Install Raid for Free ✅ IOS/ANDROID/PC: clcr.me/FilmCore_Halloween and get a special starter pack 💥 Available only for the next 30 days! Visit Halloween event page 🎃👻 trickortreat.plarium.com to win a bunch of real-life and in-game prizes 💥 Available only for new users. The event ends on November 5, 2022 at 23:59 pm ET. For the best possible experience make sure to use the desktop version. Which was YOUR Favorite Accurate Dino to see? Let me know! :D
Can we take a moment to observe that one person ALONE managed to recreate all these scenes that at the time cost millions of dollars to make? I don't know what impresses me more: this person's talent or how far 3D technology has come.
Well, to be fair, it is a UA-cam video made by one guy on his computer, w/o the resources of a multimillion dollar VFX company. 🙃 That being said, Shamook posted a YT video of his attempt at an improved deepfake for Luke Skywalker in the Mandalorian - and within a month was hired by Lucasfilm and became the chief deepfake artist on Luke in The Book of Boba Fett. 🤗
@@simbiotesnus1013 Not quite. If he were to recreate the dinosaurs as they were in the original JP movie I'm sure they'd look just as good. But since he decided to stay accurate to scientific discoveries they they don't quite match up. The skin is not as rough in these models so the bumps and crevices are not as noticeable which makes them look less realistic. It's not rocket science to figure out the small differences
@@simbiotesnus1013 Its because there were not graphics dumbass, the 1993 computer animations sucked ass, so they used models (robot like) as much as possible
This honestly just made me appreciate how much effort they put into the original film and how damn good it looks all these years later. "Realistic" or not, the original dinosaurs from the movie looked phenomenal.
Yeah, and tbh, the T-Rex just works. Taking a little creative liberty to make something just plain old look more menacing and scary is fine. I appreciate accuracy, and it depends greatly on the film, but at the end of the day, evoking some real emotion and being entertained and immersed is what counts. I always found it curious how so many people seemingly complain about lack of realism in film and video games when they're devoting all this time to things that are inherently unrealistic lol.
It’s because a lot of the dinosaurs are animatronics. Every Jurassic Park scene he was recreating (trex, raptor and spino), those dinosaurs were actually on set being filmed, and that’s why they ‘hold up’ and in a lot of cases, look better than the new movies 😂
@@podunkestthe classic actually might be more realistic than the remake… cartilage often erodes off the body before any fossilization occurred Also the Utah raptor jaw wasn’t properly placed. The jaw bone was loose compared to other raptors and also giga was actually around 5-10 feet taller than a T. rex.
@@mrpumperknuckles1631the classic isn’t even remotely more accurate. Compare an elephants Skelton to it’s actual looks, that’s the issue with the Jurassic park T rex design. It’s fundamentally flawed by virtue of the assumptions made when designing it. Also we know for a fact that they had feathers
Everyone seems to forget a HUGE plot point thats literally thrown in your face at the beginning of the 1st movie, these creatures were made from incomplete dna sequence where they had to alter and fill in gaps of code to bring them to life. They addressed this again in Jurassic world.
Even though their dna is incomplete the designs are still very accurate at that time, except for Dilo and velociraptor So the DNA thingy is just a poor excuse for not using a more accurate design
I mean they still called the velociraptor a velociraptor when it wasn't and you do see the skeletal remains of the incorrectly called raptor in the first movie so that's the only real plot point issue if you want to be more accurate I mean.
It's more modelling than animating - the animation is easily the worst part of the whole video, but then good animation takes a lot more time than good modelling does.
To be fair it's stated in the book and movies that the dinosaurs look the way they do because they were made to be theme park monster attractions. Bred specifically to be frightening, amazing and exciting with Dr Wu even admitting how different the dinosaurs would appear if they had aimed for a product closer to reality; That being said this is awesome that you did this and put so much work into it.
yeah, if you think about it, Wu was definitely experimenting with hybrids here with these. most of them would work if you combine a couple similar dinosaurs, or just are essentially hybrids if you take into account the genome filler. His Rex was probably the closest one he has, the raptors are some combination of a Utahraptor and 3+ other raptors (plus some modern birds and stuff for intelligence), the Spino is definitely not a pure genome, and is instead a reconstruction (though that's in retrospect, it would've been pure based off at the time knowledge), and I'm sure more of the dinos at his two parks were messed up. I don't know if the Giganotosaurus was his work or biosyn's, so i cant judge who was working on it.
One problem with that explanation is that in the beginning of dominion they show the original giga and rex fighting each other 65 million years ago. They look exactly the same back then as they do in the park.
@@calamarimaniac yeah, then that's just being the show straying from its roots of at least trying to be somewhat scientifically accurate back at the start.
@@dondeka2086 Too funny!! 😂 I had to look up Hermes bag, and oh my gosh, I had no idea Walmart has bags for sale that are $10K or more!!!! 🤣 That’s messed up though!
i mean, its actually a lot faster rebuilding the scene using asset packs and semi-procedural tools than it is to rotoscope that footage. it would be comparable to spilling a bag of rice and instead of picking each grain up one at a time you go to the store and get a new vacuum to clean it up. more effort initially but easier and faster over all.
It's like the difference between renovating an old building and starting a new building on a clean flat plot of land. In most cases the old structure cause more problems than they are worth.
I know you said that the T Rex had excellent vision. However in the film, it said they used frog DNA to complete their codes. Well, A frog's visual system is specifically adapted to seeing little things that are moving across its field of vision - and not things that are standing still. Maybe she took that part into her DNA.
Crichton himself would address this critique in The Lost World; he has a character point out that it was much more likely that Rexy could see them perfectly well, but wasn't really hungry/in the mood to chomp on more humans
Thats very reasonable and would be the most logic answer exepto that the one explaining that tyranosarus can't see movement is the palentologist so he was very wrong
This is exactly the explanation used in the novel. During the breakout scene in the book, Grant was literally frozen with fear, fully expecting to be chomped on by the Rex, only to be surprised when she suddenly couldn't find him, despite being right in front of her. He later came to the conclusion that the frog DNA mutated her vision to the point where she couldn't see prey standing still. I'm not sure why it was changed for the film, honestly, considering they kept the bit about dinosaurs mutating from female to male and reproducing as a side effect of the frog DNA.
Many consider that if realistic-looking dinosaurs were used in movies they would not be scary or have the same impact, but the design of the creature does not matter, the important thing is how it is presented, how it is used, and this video is proof that even with feathers, fewer teeth, fewer beaks, fewer claws, they can be just as or more scary than in the movies.
With the exception of velociraptor, lol. To be fair though, all anyone needs to do to make a tiny, feathered dinosaur scary is model it after a goose or cassowary. Prehistoric Planet seemed to base theirs off of a hawk/eagle and it was excellent. I could definately imagine being killed by the land equivalent of a golden eagle
@@kelseykwolek8241 exactly, keep in mind that we have fossil evidence of Velociraptors getting into death struggles with Protoceratops. A coyote sized theropod is apparently able to stalemate a 400 pound ceratopsian long enough for a sandstorm to kill them both.
I see where you're coming from, and I totally 100% without a doubt agree with you, but when it showed a head-on view of the Utahraptor, I was disturbed. That model looked terrifying when it was looking at the screen.
To be fair, the raptor doesn't have to grip the handle and pronate its wrist, it just has to hook it and pull down. It was a horizontal handle, not a knob.
@@thegamezone2237 but in the very video he shows an even smaller chicken open a door with a similar handle, chickens being also flightless they can only assist themselves by flapping. it's more of a barrier of not knowing how to operate a door, than a physical inability. if velociraptors were alive i think you could train them to open doors, like you can train cats too.
Amazing work, amazing video, BUT... Jurassic Park dinosaurs have a special place in my heart.. so I still love the originals. 5:15 made me laugh though. Loved it.
i think its the same effect as people who see black bears 200 feet away and are " aww its a slightly smaller bear and mom " . ive seen even the teenagers up close once. my freind helped an electrician do some log cabin work, and bear just investigating the dumpster they put scrap wood in. even the teenagers are the size of a taller adult woman. when i saw a male turkey in a campground once ( my parents helped clean them weeks before people arrived ) . they are way larger than people think. when that thing actually raises its legs all the way and cranes its neck instead of hunching over. i used to let them chase me on our golf cart at full speed. and they keep up.
And turkeys will stalk you. They legit will not stop. I had a group of turkeys start following me from my car while I was visiting some country cousins. The property was absolutely vast, and we got on some quads to head over to the tree line. 20 minutes later! We hear them rustling through the leaves, these damn turkeys, coming for me after marching in formation the whole time. When they got to me they didn't actually do anything except try to pen me in. I remember pushing them aside by their heads and their rubbery headskin was so warm! But honestly at that moment I felt sure that these turkeys would stalk me to all ends of the Earth if they set their minds to it.
@@Steve-fc4bo turkeys are fascinating creatures honestly since they look so unathletic but are honestly quite impressive. They're really capable runners, able to reach speeds of up to 25mph(40km/h), which they can maintain surprisingly long since their tendons compressing when their feet hit the ground and expanding to make the next step easier can account for over 60% of the total energy used in each step compared to a human's roughly 35%-40%. Turkeys are also able to fly at speeds of up to 55mph(88.5km/h) for distances of up to 100 yards and they can even swim. I do think one of the funniest things you can see in nature is a fully grown wild turkey roosting in a tree. They're so comically large and round that it looks like it shouldn't be possible.
Yeah, turkeys and similar sized birds can do some damage. And I think the current theory is velociraptors were pack hunters. One dog sized raptor, you'd have a chance. A pack of them? You're lunch
I felt the accurate utahaptor could have become very scary with enough screentime. I remember the art director of Bioshock , speaking about making monsters: "Make it goofy, and memorable first. Everything scary by rote has been done already, so make it goofy. Then, make it do monstrous things; and that memorable silhouette will become scary."
@@N3koPurrS If done well, they could've scared me at least. Granted, that's partially because I'm a coward who still sometimes gets spooked by his own shadow, but still :P Even with these scenes, they seemed slightly unnerving to me. I think it's because we don't see giant birds that much nowadays, with ostriches and emus being the only real examples. What we're seeing in this video is a creature the size of an ostrich, with the proportions of a giant velociraptor, the coloration of a turkey, and the head of a crocodile. Such a creature seems strange, almost otherworldly, since it's so far removed from what we're familiar with today. That's how it seems to me, at least XP (Also, I'm talking about the giant ones, the ones that were the size of a utahraptor. The tiny ones the size of a dog were just a laughing stock)
@@NegativeDumpster well yeah the point was on how they looked in this video, besides they would've never looked that way for the Jurassic Parks/Worlds because they were all genetically mutated and modified.
5:01 the reason the t rex's vision is based on movement is because, in the books its explained that, grant realizes the frog dna used to splice the dino dna was from a frog that "cant see you if you dont move"
@@AlexCrighton This is a mistake in the film. In the book Grant discovers this defect of vision in the dinosaurs in the park, when he sees their reaction.
@@Iloveaespa980 1) Not an expert but it's certainly believable that there's a species of Frog that doesn't. Michael Crichton is writing a science fiction novel so being scientifically accurate is less important that having believable to a point science. 2) He retcons this in the Sequel Book "Lost World", where a T-Rex snacks on a terrified goon who thought he could escape death only for the T-Rex to surprise him. Whether this is from Crichton learning more about Frog DNA or him being annoyed at having to make a sequel book for the success of a movie and wanted to deflate a really interesting part of that movie. I believe it's the latter.
@@jvit4245 It is also possible to explain that they can see stationary objects. They could say that stationary objects, unless they blatantly smell like food, such as bleeding dying or dead, just does not attract its attention nearly as much as moving objects. Thus the Rex might be more inclined to ignore Grant and Ellie if they stayed relatively still. Similar to how cats tend to ignore things that don't move much unless they specifically go to it, like a scratch post. But if a cat sees a mouse, with its short quick movements, the cat's attention is suddenly peaked, and the "hunt is on" so to speak.
I also saw that the t-rex most likely wouldn't have roared but would've made a low, deep rumble sound that would shake the ground and warn/scare nearby dinosaurs. Pretty creepy.
Yeah. That ones more creepy and can petrify you. However rexys roar is mega iconic and would make you shit enough bricks to build a city with some left over.
The irony is, the more accurate they become visually, the less visual horrifying it becomes; however, once you know how they sound, and envision yourself standing in front of one, or a few meters away, it suddenly becomes more chilling than it ever was before.
The accurate velociraptors/utahraptor seem dumber for some reason, but the moment you imagine yourself in front of them like how a turkey would peck into its food and eat while completely devoid of any emotion whatsoever, is extremely scary.
Not really different with how predator animal now. Just see how bears and lions look and sometimes act harmless/cute, but they're very dangerous killers
Like the foreshadowing with the chicken opening the door clip then seeing the real velociraptor fail then getting squashed BTW whats 'chickenraptor' doing trying to get into a kitchen? likely to be on the menu
Not really. Saurischian dinosaurs and especially maniraptorans were deceptively light for their volume due to hollow bones and extensive air sac net throughout their body, especially dromeosaurs like Utahraptor, that most likely directly evolved from flying creatures. Its mass could be less than that of a grizzly.
@@nickkorkodylas5005 Cassowaries also have hollow bones and avian-style respiration, and those mfers can kick through layered plywood. Given that utahraptor was twice the size of a cassowary, I'd still bet on the utahraptor lol
I love how the first Jurassic World had B.D. Wong's character say that, yeah, the dinos are artificial, labs created monsters and they aren't what real dinosaurs looked like, but it was what people wanted. It nicely addressed 1) that the OG film was fairly accurate to knowledge at the time, 2) explained why the new animals still looked like that, and 3) drove home that the park(s) were to make money, so you have to give the customers what they want.
It was even addressed as early in JP3 (2001), Grant says "What John Hammond and InGen did at Jurassic Park is create genetically engineered theme-park monsters. Nothing more and nothing less" just to drive the point they were never supposed to be 100% scientifically accurate to begin with. Also so basically the studio saying to the "akchually that's not what dinosaurs look like" nerds; "yeah we're aware they aren't accurate but that would be boring and not as exciting for our film's style and direction so we already established that fact in-universe lore"
Too bad they chucked that out the window when they made their "Giganotosaurus" look like a mini indominus rex, and then had a scene showing the same dinosaur in a weird past shot fighting a T-Rex (which they didn't live in the same era or area) (yes this stupid thing pisses my off cause I love the Giga)
To bad at the time, velociraptors were well known to have been the size of a German Sheppard. No, the dinosaurs in the original movie were not scientifically accurate. Not sure who started that myth.
Another reason to love that line is it was in the book as well. In the book, they admitted that they took some liberties in getting "creative" with the dinosaurs in order to make them a more entertaining attraction.
The Spinosaurus was my favorite. He looked terrifying. Especially in the water during the night scene. Nice work on recreating the Jurassic Park scenes with accurate looking dinosaurs models.
i wonder about the spino being weaker than the rex though. Giant river otter can kill jaguar outside of water despite being practically equally sized. In the water a spino would just drown the t rex as crocodiles drown their prey. From their appetence i doubt spinos would hunt far away from deep water, so if it ever meets a rex near water the rex would be doomed.
@@Tina99999 As they've shown in Prehistoric Planet, tyrannosaurus were very adept swimmers (good reference: ua-cam.com/video/7mtaXP2Nar0/v-deo.html&ab_channel=AppleTV), so it's unlikely spino would be able to drown one (especially since they lack the powerful bite needed to restrain a 10 ton rex, or any other grappling weapon, making spinos more like gharials than nile crocs).There's a reason both rex and spino were at the top of their prospective food chains, but when it comes to strength, we know for a fact that rex would have been far more powerful and beefier than a spino, though spino would have been better adapted for the wetland environment it lived in. If they ever actually came across each other in some alternate earth timeline, they likely would have just ignored each other or kept a good distance since they occupy such different niches, making competition rather foolish and needlessly risky. It's the same reason you never hear of gators fighting black bears in the modern day.
"I was running out of time, so I recreated the entire scene in unreal engine." When it's quicker to recreate an entire scene, than to edit it 😂 The work you put into this video is fantastic
I knew about the eyesight, but WOW 5:15 took a jet black dark turn. That being said, the artistry is flatout AMAZING!!!!! I'm no CG expert by any means, but I am more than certain that this recreation took way longer than it seems like in this video. As a fellow artist, and a dino enthusiast, you have my upmost respect and appreciation!!!
In the first book, Grant explained that the Dinosaurs had motion-based vision because the incomplete DNA was filled in with amphibian DNA. Long story short, the monsters Ingen created looked like dinosaurs, but they were mutants with some dino DNA, and the rest were a mix of whatever the plot needed.
Stop posting this myth. That is not at all what happened. The second book included a specific line calling this out as laughably wrong. The Trex could see them perfectly well at all times. The reason it didn't attack when they were holding still was because it wasn't hungry.
@@Matt_History It is not a myth, it is real. In Lost World, the animals are not created by InGen, but by the rival company BioSyn. The protagonists arrive at Sorna Island because they believe that they were facing an exception of nature, and therefore they were going to find a lost world. But as I said, these animals are the creation of BioSyn, not InGen.
5:00 I love how you made this part 100% accurate to what would actually happen and that the notion that they can't see non moving things is ridiculous.
That claim has been applied to some living species as well. It's a brain limitation of some predators that only look for living, moving prey, and thus ignore dead, stationary animals. This in turn has caused prey animals to evolve the freeze / play dead defense. But most sighted predators will still need the ability to see stationary obstacles like rocks and trees, which makes the effect of staying still less certain, as even a stupid instinctual predator might react as if it already killed you and start eating. Try staying still while your leg or chest is getting eaten.
@@johndododoe1411 I can see some truth to that but most predators have no problem being scavengers too. It might well be that they would prioritize moving things, but I don't see a T. Rex ignoring a meal cause it isn't moving.
@@johndododoe1411 It's not specific to predators, it's just easier for any brain to spot an object if it moves. Moving objects are prioritized regardless of whether you're predator or prey, which is why ambush predators also stay perfectly still for periods of time when sneaking up on prey.
Fun Fact: Chickens are the closest known relative to the T-Rex. And then people turn chickens into nuggets which are commonly dinosaur shaped. This was done well before scientists have discovered birds are closely related to dinosaurs.
Im not so sure. Now with 4K tvs, the CGI kind of stands out compared to its surroundings and comes off looking more fake for some reason. Especially the Brontosaurus. The T-Rex attack still looks the best but I think the darkness helps maintain the realism. The best CGI scene is still the T-rex as seen from Malcom's and Grant's POV from behind the windshield as it roars and stomps by. That was a masterpiece.
The T-rex eyesight reveal, and the realistic velociraptor vs door both made me roar with laughter so hard my chest and stomach muscles hurt, my cheeks ache, my eyes are red and still watery, and my breathing still hasn't quite returned to normal. The dinosaur makeovers were awesome, the sense of humour was outstanding.
The Utahraptor with it's bubba jaw in the window had me dying.. I'm glad they did what they did in JP because there's no way I could take the more realistic look serious lol. Also thank you for adding what the real velociraptor would be like because I always wondered that too lmao
I find the bubba-jaw more terrifying, tbh. It means they can bite things larger than the jaws otherwise permit. But at least they won't be able to chase us across any croc-infested rivers.
@@ComradeTiki The scientifically accurate ones look less generic and more foreign, which make them scary in a different way. What really detracted from the kitchen scene IMO was the raptor slamming its body into the freezer door and the kids were able to hold it off pushing against the door (minor nitpick to a classic movie.)
This just makes me wonder how different things would be if the movie could be updated with what current speculation is on how T-Rex _sounded_ as well as looked. Little in the way of badass roars, but instead this creepy rumbling noise that you'd feel more than you'd hear. Imagine _that_ being what causes the ripples in the water glass instead of the big heavy stomping.
I think the key work in your post, is "speculation". This video should be titled. "What if we replaced what we guessed these things looked like, with what we now guess they look like?" I am pretty sure if you could go back in time and see one of these in the flesh, both are very wrong.
Exactly. No one knows for sure. Based on what we do which is the skeleton a T-rex would have been something you would not have wanted to encounter. Also the vision based on movement was from having to use DNA from other animals to fill in the DNA gaps. In the movie they explained the DNA gaps but they didn’t explain that was why it’s vision was based on movement. In the book they supposedly do (I never read the book) and the animal that trait came from. I appreciate the effort put into the video because it’s interesting to hear different the different speculations about their appearance.
When the first jurassic park film was in the cinema a program called Tomorrows World was on the BBC and they did a segment on the sounds of dinosaurs When it came to the Tyrannosaurus the song Get it on by T-Rex was played, the presenter cracked up and said they were now looking for a new sound man
@@breauxcewayne1971 IIRC they explained that it was because they used frog DNA to fill the gaps and at the time they thought certain Frogs used movement to see, and applied that to the Trex specifically. This was later disproven and I think that's why they kind of make a joke out of it in JP3.
Dinosaur fan here! Been loving Dinosaurs since i was around 2-4. Im glad that another person realised that T-Rex don’t have feathers! I love the way you model these dinosaurs! It makes them look way more realistic. Even though people are used to seeing Jurassic Park Original dinosaurs, this is still absolutely unbelievable!
Those Utahraptors were so beautiful! I love how much they are like a cross between an eagle and a grizzly bear! But my favorites were the real Velociraptors 😂 That scene was HILARIOUS!
The crazy thing is Baryonyx which is directly related to Spinosaurus is not only actually shaped like we thought Spinosaurus was, but is one of the oldest and well documented complete skeletons. The Spinosaurus design was actually based off it since they were so closely related. Not just Baryonyx but other members of that family too. It's just Spinosaurus turned out completely unique and unpredictable.
and thats actually false, we barelly have complete fossils of spino, and a big part of its appearance is made from mixturing other spinosaurids pretty much its whole appearance is a kind of quimera from oxalaia quilombensis, lol!
@@SaragossiDeer Also the video has things rather inaccurate too, most research claims Spinosaurus wasn't a swimmer at all, and the reduction of his back legs is false due to most studies using an inaccurate model. The most accurate designs we have really point to it being Bear shaped.
@@DreA1503 Well most of the "revised" versions of Spinosaurus tried to make it like a crocodile, with smaller back legs than previous models. But most evidence points to it being a wader, not a swimmer, as it's tail and hip bones are far to rigid in movement and most models using inaccurate leg sizes. So this makes Spinosaurus rather like a bear, with stout powerful back limbs slightly longer and more robust than it's forelimbs which were rather well developed for ithe type of Dinosaur it was. In short, Spinosaurus was a robust bear-like dinosaur, not a pseudo-crocodile.
@@zussman_ i mean we've tamed dangerous animals before,wolves,that became all the different dog breeds Which would be a fair comparison since they both hunt in packs,both are dangerous (not as dangerous on their own as in a pack but i mean obviously because in a 1v1 you probably could have had a fair chance) So tldr:if velociraptors weren't extinct we probably could have had pet velociraptors (with different breeds) given how wolves were tamed and became dogs
Whoever said they were dinosaurs, those are clones with dinosaur DNA and completed with other animals like amphibious or reptiles, so the movie is not wrong.
The other thing about Rexy (and really predators in general) is that she wouldn't roar and snarl at her prey. She would be very quiet in a chase. The only time when she would roar while chasing is if the offender got near her newly laid clutch of eggs or chicks (just like we see in modern birds and crocodilians).
@@ancadiamant The low frequency of the roar means it can be heard from a much further distance without necessarily being louder than the surroundings. This activates the fear response in most prey animals.
The shot of the Utahraptor nudging the door took my breath away especially. There’s something about how the light interacted with the model that made it look so realistic in that shot. Really impressive work btw!!!
@@alphacommander428 Good point. A simple large push-down handle would be relatively easy to push down with the head at the right height - assuming they are as intelligent (or more) as nowadays large birds are, which is very possible given they are cousins.
I liked that you also included more realistic conclusions to the scenes as well. 😂 Also, showing the realistic t-Rex just goes to show how ridiculously tiny their arms really were. Even in artistic renderings they tend to get over proportioned. I guess it detracts from the menacing predator look.
Adding that Trex probably didn't roar but made an uncanny...hum? That you'd feel more than you heard. Someone said it might've been reminiscent of the Jaws theme opening strings. A vibration felt through your body. Even if it didn't roar like you expected, you'd FEEL it was around lol.
I read that it was probably close to the weird vocalisations that emus make. Now, given I am Australian and have heard emus do their throat trilling a few times, it’s freaky enough with animals the same size as you. I cannot imagine how terrifying it would have been at the scale of T-Rex.
Your utahraptor design would’ve scared me 100% if that was the original design in the movie. And I cracked up when you decided to put in more realistic designs of the velociraptors and I knew what to expect but you blew it out of the water, especially with the conclusion of the scene if it were like that. Awesome job!
It wasn't just "a velociraptor based on Deinonychus". It was actually Deinonychus. At the time Crichton wrote the book, there was a rather big debate among paleontologists about whether to call it Deinonychus Antirrhopus or Velociraptor Antirrhopus. The book Crichton used for reference used the latter name.
@@NathanielTavington While true, the fact that Deinonychus was being debated as part of the Velociraptor genus at the time doesn't make him _that_ incorrect to use the name. I'm just getting tired of the "He was so wrong, look at how tiny Mongoliensis is!" comments. Knowing what I know now about the Antirrhopus name debate, it feels really disingenuous.
@@aircraftcarrierwo-class Yeah, I think a lot of people don't understand how much paleontology has changed since Jurassic Park was published and the movie came out. I see lots of people going on about how wrong the movie and book are but they don't seem to understand that Michael Crichton and Steven Spielberg are pretty responsible for the big leap in paleontology that we've seen in the past three decades, because Jurassic Park renewed public interest. A few of them have also clearly not read the book at all, since even Grant was suspicious of the "velociraptors" that Wu created.
@@NathanielTavington Oh yeah JP definitely built hype for paleontology. I never read the book but the film is still one of my favorites, warts and all. A lot of the actual inaccuracies are due to it being relatively new science at the time (IE: feathers) or because it was easier for filming (Pronated hands on raptors, in closeups those are gloved human hands) What really bugs me is like... In Lost World we got some pretty accurate stegosaurs, but then in Jurassic World we got terrible 1950s-style stegos. It bugs me because they had it right, then actively made it wrong again.
@@aircraftcarrierwo-class ngl there is a lot that bugs me about Jurassic World. I like to tell myself though that the stegos look bad in JW because there's a part in the book where Wu is complaining to Hammond about how the dinosaurs don't "feel" right. He says they're too smart and too fast and the public will want dumb, slow, plodding animals. That's what I tell myself haha.
5:30 I dunno about anatomically correct Velociraptors being not scary. If a pack of squawking dog-sized feathered lizards came at me, I wouldn't be any more dismissive of them than I would be of a pack of barking hunting dogs running at me. Either way, I'd be doing my best to set a new PB for the 100 m dash. XD
@fentzy5068 that's only kind of true. While they might not have hunted in packs the way wolves or lions do, with coordinated tactics and clearly working together, they might have still attacked in "flocks" like seagulls and similar animals. So yes they're fighting for themselves, but they're fighting for themselves along side a bunch of others doing the exact same. So, still scary as hell to come across a group of them.
Bro... Idk how u did this.. but it's incredible.. ur a computer genius. And even though it's were accurate.. the movie ones looked way better of course.. but they were just movie monsters.. that haunted my dreams for decades .. but again.. I'm absolutely mind blown that you were able to do this. Incredible 😮
You could slam a door against it like that, but then you would want to prop a stick under the knob and run. A cassowary bird that size can rip a person wide open with what it has for toe claws. You can see video of Steve Irwin running from those.
I quite like the explanation that the trex is pretty well fed by that stage and by being quiet and staying still they do not trigger a predator response from the rex. It just kinda checks them out and goes to playing with the car. The velociraptor scene was gold, and thanks for the bonus one on the end, you have given justice to one of my all time favorites.
@@TD-ht8dz Pretty sure the theory is that overall it was well fed, as in like a pet dog or cat with a good diet. It's getting regular meals of decent size and nutrition, so it's not really hungry and hunting for sport/play because so many of its meals are just provided on a platter or staked to a point on the ground and not free roaming to be hunted and the hunt is enrichment the same way it enriches a dog to play fetch or a cat to chase a laser pointer. Not because the rex is hungry, because the rex is bored.
@@TehFrenchy29 yeah, but also a goat every few hours isn't anywhere close to enough for a T-Rex, you would need like at least 15 goats per hour probably to satisfy a body that big
It's really bold to say that this is a definitive scientifically accurate Spinosaurus, considering if you put two Spinosaurid paleontologists in a room, they'd probably rapidly devolve into violence before they were able to agree on anything.
That's because he is just a layman with a big ego. 🙄 Being able to animate and having paleontology as a hobby doesn't make you a real scientist. 😅 Nothing about this video is scientifically accurate. 😂
I love how these raptors look derpy. It makes them look very uncanny. Much like the shark from jaws, they’re expressionless like a doll. Biological murder machines driven by extreme predatory instinct. When you couple that with their crooked and expressionless face, I find it more terrifying than the real ones.
Look at bears. They're predators, very able to tear a human apart, and for some reason we find them adorable. The JP movie made raptors look evil, because, well, it's a movie and it needs to built up suspense, and raptors were kind of villains in the story. The real dinosaurs were just animals. Could've been really cute in real life and still dangerous.
"Any size difference is negligible" T.Rex since then: has had two more tons added to its estimated average weight, making it outweigh Giga and Spino by a notable margin. T.Rex never gonna get dethroned.
Both Tyrannosaurus and Giganotosaurus are currently estimated at an average of roughly 8 tonnes. Considering we have a whole 2 specimens of Giganotosaurus, and what.. 25 from T. rex? It's not a fair comparison. One is vastly more understood. We likely haven't found our Sue or Scotty of Giganotosaurus, maybe we won't ever. But without a proper sample size the average Giganotosaurus's weight could be as low as 5 tonnes, or has high as 9, we can't be too sure. That being said, T. rex is more heavy set, and if I had to choose I'd bet T. rex would shake up to be biggest. Unless Spinosaurus gets invovled, that thing ping pongs between size estimates every new paper. It's been as low as 4 tonnes and as high as 20. So don't count it out either.
@@aliendilo3105Yeah, their current weight estimates have no meaningful margin between them. Obviously we are data deficient with giga and rex seems more heavily built regardless, but if we're just talking in terms of "what was the largest land predator" then both are correct answers. It's more reasonable to say "rex/giga are among the largest land predators" as opposed to "rex/giga IS the largest land carnivore."
Ok, the recreation of the vilociraptor was hilarious. Between the jumping and the getting smashed by the door, it's no wonder they want with a different design.
Velociraptor made me so happy! FINALLY someone makes it accurately pint-size. Also those beautiful Utahraptors, I love the golden eagle color choice! All the faces were friendlier like a real animal would look, particularly around the eyes. It shows how they can be beautiful but deadly. Not the otherworldly monster that Hollywood depicts them to be.
@@jiskool1 Lol, no? Jurassic Park is a dinosaur movie that revolutionized cinema, and dinosaurs right or wrong wouldn't change that. The difference is that people at the time would be more informed, and they would be used to and afraid of the Raptor with feathers. But they did what they could because at the time they didn't know much about what dinosaurs actually looked like, so they were based on the fossil. But that's no excuse for movies these days, where they do it wrong on purpose. Giganotosaurus was the most wrong of all and came in the last movie in the middle of 2022.
AmI really the only one who found the small raptors to look like chickens, and the Utahs to just look hilarious? Yes they could still kill me, not because I’m too scared to charge them with a knife or pan and stab into the eyes, but because I’d be laughing on the floor making jokes about how derpy they look.
@@jwalster9412 Small raptor - Cute and kinda friendly looking, but can claw a mouse's organs out in the cruelest way. Cat - Cute and friendly looking, but can claw a mouse's organs out in the cruelest way. See? Dinosaurs are just animals
Interestingly, you might have actually been able to the "don't move and it won't see you" thing with Giganotosaurus instead of rex, as the giant carcharodontosaurids like giga may have had a blind spot at the lower end of it's snout due to it's skull being so long but with such a deep face. So find it's blind spot and you might just be able to hide from it. T. rex was just a biological terminator though and your only hope was to pray that it or it's raptor sized kids don't find you
There's an enormous amount of new info now about T-Rex including it's behaviour - it was probably an ambush predator - would almost certainly never have roared except to let the world know about its territory or whilst mating, not even likely that its footsteps would have made a sound in a forest (check out how big cats and elephants can do so silently) why give your prey info about where you are? Its olfactory senses were superb as was its sight and hearing. O and there's a load of evidence that they were pack hunters! Check out Steve Brusatte's book - The rise and fall of the dinosaurs and Michael J Benton - The Dinosaurs rediscovered. Good reads too.
Most predators don't roar at prey. Hollywood doesn't just do it to dinosaurs. Lions, tigers, bears, wolves, none of them are likely to roar or growl when attacking. They'll kill you silently and calmly.
If you’re gonna get technical about the whole vision thing, you might also want to add the fact that reptiles don’t have the kind of vocal tract that would allow them to roar. Dinosaurs vocalize similarly to modern day reptiles with hisses, grunts, squeaks, honks. A T. rex would have the same kind of rumbling hiss you’d hear out of a crocodile, just amplified to eleven making it even more terrifying.
We don't know what dinosaurs sounded like as vocal cords aren't preserved. All the different species could have been making a variety of sounds akin to birds, crocodiles, turtles... That's why they use a variety of sounds in movies.
Oh, you need to hear an actual Nile Crocodile growl then. Now, considering that a 8 ton T-Rex will have immensely larger resonance "chambers" in its body, odds are, that it would not only sound a HELL of a lot deeper than the movies, but it would be so deep into sub-bass frequencies, that the sensation of feeling your body, lungs, ribcage vibrate at a few hundred Hertz is... well. Yeah. Terrifying. If we'd get really technical, our atmosphere doesn't have enough oxygen to support dinosaurs anymore anyways, so at best they'd not be doing too well - imagine climbers without oxygen bottles. The summit of Everest has about 1/3 of the sea level's atmosphere. The dinos back then had 50% more oxygen in the atmosphere. They'd not do too well these days.
Actually, in the book the movie is based off of, it's explained that the poor eyesight is from the frog/toad DNA they used to fill in the gaps, not because t-rexes had bad eyesight.
I'm gonna bring up something from people who DID read the novel "No, There are many instances in the First book in which Alan Grant Deduces that most of the dinosaurs have vision based on movement, from what he had learnt from the encounters with the T-Rex and the Hadrosaurs, but, There has been no direct relation established between Frog DNA or even Amphibian DNA for that matter, with Eyesight based on Motion, However, In one part the text does say that 'Their vision is based on movement, just like Amphibians"
It's crazy how we're able to make something as complex as a Trex look so believable yet the second you put acgi human in your scene it instantly turns into a video game lol.
Yeah, and that is a great cross check on the modeling. If the model applied to a real object or animal is wrong, there's a flaw somewhere in the model. Applying unique twists for each species without a system is cheating as the twists for things that can be checked would adapt to that, while twists for uncheckable things will have no reason to be right.
Makes sense, we have the phenomena of the Uncanny Valley because we know what our species is, so artificial representations of such are immediately seen as not-human. There was a time when homo sapiens weren't the only bipedal hunter-gatherers!
Now I'd love to see someone re-do the sound design on this with how dinosaurs actually sounded like (for example, the T-Rex actually sounded like a really low rumbling rather than a loud roar.)
@@galois6569yeah, imagine your running through a forest and you feel this rumble in your chest, like standing front row in a concert. You turn around and there she is
No one has any idea what they actually looked like. So, though I admire the effort (it’s amazing actually), to claim this is how they really looked is no different than claiming how they looked back in 1993.
I have a hard time taking them seriously- that underbite doesn't make much sense with what we now know about therapod teeth and the likelihood of lips.
Yes irl the downturn in the jaw would have been less pronounced and the lips would have concealed the jaw rather than exposing at the tip like shown in the video.
And its ironic because its one of the relatively few large maniraptors that have (quite likely, first was inconclusive, second could still be something that managed to wringle itself nearby at time of death) trace fossils found (twice in fact, one recently with a massive truck sized brick of a find) that show they had scutes (the derpy-not-full-on-scales on parts of crocs and on turtles).
@@ANDELE3025 Actually the 3 types of scales on bird feet/dinosaur feet are called Scutate, Sceutellae and Reticulae. Scutes are more crocodile scales than bird scales, and avian scales fun fact are a type of feather.
@@apnosaurus I know (and before someone chimes in, if its 2, 3, 5 or even 13 with insect ones included for types or types+subtypes doesnt matter for the point), the point itself was essentially that the channel chose one of the few raptors that by known info extremely likely had as close to full on traditional reptile scales, on the body at that, as you get without outright calling them "scales" instead of the (probably/at least by DNA sequencing and protein binding) reverse-evolved scute via flattened stem+shaft spike of feathers. Understandable mistake if one due to rona didnt hear about the bed or small truck sized megablock of a utahraptor fossil (since it also got little generic news coverage and even wikis are shit slow to update or give links since admins sniffing their own farts became more important to them in the last decade than easy access to information).
Right. We all know that this person is quite talented in his craft and animation skills. That can not be denied and we should give him all the credit he deserves. The argument was simply in the depiction of a certain Life form, and the way it was presented, as it being a total fact. Something which, did not take into account, the always existing, Laws of Physics, within the Earth's surface.
It really amazes me just how well the original JP's special effects have held up, both practical and CG. Very much ahead of its time in how it was able to leverage the strengths of both styles and minimize the deficits; a lot of movies that came afterward just used CG for everything, which doesn't usually work. Also, Utahraptor is so derpy I love it.
@@Icetea-2000 his design is fine, but it still cant hold a candle to the OG one, it looks out of place and fake. The OG holds up insanely well. That said we still gotta give the guy respect, dude is talented as hell to make this one deep.
They look like they should be taking pictures of tourist traps and speaking with Minnesota accents. "Oh well you know we just had to come see the human kitchen, didn't we Jimmy? I said to him, didja know they do 'em free range here? Real excitin' for the hatchlings, bit a gettin' back to nature, y'know?" It's so good.
IMO the difference is that people who animated the dinosaurs back then had PASSION for it and didnt just fulfill their job after they slaved through their university years, being mentally broken down. they probably also had quite some time for it and werent as deadly pressured by the deadlines people nowadays get from the top who gives a shit about production value and only looks at advertised release dates. same with old RPG games. gothic etc. had passion. the new ones are just massproduced.
I think the dinos of the original movies look way nicer in aesthetic levels. They might not be scientifically accurate but they looked great, beautiful, scary and cinematically interesting. This also makes me realize, the ones from the original movies are created by an entire team of professional CG and Comp artist. The fact that the re-created version was done by a single artist is amazing! Great work!
Its mentioned in the original book that they modified the dinosaurs to be more intimidating in appearance, as the real things kept coming out, and I quote, 'fuzzy'.
I get whatcha saying and agree it’s impressive, but CGI wasn’t really used much at all during the making of Jurassic Park, not even 70 vfx shots taking up less than 5 mins of the actual films runtime. To put that in perspective, films nowadays use like up to 2000 or more vfx shots, so realistically they look so real because, well, they are real!
@@Slippinn_Jimmy yeah that's right. High quality ones that held up close ups very well. There were also a good number of VFX shots with CG dinos, but they were matched to the original animatronic ones and that's why the CG then looked amazing.
For those caught off-guard by the derpy raptors, take solace in the fact that, while the lower jaw did curl down at the tip like that irl, it would’ve most likely been covered by lizard-like lips, as was the case with the raptors in the original film. In life, it would’ve looked like the raptor had a strangely prominent chin, perhaps, but that’s about it, no weird reverse-bucktooth thing going on.
The skull he based his construction off of also seemed to have a greater than average dip on its lower jaw. Utahraptors typically had a very insignificant dip, but he exaggerated it quite a bit while using an already exaggerated specimen. Definitely the worst part of the video, but still a very good reconstruction
Install Raid for Free ✅ IOS/ANDROID/PC: clcr.me/FilmCore_Halloween and get a special starter pack 💥 Available only for the next 30 days!
Visit Halloween event page 🎃👻 trickortreat.plarium.com to win a bunch of real-life and in-game prizes 💥 Available only for new users. The event ends on November 5, 2022 at 23:59 pm ET. For the best possible experience make sure to use the desktop version. Which was YOUR Favorite Accurate Dino to see? Let me know! :D
Allosaurus
Do you know today is godzilla birthday
Or Stegosaurus
Sheesh
Perphaps maybe you might do the Hybrid Dinosaurs such as Indominus
Can we take a moment to observe that one person ALONE managed to recreate all these scenes that at the time cost millions of dollars to make? I don't know what impresses me more: this person's talent or how far 3D technology has come.
Yes, he managed to recreate all these scenes, only the 2022 graphics look worse than the 1993 graphics.
This probably took nearly a year to remake.
Well, to be fair, it is a UA-cam video made by one guy on his computer, w/o the resources of a multimillion dollar VFX company. 🙃
That being said, Shamook posted a YT video of his attempt at an improved deepfake for Luke Skywalker in the Mandalorian - and within a month was hired by Lucasfilm and became the chief deepfake artist on Luke in The Book of Boba Fett. 🤗
@@simbiotesnus1013 Not quite. If he were to recreate the dinosaurs as they were in the original JP movie I'm sure they'd look just as good. But since he decided to stay accurate to scientific discoveries they they don't quite match up. The skin is not as rough in these models so the bumps and crevices are not as noticeable which makes them look less realistic. It's not rocket science to figure out the small differences
@@simbiotesnus1013 Its because there were not graphics dumbass, the 1993 computer animations sucked ass, so they used models (robot like) as much as possible
The accurate velociraptor made me laugh much harder than I felt was necessary.
They look so....derpy lol
i know right?! 🤣
Read your comment before the scene but it still got me off guard I spat my water abhahaha
It's epic
LOL
This honestly just made me appreciate how much effort they put into the original film and how damn good it looks all these years later. "Realistic" or not, the original dinosaurs from the movie looked phenomenal.
Yeah, and tbh, the T-Rex just works. Taking a little creative liberty to make something just plain old look more menacing and scary is fine. I appreciate accuracy, and it depends greatly on the film, but at the end of the day, evoking some real emotion and being entertained and immersed is what counts. I always found it curious how so many people seemingly complain about lack of realism in film and video games when they're devoting all this time to things that are inherently unrealistic lol.
It’s because a lot of the dinosaurs are animatronics. Every Jurassic Park scene he was recreating (trex, raptor and spino), those dinosaurs were actually on set being filmed, and that’s why they ‘hold up’ and in a lot of cases, look better than the new movies 😂
@@podunkestthe classic actually might be more realistic than the remake… cartilage often erodes off the body before any fossilization occurred
Also the Utah raptor jaw wasn’t properly placed. The jaw bone was loose compared to other raptors and also giga was actually around 5-10 feet taller than a T. rex.
Well the remake doesn’t look any more realistic. Let alone accurate.
@@mrpumperknuckles1631the classic isn’t even remotely more accurate. Compare an elephants Skelton to it’s actual looks, that’s the issue with the Jurassic park T rex design. It’s fundamentally flawed by virtue of the assumptions made when designing it. Also we know for a fact that they had feathers
Everyone seems to forget a HUGE plot point thats literally thrown in your face at the beginning of the 1st movie, these creatures were made from incomplete dna sequence where they had to alter and fill in gaps of code to bring them to life. They addressed this again in Jurassic world.
Utter bs Hollywood writing
They use frog DNA for some reason when humans are more closely related to Trex than frogs are
Even though their dna is incomplete the designs are still very accurate at that time, except for Dilo and velociraptor
So the DNA thingy is just a poor excuse for not using a more accurate design
@@UMIF001 the DNA stuff is actually a perfect excuse for why the dinosaurs are not accurate, literally filling in blanks it makes perfect sense.
I mean they still called the velociraptor a velociraptor when it wasn't and you do see the skeletal remains of the incorrectly called raptor in the first movie so that's the only real plot point issue if you want to be more accurate I mean.
@@bobmclovinelectricboogaloo It was a retcon, by the first movie, the only thing that changed was their capacity to change sex, nothing else.
As someone who witnessed her sister learn how to animate, i just cant believe the amount of effort that went into this one video
It's more modelling than animating - the animation is easily the worst part of the whole video, but then good animation takes a lot more time than good modelling does.
@@mnomadvfx yeah, as a lay person, by animating i meant the whole thing, modelling, rigging etc.
@@mnomadvfx As a 3d animator i consider Modelling, texturing and rig worse. Perhaps because i enjoy animating
there's more of the original work being shown throughout this video than his own, and when he shows his own it's well... not very good
@@Heyim18bro As expected, your channel doesn’t have any content.
The Utahraptor, as scary as its size is, I can't help but chuckle at its constant look of mild surprise.
real birds of prey have that look to em too, esp hawks and some owls.
"You want to teach me to ride what?"
BRO ITS SO FUNNY
scary
they said :o
To be fair it's stated in the book and movies that the dinosaurs look the way they do because they were made to be theme park monster attractions. Bred specifically to be frightening, amazing and exciting with Dr Wu even admitting how different the dinosaurs would appear if they had aimed for a product closer to reality; That being said this is awesome that you did this and put so much work into it.
yeah, if you think about it, Wu was definitely experimenting with hybrids here with these. most of them would work if you combine a couple similar dinosaurs, or just are essentially hybrids if you take into account the genome filler. His Rex was probably the closest one he has, the raptors are some combination of a Utahraptor and 3+ other raptors (plus some modern birds and stuff for intelligence), the Spino is definitely not a pure genome, and is instead a reconstruction (though that's in retrospect, it would've been pure based off at the time knowledge), and I'm sure more of the dinos at his two parks were messed up. I don't know if the Giganotosaurus was his work or biosyn's, so i cant judge who was working on it.
very true.
One problem with that explanation is that in the beginning of dominion they show the original giga and rex fighting each other 65 million years ago. They look exactly the same back then as they do in the park.
@@calamarimaniac yeah, then that's just being the show straying from its roots of at least trying to be somewhat scientifically accurate back at the start.
That's true- they didn't ask for reality, they asked for more teeth.
5:15 this was genuinely smooth and so brutal, good job on that part dude
Bro gave T-rex the Oil of Olay treatment. Never seen T-rex skin so smooth before.
😂😂😂 Hilarious comment, and so true!!! Not laughing at the talented creator though-just a funny comment!!
The T rex has a hermes bag leather skin
@@dondeka2086
Too funny!! 😂 I had to look up Hermes bag, and oh my gosh, I had no idea Walmart has bags for sale that are $10K or more!!!! 🤣 That’s messed up though!
Also, she thicc. Living her best life
T-rex has an amazing plastic surgeon, making her look many years younger.
I love the "I was running short on time" and then proceeds to rebuild an entire scene from scratch haha
Wanted to post the same comment. That guy is crazy:)
i mean, its actually a lot faster rebuilding the scene using asset packs and semi-procedural tools than it is to rotoscope that footage. it would be comparable to spilling a bag of rice and instead of picking each grain up one at a time you go to the store and get a new vacuum to clean it up. more effort initially but easier and faster over all.
@@AlienXtream1 Tight
today i learned
It's like the difference between renovating an old building and starting a new building on a clean flat plot of land. In most cases the old structure cause more problems than they are worth.
As someone who was absolutely obsessed with dinosaurs as a child, this is legitimately one of the coolest things I’ve ever seen.
Right wiv ya Pickles!
are you his friend or this is cap?
im with ya on this
Dinosaurs never existed !
I know! It was cool to watch
The Jurassic World Giga is basically an Acrocanthosaurus on steroids.
I know you said that the T Rex had excellent vision. However in the film, it said they used frog DNA to complete their codes. Well, A frog's visual system is specifically adapted to seeing little things that are moving across its field of vision - and not things that are standing still. Maybe she took that part into her DNA.
Crichton himself would address this critique in The Lost World; he has a character point out that it was much more likely that Rexy could see them perfectly well, but wasn't really hungry/in the mood to chomp on more humans
These are scientifically accurate
Thats very reasonable and would be the most logic answer exepto that the one explaining that tyranosarus can't see movement is the palentologist so he was very wrong
But its the paleontologist, who explained to the girl, tyrannosaurus wont see them. Hes not a frogologist - he wouldntve known
This is exactly the explanation used in the novel. During the breakout scene in the book, Grant was literally frozen with fear, fully expecting to be chomped on by the Rex, only to be surprised when she suddenly couldn't find him, despite being right in front of her. He later came to the conclusion that the frog DNA mutated her vision to the point where she couldn't see prey standing still. I'm not sure why it was changed for the film, honestly, considering they kept the bit about dinosaurs mutating from female to male and reproducing as a side effect of the frog DNA.
Many consider that if realistic-looking dinosaurs were used in movies they would not be scary or have the same impact, but the design of the creature does not matter, the important thing is how it is presented, how it is used, and this video is proof that even with feathers, fewer teeth, fewer beaks, fewer claws, they can be just as or more scary than in the movies.
With the exception of velociraptor, lol.
To be fair though, all anyone needs to do to make a tiny, feathered dinosaur scary is model it after a goose or cassowary. Prehistoric Planet seemed to base theirs off of a hawk/eagle and it was excellent. I could definately imagine being killed by the land equivalent of a golden eagle
@@kelseykwolek8241 exactly, keep in mind that we have fossil evidence of Velociraptors getting into death struggles with Protoceratops. A coyote sized theropod is apparently able to stalemate a 400 pound ceratopsian long enough for a sandstorm to kill them both.
Couldn’t agree more.
I see where you're coming from, and I totally 100% without a doubt agree with you, but when it showed a head-on view of the Utahraptor, I was disturbed. That model looked terrifying when it was looking at the screen.
Then there's the other side who is completely done with the fanatics that care about accuracy to the point it's become a cult- *raises hand*
To be fair, the raptor doesn't have to grip the handle and pronate its wrist, it just has to hook it and pull down. It was a horizontal handle, not a knob.
That's what she said!
You gotta hook it and pull it
Come now hook it and pull it
Woah hooooahh Woah hooooahh! 4x
DAMN YOU, OSHA!!!!!!
A real Velociraptor would not be able to reach the door handle
@@thegamezone2237 but in the very video he shows an even smaller chicken open a door with a similar handle, chickens being also flightless they can only assist themselves by flapping. it's more of a barrier of not knowing how to operate a door, than a physical inability. if velociraptors were alive i think you could train them to open doors, like you can train cats too.
Amazing work, amazing video, BUT... Jurassic Park dinosaurs have a special place in my heart.. so I still love the originals. 5:15 made me laugh though. Loved it.
The velociraptor scene KILLED me. That was HILARIOUS. Thank you so much!!!!
And the T Rex’s vision 😂😂
The velociraptors who were spreading terror against those kids had the size of a turkey.😂😂
It was the moan for me 😂
Might look funny but they would still eat you alive
oh no
But have you ever met a pack of angry turkeys, especially when being a child? Those velociraptors are underestimated, bro.
i think its the same effect as people who see black bears 200 feet away and are " aww its a slightly smaller bear and mom " . ive seen even the teenagers up close once. my freind helped an electrician do some log cabin work, and bear just investigating the dumpster they put scrap wood in.
even the teenagers are the size of a taller adult woman. when i saw a male turkey in a campground once ( my parents helped clean them weeks before people arrived ) . they are way larger than people think. when that thing actually raises its legs all the way and cranes its neck instead of hunching over. i used to let them chase me on our golf cart at full speed. and they keep up.
And turkeys will stalk you. They legit will not stop. I had a group of turkeys start following me from my car while I was visiting some country cousins. The property was absolutely vast, and we got on some quads to head over to the tree line. 20 minutes later! We hear them rustling through the leaves, these damn turkeys, coming for me after marching in formation the whole time. When they got to me they didn't actually do anything except try to pen me in. I remember pushing them aside by their heads and their rubbery headskin was so warm! But honestly at that moment I felt sure that these turkeys would stalk me to all ends of the Earth if they set their minds to it.
@@Steve-fc4bo turkeys are fascinating creatures honestly since they look so unathletic but are honestly quite impressive. They're really capable runners, able to reach speeds of up to 25mph(40km/h), which they can maintain surprisingly long since their tendons compressing when their feet hit the ground and expanding to make the next step easier can account for over 60% of the total energy used in each step compared to a human's roughly 35%-40%. Turkeys are also able to fly at speeds of up to 55mph(88.5km/h) for distances of up to 100 yards and they can even swim.
I do think one of the funniest things you can see in nature is a fully grown wild turkey roosting in a tree. They're so comically large and round that it looks like it shouldn't be possible.
Yeah, turkeys and similar sized birds can do some damage. And I think the current theory is velociraptors were pack hunters. One dog sized raptor, you'd have a chance. A pack of them? You're lunch
The accurate Velociraptor one needs to be it's own separate clip. It was beautiful.
Poor thing got slammed into a wall. Smh....
Utah raptor is better
okay stop simping for him buddy hes not going to sleep with you
"Let me in! Don't you know who I am?! My father will hear of this!" as it struggles ineffectually to get in
Yeah, it would be cool if we had the whole Kitchen scene with that Raptor.
Not only did you recreate the Rex, but you made the scene realistically accurate 😂
I felt the accurate utahaptor could have become very scary with enough screentime.
I remember the art director of Bioshock , speaking about making monsters:
"Make it goofy, and memorable first. Everything scary by rote has been done already, so make it goofy. Then, make it do monstrous things; and that memorable silhouette will become scary."
This is pretty much why many people fear clowns
Bro idk bout you but I would've been laughing instead of panicking at the raptor scenes if they looked like that
@@N3koPurrS If done well, they could've scared me at least. Granted, that's partially because I'm a coward who still sometimes gets spooked by his own shadow, but still :P
Even with these scenes, they seemed slightly unnerving to me. I think it's because we don't see giant birds that much nowadays, with ostriches and emus being the only real examples.
What we're seeing in this video is a creature the size of an ostrich, with the proportions of a giant velociraptor, the coloration of a turkey, and the head of a crocodile. Such a creature seems strange, almost otherworldly, since it's so far removed from what we're familiar with today.
That's how it seems to me, at least XP
(Also, I'm talking about the giant ones, the ones that were the size of a utahraptor. The tiny ones the size of a dog were just a laughing stock)
@@NegativeDumpster well yeah the point was on how they looked in this video, besides they would've never looked that way for the Jurassic Parks/Worlds because they were all genetically mutated and modified.
I agree. IT movie had success because of this I guess.
5:01 the reason the t rex's vision is based on movement is because, in the books its explained that, grant realizes the frog dna used to splice the dino dna was from a frog that "cant see you if you dont move"
@@AlexCrighton This is a mistake in the film. In the book Grant discovers this defect of vision in the dinosaurs in the park, when he sees their reaction.
What if the frog dna was a failsafe for the tyrannosaur
Frogs were able to see objects that didn't move.
@@Iloveaespa980 1) Not an expert but it's certainly believable that there's a species of Frog that doesn't. Michael Crichton is writing a science fiction novel so being scientifically accurate is less important that having believable to a point science.
2) He retcons this in the Sequel Book "Lost World", where a T-Rex snacks on a terrified goon who thought he could escape death only for the T-Rex to surprise him. Whether this is from Crichton learning more about Frog DNA or him being annoyed at having to make a sequel book for the success of a movie and wanted to deflate a really interesting part of that movie. I believe it's the latter.
@@jvit4245 It is also possible to explain that they can see stationary objects. They could say that stationary objects, unless they blatantly smell like food, such as bleeding dying or dead, just does not attract its attention nearly as much as moving objects. Thus the Rex might be more inclined to ignore Grant and Ellie if they stayed relatively still.
Similar to how cats tend to ignore things that don't move much unless they specifically go to it, like a scratch post. But if a cat sees a mouse, with its short quick movements, the cat's attention is suddenly peaked, and the "hunt is on" so to speak.
I (non-sarcastically) absolutely love that he casually has a dinosaur skull just chilling right next to him.
I really appreciate your valuable time, you're among my shortlisted winners. Contact above ..🖕👆
With sunglasses on it
It's one of the most badass things you could ever have chilling in your room.
I've been collecting action figures, I think dino bones are next. 🤣
@@The_Metal_Elitist I do, too! Vintage Star Wars, in fact. What do you collect?
LMAO. The T-Rex just straight up eating Dr. Grant and the kid was hilarious.
I also saw that the t-rex most likely wouldn't have roared but would've made a low, deep rumble sound that would shake the ground and warn/scare nearby dinosaurs. Pretty creepy.
Yeah. That ones more creepy and can petrify you. However rexys roar is mega iconic and would make you shit enough bricks to build a city with some left over.
I was hoping someone pointed this out
@@joelscotting2241 didnt they recently find a fully preserved ankylosaurus larynx? So dinosaurs would have been able to both subvocalise and roar?
And probably would have been so deep and bassy it would reverberate in your chest.
@@darrynquirk1979 that was a pinecosaurus larynx
The irony is, the more accurate they become visually, the less visual horrifying it becomes; however, once you know how they sound, and envision yourself standing in front of one, or a few meters away, it suddenly becomes more chilling than it ever was before.
Not exactly. The accurate ones are still scary.
Look up modern dinosaur sounds and tell me again dinosaurs arnt scary
The accurate velociraptors/utahraptor seem dumber for some reason, but the moment you imagine yourself in front of them like how a turkey would peck into its food and eat while completely devoid of any emotion whatsoever, is extremely scary.
@@birddhunterrdid you read the full comment
Not really different with how predator animal now. Just see how bears and lions look and sometimes act harmless/cute, but they're very dangerous killers
I liked how accurately you rendered Giganotosaurus's fire breath, most scientists ignore that.
Mainly because Ian chucked a flame tipped spear at it
The Accurate Velociraptor Killed me. Even him 👁👁😂
I love how the utahraptors have a constant shocked pikachu face x'D
OMG and the accurate velociraptor part? *chef's kiss*!
Like the foreshadowing with the chicken opening the door clip then seeing the real velociraptor fail then getting squashed
BTW whats 'chickenraptor' doing trying to get into a kitchen? likely to be on the menu
I feel like utahraptor would be able to just beat down a door with sheer brute force rather than needing to open it
Likely true, but that takes a lot of energy. That would've been cool as shit to see, utahraptor kicking the crap out of a door.
Kind of like an emu or a cassowary. They can kick, and it is very violent.
@@jeremiahkindel9301 For real. Cassowaries are terrifying.
Not really. Saurischian dinosaurs and especially maniraptorans were deceptively light for their volume due to hollow bones and extensive air sac net throughout their body, especially dromeosaurs like Utahraptor, that most likely directly evolved from flying creatures. Its mass could be less than that of a grizzly.
@@nickkorkodylas5005 Cassowaries also have hollow bones and avian-style respiration, and those mfers can kick through layered plywood. Given that utahraptor was twice the size of a cassowary, I'd still bet on the utahraptor lol
I love how the first Jurassic World had B.D. Wong's character say that, yeah, the dinos are artificial, labs created monsters and they aren't what real dinosaurs looked like, but it was what people wanted. It nicely addressed 1) that the OG film was fairly accurate to knowledge at the time, 2) explained why the new animals still looked like that, and 3) drove home that the park(s) were to make money, so you have to give the customers what they want.
It was even addressed as early in JP3 (2001), Grant says "What John Hammond and InGen did at Jurassic Park is create genetically engineered theme-park monsters. Nothing more and nothing less" just to drive the point they were never supposed to be 100% scientifically accurate to begin with.
Also so basically the studio saying to the "akchually that's not what dinosaurs look like" nerds; "yeah we're aware they aren't accurate but that would be boring and not as exciting for our film's style and direction so we already established that fact in-universe lore"
Too bad they chucked that out the window when they made their "Giganotosaurus" look like a mini indominus rex, and then had a scene showing the same dinosaur in a weird past shot fighting a T-Rex (which they didn't live in the same era or area) (yes this stupid thing pisses my off cause I love the Giga)
@@duffel_brr but we need rexy to have a dumb revenge driven motivation to get back up like a fucking anime character and kill the giga!
To bad at the time, velociraptors were well known to have been the size of a German Sheppard. No, the dinosaurs in the original movie were not scientifically accurate. Not sure who started that myth.
Another reason to love that line is it was in the book as well. In the book, they admitted that they took some liberties in getting "creative" with the dinosaurs in order to make them a more entertaining attraction.
1:44 we saw dancing dinosaur before gta 6🗣🗣🔥🔥
🙄
Rex jackson*
BRUH, THE RAPTOR BEING SQUISHED BY A DOOR WAS PEAK COMEDY, LOL
Yes, it was. Imagine if the movie went that way.
The door even reversed its open direction just to make it happen haha
WTF is "Bruh" ?
@@rzn2258 Basically another way of saying "Bro" or "Dude"
😂@@aomafura3374
Let's take a minute to appreciate the effects from a movie made in 1992. Freaking awesome.
*1993, but yes, i agree.
VHS release in 1994 I get what y’all are saying tho
Yeah it’s 1993
@@brockvella tv release was 1996 but yea
I dont understand anyone here in the replies, by 1993 i meant that it was done filming 1993.
I love the accurate detail of the T-rex having more than 10 times better eye sight than humans 😂
The Spinosaurus was my favorite. He looked terrifying. Especially in the water during the night scene. Nice work on recreating the Jurassic Park scenes with accurate looking dinosaurs models.
i wonder about the spino being weaker than the rex though. Giant river otter can kill jaguar outside of water despite being practically equally sized. In the water a spino would just drown the t rex as crocodiles drown their prey. From their appetence i doubt spinos would hunt far away from deep water, so if it ever meets a rex near water the rex would be doomed.
@@Tina99999 It would meet rex in the first place, they lived in different times. It really is a stupid question
@@no1uno388 Its a what if tho
@@Tina99999 As they've shown in Prehistoric Planet, tyrannosaurus were very adept swimmers (good reference: ua-cam.com/video/7mtaXP2Nar0/v-deo.html&ab_channel=AppleTV), so it's unlikely spino would be able to drown one (especially since they lack the powerful bite needed to restrain a 10 ton rex, or any other grappling weapon, making spinos more like gharials than nile crocs).There's a reason both rex and spino were at the top of their prospective food chains, but when it comes to strength, we know for a fact that rex would have been far more powerful and beefier than a spino, though spino would have been better adapted for the wetland environment it lived in. If they ever actually came across each other in some alternate earth timeline, they likely would have just ignored each other or kept a good distance since they occupy such different niches, making competition rather foolish and needlessly risky. It's the same reason you never hear of gators fighting black bears in the modern day.
Couldn’t have said it better myself!
"I was running out of time, so I recreated the entire scene in unreal engine."
When it's quicker to recreate an entire scene, than to edit it 😂
The work you put into this video is fantastic
I knew about the eyesight, but WOW 5:15 took a jet black dark turn.
That being said, the artistry is flatout AMAZING!!!!! I'm no CG expert by any means, but I am more than certain that this recreation took way longer than it seems like in this video.
As a fellow artist, and a dino enthusiast, you have my upmost respect and appreciation!!!
6:51 too funny haha 😂
In the first book, Grant explained that the Dinosaurs had motion-based vision because the incomplete DNA was filled in with amphibian DNA. Long story short, the monsters Ingen created looked like dinosaurs, but they were mutants with some dino DNA, and the rest were a mix of whatever the plot needed.
The short film in the movie explains that they created mutants. So differences would be explained from that.
Stop posting this myth. That is not at all what happened. The second book included a specific line calling this out as laughably wrong. The Trex could see them perfectly well at all times. The reason it didn't attack when they were holding still was because it wasn't hungry.
@@Matt_History It is not a myth, it is real.
In Lost World, the animals are not created by InGen, but by the rival company BioSyn.
The protagonists arrive at Sorna Island because they believe that they were facing an exception of nature, and therefore they were going to find a lost world.
But as I said, these animals are the creation of BioSyn, not InGen.
@@MegaroadProduccioneswhat are you talking about dude, the dinosaurs on sorna were made by ingen
I think the biosyn thing was in one of the snes or genesis games, not the novel or the film lol
The raptor at 9:00 is priceless. I am awed by your technical brilliance.
5:00 I love how you made this part 100% accurate to what would actually happen and that the notion that they can't see non moving things is ridiculous.
That claim has been applied to some living species as well. It's a brain limitation of some predators that only look for living, moving prey, and thus ignore dead, stationary animals. This in turn has caused prey animals to evolve the freeze / play dead defense.
But most sighted predators will still need the ability to see stationary obstacles like rocks and trees, which makes the effect of staying still less certain, as even a stupid instinctual predator might react as if it already killed you and start eating. Try staying still while your leg or chest is getting eaten.
@@johndododoe1411 I can see some truth to that but most predators have no problem being scavengers too. It might well be that they would prioritize moving things, but I don't see a T. Rex ignoring a meal cause it isn't moving.
@@blasttyrant3228 As I noted, it's a common thing with predators.
@@johndododoe1411 It's not specific to predators, it's just easier for any brain to spot an object if it moves. Moving objects are prioritized regardless of whether you're predator or prey, which is why ambush predators also stay perfectly still for periods of time when sneaking up on prey.
To say nothing of smelling them. T. rex had an enormous nasal cavity and probably had a first-class sniffer.
TRex was actually more of an ambush hunter, they're working out, than a hunter who chased down their lunch
😂 I love how terrifying a giant turkey would be, but also how hilarious that actual velociraptors would be more like giant chickens
We think it's hilarious but people know to stay away from cassowaries...
Not even giant chickens
Just chickens
Fun Fact: Chickens are the closest known relative to the T-Rex. And then people turn chickens into nuggets which are commonly dinosaur shaped. This was done well before scientists have discovered birds are closely related to dinosaurs.
To be fair, the second movie manages to make Compsognathus scary.
"SHES CHONKY" is where it got me tho and that little dance
Even to this day, Jurassic Park's CGI and practical effects hold up even today. Much like Terminator 2 still holds up as well.
Im not so sure. Now with 4K tvs, the CGI kind of stands out compared to its surroundings and comes off looking more fake for some reason. Especially the Brontosaurus. The T-Rex attack still looks the best but I think the darkness helps maintain the realism. The best CGI scene is still the T-rex as seen from Malcom's and Grant's POV from behind the windshield as it roars and stomps by. That was a masterpiece.
Well the CGI from both movies were done by the same guy 🙄 Dennis Muren. Hell, it seems that he's the only person who can make real looking CGI.
I think during those times the studios were afraid that audience wouldn't take the characters seriously if the CGI wasn't then perfection.
The reason why Jurassic Park looks so good is because they used physical dinosaur puppets but the CGI is still awesome 😎
No the cgi hasn’t in certain scenes but the real animatronics look better then the new movies
Hahaha!! Bro, I laughed my ass off when you showed the real velociraptors. That was some funny stuff.😂
The T-rex eyesight reveal, and the realistic velociraptor vs door both made me roar with laughter so hard my chest and stomach muscles hurt, my cheeks ache, my eyes are red and still watery, and my breathing still hasn't quite returned to normal. The dinosaur makeovers were awesome, the sense of humour was outstanding.
Slapstick of the highest calibre.
This made me really appreciate just how much '90s software tech was pushed to make this awesome movie!
Honestly a much better time. Society is utter trash these days lol
The Utahraptor with it's bubba jaw in the window had me dying.. I'm glad they did what they did in JP because there's no way I could take the more realistic look serious lol.
Also thank you for adding what the real velociraptor would be like because I always wondered that too lmao
I find the bubba-jaw more terrifying, tbh. It means they can bite things larger than the jaws otherwise permit.
But at least they won't be able to chase us across any croc-infested rivers.
@@ComradeTiki The scientifically accurate ones look less generic and more foreign, which make them scary in a different way. What really detracted from the kitchen scene IMO was the raptor slamming its body into the freezer door and the kids were able to hold it off pushing against the door (minor nitpick to a classic movie.)
0:53 That Nosferatu part was HILARIOUS 😂
The acute raptor was terrifying to me the way it looked trough the window with its soulless emotionless eyes
Ngl it's mouth looks goofy but still scary
Yeah I thought it was creepy too 😮 really well done!
And I loved that it was followed by a realistic velociraptor getting squished by a door lol
This just makes me wonder how different things would be if the movie could be updated with what current speculation is on how T-Rex _sounded_ as well as looked. Little in the way of badass roars, but instead this creepy rumbling noise that you'd feel more than you'd hear. Imagine _that_ being what causes the ripples in the water glass instead of the big heavy stomping.
I think the key work in your post, is "speculation". This video should be titled. "What if we replaced what we guessed these things looked like, with what we now guess they look like?" I am pretty sure if you could go back in time and see one of these in the flesh, both are very wrong.
Exactly. No one knows for sure. Based on what we do which is the skeleton a T-rex would have been something you would not have wanted to encounter.
Also the vision based on movement was from having to use DNA from other animals to fill in the DNA gaps. In the movie they explained the DNA gaps but they didn’t explain that was why it’s vision was based on movement. In the book they supposedly do (I never read the book) and the animal that trait came from.
I appreciate the effort put into the video because it’s interesting to hear different the different speculations about their appearance.
When the first jurassic park film was in the cinema a program called Tomorrows World was on the BBC and they did a segment on the sounds of dinosaurs
When it came to the Tyrannosaurus the song Get it on by T-Rex was played, the presenter cracked up and said they were now looking for a new sound man
loud ambush predators don't typically make the cut. Jus' sayin'.
@@breauxcewayne1971 IIRC they explained that it was because they used frog DNA to fill the gaps and at the time they thought certain Frogs used movement to see, and applied that to the Trex specifically. This was later disproven and I think that's why they kind of make a joke out of it in JP3.
"It cant see us if we dont move"
Trex: I am about to commit the most miniscule act of tomfoolery
Dinosaur fan here! Been loving Dinosaurs since i was around 2-4. Im glad that another person realised that T-Rex don’t have feathers! I love the way you model these dinosaurs! It makes them look way more realistic. Even though people are used to seeing Jurassic Park Original dinosaurs, this is still absolutely unbelievable!
Those Utahraptors were so beautiful! I love how much they are like a cross between an eagle and a grizzly bear!
But my favorites were the real Velociraptors 😂 That scene was HILARIOUS!
The velociraptor got squished by the door lol
So that's what an owl bear would be like
They were like griffons
The crazy thing is Baryonyx which is directly related to Spinosaurus is not only actually shaped like we thought Spinosaurus was, but is one of the oldest and well documented complete skeletons. The Spinosaurus design was actually based off it since they were so closely related. Not just Baryonyx but other members of that family too. It's just Spinosaurus turned out completely unique and unpredictable.
and thats actually false, we barelly have complete fossils of spino, and a big part of its appearance is made from mixturing other spinosaurids
pretty much its whole appearance is a kind of quimera from oxalaia quilombensis, lol!
@@SaragossiDeer Also the video has things rather inaccurate too, most research claims Spinosaurus wasn't a swimmer at all, and the reduction of his back legs is false due to most studies using an inaccurate model. The most accurate designs we have really point to it being Bear shaped.
11:13 I don’t know about you but sail boi just got more horrific
No matter how accurate it is... both are meant to be horrifying
@@grimnir8872What do you mean by bear shaped?
@@DreA1503 Well most of the "revised" versions of Spinosaurus tried to make it like a crocodile, with smaller back legs than previous models. But most evidence points to it being a wader, not a swimmer, as it's tail and hip bones are far to rigid in movement and most models using inaccurate leg sizes. So this makes Spinosaurus rather like a bear, with stout powerful back limbs slightly longer and more robust than it's forelimbs which were rather well developed for ithe type of Dinosaur it was. In short, Spinosaurus was a robust bear-like dinosaur, not a pseudo-crocodile.
My favorite was the accurate velociraptors, the lil guys jumping to the door window were so freakin cute 😭 PLUS, I absolutely adore their feathers.
They cute until they eating your insides while your still alive 💀
@@Dgr__003 ☠
Dinosaurs as our pets? Jurassic Park didnt teach yall anything huh? 😂
@@Dgr__003 sshhhh, let a man dream
@@zussman_ i mean we've tamed dangerous animals before,wolves,that became all the different dog breeds
Which would be a fair comparison since they both hunt in packs,both are dangerous (not as dangerous on their own as in a pack but i mean obviously because in a 1v1 you probably could have had a fair chance)
So tldr:if velociraptors weren't extinct we probably could have had pet velociraptors (with different breeds) given how wolves were tamed and became dogs
Whoever said they were dinosaurs, those are clones with dinosaur DNA and completed with other animals like amphibious or reptiles, so the movie is not wrong.
The other thing about Rexy (and really predators in general) is that she wouldn't roar and snarl at her prey. She would be very quiet in a chase. The only time when she would roar while chasing is if the offender got near her newly laid clutch of eggs or chicks (just like we see in modern birds and crocodilians).
Yes. I remember seeing a report that their real sound is low so it is so much more menacing.
Or poaching her kill
@@dragonboyjghI mean, stealing it, sure, but killing it would just mean less work for her, and Trexes likely scavenged like lions do today.
@@ancadiamant The low frequency of the roar means it can be heard from a much further distance without necessarily being louder than the surroundings. This activates the fear response in most prey animals.
I was about to point out that it kinda sounded like an elephant and a tiger at the same time lol
The little velociraptors trying to look through the window was everything lol
The shot of the Utahraptor nudging the door took my breath away especially. There’s something about how the light interacted with the model that made it look so realistic in that shot. Really impressive work btw!!!
The eyes. The eyes are especially well done. When it looked through the glass in the door, no kidding, it was more impressive than the original.
I always wondered if real dromeosaurs could open the doors with their head
@@alphacommander428 Good point. A simple large push-down handle would be relatively easy to push down with the head at the right height - assuming they are as intelligent (or more) as nowadays large birds are, which is very possible given they are cousins.
5:08 OH HELL YEAH, I’VE BEEN WAITING FOR THIS FOR SO LONG
I love how in the kitchen scene you edited Timmy to say “Its a raptor” instead of “its a velociraptor”.
That was a really neat detail
I thought I was trippin
He did forget to put the hand on it's back while it was opening the door though.
@@TheMrbubbles1378 Their hands faced inward, I recon they could've just manipulated the handle with their fingers.
@@TheMrbubbles1378 Just like wedging it between two of them and pulling down.
I liked that you also included more realistic conclusions to the scenes as well. 😂
Also, showing the realistic t-Rex just goes to show how ridiculously tiny their arms really were. Even in artistic renderings they tend to get over proportioned. I guess it detracts from the menacing predator look.
Are shorter but much stronger and bigger than human arms.
"Don't make a sound, it can't see us if we don't move."
T-Rex: "I have never been so offended by bullsh!t throughout my entire life and reanimation."
Scientifically accurate T-Rex still look menacing enough to me... That head with those jaws. Those are truly menacing.
Those small arms really need tools to be of general use. Imagine T-regina with a T-rex designed car running on biogas.
@@johndododoe1411 it wasn't going to eat them but after that it had to just on principal
Adding that Trex probably didn't roar but made an uncanny...hum? That you'd feel more than you heard. Someone said it might've been reminiscent of the Jaws theme opening strings. A vibration felt through your body. Even if it didn't roar like you expected, you'd FEEL it was around lol.
I read that it was probably close to the weird vocalisations that emus make. Now, given I am Australian and have heard emus do their throat trilling a few times, it’s freaky enough with animals the same size as you. I cannot imagine how terrifying it would have been at the scale of T-Rex.
ua-cam.com/video/2eqJYtFO3SI/v-deo.html
So basically the 'brown note'?
I've read scientists believe they most likely grumbled and hissed like crocodiles.
T-rex started a skin care routine, good for him
Your utahraptor design would’ve scared me 100% if that was the original design in the movie. And I cracked up when you decided to put in more realistic designs of the velociraptors and I knew what to expect but you blew it out of the water, especially with the conclusion of the scene if it were like that. Awesome job!
It wasn't just "a velociraptor based on Deinonychus". It was actually Deinonychus. At the time Crichton wrote the book, there was a rather big debate among paleontologists about whether to call it Deinonychus Antirrhopus or Velociraptor Antirrhopus. The book Crichton used for reference used the latter name.
Crichton also said himself that "velociraptor sounded scarier" haha
@@NathanielTavington While true, the fact that Deinonychus was being debated as part of the Velociraptor genus at the time doesn't make him _that_ incorrect to use the name.
I'm just getting tired of the "He was so wrong, look at how tiny Mongoliensis is!" comments. Knowing what I know now about the Antirrhopus name debate, it feels really disingenuous.
@@aircraftcarrierwo-class Yeah, I think a lot of people don't understand how much paleontology has changed since Jurassic Park was published and the movie came out. I see lots of people going on about how wrong the movie and book are but they don't seem to understand that Michael Crichton and Steven Spielberg are pretty responsible for the big leap in paleontology that we've seen in the past three decades, because Jurassic Park renewed public interest. A few of them have also clearly not read the book at all, since even Grant was suspicious of the "velociraptors" that Wu created.
@@NathanielTavington Oh yeah JP definitely built hype for paleontology. I never read the book but the film is still one of my favorites, warts and all.
A lot of the actual inaccuracies are due to it being relatively new science at the time (IE: feathers) or because it was easier for filming (Pronated hands on raptors, in closeups those are gloved human hands)
What really bugs me is like... In Lost World we got some pretty accurate stegosaurs, but then in Jurassic World we got terrible 1950s-style stegos. It bugs me because they had it right, then actively made it wrong again.
@@aircraftcarrierwo-class ngl there is a lot that bugs me about Jurassic World. I like to tell myself though that the stegos look bad in JW because there's a part in the book where Wu is complaining to Hammond about how the dinosaurs don't "feel" right. He says they're too smart and too fast and the public will want dumb, slow, plodding animals. That's what I tell myself haha.
5:30 I dunno about anatomically correct Velociraptors being not scary. If a pack of squawking dog-sized feathered lizards came at me, I wouldn't be any more dismissive of them than I would be of a pack of barking hunting dogs running at me. Either way, I'd be doing my best to set a new PB for the 100 m dash. XD
Like the little ones in the 2nd or 3rd Jurassic park movie (with the little girl on the beach). Have enough of them and they’re scary
velociraptors wernt in packs tho
@fentzy5068 that's only kind of true. While they might not have hunted in packs the way wolves or lions do, with coordinated tactics and clearly working together, they might have still attacked in "flocks" like seagulls and similar animals. So yes they're fighting for themselves, but they're fighting for themselves along side a bunch of others doing the exact same. So, still scary as hell to come across a group of them.
Even a pack of compsognathus could kill someone, and they were half the size of velociraptor
Bro... Idk how u did this.. but it's incredible.. ur a computer genius. And even though it's were accurate.. the movie ones looked way better of course.. but they were just movie monsters.. that haunted my dreams for decades .. but again.. I'm absolutely mind blown that you were able to do this. Incredible 😮
That raptor snapping its wrist and then howling in pain was hilarious! Also the intro of Rexy in the trees with the rain was spectacular!
6:48
The velocirapors being taken out by a door got a bigger laugh out of me than I expected.
same i didnt expect that, i laughed way harder than i should have xD
I actually felt sorry for it! 😅
@@DraconimLt trying so hard to be scary
You could slam a door against it like that, but then you would want to prop a stick under the knob and run. A cassowary bird that size can rip a person wide open with what it has for toe claws. You can see video of Steve Irwin running from those.
@@restorator7 Cassowaries are way bigger than that lifesized velociraptor, unless you mean a juvenile?
I quite like the explanation that the trex is pretty well fed by that stage and by being quiet and staying still they do not trigger a predator response from the rex. It just kinda checks them out and goes to playing with the car. The velociraptor scene was gold, and thanks for the bonus one on the end, you have given justice to one of my all time favorites.
A moist obese BBW trex is an answer to a question no one asked though. Realism isn't important in entertainment IMO.
I agree except for the fact that all the Rex had at that point was a goat and a human so there's no way it would have been well fed at that point
@@TD-ht8dz Pretty sure the theory is that overall it was well fed, as in like a pet dog or cat with a good diet. It's getting regular meals of decent size and nutrition, so it's not really hungry and hunting for sport/play because so many of its meals are just provided on a platter or staked to a point on the ground and not free roaming to be hunted and the hunt is enrichment the same way it enriches a dog to play fetch or a cat to chase a laser pointer. Not because the rex is hungry, because the rex is bored.
@@TehFrenchy29 Cue Steve Irwin "She's not gonna hurt ya. She's only playin'"
@@TehFrenchy29 yeah, but also a goat every few hours isn't anywhere close to enough for a T-Rex, you would need like at least 15 goats per hour probably to satisfy a body that big
Video starts at 3:55
It's really bold to say that this is a definitive scientifically accurate Spinosaurus, considering if you put two Spinosaurid paleontologists in a room, they'd probably rapidly devolve into violence before they were able to agree on anything.
I swear every time I turn around there's a new discovery about spinosaurus
That's because he is just a layman with a big ego. 🙄
Being able to animate and having paleontology as a hobby doesn't make you a real scientist. 😅
Nothing about this video is scientifically accurate. 😂
Well than let’s say ist definitely more accurate than the one out of the movies.
I love how these raptors look derpy. It makes them look very uncanny. Much like the shark from jaws, they’re expressionless like a doll. Biological murder machines driven by extreme predatory instinct. When you couple that with their crooked and expressionless face, I find it more terrifying than the real ones.
Look at bears. They're predators, very able to tear a human apart, and for some reason we find them adorable. The JP movie made raptors look evil, because, well, it's a movie and it needs to built up suspense, and raptors were kind of villains in the story. The real dinosaurs were just animals. Could've been really cute in real life and still dangerous.
@@tajniak4335 and dogs
You have to remember dinosaurs are the ancestors of birds and have you ever seen a bird make a cute face like a dog.
@@wompwompwompwompwompwompalienz and angry dog or bear is very far from being cute. Specially when you are in danger ( or the protagonist)
@@marcofearg9956 i find it amusing when a puppy is furious
until they’re a year old
"Any size difference is negligible"
T.Rex since then: has had two more tons added to its estimated average weight, making it outweigh Giga and Spino by a notable margin. T.Rex never gonna get dethroned.
Only because they're so bulky.
Both Tyrannosaurus and Giganotosaurus are currently estimated at an average of roughly 8 tonnes. Considering we have a whole 2 specimens of Giganotosaurus, and what.. 25 from T. rex? It's not a fair comparison. One is vastly more understood. We likely haven't found our Sue or Scotty of Giganotosaurus, maybe we won't ever. But without a proper sample size the average Giganotosaurus's weight could be as low as 5 tonnes, or has high as 9, we can't be too sure.
That being said, T. rex is more heavy set, and if I had to choose I'd bet T. rex would shake up to be biggest. Unless Spinosaurus gets invovled, that thing ping pongs between size estimates every new paper. It's been as low as 4 tonnes and as high as 20. So don't count it out either.
@@aliendilo3105Yeah, their current weight estimates have no meaningful margin between them. Obviously we are data deficient with giga and rex seems more heavily built regardless, but if we're just talking in terms of "what was the largest land predator" then both are correct answers. It's more reasonable to say "rex/giga are among the largest land predators" as opposed to "rex/giga IS the largest land carnivore."
@@aliendilo3105we barely have 2 *full* specimens
Turkey size raptor getting clapped by the door made my 6yo laugh for two minutes straight. Great Work, humor and attention to detail!
Ok, the recreation of the vilociraptor was hilarious. Between the jumping and the getting smashed by the door, it's no wonder they want with a different design.
Velociraptor made me so happy! FINALLY someone makes it accurately pint-size. Also those beautiful Utahraptors, I love the golden eagle color choice!
All the faces were friendlier like a real animal would look, particularly around the eyes. It shows how they can be beautiful but deadly. Not the otherworldly monster that Hollywood depicts them to be.
Small Raptor- cute and kinda friendly looking
Big raptor: just horrifying.
Yea but the movie wouldn't be as memorable if they kept the natural looks. It would just be a generic dino movie Spielberg did.
@@jiskool1 Lol, no? Jurassic Park is a dinosaur movie that revolutionized cinema, and dinosaurs right or wrong wouldn't change that. The difference is that people at the time would be more informed, and they would be used to and afraid of the Raptor with feathers. But they did what they could because at the time they didn't know much about what dinosaurs actually looked like, so they were based on the fossil. But that's no excuse for movies these days, where they do it wrong on purpose. Giganotosaurus was the most wrong of all and came in the last movie in the middle of 2022.
AmI really the only one who found the small raptors to look like chickens, and the Utahs to just look hilarious? Yes they could still kill me, not because I’m too scared to charge them with a knife or pan and stab into the eyes, but because I’d be laughing on the floor making jokes about how derpy they look.
@@jwalster9412
Small raptor - Cute and kinda friendly looking, but can claw a mouse's organs out in the cruelest way.
Cat - Cute and friendly looking, but can claw a mouse's organs out in the cruelest way.
See? Dinosaurs are just animals
The amount of skill, time and effort that went into this are staggering. All from just one person. Community culture at its finest.
Interestingly, you might have actually been able to the "don't move and it won't see you" thing with Giganotosaurus instead of rex, as the giant carcharodontosaurids like giga may have had a blind spot at the lower end of it's snout due to it's skull being so long but with such a deep face. So find it's blind spot and you might just be able to hide from it.
T. rex was just a biological terminator though and your only hope was to pray that it or it's raptor sized kids don't find you
Adult Trex is said to likely be an ambush predator so it’s weird to me to keep seeing it roar randomly in movies.
There's an enormous amount of new info now about T-Rex including it's behaviour - it was probably an ambush predator - would almost certainly never have roared except to let the world know about its territory or whilst mating, not even likely that its footsteps would have made a sound in a forest (check out how big cats and elephants can do so silently) why give your prey info about where you are? Its olfactory senses were superb as was its sight and hearing. O and there's a load of evidence that they were pack hunters! Check out Steve Brusatte's book - The rise and fall of the dinosaurs and Michael J Benton - The Dinosaurs rediscovered. Good reads too.
@@marieallen9715 Pack hunters? How terrifying. I wonder if it both means that they hunt as a pack and also hunt down entire packs XD
Maybe it'll add more cinematic tension in movies. Cinema will look dull if it gets 100% based on actual scientific factors
Most predators don't roar at prey. Hollywood doesn't just do it to dinosaurs. Lions, tigers, bears, wolves, none of them are likely to roar or growl when attacking. They'll kill you silently and calmly.
@@MythraStudios science has nothing to do with bad writing, the more scientifically accurate, the more immersive a movie can get
If you’re gonna get technical about the whole vision thing, you might also want to add the fact that reptiles don’t have the kind of vocal tract that would allow them to roar. Dinosaurs vocalize similarly to modern day reptiles with hisses, grunts, squeaks, honks. A T. rex would have the same kind of rumbling hiss you’d hear out of a crocodile, just amplified to eleven making it even more terrifying.
Modern crocodiles can growl though. I think it would be cool for t-rex to just growl like that and hiss with the mouth open.
Damn and could you imagine the popping sound a rex would make (like crocs do to release pressure in their jaw) 💀
We don't know what dinosaurs sounded like as vocal cords aren't preserved. All the different species could have been making a variety of sounds akin to birds, crocodiles, turtles... That's why they use a variety of sounds in movies.
Dinosaurs weren’t reptilian. They were more related to Ornithological species like birds. Crocodiles are of an entirely different genome
Oh, you need to hear an actual Nile Crocodile growl then. Now, considering that a 8 ton T-Rex will have immensely larger resonance "chambers" in its body, odds are, that it would not only sound a HELL of a lot deeper than the movies, but it would be so deep into sub-bass frequencies, that the sensation of feeling your body, lungs, ribcage vibrate at a few hundred Hertz is... well. Yeah. Terrifying.
If we'd get really technical, our atmosphere doesn't have enough oxygen to support dinosaurs anymore anyways, so at best they'd not be doing too well - imagine climbers without oxygen bottles. The summit of Everest has about 1/3 of the sea level's atmosphere. The dinos back then had 50% more oxygen in the atmosphere. They'd not do too well these days.
Actually, in the book the movie is based off of, it's explained that the poor eyesight is from the frog/toad DNA they used to fill in the gaps, not because t-rexes had bad eyesight.
Finally someone that read the book 👏 if only a fraction of people watching this video has read the book.
Yo this guy READS🔥🔥🔥
@@djkleb7645 I thought something said thats why they are featherless as well
I'm gonna bring up something from people who DID read the novel
"No, There are many instances in the First book in which Alan Grant Deduces that most of the dinosaurs have vision based on movement, from what he had learnt from the encounters with the T-Rex and the Hadrosaurs, but, There has been no direct relation established between Frog DNA or even Amphibian DNA for that matter, with Eyesight based on Motion, However, In one part the text does say that 'Their vision is based on movement, just like Amphibians"
I'm guessing that's how they would explain the dinosaurs looking so different to what they would realistically.
I believe that, in the books, the raptors are closer to Deinonychus. Also, there were as intelligent as chimpanzees.
The raptor models really made me want to see an actual documentary with them, so clean
There is one lol, its called Prehistoric Planet
@@edenjaycollins6055Yes, but we don't have the utahraptor in it =/
It's crazy how we're able to make something as complex as a Trex look so believable yet the second you put acgi human in your scene it instantly turns into a video game lol.
Yeah, and that is a great cross check on the modeling. If the model applied to a real object or animal is wrong, there's a flaw somewhere in the model. Applying unique twists for each species without a system is cheating as the twists for things that can be checked would adapt to that, while twists for uncheckable things will have no reason to be right.
Basic evolution,, our brains are hard-wired to be able to tell if something is 100% human or not.
Makes sense, we have the phenomena of the Uncanny Valley because we know what our species is, so artificial representations of such are immediately seen as not-human. There was a time when homo sapiens weren't the only bipedal hunter-gatherers!
Imagine being a dinosaur watching this, It'd be the opposite way around
@@peterlewis2178 I don't know. That Trex might see the digi double and think 🤔 damn, she's a sexy beast!
Now I'd love to see someone re-do the sound design on this with how dinosaurs actually sounded like (for example, the T-Rex actually sounded like a really low rumbling rather than a loud roar.)
ua-cam.com/video/XcBoY_aEVj8/v-deo.htmlsi=DUMelig8LBrkCA7g
MIght be scarier honestly.
yes also cool pfp!!!
@@galois6569yeah, imagine your running through a forest and you feel this rumble in your chest, like standing front row in a concert. You turn around and there she is
@@RehnCookieMuffinno its not🤣
No one has any idea what they actually looked like. So, though I admire the effort (it’s amazing actually), to claim this is how they really looked is no different than claiming how they looked back in 1993.
Utahraptor truly looks like a giant turkey. Their relations with birds are undeniable.
I have a hard time taking them seriously- that underbite doesn't make much sense with what we now know about therapod teeth and the likelihood of lips.
Yes irl the downturn in the jaw would have been less pronounced and the lips would have concealed the jaw rather than exposing at the tip like shown in the video.
And its ironic because its one of the relatively few large maniraptors that have (quite likely, first was inconclusive, second could still be something that managed to wringle itself nearby at time of death) trace fossils found (twice in fact, one recently with a massive truck sized brick of a find) that show they had scutes (the derpy-not-full-on-scales on parts of crocs and on turtles).
@@ANDELE3025 Actually the 3 types of scales on bird feet/dinosaur feet are called Scutate, Sceutellae and Reticulae. Scutes are more crocodile scales than bird scales, and avian scales fun fact are a type of feather.
@@apnosaurus I know (and before someone chimes in, if its 2, 3, 5 or even 13 with insect ones included for types or types+subtypes doesnt matter for the point), the point itself was essentially that the channel chose one of the few raptors that by known info extremely likely had as close to full on traditional reptile scales, on the body at that, as you get without outright calling them "scales" instead of the (probably/at least by DNA sequencing and protein binding) reverse-evolved scute via flattened stem+shaft spike of feathers.
Understandable mistake if one due to rona didnt hear about the bed or small truck sized megablock of a utahraptor fossil (since it also got little generic news coverage and even wikis are shit slow to update or give links since admins sniffing their own farts became more important to them in the last decade than easy access to information).
Can we all just sit for a moment and appreciate how much effort FilmCore
Put in this video, and how he made all this by himself?
Right. We all know that this person is quite talented in his craft and animation skills. That can not be denied and we should give him all the credit he deserves. The argument was simply in the depiction of a certain Life form, and the way it was presented, as it being a total fact. Something which, did not take into account, the always existing, Laws of Physics, within the Earth's surface.
LMFAO!! "Don't move! He can't see us if we don't move!" Crunch.
T rex: "that's funny usually the prey tries to run away? Oh well easy food" *picks then up and shakes them violently like a dog with a chew toy* 🍖🦖🦕
That was amazing to watch
You forgot 2 thinks
1. T-rex had padded feet.
2. T-rex likely didn't sound like that.
Correct me if I'm wrong, please and thank you.❤
It really amazes me just how well the original JP's special effects have held up, both practical and CG. Very much ahead of its time in how it was able to leverage the strengths of both styles and minimize the deficits; a lot of movies that came afterward just used CG for everything, which doesn't usually work.
Also, Utahraptor is so derpy I love it.
This is just a very political way of saying that his design looks like shit
@@Icetea-2000 It is, in fact, not.
@@Icetea-2000 his design is fine, but it still cant hold a candle to the OG one, it looks out of place and fake. The OG holds up insanely well. That said we still gotta give the guy respect, dude is talented as hell to make this one deep.
They look like they should be taking pictures of tourist traps and speaking with Minnesota accents. "Oh well you know we just had to come see the human kitchen, didn't we Jimmy? I said to him, didja know they do 'em free range here? Real excitin' for the hatchlings, bit a gettin' back to nature, y'know?" It's so good.
IMO the difference is that people who animated the dinosaurs back then had PASSION for it and didnt just fulfill their job after they slaved through their university years, being mentally broken down. they probably also had quite some time for it and werent as deadly pressured by the deadlines people nowadays get from the top who gives a shit about production value and only looks at advertised release dates.
same with old RPG games. gothic etc. had passion. the new ones are just massproduced.
I think the dinos of the original movies look way nicer in aesthetic levels.
They might not be scientifically accurate but they looked great, beautiful, scary and cinematically interesting.
This also makes me realize, the ones from the original movies are created by an entire team of professional CG and Comp artist.
The fact that the re-created version was done by a single artist is amazing!
Great work!
Its mentioned in the original book that they modified the dinosaurs to be more intimidating in appearance, as the real things kept coming out, and I quote, 'fuzzy'.
I get whatcha saying and agree it’s impressive, but CGI wasn’t really used much at all during the making of Jurassic Park, not even 70 vfx shots taking up less than 5 mins of the actual films runtime. To put that in perspective, films nowadays use like up to 2000 or more vfx shots, so realistically they look so real because, well, they are real!
The dinosaurs in the originals were animatronic I believe
@@Slippinn_Jimmy exactly that my friend, that’s why they look so beautiful 😩
@@Slippinn_Jimmy yeah that's right. High quality ones that held up close ups very well.
There were also a good number of VFX shots with CG dinos, but they were matched to the original animatronic ones and that's why the CG then looked amazing.
For those caught off-guard by the derpy raptors, take solace in the fact that, while the lower jaw did curl down at the tip like that irl, it would’ve most likely been covered by lizard-like lips, as was the case with the raptors in the original film. In life, it would’ve looked like the raptor had a strangely prominent chin, perhaps, but that’s about it, no weird reverse-bucktooth thing going on.
Yea that was the one part in all these reconstructions i found strange ngl
Then raptor philosophy memes wouldn't have existed.
The utahraptors looked like they were in gorilla suits from the front but otherwise it looked great!
The skull he based his construction off of also seemed to have a greater than average dip on its lower jaw. Utahraptors typically had a very insignificant dip, but he exaggerated it quite a bit while using an already exaggerated specimen. Definitely the worst part of the video, but still a very good reconstruction
7:37 got me giggling, the whole video is great tho!
It's like that chicken from Moana 😂