some time and this video gave me the courage to come out of my comfort zone and create my own channel! I have used alot of information that you teach and I have created my first cinematic sequence! I would love any feedback and support so please check it out! Much Love!
    Stephen.

    • @gguunneer
      @gguunneer 5 років тому +1

      What camera do to have?

    • @StephenShreds
      @StephenShreds 5 років тому +1

      @@gguunneer Canon sl2!

    • @StephenShreds
      @StephenShreds 5 років тому +2

      @@gguunneer might makey way to the RP!

  • @VMKAROUND365
    @VMKAROUND365 5 років тому +11

    I hope magic lantern unleashes the full potential of the video of the camera

    • @christopherpackart
      @christopherpackart 5 років тому

      If they did it would take them several years.

    • @pvalpha
      @pvalpha 5 років тому +1

      ML might be interested in the challenge. It sounds like this is a 6D mirrorless with feature hobbling. Nothing gets a community motivated quite like having hardware that is clearly more capable being nerfed by software and marketing decisions. Still, its going to take them a few years: someone has to have a camera or three and be willing to brick them in the initial effort. There's also the argument that if you want a more capable camera you pay the extra $$$ and that the ML guys are stealing money from Canon by enabling features on lesser priced cameras. The counterargument is, of course, you bought the darned thing and can do whatever you want with it so long as it doesn't endanger the people around you or interfere with daily life - obviously at the cost of any guarantee/warranty by Canon. RTR is as good an argument as any for ensuring that people can get more value out of the things they own. Its a shame that our world is reduced to such polarizations, but such as it is.

  • @PeterOgbodu
    @PeterOgbodu 2 роки тому +7

    I shot with a friend's RP this weekend and after the firmware updates the eye af was impressive, I was getting shots of people doing acrobatics who were about 50-100 meters away with my 85mm f1.8 at 1.8 tack sharp in the eyes. it really impressed me. was a bit slow with quick shots but the focus wasn't a problem. thinking of buying one now.

    • @azeezadesina52
      @azeezadesina52 9 місяців тому

      Did you eventually get the RP?

    • @PeterOgbodu
      @PeterOgbodu 9 місяців тому

      @@azeezadesina52 my brother did. it is awesome. Eyeing the rp or r8 now. once i do i will switch from my 77d

    • @azeezadesina52
      @azeezadesina52 9 місяців тому

      @@PeterOgbodu I'm curious,is there anyway I could please get sample footages from the camera?

  • @D-One
    @D-One 5 років тому +1

    5:15 80$ grip that does nothing but extend the body if you have big hands? 80$!? Really? geez, it's a piece of plastic with a screw hole.

  • @moelester2203
    @moelester2203 5 років тому +8

    At that price point..they will sell a ton..i personally would spend the extra dollars and get the a7iii

    • @eghaadam5794
      @eghaadam5794 5 років тому

      Or get the A7II and save $300, if you're looking at a comparable spec sheet with this RP

  • @ImaginaShip
    @ImaginaShip 5 років тому +1

    Don’t like the card slot being in the battery compartment as well as using the different battery other than the LPE6 series, I’m holding out for something better may end up getting the R.

  • @MrCouvade
    @MrCouvade 5 років тому +19

    Still like my Canon 5D MK I It really produces good smooth images still after 14 years still is my favorite..

  • @tmpm441
    @tmpm441 5 років тому +1

    Is canon getting more stupid ? Their costumers are waiting for a professionnal mirrorless, the give us a crippled camera but that was’nt enough now they bring out another crippled piece of s.
    Why should i brought this s. Instead of 6dii who is Way cheaper ?
    This camera is a scam, it’s a full frame m50.
    Canon EOS RIP

  • @spider853
    @spider853 5 років тому +67

    What a beautiful model! (I'm not talking about RP ;) )

    • @andrijajovanovic1589
      @andrijajovanovic1589 5 років тому +4

      Downloading the fullres images just for her. lol :D

    • @marvinbeatz6266
      @marvinbeatz6266 5 років тому +2

      Not my proudest fap

    • @spoolindsm127
      @spoolindsm127 5 років тому +2

      @@marvinbeatz6266 Get on that nofap bruh it's good for you

    • @hosenOne1
      @hosenOne1 5 років тому

      found her from insta... /elle_wenzel/

  • @1lifeonearth
    @1lifeonearth 5 років тому +1

    At first im like, oh fuck i might have to switch to canon. but dont worry, upon further inspection of the video options, that thought left my mind very quick.

  • @ByFrosty
    @ByFrosty 5 років тому +5

    For certain hybrid shooters, this camera on the photo side is amazing but the video specs for content creators and video-related thing get finger

  • @damontheesirrr
    @damontheesirrr Рік тому +1

    Where can we find a battery grip for the RP? Some people say one doesn’t exist but others like this video say that they do exist? Can anyone help?

  • @DianaGladney
    @DianaGladney 5 років тому +4

    Awesome preview and really appreciate the hard work you guys did. I hope the 1080p 24fps is added via firmware update.

  • @1lifeonearth
    @1lifeonearth 5 років тому +2

    explain to me why the fuck camera companies use precious real-estate STILL IN 2019 for a trash-can/delete button??? We have storage capacity for thousands of raw photos, why the fuck would anyone spend time looking at photos and pressing the delete button in-camera....

    • @welfarestates8465
      @welfarestates8465 5 років тому +1

      They could at least move that function to the touch screen like Panasonic does. A dedicated button is obtuse.

    • @1lifeonearth
      @1lifeonearth 5 років тому +2

      @@welfarestates8465 for real

    • @neatengineering
      @neatengineering 5 років тому

      You can re-map it

    • @welfarestates8465
      @welfarestates8465 5 років тому +1

      @@neatengineering Of course, but that doesn't change the fact that you've still got a button with a trash can on the back your camera. It looks dumb and unnecessary.

  • @quite1enough
    @quite1enough 5 років тому +5

    Do Canon gonna include 24fps mode in 1080p with firmware update?

    • @Sorennn94
      @Sorennn94 5 років тому

      John Smith it has 25 FPS tho

  • @flycory
    @flycory 5 років тому +2

    Since I am about 80% video.. This camera is completely SHIT... They need to at MINIMUM add 1090p/24/120... Can it be done via software? Who knows. But until they do.. DONT BUY IT.

  • @glennbmendoza
    @glennbmendoza 5 років тому +3

    Lot of Canon haters... lolz. This camera is for photographers who prefers 1. Mirrorless 2. Small Body 3. Full Frame. This is not intended for Videographers. I'm canon user since film days but shifted to Fuji coz Canon took some time before making decent mirrorless camera. The EOS R is good but still too big for my taste. But with this camera, perfect for me and I'm going back to Canon. Why I'm going back ? It's full frame, mirrorless , and small... I don't effin' care with video features. In fact, if they will cut $300 and removed video that is perfectly fine for me.

    • @foamphotos4105
      @foamphotos4105 5 років тому +1

      I held the RP today, body+battery is super light. Lighter than I expected. When the Rf24-105 f4 was attached it added a good bit of weight but still comfortable. Felt great in hand but did notice my pinky hanging off

    • @LouisLuzuka
      @LouisLuzuka 5 років тому

      Foam Photos would u buy

  • @simonworger
    @simonworger 5 років тому +1

    Can't decide if I should get this camera, I'm not interested in video. Just sold my M50 it was just too small and I was using L series lenses on it anyway ! Currently got the 70-200 f4 and 300 f4, should I use these on the RP or go regular dslr body ?

  • @mikes1984
    @mikes1984 5 років тому +6

    my wife says you should condition your hair and not brush it out

  • @JustinPaulPictures
    @JustinPaulPictures 5 років тому +1

    I totally get that the price is sweet for a full-frame ... but $1300 isn’t cheap exactly. It’s still 1300 bucks ... still what I paid for my first car. I don’t love that it’s being repeated soooo much as a way of excusing it’s shortcomings or Canon’s spite.

  • @KyleSand
    @KyleSand 5 років тому +4

    They'll sell a ton of RF 35mm 1.8 is with this body, that lens punches way above its weight.

  • @kian8382
    @kian8382 5 років тому +8

    Jared you nailed it. Though you call it a "preview", it's clear to see what this camera is/isn't capable of doing and who it is/isn't for. I recently got the Canon EOS M50 after using the Fuji for a year and I can see Canon definitely don't pretend to make it fully featured, but it doesn't matter as long as it does what I need, still an impressive product, very clever designed. Thanks for the preview.

    • @bagery
      @bagery 5 років тому +1

      Did you switch or are you using both? If you switched, what made you do so?

    • @kian8382
      @kian8382 5 років тому +1

      @@bagery At first I was planning on getting the X-T30 because it solves almost every problem I had with the X-E3, I never liked the X-T20 btw. OTOH Canon has better flash metering which Fuji continues to ignore, and there are some lenses from Canon I want to use so I'd like to own both systems. However after getting the Canon I realized it does almost everything I need, as well as being simple and more compact. Something I learnt from switching, there simply isn't a "better" system, they are more alike than different, and the hardest part switching to EOS M was actually replacing the XF90 f2 lens.

    • @bagery
      @bagery 5 років тому +1

      @@kian8382 Very sound judgment on whole experience. Thanks so much for the followup. Fuji sounds fantastic, but I'll either get M50 or RP. Your opinion helps confirm why I stick with Canon. Much appreciated

    • @kian8382
      @kian8382 5 років тому

      @Gary Kenyon People criticize Canon's dynamic range and high ISO performance, but AFAIK Canon measures ISO differently from Fuji, with proper raw processing I think they are very close. The sensor in the EOS M50 isn't ISO-invariant and that means more noise if you pull up the shadows. Canon's in-camera JPG noise reduction doesn't handle color noise if you turn down the NR so often they may appear uglier by default, but then I prefer Canon's in-camera raw development to Fuji's, giving you instant preview and is overall friendlier.

    • @mattharter4685
      @mattharter4685 5 років тому

      Love my M50 even bought a used M5 as a backup. I like the R series but I think I would just rather buy a full featured proper DSLR (or just stick with my D90 and D200), and use my M50/M5 for my mirror-less needs. 4K tech is still in need of work for entry level cameras

  • @shonen84
    @shonen84 5 років тому +4

    The real game changer is that RF 24-70 f2.8 L IS. And the RP is a great entry into the RF mount. Exciting stuff.

  • @Raychristofer
    @Raychristofer 5 років тому +3

    Outstanding review Jared and I appreciate how you had a balanced view of its Pros and cons. Try not to discourage companies from adding flippy screens though, I'm not a vlogger but there are so many times I'm sitting in front of my Lumix G7 and I'm thankful that not only can I frame myself but see my audio levels and things like that.

  • @jacobschouten9980
    @jacobschouten9980 5 років тому +13

    Thank you for not just shitting on the camera, as most have decided to do. Watching an honest and rational review was refreshing.

  • @jnd2415
    @jnd2415 Рік тому +1

    So tired of people n UA-cam calling “Entry Level” full frame cameras cheap or for beginners. $999 isn’t cheap to most people. Not everyone’s a pro nor need an R5. But then again, everyone thinks that they are some big time videographer or pro on UA-cam.

    • @dylan-nguyen
      @dylan-nguyen Рік тому

      Entry level just means the cheapest model you can get.. not that it’s inexpensive in general

  • @lucuslopez6866
    @lucuslopez6866 5 років тому +7

    Not too bad of a camera. In a year or two it will drop to 1k - 1.1k. Canon's gonna make a killing of this camera.

    • @luminari_productions
      @luminari_productions 5 років тому

      The video is atrocious I don't think this going to do well. Jared is the only one with a remotely positive review. They could have destroyed the vlogger market and amateurs /beginners. It's a shame.

    • @dirtywater5336
      @dirtywater5336 5 років тому

      Not too bad of a camera? It does a lot of things just ok but nothing great. Take a look at what Fuji is doing and come back here, qualified to comment

  • @HeroShotz
    @HeroShotz 3 роки тому +1

    $999 now i kinda feel like i didnt need to upgrade to the r6 lol

  • @InTheFilth
    @InTheFilth 5 років тому +4

    Man, was really considering switching to Sony and getting the A7iii but now I'm conflicted since video isn't really a thing I do. Lol

    • @jasone2240
      @jasone2240 5 років тому

      It you can afford the RF lenses and don't need eye AF go for it.

  • @MusaonYT
    @MusaonYT 4 роки тому +1

    If you had the option to go for an 80D with 50mm1.4 vs the RP with 50mm1.4 (with the adapter) for $400 extra, which one would you pick?

  • @jaschana2220
    @jaschana2220 5 років тому +89

    Personally, I'd rather have a top of the line apsc camera than a bottom of the barrel full frame that doesn't do anything well.

    • @thenagyyeno
      @thenagyyeno 5 років тому +15

      Jas Chana exactly. And u don't even have to buy the best ASP-C. Fuji just released the Fujifilm XT30. For £899 and it will eat this for breakfast. Ahhh and you don't need to sell your kidney to buy some lenses for it.

    • @MilesAndHeights
      @MilesAndHeights 5 років тому +6

      @Jas Chana That’s so true. Its better to save ur money and buy something decent. I’m still rocking Canon m5. Hopefully they release m5 mk ii soon with some premium lenses.

    • @francescopapi5344
      @francescopapi5344 5 років тому +6

      Full frame will still have better low light performance though. What really is lacking in this system are small affordable lenses. No point in inexpensive (relatively, 1300$ is a lot of money for me) and small body if native glass is super big and expensive. You can spend less on adapted glass but the camera package is still big and bulky that way.

    • @jbmaru
      @jbmaru 5 років тому +2

      @@francescopapi5344 Not with a pancake lens or a nifty fifty!

    • @kaden9572
      @kaden9572 5 років тому +3

      AMEN. All these people saying it's great for the price? No it's not. Get a nice aps-c, m4/3 or something else that can actually rip!! This thing is full frame, sure, but it's a TRASH full frame

  • @DentargPL
    @DentargPL 5 років тому +3

    Oh nice, this is my first FF camera. I've already got EOS 200D, so same battery, some EF glass, no brainer. I do not care about video.

  • @stuartwhite8939
    @stuartwhite8939 5 років тому +5

    I'm upgrading from my sl2 to this

  • @zahifar3936
    @zahifar3936 5 років тому +1

    Canon thinks that beginners who would buy this camera wouldn’t use manual focus and thus they didn’t include the manual focus aide. Perhaps. Still in this case it becomes like manual focusing with a dslr if I’m not wrong. Attractive camera for photo.

    • @stepheneckert4006
      @stepheneckert4006 5 років тому

      Zahi Far it still has focus peaking, just not their “focus guide” from their higher end models

  • @kyokuten
    @kyokuten 5 років тому +3

    I'm a happy 5D Mark IV owner and as I work at sea, I see this as a very good camera for me, travelling with a light camera and a 24-240 plus my 85 1.2 and 14mm f2.8 sounds like a plan for me, thanks Jared, this video was useful

  • @SusanMJB45
    @SusanMJB45 5 років тому +3

    This is exactly the camera I've been searching for. I care ZERO about video....

  • @0rdsec
    @0rdsec 5 років тому +3

    Amazing review! Informative, goes over everything I was looking for, without any of the "ugh this can't shoot 8K 120p so it SUCKS" nonsense. Looks great to me as a second camera. I don't give much of a crap about video as I have no idea how to shoot it, and everything in terms of stills looks fantastic. Especially for the price, this is phenomenal. Can't wait to receive mine!

  • @murph6547
    @murph6547 5 років тому +1

    moral of this video....just dont buy RP....

  • @Canoneosmiami
    @Canoneosmiami 5 років тому +3

    It’s a good start from canon in the right direction ,I think I gonna hold off till ibis in full body comes out ..

  • @merv3930
    @merv3930 5 років тому +1

    Like for Jared to shave his head at 1M subscribers

  • @staticnetwork
    @staticnetwork 5 років тому +13

    I'm a life long Canon digital user back to the S230 Elph and 10D and I'm about to upgrade my out of date 60D (and lot of glass) and move on. I had hopes Canon would jump aboard the mirrorless/4k wagon sooner but I can't wait, I don't like the looks of this camera. It was meant for someone like me. I'm planning on committing to Sony. I really like the A6400, Sony's auto-focus, 4k @ 30fps, 1080p @ 120fps.

    • @ja195
      @ja195 5 років тому +1

      Okay

    • @clydelaya6230
      @clydelaya6230 5 років тому

      sony a6400 over eos rp? not good, not good at all

    • @staticnetwork
      @staticnetwork 5 років тому +1

      @@Bobbiey absolutely true, I'm sure it has better picture quality. But, I want the best all around camera for 4k and on the go pics. The features and size and the maturity of sony's mirrorless portfolio are compelling me. If I was to go full frame I'd pick up the A7 III.

    • @staticnetwork
      @staticnetwork 5 років тому

      @@clydelaya6230 For picture quality I don't doubt the RP is better, but for features, and 4k the sony is better. The A6400 also starts at $900 vs $1300, and there are cheaper glass options to fit my needs. If this Canon had great 4k video I'd jump on it. I want an all round camera for both pics and video in a small package.

  • @mikedisalvo6305
    @mikedisalvo6305 5 років тому +1

    So will my Sigma 24-70, 2.8 DG lens work on this camera or the R with the mount adapter? Lens is like 4 or 5 years old.

    • @ebonisterling5728
      @ebonisterling5728 5 років тому

      mike disalvo same question. Did you get any answers?

  • @TheKentg01
    @TheKentg01 5 років тому +3

    Thanks Jared. I appreciate the Hands on preview. I especially appreciate the RAW files I was able to download and put them through LightRoom. I was able to push & pull them pretty far in post. I loved the image examples of ISO levels. The files can do exactly what I need them to do. I bought 2 of RP's last Wednesday. It was nice to get my hands on the RAW's so early. Just food for thought. As we all know. Camera bodies are just a tool in the tool bag. This camera body is not just for beginners. This camera body is also for Canon users with different types of work. Some projects do not need big files. Sometimes I am opening up 10-15 layers or more in photoshop form 1 composition. So if I have a project that I can use this camera body on, I will. Thanks Again Jared.

  • @sbk_nef
    @sbk_nef 5 років тому +1

    this camera is a 1300 $ piece of shit.
    get a sony a7iii (still the best in class) and EF to E mount adapter and use all your freaking Canon 2.8s

    • @ceddo2511
      @ceddo2511 5 років тому

      Jared will reply and moan about the ergos and 'colour science' of Sony because those 2 subjective things are all the CaniKon brigade have.

  • @mixflip
    @mixflip 5 років тому +8

    Super inexpensive @ $1200?
    I think you guys are throwing the word inexpensive around a little too much lol.

    • @mikepawlikguitar
      @mikepawlikguitar 3 роки тому

      Comparatively speaking to a Canon EOS R5/6 or Sony A7 III/Nikon Z5/Z6/Z7/Z6II/Z7II yes, cheap AF for that matter.

  • @ScottJWaldron
    @ScottJWaldron 5 років тому +2

    A lot of information, especially considering how much time you had with the camera. Great job on that. I do like the ergonomics, size, and things like the extension grip. Firmware/software wise Canon... well, yeah.

  • @danprocaccio
    @danprocaccio 5 років тому +27

    Why no 24p at 1080, thats crazy! This camera is epic for the price, but that one single lack of spec is ridiculous. Cant even right now. I want this camera so bad but it DOESN'T have 24p at 1080 un-cropped. sad face...... canon gets off on withholding. cameras have had 24p 1080 for 10 years, this lack of video spec is utterly ridiculous!

    • @weareyesyesyes
      @weareyesyesyes 5 років тому +2

      How about the recording limit? Before there was a reason. That reason is no longer. Why even have it? This camera will still sell very well I think, and if I shot canon I would pick one up. But removing silly things like this is why I don't shoot canon anymore.

    • @pahwraith
      @pahwraith 5 років тому

      @@weareyesyesyes maybe it overheats. Also it takes half s second to press the record button again.

    • @danprocaccio
      @danprocaccio 5 років тому +3

      Ramin M its a decently epic full frame cam for the price.........until you realize it cant do the simple task of shooting hd at 24p.

    • @ABRestoration
      @ABRestoration 5 років тому +1

      @@danprocaccio why do you want to shoot in 24?

    • @aaronrodriguez8962
      @aaronrodriguez8962 5 років тому +2

      @@ABRestoration 24fps is considered the most cinematic footage possible. It's the "norm" in which we've been accustomed to for decades in most movies and seems to look the most natural. It creates a nice motion blur which closely mimics the natural blur we see with our eyes in the real world. If you have a camera capable of 24, 30 and 60fps, you can check it out yourself. Wave your hand in front of the camera and compare it to what you see with your eyes. Just make sure to use the 180 rule , meaning for 24fps, use 1/50th shutter speed, for 30fps, use 1/60th and for 60fps use 1/125th. You will see that while the 30fps and 60fps look more clear and crisp movements, they don't look as natural as 24fps.

  • @saminekunis8680
    @saminekunis8680 3 роки тому +2

    Thank you for the most honest review of the RP & bc of the many secret features that nobody else mentioned i will definitely buy one as my 3 rd camera for overhead Video to give you kind of a 3 D effect and for that this camera is just what i need at a price i can afford

  • @HassaanMKhalil
    @HassaanMKhalil 5 років тому +6

    360p SQUAAAAAAAAAAD

  • @DrawingLightPhotography
    @DrawingLightPhotography 2 роки тому +1

    I got the RP, not happy with the video features. Upgrading to the R6 very soon

    • @harrison00xXx
      @harrison00xXx 2 роки тому

      If your budget is anyways 2000$+, why even considering the RP?
      I tried R6, R and RP... R is the WORST of all... expensive and bad.
      I really though about the R6, but then i would have missed on some lenses i planned in and i dont wanted to stretch my photography budget that hard (i even saw already 1000$ as expensive for the body alone).
      I was choosing the RP... even for WILDLIFE! Yes the 5 fps are slow, but i barely use video and if... the crop is even an advantage so idc about the crop in 4k everybody hates!
      Just think about that: R6 and "good" glasses is probably ok, but for the money? idk... RP and better glasses = awesome results (at least stills, not video) for the same or less money. Or changed anything since DSLR times when everybody said: "good glass is more important than a good camera"?
      Also.... the good glasses will ALWAYS be expensive, the R6 and cameras at all drop in price much faster. So i have rather now a " shitty" camera (as i nearly always had!) and wait for affordable 2nd hand R5/R6 or even R3, so the good glass i have get the very good companion later.

  • @LisasLife
    @LisasLife 5 років тому +9

    I guess I will wait for IBIS. I like Canon for video. But they are sooo behind Sony it's disheartening. And I can't afford the Sony A7riii which would be my dream 📷. Especially with a GMaster lens. Oh well I will stay with my M50 until Canon gets close to the perfect mirrorless 📷. Course by that time the other manufacturers will have blown that one away. Why do I love Canon Soo much?!

    • @kikipratama1
      @kikipratama1 5 років тому +1

      You are trapped. But I don't say it's that bad.
      Actually Canon knows how to market things. You can't afford Sony ? Canon has the cheapest. Your videos cheapo ? Canon has the expensive Cine. You want ergonomics ? Canon has. You want better glass ? Canon has.
      You want the worst ? Canon has too...

    • @kikipratama1
      @kikipratama1 5 років тому +4

      @@VincentPerryJr I'm in the same thinking that IBIS will not be offered anytime soon.
      However, judging by how the most new lens has IS except the RF85, RF50, RF28-70 it looks like Canon tries to make a path for it, so you will be "forced" to buy the top tier bodies with IBIS to make use of the best glass.
      If the rumors are right that Canon's going to release a 100MP camera, then it better be stabilized in every possible way since higher megapixels hardly accepts camera shake or you'll struggle to notice the difference.

    • @Seansds
      @Seansds 5 років тому +3

      @@kikipratama1 With Canon announcing that IBIS is coming I'd bet it's in their next pro model they release. Canon very rarely announces upcoming features before the product comes out.

    • @kikipratama1
      @kikipratama1 5 років тому

      @@Seansds I bet that's going to be as expensive as ever then. For just an IBIS.
      As Canon may never wants to cannibalize its recent EOS R & RP.
      Time will tell.

  • @CarloMagnoFood
    @CarloMagnoFood 5 років тому +2

    Ok I just watched the rest of the video. This camera is ridiculously cool and at 1300 USD? That's ridiculous.

  • @viktoriavanleeuwen9520
    @viktoriavanleeuwen9520 5 років тому +9

    The video quality is fantastic as this review was shot with the new Canon RP. Now there a few quibbles on some things on this camera, but overall you are getting a fine FF camera for the price of $1299. in a compact body. I will be selling my 77D and upgrading to it, and keeping my extra batteries as these are the same. The RP is much better than the 6D2 as well in lots of features. Other people stop complaining if you want more camera buy the R camera instead.

  • @fotocrimelabphotographyfil496
    @fotocrimelabphotographyfil496 5 років тому +1

    hey jared , raw files of rp are the same with eos r?

  • @danielwilliams8533
    @danielwilliams8533 5 років тому +18

    Why wouldn't they just include focus peaking for manual focus? Wouldn't the software be super cheap to put in?
    I believe all camera conspiracies.

    • @rslrandy
      @rslrandy 5 років тому

      nah

    • @MrFeedrate
      @MrFeedrate 5 років тому +1

      I've got focus peaking on my m50 and it isn't completely useless

    • @danielwilliams8533
      @danielwilliams8533 5 років тому +5

      @@MrFeedrate It's one of my favorite features on cameras. I'm going through a manual focus phase.

    • @kevindiaz3459
      @kevindiaz3459 5 років тому +8

      Focus peaking should be on all mirrorless cameras, period.

    • @MrFeedrate
      @MrFeedrate 5 років тому

      @@danielwilliams8533 I get that, but focus peaking is not accurate enough on the M50

  • @stuartcrofts8860
    @stuartcrofts8860 5 років тому +2

    Is Jared the emperor of camera reviews?Yes he is, hail Jared. May your subscribers double because your videos are comprehensive, entertaining and really clean, oh and thanks Steven. Steven is like a councilor or something. Thanks dude excellent work as always. Side note - where the flip is my bells n whistles hybrid camera? I have the money on standby, cmon Canon it’s time to make the full frame hybrid competition killer. Do it! Do it!

  • @BinhDong
    @BinhDong 5 років тому +12

    I can’t wait to get my hands on one! At this price point, it’s should be a great deal

    • @floridahiker1503
      @floridahiker1503 5 років тому +1

      Oh yeeeaaahhh.

    • @BinhDong
      @BinhDong 5 років тому

      Florida Hiker 😆😆😆😂😂😂 awww yeahhh. I’ve been spotted. ✌️

  • @MorphMixologyReptiles
    @MorphMixologyReptiles 5 років тому +1

    Ok so I run a small youtube channel with some tripod and some vlogging. Im also an aspiring amatuer photographer. I really want to get into it more. Currently shooting on the M50 with kit lens. Would you recommend this EOS RP or the 6D Mk II with their respective 15-35 L series? I would really appreciate a pros opinion. Thanks!

  • @ouiaan
    @ouiaan 5 років тому +37

    Everyone: Canon will release something amazing...
    Canon: We're not giving you 24fps... Super smol battery, pretty much a 2010 camera, but hey! We have colored grips you're welcome

    • @luminari_productions
      @luminari_productions 5 років тому +8

      This is the worst camera of the past 5 years.

    • @NoahStephens
      @NoahStephens 5 років тому

      Canon shoots itself in the foot so much

    • @treeburke
      @treeburke 5 років тому

      Luminari Productions u

    • @persaud101
      @persaud101 5 років тому +2

      Sounds like a butt hurt youtuber user..Your not their target market..

    • @WuschelofDespair
      @WuschelofDespair 5 років тому +1

      Honestly being able to enter full frame land at 1300$ is amazing, sure it won’t be the best camera out there but it‘s actually a good deal I think.

  • @japzinterludes6097
    @japzinterludes6097 4 роки тому +1

    I think i will buy this rp. Thanks jared

  • @TheMikeCrispy
    @TheMikeCrispy 5 років тому +3

    Just wanted to say this is an excellent and in-depth hands-on. Great way to present the pros and cons without any inherent bias either way. Loving the content!

  • @juanalvarado7794
    @juanalvarado7794 5 років тому +2

    Damn those lenses are SMALL!! That 70-200 is way smaller than my olympus 40-150 2.8 PRO. ....m43 better step up their game. FF cameras are getting smaller and M43 are getting bigger...😪😪

  • @alrestivo2746
    @alrestivo2746 5 років тому +6

    And we thought the EOS R was a shitty camera, boy were we wrong, the
    EOS RP is a really shitty camera. the EOS R is just shitty.

    • @Morespizzle
      @Morespizzle 5 років тому +5

      Any camera you use is shitty rofl

  • @mp7a
    @mp7a 5 років тому +2

    Missing the king of 12800 ISO, Mr Todd Wolfe.

  • @spike--
    @spike-- 5 років тому +7

    For everyone crying about video quality. Go buy a video camera. Problem solved.

  • @mychaimiodek6116
    @mychaimiodek6116 5 років тому +1

    Proper pronounciation of "EOS" is ee-ohs, not ee-oh-es. It's because it's named after Greek goddess Eos. Confirmed by Canon vice executive.

    • @froknowsphoto
      @froknowsphoto  5 років тому

      No it’s not.

    • @mychaimiodek6116
      @mychaimiodek6116 5 років тому

      @@froknowsphoto it is, Gerald Undone made a video about it yesterday or so. Stop this improper pronouncation, or Eos will come and blind you for life or sth, blasphemer!

  • @marianofigueroamusic
    @marianofigueroamusic 5 років тому +3

    I was literally refreshing your channel waiting for this video :)

  • @frankwaters8177
    @frankwaters8177 4 роки тому +1

    i got mine for $862, including tax, using the canon loyalty program.

  • @krectus
    @krectus 5 років тому +13

    Full Frame Rebel, decent move Canon, I like it.

    • @TheIshikawaRin
      @TheIshikawaRin 5 років тому

      It is a league above the 000D series, that is a really bad comparison.
      It’s like calling the 6D Mark II a “full-frame Rebel”, it’s just inaccurate and feels wrong.

    • @krectus
      @krectus 5 років тому

      @@TheIshikawaRin This is very similar to the latest rebels in many ways. Heck it even uses the same battery and user interface as them. It even includes a lot of the extra modes that the rebels have. If this had a crop sensor in it they would have branded it as such. Jared even mentioned it seems like a full frame rebel. It is worse than the 6d Mark ii in a few ways, lower max shutter speed, slower fps.

  • @davidpavlich8939
    @davidpavlich8939 5 років тому +1

    I lived in New Orleans for 20+ years. It was pretty neat seeing you shoot in and around the city. Arguably, one of the best street photography cities in the world. Then there's the music and food. I hope you got to dine at some of the local joints. Sure do miss the place. Oh yea, and nice review.