Judge Luttig Has MAJOR QUESTION for Supreme Court

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 тра 2024
  • Former federal appellate Judge Luttig joins Legal AF’s Michael Popok for a no holds barred discussion as to whether the Supreme Court is encouraging Trump to self-pardon or President Biden to pardon Trump in order to delay their decision on the immunity issue.
    Visit meidastouch.com for more!
    Support the MeidasTouch Network: / meidastouch
    Add the MeidasTouch Podcast: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
    Buy MeidasTouch Merch: store.meidastouch.com
    Follow MeidasTouch on Twitter: / meidastouch
    Follow MeidasTouch on Facebook: / meidastouch
    Follow MeidasTouch on Instagram: / meidastouch
    Follow MeidasTouch on TikTok: / meidastouch

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,5 тис.

  • @altrevino3135
    @altrevino3135 18 днів тому +390

    I’m sick of SCOTUS making shit up when it suits them

    • @AussieSteve1984
      @AussieSteve1984 18 днів тому +9

      Robust vernacular and so, so true.

    • @mikemiller3069
      @mikemiller3069 18 днів тому +24

      Or when it suits trump or the Republican party.🤬

    • @tinasepulveda1895
      @tinasepulveda1895 18 днів тому +11

      ​@@mikemiller3069EXACTLY

    • @4yerears
      @4yerears 18 днів тому +8

      Orwell called it

    • @fastfreddie54
      @fastfreddie54 18 днів тому +8

      Didn't you mean to say "SCumOTUS making shit up when it suits Trump" ?

  • @lf3541
    @lf3541 18 днів тому +224

    Judge Luttig is a JEWEL in the crown of American law. We're lucky to have him!
    Great piece, Michael.

    • @dottydew3673
      @dottydew3673 18 днів тому +6

      It's not like he can do anything about it. Apparently nobody effing can. VOTE and pressure Biden to add to the supreme court.

    • @fionawilson6958
      @fionawilson6958 18 днів тому

      Hopefully the Democrats will win big in November and that will be something that they will do otherwise I’m going back to the United Kingdom and screw this shameful country.

  • @winkieblink7625
    @winkieblink7625 18 днів тому +232

    I just heard ROBERTS AVOID being a justice. He NEEDS TO BE REMOVED.

    • @vjcush
      @vjcush 18 днів тому +9

      👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻!!
      I Totally Agree With You!!
      👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻!!

    • @philipd8868
      @philipd8868 18 днів тому +7

      Agreed

    • @djdahl9035
      @djdahl9035 18 днів тому

      Ignorant Dems interest rate over 7% and still too dumb to understand we are on the wrong track, let us see when the economy totally crashes this summer if they finally (30% LOL) get smarter.

    • @deselby6669
      @deselby6669 18 днів тому +7

      He would not have suggested it if anything could be done about his shadiness

    • @robertlamoy7783
      @robertlamoy7783 17 днів тому +4

      I think I’m going to be sick 😢🤢🤮

  • @timothy9874
    @timothy9874 18 днів тому +57

    So Chief Robert’s position is that: you can’t trust a jury, judge, or government prosecutor. So, why doesn’t that apply to his own court? This is disgraceful.

    • @littilwood
      @littilwood 12 днів тому

      It already applies to his own court, which is why he's adamant that he doesn't think Congress has the authority to pass a code of ethics that the Supreme Court should be bound by, but also that the Supreme Court shouldn't have to pass and abide by its own code of ethics.

    • @viewer2277
      @viewer2277 2 дні тому

      Well Roberts position is whatever contortion is needed to deliver the decision that his KEEPERS (whether keepers via bribery, friendship or extortion) want on a given day. I suspect that Governor Kristi Noem and Roberts are both of the same moral and intellectual caliber (that is: rock bottom).

  • @user-jl9fz4jy5g
    @user-jl9fz4jy5g 18 днів тому +420

    In Australia Supreme Court judges retire at 70. Your legal system needs to be amended and needs to get away from political appointments.

    • @philipmullins5185
      @philipmullins5185 18 днів тому +42

      In Australia , judges are appointed on their education qualifications and their legal experiences and has nothing to do with their political preferences and it does work.

    • @fuzzfacelogic789
      @fuzzfacelogic789 18 днів тому +24

      @@philipmullins5185 And where the US system of judicial appointments completely fails.

    • @annieclaire2348
      @annieclaire2348 18 днів тому

      The political appointments system for ANY judges is totally useless and not fit for purpose in an true and anti-corruption democracy.

    • @Dan-kh5ll
      @Dan-kh5ll 18 днів тому +24

      Wow that makes total sense! I love that setup way better!
      My country's justice system is a total disgrace and embarrassment. All republicans fault! Every Trump ring kisser is despicable!

    • @stormshadax
      @stormshadax 18 днів тому +2

      Yall are a monarchy. We'll keep our democracy and our Republic. Only difference is instead of the people choosing, your country's leader appoints someone who appoints the judges.. Your system actually sounds worse than ours.

  • @Brutally-Honest
    @Brutally-Honest 18 днів тому +291

    When you lose confidence in the honesty of the Supreme Court we have definitely fallen very deeply.

    • @yvonnecook8635
      @yvonnecook8635 18 днів тому

      Unfortunately yes you guys have. I knew after shithead put his three in, this was gonna happen. WTF does he have on them.

    • @tinasepulveda1895
      @tinasepulveda1895 18 днів тому +16

      EXACTLY

    • @tinasepulveda1895
      @tinasepulveda1895 18 днів тому

      EXACTLY the SCOTUS needs term limits NOW

    • @tinasepulveda1895
      @tinasepulveda1895 18 днів тому

      EXACTLY as the SCOTUS needs term limits NOW

    • @brownsugarzeze2330
      @brownsugarzeze2330 18 днів тому

      Trump is the devil and Putin and the GOP did this to America now the Supreme Court has joined them this is sick

  • @DonnaHolt-ge6om
    @DonnaHolt-ge6om 18 днів тому +77

    Judge Luttig should be one our Supreme Court Justices!

  • @davetousley3888
    @davetousley3888 18 днів тому +51

    I am speechless and disgusted a Supreme Justice can be so reprehensible.

  • @bridamc3493
    @bridamc3493 18 днів тому +149

    I really respect Judge Luttig.. He gave Mike Pence the direction that saved the country. It was hanging by a thread at that point Very grateful to him.❤

  • @v.britton4445
    @v.britton4445 18 днів тому +79

    Thank you Judge Luttig and Michael Popock..
    I am so disgusted by the fascist $OTU$

    • @Swnsasy
      @Swnsasy 18 днів тому +1

      We need all 3 branches in order to impeach.. AOC already said she will write up the article!!

  • @VickiGonzales-oc9hj
    @VickiGonzales-oc9hj 18 днів тому +78

    How do we hold the Supreme Court accountable for knowingly not holding their party accountable for wrongdoing?

    • @judithsherwood3735
      @judithsherwood3735 18 днів тому +8

      Vote blue up and down the ballot. Then the Congress can actually make some changes for the good instead of what we have to put up with now.

    • @Nothingbutlovehere369
      @Nothingbutlovehere369 18 днів тому +9

      Senator Sheldon Whitehouse is working on it. It’s going to take time, and will by others to seek integrity, truth, facts…and expose the “receipts.” The court (corrupt influences) needs to be held accountable! Court reform now!

    • @weird1600
      @weird1600 17 днів тому

      @@Nothingbutlovehere369 Congress and the administrative branch have no power over the court You may wish to read the constitution! Besides the most corrupt branch of government trying to control the judicial branch is a hell of a joke!

    • @MysticVic1
      @MysticVic1 17 днів тому

      "Their Party" ......says it all !!
      They sure the hell are "republicans" first and foremost.

  • @cathydemars4413
    @cathydemars4413 18 днів тому +29

    SCOTUS needs to be held ACCOUNTABLE AND DISBARRED

  • @lettiemulder6732
    @lettiemulder6732 18 днів тому +135

    I now understand why Judge Luttig was not given a seat on the SC Bench. He is too honest fot the Republicans

  • @TeresaHunnell-yg2zk
    @TeresaHunnell-yg2zk 18 днів тому +145

    This is the absolutely the most shameful and frightening Supreme Court I have ever witnessed

  • @pb5640
    @pb5640 18 днів тому +26

    Robert’s needs to be removed and Judge Luttig needs to be inserted into SCOTUS!

    • @PricillaScarborough-mb7zm
      @PricillaScarborough-mb7zm 16 днів тому

      Definitely! Get Robert's out as he is doing more damage to our country by not following our Constitution!

  • @Robert-ts5ze
    @Robert-ts5ze 18 днів тому +26

    Justice Roberts might want to reconsider his life work . He is out of this element as a Supreme Court Justice .

    • @philipd8868
      @philipd8868 18 днів тому +1

      He needs to step down or be impeached.

  • @lindaswanson9328
    @lindaswanson9328 18 днів тому +76

    If our founding fathers thought the president should have full immunity, they would have put that in the Constitution. Shame on Scotus.

    • @philipd8868
      @philipd8868 18 днів тому +4

      Agreed - and they included insurrection as a disqualifier

  • @user-eg2le7rk2j
    @user-eg2le7rk2j 18 днів тому +129

    If a president can pardon himself, doesn't that make him above the law ??

    • @Kwk16534
      @Kwk16534 18 днів тому +13

      Of course it does if this is permitted it's the end of our democracy

    • @idamcneill8005
      @idamcneill8005 18 днів тому +5

      That would be true. It's never been done. Even Nixon had enough respect for the Constitition NOT to self-pardon! Or even ask for immunity..
      but back then, Republicans still upheld the Constitution

    • @cowbunny001
      @cowbunny001 18 днів тому

      ​@@Kwk16534- Ours is a Constitutional Republic.

    • @johndigiacomo1674
      @johndigiacomo1674 17 днів тому

      @cowbunny001, do you even KNOW what a Constitutional Republic is? We are a republic because we have an ELECTED government as opposed to a monarchy or dictatorship. We are a Constitutional Republic because we have a written constitution.defining our government. We are also a REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY, by the terms of that constitution. Why do you MAGAT morons think by employing terms like republic, or Constitutional Republic that our democracy can be voided. Our Constitution begins, WE THE PEOPLE, the most important beginning in human history. It defines who the constitution is for.

    • @johndigiacomo1674
      @johndigiacomo1674 17 днів тому

      @idamcneill8005, do you think ANY of today's current Republicans have the sent respect or shame that even Nixon had? They have no honor or shame.

  • @paulshaw5119
    @paulshaw5119 18 днів тому +86

    The SUPREME COURT should be acting in GOOD FAITH too!!! OBVIOUSLY NOT!!

    • @user-rr1jw9cz1u
      @user-rr1jw9cz1u 18 днів тому +4

      The good faith of medieval catholic Europe! 😾👎🏾👎🏾👎🏾👎🏾👎🏾👎🏾

    • @susanfrancis5471
      @susanfrancis5471 13 днів тому

      Obviously. It’s disgusting.

    • @susanfrancis5471
      @susanfrancis5471 13 днів тому

      They seem to now believe they are not only Supreme, but Almighty.
      Labels can be a bad thing.

  • @candyrosefreeman7232
    @candyrosefreeman7232 18 днів тому +30

    Thank you Michael and Judge Luttig. Thank You M.T.N. For All You Are Doing To Defend Our Precious Democracy, With The Truth. Blessings And Truth For All.

  • @edwinbathke2302
    @edwinbathke2302 18 днів тому +460

    Robert’s should be reclassified as Supreme Court Jester because he is a joke, a very bad joke, but nonetheless a damned corrupt joke. Remove him!

    • @phylis3917
      @phylis3917 18 днів тому +11

      We are stupid right?

    • @whiskyjames4200
      @whiskyjames4200 18 днів тому +19

      Not to mention Clarence Thomas.

    • @mikemiller3069
      @mikemiller3069 18 днів тому +20

      Let's not forget that AT LEAST 3 members of the court committed perjury in their quest to be coronated to their lifetime appointments and now that they have them, see themselves as unimpeachable royalty. They should be in prison rather than on the bench.

    • @jonlawson3004
      @jonlawson3004 18 днів тому

      This is so disgusting. I know these justices are smart enough to understand if they rule in favor of absolute presidential immunity SCOTUS will instantly become powerless and only a threat to a president’s absolute power they provided. Throughout history every leader with absolute power quickly eliminates any and all threats to that power.

    • @tinasepulveda1895
      @tinasepulveda1895 18 днів тому +17

      ​@@whiskyjames4200EXACTLY as his wife Ginni Thomas was right there with The PROUD BOY'S and Oath Keepers and QANON on January 6th, 2021

  • @TheMastiffprince
    @TheMastiffprince 18 днів тому +173

    This is shameful and disgusting, Congress are the ones who can remove SCOTUS. Make sure to vote 💙 for every house member.

    • @annieclaire2348
      @annieclaire2348 18 днів тому

      👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼💙🌊💙🌊💙🌊💙🌊💙🌊💙🌊💙🌊

    • @vjcush
      @vjcush 18 днів тому +3

      👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻!!
      I Totally Agree With You!!
      👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻!!

    • @dankelly2147
      @dankelly2147 18 днів тому +4

      And Senate. These justices must be impeached; the number of justices must be expanded to cover each of the nation’s districts; and the Senate must confirm progressive judges to full the court.

  • @kimberlylundy410
    @kimberlylundy410 18 днів тому +43

    We need 9 judge Luttig's on the court.

    • @judyacereto6496
      @judyacereto6496 17 днів тому

      There are 9 right now. I think the court should be expanded to 13; should have been done in 2021!

  • @robinkuykendall-adams6650
    @robinkuykendall-adams6650 18 днів тому +9

    So much respect for the Honorable J Michael Luttig!⚖️🇺🇸⚖️

    • @jamesdilger8678
      @jamesdilger8678 18 днів тому

      If you are making a sincere statement, you might want to correct the spelling of his name. The way it currently reads sends a very mixed message. IMHO

    • @robinkuykendall-adams6650
      @robinkuykendall-adams6650 18 днів тому +1

      @@jamesdilger8678, ya got me! My phone just changes names whenever it wants to 🙄 but thank you. I've corrected the mistake. The honorable J Micheal Luttig ⚖️🇺🇸💙

    • @jamesdilger8678
      @jamesdilger8678 17 днів тому

      @robinkuykendall-adams6650 I was pretty sure I understood what you meant, but sometimes people use sneaky sarcasm and it wouldn't be the first time I have seen a faux compliment worded similarly. Hope you weren't too offended.[ I know people hate grammar police, but when I was in the military I was in print journalism and misspelling someone's name (or misidentified individuals) was a big deal. ]
      Be well!

    • @robinkuykendall-adams6650
      @robinkuykendall-adams6650 17 днів тому +1

      @@jamesdilger8678, not a bit of it! I'm glad you caught it because I truly have mad respect for Luttig and I would hate for folks to think I was calling him Michelle! ⚖️🇺🇸⚖️

  • @lindaarnold5683
    @lindaarnold5683 18 днів тому +185

    Once Trump is cleared away, the Supreme Court needs some serious adjustment!! 😡😡

    • @michellecleek3997
      @michellecleek3997 18 днів тому

      Correction.....IF Drumpf is cleared away....
      If he is somehow NOT "cleared away", then SCOTUS will no longer exist.
      "King Donnie" will have no need for a high court. He will make all of the rules all by himself.

    • @i-love-space390
      @i-love-space390 18 днів тому +6

      You are quite optimistic. Don't forget to vote, because I am not (optimistic).

    • @timnray99
      @timnray99 18 днів тому

      psssttt you are
      Pissin' In The Wind ua-cam.com/video/6QgNzTN-STA/v-deo.html

    • @vjcush
      @vjcush 18 днів тому +2

      👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻!!
      I Totally Agree With You!!
      👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻!!

    • @redhedkev1
      @redhedkev1 18 днів тому +2

      Perhaps a refresher lesson on how one goes about LEGALLY impeaching a Supreme Court Justice.
      It can't be any more fraught with Constitutional dangers than we already have with this Presidential Immunity hearing.

  • @user-mp3sc2sk1m
    @user-mp3sc2sk1m 18 днів тому +73

    Only judge who is willing to speak the truth and stand by the rule of law judge LUTTIG

    • @vjcush
      @vjcush 18 днів тому +1

      👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻!!
      I Totally Agree With You!!
      👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻!!

  • @dobnerk
    @dobnerk 18 днів тому +11

    Thanks for bringing Judge Luttig and his wisdom to the American public who believes in the Constitution and what America is all about.

  • @btrump1
    @btrump1 18 днів тому +10

    Perhaps all these ‘judges’ need to go back to law school???💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙

  • @PKing-px5dg
    @PKing-px5dg 18 днів тому +1144

    A Supreme Court enabling an Insurrectionist should be removed immediately per the 14th Amendment, then referred to the DOJ for charges! Period!

    • @phylis3917
      @phylis3917 18 днів тому +39

      Nauseating.

    • @stewartfenton7660
      @stewartfenton7660 18 днів тому +34

      They should but they won't.

    • @jf4872
      @jf4872 18 днів тому +1

      That is not how the 14th amendment works. Facts are facts....Trump did and said nothing illegal whatsoever on Jan 6. That is a fact.

    • @jf4872
      @jf4872 18 днів тому +4

      @@stewartfenton7660 They won't because they can't due to 'Executive privilege. The doctrine of executive privilege defines the authority of the President to withhold documents or information in his possession or in the possession of the executive branch from a compulsory process of the legislative or judicial branch of the government.

    • @prjndigo
      @prjndigo 18 днів тому +1

      don't worry, if they rule against the 2A at any point they're forfeit from that moment forward

  • @watchit6298
    @watchit6298 18 днів тому +51

    Here’s what a respected , Honorable judge sounds like 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸Honorable judge Luttig 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

  • @eleicajunstrom8724
    @eleicajunstrom8724 18 днів тому +17

    Jeeze... What did I just listen to... I am so disappointed in our Supreme Court!!! If these Supreme Court Justices feel this way, then they should quit their seats and move on, so we can fill those seats, with Justice's that really care about protecting our Laws. Instead, we have these Idiots that only want to protect Trump!!! Disgusting!!!

  • @mikesabran
    @mikesabran 18 днів тому +17

    What more can be done to stop this disgrace of the SCOTUS??

  • @GLORIA-mm1ej
    @GLORIA-mm1ej 18 днів тому +799

    History books will not be kind to these corrupt Justices

    • @JusticeAlways
      @JusticeAlways 18 днів тому +66

      If history books are allowed...that is.

    • @Theodore617
      @Theodore617 18 днів тому +42

      They get their way
      They will burn lots-o-books

    • @mitseraffej5812
      @mitseraffej5812 18 днів тому +31

      History is always written by the victor.

    • @allonelife699
      @allonelife699 18 днів тому +19

      History books may very well be kind to these justices. Your assuming we are going to wake up some day from this. Don't be to naive

    • @troyallen8223
      @troyallen8223 18 днів тому

      The fact that they are just getting ramped up is just more bad news coming down the pipe for the rest of our days. 🤷🏼😞🤬. We gotta deal with this crap going forward for another 50 years is my surmise. Unless everybody truly wakes up to what they are planning. We can only stumble forward.

  • @Adriano-xq8zv
    @Adriano-xq8zv 18 днів тому +109

    Why don't people protest for the removal of these criminals at the SCOTUS court.

    • @matthewhearne7200
      @matthewhearne7200 18 днів тому +3

      Because there is no pathway to do that?

    • @Swnsasy
      @Swnsasy 18 днів тому

      ​@@matthewhearne7200Abso-damn-loot-lee there is! Congress can impeach him.. AOC already said they win the House and have all 3 she will write it up!!

    • @Swnsasy
      @Swnsasy 18 днів тому +2

      We need all 3 branches in order to get rid of them! AOC said if we do, she will write up the articles for impeachment..

    • @matthewhearne7200
      @matthewhearne7200 18 днів тому +2

      @@Swnsasy They are one of the 3 branches. smh.

    • @Swnsasy
      @Swnsasy 18 днів тому +3

      @@matthewhearne7200 Oh for fucks sake. People slip up. How horrible I am that I wrote branches instead of chambers.. I should be jailed!!! 🙄 The point still stands, yes there is a way to get them out and AOC stated she would write them up!

  • @i-love-space390
    @i-love-space390 18 днів тому +13

    When one of the most conservative judges in America is afraid of the ignorance of the SCROTUS, then we should all be afraid.

    • @janiceminer
      @janiceminer 18 днів тому

      Unfortunately, it is not ignorance, it is corruption and ideology

  • @user-lb9jh4cd9o
    @user-lb9jh4cd9o 18 днів тому +9

    All government officials should be held accountable for misuse of power against the PEOPLE

  • @user-pe9ot6cy4s
    @user-pe9ot6cy4s 18 днів тому +1384

    Wow. Just wow. Sad to think I'm witnessing the moral and legal unraveling of the US Supreme Court in my generation. This court will be remembered as the most shameful in our nation's history.

    • @martystrickland9623
      @martystrickland9623 18 днів тому +71

      SAD😢😢😢😢

    • @darciereed9595
      @darciereed9595 18 днів тому +113

      Yes, it absolutely will! Never thought I'd see this happen in our country 💔

    • @Yahodie42
      @Yahodie42 18 днів тому

      Rea
      The unraveling of the Supreme Court? It’s been unraveling and becoming more corrupt every day for a long time. We are just now witnessing the seams of the corruption brake. Unfortunately it’s our democracy being broken for us to see these seams brake

    • @gabbargado6242
      @gabbargado6242 18 днів тому +107

      It's almost unreal to hear the ignorance of the law that these supreme court justices display.

    • @allonelife699
      @allonelife699 18 днів тому

      Maybe this court will not be remembered "as the most shameful in our nations history". The victors will write the history. Before we know it our democracy can be lost.

  • @lisamunroe7179
    @lisamunroe7179 18 днів тому +138

    No sexual assaulters should ever be given positions of power. Ever! How can anyone trust a judge who can't even keep their hands to themselves?!

    • @pperk1219
      @pperk1219 18 днів тому +23

      Bye, then, Thomas and Kavanaugh

    • @zxy78267
      @zxy78267 18 днів тому +9

      ​@@pperk1219I was going to say the same thing.

  • @frankssandrie3051
    @frankssandrie3051 18 днів тому +9

    Judge luttig we hope you can help this country by telling us the way the constitution was written and supposed to be followed ❤❤

  • @brt432
    @brt432 18 днів тому +12

    A supreme court justice should be elected by the people... Not appointed by a single person/president !!!... And they should also have term limits !!!

  • @MO-1888
    @MO-1888 18 днів тому +360

    Why isn’t Judge Luttig a member of the Supreme Court….. he clearly should be!

    • @user-wb3es8hz1d
      @user-wb3es8hz1d 18 днів тому +27

      Thankfully, Judge Luttig is willing to be one anyway in this important manner by helping us all to better understand the correct meanings of our laws.

    • @tinasepulveda1895
      @tinasepulveda1895 18 днів тому +10

      @M0-1888, EXACTLY

    • @andyg9991
      @andyg9991 18 днів тому +36

      Because he obviously cant be bought!

    • @markstephenson6952
      @markstephenson6952 18 днів тому

      Judge Luttig is EXACTLY who should be on the Supreme Court. He is not because RepubliQans only pick RepubliQans who will promote RepubliQan.

    • @sylvesterwilliams1931
      @sylvesterwilliams1931 18 днів тому

      Because he doesn’t know what the F he’s talking about and a corrupt traitor himself.

  • @PKing-px5dg
    @PKing-px5dg 18 днів тому +171

    The question before the Supreme Court is: Do we have a King or not? It's not that hard!

    • @Arealist763
      @Arealist763 18 днів тому +3

      That's the first question. The second is whether it should define the scope and extent of any immunity or leave it to a lower court. Thus the debate. This case is more than about trump. If presidents have no immunity then you can bet that many decision makers are in criminal jeopardy.

    • @deanmoulton8994
      @deanmoulton8994 18 днів тому +4

      @@Arealist763 Future Faking is not relevant to this case. The US justice system "claims" to be based in fact. Fact is not a belief in what will happen in the future, it is what has already happened. Your belief that the powerful will not get adequate representation in our justice system, is not based in fact.

    • @Arealist763
      @Arealist763 18 днів тому +1

      @@deanmoulton8994 Sadly you don't seem to understand the reasoning behind the appellate system. Appeals rarely succeed on the basis of factual evidence. It's normally about key legal principles.

    • @gardens4good
      @gardens4good 18 днів тому +1

      They want to rule we have a demi-king, both suck.

    • @deanmoulton8994
      @deanmoulton8994 18 днів тому +2

      @@Arealist763 My statement is that at all levels of the US justice system the powerful have adequate representation. Understand?

  • @faithprentice7797
    @faithprentice7797 18 днів тому +13

    Pardoning yourself secretly is the same as declassifying by thinking it. Nonsense!

  • @user-ir4wp2iv9f
    @user-ir4wp2iv9f 18 днів тому +14

    It's just so hard to listen to the Supreme Court.

  • @patokeefe5306
    @patokeefe5306 18 днів тому +366

    This disgraceful legacy is what these judges are leaving... The supreme Court should be holding up our law and constitution... This is disturbing and the people of the United States better think real hard when they vote..

    • @lynnebarrett9912
      @lynnebarrett9912 18 днів тому

      It won't change anything. Unless President Biden fills the court with the rest of the District Courts or wherever they come from.

    • @tinasepulveda1895
      @tinasepulveda1895 18 днів тому +12

      EXACTLY

    • @tinasepulveda1895
      @tinasepulveda1895 18 днів тому

      EXACTLY as The SCOTUS needs term limits NOW

    • @francisbellanger6608
      @francisbellanger6608 18 днів тому

      This is akin to a Legal Coup arrangement between a former President and his own Personally Corrupted Supreme Court ?

    • @melissarenninger5321
      @melissarenninger5321 18 днів тому +14

      It's a famn shame WE THE PEOPLE can't vote in the Supreme Court justices ourselves. Clarence Thomas should be removed immediately. The same for Amy Coney Barrett and Brett Cavanaugh. Trump appointed 2 of the 3 and I'm sure they're paying him back for this cushy appointment.

  • @idw9159
    @idw9159 18 днів тому +102

    the major question for supreme court is when is the DoJ going to indict their corrupt asses?

    • @annieclaire2348
      @annieclaire2348 18 днів тому +4

      Isn’t that the role of congress?

    • @Scott_works
      @Scott_works 18 днів тому

      @@annieclaire2348 Sadly, it is. We'll have to wait for the current Republicans don't have the majority. I wonder why they can't use the 14th Amendment against them, to prevent them from re-election?

    • @lisanunlist9510
      @lisanunlist9510 18 днів тому

      FYI: tautology means redundancy; saying the same thing twice but in a different way (like I just did) 😉

  • @Cool5380
    @Cool5380 18 днів тому +10

    The judges in this court should be forced to retire asap!

  • @annedebrams007
    @annedebrams007 18 днів тому +6

    Thanks for Supreme clarity on this issue Judge Luttig 'shout it from the rooftops' !!

  • @reddrockingeezer
    @reddrockingeezer 18 днів тому +76

    Why can't the Justice Department use Judge Luttig to make these arguments before the Supreme Court? His logic is indisputable.

    • @phylis3917
      @phylis3917 18 днів тому +3

      100 years from now perhaps. Society not sophisticated enough.

    • @murraydonald1497
      @murraydonald1497 18 днів тому +9

      He did submit an amicus brief

    • @geraldmiller5260
      @geraldmiller5260 17 днів тому

      Because Milquetoast Merrick Garland is in charge.

  • @carleenmulloy481
    @carleenmulloy481 18 днів тому +126

    I want all these judges impeached

    • @tinasepulveda1895
      @tinasepulveda1895 18 днів тому

      @carleenmulloy481, EXACTLY as the SCOTUS needs to be FIRED especially Clarence Thomas

    • @user-pw7bs8zg3w
      @user-pw7bs8zg3w 18 днів тому +9

      They should be impeached, these are high crimes and should be treated as such. These justices should be charged with aiding an insurrection, interfering in legal proceedings and obstruction.

    • @vcb1023
      @vcb1023 18 днів тому

      No no! Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson still has integrity and knowledge of the law. tRump's picks are TRASH!

    • @user-cz5lj2vx1f
      @user-cz5lj2vx1f 18 днів тому

      Correction: all the MALE judges impeached. The WOMEN n the court--even Coney Barret--upheld the Constitution

  • @robertwhyte3435
    @robertwhyte3435 18 днів тому +7

    Only a lawless Supreme Court Justice would make that statement.

  • @wolfstar_productions
    @wolfstar_productions 17 днів тому +3

    This should have never NEVER been accepted by this Court.

  • @blueberry-ri7eb
    @blueberry-ri7eb 18 днів тому +68

    Astoundingly shameful the tortured reasoning trying to avoid the actual case. Thank you judge Luttig for your input.

  • @drindabell3350
    @drindabell3350 18 днів тому +177

    My God. I am shocked at not only Chief Justice contempt for the constitution, democracy, and American citizens, but his total lack of rational thought processes. Yes remove all male Justices for their inept, idiocy!

    • @annieclaire2348
      @annieclaire2348 18 днів тому +9

      Absolutely agree!👍🏼 💙🌊💙🌊💙🌊

    • @tinasepulveda1895
      @tinasepulveda1895 18 днів тому +6

      ​@@annieclaire2348EXACTLY

    • @tinasepulveda1895
      @tinasepulveda1895 18 днів тому +6

      @drindabell3350, so am I. It's disgusting 🤢

    • @kojoefante
      @kojoefante 18 днів тому

      You must be slow except there are females there, there are many female
      Republicans do we remove them to or you’re just sexist?

    • @lourdeskrohn5087
      @lourdeskrohn5087 18 днів тому +3

      We must call and demand Roberts and all that help Trump to be impeached and removed.

  • @jamesfelix9911
    @jamesfelix9911 18 днів тому +8

    The greatest question still unanswered in this case is; why Justice Thomas sitting in this Jan. 6 case which his wife was also involved?. American Judicial system is a failure.

  • @lynnjudd9036
    @lynnjudd9036 18 днів тому +5

    We need a Supreme Court that doesn't continually "beat around the bush " but follows the law.

  • @user-vz7wy9rr9i
    @user-vz7wy9rr9i 18 днів тому +83

    How far will these people go to crown King Trump.

    • @TheMazeCraze64
      @TheMazeCraze64 18 днів тому +15

      As far as the Heritage Foundation's bank account will take them. DT is just their tool.

    • @johnandrews2768
      @johnandrews2768 18 днів тому +13

      Until they are stopped

    • @yvonnecook8635
      @yvonnecook8635 18 днів тому +13

      As far as the American people will let him. Up to you guys to vote blue

    • @annieclaire2348
      @annieclaire2348 18 днів тому +5

      @@TheMazeCraze64 - exactly!

    • @marianmartinez1494
      @marianmartinez1494 18 днів тому +2

      Humpty Trumpty!!!👑💩

  • @anne-marieparker2137
    @anne-marieparker2137 18 днів тому +126

    Question- is Supreme Court going to save democracy or corruption.??

    • @1927su
      @1927su 18 днів тому +21

      No, WE THE PEOPLE are by voting for DEMOCRACY in November 2024.

    • @TheMazeCraze64
      @TheMazeCraze64 18 днів тому +12

      We the people don't get to elect the SCOTUS! Unfortunately.

    • @eachlovediva
      @eachlovediva 18 днів тому

      I don’t trust people to do the research and learn the facts instead of conspiracy theories and lies that they call alternative “facts”. They’ll vote for a populist demagogue on grievances, nonexistent religious persecution, cruelty and greed. Unfortunately the consequences will be brutal as rights and freedoms will be lost to everyone but the ultra rich. When these idiots finally figure out the truth, do we leave or start a deadly revolution against a dictator? How about voting for Biden and Democrats to skip the dictatorship and pass legislation to fix the problems.

    • @annieclaire2348
      @annieclaire2348 18 днів тому +16

      @@TheMazeCraze64 - actually by enough people getting out and voting for democracy-loving candidates, voters CAN have some impact on who is appointed to SCOTUS

  • @JW-jl8iq
    @JW-jl8iq 18 днів тому +4

    The supreme being court must be expelled

  • @kinesta
    @kinesta 18 днів тому +684

    What the actual F man. The supreme Court needs to be removed if this decision makes a king

    • @larryjones9773
      @larryjones9773 18 днів тому +66

      Well said. Kings or Queens aren't allowed in this country.

    • @brianpowell6058
      @brianpowell6058 18 днів тому

      If this supreme court does make trump King they will be removed, by the King they'll have made. No dictator has a supreme court or a strong judiciary.

    • @tammymiller9773
      @tammymiller9773 18 днів тому +15

      Don't worry. If we are cursed with a king, we won't have ..🤮

    • @CarlWithACamera
      @CarlWithACamera 18 днів тому

      Oh, they will be removed. If they think they will survive Trump as dictator they are more delusional than we already know them to be.

    • @dwainmcwilliams2043
      @dwainmcwilliams2043 18 днів тому

      They are just stalling, in the hope Trump can actually steal the 2024 election.

  • @annieclaire2348
    @annieclaire2348 18 днів тому +351

    Thank you so much for speaking so strongly Judge Luttig. We need to hold the feet of the far-right wing male and single far-right wing female justices of the SCOTUS to the fire of law and justice based on the Constitution. I was so shocked the first time to hear the Chief Justice make his appalling comments about Grand Juries as it reveals his utter contempt for the average American citizen.

    • @larryjones9773
      @larryjones9773 18 днів тому

      We need to charge the Supreme Court with treason. They are trying to install a King.

    • @billrobbins5874
      @billrobbins5874 18 днів тому

      Base it on the laws and the Constitution. 60 court cases by lawyers on behalf of trump for election fraud. All dismissed no evidence.

    • @SurprisedBuffalo-ug3rf
      @SurprisedBuffalo-ug3rf 18 днів тому +14

      Agree!!!

    • @susanzemke6569
      @susanzemke6569 18 днів тому +8

      Include Coney Barrett in this.

    • @Canuckmom128
      @Canuckmom128 18 днів тому

      Very well said, except Coney-Handmaid-Barrett is knee deep in this corrupt cabal, too. Ya…when J. Michael Luttig tells you - you done messed up - then you’ve messed up. Good Gawd…the NERVE of Roberts and his distain for Grand Juries. WOW.

  • @lianajackson2932
    @lianajackson2932 18 днів тому +2

    The people of the USA should be able to vote crooked scotus out

  • @gohboon7525
    @gohboon7525 18 днів тому +126

    Send the corrupt chief back to the lower court. He’s DISGRACEFUL.

    • @tammyc5511
      @tammyc5511 18 днів тому +8

      He should be sent back to lower court, he should be removed from any court

    • @vjcush
      @vjcush 18 днів тому +2

      👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻!!
      I Totally Agree With You!!
      👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻!!

    • @djdahl9035
      @djdahl9035 18 днів тому

      Ignorant Dems interest rate over 7% and still too dumb to understand we are on the wrong track, let us see when the economy totally crashes this summer if they finally (30% LOL) get smarter.

    • @bonnieprice9482
      @bonnieprice9482 18 днів тому +1

      Senator whitehouse is working on this !

  • @elaineisabelle427
    @elaineisabelle427 18 днів тому +21

    Thank you Judge Luttig, we appreciate all you do. It's a shame your not on the bench, I'm guessing you weren't corrupt enough. Thank God

    • @ln8116
      @ln8116 18 днів тому +2

      He is too honest to be a supremely corrupt court justice.

  • @user-ty1wm3cn7n
    @user-ty1wm3cn7n 17 днів тому +1

    They will NEVER SIMPLY SEND ‘IT’ back TO THE APPEALS COURT. NeverNeverNeverNever #MarkMyWords BetMeBetMe😡

  • @SharonNovak
    @SharonNovak 18 днів тому +1

    Put judge Luttig on the Supreme Court

  • @user-sq7nk9us6f
    @user-sq7nk9us6f 18 днів тому +94

    Just imagine having Supreme Court Justices who do recognise or even believe in the law, let alone the Constitution. WOW!!!

    • @wally3586
      @wally3586 18 днів тому +3

      At this point we would 'have' to imagine...

  • @user-lf3eg5yi9o
    @user-lf3eg5yi9o 18 днів тому +109

    This is effing nut WHY ARE WE EVEN ARGUING THIS. IT'S IN THE CONSTITUTION

    • @TheMazeCraze64
      @TheMazeCraze64 18 днів тому

      Sickening Kavanaugh is weighingl in on the person that pushed him through what, a one or two day FBI investigation passing up 3,500 plus leads that could have quashed his confirmation. 🤮

    • @annieclaire2348
      @annieclaire2348 18 днів тому +6

      It’s the fact that immunity is NOT in the constitution and never should be isn’t it?

    • @mikemiller3069
      @mikemiller3069 18 днів тому

      Apparently, several members of the SC haven't READ the Constitution.

    • @Scott_works
      @Scott_works 18 днів тому +3

      The issue is a no brainer. But look at these justices doing contortions and using ,"magic words" to try to reason their way around it.

    • @johndigiacomo1674
      @johndigiacomo1674 17 днів тому +1

      @Scott_works, these justices just "legislated" around the Fourteenth Amendment. ANY court in the land had not just the right, but duty to uphold section three of the Fourteenth Amendment. It was clear, and every court was upheld in supporting Constitutional law until this court decided to overstep their bounds and legislate.

  • @DBRising
    @DBRising 17 днів тому

    Honorable Judge Luttig. America salutes and supports you. We need you on SCOTUS.

  • @user-zd2uv3ss9z
    @user-zd2uv3ss9z 2 дні тому

    If he didn’t know he was doing something wrong, Why did he attempt to HIDE IT???

  • @100-pc-notbot
    @100-pc-notbot 18 днів тому +42

    Really, Trump is arguing that he should have more power than even the British monarchs that the US founding fathers rebelled against?
    Mother goddess!

    • @annieclaire2348
      @annieclaire2348 18 днів тому

      And virtually every Monarchy in the Western World has no political or legislative role or authority whatsoever. They have all been set aside for the establishment of democracy. The only countries where there is a leader with total authority is where the leader is an authoritarian dictator.

  • @George-po3fx
    @George-po3fx 18 днів тому +28

    With a few exceptions, this is an Inferior Court.
    What a Shame.

  • @ZACATCS
    @ZACATCS 18 днів тому +2

    Most of the Justices came to the Oral Arguments thinking of "Presidential versus Private" acts rather than "Lawful versus Unlawful."

  • @AWalkerbtweenworlds
    @AWalkerbtweenworlds 17 днів тому +1

    How on earth is the Chief Justice implying that a Federal prosecutor, Grand Jury, and Court of Appeals are dishonest and bringing a false case?! What planet are we on? Who *are* these people?😮😵

  • @TheJhndarwin
    @TheJhndarwin 18 днів тому +186

    To bad the supreme court doesn’t listen to this mans wealth of knowledge

    • @1927su
      @1927su 18 днів тому +10

      Exactly!

    • @charlesasmith7836
      @charlesasmith7836 18 днів тому +10

      Agree only trump's ignorance they listen too they such a total waste of time period 💯🙄

    • @mikemiller3069
      @mikemiller3069 18 днів тому

      They don't follow the Constitution so they're not going to feel constrained by any man's opinion. They operate as if they are untouchable which, unfortunately, they almost are.

    • @user-wb3es8hz1d
      @user-wb3es8hz1d 18 днів тому +4

      Thank God that Judge Luttig speaks up to correct the male justices on this particular SCOTUS. Almost certainly, we would never know their flaws and mistakes (intentional or otherwise?) without Judge Luttig.

    • @tinasepulveda1895
      @tinasepulveda1895 18 днів тому +1

      ​@@1927suAgreed

  • @ksibley7534
    @ksibley7534 18 днів тому +40

    I think our immune president should fire these justices and make new appointments.

  • @johnwoolard4599
    @johnwoolard4599 18 днів тому +4

    Roberts proves the problem with the legal system. He admits the process is bad, so they need to protect only one person from it. FIX THE LEGAL SYSTEM FOR ALL OF US!

  • @terribogan3676
    @terribogan3676 18 днів тому +1

    Put Luttig on the Supreme Court

  • @jkotsche7035
    @jkotsche7035 18 днів тому +24

    We have stepped through the looking glass with this Supreme Court.

  • @StacyInLove1
    @StacyInLove1 18 днів тому +24

    🥀 I am disgusted by our current MAGA SCOTUS

  • @sharonnicholson6377
    @sharonnicholson6377 4 дні тому

    Thank you for having this discussion with His Honor Luttig in support of what you have been saying along Popok.

  • @DeborahGee
    @DeborahGee 16 днів тому +1

    That was a great discussion with Judge Luttig. It’s a drag that he’s not on the Supreme Court because he clearly knows what he’s doing and those Justices don’t have the same kind of educational knowledge of the Constitution that Judge Luttig has.

  • @rogerkleemann1691
    @rogerkleemann1691 18 днів тому +20

    From Australia.
    Some members of the current Supreme Court will be judged harshly by history. Judge Luttig will be revered by history. In the here and now it is the likes of Judge Luttig who are making a valuable contribution towards the defence of the Republic and democracy. To say the judge has become a legend in his own life time is to underestimate his contribution. Thanks to Meidas for providing Judge Luttig with opportunities to share his opinions and wisdom.

    • @b.comeau2597
      @b.comeau2597 18 днів тому

      Excellently stated. Judge Luttig is brilliant and how sad that this esteemed man is not on the Supreme Court leading it.

  • @Alcagaur1
    @Alcagaur1 18 днів тому +15

    John Roberts seems to think he is safeguarding his place in history, instead of digging his grave across four dimensions.

    • @nicklazzaro5055
      @nicklazzaro5055 18 днів тому

      I say this ab Alito all the time... this guy seems to think he wants totally anarchy not realizing he will be one of the very first people dragged from his home and dangling in a tree.... little 5 ft nothing 70 yr old pos wants anarchy..... hes going to find out the very VERY hard way.

  • @TracyJustice-xd9ql
    @TracyJustice-xd9ql 18 днів тому +1

    He is being prosecuted because he's a criminal.

  • @martinandre9170
    @martinandre9170 12 днів тому

    People that's what you get with an illegitimate Supreme Court.

  • @lorettaberry415
    @lorettaberry415 18 днів тому +8

    I have lost respect for these Republican men of the Supreme Court Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court!

  • @luckylady123100
    @luckylady123100 18 днів тому +78

    There needs to be prosecution for rogue Judges.

  • @caryburns5509
    @caryburns5509 17 днів тому +1

    I'm so impressed with Judge Luttig!

  • @maureenoneill5754
    @maureenoneill5754 18 днів тому

    Never ever should a President be legally allowed to pardon themselves! WTAF Supreme Court????

  • @user-rz5di8fv9x
    @user-rz5di8fv9x 18 днів тому +53

    *Supreme Court Judges want to Self Govern - But Outside Committees need to Oversee them and there should be Term Limits with We The People - Voting them In or Out.*

  • @rjwoodscvi
    @rjwoodscvi 18 днів тому +50

    What ever happened to the rule that "ignorance is not a defense to breaking the law" that we've all
    been held to ?

    • @Traitorman.14.3
      @Traitorman.14.3 18 днів тому

      Two arguments.
      It is America. Ignorance is running rampant and is even supported and enhanced by the Republican party.
      And the number of laws in America is astonishing. Even to the point that some laws can be succesfully reneged by other laws.

    • @edwardgobbo9685
      @edwardgobbo9685 18 днів тому +3

      That only applies to the poor.

    • @rjwoodscvi
      @rjwoodscvi 18 днів тому +1

      "Agreed"

  • @lindablue7494
    @lindablue7494 16 днів тому +1

    Great interview Popok and Luttig. Two great minds regarding American, and Constituional Law.

  • @58nomad
    @58nomad 18 днів тому +1

    Our Supreme Court is not so Supreme anymore.

  • @pellestorck3776
    @pellestorck3776 18 днів тому +192

    If this is the case we can't prosecute any criminals. This is the sole purpose of having a legal system.

  • @benjaminstubblefield2637
    @benjaminstubblefield2637 18 днів тому +41

    Thank goodness there are still judges like Judge Luttig, who remember that the Constitution is interpreted by The Supreme Court, and you don’t reach the Supreme Court, and start making up decisions!

  • @golfkitchen4941
    @golfkitchen4941 18 днів тому +1

    What is the point of a Supreme Court if a president can choose to be lawless?

  • @kathrynchase4795
    @kathrynchase4795 17 днів тому +1

    The new name for the Supreme Court should be the Obscene Court.

    • @davegreene8588
      @davegreene8588 17 днів тому

      They certainly qualify as Supremely Obscene, as well as Stunningly Stupid.

  • @addywick8941
    @addywick8941 18 днів тому +27

    I feel like I'm living in between the Twilight Zone and 1984!!!

    • @Canuckmom128
      @Canuckmom128 18 днів тому

      Failure is NOT an option, folks. It’s Democracy and Progress with President Biden, or Nazi Germany meets The Handmaid’s Tale with Criminal Defendant Trump (and his corrupt SCOTUS).
      VOTE BLUE
      ✊🏼⚖️🗳️🌊🌊🌊🗳️⚖️✊🏾

  • @wayneraven4047
    @wayneraven4047 18 днів тому +28

    Are these Supreme Court Judges of the real world? Not to me, can't they see the big picture, it's Absurd.