A bit exaggerated xD even because if it was like this, it would have been a slap on the face to Star Citizen fans, and it’s not going to happen thankfully
Yeah, as a much more than 1000+ hrs Star Citizen vet I'm about to tell you something. Love or hate Bethesda for being Bethesda, but don't complain too much, because you can always have Chris Roberts as a developer. AI doesn't exist in this game, tbh much more things as well. And we are talking about hundreds or thousands MILLIONS OF $ INVESTED IN THIS FUCKING TITLE, NOT BETHESDA, NOT ROCKSTAR, NOT EVEN FUCKING SANTA CLAUS EVER HAD EVEN 1/100 OF THEIR FUCKING BUDGET AND GAME IS AT SHIT POINT FOR AT LEAST 10 YRS + RIGHT NOW. I don't believe this will change in 1 year with "single player campaign", no fucking way. You will say "Starfield was a shitshow, but at least was a game" after this one will get released, im 100000000000000000000000% sure about it.
Not necessarily, star citizen is still it's own thing. The big deal for squadron 42 is it's singleplayer, so netcode won't interfere with gameplay & those limitations don't exist. Star Citizen is an incredible game, the multiplayer aspect is what somewhat keeps it strapped down. Squad 42 being SP won't have that issue. They can go all out in every regard and not worry about netcode limitations.
Then consider playing Star Citizen, Squadron 42 is its Single player campaign. It's a bit behind, but they will add these things over the coming year to Star Citizen.
i have an i7, 32 gigs of ram, and a 1070. Star Citizen runs fine. The key requirement is an SSD and Ram. Any modern built PC can run it. It will get even better, once its optimized.
Officially they are making 2 games, a single player and an mmo, at the price of 1.5 game since world building, narrative, design, graphics, ai, engine and more should be shared
i think it is so cool becouse we can pla star citizen that you will recognize Ships in squadron and just think: hey look a drake cuttlas is flying over
They've been working on Star Citizen's tech for 13 years because they're building something groundbreaking. The game's development involves complex systems like server meshing, which will allow thousands of players to interact in one universe seamlessly. They're also developing their own in-house tools like the Lumberyard engine, improving features like procedural planet generation, real-time physics, and intricate spaceship mechanics. Creating an entire universe with such a high level of detail and functionality takes time, and that's why the progress has been slow but steady
This shit aint never comin out... theyve been talking about it comin out in 5 parts since 2013. So if it was anywhere close to coming out the little icon would say sq42:part 1 lol
PA: This title is made up, nothing was ever said about the game releasing in 2024. Remember this quote: "Don't spread misinformation on the internet. My name is Todd Howard." - Todd Howard
Im sorry, but "7:32" got me almost choke myself, good one, I like sense of humour. I almost died at "solid gunplay (or weapon gameplay how this noob said)", but when he said "good enemy reactions" I started to laugh as a mad man. Yeah, I'm a Star Citizen vet, you will not fool me... Again. At least 1/4 of the budget was spent for every single known face in the hollywood. Cool marketing move, if only 3/4 of the rest was not for C. Roberts food but project itself, maybe, just maybe...
You forgot to mention that players need Roll Roys Noire to run this title on medium settings or at least Bugatti Centodieci for 30 fps low. I think that real space ship might be just ok for medium+ (no vsync, shadows low and motion blur off) stable 45 fps. True "pro" experience.
You forgot to mention that 1. Star Citizen is not Squadron 42, SC is a massive MMO sandbox. 2. Star Citizen is not optimized at all. There is a lot of room to improve the performance.
@@viktorianas you do realize you can have good visuals that run well? Arkham Knight and Battlefield 1 have similar graphical fidelity and they're from nearly 8 years ago. They run fine. This game is just poorly optimized.
This has Cyberpunk 2077 written all over it. Visuals for top-tier PC’s will be great, but the gameplay and voice-acting will be cheesy. It will release with countless bugs and they’ll make more excuses, which the simps will all believe.
to be fair cyberpunk got amounts of pressure thrown on it and things promised that the developers never even said. the cyberpunk fans themselves ruined the launch of the game. half the stuff people complained about at launch was never actually promised by the devs. and they redeemed themselves much like no mans sky did. both of these companies started there game and have relatively finished it in less than 10 years with there own studio funds. meanwhile this studio has over 500 million in donations, 12 years under its belt and we still have no game squadron 42 isn't released and star citizen is an alpha release. don't lump this shit in with a game like cyberpunk. this is nothing but a large scale scam at this point. if they turn over and make it good tho they have the excuse of star citizen (the game they base most of 42 on) being there testing stage since its not considered a game.
it needs to be both... if you wanna 'just fly' there are other games This is for people who love startrek, Stargate, Battlestar, Expanse ... etcetc , 'You' on board ships with others, not just 'You are a ship'
@@UdGin0 I cannot say I know a game more sci-fi pinnacle than starfield let alone even a standard game better than starfield. Squadron 42 doesn't even have jetpacks and isn't even out. And star citizen needs a constant Internet connection. Its not a single player game.
This game has been in development for around a decade, and now that it's time to put their best foot forward, this is the best they can come up with? Sub 30 fps performance, awkward voice acting, and awful animations (particularly the one from 3:03 to 3:08, you can clearly see the knife clipping through the character model). This is one of the most expensive video games ever made, but I've seen indie games with more polish.
I replayed the video, and because I'm not blind or deaf, I can tell you the game looks and sounds like crap. They can say they're just starting the polish phase now, doesn't change the fact that a game that's been in development for 10 years and cost half a billion dollars to make should be in a much better state than what was shown to us.
Yeah, as a much more than 1000+ hrs Star Citizen vet I'm about to tell you something. Love or hate Bethesda for being Bethesda, but don't complain too much, because you can always have Chris Roberts as a developer. AI doesn't exist in this game, tbh much more things as well. And we are talking about hundreds or thousands MILLIONS OF $ INVESTED IN THIS FUCKING TITLE, NOT BETHESDA, NOT ROCKSTAR, NOT EVEN FUCKING SANTA CLAUS EVER HAD EVEN 1/100 OF THEIR FUCKING BUDGET AND GAME IS AT SHIT POINT FOR AT LEAST 10 YRS + RIGHT NOW. I don't believe this will change in 1 year with "single player campaign", no fucking way. You will say "Starfield was a shitshow, but at least was a game" after this one will get released, im 100000000000000000000000% sure about it.
This is exactly how I pictured Starfield will be.
A bit exaggerated xD even because if it was like this, it would have been a slap on the face to Star Citizen fans, and it’s not going to happen thankfully
Poor you. I just saw it as fallout with early 2000's dogfighting.
Yeah, as a much more than 1000+ hrs Star Citizen vet I'm about to tell you something.
Love or hate Bethesda for being Bethesda, but don't complain too much, because you can always have Chris Roberts as a developer.
AI doesn't exist in this game, tbh much more things as well.
And we are talking about hundreds or thousands MILLIONS OF $ INVESTED IN THIS FUCKING TITLE, NOT BETHESDA, NOT ROCKSTAR, NOT EVEN FUCKING SANTA CLAUS EVER HAD EVEN 1/100 OF THEIR FUCKING BUDGET AND GAME IS AT SHIT POINT FOR AT LEAST 10 YRS + RIGHT NOW.
I don't believe this will change in 1 year with "single player campaign", no fucking way.
You will say "Starfield was a shitshow, but at least was a game" after this one will get released, im 100000000000000000000000% sure about it.
@alexcruba4928 I mean there is Star Citizen too. But even the modders won't be able to do some of the things The Star Engine is capable of etc.
Starfield is boring man
Looks very neat, love the intractability.
The pre alpha is pretty fun
I think you accidentally used the correct word there.
This is the finished product of Star Citizen...... I never cared for space games, but this one caught my attention.
Not necessarily, star citizen is still it's own thing.
The big deal for squadron 42 is it's singleplayer, so netcode won't interfere with gameplay & those limitations don't exist.
Star Citizen is an incredible game, the multiplayer aspect is what somewhat keeps it strapped down.
Squad 42 being SP won't have that issue. They can go all out in every regard and not worry about netcode limitations.
i need it now!
Then consider playing Star Citizen, Squadron 42 is its Single player campaign. It's a bit behind, but they will add these things over the coming year to Star Citizen.
@@insider9796The only way for me to buy SQ42 is buying the carrack starter pack 😢
Wow.... I can't imagine the PC needed for this.
i have an i7, 32 gigs of ram, and a 1070. Star Citizen runs fine. The key requirement is an SSD and Ram. Any modern built PC can run it. It will get even better, once its optimized.
@@Rummyson I have a PS5....
@@number1enemyoftheuseless985 a PS5 would melt trying to run this haha
@@Rummyson i wanna play it but i got an i3 😭
@@number1enemyoftheuseless985 consoles would melt.
My guy this is a linear single-player campaign. Star Citizen is the open-universe mmo.
squadron will be open world in Odin system
Officially they are making 2 games, a single player and an mmo, at the price of 1.5 game since world building, narrative, design, graphics, ai, engine and more should be shared
Remember when Ben Lesnick said he played the full game about 10 years ago? Yeah...
i think it is so cool becouse we can pla star citizen that you will recognize Ships in squadron and just think: hey look a drake cuttlas is flying over
this is how games in 2024 should be
Will come out 2096
something like that.
We might get private spacecraft before this gets released.
your being optimistic arent you?
They've been working on Star Citizen's tech for 13 years because they're building something groundbreaking. The game's development involves complex systems like server meshing, which will allow thousands of players to interact in one universe seamlessly. They're also developing their own in-house tools like the Lumberyard engine, improving features like procedural planet generation, real-time physics, and intricate spaceship mechanics. Creating an entire universe with such a high level of detail and functionality takes time, and that's why the progress has been slow but steady
I bought the game 10 years ago and still wasnt able to play it...
always looks good...but,when are we actually getting it?..ive had it in my account for around 10 years now.but still not ready to play yet?
All of the celebrity faces in this lol there is like 6 of them
Are they still working on adjusting the price? It's been over a year since they removed it from the store.
This shit aint never comin out... theyve been talking about it comin out in 5 parts since 2013. So if it was anywhere close to coming out the little icon would say sq42:part 1 lol
incredible open wolrd Universe !!!!
we can only dream but I doubt we will ever see this
What happened at 8:45?
the video is directly from the “hold the line” video only cutting out the gameplay, that was the gameplay cut for the hangar part.
Man no comments,just want the game ASAP I can't waittt
The cast of this game is amazing
This is the type of game that looks good in the previews but then you play it and meh...
This is the one game which is doing thexact oposite of what you said.
Every trailer thay make is ingame footage.
@@DrPet80 Everybody also said that about Starfield and look what happened.
@@Got2Learn the starfield trailer was a joke.
@@Got2Learnyet starfield is a far more detailed game
PA: This title is made up, nothing was ever said about the game releasing in 2024. Remember this quote: "Don't spread misinformation on the internet. My name is Todd Howard." - Todd Howard
Im sorry, but "7:32" got me almost choke myself, good one, I like sense of humour.
I almost died at "solid gunplay (or weapon gameplay how this noob said)", but when he said "good enemy reactions" I started to laugh as a mad man.
Yeah, I'm a Star Citizen vet, you will not fool me... Again.
At least 1/4 of the budget was spent for every single known face in the hollywood. Cool marketing move, if only 3/4 of the rest was not for C. Roberts food but project itself, maybe, just maybe...
You forgot to mention that players need Roll Roys Noire to run this title on medium settings or at least Bugatti Centodieci for 30 fps low.
I think that real space ship might be just ok for medium+ (no vsync, shadows low and motion blur off) stable 45 fps. True "pro" experience.
You forgot to mention that
1. Star Citizen is not Squadron 42, SC is a massive MMO sandbox.
2. Star Citizen is not optimized at all. There is a lot of room to improve the performance.
Beta to be release by 2032 (Maybe)
thats quite positive. More like 3032
when we die, thats when the game will come out.
No kidding...this would be impossible on this or next four generations of tech..
We will see Beta for SQ42 sometime next year and Beta for Star Citizen around the end of 2024, if things go smooth for 4.0's release
I like how even on their own beefy ass game dev PCs they get less than 30 fps lmao
its like a child wrote this comment
literally in polishing state
These graphics will last 10+ years as a minimum, you want them to make ugly game instead????
@@viktorianas you do realize you can have good visuals that run well? Arkham Knight and Battlefield 1 have similar graphical fidelity and they're from nearly 8 years ago. They run fine. This game is just poorly optimized.
@@Deathstrodo you realise that this is probably the most complex game ever created in human history? BF1 is like Tetris in comparison.
It's not open world, it's linear mission-based game.
This was extremely edited from the original, and compiled with another video from a few years ago.
What was the reasoning for it?
Woah your only 8 years late.
Like gta 6, isn’t?
gamers when a game has a normal development cycle
8???? and the rest.
This has Cyberpunk 2077 written all over it. Visuals for top-tier PC’s will be great, but the gameplay and voice-acting will be cheesy. It will release with countless bugs and they’ll make more excuses, which the simps will all believe.
No, it will not release with countless bugs, that I can assure you. The real threat to it's success is if it's boring
they showcased the voice acting in a vertical slice 6 years ago, and it's on par with the best games out there
to be fair cyberpunk got amounts of pressure thrown on it and things promised that the developers never even said. the cyberpunk fans themselves ruined the launch of the game. half the stuff people complained about at launch was never actually promised by the devs. and they redeemed themselves much like no mans sky did. both of these companies started there game and have relatively finished it in less than 10 years with there own studio funds. meanwhile this studio has over 500 million in donations, 12 years under its belt and we still have no game squadron 42 isn't released and star citizen is an alpha release. don't lump this shit in with a game like cyberpunk. this is nothing but a large scale scam at this point. if they turn over and make it good tho they have the excuse of star citizen (the game they base most of 42 on) being there testing stage since its not considered a game.
Don't walk too fast that frame rate is getting dicey...😬
I don't WANT to run jump and climb. I want to FLY!!!!
SQUADRON 42 not INFANTRY 42.
it needs to be both...
if you wanna 'just fly' there are other games
This is for people who love startrek, Stargate, Battlestar, Expanse ... etcetc , 'You' on board ships with others, not just 'You are a ship'
If you want to just fly, I suggest Elite Dangerous
@@UdGin0starflight has jetpacks
@@UmmerFarooq-wx4yo Not sure what to do with that information 😅
Starflight isn't exactly the pinnacle of sci-fi gaming isit
@@UdGin0 I cannot say I know a game more sci-fi pinnacle than starfield let alone even a standard game better than starfield. Squadron 42 doesn't even have jetpacks and isn't even out. And star citizen needs a constant Internet connection. Its not a single player game.
Its not open world, its a mission-by-mission single player game
They mean "based-on" open world 😁
dont even really care for sq 42 im waiting for star citizen
Don’t even care about star citizen I’m waiting for sq42
@@inquisitive5418 the pu will be totally different then sq 42
Don’t even care about star citizen and squadron 42 I'm waiting for GTA 6
neither game will ever see full release. cloud imperial games is a scam grifting company
@@qntainmnt its coming out good games take time gta 6 is taking over 14 years
i've learned i like space tv shows and movies and dislike space video games.
Never grew up playing the Wing Commander series or Freelancer ha?
I paid for this game when earth was in its infancy. Now I play Starfield.
Downgrade
You still play Starfield? XD
But it's only made for boring PC
So there's no action gameplay
Did you even watch the original
The video literally shows the protagonist carrying weapons and piloting a combat ship, within the 1st minute!
wtf damn!
This game will be a starfield killer and it pains me to say that because starfield is an amazing game
At least not like starefield
True, you can actually play Starfield.
Lol this guy said 2024 bahahaha
This game has been in development for around a decade, and now that it's time to put their best foot forward, this is the best they can come up with? Sub 30 fps performance, awkward voice acting, and awful animations (particularly the one from 3:03 to 3:08, you can clearly see the knife clipping through the character model). This is one of the most expensive video games ever made, but I've seen indie games with more polish.
literally is beginning the polish phase.. are you blind or deaf? replay the video
I replayed the video, and because I'm not blind or deaf, I can tell you the game looks and sounds like crap. They can say they're just starting the polish phase now, doesn't change the fact that a game that's been in development for 10 years and cost half a billion dollars to make should be in a much better state than what was shown to us.
@@midnightanimal4598 Hard coping from a hater :)
@@Malibutomihard coping from a blind lover
@@midnightanimal4598 It's not the release video.
Yeah, as a much more than 1000+ hrs Star Citizen vet I'm about to tell you something.
Love or hate Bethesda for being Bethesda, but don't complain too much, because you can always have Chris Roberts as a developer.
AI doesn't exist in this game, tbh much more things as well.
And we are talking about hundreds or thousands MILLIONS OF $ INVESTED IN THIS FUCKING TITLE, NOT BETHESDA, NOT ROCKSTAR, NOT EVEN FUCKING SANTA CLAUS EVER HAD EVEN 1/100 OF THEIR FUCKING BUDGET AND GAME IS AT SHIT POINT FOR AT LEAST 10 YRS + RIGHT NOW.
I don't believe this will change in 1 year with "single player campaign", no fucking way.
You will say "Starfield was a shitshow, but at least was a game" after this one will get released, im 100000000000000000000000% sure about it.
Lots of CGI, but zero gameplay
? bro did u watch the video
@@kenshi_cv2407 yeah a lots of CGI, but zero gameplay