This is not a realistic view of our world 65 million years ago, Giganotosaurus and T Rex did not exist in the same time period and T Rex did not have feathers
@@danielv1617 No, it should be narrated by somebody who isn’t a preaching, patronising, sanctimonious bore. Somebody who hasn’t spent the last sixty years standing on the shoulders of giants.
I really like how Rexy doesn't just start attacking everyone in sight, just sort of wanders through the drive in like she's not quite sure what all these people are doing. She might be a predator, but she doesn't have it in for humans... she's just a wild animal doing what she needs to survive.
A croc or a lion or any other large predator would attack, kill and eat any feasible prey like this, animals have instinct, it's not about having it in for something.
When I was a child, if I had seen this opening scene I would have believed it had to be REAL footage of Dinosaurs taken using a Time Machine. Movie Magic has entered the Platinum Age of special effects and I'm on board 100%.
I still felt that way as a 9 yr old seeing the first Jurassic Park. That movie still holds up because of it's many practical effects. 2000-2020 it was this CGI limbo where you could tell it was fake. Like CGI yoda etc.
Except the T-Rex never looked like that in real life (look of the head is all wrong, just find a picture of Sue the T Rex for a more accurate one). Also, the hands of the animal could only face inward (like if you were clapping), so the movie version of it with the hands facing downward is wrong.
And bold move making the first hero shot of an Oviraptor with pronated wrists eating an egg, establishing right away that the movie is not going to even try to be accurate to the science
As much as I love Jurassic Park, there's simply no way Giganotosaurus and T-Rex could've ever met (different part of the world, tens of millions of years apart).
Did they travel back in time for that opening scene?? That looked insane. Edit: The sheer volume of nerds and geeks on this comment second is simply hilarious. Thank you.
It was leak like a year ago. About the opening scene being back time, and it’s supposed to like reveal the meteor hitting the dinosaurs. The people who had the chance to see it, said it was extremely breath taking! So I can’t wait!! I can tell that most of the opening scene must’ve been cropped and edited. Obviously so they don’t give everything away! But can’t wait!
Crazy how they even got the fauna right. Millions of years ago earth would've looked like a different planet compared too nowadays. I would LOVE too see these guys make dino documentaries like the ones I used too watch as a kid. The next genoration would LOVE it and personally I would too
@@southpakrules Rexy (the T-Rex) is female, as were most, if not all of the dinosaurs in the original Jurassic Park. (Of course there was the matter of the frog dna, and some species spontaneously changing sex and therefore were able to mate. Rexy was the only t-rex at Isla Nublar, so no reason for her to sex change)
@@southpakrules Bro, do not start with all this of assuming genres and that, it is a movie, it is made to enjoy, so do that, and science is not racist, science is the most exact thing there is, so do not say nonsense and enjoy the video.
@@southpakrules mmmkay so even though I'm pretty sure you're just looking for an argument, it was stated that all dinosaurs in Jurassic Park are female but are able to reproduce asexually because if tree frog DNA that was put into their genome to help them acclimate to modern temperatures as was other modern animal DNA. (Which explains why most of the dinosaurs don't look accurate to scientific interpretation.) Reproducing asexually = a single creature, in this case a dinosaur, reproduces by cloning itself. It does not require a member of the opposite sex to breed, however in some cases if not all (I'm not too sure about this next part) things that reproduce asexually can also reproduce via opposite sex. So yes. Rexy is a female. However there are a few hints that males do exist occasionally throughout the Jurassic Park franchise. I.E. The rich dude in Fallen Kingdom specifying that the allosaurus being auctioned is a juvenile female.
Firing a very low velocity, fin stabilized, unbalanced projectile, out a of a extremely short barrel, large caliber smoothbore. Its more of a guess then aiming. The projectile will have a ton of velocity change meaning excessive drop and wind effects, and its moving too slow to really stabilize as regular bullets rely on spin while fins rely on sufficient speed and being aerodynamic. It likely doesn't stabilize in the barrel meaning it might not exit "straight" and come out at a slight and different angle every time like a nerf gun. On top of that because it wont stabilize right, it might not fly straight either. Also shooting out of a moving helicopter is extremely weird and hard to do. They move a lot even when hovering. And when they are moving steady in a direction that really complicates lead and windage. And something like that giant ass slow moving non-aerodynamic syringe being shot will be affected by the rotors swirling downwash, where as a aerodynamic bullet will not. Also the liquid sloshing around inside of it in flight will alter the center of gravity and further unstabilize it. So no that's not that unrealistic. Having that gun on hand with the proper ammo to local police is.
@@johnlivingston9217 And how does a Trex 1) see a dart no bigger than a finger from that distance with a spotlight blinding him and 2) have the brain capacity to understand what the dart is and to duck away from it to avoid getting tranquilized. Buuuull shit!
In real life spino can’t neck snap a giant carnivore because of its cone shaped teeth the one in jp III had T. rex like teeth also it’s build was very different
I find it interesting that people still chalk up the Jurassic series on a scale of accuracy when Crichton himself never went in for that. "They aren't real now" as Wu said in the book. The only real science starts and stops with getting the dinosaurs created. It flirts with the idea but isn't really about it. Like time travel in Terminator. It's not about travelling through time. It's used to get the story going.
When that first opening shot of the sunrise with prehistoric trees followed up by the dramatic _DUNNN_ I got huge nostalgic flashbacks to Walking With Dinosaurs. They really need to bring shows like that back
i personally believe that predators didnt actually fight that often. why on earth would they injure themselves? maybe they were like crocodiles where if they saw another predator they would not be hostile.
What's with the weird Cuckoldry imagry at 4:25. Hollyweird is awful, this movie will be awful. The only redeeming quality are the tech DUDES who create amazing CGI.
I can’t believe this wasn’t part of the opening for the film it even sets up when rexy came into conflict with the Giganotosaurus back in the Cretaceous period
🎵 65 million years ago, A meteor crashed into the earth, Hurtling towards the planet, at a 100 thousand kilometers per second, If we never found their bones, We would’ve never have known.🎵
Killed off the T-rex to give the new big bad some sort of inflated importance, not falling for it Jurassic Park 3. Also, is this like within minutes of the girl releasing all the dinos? Helicopter response that doesn't look like InGen or competitor, but nobody told people to avoid the drive-in movie theater or to stay indoors.
Weel it's official, they invented time control! Not because the first scenes are from 65M years ago, but because apparently 6 minutes have passed since the beginning of this clip and it really doesn't feel like that
If this scene is not in the movie, then I question Colin Trevorrow credibility on the entire film... sadly they added protofeathers based on air... we already have Rex skin samples from the entire body (except head) and not 1 single feathers or protofeathers at all, Trevorrow should fire all his paleo advisors for adding them, when we know for fact and real evidence that it never had any of those features, even the museum who owns SUE, released a life size model 2 years ago, and no feathers or protofeaters at all, just smooth skin as it should be.
@@maximaldinotrap If so... and you are developing a realistic scene, then why hiring them at all? Its like going to the doctor, and not taking the medicine...
Let's just think about the fact that living beings started to use noises (in order to communicate) only after a certain period of time. Early animals weren't able to growl, scream or bark and they used scents, magnetism, touch and light instead. Earth in that period was a silent planet, water fire wind and earthquakes were the only things able to produce sound and I can only imagine how alone and lost a human would feel there.
I kinda wish they used this logic thought the films, like the first jp did, yea big music pieces are needed but you can create allot of tension with very little, also we don’t need corny characters. Ian malcom was eccentric but he was also sexist a bit of a dick, but then got serious when he saw what was going on.
I disagree greatly sir but hey that’s my opinion And your opinion is that movie sucked which I think is wrong but stew it’s my opinion and your opinion it’s
Honestly, all I cared about when watching the movie was the more accurate dinosaurs and the Dimetrodon. Unfortunate that they still have the Dilophosaurus spit venom, though
@@TheChosenOne1098 but ronin the movie did suck and this scene was not in movie but it gives a hint that this gigantasaurus kicks the trex ass like it did in movie.
Love how the original t Rex has hair/feathers on its skin while the current one doesn’t, to show how despite filling in the genome the current dinosaurs are not truly accurate
That was the whole thing in the original novel in fact. Doctor Wu explained that they would hatch the animals without knowing and tweak the mix of the modern animal DNA with the incomplete DNA found. The clones were made to look as an approximation to what was known then or what people expected. They weren't really Dinosaurs, they were chimeras, hybrids of different species that would look like Dinosaurs in the image of what was discovered at the time. That was the whole point of having Allan Grant and Ellie Sattler at the Park, to approve on the look and partial behavior of the creatures to Hammond. Crap got really messed up when they started behaving outside of what was expected and Wu even suggested to Hammond to scrap the batch they had and hatch a few new batch that was more controllable. Many of the characteristics such as color and even poison or snake like attributes were part of the DNA mixing in the cloning process.
Jurassic park is all wrong with the fact that every dinosaur fighting with Trex doesn’t die from the 6 ton bite. And of course, this epilogue has a flashback to the time period of the dinosaurs with trex and acrocanthosaurus or giganotosaurus or whatever dinosaur that is living together and competing. Trex really never lived with any other large predators nor was in any competition with them
To save on special effects it was decided in studio that creating a working time machine was cheaper than getting the super computers for processing the special effects. Like Stanley Kubrick did with the moon landings. All filmed on location to save money.
Or during the time when Job 40 was written, and other historic accounts "the science" and "chosen history" works so hard to deny and reject. Read a literal translation of Job from Bible Gateway with the notes at the bottom, try English Standard Version.
I think the starting scene is a cool concept without any humans and just dinosaurs and you kind of imagine what the dinosaurs are thinking about and how the story goes in your head that would be pretty cool
I don't want to be that you but I see here the same shitty problems of the last film: The people being so stupid and the dinosaurs being treated like a slasher guy who is nearly unbeatable. Come on we eradicated mamuts and another beasts with similar size of dinosaurs with only stones, bones, wood, torch and spears. How and why in the hell why can't kill a bunch of giant animals with all the technology?
@@freddyjosereginomontalvo4667 plot convenience, the writers can't be assed to come up with any real conflicts. just easier to make the humans absolute spanners. they've seen the audience eats it up anyway, so why bother
@@neito.m.6741 Right? We've got a 12-ton Carnivore running free but no worries! We'll wait til it gets tired to catch it. Even though we have a helicopter and thermal imaging technology.
Yeah I just watched it yesterday and couldn't find this scene. It was ridiculous we couldn't know that why were Giga and Rexy fighting. This should be the back story for why they were.
No, its not. They didnt lived at the same age and if they did, T-rex would stomp giga due the fact of be much more bulkier, stronger bite, heavier and build to fight directly, while Giga was build bite and run. That movie sucks.
@@FeroxX_Gosu Doesnt mean that It have to be a extremely dumb movie which leads the average person to misinformation. Unfortunately movies like that have a underrated responsibility.
@@triplocore JP's only responsibility is to make children pick up a Dino book or documentary after they watch a JP movie and they definietly live up to that! Hell, I even searched for dino stuff after the movie for days to get myself up to date with the recent scientific results and watched the Apple documentary "Prehistoric Planet".
@@FeroxX_Gosu If you really believe that more than 1% really do that, I have a bad news for you. The majority will just take it as reality, I lived it in my skin, I was the children who get to read the books about that after watch the movie, but my friends, all of them, assumed that JP3 was the truth and spino really could beat the T-rex. That new JW movie is just the same. Giganotosaurus was inferior to T-rex in absolute ALL ASPECTS, but who care? A lie repeated 1000 times becomes a truth. Kids who just see that movie will just believe that they lived together and T-rex was a prey, thats it. Just one or another will bother to search it, and half of them will just keep the same opinion even reading the truth and search by wrong source to enforce his beliefs because the average person dont like to believe that his visions was wrong.
That was incredibly well thought out. Beautiful imagination! When The T Rex drops, and the shot zooms in on the eye, and then the mosquito landing on it.... Wow. That's some serious attention to detail.
Conversely, this means that the existence of the fan favorite Rexy is based on a story that she was killed by a giga that was already extinct (died out arround 30mio years befor the t-rex) at the time. is that supposed to be the story for rexy?
I love the fact that instead of making the T-rex roar really loudly a whole heap, they made them mostly do a super low pitch growl/rumble like how they actually did.
@@mortenskands201 See above comment. We can make accurate speculations based on things like the shape of skull cavities and estimated biomass, along with the use of infrasound technology to get an idea of what it might've sounded like. Is it gonna be 100% accurate? Probably not, but we can get close.
I was totally bummed when it wasn’t in it. When the film started and the first scene came on, I was like “Did I miss something or did they not put it in??”
This looks absolutely stunning, but as a lifelong paleontology junky the whole Tyrannosaurus vs Giganotosaurus absolutely killed me, especially after they sort of hyped up how "accurate" it was going to be, but then again this is Jurassic Park so I shouldn't really expect scientific accuracy because 1-that isn't the focus of the movie, and 2-Cool fight scene.
@@ozzywalker609 "stealing" the eggs refers to eating them. Which we have zero evidence for in oviraptor and again, is based on the misidentification of its own eggs.
The T-Rex's tail hitting the tranquillizer dart stuck in the windshield for a split second at 4:57. hoooooly crap the amount of detail these artists put into this is incredible
@@6666Imperator dinosaur enemy= ROAARRRR dinorsaur juvi trying to take some of the ded dinosaur ur pack killed= snap roar herbivore when carnivores coming= uhuhhuhuhuh raptor calling pack for attack= intense screaching
Man i loved those early 2000's dinosaur documentaries. The ones where it was all about the dinosaurs and not paleontologists. Cuz at one point dino documentaries pretty much became fossil record documentaries, some of the most boring shi--
Yeah man, that's what probably happened 65 million years ago, a deformed Giganotosaurus fighting against a Tyrannosaurus in a random Savannah somewhere because why not am I right? This probably happened for sure, I'm feeling it.
The fact that they finally, in-movie, nodded to the fact that the dinosaurs in the time of the movie were far from historically accurate through the appearances and behavior of many of the past ones is incredible. Still not perfect, but it's enough to get the point across that they were engineered and it makes me so excited for this movie! EDIT: Okay apparently I didn't make it clear enough that I was referring to the fact that we've never been given a physical comparison or direct reference to modern paleontology concepts such as presence of feathers, just a blurb in the speech about how other genes were spliced in without seeing what the dinosaurs would've looked like without them.
@Jon Hesson first of all he never said that, chill the fuck out, and second of all rex was thought to have some feathers when they were young but shed them as they turned into adults
@Jon Hesson That's not exactly true unless you count dinosaurs like Archaeopteryx, which have existed since over 150 million years ago in the Jurassic, as not resembling birds. The origins of complex feathers lie even further back, in the middle to early Jurassic, based on the fact that most major groups of feathered coelurosaur theropods seem to have diverged from each other there. Barring the pretty much non-existent possibility that different groups of theropod dinosaurs evolved feathers independently of each other, then at the very least the last common ancestor of pretty much any coelurosaur (including Tyrannosaurs AND birds) would have had at least protofeathers too, given there is concrete evidence that the earliest tyrannosaurs possessed protofeathers and lost them secondarily in later genera. I do agree that the fluffy rex portrayed here is now an outdated look, and that many dinosaurs would not have possessed feathers, but it's no good to exaggerate the other side of the argument.
Every therapod in the T rex family tree has been proven to have feathers, except T rex ofcourse. It is widely believed that t rex lost it's feathers the way elephants lost their hair.
@Jon Hesson The majority of *very large non-coelurosaurian* dinosaurs did not have feathers (and this isn't even getting into the possibility that theropod protofeathers may be homogenous, thus shared by a common ancestor, with the quills found in some ornithischians and even the pycnofiber hair of pterosaurs). Archaeopteryx isn't even the first feathered or bird-like dinosaur in the fossil record, and it definitely didn't sprout complex feathers overnight. Fossils of even older forms like Epidipteryx from 165 million years ago and Anchiornis from 167 million years ago also preserve complex feathers, and these indicate there was a massive radiation of feathered, gliding forms that can trace its origins to the Early Jurassic. These forms gave rise to the better known dromeosaurs, as well as the line that led to birds, and the likelihood that the ancestors of Tyrannosaurs would have split off from this lineage before it even developed complex, vaned feathers, as well as the presence of a full, fluffy integument in basal coelurosaurs such as Sinosauropteryx indicates there was a very large diversity of small to medium-sized feathered dinosaurs since at least the early Jurassic, as the earliest undisputed Tyrannosauroids are Middle Jurassic in age.
I am absolutely BLOWN AWAY that they cut this from the final film. Not a SINGLE SHOT of any of this masterpiece made y the final cut and that’s hard to understand why. The REAL beginning was crap, just like the rest of film. It’s like there were two versions, the b movie made in the basement fan movie and the real billion dollar Hollywood version we expected and we got the B movie.
Respect to the camera man who's been alive for more than 65 million years.
And is able to float and teleport
Yeah, he's been drinking nothing but formaldehyde for 65 million years. Amazing preservative, that.
@@theloneranger8725 the camera man is a God confirmed
😀
@@Meme_Hobo lol
Please, make a whole movie like this! no music, no plot, no protagonist, just a realistic view of how our world was 65 million years ago!
He didn't make this :/
It was 66 million years ago the dinosaurs went extinct .. the title is wrong
@@salmonhippo9824 They didn't say this to him. To the creators.
This is not a realistic view of our world 65 million years ago, Giganotosaurus and T Rex did not exist in the same time period and T Rex did not have feathers
@@sumbitch3rdgen
They didnt even exist 65 million years ago. The mass extinction that ended the mesozoic era took place 66 million years ago.
My God, just imagine a remake of BBC's Walking With Dinosaurs with this kind of movie magic.
Walking with Dinosaurs was shite.
@@aciddrive1019 brainlet take
The people need a Netflix “Walking with Dinosaurs” narrated by Sir David
@@danielv1617 No, it should be narrated by somebody who isn’t a preaching, patronising, sanctimonious bore. Somebody who hasn’t spent the last sixty years standing on the shoulders of giants.
@@aciddrive409Yeah!! Donald Trump should do it I'm sick of all this global warming nonsense, Down with joe biden, me and you bro, forever 🤗
I really like how Rexy doesn't just start attacking everyone in sight, just sort of wanders through the drive in like she's not quite sure what all these people are doing. She might be a predator, but she doesn't have it in for humans... she's just a wild animal doing what she needs to survive.
Jurassic park the game: ha... yeah...
A croc or a lion or any other large predator would attack, kill and eat any feasible prey like this, animals have instinct, it's not about having it in for something.
She did eat the lawyer in the first movie.
@@Dante-vf4sd A croc would probably not a lion though
When I was a child, if I had seen this opening scene I would have believed it had to be REAL footage of Dinosaurs taken using a Time Machine. Movie Magic has entered the Platinum Age of special effects and I'm on board 100%.
Very true and 100% agree.
thanks to NASA we've improved CGI that much.
I hope in the next moon landing they make it right.
I still felt that way as a 9 yr old seeing the first Jurassic Park. That movie still holds up because of it's many practical effects. 2000-2020 it was this CGI limbo where you could tell it was fake. Like CGI yoda etc.
Yeah? Yet 1993's effects somehow looked better. That's when I was a kid and I practically shit my pants when I saw the T Rex in the rain.
Except the T-Rex never looked like that in real life (look of the head is all wrong, just find a picture of Sue the T Rex for a more accurate one). Also, the hands of the animal could only face inward (like if you were clapping), so the movie version of it with the hands facing downward is wrong.
Impressive CGI! The animals, the detail, the landscapes, and even measly insects… beautiful work!
they needa go ahead and just do a dinosaur documentary lol
Not to mention the sound design is on point. They really brought them to life in such an amazing way
And bold move making the first hero shot of an Oviraptor with pronated wrists eating an egg, establishing right away that the movie is not going to even try to be accurate to the science
In the end they scrapped this scene and it had the best cgi. Some of the cgi in this movie was so bad 🥲
As much as I love Jurassic Park, there's simply no way Giganotosaurus and T-Rex could've ever met (different part of the world, tens of millions of years apart).
It has basically been established at this point that the Jurassic Park universe is not the exact same universe as ours.
The T-Rex would still win
@@lyly_lei_lei this part is clearly showen to be back in time.
@@drbomdaydayboms4890 Yes, back in time in a *different* universe, the Jurassic Park universe, not our own universe.
@@lyly_lei_lei derp xD
Did they travel back in time for that opening scene?? That looked insane.
Edit: The sheer volume of nerds and geeks on this comment second is simply hilarious. Thank you.
It was leak like a year ago. About the opening scene being back time, and it’s supposed to like reveal the meteor hitting the dinosaurs. The people who had the chance to see it, said it was extremely breath taking! So I can’t wait!! I can tell that most of the opening scene must’ve been cropped and edited. Obviously so they don’t give everything away! But can’t wait!
LMAO
Good luck to the camera man
Nah they removed all the buildings and replaced them with dinosaurs they didn't make for no reason
@@Zweve Lol. 😂
Crazy how they even got the fauna right. Millions of years ago earth would've looked like a different planet compared too nowadays. I would LOVE too see these guys make dino documentaries like the ones I used too watch as a kid. The next genoration would LOVE it and personally I would too
You mean the flora?
@@calvinfujii5921 fauna is environment stuff aka ferrnas and trees and animals
@@calvinfujii5921 no animals only actually and thiz dude not right that is a acro playing as a giga lol
"They got the fauna right"
Except that Giganotosaurus wouldn't be there and Dreadnoughtus is from Argentina.
@@allo1099 fauna is animals. flora is plants
btw this scene is not in the actual movie
I love how Rexy wasn't randomly eating everyone, she's just there like "tf are these"
Did you just assume T-rex gender?
@@southpakrules Rexy (the T-Rex) is female, as were most, if not all of the dinosaurs in the original Jurassic Park. (Of course there was the matter of the frog dna, and some species spontaneously changing sex and therefore were able to mate. Rexy was the only t-rex at Isla Nublar, so no reason for her to sex change)
@@transitfan954 Biology has nothing to do with it. T-rex could be traumatized literally shaking. Science is racist.
@@southpakrules
Bro, do not start with all this of assuming genres and that, it is a movie, it is made to enjoy, so do that, and science is not racist, science is the most exact thing there is, so do not say nonsense and enjoy the video.
@@southpakrules mmmkay so even though I'm pretty sure you're just looking for an argument, it was stated that all dinosaurs in Jurassic Park are female but are able to reproduce asexually because if tree frog DNA that was put into their genome to help them acclimate to modern temperatures as was other modern animal DNA. (Which explains why most of the dinosaurs don't look accurate to scientific interpretation.) Reproducing asexually = a single creature, in this case a dinosaur, reproduces by cloning itself. It does not require a member of the opposite sex to breed, however in some cases if not all (I'm not too sure about this next part) things that reproduce asexually can also reproduce via opposite sex. So yes. Rexy is a female. However there are a few hints that males do exist occasionally throughout the Jurassic Park franchise. I.E. The rich dude in Fallen Kingdom specifying that the allosaurus being auctioned is a juvenile female.
This movie took 65 million years to make.. now that's dedication
Wow! That camera man is legendary! He traveled back in time for a 5 min clip!
The camera man needs more hype
The camera man needs a raise
The camera man is an overused and unfunny joke
@@garterbelttights6607 ok and? 64 people found it funny
@@redhotlavagaming2533 m8, im older than you. Get a life. People find the joke funny even tho you don't, so why even post a comment?
4:53 How, in the name of God, do you miss that badly
dart guns arent like real guns, also he was a kid, on a helicopter, but still, it was a fucking tyrannosaurus
He couldn't even hit a dinosaur if he tried.
Firing a very low velocity, fin stabilized, unbalanced projectile, out a of a extremely short barrel, large caliber smoothbore. Its more of a guess then aiming. The projectile will have a ton of velocity change meaning excessive drop and wind effects, and its moving too slow to really stabilize as regular bullets rely on spin while fins rely on sufficient speed and being aerodynamic. It likely doesn't stabilize in the barrel meaning it might not exit "straight" and come out at a slight and different angle every time like a nerf gun. On top of that because it wont stabilize right, it might not fly straight either. Also shooting out of a moving helicopter is extremely weird and hard to do. They move a lot even when hovering. And when they are moving steady in a direction that really complicates lead and windage. And something like that giant ass slow moving non-aerodynamic syringe being shot will be affected by the rotors swirling downwash, where as a aerodynamic bullet will not. Also the liquid sloshing around inside of it in flight will alter the center of gravity and further unstabilize it.
So no that's not that unrealistic. Having that gun on hand with the proper ammo to local police is.
Rex saw the dart was coming, he ducked. So not the hilo kid’s fault.
@@johnlivingston9217 And how does a Trex 1) see a dart no bigger than a finger from that distance with a spotlight blinding him and 2) have the brain capacity to understand what the dart is and to duck away from it to avoid getting tranquilized. Buuuull shit!
It's a shame this was cut from the film.
This scene wasn't even in The movie , why ?? :(
“Opening scene” literally not in the movie
I like how the T-rex puts one leg in front of the other leg which causes his body to move forward
Haha! good one!
That is not the opening scene at all. In fact most of the scenes is not in the actual movie from all the dominion trailers
It’s Jurassic Park: The Lost World all over again
The fact that the cameraman managed to survive for so long🫡
They lied to us. This is what we wanted in Dominion
this is not the opening scene, the opening scene starts with the Mosasaurs taken down a boat. THEY FREAKIN LIED!
It’s because it’s extended cut and sorry I’m late
4:42 god damn fucking hell this shot looks great O.O
Fr
This should have been in the movie. It could explain Rexy and the Giga’s rivalry instead of having them fight for no reason
Why is this not in the film?
Don't need a dart that big if a mosquito can bite through its hide.
Yeah the Mighty Giganotosaurus just to be killed by Rexy tackling him to the Therizinosaurus' Claws how epic
I didn't know Giganotosaurus lived 65 milion years ago. Another fantasy.
Enjoyed this more that the movie itself.
3:29 the mosquito tho
These guys are comical. Birds eye view with a spot light and they lose sight of a dinosaur moving at 10 mile an mile.
I love it when both Tyrannosaurus and Giganotosaurus are fighting
I'm still amazed how nobody has ever heard a dinosaur and still make the sound 🤔
the fact that the giga ended it with a neck snap
just scary
That's literally how all the big dinos get ended i think they could be a little more creative
spino be like: I DID THAT TOO!
But spino can’t neck snap tho-
@@advatlol says who
In real life spino can’t neck snap a giant carnivore because of its cone shaped teeth the one in jp III had T. rex like teeth also it’s build was very different
I find it interesting that people still chalk up the Jurassic series on a scale of accuracy when Crichton himself never went in for that. "They aren't real now" as Wu said in the book. The only real science starts and stops with getting the dinosaurs created. It flirts with the idea but isn't really about it. Like time travel in Terminator. It's not about travelling through time. It's used to get the story going.
I was expecting to see the meteor to strike to earth in the end but it was great anyways.
Same but this is just a trailer. Really hoping the movie has an extinction scene that would be awesome 👌
It might be a disease that killed dinasours
Okay so there’s this guy who makes stop motions about Godzilla and he always uses this sound but I FINALY found it the sound is at 2:43
Yeah this really should’ve been the opening scene instead of the rescuing of the baby triceratops
When that first opening shot of the sunrise with prehistoric trees followed up by the dramatic _DUNNN_ I got huge nostalgic flashbacks to Walking With Dinosaurs. They really need to bring shows like that back
this movie was such a let down
i personally believe that predators didnt actually fight that often. why on earth would they injure themselves? maybe they were like crocodiles where if they saw another predator they would not be hostile.
I can definitely see them fighting for food but just random fights like that don’t make sense
The final fight in the movie is super cheap . Target audience is preschoolers.
Props too the Camera man too risking His/her Life 🙏 🙏 🙏
What's with the weird Cuckoldry imagry at 4:25. Hollyweird is awful, this movie will be awful. The only redeeming quality are the tech DUDES who create amazing CGI.
for anyone wondering: id say the kid is ok. they made it very clear that if you dont move the t-rex wont harm you, and the kid was frozen in fear.
I can’t believe this wasn’t part of the opening for the film it even sets up when rexy came into conflict with the Giganotosaurus back in the Cretaceous period
this is better than the whole entire movie itself
65 million years ago you had to be big, strong or elusive to survive! Today you need intelligence and not hurt someone else’s feelings!
I saw it Yesterday, they Just cutted it Out😯
🎵 65 million years ago,
A meteor crashed into the earth,
Hurtling towards the planet,
at a 100 thousand kilometers per second,
If we never found their bones,
We would’ve never have known.🎵
the way the people are oblivious to the giant dinosaurs really takes away the fear from it
Killed off the T-rex to give the new big bad some sort of inflated importance, not falling for it Jurassic Park 3.
Also, is this like within minutes of the girl releasing all the dinos? Helicopter response that doesn't look like InGen or competitor, but nobody told people to avoid the drive-in movie theater or to stay indoors.
Amazing scene and so so SO annoying it wasnt in the film. The actual used opening scene is so lame in comparison.
The cameraman 65 millions yrs ago:
😀🍹🎥
Weel it's official, they invented time control! Not because the first scenes are from 65M years ago, but because apparently 6 minutes have passed since the beginning of this clip and it really doesn't feel like that
If this scene is not in the movie, then I question Colin Trevorrow credibility on the entire film... sadly they added protofeathers based on air... we already have Rex skin samples from the entire body (except head) and not 1 single feathers or protofeathers at all, Trevorrow should fire all his paleo advisors for adding them, when we know for fact and real evidence that it never had any of those features, even the museum who owns SUE, released a life size model 2 years ago, and no feathers or protofeaters at all, just smooth skin as it should be.
That's a nice level of gaslighting right there; you must very proud of yourself.
I agree, but this is probably just a brief flashback and Rex’s from the other films doesn’t have them
You realize that having paleontologists as advisors doesn't mean that you have to completely listen to them right?
@@maximaldinotrap Doesn't mean you shouldn't ignore the advice that matters. Which is why Jurassic World has turned into a bigger pile of shit.
@@maximaldinotrap If so... and you are developing a realistic scene, then why hiring them at all? Its like going to the doctor, and not taking the medicine...
Este dino me recuerda al indominus
Giganotosaurus se llama el Gigante de América del Sur
This is actually a prologue. It is on the Jurassic World You Tube Channel. Hate click bait, still cool though and well done.
Camera man is so hardworking that he time travelled to past and captured this video.
2:44 is my favorite part
just the sound design wihtout any music in the background. just this makes it feel so much more alive its incredible
68th like
Let's just think about the fact that living beings started to use noises (in order to communicate) only after a certain period of time.
Early animals weren't able to growl, scream or bark and they used scents, magnetism, touch and light instead.
Earth in that period was a silent planet, water fire wind and earthquakes were the only things able to produce sound and I can only imagine how alone and lost a human would feel there.
Looks so fake man :P
@@louiefence6579 because cgi and this isn't what dinos sound like
I kinda wish they used this logic thought the films, like the first jp did, yea big music pieces are needed but you can create allot of tension with very little, also we don’t need corny characters. Ian malcom was eccentric but he was also sexist a bit of a dick, but then got serious when he saw what was going on.
They could literally do an entire movie of just this and I would be fine with it.
Same, would be a better movie without the verbal propaganda!
@@EthanBonardel 🤡
Yes
they did, its called walking with dinosaurs
Exactly! Pure eye candy.
I would be happy with a full movie just like the opening scene. That was incredible.
I know, me too!
Ok but the problem is, this movie need human or narrator to tell us about the plot
@@monstertokusatsu6042 no it doasnt! I would just love to watch these animals without a freaking narrator.
narration by David Attenburough (or however you spell it)
And then they ruined it by having yet another weaker dinosaur kill the Rex
Seen the movie. This trailer is superior to the entire movie.
I disagree greatly sir but hey that’s my opinion And your opinion is that movie sucked which I think is wrong but stew it’s my opinion and your opinion it’s
@@TheChosenOne1098 I certainly don’t disagree. 😔
Foreeal
Honestly, all I cared about when watching the movie was the more accurate dinosaurs and the Dimetrodon. Unfortunate that they still have the Dilophosaurus spit venom, though
@@TheChosenOne1098 but ronin the movie did suck and this scene was not in movie but it gives a hint that this gigantasaurus kicks the trex ass like it did in movie.
Love how the original t Rex has hair/feathers on its skin while the current one doesn’t, to show how despite filling in the genome the current dinosaurs are not truly accurate
That was the whole thing in the original novel in fact. Doctor Wu explained that they would hatch the animals without knowing and tweak the mix of the modern animal DNA with the incomplete DNA found. The clones were made to look as an approximation to what was known then or what people expected. They weren't really Dinosaurs, they were chimeras, hybrids of different species that would look like Dinosaurs in the image of what was discovered at the time. That was the whole point of having Allan Grant and Ellie Sattler at the Park, to approve on the look and partial behavior of the creatures to Hammond. Crap got really messed up when they started behaving outside of what was expected and Wu even suggested to Hammond to scrap the batch they had and hatch a few new batch that was more controllable. Many of the characteristics such as color and even poison or snake like attributes were part of the DNA mixing in the cloning process.
Jurassic park is all wrong with the fact that every dinosaur fighting with Trex doesn’t die from the 6 ton bite. And of course, this epilogue has a flashback to the time period of the dinosaurs with trex and acrocanthosaurus or giganotosaurus or whatever dinosaur that is living together and competing. Trex really never lived with any other large predators nor was in any competition with them
@@ricardofalcon7889 it's actually 7.1 tons
@@Souljaboyo477 it’s roughly estimated to be around its own weight
@@ricardofalcon7889 But when has a dinosaur not died from the T rexes bite
“It’s like taking a stroll through the woods, 65 million years ago.” Nice throwback to the first Jurassic World movie.
To save on special effects it was decided in studio that creating a working time machine was cheaper than getting the super computers for processing the special effects. Like Stanley Kubrick did with the moon landings. All filmed on location to save money.
Ha ha ha
World or park
Or during the time when Job 40 was written, and other historic accounts "the science" and "chosen history" works so hard to deny and reject. Read a literal translation of Job from Bible Gateway with the notes at the bottom, try English Standard Version.
@@imhuntingwabbits5532 He he he ha
I think the starting scene is a cool concept without any humans and just dinosaurs and you kind of imagine what the dinosaurs are thinking about and how the story goes in your head that would be pretty cool
yeah but there would be like no plot if they were to make a movie like it
@@papaprotein9000 there is a movie about an allosaurus that gets its jaw broken that begs to differ
@@papaprotein9000 just looked it up, the movie’s called Dinotasia if you want to see it. It’s good.
they probably didn't do a whole lot of thinking in any sense that we can relate to though.
@@papaprotein9000 I think a lot of people would pay to see dinosaurs.
When you realize that this wasn’t the opening scene to the movie
Yeah
Yup, this scene alone could've made it decent.
Literally me right now...
@@FourKaiju this scene is better than the ENTIRE movie .
In the extended edition it has this and I prefer that over the theatre release
To lose track of a T-rex dinosaur, what the quintessence of the army
This man is said "quiet down kid, it can run forever". I don't think he understands what's happening.
I don't want to be that you but I see here the same shitty problems of the last film: The people being so stupid and the dinosaurs being treated like a slasher guy who is nearly unbeatable. Come on we eradicated mamuts and another beasts with similar size of dinosaurs with only stones, bones, wood, torch and spears. How and why in the hell why can't kill a bunch of giant animals with all the technology?
@@freddyjosereginomontalvo4667 plot convenience, the writers can't be assed to come up with any real conflicts. just easier to make the humans absolute spanners. they've seen the audience eats it up anyway, so why bother
@@neito.m.6741 Right? We've got a 12-ton Carnivore running free but no worries! We'll wait til it gets tired to catch it. Even though we have a helicopter and thermal imaging technology.
@@freddyjosereginomontalvo4667 because people just buy this shit up and they know they don't need to put effort into it to make money.
Why wasn't this the opening scene in the film, WHY? This was much more exciting and entertaining then what we actually got in the final film...WTF?
Yeah I just saw the movie and this was not even in it
Their will be extended cut that might put the prologue back.
@@legendary5733 hope it does
Yeah I just watched it yesterday and couldn't find this scene.
It was ridiculous we couldn't know that why were Giga and Rexy fighting. This should be the back story for why they were.
Because the fight would be 30 million years of impossibility
The movie should've been much more like this scene! This scene is awesome!
No, its not. They didnt lived at the same age and if they did, T-rex would stomp giga due the fact of be much more bulkier, stronger bite, heavier and build to fight directly, while Giga was build bite and run.
That movie sucks.
@@triplocore JP was never meant to be a scientifically accurate documentary..
@@FeroxX_Gosu Doesnt mean that It have to be a extremely dumb movie
which leads the average person to misinformation.
Unfortunately movies like that have a underrated responsibility.
@@triplocore JP's only responsibility is to make children pick up a Dino book or documentary after they watch a JP movie and they definietly live up to that! Hell, I even searched for dino stuff after the movie for days to get myself up to date with the recent scientific results and watched the Apple documentary "Prehistoric Planet".
@@FeroxX_Gosu If you really believe that more than 1% really do that, I have a bad news for you.
The majority will just take it as reality, I lived it in my skin, I was the children who get to read the books about that after watch the movie, but my friends, all of them, assumed that JP3 was the truth and spino really could beat the T-rex.
That new JW movie is just the same.
Giganotosaurus was inferior to T-rex in absolute ALL ASPECTS, but who care? A lie repeated 1000 times becomes a truth.
Kids who just see that movie will just believe that they lived together and T-rex was a prey, thats it. Just one or another will bother to search it, and half of them will just keep the same opinion even reading the truth and search by wrong source to enforce his beliefs because the average person dont like to believe that his visions was wrong.
Missed opportunity not having this in the movie. Would’ve set up Gig vs Trex way better.
Truth
Glad that cameraman survived that T-rex battle 65 Million years ago.
Including the asteroid impact.
And space to get that shot of the land mass of the Earth at 0:24
This is why you don't have a girlfriend. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Seriously, so overdone....
they found the video in the amber
This scene was not even in the movie
yup
That was incredibly well thought out. Beautiful imagination!
When The T Rex drops, and the shot zooms in on the eye, and then the mosquito landing on it.... Wow. That's some serious attention to detail.
also how the eye goes from a "living thing" to a dead eye was great too.
Conversely, this means that the existence of the fan favorite Rexy is based on a story that she was killed by a giga that was already extinct (died out arround 30mio years befor the t-rex) at the time. is that supposed to be the story for rexy?
So much attention to details that they show two creaturs that existed in two different continents with a time lag of more than 30 million years.
I love the fact that instead of making the T-rex roar really loudly a whole heap, they made them mostly do a super low pitch growl/rumble like how they actually did.
Wow you were alive to hear what they actually did!?
@@ramonvasquez3202 Speculation based on the most related modern day animals and infrasound.
how the fuck would you know
@@mortenskands201 See above comment. We can make accurate speculations based on things like the shape of skull cavities and estimated biomass, along with the use of infrasound technology to get an idea of what it might've sounded like. Is it gonna be 100% accurate? Probably not, but we can get close.
@@JohnnyShagbot well semi accurate until we have more findings that prove it's complete truth
I watched the movie in the UK and the opening was not this
was it a cut or something else???
That intro scene is incredible! I could watch it a dozen times in a row.
well did you?
Its a bit Stanley Kubrick ean ish
Machine time yes sirrr
When is Hollywood gong to realize that people will pay to watch a two hour film of nothing but prehistoric life!
I mean... Jurassic World 2 was really terrible so I'm not gonna watch this movie for that reason.
@AUTISMO There WOULDN'T BE any overpaid actors in it to begin with - JUST DINOS - that would be the main thing!
They kept it so steady and it's such a large target, yet the guy missed like a Stormtrooper.
I can't believe this wasn't in the full film
I thought I missed this scene in theaters but it wasn't put in.
I know right, super disappointing!!
I was totally bummed when it wasn’t in it. When the film started and the first scene came on, I was like “Did I miss something or did they not put it in??”
They said it was to long so there for they did not put it.
@@NpcCat12 yeah it was much better to spend time on the story of the clone girl
This looks absolutely stunning, but as a lifelong paleontology junky the whole Tyrannosaurus vs Giganotosaurus absolutely killed me, especially after they sort of hyped up how "accurate" it was going to be, but then again this is Jurassic Park so I shouldn't really expect scientific accuracy because 1-that isn't the focus of the movie, and 2-Cool fight scene.
Don't forget the oviraptor stealing eggs, the sauropods having elephant feet and the t rex having feathers. None of those are accurate.
Did any of those prehistoric fauna even coexist together?
@@GeraltofRivia22 Well, the oviraptor didn't steal the eggs, it just ate them. And rex having feathers is still up for interpretation.
@@ozzywalker609 "stealing" the eggs refers to eating them. Which we have zero evidence for in oviraptor and again, is based on the misidentification of its own eggs.
@@jackleo4435 1-Nope, none of the creatures in that clip lived together irl, and 2-happy new year
The T-Rex's tail hitting the tranquillizer dart stuck in the windshield for a split second at 4:57. hoooooly crap the amount of detail these artists put into this is incredible
I like the fact that they dont have auto aim on the darts and actually missed
"Keep it steady" shoots it on car, yeah Great details
@@Pannkakaize Made no sense but sure
Yet it somehow looks significantly less real than in 93.
man every big carnivore dinosaur is not a T-Rex😂
Fun fact: Dinosaurs weren't called dinosaurs when they were alive. In fact, nothing had a name when the dinosaurs were alive.
no shit
@@kingkuf7371 :D
B.S
how do you know? You would need to be in the brain of a dinosair to know what they call or not call their food :P
@@6666Imperator dinosaur enemy= ROAARRRR
dinorsaur juvi trying to take some of the ded dinosaur ur pack killed= snap roar
herbivore when carnivores coming= uhuhhuhuhuh
raptor calling pack for attack= intense screaching
How many times did they travel in time to put those chronologically inaccurate animals in the same spot?
probably a lot considering the camera crew's lives were put in danger lol
Not to mention the inaccuracies of the animal designs and behaviours.
I can’t believe this wasn’t even in the movie😭😭
There should be an extended version of this movie that includes this scene.
Yeah I was so looking forward to seeing it in the theater.
They removed this scene from the movie, it opens up with something else
honestly it's like a dream come true for me to see the things that probably happened 65 million years ago, and with extremely well graphics too
Man i loved those early 2000's dinosaur documentaries. The ones where it was all about the dinosaurs and not paleontologists. Cuz at one point dino documentaries pretty much became fossil record documentaries, some of the most boring shi--
It’s probaly no where near of what it really looks like lol
Yeah man, that's what probably happened 65 million years ago, a deformed Giganotosaurus fighting against a Tyrannosaurus in a random Savannah somewhere because why not am I right? This probably happened for sure, I'm feeling it.
And in case some of you play Jurassic park III builder. I have completed the game :/
The design chosen for the beasts are bullshit tho. They would look way less intimidating
The fact that they finally, in-movie, nodded to the fact that the dinosaurs in the time of the movie were far from historically accurate through the appearances and behavior of many of the past ones is incredible. Still not perfect, but it's enough to get the point across that they were engineered and it makes me so excited for this movie!
EDIT: Okay apparently I didn't make it clear enough that I was referring to the fact that we've never been given a physical comparison or direct reference to modern paleontology concepts such as presence of feathers, just a blurb in the speech about how other genes were spliced in without seeing what the dinosaurs would've looked like without them.
@Jon Hesson first of all he never said that, chill the fuck out, and second of all rex was thought to have some feathers when they were young but shed them as they turned into adults
@Jon Hesson That's not exactly true unless you count dinosaurs like Archaeopteryx, which have existed since over 150 million years ago in the Jurassic, as not resembling birds. The origins of complex feathers lie even further back, in the middle to early Jurassic, based on the fact that most major groups of feathered coelurosaur theropods seem to have diverged from each other there. Barring the pretty much non-existent possibility that different groups of theropod dinosaurs evolved feathers independently of each other, then at the very least the last common ancestor of pretty much any coelurosaur (including Tyrannosaurs AND birds) would have had at least protofeathers too, given there is concrete evidence that the earliest tyrannosaurs possessed protofeathers and lost them secondarily in later genera.
I do agree that the fluffy rex portrayed here is now an outdated look, and that many dinosaurs would not have possessed feathers, but it's no good to exaggerate the other side of the argument.
Every therapod in the T rex family tree has been proven to have feathers, except T rex ofcourse. It is widely believed that t rex lost it's feathers the way elephants lost their hair.
@Jon Hesson You literally contradicted yourself there buddy, congrats
@Jon Hesson The majority of *very large non-coelurosaurian* dinosaurs did not have feathers (and this isn't even getting into the possibility that theropod protofeathers may be homogenous, thus shared by a common ancestor, with the quills found in some ornithischians and even the pycnofiber hair of pterosaurs).
Archaeopteryx isn't even the first feathered or bird-like dinosaur in the fossil record, and it definitely didn't sprout complex feathers overnight. Fossils of even older forms like Epidipteryx from 165 million years ago and Anchiornis from 167 million years ago also preserve complex feathers, and these indicate there was a massive radiation of feathered, gliding forms that can trace its origins to the Early Jurassic. These forms gave rise to the better known dromeosaurs, as well as the line that led to birds, and the likelihood that the ancestors of Tyrannosaurs would have split off from this lineage before it even developed complex, vaned feathers, as well as the presence of a full, fluffy integument in basal coelurosaurs such as Sinosauropteryx indicates there was a very large diversity of small to medium-sized feathered dinosaurs since at least the early Jurassic, as the earliest undisputed Tyrannosauroids are Middle Jurassic in age.
I am absolutely BLOWN AWAY that they cut this from the final film. Not a SINGLE SHOT of any of this masterpiece made y the final cut and that’s hard to understand why. The REAL beginning was crap, just like the rest of film. It’s like there were two versions, the b movie made in the basement fan movie and the real billion dollar Hollywood version we expected and we got the B movie.
NOPE that wasn't the opening scene. These 7 minutes are better than the 2 hour movie. Don't waste your time and money.
Yeah they messed up. Story/plot is all over the place. It should have been better with all of those new dinos.
Its sad how this whole thing was cutted off in the official release, and it was replaced with a boring TV interwiew :(
They said they would make an accurate prologue… and yet, a bunch of inaccuracies…
The best scene in the movie wasn't in the movie. Wow.
I love how the giga crossed a whole continent just to fight the t rex
continent? that bad boy jumped forward 7 millions years just to hand out that ass whoopin
Not to mention the T-rex lived on an island where is now western america.
Looks more like an achro than a giga tbf
Giga had some serious fucking beef
@@mareanie5998 wdym? It looks like a giga to me
I see a lot of people talking about the CGI and Cinematography but the Sound Design is absolutely phenomenal.
The scene with the T Rex at the cinema is awesome. Why couldn't the movie had more of that, i.e. dinosaurs in our world, rather than giant locusts?
It's amazing how a mosquito can pierce T-Rex skin! I would have thought it would be too thick, but evidently not...
How else do you think they get t-rex dna
prehistoric mosquitos are something else
the mosquito listened to the rock rap and became ripped as hell.
@@redhotlavagaming2533 They took some Avinychus DNA to help them in their quest.
it must be because mosquitoes of that time were far stronger than now as survival was hard at that time Glad those mosquitoes aren't here now xD
This movie was an awful installment. This scene wasn’t even in the film!