Nathuram Godse : Hero or Villain?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 чер 2024
- Get 50% OFF on Kukufm’s 1st Month subscription!!
Only at Rs 49 instead of Rs 99 🤑 🤑
Download Link - kukufm.sng.link/Apksi/bw9n/wwmx
Coupon code - MOHAK50
(Coupon valid for first 250 users)
******
📃Sources: docs.google.com/document/d/1Y...
📚📖Top five book recommendations:
amzn.to/3QH0MRB
amzn.to/3ISyKjX
amzn.to/3Xj3hvO
amzn.to/3Xf4Smt
amzn.to/3WjLGT4
📸💡Filming gear:
amzn.to/3ZDE295
amzn.to/3ZD5Me2
amzn.to/3H9Siza
amzn.to/3iIN1oU
amzn.to/3XB4zCc
amzn.to/3XBUOU8
amzn.to/3QKvNUv
******
🔍✍️Research:
Mohit Priyadarshi: / mohitprior
✂️🎛️Editing:
Yash Vyas: / yashvyas24
CharanTej: / mograph.charantej
Channel Manager :
Ajeesh Babu: / ajeesh_babu
🎨Thumbnail :
Aanchal verma: / aanchal_creates
Subtitles:
Dhruv Bambhaniya: / dhruvkumar_2920
Want to work with us? Check this link!
tinyurl.com/22pxjjtv
******
Liked the background music? I use Epidemic Sound. You can get a 30-day free trial using this referral: bit.ly/3A7bUx7
******
🗳Support on Patreon: / sochyoutube
👾Discord: / discord
🐦Twitter: / mohakmangal
📷Instagram: / mohak.mangal
👤Facebook: / 100090557222673
******
Playlists
🇮🇳Indian Society: • Hijab: Ban Right or Wr...
🗺Geopolitics and Foreign Affairs: • Will China Invade Taiwan?
🧍🏽♀️Issues of a Young Indian: • Are Indian Girls Bad a...
💰Economy: • How Kerala Changed its...
🗳Indian Politics: • UP Elections: Why Are ...
🇮🇳 Discoveries of India: • How Goa Joined India
📈Money, Stocks, and Crypto: • Why Indian Youth is NO...
******
Creative commons:
Unsplash
Flaticon
Freepik
Videvo
******
Markers
00:00 Introduction
01:56 The Aftermath
03:55 Why am I talking about this?
05:23 Why Godse killed Gandhi 1) Muslim Appeasement
09:07 Why Godse killed Gandhi 2) Partition Support
11:25 Why Godse killed Gandhi 3) The Final Trigger
12:54 So, was Godse a terrorist or a revolutionary?
14:56 Is Gandhi Innocent
15:31 Terror
15:54 Conclusion
Thanks for the feedback. I agree. I did not give the strongest arguments in favor of Godse. That is my mistake. I will improve this going forward! I am still against political assassination but in the video I should have included the strongest arguments of both sides. Thanks to everyone who shared constructive feedback. I will improve :)
Get 50% OFF on Kukufm’s 1st Month subscription!!
Only at Rs 49 instead of Rs 99 🤑 🤑
Download Link - kukufm.sng.link/Apksi/bw9n/wwmx
Coupon code - MOHAK50
(Coupon valid for first 250 users)
Nice that u have accepted your mistake
Well congratulations for the heavy criticism you’ve received
Hopefully you’ll think 10 times before creating left biased content
@@jalkarna true
Well I don't think godse's act was to pass a message
So did sardar udham singh
Both surrendered
Not terrorist but , MURDER is correct word 👍
I guess Mr. Gandhi was so much in love with his ideology that he failed to notice its not working.
Yes, Actually if not for WW1 and WW2 I don't know if India would've been independent solely using Gandhiji's methodology
I WANT ANS FROM YOU WHY NEHRU IS FIRST PRIME MINISTER JB KI SARDAR VALLABHBHAI PATEL NE PRIME MINISTER KE LIYE SAB SE JADA VOTE MILE THE
APNE BARI ACHI VIDEO KO O BANAI PAR HINDUS KE UPAR JO HINSA HO RHI THI AK BAR BHI BOLA USKE BAREME
AJJ TAK TO DEKHA HI HOGA MUSLIMS KITNE ACHE HOTE HAI 95% OF T3RRORIST KAHA SE ATE KON RELIGION AJ KE SAMYE BHI AK WORD AGAINST BOLKE TO DEKHO HIMMAT HAI NHI , KISSE APNE SAR TANNSE JUDA KARNA HAI
19 JANUARY 1990 YAD HAINA TABHI CONGRESS HI THI TAB BHI SICKULAR SARKAR HI THI WO BHI BATAO GANDHI NE ITNA KAM KIA THA KI BRITISH UNHE APNA SABBSE ACHA POLICEMEN KEHTI THI "GANDHI" HINDUS KE UPAR HUYE JADA TAR HINSA GANDHI DEKH HI NHI PAYA OR AJJ AP
🙏🙏 JAI SICKULARISUM
JAI
@@phonwanhatsu6598 so. If you use vilance to gain freedom country will end up like Soviet union.....and dictatorship and dictators won't let anyone speak against them
Lmao
Bro..
I think u just listen the one face of full story
I think he was a murderer not a terrorist as his purpose was not to send any message by killing Gandhi. He just wanted to eliminate Gandhi from Indian political scenario so that Gandhi's ideology will not influence the decision of other Indian leaders.
Well that's actually more accountable
As his intention was kill Gandhi not to terrorise indians
It was a political murder..nothing else
👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼 Such a conclusion was expected from Mohak btw.
@@astatineradeon1688 attacking on a single person in crowd or in empty place is called murder bro.
Terror attack is like which happened in hotel taj and in masjid in pakistan were 100 peoples died.
@@VAIBHAVPATIL-ee8eo yeah ofcourse dude
Maturity is when u realize that the real reason behind India's independence is WW2 and Indian national army...
Finally, one person with a brain
On point.
exactly eal reason is this only
Absolutely 💯
Yes, this is also fine, but becoming a freedom fighter is not easy.
Subhas Chandra Bose also had many conflicts with Gandhiji, but Bose never tried to kill Gandhiji..Infact Bose said Gadhiji as " Father of the Nation" from Berlin Radio. Gadhiji also said Subhas Bose is the "Patriot of the Patriots". Differences of opinion are there but they had immense respect for each other. This is the difference between a Patriot like Bose and Rebel like Nathuram. If I ask what is Nathuram's contribution for India? how many times he went to jail for India? answer is 0.. Nathuram did nothing for India.
logo ke bas ki nahi hai bhai sochna. unko bas bewajah nafrat karni hai.
he got us rid off of a guy who cost us a huge part of my motherland and Kashmir and 55cr rupees at that time along with countless hindu lives which you don't carw about cause being secular is more important for you than actually realising what was Gandhi's role in independence which is 0 btw according to the prime minister who signed the independence documents of India
How many times mr gandhi and mr nehru drink tea with Britishers
@@viratpatidar9152 Literally
First of all, Bose never got to see India's independence since he died back in 1945. But his impact lived on throughout the course of history till 1947.
Hindu-muslim conflicts started to exist after partition.
Gandhi was responsible for his neo-islamic beliefs. If it was wasn't for Godse, y'all brainwashed hindus would have met the fate of reading Quran.
If someone says that Gandhiji's non-violence was the one and only reason for India's independence, it is not true and it does not mean that anyone who does not support Gandhiji or his ideology is a violent person.
Note- who does not support Gandhi it not clear he is a violent person.But who hate Gandhi it's clear he is a violent person
But RSS and Godse has no role in Indian freedom struggle
Well said 🙏
@@RajSingh-js7zt khilaft moment was supported by gandhi
He even said that he will postponed the freedom struggle for thay
It was a combined effort of all should be the statement than this...
I don't know why Mohak skipped the part where right after Gandhi's assassination a riot was broke out in maharashtra where congress cadre killed countless Chitpawan Brahmins including kids and women. (Because Godse was chitpawan brahmin)
This has nothing to with godse being a murderer (title of video).
If I kill a guy from a community, and then people are discussing about my actions. If another guy from that community kills people from my community, it doesn't change the discussion about **my** actions.
@@allipse8224 it has deep connection with the video. Because it was Gandhi who said that we hindus should surrender ourselves and lay our weapons if muslims come to us for killing and raping us. Same advice he gave to Jews when Nazis were hunting them.
After Gandhi's assassination it was Gandhi's "non violent" fanboys who painted the streets with blood.
@@allipse8224 you have to acknowledge both of them as terrorists then.
"The motivating factor for the violence was not love for Gandhi on the part of the rioters but the denigration and humiliation that the Marathas were subjected to due to their caste status. The total monetary loss has been estimated to Rs.100 million (or about 20 million in 1948 US dollars)"
@@ClashwithImb wow nice justification of One sided violence. And why those people killed only Chitpawan brahmins? Why not Konkan brahmins or other brahmins? Wasn't all the brahmins were on top in caste status? And why that timing? Have you even read about chitpavan massacre? And why all the murderers were congress cadre and not common maratha?
Mohak, you selectively talked about Nathuram Ghodse misunderstanding Gandhi's philosophy but did NOT talk of how Gandhi actually practiced appeasement and also favouritism toward Jinha and Nehru. Disappointed :(
Hindu mahasabha sarvarkar favoured muslim league and jinnah for a divided India
Gandhiji fasted to give 5.5 lac rupees, which is a huge sum back then for a newly independent India. Also he wanted a corridor that connected karachi and dhaka, what's worse he also proposed that the jurisdiction of the corridor to only belong to the two connected regions. All mainstream media and so called creator media are the same, two sides of the same coin.
Mahasaba was weak, they had no power. @@Pratik6554
True lines☝️
@@Pratik6554lies, where did they favor muslim league?
savarkar opposed creation of pakistan
Major difference between common people and leaders at that time was -
People now just blame the leaders but leaders themselves worked in their own way and still respected each other.
EVERYONE lacks knowledge and common sense today. The Educated Fools in Power are simply the blind leading the blind shamefully basking on the currency which carries the picture of Gandhi as the father of the country, but whose legacy has no meaning with the word PEACE he fought so hard for. What a SHAME !
Safety vault theory
Just imagine if Pandavas had gone on hunger strikes against Kauravas and Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj against Mughals to gain victory over them. Does that makes sense, not at all.
What a point bro hats off to you .
Ya that's the point buddy
kya baat hai bhai
Comparing historical events and figures from different time periods and contexts can be challenging. Each historical event and figure had their own unique circumstances, challenges, and strategies.
Gandhi's approach of non-violence and civil disobedience was shaped by his beliefs and the specific conditions of the Indian independence movement. He believed in the power of non-violent resistance to bring about social and political change. Gandhi's hunger strikes and peaceful protests were aimed at mobilizing public opinion, highlighting injustice, and putting pressure on the British authorities.
It is important to remember that historical events and figures cannot be judged solely based on the actions or strategies of others. Different individuals and societies adopt different approaches based on their own beliefs, values, and circumstances. The effectiveness or appropriateness of a particular strategy may vary depending on the context and the goals being pursued.
Historical analysis requires a nuanced understanding of the specific historical context and the complexities of the events and individuals involved. Comparing different historical figures and events can be insightful, but it is essential to consider the unique circumstances and challenges they faced before drawing conclusions or making judgments.
Gandhi ji's ideology wasn't mere hunger strike, it wad civil disobedience. For a certain power to rule they need aide from the people being ruled upon. Civil Disobedience ideology was to withdraw that aide, hence forcing the power to atleast make ammends if not surrender.
The difference between a rebel and a patriot depends upon who is in the power at the moment
Bro I m frm Bangladesh and u said a quote worth a billion dolar...
@@asifzaman6153 why
@@A2000skid Did u understand what he tried to say?
@@asifzaman6153 no that's why asked u
I don't agree
The only reason to consider Gandhiji as the Father of the Nation to me is, his contribution in uniting the Congress and providing a vision of Independent India through periodic but strategic methodologies, which till 1915 in India was not working because of uncoordinated efforts and varied objectives of Moderates, Extremists and Revolutionary Terrorists.
Hence, Gandhiji sowed seeds of Nationalism at that very time and nurtured the team spirit till Independence. Many decisions of him were very strategic, mainly to streamline the mass for Independence.
Thus, Godse was wrong. He understood things through a narrowed prism and was focused more on his prejudices than Indian Nation as an identity. Using treachery to murder Gandhiji is surely a Terrorist activity to satiate his prejudiced personal hatred/misconceptions towards/with Gandhiji.
I wish the Congress had ceased to exist after 1937.
you understand it along with people who understand our history. People assume indians were playing nice with each other throughout history which they were not
Gandhi United the Congress by forming a pro Muslim appeasement group. He was silent about mallapuram genocide, silent about direct action day , silent about everything. However he jumped the ship in jammu attacks , he forgot the importance of lives in his belief of non violence.
Godse was not wrong he was caring for hindu interest only. Gandhi was too much favouring islamic interests even after partition on religious lines
Awsm explanation.
Hi, not able to find the summary of 'India after Gandhi' on Kuku FM. Could anyone share the link please?
Why Gandhi supported Moplah genocide ? Why he defends Abdul Rashid who killed swami sraddhanand ?? ❔❓❓❓.......
bcs he gets orgasom by pleasing muslims
Gandhi said during direct action day that if muslim comes to your house to kill hindu then hindus should lay their weapons and surrender them to muslims. Same thing he said for Jews when Nazis were hunting them.
Because he is trash
ये भाई ऐसे प्रश्न पूछना मना है यहां
Correct me if im wrong,
You've never read any primary material regarding Moplah revolt, and your only knowledge is based on what you've heard someone say on social media.
Edit:
Basically there are the British sources and local sources. People outside Kerala has no idea about the local ones and draws there idea from the British sources. This is the case for both Gandhi and Ambedkar
There are books by people who were present at that time in Malabar(both Muslim and Hindu). These are mostly in Malayalam. These are some that i have refered.
- 1921 Anglo Mapila war by AK Kodur
- MP Narayan Menonum Sahapravarthakarum
Sure there must have been violence against Hindus, whenever there is chaos there will be people who are bound to take advantage. My argument is you canot take one small part of it and generalise the whole conflict.
LONG LIVE BHAGAT SINGH JI🕊️❤️
❤️🔥
Inquilab zindabad 🔥
hes dead.
Commuinist💪💪
He was an anarchist not your hindutvaist
"What rulers write is the history and what losers write is conspiracy ,🤣,but the real one ,who never knows" my father said once
Your father is Mirza Ghalib?
@@sanjaysrivastava4994 😂
EVERYONE lacks knowledge and common sense today. The Educated Fools in Power are simply the blind leading the blind shamefully basking on the currency which carries the picture of Gandhi as the father of the country, but whose legacy has no meaning with the word PEACE he fought so hard for. What a SHAME !
He is wrong.
Yup totally agree....
Godse was right .. Hindu and Muslims can never be united . Gandhi and congress always do act to appease Muslims to get their vote this is also right . Gandhi was also not in favour of Bhagat singh . And didn’t even try to stop his punishment (death sentence) when he can and I am not saying this , britisher said this in their book that there was no role of Gandhi (minimal role) in Independence
For those who never understood the wider perspective, Gandhi Ji in his quest for Hindu-Muslim unity forgot the basic of facts that it was not the british who created the divide it has been there for centuries the british just exploited it for their own benefits which was ofcourse to govern India.
Yup the divide was there for centuries because both religion are poles apart and one of them came from outside with invaders who wanted to change this land's culture traditions.... How could people accept this?
@@farahead157 gandhi made fun of hindus by saying that hindus who were killed by muslims
Moplah roits they deserved it
Now a days there has been a fashion in India to blame britishers for all the ills present in the erstwhile India, particularly casteism and hindu-muslim divide in the Indian society.
@@kanikakanika8377 Islam come to India before the invaders and most of the Muslim rulers didn't change any Hindu laws? From what i know in Islam if the ruler is muslim but there are sections of public following different religions they are governed according to their own religious ruling
From terrorism has no religion to turning out all terrorists belonging to the same religion, we all grew up !
You doesn't explain here that in last point about 55 crores.Yes Gandhi was Totally wrong on that moment because Pakistan already has an attacked on Kashmir which we can't forget , And Gandhi wants to give 55 crores to them knowing how many damage they given to India.
At that Point you cannot think about Peace. And Gandhi Philosophy doesn't works in this world now.
"Non violence state works Until next person doesn't follow Non violence".
ye chhoti sonch teri h..... gandhi ki nahi..... 55 crore bharat nhi deta uske baad jo bhi ghatna ghatti uski jimmedari tu leta 😡 bhkkk andhbhkt.... usse jo tay hua usko de diya gya..... isse ye saabit nhi hota gandhi anti national tha bhkkk 😡
True. And for that reason only I think godse was right.
Gandhi's philosophy was obsolete, is obsolete and will forever be obsolete...He was also a pathological liar and hypocrite with his philosophy...
You mean to say non violence works until other person also believe n behave in the same manner?
@@altamashnawed983 Freedom was a achieved by efforts of all other freedom fighters too.. But the problem is that "55 crore" which was used against the people of India for terrorism... If left alive Gandhi would have done much more damage to India...
And please stop giving the same lame point
Maturity is when you understand Gandhi's non violence is root of violence
Please elaborate. I would like to understand this concept.
@@RamanSharma89 Imagine a scenario where Pakistan have mukes and India following ahimsa and about to disintegrate army because we are peaceful people following ahimsa then it would take lots of violence.
Read about Gandhi's letter in his book which he sent to Hitler on ww2 , you will understand his opinions
No, it's not.
You have not understood his perspective.
@@RamanSharma89you will slaughter a lamb with a knife because you know the lamb cannot kill you. The moment you hear a tigers roar while walking through a jungle you will pee in your pants and drop the knife and run for your life.
@@free_audiobooks The scenario you've presented is a hypothetical one, and it's important to remember that the real-world situations are complex and multifaceted. Gandhi's philosophy of ahimsa (non-violence) was based on the principles of love, truth, and non-violence as a way to resolve conflicts and promote harmony. However, it's essential to consider the practicality and context of implementing such principles in the real world.
In the context of the hypothetical scenario you've described, if Pakistan possesses nuclear weapons and India follows a policy of ahimsa without a strong military, it could potentially lead to security concerns and challenges. In real-world situations, countries have to balance the pursuit of peace and non-violence with ensuring their national security and sovereignty.
Gandhi's principles of non-violence emphasized peaceful resistance, but they were not meant to be blindly followed without considering the context and possible consequences. Gandhi himself recognized the need for self-defense and protection against aggression. In the real world, nations often adopt a combination of diplomatic efforts, non-violent means, and, when necessary, defensive military capabilities to safeguard their interests and maintain stability.
Gandhi's philosophy of non-violence, also known as Satyagraha, did recognize the need for self-defense and protection against aggression in certain situations. While he advocated for non-violent resistance as a principle, he also acknowledged that there might be circumstances where self-defense is necessary to protect oneself and others from harm. Here are some statements made by Gandhi that reflect his views on self-defense:
In his book "Hind Swaraj," Gandhi discussed the concept of non-violence and self-defense. He wrote: "I do believe that, where there is only a choice between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence... I would rather have India resort to arms in order to defend her honour than that she should, in a cowardly manner, become or remain a helpless witness to her own dishonor."
In the context of the Indian freedom struggle, Gandhi recognized the importance of defending oneself against physical harm. He stated: "I have no message to give to the world. I have nothing new to teach. Truth and non-violence are as old as the hills. All I have done is to try experiments in both on as vast a scale as I could. In doing so, I have sometimes erred and learnt by my errors. Life and its problems, its joys and sufferings, its glory and shame, the way of life, etc., are enough for me to grapple with."
Gandhi also emphasized the distinction between self-defense and revenge. He believed in the moral justification of self-defense but rejected violence as a means of seeking revenge or inflicting harm upon others. He stated: "I object to violence because when it appears to do good, the good is only temporary; the evil it does is permanent."
These statements show that while Gandhi strongly advocated for non-violence as a guiding principle, he did acknowledge that there might be situations where self-defense becomes a moral imperative. His views on self-defense were contextual and aligned with his larger philosophy of promoting truth, love, and non-violence as essential elements of a just and peaceful society.
9:50 Why Ask Godse to have Alternative Policy if Gandhi Had Such immense Power in politics of India at that Time and Only he did was to go on a Hunger Strike, as if it will Change the Heart of Muslims that did Moplah, Direct Action Day in Bengal, etc.
According to Gandhi's Policies, He seems to be a British Stooge.
Mohak, you should've atleast mentioned the Severe Violence several innocent Chittapavan Brahmins faced after the Assassination of Gandhi Ji by Godse ! Injustice anywhere is a threat to Justice everywhere. 🙏🏻
Deserved
@@mehmeetdhar7618 what u mean??
@@mehmeetdhar7618 Thats why hindutva ideology is still alive
@SimpleGuy deserved
@@mehmeetdhar7618 China's treatment of Uyghur is also deserved for u?
“Until the lion learns how to write, every story will glorify the hunter.”
This statement can literally be used for every evil person in the history
@@sahilbishnoi8944 Agreed this statement can be used for every person in power,
it all depends on you who you want to believe is the hunter & who’s the lion.
@@moonchild7909 yeah can we say that about the poor british Or nazis Or Japanese. History does depends on the person writing it, but only to an extent. I don't even know how can justify someone's murder in cold blood. In this case the lion did write a lot of bs that is taught by the RSS to their simps.
@@sahilbishnoi8944 Why can’t you construct any argument without using the word Nazi RSS etc. Why do you also have to put everyone in boxes set by your worldview?
Sahil i can also give you many examples of conventional “hunters” like Mother teresa, Alexander the great, George washington, Che Guevara including your beloved gandi they all had snakes in their closets.
You might not get it but these people are worse than we were taught in schools. People can only know so much. So instead of challenging me, challenge you own thoughts & find out why they’re so rigid?
Just grow up & learn the more you can, you’ll automatically shut up.
Agreed wonderful explanation in simple statement
I am a NRI and i am really shock and sad to see the current situation of the country Gandhi is one of the most important and popular freedom fighter of the country he is really respected in most other countries except his own and to the people who are saying that gandhi ideology is not the reason for the country independent yes ofcourse he was not the only freedom fighter but it is als o truth that he was the most important person who unite the country and its people to fight for freedom
I dont know about others but for me bose is the father of our nation..
Agree if im right
👍
😂😂😂
Bharatvarsh was there when forefathers of Gandhi and Bose was not even born, this civilization is among the oldest civilization like Egyptian, Mayan, Mesopotamian civilization, the only difference is that it's still standing showing the world nobody can eradicate this civilization
Jo iss jagat ke pita hai wahi hamare Rastra ke vi pita hai, Bhagwan Shankar 🕉️🙏
And netaji subhash chandra bose says that Gandhi ji is father of nation now cry 🎉
I accept that freedom isn't given it's taken but netaji is great and if any great person says any other person great then just thought how great is that person❤
We need to change the perception that we got independence not just because of Gandhi ji
But because of every freedom fighters who fought against Europeans
And everyone has equal contributions
@@sanjaysrivastava4994lol
It's not Gandhi or Indian freedom fighters British empire got weak after ww2 so they decided to leave. Almost most of the countries under British colonial rule got independence around the same time
@@stfup9360 Hitler played a bigger role in independence of british colonies than gandhi nehru ever could
@@prj7894 You can say it. But not only gandhi nehru but also Bhagat sing , Subash Chandra Bose didn't played any big role. Indians are not any martial race . They could have never ever got independence with any arm struggle against Britain. Britians would have given them independence anyways. If the world war 2 didn't took place then Britian would have ruled them as long as they wanted . India was ruled by Britain for 200 years they didn't showed much resistance other countries under British empire showed much more resistance then indians for example America. So it doesn't matters if Indians chose gandhis non violent movement or SCBs arm movement eventually both of the would have failed. It's a fact India got independence cause the British empire decided to do so as Hitler weakened them not Gandhi not Bose nor Nehru or any India is responsible for the independence of India. Well you can say Jinnah is responsible for Pakistan cause without him it all would have been India. But still not Jinnah could have created Pakistan of Britishers didn't wanted
15:32 there are evidence that gandhiji completely ignored the massacre of hindus by muslims other youtubers have shown evidence on there channels . I agree with gandhi that a country should be secular and people of any faith pr caste should be treated equally but you cannot deny that gandhi completely ignored the massacre of hindus e.g direct action in kolkata , mophla massacre and after partition massacre of hindus and sikhs in Pakistan
Nothing only this he adviced jews to fall at Nazis feet and beg for mercy but should not sort to violence
@@kanikakanika8377 Veer Savarkar appreciated Hitler
As if no Muslims have been killed in those riots
When country was celebrating freedom... Gandhiji was in kolakata... Trying to calm the riots.
bhai app aap plz padhlo ... aaap AKTK ki video ki baat kar rahe ho pata hai .... per aap plz Mopla ke baare me or details se podho ... and plz check local news papers ... where they print about gandhi then u get the real fact ... and one thing... Gandhi was a human ... wo v galti karenge ... har baaar kisika decision sahii nehi hoga .... but iska matlab ye nehi ki maar diya jae .. usse jo jindagi var humanity ke liye ladha .... agar itna hi GOdse ko marna tha to ... wo ek Gadhi ke waje ... 100 pakistani maar sakte the sayad .. kashmir wapas aajta ...
I don't think Gandhiji was a nonviolent. He never said the Indian army amongst British rule to throw there job and fight for India's freedom. He never blamed British government for Jalianwala massacre but said Udham a mad for killing general odyer..
10 class ki history nhi pdhi kya .
Freedom was not received by the efforts of individual personality, it was the collective efforts of every single person that was involved. Some faces indeed evolve as the face of the masses and due to this, they are worshipped more. But having a society where everyone can have life without fear is also imperative. And being a leader one possesses a great responsibility as a single statement or move acts as valuable for the masses.
EVERYONE lacks knowledge and common sense today. The Educated Fools in Power are simply the blind leading the blind shamefully basking on the currency which carries the picture of Gandhi as the father of the country, but whose legacy has no meaning with the word PEACE he fought so hard for. What a SHAME !
Gandhi ki Wo wali statement bhool gaye - Gandhi in 1922: "Even if d Muslims want to kill us all we should face death bravely. If they established their rule after killing Hindus we would be ushering in a new world by sacrificing our lives!"
Ye log yaad bhi na rkhenge
Source frustrated indian uneducated tankie will start calling andhbhakt and will say:No saar this is whatsapp university saar .😭😭
Har jagah yahi same copy paste🤣🤣🤣
Aajkal bachche bhi IT cell mein chale gaye hain
@@arpitkumar2981 Copy paste doesn't mean this is false,
Sometime when we write something in public need strong words and that's why we use Google for Valid Proof
Jai Hind 🇮🇳
@@arpitkumar2981 bhai Ja madarasa Join krle fir.. fir udhr ye bhi Sikhna army join mat krna quki terriost true muslim h Ja padhe udhr
Tell me one thing
As mohak mentioned the final trigger is when Gandhi asked Indian government to give 55CR. Due to Pakistan.
But he didn't mention Pakistan used that same money to invade jambu kashmir.
usne baad me us money ka istemal kahan kiya ye pajistan ki galti hai gandhi ki nhi 👍 usool aur vaade bhi koi chij hoti chilgoje 😡 bharat gandhi ki vichardhara ki wajah se mahaan hai godse ko lilll tapori.... hartyara nafrati bolte sab 😂😂😂
@@DivY4NsHuu mere pure comment me naa maine godse ko shi btaya na Gandhi ko glt.. It's clearly evident violence is wrong.
The point is us desh ko ek ruppe ki madad kyu ki jaaye jo unhi paiso se hmare desh ke veer jawaano ko maare.
@@vikasnamdev1626 chor do bhai wo nhi manega.
Arre yaaar 😂
Gandhi didn't ask to give 55cr it was distribution of property jiska total amount 70 cr tha nd 20 cr was already given, Gandhi ka fast was for Delhi riots bt OPIndia jaisi website ne mast khel ke ye mudda add krdiya 🤦
History padho WhatsApp nhin!
Ye h extreme leftist.... Ye kuch mention nahi karenge
Gandhi was Muslims supporter .....and if not than why he supported kilafhat movement...and what happened after ......that resulted in the brutal murder of over 10,000 Hindus, the rape of thousands of Hindu women and the desecration of temples that Hindus held sacre...and
Gandhi said, “If the Mussalmans of India offer non-cooperation to Government in order to secure justice on the Khilafat, it is the duty of every Hindu to co-operate with their Muslim brother "
Secular ke nakab mai Muslim supporter the .....he get what he deserves
He was Secular.
If u want a clear picture of what happened in partition of India read ice candy man by bapsi sidwa a parsee.both are at fault
He used muslim issue to unite India, it was political maneuver. He was a devout and traditional hindu as far I know
He was a secular patriot and u r a extremist
Ek simple si baat bolane mein itna dikkat ho raha hai tujhko Ek baat Ko kitna kamata hai re. Desh Ka asali Gdr tujh jaisa UA-cam log hai 😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡
acha jo tu bole ji ji bolte rhe, toh shi hai
Netaji was the only person who took the right decision i think
Edit
I was supporting the decision of making an army (Azad Hind fauz) to get independence rather than just go for hunger strikes. Idealism is not always the best way you have to be diplomatic (Even lord Krishna had to take the path of diplomacy).
Netaji Subhash was against giving universal adult franchise in the initial years of independence and supported military rule. He wasn't the perfect decision maker either which is evident from the fact that he sought help from Germany and Japan, the side that later lost world War II. He is my inspiration, but he was not the only person to make right decisions.
@@ManiacRoy i agree with you also being idealistic (like Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru ji) at the time of independence was not the right thing we actually needed someone who was a mix of both worlds.
By joining hands with fascists and imperialist?
@@Stellar_Insights_ he was allowed. And took many decisions. Point is every leader of that time took good and bad decisions. Afterall they were new to ruling a country..with zero experience and zero help from the world.. So we shouldn't judge them by present standards.
In which way ?, and which decision you’re supporting ?
Gandhi ji ne bhuk hadtal nai ki against partition and said it was Congress fault but went on a hunger strike against Delhi riots? Why?
True 🥴
bhook hadtal karke bhi kya ukhad lete partition ke against? jinnah hated him. Yeh toh aisa hi hua ki putin ko rokne ke liye zelensky hadtal par baith jaye. Putin toh bolega jaa mar ja mujhe kya?
Who said he didn't do hunger strike in times of partition? Omg read atleast.
Because delhi riots lead killing of both hindus and muslims
Where as partition was a mutual decision between muslim conference and congress
friend i think it is safe to make out that when the reporter asked him for the fast against partition, the time was when it was already done and nobody could change anything thats why he said the fault of congress would cost his life because it was too late but for delhi riots it was a sure posibility to stop it if people were moved by his fast.
When Gandhiji can give PM post to Jinnah why can’t he give it for Saradar Patel and forcibly put Neharu as PM in India when Patel won the election ? For What Gandhiji wanted peace between Hindus and Muslims when Pakistan attacked Kashmir after partition and why didn’t he allowed his wife to meet his eldest son Harilal Gandhi In a railway station …why didn’t he follow the peace and love which he preached ? Yes Subhas called him Mahatma but once he got close he got to know the truth and how Gandhi treated him in Haripur congress when he won congress 2 nd time against gandhis candidate seetharamayya a communist ..British wanted congress and Gandhiji as safety valve to control people’s anger that’s why congress spied on Netajis family even after freedom till 1970s
😂😂😂 महात्मा गांधी की पत्नी भारत विभाजन के समय नही थी उनका निधन 1944 में हो गया था और नेताजी ने 1944 में सिंगापुर से उन्हें राष्ट्र पिता कहा था और यह भी की हमारे बीच मतभेद है मनभेद नहीं है सीतारमैया वाली कहानी पड़ो गे बुक्स से तब पता चलेगा वो कितनी नॉर्मल बात थी चाहे कोई महात्मा गांधी की जगह हो वो वैसा ही करेगा यदि वो नैतिक विचारो के हिसाब से देखना
@@premdaheriya8455 there is difference between father of the nation and Mahatma bhai …I agree Gandhis non violence as tool if we was a saint in Himalayas and not a politician in the field fighting for freedom.
Gandhi and congress was ready to give 20% muslim 50% seats in assembly. Is this true Secularism ? From start of khilafat gandhi nurished muslim appeasement policy. Search about naukhali riots, shraddhanand murder and thoughts of gandhi. Even patel was disagree with gandhi. Read about savarakar hindu rashtra it was true secular with 22% reservation for muslim and one vote for every person irrespective of cast and relegion. Dont go by name hindu rashtra they consider it has ancient culture.
Partitation was result of Gandhi's failed policies. Gandhi thought by appeasement he can stop partitation but finally partation happened and also india gone in mode of muslim appeasement even after freedom.
Read savarakar and ambedkar about this issue.
*Some reasons like Gandhi's opinions about moplah riots,naokhali riots are few reasons behind Gandhi's murder these should be known to all indians*
I WANT ANS FROM YOU WHY NEHRU IS FIRST PRIME MINISTER JB KI SARDAR VALLABHBHAI PATEL NE PRIME MINISTER KE LIYE SAB SE JADA VOTE MILE THE
APNE BARI ACHI VIDEO KO O BANAI PAR HINDUS KE UPAR JO HINSA HO RHI THI AK BAR BHI BOLA USKE BAREME
AJJ TAK TO DEKHA HI HOGA MUSLIMS KITNE ACHE HOTE HAI 95% OF T3RRORIST KAHA SE ATE KON RELIGION AJ KE SAMYE BHI AK WORD AGAINST BOLKE TO DEKHO HIMMAT HAI NHI , KISSE APNE SAR TANNSE JUDA KARNA HAI
19 JANUARY 1990 YAD HAINA TABHI CONGRESS HI THI TAB BHI SICKULAR SARKAR HI THI WO BHI BATAO GANDHI NE ITNA KAM KIA THA KI BRITISH UNHE APNA SABBSE ACHA POLICEMEN KEHTI THI "GANDHI" HINDUS KE UPAR HUYE JADA TAR HINSA GANDHI DEKH HI NHI PAYA OR AJJ AP
🙏🙏 JAI SICKULARISUM
JAI
What genocid e
Its amyth
Upper caste hindu landlords were killed
@@muhammedjaseemshajeef6781 just like gujrat riot is myth
@@Noone-gz8li just like his religion is myth
@@soumyadipbosu5998
In 1946 Kolkata had a 30% Muslim population and Noakhali was a reaction of Bihar
Nathuram Godse jisne Gandhi ko milaya tha God se 😂😂
Haha
ish m hasi ka baat kya hai?
❤❤❤God ji❤❤❤ bol respect do
@@user-fo8mo7hy4k Tum nahi samjh sakte.
😂😂😂
Real reason behind indian independence is ww2 and subhas Chandra bose and indian national army . I kinda suggest watch Subhas Chandra bose movie
My god, the level these andbhakts will stoop to to get there facts right
True like u ganduji isn't great check the statements made by the British commander when asked y did india got independence? When asked he said gandi has no contribution 😂@@evilandrew1097
🤣🤣🤣, yes in gobar university these kind of things are taught
@@evilandrew1097 abhe I am not andbhakt pehele history book aache se pad I never said ki Gandhi ka hat nahi tha 😒
Whatsapp thoda kam use kar
Yᴏᴜ ᴀɴᴅ ᴅʜʀᴜᴠ ʀᴀᴅʜᴇ sᴀᴍᴇ sᴀᴍᴇ ʙʀᴏ😂😂😂
Coz they don't speak for RSS/Hindutva?
There was no proof that Gandhi was responsible for Hindus murder but there were ample of evidence that he supported "peaceful"community at his fullest
He was not biased against any community. When he worked for Hindu community, you will ignore him. When he worked for muslim community, u become angry. Typical toxic mindset.
@@grapeshott well said.
He never hid the fact that he supported Muslims, you people just hate that and cry abt it
@@zuesmaya8167 please don’t bother him, otherwise Hindus will become endangered.🤣🤣🤣
@@zuesmaya8167 He never hid the fact he was a benchplayer in the Indian Freedom movement who was a terror sympathizer and a racist to africans and a bjgot....so yeah cry.....one more thing about this clown....This buddha even disrespected a person like Netaji despite Netaji giving nothing but respect to him.....
15:15
Please clarify this now. Try to justify this.
On page 355 of Volume No 92, there is a description of Gandhi’s prayer gathering in New Delhi on October 18, 1946. It is worded in this manner, “Gandhiji advised the women in East Bengal to commit suicide by poison or some other means to avoid dishonor. Yesterday he told the women to suffocate themselves or to bite their tongues to end their lives.“
Gandhi was, of course, pushing Hindu women to commit suicide in order to tolerate or avoid Muslim atrocities. Why isn’t this kind of Gandhi’s legacy taught in our schools and colleges?
Can someone clarify to me what Gandhi meant by this line? “If every Hindu in East Bengal had been done to death, I would not have minded it. After all, why did Gandhi place little value on the lives of Hindus?
He also said jews should submit to the nazis. Insane man.
Where do you get this information
Kaha kaha se Gyan leke AA jata h
Shocking claims
15:16 Please justify this too.
Pages 247-249 of volume 94
"Hindus should not harbor anger in their hearts against Muslims even if the latter wanted to destroy them. Even if the Muslims want to kill us all we should face death bravely. If they established their rule after killing Hindus we would be ushering in a new world by sacrificing our lives. None should fear death. Birth and death are inevitable for every human being. Why should we then rejoice or grieve? If we die with a smile we shall enter into a new life, we shall be ushering in a new India.”
Nathuram godse ko Saja galat Mili hai
You forget to mention another reason mentioned... Gandhi was suppose to go on hunger strike to provide Pakistan a corridor between Pakistan to Bangladesh through India...& if this would happened then just imagine how Indian Map looked like now & infiltration problem we were facing now.
Funfact:- It's easy to give opinion rather than taking decisions
That's why we are not leaders. But they are so they should take decisions.
Godse was good at taking decisions.
@@anilchoudhary999 😂
@@anilchoudhary999 taking bad decision
phir godse adolf hitler ki tarah genoside karta muslim aur baki ke dharmo ko khatm kardeta tha
I am Neither MUSLIM NOR HINDU I am Christian. AND I WANNA SAY THAT he wasn't thinking Gandhiji was appeasing Muslims, He believed that Gandhiji was Appeasing Pakistanis Like His Continuous hunger strikes forcing government to pay money to Pakistan to Grow and (In real Pakistan's plans were to invade India), Which of that time were Muslims who have already created a Different Nation... Modern Day Media is showing him this way.
And yeah, I agree with the Fact which @RR kumAR mentioned above/bellow in comments...
And also, the reply made to it by @Nikhil Thakur.
Ok you are neutral right I am right wing person just want neutral view on UCC what is your opinion...
But i think how much help Pakistan would have got if Gandhi ji would be alive
Then I remember jinnah was also gonna die soon
So yeah nothing more would have happened if Gandhi didn't died
As mr modi said,"You Britishers don't teach us human rights"..😂😂
Tunhe TRS clips dekhke bola hain na?
@@abenalex3176 buddy godse saved india
Gandhi must be executed much earlier for country's welfare 😊
Some points to be noted:
1. Gandhi may not be directly responsible for Partition but he allowed it and created an "Islamic State-Pakistan, and a Secular State-India". This point clears that Hindus didn't wanted the partition but to "Appease Muslims" Gandhi allowed forming of an Islamic state. Which illegally occupied a part of Kashmir later.
2.Gandhi even was thinking to make Mohammad Jinaah the Prime Minister of India to stop Muslims from forming Pakistan. Which is clear case of Muslim appeasement in a Secular Country with majority of Hindus.
3. After Partition, when a part of Kashmir was illegally occupied by Pakistan then India denied the cash balance of Rs.55 Crs to Pakistan which was again given to them because of Gandhi Ji's "Bhuk Hadtal". This again is another case of Muslim appeasement and not also about Muslims of India but Pakistanis, even after they illegally occupied our Kashmir Provinces.
So, despite so many compromises made by "Majority Hindu Population of Secular India", our beloved Gandhiji was still offering Muslim's: Positions, Money, Area and Power to maintain good relations between Hindu and Muslims And appeasing them(Even Pakistanis). So according to me Nathuram Godse did the Right Thing by assassinating biased Gandhiji. Jai Hind. Jai Bharat🇮🇳
So I think I must clarify:
1. The partition of India was primarily driven by political and communal factors, including the demand for a separate Muslim-majority state by the All India Muslim League, led by Muhammad Ali Jinnah. The British government, which held colonial control over India at that time, also played a pivotal role in the partition process.
Gandhi consistently advocated for Hindu-Muslim unity and worked towards communal harmony throughout his life. He strongly opposed the idea of partition and did everything in his power to prevent it. However, the deeply entrenched communal tensions and political realities of the time proved to be significant challenges.
2. there is no evidence to support the claim that Mahatma Gandhi offered Muhammad Ali Jinnah the post of Prime Minister of India to prevent the formation of Pakistan. Gandhi's vision was for a united, secular India, and he worked tirelessly to foster understanding and peace between religious communities. While there were negotiations and discussions between various leaders during that time, there is no credible evidence to suggest that Gandhi offered Jinnah the position of Prime Minister to prevent the partition.
3.That claim of 55 crore is complete fake info.
He advocated for equal treatment and respect for all religious communities.
i totally agree with uu
@@sanjaysrivastava4994 seems people are happy and living fake narratives. The btech degree was supposed to improve the scientific temperament but seems things have gone bad. Thank you for your valuable contribution
Agar aisa tha to partition sahi se kyu nahi kiya
Agar hindu maare to secularism
Aur agar muslim maare to kuch nahi
Bhai history sahi se padh ke aa
Sanatan hi satya hai 🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩
Ek din iss pawan bhumi par bhagwa lehrayega
Very true👏👏👏🙏
India has diversity in religion and culture. Gandhiji and Netaji understood very well the importance of Indian secularism and uniting all people towards the goal of poorna swaraj. While Netaji chose the path of armed revolution; Gandhiji always believed in the ultra new concept of 'Non-violence and Non-cooperation'- we could have achieved in 1942 if Gandhiji didn't pull out due to a single incidence on violence (it was a matter of principle and not politics). Gandhiji's this decision of withdrawal was a political blunder.
The British divided India into 5 parts and the same English bloodline (England, USA, Canada, Australia New Zealand), is still putting seeds of division in a diverse India by whatever means possible - may it be caste, religion or culture, The recent support to the stupid Khalistan movement by these English speaking nations is a classic example. Wake up India - the dangers of English hypocrisy still looms over the world
There is a play in Maharshtra named "Mi nathuram godse boltoy" which means "I am Nathuram Godse speaking" which shows Godse’s thought after and before killing of Gandhi..its almost housefull everytime and has great actor like Sharad Ponshe
The actor is a legend frr 🤌🏻
लोग कहते हैं कि चरखा चलाने से आजादी नहीं मिली है तो आजादी हिंसक क्रांति से भी नही मिली
ना ही आजादी अपनी पर्सनल दुश्मनी निकालने किसी के पैरों में गोली मारने , ट्रेन लूट लेने और खुद को गोली मार देने से भी नहीं मिली है छुपते छुपाते खुद को बचाते रहने से आजादी नहीं मिली है
खुद को मारने से भी बड़ा काम देश के लिए जीना होता है
आजादी लाखों करोड़ों लोगों के जागने से मिली है जो गांधी जी के आंदोलन से जागे थे , उन आंदोलनों में भी लाखों लोगों ने अपने शरीर को तोड़ा था , जख्मी हुए थे मरे भी थे लाखों की संख्या में लोग जेल गए थे और जेल जाने का डर टूटा था,,, अपने हक के लिए आंखों में आंखें डालकर अंग्रेजों से बात करने उनकी बराबरी करने,उनके सारे जुल्म सहकर अपने हक की बात करने से मिली है,,,, हिंसा और नफरत ने मस्तिष्क को संकीर्ण हो जाता है सोचने समझने की संभावना खत्म हो जाती है यदि हिंसा से देश आजाद होता तो लाखों टुकड़े होते क्योंकि तमिलनाडु भी भाषा के आधार पर अपना अलग देश बनाता,,,, अहिंसात्मक तरीके से आजादी मिलने के कारण पूरा देश एक रहा है पूरे पॉजिटिव उत्साह के साथ आजादी की लड़ाई में भाग लिया है,,,, गांधी के नाम पर ही पूरा देश एक हुआ था
गांधी को ही लाल बहादुर शास्त्री नेहरू पटेल सुभाष चंद्र बोस,,,,,पूरे देश के लाखो नेता,,,अपना आदर्श मानते थे
आजादी का मुख्य कारण प्रजामंडल आंदोलन भी है जिसके कारण रियासत राज्यों में जन जागृति आई थी जिस के प्रणेता गांधी नेहरू पटेल थे
सिर्फ देश को आजाद ही नहीं करवाना था देश का भविष्य भी बनाना था और संविधान भी बनाना था इसके बिना देश आजाद भी नहीं हो सकता था
I'm Marathi but I'm unheard of this play so can u tell what was difference in his thinking before and after killing Gandiji
After watching movie with sub titles My respects To Godse sahab💹📈💹📈💹📈💹💹 and respect to Gandi📉📉📉
EVERYONE lacks knowledge and common sense today. The Educated Fools in Power are simply the blind leading the blind shamefully basking on the currency which carries the picture of Gandhi as the father of the country, but whose legacy has no meaning with the word PEACE he fought so hard for. What a SHAME !
I think if gandhiji can force Indians to pay Pakistan even after illegally occupying POK, he could stop partision by "Aamaran Ansan" but he refused to do so.
Partition was done by Britishers. Not indian leaders.
@@Trash-hc5uk It was not done by it was done through Indian Leaders like Gandhi ji
@@Trash-hc5uk then why pakistani celebrate jinna for reason of partition? ??
@@bharathikb8116 it was done by leaders to came in power
Pakistan invasion came to an end in december , 1947. whereas , gandhi did fasts in january , 1948
Gandhi ji role was very precious as a binding agent...for unity for mass struggle and common goal sgnist common enemy....and bhagat singh , bose...all acted as massive boost to this struggle...
Not really. Mr. Gandhi was a servant of the British Empire. Congress party was established in 1885 by Allan Octavian Hume (A British govt officer) because the Britishers wanted to create an Indian-led body that could act as the mediator between the large Indian public and the small no. of British rulers. As per the safety wall theory, Congress was constructed by the British as a safety wall for the British, who could be used to make people feel represented, but when revolutionaries like Bose would stand up, the British used Congress as a safety wall by pitting the Naram Dal leaders against the Garam Dal. And that made Bose leave congress in 1929-1930. Mohandas Gandhi was also a lawyer. He practiced law on behalf of the British empire. He went to South Africa, participated in local politics and made sure that the British govt stays stable there. He was also made a military officer by the British, to fight the Boer war on behalf of the British. After that, there is one incident where Mr. Gandhi makes this statement against the local black people there, calling "the white race as more superior to the black race and the blacks must always be subservient." These are his thoughts. Gandhi is the best example of Champak Chacha from Taarak Mehta ka Ooltah Chashma serial, where all Champak Chacha does is pravachanbaazi, and shouts from the balcony to everyone in the ground, who were arguing, but never really comes out and loses even a drop of blood. British PM Clement Attlee is on record, saying that Gandhi's contribution to India's freedom struggle was minimal. And most of the damage that was caused to the British, was due to the 1946 Indian Naval Rebellion. (I don't wish to call it mutiny here coz mutiny is again a colonial term to suppress revolutionary Indians.) Though I have certain disagreements with the BJP on some things, I can ask that those who today accuse the BJP of its parent and ideological organization being the RSS and Hindu Mahasabha, they must first ask Congress who their parent was? Allan Octavian Hume? A British secretary? So at least the current administration is better than having a regime whose parent organization is the British govt, and were somehow ruling India for about 50-60 years. Those who had personal assistants and book writers for them while they were kept in 5 star jails, people think they contributed to India's freedom. And those who were given the Kolhu ka Bail punishment, in Kala Pani for 12 years, and were kept for more than 20 years under watch, in Ratnagiri, we didn't even learn about them in our books. Gandhi ko binding agent nahi, British agent bolna chahiye.
@@chinmayjoshi4539 chal nikal
@@chinmayjoshi4539 Gandhi's independence movement was not a puppet of the British Empire. While it is true that the British initially allowed the establishment of the Indian National Congress as a means to engage with Indian leaders, it eventually became a platform for nationalist aspirations. Over time, the Congress leaders, including Gandhi, asserted their independence and demanded complete self-rule for India.
Gandhi's struggle for Indian rights in South Africa: Gandhi's experience in South Africa shaped his political ideology and commitment to non-violent resistance. While he initially represented the interests of the Indian community there, he also fought against racial discrimination and injustice, which brought him into conflict with the British colonial authorities.
Gandhi's role in the Indian freedom struggle: Gandhi's leadership and non-violent resistance played a crucial role in mobilizing the Indian masses and creating a united front against British rule. His Salt March and Quit India Movement were powerful demonstrations of mass civil disobedience that shook the foundations of British rule in India.
Gandhi's commitment to truth and non-violence: Gandhi's philosophy of non-violence and truth (Satyagraha) was not mere "pravachanbaazi" (sermonizing) but a deeply held belief that influenced his actions and decisions. He led by example and faced numerous hardships, including imprisonment, in pursuit of justice and freedom.
Clement Attlee's statement:He never said that, Attlee did write in his autobiography "As It Happened" that "The credit for Indian independence must go to Gandhi. He was primarily responsible for it. He brought the Indian National Congress together, which was the most important thing. Nehru and the others did carry on the campaign but Gandhi was the initiator."
As for a British official statement acknowledging the role of non-violence in Indian independence, Lord Louis Mountbatten, the last Viceroy of India, said in his farewell speech on August 15, 1947:
"The credit for achieving this great task must go largely to Gandhi, who, as the world knows, was the outstanding figure in the Indian national movement. It was his genius for leadership which made British withdrawal possible."
Contribution of other freedom fighters: India's struggle for independence was indeed a collective effort, and many freedom fighters made significant sacrifices for the cause. Bose, the Indian Naval Rebellion, and other revolutionary movements also played vital roles in challenging British rule and contributing to India's eventual independence. But u have to understand that every one had equal role,
Congress as the parent organization: While the Indian National Congress was initially established by Allan Octavian Hume, it evolved into a nationalist organization representing the aspirations of the Indian people. Gandhi and other leaders reshaped its agenda and policies to advocate for self-rule and independence.
It is crucial to recognize that history is complex and multifaceted, and different perspectives may exist on the same events and individuals. While there may be criticisms of certain aspects of Gandhi's approach or the Indian independence movement, it is essential to acknowledge the overall impact and significance of their contributions to India's journey towards freedom.
But his method didn't work right? Partition still happened. And how dare you reduce Subhas ji and bhagat ji to "boosts"? They WERE the MAIN FREEDOM FIGHTERS. Gandhi doesn't come an inch close to them. Gandhi is not even worth the dirt on their feet.
@@AtheistNationalist u just showed ur floor level status of yours by ur comment. Gandhi is known for uniting people to fight against British. He is not known for uniting hindus and muslims.
15:19 he want proof so listen
Once a muslim community wrote a book named " Krishna teri geeta jalani padegi " when hindus complaint for that he said this freedom of speetch
After that when a Hindu writer wrote a book about the character of muslims so gandi punished him and banned the book
Thos proofs that gandhi ji was supporting muslims
ये wattsaap का ज्ञान है ranganthn करके एक गोडसे वादी आया अब वो गांधी की कंप्लीट वर्क्स ऑफ महात्मा गांधी से बता रहा है कंपलीट वर्क्स ऑफ महात्मा गांधी के एक एक दिन का वर्णन है कि उन्होंने क्या किया और बोला है उनमें से वो सन बताए या फिर वो पेज नम्बर बताए और खंड बताए गोडसे वादी से यह कहा लिखा है ये जरूर मिल जाएगा कि गांधी ने हिंदुओ को ऐसा काम के लिए कहा था पर ये भी मिलेगा की गांधी ने मुस्लिम को भी बोला था महात्मा गांधी एक कम्युनिटी को खुश नहीं कर सकते वरना असहयोग आंदोलन, दांडी यात्रा, भारत छोड़ो आंदोलन कभी नहीं कर पाते उन्होंने खुद ही कहा है 1910 में
Once kya hota hai,pura likh na...kab hua kisne likhi ...
It was not the non-violence which gave us freedom, lakhs of people fought and died for the freedom don't forget that. Subhash Chandra Bose the true father of the nation. Jai Hind Jai Bharat.
@@sarfarazsorathiya1289 goverment does not agree on giving the title of 'father of nation' to Mahatma gandhi ig you should improve your general knowledge
I think that all youtubers like you is scared to speak against Muslims
@@sarfarazsorathiya1289 i dont care who gave but my real hero was bose not gandhi bose was a real freedom fightter
Jai subhash
@@DeiwimankiruShullai-ex2kq best army alright such a great army he created, that with japanese suport couldnt even reach mainland of North east india. True liberation as per say. Let me tell you one thing, only reason india got there independence was political and economical and thats it, IT JUST BECOME TOO COSTLY FOR BRITISH TO RUN INDIA, plus india wasnt as rich as it was in 1800s so no reason to reap the benefits, why do you think african nations stayed in colony for so long, just because they were easier to deal with politically and had alot of resources left. COLONIST REAPED THE BENEFITS OF THE COLONY UNTIL IT WAS PROFITABLE. No ARMY of Bose got us the independence.
This video is inclined towards Gandhi..
Godse's point of view are not mentioned as it was. Gandhi's concepts cannot be practiced in real world.. Even his followers didn't followed his footsteps because it was impractical from every possible point. Suggestion to Hindus and Jews to face death and don't take retaliatory measure is stupidity.. You can follow Gandhi only if you are guarded and have mass following.. His view on Moplah was disgusting and had contradictory views on rangeela rasul book author and he was undemocratic
rangeela rasul 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
bro are justifying what hitler did ?
Gandhi also didn't say anything when Churchill killed 40 lakhs bengalis with the help of Muslim league
There are many videos that tilt towards Godse, yet people don't mention that fact often. There is nothing wrong to tilt away from an ideology of violence.
"But the German persecution of the Jews seems to have no parallel in history. The tyrants of old never went so mad as Hitler seems to have gone. And he is doing it with religious zeal. For, he is propounding a new religion of exclusive and militant nationalism in the name of which any inhumanity becomes an act of humanity to be rewarded here and hereafter. The crime of an obviously mad but intrepid youth is being visited upon his whole race with unbelievable ferocity. If there ever could be a justifiable war in the name of and for humanity, a war against Germany to prevent the wanton persecution of a whole race, would be completely justified. But I do not believe in any war. A discussion of the pros and cons of such a war is, therefore, outside my horizon or province.
But if there can be no war against Germany, even for such a crime as is being committed against the Jews, surely there can be no alliance with Germany. How can there be alliance between a nation which claims to stand for justice and democracy and one which is the declared enemy of both? Or is England drifting towards armed dictatorship and all it means?
Germany is showing to the world how efficiently violence can be worked when it is not hampered by any hypocrisy or weakness masquerading as humanitarianism.
It is also showing how hideous, terrible and terrifying it looks in its nakedness.
Can the Jews resist this organized and shameless persecution? Is there a way to preserve their self-respect and not to feel helpless, neglected and forlorn? I submit there is.
person who has faith in a living God need feel helpless or forlorn; Jehovah of the Jews is a God more personal and the God of the Christians, the Mussalmans or the Hindus, though as a matter of fact, in essence, He is common to all and one without a second and beyond description. But as the Jews attribute personality to God and believe that He rules every action of theirs, they ought not to feel helpless. If I were a Jew and were born in Germany and earned my livelihood there, I would claim. Germany as my home even as the tallest gentile German might, and challenge him to shoot me or cast me in the dungeon; I would refuse to be expelled or to submit to discriminating treatment. And for doing this I should not wait for the fellow Jews to join me in civil resistance, but would have confidence that in the end the rest were bound to follow my example. If one Jew or all the Jews were to accept the prescription here offered, he or they cannot be worse off than now. And suffering voluntarily undergone will bring them an inner strength and joy which no number of resolutions of sympathy passed in the world outside Germany can."
Source: Harijan, 26-11-1938
Mahatma Gandhi also wrote a letter to Hitler in 1940. Here's a part of it:
"Our rulers may have our land and bodies but not our souls. They can have the former only by complete destruction of every Indian-man, woman and child. That all may not rise to that degree of heroism and that a fair amount of frightfulness can bend the back of revolt is true but the argument would be beside the point. For, if a fair number of men and women be found in India who would be prepared without any ill will against the spoliators to lay down their lives rather than bend the knee to them, they would have shown the way to freedom from the tyranny of violence. I ask you to believe me when I say that you will find an unexpected number of such men and women in India. They have been having that training for the past 20 years. We have been trying for the past half a century to throw off the British rule. The movement of independence has been never so strong as now. The most powerful political organization, I mean the Indian National Congress, is trying to achieve this end. We have attained a very fair measure of success through nonviolent effort. We were groping for the right means to combat the most organized violence in the world which the British power represents. You have challenged it. It remains to be seen which is the better organized, the German or the British. We know what the British heel means for us and the non-European races of the world. But we would never wish to end the British rule with German aid. We have found in non-violence a force which, if organized, can without doubt match itself against a combination of all the most violent forces in the world. In nonviolent technique, as I have said, there is no such thing as defeat. It is all ‘do or die’ without killing or hurting. It can be used practically without money and obviously without the aid of science of destruction which you have brought to such perfection. It is a marvel to me that you do not see that it is nobody’s monopoly. If not the British, some other power will certainly improve upon your method and beat you with your own weapon. You are leaving no legacy to your people of which they would feel proud. They cannot take pride in a recital of cruel deed, however skilfully planned. I, therefore, appeal to you in the name of humanity to stop the war. You will lose nothing by referring all the matters of dispute between you and Great Britain to an international tribunal of your joint choice. If you attain success in the war, it will not prove that you were in the right. It will only prove that your power of destruction was greater. Whereas an award by an impartial tribunal will show as far as it is humanly possible which party was in the right. You know that not long ago I made an appeal to every Briton to accept my method of non-violent resistance. I did it because the British know me as a friend though a rebel. I am a stranger to you and your people. I have not the courage to make you the appeal I made to every Briton. Not that it would not apply to you with the same force as to the British. But my present proposal is much simple because much more practical and familiar. During this season when the hearts of the peoples of Europe yearn for peace, we have suspended even our own peaceful struggle. Is it too much to ask you to make an effort for peace during a time which may mean nothing to you personally but which must mean much to the millions of Europeans whose dumb cry for peace I hear, for my ears are attuned to hearing the dumb millions?"
These are Mahatma Gandhi's views on the Jewish question. He did go quite far for his principles, but he was certainly not an ally of destruction.
Why did Netaji goes to meet Hitler , even when he killed jews?
I ask once more why did Gandhi ji oppose Subhash Chandra Bose in 1939 when Bose became the Congress president with a huge mandate? It will not be irrelevant to mention that Subhash Chandra Bose cleared the Indian civil services with a few months preparation when the exam used to be much more challenging for the native Indians to discourage them from joining executive offices of the British Government in India. Infact, after constituting the Congress socialist party within inc Subhas Chandra Bose gave the finest economic roadmap for realising the socialist pattern of development in independent India which had hardly ever been given by any other leader. Even the Five Year Plan strategy was formulated by Bose in INC and pandit Jawaharlal Nehru was made the chairperson of the committee and all of these are happening in the 1930s.Furthermore, what never finds mention is his contribution to ideas related to future nation-building. How many students of this generation know that it was Netaji who was as much a mastermind behind the Economic Planning that was adopted in post-independent India as Jawaharlal Nehru is credited to be? Textbooks on post-independent Indian history, which deal with the Five-Year Plans extensively, never discuss this fact. Well-known historians like Bipan Chandra and Ramachandra Guha do not even mention Bose’s name in the context of Economic Planning.
The politics runs so deep that Prasanta Chandra Mahalanobis, the architect of the Second Five Year Plan, in his book Talks on Planning, called Jawaharlal Nehru the pioneer of economic planning in India.
The economic vision and organisational calibre of a young man very much younger than Gandhi ji drew huge popularity within the inc itself. This is proven by the fact that Bose had elected twice as the president of inc. So why did Gandhi ji oppose Bose in the Tripuri session even after Bose was elected the president and not only opposed but also nominated Pattabhi Sitarmayya instead of Bose??
I wonder what Gandhi’s stance would be on
Uri
Balakot
Kasab’s hanging
India having Nuclear Weapons
India inducting Rafales etc
He saw himself as a messiah at the cost of a strong independent India
A 2,000+ year old nation doesn’t need a father
Perfectly true
I don't worship Gandhi as the ultimate figure responsible for the independence of our nation. He had different views on different things. I respect him but I disagree with lot of things he said. However, I don't support any kind of violence in the name of religion. Nathuram had his opinions but from all the records all see is him being extremely brainwashed into thinking that killing Gandhi...
Godse was a murderer who has zero achievement in his life only reason people knew his name because he murdered someone famous....
Well that famous person was on a hunger strike and wanted india to pay pakistan a hefty amount while pakistan was invading india . If that isn't appeasement then it is a brain-dead act . Imagine how much more damage he could have done .
That too for Hindus sake
♥️
Lol goa wouldnt be part of india if gandhi was alive cuz non violence might had delayed annexation
"godse had no achievement in life"
Read his book, you'll realise how wrong that statement is
I don't know who is right or who is wrong but your effort through this video has been to portray Gandhiji as a hero but you have not shown or mentioned Gandhiji's other side which should be known to the people... But I also condemn what Godse has done by killing a person ... that is a crime in my point of view which is unpunishable in the highest court of law.
MUJE bhi yeh todha biased hi laga ,,mohak gandhi ji ki side le rahe hai,,and kuch points like pakistan ne india par attack kiya and gandhi ji ne pakistan ko money di yeh toh saaf gandhi ji ki galti thi,,,main bhi unki killing ke againt hu but ,shayd gandhi ji ne bhi kafi galtiya kari thi
*As a Hindu 🚩🇮🇳, I'll say, Hindus have started worshiping Godse after 70 years like Krishna & Shiva, they don't even know their own ideology, that's why all Hindus who vote for BJP/RSS are terrorists. In my opinion BJP/RSS are Indian 🇮🇳 terrorist groups*
गांधी जी आपके वजह से भविष्य में हिंदू खत्म होने का कारण बनेगा 🥺
सरदार पटेल सही थे , गोडसे सही थे 💯
Andhbhakt mat bano bhai gandhi ji bas kisi ka bura nahi chahte the vo bas sab ko ek rakhna chahte the usme unke decesion se log agree nahi karte mere hisaab se vo sahi the kyu ki aaj kal desh me bas hindu muslim ke alawa kuch chalta hi nahi hai agar gandhiji sab ko ek kar lete to aaj itna hate nahi hota india me
Godse was terrorist
When Muslims killed Hindus in Kerala Gandhi said it's Mopla rebellion (Malabar). I learned in textbooks as such. My grandma is a survivor and she told me real stories. Because of Gandhi it was. Labelled just a rebellion and thousands of Hindus killed and occupied their homes. Malabar is still Muslim heavy population.
Godse didn't even threw a stone at an any English person but fired 3 bullets at Bapu or Mahatma ji. Bapu did many marches against British in which he himself got injured severely but Godse didn't even did a single. Forget about a march he didn't even criticized the British for the death of those thousands or even millions of innocent Indians who had died in wars or droughts in the British era. He just spread the divide & rule policy of British.
You are telling that Godse didn't even fired or thrown stone over British state of cmtng this kind of film dialogues, first grow and learn the reality , he didnt fired a bullet because he was also practicing the Gandhi policy(as one she used to be one of the follower of Gandhi you can go through confession trail), he did many marches for political gain of Congress , also you should keep this in mind that your so call Gandhi didn't even criticized British atrocities over freedom fighters in cellular jail and also he didn't even said a single word against Michael O Dyer the man behind jallianwala Bagh , Gandhi who you are thinking ambassador of nonviolence didn't even opposed recruitment of Indians
In British Indian Army and also given Full support
Seeing the condition of Pakistan now, I'm not that unhappy about partition; violence that happened was saddening tho
This statement makes zero sense
So u should go to Pakistan
@@saintpixie2765 true
@@madanigaming6595 bro you are the kind of people why wars exist
Agreed but more(atleast all the north indian ones) muslims should've been forcefully sent there, our country would be in a better condition without them
Gandhi was on a hunger strike and wanted india to pay pakistan a hefty amount while pakistan was invading jammu kashmir . If that isn't appeasement then it is a brain-dead act . Imagine how much more damage he could have done .
And people like godse , savarkar are just not that great If they would have been , then they would have been able to cause mass movements against the Gandhian ideology It seemed easier for them to just kill Gandhi
Did Gandhi ever called for killings of Hindus ? NOPE Bt becoz he didn't came to criticize or blame d muslims .... U kill him
again this is distorted truth. Pakistan invasion came to an end in december , 1947. whereas , gandhi did fasts in january , 1948
55 crore was given by under international agreement gandhi was protesting to stop hindu muslim violence
Actually
@@tycva147raunakmalviyamalvi5 just because it came to end you just forget about it and move on ?....then why even go through the whole struggle of freedom fighting..just let the British rule ....
In my opinion Godse was nationalist and i do follow Savarkar's ideology of hindutva 💯🙌, what's wrong in that?
Spreading hate
It's not nationalism It's ultra nationalism. Extremism of any sort is dangerous.
@@I_am_groot_3874its not ultra nationalism .
@@GayathriK-re7wt how would you define it?
@@GayathriK-re7wt IT is indeed
Raghupati raghav raja ram desh baccha gaye nathuram 🚩🚩
Let's discuss if Gandhi ji can be called a Mahatma! with facts not emotions! does turning a blind eye towards atrocities and violence's selectively make a person guilty? or not guilty?!
Mahatma sleeps naked with underage women? Today he would be equivalent of nityananda or asaram bapu.
Ambedkar was right that this country has an obsession with deification of half naked men
I WANT ANS FROM YOU WHY NEHRU IS FIRST PRIME MINISTER JB KI SARDAR VALLABHBHAI PATEL NE PRIME MINISTER KE LIYE SAB SE JADA VOTE MILE THE
APNE BARI ACHI VIDEO KO O BANAI PAR HINDUS KE UPAR JO HINSA HO RHI THI AK BAR BHI BOLA USKE BAREME
AJJ TAK TO DEKHA HI HOGA MUSLIMS KITNE ACHE HOTE HAI 95% OF T3RRORIST KAHA SE ATE KON RELIGION AJ KE SAMYE BHI AK WORD AGAINST BOLKE TO DEKHO HIMMAT HAI NHI , KISSE APNE SAR TANNSE JUDA KARNA HAI
19 JANUARY 1990 YAD HAINA TABHI CONGRESS HI THI TAB BHI SICKULAR SARKAR HI THI WO BHI BATAO GANDHI NE ITNA KAM KIA THA KI BRITISH UNHE APNA SABBSE ACHA POLICEMEN KEHTI THI "GANDHI" HINDUS KE UPAR HUYE JADA TAR HINSA GANDHI DEKH HI NHI PAYA OR AJJ AP
🙏🙏 JAI SICKULARISUM
JAI
He dint turn a blind eye to the violence smh
Rabindranath Tagore give him the title "Mahtma"
And Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose give him the title " father of the nation".
@@raunakkohli6666 yeah , infact he put the blame on hindus . Such a shameless person he was .
The real blame for Hindu-Muslim violence after independence goes to Jinnah, not Gandhi, because Jinnah called for Muslims in Bangladesh and Pakistan to kill Hindus until Gandhi and Nehru agreed to the partition. Greedy Nehru agreed to Jinnah but mostly Jinnah and his followers were responsible for the Hindu-Muslim violence. Read about Action Day 1946.
There's nothing like real and unreal culprit there...Gandhi was also very much responsible to the cause with his obsolete philosophy...
Jinnah, Gandhi and Nehru. 2 of them wanted to become the King, and one wanted to become the Mahatma.
Gandhi Surrendered to Jinnahs Violent Blackmail called Direct Action Day, and agreed for Partition
But what Gandhi did he need to make violent decision on it instead of he say Hindus should be never angry against the Muslims even if the latter might take up their minds to undo even their existence.'
This is the reason most of them don't like him
And we have Gandhi photo on every currency and what is impact of nonviolence moment on Britishers it is nill
Jinnah ka statment ye v tha agar subhash bose agar pm hote to unko divide nehi karna h jinnah khud bolatha sabke samne.. issiliye congress ne bose ki death ka natak kiya.. bose ko chupaya gaya.. bose ke family ko daraya gaya.. agar bose pm hote to akhand bharat ab v hota..
Bapu was against untouchability, and he tried to reform Hindu society but this fueled anger in people like Godse and V.D.S. Because they didn't wanted a reformation in Hindu society like other great people such as Raja Ram Mohan Roy, Swami Vivekananda, Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar, Rabindranath Tagore, Ramanujacharya, Basaveshwara, Debendranath Tagore and many others, who did wanted a reformation in Hindu society. ❤😎😁🤣😂🤔🤠👍🌍☮♾
What you said bapu is against untouchability it right to reform Hindu society , which made godse and Savarkar angry tell this to those people who don't know the history
Keep it in mind that your bapu is the one who was in the support of varn vyavastha , while Savarkar is the one who was completely against it and advocated for castless society and he is the one who fought against the untouchability , and made so many lower section people to enter in temples and funded lower section people for their education and reformed Hindu society
Bro do you know how much caste reformation Savarkar took? I'm not his followers but don't just randomly accuse him of things he isn't guilty of and in fact, is the very opposite of those things. He protested for the entry of dalits into temple which could've got him killed in those days, since casteism was at its peak. Falsely accusing someone of things he was the very opposite of just undermined your own position. Savarkar played a very good rule in removing casteism and even mentioned caste system as "one of the shackles which restrict Hindu society". You're a crazy guy
@@pedadasiddardha5492 correct , these people don't know history
@@AtheistNationalist correct 👍
Accha bhai jab gandhi,nehru ne bola tha ki mandir me chipne wale log terrorist hai tab tu kha gya tha bol🤬🤬😡
You can not denied the fact that he was responsible for partition. He didn't support Sardar Patel, He always supported Nehru. There were 14% Hindus in Pakistan and now less than 2%. Muslim population in India is increasing day by day in India. Look at the countries like Afghanistan and Iran. Where majority became minority and minority became majority.
There was 33% Hindus in East Pakistan (Present day Bangladesh) . But now it is below 8%. I hate Gandhi and Congress. For their policy we and our people are still suffering and will be suffer in future.
Oh Vhagwan, Gandhi burned in the fire of hell. That is my prayer to you.😡😡
It seemed easier for to just kill Gandhi..
Did Gandhi ever called for killings of Hindus ? NOPE
But becoz he didn't came to criticize or blame d muslims .... U kill him
Where u ogt this whatsapp gyan then Pakistan was Bangladesh and Pakistan. Pakistan Hindu population is stable
@@gerardtimothy4186 first tell me answer how Hindus decreased in pakistan. As u said there are less than 2 percent but u forgt at time of independence pakistan also consisted of Bangladesh
@@gerardtimothy4186 plz any census source and a genuine source
Killing Gandhi ji was a wrong act of violence but, I personally think that a few of Godse's opinions were definitely correct about Gandhi ji. Gandhi was not following secularism but rather was trying to create peace by giving Muslims whatever they wanted. He could have used his popularity among all the people to gather support and create a real form of secularism and unity but he didn't do so. And, I'm not against Muslims but want equality for all rather than giving favors to a community so that they don't do violent riots.
What godse had was madness and "andh bhakti"..
Politics based on religion is pure evil. Religion based Politics is only a game to get and hold on to power.
Those who can't see that don't have eyes, those who can't realise that don't have my minds and those who can't accept that tremendously lack knowledge.
If you want, worship whomsoever at your home not in a party office.
At the time of partition with britishers where Gandhi was leading the country 2.1mn lost their lives. Mainly Hindus
Who will take the accountability of their lives ,If all good credit goes to Gandhi .
If because of his decision 2.1 mn people died Godsey thought to surprise Gandhi... he was a gentleman . He couldn't able to bear deaths of their Sanatani brothers and sisters mother's were raped in Pakistan.
TMC does the same
Give proof that he was trying to create peace by giving Muslims whatever they wanted.
@@drsejutisengupta3831 ya bjp is so pure it directly comes from Swarg 🤣
Koi kuchh bhi kahe Godse ko me dil se support aur respect karta hoon
Did godse ever kill any britisher
Andhbhakt 😂
Anyone notice which series part is showing
Dear UA-camr,
I suggest you make one more video on Godse. What I personally beg you to cover in the new video are below given six points. All we said in the video is that Gandhi was not doing Muslim appeasement and was not in favour of division. It was very high level and superficial. What we need is very factual, detailed, event based analysis. I have heard some part of Godse's speech in court. He had made some very specific events based accusations and claims against Gandhi. We did not talk at all about them in the video. It felt like we don't have any answers for those questions Godse asked and we are trying to dodge those questions and hastily declaire him as terrorist. The main accusations are as follows
1. Gandhi never said a word about Hindu being slaughtered and tortured in Pakistan. Never bothered to condemn Jina or Pakistan or Muslims for that
2. Gandhi also said that Hindus from Pakistan shouldn't run to India to avoid the hell of slaughter and torture. They should stay in Pakistan.
3. Gandhi never went on fast when Hindus were being killed on direct action day or for Hindus being killed in Pakistan because he knew that his fast won't have effect on Jina and muslims. Actually the fast begun when Hindu started retaliation in India and government denied the money to pakistan.
4. First condition to break Gandhi fast was to muscle out all the suffering Hindu and Sikh immigrants taking shelter in masjid of Delhi. And when that was done, some went to Gandhi for shelter in birla house but gandhi didn't even bother take notice of them.
5. Gandhi blackmailed Indian government by the means of his fast to give Pakistan money being fully aware that the money shall be definitely used against india in Kashmir and in various other matters.
6. If some newspapers wrote about slaughter of Hindu happening in Pakistan those days, those newspapers were being blamed for disturbing Hindu Muslim unity and were stopped from publishing such news.
In my personal opinion, if above accusations are correct then Godse was really Deshbhakt and gandhi was doing Muslim appeasement. If those accusations are false then we can call godse terrorist.
How was Gandhi already aware of how Pakistan will use the money? If Gandhi had no leverage with Jinnah or muslims - why would he go on a fast to stop them? He could stop violence by Hindus because he had control over them and they would listen to him, so there is no point in saying he didnt fast for Hindus, because its not going to help anyway by your own admission
@@deathstarresident
I was just listing Godse's point of view. Pakistan was fighting India in Kashmir at the time. Battle was fresh and was on peak. Battles are most expensive. On the top of that, pakistan never tried to hide that they considered india as enemy even in 1947. In the middle of such mess, a huge money transfer to pakistan. It did not take a genius to guess how they would use the money. And gandhi was a genius. Some people say that the money was rightfully Pakistan's. It was not.Because when a nation divides in two, both nations share assets as well as liabilities. So Pakistan was supposed to share some of debt as well. They shared none. Mr.Patel was just showing jinna that there are some serious consequences to his action. There was nothing unethical with that. But gandhi forced him with fast.
He could not stop jinna and muslims but stopped Hindus. The point was he could have started the fast to force government to take strict millitary action against rioting muslims in India BEFORE Hindus started retaliation. He could have forced government to start deplomatic dialogue to migrate Hindus in Pakistan to India peacefully rather than saying that they should stay in Pakistan and die.And should not have muscled suffering Hindu and Sikh out of masjid. That would had protected Hindus.Rioting people needed to learn a lesson that there are consequences for their doing. he could had atleast done it in india. At the very least, he could have condemned the jinna and rioting community in strongest words. And if he could not do any of that, then atleast he should have stayed silent when Hindus started retaliation
Bro, you talk of Hindus who died but you didn't even mention the Muslims who also died in the partition. The number of Muslims who died in the partition was actually double than that of Hindus & Sikhs both combined. And Bapu took the fast so he can stop the bloodshed from both sides.
Does that give right to glorify a murderer n calling him nationalist 😊
@@Ashar.Bhutta well muslims started it. So if lot of them died, it is fault of nobody but the people who started riots.And if Bapu did it stop both, why not do it immediately when it started?why to wait till retaliation was started?
He was neither a nationalist nor a terrorist, he was a extremist thinking his ideology has a noble sense to prevail.
Ok hypocrite
this is a nice tldr lol
Yep, and the rise of extremism in India is what concerns me
Those days everyone was Extreme or you would just be a normal poor person which was the majority of them anyways , so if you wanna stand out and be remembered in history do something extreme if it's something bad even better.
100 percent agree with it.
And for those who don't
Bhagat Singh was Atheist and according to him the nation can't run with religious philosophy and belief.
When i were don't know about Mahatma gandhi 😡😠
When i know about gandhi 😊🫡
In my opinion every indian should read gandhi biography and movement and their philosophy.
Beause of when i read about gandhi and india freedom struggle my opinion is changed about Mahatma Gandhi. Jai hind 🇮🇳
Mahatma ji went on the hunger strike for peace and Hindu-Muslim unity he never said that give those 55 crore Rupees to Pakistan, but instead it was promoted by Godse and V.D.S. What Mohak said in the video was 💯correct and I'm against the political assassination. Bapu were innocent.
Tell this to those people who don't know history , and Gandhi is the one who made strike regarding the 55 cr (55cr amount which is the pak share from reserve Bank it is denied by patel bcos pak atrocities during the time of partition) Gandhiji led the strike for that amt not for Hindu Muslim unity , Savarkar and Godse never even involved in that strike , and what mohak side is 100% false , you are against the your own political assassination , bapu is not innocent
It's so sad that this question is for debate now a days in India.
Sad .....really sad .....
Par bhai kuch logo ko "Gandhi Babu" milata hai Gandhi ko bura bol ne par
Gazab baat hai 🤣
Its not sad its scary
@@wasted4908😞
@@rohanjagdale97 what about freedom of speech bro
If Shree Ram can be criticized on national TV
Prophet Muhammad can be criticized on national TV
Then who the hell is Mr. Gandhi?
14:57 Smart move Mohak bhai... vo innocence questions k time bhai ne bola ki aise bata pana mushkil hai aur aage bahot easily bol diya ki kuch log ye sochte hai aur kuch log vo sochte hai...khudka decision nahi bataya 😂
Phir vo terrorist ke questiona pe sidkha personal opinion de diya ki Godse ne terrorism use kiya... aur iss personal opinion ka explanation khudka nahi tha but was based on some journalists and researchers ka terrorists ka definition...
Mohak bhai you have made us fool by accepting a mistake via highly likely ignorable comment but not by uploading a revised video.
In libarandus se kia expect kar sakte hai
15:14
@@privisuals9888 a person who belives to give money to country which attacked their own country is decision of terroist
Gandhi is like Dhritrastra who wants to please Zinna like Duryodhan and if Gandhi alive further, he could do big blunder and don’t give rights Hindus to do anything, he would change the geagrophy of india
Non violence can't be use in Indian politics history.
EVERYONE lacks knowledge and common sense today. The Educated Fools in Power are simply the blind leading the blind shamefully basking on the currency which carries the picture of Gandhi as the father of the country, but whose legacy has no meaning with the word PEACE he fought so hard for. What a SHAME !
My textbooks glorified Gandhi but my maharashtrian parents told me the reality of gandhi.
your "Brahmin" parents lied to you about Gandhi.
@@sudoanonymous96 lol I'm not from a bramhin family 😂
@@sudoanonymous96 average mlecha targeting brahmins
Not surprised
@@sudoanonymous96 L
@@bhakti7653 tumhare papa rss k memeber honge ya fir bjp k 😂kyu ki ek sacha deshbhkt gandhi k bare kabhi kuch glt nhi bolega ...gandhi ji aaj log buraya krte aacha hota aaj bharat aazad naah hua hota..
Gandhi had to be eliminated, otherwise India would have been further partitioned into 2 parts and there would have been no way to stop that fate.
WhatsApp graduate he United people if he don't that means india get more partioned
Gandhi was never in favour of partition what done is done just forget it
@@ralphyyy8679 ok so why nehru didnt succeed to protect ladakh in 1962?
@@sunilgarad39 he weak army he think that after world war 2 no country would invade other country and United nation protect everyone
He was idealistic and he think there is no use of army so we should spent on education and health sector we can't call it it his total fault
But he did many better thing so plz just don't hate for one thing
@@ralphyyy8679 how usa got independence early And also was it united without wars?
@@sunilgarad39 that just one example
Many people who go against that got killed brutally and many people india use weapon to British but they fail america get independece because of France supported them china was get independence later but still reunited progress better than us
I would be happy if you had a English channel , most of the times I hear to videos while driving. Make a english channel as well. I am very much interested and happy with the topics you are discussing
then why did gandhis people killed 2000 og people belonging to godses cast ????
Their is no Comparison between A Freedam Fighter and a murderer. So, why everyone talking like they are equal .
True killing someone because your ideology is not same
Na bro read a little more about how our soldiers were sent to Europe to fight for the Allies, most of them died. Isn't Gandhi responsible for their death? How's that any different from Stalin killing his own people
@@noone379 Gandhi was hypocrite why he participate in ww1 and ww2 and didnt follow non violence
@@Stellar_Insights_ BRO 😭it was during british rule gandhi had no say in it.
@@Stellar_Insights_ read again and tried to see all the other options what can be
It is good that you admitted of tilting towards Gandhi, I agree with the views of Right-wing leaders and Godse. Gandhi was just over glorified freedom fighter compared to others he was neither successful in uniting Hindu Muslim nor he was responsible for the freedom of India. You could've mentioned the not so secular speeches and thoughts of Gandhi against Hindus
He remained quiet during the Moplah massacre, Direct action day, Kashmir where thousands of Hindus were butchered/exploited. Because it doesn't suited his hindu muslim bhai bhai narrative
Arey bhay yaha sachai nai bol sakte , Peaceful community ko v toh please karna hai 😔
Completely agree with you
Most understand comment
The reality is that the majority of socio-political objectives today are only achieved through peaceful means through diplomacy
Bro don't say that Hindus can be Victims too. You will be labelled as "Bhagwa wadi". You have to be secular & liberal if you want to be seen as educated cool individual in the society. Mention only those instances where other communities underwent repression. Else if you speak about Hindu victims or biased stance of political leaders towards hindus, you won't earn browny points.
Edit: Tldr: Jyada sach mt bol.
Bengal me jo hindu maare Jaa rhe the aur Hindu mahilaye ka shosan ho rha tha uspe jo Gandhi ji ne comment Kiya woo q nhi bataya kya aap sirf ek tarfa baat bata kr Hume bhatka rhe h. I oppose you.
Did Gandhi ever read Bhagavat gita in masjid.
But he did read Qur'an in mandir
If Gandhiji really wanted to stop partition, he'd have gone on a hunger strike. I mean, he did a hunger strike to overrule congress' decision to appoint Sardar Patel ji as PM instead of Nehru. Was that more important than opposing the division of our nation ?
What ??
Kahan se laate ho ye theories??
phir theek se suna nahi tune, dubara suno 10:50
muslim ligue ke log danga kar rahe the ,to ho humare sath judte kese ??
@@dilshadmsts the key thing to understand in his statement was that he thought his hunger strike was not going to change anything, which means the congress had decided and there was nothing that could be done. Do you really think such a decision would have been taken without the prior blessings of Gandhi himself?
i think you should go read in detail what actually led to the partition and who particularly incited it,i personally think we should leave these things behind as passing comments now comfortably sitting is a lot easier than making decisions in an unclear phase of our history
Btw I want Mohak, akash, sham sharma and AKTK in one wholesome podcast
G mar lega in libarandus ki
His sasta dhruv
There will be bloodbath
AKTK is bekar factless
Podcast on hindu khatre me hai
Now a days people feels patriotic to the person who become hero by weapons not by voice.
You have editing error at 6.14
Not most of the people in india really knows the real truth about freedom struggle.. the text book we read in our schools simply glorifies Mr gandhi and their ideology.. if you think that non violence leads india to be free than you are in the darkness in your whole life..
JO HOTA HAI WO DIKHTA NAHI, JO DIKHTA HAI WO HOTA NAHI..
Konsi school book padhi hai tune?mere wale me to dono ko bataya gaya hai.tell me one example,one book that explicitely says that only non violence leads to independence,plus that book must be written by credible historian.neither non violence alone or violence alone made independent possible
@@rationalist455 meri book thodi biased hai lekin woh Azad Hind Fauj ko mention karti hai
@@rationalist455 bhai jo real freedom fighters hai unke bare mai bhaut hi kaam bataya hai.. tune kitne books mai sardar udaam singh ji ka naam suna hai ya fir Azad ji ka naam suna hai.. or b bhaut hai jo cmnt mai nahi bata sakta.. books mai indirectly yai hai ki india ko freedom so called non violence kinl wajha se mila hai..
@@sidyapun9057 Bhai India ke freeedom bohot lambi he hum cbse me 8 th class me morden history padai the jaha end of mugal to Maratha Empire to other regional Empire se leke britsher ka control to freedom and uske baad ka sab kuch batana padta the and cbse me social science me 3 subject they history geo and politics science ek 8 class student kitna he yaad kar lega kitna he pad sakta he Hume as Indian khud bhi padna chahye in cheezon bare me apne history ke bare me cause school textbook sab kuch nahi bata sakti there were thousands of freedom fighter from different part of inidia jink hum kabhi naam bhi sunenge iska ye matlab thode he school book pe daal do dosh unhe bhi ek curriculum banna he plus ye bohot clear he book me ke Hume azadi ek collective approach se mile he jisme bohot logo ka yogdan the Jo diff religion area views and ideology ke the
@@anujgopalsharma8911 bhai ek baar pata kr lo india ka education system kisne banaya hai or abhi taak same wesa hi chal rha hai.. india ki itni rich history mai but mughals or British k bare mai hi zyada bola hai jo invaders the.. Bhagat singh ji ko aaj b books paar revolutionary terrorist bola jata hai and first war of independence 1857 ko sepoy mutiny
Congress is not secular, it's little inclined towards muslim. BJP clearly says they are a Hindu party. Similarly, AIMIM is a muslim party. So Congress either takes a side, or becomes a complete neutral party.
The same way it happens in USA not bad .....the republicans are right wing do majoritarism christianity,white people .....and democrats do minoritarism ...they support blacks ,Jews,muslims.they are left inclined
Same way bjp is far right capitalist , majoritarism party
Congress is little left inclined
good point 👌👌
Bro congress party was founded by British Empire....so & who support congress they support the British before also now also...
@@rockyyashgaming771 no congress is not an anti hindu party .Congress is a centric party leaning towards left wing .This means it wants equality which BJP supporters see as anti Hindu party because of bjp propaganda and also giving out out some policies to help muslims from financial and social problems doesn't make someone anti hindu
Congress should be removed
For your formation, sir, Gandhi did not hate the British rulers. He hated first the inequalities among th Indians themselves. Annie Besant the founder of Home Rule for India presided over a meeting at the Banaras university in 1920. Among those dignitaries present were the Viceroy and many rich and powerful Indians. All guests arrived by the latest Rolls Royce and modern private transportation Gandhi arrived by rickshaw. Gandhi was given just five minutes talking time. He was the last speaker. From the start he began his attack on the front row rich Indians. He alleged while driving through the streets they missed so much of India's misseries. He called on the Ranies and Maharanis and the rich to shed some of the glorious jewellers and care for the poor and the needy. The Rajas wore gold studded turbans. When they started to leave Mrs. Besant hushed Gandhi down. He was aware that they were not interested in India's independence or selfrule. They were happy to keep the status quo. The students roared their approval,while affluent left ashmed. The Viceroy was shocked.
francis waston and clement attlee mentioned that they did not left India because of Gandi they left because of Boss sir and INA. Gandiji started leave India moment in 1942 but it was failed then congress supported Boss sir and INA. Even Ambedkar sir also suggested Boss sir and NIA.
5:53 Kuldeep Yadav on the right side of godse😂😂😂😂
Ayushman khurana beside him with beards
ur absolutely right that he didnt had any intention to kill anyone but his decisions ended up in communal riots
he is responsible
ritish civil servant Sir Cyril Radcliffe drew up the borders between India and Pakistan, in 1947, dividing the sub-continent very roughly into:
a central and southern part, where Hindus formed the majority
two parts in the north-west and north-east that were mostly Muslim