My Career Ended Abruptly in this Stream? (Reacting to comments on "100 Reasons Islam is False")
Вставка
- Опубліковано 26 сер 2024
- A false flag campaign caused UA-cam to abruptly end this video mid-stream. I won the appeal and it is back up.
Nearly two years ago, I posted a video titled "100 Reasons Islam is False." The video has generated over 175,000 views and 5,000 comments. Now, for the first time ever, I will read and react to some of those comments live. Be sure to turn in live, because I'm probably going to have to delete my channel out of embarrassment once I see how badly I've been refuted.
Original video is found here: • 100 Reasons Islam is F...
Read my vision/mission statement at ReasonedAnswers...
Support me on Patreon: / reasonedanswers
SubscribeStar: www.subscribes...
or PayPal: www.paypal.com...
Follow on Twitter: / reasonedanswers
Like on Facebook: / reasonedanswers
Feel free to email with any questions: thaddeus@reasonedanswers.com
#IslamDebunked #Reaction #Refuted
----
This video is licensed under the Create Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0) license. You may freely share and modify this video however you see fit provided you 1) give credit by linking back to the original and 2) release any modifications under the same license. Full legal details can be found at: creativecommon...
This video ends abruptly due to a false flag campaign, presumably by desperate Muslims who were offended by the truth. I filled an appeal and won, so the content is back up. This won't be the end of it - this is not the way to win jihadis, not the way at all. Thanks to those who (briefly) caught it live and to those who gave superchats (CargoCrew and Rick Newton).
I tried to get back to your channel and found I had been unsubscribed during the stream.
@JohnsonHoword Given the nature of the flag (I don't want to specify as I don't want to give people ideas), it is impossible an automated system detected it in this case.
Cowards are so afraid of their cult and false prophets being exposed. The desperation is wild these days. Press on!
Figured this would happen. Surely this campaign will soften your heart toward their religion and not make you bitter and curse it under your breath. Surely.
@@Weissguys6 exactly pretty sad ngl
Your streams are my favorite and i love the community you've created and the knowledge you and Mary share. Don't let the cult of crybabies get to you. The more they cry and whine, just means you're over the target. Potatoes gonna potate.
Thank you! The comment about the community in particular means a lot to me as that has been an intentional focus.
I hate that you got a false flag. Your content is always so interesting and you seemed to really be enjoying yourself. Some people are just party poopers.
Don’t debate Muhammad Hijab.. He is just an ad hominem professional once he gets owned.
He has a PhD in Ad Hominem studies, so it’s kind of a given
And his IQ test came back negative.
Those who fear the truth try to silence it. I hope they are not successful in the longterm.
Don’t give them the time of day Thaddeus they have no manners they are like a wildman
Lucian of Samosata was a second century Greek satirist. In one of his works, he wrote of the early Christians as follows:
The Christians ... worship a man to this day - the distinguished personage who introduced their novel rites, and was crucified on that account.... [It] was impressed on them by their original lawgiver that they are all brothers, from the moment that they are converted, and deny the gods of Greece, and worship the crucified sage, and live after his laws.[27]
Although Lucian is jesting here at the early Christians, he does make some significant comments about their founder. For instance, he says the Christians worshipped a man, "who introduced their novel rites." And though this man's followers clearly thought quite highly of Him, He so angered many of His contemporaries with His teaching that He "was crucified on that account."
Although Lucian does not mention his name, he is clearly referring to Jesus. But what did Jesus teach to arouse such wrath? According to Lucian, he taught that all men are brothers from the moment of their conversion. That's harmless enough. But what did this conversion involve? It involved denying the Greek gods, worshipping Jesus, and living according to His teachings. It's not too difficult to imagine someone being killed for teaching that. Though Lucian doesn't say so explicitly, the Christian denial of other gods combined with their worship of Jesus implies the belief that Jesus was more than human. Since they denied other gods in order to worship Him, they apparently thought Jesus a greater God than any that Greece had to offer!
[27] Lucian, "The Death of Peregrine", 11-13, in The Works of Lucian of Samosata, transl. by H.W. Fowler and F.G. Fowler, 4 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon, 1949), vol. 4., cited in Habermas, The Historical Jesus, 206.
Source: Bethinking
Lucian lived in the second century. So it was common knowledge for him “What is Lucian's source of information about Jesus? He knows that Christians have sacred books, and this raises the possibility that he drew his knowledge of Jesus from them. To judge from what he says here, it is unlikely that Lucian had read them. Most of the correct infor- mation he relates about Christianity was common knowledge in his time.115 Moreover, a reading of the Gospels would have corrected some of his misconceptions, especially that Jesus himself taught his followers to deny the Greek gods and that early Christian leaders were commonly called "priests." The use of the non-New Testament words "patron," "lawgiver," and especially his characteristic word for "crucified" also ar- gues tellingly against a New Testament source. So there is no literary or oral connection between Lucian and the New Testament and other early Christian literature in regard to the person of Jesus.
In sum, the kernel of Lucian's The Death of Peregrinus, including Peregrinus's association with Christians, is likely true, but Lucian has also embellished much of it for satiric effect. It is likely, but not demon- strable, that some information about Jesus came with the story of Peregrinus itself and was embellished by Lucian for his purposes” Jesus outside the New Testament page 79
hey brother in case UA-cam didn’t notify you someone responded
@@DanteRedgrave-6492 it was me lol
Long Live Legendary THADDEUS ❤️🙏🇦🇱
Truth is sound like hate when someone hate the Truth.
No Brain No Gain is absolutely right: he has no brain, therefore, he has no gain.
A zombie stinks.
😘
I missed it. 😔
Don't worry, there will be a part 2 since jihadis managed to end part 1 abruptly.
Keep on defying them as you usually do!
Will do!
Excellent.
Can you upload the original "100 Reasons Islam is false" just changed the name slightly. It is a Bullseye for Islamic Lies.
If someone question the existence of Jesus Christ, he himself doesn't exist.
14:13 I just noticed that you deflected and switched to Alexander the great when I pointed out that we have coins and statues of julius ceaser. I guess I actually scared you for once
_" I guess I actually scared you for once"_ LOL, what a joke. Oh yes, I totally accepted your "criteria" of "whoever doesn't have coins didn't exist" and "deflected" because I was "sacred" and totally wasn't showing you how stupid your criteria are. Thanks for showing, yet again, the desperation one needs to uphold mythist criteria and how incredibly unserious you are.
@@ReasonedAnswers I didn’t say that whoever doesn’t have coins doesn’t exist. I was pointing out how we have more evidence for julius ceaser than for Jesus. It’s not my fault that your god has to be either stupid or weak to hardly left out evidence for the existence of his so called begotten son.
@@nopainnogain3345It's not God's fault you refuse to use your brain. Your "more evidence" is easily denied using your own "standards" - more easily in fact since it actually was quite common to put mythical figures on coins whereas there is not a single biography written about a mythical figure from the ancient world and you need to claim FOUR people wrote biographies of one. The simple fact is that there is the same or more evidence that Jesus existed than ANY other figure of ancient history. This is why ZERO HISTORIANS support your insane position. But yet again, keep thinking historians have no clue about historian and the evidence is "weak." It just makes you look like a complete joke to ANY informed person, including atheists.
We have coins and statues of the god Mercury. I wouldn't be surprised if we also have them for Diana.
@@ReasonedAnswers “It’s not god’s fault you refuse to use your brain” I guess I didn’t had a brain ever since I was born 🤷♂️
“It actually was quite common common to to put mythical figures on coins” I looked this up. And all i got was not anything related to this.
“The simple fact is that there is the same or more evidence that Jesus existed than any other figures of ancient history” this is a lie lol. Idk why many people are bringing this up. Even if it were true that there are more evidence for Jesus (Which it isnt) each historical figures are different on their own. So it wouldn’t work to appeal this to other historical figures (especially since you appealed this to alexander the great)
I was about respond to all of theses things you responded in my comment section during the live stream but i will try it do it in here.
3:53 I was talking about the previous live stream where I said that I misunderstood the question about the other historical figures and you didn’t even brought up the part where I said that misunderstood it.
5:01 I can give you one person who said Jesus existed because it was a common nane. and that would be Joe Rogan who even pointed out that the evidence for Jesus isn’t great
6:56 how am I supposed to give out the reasons as to why historians are wrong especially since nobody in the live stream give out the reason as to why they believe Jesus existed? Some few people pointed out that historians believe Jesus existed during the live stream but they never give out their reasons for it even tho I asked numerous times. And you can only appealed to authority if you give out the reasoning by them and besides it’s kind of an closed minded to appeal to authority.
8:28 you are talking about the Arabic and the syriac version for The Testimonium Flavianum. And as I pointed before in the other post. look at the work of Alice Whealey who has proven that both of them are Eusebius’s versions. So no they aren’t close to the original. If anything it shows it was never there in the first place.
8:50 im sorry but did you just cited suetonius? Because if you actually read the passage. He talks about someone named “Chrestus” (which was a name) who was causing a lot of trouble. Which does not fit the description for Jesus at all especially since chrestus is name.
8:52 pliny the Elder did not mention Jesus. Im pretty sure you meant pliny the younger. And if so yeah he does makes a brief about Jesus in his letter 96 but if you read full passage. Pliny the younger says that he was interrogating the Christians and that they are telling him about their religion. the letter was written in the second century. So he would have been getting his information about Jesus from Christians in the second century.
8:55 im pretty sure you are talking about Mara bar Serapion. And if so. Then I would be happy to cite a *christian* scholar Robert E. Van Voorst who believes that this isn’t referring to Jesus (with reasons) in his book called “Jesus outside the New Testament” in page 72 he says “The results for study of the historical Jesus are slim. Mara's letter is not an independent witness to Jesus, for two main reasons. First, it obviously links the life of "the wise king" with his movement and its teachings, making it possible that Mara learned about the wise king from Christians. Second, its assertion that the Jews killed Jesus is du- bious at best. By his own logic, for Mara to implicate the Romans would go against his main point, that people who persecute and kill their wise men do so at their own peril. In sum, Mara's letter says more about Christianity than about Christ. Most interesting is that this Stoic writer, from an area outside the Roman Empire” another thing I should point that scholars have disputed which century the letter was written. Infact it was most likely written in the second century. So this is not a “first century” source
9:19 yes you have paul’s epistles but the problem is that paul hardly spoke Jesus as an actual human being. Which is one of the reason why I believe Jesus did not existed
10:29 the talmud contradicts many things about the Jesus in Christianity. Which cannot be referring to Jesus at all. And it was written in the 5th century. Pretty late to be reliable.
Are you a Muslim?
@@arendwittmar4007 no
_"that would be Joe Rogan"_ LOL, if you think Joe Rogan is a scholar, then I guess it makes sense that you are a mythist I guess... When you are ready to actually start thinking, email me at thaddeus@reasonedanswers.com and let's talk live. I really can't keep wasting time with such nonsense in comments.... I do find in amazing how you had never heard of any of these things live and yet now you suddenly have vigorous responses. Almost like you are copy and pasting a mythist website and not doing the least bit of thinking.
just for clarification, why do you want to prove jesus didn't exist? Aren't you a muslim?
@@ReasonedAnswers I don’t know what’s wrong with Joe Rogan. And that’s not actually true tho. I did known all of theses so called sources about Jesus before the live stream. The reason I didn’t include them because they don’t prove anything for the existence of Jesus. I don’t blindly accept them unlike you.
If you are not offended, I like to upload your video and make it viral - it is amazingly done and put out. Great job.
Please do! All of my content is Creative Commons licensed for free reuse. Just provide a link to the original for legal purposes and you are good to reupload/edit/share/etc however you like.
Will do bro@@ReasonedAnswers
They took down the amazing one cos you hit the nail right on the head - your moment of Brilliance indeed. @@ReasonedAnswers
Hi, I am from india. I really love your videos very much. I can I contact you???
You can email me at thaddeus@reasonedanswers.com