I absolutely hate those weirdly long steps in office buildings. NOt short enough for one step, not quite long enough for two, forces you to do a weird lurch
Actually, that way you just invert the paradox. After all, if the statement "the statement below is false" is false, it should actually say "the statement below is true" and vice versa. So instead of "The statement below is false The statement above is true" you'd simply get "The statement below is true The statement above is false"
How did everyone get from watching a clip of a movie to discussing God? I tried scrolling down to see how it started but I honestly didn’t have the patience! ( no offense to anyone, just curious! )
Arthur was explaining to Ariadne that the specialness of the dream is that we can create the impossible objects that couldn't be created in the real world - that's 'paradox' which mean something that contradicts within itself. for this case is the Penrose staircase as you see they've been stepping up but it brought them back to the same place - where the paper scattered on the floor, when the actual stairs will bring you either up or down but not back to the starting point
Allow me to illustrate by rephrasing the statements, in either order: A:(It is true that) the statement below is false. (Therefore, it is false that) the statement above is true. B: (It is true that) the statement below is true. (Therefore, it is true that) the statement above is false.
@Personaboutspeed if the barber shaves himself then he's counted as a man who wants to shave himself so the barber (which is him) is must not to shave himself. But if he doesn't shave, he'll be counted as a man who doesn't want to shave himself so he must shave himself. 2 statements create a conflict, a paradox...
This paradox is really cool but I don't get how he does that. I mean, if it turns out to be an illusion, how were they able to walk around it twice, pass the person picking up papers twice?
I beg to differ because the first sentence is the one that counts, eliminating the second one from any validity. If you would say: the statement below is true, the statement above is false. Then you would have a paradox.
In General, a paradox is a moment in time, where the end equals the beginning and where the one can't exist without the other obscuring point of origin. It's a loop in logic itself. "What came first, the chicken or the egg?" You need a chicken to lay an egg, but you need an egg to get a chicken. Another one is the time travel paradox; ie. Your spouse gets into a car accident and comes to pass. You decide to build a time machine and travel back to save him that day from stepping into his car. Congratulations, you have stopped the car accident. The problem is that that car accident was the *reason* to build a time machine. By saving him, that ^ moment you decided to build a time machine would cease to exist, so you can't even be in the past then. U also have some pseudo-paradoxes, which you can come across in daily life. ie. "You can't get a job, without experience, but you can't get experience without a job." There are many cases off a paradox and some are quite interesting. The stairs shown here are a visual paradox, but are not necessarily a good definition off a paradox. The problem with this is, that it's more off a trick, than an actual paradox. This thing has more to do with cheating how your eyes interpret things, especially when mapping things from 3d to 2d (ie. painting/picture/movie) Which is why this works perfectly right in this movie clip. This thing can never actually exist in real life. Have a nice day!
@Guidodo 1. True or False? The statement below is false. 2. True or False? This statement and the statement below are either both true or both false. 3. True or False? The top two statements are either both true or both false. Now there's a paradox for you.
"of course it is".. what? strange how you so confidently can say that when the technology to do stuff like this lies wayyyy in the future. im pretty sure his question wasn't if our brains were capable of dreaming or not, but rather dreaming "together" and controlling those dreams as we please
@sacr3 I never said he liked anything. I dont really know how it works. but I think heaven or hell is more about your subconcsisous mind that begins here on earth first. "What is done on earth shall be done in heaven". Doing good gives you a good consciousness, doing bad gives you bad. creating a soul of what will go on. The movie is really about the levels of your mine. The duelity of the conscious and unconcious mind. So is the mind, body, and spirit.
@briannema768 Well, someone could always tie him up and she can shave him then, and then he won't have to deal with the conflict on who would shave him until next time. Or he could just get a giant beard too. Thats probably easier. :-/
Think of a paradox. Hard isn't it? Think of this. There was a town where all men has to shave in two ways: by himself or by the barber. The town has only one barber. The barber will only shave men who doesn't want to shave themselves. Quite logical right? Now how 'bout this: Who shaves the Barber?
I respectfully disagree. As the second statement is a claim that the first statement is true, accepting the first statement- i.e. the idea that the second statement is false- will lead you to subsequently identify the first statement as false, as the second statement (which you consider to be false) identifies the first statement as true. You can't identify one statements as "the one that counts" as each pertains to the validity of the other, and therefore indirectly pertains to its own as well.
Our brains are capable of many things on a subconscious level because technically, our imagination has no rules. We create images and generate thoughts that are slowly aligned to the real world, but it's not that we are forming thoughts from this, rather we are filtering our frame of reference. We can imagine pretty much anything if our thoughts are not aligned to the laws of physics, but the fundamental limitation is in what we can do to tell our brains that what we imagine doesn't have to be based on what we see.
I've created a few movies. How about you? Anyway, I only expressed an opinion about the movie or, specifically, one of the stars. I'm entitled to it. We all are, except when we call each other nasty words.
@ShadowwDrizzt Ceux qui disent que les effets spéciaux sont pourris... Ben ils blaguent :3 Pour ma part j'ai vu le film et j'ai même aimé ! Comme quoi... PS : Mon "Désolé :3" était pourtant un bel indice pour comprendre que je blaguais...
Mdr, comment peut-on nous prendre au sérieux quand on écrit en majuscule xD Il va falloir apprendre réparer votre détecteur de troll là ! Mais c'est vrai que c'est toujours marrant de se sentir puissant en affirmant que les autres sont des cons, je vous comprend totalement "ShadowwDrizzt"
This may be the case, but why state it as vice versa if the statement has already presented itself. If two men we're debating and Man1 said to Man2 "You are right sir," and Man2 replied "That is wrong," you would not switch their statements to be vice versa. Oh wait..... Fuck, you would!!! Then again if it has been stated then a restatement wouldn't be necessary.
nothing, cause he's not actually lying. it's a hopeful statement. See, lying is not actually lying. How would you know if you weren't lying to yourself? Otherwise you'd just be flip flopping on what a lie actually is.
.....of course it is....sheesh look up ''Lucid Dreaming >.> That's what the movie is based around upon and is very real minus the dream hoping thing, that's the made up part.
Religion is just a product of a man who was high af from hallucinogens that in the end he started worshipping the God he saw and things got out of hand from there. Also Mother Mary was raped but she tried to cover it up with some bullshit story and gave birth to "God's son". The healing of the blind man and walking on water was just a public prank. Also, after his death, he didn't get ressurected. He was probably grave robbed and fed to the dogs by some cultists.
Those two guys are really good actors.
Wait till they kiss each other
"I tried not to COME."
"But there's nothing quite like it."
GIGGITY.
Oh wow this aged quite nicely
0:49 Whenever I hear this part, I get goosebumps, man.....
That is widely known as Hans Zimmer effect...!!
Here's a paradox: Christopher Nolan have been nominated five times at the Oscars, but he have not won one.
how is that a paradox?
humpadumpa it’s really just an injustice, all of his movie post memento have arguably changed cinema or trends
some people like to listen to their dialog sorry bad joke lol
the way he looks at her omg THE FEELS
I am pretty sure he sedated her, then banged her and later joined her in the dream
@@vikraal6974 that’s messed up man
Looks at him 😂
I absolutely hate those weirdly long steps in office buildings. NOt short enough for one step, not quite long enough for two, forces you to do a weird lurch
"I tried not to come."
I love the Penrose steps.
"I'm reaching climax level"
Man is genius
Christopher Nolan❤️
Snake, You can't change the future like that. You have created a time paradox
Very clever, I will have to brainstorm a bit more on that one
I unequivocally agree with your argument.
0:50 ♡
I can't believe this movie only had male main characters...
Lol oh boy
Is that a problem?
@@stromv8888 Check the main characters again and the recent news about them.
Really, I wasn’t aware that Mal was a man
@@matteobeach4261 She was dead though. ;)
@wizardwarrior713 it's all about the point of view and angles
penrose step makes you loop in an infinite staircase although it's an ascending steps.
Why would people dislike this video, they came to watch it
"i like where this is going"
The statement below is false.
The statement above is true.
Now there's a paradox for you.
@Ohnani As opposed to any other scene in the movie how?
Joseph Gordon Levitt looks alike the Heath Ledger,He remind me him in all scennes. Rip Heath
Actually, that way you just invert the paradox. After all, if the statement "the statement below is false" is false, it should actually say "the statement below is true" and vice versa. So instead of
"The statement below is false
The statement above is true"
you'd simply get
"The statement below is true
The statement above is false"
since they know they are in a penrose staircase, why are they ascending it ? or maybe you can't feel tired in a dream anyway ?
*pure creation
@Ohnani I didnt understand...Ridiculously sharp?
@briannema768 the Barber shaves himself? or em i missing something?
How did everyone get from watching a clip of a movie to discussing God? I tried scrolling down to see how it started but I honestly didn’t have the patience! ( no offense to anyone, just curious! )
@freestyleandsoccer how can you say that?
Paradox
he's grown up from 3rd rock from the sun
1 person hasnt ever had a dream
@Ohnani Joseph Gordon Levitt looks sharp in every scene
@Ohnani he's just a classy dude
Arthur was explaining to Ariadne that the specialness of the dream is that we can create the impossible objects that couldn't be created in the real world - that's 'paradox' which mean something that contradicts within itself.
for this case is the Penrose staircase as you see they've been stepping up but it brought them back to the same place - where the paper scattered on the floor, when the actual stairs will bring you either up or down but not back to the starting point
you are a genius, can i worship you?
0:47 ♡♡♡♡
Allow me to illustrate by rephrasing the statements, in either order:
A:(It is true that) the statement below is false.
(Therefore, it is false that) the statement above is true.
B: (It is true that) the statement below is true.
(Therefore, it is true that) the statement above is false.
Nolan should have snuck a pair of ducks into the movie.
two words MC Usher
Big ones.
@DisfunctionalMisfunc Oh wow, never thought of that but no. Men have only two options, only by himself or the barber...
If Pinocchio says "my nose is going to grow at this very moment," what happens?
WHUT!?
He explodes.
the looks like ellie for the last of us
@Personaboutspeed if the barber shaves himself then he's counted as a man who wants to shave himself so the barber (which is him) is must not to shave himself. But if he doesn't shave, he'll be counted as a man who doesn't want to shave himself so he must shave himself. 2 statements create a conflict, a paradox...
May I quote this somewhere?
@0:27 you can see that Elliot had reasons not to continue as a woman.
👌
This paradox is really cool but I don't get how he does that. I mean, if it turns out to be an illusion, how were they able to walk around it twice, pass the person picking up papers twice?
If someone says "I always lie", are they telling the truth? Or are they lying?
They are lying about it in the sense that they sometimes lie.
See... paradox.
I really dont understand this scene. Can someone explain it to me?
I beg to differ because the first sentence is the one that counts, eliminating the second one from any validity. If you would say: the statement below is true, the statement above is false. Then you would have a paradox.
@ppenguin23 It ends because Arthur shows her the illusion.
No matter how many times I watch this I still don't understand what a paradox does.
Can someone explain plz?
just google the penrose stairs, it is not possible, but in a dream anything is possivle
In General, a paradox is a moment in time, where the end equals the beginning and where the one can't exist without the other obscuring point of origin. It's a loop in logic itself.
"What came first, the chicken or the egg?"
You need a chicken to lay an egg, but you need an egg to get a chicken.
Another one is the time travel paradox;
ie. Your spouse gets into a car accident and comes to pass. You decide to build a time machine and travel back to save him that day from stepping into his car. Congratulations, you have stopped the car accident. The problem is that that car accident was the *reason* to build a time machine. By saving him, that ^ moment you decided to build a time machine would cease to exist, so you can't even be in the past then.
U also have some pseudo-paradoxes, which you can come across in daily life.
ie. "You can't get a job, without experience, but you can't get experience without a job."
There are many cases off a paradox and some are quite interesting.
The stairs shown here are a visual paradox, but are not necessarily a good definition off a paradox. The problem with this is, that it's more off a trick, than an actual paradox. This thing has more to do with cheating how your eyes interpret things, especially when mapping things from 3d to 2d (ie. painting/picture/movie) Which is why this works perfectly right in this movie clip. This thing can never actually exist in real life.
Have a nice day!
Dazzy Z thank u so very much! I think I understand now.
Ey np. If you like this kind off imagery, you can type in M.C. Escher in google pics, you won't be disappointed!
oohhhhh i see the trick
we can but that won't mean it's truth.
@freestyleandsoccer EVAR. :D
Is this movie english
My condolances
i dont understand, my brain died
@imcoolmanimcool yea what he said
@Guidodo
1. True or False? The statement below is false.
2. True or False? This statement and the statement below are either both true or both false.
3. True or False? The top two statements are either both true or both false.
Now there's a paradox for you.
lmfao brilliant
"of course it is".. what? strange how you so confidently can say that when the technology to do stuff like this lies wayyyy in the future. im pretty sure his question wasn't if our brains were capable of dreaming or not, but rather dreaming "together" and controlling those dreams as we please
@sacr3 I never said he liked anything. I dont really know how it works. but I think heaven or hell is more about your subconcsisous mind that begins here on earth first. "What is done on earth shall be done in heaven". Doing good gives you a good consciousness, doing bad gives you bad. creating a soul of what will go on. The movie is really about the levels of your mine. The duelity of the conscious and unconcious mind. So is the mind, body, and spirit.
@Daggerspine107 THE BARBER CHOOSES TO SHAVE HIMSELF!!! After all he is a barber and knows how to shave
0:49
@NinjaNabs Completely other movie.. one with depth.
@briannema768 Well, someone could always tie him up and she can shave him then, and then he won't have to deal with the conflict on who would shave him until next time. Or he could just get a giant beard too. Thats probably easier. :-/
Think of a paradox. Hard isn't it? Think of this. There was a town where all men has to shave in two ways: by himself or by the barber. The town has only one barber. The barber will only shave men who doesn't want to shave themselves. Quite logical right? Now how 'bout this: Who shaves the Barber?
HAX!
I respectfully disagree. As the second statement is a claim that the first statement is true, accepting the first statement- i.e. the idea that the second statement is false- will lead you to subsequently identify the first statement as false, as the second statement (which you consider to be false) identifies the first statement as true. You can't identify one statements as "the one that counts" as each pertains to the validity of the other, and therefore indirectly pertains to its own as well.
People love to not use logic. Best not tell them that or they might go nuts like the animals they really are.
I wonder if our brains are actually capable of this
Our brains are capable of many things on a subconscious level because technically, our imagination has no rules. We create images and generate thoughts that are slowly aligned to the real world, but it's not that we are forming thoughts from this, rather we are filtering our frame of reference. We can imagine pretty much anything if our thoughts are not aligned to the laws of physics, but the fundamental limitation is in what we can do to tell our brains that what we imagine doesn't have to be based on what we see.
C PA GRAV LOL
:D
0:48
no lol :P "Trucs" is actually the french word for tricks
lawl at the comments XD
this comment made me lol, literally.
now my stomach hurts so bad.
Is it better now?
I've created a few movies. How about you? Anyway, I only expressed an opinion about the movie or, specifically, one of the stars. I'm entitled to it. We all are, except when we call each other nasty words.
@ShadowwDrizzt
Ceux qui disent que les effets spéciaux sont pourris... Ben ils blaguent :3
Pour ma part j'ai vu le film et j'ai même aimé ! Comme quoi...
PS : Mon "Désolé :3" était pourtant un bel indice pour comprendre que je blaguais...
@hotdog782 Sigh, no, no you cant...
Err, MC Escher?
@dajman15 no
kings speach fan disliked this
the top comments are the same commentception
This might be one of the smartest comments on UA-cam.
i disagree
commissionergordan
Lol I love the people who take the time to reply to a 5 year old comment. 👍 for you!
@Thounethoune
OUAIS TA RAISON EN FAIT, LES EFFET SPECIAU SON TOUT POURRI §
@xXTheCinchXx omg Inception x_x
Lie in a lie or a lie lying about a lie that is a lie
Uchiha Itachi use Izanami, infinite Paradox
I just think of Big Bang as God, it makes sense on so many levels. xD
I don't get it
What part? the paradox or the scene as a whole?
Mdr, comment peut-on nous prendre au sérieux quand on écrit en majuscule xD
Il va falloir apprendre réparer votre détecteur de troll là !
Mais c'est vrai que c'est toujours marrant de se sentir puissant en affirmant que les autres sont des cons, je vous comprend totalement "ShadowwDrizzt"
This may be the case, but why state it as vice versa if the statement has already presented itself. If two men we're debating and Man1 said to Man2 "You are right sir," and Man2 replied "That is wrong," you would not switch their statements to be vice versa. Oh wait..... Fuck, you would!!! Then again if it has been stated then a restatement wouldn't be necessary.
nothing, cause he's not actually lying. it's a hopeful statement. See, lying is not actually lying. How would you know if you weren't lying to yourself? Otherwise you'd just be flip flopping on what a lie actually is.
AT THE END OF THE MOVIE AFTER THE CREDITS YOU CAN HEAR A CLONKING NOISE
Once you see it, you'll shit brix
.....of course it is....sheesh look up ''Lucid Dreaming >.> That's what the movie is based around upon and is very real minus the dream hoping thing, that's the made up part.
@kissmymoney
Je crois que c'est toi qui a rien compris, lis les autres commentaires :3
lmfao
Would you please tell me who created god, because, how can someone just appear out of nowhere?
Religion is just a product of a man who was high af from hallucinogens that in the end he started worshipping the God he saw and things got out of hand from there. Also Mother Mary was raped but she tried to cover it up with some bullshit story and gave birth to "God's son". The healing of the blind man and walking on water was just a public prank. Also, after his death, he didn't get ressurected. He was probably grave robbed and fed to the dogs by some cultists.