Unless you include the price of these guns, this video is worthless. A 3k rifle might be better than a $200 rifle, but duh. We are not all millionaires. Give us info we can use. Sorry if this video got me cranky. I’m looking for a rifle for competition, but I don’t want to end up living under a bridge with my newly acquired match rifle.
I have the savage and I agree, it is surprisingly accurate and absolutely worth the money. I tuned it up with a heavier Boyd stock to improve the overall appearance. Only thing that I don’t like about it is the crappy magazines, appearing as if they’ve made it from empty bean cans.
I'm stuck with a Ruger M77/22 Varmint I bought new when they first came out. Yeah, I know, not the greatest, but it has always shot well. However, I installed the bolt shims, sear and springs available for these rifles, and the results were most gratifying...finally a trigger that could be called "really good" but not adjustable. Using an old Leupold 2.5-8 Vari III, the thing will do .250" at 25 yards with cheap ammo and that's with 75 year old eyeballs. Evidently these rifles (especially the Varmint model) can bring some "green", so I will just stay with it. If it does .50 at 50 yards as indicated by the .25 at 25 yards, it is as good as I will ever need.
Been running a Savage Mk.2 for a while now. Did some DIY modifications and it's wicked accurate with CCI Standard Velocity 40gr. Best 100yd. group was under 1 MOA
Ok, but is that indicative of what it does consistently? My bergara b14r with the lot of sk std + I've got shot a ~.4 5 round group at 100... But that was one time, it also shot a 1.4 but 95% of the time it's ~1 moa @100 (.8-1.2) for any kind of statistically significant dataset (10 3 Rd groups or 5-7 5 Rd groups 3 10s 1x 30 etc) In my testing std is prone to fliers ~ 2-3/10 with ~ 1/30 way off @100 2 ish moa from the rest of the group. It's great with 90% going into 1.6 ish moa for a very low cost though.
I have the Lithgow LA101 .22lr with the timber stock and using SK Rifle Match ammo, I regularly come home from my local competition with mostly gold medals and if not gold silver in the hunter class. Two weeks ago, I our scored the target rifles that cost 5 0r 6 times as much. The best target rifle scored 250 out of 250 with 10 centers. I scored 250 out of 250 with 11 centers. It was my best score yet. It is not the first time I have outscored the target rifles. That little Lithgow makes me look good. I live just 300 km (187 mile) from where the Lithgow is made at Lithgow New South Wales, Australia.
good for a lithgow but i do better with CZ 455 th 250 .14. i dont like the trigger of lithgow but it is a good hunting rifle i agree with SK RM and standard spec also flat nose not to bad
I have four of the guns you mentioned. I would like you to replace the Ruger Precision with the Vorquartsen. I have shot both and the Vorquartsen is by for the better rifle. It is similar to the Kidd. I have both. Some where on your list should be the Bergara. It is very similar to the CZ 457 Varmint MTR, I have both.
I have the Ruger precision rim fire with a can. Leupold rim fire scope. It shoots good groups. I’m interested in getting a sub 1 pound trigger in the future.
This video uses generic manufacturer's video clips and is AI narrated to include a speech impediment LOL. I doubt they have ever even held a rifle before.
The best improvement to the .22 rimfire would be better, cleaner shooting ammunition. The current powders used are as nasty and dirty as blackpowder! The residue would never be acceptable by centerfire shooters.
Ruger RPR produces QUARTER size groups at 50 yards?! That performance is a far cry from precision. Hopefully this guy just misspoke because my Savage Precision .22WMR will take Ruger's lunch money if he is correct in his reporting.
Why are you calling these firearms "weapons" ? They're used in sporting competition shooting paper targets. "Weapons" are used in shooting at humans in defense situations. Firearms are used for sporting events.
These reviews make me laugh. They just take overs reviews and have a AI voice read them out. I have watched 3 version with exactly the same word for word descriptions for the Savage Mk2 now 😂 lazy.
Unless you include the price of these guns, this video is worthless. A 3k rifle might be better than a $200 rifle, but duh. We are not all millionaires. Give us info we can use. Sorry if this video got me cranky. I’m looking for a rifle for competition, but I don’t want to end up living under a bridge with my newly acquired match rifle.
I have the savage and I agree, it is surprisingly accurate and absolutely worth the money. I tuned it up with a heavier Boyd stock to improve the overall appearance. Only thing that I don’t like about it is the crappy magazines, appearing as if they’ve made it from empty bean cans.
I'm stuck with a Ruger M77/22 Varmint I bought new when they first came out. Yeah, I know, not the greatest, but it has always shot well. However, I installed the bolt shims, sear and springs available for these rifles, and the results were most gratifying...finally a trigger that could be called "really good" but not adjustable. Using an old Leupold 2.5-8 Vari III, the thing will do .250" at 25 yards with cheap ammo and that's with 75 year old eyeballs. Evidently these rifles (especially the Varmint model) can bring some "green", so I will just stay with it. If it does .50 at 50 yards as indicated by the .25 at 25 yards, it is as good as I will ever need.
Been running a Savage Mk.2 for a while now. Did some DIY modifications and it's wicked accurate with CCI Standard Velocity 40gr. Best 100yd. group was under 1 MOA
Ok, but is that indicative of what it does consistently? My bergara b14r with the lot of sk std + I've got shot a ~.4 5 round group at 100... But that was one time, it also shot a 1.4 but 95% of the time it's ~1 moa @100 (.8-1.2) for any kind of statistically significant dataset (10 3 Rd groups or 5-7 5 Rd groups 3 10s 1x 30 etc)
In my testing std is prone to fliers ~ 2-3/10 with ~ 1/30 way off @100 2 ish moa from the rest of the group. It's great with 90% going into 1.6 ish moa for a very low cost though.
My mk 2 is 5inch a 100yds on average. What did you do to yours?
@@dhall5634with what ammo?
@@tacdriver22mk2 all ammo
No review on the bergara b14r??
He's waiting for someone else to create content for him to take from
I have the Lithgow LA101 .22lr with the timber stock and using SK Rifle Match ammo, I regularly come home from my local competition with mostly gold medals and if not gold silver in the hunter class. Two weeks ago, I our scored the target rifles that cost 5 0r 6 times as much. The best target rifle scored 250 out of 250 with 10 centers. I scored 250 out of 250 with 11 centers. It was my best score yet. It is not the first time I have outscored the target rifles. That little Lithgow makes me look good. I live just 300 km (187 mile) from where the Lithgow is made at Lithgow New South Wales, Australia.
good for a lithgow but i do better with CZ 455 th 250 .14. i dont like the trigger of lithgow but it is a good hunting rifle i agree with SK RM and standard spec also flat nose not to bad
I have four of the guns you mentioned. I would like you to replace the Ruger Precision with the Vorquartsen. I have shot both and the Vorquartsen is by for the better rifle. It is similar to the Kidd. I have both. Some where on your list should be the Bergara. It is very similar to the CZ 457 Varmint MTR, I have both.
This computer generated voice is probably unaware that the Volquartsen rifle even exists. I have one too and it shoots 1/4 moa at 100 yards
My CZ453 Varmint will print .5" @ 50 yds with CCI standard. Even with some Federal or Blazer ammo, it will print less than an inch.
The Tacticool shoots just as well
I have the Ruger precision rim fire with a can. Leupold rim fire scope. It shoots good groups. I’m interested in getting a sub 1 pound trigger in the future.
Glad Anschutz is in there. However, no love for the Bergara B-14R?!? It has to be top 3.
Just three questions. Did you shoot any of these guns? Do you own any of these guns and did you get paid by any manufacturers for this review?
I'd like to think its a robot. If not, its a guy poorly reading a script. Cause, he don't know diddly.
Diddley Squat
@@tomcatt998not sure what you mean with that comment. I assume you're a dummy.
I thought they said that they owned a couple of these.
This video uses generic manufacturer's video clips and is AI narrated to include a speech impediment LOL. I doubt they have ever even held a rifle before.
The audio on this was like cotton balls were stuck in the mouth of the auto reader😂
I looked into the Tikka but I don’t really like the plastic stock.
Could you plz just put the prices of them somewhere
Can the tikka t1x mtr be used by youth? Or is the stock too long?
I've had the youths at the range have a plink with my Tikka without issue, the polymer stock isn't heavy which helps
I have a savage fbr-sr and it's accurate . Dime size groups at 35 yards. It just fails to eject 20% of the time
C spec magazine , feed great
The best improvement to the .22 rimfire would be better, cleaner shooting ammunition. The current powders used are as nasty and dirty as blackpowder! The residue would never be acceptable by centerfire shooters.
CCI is pretty clean and accurate. I recently made a 100yd. Cold Bore shot, twice in a row on a one inch square target.
Ruger American rimfire Long-Range Target?
My MKII SV-SR shoots shot for shot with my buddies big dollar heavy barrel custom .22. This infuriates him as he equates big dollars with accuracy.
Nice good Job 👍🏽
Excellent content! Great video! I own all these except the Vudoo! (Yes, you spelled it wrong) That’s about to change . . . 😈
Budget best.22 longer range target rifles
Where is the savage b22?
Ruger RPRR has a 30 moa rail not a 20.
Tikka T1X MTR 1200 dollars in Australia definitely not a budget gun
Narrator's computer voice is kind of creepy.
I tried a tacsol x22 backpacker takedown. Accuracy great. Reliability unimpressive
Ruger RPR produces QUARTER size groups at 50 yards?! That performance is a far cry from precision. Hopefully this guy just misspoke because my Savage Precision .22WMR will take Ruger's lunch money if he is correct in his reporting.
Savage is one of the few brands I will never buy again. Constant bolt and feeding problems. A true Walmart brand.
It’s a .22Lr video… shows a river .17HMR 😂
Why are you calling these firearms "weapons" ? They're used in sporting competition shooting paper targets. "Weapons" are used in shooting at humans in defense situations. Firearms are used for sporting events.
These reviews make me laugh. They just take overs reviews and have a AI voice read them out. I have watched 3 version with exactly the same word for word descriptions for the Savage Mk2 now 😂 lazy.
So many of the pics don’t match the actual rifle model being discussed. Worthless.
Don't like having a computer read to me. No prices. Crap review. Thumbs down.
why do you talk like this??????
None that crap is budget friendly.
Stealing other videos to create content.
Create your own content and stop using other people's original content.