Idaho Four House of Horrors Demolished

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 жов 2024
  • Why would they demolish the house before the case is over? Full episode now available on the 10 to Life UA-cam channel!
    #AnnieElise #IdahoFour #bryankohberger #TrueCrimePodcast
    Shop the Merch!: www.annieelise...
    Join the 10 to LIFE Community for Exclusive Content & Perks: / annieelise
    .
    Become a Channel Member:
    / @annieelise
    .
    For Business Inquiries: 10toLife@WMEAgency.com
    .
    Podcast: podfollow.com/...
    .
    Follow me on Social:
    Instagram: / _annieelise
    Facebook: / 10tolife
    Tik Tok: / _annieelise
    .
    *Sources used to collect this information include various public news sites, interviews, court documents, FB groups dedicated to the case, and various news channel segments. When quoting statements made by others, they are strictly alleged until confirmed otherwise. Please remember my videos are my independent opinion and to always do your own research.
    ••••••••••••••••••
    Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this video are personal and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any other agency, organization, employer, or company. Assumptions made in the analysis are not reflective of the position of any entity other than the creator(s). These views are subject to change, revision, and rethinking at any time and are not to be held in perpetuity. We make no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, correctness, suitability, or validity of any information on this video and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. All information is provided on an as-is basis. It is the reader’s responsibility to verify their own facts.
    Comments on this channel are the sole responsibility of their writers and as such the writers will take full responsibility, liability, and blame for any libel or litigation that results from something written in or as a direct result of something written in a comment. Please feel free to challenge or disagree in the comments section - but 10 to LIFE reserves the right to delete any comment for any reason- so please keep it polite and relevant.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 60

  • @hatt2381
    @hatt2381 3 місяці тому +83

    I don't understand why this was done before trial. There's a lot of mystery around this case

    • @rachelvaitkus
      @rachelvaitkus 3 місяці тому

      always is #why tho#

    • @Profb-ox1od
      @Profb-ox1od 2 місяці тому

      It’s because something more happened. Bk did not do this. Evidence downstairs I believe. I’m a psychic.

    • @joannajamerson35
      @joannajamerson35 2 місяці тому +1

      It's very creepy to me, how the roommates did nothing

  • @johnhenderson8020
    @johnhenderson8020 3 місяці тому +70

    How in the world could this be allowed. Is this not destruction of evidence?

    • @Just_Jenny85
      @Just_Jenny85 3 місяці тому

      Yes it is. They’re hiding many things. I’d do your own research on this case if you’re interested in it. It goes so deep.

    • @JesusIsKingForever77
      @JesusIsKingForever77 3 місяці тому +4

      Right. Seems the judge would’ve stopped it til after the trial. It’s a weird thing for both sides to agree on, usually 1 side is fighting it, so it can’t happen. Super weird.

    • @rhondaallan4680
      @rhondaallan4680 2 місяці тому

      Yes! It is destruction of evidence.

  • @tejadeja9542
    @tejadeja9542 3 місяці тому +43

    Something seems waaay off here!

    • @Just_Jenny85
      @Just_Jenny85 3 місяці тому +4

      Everything is way off!

    • @corirodriquez2889
      @corirodriquez2889 3 місяці тому +2

      Was the authority of the college involved in this with Brian???

  • @darleenmarieramos
    @darleenmarieramos 3 місяці тому +42

    I was and am so against demolishing this house before the trial. In case the jurors needed a walk thru. (They do that sometimes.) I still can't believe they did that. 🙄

    • @Just_Jenny85
      @Just_Jenny85 3 місяці тому +5

      Me neither. It’s telling to me that they wanted it gone ASAP

  • @JDoe001
    @JDoe001 3 місяці тому +27

    I think they should’ve waited (to take jury there if so).

  • @Sunshine-n1n
    @Sunshine-n1n 3 місяці тому +13

    House should not have been touched until there was some resolution to this case. What were they afraid of ?

  • @MrGleeiscool
    @MrGleeiscool 3 місяці тому +33

    UPDATE : Bryan kohlberger will stand trial in June 2025

    • @JeaneneEnglish-tf5gv
      @JeaneneEnglish-tf5gv 3 місяці тому +3

      But WHERE⁉️😳🤨 I HONESTLY BELIEVE that he should stand Trial
      In the same area he committed it.
      THEY didn't even give O.J. SIMPSON
      A Change of VENUE and he was A
      High Profile Celebrity⁉️😳🤨💩😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡

    • @twistedsista4467
      @twistedsista4467 3 місяці тому +3

      ​@JeaneneEnglish-tf5gv Yes they did.. OJ committed crime in Brentwood, and the trial was in Los Angeles. OJ Lawyers put in for change of venue.

    • @MaryRose86
      @MaryRose86 3 місяці тому +2

      More like 2028. Trust me it’s just gonna keep getting pushed back. It’s way too high profile.

  • @Bonnieward
    @Bonnieward 3 місяці тому +17

    So all houses that someone was murdered should be tore down?

  • @rebeccaoneill9363
    @rebeccaoneill9363 3 місяці тому +7

    Any opportunity to reexamine for evidence or to bring the jury on a go-see is completely lost. What a disasterous, sentiment-driven decision.

  • @Nunya8523
    @Nunya8523 3 місяці тому +8

    I can’t help but think of the president of the university publishing a book during this time 🙄😑

  • @lillieanna8142
    @lillieanna8142 3 місяці тому +8

    SOMEONE KNOWS SOMETHING...COVER-UP.?! 🧐🤨🤔

  • @armandomejiatakara818
    @armandomejiatakara818 3 місяці тому +11

    There’s a lot of fish in that there house

  • @kelleyanne2368
    @kelleyanne2368 3 місяці тому +15

    Sus

  • @ntag411
    @ntag411 3 місяці тому +4

    It's business as usual. They do everything possible to cloak or eliminate bad news/reviews of their product or service. 😮

  • @TheRealOBZRV
    @TheRealOBZRV 3 місяці тому +8

    Cover up.

  • @Nenernener123
    @Nenernener123 3 місяці тому +3

    University has pull & they want this to go away as soon as possible

  • @jinjin0135
    @jinjin0135 3 місяці тому +2

    That is absolutely ridiculous. It should have been left alone until after the trial! There's still so much evidence probably.

  • @MichaelWH
    @MichaelWH 3 місяці тому +6

    It was approved by both the defense AND prosecution

    • @Just_Jenny85
      @Just_Jenny85 3 місяці тому +3

      That’s so weird too. Why would defense approve it?

    • @kendraknight3085
      @kendraknight3085 2 місяці тому +2

      Which was completely asinine. There was still something in the house that they didn't want to come into evidence. Now it gone forever.

  • @sciencenotsrigma
    @sciencenotsrigma 2 місяці тому +1

    I have worked in homeless shelters, after being homeless, myself. I understand that people have irrational feelings about houses where atrocities took place, but I wish we could find a way to deal with it, besides tearing down perfectly good housing. Unless it’s a biohazard, it makes little logical sense to do so. I have asthma, and I’ve been disabled by having such bad air in substandard housing, at several different apartment complexes. There are children in those buildings, going to the hospital, and seniors and chronically ill people on oxygen, like my neighbor and I were. There are a lot of people living on the streets, in the Midwest. In Minnesota, the best funded welfare, mental health, and treatment state in the Midwest, there are not nearly enough homeless or treatment beds for all the people sleeping on the streets. This is crazy! I’m part of the indigenous community, and people burn sage to purify a house where evil things have happened. When I worked in a shelter that just opened, in an old house where people felt uneasy, we called in an elder, who purified the room. Everyone felt fine there, after that. Knocking down perfectly useable buildings is not sustainable. If people want to turn around the spirit of a place, they could donate it to a homeless person or family, or do what they did in the case of Abby and Libby. They made youth programs and activities in the park they died in, in their memory. Ariel Castro’s house, they made into a shelter for trafficked women. Now, those places are known for good things.

  • @ezrasgrl
    @ezrasgrl 2 місяці тому +1

    I’m still upset they demolished the house before the trial ended.
    While I understand wanting the house gone, I feel like justice would be better served by keeping the house intact until after the trial and verdict is reached. My heart goes out to their families and loved ones 🙏🏻💔

  • @nyxnicky
    @nyxnicky 3 місяці тому +9

    This feels like a weird C I A ritual or something, just very weird, esp demolishing the biggest evidence- the house. Something doesnt add up.

    • @Just_Jenny85
      @Just_Jenny85 3 місяці тому +2

      I heard the president of the college lived there when he was a kid.
      I think his last name is Green?

    • @nyxnicky
      @nyxnicky 3 місяці тому +4

      @@Just_Jenny85 just feels like a coverup of some sort. Like an MKUltra event.

    • @Just_Jenny85
      @Just_Jenny85 3 місяці тому +2

      @@nyxnicky I think you’re onto something there

    • @Just_Jenny85
      @Just_Jenny85 3 місяці тому +3

      @@nyxnicky but also, do you remember Hudson lindo? I haven’t seen this full video yet of Annie’s but I know that there’s a lot of secrets in the fraternities. And Hudson lindo unfortunately lost his life in 2021 during rush. Ethan did rush that year, and also in 2022 because he was a freshman again. I feel like they literally “killed 4 birds with one stone”.

  • @chrissyzang8764
    @chrissyzang8764 3 місяці тому +3

    Wait for trial bizzare

  • @mermaidsquad1391
    @mermaidsquad1391 3 місяці тому +2

    They should have waited until after the trial. Imo

  • @TH62_
    @TH62_ 3 місяці тому +3

    Evidence is gone

  • @kellyjradde1711
    @kellyjradde1711 3 місяці тому +6

    Nefarious
    Probably mkultra

  • @eikoqdupree101
    @eikoqdupree101 2 місяці тому +1

    Carzy weird.. ?

  • @EattheFOODTina-ND
    @EattheFOODTina-ND 2 місяці тому

    The primary reason the house was taken down was money. It was costing the University hundreds of thousands of dollars for security.

  • @lauriedaniele5967
    @lauriedaniele5967 2 місяці тому

    I still don’t understand why demolish the house. Why don’t they just cover it up or something and go on until the trial was over?

  • @rhondaallan4680
    @rhondaallan4680 2 місяці тому

    It should never have been demolished because it's an ongoing case!

  • @Smithers331
    @Smithers331 Місяць тому

    Yes, it should've been demolished after Justice is served.

  • @raider7829
    @raider7829 15 днів тому

    I was SHOCKED THEY DID THAT SO FAST. WTF IS GOING ON????

  • @rachelvaitkus
    @rachelvaitkus 3 місяці тому +1

    I'm with you on this one Annie

  • @ShelleySorenson
    @ShelleySorenson 3 місяці тому

    Did the owner of the house get compensation for the house?

    • @elissahayden8819
      @elissahayden8819 2 місяці тому

      Sounds like the Owner just gave it to the university and didn't sell it

  • @kathygrosvenor4464
    @kathygrosvenor4464 3 місяці тому +2

    In 1 1/2 years, the home was extensively searched for evidence. That’s a very long time to have access to a crime scene. Now it serves no purpose other than standing as a grim reminder of the horrific tragedy.

  • @josenevarez-h3y
    @josenevarez-h3y 3 місяці тому +1

    Cover up fishy