How the US fights WW3 Is Not How You Think

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 тра 2024
  • Fighter pilot reacts to the USA flying fighter jets, nuclear submarines and other military capabilities when it comes to fighting in the air, land and sea.
    Support this channel by becoming a patron: / maxafterburner
    📱 For more Follow Me On Instagram: / maxafterburnerlife
    📱 Follow Me on Tiktok: / maxafterburnerlife
    ✈️ Here is my website if you'd like to learn more: maxafterburner.co
    Check out my Commercial Aviation UA-cam channel as well: / @maxaviationlife
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 138

  • @ramgarcia4478
    @ramgarcia4478 Місяць тому +3

    Man i cant believe the end is coming😢

  • @jrod9560
    @jrod9560 3 місяці тому +9

    I love how these videos are actually filled with facts and real life information and not click bait channels headlines. Pay attention and learn peeps.

  • @TerryCheever
    @TerryCheever 3 місяці тому +7

    Already knew this info, but well done for the masses who don't know this stuff, good job as usual.

  • @bestestusername
    @bestestusername 3 місяці тому +23

    Always interesting when an ex air force pilot talks about stuff like this.

    • @wazowski489
      @wazowski489 3 місяці тому

      bro he posted the video 8hrs ago, how did you comment 6 days ago ?

    • @bestestusername
      @bestestusername 3 місяці тому +1

      @@wazowski489 lol ask UA-cam, I like the vids. Possibly he had it as an advertised video before it went live and in my excitement I commented

    • @jenniferreneegarnes-colema9936
      @jenniferreneegarnes-colema9936 3 місяці тому

      Just knowing your military background makes me feel confident in your information.

  • @janicewolfe3028
    @janicewolfe3028 3 місяці тому +5

    Thank you for your service and for your insight 😊

  • @cadreops6067
    @cadreops6067 2 місяці тому +2

    👍👍 Is what this video deserves!
    Great work Max, outstanding job.
    Prior Active Duty Army, Combat Veteran here, 2007 Surge in Iraq, Diyala Province. 19DD3
    1st Cavalry Division
    3rd HBCT Grey🐺Wolf
    6th Squadron 9th Regiment
    Looking forward to sharing more of these informative videos.
    🇺🇲

  • @gregmoulton260
    @gregmoulton260 3 місяці тому +1

    Great content, thank you.

  • @ScottySundown
    @ScottySundown 3 місяці тому +1

    Ryan good work my dude!!!! I love this channel!!!!!!!!!

  • @davmac6148
    @davmac6148 3 місяці тому +1

    Holy Shit ! The end of WW3 would be the start of hell on Earth for all survivors

  • @luscid5602
    @luscid5602 3 місяці тому

    Nice stash bro! My brother is the XO of a hornet squadron currently deployed and he recently sent a pic of his stash. I gotta say he’s got ya beat!🤣😂

  • @dust1209
    @dust1209 3 місяці тому +1

    It feels strange saying this concerning the topic of the video, but your sense of humor is great.

  • @jrod9560
    @jrod9560 3 місяці тому

    Would love for a video on how the Dragon Lady is still relevant today. I could spot IED's and relay locations to ground troops. If you need content I can help. :)

  • @nobilismaximus
    @nobilismaximus 3 місяці тому +3

    That moustache will be awesome when it grows up, buys some land and grows a beard.

  • @darkshaman7087
    @darkshaman7087 3 місяці тому +1

    There will be no winners only lucky and the unlucky survivors

  • @jimc6687
    @jimc6687 3 місяці тому

    ALCS patch on that one soldier at the 4:20 mark?? American League Championship Series patch, Ryan?? Jim C.

  • @bradthorne7581
    @bradthorne7581 3 місяці тому +3

    Max (Ryan) have you been to the Titan missile museum? You’ve flown fighter jets, I know you know our current missile’s have a lot more than 5 warheads.

  • @badroosterimages3719
    @badroosterimages3719 3 місяці тому +3

    Old SIOP guy here, and that was a really good explanation. Additionally, for a while we also had Ground Launch Cruise Missiles (GLCM) and Pershing IIs stationed in and around UK/Europe in the mid to late 1980's until the the INF Treaty was signed and they were removed.

    • @clarkosaurus
      @clarkosaurus 3 місяці тому

      SIOP = Standard Integrated Operations Plan (right?)

  • @bertg.6056
    @bertg.6056 3 місяці тому

    Ryan, how about a video featuring the B-52J engine upgrade, and any other mods, too?

  • @fgranlun
    @fgranlun 3 місяці тому +1

    Your mustache is beginning to look really manly. Good job on this mission-critical area of operations!

  • @wanderer2176
    @wanderer2176 3 місяці тому +1

    I think the subs would be held in reserve for the final wave or post war world.

  • @Av-vd3wk
    @Av-vd3wk 3 місяці тому +10

    2:56 - Why would China need spy ballon’s to “copy the layout of our ICBM silos/bases”??? When they can simply use spy satellites

    • @DryUrEyesM8
      @DryUrEyesM8 3 місяці тому

      Why use balloons when satellites exist?
      China has an extensive satellite network. In a Nov. 2022 report, the Defense Department said China’s intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance-capable (ISR) satellite fleet had more than 260 systems, second only to the U.S., as of the end of 2021. A senior defense official noted on Thursday that, for China, the balloon flying over Montana “has limited additive value from an intelligence collection perspective.”
      Yet even with satellite technology surpassing some abilities of balloons, James Char, a research fellow with the China Programme at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies in Singapore, tells TIME that spy balloons have some operational advantages. For example, balloons can weather extreme conditions, he says, and are less expensive to deploy and operate compared to satellites. Chinese Academy of Science scholars found in 2020 that, despite harsh environments at more than 68,000 feet above ground, “the high-altitude balloon has long endurance time, which can achieve sustained and wider coverage for regional observation and detection.”
      “It is harder to be spotted by radar as well, given the fact that they’re simpler in terms of technology,” Char adds. U.S. officials admitted the balloon flying over North America this week was first spotted by civilians on a plane.
      High-altitude balloons can also be “trucks for any number of platforms, whether it be communication and data link nodes, ISR, tracking air and missile threats - and without the predictable orbits of satellites,” Tom Karako, senior fellow for the International Security Program and director of the Missile Defense Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told Politico.
      And though the technology is old, says Bec Shrimpton, director at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, balloons can complement surveillance technology in orbit, while they can be built and deployed at a fraction of the cost. According to a 2020 analysis in defense publication Armada International, the development, launch, operation, and insurance of a single satellite can cost up to $300 million.
      Another potential edge for balloons, Shrimpton tells TIME, is how unlikely defense officials may have been prepared for it to be used, especially by China. “It’s probably better because it’s unexpected,” she says. “It’s not that we haven’t seen this before, but we are expecting far more from Chinese surveillance efforts.”

    • @CheekyMenace
      @CheekyMenace 3 місяці тому

      Satellites mostly just provide flat imagery. There are a lot more types of real time 3D readings and surveys that can be captured from flying over closer to the ground, and can take much higher resolution photos than a satellite can. The balloon was carrying a 2000 lb payload like the size of two buses, full of who knows what types of high tech equipment. That's why we've always still had spy planes even after satellite's got put into space.

    • @c431inf
      @c431inf 3 місяці тому

      Signal intelligence

    • @halilzelenka5813
      @halilzelenka5813 3 місяці тому +1

      I call bullshit on the spy balloon story

    • @CheekyMenace
      @CheekyMenace 3 місяці тому

      Satellites mostly only take flat images. There are a lot more different types of real time surveys and readings you can do, and take much higher resolution photos from passing by where the balloon was compared to a satellite in space. The balloon was rigged with a large 2000 lb payload of solar panels and who knows what types of high tech equipment. There's good reason that we use spy planes for decades even after putting satellites in space.

  • @BillClintonsCigar
    @BillClintonsCigar 3 місяці тому

    I figured that we would do the same thing we always do and show up late and declare victory.

  • @harshtruth9148
    @harshtruth9148 2 місяці тому

    The F-35 I believe recently gained the ability to launch nuclear missile strikes

  • @joenop3393
    @joenop3393 3 місяці тому +1

    Nice Stash!

  • @FPdesignfab
    @FPdesignfab 3 місяці тому

    How do constant, un-interrupted comms work with subs that are submerged below oceans..?

  • @Swiftgti
    @Swiftgti 3 місяці тому +3

    Our president can’t even spell nuclear how is he gonna do anything lol

  • @freddiecarr7602
    @freddiecarr7602 3 місяці тому

    General Sir John Hackett may have to write another book.....

  • @moseskelly2886
    @moseskelly2886 3 місяці тому

    I feel the B-52, B-2, B-21, & B-1 should all stay in together. That will be an extremely powerful team💯💯💯

  • @buckybarns5984
    @buckybarns5984 Місяць тому

    You are assuming WW3 will involve nuclear weapons. However for it to be an actual world war it would need to be conventionally fought (AKA world war vs nuclear war)

  • @solidsnek69
    @solidsnek69 3 місяці тому

    7:15 WILLLLSSSSOOOONNNNNN! 🏐

  • @gqrob28
    @gqrob28 3 місяці тому

    E-6B Mercury TACAMO aircraft have the Airborne Launch Control System capability to launch Minuteman missiles. The TACAMO aircraft primary mission is to relay EAMs to our Ohio Class Submarines for missile launch.

  • @jasonbutt7199
    @jasonbutt7199 3 місяці тому

    The 2nd and 3rd comings happen close together

  • @ewalddroidworks
    @ewalddroidworks 3 місяці тому +2

    Hey mustache, You forget Yellowstone. If they nuke Yellowstone we are doomed.

  • @cccalifornia7206
    @cccalifornia7206 Місяць тому +1

    What about the option of "SPACE FORCE" fired NUCLEAR Missiles????👈👌😳

  • @edbam6344
    @edbam6344 3 місяці тому

    How did it grow back so fast.

  • @andrewp9975
    @andrewp9975 3 місяці тому

    These are just the known missile locations. I am sure we have “others”

  • @rastafari7415
    @rastafari7415 3 місяці тому

    Damn that sucks, all of our cards seem easy to beat.

  • @flatlyna2223
    @flatlyna2223 3 місяці тому +1

    I would love to know how viable these systems remain, assuming they are old devices or have they received upgrade packages and upgrades ober the years?

    • @poseidon5003
      @poseidon5003 3 місяці тому +1

      They are mostly older missiles because older missiles work. They don't need to be fully modernized. They only need to be maintained and kept in operating condition.

    • @kosher4418
      @kosher4418 3 місяці тому +2

      There is only one enrichment plant in the USA, we do not know how well it copes, each warhead requires maintenance every 17 years or it will turn into a "dirty bomb"

    • @poseidon5003
      @poseidon5003 3 місяці тому

      @@kosher4418 The fissionables should last around 30 - 50 years before helium embrittlement degrades the pit. Explosives typically last in the elevated radiation environment for a decade or so, then they degrade and become unstable.
      They replace the explosives far more often than the fissel material.

  • @NickyDekker89
    @NickyDekker89 3 місяці тому

    Well, in the end it doesn't really matter because pretty much everyone on earth will be affected so everyone is practically dead.

  • @ingemar_von_zweigbergk
    @ingemar_von_zweigbergk 3 місяці тому

    where those distributed swarms of brain pop drones at?

  • @bumpercarjoe6391
    @bumpercarjoe6391 3 місяці тому

    If the US has acoustic censors in the water shouldn’t we assume our enemies do as well?

  • @kylereese4822
    @kylereese4822 3 місяці тому

    Would Max Afterburner after an zombie Apocalypse(rule books don't apply any more = things forced to work)
    FLY - An aircraft made from 2 Huey`s side by side(no engine/tail) 12 foot apart, 2 Lear jet engines inboard, tail sections from 2 random planes all grafted together using a welded scaffold frame....
    BOAT - propellers damaged chain tangled, fuel tanks intact, fitted with wings(shortened) and engines from a large aircraft(destroyed cockpit)....
    ??

  • @dortaciaparks827
    @dortaciaparks827 3 місяці тому

    My friend just told me there is a civilization at the bottom of somewhere in the ocean

  • @Stucknthe80z
    @Stucknthe80z 3 місяці тому +1

    This was as basic as basic can get. Chinese don’t need a spy balloon to see the layout of nuclear silos.
    A novice take on everything.

  • @joseringo4190
    @joseringo4190 3 місяці тому

    Something about ICBMs helps me sleep better at night.

  • @markgreen8412
    @markgreen8412 3 місяці тому

    Only complaint I have being an American citizen if they do not have Fallout shelters here anymore and this is ridiculous because the population is who the next group of Fighters will be left in the country for everything from military to police to triage not to mention Homeland defense

  • @deancreech-cz4wt
    @deancreech-cz4wt 3 місяці тому

    " Following total atomic annihilation, it may fall to you to rebuild this great nation "

  • @JestAMinute
    @JestAMinute Місяць тому

    how does a spy balloon find silo spots? no way dude. are they not hidden?

  • @YoRHaUnit2Babe
    @YoRHaUnit2Babe 3 місяці тому +2

    I'll say, the US has probably finally figured out how to efficiently reverse engineered UAP materials and found a way to integrate them into newer fighters.
    I also bet the 6th Gen fighters will be even more manouverable or have near perfect radars.

  • @dennisarzubiaga2833
    @dennisarzubiaga2833 3 місяці тому +1

    My question is what will happen to the current 20 B-2 Spirit bombers in a couple of years? Will B-21s replace them all together? Will the B-2s be scrapped? Great video.

    • @kwonekstrom2138
      @kwonekstrom2138 3 місяці тому +1

      The B2 is likely to go into long term storage. The B21 provides similar capabilities and is supposed to be much easier/cheaper to upgrade and maintain.

  • @jasondessin8962
    @jasondessin8962 2 місяці тому

    Can't the B1 Lancer also carry nukes? I know back in the 60s and 70s even the A4 Skyhawk could carry nukes as well please let me know in the comments.

  • @user-xt5oe2gm5v
    @user-xt5oe2gm5v 10 днів тому

    Bode.
    You okay?

  • @johnnyllooddte3415
    @johnnyllooddte3415 2 місяці тому

    6000 miles?? an icbm can circle the globe and maintain orbit for days if need be.. thats not practical for a nuke,,, but it could

  • @gardnert1
    @gardnert1 3 місяці тому

    I wonder if any silos were built in secret and stealth so that an adversary would never suspect a location as being a missile silo... 🤔
    Also, the Chinese balloon was a shit show of a mission. Their "sensors" were pathetic. They would have been better off buying commercial imagery.

  • @d.b.1176
    @d.b.1176 3 місяці тому

    Who wants a mustache ride?

  • @dennisyarbrough7284
    @dennisyarbrough7284 3 місяці тому +1

    Why do you tell the enemy where our missile bases are at. Not that they don't already know

    • @goovy6425
      @goovy6425 3 місяці тому

      If you read the word of God you will realize that our country will not be around sometime very soon. Every single prophecy I. The Bible has come to pass, and I can guarantee you that here soon you’re going to wish that you were saved by the blood of Christ Jesus. Please before it’s too late read 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 at the VERY least.

    • @philipr.6090
      @philipr.6090 3 місяці тому

      Well, these missile fields are so large and have been public for so long (decades) that you would pretty much need to be a tribesman in the Brazilian rainforest not to know where they are.

  • @RedNeckSurgeyTech
    @RedNeckSurgeyTech 3 місяці тому

    No they can take it back so to speak, with a self destruction in mid flight. And that's exactly how I thought we would fight WW3.

  • @letsplaywar
    @letsplaywar 3 місяці тому

    Oh my God this is horrifying.

  • @SrenMeinckePersson
    @SrenMeinckePersson 3 місяці тому +1

    do you have to be god at maths to be a pilot from my son

  • @Sandhill1988
    @Sandhill1988 3 місяці тому

    It's a quad, what about the space force.

  • @glennm449
    @glennm449 3 місяці тому +1

    Slim Pickens approves

  • @bradthorne7581
    @bradthorne7581 3 місяці тому +2

    Are y’all bots? What Ryan said is completely false regarding the number of warheads 🤦‍♂️

  • @billhayward1585
    @billhayward1585 3 місяці тому

    what would be the point of launching 400 missiles? That would be the End of the World! Hope to keep enjoying your show.

  • @scoogsy
    @scoogsy 3 місяці тому

    Really interesting video.
    The last part about how the nukes would target population centres is quite scary. Clearly Russia would do the same.
    Once one nuke is away, it’s the end of modern civilisation as we know it. Isn’t it great to know we have these dangling around everywhere.

  • @garroshhellscream7016
    @garroshhellscream7016 3 місяці тому

    What's about Vietnam and Afghan how many mamarika soldier injured and dead?

  • @brianmurray1395
    @brianmurray1395 3 місяці тому

    I believe the younger people of our western societies have been brought up on WAYYYY to many dam video games.

  • @adissabovic
    @adissabovic 3 місяці тому

    Empty can rattles the most, Mr. Bluff!
    BTW:
    ua-cam.com/video/870ms8vqnsE/v-deo.html

  • @robertooneill-xh1iz
    @robertooneill-xh1iz 2 місяці тому

    I m afraid that we re truly all doomed....may the m

  • @Amen-Magi
    @Amen-Magi 3 місяці тому

    Your mean all US ICBM missile are for cold war

  • @Joe38484
    @Joe38484 3 місяці тому

    You should have saved yourself time and say there is no winner in a nuclear war, thinking US has an upper hand over China and Russia nuclear arsenal is just insane

  • @timjames6190
    @timjames6190 3 місяці тому

    May god forgive us if This would to happen I was a soldier in the 1980’s in the British 🇬🇧 army our job was to defend Europe west Germany 🇩🇪 if Russia was to kick off nuclear war was very real and on all our minds back then we hoped it was a thing of the past but now I’m worried very worried what Russias next move will be in the next few years , we may all be gone up with a big bang 💥 to many mad men in control of all countries around the world

  • @stefanagardi
    @stefanagardi 3 місяці тому +1

    With the Launch Codes being 0000 it would be no effort for the enemy to reprogram the targets, the US would destroy themselves :P

    • @c.t6149
      @c.t6149 3 місяці тому +2

      Lol... Its not that easy as that. Nuclear arsenal is a billions dollar project. Its has the most advanved safety tech

  • @scottwasik79
    @scottwasik79 3 місяці тому

    Billy Meijer on everything everything he said is true look him up please to blow your mine

  • @kylereese4822
    @kylereese4822 3 місяці тому +1

    3 fully operational TSAR`s America would not exist anymore..... 1 TSAR at 1/3rd full power = 1500+ Nagasaki & Hiroshima bombs....

    • @flyakwa
      @flyakwa 3 місяці тому

      There is no operationnal Tsar Bomba. It was an experimental device in the 60s.

    • @Suwo0p
      @Suwo0p 3 місяці тому

      Russias bullshit military probably doesn’t even have a operational tsar

  • @johnnyllooddte3415
    @johnnyllooddte3415 2 місяці тому

    nato and israel use a dozen other aircraft to carry nukes.. including f15 f16 and f35s

  • @kessilrun6754
    @kessilrun6754 3 місяці тому

    Yeah, WWIII is nothing to laugh at, but I do jokingly refer to it as "Remote wars." Because we'll largely be firing from our backyard to someone else's front porch.
    They should send in Maverick (Tom Cruise). Bro knows how to fly in real life! Maybe not as well as our ace F-15 Pilot here, but still...it just sounds cool.
    ...and wait...no space based missiles? I find that hard to believe. I know there are lasers up there and the like. Space Force!

  • @milescoleman910
    @milescoleman910 3 місяці тому

    But but but I thought we had no hypersonics per the MSM and all the morons. Lol

  • @jessepatch9076
    @jessepatch9076 3 місяці тому +1

    That moustache is horrible lmao

    • @ep11_x
      @ep11_x 3 місяці тому

      Cant grow one yourself? 😂

    • @jessepatch9076
      @jessepatch9076 3 місяці тому

      Im guessing you cant xD@@ep11_x

  • @manuwilson4695
    @manuwilson4695 3 місяці тому +1

    Why in the hell do you keep prattling on about the speed of ICBMs?...THEY'RE ALL THE BLOODY SAME!!! 🙄

  • @paullemon6542
    @paullemon6542 3 місяці тому

    Bad to the bone

  • @pathfinderdiscovery9395
    @pathfinderdiscovery9395 3 місяці тому

    Holy shit !!! Oh lord forgive me for cursing but it’s what came to mind , That’s great to know but lord Jesus I hope that Neva Eva Eva have to be used , seeing what Japan went threw an all of these new bombs are many many many more powerful , after we an they’ve died the earth all left on her are through as well , I’d rather go quickly than survive an have to suffer what most above grounders will suffer an I know we can’t go hide at Cheyenne complex or any of those but it will be ruff for them to , no sun for yrs an yrs once nuclear winter has grab the whole planet , those are some very bad weapons that I hope we never have to use so just one or 2 would flatten North Korea an damage the south from fall out , then Russia an USA if both launch China wins

  • @norbertthetank5231
    @norbertthetank5231 3 місяці тому

    I have no faith in our current government and leaders and generals.

  • @anthonyk6265
    @anthonyk6265 3 місяці тому

    Countries being invaded at the southern border

  • @raz4371
    @raz4371 2 місяці тому

    Slava ukriane 💛💙

  • @johnw5584
    @johnw5584 3 місяці тому

    OKAY BOOMERS!!!

  • @maniaouri2146
    @maniaouri2146 3 місяці тому

    Why Americans alsways talk about war and how good they are at it, while neglecting skyrocketing poverty and homelesness in their own country not to mention the over 40 Trillion National debt ........ among the over 100 wars created by America, can any one tell us which war did America win ?

  • @paulzellman9632
    @paulzellman9632 2 місяці тому

    Using nuclear weapons is very bad fot the environment -hunters. Svede Greta Thunberg.

  • @dustyarain
    @dustyarain 3 місяці тому +1

    Lets talk about how russia will punish US with its own tasar bombas

    • @johnback0007
      @johnback0007 3 місяці тому

      I thought that was a toy that elon musk throw around his kitchen.