Populism is reshaping our world
Вставка
- Опубліковано 22 тра 2024
- From the streets of Turin to Silicon Valley, people power is taking the world by storm. With frustrations rising and the old order apparently crumbling, who really has the answers?
Click here to subscribe to The Economist on UA-cam: econ.trib.al/rWl91R7
December 2016 Italy's populist opposition is shaking up the establishment. They're days away from a referendum that could spell the end for the Italian government and make it the latest domino in the toppling international order.
Around the world populist leaders are connecting with voters fed up with politics as usual and exploiting anger at an establishment out of touch with ordinary people. But giving voice to people's frustrations is one thing, offering them real answers is quite another.
Five Star's anti-establishment message is resonating with voters. It is now Italy's biggest opposition party. The country has been crippled by recession and stagnating wages. With rates of inequality among the highest in Europe many people feel left behind by globalization and let down by political leaders.
Now the populists sense there may be an opportunity to bring those leaders down. A referendum on constitutional reform has become a vote of confidence in the ruling elite. Prime Minister Matteo Renzi has said he will resign if the country votes no. He's the latest politician to find himself in the firing line. Tonight, thousands of five-star supporters are gathering at a rally in Turin. Some are starting to ask what they might do with success.
Beppe Grillo has vowed to get rid of political parties but he certainly knows how to start one. Grillo's success has come through impassioned charges against the corrupt elites and global forces he blames for Italy's woes but five stars leaders may soon have a harder note to hear. A question of how they would tackle unemployment and inequality.
Two days after the rally Italians overwhelmingly voted no in the referendum. Prime Minister Renzi made good on his promise to stand down. It's another victory for populism as across the world charismatic leaders defy expectations. They're finding success selling deceptively simple answers to difficult questions. They almost always blame the failings of free trade and mass migration for rising inequality but is this the right target?
Few cities are immune to the uneven impact of globalization.
The latest venture from a San Francisco startup has the potential to turn one of America's most iconic industries on its head. Last year Uber paid $680 million for Otto, a company whose technology could fundamentally change trucking forever. It allows a truck to drive down a highway with nobody at the wheel. The company claims it could save the industry billions of dollars a year, reduce emissions by a third and eliminate the driver errors that cause up to 87% of truck crashes. But this bright sounding future has a dark side. A series of studies have found technology, not globalization, to be the biggest driver of inequality in developed countries. There were three and a half million people employed in trucking in America and with their industry seemingly the next in line for automation many face an uncertain future.
As inequality grows in Western democracies, wealthy California has become one of the most economically unequal states in America as technology has displaced many lower skilled jobs.
An alienated public turned on the establishment because it failed to provide answers. As some tech giants become as powerful as that establishment, it's a lesson they're starting to learn. So they're going back to school.
For too many people in western democracies progress is still something that happens to other people. Wealth does not spread itself. An underclass appears beyond help, finding a way to reconnect with them and provide an alternative to populism will be at the top of the agenda for the political and business leaders of tomorrow
THE AGENDA explores the defining questions of our time and seeks out the stories, solutions and the personalities who might just hold the answers. Discover the mould-breakers experimenting with new ways to approach some of the modern world's most fundamental issues; find out what happens when bold ideas and real life collide, and meet the leaders whose thoughts and actions are themselves helping to shape the agenda.
Series One of The Agenda: People Power gets to grips with the rise of populism and what lies behind it.
Check out Economist Films: films.economist.com/
Check out The Economist’s full video catalogue: econ.st/20IehQk
Like The Economist on Facebook: / theeconomist
Follow The Economist on Twitter: / theeconomist
Follow us on Instagram: / theeconomist
Follow us on LINE: econ.st/1WXkOo6
Follow us on Medium: / the_economist
Definition of a Populist:
"A member or adherent of a political party seeking to represent the interests of ordinary people."
Smoothbluehero Also, it means they use that to get votes, while not actually doing nothing for the people.
Except that most people don't know shit about what's important and are easily told what to believe in by charismatic cunts.
Simon;
Saudi Arabia has 4 universities in world's top 400, and no democracy
+Smoothbluehero Bernie Sanders is a populist who seems to be modelling after FDR.
+Vladimir Tepes Ayyy tankies!!!!!!
Three years after the video was published. And populism is accelerating.
Technology, social media, faster internet connection all lead to populist to connect, organize and shout more
Yep, we can see that again with those politicians branding BLM when they actually don't care about aside for winning election.
It's going down actually. Trump is losing, UK is struggling, Salvini was kicked out, Freedom Party in Austria was kicked out from government and loosing popular support. Orban's party lost support in Budapest and the city has a progressive mayor. Check your facts. The only ace up their sleeves the populists had were large portions of populations uneducated politically. But things are changing. We live in the information age.
Except like most people don't understand what populism means just like fascism and many other things. They all are pointing to the wrong direction.
@@ldinti03 they're getting educated now. Actually I'm glad Trump got to be president and that UK got out of the EU. They're just marginal losses and soon these mistakes will be corrected and citizens will have learned what electing populists in the information era means, how important our votes are.
Just to remind. If some guy says he can fix everything and has a very loud voice, you should really think twice about it. Just saying. But sometimes change is needed.
The last time a man said something like that. People died in gas chambers. Just saying.
@@shwetamirani5494 fair enough
@peace leader you mah man. You deserve the Nobel Peace Prize
@peace leader probably after World War 3
@@shwetamirani5494 that wasn't the last time. Think harder and more to the east.
The one guy near the end is correct. It is true that silicon valley's reputation has gone way down.
Just as pretty much the top of ALL industries, really. At the very tops of them all are the same fat, Globalist elites that own pretty much the entire world. And if not, then some other ruthless alphas just looking to step on somebody on their march to becoming one of those elite scumbags.
Silicon valley should be nuked.
@@OpiumBride Silicon Valley workers are much better paid
@@nil981 say goodbye to your tech
Universal basic income, sustainable development, direct democracy, circular economy, renewable energy; 5SM and Trump have almost nothing in common (a part being against this establishment). They have a completely opposite view of the world. Stop comparing them.
Benito Mussolini can't take you seriously with that name
Direct democracy is flawed, and will never work. Universal income is just a fancy term for inflation. Instead of 0$ being worth nothing, pay everyone 20$ an hour and 20$ becomes nothing. Circular economy is complete quackery. Renewable energy is good, but why can't we just build three nuclear reactors for each state instead of thousands upon thousands of solar plants and wind farms?
Joseph Stassup direct democracy works in Switzerland much bettter than any other democracies in the world. Universal income is just under test right now, don't jump into conclusions of something you don't know about at all. Circular economy works in Scandinavia already, your point is invalid. And we can't because that is ten times more dangerous for the people and for the environment as it is nuclear exposure.
Fabio N Both capitalize on emotions though
Joseph Stassup your points are absolutely anachronistic. Nuclear reactors have been proven to be completely unsustainable both economically and ecologically. UBI is the only answer to the increasing inequality of this freaking mad neoliberism. Circular economy might be as you pointed out still undeveloped and utopistic (which is not true btw) but it must be the goal, and politicians must have a goal instead of acting for self preservation.
''the best argument against democracy is five minutes with the average voter'' even before Churchill we knew that the best form of government we know had a massive flaw, in ancient greece they had to force people to participate in politics
I am NOT saying abandon democracy but I would very much like to point out that most people simply do NOT care about politics enough, even when it concernes them, the only way to pull them in is ti appeal to their emotions, which is the absolute worst way to re-energize democracy
it's our fault we get fed bullshit all the time, it's the only way for politicians tog et votes, it's our fault that we don't make arguments and comprehensive plans prerequisites for out votes
because we simply don't care about competent arguments the best way to reach us are exaggerations or just down right lies, and ofc appealing to our emotions ''feel it in your stomach, not your head''
politics and political systems and most of all studyin the constitution is my line of work and I have to say that I am more disappointed in the cynicism and apathy of the voters than the political elites, when the only way to reach people and make them interested in politics is manipulating their emotions we have a massive problem on our hands
another problem we have is that we think of politicians as saviors who can singlehandedly make our lives better and simultaneously make them scapegoats for everything wrong in our lives, forgeting that the changes in our contries are far more complex than that
Sadly, at this moment in time, the way forward looks a lot like we'll be walking backwards, shutting ourselves in even if history has proven us time and time again that cooperation andworking together brings out the best of human kind and alienation, banking on hatred and intolerance bring out the worst
well said lemon lyman. what do we do from here?
s0ngf0rx I say education. We educate people. Ignorance is far too abundant.
s0ngf0rx I personally think that the cynical view of politics most ppl have today is one of the greatest issues of our time :/ and a lot of the time cynicism is the result of simply not knowing enough about it
That's the result of first amendment and the internet. You get all the conspiracy theories from first amendment, and you get echo-chamber effect from selective reading online.
wisdomleader85 which can be countered by better education or at least awareness of the daily issues, but yes, youa re correct :(
Ahhh.... the solution: we will have several million computer programmers.
Pat TheHombre Where did you here that? CNN? Twitter?
Ther are already many millions of programmers.
Good. I thought democracy was supposed to serve the people, not the politicians.
+Gerogeo
It's not surprising the teacher who allows his pupils to behave like assholes and promises them every treat they desire will be voted most popular.
But is it good for them to be able to curse and bully the class outsider? And will they get the treats?
+Georgeo
You're barking up the wrong tree. Those who derailed democracy are not the politicians - it's those who fund them for their own gain.
If people don't think much when voting or about voting at all, it serves politicians. Democracy is not a universal system, it works only when lots of people make it work.
Paneuropäischer Nationalismus what are you talking about? Democracy was never an option in Russia.
Paneuropäischer Nationalismus People thought so 15-20 year ago. It is not about options, they just need time to grow into it.
the economist also said the Europe needed the refugees bc they were skilled workers. less than 1% of refugees in Germany have jobs. I stopped reading the economist
Source of that statistic?
Well, if there aren't any sources to back a statistic I bring up, I'd rather not say it at all.
Also refugees didn't start to come a few months ago, so we should have some statistics and facts, not speculative estimations.
And ultimately, if bureaucracy is what hinders refugees from working, is it truly their fault?
Dieser;
you manipulate statistics like a schoolboy
Do you have some alternative facts to counter-argument?
the statement "refugees account for 4,68% of unemployment" is meaningless;
what matters is: economic performance of non-European communities (residing in Europe) like the Turks, Syrians, Iraqis, Afghanis, Somalis & so on
Populism perhaps 'appears' when a system cannot operate efficiently enough to warrant a content society.
Well said.
Robert;
do you expect European & North American societies to become more & more content in the coming decades?
You are right but populism is a symptom of the disease not a cure for it.
Daumier It can be populism and nationalism are a good mix
@Tesla; Yeah, populism and nationalism mixed gave us great stuff, like Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia
"Populism is bad when I start to lose." - The Economist, 2017
Marcotonio Populism just means a lot of people are doing stuff though. It doesn't mean it's good stuff they're doing. I mean, slavery was a populist institution.
Oliver, while I agree with you, this documentary feels like nothing but mumbling against a crushing defeat. Every media outlet that's given up on the full-on liberal propaganda has shifted the gear to this other milder approach, going poetic and unspecific, even nihilistic, bittersweet envision of the future, because they can't argue anymore about the present.
The funny thing is this could very well have been a video about our future and how machines are taking over without a single drop of politics shoehorned into it and everyone would be agreeing and thinking about the problem. The way they did, though, can be summarized by reading some top comments here, everyone sees the dissimulation at work.
short answer, like it
Looks like they are preparing us for 'democracy is bad' . They will want to curtail it soon.
"Populism is not the answer if it's based on deception and anti-intellectualism" is what I've heard from it
when politicians say "change" this means they're gonna drop some huge BS on you
The economic effects of technological advancement is being understated. There is a domino affect that is causing greater issues than is reported. It was stated that 3 million truck drivers would be out of a job with self driving trucks. That leads to 3 million+ meals not being eaten at truck stop cafes. This leads to lay offs of college students supporting their college education through waiting tables. This leads to more people unable to educate themselves for the new tech jobs. This increases the gab between the haves and have nots, creating an even bigger divide in the nation. Not to mention that most technology jobs are in large urban areas and rural areas rely on the trucking industry for economic stability. This is becoming an issue of urban wants versus rural needs. This is what American politicians are not seeing. Education doesn't help you if there are no jobs in your town. Some may say that people just need to move to the city. Well, can the cities handle a mass influx of people?
Wow, very well said. I thought of something similar as I saw the scenes of the truckers eating at the diner. If they're gone, who is going to eat there? Sure there will still be some customers but many of these places probably live off the truckers.
This whole election, in the US at least, showed the disconnect between urban elites and the rural periphery.
What I find amazing is that my original comment was placed on a different video and now I see it on this video. I wonder how that happened?
It is the price of a modernizing economy and a better standard of living and it has been happening since the industrial revolution. Yes truck drivers will lose their jobs, but think about this. If you were a shipping company would you rather have a continuous year round costs in labor, or pay for manufactured labor that is much more cheap and efficient? This is a good thing! The costs of shipping will go down which mean more money can be spent in other places, shipping companies can invest in other businesses which means better and cheaper products and the overall American economy will be improved. Advancement isn't some politically motivated unAmerican idea. It is what makes us strong.
I never said its politically motivated or unAmerican but the fact is people will suffer. That's exactly what happened with the industrial revolution, many, many people ended up suffering a lot with the drastic changes. The reason populism has flared is because the political and media elites have become so disconnected with the suffering of those impacted by automation(and globalization as well but of course the Economist will underplay that for obvious ideological reasons) that those people are rebelling through democratic institutions.
Now, we're seeing elites cry about the people actually using their voice and I find that distasteful. Its their fault, they squandered the trust they had
+15jorada
An economy that cannot support its population - no matter how profitable it is - is unsustainable... The Industrial Revolution brought and created new lines of work; the complete automation of the work-force is set to cut jobs while creating very limited positions in maintenance.
These changes are not comparable and as it is now what we'll see from automation is aimed only at reducing the quantity of jobs available for the majority of people. While you are right that the spending-power of major corporations will be significantly advanced, the trickle-down effect your theory operates on will be mitigated by a lack of consumerism as unemployment rates skyrocket.
1:32 "I'm too young to vote" What!!? She looks like 30 yrs old.
She's just a big girl, not old
Raymond Ramos you've never made a bullshit excuse to hang up on a telemarketer?
@@deathbycognitivedissonance5036 lmao
Raymond Ramos it be like that in the US for just about every thing lol.
it's just a kind of refusal, in a joking way. no need to take it seriously.
I think that many populist rhetorics would tremble if the education systems emphasized on teaching the students the definition of each fallacy and the skills needed for identifying it.
A comedian for a leader. Populism in a nutshell.
yeah kinda like his holiness Obama the 1st
Credit Suisse and the Economist telling us that populism is dangerous and we should trust companies to find solutions to inequality. Give me a break
Anyone with a shred of media competency knows that The Economist is pro-free-market, pro-liberal. And that's perfectly alright. You have to read/watch publications from both sides and make an effort yourself to get a decent idea of various positions.
That's the main issue that has led to the situation outlined here: people have gotten too lazy to form their own opinions on things and rather either parrot populists with completely overblown radical theses or shrug and kind of defiantly accept the issues that DO exist within the global political system just to spite the populists.
You're a solid one aren't you? They mention governments and companies, pray do tell erudite sir, could you allude as to whom else we could turn to? The Boy Scouts? The Girl Guides? The Model Airplane Makers Club of America?
I mean, you can't say that there isn't any inequality around the world.
GenestealerUK Don't tell me your a trump supporting socialist. Wow
LLoyd Blankfein and Soros are going to fix your wagon!
so it started with "the will of the people" and drifted back into "what is good for business"; the very cause of the problem.
'wealth does not spread itself'
(Unless you are already wealthy and then it will spread to you nicely)
Capitalism made us all wealthy until the 1970s, then it started to centralise wealth, especially in the US. Capitalism now is very much crony capitalism, politicians and the 1% in each other's pockets.
The trucker and the cat I love it that’s should be a tv show haha
The political class is the problem.
Why?
Cos they're blind to the real problems and push identity politics and smoke and mirrors. And everywhere they will push it, they will lose the votes over time. The only comprehensive response to nationalism is democratic socialism - so it boils down to negotiating how big the safety net should be. Globalism is doomed, just like communism. Without AI there's no hope to outperforming market is central managmenet of state capitalism or welfare with open borders. No chance
The problem is the rich elite oligarchy, that has crushed our democracy. The far right is leading us into totalitarianism. No thanks!
feelinglucky duck
Politicians and Tech Ind are killing jobs for America. They care about themselves only. Always follow the money trail !
🎤🎻🎶 love new Orleans
@@kathycox1273 Following the money leads right to the elite rich oligarchy. Politicians are all mere whores getting paid off for their disregard of the public by the elites.
Demagoguery is alive and well in Italy.
"I would love to engrave in a person's brain a positive attitude" pretty much says it all. This is not the pursuit of happiness but its opposite,
truely a poor choice of words
Ok sorry I know this has nothing to do with the issues discussed in this video, but OMG I fucking love that that truck driver drives around with his cat in his lap. So cute!!! 😻
@Fhjthnl Lol Iuyo i'm here for the cat.
Demagoguery is also reshaping our world
ilker yoldas selamlar bir turk gormek guzel
ilker yoldas saving and loving ones nation is not demogoguery
ilker yoldas Populism is a common devolvement of democracy. The world's first democracy, ancient athens, also had problems with demagoguery... populism took hold of them too, just read a bit about Athens right before the peloponesian war
When people start taking politics for granted, then populist are coming and leading the country to regression.
somehow, I began to think democracy isn't a good system at all. politics require so much training that ordinary people may not competent to carry this job. why not leave it to elites?
Corporations/Banks: PAY. YOUR. TAXES.
Compare the lead-up to the French revolution when the Church and Landowners and wealthy consistently and over decades refused to pay...until one day the dam broke. If these taxes were available to retrain and re-design whole countries this bs about technological change being the main culprit would be exposed.
The video glosses over the effects of mass migration. The more you have of something the less it costs. At the same time that technology is changing the job market, masses of low skilled and high skilled (H1b, etc.) workers are flooding in. Something has to give.
Yes. Gone are the days when unskilled or semi-skilled white workers could make a middle class wage. Unskilled migrants take unskilled jobs for low wages and skilled migrants take skilled jobs for high wages.
@@Cybele1986 but you think that doesn't help the economy?
Years later, truckers are heros and globalization and consumerism is the problem.
Why was this deleted and reposted?
Some people dont seem to understand that even if more people want something it doesnt mean its the right thing.This is exactly why populism is dangerous, because we as a mass can be manipulated. Sometimes you need to tell the averge worker bad news not everything that he wants to hear. Populism is not inherently bad but it often is.
So none of you are smart then and you dont have any right to form rational opinions based on your experience or knowledge? How fucking stupid are you? If its not the will of the people then its not the will of anyone. JUst because you dont like the ones who decides doesnt mean the system is bad. It's actually perfectly fine.
No, that’s exactly why democracy is dangerous. Think and reflect a bit about what you said: so it’s only when a group of people (the minority by the by) decides that the other is “populist” that the situation of letting people who do not know what is best decide become dangerous? Other parties never wooed their voters by telling them exactly what they wanted to hear?
@@gjermund1161 Well, sadly, aren't most people quite irrational these days? I mean look at anti-vaxxers, flat earthers and others eaten by silly conspiracy theories.
@Gayle Elizabeth To be honest, most leftist are millenials and gen z while rightist are boomers.
“But we work at the Economist, so we’ll be fine.” Phonies
All mainstream media has the same simple answer to why right wingers and nationalists are rising globally. They sarcastically pose the question "Are immigrants and globalism really the whole problem? Or could it be that technology is taking a bite at the middle class too?" As if populists are not aware of the technology factor. Just because there are multiple factors, doesnt mean certain factors of that multitude are not correct. Nobody has ever said "immigration and solely immigration alone is the cause of all our economic problems" but by the way they produce these mini films, you would think that's what one side is arguing. This nihilistic, dishonest, manipulative behavior is why people have voted into office totalitarians whom are willing to hang "journalists" and end free press. If most mainstream journalists, reporters, and talk show hosts end up getting flogged and imprisoned during a revolution, I would have great difficulty finding sympathy for them.
They act like their denial of some factors some how poked a hole through the populist argument. If they cant frame the narrative sideways, they lose the argument, so the media will never ever have an adult conversation about anything. Always just spin, exaggerations, mockery, sarcasm, and all other forms of childish fuckery...
@@russiauncensored7788 and you think the alternative is more mature???
The airline industry used to boast about the need for pilots to fill the boosted aviation industry. Their aim was to influence a surplus of pilots which would drive down wages and thus give more profits to the aviation industry. Same thing is happening now. We have enough programmers. The reason why big tech continues to encourage programming is to drive down the 120k salaries to 40k thus leaving kroe profits in teh hands of CEOs
I'm very skeptical about a universal basic income.
I am a little too, just because it gives lots of room for whoever is in charge to play games with such an income in government. I'm more for forcing businesses to compensate with shares along with wage and salaries that produce a dividend as a method to provide incomes to people. Meaningful amount of shares. Perhaps they can't be just sold for cash, but traded only, and those shares provide incomes.
Of course that would rock the apple carts of the oligarchs. But the system is about blow up the apple cart as it stands anyway.
A universal income wouldn't be extremely bad. But a share system would probably be better. And even coop agreements for basic goods like homes and apartments. You don't pay to a 3rd party that's just trying suck maximize profits and doesn't give a rats ass about the quality of the place, but has a living stake in keeping it nice because they live there too.
Mix of a shares and wage compensation, co-op, and universal basic income system will inevitably be the solutions especially as automation becomes that of Futurama. Seriously, you have robots that repair the robots. You don't need human labor whatsoever at that point.
all UBI will end up doing in the long run is stop an entire generation from finding decent work and instead relying solely on the government, when it omes time to vote you know damn well who's voting what. all of the people who are on UBI are going to vote for the govrnment guarenteed because they won't bite the hand that feeds them. come to think of it UBI is yet another scheme for the govt to control people subconciously
frank din Same, it sounds nice, and Finland seems to do it well, but plans like the ones proposed by 5SM in Italy and some Socialists in France (i.e.: Benoît Hamon) just make me uneasy, like it's a disaster waiting to happen...
+killman369547
The alternative is people are poor and jobless as automation continues to displace more jobs than it creates (because unlike big technological innovations in the past which would create new jobs in the same supply chain or open up a new supply chain run by people, almost every supply chain can now be automated aside from a few skilled technicians and engineers and a few other highly skilled positions).
But I agree about the concern regarding not voting out the "hand that feeds you" and state control. It's too much power concentrated in too few hands to be a good idea to completely centralize it. However, most effective countries with strong social nets create those programs away from the levers of government so that they can function somewhat autonomously (with the understanding that, if they're ineffective, government has the power to reform them). I think this is the model we need to keep in mind. It's not perfect, but I think it's probably the best option we have on the table.
It sounds very scary, but there are no other ways. We just need to find a solution to manage populism.
The best video ever. The timing, the information, the production.
5 stars is the image of the decline of Italy
Says the girl with a rainbow flag behind her
@@MeetMyGreenBud7 What's that supposed to mean?
I can only remember Leon the Professional: "if you feel it in your gut, it's probably shit".
I'd love to see Beppe Grillo take power -- just to see how utterly incompetent he is and how the illusions of his supporters are shattered..
You like these 'refugee' boats as well?
pretty much Close the borders to immigration for a few years, exit the EU, stop kowtowing to the green cult of de-industralization. Defund universities that do not encourage debate and free speech. Easy any idiot could do it. Maybe also a flat tax of 20%
For a start , restrict all access to all tax havens for the top end then tax exempt anyone who relies on a minimum wage as their sole income
So you think that exploiting the wealthy and giving them nothing in return is okay?
Lets face it, We'll be ever condemned to have the scraps if we keep expecting some politician or corporation to do the right thing for us. Educating ourselves continously and engaging with our communities are the most powerful tools we have as "regular" people to drive the future to the place we want.
The establishment does not understand that the biggest issue is not automation or immigration: it is the greed of the 0.1%. Some countries went to the wrong route benefiting more that 0.1% but maybe some will fall on the other side of the spectrum giving more opportunities to people rather than maximizing profits non-stop.
People of the world, rise up! We outnumber them 1000 to 1. This is happening all over the world. Don’t give up!
"Technology has the potential to create more jobs than it destroys" lol, you sure about that?
These globalists don't know what they are talking about, robots are gonna replace workers, they are doing, these liberal globalists are so disconnected from reality, they think changing the demographic of a population is no big thing sorry I can't destroy my ethnic group for money.
I'm aggree with you.They propose to educate the new generation with the new tecnology e the others?
Yea mass migration will absolutely drop wages. More workers = more competition = lower wages.
Less housing- more rape- more evil booked religions.
Actually with border security and reduced migration, many of the so-called jobs that Americans could have filled remained empty. That's bc most migrants take jobs that Americans don't want. For instance in 2011, after the market crash and unemployment reached an all time high, there were 6,200 open farm jobs in North Carolina and only 256 applied, but only 7 worked. That's bc we live in the Information Age and most millenials are college-educated & tech savvy. They're more likely to seek jobs that reflect their education & that offer esteemed title or status. Nobody aspires to be a farm hand anymore. In the Industrial Age, not many baby boomers were as educated. They were more likely to do labor than to work in an office. Farm work requires skill that demands stamina from dawn til dusk. Many migrants are incredibly skilled & most certainly have the stamina, even traveling hundreds of miles to obtain work. This proves that they don't steal jobs, they fill a very real gap in many labor industries. Most of these will go to automation. But in the meantime, border restrictions have led to farms closing down, bc they can't compete against corporate farms that churn out more yield with automated machinery. And the best part is that these workers are taxed, yet can't reap the benefits of those taxes. It's basically free money that goes directly to the American ppl for programs like Social Security, Infrastructure, Public Safety, etc. We're idiots for closing down the borders bc that was money we could've used. Now Social Security is depleting and programs like the ones for Veterans and Medicare are dwindling. We completely misunderstood the value that migrants brought to our economy. Any money we paid them to work is most certainly not going to anyone else now. No millenial is going to do labor when they lack the skills to do so, especially if they can more easily make money online from their couch. We're dreaming if we think the old workforce of the Industrial Age is alive & kicking. It died when the Internet was born. Technology is our economic future. Get used to it.
They said the same thing here in the UK. The ONS stated that there is a difference of 1.88% difference.
It also depends on how the economy is doing.
You all have beautiful cultures and identities. Protect them! Fight for them! Do not let these globalist / marxist types shame you into extinction!
What a simplistic world view
just call it "democracy". populism is popular politics. that's democracy. ffs.
No. They can not be used interchangeably.
define democracy for me, if you would.
Alex R Cambridge Dictionary:
" a country in which power is held by elected representatives"
I don't think you're basing this opinion on anything substantive. it's usually those that are against populism that are against any diversity in opinions.
Democracy is a form of government where the people have a significant influence on what kind of decisions made. The word means popular. Characteristics of democracy is free elections, majority rule, the right to disagree with the majority and that individuals' fundamental rights are safeguarded.
Populism and demagoguery are a fact, in south america we are having a lot of trouble because of this. In Colombia, for example, they say the system is wrong (which is true) but they can't think about real solutions, as a result we had a pause of 2 months for the end of a half-century war and renegotiation came to nothing much different because they had no arguments...
The problem is that people with a low education often believe them just because their frustration is represented in their speech so the only way to fight these charismatic leaders is educating people and punishing the elites voting for new options, but real options.
Alejandro Exactly and all these people writing angry comments can't see what's wrong with populists, but few years down the line they shall know.
Correction: Socialism is a fact in South America. Large populations of low educated people (because all the intelligent folks left long ago) vote for big government, and big government screws them over, as is the case in Venezuela.
Venezuela is the only country that's "socialist", Colombia and Argentina have a center-right goverment, Ecuador and Uruguay have center-left... So I can't see the "socialism" invading south america
+Alejandro Argentina has been populist for the last decade, luckily not anymore
Alejandro south america have socalism ideolgoy
Happy for Italians who are standing up for themselves. Fight the good fight.
Same goes for the Hungarians, Poles, etc. soon it will be the vast majority of the Europeans. This is only the beginning.
dino volla I have to be honest the world is so troubling these days all these combined victories give me personal hope of a better future hopefully one that will topple globalism and the elite behind it all.
The sound on this video is better than most. Thank you, Economist.
Zeitgeist much? Capitalism is dying...
There are millions of apps in google play store. Most of them do the exact same thing. The idea that coding is a future opportunity for everyone is idiotic. There is a finite limit to how much people can consume and a finite limit to how many jobs need to exist.
" There is a finite limit to how much people can consume and a finite limit to how many jobs need to exist."
No. 300 years ago more than 90% of the people were working in agriculture to feed the world. Now less than 10% do. The rest create other things for people to consume. People want bigger TVs, faster cars, yachts, a second car, a second house, space travel - you name it. Entertainment has exploded - people are spending hundreds of Billions to get entertained.
If there is labor for it, and there are money for it, there will be jobs to produce goods and services. There is no limit to consumption.
Sure not everyone can make their own app and get rich - if you don't have a great idea you can always work for someone who has. Or, at least, pays you salary.
save your breath Nikola Tasev, he doesnt know anything about the world....
No, I don`t think so. Creative people, entrepreneurs are the future. Look at men like Elon Musk and Steve Jobs, they created new markets and innovated brand new ideas and products. There is no limit but the one you set for your self..
aratosm Think about all of the things you do today that don't need electronics. Is that list numerous?
I say, don't save your breath! Spread reason and rationality!
99.9% of all politicians are self serving traitors. We have got to reject, the scum that have got themselves into a very profitable little number, making themselves rich in the process.Politics throughout the world has got to change or die.
It’s a reality that not everyone in the world can be smart. In fact, the majority of the world isn’t smart. In the past, these people could take up jobs such as factory workers,drivers,farmers etc and be happy. But now the world is going in a direction that abandons these “less than ordinary” people.
This is why socialism and liberal politics is needed, to provide a safety net for everyone, and make sure nobody feels abandoned.
If there was a country that lifted millions of people out of poverty this century, I think of China.
Authoritarian totalitarianism ftw, right?.....
Found the China bot
In what democratic country could populism possibly be considered a bad thing? Do you want the ordinary people to be represented or not?
>implying that solutions presented on a basic level before this whole thing hasn't been superficial feel-good, 'let's-not-think-about-it-too-much' answers.
Were you living under a rock all this time?
No, they don't want ordinary people to have any say, they want them enslaved.
this debunks the myth that Europeans are somewhat "better" or more intellectual, they have their own Trump-like politicians and are eager to support them
Those in office call whatever democratic demands they dont like populism.
We are gonna be governed by comedians!
It's self-irony
@Nahush Modi its all because of the person who holds your last name
So populism is when the people decide to vote for someone who promises to bring about the changes they want? I thought that was democracy? Or is democracy just a means by which you try to keep people happy with whatever you give them?
The problem is that populist movements often get commandeered by the nationalists/chauvinists hiding in their ranks.
Not a single country on this planet is a democracy. Quit misusing the word. Ancient Rome was a democracy. Democracy is mob rule.
Oh, where have you been all this time. Don’t you know that lies are truth, truth is lies, men can be women and women can be men, white skinned people can do no right and coloured can do no wrong, Islam is a religion of peace .... everything redefined to suit the deranged far left agenda...
Populism is the mentality that "the Elites" in whatever form they take (Academic (Scientists)[this one is silly], Financial(The 1%), within the Government(Corrupt Politicians)), are AGAINST "the people".
It's not a system of voting, and it's not quite a political stance? It's more like, just being pissed off at all the people in charge.
Because of this it isn't really unique to any political or economic system.
As a result though, skillful politicians or con men will abuse this distrust in the powers that be, making the situation worse, feeding in a comfortable cycle of pissing off constitutes but being able to blame "The elites".
This is a bad outcome.
We also run the risk of things just absolutely going to hell in a handbasket.
Also a bad result.
Even letting it reign free, it has a tendency to go towards authoritarianism, if it really starts deciding elections.
Another bad end.
So why is it a bad thing? It can't really work in the long run, it can't end well, and if we don't come up with something else we're kind of in danger of things going to hell in a handbasket.
in a summary, when comfort is taken away, people shit themselves.
isn't populism democracy? whats the alternative to public ruling it self?
Yes, VOX POPULI!!!!!
Voice of the people!
Technological advancements have benefited humans in the past. Look at the Industrial revolution. Although millions lost their jobs, our overall life quality has gotten better. At the same time, although we've gotten healthier and our life expectancy has risen, millions of people did lose their jobs, they were sacrificed for our well being, this we shouldn't forget.
I understand peoples outrage against these rapid changes that threaten their jobs and income, but shouldn't we focused on softening their transition. Shouldn't we discuss policies that benefit this transition, from manual labor to automation? Like reeducation Programs, banning companies from firing veteran workers and having the workers do the same tasks the robots do?
At the same time I'm wondering what should we and our children learn for the future, what should we prepare for, so that we can work and have an income? Or will we live in a Utopia where people won't have to work anymore, where robots take over our activities - and we benefit of their labor? I personally don't think that Utopia will come until, let's say 100 - 200 years, so I still need to know what should I teach my kids, so that my grand-grand-grand children will get to live in the before mentioned Utopia.
The financial world abuses went little too far, then 2008 and the little guys cannot take anymore.
CGP Grey made a video about automation a while back, but he points out how technology won't create more jobs than it destroys. This is a change we're not prepared for: abundance of goods, automated services, and unimaginably efficient production, but most people won't have the incomes to buy these things.
Hey, thanks for this video. It was really interesting.
If populism is not democracy than what is it? I guess your main stream media democracy is do what I say or else. It seem the establishment term of democracy is pick the person I tell you to pick or else you are a populist. LOL
Sure. Then communist regimes also began with populism. Why then west is hell bend on calling them authoritarian.
If a group decides to kill you based on vote then you die that is populism. But democracy offers rights.
Populism is part of a deeper democratic category. The root of all children. The height of love. And that is _SEX_
@@monbjra most communist government came into power through armed revolution, weather its Lenin in the Soviet union how had kill the entire royal family of the Tsars or weather it Mao who had kill significantly about of his adversaries to consolidate power after civil war, both case majority of people did not adhere to their ideology and neither did they come into power democratically secondly their socialist ideology are more closer to left populist like Bernie by your own logic you must terrified of the progressive elements of the democratic than populist nationalism. If you are worried about totalitarianism then its important to remember the first totalitrian state was humanist in its values and formed after the radical left wing elements of the jacobians hijacked the french revolution. We dont see terrified of humanism then as the same you condem populism this Cleary expose the double standard in your argument. Like it or not out of the chaos of illegal mass immigration , terrorism etc there is going to a be shift in the current world order to smaller governments and nations having sovereign control over their borders .
Populism is an abuse of democracy, feeding the public lies.
Now that wouldn't be of any use without democracy, as the public would not be able to cast a vote.
So frustrating to see people abdicate one of the most important rights a citizen gets. I understand feeling ignored and disenfranchised, but that only gets worse if those hurt by the government don't stand up to vote against it. Make election day a holiday, and reach for the government you want, for as long as it takes.
People/politician will do and say whatever it takes to gain power. How many can truly provide real solution to the problem
Thumbnail should have been hands giving the middle finger to the globalists
Love how the Economist conveniently leaves out the fact that automation is pretty much only plausible because globalization makes tech cheaper to buy for businesses. Thus globalism and technology share the blame for job loss
I'm in favour of free trade and free movement. But we have been reckless in the way we have implemented them. And then we have slandered the people who lost out with accusations of bigotry. It's no wonder there's a backlash.
Populism has plagued politics all the way back to the age of ancient Republican Rome and Democratic Greece.
Demagogue is not a new word.
old dogs learning new tricks is very hard...
Populism is another word for FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY,
I think populism is appealing because electoral candidates make simple statements that are easy to agree with, not sounding like the politicians that the populous is tired of, but totally unable to implement those election promises without sounding and acting like those old style politicians.
None of these problems have fast and easy answers. Choosing a anti-establishment party won't fix these problems instantly.
I think our focus should be on making it cheaper and easier for anyone to reeducate themselves in order to keep up with changing tech advancements.
frank din
start a company with the goal you outlined. youll be rich
amer shakir your not understanding the problem. It's an issue of people not being able to quit jobs or take time off work to do so
"California, New York, you don't control the country no more." - trump is from New York
Ok? He reaches out to other parts of the country, unlike Hillary (the Illinoisan that moved to New York) that wanted to put ‘a lot of coal miners out of business.’
Jose Melgar Dude, they're simple minded pigeons. Just let them be
trying to browbeat and insult other people , into accepting your argument , is a sign your kind is losing.
That's irrelevant: is he supported by them? No. They hate him it seems.
Trump doesn't control the country, the Koch brothers and Goldman Sachs does
Technology is not the main drier of inequality. Corruption is!
"In the long term, technology has the potential to create more jobs than it destroys"
This is false. I think there is a consensus building among most futurists that technology is going to create a huge unemployment crisis. It will create new jobs in the short-term but in the long term, those jobs will be made redundant by technology as well.
Moreover, the number of new jobs it creates will be dwarfed by the jobs lost.
repost?
When they were showing those kids how to code I rolled my eyes. Even the coders are going to be out of a job once computes can start to code for themselves. Coders are an analog input giving instructions to digital computers. Computers writing code for other computers will rend human coders useless.
Could someone mention the name of beginning music
Thx
It's not "populism", it's democracy!
I miss the 2000s before all this mess
it was a time that we thought things would only get better
@@sodakk17 Yes I remember the optimism.
can someone explain to me how a self driving truck can reduce emission?
Nasir Lukman It's plans routes with greater efficiency and doesn't need to idle in the winter to keep its driver warm
It probably brakes less but is a pain to be stuck behind.
Nasir Lukman
Because truck drivers eat a lot of meat and fart a lot
The truck can maintain a constant speed, so it doesn't have to accelerate.
Nobody knows, but it surely will increase the number of fatal accidents.
The politicians keep giving away their people's heritage to foreigners (migrants).
You are explicitly saying that any foreigner or immigrant are not people? Or is there something I did not understand?
You know that there are many countries in Europe, North America and Latin America that are leaning towards populist governments and each one thinks the same as you? You are not people for many others.
It truly seems ridiculous. There are foreigners who love the country that received them and there are natives who contribute nothing to their own system. Populism only contributes to hate just because.
Democracy is populism from a base of plenty. Populism is democracy from a base that is non sustaining
Is it really that surprising that nationalism/populism has arisen from the failures of their governments on dealing with the migrant crisis. That has both terrified people of an athotarian ideology and strained economy due to handling migrants; in their respective Nations. Almost to the point of collapse.
Sadly that crisis is getting worse each year.
Hydrogen One It is the UN that is behind the migrant invasion. They seek to destabilize nation states so that they can swoop in and “fix” it. Google Peter Sutherland. The Chief Migrations officer. The WHAT???
Rebel Withacause Yes! Crisis--->Solution. We know those globalist communists working behind the scenes.
Question: Can we have a global economic system without a global government? If so, how? This isn't to cause a fight, I am genuinely curious of what people think because it's a question I have been asking myself for a while.
Systems that afford a high degree of autonomy and freedom as well as national sovereignty don’t require a centralized commanding presence. In fact a global government having considerable power would inevitably make its prime concern the maintenance of that power. Anyone not with the program would be persecuted and the pursuit of happiness would be crushed.
not populism but democracy! The truth is that not everyone has the equal competence for vote!
Populism will become stronger and stronger as populism is just the voice of the people over the voice of the elites. We have been ignored for too long, now we raise our voices. The system can never break the people if the people refuse to accept the non-popular voice and speak up louder. Populism is the new buzz word for democracy.
"Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether they could they didn't stop to think if they should." What history will say about technology in the 21st century.
Populism just portrays the flaws in human psyche, remember those times when mobs burned witches ?
Hopefully we all point fingers at the real problem, corrupt politicians more concerned with lining their own pockets than helping the people, rather than immigrants and other scapegoats.
Futurists nearly 100 years ago said this day would come. Forty-five years ago I wrote a short story about a robot that escaped his owner to seek out a lawyer to help it. The robot was a model DS, from Dredd Scott. Displaced workers must be compensated for the loss of jobs, and welfare is not the answer. I can write an essay, by my cousin can not. He can rebuild a diesel engine, but I can not. Today's problem of automation destroying jobs is not new, but we already have more people than jobs. My great-grandchildren may face a time where technology will refuse to work for us. We could be on a road to disaster.
As someone who works in tech, I would LOVE to be part of a organization that helps train, and mentor interested adults!
"an establishment out in touch with ordinary people" well, you've just described yourself economist
This is what's wrong about democracy , it's all about showmanship not leadership
Instead of the establishment politicians changing and addressing the issues, they have decided to close ranks.
Austine Declan 👍. They will regret it. I hope. Problem is that most of these asses dont have to live with the dire consequences of their actions...