Range Rover Evoque ED4 2WD (Team Review) - Fifth Gear

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 127

  • @kingofalldoughboys
    @kingofalldoughboys 10 років тому +53

    "A simpering cabbage!?" I love you Brits! That is HILARIOUS!

  • @louiswilliamhicks
    @louiswilliamhicks Рік тому +2

    Honestly, I adore both Tiff and Vicki and I love the way they are together on screen. It's one of the best reasons to watch. Johnny has grown on me, and of course we all love Jason Potato.

  • @TraneFrancks
    @TraneFrancks 10 років тому +15

    "Simpering cabbage." ROTFLMAO!
    That is possibly the best insult I've ever heard.

  • @egm1843
    @egm1843 9 років тому +11

    Kudos to Vicki for overcoming her irrational fear. Not everyone can do that, leave alone on camera.

  • @fifthgearuk
    @fifthgearuk  10 років тому +46

    The team review the Range Rover Evoque ED4 2WD, on both track and off-road. However before they can finish the track they suffer a serious break down, with Vicki not the car...
    For more fantastic car reviews, shoot-outs and all your favourite Fifth Gear moments, subscribe to our Official Channel - ua-cam.com/users/fifthgearuk
    #FifthGear #RangeRover #Review

    • @RobertLeBlancPhoto
      @RobertLeBlancPhoto 10 років тому +3

      Lol... Cabbage.

    • @RobertLeBlancPhoto
      @RobertLeBlancPhoto 10 років тому +4

      Scott Baldock I agree that LR should've given it it's own name rather then putting it in the RR lineup, but the AWD version does indeed have the off road capability known to the brand.

    • @stephendriver66
      @stephendriver66 10 років тому +2

      Too many blind spots and visibility poor. Unfortunately it isn't very practical either. Boot space is only capable of accommodating a couple of designer handbags and a toy dog. Parking is a nightmare, again due to poor visibility. Bizarrely, radical design was chosen over common sense when LR went ahead and built this.
      This isn't your regular mud plugger. More of a puddle jumper to be precise.

    • @RobertLeBlancPhoto
      @RobertLeBlancPhoto 10 років тому +4

      stephen driver I agree entirely. After all, the styling was lead by Victoria Beckham.
      LR was never known for function over form, especially with the Hipster intended Evoque. The Subaru Forester XT-Touring, at 2/3 the price, is a far better vehicle and value, but not on your list if you're the type to care more about turning heads at the valet parking line than owning a practical, reliable, functional CUV.

    • @RobertLeBlancPhoto
      @RobertLeBlancPhoto 10 років тому +2

      Alan Akeister Crap. LR loves to tout how they hired her for styling consultation. My point earlier affirmed stephen driver's statements of how the vehicle seemed to be designed towards the cues of those who never go off road and tote around toy dogs, and I'll bet that the vast majority of your claimed 112k were sold to that market, along with Hipsters and metrosexuals, which again LR admits to marketing this vehicle to specifically.
      Also, no one said it was so bad. In fact, I specifically said that the AWD version is quite good off road, although 99% of owners will never use it as such.
      What we did say was that it's a poor value, and that functionally, there are many better choices, even at much lower prices.
      Regardless, surely you don't expect anyone to actually take your opinion on any vehicle to be an unbiased expert one, given your specific profession.

  • @h3runs
    @h3runs 10 років тому +24

    Vicki is too adorable XD
    As for this "Range Rover," when I heard 2wd, I just assumed it would be RWD and figured although odd for a Rover, maybe they're going after the BMW and Porsche RWD market. I actually had to stop the clip and replay when Tiff said it was FWD :| Land Rover/ Range Rover lost a bit of respect from me with this one.

    • @azerro1080
      @azerro1080 7 років тому

      k3rrons i thought rwd aswell! Fwd=Failure Wotdafuq Dumb

    • @nunochaquice9928
      @nunochaquice9928 4 роки тому +2

      I agree. I first thought it was FWD when Vicky started on the track. I think I saw the front tyres spin, I dindnt want to believe I didn't repeat but then Tiff confirmed it is FWD.
      Fo r me no problem in it being a 2WD, the problem for me is being a FWD, In a Range Rover!

  • @Ioanides001
    @Ioanides001 10 років тому +31

    I want what Vicky is smoking. Awesome stuff...

  • @NaughtyBwoi
    @NaughtyBwoi 9 років тому +14

    Where are Vicki's eyebrows?

  • @OCRay1
    @OCRay1 7 років тому +5

    Vicki has made is clear to anyone who has seen the show more than a couple times that she hates driving off-reading, yet it seems like she is the one behind the wheel any time the team takes a car off-road. I don't really have a point, I just thought it was kind of funny

  • @TheTreyVidz
    @TheTreyVidz 10 років тому +58

    What is the point of a 2wd range rover...

    • @monkey2702mw
      @monkey2702mw 6 років тому +7

      TheTreyVidz it's cheaper than the 4wd one so more people can buy it. Plus as said in the video better fuel economy and for people who just want one and spending 99% of its life on the road.

    • @kylecoomer2848
      @kylecoomer2848 5 років тому +1

      For people like me you live in NYC and don’t need a 4WD car and are trying to budget on fuel economy and a cheaper car

    • @oprahwinfrey878
      @oprahwinfrey878 5 років тому +5

      It snows all the time here though. I feel 4x4 should be standard on all cars.

    • @KHolland
      @KHolland 5 років тому +2

      Oprah Winfrey No it should not, it uses more fuel and in most places it is not necessary.

    • @AndorRadnai
      @AndorRadnai 4 роки тому +2

      None. If you want fuel economy and a nice on Road feel, why would you buy a Range Rover? It’s just stupid!

  • @probablynovideoshere
    @probablynovideoshere 9 років тому +29

    i feel Range Rover shouldn't make a Fwd model at all. They should at least pretend the car is off roady. Even Subaru doesn't make a 2wd impreza.

    • @ahmaddihsann7724
      @ahmaddihsann7724 9 років тому +2

      At some point, 2wd set up is better than 4x4.

    • @mbdrives3541
      @mbdrives3541 9 років тому +2

      +Ahmad Ihsan at what point of an off-road situation would 2wd be beneficial over awe and by the way awd and 4x4 are different things

    • @svein-haraldribland8559
      @svein-haraldribland8559 8 років тому +1

      probablynovideoshere Subaru is boring anyway.

    • @jp_0118
      @jp_0118 7 років тому +2

      probablynovideoshere yeah they do. The japanese market has a 1.6 FWD Impreza

    • @aryabramantyo4340
      @aryabramantyo4340 4 роки тому

      @@svein-haraldribland8559 yep no sti

  • @chaoszombie9995
    @chaoszombie9995 8 років тому +7

    Why did you not reverse it up? It's a rear wheel drive car backwards

  • @kantinansriprasert5999
    @kantinansriprasert5999 9 років тому +14

    Vicky is the best part of Fifth Gear.

  • @pev2197
    @pev2197 9 років тому +7

    on 2:13 is that an airbus beluga on the background?

  • @bicyclist2
    @bicyclist2 7 років тому +7

    If Rage Rovers going to make a 2wd Evoke it should be rear wheel drive. Thanks.

  • @EpicThe112
    @EpicThe112 8 років тому +3

    so good but their rival programme BBC two's Top Gear did end of road test with the Range Rover Evoque and it's done by selecting it to off road in the terrain response system and for Vicky she should have used mud ruts mode

    • @farishanafiah8461
      @farishanafiah8461 2 роки тому +1

      The one in Top Gear is the 4WD version. This one isn't.

    • @EpicThe112
      @EpicThe112 2 роки тому

      @@farishanafiah8461 which one is it for Vicki

  • @S2kBPRIME
    @S2kBPRIME 10 років тому +3

    I like this video much more than I like the Evoque.

  • @RealtimeReviews613
    @RealtimeReviews613 10 років тому +3

    U guys need MORE AND FREQUENT youtube content

  • @nurawis1
    @nurawis1 7 років тому +2

    I love Vicky & Tiff.

  • @angelicacushing6032
    @angelicacushing6032 6 років тому +5

    I guess Ranger Rover was selling 2wd cars and needed some PR. No way in hell that car deserved a 24.5/30.

  • @chromaticskent7395
    @chromaticskent7395 9 років тому +11

    Why do they even make SUVs in 2wd? What's the point

    • @lewis72
      @lewis72 9 років тому +13

      +chromatics kent
      People will buy them, so companies will make them. Simple as that.
      Besides, how many 4x4s need 4x4 from their owners?

    • @kylecoomer2848
      @kylecoomer2848 5 років тому

      chromatics kent better fuel economy wierdo

  • @Chefmarvy
    @Chefmarvy 9 років тому +2

    I LOVE Range rover products

  • @gamerfowzia5403
    @gamerfowzia5403 7 років тому +5

    That laugh at 04:07. 😁

  • @imJGott
    @imJGott 10 років тому +2

    I really do enjoy your show

  • @geraintwilliams1708
    @geraintwilliams1708 8 років тому +2

    Making all that drama about off road driving but on Wrecks to Riches MPV episode 2 she went on a Land Rover experience and seemed to enjoy it!!! Hmmmm

  • @oromoto
    @oromoto 10 років тому +4

    Damn, I thought you guys were giving it 5...

  • @azerro1080
    @azerro1080 7 років тому +6

    Wait a wrong wheel drive range rover so fwd on an suv!? Might as well get a Toyota or a Honda.

  • @Harrison101HD
    @Harrison101HD 10 років тому +6

    Oh Vicki...

  • @efebaba92
    @efebaba92 10 років тому +21

    summary of fifth gear team reviews;
    reviewing a british car: "it runs like crap, its expensive, not enough space in the back seat but thats all okay i give it 9 or 10 maybe 11
    any other car: omg its so smooth on the road, its price is good, its epic, however it sucks i give it 7 or 6 or 5

    • @Yogobogo
      @Yogobogo 10 років тому +1

      This isn't Top Gear review.

    • @efebaba92
      @efebaba92 10 років тому +1

      yogobogo thanks i fixed it:D

  • @rscosworthfan
    @rscosworthfan 7 років тому +4

    3:53 vicky goes into labour lol

  • @fezkahn4080
    @fezkahn4080 7 років тому +3

    Wanted review on the car

  • @Colin-kh6kp
    @Colin-kh6kp 10 років тому +3

    I don't get why viki is afraid to hurt a car she doesn't own and wont have to pay for if it gets damaged, I would have thrashed that car around

  • @manenwan
    @manenwan 10 років тому +3

    Where is Jason

  • @Diwash1
    @Diwash1 10 років тому +2

    00:25 57.6 mpg that does not seem right.... Mileage similar to a 250cc bike? :D

    • @TooTallTang
      @TooTallTang 10 років тому +4

      British Gallons are larger. It's very economical but not highly unusual.

    • @zecc81
      @zecc81 10 років тому +1

      Divide British fuel economy ratings by 1.2 for US

  • @awksedgreep
    @awksedgreep 10 років тому +2

    Land Rover PR: The Macan is kicking our ass, quick . . . find an Evoque that doesn't directly compete and have 5th gear review it.

  • @kieranhughes4090
    @kieranhughes4090 8 років тому +4

    0:12 doesn't he mean Range Rover evoque

  • @JohnnyWrong
    @JohnnyWrong 10 років тому +13

    2WD is one thing, but FWD? Nah.

    • @CaldeAilis
      @CaldeAilis 10 років тому +2

      RWD on a muddy hill? Now that's something I would like to avoid.

    • @JohnnyWrong
      @JohnnyWrong 10 років тому +1

      Calde Ailis Anything but 4WD and you've no place on a muddy hill.

    • @CaldeAilis
      @CaldeAilis 10 років тому +1

      Johnny Wrong Of course. But if you compare FWD and RWD in this type of condition, RWD is harder to control. And without a drive shaft, FWD could be lighter, which is also good on a road like this.

    • @benanderson89
      @benanderson89 10 років тому +1

      Johnny Wrong FWD in a car that isn't meant to be a sports car is by far the best way to go. Snow, hell even rain, can upset a RWD drive car to the point where it becomes dangerous.

    • @JohnnyWrong
      @JohnnyWrong 10 років тому

      benanderson89 The danger's where the fun is, son.

  • @Souraneel
    @Souraneel 9 років тому +2

    She had a valid point still

    • @XzzVttll
      @XzzVttll 9 років тому +1

      +Fasta Rasta her point? she said what if WATER COMES INTO EXAUST???? how stupid you must be to say something like that????

    • @scottsherman7069
      @scottsherman7069 9 років тому +1

      +lalos It can happen you know...

    • @XzzVttll
      @XzzVttll 9 років тому

      another moron... no it cant...its from catalisator

    • @scottsherman7069
      @scottsherman7069 8 років тому

      +lalos I give up on you.

  • @1ronae1
    @1ronae1 10 років тому +2

    Love the car, test drove and fun to drive.. HOWEVER, only if the roof would open up,....this is the only thing that stops me from purchasing. panoramic roof? what's the purpose without the open air???

    • @XzzVttll
      @XzzVttll 9 років тому +3

      +1ronae1 its sad that morons like you can buy a car like that

  • @shrikantraghuwanshiraghuwa9665
    @shrikantraghuwanshiraghuwa9665 8 років тому +5

    loves their reviews ,,.but too much drama ,,she cried// who cries seeing a little hill..

  • @BiodegradeableMan
    @BiodegradeableMan 8 років тому +2

    Has the far better Jaguar Ingenium engine now.

  • @FreedCornet743
    @FreedCornet743 10 років тому +2

    Where's jason

  • @darksideofmind91
    @darksideofmind91 10 років тому +3

    But, wait... weren't you 4?

  • @chrisyboy666
    @chrisyboy666 9 років тому +2

    I honestly don't know why you would buy a 2wD evo when you can get a 4wD for a bag of sand more seems pointless to me

    • @Vikinatorn
      @Vikinatorn 8 років тому +2

      +Carlos Because it has better fuel economy, and is better for the environment. For most people, who never take their expensive range rovers off road, 4wd is actually a constant disadvantage.

    • @chrisyboy666
      @chrisyboy666 8 років тому +1

      +Victorhuhu Exactly I can't understand why people would by one for them very reasons.

    • @ejemploralf3782
      @ejemploralf3782 8 років тому +1

      I share your point actually, where I live 2wd SUVs are very popular but even though they're cheape, lighter and comsume less fuel they are still heavier than a normal car they do less miles to the gallon, they are less stable and for the price of a 2wd suv you could buy another car better equipped more spacious more stable and less thirsty

    • @totallywinningprogamer9860
      @totallywinningprogamer9860 8 років тому +1

      +Victorhuhu But I do bring my Range Rover off roading.

  • @fabulousprofound
    @fabulousprofound 10 років тому +2

    vicki the simpering cabbage. i had no idea lol. like they said she is so fast on tarmac...

  • @hydragames2743
    @hydragames2743 8 років тому +3

    mulher ao volante perigo constante

  • @loganthecarguy9109
    @loganthecarguy9109 5 років тому

    Range rovers even in their AWD variant aren’t real off-road cars, no low range, no lockers, crappy ground clearance and needs a new set of grippy off-road tyres

    • @FAT8893
      @FAT8893 4 роки тому

      Maybe the lower-end Range Rovers. The Sport and the standard Range Rover do have low range gearbox and lockers.

  • @mycomputergl0wsblu
    @mycomputergl0wsblu Рік тому

    All these FWD SUVs are just crap. I was super close to getting a BMW X1 sDrive, but then I found out it came in FWD base spec. I was so surprised about that as most base SUVs use to be RWD. Nowadays it seems that has changed. So, said screw that and got a 3 series F30 for the same price as the X1 instead.

  • @esteban75lover23
    @esteban75lover23 10 років тому +1

    7th!!

  • @cutiezoe05
    @cutiezoe05 9 років тому +2

    Land rover discovery

  • @D3F3ND3R86
    @D3F3ND3R86 6 років тому +2

    Why would anyone want a 2wd

    • @FAT8893
      @FAT8893 5 років тому +1

      Some people never go offroad, so the 2WD Evoque make sense after all.

  • @amoddedblueteslap100d7
    @amoddedblueteslap100d7 3 роки тому

    My aunty wants one

  • @KiwiDashcam
    @KiwiDashcam 10 років тому +2

    Everybodies entitled to a little "offcourse" cry now & again. Shame it happened on youtube *grin*, with such a large puddle to mop up. Remember guy's. whichever young lady has the last laugh, laughs longest *wink*

  • @cupofteaplease
    @cupofteaplease 3 роки тому

    Bit of a pointless review it’s 2wd not designed for off road so what do they do! What a waste none the wiser if you were interested in buying one. 1/10 is my score for the reviewers.

  • @johnh1852
    @johnh1852 7 років тому +3

    WOMEN CANT DRIVE

  • @misaprotic5366
    @misaprotic5366 6 років тому +2

    So biased...

  • @pachy444
    @pachy444 8 років тому +2

    It's a Clown car.

  • @grahamball364
    @grahamball364 5 років тому +1

    Looks to be a man car only

  • @martinblomqvist1870
    @martinblomqvist1870 5 років тому

    Vicki is so weird

  • @stuzx7r
    @stuzx7r 3 роки тому

    same OTT performance from that woman every time off road, sack the cabbage !!

  • @Chefmarvy
    @Chefmarvy 9 років тому +2

    I LOVE Range rover products