Franklin Tucker Tells Court TV What Wasn't Shared in Court
Вставка
- Опубліковано 26 січ 2024
- Franklin Tucker and his wife, CrossFit founder Lauren Jenai, speak to #CourtTV about his alibi, their relationship and the evidence that wasn't allowed in the Treehouse Murder Trial.
#CourtTV Get more #TreehouseMurderTrial here:
www.courttv.com/tag/franklin-...
#franklintucker
Watch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today www.courttv.com/
Join the Investigation Newsletter www.courttv.com/email/
Court TV Podcast www.courttv.com/podcast/
FOLLOW THE CASE:
Facebook / courttv
Twitter/X / courttv
Instagram / courttvnetwork
TikTok / courttvlive
WATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVE
www.courttv.com/trials/
HOW TO FIND COURT TV
www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/
#CourtTV Get more #TreehouseMurderTrial here:
www.courttv.com/tag/franklin-tucker/?
The state has no hard evidence, amateur prosecutors. This dude has some balls defending himself,
He's a literal boss ! 😂
Thanks to both of you much appreciated and guess we'll see if we make it to round 2 but right now working on my motion to dismiss which make things much clearer for everyone. Thanks again for support it means a lot.
@@freefranklintucker All the best, I will be following the outcome and hope it's a good one!
Ty did a good job representing himself and making the prosecution look really bad. When he was being cross examined the way the prosecution was talking to him you could tell Ty’s gotten under their skin. Prosecutors don’t have solid evidence to prove he’s guilty and I really think it’s a waste of money to do this case all over again
My opinion. He had something to do with it all. He’ll get off. No evidence against him except one man said so. Not enough. Don’t care for the man..
Didn’t the other guy point the finger at him also ?
He got a hung jury but if he actually hired a competent lawyer, he would have easily gotten a not guilty ruling. He claims to not care about money so why not hire a lawyer?
The jury was 11 to 1 to convict...I don't see that as a win in total. Maybe for now, it is. Who knows what happens next time.
I read a post by someone saying the wife would not permit him to hire an attorney…I have no idea or there’s any basis to that or not.
By sheer luck, a fellow conspiracy zealot was selected for jury duty. He will not be that lucky next trial.
Source please, or stop spreading fake information@@brett19890
I also want to know. Hard to believe @@amberam7437
I want to give mad props to the jurors who were able to stand their ground during deliberations.
You think he’s innocent?! He will get convicted the second time around
@@bbginc694 No, not necessarily. I do think when jurors are in deliberations and they are discussing the evidence that is going to prove guilt or not, it gets tough to stand firm.
@@V.Oakley11-1 favoring guilty verdict. That should tell you enough to know the evidence is very strong.
@@bbginc694 whoa, I did not know that. Well I'd say he did better than Darryl Brooks. 🤣
I don't think he's Guilty, however the Proscuter seems to be after Tucker on a personal level.... Its very clear.
I wish they would of found him INNOCENT.
This dude is the worst type of thug. Charming,manipulative & quite cunning. His obvious cohersion of Paula when she was clearly in no fit state to testify was sickening. On the other hand I found Travis immensely credible. He's certainly no angel,but when confronted he owned his crime & is living the consequences now. I can't say I'm confident of any justice in a retrial either. The prosecution is weak, the judge indecisive & a defendant who knows how to milk the system.
Did you learn his personality type from the University of UA-cam?
I am so with you on this...he is a weasel !
Charming 🤢 🤮
Just because he is "charming" doesn't make him guilty. I didn't like him at first either and thought he was guilty but the more I read about this case there is no way I can say without a doubt he killed Matt. Did he do some shady stuff, sure but the way this case was handled was very shady!
Exactly my thoughts.
Ty really made the Prosecution look bad! He did a pretty good job representing himself. The Prosecution is wasting money trying him again.
Because he coerced witnesses to lie!!!!
They’re not if the details are correct about it being 11-1 Guilty
11-1 for guilty! Are you serious. Did you see the evidence? He wil be convicted next time around.
I think he will roll with a big lawyer this time and then he will walk. The fact they offered him(a murderer) a deal for time served for a few years speaks a lot don't you think?
@@Beano1986The court did not poll the jury, there is no 11 to 1 factor. Don't know where your information came from but it is not true.
He just won’t talk through his alibi…why? He really sounds like a jailhouse lawyer.
Please Help me understand HOW this is even LEGAL to "interview" a suspect while the trial is still unresolved?!!!!
Trial by Public Opinion ????????????????????????????
Free speech, gag order gone
Seriously! Plus he was on social media the whole trial. He defamed the judge on fb.
I will help you. The jury was already assembled. Their impartiality matters. Not ours. They are constantly reminded of the judges' juror instructions thru out the trial and deliberation. As long as they follow those instructions as they swore an oath to do, they would never see this interview until they were relieved of duty.
I agree that is so wrong, but I think it mostly back fires and makes them look worse
Hung jury 1)
2) no gag/free speech
3) not trial underway
4) he's also his attorney
5) what are you even talking about
ExclamationPointExclamationPointExclamationPointExclamationPoint
I like her. She keeps it “real”. True to herself & not worried about what people may think.
Lock him up for ever
Tuck get a lawyer man,you really pissed the prosecution off real bad❤
I definitely would’ve stood my ground. Like him or not…there is reasonable doubt.
The State's closing was so sad! They threw out a few things that they didn't/couldn't show proof of in court. Only meant to stick unfounded accusations in the jury's head. And then, to top it off....after the verdict...NOW they insist on the gag order?! LOL I don't know why they're even doing a re-trial.
He is so guilty, So since there is a mistrial, they go after him again, so I hope he doesn't get too comfortable.
Have you seen evidence we missed? I'd like to see it, if so.
@@Earthgal1964 this is old move on.
25:32 He never answered the alibi
Yes he did, he said he was asleep
12:55 !!!
Yes he does. He comes back. The video of him at the bar has conveniently been lost and he was asleep. But they won't allow the witness to be called.
I think Tucker paid her off.
Had he hired a lawyer he would have been done with this. His pride and arrogance will cause a guilty verdict if he continues representing himself. He has no idea what he’s doing in the legal realm, like objecting for appellate issues.
He did better than some lawyers I've seen.
What you see as pride and arrogance is simply trying to control my anger and disgust and while I may not even be a good lawyer cause I'm not a lawyer, it was enough to beat the dirty judge and dirty prosecutors even when the judge let the lie go back to deliberations. Now my lawyers who have 70+ years experience knew just like I did they couldn't win against a dirty judge but Pro Se does have a few advantages there and I'm a lot cheaper by the hour 😉🥸😘
@@freefranklintucker I was referring to what you said during interviews. Don’t get me wrong, I totally understand being disgusted and angry, as well as you knowing the case better than anyone else. BUT when your life is on the line and you’re having to defend it according to the law, you have to bury that pride and realize you’re playing a game where you don’t know the rules. A trial is so much more than just the facts. It’s about strategy, preserving the record for an appeal so you have a chance with the appellate court if convicted, creating reasonable doubt, discrediting witnesses, taking the stand with a lawyer on direct to aide you, etc. I get that there might be benefits for pro se but none that are worth my life behind bars. I’m glad you have legal representation this time. I don’t doubt that they agree with you 150%. We all saw the lack of evidence, the judge’s behavior, the prosecution, etc etc but a lawyer knows how to handle this. My condolences for the loss of your friend Paula.
I guess when you lie about something big like that it gets easy to lie to ur wife kids an everyone else
To argue a false truth is crazy , takes a special person
I think he’s had plenty of practice. He comes across as a compulsive liar. He believes his own bs
Dodging questions and not saying she/he didn't do it.
Hes dirty.
Guilty for me
Guilty 💯
I like her. She seems like a good lady. I hope she's right about him.
Don’t believe him. He didn’t answer Vinny’s alibi question. Just pointing at others’ mistakes and bad moves.
His alibi was that he was sleeping, I believe.
Love this guys energy ngl. Yall dont like him because hes a little cocky but he IS competent! The prosecution is so bitchy because they lost to a guy who isnt a lawyer. 😂😂
Na I don’t like him because he comes across as an untrustworthy, slimy and a con man. Oh did I also mention a liar too
He was offered a plea deal, which he refused. He would have been done with this by now. Why does the prosecution continue?
Because he’s suing them civilly for charging him. If they can get a guilty verdict it might help them in the costly lawsuit- which is more important than the criminal one to them.
Because they know he’s a liar. He just lied in this interview saying he was at Tom thumb but in trial he said he was asleep. AND his wife just said he was sleep. 🤷♀️
@@debsibson7071 actually he said he was asleep and then after the cops started canvassing the area and came by the warehouse and spoke to Travis and Big Scott, Travis went upstairs and woke him up and then he and Travis walked to Tom Thumb because he needed cigarettes
He went to Tom Thumb later.
@@debsibson7071 js
Has he already?@@2TurntKaren That would be a fun one to watch.
This case is so wild!! if you go Pro Se, you can give interviews DURING your trial, post on social media, and share evidence - or lack of - that was and was not allowed in the trial...... and that is not problematic??? While the prosecution's case is very weak, and Tucker did a reasonable job in his defense, if this does go to trial again, I seriously hope Tucker gets an attorney.
Why was tucker talking to her about the case and showing her the details??? I thought they can’t do that??
I heard that they aren’t even together now and getting a divorce already. But, he obviously didn’t do it. Why would you fight so hard? Why would he not take a time served plea? I agree with what he said cause they want you to take a plea and 80% of the time you do. He’s fighting back. It really does show that he didn’t do it to me. The evidence shows that and he slammed the prosecution while representing himself!
I think more like 95 percent
They up charge and then say they'll dismiss and downcharge to get you to plea. Most people can't afford an expensive lawyer with the other side pressuring and wearing you down. It will cost most more than they ever could afford. It's like a conveyer belt almost
Ya very sad system
If you were innocent.. why would you accept a plea deal which would make you a convicted felon? Do you understand the ramifications of having a felony on your record?
@@IlicetWasn't he already a felon?
The state didn't prove their case, plain and simple. They didn't have the evidence. Regardless of if he truly is guilty or not.
Tucker was lucky, I feel he was at the Treehouse and was involved. He doesn't have a alibi, other than he was drunk.
Why on earth are none of those beautiful photos of them both on his Facebook ?
Just druggy demon type pictures!!!
Worst detective “work. Nonsense cops.
Yep he shouldn’t been able to befriend Paula before they had enough evidence
Interesting real estate names- The Tom Thumb. The Firestation. The Treehouse !
Typical for Key West. It's its own little world.
I dont think the state proved their case IMO !! I also think the jury cant come to a verdict!
Vinny why are yiu not covering the 3 chiefs men who died
They also didn’t COVER the Johnny Depp Trial. I followed that Depp Accusation since 2016. I wrote email after email after email to CourTV: “Why aren’t you covering the Depp Accusations?” Leading up to the Virginia Trial, I again wrote them: “Why aren’t you covering this?” They finally talked about it Briefly at the beginning of The Virginia Trial. THEN THE DEPP TRIAL BLEW UP IN THE 2ND WEEK OF THE DEPP TRIAL. Then: CourTV FINALLY COVERED IT. I finally figured out WHY they didn’t cover DEPP FOR SEVERAL YEARS:::: It’s that CourTV has a BELIEVEALLWOMEN Mentality. After The Depp Trial, I saw The Pattern: THEY DIDN’T COVER THE TREVOR BAUER ACCUSATIONS, even though it’s been proved it was FALSE. They didn’t cover the False Accusations Against Marilyn Manson, which were PROVED to be False. CourTV has AN AGENDA --- AND IF THE CASE DOESN’T FIT THEIR AGENDA, THEY WON’T COVER IT.
They GRUDGINGLY covered Depp because IT BECAME SO HUGE, and they acted as if Amber was THE EXCEPTION of the rule. It’s NOT. Amber IS NOT THE EXCEPTION. Many accusations turn out to be false, but CourTV ignores the stories.
I have NO IDEA why CourTV is ignoring the KC freezing story, but my guess is they have some sort of agenda.
He is guilty! He did it! Stop trying to get him off! Geez
How did you come to this? Guilty without a doubt?
zero evidence
@@byronfoppola8676 He IS NOT INNOCENT!
@@lwajid8021 There's no evidence
@@byronfoppola8676 innocent and not guilty are two different things
The testimony of the offender is enough! He was there and he did that! So he could be
“found” not guilty but he is not innocent! A weasel! Yes I see this devil!
He pulled the wool over everyone’s eyes!
No, just 1 person according to reports
Not mine as he's 100% guilty
I dont know what happened, but when someone asks, 11:02 about where you were while the crime was happening, and you answer anything but where you were, 13:13 it looks bad. Especially when you do it twice in a row. But props to man, he beat the state pro se, respect.
Edit: the reponse he gave, "my alibi is real simple, the video at Tom Thumb." Is not, " I was at Tom Thumb" and btw, I dont believe he claimed to be at Tom Thumb during the crime.
She tries to correct it, 14:08 "Ty claims he was asleep during the crime." Again, not "Ty was asleep." It looks bad, imo.
And if she would have said, "Ty was asleep", you would have argued that she was lying because she wasn't there.
Helping him taint the jury pool for the retrial?? Disgusting this man is guilty
Not surprised the jury was hung, because the prosecutor's case was weak - NOT because Tucker was a great lawyer. In fact, if he had hired a kickass attorney, he'd be a free man. There's an expression in French - "il pète plus haut que son cul" (He farts higher than his asshole.) Describes Tucker to a "T."
Lmao I’m sure that sounds better in French
I love this guy. He should be proud of Himself. Ty is not guilty
Thank you.
He really believes he didn't do it because he claims he was blackout-drunk! He made a mockery of the court and the judge tipped toed around him. The judge should have been more stern and not let his theatrics carry on. I hope he gets a guilty verdict next time. He is a full-blown narcissist!
I really do think that Ty is not guilty! His wife is beautiful! God Bless you through this hard time!
No, this is squarely on the prosecution for not having the evidence to prove beyond a doubt that he did it.
I think he is doing great. I don't think he was involved
Bucking for you Ty
There won't be another trial in my opinion it's gonna get dropped. Unless the prosecutor wants to embarrass himself again
My thoughts too
@@RcPlayer-tt2vw Why would they give a murderer a plea deal for time served I mean that says it all to me. Mainly because it just doesn't happen ever!
Ty's wife founded Cross Fit. She can afford to buy the best security in America . I don't buy why she can't be in Key West 😮😮😮
Kids
She can't stand him but there was no prenup. Tucker may be innocent in this case but that doesn't mean he isn't a scam artist.
They are not together anymore. She told other reports that, not sure why she didn’t just say it here.
She probably got tired of his compulsive manipulativeness.
@@lesliecas2695 If they're not together and they have no prenup he had better watch his ass
He was part of the robbery , know justice for the man killed know justice for Paula getting attacked.
I
I dint understand why the jurors didn’t have a verdict .???
Ok cool but how do you know.. are you basing this off emotions? Do you just not like the guy?
@@painandpleasure8704 know my comment is not based on emotion , I’m just trying to understand as I thought one of them got life , and then with them getting a hung jury they were all acquitted.
Please correct me if I’m wrong . Just wondering who was going to be accountable for the victims??
NOT EVERYONE ON TRIAL IS GUILTY! NOT EVERYONE IN COURT FOR MURDER IS GUILTY! NOT EVERYONE ON COURT TV IS GUILTY! Yall just dont like the guys personality. He doesnt care about what others think, hes being himself hes authentic and yall sheeple dont like it.
She thinks she's slick throwing in the fear card knowing people would be aware of her financial ability to afford a plane ticket and a babysitter, she's obviously not a Tammy Wynette fan otherwise she would've stood by her man.
I know right? I was screaming LIAR!! You get a babysitter even if for 24 hours and fly, spend the night and have a bodyguard with you if you are so fearful. But had my husband been in a situation like this there would be NO WAY I would be anywhere else.
@@andreacapaldi4300 right on!👍
He’s not saying anything that’s relevant
The state was having a hissy fit any time he brought up “what can’t be said”
Do you think the defense bought the victim? If yes, how much? Where is the money trail?
HE IS NOT TOTALLY INNOCENT
How does the legal system address the issue of forced labor and modern-day slavery?
He can’t answer the straight question. What did you do? What your alibi he skirting around it
I think he should have explained more of the dynamics of SoFlo/Key West some more when asked about the "shady" people in his life. I lived in SoFlo for a year in a nice quiet neighborhood, made friends with my friendly (but quirky) neighbors, had afternoon cocktails, helped each other during hurricane black outs etc. Then found out that many of these people had been in jail and were on the secs offender list. Blew my mind - it seemed statistically impossible but the truth is that sunny Florida really does attract transient shady people!
0:15: 🎥 Discussion about the survivor's changing testimony and allegations of being paid off by the defendant and his wife, with upcoming response from the defendant.
4:33: 🔍 Franklin Tucker discusses his alibi and phone records, revealing his relationship with the defendant and access to case evidence.
8:41: 🎙️ Franklin Tucker discusses maintaining composure during false accusations in court, emphasizing the need to present his side of the story.
12:47: 🎙️ Franklin Tucker discusses the importance of proving factual innocence in a murder case and the significance of alibis.
16:13: 🎥 Discussion about withheld evidence in a court case, leading to concerns about due process rights and uncertainty about the jury's decision.
21:06: ⚖️ Franklin Tucker discusses the benefits of representing oneself in court, the jury's perception of him, and his strategy of avoiding local jurors.
24:40: 💬 Franklin Tucker discusses his lack of knowledge about his acquaintances' illegal activities and expresses frustration with being wrongly implicated in a crime.
Recapped using Tammy AI
I was so disgusted with the prosecution lawyers and the judge in this trial I will never have faith in the justice system again! They have a personal vendetta against Tucker! They don’t like losing and they had made up their mind after they’re stupid and I mean stupid detective, who got fired, settled on this story!
I'm sorry but every single part of the investigation from day 1 should have been able to be brought into this trial. The investigation was definitely botched. I think if he was guilty then he would have taken time served like he was offered. Of course Travis took a deal of a lifetime since he was at the scene of the crime. I feel like even Vinnie thinks he was innocent. I do feel like he should definitely get a lawyer in the next trial. He did a pretty good job for pro se
If he is smart, next time he will hire an actual attorney.
Why is court tv intruding in the legal process?
This guy didn’t take a deal of time served. That speaks volumes. The states main witness is looking for a scapegoat. Shame on the prosecutors
All of a sudden he’s married and she’s love him … where was she at all this time?😅
You have got to read this article. There’s transcripts and other information I never knew about this case . I was on the fence about Tucker the entire time until I read this. Here is the link.
Comment below and let me know your thoughts . I’m interested now.
Tod O’Quinn’s interviews sealed it for me. I think NG
Tucker said he turned down the plea in order to prove to his kids that he’s innocent. I highly doubt hid kids even speak to him. They weren’t in court supporting him.
I agree
My son wanted to attend and my daughter had other obligations, but in reality I'm happy they didn't come but both my kids support me fighting this and wouldn't expect any less from me. My son especially since I rasied him as a single father until just prior to going back to Key West where he was supposed to come down in another 2 months but this happened ... I wore the pants and the apron for 13 years before this but of course that doesn't really fit the image they want does it?
He deserves to be in PRISON... You have to watch every single detail and every single person that was involved in this case! THAT MAN IS GUILTY!
I truly hope his wife is safe. I don't trust this guy one bit and honestly worry about her.
5:53
Narcissists are EXTREMELY charismatic and also VERY VERY manipulative as well!!
He Makes Me So Sick 🤢 I can’t watch. Sorry
I love you Vinny!
Key west is a scary place
All the UA-cam university grads in law are out tonight😂😂😂😂😂
I can't handle Tucker, and have always thought money exchanged hands to cover his butt.
Didn't see one photo or hear any personal info on the man who was murdered during this robbery. It was all Paula this and Paula that. He was killed trying to help Paula.
1. "You do realize that tomorrow you could be locked up for the rest of your life?"
No, that never occurred to him.
Do these talking heads on TV go to some special school that teaches them to be pompously inane?
2. He is SO guilty.
3. She is SO deluded.
Guilty!
I don't plan on watching it but does he give any details on exactly what he had been telling Paula in the run-up to the trial? "Be good" I honestly don't know if he was involved in the murder, but manipulating an ill person that is on medication is disgusting and the judge should not have let it go in.
Oh but u are going to comment on it tho u won't watch it . That's just ridiculous
@@loopy1159what people do isn't your business to Bash on them. Him and his sham wife are sickening to watch and listen to their BS. The marriage is a sham..they are separated because she wanted it. 2 clowns and their circus. You supporting them doesn't mean we all do. STOP BASHING ‼️
@@loopy1159 Hahaha! I watched a bulk of the trial and an interview he did while the trial was going on. I've heard enough of this clown. Again, what I saw him do in court was vile. That's all I need to see of him. Also, is spelling out "you" really that difficult? I'm sorry, that was petty.
the state wouldn’t bring charges against him and set his case for trial if he didn’t have at least a little something to do with it.
They brought charges because someone said he was involved. That does not mean he was.
When they looked there was NO evidence against him.
So you believe someone should just be able to say you did something with no evidence you did and you should be charged?
@@hazelhadley-britt6396 happens everyday. welcome to our corrupt “justice system”
He was fortunate to get a mistrial this time around as pro se. He needs to get an attorney for the next trial even if its a public defender. Alot of things he should have objected to that an attorney would have. Same for motions and things like that.
The Prosecution was totally leading on direct. In which, I’m 99.9% sure. You’re not suppose to lead on direct!
@@Inbetweenthelinesnow ya they got away with a ton of stuff that a lawyer would have caught. Leading and hearsay constantly.
NOT GUILT
He most definitely didn’t get a simple life without complications during this chapter of his life… hopefully he finds it after this situation is behind him
What is the case number of the dismissed defamation suit?
I think he speaks TRUTH
I got only 2 words "NOT GUILTY"
Wasn't this a mistrial?
18:40 I'm late to this trial. So what is this picture all about? How did it get him in trouble? I don't see any knife [if that is indeed what I hear them discussing].
state will go after him harder and now have more info from him
😂 fireworks AKA cash on hand
Regardless of the verdict, this man came across as being extremely manipulative. I wonder if the jury was polled? That would be an interesting piece of information.
Ooooo I love this. Pro se is a wild world. It’s like the Wild West. If I was his attorney I would absolutely make him shut his mouth just because now as we know, jury was deadlocked (which I agree with) so they likely will attempt to try him again. And the prosecution will run with this. But it also opens the door for him to play this entire interview if peosecution brings it in and overall I think it’s favorable to him. He comes off much more real and likable and human in this than he did representing himself. Which considering the prosecution is grasping at straws, I believe his arrogance was the biggest thing for him to overcome. Might be a good move. But for this trial, no I would not be able to convict him beyond a reasonable doubt. I’m 75% convinced he was involved. But I can’t lock someone up with that much doubt.
At this point it feels like the DA just got his felling hurt and want to punish this guy.
I don't get why they are trying this case again, they offered him time served and had a mistrial. So what's the point of wasting resources when they were satisfied with six years he served? I think it's about them trying to convict so they don't get sued fir what the time he falsely served in jail.
This guy is going to give the prosecution evidence by running his mouth. Supposed to take the win and run.
He was on of those shady charcters .
This guy was absolutely railroaded. Ty Tucker is not guilty. Period.
whether you like him or not, believe him or not, it's about evidence, lots of people look suspicious, are not likeable to the masses etc but that does not mean they are guilty no matter how obvious things may look as obvious things happen to every day people and that's why you need hard evidence, also this woman is probably needy of a man, you can have money but have no man and just you go for who you used to know how desperate you are as he is desperate too for a woman and one with money! so they suit each other if that's what that is, successful woman marrying a toothless druggie etc but that does not mean you can convict this dude of murder as i have seen nothing to securely convict and you can't believe the druggie get away driver, that is just ridiculous, bunch of druggies and it went too far but you cannot convict this dude currently and if he's innocent the hell he has gone, going through is ruining his life
I’m not saying he’s guilty, but I hate when someone has the defense on the night of a murder that they were drunk and passed out. That just doesn’t smell right and seems like an attempt to not have to describe any events because he’s saying he can’t. Does that trouble anyone else?
He is guilty
Your allowed to put what you want in closing, I thought
You can’t talk about evidence that was not part of the record. That’s what he was trying to do.
Only evidence presented in trial - and conclusions drawn from those set of facts. If one of those conclusions can be debunked by evidence that wasn't allowed in - it's a problem.