What really happened to Alex Belfield and his Voice of Reason YouTube channel?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 жов 2024
- A certain amount of uncertainty surrounds the disappearance of Alex Belfield from UA-cam. It seems that the host of the channel was not always entirely honest with viewers.
www.dailymail....
www.nottingham...
I liked his channel until he insulted someone suffering from depression - calling him selfish. No doubt Belfield is one of the lucky ones never to have suffered from that horrible disability. Blaming someone for their own disability is just wrong.
Same! I liked him but he insulted someone in recovery from addiction once and that deserves ultimate respect so I respectfully called him on it because he obviously wasn’t knowledgeable on the subject. His arrogance was his downfall unfortunately
@Abe Adams It is debilitating though.
Depression is a medical condition not a disability.
He was like that bloke down the pub, interesting after one pint, but annoying after several.
Belfield, the guy once had the brass nerve to make an appeal for donations for his legal lawyer fees on a Sunday evening, yet by the Monday afternoon he had released a video of him travelling first class to London by rail and then staying a couple of nights in a top class swanky London hotel. It was at that stage i first began to think something was a bit rotten with Belfield and my interest in him started to lessen. His channel just became about `him` more and more and actually became a little boring.
First class going abroad .hese was taking the piss
He's a grifter, one that got me was his Kyle Rittenhouse video of him saying he shot 3 black men, then deleted it
@@cuprashoe Christ he said that , none of them were black ,belfield coming like cnn
To this day i still call him Alex bellend NUFF SAID ey !
@@hookywookywithmalarkyman704 he was defo a bit bellish
Starmer didn't prosecute the grooming gangs while he was in charge of the CPS, he has a lot to answer for now that he has become the leader of the Labour party. I hope Belfield clears his name as he has done nothing wrong afaic.
Yes Dick was (rightly) driven out because of her and her staff's uselessness and incompetence but the same for some reason musn't apply to Starmer.
so you know that he will be found not guilty of all charges concerning 12 cases of harassment? Interesting. How so?
People will become their own law if new healthy laws that protect our children aren't formed. I say bring back execution to people like those gangs. That way they won't hurt anyone else anymore. Why keep criminals like them alive?
@@barfieldmcduff8774 you must be commenting on the wrong post as I didn't read what you are saying anywhere but I did see something about grooming gangs, tell me, what do you know about that caveman sport.
In view of the politically guided incompetence of constabulary regarding thousands of raped girls and grooming gangs, as well as exemptions for politically correct statue vandals, the presenters assumptions about constabulary seem peculiar.
But unless we’re to put our faith in the mind readers of some latterly enacted Orwellian nightmare, we can all rest assured that they won’t be declaring everyone’s guilt until proof of innocence?
It is very sad. I enjoyed watching Alex for the two years of lockdown. However, I did get fed up with all his jelly-wobbler and man-sausage 'jokes'. What kept me watching his channel were his exposure of, and attacks on, hypocrites and the corrupt. He should have stuck with this. To go behind a pay wall, is to preach to the converted. Alex Belfield has become a closet protester, an angry man shouting in a padded cell. I wish him well with his court cases.
Well said
"man -sausage"lol.His dog will be missed what was she called?.Inundated with Xmas gifts too bet fans now feel they've wasted their money on him.
Agree! he devalued his often very valid comments with very dated, and infantile humour. Made him seem rather sad at times.
In view of the politically guided incompetence of constabulary regarding thousands of raped girls and grooming gangs, as well as exemptions for politically correct statue vandals, the presenters assumptions about constabulary seem peculiar.
But unless we’re to put our faith in the mind readers of some latterly enacted Orwellian nightmare, we can all rest assured that they won’t be declaring everyone’s guilt until proof of innocence?
Spot on kEYBAWD, he gave many clues in previous months he would end up behind a paywall. He was purposely pushing the boundaries & painting himself a hero of free speech. His Barrister has been paid for by donations so now it's time for him to make a ton of money after insulting the folks he claimed to champion namely the poorest by saying it's only the price of a beer. With the price of gas-electric, inflation the very poorest who looked up to him just haven't got that to fritter away on one man's echo chamber. Rumble was a clear option to stay free so I am sure this was all planned.
We need hundreds of Alex Belfields, that's the point. I'm not a particular fan but, I would rather have 500 examples like him to chose from, than none. Free speech is the issue, too many are busy constraining that, or are otherwise only allowing their preferred narrative to escape.
As a fan of Alex I agree, but he has been banned for legitimate reasons. Hopefully if he returns he will show a little more integrity.
Agreed
I agree with Simon most of the time, but not on this and also when he himself was untruthful about the racist bias Google spe ws when you search 'black people's compared to 'white people'. We don't need milk toast conservatives playing devil's advocate and crawling to leftists to appease them and seem neutral, not when the world is dominated by the left and we are on the brink of total subjugation as it is. Gimme a 100 Belfields now more than ever!
@@billylee6236 maybe, but I would rather have unbiased and impartial news than listen to people who are just saying what I already believe. I agree that the far left has gone mad but it is just the far left. Being Liberal is not bad or evil and being Conservative is not good. The extremes are the worst as they have to lie and rely on opinion and pseudoscience to justify their position.
@kinelll two lies don't make a right.
Belfield has a creepy, n0ncey vibe about him. He makes my skin crawl.
Was pally with saville so......
I thought he came across as creepy,too.
The way he talks is sleazy so it's not easy to miss. I don't get why he's talks the way he does about women. He doesn't seem to understand his audience was probably 50,%female. I stopped watching him because it was like he had been licking a toilet seat some days. Did like him.dont now and that's his own fault.
Yet you could have a leader soon who defended Savile in Court .
@@Tad1945 and covered up the grooming gangs. A fine man of integrity indeed.
Hi Simon I understand what you mean , but at the same time I feel there is yet a lot more to come out regarding the treatment of the individual in question . Yes his presentation was bound to get I’m cancelled in the end , but I still feel the likes of a certain media channel. And the law enforcement departments have yet have to account for their actions , I shall follow this case with interest . And ask people to set aside the likes or dislike , of the individual and see how this all stands up in court of law . Best wishes to all
I still think its a massive witch hunt
@@hissingsidll750 unicorns are over the hill
In view of the politically guided incompetence of constabulary regarding thousands of raped girls and grooming gangs, as well as exemptions for politically correct statue vandals, the presenters assumptions about constabulary seem peculiar.
But unless we’re to put our faith in the mind readers of some latterly enacted Orwellian nightmare, we can all rest assured that they won’t be declaring everyone’s guilt until proof of innocence?
ua-cam.com/video/KrRPfsUDl58/v-deo.html
@richard walton as Alex was a filling in presenter for the BBC, he's be in almost every bit of the BBC from landend to gonagrots, and abroad, so most likey see a lot, he may thing now's things, but in he may also, have information, but by him self, is not much, but like jimmy investigation, loads not connected stuff, but it not until collected and joined up something bigger is seen, as he says he's not a fan of show-bissness after hours life still stuff, and he likes to point it out, every time he gets, from what I've seen, the apparent charges of stroking, will if your stoking someone, that means you are following someone, or a group of people, will that most also include seeing what they get up to, and with who, I for one would like to now, what the story he as a journalist was following and if he had expected to find? finding real news not just reading an auto cue, word for word, created who for what purpose, well if it aver gets to court I don't it going be allowing report of how, these people live, and there high morel standards is it?
It's £35,000 per week not per annum at 10% of his subscribers.
Not certain of the numbers, but that does rather sound more like it ...
Simon is obviously not very good at maths
Wow….that makes sense.
He has 371,000 subs at the moment, so 10% is 37,100. So it would be that amount per week, or £148,400 a month or just-over £1.9m a year.
I'll be interested to see how many do go over to the new site though... even Lotus Eaters have nowhere near that many paying members, so I doubt somehow Alex will get more!
Belfield made a point about how he has pushed for it to go to court so he can clear his name. He chose not to just leave it at a magistrate's court etc. A friend of mine is doing this about something. It can be quite a gamble, and risky.
It's pretty far fetched... Since when does the defendant decide. Given magistrates have limited sentencing ability surely it's been decided by the justice system... Not Alex
@@seanjonesy180 ITS CALLED... ELECT TRAIL BY JURY... AS SAID, BIG GAMBLE, BUT YOU CAN DECIDE, SO YOU CAN GET THE TRUTH OUT THERE
@@petergarbutt9521 No need to shout...
@@richardhodds7812 NO DISRESPECT TO NO ONE, I USE CAPITALS, SIMPLY BECAUSE ITS EASIER FOR ME TO READ, STAY SAFE
@kinelll He has promised to give any proceeds to charity.
If he has defamed someone there are laws for that. Hopefully the truth re Jeremy Vine will come out. But I don't see any reason for removal from YT and don't think we should seek to excuse YT for this censorship. And don't assume Vine is right either.
Vine is a complete and utter tnuc........just my opinion 😁
Alex knows that Defamation is notoriously difficult to prove in Court, so it can be played as a risk game for publicity, as long as you get your legal costs awarded to you ...
@@hissingsidll750 and mine!
@@hissingsidll750 Dyslexia rules KO 👍
@@airwolf8915 you mean lexdistic Dah
Alex was very entertaining in 2020 and 2021, but sadly his act has run out now for me.
Ditto.
I stopped watching him when he showed his true colours and engaged in the kind of sneering hatred of white working class people we expect from your typical wolist. I guess you can take the man out of the BBBC but you can't take the BBC out of the man...
Tend to agree. Entertaining while it lasted. I'd follow him to Bitchute, Rumble, Odysee etc if he had done that as many have. Behind a £52 paywall I don't think so.
He got greedy
@@angusdrey8930 it's worth it
I saw & heard him castigate an old boy on his live phone in. Because Alex wanted people to ring on a certain subject, but the old boy obviously was a subscriber, yet Alex started calling him a Moron & a Cretin.
I knew the BBC doesn't fall very far from the branch. It was disgusting behaviour & showed him in the light he performs within.
I remember him berating a woman caller who was actually agreeing with him. An unpleasant man.
"All the world’s a stage,
And all the men and women merely players"
Starmer was followed by Jeremy Corbyn's brother and his cronies (widely known to the media) who asked in loud voices (all on YT) equally about Julian Assange. Starmer was also escorted by at least 8 police-personnel to his waiting car. No-one treid to attack him but the BBC made the incident seem like a far right gang which it wasn't. Are you now the voice of the BBC, Simon?
Assange was arrested under the premiership of Cameron.
He said at the time anyone wanted for questioning in another country
Who landed in the UK should be detained and deported to said country.
Strange those rules didn't apply to a certain mark thatcher
Who was flying in and out of the country at the same time.
And was wanted for questioning by an African country for financing a military coupe on a democratically elected government.
Yes, that Starmer incident looked ridiculous, it was clear absolutely no one tried to attack him. But hey, that’s what the media does, I’m rather surprised by your take on it though I confess.
Don’t agree with you on this one.regarding the telegram platform either, I think anything other than far left is reported as far right, that’s how far everything is leaning to the lefts ideology these days.
Regarding Alex Belfield , I was a fan but got fed up with his continual harassment of some people and his rudeness if people made comments about it. He is still on YT in a lesser way, presumably to get more subscribers.
Surely a far left gang.
Thanks for the reasoned report I believe your version to the BBC.
Like a lot of people, I often found Alex funny and entertaining, but sometimes a bit overly full of himself and irritating. But it was his utter hypocrisy and nastiness to a lot of his subs, concerning a video totally slating Laurence Fox, that done it for me. He got a massive amount of dislikes, and negative comments. But rather than accept that most people thought differently, and he might of called it wrong, he attacked everybody that disagreed with him, and literally told them to F Off! It looked so bad for him, he promptly deleted the video. So the voice of reason, and supposed super advocate of free speech, was exposed as a thin skinned arrogant hypocrite, who seems to have a bully boy side to his nature.
Agreed. I kept leaving the comment "Laurence Fox is Innocent" on his videos, until he banned me and I can't leave comments any more! I believe all of our alt-right heroes should stick together. Don't get angry about trivial differences of opinion.
That was the point I had my doubts about belfield, he literally told us to F off because we had a different view on the subject.
his dig at mental health really pissed me of
Sooooooo many of Alex's videos got deleted after the comments. Thousands over the years. There was one example I can think of where he was going on about NHS nurses and the entire comment section was against him, someone even asked in the comments of another video were all the comments where today? The reply being that we were all still over in the NHS thread telling Alex how wrong he is.
100% agree with your comment.
Simon, I'd happily pay a few £ pw to listen to your views should the YT stazi force you out.
Hear hear.
Let’s be honest BBC knew a long time about Saville and glitter and the rest.
Oh dear.
@@steveluckhurst2350 look at John Lyndon they banned him for speaking up about it.
@@theprincipalofficer_1 And who was the last person to interview Savile?
@@steveluckhurst2350 don’t know that as there was a person who did interviews and went round with Jimmy on BBC can’t think of his name.
@@theprincipalofficer_1 Then I suggest that you look at Mr Belfield's CV. You will note that he mentions it with pride. Of course, he was working for the BBC at the time, and as you so eruditely put it the "BBC new (sic) a long time about Saville (sic)".
Yes, the sight of him him in a 5 star hotel, sat in a jakuzzi asking for donations for his fight with the BBC was too much for me....................
@Sideshow Bob's Fan Club Quite right, there's one born every minute......................................
Thank you Simon for letting us share your quiet, intelligent and thoroughly English presentations.
Drab and lethargic, I would call them. Reading your comment I find myself thinking there might be something to be said after all for diversity training.
@@ZL54JK8 You can always stop watching .
@@brianfenner9574 Thank you for your wise counsel, meant kindly, I know. However that same thought did occur to me after watching the video several months ago, and I haven't revisited the channel since.
Alex has now compared himself to Jimmy Carr and Joe Rogan in terms of being cancelled. Most people have heard of Joe Rogan and Jimmy Carr comparing himself to those two men is ridiculous. His ego seems to have inflated.
I compare Jimmy Carr to a pile of 💩.. I agree about Rogan tho..
I heard of Bellfield before I'd heard of Rogan.
I donated to Alex Belfield at one point, but I got fed up with his rudeness. Free speech is one thing, being nasty to people is another, and he crossed that line too many times.
He's only rude to the people who deserve it, like Linekar.
@@caltriton6904 he's rude to commenters
Yeah sends them a disgusting WhatsApp message cause he ain't got the balls wrongen
@@caltriton6904 interesting. Why does linekar (sic) "deserve it"?
@@steveluckhurst2350 because he is a wanker
Old Bell-End was mildly amusing in small doses, but £1 a year is overpriced. His assessment of his worth and level of humour is, as they say in the City, overpriced and at risk on the downside.
It’s a pound a week isn’t it?
Alex Belfield found a niche when people were looking for a different outlook during the worst of Covid, he was funny at first but his tall story after tall story became routine and monotonous.
I wish him well but I feel he’s now a busted flush !
He is a wart a horrible wart that needs cutting out before he spreads to too many other poor soles If you dont bieleive me
look deeper and you will see the light trust me you will !! and you dont have to go too deep !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@@allanhughes7859 his views on the Ukrainian refugees was particularly distasteful. But thats par for the course for this wretched individual.
He got so booooring
@@bigmcpauline7119 plus his views are those of an odious little reptile.
He was and is following a business plan. Build a group of loyal fans, suggest you are being targeted and attacked, say you have to go behind a pay wall. Just how many would be willing to pay a pound a week to listen to mostly rubbish? Not so sure.
Remember you said, "nothing is free"?
Well, neither is UA-cam, where we have to watch countless adverts, to view anything.
Unless you use the website version, rather than the app, in a browser with a built-in ad block like Brave, Opera (⚠️🇨🇳 owned!) or Vivaldi
Smut, double entendres and sexual innuendo becomes very grating, he also couldn’t hide his love for Boris.
Don`t feckin` watch it then 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
@@hissingsidll750 we feckin DON'T!!
@@catherinepositano8544 but you still come on here don't you. What a plank
Alex Belfield worked for BBC Radio (Mansfield) and fashioned himself as a 'shock-jock-wannabe' pushing peoples buttons; while I have no axe to grind, the cynic in me says that this has been contrived- in order to drive 'punters' to both his and Jim Davidson's channels - it's all about the money folks! nothing new under the sun
I saw a Jim Davidson video this week advertising that Alex had joined him on his Pay Wall Channel......I wouldn't pay to watch either of them.
I thought it was Radio Leeds
@@juliemercer1458 yes, the humour is pretty much low grade 'end-of'-pier' smut from a by-gone era with Belfield using Frankie Howerd-esque delivery (so not even original..) my guess is that these types just crave the attention (sad clowns...)
@@juliemercer1458 Well, that`s your choice.
@@deadpeoplestuff5686 I just don't find Belfield funny at all. He just repeats the same jokes over and over, which I wouldn't mind If they were even slightly funny, but they aren't they're just irritating. Same things every video, nothing new at all. His impressions are terrible too. Towing the WOKE/leftist line of jokes is just not funny, we need to get back to being able to offend people in funny ways, not the Belfield way which was offend them just for the sake of offending them because he doesn't like those people, that's childish not funny.
All he did was pick news articles and parrot what was mentioned with is own small twist and by doing so got so many things wrong, info and misinformation. I called him out many times for putting out the wrong facts, but he never read his comments so was pointless, and his subscribers would hang on his every word without checking, believing his nonsense. Not to mention the videos he got many dislikes for he would delete or private them. Clickbait was used on every video (up to 6 or more a day) which showed he was only in it for the grift/money and I lost count of how many times his video always came back to him and his back doors getting kicked in, got sick of hearing about "back doors/no warrant" etc, on every other video. He could be talking about Katy Price or whoever and it always ended with him and his back doors.
I was subbed for a while but had enough and around 5 months ago unsubbed. It was channels like his that made me install an adblocker too, I don't even want to help them out with ads they are that bad.
Bellfield made some good videos during lockdown particularly exposing the hypocrisy of the authorities and the stupidity of some people but overtime I found him increasingly irritating. Some of his comments on people’s appearance went beyond humour and were down right cruel and were often irrelevant to the point he was making. It was sneering and condescending stuff. After about 6 months I muted notifications and later just unsubscribed. He had a lot of promise as an alternative voice but his obsessions, anger issues and sub-chubby brown “humour” were not something I wanted to see for free never mind pay for.
Completely agree👍
Alex is not for everyone. Lol.
Same. I genuinely think he is a bitter person because he never rose to the levels of stardom his ego believed him to warrant whilst 'lesser talents' (in his view) became household names. I always got the impression that if the BBC ever offered him his old job back he would have jumped at the chance and turned his back on the 'lesser people' who gave him his platform. A truly nasty little man imo.
@@MCDrB-wq8ed lol... fair enough.
@@MCDrB-wq8ed your last sentence sums him up succinctly
Yes. Alex was not quite 100% truthful to his often uber loyal followers that he is in fact a defendant with a court date to stand trial for. This was foolish, because he does have a strong case for police harassment and dubious allegations from the BBC. Also, I could smell a rat when he was asking for money for his eye wateringly expensive barristers, yet many of his supporters are ignorant he is in fact quite rather wealthy vis a vis the average man on the street. I'm not sure some begging should be then seen having a top level holiday in Florida. At least not until all the litigation is settled.
ex BBC employee that bangs on about freedom of speech but bans people from his channel if they point out the lies he posts, begs for donations to fight a court case then buys himself a new piano , last man to interview Saville and didnt bring up child abuse just a few of the things thats wrong with Alex , from Alex's point of view his YT ban is the best thing to happen to him now he can get down to whats really important to him money, glad to see a lot of his followers refusing to pay for his new subscription channel
I find it disconcerting this turning on Belfield movement, the police bashing his door down when he said he'd open it and then confiscating his equipment without no charges whatsoever is outrageous. I like your stuff Simon but why you feel the need to try and sow seeds of doubt into Alex's character, leaves me baffled.
Hmm. He's had plenty of money via UA-cam but wanted money to fund his court cases. I'm not sure why people should be asked to support him to fight a case involving 12 incidents of harassment. I have enjoyed Belfield's channel, but not sure I'm as convinced by him now that these incidents have come to light. As for a Paywall....no chance.
Seems honest and fair to me. I like Alex but he has mislead people. Pointing that out is no crime.
A lot of you tubers have been getting more views and even new subscribers on the back of Alex
How do you know Alex is telling the truth? do you know him personally? have you spent any private time with him? my guess is no you have not
Very true, I love Simon and his stuff but feel he is being a little harsh here and don't appreciate the way he is hanging a fellow British conservative UA-camr out to dry, as I guessed by his video title alone. Alex was one of the few Brits actually really making a stand for us here, when the West is now all but conquered by Islam and the Left and we are on the brink of total domination. I don't think Simon has been in Alex's shoes regarding the police, I have (Scotland is even worse than England!) and know exactly what he is talking about. I could give a million examples, suffice to say when reporting a crime in Scotland the police ask you if they are Asian or not! While for decades there has been an epidemic of Asians making false reports about white people and the case automatically goes to court, for allegedly saying a nasty name! MENTAL!!! We are doomed. Simon has been funny like this before, in a recent video alluding to the fact we used to be racist in Britain and in an older video claiming Google doesn't discriminate against whites when you search for 'white people' as opposed to 'black people'. I think he was either being naive there or hopefully not dishonest as he claims of Alex. Many
pointed out all he had to do was take two seconds to run such a search. He strikes me as being a bit like Fox News, kinda pretending to be conservative while actually sitting on the fence to stay on both side's good books. Doesn't work like that, it just means conservatives won't trust him and naturally lefties will hate him no matter what for ever saying anything 'anti-left' from the start. It's called falling between two stools lol. Btw, Fox really showed their true colours with the Trump/Biden and Pence/Harris debates. The 'mediators' were both clearly Democrat supporters and interrupted and plain lied as they do, at the end of the Pence debate even resorting to reading a fake child's letter to set Harris up for a cheap browning point (garden the pun!). Slimy and pathetic, luckily most of us are not as stupid as they think we are to fall for it and just see through them and their agenda even more. Simon, get off our backs with this simping crap and get real. This sounds more and more like lefty pandering and we can smell this type of treachery creeping up a mile away. It is long past being second nature to spot and don't insult like this, we need loyalty, determination and overall commitment now FAR more than ever!!
You forgot to mention the BBC lawyer sacked for lying about Belfield and forging a judge's signature. And the guy sent to prison for impersonating him. And the seven 'no further actions' during the witch hunt!
You tell one side of the storey!
Never much liked bellfeild he always came across as a bit pompous, I met him at an anti lock down protest a few months ago and that only solidified my opinion of him.
Oh that whole telegram is used by thefar right thing 🙄🙄telegram is used by the far right as much as any other platform that actually cares about free speech (IE a small minority in reallity) I thought you were better than this.
@@webz3589 yeah made me laugh when he said that about telegram also makes me wonder who his examples of far right on telegram would be.
@@webz3589
I agree with you about that.
He made some good points, but it seemed he couldn't talk about anything without using schoolboy smut which made him more tiresome than interesting in my view. I suspect UA-cam has served it's purpose in creating and establishing a following, which he feels he can now convert into a far more lucrative income. Good luck to him, I think he'll need it.
He's been open enough to admit that it is paying for his lawyer. A very money-hoovering business. He has been insightful in dark areas but you are right, he is annoying with his obsession with making school smut. And even more annoying when he interrupts someone making really good points in order to do it. Sometimes he's done it on purpose to get away from dodgy topics.
People having a go at Mr Belfield mistify me. Have you ever thought that that is his style. If you don`t like it you know what to do.....or do you ? I for one found him very entertaining and as for his `smut` well I`m very broad minded and loved his near the knuckle style and the way he danced around the rules using his type of polari, very clever. In my book a jokes a joke. He`s not perfect, far from it, and I disagreed with him a fair few times but please get off your high horses.
I think I got more decent, factual info out of Mr Belfield than ever I did out of the MSM put together. The `schoolboy smut` was a bonus 😁
@@hissingsidll750 well he's been successful in getting us all talking. No one is perfect and he is fallable like anyone else. I have found myself laughing at a fair amount of his stuff especially recently prior to the ban. I'll go off and mind my own facking business.
i agree his jokes wore thin after the tenth time an he made a few mistakes over the years that he would never admit to just delete the vids. i honestly prefer this channels style much more informative and clever in my opinion.
He doesnt need luck hes an ex bbc employee been given a fake rebel persona to control the idiots who cant see badic propaganda. Oy vey
I watched Alex from day one and watched his subscriptions rocket, however over a period of time my view of him changed as I saw a nasty, vindictive side to him - I also formed the opinion that he was more of a grifter who realised there was a gap in the market for people who spoke out and was using his channel to build a pay wall. That is why I unsubscribed and forgot him. However, looking forward to the Vine/Belfied battle as I dislike both individuals.
He never ever replied to any comments, why.
Flash in the pan.
Yes I agree to me he seems phoney and very arrogant
And don't forget his unhealthy obsession with Katie Price and Kerry Katona 😳
BBC never goes away its in the blood
I used to watch Belfield, but became bored with his repetitive rants.
Never went much on his humour or presentation. Did appreciate his subject matter. Perhaps his YT celebrity status ran away with him somewhat. Wish him the best. We need all the freethinkers and ‘spanners in the works types’ right now in the fight against wokery and corruption.
Behave chunky
I am not sure where Alex expects to get a £1 aweek as he was okay but tends to just rant uninterestingly
Meanwhile Jeremy at TheQuartering does largely the same-thing and is still here for free.
Or for a UK example, Lotus Eaters and Mayhar Tousi both cover the same sort of things and again, are both still on here for free
The best thing happent to the channel, it got cancelled….and not before time. Revolting individual.
The police raiding him thing was supposedly someone claimed he made a bomb threat to the BBC, which he never did.
@Jay Smith He's going to try and sue people about a lot of it. I mean, IDK if he was joking but he's said they strip searched him. In my experience police are often awful. So I wouldn't be surprised if they were in cahoots with the BBC. They definitely did with the Cliff Richard raid. (Though I do think more will come out about Cliff in time.)
I loved watching Alex
He got me through the madness of the last few months.
He made me smile and laugh and was very entertaining.
I wish him well for the future but times are going to get
Tough what with everything going up in price so, who
Knows how many will be willing to pay.
I love your calm presentation Simon and I also
Wish you well.
Totally agree, well put.
I'd love to see him on his own platform. I'm still happy to throw him a quid or two per month in both support and appreciation of this talented broadcaster.
I love his channel too and would like to support him as he did for so many over the last two years.Some nurses here in New Zealand 🇳🇿 we’re well supported by him and I appreciated this.
I don’t know how to find his new channel but trust he goes well in his ventures.
In view of the politically guided incompetence of constabulary regarding thousands of raped girls and grooming gangs, as well as exemptions for politically correct statue vandals, the presenters assumptions about constabulary seem peculiar.
But unless we’re to put our faith in the mind readers of some latterly enacted Orwellian nightmare, we can all rest assured that your guilt won’t be required until proof of innocence?
I had have paid my subscription to watch Alex , he is one of the very few who tells the truth, the price of subscription is so small for what he does
I was a big fan of Alex and he didn't pull his punches on his videos but to be fair he did have an axe to grind with certain people. Very entertaining but do I want to pay now he's not on UA-cam? No.
Alex Belfield could be very entertaining and I did used to enjoy some of his videos. However, I unsubscribed as he seemed to enjoy referring to middle aged women in a derogatory fashion and being one myself I got annoyed.
Bel field is a complete misogynist…..
very entertaining how sad are you ???????????????
You are in error. He was open about the charges- indeed had been repeatedly inviting them so he could have his day in court. His point about not being charged referred to there being no charges arising from the repeated and plainly unlawful raids in his house.
Belfield’s Achilles heel is his cockiness. He makes repeated but entirely gratuitous digs at people who may well snap back. Given the target on his back already, he gives those who would see him silenced far too much ammunition.
I don't think him cocky but lewd. I found the police kicking in his door intereresting, if true. His story about contesting them for fear of being fitted up sounded reasoned. Police filmed with no identity numbers, too! Then what's with the barrister, now sacked. Then other alleged wrongdoings. True or false
He was open about the BBC and Jeremy Vine stuff, but I never heard him explain about the other complaints of stalking from other people, did you?
@@goldeneddie That's right. He has never outlined the specifics of the charges against him-ever. He's very selective in his reporting and is a fair distance from what I would call open and honest. Still, he lured some suckers in with such behaviour.
The problem i have with Aex is he comes across as bitter, he's often nasty and a little bile filled, i have no love for the BBC and don't doubt most of his tales, he seems to me to be one of the lovies, one pushed out by his other lovies, i'm not surprised he's found himself in so many difficulties, with his way it was bound to happen.
Loads of people said the same thing about Starmer/Saville, I don't agree with the suggestion Starmer stopped Saville being prosecuted or anything, but it's certainly not just Alex or the far right that said so.
Don't forget Starmer/Grooming Gangs...
Well begfield was a close friend of saville if you look.
@@chrisclarke6344 A lot of people occasionally spoke to/interviewed/knew of Saville, but that doesn't make them a close friend.
@@ConstantiaVerted not many had their photo taken with him while they have their arm round saville did they? Plus all his regular 'impressions' of saville sort of indicates towards liking him doesnt it? Plus his recent comments of taking ukrainian refugees so long as they are a mother and daughter under 40 so he could sexually abuse them, sort of points in a general direction of his thinking does it not?
@@chrisclarke6344 haven't listened to him lately , if he said that he must be losing it . When your audience fades you up the ante , sad really , oh well , what can you do eh ? Onward and upward !
He's pals with that other plank Davidson. Use UA-cam to get viewers then switch to a subscription service.
Difference being, Davidson despite being a shill is or was; actually funny. Bellfield is like a 70's Butlins Blue Coat, his 'humour' is half a century out of date.
Alex is a liar he never got banned, he uploaded a video telling us he had a ban which you cannot do if you had a strike.
He has got such a big head it's unreal.. he will be back on UA-cam when his new venture fails
Belfield is a classic narcissist who enjoyed stirring the pot and enjoyed making everything about him.
His lawyer acted for the likes of Savile. Glitter to say a few .he's not using money to sue bbc ..but defend himself against stalking ect .with a further 12 offences against him why didn't he say that 🤔
There is no far right. Just right and wrong.
Well said
There is no far left... Just left and left behind
If you base your fame on flinging out shit from your cage like he did then it's only a matter of time before someone flings it back, Katy Hopkins tried the same game and was rinsed in court of all her money .
Alex did shed a light on some questionable practices at the BBC, which is public interest. But there are only so many stories about Katy Price and Carol Vorderman that one can take.
I suppose he did leave himself open to criticism for declaring that people should not watch him if they disagreed with his views, while at the same time spending a lot of time looking at Carol Vorderman on social media.
No different to MSM
The thing is with Vordeman is the hypocrisy and that`s what Alex was highlighting. She flashes her jugs all over the shop and then calls `sexism` and `misogyny` when they call her out. She and all like her deserve everything they get
And he said nothing while he was getting his slice of the BBC. I think that looks worse when somebody knows & says nothing but starts squealing after the shits hits.
Personally I found AB's constant use of inuendo tiresome. He was constantly playing with fire and ....
1 pound a week from 35,000 people is......1,820,000 quid in a year...!!!
True, Alex could live of 1% quite easily, £182,000, or for that matter most of us in the UK these days live off less than Alex's 0.1% ; £18,200
He was very careful what he said whilst collecting his money for his defence, he didn't care about his subs or his channel once he made his money, had his holidays and filled his house wiith "art".
big leap from universal credit!
Yes he said he was a carer for his Antie .how long for two weeks
He's f.o.s....
The art in his room is almost as awful as his piano playing. Incidentally, that baby grand appeared from nowhere after his reported hardship.
Alex Belfield should be unbanned.
Thank You Sir for a very illuminating and informative Channel. I do feel AlexBelfield never said or did anything others did not without an evidential base that could not be checked. He is entertaining even if in a different manner but that is life. He was what he was supposed to be entertaining, interesting, showed a heart and soul if one was willing to see, human failings and strengths, sociable and liked by more than some knew. God Bless. 🙏💪
You need to brush up your maths --- if 10% of his YT subscribers, 350,000 ; (that is 35,000) each pay £1 per week that is a WEEKLY income of £35,000 !!!!!!!! Not an Annual £35,000. So it could be around £1.7Million -- eek!!
You said it yourself, Simon…
Trying to stay “ON THE RIGHT SIDE” of UA-cam is extremely difficult…
Of course, as most of us can easily observe… Staying ON THE LEFT SIDE is risk free. 🤨
Your OK Simon. You can't be accused or arrested for telling the truth . Bellfield used his platform to have a go at the BBC because they sacked him. It got very tiresome. He's a bit like Alan partridge, and Jeremy vine was his Tony hares 😂
Alex Belfield told the people who donated money to him that after his court case 'victories' he would donate the money to charity. Then shortly after this he made a video saying charities are corrupt and people should not donate to them. He also said that no charges were ever made against him, yet he has 12 charges of harassment coming up very soon. This will be quite rightly seen as dishonesty by Mr. Belfield.
And then he went to USA ON VACATION...AGAIN!!!! LOL
FIRST CLASS! ! It was all over the place! !! Drunken messy video on plane, though alcohol hits 3 times up there!!! N possibly tired but so many complained, his viewers,50k odd on average these days, can no longer see.
Probably not his finest hour! :-)
This channel has a very wise presenter. V shrewd gentleman.
Deals in facts and plays devil's advocate quite a lot!
Update, hes been found guilty and may be looking at jail time.
People having a go at Mr Belfield mistify me. Have you ever thought that that is his style. If you don`t like it you know what to do.....or do you ? I for one found him very entertaining and as for his `smut` well I`m very broad minded and loved his near the knuckle style and the way he danced around the rules using his type of polari, very clever. In my book a jokes a joke. He`s not perfect, far from it, and I disagreed with him a fair few times but please get off your high horses.
I think I got more decent, factual info out of Mr Belfield than ever I did out of the MSM put together. The `schoolboy smut` was a bonus 😁
you misunderstand me Sid - I don't have a problem with either Alex or his humour. It's not my 'cup of tea' but I quite like the fact that others still enjoy it (harkens back to a gentler time..) I'm certainly not against it..
@@deadpeoplestuff5686 I don`t think I`m misunderstanding you, if anything it sounds like you are agreeing with me.
I don't see how you got "more decent, factual info" from Alex then the MSM when all he does is read-out their articles to you. 🤷🏻♂️
@@dftfire you don't - you just get his take/opinion; that said, he does point out the madness and hypocrisy (for those who might not see it still) and he's also posted one or two gems (Matt Hancock) that once you 'see it' you can't 'un-see it' - so he's a bit more than a wet lettuce (still not funny though!) bygones
I don't think it's 'mystifying' why some people are against Bellfield. Here are the problems I've seen people highlight about him:
1. Begging and misleading? He begged for donations for 'legal fees' as if he were some kind of free speech 'champion', when in fact he has a series of stalking cases that he's being taken to court for. Stalking claims from a number of different complainants. See Nottingham Court press.
2, A Broken Promise? Having pulled in donations, he never did explain how they were spent despite promising transparency.
3. Possibly just a grifter? Many have complained that, having begged for money desperately and not explaining where it went, he went on to produce videos sitting at his grand piano talking about his lovely holidays.
3. Deleting Our Comments! When challenged on a video where the comments didn't stroke his ego, he deleted the video and made a counter-video telling everyone to f off. He claims to champion free speech, but removed that video because our free speech hurt his ego.
He wants 52 pound a year but is against the license fee! Ha! Good luck to him though. But there are better pundits here still and on Odysee.
Why should anyone pay a third of the TV licence money just to watch one guy a couple of times a day when the same guy keeps saying scrap the TV licence 🤪
I never liked the personal attacks, and saying "I love you" made it cultish.
I have to concur with you Simon, he was sometime entertaining and somewhat enlightening but I found him irritating and irrelevant at times and up his own jacksy somewhat, however, his stance over Police and BBC activities amongst other things is something that needed to be aired.
Having said that, his obsession with various nonentity ‘celebs’ became tiresome and his whole stick was fast running it’s course, I miss him on UA-cam though to be truthful but there’s no way I’ll pay a subscription to be blasted on a regular basis by his continuous, offer pointless, waffle.
I found him not funny in the slightest ..But he did highlight some good points with regards what's happening to our country...
Oh dear where will you go now he's gone?
Maybe Lotus Eaters, PJW, Spiked, Lotus Eaters, Triggernometry, Spectator, Mayhar Tousi... face it, there's no-shortage of alternatives
Good at first but i cant stand to look at him now
He who speaks the truth and becomes popular gets you cancelled, I am amazed Russel Brand still gets away with all the truths about government corruption along with corporations with self interest's that he has uncovered, all backed up with evidence, especially when you take into account he has 5 million subs and growing as of now, I highly recommend him btw.
One would assume Mr Brand likes a big dinner on a Friday night then.
Brand is an obnoxious twat who will jump ship when it suits him.
@@enzedpatriot3040
Just some fun.
I was watching a YT clip about Black Pete, the Dutch helper of their Santa.
The presenter took a walk around a British park asking random people their views and lo and behold there was Brand with a nice girlie wheeling a pram.
Of course they were extremely shocked by Black Pete.
At that time I doubt Brand wouldn't have acknowledged any child he may have fathered never mind pushed it in a pram. These friggers are for sale, and quite cheaply at that.
@@enzedpatriot3040 Even when what he says happens to be true.
I don't know the man personally, I'm fairly sure you don't either. "Don't shoot the messenger comes to mind" Perhaps you are like Bellend and have a hatred towards Russel just as Bellend does with Katie Price and alike, the mind boggles. "True Brit's" what sort of idiot are you.
@@enzedpatriot3040 Brand and Blowhard are of a similar ilk, in that respect.
I subscribed to Bellfield 'for a while', and found him interesting and funny, but then he relentlessly attacked cyclists, fat people, gay people and others time and time again - for no good reason! He attacked GB news which I also enjoy watching, reckoned he had more views on his YT channel than they did, which was another BS statement! Can't stand Bellfield now, he's such an arrogant twerp, full of himself, and obsessed with his pending legal cases! When people ring his phone line, he cannot help himself, and always twists the callers' subject around to talking about his own cases, which I'm now sick of hearing about. So I took his advice, and switched off my subscription and stopped watching his shenanigans.
Gb news is a useful debut in this nation
@@andybray9791 any chance of English? Then I might agree with your sentiment!
I remember as the Covid shutdown began, that he acted terribly to a young lad who felt the response was over the top and that restrictions should end.
But be honest alex actually trusted the NHS and State info on the topic, It was only as the scare wore on culminating in that FOI document that showed the truth that many came of the fence and saw the statistical light
Absolutely brilliant 👋👋👋. I unsubscribed TVOR, after the host mentioned mental health and alcoholics. He said he had never suffered these ailments. I therefore do not appreciate him opinions on this subject. This was shortly after I give a small donation and made a congratulations video. On the growth of TVOR. Good luck to the Ginger Tom in his new venture but no payed sub from me, I'm afraid. Great channel Sir 👍😁👋👋👋
@cupidstunts.stcmedia.6618
Paid. I know the conventions of English spelling are less than consistent, but they are what they are.
Point of order Mr Chairman. Telegram is not actually used by ‘some people on the far right’ any more than by some people on the far left.
I agree, using the "woke" language.
He was generally a fantasist and liar, he made a lot of money out of public donations for his “legal battle” with the police etc.
So Belfield is guilty of not self-censoring enough. The state of the UK now.
Remember that just because allegations are made it does not mean they are true.
He must of made a few million in donations, his got a nice house in Nottingham and goes on lots of holidays it’s a bit fishy
Must of?
Fishy? Shushy shushy
@@jamesjameson4566 hello chunky 🤭
He’s a grifter, what’s funnier is that people actually fell for it
Thats all he talks about now. his selling his bloody tickets
A Bel regurgitates Msm.
He's a DONATIONS grabber..
£52 a year is too much. It's a third of the TV licence for a lot less hours of content.
You had no police kicking down your front door yet
Three times.
Alex has seen the dark heart of the BBC.
I'll be more interested to see how he gets on with the 12 incidents of harassment. He did say he would return any money not used by the gofundme campaign (he had previously said no one should ever donate to a gofundme campaign). After he had the money he said he couldn't return it. I always liked Alex, but now I'm not so sure.
Or back door, as Belfield used to joke ad infinitum/nauseam...
I always felt he was trying to piggy back off bigger and better channels that got silenced by using a victimhood narrative. Certainly his ego overshadows any salient points he may make, just cant stand the chap as he doesn't come across as sincere.
The truth is very powerful and a great threat to freemason/jesuit satanists who control our governments and have brainwashed the masses.
I unsubscribed to him when he started dumping on mothers. I personally found him condescending. Rarely amusing.
I believe that the 25K was a fine imposed because his legal team requested more time because they had failed to submit legal papers in time for the preliminary hearing.
As an American I can not understand how limited speech is in other countries. It is odd to me that you can push any limit. Words are words. Its the actions that are more revealing. To punish a person for using words seem to me an omission of guilt. If it isn’t true it would not bother you. If you are offended then there was truth to the statement. Alex is honest. Which pissed a lot of liars off.
The truth is very powerful and a great threat to freemason/jesuit satanists who control our governments and have brainwashed the masses.
_"Alex is honest"_ Bwaaaahahahahahahahahahaha. Funniest comment I've read all week.
@@swoop1352 lost my tea at that.
Belfield ended up perpetuating his own fears and nervousness disguised as an upper class opinionated person. It started off well disguised, but he got a little bit of popularity which encouraged him to go balls deep and reveal himself as quite a nasty person.
I thank UA-cam that you have been introduced to me, appreciate everything you do
He was getting a bit too big for his boots
I live in Queensland, Australia. Because I'm not vaccinated, I'm banned from all social and recreational facilities (pubs, restaurants, cinemas, museums sporting venues etc.) Even though, their own immunisation protocol states that there must be no coercion, manipulation or undue pressure the Queensland government deprive me of a lifestyle which I've taken for granted for decades; but that's not called harassment.
Have the jab then! Why won't you?
if you think starmer and the angry mob was not a set-up ye need a rest and a cup of tea. what with tunnels and provided cars and close protection security . Same players doing aggressive shouting same actors come on Government we are getting bored with the same faces pretending to be angry public.
I'm sure he does know it was all a setup, but is smart enough to realise that certain topics are verboten. The privileged have a certain protection that the little people do not.
I find it amusing that Alex has always boasted that he is a professional and that he knows exactly what he can and can't say to avoid being removed from UA-cam. I suppose he's telling himself that into a mirror as we speak. 🤣
Not really...
True he knew what constituted free speech in our Country... But there again does free speech actually exist ?
You tube has it's own rules and I am sure it will have it's own take/ slant on how they are to be applied.
But for sure out there the Democrat Party USA seems to have a big pull on this ... I love the expression CNN Clinton's News Network.
@@markdowns9607 Then go and watch his criticism of others who got removed. He always said he knew the boundaries to avoid being taken down. So YES really.
Except UA-cam keep changing the rules.You a guardian reader?
@@JoeBlowUK stick to reading the Guardian and do remember to pay your TV licence fee.
@@markdowns9607 Ah, the sign of an argument won, when your opponent resorts to insults when he has nothing more to add to his argument. 🤣
I'm not going to pay £52 a year only to switch channels within 30 seconds 90% of time
It is a stretch to say Belfield was in any way responsible for the outrage against Starmer. Moreover, Starmer's protection of Saville deserves to be widely known, if he is to hold high public office. You seem to be providing a argument for the punishment of free speech and the exposure of important if uncomfortable points of view. Being banned by UA-cam is not a sign of bad conduct - quite the reverse. Being on Telegram is not a sign of being "far right" - it is a necessity created by the far left bias of other social media platforms. I do agree that he has made a professional error in creating a subscription platform - he would have been better off going to Rumble, maintaining a large online audience and benefiting from that support at his live shows.
Two truly awful people, Vine and Bellfield.
Amusing, direct and usually right. Sadly also relentlessly needy and a specialist in victimhood.
I am an American who quite enjoyed Belfield's honesty and straight forwardness. Removing him is a blow against free speech.
🤣🤣🤣🤣 You're probably considered intelligent in America.
The mob incident with Starmer was a set up. Come on, he could have taken a number of other routes and should have.
👍🏻 100%
Those people were shouting at Starmer to be a REAL opposition. I didn't hear much else. Surely Starmer must know his lack of REAL action against paedos as DPP would come back and bite him anyway.
6:15 35,000 subscribers paying £1 per week would not equate to an annual income of £35,000.
That's ok, he's only going to get 4 anyway.
Good spot and nice bow tie! 3thousand 500 paying a quid a week would be a fantastic income for most people in this country, that'd be an annual salary of 182,000 for a few skits a day... I'll be interested to learn if he achieves a 1% crossover!
It would be just over £1.8m a year ... assuming 35,000 do choose to pay, which is a big assumption. Alex's content may be amusing, when you can watch it for free. How many will really think it's worth paying for though?
I found Alex to be funny and not afraid to say what he thinks. If you did not like him or his views, you had a choice of not watching him. There are lots of things on UA-cam that I don't like or agree with. I just don't watch them. That is my choice. To ban someone because you don't like what they say is dictatorship.
Hmm, not many comments in favour of Alex Belfield. Maybe it just proves the point he often made " My haters really love me as they do not switch off."