Mazda CX-30 vs Audi Q3 vs Volvo XC40 2020 comparison review
Вставка
- Опубліковано 10 чер 2024
- This a small SUV comparison with a difference. Why? Because one of these cars is not necessarily like the others. Two of the vehicles here are premium-branded SUVs, and one is a challenger.
Mazda Australia is pushing upmarket with the new CX-30 model, which we’ve got here in top spec G25 Astina trim. And up against it? The all-new Audi Q3 35 TFSi - its first appearance in a CarsGuide comparison test - and our reigning pint-size premium SUV champion, the Volvo XC40, which we’ve got in entry-level Momentum spec.
All three of these models have a starting list price tag in the $40,000 range, and they are all petrol powered, automatic, and two-wheel drive.
Both the Audi and Volvo have a bunch of optional extras fitted that nudge their prices considerably, but the Mazda is almost box-fresh. However, we’re aiming to assess these models not so much on the glittery added bits, but the way they perform in other ways. We’ll assess each of these models against a range of criteria to help you decide which deserves to be on your shopping list. Let’s get to it.
Price may not be too important to you if you’re willing to spend more than forty grand on a small SUV. Maybe it’ll be a second or third car for your family, or a sole vehicle to live your urban lifestyle… it’s still important to position where each of these SUVs sits on the cost spectrum.
How much is an Audi Q3? What about a price list for the Mazda CX-30? And the price range for a Volvo XC40? We will run through each of the models below.
Let’s start at the most affordable SUV here, which is the Mazda CX-30. The CX-30 range starts from $29,990, and goes up to $43,490. These prices are RRP, or MSRP - they don’t include on-road costs, so these aren’t “driveaway” prices. You can always check out AutoTrader.com.au to see what deals are being done.
Now, the model we had on test was the CX-30 G25 Astina 2WD, which has a list price of $41,490 +ORCs. The AWD version - not available at the time of testing - is the flagship at $2000 more. Our car was optioned with metallic paint ($495) and floor mats ($195), meaning an as-tested price of $42,180.
The next most expensive is the Audi Q3. The range starts at $46,400 plus on-roads for the Q3 35 TFSI we have here - so, a roughly 10 per cent step up in price over the Mazda. The range will expand at a later date, but this - and a limited-run Launch Edition - is the only Q3 you can get at the time of writing.
Now we all know that premium brands like to offer customers plenty of options, and our vehicle was no exception. As tested, the Q3 35 TFSI we were driving was a $52,150 plus on-road costs proposition. Youch. It was equipped with metallic paint ($1250 - not sure why European paint costs so much more than Japanese paint…), plus the $2600 Comfort Package (electric front seats with electric lumbar support and heating, heated and folding exterior mirrors with kerb-side dipping, an auto-dimming rearview mirror, and adaptive cruise assist with emergency assist). It also had the Style package 1 ($1900), including full colour-coded bumpers and wheel-arches, 19-inch alloy wheels and interior silver aluminium inlays.
The most expensive model on test is the Volvo XC40 Momentum, which has a start price of $46,990 and ranges up to $56,990 for the flagship. Our model gets the entry-level T4 powertrain with 2WD, and that’s what you get for $46,990.
Our test vehicle had a number of options that pushed the as-tested price up to $54,890, as it had a number of options, including: the $1000 Momentum Comfort Pack (electric adjustment for passenger seat, heated front seats, heated steering wheel, front seat cushion extension); the $3000 Lifestyle Pack (panoramic sunroof, tinted windows at the rear, and a Harman/Kardon sound system; the $2000 Momentum Technology Pack (with 360-degree camera, semi-autonomous parking, power-folding rear headrests, adaptive LED Headlights, ambient interior lighting; metallic paint ($1150); and leather accent upholstery comfort seats ($750).
They’re all powered by four-cylinder petrol engines, but the displacement (engine size) varies greatly between the three. From the downsized 1.4-litre turbo in the Q3, to the punchy 2.0-litre turbo in the Volvo, to the non-turbo 2.5L in the Mazda, there are some very different approaches here.
Read Matt's full review: carsgui.de/2wDa2kv
Visit our Mazda CX-30 hub: carsgui.de/387hTEY
Visit our Volvo XC40 hub: carsgui.de/2jKZAxH
Visit our Audi Q3 hub: carsgui.de/2TLgv4Q
Check out our ExpertGuide: carsgui.de/2IQbbLx
CarsGuide - Go beyond the test drive
Check us out: www.carsguide.com.au
Subscribe to our channel: carsgui.de/2aMzFTT
Follow us on Twitter: carsgui.de/2ah6eta
Like us on Facebook: on. 17kv9Ui
See our Instagram: carsgui.de/2aQ0M1H
#CarsGuide #SUV #SUVcomparison - Авто та транспорт
The fact that mazda is being compared to these two brands is already a big win for mazda
Don't be a idiot
@@professorgimsara2180 Professors should know that it's not "a idiot". it's "an idiot". Idiot.
@@professorgimsara2180 Why?
I was wondering how it's being compared to these even
yea please dont compare mazda.... The CX30 doesnt have that WOWFACTOR or driving experience of being in an actual luxury/premium car!
Having owned a couple of German cars, I can tell you that the other two will be in the shop..a lot. The Mazda is sportier and because it has a proper automatic, you’re not going to burn out the clutches and suffer stuttering and jerkiness in traffic, like you will in the other two. It’s also 10% cheaper than the Poverty Pack specials from Audi and Volvo, and let’s face it, if you want decent spec, you’re going to be paying an extra $10K to $15K more than the Mazda, and a lot more for parts and service. And by the way, touch screens are no good in the bumps, don’t work well when they’re hot and have been in the sun, and leave grubby finger prints all over them. The Mazda is simply better made, more reliable, more affordable and performs better, plus it will have better resale value after four years.
German maintenance is expensive and with a DCT you get the same problems that Hyundai and Kia has, you can't creep when stuck in traffic becuase the constant engage and disengage of the clutch will just well wear it out. And thats money. I'd take a CVT over a dual clutch.
Very helpful. Thank you!
I felt like this was really biased review, when reviewing the Mazda there was more nit picky / personal complaints in the review compared to factual complaints for the general consumer. I understand everyone has there own taste to what they like and whats worth more for value. It’s amazing for the price point how much the Audi lacked in safety tech, safety in cars have become increasingly important and is now even becoming more standardised in budget friendly vehicles. This is only my opinion and what i thought.
So, the Mazda tied a car costing ten thousand more? That's a win for the Mazda for sure.
Using the rotary isn't annoying at all - in fact it's the most ergonomic and safest way to interact with the system. I wouldn't prefer to hold my whole arm in the air to use the touchscreen, when I just could quickly interact from the arm rest instead.
Agreed, touchscreens are usually slow and get all smudgey as well
Unbiased review , he says mazda seem like they didn't know to finish the interior because you can see a usb hole (which they litterally zoomed in , you can't really see it when you are sitting in the car) but then it's not a problem anymore for the volvo when it's even more in sight 🤣
Drove both Mazda and Volvo and I gotta give the sportier feel and better handling of the Mazda serious props. The Turbo version makes the CX30 just that much better too. Between all that and the significant lower upfront cost, lower cost of fuel (premium vs regular), lower insurance costs, lower upkeep costs etc... I think Mazda wins this for me.
The CX-30 beats my previous C-Class for comfort for the driver!
You are saying that Mazda is not as "premium" as Audi is but when in the world, a 1.4 tfsi is more premium than a 2.5 engine ???
It would help if your reviewer was unbiased. Hit the middle of the video where people will move on and the overwhelming negativity starts to ease. The fact you don’t know that Mazda deliberately don’t have a touchscreen to help drivers concentrate on actually driving seems to have evaded your prep work. This is shared with BMW who offer options for interaction that are broad and driver awareness focussed. My favourite is the Audi but the Mazda is a great car undeserving of so much negativity.
The problem with the luxury brands, or at least one of them, is the never ending list of options. You're paying $10,000 to $12,000 more for the Audi and Volvo respectively, that is just highway robbery, in my humble opinion.
it's also not the same category, with CX-5 being more comparable in terms of size and price
@@redReiRei exactly. I was wondering about the choice of mazda for the comparison.
So a Volvo that as tested is 28 % more expensive than the Mazda was better. Great value...
Dag Brück i think he took price into account though. The Audi was equal with the Mazda in the end, despite having a more positive review
James Allerton well, possibly. But value wasn’t mentioned in the conclusions, right? In many car reviews it is easy to find a good car if you don’t have to pay yourself.
After the review, I would put all my money on the Mazda CX-30!
The reason the Mazda does not have a touch screen is quite simple. Spoiler: it's not because they never had it. I have both, but hate touch screens in cars.
My Mazda 3's touch screen doesn't work above walking pace for safety reasons. I don't mind no touch screen when I get my CX30.
The results of this test provided no surprises at all for me. Well, thats not exactly true...the fact a crossover version of a compact car from a non-premium/luxury manufacturer can be compared to the most similar offerings from Audi and Volvo and not completely be outclassed has to say something. It either means Mazda is learning how to do premium at a non-premium price point, or the so-called premium makes are slipping up. I think its the former, and thats pretty remarkable.
underrated comment right here. i'll be picking my new cx-30 g122 petrol this week :)
The reason why Mazda has know touch screen, it's for safety, everytime you have to operate the touchscreen your eyes comes off the road .
But don’t your eyes have to look at the screen to see what your scrolling too...I think it’s more to do with screen placement and it’s to much of a reach to be able to touch the screen while driving.
@@johncleaver4245 nope, when you use the infotainment system of Mazda you can understand why. I prefer that infotainment just like Jaguar vs the touchscreen while driving.
@@ClaudioAguileraMunoz nope? So you don’t have to look at the screen when scrolling? I wasn’t talking about preferences, that’s a individual thing, I was saying I don’t think the system Mazda have gone with is for safety reasons.
@@johncleaver4245 of course it’s for safety reasons, just like Jaguar, and yes, it is not like you don’t have to look at the screen, but the difference in body position between teaching the touch screen and not reaching it. Just like Mercedes E-Class, it’s better to not touch the screen for safety reasons even when it’s giant.
@@ClaudioAguileraMunoz Why is it that this is not mentioned on any governments safety standards when new cars are assessed?...Audi didn’t see a safety issue when they changed over from the “rotary” system to the touch screen, neither do the vast majority of the other car manufacturers....there’s a reason why your iPads/tablets/ smart phones are touch...because it’s quicker and easier/simple to use and takes up less room...again its more to do with the car manufacturer wanting to differentiate there products from the “next guy”...I’m only guessing but I bet Mazda end-up following suit.
Fun thing :
Mazda has a rotary dial and that’s annoying(aka, you’ll never get used to)
In Volvo everything is through a touchscreen, but: “trust me, you’ll get used to it”.
I mean, come on?
Ikr
Literally all the other car review channels said they like the rotary dial and that is easy to get used to lol.
Why are reviewers and people obsessed with touch screens ? I have a touch screen in my car and it's full of greasy burger finger prints, hand lotion smudges, sticky sugary drips, saliva spots, potato chip oil Covering all over its surface. The screen gets all scratched offer frequent wipping and cleaning.
I applause Mazda for making the info screen a no-touch surface!
There's built in voice command and steering wheel controls. At no time anyone needs to lean over and touch the screen. Learn how to use those functions.
Try using a touchscreen on the move and you will see why Mazda was smart removing the touch aspect. So much easier with the the controller.
That's the reason! My Mazda 3's touch screen only work to walking pace speed.
@@peterhayward1848 A lot cars disables touch, Subaru for example if ur using navigation and want to change something it disables until ur vehicle is stopped. Other touch screen functions work while vehilce in motion, but you spend more time swiping through the menus though. Mazda is more of a shortcut menu since it has shortcut buttons already laid out on the side of the wheel instead of needing too much attention from you to touch the right icons.
Really good review format, editing and graphics.
Not one but two thumbs up.
I almost had the feeling that the reviewer wanted to find more fault with the Mazda. I'm a bit biased as just about to change to a CX30! Overall the Mazda will be more reliable as it's Japanese. The European makers just can't match the Japanese makers. Good review though.
I changed from Audi to Mazda after my Audi lease is about to end. Gotta say, overall, I don't mind sacrificing a bit of the "luxurious" comfort to save $20k USD. The Mazda has all the safety features and some more features (leather seats, Android play) that I was looking for, and the driving experience was not bad at all for city driving. I didn't get to drive above 80mph on the highway during my test drive because that's when the traction and steering control usually will show differences between an Audi and a more affordable car, but for the amount of in-city driving I did, Mazda did its job nicely.
Yep, having a reliable car and knowing that when something breaks it doesn't suddenly surprise you with a 1000$ receipt is good enough for me. I live in Poland and people here still buy german cars being somehow sure of their "superiority" against japanese brands even when they go about replacing the turbo and clutch after 3 years.
Absolutely true
Yeahhh well, still taking the Mazda without a doubt
without watching can say Mazda is winner because of reliability
Volvo > mazda
@@Littlegoblinfatface I’m purchasing an XC40 but I gotta tell you, Mazda is top1 reliability brand in the world in 2020
Yes.
@@Littlegoblinfatface No.
clear comparison. well done. thanks!
Thank you for the review! Please could you update this line up for 2022?
Him saying “Trust me” so many times really bugs me
I consider the Mazda to be more comfortable. I have had my XC40 for almost two years and recently test drove the CX30 and the seats and armrests were so much softer and it had a heads up display too! If they took away the badges, then I would have chosen the CX30 to be the more expensive one. It offers about 90% of the Volvo but much less money so I will find myself "downgrading" - a year's payments on my Volvo is that of two on the Mazda (lease) and the Mazda has more power too! (250 Horsepower).
Shouldn’t the CX-5 be more formidable comparison than the smaller cx-30? 🤔 Already knew which way this review was headed 👎🏼🖕🏼
At the end of the day, it all boils down to your preference, budget and purpose.
In most of the Carsguide video there is mention of wanting knobs rather than touch for things like volume and air-con controls. I would like to see a review which demonstrates the voice control and steering control function for those so called annoying things.
please compare latest editions of same cars in Canada? Thanks
2021 CX-30 GS, Volvo XC40 T4 (2020) and Q3 Komfort
This was an awesome review, thank you! I had an Audi A5 for several years and it was my favorite car I’ve ever owned. But after I got it up to 125,000 miles I had to get rid of it last year, and I decided to try a Mazda cx-30. I’ve never owned a Mazda prior, but I really have admired several models over the years. When I went to test drive the cx-30 I was impressed with the comfort of the drivers seat.. the interior had a similar feel to my Audi A5 behind the wheel. The handling, acceleration and quietness seemed very comparable. My Audi was a premium plus, and my Mazda is Premium. This cx-30 has more bells & whistles, but it is 9 yrs newer. Now when I 1st start my car, it is much louder than the Audi until it warms up for a minute, then the rpm’s decrease and it quiets down.. Never had that with my Audi and prior BMW’s.. But ultimately, I find that I appreciate how much bang for the buck Ive been getting out of my1st Mazda, the cx-30.
I'll take mazda anytime, because it's cheaper and have most of the tech what BMW and Volvo have. Not to mention a basic Volvo and BMW won't even have enough tech sa a low trim mazda.. Ijs.
For me it's :
1. Mazda
2. Volvo
3. Audi
And I like all of these brands
It says that you are a idiot
@@professorgimsara2180
Twice
It's either you idiot Or an idiot.
Have this Mazda and is a super car ! Very comfi and fun and easy driving, elegant and....a very affordable price here for Europe (Belgium).
I see one big issue with this comparison, Mazda CX-5 should have been used, not CX-30. CX-5 is a lot closer in size and price to the other 2 vehicles, so it was kind of pointless. Mazda always makes it's vehicles bigger than the competition. This comparison was like comparing the Mazda 6 to Mercedes Benz S class, pretty absurd from all aspects.
So basically Audi Q3 interior is made purely for customers with mostly having blind co-passenger. OK
Can you please repeat the same comparison with the Cx30 turbo version from this year
Yeah. I felt like Matt was picking on the CX30 on the separate review.This vid confirms it.
*Gets top GT Sport Tech trim with hardened suspension*
*Complains about suspension*
Touch screens don't really belong on a dashboard...
They are an accident waiting to happen.
That’s not true. Touch screen is safer to use because it is quicker so your eyes don’t need to look at it all the time when you use it, Whereas in Mazda you eyes need to keep looking at the screen so you know you are selecting the right function on the screen.
@@HHH-nl2yd I’m pretty sure you have no idea what you’re talking about. Please don’t do anything in your life which involves making decisions where safety is concerned for others🚨
@@harryrammer pretty sure I know what I am talking about. Just so let you know only Mazda abandoned touch screen and back to like the old Audi. So you think all other car companies are stupid ???
@@harryrammer just give you an example, how long is gonna take you to change apps from the Mazda control center comparing to a touch screen. The quicker the safer while driving. Unless you really don’t use the screen while driving
@@HHH-nl2yd regarding the stupidity of other car companies, mostly yes, but definitely all the German ones. Germany do make nice watches though!
Regarding changing apps on a touch screen whilst driving, I consider this a risky procedure by the user which could very well cause a hazard to third parties.
I have used the Mazda CX-30 console screen functions and they are extremely well thought out. With all safety concerns considered so as to keep any risk to a minimum.
Nowadays, touch screens are installed in vehicles because “the sheeple” demand it, without thought or consequence of using them safely. Vehicle safety legislation will catch up on this one day and they will ALL be outlawed, you’ll see.
Shouldn't the Audi and Volvo be compared to the Mazda CX-5?
Something is wrong with comparing Mazda CX 30 with the other two cars. 🤔
It should have been compared to Audi Q2 and Volvo V40 cross country. Mazda X5 are same size as XC40 and Q3
what about reliability and price difference?
VOLVO has been around for so long, and you still don't know that is a removable waste bin in the centre console?! #practicality
Volvo withstanding newer offerings from the competition. It just shows how good the design is. Where the 2l 4-banger scared off a lot off Americans, Audi takes it to even lesser standards with a 1.4 no friction engine that will spill the oil within 3 years of ownership.
pichurri also the least powerful and least fuel efficient on test. Bit disappointing.
Thank you for a great comprehensive report especially since I’m considering a CX30 at the moment.
Great, glad we could be of assistance.
Cheers
Matt
CarsGuide Hi Matt you’re welcome, being a bit of a car buff always enjoy your reports and Road Tests especially when you do them in the lower Blue Mountains where I recognise the scenery as I lived in the area for 60 years.
Cheers
I’ll chose the CX30 better performance and the interior is stunning
Apples with oranges...the CX-5 would be the propper car against the other two
I think the CX5 goes against the Q5, Forestor, and larger SUVs. Q3 is a compact SuV that matches the Rav 4, subaru cross, mazda cx30..
I feel like the CX-30 is quite out of place in this comparison. I would've compared the CX-5 against these two premium cars. I know it's to showcase the CX-30, but it just doesn't fit well in this comparison.
If its possible could you do a video on Toyota Corolla... comparison between the last 3 or 4 models.
That would be interesting
Waste of time reviewing sedan car like Toyota Corolla which is boring that uses old technologies to achieve the reliability needed . Japanese engineers are not brave enough to modernise new technologies in their present line up. What a shame just to achieve that boring reliability especially the boring Toyota brand.
@@konsen6149 Millions of people have continued to choose the Corrolla over other brands even though others have the tech and people specifically in 3rd World Countries are still doing so.
Reliability, Good resale value, low fuel usage is what most people look for and that's why so many families choose and will always choose the Corolla.
Toyota is brave they have introduced alot of tech in the 2020 Corolla model but only time will tell if reliability holds up
So that's the question that has to be answered in due time.
My concerns now are that the Corolla is moving towards tech thus its price will sky rocket and therefore it will move away from being the "people's choice" 💔
That why Corolla is only meant for third world countries where their population breed like rabbits. They don't know much about car technology which Toyota is famous for using old technology and pretty much concerned about repayment loan. The cheaper the better whereby Corolla is a cheap affordable car to get around . They do not mind about lack of safety , comfort and boredom.
Most first world buyers would not buy a Corolla simply because Corolla keeps using old technology over and over again which is nothing good to shout about.
@@konsen6149 No they are not meant for only 3rd World countries. Not everyone in 1st World countries are rich and not everyone aspires to having the best of cars. Some people are more interested in providing a good home for their families.
Providing a good homes for families, I totally support as it aspired us to work harder. But considering having a Toyota for its reliability it makes me pondered into agreeing with you. I heard of Takata , unintended acceleration and other safety features/ body structure issues that remained some big questions thinking of owning a Corolla. Cheers
Great I love all three but my favorite is the mazda
CX5 will be more comparable
Not quite. The CX5 goes head to head with the Q5, Xc60 instead of these guys.
Mr. C.G.O CX30 is just an lifted Mazda3, not an trully crossover. In other reviews CX5 also compare with X1 and XC40.
@@aquaboy1650 Aquaboy, you got that wrong. It`s not just a lifted Mazda 3, it`s the same platform yes, but they have made several adjustments because this is higher car then the Mazda 3.
Luxury is in the details
こういう比較って国産だとやりづらいけど、オーストラリアだと自分の国で作ってないから客観的で公平な見方をしてそうで参考になる
Really liked your review format, but think you chose the wrong Mazda. I would like to see the CX5 take on the Volvo as it would be closer to the price and size of the XC40. Plus you get the 2.5 turbo.
Test drove the Mazda CX-30 & it would have been our 13th Mazda but the Volvo was our winner too, so we bought one. I’d never considered Volvo before but all the reviews from motoring journalists were positive I had to test drive & it blew me away. If you’re looking for a small SUV then just go & try the XC-40 it will surprise you.
How is the service going to be when you have a problem with your Chinese built car.
Peter Paynting car is built in Belgium.
@@michaelsummers9579 Different country. Same problem. Will still have reliability, serviceability and quality issues as it is not built to handle the Australian weather. Especially if the car is red or burgundy.
Peter Paynting That I don’t know. I live in the UK.
@@petron1954 You bring up a good point, and one that is shared with the U.S. as well, but we have far more extreme winter weather versus Australia. Japanese makes have learned how to design their cars to survive Aussie/American climate cycles..Europeans, not so much. I think this is why VW/Audi is seen as fairly reliable in Europe/UK, but have horrible reputations down under and North America.
Disagree with you….touch screens are annoying! Fingerprints, raising arm to use. Sorry would rather have the dial.
Please compare all 3 vw, t roc, cross and tiguan in the 1 review if possible please, similar to the German autofgenghal channel
Here’s a quick review to your request. All vw’s are crap! There you go😉
You forgot to mention Mazda CX30 compared to the other two is actually smaller by 1.5 inch to 3 inches. So the rear seats is obviously less space, Mazda is 173.1 inch, Volvo is 174.6 inches Q3 is 176.6 inches. But one thing you have to consider about Audi is that everything is considered an option....LED lights, blindspot etc are options....Audi top trim is like $50K vs mazda $33K....
Mazda top is 40k
Shouldn't it be the CX5 that's compared to the other two?
For Mazda CX 30 model is d best value & safety comes first. Two ranges of models is a luxury & performance
Great idea to have lots of passengers when testing the cars. That uncovers any under-powered issues.
Its underpowered probably because of the transmission...DCT requiers time to engage clutch hence you will have slow starts. Same kinda deal with Hyundai and Kia cars that uses DCT.
I'd like to see a Haval H6 compared to a RAV4 and a Forester.
the Audi's design looks like a joke beside cx30
Yeah, idiots like you can't chose what looks the best
Cool next , dacia sandero vs bentley
Many thanks for this Review - all three of these vehicles were on our list and we have, as a result, settled on a T5 model of the Volvo.
😂you jumped down a 🕳...volvo crowd🙄 don’t forget to wear your wellies in the high street!!
Let me get this straight,
you are saying the volvo and Audi are better/same?
let me check the price
Mazda 34.000 Euro full Equipment (Sky X)
Audi price 47.000 Euro (To get the same Equipment)
Volvo price 47500 (to get the same Equpiment)
But in my Case i get the Cheaper Version Mazda Comfort+ plus Sky G for about 27.800 I am Saving arround 18.000! Euro.`
In the End is always about price-performance, how much i get for what price.
i just bought a new cx-30 (basic equipment, g122 petrol, polymetal color; europe) for 21.000euro. it has everything you need.. it only lacks parking camera, 18'alloys and automatic climate control (for which i don't care because i prefer manual).
The rotary dial is much simpler on the move
Morons like you can't figure out why it sucks
@@professorgimsara2180 Why does it?
@@professorgimsara2180 No u
And you not plagued with finger prints in the screen, also the Mazda has a very good voice assistant on the go so you don’t have to use the dial
What about reliability
Wing Hoh 1. Mazda 2. Volvo 3. Audi
On reliability Mazda destroys the other two
XC40 easily wins in my opinion. The turbo four cylinder is perfect here.
don't agree, had volvo T4 and the ride was on R DESIGN almost as firm as the mazda (perhaps slightly more compliant with some harsh roads but marginaly), seat cushion soft on both ,but where the mazda was far more refined is the silence on board, including from the engine, more subdued, not to mention the smoothest automatic gear on the mazda which contributes to the overall refinement
R design = even more money?
The reviewer is defo an Audi fan boy, Audi have very basic spec and less reliability compared to Mazda or Volvo, the only negative for me with the Mazda is the boot otherwise it would be my fav, I have driven the Q3 and the XC40 and preference is the Volvo but my fav here without having driven is the mazda
great review, a fair dinkum one
Mazda will sell in 5 years time for more then the other 2 put together
Audi will be worth quite a lot with that brand new turbo and clutch!
This is got to be the most bias review I've read. Didn't even talk about how the Mazda all wheel drive is superior to both the others, how the motor shuts off cylinders, and its a bullet proof design, and that the Mazda is even in this competition with vehicles that are10,000 more. Take the Mazda off road against the other 2 and then tell me who comes out on top...Plus the Mazda CX-30 isn't their luxury package it their starting point vehicle. Price to performance Mazda wins hand down....
I would rather have the sportiness of my mazda cx30..
I've had lexus, bmw and mazda. would choose mazda any day for minimalist and luxurious interior, better drive and for user experience.
This guy sits quick far back from the wheel, the rear seat space comparison can't be realistic
A
The air vents in that Volvo are hideous. What were they thinking? The rest of the car looks so nice.
Still waiting somebody do produce more beautifull midsize sedan than mazda 6 :) (since 2013).
Volvo and Audi are just charging extra for that badge
A firmer suspension setup for Aussie version?
6:40
suspension setup which is a lot firmer
and you do sort of feel a lot more of the little lumps and bumps in the road
TheStraightPipes
ua-cam.com/video/d9WbYYtBYy0/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/d9WbYYtBYy0/v-deo.html
8:40
on the suspension comfort I think they absolutely nailed the damping the suspension is super comfortable
you can drive this in the city ...
this thing over potholes and whatever anything we got in California lovely
At 3:02 - "All 4 of these..." 🤔
Mazda est une voiture pour les passionnés, elle est discrète, et ce vol beaucoup moins que ses rivales. C'est une voiture pour rouler tranquille. Elle est équipée de détecteurs d'angles morts qui sont de séries. Mazda ce différencie aussi par son tarif. Si on prend en compte la fiabilité de Mazda reconnue mondialement, et son tarif avec beaucoup plus d'équipements de série, je serais plus tenté d'acquérir le Cx30. Merci pour ce test
I absolutely DESPISE the back seat test these reviewers do. Who is carting around adults in the back seat on a regular basis? This class of vehicle is for couples with small children. Almost NOBODY is carrying around 6' children in a SUBcompact SUV. it's a worthless test. If u want to make it meaningful test it with a babydoll and car seats or small dummies in place of children.
Whilst Mazda may be claiming to be moving upmarket it would only be to premium (or sub premium) and not luxury so this comparison is pointless. Considering how much you rubbished things on the Mazda I would suggest a score of equal second is overly generous.
vs Price
@@hmaccas738 you can't throw a rubbishy and cheaper premium or sub premium car against more expensive luxury cars and say it wins on price.
Why not use the CX-5 turbo .Does not make sense , CX-5 a more fair compare.
Wait for the new peugeout 2008.
it's a great car if you're into latex & plastic toys
Compare the cx30 with the 2008
What the hell is that annoying background sound? Could only listen for five minutes and I'm out of here.
hahah .. just turn the volume off :-)
Volvo and Audi good luck with after sales service....
These luxury brands (Volvo certainly at this time) still only have a 3 year warranty. They basically don't stand behind their cars.
Reliability itself volvo and audi fail already
Mazda Rules!!!
Solely because of reliability. There are better choices for the same size vehicles. Even a CX-5.
@@petron1954 for example? Please don’t tell me BMW X1 or Audi Q3 🤦🏻♂️
@@ClaudioAguileraMunoz Neither. Maybe a Subaru Forrester, RAV4 or Hyundai Tucson. Definitely nothing made in Europe.
Reliability, resale & warranty
1 Mazda
... big gap
2 Audi
3 Volvo
Greg you nailed it. Servicing costs less on Mazda. Also I believe has provided a car that is unapologetically aimed at a driver and passenger mainly.with more room upfront than many larger cars. Back seat space will be suitable for the main demographic they are aiming at, if not they will be buy a CX 5. To option the Volvo and Audi to match the Mazda makes them around 15 k dearer. I believe it was stated in recent testing that the Mazda recorded the highest ever safety score for adult passages. It’s the Mazda for me and I have had an Audi A4 and Mercedes B class and never again. I’ve moved beyond badge and prefer to focus on value and quality.
@@tonyagius1378 Good to see you have realised your mistakes with Euro crap and moved on. As you say, the Mazda is more of a drivers car.
You can't take reliability already for this model it's new. Resale i think the Audi would take it and warranty i don't know... brand doesn't mean anything only on comfort and resale Value and luxury.... i went from honda to volvo and i'm not complaining love it and im driving a xc40 for 1 year and 2 months already.
The reliability gap isn't that big, it's pretty much similar between those brands only 4 percent better on the Mazda (67%). Mazda is not Toyota/Lexus or Honda, all with 80% and up
Had a Lexus gs and a Mazda cx-5
If I want to buy a SUV I want to sit high. I don´t do it in the Mazda.
Too many ads
Mazda beste Auto und zufelesiege weiter so Zoom ZoomZoomZomm 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩👍👍👍👍👍👍
mazda is the best period
3.01 all four of this? Wtf