Inside the operations room of a £1.4bn Royal Navy Type 45 destroyer

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 сер 2024
  • HMS Diamond has been battling Houthi rebels in the Red Sea, taking out multiple drones using several on-board weapons.
    Meanwhile, in Portsmouth, her sister ship, HMS Duncan, has been taking on a training exercise to recreate the Type 45 destroyer's response to a potential aerial attack.
    Commander Ben Martin, Commanding Officer of HMS Duncan, said it is "routine business" to make sure the ship is prepared "as the very high readiness destroyer".
    More: www.forces.net...
    #forcesnews #navy #warships #military #technology
    Subscribe to Forces News: bit.ly/1OraazC
    Check out our website: www.forces.net/
    Facebook: / forcestv
    Instagram: www.instagram....
    X: / forcesnews

КОМЕНТАРІ • 187

  • @user-zb9os5lk7t
    @user-zb9os5lk7t 6 місяців тому +32

    I've been lucky enought to have a tour of HMS Dragon including the operations room, a day i'll never forget.

  • @furiousscotsman2916
    @furiousscotsman2916 6 місяців тому +87

    For anybody wondering what they are wearing it's flash protection against fires.
    It has been mandatory since the Falkland conflict any time the ship is likely to be under attack or in hostile waters all crew will be in flash protection, one of the harsh lessons the RN learned the hard way.

    • @Optikification
      @Optikification 6 місяців тому

      yep type 42 destroyers were death traps and unsuited for the combat they got put into.

    • @johnnunn8688
      @johnnunn8688 6 місяців тому +20

      The RN has used anti-flash since forever; way before the Falklands.

    • @johnpatrick4673
      @johnpatrick4673 6 місяців тому +11

      Anti flash gear was worn well before the Falklands War

    • @petesheppard1709
      @petesheppard1709 6 місяців тому +10

      Why aren't they wearing eye protection? The eyes are the most vulnerable parts to flash, flame and fragments--and there's no replacing them.

    • @Failedcivvy
      @Failedcivvy 6 місяців тому +2

      Cheers dits

  • @alenkerr8533
    @alenkerr8533 6 місяців тому +43

    Maybe small but our British navy outstanding

    • @meme4one
      @meme4one 6 місяців тому +1

      Measured against what? Some cheap drones? We didn't fair too well the last time our navy saw real combat. The carriers are handy but in the Falklands our combined arms was very poor, navy was hit hard.

    • @alenkerr8533
      @alenkerr8533 6 місяців тому +3

      @@meme4one yes but that's in the past and thousands of miles away from bases our navy is modern small but powerful

    • @Dingdangdoo
      @Dingdangdoo 6 місяців тому +3

      @@alenkerr8533 politicians would love you.

    • @meme4one
      @meme4one 6 місяців тому +1

      @@alenkerr8533 I am sure we thought that back then too. When was the last time our navy was proven in battle?

    • @alenkerr8533
      @alenkerr8533 6 місяців тому +1

      @@meme4one it's all about building a modern navy just in case war breaks out as it's looking likely

  • @Jay-O_Carlow
    @Jay-O_Carlow 6 місяців тому +2

    Thanks To all the FORCES, Not only Protecting us , But the whole world when help is needed , You Men & women are already there and ready to go , Cant thank all of You Enough!!

  • @geofo60
    @geofo60 6 місяців тому +4

    The operations room has certainly moved on since my time as a Cadet, hoping to become a Weapons Artificer in the mid 60's at HMS Excellent. Great memories of the Sea Cat missile system.

  • @alanmcmillan6969
    @alanmcmillan6969 6 місяців тому +5

    Thank you.

  • @MeetShah_
    @MeetShah_ 6 місяців тому +58

    I hope so we get the royal navy to its former glory in the next 10 years and become the largest and the best navy in the world

    • @AtheistOrphan
      @AtheistOrphan 6 місяців тому +46

      Nice thought but I can’t see it becoming ‘the largest navy in the world’ somehow! For example the US Navy currently has 299 deployable combat vessels, compared with the Royal Navy’s 67.

    • @jambo8442
      @jambo8442 6 місяців тому +17

      In your dreams pal

    • @MeetShah_
      @MeetShah_ 6 місяців тому +1

      @@AtheistOrphan hoping soon if they increase there production 5X

    • @GapeGang
      @GapeGang 6 місяців тому +8

      Not happening ever again

    • @regarded9702
      @regarded9702 6 місяців тому +2

      If the UK joins some sort of European Federation and then the US dissolves as a country then that could maybe happen.

  • @Ashhow
    @Ashhow 6 місяців тому

    I had the luxury of staying on HMS Dragon in the South Atlantic during an exercise. Awesome ship, it could turn on a dime.

  • @mihalich7740
    @mihalich7740 6 місяців тому +5

    00:25 - Старый добрый (боцманский) свисток - по-прежнему в деле! 😅
    Отдельный "Лайк" хотя бы за это! 😂😂😂

    • @spidos1000
      @spidos1000 6 місяців тому

      How’s Ukraine going? Heard a Russian ship was recently sunk?

  • @andreluiztheophilomaximian5571
    @andreluiztheophilomaximian5571 6 місяців тому +1

    Back in control

  • @rogerkay8603
    @rogerkay8603 6 місяців тому +1

    Good lads

  • @davidrobertsemail
    @davidrobertsemail 6 місяців тому +4

    Sad there’s only 6 of them.
    When the initial order of 12 was placed most commentators complained that was far too few.

    • @dynamo1796
      @dynamo1796 6 місяців тому

      You'd always have more if you could afford it. In the real world, I'm happy to see that we have two carriers, 6 of the best air defence destroyers in the world and now we're getting the Type 26s too which are baller.
      By the end of the 2020s, the Royal Navy will be the most capable and modern fleet in Europe - head and shoulders.

    • @davidrobertsemail
      @davidrobertsemail 6 місяців тому

      @@dynamo1796the navy can’t even go near the houtis without US air defense. Best in Europe!!! That’s a laugh. Europe is an absolute joke.

  • @fToo
    @fToo 6 місяців тому

    @1:36 "sea viper is the weapon of choice" until the missile stocks start running low !

  • @TheMono25
    @TheMono25 6 місяців тому +2

    Lovely and clean. I can't See a bottle of vodka or a cigarette butt in sight❤❤

    • @boabm6522
      @boabm6522 6 місяців тому

      Your closet?​@@AureoleWebweaver

    • @exiletsj2570
      @exiletsj2570 6 місяців тому

      @@AureoleWebweaver 😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @AverageAlien
      @AverageAlien 4 місяці тому

      Cleared away for the camera mate

  • @eddieboy4667
    @eddieboy4667 6 місяців тому +1

    Imagine our new arrivals doing this ???

  • @jamesjeffs9443
    @jamesjeffs9443 6 місяців тому +3

    Get the rust of the boat. Looks a mess . .

  • @michaelanderson3096
    @michaelanderson3096 3 місяці тому

    Lazer defense too.

  • @regolith1350
    @regolith1350 6 місяців тому

    1: What the hell are they wearing?
    2: Let me check the comments...

  • @MsIceBreaker
    @MsIceBreaker 6 місяців тому

    Skills.

  • @markcooke5270
    @markcooke5270 6 місяців тому

    Yes the sea viper is expensive against a drone but were developing systems for that ... Most navies are having to do the same ....

  • @jeanpaultongeren125
    @jeanpaultongeren125 6 місяців тому

    these and the Dutch Navy (ships where im From) have Thales on board.. very big player best radar tech

    • @markcooke5270
      @markcooke5270 6 місяців тому

      Yes Artisan and Sampson systems

    • @dynamo1796
      @dynamo1796 6 місяців тому

      Nah SAMPSON is the best active AESA radar but the Thales stuff is pretty good for lower tier surface combatants, like the frigates. The big guided-missile boys like the T-45s, Horizon and Arleigh Burke's all use higher level gear like SAMPSON, PAAMS and SPY-1 respectively.

  • @frankthompson6503
    @frankthompson6503 6 місяців тому

    Get another 10 ships like diamond and Duncan.

  • @keech100
    @keech100 6 місяців тому +6

    The economics of this is insane. Sea vipers cost over 1m per unit shooting down drones that are probably bought on ali express

    • @nigelmacbug6678
      @nigelmacbug6678 6 місяців тому +3

      Vs the billions lost in disrupted trade, sunk ship and lost lives

    • @noice8674
      @noice8674 6 місяців тому +3

      That's why laser weapons are important. Costs just 100 dollars to strike a drone.

    • @PhilbyFavourites
      @PhilbyFavourites 6 місяців тому

      @@noice8674I’d much appreciate you adding the development, and all the through life, costs for your laser system….
      Unlikely you’ve been involved in MOD UK procurement….

  • @Ray-td5lo
    @Ray-td5lo 6 місяців тому

    Surprised it’s not sitting in maintenance

  • @Michaelhunt-Ertz-gi1sd
    @Michaelhunt-Ertz-gi1sd 6 місяців тому

    They look like a low budget Star Wars cast with that shot on

  • @EnglishVeteran
    @EnglishVeteran 6 місяців тому

    But they ran out of big bullets! 😂

  • @andylees2940
    @andylees2940 6 місяців тому

    Sea viper to take down a 2 bit drone…. Uk cannot afford such a war lol

  • @jscotty349
    @jscotty349 4 місяці тому

    accurately depicts the appropriate attire for the british people in 2050 under (censored word) law

  • @originalkk882
    @originalkk882 6 місяців тому

    Still no anti-ballistic missile capability. Plus the time for these people to react, communicate, and launch missiles is far too long when attacked by high speed missiles.

  • @jbuckley2546
    @jbuckley2546 6 місяців тому +2

    Have they installed a reserving camera now?

    • @Markus117d
      @Markus117d 6 місяців тому +1

      What's a "Reserving" camera? 😂

    • @jbuckley2546
      @jbuckley2546 6 місяців тому

      @@Markus117d I reverse the right to reply to that Markus.

  • @johnhudghton3535
    @johnhudghton3535 6 місяців тому +6

    They defeat the drones and then damage the ship while "parking". "Right hand down a bit..."

    • @dynamo1796
      @dynamo1796 6 місяців тому

      That was a minesweeper, not a T-45.

  • @parrotbrand2782
    @parrotbrand2782 6 місяців тому

    No land attack weapons. How to attack Houthis' base?

  • @AAAAAA-tj1nq
    @AAAAAA-tj1nq 6 місяців тому

    millions of pounds missile vs a thousands of pounds drone

    • @Markus117d
      @Markus117d 6 місяців тому +1

      Thousands of pounds drone Vs Millions or even Billions of Ship and cargo.. Not to mention peoples lives.. 😂🤔

  • @CC-ns2ds
    @CC-ns2ds 6 місяців тому +2

    If we got rid of our own nuclear deterrent and just hosted US nukes we could put so much more money into our navy and with china and the South Pacific being the next naval focus point it’d make sense to have 10 nuclear attack and cruise missile launch subs instead of ballistic subs but idk.

    • @keech100
      @keech100 6 місяців тому +2

      Technically not that much from the deterrent themselves. Only 3bn I believe a year which is about the cost of 2ish nuclear attack subs before you take into account training and ammo.
      Although I do agree with your overall point of needing more normal troops. We pretty much just do whatever the US does as it is

    • @CC-ns2ds
      @CC-ns2ds 6 місяців тому +1

      @@keech100 Ahh man I assumed it’d be slightly more but thanks for the insight. I just hate the fact we are lagging behind the French in getting a decent surface fleet up and running.

    • @dynamo1796
      @dynamo1796 6 місяців тому

      The next major war will be in the Pacific, now that Russia is castrating itself and it's economy in Ukraine. The war in the pacific will be fought by the US, leading Canada, Australia, Taiwan, NZ and probably the Philippines too. The UK will no doubt play a role but it isn't operating in it's back yard so its contribution will be more limited.

  • @rayandco
    @rayandco 6 місяців тому +2

    Our navy prior to thatcher was still third largest in world , she crippled our armed forces , sadly our navy can’t even protect our coastline these days

  • @richardmarsden5610
    @richardmarsden5610 6 місяців тому +2

    A warship with negligible offensive land-attack capabilities. Very limited VLS capacity too for a guided missile destroyer.

    • @markcooke5270
      @markcooke5270 6 місяців тому

      You've heard of quad packing and the new New Naval Strike missile and the Joint Air to Air and Air to Land missile were designing with France

    • @richardmarsden5610
      @richardmarsden5610 6 місяців тому +2

      @@markcooke5270 Hear a lot of things.

    • @dynamo1796
      @dynamo1796 6 місяців тому

      Its a specialty air defence destroyer, land attack isn't its mission. It also has Harpoons for ship-to-ship attack and is getting NSM as well as the quad pack systems. The T-45s are the best destroyers in Europe.

  • @user-microburst
    @user-microburst 6 місяців тому

    Why the hoods? Fireproof like F1 ones?

    • @lachlanchester8142
      @lachlanchester8142 6 місяців тому

      Indeed

    • @dynamo1796
      @dynamo1796 6 місяців тому +1

      Anti-Flash gear. If you take a hit and have a flash-burn of superheated air etc then anti-flash stops you from getting 1st degree burns all over your body and likely dying.

  • @Failedcivvy
    @Failedcivvy 6 місяців тому

    Throbbing

  • @richardtodd6559
    @richardtodd6559 6 місяців тому +1

    They destroy the drone saving the ship…& reverse into another ship thereby doing drones job for free…Britannia rules the waves…lol

  • @user-fi4kd5it6v
    @user-fi4kd5it6v 6 місяців тому

    Meanwhile they're losing against Yemen and Afghanistan 😂
    Shame on you! 😤

  • @jej3451
    @jej3451 6 місяців тому +4

    Using a £2 million missile to shoot down a £2,000 drone is not sustainable.

    • @johnnunn8688
      @johnnunn8688 6 місяців тому

      It is when ships cost billions, f**l!

    • @sshep86
      @sshep86 6 місяців тому +8

      Ofcourse it is. That £2000 drone can do millions of pounds of damage or worse kill a person. The Ukranians have proven how low cost drone boats can sink a corvette just the other day, potentially killing up to 50 personnel. Stopping that from happening is worth millions of £s any given day.

    • @jej3451
      @jej3451 6 місяців тому +3

      @@sshep86 The problem is that the enemy can make thousands of them. The UK cannot afford thousands of Sea Vipers.

    • @lonpfrb
      @lonpfrb 6 місяців тому +2

      You have a fair question but have not accounted correctly for the assets at risk both civil and military.
      Type 45 and crew value hugely outweighs the ordinance.

    • @meme4one
      @meme4one 6 місяців тому

      ​@@lonpfrbso why stick it out where it's a sitting duck when we run out of missiles to support someone else's war?

  • @jambo8442
    @jambo8442 6 місяців тому +2

    Can anyone tell me why they have masks on ?

    • @Spiretail
      @Spiretail 6 місяців тому +8

      Fire protection.

    • @furiousscotsman2916
      @furiousscotsman2916 6 місяців тому +3

      Its mandatory in a war zone or potential war zone to be in flash overalls since the Falklands war, one of the harsh lessons the RN learnt from that conflict, so now when there is even a remote chance of say a missile impact and a fire then all crew must be in flash protection.

    • @SgtAndrewM
      @SgtAndrewM 6 місяців тому +3

      Anti flash gear

    • @EnglishVeteran
      @EnglishVeteran 6 місяців тому +1

      No there is an outbreak of CONVID!😂

    • @whysoserious7553
      @whysoserious7553 6 місяців тому +1

      Because of too many farts

  • @mohamedkhalilelachi4706
    @mohamedkhalilelachi4706 6 місяців тому

    Brits spreading freedom ? 😂 Looking at the state of your economy I think you have better things to do

  • @Marcopolo12as
    @Marcopolo12as 6 місяців тому +1

    Hopefully they dont reverse this one in to another ship too

  • @tokyoexpresswayjapan8105
    @tokyoexpresswayjapan8105 6 місяців тому

    Shouldn't you guys be censoring those equipment and radar?

    • @lonpfrb
      @lonpfrb 6 місяців тому

      No because deterrence requires credible capability. So best to show that it works.

    • @meme4one
      @meme4one 6 місяців тому +3

      Thank God we have a military expert online to advise the Ministry of Defence on what is sensitive and should be hidden from the enemy. Report to Whitehall on Monday for a job at the top.

  • @joeharris3878
    @joeharris3878 6 місяців тому

    Yeah ! I remember those funny scarves from the Atgentine -- English war of +/--1980

  • @zlatkokovach7862
    @zlatkokovach7862 6 місяців тому

    This is laughable. 😂

    • @avro9159
      @avro9159 6 місяців тому

      why is a never served who sits down to pee pretending to laugh at the royal navy?

  • @MrSzwarz
    @MrSzwarz 6 місяців тому +2

    These Houthii are not even "real" opponents, and already it is both for UK and GB Navy a big problem...

    • @A_NorthKorean_CoOp
      @A_NorthKorean_CoOp 6 місяців тому +2

      Sure

    • @sshep86
      @sshep86 6 місяців тому +5

      UK and GB are the same country. 😆 Want to try again?

    • @nphil93992
      @nphil93992 6 місяців тому

      its a big problem becuase politicans get in the, either the UK or US could solve the entire middle east problem in 30 minutes if they want to

    • @dc-4ever201
      @dc-4ever201 6 місяців тому +1

      ​@@nphil93992it takes a very naive and stupid person to think they can solve 1400 years of hatred between two religions in a short time.

    • @sshep86
      @sshep86 6 місяців тому

      @@dc-4ever201 I cant be sure. But I am guessing they are referring to an uncontrolled nuclear reaction deployed in air burst.

  • @ffudon
    @ffudon 6 місяців тому +3

    I thought this channel was all about Ukranian comedy and satire 🤔

    • @BlutoandCo
      @BlutoandCo 6 місяців тому +3

      Yawn

    • @sshep86
      @sshep86 6 місяців тому +2

      Don't need comedy when there plonkers like you to laugh at.

  • @agoezrose-ln8ex
    @agoezrose-ln8ex 6 місяців тому

    bali island love blonde blue eye friendship catholic church and believe follow bule ❤🇦🇺🇬🇧🇺🇸❤️