The heroic RAF firefighter who was forced out of the military
Вставка
- Опубліковано 17 лип 2024
- Carl Austin-Behan was supposed to have had a long career in the Royal Air Force.
He had, at a junior level as a firefighter, demonstrated remarkable bravery in pulling a pilot from the cockpit of a burning aircraft.
But the promise of a glittering life in the military came to a sudden and shattering end.
It was proper zero-to-hero stuff, and this is his incredible story.
More: www.forces.net/lgbtq/incompat...
#forcesnews #news #airforce #firefighter #uk #military
Subscribe to Forces News: bit.ly/1OraazC
Check out our website: www.forces.net/
Facebook: / forcestv
Instagram: forcesnews...
X: / forcesnews
The RAF's loss of an obviously determined, focused individual! Good on him for picking up the pieces and forging a successful career.
Boy that must have been a hell of a blow to have been kicked out of the RAF like that.
I know right. Kicked out of the RAF for being gay and still too straight for the Navy.
@@meme4oneYou're a funny man. 😂😂. I think you must mean the Royal Fleet Auxiliary.
I served in the Canadian Forces, there was a gay guy on base, nicest fellow you'd ever want to meet. He was passing by my open door one day, stopped and complimented me about the couch (settee, chesterfield) I was sitting on. He was booted out several days later. Because the armed services at that time looked down on alternate sexual alignment, a LGBQ person had to keep that secret, by doing so, you became a security risk, in the upper echelon's opinion. I have always thought that if one is open about one's sexual orientation, you are no longer a security risk therefore you can get on with serving your country or whatever. Glad times have changed and continue to do so.
As a regular, in the 60s and 70s we had several gay men in the station, we kept quiet, these guys were good airmen, and would have been a tremendous loss to the service.
leonard matlovich a us airman his gravestone read "when i was a soldier they gave me a medal for killing two men and a discharge for loving one"
I served in the RAF 1974 - 87 and remember the same interview regarding Gays. I thought at the time it strange as I had been taught at school that some half million gays had fought for Britain in W.W.II.... Nothing was said then. This is a real loss for the RAF and the British military as a whole.
Well he is a proper gentleman he can serve I don't se him doing anything wrong
Man that is just disgusting but the gentleman is in good company with others that were savagely dealt with despite what they did for their country during wartime and were treated like lepers afterwards. Alan Turing is one who stands out in my mind and there would have been tens if not hundreds of thousands of others.
I worked with a guy for two years when someone said he was gay and I hadn't noticed because it *wasn't* relevant and it *wasn't* important. He was just a really good bloke.
So, so sorry.
Thankfully we're growing up as a society, 6% of conscripts in all wars will have been a LGB.
Good upload👍
I love the cynicism 😂
"Growing up" Hahahaha yeah things are better than ever right? LOL
I dips m'lid to you sir - times have fortunately changed.
Poor guy hope hes doing ok thankyou for your service ✌
It is a shame good, capable people were removed/prevented from service because of their sexuality.
More than a shame. It was disgraceful and totally unnecessary. Destroyed lots of lives.
It was unfortunately the way things where chances are if you where outted back in those days you where in for a hard time of it best things was to discharge the person but fortunately society has change
And women. I was OCWRAF back in the 80's and had to dismiss an exceptional airwoman for being gay. She went on to have a distinguished career in the Police
Being attracted to kids is a "sexuality", you're defending them. You lot are sick
@@lizzietheoldbiddy262 I have updated "men" to "people" in my comment.
Also, what is OCWRAF?
You knew before you joined what the rules were. Whether right or wrong you knew at that time what the rules were.
these rules along with so many social norms existed and to some extent still exist specifically to justify the prejudice. i.e. "gay men are no use to society" also "we will actively prevent gay men from being of use to society"
the man is a decorated hero, show some respect.
The rules, were the rules. He signed the same paperwork I did. It was very clear that being homosexual was not permitted. Sorry.
He can’t exactly help it though
The law has been lost by all in the British armed forces
Sexual fraternization in the forces, was always discriminated against , according to rank. It and societies 'progress' will depend upon social factors ,so acceptance through legislation always takes longer than upbringing in environment. The shifting of tolerances and behaviour takes time , if they have been forced by elected party means ,it is generally not always for the better. Injustice and tolerating the intolerable, is down to who we vote to make those calls in setting up legislation, you cannot please all of the people all of the time ,and Governments elected by 1/3rd of the electorate often have strong minority views in the party, not reflected in the whole society. As a socialist liberal, this in discrimination seemed wrong by instinct , but upheld by laws from minds more nationalist and conservative. Our liberal freedoms are hard won , so be sure to understand when tolerating the intolerable your views may be the problem, but by not voting for what you are willing to tolerate, then change becomes harder, as acceptance of law becomes ingrained through political policy and media bias exposure is a very powerful weapon ,when closed minds wield the financial clout to brick by brick alter peoples perceptions . It is why now people should seriously consider political could news as political bias and maybe legislation should be toughened on the 'freedom' of a press run by plutocrats, the old Citizen Kane film still relevant. Woke and MAGA are imported attitudes from a society that we should still resist becoming dominated by. 80 years since losing our own dominance in setting views , by Soviet and U.S post WW2 power, that frankly are unacceptable today ,still does not mean ALL those views and identity are wrong. Nationalism, Capitalism ,Liberalism and Socialism are what makes us politically aware. That Race, Religion and Sexual orientation are still as issue ,speaks of misuse of power in shaping our society by people not living within it.
I agree Carl, no one should be defined by their sexuality. People should be defined by the content of their character. Your story demonstrates you are of good strong character. Well done and good luck for the future.
How awful,poor man.😢Wishing you good health and happiness 🏴🇦🇺
Cranks
Thanks for this article. I left the Air Force because of the gay ban which at the time was brutal, discriminatory and very nasty. Hopefully LGBTQ service people are now treated inclusively with respect.
Hang on a moment, 🤔 he said he knew he was gay at the age of seven, and joined the military anyway knowing full well what the conditions were. Then after allowing his private life to become public knowledge, he's surprised when he's kicked out 🤔.
⚠️ All that matters is that they can do the job, and doing it exceptionally well is a bonus, which he clearly achieved!🥇
I'm very surprised and disappointed by the RAF in this day and age.
⬇️
Can you imagine if Alan Turing was thrown out of Bletchley in 1940?
This would have likely resulted in a further two years of war, with millions more dying...
⬇️
The ignorance of the person who sacked him is one thing, but the irony that he may of highly likely not even been alive today, if it hadn't been for good people, like Alan Turing and others, who helped prevent his forefathers from getting killed, hasn't even entered their small-minded head!
Given the stigma though, there were security-risk aspects.
@EvoraGT430
True, though anyone is a possible security risk, with honeytrap's, etc.
Generally speaking, the pro's outweigh the con's...
What rubbish you spout, it was against the rules, stop using today's woke outlook on what happened before. Next, you will want forgiveness for people who were press ganged!
Dismissed for breaking the rules end of compensation for lying like every part of society whenver you do wrong you get praised for it
Thankfully times are changing, plenty of people who are not straight still want to serve their countries.
I'm sure he's a great fella but he lied to get in so he can't complain when he got kicked out. I had friends in the Navy that were gay back in the 80s and 90s. They never admitted to it, kept it low key off the ship and under went under the radar. Strange times. They're out now in more ways than one. 😂
You'll probably find he had to lie or hide it to get almost any job. Asking someone about their sex life is ridiculous so they deserve to get lied to.
@@davidkavanagh189Yes I agree, but, in the forces there's very little privacy especially on a warship. It's all about potential sexual partners. Where does a gay man go ? Into a crowded messdeck with 50 straight men ? Into a mess with other gay men? Or Into the female mess which would never happen.
Having gays in a messdeck has the potential to cause problems relating to power dynamics, hierarchical issues and discipline. It's the same as placing men in female sleeping quarters.
If a man gay or straight wants to go to sea my recommendation is to join the Royal Fleet Auxiliary. You get your own private cabin and all the aforementioned issues disappear. I did Navy and Royal Fleet Auxiliary and the RFA is far better.
There were reasons why it was illegal to be gay in the Army etc, and not particularly sinister reasons either. A young soldier in my battalion was bullied by a secretly gay, older soldier which led the younger man to attempt suicide.
And thats why it was illegal to be gay in the army yeah 😂
@@lachlanchester8142 One of the reasons, yes. What's your military experience?
@@jimmyjohnson7027 ‘gay people are bullies and will make you kill yourself’ was not one of the reasons, the reasons were pretty homophobic but just saying every single gay person is a bully is pretty extreme even for the 80’s
@@lachlanchester8142 That gay soldier was definitely a bully. Gay soldiers were also blackmailed into handing over 'sensitive' information to governments that were not necessarily friendly to Britain. What is your military experience?
@@jimmyjohnson7027 they were blackmailed because it was against the rules and would have negative consequences if released.
You can't blackmail someone for being gay when they are openly gay.
Rightly or wrongly it was a term and condition of Service at that time. I was asked at the Army Career Office bluntly “are you a poof” before I was allowed to sign anything. He knew he was stating a falsehood upon application and it is still the same today if you lie on most job applications about anything (ie you lose your job). As such compensation should not be considered.
It was called the fundamental difference statement. Read out to you and questioned about it.
It's known that Kitchener was queer and it's fairly certain Montgomery was too.
Discuss.
@@DanBeech-ht7sw You raise a good point but I think back in the day it didn’t matter. They just needed the numbers. Probably a bit of don’t ask don’t tell.
Those were the RULES
They didn't kick lord kitchener out, so why him?
Plenty of good change has happened in society because of people not following rules
This is one of the reasons that I decided to leave after 30 years. The military is more interested in appeasing minorities than the majority. They knew the rules when they joined, and it would have been referenced many times during their career before the rules changed. So what is next? Apologies to females who were not allowed to go to sea before 1992!
If you didn't like the rule, don't join or leave. Do blame everyone else.
A WREN officer got pregnant back in the 1980s. The Navy didn't run a creche so she was told it was either a child or her career, your choice. She chose the career. She sued the Navy years later for a fortune.
@stephennelmes4557 and this has to do with this because? It was not against regulations to be pregnant whereas been gay was.
@robhartley3930 If you don't like the rule, don't join or leave. Don't blame everyone else.... Your words...The point is, gay or pregnant, there was no place for you in the Royal Navy. Unless you could have someone else raise your child.
@stephennelmes4557 And! That was no different than normal society at that time. If you got pregnant, most companies would make the same decision. You also forget that as an officer in the RN, the job comes first. Everything else is second.
@@robhartley3930Rob, I completely agree. I'm for the rules not against them. I think we have a blue on blue. On the same side but talking at cross purposes. The WREN was given a choice. She made her choice and decided to plunder the public purse to see what she could get years after. It should not have been allowed.
"Do you have Homosexual tendencies?"
The correct, and honest answer is
"No."
Why is this the correct and honest answer? Because he IS Gay, NOT "having a Tendency towards being Homosexual." That makes it sound that it is something one "contemplates" doing, not "Is Gay." The question itself, as asked, is ludicrous.
Sorry but no, I disagree with compensation for that period. He knew when he joined up what the law (not rules as Queens/Kings regulations are legally binding) was and what the penalties were. We ALL did. It was drummed into us all through Swinderby and our later career. He even said it himself that he was living a double life.
So he didn’t properly read what he was signing? Let’s hope he took more care reading the documents when he was Mayor later on!
The law has changed, for the better in my and most other people’s opinions but so has moral and ethical judgement across the board in that time. We cannot rewrite history and we shouldn’t compensate it when it was clearly indicated to be the conditions of service. There were many, many opportunities to resign or PVR, he had the warning and the choice, he chose to take his chances and lost.
Interesting in my service career I never heard of this happening to lesbian troops (although I’m not saying it didn’t happen) yet many were in very open relationships on camp. The thinking was very different then.
He knew, as I did at the start of my 28 year career, that being gay was not allowed in the armed forces. That is how it was. It was accepted by all of us hetro members of the RAF.
If you use drugs the situation is exactly the same.
Stand fast RAF Reg
Now of course it's an entry requirement I believe and certainly enhances promotion prospects. Indeed I understand the RAF positively discriminates against White males of any persuasion.
You understand nothing.
@@DanBeech-ht7sw Think you'll find Dan that the RAF have already apologised for this discrimination. Google is you friend.
@@johnbobson1557 yes. Shouldn't have happened. Stupid rule wasn't it.
The RAF kicked him out! If he was American they would make a film about him and how he overcome Adversity. We Brits really do Suck sometimes.🤬
Well, some of us do, anyway.
There are a number of people in these comments who do not recognise the wrong of being kicked out of the armed forces for their sexuality, stating that they signed up for it and therefore should have known. Imagine the bravery of being a queer person and deciding to serve their country despite that, and live in fear, knowing that a colleague could dob them in at any moment and that they could be randomly investigated? And then imagine being the queer person, serving their country with honour - as this man did - and then being rejected by the very branch they have pledged their life - literally - to? So many of the comments here just reveal people who were obviously part of the problem, and are part of why this process has taken so long - something they have the audacity to critique. Were you an ally, back then, or did you hurt these people too?
What complete rubbish you spout. They knew the rules and deliberately broke them. I don't care what the rules are today, then they were different and you abide by them or leave. If you don't, expect the consequences. I bet you never served a day in your life, so but out.
@@robhartley3930well said.
As much as I think the military policy about homosexuality has now come to be as inclusive as possible as a good thing, those people who joined the military when it was still an offence to be a gay person knew what they were doing was against military law, therefore their dismissal was perfectly legal and justified, others might see my opinion as homophobic but in reality that was the military law at the time and had to be upheld, and if you decide to not enforce a law then what other laws, rules and regulations would commanders be willing to not follow, the law was the law at that time, and now it has been changed the homosexual personnel don’t have to watch over their shoulders because they are no longer committing any offence, good luck to them all.
You are correct, however the point is that it was a mistake to have such a law. We should learn not to institute laws on prejudice. LGTBT people want and can serve their country too. Their sexuality has got nothing to do with that. Imagine being capable, able and willing but being told you can’t. I don’t think many people outside of this community would have experienced this or would rightly have thought that it made any sense.
@@chanon_z8063 As an older veteran I don’t understand why people think it was a mistake to have the law at THE TIME 🕰️, when the manual of military law and the manual of Airforce Law were written it was a completely different era in time when, rightly or wrongly, attitudes to both LGBTQ people and sexuality was completely different, and the fact that, again at the time, people who were part of the LGBTQ community were a security risk, which they were, being open to being coerced into spying and other activities that would jeopardise the security of the United Kingdom and beyond, and because they were vulnerable to coercion they could not serve, it was not about the calibre of the people or their personal feelings towards duty, honour and patriotism, it was about security, and, more importantly they knew what the law was at the time and it was an offence to lie on their application forms for service, rightly or wrongly we can’t judge a law based on today’s standards or openness towards the LGBTQ community, and tbh I think it was the correct policy at the time.
For context, if a person that was or is a drugs user and were successful in an application to join up and later on they either were caught out, or they fell off the wagon then they would be immediately dismissed from the service in the same way as a LGBTQ person would have been, so would you say that was wrong, and even though the Soviet Union has collapsed that doesn’t mean that the security of the country is not vulnerable, the same doesn’t apply to alcoholism in that it is not strictly against the law, either civil or military, but it would be taken very seriously and depending on circumstances could lead to a person being dismissed from the service. It really was not about someone’s gender or sexuality, although it was not generally acceptable at the time, it was about the fact they could be open to coercion and they broke military law.
I agree that we can’t judge the law of years gone by today’s standards. I am saying that stories like these are important to ensure we don’t have laws like this anymore. LGBTQ people were security risk only because there were civil or military laws that made homosexuality illegal. If there were no laws they couldn’t be coerced by foreign intelligence services and were therefore not risks. Also I’d like to point out that comparing homosexuality with drug and alcohol addiction was where the problem was. Your sexuality does not make you an operational liability, unlike drugs and alcohol. Plus what occurs between two or more 😊 adults is not the government’s business and should never have been.
you lied on your job application and now want compensation for being called on it and losing your job
The ban was completely wrong and abhorrent, lots of people lied to get in.
So did Monty.
Government agrees with you. He'll get the compo...
We can’t have that sort in the armed forces…they mess around
Legal or not, it's gonna happen.
Although extreme unfair it was in the 90's and he knew the rules.
He knew the rules when he joined. Dishonest from the start so no sympathy
The RAF has definitely gone Woke.
Do you have a problem with people being homosexual?
@@DanBeech-ht7sw No. But I do have a problem with people using their sexuality to break the rules, especially when children are involved.
@ogukuo72 what children are involved? Are you trying to introduce a red herring?
You are.
@@DanBeech-ht7sw No.
@ogukuo72 yeah you are
Yawning
This is sad however, it was an offense at the time which he would have known. Asking for compensation is, in my opinion, ridiculous. I wish that people would have fought this far far sooner, at the time when homosexuality was decriminalised in the UK. I'm so glad that he went on to achieve great things, and have a beautiful family xxx
The discrimination was wrong then, the ban on being gay in the forces whilst legal in the nation showed how backward the forces can be.
….unacceptable by today’s standards but that was then and those were the rules back then ……things have changed…
I served in the RAF from 1970 to 1980. We all knew the rules, one being that it was illegal to be a homosexual in the armed forces. It was common knowledge that if you were identified as a proven homosexual you would be dismissed. They were the rules. So why do these people come out of their holes decades later and shout foul. Sadly, it may be OK to be a homosexual in the armed forces nowadays but that’s because some misguided fools have changed the rules. I salute this mans service but not his morals.
You have no morals.
Presumably you would have had monty kicked out of the army, along with half the public school officers.
@@DanBeech-ht7sw Yes I would. They were the rules. End of.
@@objectiveone5476 I doubt very much you would be so fanatical about enforcing other rules