N64 was a big let down for a lot of people at the time. Has about 12 great first party games and a bunch of bullshit. The PS1 library was stacked so heavy that it got most of my playtime in the 90's and into the 2000s...
I’m 34 years old and while I have a ps5 and my gf has a switch, I spend 90% of my gaming time playing ps2 and GameCube games. Between the 2 there are way too many quality bangers to count, modern games can’t hold a candle to that period of time
It's funny how the N64 had better graphics (64 bits) and power but the cartridges was a huge bottleneck and the the PS1 had lesser graphics (32 bits) and power but the CDs made it possible for Sony to take advantage of bigger games and FMV (full motion video)
"Sony ALWAYS wins, baby! You can't beat Sony! Sony ALWAYS wins!" -Chad Warden. In the 80s and 90s, the ARCADES are where you went to experience cutting edge tech. Namco and SEGA's rivalries are what inspired Sony to make the PlayStation a 3D console, and influenced the creation of a LOT of its games (Crash Bandicoot for one). So in a twisted hilarious way, we actually DO have Sega (and their arcade rivals like Namco and even ATARI) to thank for the existence of PlayStation!
The PlayStation was also originally meant to be a CD SNES add-on, and Sony turned it into an actual standalone console to spite Nintendo for going with Philips
12:55 Not true. Final Fantasy Crystal Chronicles was on GameCube in 2004, and many FF and other Square games were on GBA, DS, 3DS before 2019. Sony just apparently got exclusive console rights to many mainline Final Fantasy titles after 6. I don't think Square was ever beefing with Nintendo, it's just that their business interests aligned with Sony's.
Yes it was more business and Sony making a deal with Square Enix for exclusivity. But that has ended recently due to low sales. Square should had broken that deal years ago. Now they will go multiplatform
Honestly I strongly felt the same way but more towards gaming afterwards. We had the first successful CD based game console going head to head with the last successful cartridge based game console. Both consoles has many advantages over each other. We are still getting games ported from both systems to this day. Personally I have to go with PS1 for a few key reasons. Overall better audio, more variety of games, better controllers and a more unique memory unit aka memory cards.
The video was very entertaining and i learned alot from all this. SHEESH. as a man who PLAYED every single console from 2005 at 4 years old to NOW, this opened my eyes on ALOT. Nice video bro!
Me the Dreamcast kid just vibing on the side. Oh the Dreamcast was my older cousin's, the 1st console I ever played on. Awesome games by Sega and others for sure. But the 1st console i owned myself was an 8bit one, like only played Atari games. In the early 2000s. I don't remember where it came from either lol.
@@TheeBreadShow i really am tbh. If you ever feel like it, definitely check out the Sega side of UA-cam or retrospectives on the Dreamcast. Just nothing but good vibes and very educational not just for the console, but the industry as we know it. And hey, you might learn of some games to try, it's pretty simple to emulate thankfully.
You don't see a whole lot of N64 vs PS1 debates. One outsold the other by 4 to 1. It was good though. Both were great in their own way. Then the 6th gen came and it pretty much hasn't stopped.
I was born in 2000, but my gaming life started with the Nintendo 64 and the SEGA Dreamcast. Although I didn't play many video games, I did play some titles like Super Mario 64, the Legend of Zelda Ocarina of Time, Donkey Kong 64, Mario Kart 64, Hydro Thunder, Tony Hawk's Pro Skater, and Resident Evil Code Veronica.
The reason why square stopped making final fantasy games on nintendo was because they wanted to do bigger things and sony had the tech to do it. It had nothing to do with sony vs nintendo. During the 6th generation Square made a handful of games on the GBA and even some on gamecube
Excellent take imo. I feel like ps1 and n64 are a tie in the post generation. N64 has the big N titles, but PS1 was home to the second half of the jrpg golden age.
PS1 won the console battle of the 90s, but Nintendo won the console wars in the long run. Look at how Switch is doing, it's on its way to beating the PS2 as the best-selling console of all time. Whereas the other console manufacturers lost to PC.
@Nonantement Yes that is true, I just mentioned the PS1 since that was the bigger focus of the video. But of course the PS2 was also dominating in the early 2000s.
My first gaming console my family had was the NES that my older cousins gave to us (I grew up in the early 2000s) and then shortly after we got a PS2 and my older sister got a N64
If you're comparing the newest nintendo and PlayStation consoles (Switch and PS5) then I believe the Switch is better because it not only has more games and just better exclusive games and the Switch is better form factor. A lot of people I know who own a PS5 are just longing for more games.
The N64 had some great games but the graphics in most of the games looked the same mainly due to the cartridge storage sizes limiting what devs could do with the hardware where as the PS1 had some really impressive looking games for the time because the amount of available storage on the CD's allowed devs to really take advantage of the hardware. The PS1 also had a better audio quality and bigger variety of games.
Some may claim that PSX got two year head start to N64. But, N64 got two and half years head start for proper 3D -analog control. -Who even plays those old PSone games these days anymore that did not support analog + rumble?
Some advice from me: sometimes if you mess up what you say, its okay, you can retake. I noticed you messed up a few of the lines but you could easily retake that and it would improve the video
Great vid! But to be honest, it's hard to make a case for why the N64 is better that isn't basically just saying "it's better because it has Nintendo games." Which isn't too compelling when the PS1 had so many more games of equal quality and influence (and also had undeniably much more variety to its library).
I chose to buy a nintendo 64 over a playstation in the mid 90s simply because of goldeneye 64. That was defeat system seller. Luckily my buddy lent me his playstation for a long time and I got to play tomb raider, resident evil 2, metal gear solid, ff7, ff8, twisted metal 8, crash bandicoot, etc...
My brother gave me the ps1 when I was like 6 or 7 so like 2010-11 I think and it’s still my favourite console along with the gba my sister gave me when she got a ds
Corrections that need to be made is that the N64 analog stick is omni directional. And final fantasy came back to Nintendo with crystal chronicles on GC. Unless you're talking specifically the mainline titles
I was born in 2004, but I started out with an original xbox and ps2. my brothers were like 4 and I was 7-8. we also all had ds lites that got ran into the ground (only just recently got a 3ds) around 2013 was when we switched to an xbox 360 (never got a ps3) and so on. Im currently using my switch and xbox one the most. I always felt/feel a generation behind :p
Considering the only playstation I own anymore is the ps2 I'd say nintendo won since I still own my n64, gamecube, wii, 3ds, and switch, I had ps3, ps4, and ps5 but it was just to play 3rd parties so I had no reason to keep them if you don't have any good 1st party games then there is no reason to own the console
PS1,2,3,4,5 combine for over 500M units sold. Imagine if Nintendo would have kept the deal to partner with Sony. Just think about that relationship with Nintendo focusing on their amazing games while letting Sony build them competitive hardware that would allow 3rd party studios to have stayed with Nintendo this whole time. Look at the GameCube, Wii, WiiU, and Switch eras where Nintendo was so far behind on hardware. GTA V has moved over 200M units... and what slice of that pie did nintendo get? Look at the CoD and Rainbow6 franchises... Microsoft and Sony took the lions share of those games as well because Nintendo couldnt. Not to mention Sony exclusives like the God of War franchise or Gran Turismo. With competent hardware and their first party franchises, Nintendo would have crushed the Xbox and continued to enjoy dominance in their 5th decade.
@@TheeBreadShow Yea, as of now I'd totally agree. Im more thinking about how the original xbox or 360 wouldve even gotten off of the ground if those NES titles has PS hardware behind them. Even now...imagine a Zelda game running on PS5 like the recent God of War. Same great play and story... but nothing holding it back.
i grew up with both systems but anyone who thought the N64 won is delusional. little to no fighting games and rpgs. 3rd party support is crucial and Rare carried nintendo.
I love both systems but here isnmy subjective opinion. Nintendo had quality, PlayStation had quantity. But when it comes down to which, I'm picking......
My consoles in order are SNES, PS1, PS2, Xbox, Xbox 360, PS3, PS4, PS5, Xbox1x. Once halo 4 came out and was a huge disappointment I had no reason to buy Xbox anymore. I bought a used xb1x for halo mcc once it was finally fixed though
I do want to ask. You do know that Sony didn't say square enix it's ok to put your games on a Nintendo console now. Now maybe I took it the wrong way from your video but that's just the vibe I got.
I went back and forth with ps1 and n64, kept trading at funcoland. Think I traded in the ps1 after playing 007 but eventually traded it back for ps1 again to play MGS.
super mario rpg has nothing to do with Nintendo's and PlayStation relationship, they just simply made agreement with square Enix, it has nothing to do with the remake, they just wanted money
This generation is dry with aaa games. There’s no reason to buy a PlayStation or Xbox. However, Nintendo has been bringing exclusive bangers to the switch. And guess what? The switch is less “powerful” than its competition
Have you ever heard of the turbo graphic 16??? Which (I believe) arrived after the SEGA and SNES and was superior, by far, than both in game play and graphics but failed... why???
The switch is the b console just to a certain type of gamer. Nintendo's handhelds are just as mainstream as the Playstation brand. Every console genrration since the first Game Boy, a Nintendo handheld has always been the first or second bestselling system.
The N64 had good games which I still have mine but looking back at it, it's a over hyped console, I got a Saturn years after that gen and enjoyed it much more, then the dreamcast was so good for the short time it was out, but between the PS1 and N64 it wasn't even close but I did love the GameCube, the wii was cool but more of a gimmick system lol but enjoyed those games
The N64 was obviously a flawed system with its poor third party support and its near complete lack of certain genre's (fighters, RPG's), but it was absolutely revolutionary for its time. The analog stick, rumble pack, four control ports, and full blown 3d games like Mario 64, Zelda OoT, and Goldeneye made it the system that most helped usher in the 3d era of gaming. The N64 library is limited compared to other great systems, but its impact on the industry is difficult to overstate, so I'm not sure I would call it overhyped. Also, I agree with you about the Saturn. I got that system immediately after it came out and it was my go to console for a good three years or so.
I have to side with playstation in terms of being the overall winner, even the existence of playstation is a net loss for nintendo since it is a demon they conjured up themselves.
I disagree, Sony didn't "elevate" gaming otherwise they wouldn't be in the situation they're in right now. They basically money hatted their way to their position.
@@mr_m4613 They absolutely did. They aimed for larger than life experiences allowed by the appropriate tech (PS1 CD space, PS2’s ease to develop for) and catered a more cinematic audience that wanted more story depth and presentation without just prioritizing game design. Nintendo can be okay doing as much as they can with their software while asking less of their consoles. That’s a perfectly fine philosophy for themselves, but it obviously detracted 3rd parties who ditched Nintendo and went to Sony’s side to make their bigger games that allowed them to use their full imagination on. So of course they elevated gaming, the history clearly shows it.
@@miki49 Playstation are followrs not leaders. If they elevated gaming, everyone would be following them. Sony has 5 Playstations between generations, other than the outer shell of the console and some cosmetics you've been playing the same way for the last 25 years.
@@mr_m4613 Lol not how business works little bud. They pioneered and catered the larger gaming experience. It began with them, that was the philosophy that birthed them. There was no other company with that philosophy to “follow” back then. A company can’t just copy that and expect to be successful. Just look at how xbox is doing now. They can’t hold a candle to that same design philosophy. It wasn’t what brought them up, but they try hard to match it and continually fall short. You can pretend like Nintendo hasn’t done their same thing for years too. They had their own philosophy that hasn’t changed since the 80’s that I’ve already mentioned above. And there’s nothing wrong with that, it just is what it is. Why would a company lose sight of the original philosophy that made them and proved successful? I’m just here to bring the history and the facts, you can leave your one-sided fanboyism at the door. There’s a difference between having your camp and then spreading misinformation. There is no “following” what wasn’t there before you. Your words show a clear need to grow up. I recommend that you take that advice.
Nintendo has the most epic beefs Super nintendo vs sega genesis Nintendo vs PlayStation But lemme tell ya PlayStation won u know why Bcuz nintendo is scared to even conpete with sony and Microsoft
N64 had like 16 good games lol. Ppl be hyping thid concole up with too much nostalgia. Nintendo was never any real compettion in PlayStation. Playstation had more games, more gems, and was more impactful. Games like resident evil, silent hill, metal gesr solid were just as impactful as zelda and Mario.
You say this, yet the only reason the PlayStation exists is because Sony had a deal going on with Nintendo to make a SNES add-on that fell thru, and Sony wanted to spite Nintendo. Also, the PS1 didn't get analog sticks before the N64 introduced one.
@@aiodensghost8645 that's all irrelevant. The PS1 has WAY more games. That mattered back then. And it wasn't shovelware, it was bangers like silent Hill, metal gear solid, ff7, Spyro, crash, hell tomb raider got like 5 games on PS1. I like N64, but just like with the GameCube, it's coated with so much nostalgia goggles that ppl tend to overrate it a bit. It had incredibly high highs. But it also has game droughts like crazy. The N64 controller was also cheap as hell. I can't tell you how many times my c stick broke. Sony didn't have thumb sticks but once they incorporated them, it felt more natural which is why we still use a variation of that PS1 controller while Nintendo constantly keeps switching controller style every console
The saturn is the unsung arcade port king, but nobody cares because the redditors like the n64 (that console sucks) and the regular people like the ps1 (my beloved) Saying that the n64 has the best library is legitimately insane dawg most of those games suck and have aged like milk. Mario 64 is mid af, ocarina of time is okay, but majoras mask sucks, mario kart 64 is the 3rd worst one behind the original and gba games, 99% of 3rd party games are leaps and bounds inferior than the ps1/saturn versions of the same games or just straight suck unless youre mischief makers. Waverace and smash 64 are cool though, but thats it
Mario party as a series is the most boring shit of all time, pokemon is... well it's pokemon LMAO that shit dosent work. The ps1 has metal gear solid and symphony of the night, I dont have to say shit about the ps1 my beloved and saturn has the best versions of capcom's vs games, so it's better than n64 by default. Not trying to change your mind, the gamecube is a top 2 console for me, I love nintendo. i just fucking loathe the n64. One of if not the worst console I've ever played/own
1080 Snowboarding is the game
Yeyeye SSX Tricky was a lot of fun too!!
LETS GO GOOD LOOKS ‼️
There's also 1080 avlaanch on the gamecube
Yep. 1080 Snowboarding
He only said that to increase the number of comments lol he even found an image of the game. Good strategy though, cheers my friend, you deserve it 🥂
The Sega Saturn was so impactful that The Bread $how forgot to mention it
lmaooo yeah you right, it might need its own video...
N64 was a big let down for a lot of people at the time. Has about 12 great first party games and a bunch of bullshit. The PS1 library was stacked so heavy that it got most of my playtime in the 90's and into the 2000s...
I’m 34 years old and while I have a ps5 and my gf has a switch, I spend 90% of my gaming time playing ps2 and GameCube games. Between the 2 there are way too many quality bangers to count, modern games can’t hold a candle to that period of time
It's funny how the N64 had better graphics (64 bits) and power but the cartridges was a huge bottleneck and the the PS1 had lesser graphics (32 bits) and power but the CDs made it possible for Sony to take advantage of bigger games and FMV (full motion video)
Think about what a game like rese 2 or ff7 would be without cutscenes 😅😅
Apparently having a 64-bit CPU only hindered the performance of the N64. The N64’s CPU is just faster, and it has a dedicated FPU.
@@Tom-jw7iimost N64 games were coded with 32 bit instructions
The N64 also had less memory, so less texture detail.
@@Tom-jw7iiit didn’t have a 64 bit CPU. It could do a 64 bit thread iirc, but anything that tried it ran substantially worse, so most games never did
"Sony ALWAYS wins, baby! You can't beat Sony! Sony ALWAYS wins!" -Chad Warden.
In the 80s and 90s, the ARCADES are where you went to experience cutting edge tech. Namco and SEGA's rivalries are what inspired Sony to make the PlayStation a 3D console, and influenced the creation of a LOT of its games (Crash Bandicoot for one). So in a twisted hilarious way, we actually DO have Sega (and their arcade rivals like Namco and even ATARI) to thank for the existence of PlayStation!
The PlayStation was also originally meant to be a CD SNES add-on, and Sony turned it into an actual standalone console to spite Nintendo for going with Philips
12:55 Not true. Final Fantasy Crystal Chronicles was on GameCube in 2004, and many FF and other Square games were on GBA, DS, 3DS before 2019. Sony just apparently got exclusive console rights to many mainline Final Fantasy titles after 6. I don't think Square was ever beefing with Nintendo, it's just that their business interests aligned with Sony's.
Yes it was more business and Sony making a deal with Square Enix for exclusivity. But that has ended recently due to low sales.
Square should had broken that deal years ago. Now they will go multiplatform
Honestly I strongly felt the same way but more towards gaming afterwards. We had the first successful CD based game console going head to head with the last successful cartridge based game console. Both consoles has many advantages over each other. We are still getting games ported from both systems to this day. Personally I have to go with PS1 for a few key reasons. Overall better audio, more variety of games, better controllers and a more unique memory unit aka memory cards.
Nothing beats Goldeneye
Man, these were the days, console wars were actually fun and interesting
two GOATED CONSOLES
That’s fasho‼️
Great video, bro!
Appreciate it!
The video was very entertaining and i learned alot from all this. SHEESH. as a man who PLAYED every single console from 2005 at 4 years old to NOW, this opened my eyes on ALOT.
Nice video bro!
Thank Brodie‼️ we gotta record again soon def
Me the Dreamcast kid just vibing on the side.
Oh the Dreamcast was my older cousin's, the 1st console I ever played on. Awesome games by Sega and others for sure. But the 1st console i owned myself was an 8bit one, like only played Atari games. In the early 2000s. I don't remember where it came from either lol.
A rare Dreamcast sighting😂 that’s the one console that I don’t have any experience with😂 your lucky to have played it
@@TheeBreadShow i really am tbh. If you ever feel like it, definitely check out the Sega side of UA-cam or retrospectives on the Dreamcast. Just nothing but good vibes and very educational not just for the console, but the industry as we know it. And hey, you might learn of some games to try, it's pretty simple to emulate thankfully.
The snowboard game is 1080• snowboarding. I think
Currently Available on NSO.
Yall saved me with this one‼️‼️
You don't see a whole lot of N64 vs PS1 debates. One outsold the other by 4 to 1. It was good though. Both were great in their own way. Then the 6th gen came and it pretty much hasn't stopped.
The 16-bit and 32/64 bit eras were so hype omg I miss those days
Top tier eras, I still play their games to this day😂
I was born in 2000, but my gaming life started with the Nintendo 64 and the SEGA Dreamcast. Although I didn't play many video games, I did play some titles like Super Mario 64, the Legend of Zelda Ocarina of Time, Donkey Kong 64, Mario Kart 64, Hydro Thunder, Tony Hawk's Pro Skater, and Resident Evil Code Veronica.
Rare rese code veronica reference!! and you played a lot of the classics fr
The reason why square stopped making final fantasy games on nintendo was because they wanted to do bigger things and sony had the tech to do it. It had nothing to do with sony vs nintendo. During the 6th generation Square made a handful of games on the GBA and even some on gamecube
Love both but Play Station did more with less
Another Bread Show banger! Really high quality vid!
Let’s gooo‼️‼️ thanks brodie‼️ I got more coming fasho‼️
Great video. I subbed.
Thanks for the sub, Welcome to the Show!
Excellent take imo. I feel like ps1 and n64 are a tie in the post generation. N64 has the big N titles, but PS1 was home to the second half of the jrpg golden age.
PS1 won the console battle of the 90s, but Nintendo won the console wars in the long run. Look at how Switch is doing, it's on its way to beating the PS2 as the best-selling console of all time. Whereas the other console manufacturers lost to PC.
@Nonantement Yes that is true, I just mentioned the PS1 since that was the bigger focus of the video. But of course the PS2 was also dominating in the early 2000s.
My first gaming console my family had was the NES that my older cousins gave to us (I grew up in the early 2000s) and then shortly after we got a PS2 and my older sister got a N64
Retro gaming early 2000s babies ‼️‼️ a rare breed fasho
If you're comparing the newest nintendo and PlayStation consoles (Switch and PS5) then I believe the Switch is better because it not only has more games and just better exclusive games and the Switch is better form factor. A lot of people I know who own a PS5 are just longing for more games.
I mean yeah but the Nintendo switch came out in 2017
The N64 had some great games but the graphics in most of the games looked the same mainly due to the cartridge storage sizes limiting what devs could do with the hardware where as the PS1 had some really impressive looking games for the time because the amount of available storage on the CD's allowed devs to really take advantage of the hardware. The PS1 also had a better audio quality and bigger variety of games.
Some may claim that PSX got two year head start to N64.
But, N64 got two and half years head start for proper 3D -analog control.
-Who even plays those old PSone games these days anymore that did not support analog + rumble?
People playing ps1 today are rare for sure😂😂 unless it’s final fantasy
Some advice from me: sometimes if you mess up what you say, its okay, you can retake. I noticed you messed up a few of the lines but you could easily retake that and it would improve the video
2:33 I'm playing through Tales of Destiny on my modded classic rn 😂
Underrated RPG!
Spiderman isnt 3rd party. Insomniac is an exclusive producer for sony. Similarly to rare for n64 back in the day.
Great vid! But to be honest, it's hard to make a case for why the N64 is better that isn't basically just saying "it's better because it has Nintendo games." Which isn't too compelling when the PS1 had so many more games of equal quality and influence (and also had undeniably much more variety to its library).
Yeah I think Nintendo has won the console wars overall but I think PlayStation definitely won that generation (and also the one after it).
Final Fantasy: Crystal Chronicles was released on GameCube in 2004
I chose to buy a nintendo 64 over a playstation in the mid 90s simply because of goldeneye 64. That was defeat system seller. Luckily my buddy lent me his playstation for a long time and I got to play tomb raider, resident evil 2, metal gear solid, ff7, ff8, twisted metal 8, crash bandicoot, etc...
Nintendo 64 was actually more powerful than PS1, but it just had less space because of the cartridges
My brother gave me the ps1 when I was like 6 or 7 so like 2010-11 I think and it’s still my favourite console along with the gba my sister gave me when she got a ds
Corrections that need to be made is that the N64 analog stick is omni directional. And final fantasy came back to Nintendo with crystal chronicles on GC. Unless you're talking specifically the mainline titles
I was born in 2004, but I started out with an original xbox and ps2. my brothers were like 4 and I was 7-8. we also all had ds lites that got ran into the ground (only just recently got a 3ds) around 2013 was when we switched to an xbox 360 (never got a ps3) and so on. Im currently using my switch and xbox one the most. I always felt/feel a generation behind :p
retro gamers just have better taste lol, just rooted in the classics!!
Considering the only playstation I own anymore is the ps2 I'd say nintendo won since I still own my n64, gamecube, wii, 3ds, and switch, I had ps3, ps4, and ps5 but it was just to play 3rd parties so I had no reason to keep them if you don't have any good 1st party games then there is no reason to own the console
Nintendo has the legacy fasho, without a doubt
He’s to young to remember the 90s
PS1,2,3,4,5 combine for over 500M units sold. Imagine if Nintendo would have kept the deal to partner with Sony. Just think about that relationship with Nintendo focusing on their amazing games while letting Sony build them competitive hardware that would allow 3rd party studios to have stayed with Nintendo this whole time.
Look at the GameCube, Wii, WiiU, and Switch eras where Nintendo was so far behind on hardware. GTA V has moved over 200M units... and what slice of that pie did nintendo get? Look at the CoD and Rainbow6 franchises... Microsoft and Sony took the lions share of those games as well because Nintendo couldnt. Not to mention Sony exclusives like the God of War franchise or Gran Turismo.
With competent hardware and their first party franchises, Nintendo would have crushed the Xbox and continued to enjoy dominance in their 5th decade.
Tbh i dont think its too crazy to say that Nintendo might already be crushing xbox lol, but if they did work together that would have been sick
@@TheeBreadShow Yea, as of now I'd totally agree. Im more thinking about how the original xbox or 360 wouldve even gotten off of the ground if those NES titles has PS hardware behind them.
Even now...imagine a Zelda game running on PS5 like the recent God of War. Same great play and story... but nothing holding it back.
i grew up with both systems but anyone who thought the N64 won is delusional. little to no fighting games and rpgs. 3rd party support is crucial and Rare carried nintendo.
Why is Doom not 3D?
OG PlayStation over the Nintendo 64 all day every day. Had more games, more content on this discs, better sound, better games in general to play
I love both systems but here isnmy subjective opinion. Nintendo had quality, PlayStation had quantity. But when it comes down to which, I'm picking......
the suspense is killing me
My consoles in order are SNES, PS1, PS2, Xbox, Xbox 360, PS3, PS4, PS5, Xbox1x. Once halo 4 came out and was a huge disappointment I had no reason to buy Xbox anymore. I bought a used xb1x for halo mcc once it was finally fixed though
this might be the most even spread of consoles ive ever seen, you really played em all fr
Earned a subscriber
Ayyye thanks brodie‼️
I do want to ask. You do know that Sony didn't say square enix it's ok to put your games on a Nintendo console now. Now maybe I took it the wrong way from your video but that's just the vibe I got.
Great games always win in the end.
snowboard game is called 1080
I went back and forth with ps1 and n64, kept trading at funcoland. Think I traded in the ps1 after playing 007 but eventually traded it back for ps1 again to play MGS.
And yup back in 98 me and my bro got a playstation 1 so that will always be my consoles of choice
I had my bros master system as my 1st console! Then the mega drive when he got a psx!
super mario rpg has nothing to do with Nintendo's and PlayStation relationship, they just simply made agreement with square Enix, it has nothing to do with the remake, they just wanted money
Spyro the dragon vs Mario 64
This generation is dry with aaa games. There’s no reason to buy a PlayStation or Xbox. However, Nintendo has been bringing exclusive bangers to the switch. And guess what? The switch is less “powerful” than its competition
I Feel Like Sony Won The Battle But Lost The War To Nintendo
You left out the part of Sony and Microsoft money hatting 3rd party companies to leave Nintendo and come over to them.
I'm on UA-cam for long form so yes more long vids
Have you ever heard of the turbo graphic 16??? Which (I believe) arrived after the SEGA and SNES and was superior, by far, than both in game play and graphics but failed... why???
Imma have to research this one👀 turbo grafx 16 failures
What happened to numbers 1-15😂
The switch is the b console just to a certain type of gamer. Nintendo's handhelds are just as mainstream as the Playstation brand. Every console genrration since the first Game Boy, a Nintendo handheld has always been the first or second bestselling system.
The N64 had good games which I still have mine but looking back at it, it's a over hyped console, I got a Saturn years after that gen and enjoyed it much more, then the dreamcast was so good for the short time it was out, but between the PS1 and N64 it wasn't even close but I did love the GameCube, the wii was cool but more of a gimmick system lol but enjoyed those games
The N64 was obviously a flawed system with its poor third party support and its near complete lack of certain genre's (fighters, RPG's), but it was absolutely revolutionary for its time. The analog stick, rumble pack, four control ports, and full blown 3d games like Mario 64, Zelda OoT, and Goldeneye made it the system that most helped usher in the 3d era of gaming. The N64 library is limited compared to other great systems, but its impact on the industry is difficult to overstate, so I'm not sure I would call it overhyped. Also, I agree with you about the Saturn. I got that system immediately after it came out and it was my go to console for a good three years or so.
I have to side with playstation in terms of being the overall winner, even the existence of playstation is a net loss for nintendo since it is a demon they conjured up themselves.
TEN EIGHTY SNOWBOARDING
Ik yall had my back lolll!!
Nintendo saved gaming, Sony elevated it
great way to put it
I disagree, Sony didn't "elevate" gaming otherwise they wouldn't be in the situation they're in right now. They basically money hatted their way to their position.
@@mr_m4613 They absolutely did. They aimed for larger than life experiences allowed by the appropriate tech (PS1 CD space, PS2’s ease to develop for) and catered a more cinematic audience that wanted more story depth and presentation without just prioritizing game design.
Nintendo can be okay doing as much as they can with their software while asking less of their consoles. That’s a perfectly fine philosophy for themselves, but it obviously detracted 3rd parties who ditched Nintendo and went to Sony’s side to make their bigger games that allowed them to use their full imagination on.
So of course they elevated gaming, the history clearly shows it.
@@miki49 Playstation are followrs not leaders. If they elevated gaming, everyone would be following them. Sony has 5 Playstations between generations, other than the outer shell of the console and some cosmetics you've been playing the same way for the last 25 years.
@@mr_m4613 Lol not how business works little bud. They pioneered and catered the larger gaming experience. It began with them, that was the philosophy that birthed them. There was no other company with that philosophy to “follow” back then. A company can’t just copy that and expect to be successful. Just look at how xbox is doing now. They can’t hold a candle to that same design philosophy. It wasn’t what brought them up, but they try hard to match it and continually fall short.
You can pretend like Nintendo hasn’t done their same thing for years too. They had their own philosophy that hasn’t changed since the 80’s that I’ve already mentioned above. And there’s nothing wrong with that, it just is what it is. Why would a company lose sight of the original philosophy that made them and proved successful? I’m just here to bring the history and the facts, you can leave your one-sided fanboyism at the door.
There’s a difference between having your camp and then spreading misinformation. There is no “following” what wasn’t there before you. Your words show a clear need to grow up. I recommend that you take that advice.
Nintendo has the most epic beefs
Super nintendo vs sega genesis
Nintendo vs PlayStation
But lemme tell ya PlayStation won u know why
Bcuz nintendo is scared to even conpete with sony and Microsoft
N64 had like 16 good games lol. Ppl be hyping thid concole up with too much nostalgia. Nintendo was never any real compettion in PlayStation. Playstation had more games, more gems, and was more impactful. Games like resident evil, silent hill, metal gesr solid were just as impactful as zelda and Mario.
And n64 only had like a total of 300 games only while sega saturn had like a 1,000 but most were only released in japan unfortunately
You say this, yet the only reason the PlayStation exists is because Sony had a deal going on with Nintendo to make a SNES add-on that fell thru, and Sony wanted to spite Nintendo. Also, the PS1 didn't get analog sticks before the N64 introduced one.
@@aiodensghost8645 that's all irrelevant. The PS1 has WAY more games. That mattered back then. And it wasn't shovelware, it was bangers like silent Hill, metal gear solid, ff7, Spyro, crash, hell tomb raider got like 5 games on PS1.
I like N64, but just like with the GameCube, it's coated with so much nostalgia goggles that ppl tend to overrate it a bit. It had incredibly high highs. But it also has game droughts like crazy. The N64 controller was also cheap as hell. I can't tell you how many times my c stick broke. Sony didn't have thumb sticks but once they incorporated them, it felt more natural which is why we still use a variation of that PS1 controller while Nintendo constantly keeps switching controller style every console
As a Sony pony. Sony pushed gaming forward and is now king. But Nintendo 64 was way better and true gamers alway will have a Nintendo regardless.
The saturn is the unsung arcade port king, but nobody cares because the redditors like the n64 (that console sucks) and the regular people like the ps1 (my beloved)
Saying that the n64 has the best library is legitimately insane dawg most of those games suck and have aged like milk. Mario 64 is mid af, ocarina of time is okay, but majoras mask sucks, mario kart 64 is the 3rd worst one behind the original and gba games, 99% of 3rd party games are leaps and bounds inferior than the ps1/saturn versions of the same games or just straight suck unless youre mischief makers.
Waverace and smash 64 are cool though, but thats it
Mario party as a series is the most boring shit of all time, pokemon is... well it's pokemon LMAO that shit dosent work.
The ps1 has metal gear solid and symphony of the night, I dont have to say shit about the ps1 my beloved and saturn has the best versions of capcom's vs games, so it's better than n64 by default.
Not trying to change your mind, the gamecube is a top 2 console for me, I love nintendo. i just fucking loathe the n64. One of if not the worst console I've ever played/own
the saturn prolly needs its own video dedicated to it tbh lol