Power Creep Incoming... | F-15 and Su-27 SOON!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 гру 2023
  • I'm excited for the prospect of these new jets being added.
    My Discord: / discord
    Air Models: airmodels.net/?aff=220
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 411

  • @user-lg4ht3kl4v
    @user-lg4ht3kl4v 6 місяців тому +15

    Can someone drop me an air model?

  • @Loudward__
    @Loudward__ 6 місяців тому +258

    Props to seek for literally dropping a nuke while being constantly harassed by his bad network connection.

  • @therealwildboar1007
    @therealwildboar1007 6 місяців тому +170

    I desperately hope Britain gets access to at least a late Tornado F.3 with AMRAAM at that stage.

    • @arbitercs
      @arbitercs 6 місяців тому +11

      they'll probably add it on the next patch after the december patch

    • @FakeFrenchGuy
      @FakeFrenchGuy 6 місяців тому

      im just waiting for the typhoon

    • @splabooshkey3343
      @splabooshkey3343 6 місяців тому +6

      I vaguely remember confirmation that britain will get a new top tier jet this patch
      If it's one of the planes on this list then likely a South African JAS39C, British ETPS JAS39D or gods forbid that premium Tornado IDS - that last one feels like an absolute slap to the face

    • @FakeFrenchGuy
      @FakeFrenchGuy 6 місяців тому

      dont even tempt the snail, another tornado would be criminal @@splabooshkey3343

    • @cuttlefishrampant5241
      @cuttlefishrampant5241 6 місяців тому +2

      @@splabooshkey3343 I'm honestly expecting the Atlas Cheetah instead of the Gripen, and maybe a Carver prototype, the R-Darter and A-Darter missiles would at least give something other than a copy paste missile, even if the plane would mostly be a copy paste Kfir
      Edit: Yes I know they aren't on any leak list, but these leak lists are never accurate and they would fit better imo

  • @spamramm568
    @spamramm568 6 місяців тому +97

    I think the F-16 block 50 has to get access to AMRAAM considering historically speaking that model of F-16 never carried sparrows in first place, it’s a 90’s F-16 that never had the software for anything but AMRAAM

    • @Blanchboi
      @Blanchboi 6 місяців тому +10

      Yeah idk what Seek was talking about with the F-15 being the only plane to get AMRAAMs. PLENTY of planes will get Fox-3s - the F-16C being one of them.
      Edit: The F-16C Block 50 we have in game is also from 2006. Technically speaking the Block 50 can get up to 9Xs and C-7 AMRAAMs, but we're far from both of those.
      Hell, the F-16A ADF can get AMRAAMs (and almost assuredly will for Italy). The F-16A MLU also gets access to them (technically only getting C's, but I doubt that would stop Gaijin from giving it AIM-120Bs)

    • @dondelchulia3189
      @dondelchulia3189 6 місяців тому +4

      The pod on the in game 50 makes it a 2005 aircraft lmao

    • @KillerSniper55
      @KillerSniper55 6 місяців тому

      It would have been. If not for the fact that it carries a specific targeting pod from the mid 2000s.

    • @11Tits
      @11Tits 6 місяців тому

      Yes and we literally saw a video with thr aim120 on the f16 in game

    • @SeekerHead
      @SeekerHead  6 місяців тому +4

      @@BlanchboiI’m not saying the F15 will be the only one with AMRAAMs. I meant that in the US tree specifically, I could totally see the F15 being the only AMRAAM plane for now. It adds extra incentive to pay money to get the f15, rather than just being complacent with your current F16C. This isn’t out of the ordinary for Gaijin, look at how many aircraft never got AIM9Ls or AIM9Ms. As for other F16s in other nations, absolutely I think they’d also get AMRAAMs. The F16C I just think could go either way, for that reason only.

  • @verzache-
    @verzache- 6 місяців тому +87

    Top tier will be very fun with the 16 v 16 with r77 and aim120

    • @bruhhhhhh6267
      @bruhhhhhh6267 6 місяців тому +11

      For real like at the most 10 vs 10

    • @ccy0126
      @ccy0126 6 місяців тому +1

      If you actually played top-tier no one really even use radar missiles. It's just all ground hugging Ir missles

    • @tensor8804
      @tensor8804 6 місяців тому +2

      @@ccy0126 I'm using only radar missiles, and having more kills than with ir, lol

    • @bananomet4052
      @bananomet4052 6 місяців тому +1

      Spotted the lvl7 Phantom S player.

    • @bananomet4052
      @bananomet4052 6 місяців тому +1

      @@verzache- That reply wasn´t meant to you, but to @ccy0126. IDK why it didn´t tag him before.
      Just so you know, I completely agree with you and I was one of the first to protest on the forums the moment they implemented this horrible change. Even got a month ban there for it.

  • @bwhittv1446
    @bwhittv1446 6 місяців тому +56

    We’ve always had some type of power creep. Nothing really new. Only issues is that they need to fix the 100m ceiling for radar, lower play counter or revamp of ARB and maybe add ARB EC w/ Respawn, and simply increase the BR. I personally don’t think the F-15, Su-27/J-11, or Gripen will be broken but I do believe all these types of jets shouldn’t be seeing 11.7 and below jets.

    • @sixgaming2315
      @sixgaming2315 6 місяців тому +2

      I feel they should separate the new modern jets like the su27 and f15 from older gen jets like the mig 29 and f16

    • @vma025
      @vma025 6 місяців тому +9

      ​@@sixgaming2315you mean seperate the f16/15 and su27 and mig29 from 3rd gens? Why would they leave the f16 and 29 with the 23's and phantoms?

    • @pleseshutup
      @pleseshutup 6 місяців тому +1

      @@sixgaming2315 Aren't both F-16 and Mig-29 younger/the same age as their larger counterparts

    • @zayf1760
      @zayf1760 6 місяців тому +1

      I agree with everything, except that Smin1080p actually confirmed that the 100m ceiling was purposely made for balance purposes. Probably will stay that way for a while.

    • @StudleyDuderight
      @StudleyDuderight 6 місяців тому +1

      There used to be a matchmaking split that started around 6.7/7.0 that prevented jets and props from matching together, except when queue times were really bad. I hardly ever saw props when I played the P-80 and Me 262 back then. Gaijin should bring back the split and add a few more.

  • @ANDREWISNTSOGOODER
    @ANDREWISNTSOGOODER 6 місяців тому +18

    I doubt they would only give the F-15 AMRAAMs, here’s why. For one, the F-15 can carry 2 more AAMs then the F-16, and it can also pull more Gs then the F-16. That means it pulls harder, while carrying 6 AMRAAMs and 2 Winders. That’s a hella lot of incentive to grind for it

    • @juntingiee2602
      @juntingiee2602 6 місяців тому +1

      4 amraam 4 winder

    • @areyou0k98
      @areyou0k98 6 місяців тому +1

      ​@@juntingiee26024-6 amraam and either 2 or 4 sidewindy

    • @Jacksonflax
      @Jacksonflax 6 місяців тому +1

      @@areyou0k98 every hardpoint can carry an AMRAAM. so 8 if you wanted it

    • @areyou0k98
      @areyou0k98 6 місяців тому +1

      @@Jacksonflax true but usual f-15 load out is 6 amraam 2 windys

    • @Dregkar
      @Dregkar 6 місяців тому

      F-16 in game cannot physically carry AMRAMMs, F-15 only sorry

  • @thegalbenduck5306
    @thegalbenduck5306 6 місяців тому +7

    I want them to add the Eagle and Flanker this patch just to rub it in the face of those who said there is no way these planes are coming in December.

  • @seekerpro486
    @seekerpro486 6 місяців тому +4

    Hey, leaked content is always better then leaked documents.

  • @Evrimomono
    @Evrimomono 6 місяців тому +6

    I'd be getting F15 anyways but considering F16C did carry AMRAAMs, I think it should also in the game. Maybe not right away, but it definitely should.

  • @NXBXD
    @NXBXD 6 місяців тому

    Bet, I got you bro New subscriber
    Great videos man
    I saw a top 5 video of yours sometime back just a couple hundred more to go 🎉

  • @max5129
    @max5129 6 місяців тому +58

    I really wish to see permanent submarines this update or next

    • @bwhittv1446
      @bwhittv1446 6 місяців тому +15

      I had a blast playing that Battle of the Atlantic event. The role play of Greyhound was pretty funny too 🤣

    • @ijn4438
      @ijn4438 6 місяців тому

      There would finally be an actual reason for lighter ships at higher tiers as I'm fairly confident the Battleships would be absolutely hounded by subs l.

    • @mavor101
      @mavor101 6 місяців тому

      Me too

  • @SovietCat_19
    @SovietCat_19 6 місяців тому +1

    Fingers crossed for su 27 🤞

  • @lonurad1259
    @lonurad1259 5 місяців тому

    I literally said weeks ago so many people said the amraam was coming I would laugh so hard if they weren't added. This is priceless. Makes sense too why they aren't being added.

  • @KaguyasBeat
    @KaguyasBeat 6 місяців тому +2

    They have said many times that if one nation is getting Active Radar missiles they're going to be giving them to several nations at once. Looking at that list... yea. It's possible we see some planes getting updated like the F-16C and J-8F... which I'm pretty sure I remember them saying it will get PL-12s in the future when they are ready... So new planes and updates for some current ones.

    • @FEAR_Actual
      @FEAR_Actual 6 місяців тому

      They better update the F16C for AMRAAMs. Make it one more thing to grind, ezpz. It's not got an amazing radar but with that style of missile it doesn't really matter all that much.

  • @Soarnea
    @Soarnea 6 місяців тому

    wow this is gonna be so awesome!!! (i have only rank 5 researched)

  • @WeeabooShipPoster
    @WeeabooShipPoster 5 місяців тому

    with the addition of the F-111 and A6E SWIP im starting to think they might be approaching a point where EW aircraft/mechanic might be in the near future too with EF-111s, EA-6Bs, Tornado ECR, etc.

  • @sir_chonky_seal2421
    @sir_chonky_seal2421 6 місяців тому

    One must imagine people grinding to get these jets happy

  • @tylerg7954
    @tylerg7954 6 місяців тому

    I'd love to see a video where you'd put planes in a tier list, but unlike those that go from S to F tiers, they are BRs going from say 8.0 to wherever it ends up, applying the metrics used at prop tiers. I think it'd give a sense of the scale of compassion at jet tiers.

  • @vha1207
    @vha1207 6 місяців тому +4

    Even without R-77.
    Su-27 could carry 10 AAM, including 6 R-27ER/ET.
    That's a lot! 😬

    • @ursensitiveinagayway4016
      @ursensitiveinagayway4016 6 місяців тому

      That’s why I’m glad Russian missiles irl don’t work😂💀 they have worse guidance to get to the target and they hate pulling g’s on fighters but the amraam like it because it was made for it. A f18 or f15ex I think I’m right on the ex that it can carry 14 aam

    • @-..----.--.-...
      @-..----.--.-... 6 місяців тому

      ​@@ursensitiveinagayway4016source - trust me bro

  • @noahhuls
    @noahhuls 6 місяців тому +2

    if its the JAS39C it could technically come with 9M (due to it being in service with the chechs on their gripen C)

  • @KillerSniper55
    @KillerSniper55 6 місяців тому +1

    I have to say that I would be a little surprised to see the Su-27. It would require the F-15C to be added to counter it and honestly there were so many other aircraft they could have added to fill up some trees like the F-15A, F/A-18A, A-10C, F-111F for America alone.

  • @FM-hw8yv
    @FM-hw8yv 6 місяців тому

    Whatever happens, air rb will be even more hell then

  • @VillainVonBadGuy
    @VillainVonBadGuy 5 місяців тому

    Hope you get your 25k

  • @daniilzon6807
    @daniilzon6807 6 місяців тому

    Real excited for tornado ids premium

  • @Master_Gabe_Gaming
    @Master_Gabe_Gaming 6 місяців тому +3

    There was also a leak like 2 days ago showing a picture of a AIM120 on the 16C

    • @aceofluftwaffe6444
      @aceofluftwaffe6444 6 місяців тому +2

      Hell, even a 30 seconds video!

    • @Master_Gabe_Gaming
      @Master_Gabe_Gaming 6 місяців тому +2

      @@aceofluftwaffe6444oh yeah I forgot it was a video

    • @SeekerHead
      @SeekerHead  6 місяців тому +2

      It’s fake

    • @aceofluftwaffe6444
      @aceofluftwaffe6444 6 місяців тому +1

      @@SeekerHead How do you know ?

    • @11Tits
      @11Tits 6 місяців тому

      @@SeekerHead1 it was a video of a F16 in the hanger. 2 you literally can not move cdk files to be in game.
      3 you cant move like that in the editor.
      So please tell me how it was “faked”. Spoiler it was real kekw. Dont spread false info please.

  • @aceofluftwaffe6444
    @aceofluftwaffe6444 6 місяців тому +2

    There's one question that remains unanswered tho, what variant of the F-15 are we getting ? A Late F-15A could get Aim-120s, but it would basically be an F-15C.

  • @randomshoretrooper3608
    @randomshoretrooper3608 6 місяців тому

    I cant wait for grippin

  • @adriancoric1721
    @adriancoric1721 6 місяців тому +1

    Lee pointed out in his video about the gripen variants and their armament that the the czech gripens used AIM9Ms. So those missiles for the gripen are a possibility too cause the C variant is basically a all nato weapons compatible gripen

    • @p1ngu646
      @p1ngu646 6 місяців тому

      i hope that they give it the aim9m's. cause aim9l is that the viggen caries and those are not rly viable above br 12

  • @CommenterZX
    @CommenterZX 6 місяців тому

    this makes me happy and sad at the same time due to me not being able to play cause my pc got broken but ill be happy to watch when the update comes out:)

  • @crazygone5107
    @crazygone5107 6 місяців тому

    +1/2000 new subs here

  • @realtimeflies4679
    @realtimeflies4679 5 місяців тому

    They need to put these jets in hilly terrains with much less dense mountain ranges that are taller so you have a chance.

  • @manrinkato6697
    @manrinkato6697 6 місяців тому +2

    I hope the JA37D will get the AIM-120 too :(

  • @ivanvukadin3194
    @ivanvukadin3194 6 місяців тому

    For Chinese aircraft they littery said in the Devblog of the J8-F that it will recieve the PL12 when they get added and that the loadout if 6 PL8s is only a placehonder

  • @fenway4739
    @fenway4739 6 місяців тому

    Hopefully the F-4F ICE gets added this patch or the one after, since it seems that AMRAAMs are pretty close

  • @gummonster1
    @gummonster1 6 місяців тому +1

    What is so surprising exactly? I thought this was the way the games direction was headed ever since update 1.85, when they added the MiG-19PT and F-100D and first premium jet aircraft to the game?

  • @jordimiro2118
    @jordimiro2118 5 місяців тому

    Hey! Could u show ur graphic settings pls? ive just seen the JA37C video and it looks really good. Ty.

  • @brodykloster2102
    @brodykloster2102 6 місяців тому +1

    The f16c block 50 and the f16d block 40 will 1000000% get the amraam when it comes to

  • @Ryan-go6id
    @Ryan-go6id 6 місяців тому

    I really really really hope they don’t forget to get the F16C AIM120’s

  • @crimson4338
    @crimson4338 6 місяців тому

    Well, early F-15s and SU-27s were put in service without the AMRAAM up until F-15C/D (early 1991).
    But then, when the AMRAAM would be on game, F-16C will be put up in BR since the F-16C (in game) were put in service during the 2000s.

  • @LeLe-pl8jq
    @LeLe-pl8jq 6 місяців тому

    I think these vehicles are being added more in the consideration of giving other nations competitive BVRAAM capable aircraft. Japan, Israel, China, Italy, etc.. The F-15C (yes the C variant) would be a great addition to both Israel and Japan while the Su-27 would be a good all around fighter for USSR and China especially considering how it can only carry R-27ER, albeit six of them and four R-73s simultaneously (not sure the exact number but it has ten pylons). The Gripen C of course is basically confirmed, but then the only other option would be the F/A-18C (or for most countries simply the F-18C), a great multirole aircraft that could come to USA, Germany (Swiss), Italy (Spain), and Sweden (Finland).

  • @parallax9084
    @parallax9084 6 місяців тому

    They need to add the foxhound.

  • @ImFrenzyLol
    @ImFrenzyLol 6 місяців тому

    alot of people say its coming now im 100% convinced that its coming

  • @nyb4810
    @nyb4810 5 місяців тому

    What about R-27P/EP(Р-27П/ЭП)? This already familiar missile R-27, but he has a new guidance head (9B1032), with semi-active guidance to the source of radio waves (to the aircraft radar)

  • @Jaystarzgaming
    @Jaystarzgaming 5 місяців тому

    It’ll come in for Xmas and seen the vehicles in the Dev servers but most things will be changing not constantly but gradually.

  • @supermickey6196
    @supermickey6196 6 місяців тому +1

    spectrum internet would def try to interfere with dropping that nuke lmao

  • @nosk7611
    @nosk7611 6 місяців тому +5

    I think we now need $80 12.0 premiums only seems right to me

    • @spamjosh6526
      @spamjosh6526 6 місяців тому

      huh

    • @Migthunder
      @Migthunder 6 місяців тому +2

      I can't believe I'm saying this but we actually need new premiums 😂

    • @nosk7611
      @nosk7611 6 місяців тому

      @@spamjosh6526I’m joking that gaijin would add top tier premiums and make them more expensive again

  • @Frogg-YT
    @Frogg-YT 6 місяців тому +1

    if the su27 comes to wt soon im gonna hard grind for it

  • @ThatSpecificIndividual
    @ThatSpecificIndividual 6 місяців тому +1

    I wonder how they'll do in sim.

  • @05-1scpfoundation5
    @05-1scpfoundation5 6 місяців тому

    4 x AIM-7 Sparrow or upgraded AIM-120 AMRAAM. 6 x AGM-65 Maverick. 4 x AGM-62 Walleye. 4 x AGM-45 Shrike, AGM-88 HARM or AGM-78 Standard ARM. F-4S real life had them so i need them in game

  • @WalletWorrier
    @WalletWorrier 6 місяців тому +1

    If they just used early models and didn't add new missile types there wouldn't even be powercreep. But no. Gaijin has gotta Gaijin together more money 😔

  • @yeet_ma_heat
    @yeet_ma_heat 6 місяців тому

    Rank 8 Ground and new Top Tier Jets for multiple nations including new weaponry, seems to be a bit much for one patch

  • @a-10brrrrrrrrrrr72
    @a-10brrrrrrrrrrr72 6 місяців тому

    Im torn between grinding the grippen first or the f15

  • @Arc_
    @Arc_ 6 місяців тому

    There was a Q&A a while back on a russian site where gaijin just up an said the gripen was coming this year

  • @Scorchluck
    @Scorchluck 6 місяців тому +2

    It will be very funny if they add AMI-120/R-77 on F-16 block 50 and MiG-29SMT, and add F-15A and early Su-27S to the game, without fox-3.

    • @kennedy.nola_
      @kennedy.nola_ 6 місяців тому +1

      I could honestly see this happening

  • @shizouka7088
    @shizouka7088 6 місяців тому

    i hope they invest in their servers rn, the constant high ping and packetloss on every server even on high internet connection still bugs me up

  • @dh2tf
    @dh2tf 6 місяців тому

    i hope su 27 gets added its my fav plane

  • @mich421
    @mich421 6 місяців тому +1

    They did that Nerf thing with the Tunguska when they added the pantisir

    • @MD-wn4ui
      @MD-wn4ui 6 місяців тому

      Pantsir was the most unnecessary addition.

    • @LewisB3217
      @LewisB3217 6 місяців тому

      Yeah they did that so they could add an OP AA for Russia because they “needed” it (then they undid the nerf hee hee)

  • @jackgamer6307
    @jackgamer6307 6 місяців тому

    Power creep go BRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

  • @NotsayingJustsaying897
    @NotsayingJustsaying897 6 місяців тому

    LETS GET HIM TO 25 K BOYS!!!!

  • @jinx_rogue
    @jinx_rogue 6 місяців тому

    Its perfect f15,su27,gripen e,13.0🎉

  • @mightyzuis
    @mightyzuis 6 місяців тому +1

    I wonder if the su 27 flanker will have the thrust vectoring?

    • @SeekerHead
      @SeekerHead  6 місяців тому +19

      Only very modern Su27s have thrust vectoring, and I’m pretty sure they’re simultaneously considered Su35s.

    • @adyenmurry7027
      @adyenmurry7027 6 місяців тому +6

      Those are su35s

  • @stoyantodorov2133
    @stoyantodorov2133 6 місяців тому

    Introducing aim-120 and r-77 with F-15A and Su-27 seems a weird choice considering the early versions of these jets didn’t carry fox3 and could be implemented in the game alongside the F-14B. I hope the snail doesn’t give them a strong fox3 yet. Imo at this stage it would be better if such missiles are given to aircraft with at least some limitations like lightweight fighters with limited payloads (F-16C, MiG-29SMT, Jas-39 and Ja-37) or aircraft that are strong in BVR but ass in dogfight(F-4ICE, F-4Ej Kai, Tornado F.3). Not sure about France and israel.

  • @uberschnilthegreat22
    @uberschnilthegreat22 6 місяців тому

    It woud be a slap in the face to the F-16C B50 if it didn't get the AMRAAM, as that's what the B50 variant was largely designed around.

  • @neobrandeggen
    @neobrandeggen 6 місяців тому +10

    I don't think people realize how deadly am AMRAAM or R77 is close range, say around 8km, it's a death sentance. I bet a lot of people will favour these missiles over the Fox 2's being that they overlap in the loadout, ofc you would need at least 2 Fox 2's for close range, but I feel like the meta will shift due to the death sentance that is being close to anyone with Fox 3's, ask anyone who plays DCS.

    • @SeekerHead
      @SeekerHead  6 місяців тому +31

      the holy bible of war thunder, DCS

    • @Evrimomono
      @Evrimomono 6 місяців тому

      Your Fox3 wen Planet Earth:

    • @neobrandeggen
      @neobrandeggen 6 місяців тому +2

      @@SeekerHead Don’t get me wrong, I don’t want War Thunder to copy DCS, I just referenced to it because there aren’t that many videos out there of AIM 120’s being launched at a target 8 km away 🥸

    • @user-jy6cn3jy8g
      @user-jy6cn3jy8g 6 місяців тому +1

      ⁠​⁠@@neobrandeggenalso don’t forget that DCS is as close to reality as WT, devs of both games mostly only guess how those systems/arms work(DCS is just a bit more complex)

    • @jonathanpfeffer3716
      @jonathanpfeffer3716 6 місяців тому

      DCS is really really unrealistic about how it handles BVR combat, but you are right that close range AMRAAMs are scary.

  • @Just_Jet
    @Just_Jet 6 місяців тому +2

    They should make a special BR/Gamemode ONLY for F-15, F-16, Mig-29, Su-27 and other modern jets.

    • @TehShinegami
      @TehShinegami 6 місяців тому

      don't think gaijin even remembers that the gamemodes desperatly need a rework...

    • @crimzonempire4677
      @crimzonempire4677 6 місяців тому

      @@TehShinegamipretty sure they only really care about money

    • @TehShinegami
      @TehShinegami 6 місяців тому

      @@crimzonempire4677 that's the point

  • @varazslajos
    @varazslajos 6 місяців тому

    If they put the griphen, i hope thes put the Hungarian one in to the Italian TechTree

  • @ryannm
    @ryannm 6 місяців тому

    what does germany then get? a F4F ICE with aim120s?

  • @MrTarzan007
    @MrTarzan007 6 місяців тому

    FUCK YEAH!

  • @feraltrafficcone4483
    @feraltrafficcone4483 6 місяців тому

    I’m so excited for top tier to get even more impossible to play, lmao

  • @dutchdragon2472
    @dutchdragon2472 6 місяців тому

    I wish the F-14 could get them but alas, that upgrade didn't go trough

  • @FrantisekPicifuk
    @FrantisekPicifuk 6 місяців тому +1

    Things can change, things can get pushed back. That doesn't mean gaijin was lying.

    • @SeekerHead
      @SeekerHead  6 місяців тому +2

      Which is what I said

  • @Loubie2005
    @Loubie2005 6 місяців тому

    I dont think we will get the R-77, but more of the R-27EA

  • @carottefondeurenfer
    @carottefondeurenfer 6 місяців тому +2

    I feel that if the French get the MICA em it will get the same treatment as the magic 2, nerfed to the ground until the others keep up

    • @cadeyates2786
      @cadeyates2786 6 місяців тому

      For real the magic 2 just finally got buffed what less than a month ago.

    • @Blanchboi
      @Blanchboi 6 місяців тому

      Smin1080p confirmed the MICA is too advanced to come this patch. It will definitely come in the future, but it's been "denied" for the December patch.

    • @J7E_Enjoyer
      @J7E_Enjoyer 6 місяців тому

      @@Blanchboi but super 530Ds are possibly the worst SARH at top tier, its gonna be so bad using them against aim-120s, guess its time to put my mirage 200 in its hangar for a few months and wait until mica is added so i can be competitive again albeit probably in a nerfed state, they will find a way to make it 10x worse than it actually is and not share where they got the info from, aka they made it up

    • @Blanchboi
      @Blanchboi 6 місяців тому

      @@J7E_Enjoyer Yeah you'll likely find more success running full Magic-II's (maybe taking 1x SARH just in case). The IRCCM buffs on the Magic-II's are great, so you can still have some success with those. Radar missiles (meaning AMRAAMs) will likely still be hard countered by flying low to the ground, so it won't be too bad. It's definitely a rough road ahead until MICAs come though.

    • @J7E_Enjoyer
      @J7E_Enjoyer 6 місяців тому

      @@Blanchboi yeah true, i already take either 4 magics or 3 magics and a super 530d but withy AMRAAMS the disadvantage of having to maintain a radar lock could see SARH being used much less just because people with ARH can fire from relative safety as they can defend as soon as the missile leaves the rail

  • @star_lord_2046
    @star_lord_2046 6 місяців тому

    When is the update gonna be released?

  • @aviatorlewski9310
    @aviatorlewski9310 6 місяців тому +4

    8:28 to be fair the Phoenix is underperforming

    • @jaek__
      @jaek__ 6 місяців тому +2

      no

    • @aviatorlewski9310
      @aviatorlewski9310 6 місяців тому +2

      @@jaek__ yeah. Its not lofting as much as it should, and its slamming into the ground when the other guy is just flying low.

    • @jaek__
      @jaek__ 6 місяців тому +1

      @@aviatorlewski9310 every missile does this, the aim 54 had a historically poor hit percentage either way, its not meant for fighters

    • @aviatorlewski9310
      @aviatorlewski9310 6 місяців тому +5

      @@jaek__ the aim-54 had a 45% hit rate. Compared to the

    • @jaek__
      @jaek__ 6 місяців тому +4

      @@aviatorlewski9310 The AIM-54 has no kills in USN service, it's hit % is 0.
      In Iranian service I'm skeptical if Iran scored more than 3 kills against fighters throughout its entire stint in Iran-Iraq war.
      Only F-14 drivers would ever say the AIM-54 was ever useful in A2A as a fox-3 against fighters because they were butt-hurt about it constantly getting sidelined and cucked by the AMRAAM later in its service.
      Given how many AIM-54's were probably fired in Iran service my guess is that it's probably less than 10%.
      The AIM-54 is simply not designed for fighters and no amount of evaluation of anecdotal evidence will ever change that.

  • @Admiral.Gustaf
    @Admiral.Gustaf 6 місяців тому

    I still grind for MiG-29SMT its still half way since my laptop died i had no other way to play besides PC cafes

    • @Migthunder
      @Migthunder 6 місяців тому

      Damn that's tough

  • @avlanch_gamming9468
    @avlanch_gamming9468 6 місяців тому

    I think we should get f 117 to test stealth

    • @stoyantodorov2133
      @stoyantodorov2133 6 місяців тому +1

      Stealth is a whole new pandoras box. Idk how it can be implemented in the game. Sure, the F-117 is harmless, but that can’t be said for literally every other stealth aircraft. Most nations didn’t have stealth aircraft up until the 2010s and some don’t have them even now. It’s a similar situation to heavy bombers where they can’t be implemented in a balanced way.

  • @moelester6182
    @moelester6182 6 місяців тому

    Gaijin is just killing top tier at this point

  • @GWMsharpshot21
    @GWMsharpshot21 6 місяців тому

    I hope the tornado f3 gets amraams cause irl it carried then plus British need something competitive cause their not giving them the typhoon any time soon

  • @luuk341
    @luuk341 6 місяців тому +1

    If everything in that list comes out its going to be hilarious to fly top tier Japan, Germany or UK. I main Germany and so I guess we get a pass because the 29G is sort of top dog currently. But holy shit to be the only nations at top tier without R77 or AMRAAM is going to suckkkkkkk lol

    • @Im-getting-shadowbanned
      @Im-getting-shadowbanned 6 місяців тому

      Dude, UK top tier is 2 phantoms with 4 9G and 4 skyflash(aim7E2). And Tornado F3, worse to the phantoms in flight performance and gun, only better in missiles, but skyflashTEMP is not better that AIM7-F
      UK top tier is dead

  • @angrystalin
    @angrystalin 6 місяців тому

    J-11 here I come

  • @Daniel-gp1tv
    @Daniel-gp1tv 6 місяців тому

    How realistic do you think is it, that Germany will get the late AIM-120 Phantom?

  • @foundedcupid5286
    @foundedcupid5286 6 місяців тому +1

    launching rank 8 tanks and premiuns while at the same time the su27 and f15 doesnt seen a good marketing idea
    (and the leak list have the j11a that is just an su27sk a pretty modern su27)

  • @halolong5461
    @halolong5461 6 місяців тому

    F-15 lets gooooooo

  • @Squeaky_Ben
    @Squeaky_Ben 6 місяців тому

    You seem to forget something.
    All F-16s in game are already capable of carrying the AIM-120, just like the 12.0 Mig29s were capable of carrying the R-73.
    None of them got it though.
    What is far more likely is that there will be something like a Mig29 Late and a F-16 late, which get AMRAAM support.

    • @SeekerHead
      @SeekerHead  6 місяців тому +1

      If the source of these leaks wasn’t so credible, I’d consider that.

    • @piscessoedroen
      @piscessoedroen 6 місяців тому

      Wt can't have late variants of f-16c (block 50) and mig-29smt. Because both came in service with its fox-3 weapons stock. Also gaijin didn't preemptively put (early) designation in their name already, unlike a-10 and f-14. Which for f-14, literally only the early airframes has functional canard-thing that deploy at supersonic speed

    • @jaek__
      @jaek__ 6 місяців тому

      blk 10 f16s can't carry the AMRAAM

  • @theballingboi5360
    @theballingboi5360 6 місяців тому +3

    The idea of the 15, 27, and Gripen combo is something I called 6 months ago. I said to my squadron, "I guarantee the christmas update will bring those three because they'll flesh out a base for most nations to get ARH missiles."

  • @Cyktar
    @Cyktar 6 місяців тому

    Wohoooo Su-27 dogfight yay

    • @Cyktar
      @Cyktar 6 місяців тому

      I believe they should have either buffed F16 and kept Mig29 the same or nerfed mig29 and kept the F16 the same or just not change them at all. I dont know why they wanted to do allat

  • @therealflyingkat
    @therealflyingkat 6 місяців тому

    This gaijin leak guy is kinda like the Samsung's leaker IceUniverse.

  • @codexnrdc
    @codexnrdc 6 місяців тому

    I WANT EUROFIGHTER AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH (or meteor for the Tornados, all of them)

  • @harellevi3810
    @harellevi3810 6 місяців тому

    I just hope they make the EC maps choosable in the hangar instead of forcing players to play it when they don’t want to

    • @stoyantodorov2133
      @stoyantodorov2133 6 місяців тому

      I sure hope they also give the choice for having only EC maps. Those maps are a blessing for groundpounders.

  • @slow2serious860
    @slow2serious860 6 місяців тому

    >dead on arrival and people will throw a fit
    As if it stopped them from adding tornado along with proper 4th gens

  • @hydrodrift
    @hydrodrift 6 місяців тому +1

    If the SU-27 doesn’t come in this December ima sue you

  • @LarySeeAircraft
    @LarySeeAircraft 6 місяців тому +2

    It does not make sense for the flanker and eagle to come this update, gaijin has been hyping up the gripen so much. And if the flanker and eagle come the gripen is not going to be competitive against them.

    • @jaek__
      @jaek__ 6 місяців тому

      gripen is barely competitive with an f16c brah

  • @takenname7348
    @takenname7348 6 місяців тому +2

    We just can’t keep avoiding from them. Someday War thunder will and should have Fox-3 missiles, it’s just the matter of time. The is no reason to talk shit about how air rub is going to be.

    • @darktemplardelta268
      @darktemplardelta268 6 місяців тому +2

      Honestly it wouldn't be that bad if gaijin for once listened and dropped 16v16 for top tier for 8v8

    • @stoyantodorov2133
      @stoyantodorov2133 6 місяців тому

      @@darktemplardelta268 I think the chaos of 16v16 is somewhat balancing the game, because every missile gets at least some chance. 8v8 will really favour BVR planes. Just think about Sweden or France or even Britain in an 8v8 environment.

  • @CWHistory07
    @CWHistory07 5 місяців тому

    Well they were added, but still no AMRAAMs 😢

  • @Astral-no5dd
    @Astral-no5dd 6 місяців тому

    How many Aim120’s will the f15 have assuming it and Amramms get added?

    • @brecibros2469
      @brecibros2469 6 місяців тому

      F15 could Cary alot of 120s, so that's a good question

    • @carroteer
      @carroteer 6 місяців тому

      ​@@brecibros24698 for f15c and 12 for f15e

    • @MarkDrisch
      @MarkDrisch 6 місяців тому

      8 on the F-15C AFAIK

    • @evangalinsky2499
      @evangalinsky2499 6 місяців тому +2

      15A and C can carry 8 total AAM's, all of them can be AMRAAM. Otherwise up to 4 winders and 4 sparrows. the 120 is the only one able to be mounted on all AAM hardpoints.

    • @LewisB3217
      @LewisB3217 6 місяців тому

      8 iirc? Most will prob take 6 and 2 sidewinders or maybe just 6 AMRAAMs depending on how they do

  • @jereskaldump9545
    @jereskaldump9545 6 місяців тому

    Being completely honest F15, Su27 don't make a whole lot of sense as of now. We have a ton of planes (JA37D, Mirage 2000-5F, Tornado F.3, F-16, J-8F, Mig-29) that can outright carry active missiles or were the whole point (upgrade packages, see 37D for example) of producing the variants. Either gaijin just flat out adds much better planes to only some nations while compensating with active missiles (France, China, Britain), pushing the planes up even when they are already not too competitive, or hopefully, gaijin takes the opportunity to add stuff like the gripen as its inclusion would now be justified.
    However its gaijin so who the hell knows, add F-15 and Su27, leave britain with the F.3/4...

    • @stoyantodorov2133
      @stoyantodorov2133 6 місяців тому

      Britain is CNBT at this point. Idk why they are held back so much. The FGR.2 was carrying AIM-9L but the snail refuses to add it even if the plane has been nerfed and powercrept into oblivion and desperately needs it. The tornado is an absolute joke as well. Literally worse manoeuvrability than a WW2 bomber for some reason. Most nations get a patch or two to shine, but Britain has been consistently shafted for years.

  • @11Tits
    @11Tits 6 місяців тому +1

    Well we already saw a leak showing a video of the f-16C equipped with aim-120s they are the A/B version with the C camo.
    Before you call it “fake” please back it up with
    A how did he move the cdk files over to the hanger (you literally cant as a player)
    B how did he rotate around the aircraft like that with the mouse visible. You cant do that in a user mission.
    C why did the country list react to the mouse when it hovered over the names? Quite extreme edits for a game leak?
    The chances of it being fake are equivalent of the chances of someone writing the irrational answer to sqrt(-1)

  • @152mmapfsds
    @152mmapfsds 6 місяців тому

    Adding newer and newer vehicles is for if they would just change how the game is played. Different player count Different modes ANYTHING