WarGames clip - WOPR described

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 жов 2024
  • The WOPR is described here as a machine that "thinks" about World War 3 all the time. I find the anthropomorphisation of the process of computer operations curious. It seems to be a factor that plays into suggesting the WOPR, as able to "make decisions" like a human, can legitimately order a nuclear missile launch without requiring a human to actually carry out the final step.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 237

  • @suzylux
    @suzylux 4 роки тому +52

    I was so impressed by this as a kid. This was like elite fucking tech. And scary.

    • @KrillLiberator
      @KrillLiberator 2 роки тому +4

      Well, the Cold War was fucking terrifying, after all. What a weird time to have grown up.
      The best part (irony!) was knowing that, if the balloon went up, we were going to be sooty smears on the school playground.
      Nothing about those times was especially cuddly. We really needed the distractions!

    • @xr6lad
      @xr6lad 3 місяці тому

      @@KrillLiberatorthe Cold War was not terrifying. Stop exaggerating.

    • @mosheridan7016
      @mosheridan7016 3 місяці тому

      ​@xr6lad Yes it was

    • @ninedragons6400
      @ninedragons6400 9 днів тому

      ​@@mosheridan7016No it wasn't.

  • @TheCoolProfessor
    @TheCoolProfessor 6 років тому +184

    No computer named after a hamburger will ever function properly.

    • @codeoptimizationware2803
      @codeoptimizationware2803 5 років тому +23

      @TheCoolProfessor
      :
      And that's only one reason that I will never buy a "Mac" wahahaha

    • @TheLAKERSareGodsTeam
      @TheLAKERSareGodsTeam 4 роки тому +6

      @@codeoptimizationware2803 Brilliant!

    • @Wargoat6
      @Wargoat6 4 роки тому +8

      "Your artificial heart's electronics are managed by BCN-8-R."

    • @realazduffman
      @realazduffman 3 роки тому +2

      @@codeoptimizationware2803 Now that was clever!

    • @craigmanning2439
      @craigmanning2439 3 роки тому +3

      Yea 1999 Had a AS/400 not Y2K friendly. Co-Worker slapped a WOPR sticker on the server. Laughed my ass off.

  • @wazza33racer
    @wazza33racer 3 роки тому +55

    the more complex a system, the more prone to failure..........Engineering 101. Doesnt matter if its mechanical,electrical or electronic. The more code, switches,levers,cogs or moving parts .........the more opportunities for unintended consequences, design oversights or points of attack.

    • @GnosticAtheist
      @GnosticAtheist 3 роки тому +1

      That is why we need to create an AI able to fill oversights and unintended consequences. By giving it complete control over every single system in the entire world skynet will save us from ourselves.

    • @HAWKEYE21343
      @HAWKEYE21343 3 роки тому +8

      The more they overthink the plumbing the easier it is to plug up the drain.
      Cpt. Montgomery Scott

    • @craigmanning2439
      @craigmanning2439 3 роки тому +1

      Hence todays supply train issues. This is not encouraging. Too many moving parts, way too important. I can see the failure of complex systems. : (

    • @guttercanal4661
      @guttercanal4661 2 роки тому

      Complexities? Luxury! _Complications_ are much worse!

    • @BoundlessImagination
      @BoundlessImagination 2 роки тому +2

      That is why Object Oriented Programming was created to simplify the coding process and turn those big chunks of codes into manageable objects. If the W.O.P.R were real, then it also runs on A.I.

  • @mrspooks5287
    @mrspooks5287 5 років тому +76

    *You Want Thermonuclear Fries With That ?*

    • @HAWKEYE21343
      @HAWKEYE21343 3 роки тому +5

      No I'll take the atomic fire union rings please

  • @richardhall9815
    @richardhall9815 4 роки тому +29

    You cut out McKitrick's last words: "You won't regret this." LOL!

  • @TheLAKERSareGodsTeam
    @TheLAKERSareGodsTeam 4 роки тому +28

    I cannot think of a single machine from the 80's that made that rumble sound. They mostly whirred and clicked.

    • @LeifEricsonYT
      @LeifEricsonYT 4 роки тому +8

      Yet such a satisfying sound!

    • @zachhoward9099
      @zachhoward9099 3 роки тому +5

      I think it’s to underscore how powerful the computer was, that it was running too fast or too many computations to sound like whirs and clicks of the average machine

    • @TheLAKERSareGodsTeam
      @TheLAKERSareGodsTeam 3 роки тому +1

      @@zachhoward9099 "the computer", heh!!
      Is that you, Computer Professor?

    • @jamesslick4790
      @jamesslick4790 3 роки тому +1

      I had an 81 Monte Carlo that made a hell of a rumble sound, So there's that.

    • @rustymason3860
      @rustymason3860 Рік тому

      The WOPR was a diesel-driven model. Very rare.

  • @mylovesongs2429
    @mylovesongs2429 5 місяців тому +3

    RIP Dabney Coleman!!! He played such a great role in this movie!!! 😢💔🙏

  • @ChildOL
    @ChildOL 5 років тому +48

    In other words, SkyNet

    • @stephenolan5539
      @stephenolan5539 4 роки тому +7

      More like Colossus.

    • @toshirox2
      @toshirox2 3 роки тому

      P-1

    • @samsonguy10k
      @samsonguy10k 3 роки тому

      And the control of one man with it. The General pressed the buttons WOPR needed to act, but because of what WOPR was showing. Which was pretty much the same thing that happened in Terminator 3.
      "Skynet controls the forces."
      "And you control Skynet."

  • @thomasclarke
    @thomasclarke 7 років тому +57

    Such a good movie. They don't make them like this any more.

    • @faisal181
      @faisal181 2 роки тому +2

      i dont know Ford vs Ferrari was pretty awesome

  • @xr6lad
    @xr6lad 3 місяці тому +2

    This is a blast from the past. Won tickets to this movie on a radio show when I was 14-15. And me and a high school friend got a train to the city after school to see a premier showing in our city put on by the station. Was the first time both of us had got a train to the city by ourselves. Big adventure.

  • @PaulMarriott
    @PaulMarriott 4 роки тому +16

    The WOPR is going to FLAME-GRILL the earth! :O

  • @lard_lad_AU
    @lard_lad_AU 3 роки тому +11

    Who else typed "lets play global thermonuclear war" into their Commodore 64 and was dissapointed when they got a syntax error ?

    • @bigredsock1
      @bigredsock1 26 днів тому +1

      Looks like it was just you!

  • @railgap
    @railgap 3 роки тому +41

    When I was doing research and software testing for some AI stuff, my employer sent me a hot-rod machine to work with. 64 CPUs, 4 cores each, 64 GB of RAM, and this was around 2001, so no slouch. I ended up having to run two new dedicated circuits to my lab because the machine tripped regular breakers. It's hostname? 'WOPR' of course. ;D I was so sad when I had to give it back.

    • @piotrd.4850
      @piotrd.4850 Рік тому +3

      Around 2001?! What in the name of Malvin & Jim was THAT?! SGI ?

    • @pokszymon
      @pokszymon Рік тому

      @@piotrd.4850 Thou shalt not take the name of Malvin & Jim in vain

    • @GregMoress
      @GregMoress Рік тому +1

      I'm not aware of any motherboard that could accept 64 CPUs in 2001... much less support 64GB RAM... Or why they wouldn't just have you on site... or connect via Internet.
      And what are 'dedicated circuits'? Isn't that just electric power? How do you run a computer on two or more power outlets??

    • @0x1EGEN
      @0x1EGEN Рік тому

      ​@@GregMoress He's most likely referring to a server rack. In a typical datacenter there's indeed "dedicated circuits" (AKA power whips) which run underneath the floor to which the PDUs plugs into. Enterprise servers have two or more power supply units for redundancy which plug into separate PDUs. If the breakers trip then you need to either upgrade the circuit to 60 amps (if not already) or run an additional power whip with another PDU installed.

    • @GregMoress
      @GregMoress Рік тому

      @@0x1EGEN But he said they sent it to him.
      I seriously doubt a company would trust to a non-employee with all that inventory. And if he was an employee he'd work in the building.
      Also, why didn't he say a rack, or 16 boxes to network together? He said a computer.
      The Internet is filled with people who lie about anything and everything.
      Would a pro use such noobie language?

  • @slimj091
    @slimj091 3 місяці тому +2

    Bureaucrat: WOPR.. What is that?
    McKittrick: It's a flame broiled all beef patty on a sesame seed bun with mayo, lettuce, tomato, pickles, ketchup, onion, and with or without cheese. But that's not important.

  • @dawnzephyr
    @dawnzephyr 6 років тому +48

    Ok, so, the WOPR has role played WWIII countless times by the start of the movie, but it’s not until the end of the movie that it suddenly realizes, “Hey, everyone’s dying, every single time”

    • @mandoreforger6999
      @mandoreforger6999 6 років тому +31

      Jeffrey McCloskey which proves an important part about Artificial Intelligence. It is only as valuable as the lessons you teach it. Contrary to popular belief, Artificial Intelligence really can't learn something unless the programmers give it access to the underlying lessons.
      It is impressive that this movie nailed it 35 years ago. WOPR was never given the option of considering a game that was ultimately unwinnable. There was always a winner and loser in its simulations based on body count, because that is how programmers set up the rules.
      Forcing it to play itself in tic-tac-toe opened up a gameplay style that it had not been able to pattern before, after it ran the calculations with the new parameters it realized that any war scenario always made the player worse off for playing in the first place.
      AI only learns based on parameters set by humans. If those parameters are wrong or unrealistic, AI really goes off the rails.

    • @rascallyrabbit717
      @rascallyrabbit717 6 років тому +4

      glad it didn't learn how to cheat

    • @mr_gerber
      @mr_gerber 6 років тому +6

      @@rascallyrabbit717 That's the point. You give it the rules, and that is all it knows. If you tell it to omit the rules, it's not cheating - it's acting within its commands.

    • @ryankelly369
      @ryankelly369 3 роки тому +3

      The death count is the "score." So it knows how to fight a war of attrition. The whole point is that WOPR makes decisions like there is always a winner and a loser, but doesn't understand futility.

    • @samsonguy10k
      @samsonguy10k 3 роки тому +4

      @@ryankelly369 That lesson came at the end when it was force fed all the scenarios, and had Tic Tac Toe to compare it to. When both sides know what they are doing, nobody wins. But where nuclear war is concerned, even with advantage on one side, it is still stalemate.

  • @n00blamer
    @n00blamer 2 роки тому +7

    Meanwhile the Soviet Comrades had the BIG M.A.C. (MEGA ASS CALCULATOR), operating at mind-boggling 20 MHz with uncomprehensive 4 MB of RAM.

  • @BorlandC452
    @BorlandC452 9 років тому +14

    I didn't know the bassist for Ok Go also worked on the WOPR!

    • @Mindraker1
      @Mindraker1 9 років тому +3

      BorlandC452
      1980s: WOPR supercomputer
      2010s: Flash game

  • @ryankelly369
    @ryankelly369 5 років тому +10

    WarGames was not the first science fiction work to explore such questions. In fact, I found WarGames to be very derivative of "Colossus: The Forbin Project" done some 13 years prior. What is interesting about WarGames, however, is its relatively realistic depiction of hacking via Demon/WarDialling, and the fact that computers can learn to play games quite effectively given experience on a decision tree. It's what heuristics is all about. As computers have gotten faster, they've only gotten better.

    • @samsonguy10k
      @samsonguy10k 3 роки тому +1

      Fail Safe as well is good watching to go along with that.

    • @rascallyrabbit717
      @rascallyrabbit717 Рік тому

      @@samsonguy10k in Failsafe, the override defeats were accomplished manually the only computers were for guidance and targets

    • @piotrd.4850
      @piotrd.4850 Рік тому

      Well, it wasn't far fetched considering that somebody once put trianing programme on NORAD production.... the movie practically happened.

  • @tobolulo
    @tobolulo 3 роки тому +10

    The Fed that recommended McKitricks idea to the president; retired with a full pension, even after the monumental fuck up.

  • @shortwavemysteriesbroadcas2159
    @shortwavemysteriesbroadcas2159 6 років тому +15

    i love this movie

  • @BenJabituya
    @BenJabituya 5 місяців тому +2

    RIP Dabney Coleman.

  • @k7jeb
    @k7jeb 4 роки тому +7

    "silly-cone diode" (snarf!!)

  • @Flexin010
    @Flexin010 7 років тому +26

    well just unplug the god damn thing!

    • @averagewu
      @averagewu 6 років тому +9

      S Row I don't have to take that from you, you pig-eyed sack of shit!

    • @kylecoughenour2441
      @kylecoughenour2441 5 років тому +7

      That wont work, unplugging the machine will let WOPER know an attack is immediate and it will continue eith the orginal attack order

    • @deathproofpony
      @deathproofpony 4 роки тому +7

      Hell, I'd piss on a spark plug if it would do any good!

    • @jamesslick4790
      @jamesslick4790 3 роки тому

      @@deathproofpony I use that line at least once a week! It's perfect for many FUBAR situations!

    • @zachhoward9099
      @zachhoward9099 7 місяців тому +1

      It would interpret a shutdown as the destruction of NORAD and would carry out its final orders and launch the missiles!

  • @questtech2698
    @questtech2698 Рік тому +2

    "Wopr eh? WRITE THAT DOWN AND MAKE IT DOUBLE" - Burgerking

  • @Je_QzcY3mN0
    @Je_QzcY3mN0 2 роки тому +6

    What I don't get is why the computer had to play tic-tac-toe in the finale, in order to understand that nuclear war is unwinnable, if he ALREADY has "played WW3 as a game, time and time again..." according to that guy?
    He was doing for so long and couldn't conclude that you can't win in a nuclear war and then suddenly realised it after playing tic-tac-toe?
    Or WOPR and Joshua were separate entities in the same computer? Then why didn't WOPR came to the same conclusion as Joshua?

    • @chomo54andbabyaisha97
      @chomo54andbabyaisha97 Рік тому +3

      Someone else explained this very well. Untill it was teached tic-tac-toe, everything it "knew" was there is always a winner and a loser. The tic-tac-toe teached it, it isn't necessarily so. And with that knowledge it then had a new look at the war games.

    • @piotrd.4850
      @piotrd.4850 Рік тому

      To gain reference, additional insight.

  • @StewFisher
    @StewFisher 6 років тому +16

    so basically it has 1 day of down time every 4 years then.

    • @mindriot91_96
      @mindriot91_96 4 роки тому

      LOL, it gets to relax on the leap year.

  • @isodore79
    @isodore79 6 років тому +7

    OMG! He said the title of the film!

  • @AgentParsec
    @AgentParsec 8 років тому +29

    0:22 -- I think that guy's dialogue was originally supposed to say, "Well, the Whopper spends all its time being eaten by me."

  • @elielamhout9995
    @elielamhout9995 Рік тому +1

    I like the sound of this super computer. When I was a kid, I thought that all the big computers made that sound.

  • @finalhour4406
    @finalhour4406 2 роки тому +5

    This is one of the few movies I actually enjoy watching

  • @spaceenemiesnovel
    @spaceenemiesnovel 8 місяців тому +1

    1:17: is that Barry Corbin from the Ranch?

  • @surebrec5113
    @surebrec5113 5 років тому +2

    he's got an impressive WOPR

  • @hermannabt8361
    @hermannabt8361 2 роки тому +1

    Today a single watch has more computing power than that room.

  • @yaphettbanks4936
    @yaphettbanks4936 6 років тому +13

    This is how Skynet happened.

    • @ObsidianParis
      @ObsidianParis 5 років тому

      Skynet = WOPR + Microsoft

    • @Gforcebond
      @Gforcebond Рік тому

      @@ObsidianParis No the real Skynet. It was actually created just like in the film.

  • @TonyFarley-gi2cv
    @TonyFarley-gi2cv 8 місяців тому

    Do you suspect the lights that are flashing on there or playing inside of your breaker size or do you think they're playing on the outside of your breaker size

  • @aserta
    @aserta Рік тому +1

    The fun part about "not trusting the overgrown pile of microchips" is the fact that you could enter a nuclear silo ... delivering pizza.

  • @EveryoneIsFightingSomeBattle
    @EveryoneIsFightingSomeBattle 6 років тому +2

    It all would've been fine had it not been for that open line at their space division in Sunnyvale.

    • @codeoptimizationware2803
      @codeoptimizationware2803 5 років тому

      @Defender of the Weak
      :
      Why's that? IIRC, Sunnyvale, CA is in Silicon Valley, which makes a lot of sense as far as computer technology, especially in those days. What's the problem? ???

    • @mindriot91_96
      @mindriot91_96 4 роки тому +3

      @@codeoptimizationware2803 It's been a while since I've seen this movie, but IIRC that's how David gets into the system.

  • @HBO1984.
    @HBO1984. Рік тому +1

    Dabney Coleman is a damn fine actor. 🤔

  • @bob51502001
    @bob51502001 3 роки тому +3

    The only way to win is NOT to play.

  • @Coffeeman-yq6xu
    @Coffeeman-yq6xu 3 роки тому +3

    Funny. The WOPR and the rest of the tape machines will all fit on laptop.

    • @289cobra9
      @289cobra9 3 роки тому +1

      It fits in my iPad. I can launch the warheads right now. 😂

  • @realazduffman
    @realazduffman 3 роки тому +2

    The lights just keep blinking out of sequence

    • @chomo54andbabyaisha97
      @chomo54andbabyaisha97 Рік тому

      blinking... and beeping and blinking AND BEEPING *_I CANNOT TAKE IT ANYMORE!_*

  • @TonyFarley-gi2cv
    @TonyFarley-gi2cv 8 місяців тому

    When's the last time you put anything on the inside you don't necessarily have to attach it

  • @Photonic64
    @Photonic64 5 місяців тому

    Funny how that General was also General Carville in Red Alert 2. (just much older)

  • @veazy.r
    @veazy.r 6 років тому +1

    How did I get here ? I'm deepply confuse, but hey thanks for the samples ;) Good materials here

  • @chriscole8253
    @chriscole8253 2 роки тому +2

    WOPR- the prototype of Skynet

  • @frankjamesbonarrigo7162
    @frankjamesbonarrigo7162 5 років тому +3

    Will it tell me where the ticket is?

  • @jonathoncardwell6786
    @jonathoncardwell6786 2 роки тому +1

    Actually it becomes self aware and locks out the code breaker. It’s a Joshua code. 1704 is a battle user had with the Swiss. TKS means chieftains. CPE is an economic term. Do self aware mission systems have safeguards against self aware “Thanatos”? After the fall of “icarus” rise of “Rasputin” and the distraction of the princess bride “land war in Asia”. Then the rise of “Arishem” and “galactius”

  • @wisteela
    @wisteela 9 місяців тому

    We now basically have the technology to do this.

  • @BlacKnightRising
    @BlacKnightRising 5 років тому +1

    0:53 the look that says, 'SHUT THE HELL UP PAUL!'

  • @chrisst8922
    @chrisst8922 Рік тому

    Now after the events of the film they would have had to have a post mortem. Presumably Professor Falken would have had to take part. What would he would have concluded in relation to this important scene? Might it have been that the men in the silos who didn't want to launch the milles were, in fact, right.

  • @TonyFarley-gi2cv
    @TonyFarley-gi2cv 8 місяців тому

    What side of the water molecule square square

  • @peter486
    @peter486 2 роки тому

    i have one of those at home it actually looks like those old nuclear launch copter in the silos.

  • @amrose4214
    @amrose4214 4 роки тому

    Hmm i never noticed this before. Its the general guy who says uh i would not trust a machine to make war time decision, then of course all hell breaks lose when Matt Broderick breaks into the WOPR and starts a game.

  • @akigreus9424
    @akigreus9424 5 років тому +5

    I'd like a wopr with cheese.

  • @christopjerfoote5747
    @christopjerfoote5747 5 років тому +3

    Thought the gum chewing lady was fantastic, she made the film a lot better.

    • @k7jeb
      @k7jeb 4 роки тому +2

      That was Juanin Clay. Sadly, she passed away in 1995. Her character's rechewing Dabney Coleman's character's gum said it all about their relationship.

    • @289cobra9
      @289cobra9 3 роки тому +1

      @@k7jeb
      Wow. Just looked that up. She was only 45 ☹️

  • @joncardwell6207
    @joncardwell6207 2 роки тому +1

    Sure. I wore a burger king paper hat when I was younger.

  • @dits17
    @dits17 6 років тому +11

    So WOPR turned into Google 😂😂

  • @eugenekrylov5190
    @eugenekrylov5190 3 роки тому

    not found this film in internet - is is burning books -

  • @jimandali0
    @jimandali0 3 роки тому

    WOPR with cheese, no pickles please. Product placement at its least subtle. Still a great film.

  • @TheByteknight
    @TheByteknight 3 місяці тому

    If it has all these scenarios in its database and plays an "endless series of wargames", why didn't it learn the lesson of nuclear stalemate months, if not years, ago?

  • @thelegendaryblackbeastofar39
    @thelegendaryblackbeastofar39 2 роки тому

    It's not "silicone diode", it's "silicon diode"! Silicone is a gelatinous substance with silicon, the element, as it's major component.

  • @jonathoncardwell6786
    @jonathoncardwell6786 2 роки тому

    Actually it works perfectly. Preventing nuclear war. Runs through all countries responses from any nuclear armed countries and strategies of those countries in response to nuclear plants oil pipeline disputes nada disputes and economic world economic pressures culture divides. Actually it's advanced to be able to identify personality traits of world leaders who might trigger a first strike. Like Christopher Wray being complicit to threatening Anna Chapman and going to Poland.

  • @SixOThree
    @SixOThree 2 роки тому +1

    Silicone diode.

  • @3ccdmike
    @3ccdmike Рік тому

    We have one now.

  • @michaelb6729
    @michaelb6729 3 роки тому +2

    The WOPR is an early version of the 305th Kraken ! 🤫
    😆

  • @jhonsiders6077
    @jhonsiders6077 5 років тому +1

    Looks and sounds like a idling locomotive .

    • @DASCO2136
      @DASCO2136 Рік тому

      Locomotives create more noise than that

  • @flyguille
    @flyguille 4 роки тому

    alway have the curiosity if WOPR was an old real computer, or just a empty mock up?

    • @sanjeevpathak1345
      @sanjeevpathak1345 4 роки тому

      My guess is an empty mock up for the movie. Computers were huge back then, especially a Supercomputer like the WOPR. A carry on luggage is smaller than the first laptops. Not to mention a pc back then in today's dollars was about $8K. Likely would have been several hundred thousand for a real supercomputer back then. Who knows maybe they filmed in a real location and just rented a data center for the movie?

    • @jamesslick4790
      @jamesslick4790 3 роки тому

      100 percent a "mock up". It's mostly plywood, it's countdown timer was driven by an Apple II.

    • @jamesslick4790
      @jamesslick4790 3 роки тому

      @@sanjeevpathak1345 It's not "real", it's mainly plywood. An Apple II drove the countdown timer, so that's as close to a computer the "WOPR" was.

    • @piotrd.4850
      @piotrd.4850 Рік тому

      Well, t he real computer was managing screens and set.

  • @MisterMcKinney
    @MisterMcKinney Рік тому +1

    A whopper sounds pretty good right now!! Mmm.. 🍔

  • @TheJoeSwanon
    @TheJoeSwanon 4 роки тому +2

    It’s a cheeseburger from Burger King!

  • @wreckage-vs5jv
    @wreckage-vs5jv 3 роки тому +2

    I'm glad that we now live in a future without crazy computers only few Teslas killing their drivers.

  • @alexludavertigo6926
    @alexludavertigo6926 2 роки тому +1

    W0PR!? impossiblé! 2 trillion dollar hardware don't make mistakes!

  • @jonathoncardwell6786
    @jonathoncardwell6786 2 роки тому

    Tks is a chieftain tank hatch lol……watch the launch code at the end

  • @Elfnetdesigns
    @Elfnetdesigns 5 років тому

    I still say the computer mainframe looks like a locomotive..

    • @samsonguy10k
      @samsonguy10k 3 роки тому

      Would probably sound like one too if its ventilation was in that room.

  • @sryth1
    @sryth1 3 роки тому +1

    Never trust a silicone diode

  • @NBT2469
    @NBT2469 5 років тому +10

    The WOPR was a machine invented by Burger King. LMAO!

  • @RiggsBF
    @RiggsBF 2 місяці тому

    Land of the free. Home of the WOPR.

  • @FP194
    @FP194 Рік тому

    WOPR better known as Skynet

  • @jonathoncardwell6786
    @jonathoncardwell6786 2 роки тому

    Like the whopper cheeseburger. I wore a burger king hey when I was younger but I didn't misuse a card at burger king in Bessemer

  • @Paul8259
    @Paul8259 4 роки тому

    Most of our top level defense folks may soon be taken out by the Rona. Who carries the "Nuclear Football?"

  • @TonyFarley-gi2cv
    @TonyFarley-gi2cv 8 місяців тому

    You know what to do if they agreed and then turn her backs

  • @JonathonCardwell-tu1ly
    @JonathonCardwell-tu1ly Рік тому

    Kind of like a burger king sandwich lol...I had a burger king paper crown when I was younger

  • @historicallyintriguing-q2p
    @historicallyintriguing-q2p 11 днів тому

    try to look surprised. Be ready for a judgment

  • @perfectionbox
    @perfectionbox 3 роки тому

    of course the computer has to make those noises 😂

  • @RedStarRogue
    @RedStarRogue Місяць тому

    Burger King, home of the WOPR.

  • @JonathonCardwell-tu1ly
    @JonathonCardwell-tu1ly Рік тому

    Is that like a burger king sandwich?

  • @antonybullock2240
    @antonybullock2240 2 роки тому

    Can I get extra cheese and a side of fries with that as well

  • @flashkraft
    @flashkraft 3 роки тому

    ...and best of all it runs on an Ethereum based encrypted blockchain so it cannot be hacked and it cannot be shut down.

  • @P7777-u7r
    @P7777-u7r 3 роки тому

    0:23
    Same here

  • @DASCO2136
    @DASCO2136 Рік тому

    And now thanks to innovation and Moores law, this iPhone im typing this message on has more power than this trillion dollar piece of defense department hardware

  • @primus711
    @primus711 6 років тому +4

    just make it go to any website if the bloated code etc dont eat its cycles then the coin miners sure will lol:)

  • @kdpowers
    @kdpowers 2 роки тому

    If someone started telling me especially back then about entrusting all this to a computer, I'd call them Soviet Spies. Who in their right mind would agree to this?

    • @chomo54andbabyaisha97
      @chomo54andbabyaisha97 Рік тому

      Will it ease your mind to know, that today there are very influential people in politics and business who literally want to give human rights to an AI?
      Saudi Arabia has already done it. Why wouldn't another country follow in the west?
      And what ould you think of your leader being essentially an advanced calculator?

    • @kdpowers
      @kdpowers Рік тому

      @@chomo54andbabyaisha97 I think that’s only with art and video right now bud

    • @chomo54andbabyaisha97
      @chomo54andbabyaisha97 Рік тому

      @@kdpowers Nope. Do your research. There is a great push to give AI human rights.
      I wonder... would you agree to have an AI as leader of your country?

  • @JonCardwell-m8p
    @JonCardwell-m8p Місяць тому

    Group email responses to my responses lol .

  • @prosperity1122
    @prosperity1122 7 років тому

    WOPR Ricter.

  • @jamesslick4790
    @jamesslick4790 3 роки тому

    Hell, I'd piss on a spark plug if it would do any good!

  • @5burowz
    @5burowz 2 роки тому +2

    "would you like to play a game?"
    Vlad Putin: "Yes"

  • @eugenea.buckley3555
    @eugenea.buckley3555 Рік тому

    Leon Peneta

  • @erich84502a
    @erich84502a 4 місяці тому

    Whopper? Wheres the Beef?

  • @Ori0n1975
    @Ori0n1975 Рік тому

    I just ate a WhOpPeR.

  • @benquinneyiii7941
    @benquinneyiii7941 3 роки тому

    CFD

  • @enriquevega4480
    @enriquevega4480 3 роки тому

    everybody there has a Whopper face