The 11 Most Terryfying Missiles In 2023

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 січ 2023
  • These are the 11 most dangerous missiles in the world. Hypersonics lead the way, but several conventional weapons still keep generals up at night; we included those, too.
    SOURCES: www.popularmechanics.com/mili...
    FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
    * Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
    The Buzz does not own the rights to these videos and pictures. They have, in accordance with fair use, been repurposed with the intent of educating and inspiring others. However, if any content owners would like their images removed, please contact us by email at-thebuzz938@gmail.com.
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,4 тис.

  • @levenusine5095
    @levenusine5095 Рік тому +535

    Only an American could make a video where an old american ICBM with low yield warheads, is somehow better than Russian Hypersonic weapons.

    • @JOSSBLASTING
      @JOSSBLASTING Рік тому +134

      Yes, that's american propaganda! I'm tired from that one!

    • @christopherbeckford3102
      @christopherbeckford3102 Рік тому +1

      Everything from the United States is propaganda

    • @levenusine5095
      @levenusine5095 Рік тому +1

      @@christopherbeckford3102 Hello, where are you from?

    • @jwhite0105
      @jwhite0105 Рік тому +64

      Lol act like we haven’t seen your fight against Ukraine. Hahahaha no one is worried

    • @levenusine5095
      @levenusine5095 Рік тому +1

      @@jwhite0105 You have been worried for decades. All your foreign policy is about either related to Russia or China. You even talk about them on presidential elections. And there are even old documents where you study how to separate Ukraine from Russia, because you would piss your pants if they joined again. You are actively involved in the war, with more than 100 billion dollars in aid, and 2/3 of that is military aid; you send equipment, munition; you borrow your satellites, comunications, even instructors and mercenaries, yet you pretend you are not there because is shameful how you can't still change the course of war, because now it's not a 3rd world country with outdated equipment, but a country that even has weapons that you don't; and that's the reason you try to change the subject from hypersonic weapons, to Ukraine.

  • @utherq827
    @utherq827 Рік тому +55

    RS-28 Sarmat: Well, I won't scare you and I won't appear on this list. 😁

    • @jeanlyguinea
      @jeanlyguinea 8 місяців тому +4

      because its only russian dream hahaa

    • @user-qq5kv6nd6h
      @user-qq5kv6nd6h 5 місяців тому

      @@jeanlyguinea one can find footages of this "dream" launches. Cartoons, like Kinzhal, Avangard and so on? ))

    • @TNTAH_1
      @TNTAH_1 3 місяці тому

      @@user-qq5kv6nd6h for stupid people it is cartoons)

    • @watcher63034
      @watcher63034 3 місяці тому

      Like the "impossible to intercept" Kinzahl missile? Russia has its hands full holding ground against Ukraine, let alone taking over the country. Like many of its claims, Russia is a paper dragon.

    • @argon8908
      @argon8908 2 місяці тому

      @@jeanlyguinea clueless lol

  • @theone4782
    @theone4782 7 місяців тому +31

    the chinese spy balloon is the most powerful of them all

    • @peronliu6886
      @peronliu6886 5 місяців тому

      nono.your mouth is even worse than that

    • @unclelou2366
      @unclelou2366 9 днів тому

      Well , the fact that balloon can penetrate that deep into US main land before we find out is rather scary

  • @megaharlequin3990
    @megaharlequin3990 Рік тому +50

    One thing about the WZ-8, the "WZ (Wu Zhen, 无侦)" stands for "Unmaned Scout"

  • @-x5858
    @-x5858 5 місяців тому +45

    The AGM-183 ARRW ("Air-Launched Rapid Response Weapon") was a hypersonic air-to-ground missile planned for use by the United States Air Force. Developed by Lockheed Martin, the boost-glide vehicle is propelled to a maximum speed of more than Mach 5[5] by a rocket motor before gliding toward its target.[6][7] The program was cancelled in March 2023 after multiple failed tests.[8]

    • @mirandela777
      @mirandela777 3 місяці тому

      And it was NOT a maneuverable missile, the flight path was conventional ballistic. Even so, a shameful failure.

    • @KILLSWITCH_007
      @KILLSWITCH_007 2 місяці тому

      Agm 183 arrw is not a ballistic missile.. It's a boost glide missile and , yes it failed but atleast they does not lie like Russian zircon and khinzal.... Khinzal is a ballistic missile and even hypersonic... Zircon on the other hand doesn't even exist..

  • @vibecee4183
    @vibecee4183 Рік тому +30

    Hypersonic rockets are still in the US dreams... 😂

    • @orkopayp9338
      @orkopayp9338 3 місяці тому

      russia and korea is ridicolous. china is real danger for next 50 years

    • @watcher63034
      @watcher63034 2 місяці тому

      Hypersonic rockets have been around for a long time. All ICBM's are hypersonic.

  • @ZZZ2573
    @ZZZ2573 Рік тому +81

    your ranking system is truly a comedy

    • @muammarmehatsketch711
      @muammarmehatsketch711 Рік тому +24

      Because you're American 😂😂
      Because the truth does not suit your mood.. Russia🇷🇺💪 has the best missiles in the world... without a doubt

    • @b3ng260
      @b3ng260 Рік тому +7

      ​@@muammarmehatsketch711you're not wrong, even the Indian brahmos was of Russian origin

    • @linusibaren
      @linusibaren Рік тому +1

      ​@@muammarmehatsketch711 Yeah, and Lada has the best cars. Russia is known over the world for their ability to produce quality products. 🤣

    • @imergeradeaus
      @imergeradeaus Рік тому

      ​@@linusibaren The Rockets are quality even the best so nothing funny here🧠 i as a human think its stupid lets stop War 🌏

    • @Issavibe3
      @Issavibe3 Рік тому

      Why , because Russia’s missiles overtook their American counterparts??? Understandably..do you research dude

  • @frankcuritana8159
    @frankcuritana8159 Рік тому +5

    No matter how impressive and destructive any missiles would destroy all living creatures on earth then there’s no point surviving because everything will just vanished for good.

  • @kamalchandramoney3541
    @kamalchandramoney3541 Рік тому +200

    The kinzhal successfully destroyed a deep underground arm depot 80 meters deep amidst a dense network of air defenses as well as Ukraine largest Depot. Where is the Trident 2 ,bulava or the sarmat which are easily the most feared icbm today.

    • @junkookbts1273
      @junkookbts1273 Рік тому +2

      Lol

    • @gillwill5023
      @gillwill5023 Рік тому +1

      Midget man LOL

    • @michaelsekalala8041
      @michaelsekalala8041 Рік тому

      I agree, you these media are all about praising the fake us military complex

    • @chrisp2249
      @chrisp2249 Рік тому

      The kinzhal did kill over a hundred Ukraine mercs in Lviv. Radar didn't even pick it up. That's when the Tik Tok morons realized they weren't in Kansas anymore and the enemy shoots back. America isn't on the top of the food chain anymore and realizes they waste too much money on expensive, highly logistical and man power intensive hardware. Russia and china produce excellent variants at a fraction of the cost.

    • @schwanzuslongus4638
      @schwanzuslongus4638 Рік тому +3

      Russia claims that yeah. Which means absolutely nothing

  • @Google-Is-Idiot
    @Google-Is-Idiot Рік тому +46

    In fact, WZ-8 is an unmanned reconnaissance aircraft, not a missile. And it can be recovered and reused.

  • @ConscienceCorner
    @ConscienceCorner 9 місяців тому +1

    people discuss destruction, death, disaster,calamity, sadness, bitterness with seriousness without knowing the next victim let us embrace peace

  • @alexsandertroposci1631
    @alexsandertroposci1631 Рік тому +4

    @The Buzz
    The WZ-8 is "Woo Zhéhn Bah". The H6K is also known as the Xian (Shyian) H6K. Also known as "Jzháhn Shéhn"/"God War"/God of War.

  • @javidhaydari1268
    @javidhaydari1268 Рік тому +53

    DF 17 is number two for the moment 👍

    • @chetansingh9980
      @chetansingh9980 Рік тому +1

      Okk 😇

    • @user-xs2ru9on4s
      @user-xs2ru9on4s Рік тому +2

      Они украли технологию в России, но не всё!

    • @n.c9653
      @n.c9653 Рік тому +17

      @@user-xs2ru9on4s nonsense. It came out way before anything from Russia

    • @user-xs2ru9on4s
      @user-xs2ru9on4s Рік тому

      @@n.c9653 the Chinese stole all the technology, the USSR also received nuclear weapons, they began to copy planes there too, and the development of these missiles was still in the USSR, the Americans were also in the 80s, last year Russia mastered 2 professors, now they are convicted and espionage, they are 5 years ago they transferred part of the technology to China! Why does China have missile speeds from Mach 5 to Mach 27, while the Chinese cannot reach Mach 10? They don't have the technology anymore, and Russia has used this missile for the first time in the world. By the way, the Chinese also stole laser technology from Russia!

    • @n.c9653
      @n.c9653 Рік тому

      @@user-xs2ru9on4s you make many accusations without a single piece of evidence. Or you are still living in the 20th century. China has surpassed Russia is almost all military domain in the 21st. There is nothing to 'copy'.

  • @sun_538
    @sun_538 Рік тому +28

    Le indian missiles : to yae Kya Diwali Kae liyae rakha hai Kya

  • @nirvana3921
    @nirvana3921 Рік тому +66

    To be precise, the DF-17 is a medium-range ballistic missile. It could not only attack the aircraft carrier fleet, but also turn the Japanese archipelago into a wasteland full of radioactive materials.
    🚀🗾💥🍄☢️

    • @Av0nKraD
      @Av0nKraD Рік тому +15

      No No No Its just our new year flame work,not supose to be on the list

    • @user-ue4em8ui8u
      @user-ue4em8ui8u Рік тому +7

      ​@@Av0nKraD 战忽局同志今晚加鸡腿😂

    • @liuyanbo6510
      @liuyanbo6510 7 місяців тому

      No need. There's radioactive now.

    • @BestluckYan
      @BestluckYan 5 місяців тому +5

      射程100公里,误差2000公里。只是防御武器

    • @XLrebbit777
      @XLrebbit777 5 місяців тому

      ​@@Av0nKraD达瓦里氏,感谢你的辛苦工作😂

  • @AnimasiKanasia
    @AnimasiKanasia 7 місяців тому

    As an Indonesian, I can confirm Singkong is the most terrifying.
    I mean Xingkong...

  • @stevenbaer5999
    @stevenbaer5999 Рік тому +18

    JL 2 can actually reach mach 20 that's actually too far fetch

  • @romanromanowski4470
    @romanromanowski4470 Рік тому +113

    RS-28 Sarmat jest najniebezpieczniejszy. Może przenosić między innymi pociski Avangard (nie podano ile) jako alternatywę dla 10-15 klasycznych głowić nuklearnych. Nie wiem jak mogło go zabraknąć w tym zestawieniu?

    • @user-fi2nv3ym2w
      @user-fi2nv3ym2w Рік тому +7

      Yes, in this list, you'll understand what the hell. The same "Avangard" is not a rocket. This is the combat equipment of intercontinental ballistic missiles and intermediate-range ballistic missiles.. Depending on the modification of the block itself (there are at least two of them), it has a different mass And the range there is naturally appropriate - up to the possibility of entering near-Earth orbit with subsequent entry into the atmosphere anywhere on the planet.. The Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile will be equipped with four or six such hypersonic blocks, and with the use of a special upper stage, which will act as an orbital bomber, dropping blocks in any order on targets located anywhere on the planet.

    • @romanromanowski4470
      @romanromanowski4470 Рік тому +1

      @@user-fi2nv3ym2w 👍

    • @notarrono4310
      @notarrono4310 Рік тому

      Semoga Indonesia mengakuisisi bom kinzal ...URAAA

    • @conpa3yma659
      @conpa3yma659 Рік тому +1

      Этот "список" - пропагандистское дерьмо, переполненное ложью, фантазиями и вымыслом западной пропаганды.
      Более того, видеорассказчик не понимает о чем говорит. Перепутана классификация по дальности, скорости, назначению, типу боеголовок и т.д.

    • @FrancisGuite
      @FrancisGuite 11 місяців тому

      ​@@notarrono4310 believe me indondesian will never ever acquire kinzhal missiles even if they're willing to pay billions and billions of money..... Russia will never ever sell kinzhal to Indonesia so don't even hope about it as you're just gonna end up in depression mode

  • @IlaDey-pk2cs
    @IlaDey-pk2cs 9 місяців тому

    Nice video you shared. Thank you for sharing this amazing vidio.

  • @user-fi2nv3ym2w
    @user-fi2nv3ym2w Рік тому +37

    Avangard is not a rocket. This is the combat equipment of intercontinental ballistic missiles and medium-range missiles.. And the range there is naturally appropriate - up to the possibility of entering near-Earth orbit with subsequent entry into the atmosphere anywhere on the planet.. The Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile will host four such hypersonic units, and with the use of a special upper stage, which will act as an orbital bomber, dropping blocks in random order on targets located anywhere on the planet.

    • @GegeDxD
      @GegeDxD 9 місяців тому +1

      How did you find out that it will host 4 units? 😂
      No one knows how many units the Sarmat can carry. According to the developers it can carry up to 15. So anything you say, it's nothing but misinformation.

    • @user-fi2nv3ym2w
      @user-fi2nv3ym2w 9 місяців тому

      ​@@GegeDxD Firstly, the Sarmat cannot carry any missiles. Simply because he himself is a missile - a land-based intercontinental ballistic missile. Secondly, the payload itself depends on such a value as the "thrown weight", well, that is, how many kilograms or tons a ballistic missile can deliver to its maximum flight range. The Sarmat has a throwable weight for a maximum range of about eleven tons, and therefore any payload should fit into this parameter. If we take the Avangard combat equipment, then this is a hypersonic gliding unit, it is heavy in itself, and quite dimensional. The UR-100N UTTH rocket with a cast weight of 5.8 tons carries only one "vanguard", and in principle, according to the size of the cast weight, it was possible to place two such blocks, but the size of the head part did not allow this, two "vanguards" did not fit there stupidly, because initially this rocket was developed for a completely different combat equipment.

    • @alaskaaksala123
      @alaskaaksala123 2 місяці тому +1

      Uh, we know,it’s not a rocket… did you not see the title of the video??

  • @noneintel2119
    @noneintel2119 Рік тому +4

    Chinese JL2 is an outdated missiles. Now they are using Jl3 with greater range and more accuracy in late 2022 for their subs. Jl4 is under development with much greater range than JL3.

  • @mohdshahrilshuib2991
    @mohdshahrilshuib2991 Рік тому +18

    Western still in testing phase on hypersonics. While russia have more type hypersonics ready in service.

    • @tluangasailo3663
      @tluangasailo3663 Рік тому

      Western will catch up and surpass , so if they aren't mean to use it in a hurry , it's doesn't matter

    • @mohdshahrilshuib2991
      @mohdshahrilshuib2991 Рік тому +3

      @@tluangasailo3663
      When western has catch up... Russia has already in new stage...

    • @tluangasailo3663
      @tluangasailo3663 Рік тому

      @@mohdshahrilshuib2991 Russia already can't develop the same method US is pursuing i.e.,an air launched miniature hypersonic glide vehicle & scramjet air breathing hypersonic, compact yet effective, could be fit multiple inside stealth bomber and depending on the carriers , it's range could exceed 9000 km!

    • @johnhalford378
      @johnhalford378 Рік тому +5

      Oof, imagine thinking Russian Tech is competent after the fall is USSR . Cant even invade a neighboring country with any type of competence.

    • @nikhilPUD01
      @nikhilPUD01 Рік тому

      I don't believe any country have hypersonic missiles at all

  • @blackphoenix114
    @blackphoenix114 Рік тому +32

    When I heard about kinzhal misfired, I Knew at that moment this was just a western propaganda channel🤣

    • @schwanzuslongus4638
      @schwanzuslongus4638 Рік тому +1

      Why you believe Russian Propaganda?

    • @thedonkilluminati96
      @thedonkilluminati96 11 місяців тому

      ​@@schwanzuslongus4638 no such thing especially when the west have banned all russian media outlets

    • @scottmeehan2422
      @scottmeehan2422 11 місяців тому +2

      The dagger is not a hypersonic missle as it cant move or adjust its speed once fired making it easy to shoot out the sky. As to me a proper hypersonic missle is one that can adjust its speed and move mid air to avoid counter measures. Such as the beast that is mbda's meteor BVR missle.

    • @kaijugabriel1685
      @kaijugabriel1685 8 місяців тому

      Ok The khinzal was not intercepted and neither were the s300 destroyed by small drones 🤡👍 Tomorrow Russia will show their version of Iron Man too

  • @BlackholeJET369
    @BlackholeJET369 Рік тому +18

    Without Brahmos this list is incomplete.

    • @user-us7di5ek5w
      @user-us7di5ek5w 8 місяців тому +6

      technology given by russian? joky

    • @bettawala1234
      @bettawala1234 8 місяців тому

      All critical technology of America devlop by nazi scientists.

    • @awhig2474
      @awhig2474 2 місяці тому +1

      Check your rear @@user-us7di5ek5w its Burning

  • @thetrademarkclan
    @thetrademarkclan Рік тому +3

    you talked about the Trident 2 but it didn't make the list?

    • @MrCastodian
      @MrCastodian Рік тому

      Obviously not, its an obsolete missile, its good, but not comparable with the new Russian Bulava, Sineva or Lyner, the Chinese JL-3 or the France M41, Triden exist because of life extension and they are developing a replacment missile, for good reason.

  • @stevenbaer5999
    @stevenbaer5999 Рік тому +7

    The faster the missile is, more friction it's going to cause. They actually need some type of metal or something else that is actually very extremely heat resistant.

    • @DIREWOLFx75
      @DIREWOLFx75 Рік тому

      Or you figure out how to cheat. Which i'm reasonably sure is what Russia did, due to how apparently relatively small changes are required to turn an old "fast" missile into a hyperfast missile.

    • @dad-ms8mz
      @dad-ms8mz Рік тому +3

      That's the problem they have to overcome 😅

    • @travkin8842
      @travkin8842 Рік тому +2

      Они летят в облаке плазмы

    • @Shinuchiha_99
      @Shinuchiha_99 Рік тому

      @@travkin8842 so does the trident 2.. Mach 27 in orbit..

    • @golonawailus4312
      @golonawailus4312 Рік тому +1

      China is leading on this material research

  • @ashnazgthrakatulukii1165
    @ashnazgthrakatulukii1165 Рік тому +2

    Avangard is not a missile, but it can be part of a missile.
    Also there are others non missiles in the list which even noted.

  • @agenthunk3491
    @agenthunk3491 Рік тому +2

    Mach 27… godly

  • @adityasusantapanda
    @adityasusantapanda Рік тому +36

    Shaurya...Agni-6 & Brahmos 2 says hello...

    • @tforaodg
      @tforaodg Рік тому +9

      India is not on the list

    • @FrEeTibEtXinJiAnGfReEpOkCoL
      @FrEeTibEtXinJiAnGfReEpOkCoL Рік тому

      @@tforaodg hum duniya basane main yakeen rakh te hai naki barbad karne main chottu 😎 tum log lado aur maro 🤪

    • @ankitsingh-pf5lz
      @ankitsingh-pf5lz Рік тому +2

      @@tforaodg we don't have flying tanks

    • @tforaodg
      @tforaodg Рік тому +5

      @@ankitsingh-pf5lz
      That has nothing to do with India on the list.

    • @ankitsingh-pf5lz
      @ankitsingh-pf5lz Рік тому

      @@tforaodg but Russian tanks are flying in Ukraine, we don't have that tech that's why we are not on the list.

  • @djordjetodorovic4176
    @djordjetodorovic4176 Рік тому +16

    3 KINZHALS????
    DAMN THERE ARE TENS OF VIDEOS OF DIFFERENT LOUNCHINGS OF THAT ROCKET

    • @ohmygoalspain8581
      @ohmygoalspain8581 Рік тому +5

      Russia used only 1 kinzal

    • @romanberkutov2592
      @romanberkutov2592 Рік тому

      @@ohmygoalspain8581 2

    • @nochannel1q2321
      @nochannel1q2321 8 місяців тому

      @@ohmygoalspain8581 Says here they've used at least six against Ukraine and one of them was successfully intercepted by the Patriot system.

  • @user-kt2eg4oi3m
    @user-kt2eg4oi3m Місяць тому

    You forgot the french M51, flying at Mach 15 to 10.000 km with 100 kilotons power.

  • @Jeff-uq7iu
    @Jeff-uq7iu Рік тому +1

    Look up minute man missile silo doors hit images, you'll know when you see it lol

  • @goranmancevski5550
    @goranmancevski5550 Рік тому +3

    For Putin and Russian , this is good exercise for conventional fight.

    • @f-35lightningii6
      @f-35lightningii6 Рік тому

      Russia training Avangard beast then course combat war Russia Avangard fails..

  • @peacemusiclove1377
    @peacemusiclove1377 Рік тому +3

    There's no mention of Brahmos, Agni

    • @puravidavlog5831
      @puravidavlog5831 Рік тому +1

      B'coz, this post is mainly from Chinese paid media 😂

    • @Xrginld17X
      @Xrginld17X 6 місяців тому

      Because India got its ass fucked in war with CHina in 1962, so sdtfu ad talk less and worlk harder n smareter. jahahaha @@puravidavlog5831

  • @skybughai
    @skybughai 5 місяців тому

    1.agm-183,The second test of the project failed. So this project is still in progress, all indicators are expected rather than reality.
    2.WZ8, which is an abbreviation of Chinese "无人侦察机8(Wuren Zhenchaji 8,Unmanned Scout 8)", so it is more like a unmanned version of the black bird mini Plus.

  • @golonawailus4312
    @golonawailus4312 Рік тому

    WZ 8 is theoretically an unmanned vehicle

  • @Liturgich
    @Liturgich Рік тому +66

    Посмеялся когда девушка сказала, что типа кинжал это фигня и их было типа три выстрела, ну ну )))) А если б это было западное вооружение, то не удивлюсь, что в диферамбах расписала какое оно "крутое" ( как видим на примере украины - нет не крутое). Еще что меня повеселило - это то что в ролики непрерывно указывается словосочетание - россия применит ядерное оружие, только один нюанс об этом начали кричать западные страны, причем говорили о ядерной войне пугая россию, на что естественно ей пришлось отвечать. А сейчас я слышу как ваша пропаганда в том числе и на этом ролике поет о применении ядерного удара по украине - это россии не надо она рядом с украиной, а вот всяким уродам из америки британии это нормально, так как сидят далеко, поэтому при пройгрыше не удивлюсь, что запад это применит, так как запад - никогда людей не ценили и природу , главное для них только деньги. Западные уроды открыто говорят, что украина это их полигон для вооружений и тактик, так что делайте выводы., а народу украины я б посоветовал сбрасывать ваше руководство, которое получает бабосы от амеров и сделало из страны полигон.

    • @alexmilano9367
      @alexmilano9367 Рік тому +1

      А я поржал с тебя кл@ун! Кинжал, калибр да хоть любое другое АНАЛоговнетное оружие в руках второй армии страны третьего мира( тоесть рф) прилетает только по жилым домам и сараям.

    • @Liturgich
      @Liturgich Рік тому +3

      @@alexmilano9367 ахахах, да-да особенно когда товарищ Милано в теме полнейший ноль , то у подобных сказочников все прилетает в дома, главное верить своему единственному каналу тв в стране, единственной партии и главному единственному клоуну зеле)))) главное что они рассказывают нуну))) особенно смешно когда калибр с кинжалом сравнивают, что говорит о полном незнании человека темы вообще.

    • @adityasusantapanda
      @adityasusantapanda Рік тому +12

      I'm with you my Russian brother...love from India...

    • @Liturgich
      @Liturgich Рік тому +3

      @@adityasusantapanda with you too, brother💪

    • @adityasusantapanda
      @adityasusantapanda Рік тому +5

      @@Liturgich we are always with our Russian brothers...what if Russia and India are far away...our hearts are together...

  • @einolehto-eg1gc
    @einolehto-eg1gc 8 місяців тому

    Ei ole kysymys ,siitä että kenellä niitä on enemmän ja nopeampia. nämä ovat teknisiä tietoja

  • @stevenbaer5999
    @stevenbaer5999 Рік тому +4

    The faster things are more heat it produces. What type of material does it take to go mach 20 or maybe less?

  • @fqeagles21
    @fqeagles21 Рік тому +57

    Come on guys,i think mach 27 for the Avangard seems a bit of a big Stretch

    • @keydaaq1805
      @keydaaq1805 Рік тому +26

      It will slow down to less than mach 5 when hitting a target. Its re-entering earth's atmosphere thats why its above mach 20

    • @fqeagles21
      @fqeagles21 Рік тому +5

      @@keydaaq1805 ok that's make sense then

    • @Casseiopeia9720
      @Casseiopeia9720 Рік тому

      You see how russian stupid propaganda can easily fool naive people Mach 27 only travels exosphere regime like Orbital flight vehicles you can see that glide vehicle animation projectiles dives towards below endosphere there's no Mach 27 can maneuver and travel at 60,000 ft with ambient temperature and your still dealing with Newtonian physics

    • @MrCastodian
      @MrCastodian Рік тому +12

      @@keydaaq1805 No, it does not slow down to Mach 5, no Ballistic missiles slow down that fast, especially this type of missiles.

    • @romankovalev7894
      @romankovalev7894 Рік тому +6

      Relax. It's just a guided nuclear warhead. All intercontinental missiles since the 60s descend at such hypersonic speeds along a ballistic and, accordingly, predictable trajectory. And warheads fly from one missile to one place with a spread of a hundred kilometers. And Avangard allows you to hit targets from one missile at least throughout the country

  • @karachiking92
    @karachiking92 Рік тому

    Nice

  • @einolehto-eg1gc
    @einolehto-eg1gc 8 місяців тому

    sekä joka näitä aseita käyttää,tulee myös tuhoutumaan.😊

  • @dad-ms8mz
    @dad-ms8mz Рік тому +10

    Happy to seee as always.
    Many Indian Messiles above mach 24+ Plus in terminal phase are not present in the list.😅

    • @tapiomith9403
      @tapiomith9403 8 місяців тому +1

      Bhutan have mach 70++plus missile in testing phase .that too is also not maintained 😂😂

    • @stevestarnes9198
      @stevestarnes9198 7 місяців тому +5

      iNDIA SHOULD MAYBE PROVIDE ITS CITIZENS WITH TOILETS FIRST ..lol

    • @dad-ms8mz
      @dad-ms8mz 7 місяців тому

      @@stevestarnes9198 I seee someone's ass is burning 🤣..
      Probably Whose Kid takes gun In school and have hard time Distinguishing between male and female 🤣

    • @abcejeh3774
      @abcejeh3774 6 місяців тому

      ​@@stevestarnes9198 We have enough toilets but after reading your comment I don't think we need our toilet because your mouth is always there .

    • @Xrginld17X
      @Xrginld17X 6 місяців тому

      @@abcejeh3774 Don tworry, he enemy will fill the lad with cows. Chck mate India, you're worth nothing infron of your mata coes. LMFAO

  • @lester9448
    @lester9448 7 місяців тому

    You forgot to mention sarmat 2 missile

  • @Grizathvili
    @Grizathvili Рік тому +1

    There are still Peresvet, Bulava, and others, which are not on this list.

  • @ohmygoalspain8581
    @ohmygoalspain8581 Рік тому +4

    why is sarmat not on the list?

    • @pavelslutsky3114
      @pavelslutsky3114 Рік тому

      Слишком страшен, чтоб даже говорить о нем.

  • @jerrybell7934
    @jerrybell7934 Рік тому +9

    Great respect from China.

    • @deveryhenderson8335
      @deveryhenderson8335 Рік тому +2

      Ling ling on UA-cam? Ling ling not allowed on UA-cam

    • @jerrybell7934
      @jerrybell7934 Рік тому +8

      @@deveryhenderson8335 Well, trolls also not allowed on UA-cam.

    • @franklordi2219
      @franklordi2219 Рік тому

      @@jerrybell7934 scary if you believe all this Chinese stuff is actually real. We have of course to assume it is and plan accordingly.

    • @jerrybell7934
      @jerrybell7934 Рік тому +6

      @hyper Hatred and resentment can't solve any problem for your country. In China, there's few media or channel provoking anti-this or anti-that anger. But if you are hostile, then don't expect any respect.

  • @3w653
    @3w653 Рік тому

    3.30 AGM183A 3rd test failed..... And the assistant Secretary, Andrew, of Air Force Procurement department said they plan to give up AGM183A proj and Air Force is inclined to promote the development of HACM Proj of Thor instead.

  • @Walnut777
    @Walnut777 5 місяців тому

    Wait till they come up with a “ludicrous” speed missile😂

  • @reptilexcq2
    @reptilexcq2 Рік тому +10

    Meanwhile, India had developed a missile that can fly at 60mph.

    • @snjr1021
      @snjr1021 6 місяців тому +2

      Your country has no missile 😂😢😢😅😅😅

    • @user-ux5ir7uf2e
      @user-ux5ir7uf2e 5 місяців тому

      meters per hour, got it.

  • @fqeagles21
    @fqeagles21 Рік тому +13

    Minuteman strenght Is Speed and Precision

    • @MrCastodian
      @MrCastodian Рік тому +8

      Not really, Many missiles are faster, or just as fast, Russian Sarmat, Stiletto and R-36, Indian Agni, Chinese DF-41 or France M41, They are faster, and CEP, well, Miutman 3 have a cep of 250 Meter, that is ok, Agni 10m, DF-41 100m, R-36 600m, Stiletto 300m, and what do that mean, that all missiles kill their target

    • @phil20_20
      @phil20_20 Рік тому +1

      They're being replaced. Plus, they were just recently upgraded. Where it goes nobody knows!

    • @kamalchandramoney3541
      @kamalchandramoney3541 Рік тому +1

      Minuteman carries only 3 warheads and is over 50 years old . The trident is the most dreaded missile in U.s arsenal

    • @fqeagles21
      @fqeagles21 Рік тому

      @@kamalchandramoney3541 i know, but i wasn't talking about SLBM,only land based

    • @tluangasailo3663
      @tluangasailo3663 Рік тому

      @@MrCastodian although India agni is definitely not 10 m CEP, the CEP is irrelevant in nuclear ICBM , it blast will always cover

  • @ioanbota9397
    @ioanbota9397 8 місяців тому

    I like this powerful fastest missile

  • @albionzada6750
    @albionzada6750 7 місяців тому +1

    but the missile knows where it is?

  • @arround1
    @arround1 Рік тому +4

    The video forgot to mention a US made mobile surface-to-surface hypersonic missile called "Long-Range Hypersonic Weapon" (also nicknamed as "Black Eagle").
    The first pre-production samples have already taken up combat duty with mass deployment is scheduled for around 2023

    • @nirvana3921
      @nirvana3921 Рік тому +6

      First of all, you must understand that if China and Japan have a direct conflict over the Taiwan crisis or the Senkaku Islands. If Washington's attitude is not clear, it is likely to withdraw the USFJ and USFK to the second island chain from a new deployment. Because the rebalance to the Asia-Pacific was proposed as early as the Obama era. Secondly, the United States started a full-scale nuclear war without a winner for the sake of CCP for Japan. Do you think it's possible? This will affect the entire continental U.S. Plus, you know almost nothing about China's National Missile Defense (CNMD) system. Including his early warning mechanism and subregional interception mechanism. Both The Minuteman 3 are well-launched ballistic missiles of the last century. Its maneuverability is much lower than that of a launch vehicle. Of course, China also has nuclear submarines that have long cruises in the waters around the Caribbean Sea and the Aleutian Islands, and they can also launch JL-2 missiles. You also know very little about hypersonic vehicles. China has enough strategic depth to place its launchers anywhere on its mainland. The missile will break through the atmosphere into space inside China. The THAAD system is simply powerless. And after entering the atmosphere, the aircraft carried out irregular taxiing and orbit change with Qian Xuesen Ballistics. When it breaks into the atmosphere again, it will penetrate at Mach 25, and no weapon in the world can intercept it at the moment. And you should be clear that it can be launched not only land-based. It can also be carried and launched by strategic bombers H6k. This adds more variables. You also need to be clear that THAAD is deployed in South Korea to counter North Korea's ballistic missile threat. Will South Korea make an early interception for Japan during the war? After all, this will drag South Korea into the Sino-Japanese war. South Korea and Japan are not allies, and they are full of contradictions. In addition, you must be aware that the United States has not made any nuclear commitments to Japan in the U.S-Japan security treaty. Japan itself has three non-nuclear principles.

    • @user-fl8qk3xs7p
      @user-fl8qk3xs7p Рік тому +1

      🤣🤣🤣

    • @nochannel1q2321
      @nochannel1q2321 8 місяців тому

      @@nirvana3921 China has ~200 total warheads available. The US maintains ~7,000 on active duty. Trident missiles are far worse than Minuteman missiles as they carry up to eight total warheads per missile with 20 SLBMs per submarine. The bulk of the total megatonnage of US nuclear power is contained on the Trident missiles.
      The US never started a war on behalf of Japan.
      A Chinese strike, even if using all missiles and warheads, will not affect the entire continental US as China lacks a sufficient capacity of warheads of sufficient power to do so.
      The Minuteman missiles have been continuously upgraded and the presently deployed missiles are of 21st century technology, not 20th.
      The Minuteman, like any ballistic missile, is sufficiently maneuverable as its only task is to gain the proper altitude and bring the payloads into range of their targets.
      China can indeed deploy their weapons anywhere in China. The US, on the other hand, can deploy their weapons virtually anywhere in the world due to treaties, foreign bases, carrier strike groups and the constant constantly present second strike capabilities of the nuclear-armed Ohio-class submarines.
      THAAD has been tested and been effective. It's not perfect, but it's just one of three known anti-ballistic missile weapons that exist in the US and doesn't even factor in the log in deployed weapons systems becoming known to the world and the ten or twenty years before that point where the weapons are deployed without being commonly known.
      Now actively deployed US naval laser weapons can absolutely intercept re-entry vehicles and you don't seem to understand the Mach measurement as 25 isn't really a possibility for any country. That speed is 18,527.425 miles per hour. Since re-entry vehicles lack propulsion due to the complications of re-entering the atmosphere and space vehicles don't even plummet to earth at a fraction of that speed.... Well, you're wrong, basically/.
      Japan is actually covered by the US nuclear umbrella. Not in the document you mentioned, but it's kind of odd to assume only one document dictates such a complicated number of commitments, interactions and assurances.
      I envy that you're at least being paid to post this non-sense by the CCP while I'm only correcting you for free.

    • @thehairypavementant3931
      @thehairypavementant3931 5 місяців тому

      @@user-fl8qk3xs7p

    • @Vot666
      @Vot666 5 місяців тому

      ​@@nirvana3921he's not talking about china

  • @patatebanine4278
    @patatebanine4278 Рік тому +5

    the WZ-8 Chinese looks alot like the Lockheed D-21.

    • @milkycatmeowmeow9302
      @milkycatmeowmeow9302 Рік тому +7

      Chinese... Copy everything

    • @MrCastodian
      @MrCastodian Рік тому +14

      Why copy a faild US drone? They made 4 operational flights with D-21, all crashed, 1 in Sovjetunion, 1 in China and 2 over the sea :p

    • @user-vo1qi1nx4p
      @user-vo1qi1nx4p Рік тому +11

      眼睛不需要可以捐给有需要的人😅

    • @user-ql2jo7su9s
      @user-ql2jo7su9s Рік тому

      @@milkycatmeowmeow9302 Yes,you can believe that China has stolen the time machine from future America

    • @milkycatmeowmeow9302
      @milkycatmeowmeow9302 Рік тому

      @@user-ql2jo7su9s yes i can

  • @worldview730
    @worldview730 9 місяців тому

    Do these missiles fire food for the hungry & needy?

  • @brucehuang4231
    @brucehuang4231 8 місяців тому

    WZ-8 is not missile, it's a drone.

  • @Desire123ification
    @Desire123ification Рік тому +12

    21st century warfare would be dominated by speed: Light (Laser) and Kinetic (Asteroids/Comets).

    • @josephjroy6593
      @josephjroy6593 Рік тому

      A comet crashing against the ground isn't warfare, it'll be a mass extinction event.

  • @india5317
    @india5317 Рік тому +21

    Le indian missiles : these are toys in front of me 😂😂😂😂🤣🤣

    • @peacedude-gy3zl
      @peacedude-gy3zl Рік тому +1

      🇨🇳 you love china 😂😂😂 🤪

    • @india5317
      @india5317 Рік тому +14

      @@peacedude-gy3zl I like west taiwan 😂🤣

    • @india5317
      @india5317 Рік тому +5

      @@peacedude-gy3zl where is atmi power mulk Pakistan 🤔🤔😂😂😂🤣🤣

    • @SphereMan121
      @SphereMan121 Рік тому +4

      Very arrogant comment.

    • @peacedude-gy3zl
      @peacedude-gy3zl Рік тому +1

      @@india5317
      Me too😂👍

  • @madunmadun873
    @madunmadun873 Рік тому +1

    Bagus sekali teruslah kalian saling berlomba lomba membuat senjata canggih lalu gunakan dalam perang sesungguhnya untuk mengukur keberhasilan dan kualitas.setelah kalian sukses percayalah senjata buatan anda akan laris terjual diseluruh dunia.

  • @Angel77300
    @Angel77300 Рік тому

    French Missile M.51.3 .... Speed MAch25 Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (10.000 km range)

  • @justindad2240
    @justindad2240 Рік тому +5

    Are you kidding AGM183-A ahead of DF17(Unpredictable trajectory(unstoppable) HPGV 2500km), in addition, FxxBxx got nowhere to takeoff or landing in pacific west, how? DF26 Guam/Carrier killer 5000km Mach18, Air launch DF17 10000+km, DF27 long range DF17, Australia/Hawaii express.

  • @XkMeng
    @XkMeng Рік тому +5

    Although the agm183 has passed the PPT stage, the test has hardly been successful, and it has never flown above Mach 5

  • @rc3178
    @rc3178 Рік тому +2

    Кроме,как у России,пока ни у кого нет гиперзвуковой ракеты.

  • @timsmith8506
    @timsmith8506 7 місяців тому

    Instead of all these weapons we need to figure out a way that nations can go to war using hugs….whichever country hugs the most people wins.

  • @umu8934
    @umu8934 Рік тому +7

    Nuclear countries should start making orbital station with nuclear weapons or tungsten poles that can be drop(rods of gods)

    • @bayanzabihiyan7465
      @bayanzabihiyan7465 Рік тому +2

      So many reason why this wouldn't work, but the most notable. 1. It's VERY hard to get anything to space, let alone something that heavy and expensive, (putting a nuke on a rocket that may or may not fail is very reckless too) 2. Satellites are typically unpowered and have predictable orbits and not very maneuverable, hence you really wouldn't have a lot of options as to when or even where you wanted to strike.

  • @saitama4118
    @saitama4118 Рік тому

    Brahmos says hi

  • @_KPA_
    @_KPA_ 7 місяців тому

    DPRK allready has Hwasong-17 and Hwasong-18

  • @georgecoons6872
    @georgecoons6872 Рік тому +3

    Well now what the u.s. military can do is turn the old F-104 starfighter into a a flying maneuverable missile.

  • @phil20_20
    @phil20_20 Рік тому +4

    Whatever became of the "Midget Man"? Single warhead missile. The whole thing about hypersonics is they have to survive reentry like speeds and still be able to navigate. Not an easy ability to sustain over long distances. I haven't seen any performance more impressive than other missiles so far.

    • @vonnegutshot
      @vonnegutshot 11 місяців тому

      The midgetman never made it past the prototype stage of development... The program was scrapped in 1992 right after the cold war ended in 91. Tactical nukes like the midge are frightening. A nuke fired out of a pickup truck is definitely scary. BTW check out the Orion Pegasus missile in regards to midgetman esque performance.

    • @albertmedel4168
      @albertmedel4168 6 місяців тому

      "Scrapped" 😉

  • @vicat555vick7
    @vicat555vick7 11 місяців тому

    500 kilotons is not a weight, it is a yield. Thanks!

  • @2380MG
    @2380MG 9 місяців тому

    who the hell says "double R" lol

  • @ddr3629
    @ddr3629 Рік тому +16

    I'm Russian but i feel proud for China and North Korea too. Iran also should have hypersonic nukes to defend themselves from Israel.

    • @jenny2329
      @jenny2329 Рік тому

      What do you mean by putting China and North Korea together?

  • @cidop3427
    @cidop3427 Рік тому +11

    The buzz ☕☕☕☕😂😂😂🤣

  • @zuenpin
    @zuenpin Рік тому +1

    very good ^Q^

  • @MC-rz4dh
    @MC-rz4dh Місяць тому

    Ricordate bene, non vince chi ha il missile o la bomba più grossa ma chi ha il sistema per spegnere i motori di questi dopo qualche chilometro.

  • @alexkor380
    @alexkor380 Рік тому +16

    On December 12, 2022, the US Air Force command shouted to the whole world about the "successful test of a hypersonic missile."
    They just didn’t say that the success was as follows:
    1. The missile was finally able to unhook from the B-52.
    2. The rocket flew in a straight line - the flight was uncontrolled, without guidance.
    3. The rocket accelerated to Mach 5.
    4. The missile has not yet been put into service. She now needs to be taught to fly faster and fly where you need to.

    • @nobodycares2164
      @nobodycares2164 Рік тому +3

      Yep. This rocket not exist yet. But still in the list. Lol

    • @technoartfest8708
      @technoartfest8708 9 місяців тому +4

      @@nobodycares2164 the most shocking thing is how they place Avangard ,the world first Re-entry speed missile behind most missiles in the list.
      A true list should be .
      1)Sarmat super nuke First mach 22
      2)Avangard missile second mach 27.0 missile ,This is beyond hypersonic speeds.. LOL
      3)Kinhzal missile third Mach 12
      4) Tsirkong missile four. mach 9
      5)chinese hypersonic missile
      6)from here all americans and indians experimental missiles. Mach 5.0 and under.

  • @user-ys1pd2nk1i
    @user-ys1pd2nk1i Рік тому +3

    X 32? Iskander? Sarmat? Onyx? Jars? USA propaganda

  • @user-ys1pd2nk1i
    @user-ys1pd2nk1i Рік тому +3

    Kinzal 14800 km h 3000 km

    • @nochannel1q2321
      @nochannel1q2321 8 місяців тому

      And already shown to be vulnerable to the existing Patriot missile system.

    • @user-ys1pd2nk1i
      @user-ys1pd2nk1i 8 місяців тому

      ​@@nochannel1q2321да три дивизиона патриот были уничтожены)))) это западные фантазии! Патриот ни разу не сбил ракеты Скад! Сказочник!

  • @islandon22
    @islandon22 Рік тому

    Mutual annihilation is such a fun topic.

  • @alexsandertroposci1631
    @alexsandertroposci1631 Рік тому +2

    @The Buzz
    It is pronounced "Sheeng Kóhng', not "ZjeenKōhng". I actually speak Chinese. Five dialects in fact

    • @kimpoho9064
      @kimpoho9064 Рік тому

      "ZING"is Cantonese 星.....

    • @Chillerll
      @Chillerll Рік тому

      Here is a little star for your language skills ⭐

  • @user-uq8yy1mp3d
    @user-uq8yy1mp3d Рік тому +8

    RS-28 «Sarmat»???

  • @teckmenglee8060
    @teckmenglee8060 5 місяців тому +1

    What about the RS-28 Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile by the Russian?

  • @mehranaliyari9866
    @mehranaliyari9866 Рік тому

    I just don't know why the Iranian Khyber Breaker was not among these missiles, while it has a speed of Mach 18

    • @AliHuffman
      @AliHuffman 9 місяців тому +1

      All intercontinental ballistic missiles and even shuttles and the Apollo module have hypersonic speeds in the terminal phase, but this does not mean they are hypersonic at low altitude. A hypersonic missile is a missile that can glide the final stage at a low altitude or fly with scramjet engines(maneuverable)
      For example the Shuttle in terminal phase has about 30 _40 mach.

    • @mehranaliyari9866
      @mehranaliyari9866 9 місяців тому

      @@AliHuffman With a slight change, the Iranian Khyber Shakan can be one of the hypersonic missiles, but why was Fattah not among these missiles?

    • @nochannel1q2321
      @nochannel1q2321 8 місяців тому

      Hypersonic weapons have existed since the 1950s. A modern hypersonic aircraft or missile is differentiated based on whether or not they are able to maneuver when at those speeds. So far there are none that have been down to do so.

  • @alxelin9546
    @alxelin9546 Рік тому +3

    没有巨浪3,东风41😂😂😂😂

  • @PavelMyth
    @PavelMyth Рік тому +3

    From the very first words, a propaganda lie!
    In the first months of the SVO (special military operation), only military facilities, military equipment and military units were subjected to missile strikes. Ukrainian servicemen who were not members of neo-Nazi battalions and organizations were asked to lay down their arms and those who wished could continue to serve in the Russian army.
    But, during the 8 years of the civil war in the Donbass, when the Ukrainian military shelled the peaceful city of Donetsk, with the help of propaganda, neo-Nazism deeply penetrated the Ukrainian totalitarian society. This predetermined the fate of Ukraine as a state.
    But, it's even worse than you think. The NATO war machine is working for Ukraine in the war against Russia. That is, NATO is still unofficially, but fighting against Russia with the hands of Ukrainians. Although not only Ukrainians. For example, ask how many Polish soldiers died in Ukraine? Poland's interest is understandable, they want to seize and annex Western Ukraine and Belarus to Poland.
    The problem is that after the NATO countries are recognized as participants in the conflict, a big war will begin, which will inevitably become nuclear and lead to the death of mankind. The combined stockpile of nuclear weapons would be enough to destroy humanity. There will be no winners.

  • @ajinkyagaikwad26
    @ajinkyagaikwad26 Рік тому +1

    AGM-183 ARRW failed recently in a test & USAF will cancel this Lockheed Martin's Hypersonic missile program to focus on other

  • @chriswatt859
    @chriswatt859 11 місяців тому +3

    The kinzhal is meant to avoid air defenses but has been shot down numerous times

  • @MardukTheSunGodInsideMe
    @MardukTheSunGodInsideMe Рік тому +4

    Top speeds of missiles is subjective to altitude. 10,000mph where there is no friction in the atmosphere is very different than 10,000mph at sea level 14.4psi/ 1 bar of atmosphere.

    • @nedeljkoostojic5222
      @nedeljkoostojic5222 Рік тому

      These is true.But.
      Sarmat have speed in the exite to the earth atmosfer about max32 and then he turn into flying and burning ball with speed about 27max.No one media will tel as the true.

    • @MardukTheSunGodInsideMe
      @MardukTheSunGodInsideMe Рік тому +1

      Those missiles launch straight up. They don't reach high speeds until they are significantly above the atmospheric pressures found at sea level. Rockets face 3 forms of pressure. Gravity, thrust, and atmospheric drag. When all 3 of these are at their most is called max Q. The only way these rockets reach hypersonic speeds is when atmospheric drag and gravity have been severely negated. They would never reach hypersonic speeds without it. Scramjet engines seek to change that for long-duration flights at low altitudes. This is why America appears behind in "hypersonic" weapons. They aren't just putting wings and heatshields on a ICBM. They are developing a new form of propulsion.

    • @user-xs2ru9on4s
      @user-xs2ru9on4s Рік тому

      Единственный, кто её применил- это Россия, остальное это китайские выдумки, и воровство китайцами технологий!

    • @alexevdokimov9615
      @alexevdokimov9615 11 місяців тому

      lovedurmom is Elon Musk with girl hair. ha ha too funny.

    • @alexevdokimov9615
      @alexevdokimov9615 11 місяців тому

      are you Elon Musk,s sister?

  • @yukisuzuki9468
    @yukisuzuki9468 Рік тому +1

    US,China,Russia….big boys‘ game

  • @ericb7776
    @ericb7776 5 місяців тому

    Don't understand how countries know so much about each other's weapons.

    • @gutsky
      @gutsky 3 місяці тому +2

      Because they don't,all these things are way behind the real military weapon tech.

  • @bkjworld
    @bkjworld Рік тому +4

    Agni 5 speed is mach 24

  • @danielkuleshov5876
    @danielkuleshov5876 Рік тому +15

    also this channel "india will be next superpower"

    • @gattlinggun9881
      @gattlinggun9881 Рік тому +2

      IND!A IT'S SUPPER P0PPER!!!
      😂🤣🤣🤭🤭🤭

    • @Maratha382
      @Maratha382 Рік тому +1

      @@gattlinggun9881 😂😂

    • @ritamsarma9568
      @ritamsarma9568 Рік тому +2

      @@gattlinggun9881 and Pakistan is super bhikhari

  • @xwqi
    @xwqi 5 місяців тому +1

    It is said that Russia has more than three kinds of hypersonic missiles in the sea, land and air, while China currently only has hypersonic missiles in the army. It seems that the United States is still in the testing phase.

    • @bentony7548
      @bentony7548 5 місяців тому

      well,have to correct your comments that China had these 3 kinds,,3 ways to launch a hypersonic missiles..
      055 is the ship platform.H6 for airborne. DF17/27 for the land...it just like the f35A/B/C,

    • @user-gc6om4ov8e
      @user-gc6om4ov8e 5 місяців тому

      @@bentony7548 不不不,中国什么都没有,所谓DF系列都是假的,3D动画和模型而已。我们只有一种叫做炮仗的东西是重大节日庆祝用的。

    • @user-ux5ir7uf2e
      @user-ux5ir7uf2e 5 місяців тому

      keep believing ur words

  • @avarion9538
    @avarion9538 Рік тому

    I am scared now. I really am 🙂

  • @vimalkumar3815
    @vimalkumar3815 Рік тому +8

    No problem... What ever you made it😁... Vietnam is best example... What happened in Afghanistan.. All these toys failed... Latest is Ukraine... Technological advances no matters?.. It is human skill.

    • @SUNNYSTARSCOUT365
      @SUNNYSTARSCOUT365 Рік тому +2

      True 👍👍👍 Best comment so far 👍👍👍

    • @Booz2020
      @Booz2020 Рік тому

      Talibans,. Hezbollahs, and Hamas members love driving TOYOTA Trucks 🗾🎌🇯🇵👀

    • @winstonchurchill5892
      @winstonchurchill5892 Рік тому

      Ah yes the famous hypersonic missiles in Vietnam...

  • @kimjong_un17
    @kimjong_un17 Рік тому +26

    Made in China ☕☕☕😂😂😂

  • @ARShri
    @ARShri 9 місяців тому

    Did you forget the Brahmos1 and Brahmos2
    Comon that's not fair😂!!.

  • @orion8364
    @orion8364 7 місяців тому

    Where is topol-m, RS 24 yars ??

  • @WwarpfirewW
    @WwarpfirewW Рік тому +4

    Wtf where you get that info on kinzhal? From some shady indian website?