World's Largest 135" Micro LED Professional Monitor! (2000 Nits Full-Screen)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 чер 2024
- ASUS showcased 3 new ProArt monitors at IBC 2023 in Amsterdam, including:
1) 135-inch ProArt Cinema PQ07 Micro LED Display
2) PA32UCXR 4K HDR Mini LED monitor
3) PA27DCE-K 4K HDR OLED monitor
The "Includes Paid Promotion" message in this video refers to the sponsorship by ASUS.
========================
**Click Below to SUBSCRIBE for More Reviews, Sneak Peeks & Tips:
/ @hdtvtest
========================
VISIT HDTV Test
www.hdtvtest.co.uk/
FOLLOW US!
www.threads.net/@hdtvtest
/ hdtvtest
/ hdtvtest
/ vincent_teoh
/ hdtvtest - Наука та технологія
Wow - 2000 nits full screen would be nice for my dark home-cinema room !
This would be eye blowing !
Maybe in future it will get a bit cheaper...
literally eye blowing
Most tech I am looking for only require 1 kidney or dumping my gf.
For this tech, 1 kidney+ dumping gf + a very small bank heist.
Just do a medium sized bank heist and save the rest of the trouble
gorgeous, perfect fit to someone's enormous superyacht
And 8k version scaled up would be pretty great for a movie theatre
@@amazin7006 For all over the zero movies filmed and sold in 8k. Lmao
@@georgejones5019 Real time upscaling interpolates detail.
This is it. 135 inch is the right size. Now bring the price down to consumer levels.
Maybe in a decade…
Great work!
That's ENORMOUS. You can't get your hands around it! ;-)
It’s interesting how LED/MicroLED shift the price around. It’s cheaper to produce larger size at lower res. So a 1080p at 32” is more expensive than a 4K at 110”. I bet vendors like Sony and Samsung gonna acre u over with the pricing anyway but the actual manufacturer cost is different.
DING
@@hanes2 isnt it the same shit always?! milk the stupid early adopters first then it comes down in price and be cheaper?
I think Micro LED will end up like Intel Optane. A little bit better, but much higher price. Which led to the eventual cancellation of Optane.
@@TheFather_ People been talking about MicroLED for how many years to get "cheaper"?... the barrier to entry haven't gotten cheaper, but the products at the barrier to entry has gotten better. And I don't think that's changing for at least 3-5 years. It's not a early adopter product in the industry. The big clients like XR/TV Studios/Hollywood and such at the moment pay 1 million usd per top tier calibration on a single microLED display and they may have a couple of them. So the market actually shifted towards selling the more expensive rather than focusing on the home consumer.
It would be helpful to include links in the description for your other referenced videos.
Absolutely perfect. I’ve been looking for something for the guest bedroom. The old insignia finally crapped out on me. 🤦♂️
Can you make a tutorial on how to color calibrate TVs?
Easier to do on PC monitors, but not TVs
can you compare it to the world's smallest 135" led tv?
You can clearly see the seams where the modular panels meet, maybe not noticeable in person from a distance 🧐
I love This UA-cam Channel thank you, Bro
Please review the ASUS PA32UCXR monitor as quickly as you can. Thanks!
The Man is looking sharp with those chrome glasses.
I like your glasses, Vincent. They're cool.
I hope I live long enough to see Micro LED gaming monitors.
running the AW3423DW and have been for a while now so its nice to see we finally got OLED and QD OLED monitors... But man I would love to see mirco led monitors. I don't think we will get those for a long, long time though sadly. I mean the TVs aint even mainstream yet
I hope I live long enough to see microled at iPad
I'd love to see MicroLED on a laptop or conventional sized monitor like 32" to 48". Considering it has no burn in risk, at least from what I've read, that would be about end game for me.
I don't have much experience with MiniLED but I know it's available on the MSI Titan GT 77 laptop. Perhaps that will be my next upgrade from my Alienware Area 51m, which is going on 4 years old now. Mine just has the basic IPS 1080p panel 144hz, as 4k wasn't really worth it at the time of purchase, especially on a laptop for gaming. (9700k + RTX 2080)
OLED might not be to bad, considering I use my laptop considerably less than my phone. But my Samsung S20 Ultra I've had for a few years now has quite noticable burn in now..
One of these days, eventually...😅
can you review the Panasonic TX-65MX950B please?
When and where is the Samsung 76" microled for sale?
It was much cheaper that I was expecting!
Just have to chose… ferrari or big monitor…
😂😂😂
Maybe I will wait some years…
and after 4 years keep driving that 2014 prius and watching 55" tv 😆
Man, we have to wait 5 years for micro led to become main stream for gaming monitors and TV 😢
Probably closer to 10 years
@@darudesandstorm7002 don't do this to me 😱
You might be waiting a long time, Stop the Fomo did a thread on it not too long ago, the most we will see is likely large sizes like 80-90” for around 10K, but we will never see it on a monitor, because it would require LED’s to be the size of a pixel found on a monitor, which just isn’t feasible at least with current LED technology.
I gave up the idea of upgrading to a Micro LED already, My current hope is on PHOLED and eLEAP OLED... Both slated for 2024
@@koblongata first time hearing those words, gonna do some research on them for my own info
Seems a little choppy at 1:02, is that just due to the footage they used or your camera recording it?
It's likely the video source.
Nicee big hello from Croatia😂
When I am doing music production, I have my professional speakers that I use to listen for problems, quality and so on. And then I listen to my almost finished product on conusmer level speakers to hear if it still sounds great. Is that something people do within TV/movies?
Yes, or at least they should.
But the several dark and hard to see scenes from studios, especially Disney, makes me believe they're cutting corners and rushing production.
What speakers do you use (brands i mean)
is the TAD company of products any good?
@@ydid687 I use a large array of different brands.
If TAD is good? For what? They are good for a dedicated home cinema. But they are prohibitively expensive. Here is what you can do instead. Measure up your "entertainment area" the box where you want the best experience, then find out how many speakers you want. 1.5/2.5/1.5.2/2.7.x. then you mark the optimal view distance between your and your screen. Then you direct the speakers toward that spot. Being your sitting area. Never have your speakers up against a wall, or directly in a corner. Never!
Then get a good amp that can support all of your speakers, maybe even a preamp. That was my first setup when I was 14: TV to preamp to amp. xD
Now the positives of a preamp can quickly be nothing, so it is an advanced move.
But try to optimize your setup before throwing stacks of cash at speakers. You can get good sound with cheap speakers. And if you put your great speakers in a corner you will get the same good sound as the cheap speaker.
how many frames does Vince own?
If i only were rich
Do it
Then get rich
I wouldn't spend that kind of money for a screen even if I was rich. Seems like a waste of money.
@@UstaleoneExactly. Most Rich people are practical, that's how they got rich in the first place
Then I wouldn’t talk to you anymore
Hello, first of all, good luck, I am writing this comment from Turkey. As a football fan and TV series watcher, I do not want to experience problems such as screen flickering and lag. I'm undecided between the TCL 65C845 (50000 Turkish Lira) and Samsung 65QN85C (48000 Turkish Lira) models. What would your suggestion be? Thanks again.
I get one for Christmas 🎄
2:00 wait?? The 76 Samsung microLED TV is available? WHERE
What about Sony A95L review????
Is there any forum or website I could go to , to get help with tuning out horribly luminous pink skin tones on my PHILIPS 50PUS7906. I've tried adjusting the various standard picture settings but nothing there helped. Theres advanced picture settings but I wouldn't know where to start there.
Oooh i cant wait to have it in my living room, oh wait, who am i kidding, i can barley afford a 55" tv but i can always dream :)
Who are Asus sourcing these Micro Led panels from? LG? Samsung? Sony?
as far as i know, they are getting LG panels.
@@TheFather_ That explains the price. LG is still using pick and place process while samsung has moved on to laser transfer process.
Must be Samsung, because the other Micro-LED manufacturer is Sony ... but Sony concentrates on the only reasonable Micro-LED applications: movie theatre installations ... called "Crystal LED"
wowowowowo, did you just say joled panel with pure rgb (aka. rgb vertical stripe) subpixel structure (PA27DCE-K)??? where's the catch, is it 60 hz?
I have a 24 inch Spectre side monitor for youtube while I play games
This will work well in my bathroom.
A27DCE-K joled tech?
IMO a better investment then a luxury car..
Thankfully, for those of us in the UK, with our very high interest rates, once the banks pass it on to our savings, they will grow so fast, £200k for this bargain will take no time at all (I jest of course….the banks are never going to pass it on). In all seriousness, I look forward to the day when 80 odd ” microleds are affordable .
Micro LED is like future song
I think PHOLED with dual-stack is going to be the relevant display tech for the next 5-7 years, maybe longer, mLED for mainstream will be 2030-2035, a 16K 16:10 240hz dual-stack PHOLED with rolling bar BFI and ULMB-2 will hold me over till then, and my LaCie Blue IV 22 will hold me over until that becomes available too.
16K makes no sense. 8K is already losing its battle. See latest sales stats and manufacturers saying they will not probably make 8K models. Most high-end movie theatre projectors are 2K. Things can be done, but not always should be.
@@andycrystal 8K and 4K is pointless, neither give tangible benefits over 1080p, 4K is 8.3 megapixels, 8K is 33 megapixels, 16K is 133 megapixels, this brings along with it a huge list of upgrades, no chromatic aberration, no screen door effect, a huge improvement in multi resolution handling, shaders will look night and day better, fine details will have a massive resolution upgrade, they are pouring billions into cracking the 128K PPI wall mOLED modules, which is well over 2 gigapixels, they already have 26000 PPI modules out there, once you get past 100 megapixels, you get so many nice IQ improvements, have a look at a 10 megapixel photo and compare it with a 100 megapixel photo, the IQ difference is of the scale, for gaming, 100 megapixel displays will be incredible, and with multi die GPU's round the corner, plus chiplet design, pushing 16K and 32K resolutions will be more than doable, 32K is 533 megapixels by the way, drool.
Quote by Steve Yedlin. 2022:
"Pushing for "4K" home cinema formats when we can't even deliver image streams that don't have visible compression artefacts that are much larger than 2K pixels. And pushing for "HDR" when we don't even have a coherent system for using TVs' potential for faithful color rendition." I reckon you know who he is...
We are waiting micro led tv
you can get it for my birthday
Who is manufacturing the micro LED panel?
are you in Scotland 🤔
I'm a simple man, so forgive me if I'm out of line. But is there any reason why they can't use MicroLED to create an incredibly dense FALD backlight for a transmissive display tech, like Quantum Dots or LCD? I have to assume making LARGER, lower-resolution MicroLED panels is cheaper, so you could theoretically use them to create FALD zones much smaller than even the most densely packed FALDs out today, without the issues of burn-in (which is why people are anticipating MicroLED).
I did some quick maths, and the Blue Subpixel's width of Samsung's The Wall is about the same size as a single full-color pixel of a 27-inch 1440p display. You could expand the size to make it into a 5px local dimming zone, which would be enough for even the smallest real-world HDR applications, plus desktop elements. And since it's easier to make a larger MicroLED, it would probably be substantially cheaper, perhaps well within at least a high-end consumer reach.
I thought JOLED went bust and its manufacturing facilities wound up?
Ser your buying?
What' the full screen sustained brightness of the Micro LED TV?
2000 nits
I thought it was the 270" at about 500,000 USD? Maybe because you typed "Monitor".
why do they never advertise refresh rate
Cant wait for the day when micro LED replaces the problematic OLED.
Based. Bought iPhone 13 though I Rees hope display will not burn in for 2-3 years cost of replace expensive. And ye not gonna buy oled again. Would be cool get microled for iPad. While wanna try iPad Pro 11 2021 with ips miniled sucks peopl said so ye need wait for microled
How much?
It's a damn shame JOLED is only available on tiny PC monitor sizes :(
What's JOLED? 🤔
@@cube2fox Real OLED, AKA RGB-OLED, pure RGB-OLED is the only OLED worth owning, especially for a monitor display where you will be closer than a meter to the display, QD-LED and WOLED have artefacts and non-standard pixel layouts, making them horrible for fine details, colour accuracy, and so on, not good for gamers or pro users.
What’s Joled?
@@cube2fox Google is your friend...
(partial) Spoiler: true RGB-OLED panels up to 32" ... Japanese company
Available *for now* , since the company is kill.
I feel like most 135" screens are probably about the same size
And it could be yours today for the low-low price of $93,000 + another $3,000 for the stand.
200k?! Thanks, I'll buy a laser projector instead lol
ill stick w the LGC1, its still amazing for its price and has 4x hdmi 2.1
no 'brightness zones' on an oled either.
Yes! We can get this baby in 2033!
We don't need larger micro LED displays! We absolutely need small and very small micro LED displays! Until that time however, who cares?!
People who are interested in the technology and want to follow its development and marketing?
@@sladeberner6182 Sure. However, aren't we all interested in technology? Otherwise, why else would we be watching this video? The real question is... Why do they seem to only be innovating in one direction, large, Larger and LARGEST? Because, from the outside looking in, it seems that they are at a technological dead end when it comes to micro-led pixel density and they're doing this, as you said for marketing purposes and commercial use only, instead of research and development into shrinking and compacting those LEDs into form factors that actually makes sense for everyone and not just the super wealthy. And yeah, this could also fund the research and development into that technology but quite frankly I don't even believe they care anymore. From most people's perspective they just seem to be sitting on their hands and twiddling their thumbs.
That would be hella difficult. LEDs get less efficient the smaller they get. They run hotter, manufacturing becomes harder. You lose brightness too. They could do 1080p smaller now, but no one would buy it even if it looked better than any 4k display. Stupid 4k. Lol. But they will get cheaper. Eventually cheaper than OLED. Eventually. Small? Who really wants small anyway?
@@donutwindy All great points. However, my point is that micro LED technology shouldn't just be relegated to televisions. Until the technology is implemented in computer monitors, laptops, tablets and smartphones, it's going to continue to be only for a very niche market and out of reach for the vast majority of people. Besides, this technology makes more sense in those form factors given the static images displayed.
@@JohnWayne1985 People who care about home theatre. PJs are currently the only option at these sizes.
I highly doubt, it can reach 2000 nits full field, asus is only claiming 2000 nits peak brightness.
The lg magnit microled also reaches 2000 nits peak, but only 250 full field.
Microled isn't guaranteed to be abl free
200 big ones 🤑
200k to see microled module lines connecting to each other
Hi!!! analyze the crew motorfest on series x and ps5 since the HDR is horrible and if you can give us some guys so that it looks good on the OLED
That’s insane
A UI at 4K at that size would look crap - text would be so pixilated. This is when we need 8K.
No. Seating distance is as important as pixel density. Perceived pixel size when watching a 50" 4K screen from 5' away is no different than watching a 150" 4K screen from 15' away. You wouldn't want to sit close enough to a 4K screen (of any size) where you can see the pixels, because the viewing angle would be too wide.
@@budala1969 You're right whern it comes to content, but when it comes to working in a program (let's say InDesign), any designer will tell you the text looks finer, sharper and less aliased. This is assuming a 200% resolution scale. Not seeing individual pixels ≠ sharpness
@@budala1969 No. He is talking about monitor use not TV viewing distances. Pixel density (PPI) is absolutely critical for a monitor and needs to be 5K” at 27 inches and 6K at 32 to even match high PPI phones from a freaking decade ago to not make out the individual pixels.
We are faaaaaar away from desktop monitors not benefiting from higher resolutions. PPI > Resolutions is common knowledge.
Picture sharpness is more important for a monitors functionality. A monitor’s resolution is an implementation detail to get to a particular sharpness sold to you alongside complementary capabilities such as how fast the monitor can refresh its use of pixels (refresh rate)
This is common knowledge in the HCI, product design and computer science industries m.
I'm glad they're making perfect videos that we can never see.
Wouldn't it be better to mix on a average television?
No. You want a stable monitor not affected by ABL or ABSL, with accurate colors and contrast when color grading and mastering. Also you are mastering for the future. Better TVs are coming out every year and eventually the mainstream market will own TVs that can show the the videos to their fullest. If you were to grade on a poor averaged consumer TV you may end up with mistakes. Eg say you tried to mix music on a pari of cheap earphones, once the song is released you realize there is a bass hum you didn't pick up on your cheap earphones. You need accurate equipment to master on or things will not look or sound right of the end users.
I can’t wait until 100” MicroLed will be affordable to $5,000 😂 Maybe in 10 years?
Kaleidoscape* bump
For that price, I'd expect it to cover all of DCI-P3
i think this ones is from AUO.
Price ???
200000
who is this for? What studio is going to spend £200k for this over sony reference monitor and an LG G3
But they are finally coming, Samsung Asus. Thats good sign for us. They will get cheaper and become more affordable
wow 😨
Asus needs to create a 6K@120hz 32” already. The PA32UCG was very much on par and superior than Apple’s Pro Display XDR besides that crucially; three years later still 4K?!! FFS it’s 2023…
Next year with DisplayPort 2.1 and Thunderbolt 5 I guess…
Considering its a master monitor. It'll be $4000 too. You'll need to wait a nother 3 years before it reachs $1000 anyways. So not even 6k possibly in 2027.
@@jwhi419 I never said it needed to be $1000 though… Like $1000 phones today it can merely more justify existing, established high-end monitor prices indefinitely-or even risk being more expensive and let the market play itself out on whether that’s sustainable.
High-end resolutions wanted by most prosumers paired with high-end refresh rates wanted by them as well and other high-end users have been desired for a long time.
Pro Display XDR price looks to be pretty justified now (the stand is not the actual monitor thankfully + convenient for prosumers and green-conscious people it wasn’t included); newer and better monitors can just be priced at its price as a no-brainer buy to a meaningful amount of the market likely.
How is micro LED different from OLED?
Micro LED is not organic, so it can output higher brightness and doesn’t suffer from burn-in like OLED does.
@@ChristopherB1 It's also much faster than OLED. I've seen MicroLED displays that are advertised as having pixel response times as low as around 2 nanoseconds. For comparison, some OLED displays I've seen are advertised as having pixel response times of about 0.1 milliseconds.
@@bigjoegamer We don't need such fast response times. Even OLED is already too fast and introduces stutter in films.
@@DM-rc4yu Gamers need it. Responsiveness is very important for us. How would you fix the problem you're talking about?
*ASUS PA32UCXR* Gonna cost like $3 to 4k
*ASUS PA27DCE-K* Gonna be like at least $800 if prices on OLED have gone down.
The former more like $5000 like the PA32UCG it replaces that I have for pro work. I guess it should go down to $4000 now that DisplayPort 2.1 is here and they decided to go with 4K in 2023 that looks bad to charge $5000 again when the Pro Display XDR (that I also own) is lighter, better designed, and destroys it in sharpness being a 6K monitor (218PPI)
World's Largest Monitor? What about the 140" Micro LED (Samsung)? Can you please compare both TVs?
@TheKurthExpress: The Samsung Micro LED is not a professional monitor.
Why can't they take that MicroLED technology and make a 720p white or blue backlight, then put 4K or 8K Quantum Dot LCD Pixel Layer on top of it? Voila! a 921,000 dimming zone MiniLED TV for a fraction of the cost of getting 99,532,800 LED's small enough to make RGB subpixels for 8K at living room screen sizes.
Micro-LED doesn't require and can't use a backlight, due to it's self-emitting !
What you are referring to seems to be "Dual-LCD" which is already in production for some time ... e.g. Vincent's HX310 professional monitor is one.
@@marcuscole8796 You aren't grasping my concept. I'm not referring to Dual LCD. I'm talking about using the Micro-LED's AS the backlight. They wouldn't have to get the microLED's small enough to make a 4K resolution below 85".
@@badpuppy3 My fault ... your proposal is: using (smaller) MicroLEDs to create a more sophisticated backlight compared to MiniLED backlights ... makes sense ;-)
BUT ... this will again be no self-emitting display like Plasma, OLED or (true) RGB-MicroLED ... you will have the identical "bleeding through" issues all LCD displays have ... but this backlight will still be EXTREMELY expensive compared to MiniLED ... so ... same disadvantages at massively higher cost ... with ofc much more zones ... ok ... but not a tv I (personally) would consider to buy...
@@marcuscole8796 Yes yes. I'm saying in a couple years time, this could be way more cost effective than trying to produce a direct view MicroLED panel at high resolutions. They already seem to have the MicroLED's small enough to achieve this, if they can just focus on getting them bright enough to be used in such a way and scale them to bring the cost down.
It would be a hybrid between MiniLED and MicroLED technologies. Given how good MiniLED's look currently with only 1000 dimming zones, I don't see how this couldn't achieve OLED like contrast with a far simpler manufacturing process.
@@badpuppy3 Sure ... this sounds like a possible and interesting solution.
Just thinking whether "Dual LCD" turns out similar or even more efficient ... and for sure much more affordable even in the short run ... like tvs already in production as the Hisense U9DG or the 65SX.
With a FHD lcd grayscale layer creating dimming zones you get 2,073,600 zones ;-)
At least contrast is already outstanding for a lcd tv (30,000:1) ... sceptical whether the lcd tv with MicroLED backlight can compete in this regard due to it's single lcd-layer !? ... maybe
Regarding luminances the MicroLED solution might have the upper hand, due to Dual LCD carries one more light absorbing lcd layer...
0.78mm is too big it would need to be 4 to 5 times smaller to be of any use to normal people.
That 32” display had some pretty bad IPS glow in the lower right hand corner…
After checking some things I regretably do NOT have an extra $200,000 at this time. No choice but to slum it up with the 77A95L owners on poverty row
Question? Why are UA-camrs using on mass it seems that hideous monstrosity of a microphone "rode" Ok so sound quality seems to be good, but so distracting seeing fairly large black square box clipped on near the persons neck. Oh, and the blue lights don't help. So distracting.
😱
I guess they could be using a more discreet broadcast lapel microphone like a news anchor or church preacher would use.
Bro get serious 200k for 135".
1:32 Yeah, nope... We dont want defined lines in our screens. Also, the matte coating makes it looks like washed out garbage.
sir im youre huge fan i love the way u defrentiate in tv which most dont do i request you to suggest me a best tv im from india so suggest me the one which i can get from india itself and under 950$' and below please
If you have any panel issues very easy to take that to the repair shop. 😂
I'll buy it when it's $500
See you in 2063
@@SP95st that point it will be vintage and worth a lot more or just outright impossible to get lmaoo
Remember CRTs have lasted for 70 to 80 years and the most professional versions of them are still sold at an expensive price up to these days.
@@SP95You mean 2363?
👽🚀⏳⏳
Gentlemen, the god of all displays.
200.000$ and you still don't get 100% DCI-P3 lmao
Also I don't get how they didn't upgrade to HDMI 2.1 on the PA32UCXR and managed to drop DCI-P3 coverage to 97% from 99%.
Edit: apparently they did the above on the PA32UCXR to reach Vesa HDR 1600 instead of sticking to 1000.
I also think the PA27DCE-K misses HDR certification and is therefore not a professional grading monitor at all.
OLED has different VESA rating standards ( VSA TrueBlack) than LCD (VESA HDR)
Being able to have TV's this size now is cool, but they'll unfortunately never replace projectors because they can't be Acoustically transparent
only 95% ? that worries me.
gues it`s not realy at all.
I guessed 3k then he said 200k 😂. This video wasn't for me lol.
Laser projector 📽️ much better and cheeper home Cinema with Klipsch speakers 7.2 Dolly Atmos speakers plus Valencia Syracuse sites . Panasonic fan for life 🇯🇵
You’re in the wrong place, maybe perhaps you got lost or something
It’s called a TV
I can see the gaps between the pixels 🤮
Of course you do it has 33 ppi
I don’t think you’re meant to sit 10” from your 135” TV.
@@rosstee Well barely anyone has the money or the space in their home to get a decent viewing experience from MicroLED regardless, unless you want a 1080p 65" model?
first thks
Подождём лет 100 пока подешевеет 😴
Да надеюсь лет через 7-10 будет айпад с микролед, олед ну нах с его выгоранием. Хотя сама технология топ, но если микролед будет как олед без выгорания, то это имба, конечно. Пока есть только айфон 13 с олед, не хочу больше
Does Micro LED even have significant advantages compared to a top Samsung OLED TV?
Yes of course it does. Micro LED has all the benefits of OLED and none of the disadvantages
@@emiel255 You have to remember we are only at OLED generation 1, OLED gen 2 tech (PHOLED & dual-stack) is right round the corner (2024-2025), that means it ahead of mLED, especially for marketable display technology, monitors and TV's made with mLED tech is 2030-2035 or so, PHOLED gen 2, and eventually gen 3 (multi-stack PHOLED) will have more than enough under the hood for the next few years, mLED, may never be practical for consumer tech, and anyway, pure self-emissive Quantum-Dot display tech maybe ready for primetime before 2030, that will be self-emissive generation 4 technology, and it will be really dope tech too.
But I think OLED and its much improved versions will be around and the dominant mainstream display technology for at least 15-20 years, once they have the productions cost down and are making near LCD numbers it will be unstoppable, eQD display tech will be like OLEDvsLCD, eventually it will take over, but not until OLED has run it course, tbh, mLED is just OLED but the non-organic version, so that is just an improved version of OLED, it does offer finer dot-pitch, higher PPI/resolutions, I can't wait to see multi-stack mLED or PHOLED monitors, whichever come first, looking glass (light-field) tech is amazing to, and I hope that gets incorporated somehow into mainstream displays.
@@emiel255 Which disadvantages? OLED doesn't seem to have big disadvantages.
@@cube2fox burn in risk (especially on monitors and the fact that they can’t get very bright especially in HDR mode. It’s one of the main reasons people look for tvs or monitors that are mini LED and eventually Micro LED
@@emiel255 I think burn in is no longer a real issue. There have been OLED laptops for a few years now.
Asus brand to me become synonym to an overpriced mediocre stuff. Apple ask for overpriced products as well, but their stuff uxualy are indeed excellent.