Ex-Federal Prosecutor EXPOSES Supreme Court’s Plan in Trump Immunity Case

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 кві 2024
  • Former Federal Prosecutor Shan Wu reacts to oral arguments held at the Supreme Court of the United States, and why the final court's decision may result in the eventual delay that Trump was aiming for.
    Visit meidastouch.com for more!
    Support the MeidasTouch Network: / meidastouch
    Add the MeidasTouch Podcast: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
    Buy MeidasTouch Merch: store.meidastouch.com
    Follow MeidasTouch on Twitter: / meidastouch
    Follow MeidasTouch on Facebook: / meidastouch
    Follow MeidasTouch on Instagram: / meidastouch
    Follow MeidasTouch on TikTok: / meidastouch

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,2 тис.

  • @KetchupVonGrippo
    @KetchupVonGrippo Місяць тому +864

    A conman, a thief, and a rapist walk into a bar. The bartender says, "What'll it be Mr. Trump?"

    • @Doctator1976
      @Doctator1976 Місяць тому +8

      I knew this story with a toddler with these 3

    • @Jared-Hoffman1980s
      @Jared-Hoffman1980s Місяць тому +42

      😂 that’s good, but you forgot traitor also.

    • @thesoundsmith
      @thesoundsmith Місяць тому +52

      The bartender - big guy, strong guy, huge hands - comes up to me, tears in his eyes, and says, "We'll need to see cash in advance,..." 😑

    • @KetchupVonGrippo
      @KetchupVonGrippo Місяць тому +16

      @@thesoundsmith that's good! 😆

    • @cynthiadavis3102
      @cynthiadavis3102 Місяць тому +17

      ​@@thesoundsmith hahaha! Perfect!!

  • @davecarew1116
    @davecarew1116 Місяць тому +413

    Thank you so much, Shan. The "Supreme" Court even TAKING this case is one of the greatest disgraces in American history.

    • @trishabaran1521
      @trishabaran1521 Місяць тому +25

      Yes it is !
      I feel like little t. Has a lot of them in his back pocket! 🤮🤮🤮
      Know respect here!
      I’m voting blue 💙 💯 all the way!

    • @katiehettinger7857
      @katiehettinger7857 Місяць тому +12

      ​@@trishabaran1521Trump doesn't, the Harlan Crows of the world do.

    • @flowers6576
      @flowers6576 Місяць тому +11

      ​@@katiehettinger7857 and Leonard Leo & his coherts.

    • @poigmhahon
      @poigmhahon Місяць тому +24

      In fact, the Supreme Court didn't agree to take on this question, they inserted themselves after the fact....making their inauspicious interruption in the justice process that much more egregious In the wake of Justice improprieties on their part, questionable rulings that fly in the face of existing jurisprudence, this court has made a mockery of citizen representation.

    • @muskyoxes
      @muskyoxes Місяць тому +13

      We were told that the appellate court spent so much time crafting such a long thorough demolition of trump's position that it made it appeal proof. Seems kinda silly now.

  • @ianmontgomery1123
    @ianmontgomery1123 Місяць тому +83

    How do we, the people, initiate a vote of no confidence against the Supreme Court?

    • @user-bj7ch7dv8i
      @user-bj7ch7dv8i Місяць тому +7

      In November vote Blue straight down the ballot and give Trump, The Supreme Court, and Republicans the Middle Finger

    • @Tully241
      @Tully241 Місяць тому

      ​@@user-bj7ch7dv8i I'll start right now 🖕

    • @jeffcd3559
      @jeffcd3559 Місяць тому +1

      Historically there has only ever been one way of addressing people who have absolute power who become corrupt...

    • @Tully241
      @Tully241 Місяць тому

      @@jeffcd3559 And what way is that? I'm listening.

    • @jeffcd3559
      @jeffcd3559 29 днів тому +2

      I was being discreet but the point isn't subtle. Those whose corruption warrants a remedy by laws but to whom no laws apply, can only be remedied by means outside the law. I leave you to your imagination though as I said, just look to history for useful examples.

  • @testboga5991
    @testboga5991 Місяць тому +17

    If the founders wanted immunity, they'd put it in. Creating this immunity thing will break America.

    • @user-hk5wu7pm6o
      @user-hk5wu7pm6o 24 дні тому

      Yes it is not there job to create the constitution but interpret what it says. Congress can deal with an amendment. Just interpret what is there. How about we consider rape. We know he is capable of that. If they want to wait till he loses the election. And this time the national guard will be there.. I think they called that a King.

  • @sinebar
    @sinebar Місяць тому +830

    Trump isn't claiming he's innocent. He's claiming he has the right to be a criminal.

    • @bob1505
      @bob1505 Місяць тому +30

      Isn't he claiming the right to commit these acts? In other words, he's not a criminal because the Supreme Court said it isn't illegal. There's a difference. This would be the investiture of an American king.

    • @bob_atwestmi_fl_us7812
      @bob_atwestmi_fl_us7812 Місяць тому +15

      Thats just about it.

    • @Mark_C1
      @Mark_C1 Місяць тому +26

      All just sounds like trying to argue with a toddler. Does it not ?

    • @doc2log
      @doc2log Місяць тому +10

      ​@@bob1505 Still a crime.

    • @DeepSeeBlue3636
      @DeepSeeBlue3636 Місяць тому +12

      @@Mark_C1worse, a person who thinks it’s in his right to own the country and everyone in it. Well, in some ways maybe it’s the same thing 😏

  • @PKing-px5dg
    @PKing-px5dg Місяць тому +223

    A Supreme Court enabling an Insurrectionist should be removed immediately per the 14th Amendment, then referred to the DOJ for charges! Period!

    • @trishabaran1521
      @trishabaran1521 Місяць тому +19

      I totally agree 💯
      Vote blue 💙

    • @flowers6576
      @flowers6576 Місяць тому +11

      💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯!!!

    • @JoeLene_
      @JoeLene_ Місяць тому +6

      In a perfect world! I agree!

    • @Simspop600
      @Simspop600 Місяць тому +7

      Absolutely!

    • @lidelloste3317
      @lidelloste3317 Місяць тому +3

      Your lips to God's ears. If there is one. Which I seriously doubt

  • @colcha
    @colcha Місяць тому +56

    Immunity from committing crimes is insane.

    • @wesleygordon1645
      @wesleygordon1645 Місяць тому +1

      As long as you are a criminal?

    • @calvinheinz4635
      @calvinheinz4635 Місяць тому

      ​@@wesleygordon1645big fan of fake elector schemes I take it?

    • @Angela-nc9gr
      @Angela-nc9gr Місяць тому

      These people are criminals alongside him 80⁰ people been arrested charged for their parts he nothing but a man that rasit

    • @TheresaGonzalez-qw3nm
      @TheresaGonzalez-qw3nm Місяць тому

      I agree. Joe Biden should be prosecuted for ALL the classified documents he had scattered all over the country. And the dirty little deals he and his meth addict son were doing with other countries. Probably selling all the info in those classified documents

  • @josefelix6644
    @josefelix6644 Місяць тому +9

    "Those who will not reason, are bigots, those who cannot, are fools, and those who dare not, are slaves."
    - Lord Byron

  • @TRE45ON.is.Bat5hit.Crazy.U.S.G
    @TRE45ON.is.Bat5hit.Crazy.U.S.G Місяць тому +679

    The court doesn’t need to agree with Trump’s crazy theory. They only need to give him time which is exactly what they did. We the people need to do the right thing and vote against Trump in November.

    • @CaptainCologne
      @CaptainCologne Місяць тому

      Agreed. They’re all trying to appear scholarly and dignified as they put their thumb up their ass.

    • @lisawall9068
      @lisawall9068 Місяць тому +59

      Vote Blue for Democracy up and down the ticket until the magas are no longer a threat.

    • @maricruzsolis8630
      @maricruzsolis8630 Місяць тому +1

      It's often said let the people decide. Well we did, what did we see? An attempted failed coup. When Republicans and Maga Republicans say, let the people decide; they mean only them.

    • @kdawson020279
      @kdawson020279 Місяць тому +29

      Justice Barrett seemed at least completely unimpressed. I think Kavanaugh is on the fence. Alito and Thomas have no respect for the Constitution. Gorsuch only does some of the time. Roberts is just trying not to decide this case in a meaningful way.

    • @docmupsy
      @docmupsy Місяць тому +42

      Let's add 4 more judges to the supremes

  • @eisande6237
    @eisande6237 Місяць тому +118

    We shouldn’t even be HAVING this idiotic conversation!!! 😤

    • @rb5825
      @rb5825 Місяць тому

      Wouldn’t be were it not for the swamp which Trump is inadvertently draining! 😂
      WHO knew how deep & wide that swamp would turn out to be? WOW!
      TRUMP🇺🇸2024
      MAGA❗️🔥🙏🏻
      GOD BLESS AMERICA!

    • @wesleygordon1645
      @wesleygordon1645 Місяць тому

      @@rb5825 Good point! True Amedricans want Trump to drain the swamp!!

    • @davidanderson2285
      @davidanderson2285 Місяць тому

      @@rb5825 Aaa

    • @Looneybob1
      @Looneybob1 Місяць тому

      ​@@rb5825ROFLMAO. Nope. REAL Americans fired him, and REAL Americans will keep him out.. tRump for 20-24 years in jail.

    • @MarsHalekGuitar
      @MarsHalekGuitar Місяць тому

      ​@@wesleygordon1645By removing his own fat butt from the drain. He is the drain clog and the swamp monster-in-chief, the one power he has managed to retain as ex-president.

  • @johnburgess951
    @johnburgess951 Місяць тому +24

    Does the supreme court want everyone to forget Jan'6, they've discussed everything and Jan'6 hasn't been mentioned?

    • @Sirrus-Adam
      @Sirrus-Adam Місяць тому

      That's because Ginny Thomas was a participant in J6... It's CYA time.

    • @arnoldlinder8736
      @arnoldlinder8736 Місяць тому

      Because Jan 6 was a nothing burger. Quit gaslighting that same lie and learn what is really going on.

    • @sydney.g.sloangammagee8181
      @sydney.g.sloangammagee8181 Місяць тому

      Did any of you see the movie with Gerard Butler, OLYMPUS HAS FALLEN?
      THAT made America look strong despite overwhelming forces . . . as compared to American Citizens in the nations capital to attend an inaugural ball wearing high heels & M A G A hats . . . Pathetically weak!!

  • @davidgoff357
    @davidgoff357 Місяць тому +5

    Sounds like a few judges need to be in prison beside Trump.

  • @markg.7865
    @markg.7865 Місяць тому +424

    This right-wing court has already given him what he wants...delay. Clarence Thomas has no business deciding this case.

    • @dianegreen1937
      @dianegreen1937 Місяць тому +27

      I can't stand him.🤷🏾‍♀️

    • @nicnic1981
      @nicnic1981 Місяць тому

      Impeach Clarence Thomas - more than enough evidence

    • @Al-oe8ib
      @Al-oe8ib Місяць тому +10

      Clarence has been a very naughty boy obviously. He is not allowed to recuse himself

    • @christophertiredofbs8514
      @christophertiredofbs8514 Місяць тому +1

      Yup
      NAZI SUPREME CORRUP COURT

    • @zibbielanham
      @zibbielanham Місяць тому

      So, we have time to try and Oust an obviously criminal justice, perhaps before tDump comes back for more goodies. At this point, we have zero confidence in this court having any consideration for the People-- does this not make them Irrelevant? Too many have Personal beliefs that depart from equal justice and protection-- they have their Own motives, and justice for Us is decaying.

  • @daniellecowley7922
    @daniellecowley7922 Місяць тому +54

    WE LEFT A KING The founders would die before they would give one man absolute power

    • @thelakeman5207
      @thelakeman5207 Місяць тому +3

      We need a bipartisan group that will oversee the Supreme Court decisions that will actually obey the Constitution. If it contradicts the Constitution, reject it.

    • @benotisanchez5583
      @benotisanchez5583 Місяць тому

      Trump could have be impeached and removed. He doesn't have absolute power. Stop lying.

  • @RobertColyer-co1nu
    @RobertColyer-co1nu Місяць тому +26

    Holding our President's accountable is what separates America from Russia, China, and North Korea

  • @dj1211
    @dj1211 Місяць тому +10

    Thank you, Shan, your contribution to Meidas Touch is well appreciated!

  • @user-ez5fw4cj3q
    @user-ez5fw4cj3q Місяць тому +269

    If he gets what he wants he will dismantle the Supreme Court as well.

    • @invadersin5203
      @invadersin5203 Місяць тому +1

      There will be no need for SCOTUS, Senate or Congress.
      But also, if he rips up the constitution, does that mean USA isnt the USA anymore? (Im not a US citizen).

    • @cg6348
      @cg6348 Місяць тому +38

      He kinda already did.

    • @CaptainCologne
      @CaptainCologne Місяць тому +19

      Only the ones who cross him.

    • @rhondajones4007
      @rhondajones4007 Місяць тому +22

      That’s why we need to vote 💙💙💙 all the way down the ballot!

    • @twistoffate4791
      @twistoffate4791 Місяць тому +1

      We cannot count on the Dishonorable United States Supreme Court. We have to vote True Blue like our lives depend upon it, because it does. I am frightened beyond belief.

  • @mikeoxbig7931
    @mikeoxbig7931 Місяць тому +172

    Remember when previous former presidents argued in court that they had the right to off a political opponent and be immune from prosecution? No? Me neither.

    • @user-vk9dz4zq6u
      @user-vk9dz4zq6u Місяць тому

      Do you remember when Clinton paid off women so it would not make him look bad? Pepperidge farm remembers.

    • @Sisterchatter
      @Sisterchatter Місяць тому +1

    • @oystercatcher943
      @oystercatcher943 Місяць тому +1

      Remember when former presidents complained of the chilling effect of potential prosecution meaning they couldn’t do their job?

    • @Peter-cn4hm
      @Peter-cn4hm Місяць тому

      If those former presidents were not immune to prosecution, why does Trump think he should be?
      If they rule that Trump is immune to prosecution, you’ll have Civil war in the Unites States. Trump
      needs to be locked up for a minimum of 25 years with no parole. Then he’ll have lots of time to get
      his act together and learn the hard way, that crime does not pay off.

    • @Hammerhandforge-fb9cz
      @Hammerhandforge-fb9cz Місяць тому

      @@oystercatcher943 Remember when former Presidents accepted the vote of the People, especially when they LOST and THAT meant they DIDN'T HAVE THE JOB ANYMORE??!!

  • @George.Q.Citizen
    @George.Q.Citizen Місяць тому +14

    “Official” vs “private” is a red herring. The President’s OFFICIAL (article 2) responsibility is to uphold the law, meaning that-BY DEFINITION OF THE OFFICE-criminal activity is NOT official!

    • @stanpetta9089
      @stanpetta9089 Місяць тому

      What illegal actions do we the people condone?

  • @leber99
    @leber99 Місяць тому +11

    They are trying to make something so ridiculous legitimate. Based on all the legal actions against him past behavior and current. There should be no question regarding this. Every justice who sides with this should be removed.

    • @arnoldlinder8736
      @arnoldlinder8736 Місяць тому

      Well it wouldn't be happening if the Democrats didn't gaslight an insurrection and say it was Trump's fault when he said go and peacefully protest.

    • @maryprater7693
      @maryprater7693 24 дні тому

      ABSOLUTELY!!!

  • @nicnic1981
    @nicnic1981 Місяць тому +57

    "Justice too long delayed is justice denied" MLK

    • @user-cv7sj6yc4t
      @user-cv7sj6yc4t Місяць тому

      DR KING WOULD BE ASHAMED OF WHAT IS HAPPENING IN COLLEGE CAMPUS AND WORK FORCE. PEOPLE NOT WORKING.

    • @nicnic1981
      @nicnic1981 Місяць тому +1

      @@user-cv7sj6yc4t Struggling to understand your point here.

  • @user-lc4qe4gr7k
    @user-lc4qe4gr7k Місяць тому +67

    NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW. NO ONE.

  • @butterfly21375
    @butterfly21375 Місяць тому +9

    Is Supreme Court going save democracy or corruption.?

  • @buddhastaxi666
    @buddhastaxi666 Місяць тому +28

    An Elected official who did not get reelected cannot claim ignoring the election result to stay in office is an Official Duty.

    • @christophercook723
      @christophercook723 Місяць тому +1

      Had he finished his term though. Seems the years were up in the following January.

    • @buddhastaxi666
      @buddhastaxi666 21 день тому

      @@christophercook723 You can query the results, not claim victory, organise a riot and plot fake electors.
      Namely IGNORE the result by promoting falsehoods as Mitch MacDonnell said publicly.

  • @jegl1012
    @jegl1012 Місяць тому +29

    Not sure what annoys me more John Sauer’s voice, Sauer’s client or Sauer’s ridiculous immunity argument.

    • @charlesvorones3612
      @charlesvorones3612 Місяць тому +1

      Yes... look up the actor John Fiedler. Sauer is the harmless-looking wimp who is deceptively evil; and Fiedler, who played so many sneaky weasels, and a dead-ringer in looks AND VOICE, would've been perfect to play him.

  • @FrederickHopkins-xb6me
    @FrederickHopkins-xb6me Місяць тому +47

    I'm worried about giving a convicted criminal the presidency, absolute immunity AND the nuclear football.

    • @jessicazellner7336
      @jessicazellner7336 Місяць тому +8

      I’m beyond worried! Makes me sick actually.

    • @anthonyelgin8653
      @anthonyelgin8653 Місяць тому

      It's not Trump but our enemies I worry about Trump going to spar them toward war,including Russia ,Saudi's ,China and even some of our friends..

    • @debrajonet1497
      @debrajonet1497 Місяць тому +1

      Dangerous business. He had already wanted to nuke Mexico while in office. He had to be talked out of it!

  • @user-oz6kv8ix7o
    @user-oz6kv8ix7o Місяць тому +4

    Shan, it is wonderful having you as a part of the Meidas Touch family.

  • @oystercatcher943
    @oystercatcher943 Місяць тому +5

    Brilliantly explained. Some justices so obviously tried NOT to get to the core of the argument. ‘Hide the ball’ is so apt. I was sick listening to this oral argument

  • @kdawson020279
    @kdawson020279 Місяць тому +130

    Judge Chutkin should just remand him pending trial for violating his pretrial conditions.

    • @doglvr7613
      @doglvr7613 Місяць тому +1

      Exactly. He just violated his pre-trial conditions by now being held in criminal contempt. He is now officially a criminal who broke New York laws so Chutkin should remain him into custody and jail him until the trial. We'll see how much delay he wants then. Actually, it's the same for every single criminal trial he has going on right now. He just broke his Pre-trial conditions in every single one of them. Anyone else in this cou try would be remanded to jail pending trial for each criminal trial he is facing.

    • @katiehettinger7857
      @katiehettinger7857 Місяць тому +6

      From your lips to God's ears.

    • @flowers6576
      @flowers6576 Місяць тому

      ​@@doglvr7613 💯!! 👍👍

    • @mickiepisces
      @mickiepisces Місяць тому

      Judge Chutkin already said Drumpf doesn't have immunity, She said that would make him a king, and we don't have Kings in the US. So it behooves me just Why would the SC remand the case back for Her to clarify, when she already stated her stance on the matter! Just waste of time to delay🤬

    • @johnscaramis2515
      @johnscaramis2515 Місяць тому +2

      @@katiehettinger7857 I'd rather have the words in judge Chutkin's ears...

  • @medic1073
    @medic1073 Місяць тому +175

    Cannon, McAfee and SCOTUS will continue to set new lows to help Trump delay delay delay but nothing makes Trump innocent.

  • @Luminaring
    @Luminaring Місяць тому +4

    This is a test of the supreme court allegiance... to one political party or the constitution.

  • @janebaldinger3137
    @janebaldinger3137 Місяць тому +5

    YES, THEY REFUSED, TO LOOK, AT THE FACTS, OF THE CASE

  • @TRE45ON.is.Bat5hit.Crazy.U.S.G
    @TRE45ON.is.Bat5hit.Crazy.U.S.G Місяць тому +308

    Let's take a moment to reflect on the former president's legal strategy. He's not saying he's innocent. He's not saying he didn't break the law. He's saying he can commit any crime he wants to because he has 'presidential immunity'

    • @SlightlySusan
      @SlightlySusan Місяць тому +24

      Since when is it the job of the president to break the law?

    • @Al-oe8ib
      @Al-oe8ib Місяць тому

      @@SlightlySusansince trump, a serial criminal, became potus

    • @thesoundsmith
      @thesoundsmith Місяць тому +27

      He is a professional con artist, running the scam of his life. He's immune from reason.

    • @mse150
      @mse150 Місяць тому +20

      Sounds like authoritarianism to me. Vote blue.

    • @phylis3917
      @phylis3917 Місяць тому +12

      His karma should arrive at year end 🧐. Aging poorly includes 🤥 .

  • @gregwalker6281
    @gregwalker6281 Місяць тому +49

    If our forefathers thought that there should be presidential immunity they wouldn't make the impeachment clause

    • @flowers6576
      @flowers6576 Місяць тому +10

      ...and the Founding Fathers would've put Presidental immunity into the Constitution if they thought Presidents should have it.

    • @Beitownit
      @Beitownit Місяць тому +4

      The founding fathers perhaps had much more faith in us than we deserve. Jeez, we sure have let them down.

  • @davidkoh7097
    @davidkoh7097 Місяць тому +4

    This clear and excellent explanation needs to be aired as widely and as often as possible to sound the alarm on the right wing cancer afflicting the Roberts Supreme Court.

  • @HM-zr3zd
    @HM-zr3zd Місяць тому +4

    Shan Wu, thanks for explaining - in plain language - the immunity argument and what the right wing of the court is trying to do.

  • @ksibley7534
    @ksibley7534 Місяць тому +39

    So the Supreme Court is participating in Election Interference!!!!

    • @loucrutchersmith7972
      @loucrutchersmith7972 Місяць тому

      Yes, they are purposely dragging this out so it won't be settled until after the election. Such a disgrace!

    • @rb5825
      @rb5825 Місяць тому +1

      Nope! They’re STOPPING it!

    • @TheEyeTeaMan
      @TheEyeTeaMan Місяць тому +1

      just like bush vs gore

    • @TheEyeTeaMan
      @TheEyeTeaMan Місяць тому

      @@rb5825 yep just like bush vs gore

  • @azizaibrahim1155
    @azizaibrahim1155 Місяць тому +101

    This whole issue is ridiculous !! It doesn’t matter if he were in office or out of office. A crime is still a crime and he should be held accountable !

    • @mickiepisces
      @mickiepisces Місяць тому +4

      Amen! 🙌

    • @johnscaramis2515
      @johnscaramis2515 Місяць тому +5

      Best thing: Trump is argueing that the immunity is not only for crimes during the presidency, but also for crimes before his presidency and after his presidency.

    • @thasandmanmorrison8469
      @thasandmanmorrison8469 Місяць тому

      @@johnscaramis2515 he has never said that. you are telling a lie.

    • @johnscaramis2515
      @johnscaramis2515 Місяць тому

      @@thasandmanmorrison8469 He may never said this directly, but based on what he does, he also expects to have absolute immunity for the things he has done before and after his presidency. Because... reasons.
      I am not lying, you are ignoring reality.

    • @thasandmanmorrison8469
      @thasandmanmorrison8469 Місяць тому

      @@johnscaramis2515 no, you are distorting what has been said. you are just making things up because you have not been keeping up with the court cases.
      get better informed

  • @cristinesaunders2428
    @cristinesaunders2428 Місяць тому +21

    I hope the Supreme Court judges see this video, and do the right thing. Trump must be held accountable for criminal actions! Jail him already!

    • @wwaldok
      @wwaldok Місяць тому

      Yes, then get Joe Biden, too! He’s next!

    • @danwaldis4553
      @danwaldis4553 Місяць тому +1

      @@wwaldok Go for it! But first, show us the mountains of evidence that you have! :) Or do you expect someone else to do the work while you sit around?

    • @rb5825
      @rb5825 Місяць тому

      Nope.

    • @rickythomas6593
      @rickythomas6593 Місяць тому

      Don't hold your breath 😂

    • @RobertMartin-vy8qc
      @RobertMartin-vy8qc Місяць тому

      You have to consider that Trump did not initiate the action. He is being reactive to what can only be considered election interference. However, setting parameters is not bad at this point because a criminal could work themselves into a position where the law needs to b set.

  • @saganworshipper6062
    @saganworshipper6062 Місяць тому +5

    "It is not the function of our government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error."
    US Supreme Court Justice
    Robert H. Jackson, 1950

    • @user-du9yr1tj4w
      @user-du9yr1tj4w Місяць тому

      And as a citizen tell me how we can correct a violation of my constituional right in a criminal case when after 20 years my charge is found to be a violation of my constitutional rights by both federal and state. Where are the attorneys that will look at the case and do justice by the law? I kept yelling 20 years ago and no one heard me now 20years later how is this justified by damages to me During this this 20 years when I have still have proof ignored.

  • @scooter2377
    @scooter2377 Місяць тому +111

    TRUMP FOR PRISON LOCK HIM UP

    • @giorgioarmmoney2558
      @giorgioarmmoney2558 Місяць тому +1

      God will let Satan to be free for a while... and many are enjoying it.

  • @stevenmcdowell7465
    @stevenmcdowell7465 Місяць тому +70

    Any ex-president with 4 indictments and 88 felonies on trial as a criminal defendant does not deserve immunity,the supreme court took the oath to uphold the law's of this country,not to uphold #45 and his crime's against this nation.

    • @Sadbuttrue-ThatSwedishGirl
      @Sadbuttrue-ThatSwedishGirl Місяць тому +3

      💯🎯

    • @user-hx2ve8sy6b
      @user-hx2ve8sy6b Місяць тому

      The conservative Justices believe they are supporting their cause, a permanent lock on political power. They seem to think that their allies will be able to control the attempt and the result of trying to reach that state of permanent power. Delusions. Millions of us are going to die as a result.

    • @fred_derf
      @fred_derf Місяць тому +1

      They were crossing their fingers when they took their oaths...

  • @guerosabroso
    @guerosabroso Місяць тому +2

    Term limits must be put on Supreme Court justices.

  • @mableleach5633
    @mableleach5633 Місяць тому +2

    The court needs to be changed. We need a non partial, honest court that upholds the law and the Constitution!

  • @jacobmeyers9161
    @jacobmeyers9161 Місяць тому +22

    The Supreme court is about to lose the last bits of credibility it has.

  • @BobPsomiadis
    @BobPsomiadis Місяць тому +85

    The president has to find a way to reform the SCOUS asap .It's gone rogue and acting like amateurs with the law .

    • @katiehettinger7857
      @katiehettinger7857 Місяць тому +8

      The duty to reforming the Supreme Court belongs to the people's representatives in Co gress. They can impeach justices or expand the Supreme Court, it was larger in the past, but to do so we need to elect a Democrat super majority in both Cham ers.

    • @anthonydelfino6171
      @anthonydelfino6171 Місяць тому +1

      @@katiehettinger7857 the president doesn't need congressional approval to expand the size of the court since the size of the court isn't a law or provision in the constitution limiting it to 9 justices. This is the same thing people have been saying for the past four years that Biden has an obligation to appoint at least 1 more if not 2 justices to address the political maneuvering by McConnell to steal seats on the court from Democratic presidents.
      But Biden is too much of an institutionalist to challenge the court like that.

    • @BobPsomiadis
      @BobPsomiadis Місяць тому

      @katiehettinger7857 No hope with Congress .The GOP is absolutely embarrassing to the USA .MAYBE AFTER NOVEMBER IF THE DEMOCRACTS CAPTURE EVERYTHING .

  • @raffinataonline
    @raffinataonline Місяць тому +4

    The Supreme Court had no business taking this case. Six of them just want to do Trump's bidding. Alito just seems like a criminal at this point. Thomas not much better. And then they left it to the last minute when they could have handled it in December...😠 Disgraceful and embarrassing.

  • @kathyd9324
    @kathyd9324 Місяць тому +2

    Trump's lawyer should be disbarred for malpractice of the law over his arguments on this.

  • @rogerpierce8200
    @rogerpierce8200 Місяць тому +49

    Time to get rid of the Supreme Court, they have no legitimacy.

    • @anthonydelfino6171
      @anthonydelfino6171 Місяць тому +3

      we do have a historical precedent in this country of ignoring the supreme court, it's perhaps something we need to remember we can do.
      the court has no teeth to enforce its own rulings

    • @Simspop600
      @Simspop600 Місяць тому +2

      Agree!

    • @johnscaramis2515
      @johnscaramis2515 Місяць тому +3

      Or introduce term limits. European countries have their judges at the Constitutional Court elected for 10-15 years, no re-election possible.
      So even if you have a judge doing bad work, the time is limited. Although I agree that even with 10-15 years, you can do more than enough damage.

    • @anthonydelfino6171
      @anthonydelfino6171 Місяць тому

      @@johnscaramis2515 term limits for court justices will be incredibly difficult since the constitution says they get lifetime appointments.
      Implementing a limit right now means a super majority of both houses of congress have to pass it as an amendment to the constitution as well as the amendment has to pass in at least 38 state legislatures. And with conservative justices being in the majority and their justices overall being young, republicans have every reason to oppose the amendment

    • @johnscaramis2515
      @johnscaramis2515 Місяць тому

      @@anthonydelfino6171 Not saying this is easy. Or even possible given the current MAGA GOP. But in the end you need something like that.
      Or assume the lifetime of a judge when the constitution was written, 1860 the mean lifetime was 39.4 years. Some people want that the constitution has to be followed word for word. Then also the boundary conditions when it was written have to be taken into account...

  • @cww4888
    @cww4888 Місяць тому +32

    If these justices don’t know the difference between official and private acts then they have absolutely NO BUSINESS being a judge on any level. Even a moron could tell you the difference. These justices are PLAYING BEING DUMB. My guess is that they can’t tell the difference between right and wrong either. Is this what they teach their own children. How pathetic.

    • @Simspop600
      @Simspop600 Місяць тому

      They are buying Trump the time to be reelected again! Is is sinful

    • @Beitownit
      @Beitownit Місяць тому +2

      The Court knows the difference and could decide this case tomorrow if it wanted, but they won't. The Court is methodical in how it acts; what they project publicly isn't necessarily what's being conveyed behind closed doors. This case poses more challenges to them than just the legal arguments, they realize this and they're going to give themselves an off ramp. The election looms large over them and this case only magnifies that a hundred fold and because it does they'll avoid having to make a decision before the election. They'll kick the case back down on remand and let the clock run out. They're using this case strategically to play both sides and for good reason, at least in their view.

  • @judymoolenschot5126
    @judymoolenschot5126 Місяць тому +1

    What I find so disgusting is the fact that SCOTUS can even argue against criminal justice

  • @rorober.1423
    @rorober.1423 Місяць тому +3

    ❤NO IMMUNITY‼ NO MISTRIAL‼
    No one is above the law

  • @craigm5713
    @craigm5713 Місяць тому +55

    Disappointed to be a guy atm. All the guys on the court acted like twats. All the women showed common sense. Women 1 Men 0.

    • @Hydrojn
      @Hydrojn Місяць тому +1

      They're rump lickers. 😛🤮🤧🤢 pres immunity= dictatorship. Duh

    • @lindaaphillippi7015
      @lindaaphillippi7015 Місяць тому

      I take offense to your use of the term “ twats”. That refers to a part of the female anatomy- thus “ demeaning” the men by calling them female-ish. You could have well said they acted like “ dicks”, another slang anatomical reference that would have been more apt. Other than that, I agree with your comment

  • @doc2log
    @doc2log Місяць тому +29

    How can a commander-in- chief commit crimes and be immune from criminal prosecution????

    • @christophercook723
      @christophercook723 Місяць тому

      Ask Obama. He committed Wilful Murder.

    • @christophercook723
      @christophercook723 Місяць тому

      Ask Obama . He committed Murder.

    • @jf4872
      @jf4872 Місяць тому

      What crime/s has he committed? Be specific. I'll give you a hint....

  • @stephenludlum9746
    @stephenludlum9746 Місяць тому +24

    This case does show the world how dangerous our conservative Supreme Court Justices are. These Justices and Trump should be locked up in prison for life.

  • @Foxwood1
    @Foxwood1 Місяць тому +2

    Time to expand the court.

  • @bobdillaber1195
    @bobdillaber1195 Місяць тому +59

    The only question the court should answer is:
    Is any person in this country not to be held responsible when they break the law?

  • @vickyhardina4865
    @vickyhardina4865 Місяць тому +17

    Team 6 being able to kill trumps enemies is frightening

    • @floodgatestudios1825
      @floodgatestudios1825 Місяць тому

      Well. Even if Trump should win the election, Biden is the President through January 2025 and if SCOTUS gives the Presidents office absolute immunity then Biden can have Trump executed and face no recourse

    • @markthomas919
      @markthomas919 Місяць тому

      Well that sword would cut two ways, got the number of the seal team? We have an orange problem

  • @winluben2909
    @winluben2909 Місяць тому +1

    What can we do about it?? The SCOTUS has gone rogue.

  • @aztec232
    @aztec232 Місяць тому +47

    What I want to know is how we can,specifically, impeach Thomas and Alito.

    • @WriterRachel
      @WriterRachel Місяць тому

      We need Biden to win, along with 60 Democratic senators & a Democratic majority in the House to IMPEACH corrupt Justices.

    • @kylesimmons3674
      @kylesimmons3674 Місяць тому +3

      Has to go through the house and senate

    • @patricial.6758
      @patricial.6758 Місяць тому +4

      Talk to your US Representative. The House is where it starts.

    • @hermantsoenyane1969
      @hermantsoenyane1969 Місяць тому

      The Republicans won't allow it, just like they wouldn't with Trump.

    • @flowers6576
      @flowers6576 Місяць тому +3

      ​@@hermantsoenyane1969 ...right now. But things could change if Biden wins reelection.

  • @renscience
    @renscience Місяць тому +35

    One of the main duties in article 2 is that the president shall uphold the laws of the US. Unlawful conduct in anyway of such laws violates this important duty. Case closed

  • @mifferss
    @mifferss Місяць тому +7

    This "Supreme" Court needs to be impeached then abolished and reappointed....taking this case is an embarrassment!

  • @joaquinvaldez-ne2kt
    @joaquinvaldez-ne2kt 28 днів тому +1

    So is it easy to break all the laws before you leave office to be safe from being prosecuted?

  • @1927su
    @1927su Місяць тому +51

    Who
    Holds the SCOTUS ACCOUNTABLE for unethical behavior/actions ??

    • @bobbart4198
      @bobbart4198 Місяць тому +5

      ... Nobody, and that is the biggest flaw in the system - that's ALSO why they need to be elected by the US voting public and have term limits ...

    • @danielhall3105
      @danielhall3105 Місяць тому +3

      @@bobbart4198 WRONG! Impeachment is the remedy for judges just as it is for the president. See Article II section 4, United States Constitution. "The President, Vice President and all Civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors." Judges are classified as Civil Officers of the United States.

    • @bobbart4198
      @bobbart4198 Місяць тому

      @@danielhall3105 ... And as we've seen in the Trump case - twice - impeachment DOESN'T work. There's only one way to control ANY group of Officials ... make them TEMPORARY ELECTED OFFICIALS - with SET TERM LIMITS.
      Only then are they truly by the people, for the people ! ... Don't forget that the Constitution belongs TO the people - ALL the People, not just the Special People, and the word " Amendment " MEANS Change for the Better.

    • @coldwarveteran4239
      @coldwarveteran4239 Місяць тому

      Impeachment is a political act, not a legal act. And Congress has proven many times they won’t make the hard decisions.

    • @joeseda8102
      @joeseda8102 Місяць тому

      The same people that hold LIBERALS and DEMOCRATS accountable for unethical behavior/actions. THEY ALL LIVE under the same rock.

  • @RatedArggg
    @RatedArggg Місяць тому +24

    Bring Shan Wu back. He's good!

  • @rosemarymeert4848
    @rosemarymeert4848 Місяць тому +1

    Thank you for breaking down this issue

  • @christophercook723
    @christophercook723 Місяць тому +1

    As a retired Lawyer you go for Gold .

  • @beachwelcome
    @beachwelcome Місяць тому +95

    If Trump cannot be held accountable then he can direct all government projects towards his companies without allowing any competitive bids from others as he did in his first term whenever possible for his benefit and he could get billions for his son in law as he did in his first term, exactly the behavior of Putin in Russia.

    • @giorgioarmmoney2558
      @giorgioarmmoney2558 Місяць тому

      Why not! many top dollar (and top justices) supporters love that. SAD!!---- Is he the Antichrist? a bible lover ? a god messenger ? HE cannot love people and be humble like Jesus. SAD.SAD...

    • @The_Tiffster
      @The_Tiffster Місяць тому +4

      He already did that.

  • @MichaelBrueckner
    @MichaelBrueckner Місяць тому +36

    Absolute immunity for Trump? Absolutely not.
    Absolute accountability? Absolutely.

  • @craigleslie1032
    @craigleslie1032 Місяць тому +1

    Thank you Mr. Shan Wu. As a retired attorney, I listened with rapt attention to Sauer's arguments and the conservative Justices attempts to help hiim in his defense of Trump. Your analysis cleared up some of my confusion with certain aspects of the SC hearing, which Orange man called a "meeting." Thanks so much. So far, you, Judge Lutig and Professor Tribe are the cleareset

    • @ShanlonWuEsq
      @ShanlonWuEsq Місяць тому

      Thank you very esteemed company!

  • @christinac3929
    @christinac3929 Місяць тому +1

    Your rights end when they harm me.

  • @LiteraryCurtastrophe
    @LiteraryCurtastrophe Місяць тому +34

    What boils my blood and irks the fuck out of me is the fact that the "only question" your Supreme Court issued for the immunity argument was whether or not, and if yes, how much, immunity is extended to former presidents...so HOW they got bogged down on the questions they did ask makes NO sense to me... Because from what i heard, not much was said about the question they framed. Somebody make it make sense, please

    • @anthonydelfino6171
      @anthonydelfino6171 Місяць тому

      they're bogging themselves down like they are because they're intentionally trying to stretch this out as long as possible. they don't want this case decided before the election this fall, at which point one of two things will happen
      1) Biden is reelected, in which case they will determine that presidents do NOT have immunity from criminal charges. they won't want to empower Biden in his last four years to do more crimes, and it will be safe to assume Trump will no longer be a player come 2028
      2) Trump is reelected, and the case will decide that the president DOES have immunity, or at least has limited immunity because they will want to enable him to create a dynastic situation where conservatives have full and continual control of our government forever
      and we have McConnell to tank for ultimately killing American democracy if that is the case (along with others, but it was his maneuvering that allowed Trump to appoint three justices in four years and dramatically change the court to what it is now)

  • @dianacalzadias4334
    @dianacalzadias4334 Місяць тому +106

    They don't want to decide anything, helping the rump is helping themselves. Impeach all those who strive to help him.

    • @pauljcross2289
      @pauljcross2289 Місяць тому

      The corruption of the SCOTUS is a disgrace to the nation

    • @yosf5221
      @yosf5221 Місяць тому

      How is it helping the court?

    • @E-D-
      @E-D- Місяць тому +5

      ​@@yosf5221Because he put some of the justices in there positions 🤷🏼‍♀️

    • @katiehettinger7857
      @katiehettinger7857 Місяць тому +3

      We need a Democrats super majorities in both chambers of Congress to impeach Supreme Court justices and expand the court. Today, there is a likelihood of reaching that goal in the House, but not possible in the Senate unless something unforeseeable occurred.

    • @jamesbarnes3832
      @jamesbarnes3832 Місяць тому

      It does appear that members of the Supreme Court are part of a criminal conspiracy. It seems factually evident that at least 3 of them take of bribes.

  • @ReneeUK1
    @ReneeUK1 Місяць тому +1

    Thank you Mr. Wu, listening to you is a pleasure as you explain everything so clearly.

  • @paulineblount626
    @paulineblount626 Місяць тому +1

    I always appreciate your breakdown of the issues, thank you so much Mr Shan

  • @joko09010
    @joko09010 Місяць тому +225

    That goodness Biden is our POTUS. History will show how gravely important his inauguration was, not just the first time, but the second. ⚖️💪🏻💙🗳️🇺🇸Biden 2024

    • @johnlane-tf4nj
      @johnlane-tf4nj Місяць тому +14

      Good point

    • @gustavodeugarte9460
      @gustavodeugarte9460 Місяць тому +26

      Following President Biden, means following the right path, the safe one, the patriotic and real American way...Let's VOTE BLUE!

    • @flowers6576
      @flowers6576 Місяць тому +18

      #VoteBlue2024AndBeyond
      #VoteBlueForDemocracyAndFreedoms
      #VoteBlueForTrumpAccountability

    • @tadstertrolley7770
      @tadstertrolley7770 Місяць тому

      Biden has done nothing for protecting democracy or the US from Trump, he's been useless.
      Has he stacked the court? Replaced Garland when it became evident he failed to act in a timely manner? Got rid of DeJoy?

    • @poudre1131
      @poudre1131 Місяць тому

      LOL!

  • @leticiabocanegra7031
    @leticiabocanegra7031 Місяць тому +15

    Thank you so much for explaining the mess that Trump and his cronies have created

  • @josephhuston7590
    @josephhuston7590 Місяць тому +1

    LOL,That court is through. And they know it.

  • @lisamay4376
    @lisamay4376 Місяць тому +13

    The only conservative who seemed unimpressed with Trump’s lawyers arguments seemed to be Amy Coney Barrett. Still, I don’t trust her.

  • @Naejbert
    @Naejbert Місяць тому +75

    All workers can work without immunity. Only criminals and dictators need it.

  • @joaquinvaldez-ne2kt
    @joaquinvaldez-ne2kt 28 днів тому +1

    So are they saying as long as you're president you have the power yo be above the law ???

  • @MaryAnnWofford
    @MaryAnnWofford Місяць тому +1

    They are trying to find a way to keep Mark Meadows out of jail

  • @wickyb123
    @wickyb123 Місяць тому +16

    Yup. With immunity he could take out justices that don't align with him under the guise of corruption.

    • @pedigreeann
      @pedigreeann Місяць тому

      He wouldn't need a 'guise'.

  • @nicnic1981
    @nicnic1981 Місяць тому +39

    I'm no esquire, so there's more to add, but here we go. OUR ONLY PATH TO KEEP DEMOCRACY: Increase SCOTUS to 13 to match 13 District Courts. Justices are rotated to each District every 2 years. Full retirement required at age 70. Also need to undo the dysfunction at the Appellate level as well

    • @jo-p5
      @jo-p5 Місяць тому +8

      Excellent idea.

    • @Maximumma
      @Maximumma Місяць тому +3

      The original 13 States, 13 Supreme court justices is what we need now in 2024. With Term LIMITS 2 Terms of 3 years = 6 years just in case you can't add.

  • @jimdevivo9241
    @jimdevivo9241 День тому

    This whole thing is very simple.
    Any act by a president that benefits him personally, or his family or his business should render him viable for prosecution.

  • @erinbuchanan6489
    @erinbuchanan6489 Місяць тому +1

    Thank you for the explanation! Very understandable❣️🙏💙🙏

  • @yvondjo5587
    @yvondjo5587 Місяць тому +20

    Specially Alito and Thomas, they are openly laughing at everyone.

    • @pauljcross2289
      @pauljcross2289 Місяць тому +4

      Maybe Biden should take them out....??

    • @anthonydelfino6171
      @anthonydelfino6171 Місяць тому

      @@pauljcross2289 that's what I've been saying. Just having Biden threaten to have certain justices assassinated should be enough to sway the outcome of the case.

    • @charles97th
      @charles97th Місяць тому

      Every time the DOJ lawyer started making some headway, they interrupted with some pathetic nonsense.

    • @yvondjo5587
      @yvondjo5587 Місяць тому

      @@pauljcross2289 yet but Biden is weak. If he is not a weak president, he could at least try to pack the supreme Court with more liberal justices to cut the power of the supreme Court justices Maga.

  • @purplepixie3397
    @purplepixie3397 Місяць тому +34

    VOTE BLUE 💙 ALL THE WAY

  • @erikapatterson4197
    @erikapatterson4197 Місяць тому +1

    Thank you Shan for your explanation.

  • @jhansigirl
    @jhansigirl Місяць тому +1

    Thank you for this Shan. It is very illuminating.

  • @kay1957-gu7ey
    @kay1957-gu7ey Місяць тому +13

    Let's change the supreme court. i.e. The American Bar Association chooses the Supremes based upon their excellence and non-bias and wholly earned respect. NOT presidents who are just anybody with a megaphone.

    • @The_Tiffster
      @The_Tiffster Місяць тому +3

      100%

    • @pedigreeann
      @pedigreeann Місяць тому +2

      It's not just the President; the Senate must advise and consent. That's why Merrick Garland isn't sitting on the Court today; the Majority Leader in the Senate, one Mitch McConnell, refused to do his duty and never held a hearing to confirm. And there was no way to force him to.

    • @The_Tiffster
      @The_Tiffster Місяць тому

      @@pedigreeann Mitch McConnell is currently the minority leader in the Senate.

  • @nickcirelli8453
    @nickcirelli8453 Місяць тому +22

    Thanks for making this whole disaster clear. This man is out to do our beloved country harm, and he is getting help from the courts country wide. Does this remind you of what Hitler did in the 30's. I'm 85 and I can say that

  • @litabrooker7872
    @litabrooker7872 Місяць тому +1

    Thank, Shan, for your clarity.

  • @cherylmack1260
    @cherylmack1260 Місяць тому

    Thank you for clearing that up or confirming it for us who have been listening and watching.

  • @randievietti5131
    @randievietti5131 Місяць тому +12

    One key aspect in the immunity argument was that SCOTUS completely ignored the issue before them: inciting a coup against the peaceful transfer of power

  • @maribelbvarela8238
    @maribelbvarela8238 Місяць тому +16

    I have very little hope on the Supreme Court.. I Wish Biden could assign more Justices.

    • @deborahsolleveld7118
      @deborahsolleveld7118 Місяць тому

      He can’t do it alone. People need to understand impeachment is the best way to remove immoral judges

  • @terrilyndel
    @terrilyndel Місяць тому +1

    Shan Wu needs to be on our Supreme Court. We need to expand the court and get rid of the electoral college. We need to allow the people to elect our officials.

  • @jasonreiyn9311
    @jasonreiyn9311 Місяць тому +1

    I have a question that is regarding the supreme Court justices my question is this. Why are there no repercussions for them lying while being interviewed by Congress? Also why has there been no steps taken by the FBI to pursue Leeds provided against the justices who had multiple allegations against them that were not investigated correctly because of interference by the attorney general?

  • @daniellepartee2570
    @daniellepartee2570 Місяць тому +24

    Thank you, Shan Wu & Meidas Touch. I really appreciate all of you.

  • @EveNickerson
    @EveNickerson Місяць тому +11

    This Supreme Court doesn't seem very supreme.

    • @n.a.lockhart
      @n.a.lockhart Місяць тому +1

      The Supreme Court is is a supreme mess 😰

    • @Dan-kh5ll
      @Dan-kh5ll Місяць тому

      I call it a brothel because it's not a Court. They should renamed scotus to Trump's whore house.