Canon EOS R10 vs R7 vs RP: Which Camera SHOULD You Buy?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 30 вер 2024
- This video is brought to you by Squarespace. I've been using Squarespace for over 10 years now and I think you should give it a try as well. Get your 14 day trial at HTTP://squarespace.com... If you decide it's for your, use the code FroKnowsPhoto at checkout to get 10% off your first order.
Canon has spent the last four years focused on full-frame cameras, R3, R5, R6, RP, R. And now they turn their attention to cropped-sensor RF mount bodies. This video is to help you decide which NEW Canon EOS Mirrorless Camera might be the right one for you in 2022 2023. I've put the Canon R7, R10 and RP specs up against each other to help you decide. We chose the include the RP as it's priced really well for a full-frame body and might be a nice option for some.
FROPACK3 is HERE with 15 all-new custom Lightroom presets!!! Check it out
froknowsphoto.... (40% OFF)
Order the Canon EOS R10 from Allen's Camera bit.ly/3Ahu9BV Amazon amzn.to/3KabJrv
Order the Canon EOS R7 from Allen's Camera bit.ly/3z5FGnm Amazon amzn.to/3AgoPPf
Order a Bernie Photo Book right here www.berniephot...
This video was filmed with the Canon EOS R5 Canon.us/r5fro
Download MyGearVault, it's FREE and the best way to keep track of all your camera gear, receipts, prices paid, date purchased and more mygearvault.co...
Get a FREE Guide To Capturing Motion In Low Light Situations froknowsphoto.... (look for the orange box)
Want to send us gifts, swag, letters...here's our P.O. BOX
PO Box 3715 Philadelphia, PA 19125
USE CODE FroKnowsPhoto at squarespace.com... to get your 14 day FREE Trial.
Gear I USE
I SHOOT RAW T-Shirts store.froknows...
I support Allen's Camera a mom-and-pop Camera store that's been around since 1977. allenscamera.c...
My Go To Mirrorless Camera for Stills
Canon R3 bit.ly/3hzfJVl Allen's Camera
Sony a1 amzn.to/2NHsm55 or bit.ly/3ccKZrt
SIGMA 35mm f1.2 amzn.to/2rLO8Jr (FAVE LENS)
Our go to Cameras for Recording Videos at FroKnowsPhoto
Canon EOS R5 amzn.to/37GQQ5R or bit.ly/2Obaj40
Canon EOS R6 amzn.to/3m6JHQ9 or bit.ly/38GIdXt
The Microphone I use for Vlogging bit.ly/2LWGRPq
My Rolling Bag Of Choice For Flying bit.ly/2LNsHRK
Follow me
►UA-cam: bit.ly/frotube
►Facebook: / froknowsphoto
►Instagram: / jaredpolin
►Twitter: / froknowsphoto
Please help us continue to make FREE content
by purchasing one or all of the FroKnowsPhoto
Educational guides. To check out previews of
each guide click here.
►froknowsphoto.c...
#FroKnowsPhoto #jaredpolin #canon
"Invest in glass" is the advice given by photographers with the best cameras money can buy.
Disagree. They say "invest in glass" because they are professionals and have used both high-end bodies AND lenses. And they truly feel if you are going to invest money into upgrading gear, it's more important to focus on good glass. You can have an R3 but if you are using a cheap lens, you will get crap pics. Plus good glass holds its value.
If you spend $5,000.00 today on a good pro lens, in eight years you will be able to sell it for $4,500.00. Maybe more than you paid for it if inflation has driven up the price of a new one.
If you spend $5,000.00 today on a pro camera, in eight years it will be obsolete and you will be lucky to get $1,500.00. And that's assuming normal times, not when they do something funky, like come out with mirrorless! Then your camera REALLY takes a hit! That's language anyone can understand. So, if you need both and have a limited budget, buy a used camera (you can get a heck of a deal on used DSLRS right now, because everyone is trading them in for mirrorless), and spend your real money on glass. Note: In this "unusual" time DSLR glass also took a hit, but not nearly like cameras. Glass is glass, for a long time. I can still use twenty year old DSLR glass on a modern mirrorless camera with an adapter. It's still great glass. But a twenty year old camera is worthless. No one wants a Canon 1d today!! But a first generation Canon 600 f4L?? Heavy beast, but still takes great shots and will work with your R3!
After 6 years doing photography starting with canon sl2 I must say glass matters not the body. Now using a7riii with GM lenses and I’ll say it again I wish I invested in good lenses.
I’m using the glass from my first slr rebel 35mm film camera. These R series are very compelling compared to my dslr, rebel t3i i’m looking at a 16-35mm lens or the 11-24mm of my current camera ,similar price. That is why i am watching these comparisons.
A decade and a half of shooting here "bodies come and go, glass is forever" is a motto of mine
This was by far one of the best comparison I've seen between the 3 cameras. I was dead set on the RP and after watching this review the R7 is the route I'm taking. 👌
Definately the better pick.
I had and enjoyed the RP since release, but the R7 made me switch to APS-C back completely again, just a much better value as a hybrid camera.
The thing is..... if i would not mind the better AF features for animals and 4k or slowmo video, i would still prefer the RP (better photography camera for less money)
The R10 is 750$ with 100$ cashback in my region while the R7 is 1250$ and RP goes for 870$, R10 looking awesome rn
Well of course. The RP and R10 are budget cameras, they don;t even compare to the R7! The R7 is FAR superior and more expensive!
Note he linear pixel density of the R7,
I love my RP. Great little full frame camera which really encourages you to take photos. I’m not sure there is ever a ‘best’ choice, we all like different things. For me the RP is just a great camera which is under appreciated.
The RP is a brilliant little camera and far better than Jared realises. It has very accurate and competent autofocus, great low light performance and has more customisable buttons than the R6 (where the R6 has a rear dial, the RP has 4 customisable buttons which also act as a joypad).
@Paul Phillipson
Yes, RP is a very good camera in terms of image quality and usability but in my opinion it is a bit on the slower side. But that doesn't matter in lots of situations like landscape, portrait, macro, ... And it is light and compact (like maybe Canon AE-1 or similar cameras). If it had cropped 4k with DPAF maybe it has been enough for me but ...:
I need a 4k compatible camera to collect video samples (I am dreaming of a documetary movie!) so I stumbled over the R7 and I must say: A very capable package if you need speed, stability of freehand recordings, reliable movie AF + more reach with telephoto lenses.
Finally I like both cameras very much and are glad to have access to both tools!
@@energieinfo21 Sounds great and you've sorted out exactly what you need.
Canon RP is one of the best and i have to agree with you. Its under appreciated by a lot of photographers and even canon themselves
I think when you are testing high-end gear, to tend to be biased in terms of performance and quality. But when I show what I shot with my RP, my friends tend to be impressed because they almost see only smartphone photography nowadays.
It's like buying an expensive microphone. You think you can tell the difference because you paid 2000€, but your audience may not.
You’ve helped me with my decision to stick with the RP despite the temptation to move to the R10. I photograph mostly stationary subjects; no need for faster FPS. The nice bokeh with the FF sensor is appreciated, too. Thanks for making your choice relevant to you and encouraging us to make our choices based on our needs and purposes. Mostly, though, thanks for promoting investing in good glass. I’ve added an EF 70-300 and an RF 50 with very satisfying results each.
How’s the EF 70-300 on the RP? I’m tempted to get one myself but haven’t heard too much about it on the RP.
It dwarfs the RP (and the Canon EF to RF adaptor adds to the length). Pleased with image quality so far.
I'd prefer the R10 because one thing to take into account is the high megapixel of the R7 means you need high resolving lenses. Not all EF lenses work well with it. The R10 doesnt have this issue and you dont have to worry about the lens "focus hunting" or getting shots that are not that sharp.
The only thing I wish it had was weather sealing.
I currently use and love an M50 I and II and have all the EF-M lenses and a bunch of EF lenses so no need to "upgrade" yet but id wait out for Canon to release an R10 with weather sealing. If not the R10 will eventually be my next step especially as a sports photographer
I went with the RP. Full frame is so great.
To me the comparison runs a bit further to include the Canon R (used: $1500) and the Nikon Z5 ($1300). And the Fuji S-X10 ($1000) now that I think about it. Of those I think the Z5 has the best image quality esp. in low light, the Fuji has the best lenses available, and the R7 has the best autofocus. So it's a pretty tough call.
fuji has more lenses for sure. Im a huge fuji fanboy but honestly Nikons few lenses are just better. The 50mm 1.8 S is zeiss quality for 1/3 the cost.
+1 on Z5. RP is probably bottom of all the cameras.
SX10 with IBIS
Canon RF LENSES are THE BEST!!!
I have an RP and have been buying decent RF glass. I'm looking at moving up to the R6 and keeping the RP as a backup or hopefully having he wife become more interested and using it as a full frame introduction. The RP still takes good photos for what I have used it for and to be fair it will still hold its own against the R10 and R7 in many instances. In my opinion, a natural jump from the RP would be an R6, or even an R5 or R3, if you have the bucks. Great review. Keep them coming.
Is youtube making money off these scammers pretending to be youtubers?
Is youtube making money off these scammers pretending to be youtubers?
I’ve gotten the R7 a while back and I’ve loved it since then. Coming from a T7 it’s nothing but a complete upgrade packed with features like the higher 32mp count compared to the 24 (which is still capable imo) and 4K up to 60fps. Even the R10 would have been a great choice to step up to but I am very happy with my R7 and recommend it for those with the budget
I’m a noob and just purchased the RP with a 35mm f1.8 macro. You almost have me convinced on swapping out for an R10 but if/when I upgrade to an R5 or alike I don’t want to invest in all new full frame glass. I love the RP and feel it’s a good starting point for me
It’s great starting point! Experiment with lenses, find focal lengths you love and then invest in good glass. Learn editing and basic composition ”rules”… get comfortable with using camera and enjoy your photography 👍 There will always be some better camera to upgrade, don’t bother yourself with that until you find that your camera is limiting you in some way…
For all the benefits of the newer tech in the R7/R10, the fact remains that the RP is a full frame camera. The better dynamic range and Image Quality is definitely better in the long run. Besides if you intend to upgrade to the R6 in the future, the RP is the better choice as they can share the lenses.
I have two R5s and just got the R7. I'm really having fun with the R7 and highly recommend it.
Can you tell me where you ordered/ got your R7? I’ve placed an order for one on Adorama, it’s on back order everywhere and I’m just curious how long it took you to get it.
I think Jared, as a sports photographer, puts way more emphasis on shutter speed and how many frames a camera can shoot per second. If you are shooting things like portraits, landscapes, products and still photography, this really is a non issue, yet he almost belabors the fact that the RP doesn't do that well. Also, you have to take into account all of the drawbacks that come with a crop sensor that you don't have to deal with with a full frame lke crop factor. There's no free lunch.
All of the drawbacks including the *one* thing? Most of the historic drawbacks eg. low light and dynamic range don't apply to this conversation as the APS-C sensors are a generation newer.
As for shutter speed - most of my photos are taken at 5-6 fps. My M6II can do 14 but only if I have a hummingbird outside my window do I kick it up into a faster mode. The RP however, can't even get out of it's own way. My old M6 Mk I could do 9 fps. Hell, my old M10 with contrast detect AF could do 4.6 fps. The RP is mostly unusable unless the subject isn't moving at all. With tracking AF it's FPS is from the early 2000's. I don't know the technical reason why it's so incredibly slow but I hope it wasn't intentional, it really crippled the camera.
@@GrantMcWilliams Canon's famous cripple hammer. Great camera crippled by the manufacturer
@@doghouseriley4732 ?
@@doghouseriley4732 how else will you sell the next generation?
These “drawbacks” as you call them are the same ones espoused but medium format photographers when 35mm was introduced. You’re talking out of your overly large posterior.
I just did our Company employee pictures with the R10 and a Sigma Art 50mm lens and was super surprised at the quality of the photos. The R10 is a wonder at the price.
It is a good comparison, but the camera itself serve its purpose to the user. RP is very good when taking portraits to be honest, but if you're taking sports or fast action photos, better to grab faster cameras. It really depends on the user. For me, I'm happy with my RP, if I need to upgrade, I'll jump to R3
Coming from a very old 40D, the EOS RP was a huge step up for me. Finally, I could fulfill my dream of stepping up to a fullframe sensor. I really love that image quality, especially for stills or landscapes and low light conditions. I also started taking pictures of some birds in a nearby park - works just fine. But remember, I stepped up from a 14 years old camera :D
Why did I upgrade: The autofocus system of my 40D was a little bit "special", it didn't hit that well. Now with those in-sensor dual pixels, the very most shots are now perfectly sharp, even with older lenses!
And I got that RP body for less than 800€/US$, which was a awesome deal! But I understand, that if you want to shoot fast moving objects, you may consider buying another camera.
Maybe there will be something like an EOS RP II - but that will probably be not be that cheaply available.
I would be very happy if the animal eye tracking was being added to the RP - but I think this won't happen.
Overall price/perfomance I give that RP a very good 4,5/5*. Just a notch to slow, but the other characteristics are amazing fot its price.
ive used a 20d with the 500f4, and a M6mkii with the same lens the M is far better, but the R7 blows it out the water, I only bought it for street stuff but was amazed by the results, I have the R3, R5 R6, the only lens upgrade ive made is the 35mm , I prefer the Petzval for portrait and I don't do that very often
Is the R10 good for video Multi STREAMING(Facebook/UA-cam and Twitch)? I don't need it to record I just need good quality for night time and a good lense to zoom, I'm a live streamer I chase police scanner calls in my local Town, but I Run at night I only Run 720p only cause it needs less light and Facebook I stream to only allows 720p. But I'm trying to do as much research before buying something so expensive. Also need a good 18mm-200mm lense that will work well with the R10. Something with good stability. Our roads are tore up so its a bumpy ride. Need something that won't look so bad. Thanks for any and all info. Thanks
Thanx for the video. I'm on Canon 700D and I shoot 99% product photography in studio enviroment. I'm looking to upgrade my gear, and I was thinking to go with the RP and EF 100mm macro lens for product photography. Do you thing that is a good combo for my use? So no landscape, no sports, maybe here and there some portraits. Thank you!
Great review Fro! Question, why didn’t you include the Eos R in the mix. I know it’s a $300 more expensive than the R7 but I feel it would have been a good battle between RP, R, and R7.
Other than it being full frame, the R doesn’t have a lot of advantages over the R7 so for me R7 all the way
@@Leo_Santisteban my only question is what is the bitrate difference between the R7 HQ video and the EOS R's bitrate for ALL-I 4k with 10-bit CLog
R is kinda old and not good for the modern game. But there are still some old cameras good for the modern game, like Nikon d500, d5
Because this video is supposed to be doing a comparison between canons newest cameras
@@CalebBoender how is the rp “one of canon’s newest cameras”?
Getting the r10 for birding with the 600 f11. The r7 doesn't offer enough benefits to make it worth it for me. Its higher quality 4k 60 is slightly more cropped and its ibis barely works with the f11 lens in particular. It has more resolution though and apparently better low light performance, two SD cards, bigger battery, larger evf, video switch so the custom modes can be used for video, and a circular dial for easier skimming of photos. It weighs .4 pounds more and costs $500 extra.
I've been very happy with my RP for a few years. I wish the low-light performance was better but it's useable. It was my path from the 70D crop-sensor to full frame, the R did not appeal to me. I may upgrade to the R5 when the price comes down. I love the RF-L glass!
I have the r6 and I absolutely love it. Crushes in lowlight
You mustn't know how to get the most out of it, the RP is fantastic in low light. You have to overexpose (keeping an eye on the histogram to not blow out highlights). In fact you should always be doing this with the RP, even in daylight, to get the cleanest possible shadows and reducing the need to recover shadows. With Highlight Tone Priority turned on, the highlight recovery is very good.
@@BrettCulverVlogs I hear this claim from R6 users all the time. There's very little difference in ISO noise between all of the R series cameras if you shrink the images down to the 20MP of the R6. The biggest difference between the R6 and say R/RP images shrunk to 20MP is the sharpness of the image. There's relatively little difference in terms of ISO noise, but there's a lot more fine detail in the R6 images which have been softened in the other 2 cameras.
@@cooloox ETTR of course, but there is a lot of noise. Topaz does a pretty good job with it.
@@rlfisher My RP doesn't have a lot of noise. It's not that different to the other R series cameras. The R6 is not that far ahead in terms of actual noise, if you shrink the RP image to 20MP. The R6 does retain noticeably more fine detail and is sharper though. My RP marginally beats my friend's R, but it is meant to according to the DXOMark scores.
In terms of stabilization the R7 seems like a really good option. I'm considering to save a bit more for an R7. Will EF lenses give me any disadvantages if I adapt?
Great comparison thanks! I just have different opinion with the evf or using your screen. At the beginning I thought exactly like you same exact thought's... Then I was wondering why many people like your friend Manny Ortiz was using the screen more and more. I got then a canon R and started using the screen in weird situations that before I required a ladder or going really down. And all the sudden after few months... I realize I was not using the EVF anymore or almost never .... Why? I got lot more sense of the scene around me I can direct the model I get better composition I work much faster ... I use EVF only on direct sun situations. I do professional portraits since 7 years ago. Thanks for your feedback as always.♥️
I love(d) the RP for it's size. Great for travel and landscapes.Battery life was not as bad as it is presented by numbers or ceba ratings.
Totally agree except for the batteries… it drains so fast !
Just came back from Denmark, shot 800 pictures in 6 days, i used 2,5 batteries !
@@julienb9961 uh, that is not so good. I would have loved an RP with the lP-E6NH battery
The answer is NONE. I'm moving away from Canon and their proprietary RF mount. I will not be forced into buying expensive lenses exclusively from Canon and nobody but Canon. Kicking out third party lens manufacturers from the RF mount is a very bad move from Canon and very disrespectful toward its customers. My R6, while it's an awesome camera, is going to be sold shortly, along with the few RF lens that I was able to purchase. Not sure who I'll chose for my next camera yet, Nikon or Sony? Which one is the best of the two in terms of mirrorless cameras and availability of lenses?
When you put the RF-S on an RF Full-frame camera, it should automatically switch to 1.6x crop mode (the same effect is obtained with an adapter for EF-S lenses to RF), this can also be done manually, if you turn off the 1,6x crop mode there will be a vignette.
True, but on RP there is no option to turn off the crop mode. In others there should be.
But that comes with a loss of sensor area, doesn’t it?
For Jared, its all about fps and shooting thru the viewfinder. LoL
Thank you Jared
Tomorrow I am going buy R10 and going use with my Sigma E 17-70 f/2.8-4 even though I paid advance still I was not fully convinced because I am a Nikon shooter after seeing this video
I feel what I am doing is good
I've had the RP for a couple years now as my primary shooter. I use it for landscapes, portraits, nature and auto photography as well has images for my social media and video of UA-cam as well as some paid work for clients. Being that it was so affordable when I bought it (the only full frame under $1k) I feel like it couldn't be beat for my use. and I feel it still holds up extremely well with then right glass.
i completely agree...
Tried it with older cheaper EF glasses and i was not really impressed, but even a "cheap" RF 50mm 1.8 is just MUCH MUCH BETTER than my EF 50mm 1.4 ever was for example.
Since a while i got a RF 800 F11 and its just awesome, even 4-5 fps are just not that awesome for wildlife, but it works and i can work around this limit with 1080p 60 fps video or even 4k video in manual focus and heavy crop to effective 1800mm (basically just enough vertical space for a 100% frame filling full moon)
@@harrison00xXx that’s awesome, I’ve been debating switching out my EF50mm 1.4 for the RF50 1.8 but haven’t decided. Good to hear that comparison. I currently adapt old EF 50mm 1.4 24mm 2.8 and 85mm 1.8 and have been back and forth about whether or not I should spend the money.
I did rent the RF 24-70 and RF 70-200 for a shoot in Maui and was blown away. It’s just so expensive for a small time / part time guy like me lol.
@@BlackFlagAdventure Just get rid of the 1.4 as long its working and get for a little payment a new RF 50mm 1.8 STM
Its especially on the RP super lightweight, it will feel like a "snapshot camera" way less than 1kg, more like 500g about.
The RF 50mm is the lens i love the most on the RP as always on, beside the RF 800 F11 for wildlife. a super compact and lightweight combo for hiking and travelling with less than 2kg!
It just happens that i have some macro, zoom and other special lenses for astrophotography as well as 2 telescopes with EF mounted so i have my "creative" lens set with Meike EF RF Filter adapter and additional to Meikes polarizer and ND filter one from breakthrough, the light pollution filter for astrophotography. In EF i can switch lenses whenever, how and how often i want since the filters protect the sensor from dust alltime, with RF lens switching im still careful.
@@BlackFlagAdventure I really loved the 1.4, especially for videos of my reptiles in nearly complete darkness while hunting or for concerts and festivals etc.
I got the RF 50mm as the EF 1.4 made AF problems in cold conditions and so i had both to compare directly.
The difference is like day and night, the EF 1.4 has just one single positive: a better bokeh and also at smaller apertures it "looks" better since it got more aperture blades.
In anything else the RF 1.8 (as well as the EF 1.8 STMs!) is SUPERIOR.... MUCH sharper, barely CA, supports smooth aperture changes for video use....
And especially the RF version feels higher quality than any of canons autofocus 50mm 1.4/1.8 lenses on EF mount before.
I would even suggest the thing you HAVE TO BUY with a smaller EOS R camera is a RF 50mm 1.8 (or a 35mm with stabilizer if you can afford)
@@harrison00xXx much appreciated I thinking I’m gonna go for it, at least with the 50mm still need to expand my glass collection tho lol, never ending gas lol
I love my EOS RP. But I can wait to get my hands on a R3 and use RP as a backup.
Same thoughts
I still film all the videos for my channels with the EOS R and I LOVE the colors and quality STILL!!
Looking to pickup a B cam now for our travel and vlogging footage, not sure which is best for our use though….
Maybe the R10 with a speed booster??
Yup, R10 it is!! Thanks Fro’
They don’t mke a speed booster for no R10 🤦🏽♂️
@@ksummz are you joking….?? Look it up, use an EF to RF glass Adapter with booster
@@healing2gether I looked only one I seen was $500 and for a full frame at that there was one that is discontinued now tho. Leave a link if u don’t mind if u can find one maybe I’m looking for the wrong item or something
@@ksummz watch my man Fulaan…he has links in his description
ua-cam.com/video/CwI4eSKzEHs/v-deo.html
@@healing2gether man bro can find one no Whre well I did but it’s like the $500 ones
There's just too much difference between R10 and RP to justify buying a dinosaur.
If you're just taking pictures, maybe you could consider the RP. But for video, the R10 is a powerhouse.
Plus the improved processor and all features. You can still buy RF glass and maybe someday upgrade to a full frame.
My opinion, of course. I'd get the R10.
I had been looking at moving from my M50 to a 90D but recently started looking at the R7 and I am really leaning toward getting this camera instead. This video did help me in deciding that the R7 is a better camera for me instead of the R10.
R10 tem melhor imagem que a R7 que sofre de difração acima de F5 !
If you are planning to upgrade M50 go for full frame sensor camera.
@@nithinvarghese I've actually been looking at a used Sony Alpha A7R III.
Went with the RP for the full frame. Don’t really need to shoot fast. So it works great for me.
Unless you need speed or unless video is your main focus, the rp is an amazing camera. And at $900 for the body (what I spent), no camera in that price bracket can come close. the images are gorgeous and you can definitely use it in a studio environment. Add some lights and some quality lenses and you can produce professional results. It's not my primary camera (the r5 does that for me) but I enjoy using it more than my Sony a7r3. The a7r3 is better but in a studio environment I don't need high framrerate and I have lights so I don't need low light performance.
Hi Jared, I really enjoyed your explanation on the three cameras. I’m looking at the updating R10 from Canon 80D. I have two Sigma lens 50mm 1.4 and 17-55 2.8 and Canon 40mm 2.8.
The R10 need C-log3. 900usd camera need log profile as Canon called R50 a beginner camera. I USE M50, I will go with R10 if Canon offer Sigma trio or 22m F2 or fast kit lens. R10 must have C-log3
Great video! I have an R5 and 6dm2 with great EF an RF lenses, all of which I love. However, it all gets pretty heavy on long trips trudging through airports, bus terminals, etc. I bought an R10 just for travelling. It was on sale in December for under $800, and it works great with all my old EF-S lenses. It was just too good a deal to pass up. My load has been lightened significantly and I still hope to bring home some great shots.
man with that amount of hair you don't need a pillow
I've owned the RP for a short time and it's an absolute joy to walk around the city or telephoto in the forest, but I'm already drooling over the R8 :D hahaa, the resulting photo always depends on the lens used; ) such rf-50L is a strong level of photos on RP !
Jeremy Parr Hi Jared I am saving up for the new R 7 as I have the old canon 7D and like to go further with my photography. this video has help me the decide with to go for thank so much for shearing this video yours truly Jeremy😁
SAVE YOUR MONEY AND GO TO SONY A7 RANGE INSTEAD. They're WAY better for photos and video. Trust me, I am a pro of 26 years.
I live in Kenya. Ideally, I would get an R5 or R6ii (for superior wildlife shooting). But, first, I can't afford it. And second, I'm not near talented enough to "deserve" it (ie, with best camera, I still don't get amazing photos). But living in Kenya, I want to grow into a decent system.
Black Friday rolls around and Canon is selling factory refurbished RP for $600! Kit RF24-105f4-7.1 is another $120! RF50 f1. 8 is $80! R7 and R10 not discounted. Bought RP and cheap but decent glass (also bought EF 85 1.8 for $180). It looks like the R7 is MUCH better than the RP. And the R10 is probably better for wildlife. But at $600 vs $1000 and $1500 plus less adjustment to go straight into R6 or R5 later. No brainer.
"...I'm not near talented enough to "deserve" it..." I know that feeling well. For a long time, my photography skills were best suited to a pointy-shooty camera. It's only now, after years of slow improvement, that I feel like I can really use the capabilities of a better camera.
I hope I can find a great deal like you did.
Someone has definitely played Doom on those EVFs though, I 100% guarantee that!
I sold my RP and bought a camera (Sony A7iV) that allows me to purchase aftermarket lens'
A good decision.
R7 têm Difração acima de F5 ! Perde pra SL2!
I have a old sistem , a 550d...
Still don´t know what to buy today...
I mainly shoot landscape and portriats , what are good budget options ?
I also go for prime lens dont used tele or zoom at all.
I got the EOS R7 and it works great. I give it 42 checks and a pass on the sniff test.
RP for me, is probably something I will look at because I already have the R10. I shoot landscapes and cityscape, places where FPS doesn't matter and if I need to shoot moving objects I can use my R10. Plus, I have 3 RF lenses which are a bonus. I use Fujifilm as well, so, I haven't totally gone full blown Canon, yet.
I don't think I have ever enjoyed a camera review this much It is by far the best review available Thank you so much
Just as a side note if buying the R7. If you are going to adapt ef lens just be carful that the lens has enough reslove, as i run into this problem when i got my 90d which also has a high megapixel sensor.
For photos get RP. For video centeric get R7.
Unless you do sports.
What's the difference between the R, RP and R10?
I think I’m going with the to buy the canon R10, I have the canon EOS R
BRO I WAS JUST LOOKING AT THESE
Well, with the EOSr, it’s cropped while in 4K so EFS lenses work. I actually use my sigma 18-35 in crop mode for 4K. On the R6 you can put it into crop mode so you could use those there too.
keeping the M50 till they stop fking about and give the R7 a bsi sensor
actually buy none. Wait for next FF hopefully by the end of the year. Canon once again repeating mistakes by taking that crap LPE17 battery and happily forcing it into the R10. That battery should be banned. And those crop lenses are just toys. I'm just hoping they put the wheel back in the usual spot on the next FF and not copy the R7 wheel placement.
I’m not flush with money, and have to make a lot of decisions based on that. So I’ve spent a long time making do with less. But I have been doing this as a profession and as a hobby for closing in on four decades. I shoot mostly in full manual, and always in raw. So at the very least I have to take umbrage with your assertion that the R10 doesn’t leave any room to move upwards, or is only for someone who isn’t looking to improve their photography as a whole. One of the things that is most attractive about it is the level of customization that you can add to it, and the amount of control you can exert over it. The RP has been a great camera for me, with the ability to be very thoughtful in the way that I approach photos and the way that the camera handles. I plan to add an R10 soon, mainly because I like the difference in features for different uses, and I appreciate the similarities between the two cameras in terms of placement of controls and levels of customizability. I’d love an R5 and R7 as my one-two punch. But the RP and R10 will undoubtedly generate very good results for me. As both are marketed as entry level cameras, I feel safe saying that they both leave a lot of room for upward movement, experimentation, and opportunity to gain experience and skill.
I don't think they want to, but new versions of the R & RP would be a good look in my eyes honestly. Especially with regards to the processor and the tough bar on the R.
I’ve been searching and watching and reading for videos that adequately describe cameras - best one by a long shot. Thank you so much for the review!
I love my RP for beauty/fashion/portraits. I pair it with Canon and Sigma primes for natural light and with a 24-105 L for studio work and while I would love an R6 or R5, I can't justify it because I just don't need the extra features for my type of photography... And the RP has 26MP vs the R6's 20, so that would even be downgrade. I love buying gear and have severe G.A.S., but I love my RP...
the most bad dynamic range in RP
Is your hair real？
Great review, been trying to find a second camera as a back up that may get use once in a while. I was thinking of the R7 and thanks to your review i believed I have a winner. I am currently shooting with a Canon R5 as the main camera.
All good. Buy the one you can afford or most happy with.
Perfect video for me. When I started watching, I had three tabs open at B&H: R10, R7, and RP. They're all kinda sorta doable on my budget, but I wasn't sure which would be the best investment. This video nicely explains the differences, and it's helped me settle on the R7 as the current leader in my camera search.
Good job, Polin. Thanks!
26:46 "cards are inexpensive" Dude, what SD cards are you buying that they are "inexpensive"? But in all seriousness, love these videos!
Sony Tough in UHS II are in my opinion the best bang for the buck. constant writing speed, not too expensive. (and "tough" as the name says, unlike the many bad reviews about more recent Sandisk products)
I use an older 256GB UHS I (micro SD) for mixed regular video and photography mainly and a (sadly only) 128GB UHS II full size SD for 4k and high frame rate video, both cards together costed less than 100$ new.
If i just remind some years ago... i didnt even wanted to afford a faster UHS-I 64GB card, now 128GB UHS II are pretty affordable, just 256GB+ gets already "expensive" when you want it faster than 100MB/s.
@@harrison00xXx Thanks for the info! This helps a lot!
Hey Jared, I've got the eos R I mainly shoot automotive photography and a bit of wedding photography, do you think I should upgrade to the R7?
I had a Nikon N65 SLR years ago and sold it because I wanted to move to all digital, but I never got around to getting a DSLR. Now I just have a Canon G15 with a tiny 1"/1.7" sensor and it's time to get a bigger camera. I was planning on getting an RP, but this video has me reconsidering now. I would prefer full frame but the next step up from the RP that's still full frame is out of my price range. I don't do fast action photography, so I still think the RP will be good enough for me.
Oh and one more comment.i actually own the 6d2 so it's very easy to compare to the rp.i thought the rp would just be the 6d2 in a smaller body with similar performance. But i was shocked when I found the rp beats it.most notably in sharpness. I used the exact same ef lenses on both and even if all in body sharpness is turned off, the rp was sharper than my 6d2. That blew my mind.
I currently have a 550d and I was thinking to buy the R10 or wait for the rumored R8 (I know there will be a big price diference between the two). Any suggestions guys?
If you want to go full frame, wait for R8 and see if it is any good for its price. R10 is not the best option for upgrade at the moment
Canon for Gods sake give us a replacement for the RP!!! I am dying for it!!!
What would you want in an RPII that the R10 doesn't offer, except for full frame? Because it seems like that's what they're offering, and the crop vs FF isn't that different between these two (re: ISO performance, specifically).
@@Bad_Wolf_Media Man full frame means the world to me!!! I have one very special usecase for it... I am a VFX artist and I need a full frame camera for photogrametry... Having a full frame sensor in there makes a difference of night and day... also 4k video from a full frame sensor is just plainly better... Also my usecases would be more video centric and that's why I want a full frame sensor... I am in a film school where we work with a lot of different cameras (recently had the chance to work with the new Venice 2) therefore I know what difference full frame makes in certain usecases...
Nikon Z5.
@@felipecastro8668 nah man only if it had the autofocus 😅 u know what Z5 according to me is that disappointing child that was meant to be the prodigy 😂😂😂
Question about IBIS. Does it work for video only or in photo mode as well? I shoot photo mostly and struggle with camera shake. I don’t always have a tripod so IBIS would be great!
Excellent comparison, I just sent the video to a few friends looking to buy a Canon. My favorite thing about R series is the adapter, I love my EF glass and won't part with them as I love my DSLR's and use them all the time especially my 5D4.
Not sure if it was mentioned in this vid as I ff through much of it but the movie length of these cams are
R10 = 2hrs
R7 = 6hrs
RP = 29m 59s
This is important to me for vlogging etc. The RP would be useless to me.
I'm going with the R10 I have a T5i and will be nice to do bird photography and moving objects for the money used
What I hate is right now there is no actual good high MP full frame below R5 pricing. (R6 is for sport)
Your choices for a decent full frame mirrorless are the Sony A7R IV, Canon R5, Fuji GFX 50R (Medium format).
That's it. The only other realistic options are DSLRs
9:50 he said R7 and then R7 again 10:00 xD
FYI, if you use an EF-S lens (on the adapter) with an "R" body the camera will recognize it and automatically adjust so it is in "crop mode" and there is no vignetting due to that. I presume that the same is true if you use an RF-S lens on a full frame "R" body. Of course, if the lens itself is known for vignette (especially zoom lenses at the widest focal length) that will still happen.
Crop mode on the R6 is a measly 7MPix, so be aware. People are already complaining that 20 MPix is not enough :)
It's always Skittles ;)
I have an rp that I quite enjoy, but am interested in a higher stack of settings. The r7 is quite intriguing, but not sure about moving back to a crop sensor when I want to keep in the full frame world.
But dang, them features on the r7 though.
I have the RP and really wanted animal eye detection, so I was thinking about selling the RP and buy an R6, now I have the RP and the R7. I must say since I have the R7 I have not used my RP, the extra reach for wildlife is amazing, the animal eye tracking is amazing and the 30 / 15 fps is amazing, oh and it has IBIS, I love my R7.
Everything about the R7 is great, even the price... but yeah, I won't be going back to a 1.6x crop any time soon.
Great video Jared,👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
We've all seen videos about how great the R7 is shooting wildlife and sports, but what about street photography and architecture etc?
I’m in the market to upgrade my 70D and was thinking about getting a used Canon R but now thinking maybe the new R7 may be a better option.
What do you think?
I bought a used RP 4 years after its release. Now planning to buy a used R7 in 2026. Now that's a good deal. 😊
Just ordered the R7 for wildlife to go with me old EF500f4L IS and keep the r6 for landscapes portraits and astrophotography
Can’t agree more about the INVEST IN GLASS as finally upgraded all my glass to L apart from the 50 mm which I’ve gone sigma art 1.4 love that 👍👍👍 great videos by the way appreciate all the work you all put into each video 👍👍👍
Canon RP is indeed a very underrated camera. For someone like me who uses only MF vintage lenses, RP is a great choice. Besides, the color science in RP is still like those of older version cameras like Canon 5Diii which is a plus. I can easily shoot at ISO 12800 and get clean and sharp images. I used to have SONY A7Riii, Leica M240 and SL and to me RP is yet the best.
Regards the battery, I found that the battery from my 5DS fits my R7. I bought the R7 with the 18-150mm kit lens to travel with, and I am disappointed with the lens, so will suck up the extra weight, an buy a 24-102mm f4L lens for our next vacation.
So far i havent been dissapointed when using the R10, i use as a backup when on the move, as replacement for my 6D MKII
I went r10 I was worried i would have buyers remorse but i got it refurbished from canon with the kit lens and a 55-210 lens with 2 year warranties on everything for under 1000….. I mean it’s pretty perfect
Still the best, straight forward information about the different camera bodies on youtube. Thanks Jared
I'm superficial, so Canon, please make an R7 in a retro body so that I can also look good when I shoot. :P
I think I’m going with the r10 soon! I do a lot of action photography and that includes shooting vehicles. Thanks for the vid!
O que achou da R10?
Love my RP so far especially paired with quality glass
You said you probably would say the image quality was similar. You have all 3 cameras there how about taking some photos and seeing where the noise becomes unacceptable for you.
Hey, i have a question regarding camera choice and i cant really solve it myself and hoped you may be able to help me with all the experience you have. Im kinda stuck in my decision between the R5, R3, Z9 and A1. I havent invested im any ecosystem yet and price isnt a deciding point here. I think i mainly want to take wildlife pictures, but may want to dip into sports in the future. Additionally all things family picture related. Are 24MP of the R3 enough to print big family pictures? Is the better ISO of the R3 relevant? All these question made it impossible for me to get to a well thought through conclusion. But maybe you can help me with that. Thank you and great content as always!
If only you could buy an R7.... UK.
Great video, but a bit late for me. I had to figure it out by myself :) Anyways, for me, I was set to buy the RP because I don't shoot a lot of sports (occasional MTB races, but they are quite predictable, I could do those with my 5Dc) and I like FF. But then the R7 was announced and I had troubles finding an RP for sale for quite a while. But I want to re-use my EF glass, so then I though about the R7 with Viltrox EF-R mount speed booster adapter. You gain 1 stop light and the crop goes from 1.6 to 1.15. But that adds 250 euro to the price of the R7. So now you get into the R6 territory. So when I saw an R6 in an outlet store for 2200 euro, I got that. 20Mpix is more than enough for me, I was used to 12 from the 5Dc or 18 from the EOS-M (yes, I've got old gear). Very happy with my decision, the extra money I spent is already forgotten.
How much better, in your opinion, is the R7 in comparison to the M6 II?
I'm stuck between 2 cameras, I go to a bunch of airshows and whatnot and want to know what camera would be better Canon R10 or 90d? I currently have the Sl3 which with only 9 autofocus points is just awful for fast-flying jets... I do have a Canon EF 70-300 USM lens but I don't mind buying an adaptor if I need to.
The Canon Rp sensor is bad... What is worse? The R7 and R10... All these cameras are good for the garbage because they do have the worst image-sensor with the worst Dynamic range, ... I have downloaded these original garbage photos from all of these Garbage cameras... Ask yourself, why Jared is doing advertisements for that garbage cameras?
I'm a poor artist, haha not that poor, as i can afford about 1.5k. Any recs for me? I take pics of my paintings mostly. I thought the RP would be a good choice, but then what lens... I have my eye on a Tamron but over budget and now am looking at used for both. Thanks for this video!!!
22:35 THIS......please say it louder for the SONY USERS in the back!
Funny thing about this point here 22:31 the whole reason I'm watching this video is because my 600D has a broken viewfinder. Looking for an upgrade. I think the R10 is the one for me.