Stop Exploiting Women with AI
Вставка
- Опубліковано 20 тра 2024
- The voice of OpenAI's chatbot sounds eerily familiar. Let's get into it.
PureTalk: Together We Can Make A Difference. Learn More at www.puretalk.com/Cooper
Videos used:
www.tiktok.com/@verge/video/7...
www.tiktok.com/@chrisnolansf/...
/ ai_stole_this_poor_lad...
www.tiktok.com/@dexerto/video...
Don’t forget to like this video, subscribe to our UA-cam channel, and ring the notification bell so you never miss a future upload! / @thecommentssection
Become a DailyWire+ subscriber today to get exclusive weekly content! bit.ly/3UHJmVf
Check out the Brett Cooper collection now: bit.ly/3On9jrP
Follow Brett Cooper on social media:
Instagram - imbrettcoop...
Twitter - / imbrettcooper
Facebook - / brettcooperdw
This video includes information, descriptions, video, and images meant to give important context to viewers. By including this context, the overlaid commentary, criticism, and analysis is able to serve the public's interest in the discussed subject matter. Pairing the appropriate context with the included commentary allows the video to: (i) educate viewers; and (ii) document newsworthy events or other matters of public interest. To the greatest extent possible, the included commentary is intended to: (a) accurately identify the involved parties; (b) describe the subject matter in detail; (c) clearly articulate condemnation and criticism of the subject behavior while including an opposing view; and (d) to discourage viewers from engaging in the subject behavior.
#TheCommentsSection #BrettCooper #DailyWire #Reaction #React #Politics #Culture #Entertainment #TikTok #tcs #otc #scarlettjohansson #openai #womenexploited #protectwomen #chatgpt - Розваги
I hate when people get told no, but then they go and do what ever they got told not to do.
They shouldn't be doing it.
@@Vipernesshaha
That reminds me of Facebook wanting to become meta.
Some other company already had it, so Facebook offered them some money. They said look, thanks but like we have kind of spent more then your offer in marketing so to totally rebrand would be enormously costly as we have had the name for like 5y so that would kind of made all our marketing spending worthless.
Facebook didn't offer more. Instead they just started using the name and told the small company to sue them. Basically saying they would tie it up in court for years and dry up their funds
I hate it more when they know they will be told no, having been told before, and rush ahead with it before they can be told no.
That happens from childhood onwards. If a kid learns that your no isn’t no, then they’ll keep pushing it. Translates into adulthood.
Saying that they weren’t trying to imitate Scarlet, when they asked for her voice right before the release, is the FATTEST lie I’ve ever heard.
Exactly. That 💯 proved it to me
But it doesn't sound like her. Like, at all.
Technology has become so advanced that people can artificially create someone else’s voice. People have been taking advantage of this technology in so many ways and it’s sickening.😡 I personally am a huge fan of Scarlett Johansson. I’ve seen her in a couple interviews and she was amazing in the MCU for the most part. Her bond with Chris Evans in real life and onset is just very heartwarming. She deserves more respect than this.
Prove it’s her voice though. Plenty of people sound alike, and scarjo’s voice isn’t so unique that it’s immediately identifiable. She’s not James earl jones or Morgan freeman, and frankly, if there’s open and free data out on the internet it’s free to use to compile a voice. Cry about it, be upset, but there’s nothing that can be done about it.
They had it ready just waiting for her approval. But they didn't get it and just released it anyway.
We were so preoccupied with whether or not we could, we didn't stop to think if they should
Jurassic Park??
Never heard it said so wonderfully
thanks for sharing my story! Appreciate you bringing awareness 🥲🤍
Was just going to tag you in this!
It's disturbing how prevalent this is becoming.
Awwww I love watching your videos Michel ❤️
QT Cinderella on a Brett Cooper Thumbnail was not on my bingo card😭
Although I totally agree, with Ms. Cooper about this companies wrong doing. Stealing, disguising, and using people for profit is absolutely wrong.
The fact is, is that women are to be and men are to do. On a spiritual level men are sacred and women divine. Common sense enough then women are to follow men as per Biblical examples. The whole upset of the balance happened when feminism came into existence and then was embraced by both men and women as if it were good. Most of the legislation today is used against men consequently and women are just allowed to get off because it never was about equality and still isn't. Men need to speak up against the legislation that has been put in place by females and males that have supported feminism and feministic agendas that have caused more harm then good. Why we ever allowed it to prosper in a Christian nation is saddening to say the least. Yes safety to an extent, yes protect children until it hinders teaching them good work ethics and yes protect both genders. Too much protection and it becomes dangerous, too little and some take advantage of it. The standards for decency should be exact same. We need to stop allowing public servants put their opinions into law and rules for the genders.
FR THO had to do a double take
I think Brett covered the QT ai pron drama a while back if I'm not mistaken.
she should use herself bc theres ai stuff of her out ther
@@watchonjarcaught in 4k
You can disagree with her political views but you have to respect Scarlett Johansson fighting Disney and winning and now she's taking on AI.
Exactly
It will literally do nothing. There's laws against revenge porn. People still get away with it. OF creators post their stuff behind a paywall. Still get EVERYTHING leaked. And in an age where all they have to do is take existing examples from UA-cam of her voice, there's nothing she can do to stop it. And I promise you, nay, bet my entire life savings that this will just jumpstart more people using her voice against her. She's clearly never heard of the Streisand effect.
She's not going to win against ai unfortunately
Conservatives need to understand and embrace AI.
Her politics don’t matter in this case. I thought of Johannsen the moment I heard “Sky”, the fact they approached her makes what they did pretty obvious.
This is one of the reasons that one of the original creators of AI left his company behind. He straight up warned people that the reason he left was because it was going to get out of control and we were all doomed essentially and that he saw it going dark places but was too late to stop it. Now he advocates against it and hopes people stop pursuing it but it's too late. . .
This is...way more concerning to me than this Scarlett Johansson thing. I wish they would make more noise about this if it is 100% true
Fuck the creator. I don't believe for one second that he was unaware of the potential ramifications of his own technology. Now he's just trying to save his own ass.
You real think a llm will turn into agi?
are you referring to Mo Gawdat?
People are dumber than we realize, I twas on the same boat as to warning people about the dangers but oh well I guess people love having their data accessed
This isn't just a problem for women specifically, this is a society issue.
It's an issue for crybabies.
@@gruntgamer4204?
So would you then argue that men and women are exactly the same with no differences? And that therefore one is not more likely to be exploited than the other?
If Brett only knew about the AI stuff of her out there. 🤣
@@awayt640 I don't know about him, but there's a lot of ways to look at it... I'm not meaning to make this into an "Oppression Olympics" but rather to make the case that it's equal.
It seems to me that guys are much more heavily affected currently by A.I. taking the monotonous entry levels jobs that would otherwise induct them into an industry, where they could make a career for themselves. This is something women look for, and value very highly in men. It's effectively lowering the value of men across the board, to women. Much the same way women's value is being lowered, due to pr0n and A.I. deepfakery. Plus, as A.I. gets better, it's going to not only take those jobs, but the ones above it too. Younger guys especially are going to have such a hard time getting their foot in the door, they're more likely to give up, and retreat into video games and pr0n, continuing the vicious cycle.
Jobs affect women too, but not nearly at the same level because men don't typically care about how much she makes, or her social prestige. It's like saying guys aren't being objectified by deepfake nudes at all, but that's totally untrue. It's just at a far lower level than women.
So, I would agree that it's a societal issue as a whole, not a women's issue. Our technology is literally so good, it treads on basic human needs, and then attempts to give them back artificially.
Using someone's likeness to avoid paying them - Crispin Glover won a lawsuit for something very similar in Back to the Future II and laws were put in place.
Robin Williams accounted for this in his will, forbidding anyone from using his voice or likeness post-mortem
There have been plenty of cases to do with this. A company asks an actor or singer, they refuse, then the company hires someone to imitate them. It is illegal.
People argue though that she doesn’t own the rights to every voice that sounds like her, but there is more to it than that, they asked her, she refused and then they made a very similar voice. If they had just made the voice a little different and had never approached her then it likely wouldn’t be an issue but it is clear to see that they wanted her voice, how they ended up with it is irrelevant really, whether they used clips of her or hired someone to imitate her, it is wrong either way.
Also if they have a voice actor that sounds similar then why are they trying to get Scarlett too? Do they really want to have two nearly identical voices for their AI? Why did they try and get her to reconsider a few days before the release? There is just too much suspicious behaviour about it. If they used another voice actor then why don’t they reveal her or post someone of the recorded clips?
I dont think they were trying to skate out on paying her. Its the fact she declined
@@legendofsociety796 it's the same mentality as big tech when they want something a smaller company developed:
"Let us pay you for it or we'll just copy it and you'll get nothing should you refuse our offer"
You know what? I would love a Robin Williams Voice AI
@@nathanielalderson9111 I think we all would, but seeing as it goes against his last wishes, I'd boycott it should Disney decide to do it anyway and just eat the fine for AI Genie.
The community will almost certainly do it though and that can't really be stopped
There’s nothing more satisfying then predicting when an ad read is going to start and skipping it perfectly 👌🏻👌🏻 I’m getting good at it
What are ads
use brave
Sam3!
Same!!!
There are extensions that do this automatically :]
I must be insanely deaf because those two voices don’t sound literally anything alike to me
I must be deaf too. Because I don't hear them sounded the same.
yeah. it doesnt sound the same. and if its iconic culturally...are ppl so wrong to imitate it?
They have added static if you filter that out it is a direct although perhaps synthetic copy
Scarlet has a bit of a grind in her voice, and the AI does not. They really don't sound alike.
Umm... Im with you all.. Not even a little bit the same😐
That sounded nothing like Scarlett Johanson.
Ikr. Thought I was the only one that noticed that.
Oh hey I'm glad I'm not the only one commenting this.
I was waiting to hear her voice in the comparisons and I just.... didn't.
It sounds NOTHING like her. I thought maybe it was my headphones or something, but no. Still don't hear ScarJo at all.
Maybe they have low sensitivity hearing and can't tell people's voices apart. To me, the two voices sound pretty different.
Yeah I didn't even think it was similar
Young people more than ever need to go back to flip phones and delete social media. You won’t regret it I promise.
You first
@@natescorner😂
The 3G network is being dismantled in the UK.
Really all you need to do is separate fones from the cameras
Make cameras connect to desktop computers only
I already do that and live a much happier life
Look, some people didn't read the terms and conditions before they started using social media platforms.
Hint: everything you uploaded to Facebook now belongs to Facebook. Theoretically, they could advertise with your pictures.
They do advertise with your pictures. I read an article about a young lady who had her stuff used in a dating site without her even knowing it. If a service is free, you are the product
Yep and that's why I stopped using it.
It's worse if your using apple,no photo or video is permanently deleted as they keep a copy of everything you ever send or receive.
It's cold, but I have no sympathy for situations like the fake porn. Once you choose to put your face on the internet, it's public domain. People have made fake celebrity porn since MS Paint, the tech is just better now. I don't support it by not looking at or for it, but you can't suppress it if it uses material from the public domain.
@rydaddy2867 exactly. The only thing I understand from a legal perspective is if people are selling the images or videos to make money. Then you can sue for using your likeness to make money, and get compensated and the video or images removed. Same thing for the ad revenue from said videos. You could sue for that money. But for just regular videos and images, sorry, that's art.
Its definitely nothing like it.
ikr not even close.
Exactly. Totally different.
Don't know why this isn't the top comment. Probably because half the commentators wrote something like that in other words.
I used to be a voiceover casting director. There are many voice artists who sound like other famous people. We had a voiceover actor who sounded amazingly like Morgan Freeman. He voiced a lot of local commercials because of that. Smaller companies cannot not afford Morgan Freeman, so they get a sound-alike. I don't get why Scarlett Johansson is angry. She has a particular type of sound that they were looking for - she didn't want the gig - so they got a sound-alike.
Because they wanted to use her voice and when she said no they did it anyhow. I wouldn't want my voice attached to something as easy to abuse as AI. And they can deny that it's her voice all they want, the fact that they reached out to her to reconsider TWO DAYS before it was released proves that it is her voice, they just wanted to add her name to what was already her voice. She said no. They can't go ahead and do it anyway. I had two different people listen to a clip of that voice and they both immediately said "oh that's Scarlett."
@@katiemaine6994 the point is, it’s not her voice. It’s someone that sounds like her. When I listened, it didn’t sound that much much like her at all. So I guess it just depends on the person hearing it. But again, they were after a particular type of voice, and they found it somewhere else because she didn’t want to do it. It would be the same for an on camera actress/actor. If the role called for a tall blonde, and Uma Thurman didn’t want the part, they would use another actor who was a tall blonde.
@@tammimesce6537 as far as I'm concerned it IS her voice. And the fact they reached out to her two days before hoping she'd sign on last minute PROVES it. The work was done at that point. Do you think they were going to redo the voice and "make it hers" in two days? It was already her voice. They just wanted her name attached to it. She said no.
@@katiemaine6994 And we disagree:)
@@katiemaine6994 It doesn't prove anything - you said it yourself, its as far as you're concerned.
As far as _I'm_ concerned, the endgame AI being trained on comments like this and news media taking stories in general and running a complete clown rodeo is going to think humans can't be reasoned with at all. P-doom won't increase because AI is inherently evil. You don't need superintelligence to see how irrationally polarized people are, going from one extreme to another.
If anything, OpenAI's response is exactly what the problem is. PR optics and political ideology are infinitely more important than the truth across the entire internet right now. Everything is conspiracies and somehow everyone knows "the truth" that everyone else is hiding. If no amount of proof will change your mind, what's the point in even trying?
Neither alignment, superalignment, nor some ethics committee can save us if people don't start correcting their own behavior first.
It’s definitely concerning
😂😂😂 wait until world war 3 spreads over. People in the west getting too comfortable.
How, fake is always so obvious
@@PURPLE_HAZE.de. someone missed the point...
ScarJo ain't angry that her voice was used, she angry because she ain't paid.
They offered to pay her? She said no because she didn't want her voice attached to it. Two days before they release, they ask again. She said no AGAIN. She had every opportunity to "get paid" but she chose not to. They just couldn't take no.
Makes sense though. She was essentially an unpaid voice actress.
@@katiemaine6994 She said no because the moolah ain't enough for her. 🙄
And she's basically stupid: It's history in the making & now she's not part of it.
They offered to pay her and she said no…..
The voices are very similar, yes, but,...NOT identical. Whoever they ended up using as the voice, congratulations to her. The company wanted ScarJo for the sound and tone (and probably other reasons) but she said "no". She had a chance to be involved and chose not to.
This does not mean that the company is obligated to find a voice COMPLETELY different to ScarJo's. They found someone else with a similar voice but it is still uniquely that persons. There are people who sound very much like other people. If one person who has the sound you want says "no, thank you" you should understand that another person who sounds the same or similar will have no problem saying "yes, please".
I'm sorry, but Scarlett Johansson needs to settle down. The voice may sound "like" her,.... but it is NOT her. Some people sound the same or close enough. It is a part of life. Deal with it and move on. You had your chance to be part of it and chose not to. The fact the company wants a sound similar to yours (ScarJo) should be flattering and not a cause for anger. No matter what voice they end up going with it is going to sound like someone (maybe even someone we know personally).
Exactly there are so many people out there and just because they picked someone else. Your likeness doesn't Trump someone else's just because your a celebrity
Y'all bring up very good points.
What if they created the voice by using samples of Scarlett's voice?
@@WorldPeace21 They didn't, they hired a voice actor
They reached out to Scarlett asking her to reconsider TWO DAYS before they released the voice. The voice was already hers, they just wanted to be able to attach her name to it. You can't tell me that if she'd agreed they would have had any time to edit the voice and "make it hers." It was already her voice, and they had no right to do that. And a lot of people want no part of AI and would not find it flattering to be used in it.
If the movie "Her" didn't exist, I would never have thought "Sky" was similar to Scarlett Johansen. They're both deep, and breathy. That's about it. Could literally be anyone. 🤷♂️
yeah the manner of speaking ("personality"} is a little similar but the voice itself is not even remotely similar. there is nothing here people, youre creating a problem where there is none.
Yeah, tell the internet to stop.
...because that ALWAYS works out well.
If they wanted to prove they didn't mean to make it sound like her, they can always say who actually voiced it.
Apparently the voice actress has been asked to remain anonymous, and I can't blame her.
@@canebro1 It would kind of solve some conflict though. But Oh Well.
Christ is King
Amen
Amen bruv.
AMMEEEEN BRUDER
ScarJo is queen
Based and Bomb-Them-Ben is literally shaking RN Pilled.
smells like BS
I just came to see who was going to blame (all) men for this.
@real-ishstraighttruthnocha1687
Fr “it’s because of the patriarchy”
That's definitely not the message I got from this video. This AI tech needs to be brought to the light. I think we as men and women have an opportunity to take a stand against this.
@@painandsufferingmn It was a joke. We know it's AI, but there seems to be a rush to blame men for everything.
@@real-ishstraighttruthnocha1687 yeah I agree I clicked bc the title
Exactly they'reis a video where a woman is screaming. I'm like why are you yelling cause she doesn't wanna cook and clean everyday. 🤔That's not what men want no like that. They talked over everyone and clearly the woman who says I do everyday no problem. 😂🤦
This sounds nothing like Scarlett.
I think that taking someone's likeness is not bad. Anyone can take someone's likeness without even using AI by simply using a brush on a digital screen or a paper. The problem is using their likeness to defame and ridicule them on the internet, as well as use their likeness for profit without their consent.
Any human like voice they used would have sounded like someone on earth no matter what.If it sounded like me (a random nobody) does that mean I could I sue? Nope. So I really don’t see any problems here. They even tried to offer her a deal ahead of time which was nice gesture of them so they could market it with her name. Oh well guess she missed out. It’s not like they aren’t legally allowed to pursue the voice they had chosen just cause it sounded like another on earth. I see absolutely no issues with this whatsoever.
They wanted to use her voice, she said no, they did it anyway? How is that okay? She's not upset she didn't get paid because they offered to pay her, she's upset she said no and they refused to accept it
How is it wrong? Voices are not distinct enough to be identifiable. If I gave you 1000 voice recordings of similar aged respondents 1 of them being HER. You could not with 100% full confidence say which voice belonged to which person. You'd be lucky to narrow it down to the 10 or 50 closest. I agree with you on pics those r identifiable, and can potentially damage someone.. But voice? Nah.
@@katiemaine6994if they actually used her voice, then it would be an issue, but they didn’t. They hired a voice actress.
@@KirbyHenry10 I mean. . .that's what they claim. The fact they wanted to put her name on it two days before the voice released says otherwise.
@@katiemaine6994 you’re saying that they had a voice model programmed and ready to go and two days before the demo they reached out to Scarlet to ask if they could put her name on an already finished product? Do you have any links to this timeline?
It doesn’t make any sense, but if you have information saying otherwise I’m happy to look at it.
All the women trauma dumping online probably regret doing it now...
Good. They should.
You don't need to post anything online. Footage of people, fully dressed, walking in the street is enough to generate deepf4kes now.
@@user-ff8rs7gk6r???
@@nalublackwater9729yes...but it's more likely to happen to someone who's broadcasting their life 9nl8ne fore likes and attention. You know that
What does this have anything to do with AI?
Slightly similar but is different. Women get outraged of this and blames all men (eventually). However, when Ai are exploiting men. No outrage and Men don't blame women. Talk about double standard
"slightly" 😂
@@ftwan5277how else to explain the difference between 100% and 95%?
So would you then argue that men and women are exactly the same with no differences? And that therefore one is not more likely to be exploited than the other?
whose blaming men here? she's blaming Altman
@@awayt640 No I am not. Men and Women are completely different. Both can and are exploited in many ways.
One example is Men and War. Yes women had to fight for their rights to vote but the reason why men didn't have to fight is because like 99 or 99.9% of every casualty in history of warfare are men. Why? Men are biologically different to women that makes them able to perform more effective (more so in the past than today with modern equipment and computers etc...) like carying bodies, heavy loads or pulling things, or just anything require pure raw body strength.
Yes women can / are stronger than men in certain ways thanks to their bioligy.
That why men could vote because of the potential required exploit in times of warfare and draft. If we do get another world war or whatever and there is a draft of anykind then MEN ARE FORCED INTO WAR, whilst women aren't forced to deploy as women are naturally better care givers in terms of nurturing the young such as breast feeding (best way to develop a baby).
I am not saying women shouldn't or can't be in the military NOW, forget about standards dropped to suit the soft snowflake alphabet people so anyone with a brain cell and join the Military in pretty much any western country. It is simple men has there uses in the military and are better than women but same thing can apply to the flip side.
Women can and have been exploited in different ways. Sexually is a easy thing. Don't need to explain how women have been exploited differently to men with comes to abuse, harm, attacks or simply objectification.
However, I can flip that when comes to the R word and other kinds of harm where yeah statsically women or more prone but when it comes to the whole coming out and getting support. Female proposed victims get automatic support. If me as a male claimed I was R word then the support isn't there because of the stigma of men abled to recive any kind of sexual harm.
TLDR of this just to respond to the comment of me possibly saying men and women are the same with no differences and therefefore the exploitation is different.
No I am not argueing that. Humanity is f*c*ed up and we know that politics and being becoming more stupider by the day. The OG comment I was saying that This video topic gets public outcry like with X and other social media but when companies are trying to de-testosterone men by making them including my generation weaker, more submissive, more obediant with all the Ai Girlfriends and that utter BS. Yes that is offensive to women and everyone behind this should be involved in a iranian like 'helicoper hard landing'
I bet if ScarJo got paid she wouldn't feel so exploited. Besides, you can't copyright a voice.
They LITERALLY offered to pay her. She said no. They offered again, two days before release. She said no again.
Right, because then she by definition wouldn't be being exploited, the definition of which is making use of someone without proper compensation. So this is a stupid comment.
If they wouldn't have offered to her it would have been completely legal as training data from publicly available sources has no legislation. So, marketing her voice ir setting up as the brand ambassador would have been a marketing strategy.
Uh yeah, if she was paid for it then she consented and did it willingly. This is going behind her back to try and associate a product with her when she explicitly said no.
@@devanmol1202 Okay, so if a telemarketer manages to get you on the phone for just long enough that they can create a deepfake of your voice, and then people proceed to use it for porn and to make it seem you confessed to a cold case murder you didn't commit, you'd be cool with that?
Sit up straight, Goose. Your spine will thank you when you are older. Again, thanks for being my Social Media Intercept Officer and letting me know about this weird happening in our society...
The ai genie has been let out of the bottle, and I don't think there's a way of putting it back in 🤷🏽♂️
Especially with it getting upgraded every week and all the tech companies pushing it into EVERYTHING
🤣
@@slarbiterAI has been in tech for years and years. You just now hear about it because it’s the shiny new thing. Ever hear of LLM or Neural Engines? Same thing
I fail to see how a chatbot with a voice that sounds similar to mine violates my rights.
Guess impersonators have committed great crimes against humanity.
Maybe if it sounds too similar and the timing of its release is sus?
Because someone could use your AI voice to talk to your family and get money from them, talk to your bank, fake crime calls using your voice. Possibilities are endless, use your fantasy
Few obvious things:
1)As far as I know OpenAI used another actress' voice. Doesn't matter if it's similar.
2)Companies should be able to use without any restrictions youtube videos, same as ALL free content over the internet for the purposes of the AI learning.
3)If there's "commercial product" done(like ad) there should be some indication(like watermark or note in the end/credits) if it's done using AI, at least if it's similar to specific person(but it would be hard to prove, so ideally in all cases).
4)The regulation above obviously can't and shouldn't be applied if nothing is sold(i.e. some guy makes n*des of specific girl using AI and puts them on p*rn site for free). You don't own your images you put out on public, you never did. Same as "undressing with eyes" was always legal.
5)Ideally big AI companies can gather and start putting indication on all generated images, but with time free open source alternatives will start to appear without such an indication.
Now I have to say that personally I don't understand the decision to not give your voice to AI. If I was given such an option, I'd gladly have done it(prob even for free). This way part of me would continue to exist even when I'll be long gone
Say what you want about the ethical issues of AI itself, but regardless of what they may have drawn inspiration from, I don't see how Scarlett has any grounds to sue because they got someone that sounds like her. It's NOT HER. It's SOMEBODY ELSES VOICE. She doesn't own THEIR voice. As for the other women, absolutely, they have valid concerns, but Scarlett doesn't (or shouldn't) have any grounds to sue.
Can't wait to see what else you have up your sleeve!
Imagine being the voice actor who landed the gig of a lifetime. To just have it ripped from their hands because they sound too similar when it’s just their natural voice.
Brett taking this episode completely personally. If I were her, I'd be so worried about this happening, too.
Love your creativity, it's inspiring!
43 simps. bloody damn bot idiots
It's likely what they did was made a voice that sounds like her voice, but without actually using her voice lines to do so, because while it does sound close, it definitely lacks a lot of the features of her speech patterns and voice, and if that's the case, then they haven't violated any kind of property rights. You can argue that you think it's unfair or unreasonable, but if they did a random generally female voice not based on anything, it's almost guaranteed to sound almost exactly like someone. So then, the mere fact that it sounds like her voice couldn't logically be a problem, so the real problem must be that then intended it to sound similar to her deliberately, but functionally, there is no difference in it's effect to her whether it was intentional or not if the result is exactly the same, so for that reason, I see nothing wrong with this. That is, unless they really did use her voice lines to train it, in which case there absolutely is a problem with that.
I think that's why in ScarJo's statement her and her team want to know how they produced the voice. Cause yeah, if it's just a simulated female voice and they didn't train the computer with any recordings of her voice, then they're probably fine.
I actually don't think it sounds like her
This is they add a little static
It’s not a gender issue with AI. It’s an AI issue. Men have the female Chatbots that can be sexual and women have the male enhanced version of ChatGPT Brett spoke about in another video.
It barely sounds like her, kind of a miss here
Only celebrities have a protected likeness.
lets hope sam altman doesn't read "i have no mouth and i must scream." wouldn't want ai going that far
I absolutely love watching your videos. You're such an amazing, inspiring and very smart person. Hope you enjoy the rest of your week
Simp
@@dailydoodle42 Whatever
@@dylanpeddle6859 They seem like a troll. I hope you rolled your eyes
@@ElsyOO366 Yeah they definitely seem like a troll
I know my opinion is in the minority therefore doesn't matter, but it sounds very different to me. Maybe because I'm Mexican so my ear isn't trained like the native speakers is.
Nope your not alone got nothing to do with being Mexican. Although I'm not American so maybe we can hear the differences more clearly
I'm American and the voices sounded different to me too.
Also, the voices were different enough to me that I was confused that Scarlett had become so upset. 🤷♀️
It matters bro. White Americans are overwhoopin, its from their lack of rhythm and musical tone that they think Voice A sounds like Voice B when theres thousands of peoples voices that have her telltale characteristics. Nobody can own that
You cant copyright or trademark a voice 💀. As long as it isnt trained on her then its fine
Not yet.
@@billygoat5302 How would you even? Voices change over time, hell the change by the day. They change if you're a little dehydrated. How can you possibly trademark that?
@@282XVLvoice recognition is a thing, there's probably a vocal fingerprint of sorts.
I didn't believe the voices were the same, but since so many others did hear a near similarity, I'd have to defer to them on this one.
However, Altman taking down the voice instead of explaining how they did it was damning.
If we're going to legislate against using a voice that sounds similar to someone else's you get completely intractable edge problems. It's not a solvable issue
Exactly this. It’s like the GTA lawsuit over the blonde poster girl.
Yeah no one on SNL ever did impersonations and sounded extremely similar. No one in Vegas does Elvis impersonations. While I am disappointed that she said no but the voice sounds similar. This isn't new and will be challenging to take to court.
I mean, yeah, you got a point.This is actually f****** stupid. Basically waste of a time of a story it's not even gonna reach a court case. Cause the judge is not gonna care. 😂 💯
If she were to win, it would really cripple Hollyweird. Think about how many voice actors leave Productions and work somewhere else and impersonators are brought on board to keep the show running. Hell even Grey DeLisle started out and still makes her living by impersonating Indira Stefanianna Christopherson's voice of Daphne on Scooby-Doo
@@chefdeadpool8481 Great point regarding voice actors. Honestly forgot about even Disney's beloved cartoon characters always getting new voice actors as much alike as the previous.
If I got a nickel for every time Brett covered AI on the show on the same day, I would have two nickels. Which isn’t much, but it’s weird that it happened twice.
YOOO the doozenschmertz reference!!!
Doofenschmertz evil incorporaaaaaateeeeeeeed! 🎶
Doofenscmertz is it you ??😂😂
My voice is so identically close to my father that if you closed your eyes in a convo with us it would sound like I was legit talking to myself. SJ’s got about as much ground to stand on as I would trying to claim his voiceover works as my own.
If someone wanted to a make a movie where scarjo voiced the character but she refused they could always just hire a voice actor that sounds similar. That’s essentially what they did
Not even close, everyone is jumping on this because of the meme and drama😂
similar KEY WORD lol its not her voice so i dont see a problem with this
That ad transition. Qui Gon Shapiro has been training Obi Wan brett well!
Next up, some random actress is going come up and say Alexa sounds just like her. Yeah, sure...
If you are searching the internet for Nude Taylor Swift pictures, You need some serious help.
Exactly. You should have saved them when they were easy to find.
They missed a chance to use the best AI voice ever. (No, not HAL-9000!) - KITT from Knight Rider!
That was the guy who played Mr. Feeny on Boy Meets World, believe it or not! 😁
Keep this topic in front of us pls! I feel like I live under a rock in this area. So hard to decipher the fear mongering and the reality. Relying on you to help us out.
Thank you for talking about the
exploitation of women in the “new world”. Something NEEDS to be done about this, since this will be the new way of exploiting women that don’t want to be exploited. The tricky thing about this topic is, who gets in legal trouble? A person? A company? It’s so valuable for you to be talking about this subject because this can’t go on. I am also seeing a lot of comments saying “when this happens to men, nobody talks about it” and that is due to 2 main reasons. One is that this happens to women way more often, and two is that men and women are emotionally and socially different. It is going to affect a self-respecting woman’s life way more than it will a man. Of course men will be affected too.
Idk, everything that is “wrong” and “illegal” with AI, is technically 100% legal.
As long as people can view a website for free, then AI can also view that same website and use it to train.
Maybe I’m bitter, but at this point, hearing dozens of nightmare stories… I’d be perfectly fine with AI filling in for a relationship as long as it works, which I don’t see why it wouldn’t. No risk, completely free, and I don’t have to deal with feeling lonely.
Defamation I cry, defamation! Beyonce, I come as a Justin Timberlake in the night. Matthew 5:40.
I’m just thinking out loud rn, but is it possible to make/generate a voice that is totally original? A voice that not one person from the 8B people across the world has?
Not right now, but you never know.
@@oriongear2499 How so? Genetics already does that. But if you would want to do it artificially, you would need a significant amount of voice samples to do so in the first place.
You could increase pitch or depth. Does that count for you?
Scarlet Johansen is terribly upset... that she didn't get paid and another voice actress did.
How do we compare with 1 good audio sample and one garbage sample
This is why they were protesting for the right of their body, face, and voice.
Sky doesn’t sound like Scarjo. It sounds like a breathy overly flirty adult female. Scarjo doesn’t own adult female flirty voices. They hired a voice actress. This is narcissistic behavior.
Imagine if she sued all redhead women because that’s how her hair was in the avengers movies.
I’m a 15 year old girl (turning 16 in a few months), last summer i had this happen to me. Keep in mind, i was 14 at the time. I had been dating a guy and he had a friend who was very obsessed with me. After me and this guy broke up i found out his friend had used an app to edit me and make fake nudes then was going around showing people. Scary world we live in.
AI from 2028: Oh, you think *this* is exploitation?
Stand by...
Who fucking cares it’s just a similar sounding voice ffs 🤦♂️ 💀
I really think this is a dumb issue, Scarlet refused to work with chat-gpt to fulfill their vision, so they just emulated her voice instead of using her voice. The thing is voice pitch and tone is extremely easy to create or modify. Two people can sound the same, this is such a waste of time to get upset about something like this.
Title should be “Stop Exploiting Women because You’re More Famous”
Scarjo doesn’t own the rights to this other woman’s natural voice.
It's not her voice. Get over it
I think AI does have a place in the world, but AI art and this kind of stuff doesn’t belong here. AI should be used in jobs and roles that humans can’t fill, nothing else.
Wow. I feel like I just uploaded multiple college degrees to my brain after hearing this dumb shit.
"Stop Exploiting Women with AI"
You may as well tell those people to say "stop eating Pringles"
The title indicates how people are insane 😮😂
This is my main problem with AI. We are now using this new technology to make fake people, disguise ourselves as somebody else and change their voice and shit. I defended AI art but now I’m starting to fully understand why some artists were against it.
This is why you have code phrases as well. People have been using your voices to exploit your parents, thinking your in a bad situation and you need money or something else. And that's just one example. I have a code unique to me and my own personality, figure yours out and tell your loved ones.
Not mad… just get use to it. Unfortunately the cats out of the bag. No stopping it now
This is so scary and sad
Back in the 1980s, some of us held jobs where we were instructed not to allow ourselves to be recorded, either film/video or audio. Because recordings could be manipulated to make you say anything they wanted you to say.
ChatGPT is just automating that, there are no legitimate uses for this technology. The programmers need to find a way to block it being used like this.
Leave the daily wire and join your friend Candace.
human characteristic identity theft - stealing human characteristics of a person's identity! fascinating and scary!
Put the phones down.. walk away from the computer and tablets…go out side and interact with live people
My thoughts too. Let's all be a bit more disciplined and discretionary with what gets posted on SM - its all an illusion "smoke and mirrors" world anyway.
But everyone else is on here too😮
Yep.
I'm split on this... tons of women exploit themselves
Just because some do, doesn’t mean we all do. Have compassion.
hey not all women exploit themselves, the rest exploit men lmao
And so what? That’s their CHOICE, you don’t have a right to exploit them without their consent
So? Tons of men kill themselves, should we make murder legal?
If we, as a society, need a robot to “connect” then we clearly have become a broken society.
The AI sounds like "generic 30ish white woman" but if ScarJo wants to be associated with that then I guess she can 😂
Open A.I. Has every right to use a voice that they created. She has no legal leg to stand on.
Its not her voice so what's the problem?
They purposely made it sound like her that's the problem...
@@jey1834 it isn't even close.
@@jey1834 I don't hear it
The age old adage of, we spent so much time trying to figure out if we could do it without considering whether we should.
Unpopular opinion:
If I wanted an actress for a part in a movie but she refused and I hired someone that looked like the actress, why is that an issue? Is no other actor allowed to look/sound like someone else?
I'm actually able to sense now when the ads are coming...Brett needs to up her game lol
AI Brett will be 🔥
@RainMan52 Why the hell would we want more AI, we need to end most use of AI
Bro what 💀
LOL!
Um. Side-by-side, it doesn't sound like Scarlet Johansen.
I think people are hearing what they want to hear.
Reminds me of what happened with Cassey of Blogilates and Popflex Active fame. She found dupes of clothing she sells online. Some of them took photos from REVIEWS left on her website, barely edited them, and then used them as promotion for the dupes. They also used a video Cassey shared of herself in her home wearing one of the skirts she sells. The dupe listing plucked her video, used AI to change her face a little, and then used it on their website.
Guys, stop fighting it. A.I. is here and we all have to adapt. Attempts to restrict and control it are foolish. If openAI is not releasing a Scarlett like voice, than someone else will in the next few months. I mean it's not that hard. If Scarlett would be smart, she would have cooperated with OpenAI and have her voice officially released.
Skynet tho?!
*Chad GPT