@@itsaboutwhatsfair1532 if only instead djokovic played nadal in the semis, then federer would have won since djokovic won 2-3 matches on clay that year vs nadal. But then federer would have beaten djokovic in the finals since he he was able to in the semi's.
@@fedwrld7617 impossible given that Novak and Rafa were top two seeds. Could only meet in final Federer would've been in line to play both no matter what
4th round Hanescu loses to Gonzalez after winning first 3 rounds without losing a set, 3rd round against Gilles Simon. Gonzalez also being in the same situation with no set lost until that macth. Such a pity they met there. Hanescu was playing great, even better than in 2005 when he reached QFs agaisnt Federer and could have reached this time a semifinal or even the final with a bit of luck and Rafa's early defeat.
Amazing invisible shot
FEDERER should have won this French open 2011
That's from 2009, which he did win
@@redasdu84 oh okay...I assumed from the font of the score board tht it was from 2011
@@itsaboutwhatsfair1532 he lost against a better player in 2011 so what’s your point ?
@@itsaboutwhatsfair1532 if only instead djokovic played nadal in the semis, then federer would have won since djokovic won 2-3 matches on clay that year vs nadal. But then federer would have beaten djokovic in the finals since he he was able to in the semi's.
@@fedwrld7617 impossible given that Novak and Rafa were top two seeds. Could only meet in final Federer would've been in line to play both no matter what
4th round Hanescu loses to Gonzalez after winning first 3 rounds without losing a set, 3rd round against Gilles Simon. Gonzalez also being in the same situation with no set lost until that macth. Such a pity they met there. Hanescu was playing great, even better than in 2005 when he reached QFs agaisnt Federer and could have reached this time a semifinal or even the final with a bit of luck and Rafa's early defeat.
Oiiii