Defendant Ty Tucker Joins Court TV During Treehouse Murder Trial
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 лип 2024
- Defendant Franklin "Ty" Tucker tells #CourtTV "it's surreal" to be in the Treehouse Murder Trial and explains why he chose to represent himself. Tucker is accused of killing a man in a robbery-gone-wrong inside a property known as the "Treehouse."
00:00 Treehouse Murder Trial Latest
02:25 Ty Tucker Joins Court TV
14:33 Wife Lauren Jenai Explains "The Real Ty"
#CourtTV Catch up on the Treehouse Murder Trial here:
www.courttv.com/tag/franklin-...
#treehousemurdertrial #FranklinTucker
Watch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today www.courttv.com/
Join the Investigation Newsletter www.courttv.com/email/
Court TV Podcast www.courttv.com/podcast/
FOLLOW THE CASE:
Facebook / courttv
Twitter/X / courttv
Instagram / courttvnetwork
TikTok / courttvlive
WATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVE
www.courttv.com/trials/
HOW TO FIND COURT TV
www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/
00:00 Treehouse Murder Trial Latest
02:25 Ty Tucker Joins Court TV
14:33 Wife Lauren Jenai Explains "The Real Ty"
#CourtTV Catch up on the Treehouse Murder Trial here:
www.courttv.com/tag/franklin-tucker/?
Where is the burger King fella who gave rory the information.... could he possibly be the 3rd person not ty???
This whole case is wild...... how many defendants and/or lawyers are able to discuss the case like this WHILE the trial is going on??
Not supposed to from what I've always known
He is super cocky and that’s what is going to let him down
He's his own worst enemy. He's giving the state more ammunition.
I wondered that too.
Well we know he’s “crazy” who doesn’t take time served for a murder trial in Florida. He’s trying to go down as the ultimate non snitcher I mean he was thrown a horseshoe… who gets caught dressed in black, wearing a mask and brings a weapon and someone dies with someone else almost dies and gets time served and doesn’t take it.
This trial is so painful to watch.
The judge didn’t think he was doing a good job , he was at his wits end !
Judge on this case is very biased. In my opinion, he seems to have patience for the jury, the state, but when it comes to the defense, he is a real bully.
100%@@J-ellOplus he's so rude
@DoodleDo Actually he has given the defendant alot of leeway more than he really should he has even tried to caution him about the interview Travis did with LE and he has let it go that Tucker has been late everyday for court
The story should be more about a man who lost his life get justice…not about a rich woman talk about her defendant husband’s innocence.
It’s about both! The man who lost his life and the man being framed for a crime he didn’t commit .
@DoodleDo What reason would they have to frame him 🤔 your being ridiculous you act as if LE and the prosecution have a personal vendetta against the defendant
@@heatherann1560 The reason to frame him is to save face over the grossly inept investigation and conclusions that investigation led to! In fact that is still being investigated ! Good reason to stick to the story they floated to the world ! They know if they are caught in all the wrong doing in the last six yrs.there will be a huge settlement coming ,not to mention heads rolling! The lead detective was actually fired ,or let’s be polite and say demoted over this very case! If they are so sure he did this why offer him to walk,AFTER ,they gave Johnson the get out of jail free card. Because I’m not rude I won’t call you ridiculous-as you did me , just suggest there is more to this debacle than is being presented!!!!
@@J-ellO😂😂 He’s guilty as 10! and going down! 🤡
I just got done watching the trial today. He was awful in court. Very disrespectful Came in 30 minutes late with a Starbucks and did not do so good He thinks he runs the court room
He is always late he was late again today and the judge let him have it he has to be on time tomorrow
Why is this guy talking on line about the case and he is the one being charged ???
Ever hear of Donald J Trump? Oh, I guess not. But I’ll fill you in. He is what you accuse this guy is. Get real
The narcissism is off the CHARTS
Right?
It's insane!
Yes I was about to say he's just full of himself
I think he's lying through his teeth. Why would both co-defendants finger him if he wasn't involved? What would they gain from that?
Why would he not accept a plea deal for time served genius? What if me and my friend said you were an ass hole? I guess it would be true. Glad you aren’t in the legal profession.
@@tjhooker6130 That you Ty?
They got plea deals. The "getaway driver" only got five years.
In one of their police interviews, one of them asked the detective "so if I say Ty did it, can I go home?" Video CUTS OUT for three minutes (still unaccounted for to this day), and when it comes back on, the guy has suddenly COMPLETELY changed his story and is naming Tucker when he hadn't before.
A detective testified that his superior was feeding these guys lines. At one point, the lead detective (who has since been pulled from the case because of improper conduct), TELLS one of these guys "so I'm going to tell you what happened". And then proceeds to tell them a story involving Tucker that contradicted what they previously said.
All victims in this case say it's not Tucker. Paula is ADAMANT it's not him. What's her motive?
The better question is what's the state's motive for going after Tucker when all the evidence points elsewhere? They didn't even interview April (who the victims said did this) until years later. She (April) left graffiti on the tree house walls the day after the murder, alluding to homicide, and it was painted over. The DNA the state has completely contradicts their story, (victims DNA found on the same knife, same with the mask which only had Rory's DNA on it). Tucker"s DNA nowhere to be found.
Trusting that the state always does the right thing is unwise. Innocent people are convicted all the time when prosecutors prioritize their egos over the truth.
@@tjhooker6130 its shameful that you are supposedly a lawyer (youtube school)
@@murderwiththecourt7834well said, finally someone who is a critical thinker!! Thank you for saying all that.
So Guilty
It is surprising that he can fit his ego into the courtroom. Been watching not sure why he's being praised when he wasted a whole day on perjuring a witness only for it to be completely off base.
He can’t perjure a witness. Not possible dude. Best to back out of the conversation.
@@tjhooker6130 they spent over a hour this morning on exactly that. He was wanting to play a video in order to perjury the witness. So I'm not sure why you are being a dick
The court wasted a whole day. He said it would depend on the witnesses answers. Prosecution didn't want him to bring in those tapes. Wanted to know what part, exactly, he was going to use. Judge agreed with the prosecution. When it came down to it, she didn't answer his questions in a way he could bring in the tapes.
Since prosecution was already trying to shoot down his bringing in the tapes, they should have had their witnesses ready...if they thought they were going to win that objection. Poor planning on the prosecutions part. & they apologized for it. js
Totally 👍
This trial is painful to watch
He's a master Manipulator and his wife left him already but we wont talk about that,,,,,
I was wondering where she was.
I’m sure it is a very stressful time for the couple, I hope all works out for both of them
Question? Did he have a record before this case?
@@pokerpegg1623Yes.
Should he be talking to the media while he's on trial? I believe he's guilty.
That's what I thought...he is on trial...he has attorneys too...
It's ok. It's not the defendant speaking, it's his lawyer.
😂😂
He probably can't have an attorney because his new rich wife has probably paid off the homeless drug addicted surviving witness, and the lawyers knew that couldn't be a part of that without losing their bar license. He is guilty. A true innocent man would never represent themselves. He is one of those who has always been able to manipulate people and think he is smarter than everyone. I think they will find him guilty. What a dumbass.
I guess he loves the attention too much to make the smart move and shut up
Only someone with a superiority complex would do an interview WHILE representing himself DURING trial.
He has his own fan page too
Gotta do it while he's still free, cos he'll be in prison if found guilty
@@layna3638Tyrone and his wife are enjoying all the attention let's see how much she enjoys it when he is behind bars and the media is hounding her 😂
No, only someone who knows he's innocent and refuses to be railroaded by a bunch of liars, is going to stick up for himself so bravely as Tucker has. Too bad you all don't understand that he's doing this for every innocent person's benefit.
I have watched this trial and one thing I haven't heard the defendant present his alibi or tell his story as to where he was or what was he doing during the robery. I love the Judge in this case he has been so accommodating. This guy may know the case but he doesn't know the law.
And today, they played Paula's old testimony and she said she thought she saw/heard him after, but "not during the crime." I don't trust this guy one bit!
Then you've noticed the prosecutor never asked him because he knows his alibi is that he was drunk and knocked out sleep.
Tucker speaks calm like a good person. But the Jury has eyes.
Look at him : Cold blooded- liar -intelligent- fearless- bad guy- murder
This trial is crazy! He had a plea bargain?? This case is so wild!!! I cannot believe this guy is on court tv talking about his case! This only proves the old saying right, about fools and representing yourself?
And his wife is commenting in the live chat stream on L&C today...crazy, never saw that before
@@Judy-fi4zb Omg!!! I was watching another channel!!! Crazy!!
This guy is not dumb for representing himself. If his wife was done paying his attorneys, he had no right to her financial support for his defense, the attorney would have been allowed to withdraw, and hed have been stuck with a public defender that he wouldn't have had a right to being the same person from day to day or then being awake for the whole trial. They can change your appointed attorney day to day and if they fall asleep there's a split in the federals appeals courts about if that is ineffective assistance. His interviews cannot possibly effect the outcome unless the jurors are watching and then when one of them slips up as they tend to he'd have even further grounds for his appeal he's already guaranteed a reversal at if his wife saved that money in cade he needs superstar appellate counsel. The judge improperly participated and gave strategy advice 3 times trying to get him not to ask the same one question in front of the jury. He's doing better for himself than he could reasonably expect from a public defender when they are closer to Havana than Miami in the singlemost deep South point in the US.
Ty is stupid he will be in prison! He is making a lot of mistakes
I looked up the defendant and his wife, and saw she was banned from visiting him in jail before she bailed him out for baring her breasts at him in the visiting area. You couldn't make it up
OMG, geezzzzz!!
Doesn't surprise me 😂
Was that to spare other inmates from going blind?
She may have a lot of money now, but she still acts like she lives in a trailer and she has the meth mouth to prove it
WHY…why do an interview DURING trial? Insanity!
He is so annoying, I can't stand him.
TY is a killer!
Nahhhhhh. You wrong. 😂
He's terrible
It’s doesn’t seem like a good idea to discuss the case during the trial.
Conman
Wow. The narcissism is unbelievable! I feel ike I am watching a repeat of both the Brooks and the Summers trials! Of course, minus the antics of Brooks.....but close!!! All the same narcissistic traits are there though! If I were part of that jury, it wouldn't be long for me to vote "Guilty AF"!!! 😂
Brooks ran over a whole town of children on a holiday on video. This guy has both crime victims saying he's not the killer, the only person that alleges he is did not witness the killing, and he's got tons of lawyers on TV every day saying he's doing a good job. The last time a pro se defendant did this good with anybody watching he won and then the Supreme Court decided to never allow another one to argue in front of them.
He never shuts up
He was asked a question and didn't shut up SMH Court TV turned clown show.
He loves to hear himself talk
I think the woman at the Treehouse that was stabbed is going to be paid off by the defendant’s rich wife for life- not immediately so it can be hidden. I think she will lie on the stand if the prosecution asks if she is being paid off to change her testimony to say he wasn’t there.
My thoughts exactly!! And he is trying to come off as a saint. He was a crack addict! What was Paula selling in the Treehouse? Crack among other drugs! He had one tooth left in his mouth. He is taking his new bride for a ride to get all the money he can and is making a complete
A$$ of himself in court. Narcissistic know it all but he is helping pave his way to a life sentence!! Judge has been way more patient with this idiot than he deserves! Coming in late, continuing to talk over the judge and prosecutors even after being reprimanded to stop!! He is full of himself and blaming everyone for his failure as an “attorney “ but himself. Just shows he is not the smartest criminal around! He needs a life sentence!!
well then you're an idiot that doesn't understand victims of violent crime or the fact she already got her money back on the bail because she left him and that's why he can't just get a lawyer or remember that the only other surviving victim also said it wasn't him. Almost as stupid as thinking the guy on an ankle monitor is bringing the lady on her deathbed on an airline line in a hospital crack to smoke every night - the other version of this theory
He thinks he’s so slick soft spoken Walking the room nobody can hear him and he stands right in front of the screen hands in his pockets either broke desperate or rich 😅
Right!!! I bet he wasn’t soft spoken that night.
Sounds like he doesn’t want his kids to know the truth…
And his wife is funny
Right how his name got brought into the case lol … cause he was friends with the defendant and he made the plan with them at the warehouse he already said he was at the warehouse
Out of all the people in the warehouse … why would they say him
If the treehouse is an open place why not blame anybody else why just him …. Clearly he had some involvement
When has a defendant with his wife been able to hold tv interviews during a trial? Oh yeah, wifey is rich and has contacts..that’s it!
I'm going to take a drink every time Tucker says "evidence".
I’ll join you lol
People are laughing at him and her. Never seen a defenent go on Cour TV for an interview.
Guilty, Guilty, Guilty!!! He is ignorant and arrogant and does not know anything about the law!!
A 6 words questions and it took him 10 minutes to answer without answering it.
But “he’s doing great” yeah right 😅
Yep, typical Narcissist
This is so wonderful! Im so proud of you Mr. Tucker! You are absolutely right! "They" count on Americans taking so called deals for a PLETHORA of reason. We are definitely in the age of Aquarius! 🎉
I know all my neighbors no way there are just going to bring my name in a case that’s has nothing to do with me
Then he telling these stories about the defendants and knowing them lol come on now 😊
What a demonstration of how this guy bamboozled his estranged wife
The fact that they use words like strategy and you come across as genuine, tells you everything you need to know. This is all fake and they are lying
Who is fake and lying?
One sick individual should have lawyered up you could take the stand to tell your life story 1 up for mentally ill clearly the dude needs help
Mentally ill? He is a con man, its not a mental illness
They don't act like innocent people. They act like they're both up sh1t creek and working methodically to try and get out of it.
Why is he doing this interview?
He likes to talk
@@tjones756about himself
Johnson already gave his statement to investigators before he was given a deal. Why would he lie that you were there, Tyrone?
Exactly. People seem to be missing this point. Tucker in his brilliance (sarcasm) let the jury know that by playing his police interview
Not the defendant coming on court tv 😅😂. Where’s the attorney? 😅
16:00
He was using drugs and living in a warehouse that didn't even have running water!
If anybody watches the video and then watches his Tucker walks, exactly the same. Lefthand in his pocket! This guy is guilty!
Per se defense cases are SOOO painful to follow. This guy acts SLICK. It's a sham. I hope the jury can sift the muckity muck.
I know I don't have all the evidence bit I just don't get innocent man vibes from the defendant
I heard the judge denied his motion for subject matter jurisdiction 😂
This isn't the 💩 show you're looking for...really.
Those "jokes" are getting old 🙄. Its not funny.
He should be working on his case and electronics
He knows he's guilty!
He's manipulated Paula for years!!
(i.m.o.)
He's been with her multiple times a day during the trial and prior to her testimony!
Of course he knows the case better than they do....because he was in that house and murdered someone and slit the woman's throat he sits in the hospital bed with while manipulating her
He is quite the narcissist thinking he could do a better job than a professional attorney. The fact his wife could probably pay for a good one too and he still went this route? Saw him on cross examination and he made himself look like an arrogant prick! I hadn’t even seen or heard about the case; so that was my first time seeing him. I watched with an open mind cause of that and within the first 2 minutes… Yikes! Innocent or guilty, he really came off as a sarcastic, unpleasant person. Def did not help his case.
I think he could have been innocent but he should have gotten an attorney even to co-counsel with him. But obviously if they were offering him time served then they probably don’t have any evidence. I’m still wondering what evidence they have.
Me too
I think you would have if you were innocent. Seriously. He's not as good as he thinks he is.
He’s a fool doing it himself. I don’t know yet if he’s guilty or innocent but the jury isn’t going to like him wasting their time
He did have counsel. "Representing yourself" doesn't mean that you don't have attorneys counseling you.
His attny are constantly sending him info advice every step of the way. He's not the genius the commentators on court tv are making him out to be
Zoom on a hospital patient wtf
This interview is so *WRONG*
I wonder if the judge and/or prosecution will raise the matter.
@@geoffpoole483 Exactly. I'm shocked that this company has chosen to do this, as I think it could jeopardise the court case...
There's something just off about this case...
Sooo the wife left him? Why is she on here then? She still covering his legal fees. Bet she is. Idk try not murdering ppl & you wouldnt have these issues.
If it’s that clear he’s innocent then why would there any issue with a lawyer defending him? Like what would the disagreement between him and his lawyer be about? All this crap in the courtroom is for an appeal. He’s guilty in my opinion.
Prosecutors can be over zealous, and sometimes their motivations are not pure. If this man has no history of robbery and is not socially connected in any way to known perpetrators, then charges should be dropped. The plea deal with the getaway driver stinks. Totally unreliable testimony.
Good thing you aren't on the jury. The man is a con man and yes, he has a record for domestic abuse and he is a crack addict. The crack addict victim who survived has since changed her testimony, I am sure as a result of being paid off and given lots of crack... He strolls in late for court on a regular basis. He can go to JCPENNEY for his business man costumes, but probably has a wife beater on underneath and a crack pipe in his pocket.
If they had evidence to convict him they never would have offered plea deal. That said the smart thing to do would be take it because you never know what a jury will decide, but then to fire his lawyers! What an idiot. I could understand if he had public defender who didn’t care about his case but he could afford excellent attorneys but thinks he could do better WTF. He screwed himself
You had a chance to just go home and spend the rest of your life with and around your children and grandchildren , just move forward with your life a free man , but Ohhh Nooo you're gonna take the chance and let a District Attorney tell a Jury their version of what happened and You Sir are not satisfied with just rolling the dice on the rest of your life, You Fire Your Attorney and Gone Represent Yourself 🤔😳
I guess my question is ,, Who ties your shoes ?
Ole boy you have the right to do everything you have done, but ive learned in life that just because I Can do something , dont mean I Should
How can Paula say with 100% certainty Tucker wasn't there? It's said he was wearing a mask I honestly think she was paid off to say that or threatened
Such a stupid comment. Ugh. I can’t handle the idiocracy!
Guarantee it he'll be paying off some people for telling lies to say he wasn't there if he does get aquitted or found innocent. If found guilty, then people will come forward once he's locked up and say he tried bribing them....
People love money.
1. A mistrial was in order
2. Video Evidence proves prosecutorial misconduct .. There should be accountability
3. Detectives will lie
4. Never talk to the Police, they are not there to help you and they are not your friends
5. Go Eagles
Now that Tucker has spent so much time trying to undermine the witness who says he was there, I would have an expectation for him to take the stand if I were on the jury. I would want to hear from him exactly where he was, what he knew, what he heard, etc. in relation to the crime.
How can he take the stand if he is representing himself though?
He comes off as very genuine
Tell you what.. this is the truth of what could happen to ANY individual. You never know what you could possibly be wrongfully accused of & most people never believe it until it happens to them.
It has happened to me, though on a much smaller scale.. but right is right & wrong is wrong. There aren't many feelings that can compare to having to defend yourself when you haven't done something wrong.
I respectfully disagree, I think if you put yourself in certain situations, such as buying, selling, taking illicit drugs, surrounded with homeless and under the influence ppl, you're more likely to be in 'harms way' then just as you say, 'any individual'...although of course it can happen to any individual, more likely though to your lifestyle choices. just my op!
@@Judy-fi4zb
Paint all with one brush? Do you realize how you sound?
@@Judy-fi4zb only if they are illegal
What a TALL STORY!😮
They really believe he’s doing a good job 🤯
I know!!
I'm just watching him cross examine his co-defendant. I am way more impressed with the co-defendant at this point!
He posted that was his exwife
Imagine non lawyers wins
Why offer him time served after 5 years if he murdered someone? That doesn’t make sense. Sounds like the state is grasping for straws.
Tucker you are guilty period.
he wants to be talking about vacillating The word does not mean lying it means, wavering wavering does not mean lying means you’re just indecisive.
if there is only eye witness testimony placing him there, then there should be NO trial, No charges..eyewitness testiomony is notoriously horrible and most unreliable. i havnt been following this, so i'm not familiar with the case yet. whats the evidence, true evidence against him? if i was innocent, and they offered me time served, i may be very tempted to take it, because i'd be so terribly afraid of being put away for life etc...i dont know what i'd do!
Yep correct. There's only one witness who said Tucker was there (he took a deal to testify against Tucker or do Life in prison) Zero other evidence. No DNA, nothing but one witness who took a get out of jail free deal to testify. I could never convict anyone on the word of one witness who took plea deal.
There are actually two witnesses who implicated him. Rory Wilson can’t testify because he’s appealing his own conviction and his statements can’t be entered as evidence because Tucker has a right to cross examine his accusers.
This dude is a blockhead
This man just loves to hear himself talk!!! He just loves to see just how far his ego can get him. Annoying 🙄🙄🙄
Never met a white guy named Ty
He’s guilty
Sometimes confidence can be confused as being arrogant and sometimes arrogance can be confused as being confident. Humility always prevails.
Being sheepish/ overly humble, will get you steamerolled. One MUST be sufficiently assertive/confident in his situation.
Things once, I'm just going to get up there until the truth, I'm just going to be myself I'm just going to tell it like it is, I'm not worried I have nothing to worry about I didn't do this.
I like his court costume better
Tucker ? 🤮
I really really think this guy is innocent. A guilty man would definitely take a plea deal. The fact that he wants to clear his name is telling. The victim saying it wasn't him is huge. I really hope this trial ends with truth. Tye is definitely doing a great job. Good luck man 🙏
I thought so too because of that until I learned he has a civil case against the state, so if he pleads guilty, there goes his civil case..
Remember that guy who raped a 70 year old woman who died in the hospital from her injuries? He was offert a plea deal to but defended himself to. He was found guilty. And the boy in the box? He had lawyers but he refused the pleading and was found guilty. So you never know what the jurors do and that’s the 64,000 dollar question
Didn't he choose to represent himself because his lawyers were pressing him to take a deal? Surely if it was so obvious he was innocent, they would have been happy to take it to trial?
I agree. I was asked to accept a disorderly conduct charge when they falsely arrested me for assault. I was insulted because there was no assault and NO DISORDERLY CONDUCT!!
@Fluffylover261 "the boy in a box" defendent has a lawyer who gave him super bad advice. He needed to take the stand and explain his actions. The judge understood that and gave him a light sentence accordingly. The guy made some bad parenting decisions but wasn't an evil person and was not trying to harm his family.
Even during his trial…..to make a short story long.
Did you hear when the paula said something about the bloody blanket and he replied saying that he knows he was there he saw it come on these people are all drug addicts I think Mr Tucker coach miss paula she getting something out of this Tucker is guilty period.
💗💗💗
Will he be able to get in the witness box and testify?
Of course, he already did but it doesn't matter because he blathers on so much about himself while cross examining a witness, there will be no further need
11:55
WRONG...
This was NEVER presented. This guy is such a liar!
I was impressed that the wife posted $2 million dollar bail. Now I've read that "a Florida court has reduced Tucker's bail from $2 million to $75,000 after the initial bond deal expired." And that she is going to divorce him after the trial. He could have had a great life.
The guy is a con man, and I believe he conned this woman into marrying him because of her wealth.
I can’t imagine how stupid you would have to be to not see that man has so much reasonable doubt it should be a crime to convict him! 2 of the victims are backing him!! 😣
Seriously bringing him on Court TV ❓ what about the divorce of these two? She left him yet wants her moment of fame on court tv. Such a clown show. So he'd rather do time when he's found quilty. His kids will think worse of him then.
Yeah I saw post he made of them no longer married, she pretty much left him with no money home
He has a shady and dark background, was on parole when this happened
@@Wildfire983any idea where to locate any information on the marriage ending? If so, is she still paying his legal fees. Bet she is. Smh. Idk imo he likely did it
Why make media part of the legal process?
His wife worth 16 million
So many times these guys won’t give the families of the victims a family member back etc. because they don’t want their families knowing they are a murderer. All of that hurt to not be known as a murderer ugggg
Could Ty have launched objections during the prosecutor's questioning of Travis? I may have missed it, but i didn't any.
He didn’t object to anything when he should have. It’s his narcissistic attitude for not having an attorney.
How would you hear a get away driver
I have a feeling “someone” got ahold of a juror or 2 and paid them good. Just my opinion
How did this bozo and Paula have the kind of supposed relationship where he says I love you? Does anyone know?
There is no evidence if you’re watching the trial, you’d know that!
💯
Innocent.
It's shameful that this even went to trial.
The ONLY evidence the state has against Tucker is the testimony of two men who committed this crime. They threw Tucker under the bus to benefit themselves. It's extremely obvious if you watch their interviews.
In one of the police interviews, one of them asks the detective "So, if I say Ty did it, can I go home?" Video CUTS OUT for three minutes (still unaccounted for to this day), and when it comes back on, the guy has suddenly COMPLETELY changed his story and is naming Tucker when he hadn't before. Neither man names Tucker until the detective suggests it.
A detective testified in a previous deposition that his superior was feeding these guys lines. At one point, the lead detective (who has since been pulled from the case because of improper conduct), TELLS one of these guys "So I'm going to tell you what happened". And then proceeds to tell them a story involving Tucker that contradicted what they previously said.
It goes without saying that both of these men lied and changed their stories multiple times.
All victims in this case say it's not Tucker. Paula is ADAMANT it's not him. But for some reason, the state would rather believe the men who attacked Paula than Paula. The other surviving witness was shown a lineup of suspects including Tucker and said it wasn't Tucker.
Why is the state going after Tucker when all the evidence points elsewhere? They didn't even interview April (who the victims said did this immediately afterwards) until years later. April left graffiti on the tree house walls the day after the murder, alluding to homicide, and it was conveniently partially painted over before the detectives investigated it. For some reason, she was never even considered as a suspect.
The DNA the state has completely contradicts their story, (victims DNA found on the same knife, same with the mask which only had Rory's DNA on it). Tucker's DNA is NOWHERE to be found.
Oh, and the victims backpack was found hidden in the air vent of the "getaway driver". Interesting, given that the state's story is that the "getaway driver" (aka Travis Johnson) got "spooked" while Ty and Rory were robbing/murdering and drove away while the crime was happening. It's almost like there maybe WASN'T a getaway driver, and there was actually just two men (Travis and Rory) who committed the robbery, and then left together... like all the evidence (and the reliable witnesses) suggest.
Innocent people are convicted all the time when prosecutors prioritize their egos over the truth.
I really hope the jury holds the state to their burden. There is way too many innocent people in jail. We don't need another one.
So far anyway
Why have a trial, you seem to think you know everything and are writing a dissertation in the comment section 🙄
Why was Ty living in a communal house renting a room for six years when he’s married to a millionaire?? Someone explain!
I think he hooked up with her after the murder
She can’t stand him either
They were married after the murder. They were childhood friends who reconnected...
@@Judy-fi4zb so why did he live in a communal house renting a room while he was married to her? This is the question. Could it be because she can’t stand him either.
If you listen to her comments on court tv and her comments during the live chat, live streamed today on L&C, she is completely defending him.