I love your videos. You are part of a very small community of UA-cam watch channels that don’t go for “reviews”, aka promoting in disguise. You express opinions that are valuable. Keep up the good work.
I try - Thanks. I do have the ambition of getting a hold of watches so I can get some better b-roll but I do intend to do it without losing my impartiality .😊
You are one of the most lucid, thoughtful, intelligent and articulate voices in this space. I’ve been following your videos for some time now and have found them to be really thought-provoking and illuminating discourses, whether it’s on the state of the watch industry or predictions for a certain brand. You’re doing great!
We need more people in the watch community who give clear, well-informed opinions while also emphasizing the importance of personal taste in decision making. Well stated.
This has become my favourite watch channel. Insightful information that is well presented, with no vested interest in selling anything. Please keep doing what you do.
He is doing a very good job of promoting watches. Very well written. I hope he never releases a outtake video. He one takes a lot of this. Very difficult.
I have the Omega NTTD and the Zenith Chronomaster Sport Blue. Both of them are amazing. I traded my White Ceramic Chronomaster Sport for the Blue steel version, no regret at all.
Everyone has different tastes, which truly makes watch collecting so much fun! We can debate the +/-'s of all 10 in this video for hours. However, your keen eye for detail & specifications has enlightened me considerably! Keep these videos coming. Love to see your perspective on aventurine dials from different brands and choosing your favorites [I can't make up my mind].
Been a watch collector for about a year and have viewed so many watch videos. You are a breath of fresh, honest air amidst the cookie cutter content. Love the hot take video. Please make more critical vids
This is only the second videos I've viewed since I've subscribed to your channel and I can truly say you are now my go-to watch reviewer. Fine work and I look forward to working my way through your back video catalogue.
'If the story speaks to you, or the watch just speaks to your aesthetic, you're not going to be disappointed'. Spot on Mike. Couldn't have put it better myself 😉
Love what you said about the Speedmaster. I bought an older 1861 from 2020. It's my only watch apart from a G shock and an old cheap dress watch from the 1960s... the Speedy can still be bought for around £3800-4000 for the older versions and in my mind, it's just a better watch than the new one.... you are right - the prices unfortunately have climbed too far north... I would recommend this version to anyone. The watch is superb and for me, it's the ultimate one watch to rule them all (and a G shock for anything really messy or wet)
@@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch yes exactly. I wear mine on leather usually... the new bracelet pulled my hair a few times when trying it on, so I would never buy it on that bracelet anyway
A correction on the Glycine Airman. It is not a “explorer inspired watch”, rather its the inspiration for the Explorer 2! Glycine Airman came out in 1953 and was the first GMT watch. The 1655 reference came out much later, in 1971, with its hand and bezel design clearly referencing the airman.
Actually Glycine’s fourth hand (the tail) was added in 1955 to the minute hand, and then moved to the hour hand in 1957 to enable tracking in 12-hour format (inspired by the 1954 GMT Master?); the 1953 original relied solely on the 24-hour bezel (and dial) and hour/minute hands. Rolex’ 1954 GMT Master was a functionally and aesthetically different design from the original Airman, using a dedicated fourth hand to track a second time zone and the rotatable bezel a third. The 1971 Explorer II followed the GMT Master format, not the Glycine; it was simply a GMT Master with a fixed steel bezel and a different dial layout that included half-hour markers to further differentiate it from the GMT Master. The resemblance of the bezels was simply due to a switch from the GMT Master’s Bakelite bezel insert to steel. What may or may not have been inspired by the Airman are the half-hour markers of the original 1971 Exp II.
Your intelligent and thoughtful insights on product and the watch industry as a whole have been incredibly refreshing. Your content is always relevant and unique. Keep up the fantastic work!!
My Meistersinger Primatic 365 limited edition watch makes me go gooey every time I open my watch box. Love its looks love the build quality love the single hand and power indicator. Love it a lot it’s lovely 😊😊😊😊
Enjoyed the takes. Thank you. My favourite watch I own and wear most is the baby Alpinist from Seiko in the limited edition brown with the washi style dial. I put it on a leather strap and it has been a joy to wear at work and weekends. I scratch my head as to why it was a limited edition when the practicality of this is unmatched - 200m diver’s, 70-hour power reserve, all in a dress watch package (after I swapped out the strap that is). So thank you for saying “wear what one likes, not one that you think others will like”. I think I got my money’s worth at USD300 from an official outlet. Best cost/performance in my mind.
It is important to note that the original Glycine Airman, 36mm was the first GMT watch, released in 1953, 1 year before the GMT- Master. (1954) The explorer though introduced in 1953, records show that it never summited Mt. Everest with Tenzing Norgay and Edmund Hillary. 🙌🏼
My daily watch currently is a 'Pre Bond' Mid sized Omega Seamaster Professional 200m. It's a 36-37mm watch. It's a little smaller than what I normally wear which would be a watch in the 40mm range but it's in near mint, works great and I enjoy it as it's a reflection of where Omega were in the 80s and early 90s. When the watch sizes were smaller than now, quite a lot smaller. It's understated, clean and quite elegant. It's aged well.
On a recent trip, I was lucky enough to spend some time in a Grand Seiko Boutique. Got to hang out with the Shunbun, Snowflake, and White Birch. After years of being told how great the Snowflake was online, and how amazing the pink dial was on the Shunbun, I tried them both on, and simply could not get over the weight, it felt.....cheap. The Shunbun was in natural light, and even the sales guy admitted it wasn't as pink in person as its sold online. The moment I strapped the White Birch on, it was like shaking hands with an old friend, great weight, great dial, tasteful finishing. Not to discredit the snowflake/shunbun, they both looked amazing, but the White Birch takes this brand to another level. Looks like I'm a subscriber now.
Best one of your videos I've watched in a while. I agree about the explorer 1, I recently declined one from WoS after waiting for a long time and I'm now in the market for a IWC Spitfire 39mm, but I'm holding out for the right deal preowned, since they have been discontinued.
Yes i did enjoy this episode, and mostly because we never know what we're going to get every Saturday morning. Good point on the Explorer, but I had the opposite reaction. I was more tepid at first, but i got "the call" at a very personally inconvenient time, december 2020, and I probably should have put off any decisions, but I was afraid i'd never get one otherwise so i bought it. I love it much more now than ever.
Thanks - Glad the vid resonated. I can't do a "deep dive analysis" type deal every week. Sometimes I just want to keep it a bit lighter and mix things up, so I am glad it was well received .😊😊
Thank you for yet another great video! This watch channel is certainly one of the better ones out there. I really appreciate your honest and insightful assessment on both different watches and the watch industry. Keep up the good work!
In my opinion, you are one of the best reviewers currently on UA-cam. Fantastic video. When you said “I don’t listen to Travis Scott”, that resonated with my soul 😂
I must agree with you on the Murph. Been considering getting a Hamilton for the longest time and if I were to finally take the plunge I'd do it with the Murph 42mm.
Would LOVE a video exploring your interest in history and the watches that are part of it! As a side note I enjoyed this curtailed take on likes and dislikes; it's like speed dating but for watches.
Great advice on the Explorer “size mafia.” I’m a huge fan of 36mm Rolex but, after trying on both the explorer 36 and 40, I decided on the 40 and am really enjoying it. If I were to have let the “explorer can only be 36mm” crowd get to my head, I’d have the wrong watch for me. My experience with the OP was completely different as the 36mm felt better.
I agree with most of your observations. However for some reason I love the Roles Air King very much. Especially the newest model. Looks different than the typical watch esthetics but in a measured and conservative Rolex fashion.
It's funny to see that out of four things you dislike about the Shunbun, three of those explicitly helped me choose and buy that watch. The box crystal gives it a vintage vibe that other spring drives from the Heritage series miss, and it makes the center of gravity low. The titanium is fantastic, because the watch is too large, that metal is a prerequisite for me to wear it comfortably. Lastly, Spring Drive isn't something you buy because the movement is a bit more pretty, it's a technologists' purchase. It is a collision-free escapement! How cool is that? I'll grant you the pink. It could have been a dash more. Regarding Hamilton you are spot on. They invariably manage to cock up some detail to make the watch never perfect. On my 38mm mechanical, the one with the color scheme you like, the glass was so reflective it rendered the watch irritating. I think it's a shame. Would love to own a Hammie again, but the right one never exists.
Fair enough on the shunbun - It goes to show that there is no objective truth when it comes to watches. Only personal preference which is as it should be 😊
Thanks - GS is sometimes a hard sell for me. What they do well is usually 10/10 but then there are just some things where they fail to hit 6/10. At that price it needs to be 8/10 for me, personally 😊😊
A thought provoking topic (as usual?) Mike. I wholeheartedly agree about the Speedmaster. Love the classic minimalist design but it didn't pass the value test. Chose instead a NOS Racing Speedy from Japan at half the price; great watch, no regrets.
I chose the Spirit Zulu time Hodinkee, because of a rotating bezel and TITANIUM 5… Longines is from the Swatch group, ETA Iis owned by the Swatch group… technically in house.
I agree with you on the Grand Seiko Shunbun. I like pink and when I saw it in person I was disappointed by its lack of pinkness. My guess is in the marketing photos they increase the pink, because in person it looks more white/silver.
The old Seiko sneo95p2 solar. Accurate, understated, easy to read, utterly maintenance-free, and shockingly tough. (Also doesn't scream "look at my giant expensive watch!")
Love the content. Agree w/your takes. Keep them coming. Have the Zulu x Hodinkee. Simply a superb watch. In that Grade 5 titanium it is the most comfortable wearing watch I own. Followed by Oris Pro Pilot X blue dial-also titanium.
Thanks - Yeah. I am trying to mix things up a bit. Like to try different things and TBH the longer videos are much harder work, so I have to pace myself 😊😊
I own the Explorer 36 mm and 39 mm. They are pretty boring but I have them for sentimental reasons. I also own,the No Time to Die is an amazing watch, one of my favorites for sure.
Great content and one of my favorite channels to watch. One point of correction: the Glycine Airman isn’t an Explorer II inspired watch, neither is the Explorer II an Airman-inspired watch. Glycine’s fourth hand (the tail) was added in 1955 to the minute hand, and then moved to the hour hand in 1957 to enable tracking in 12-hour format (inspired by the 1954 GMT Master?); the 1953 original relied solely on the 24-hour bezel (and dial) and hour/minute hands. Rolex’ 1954 GMT Master was a functionally and aesthetically different design from the original Airman, using a dedicated fourth hand to track a second time zone and the rotatable bezel a third. Both predate the 1971 Explorer II, which followed the GMT Master format, not the Glycine; it was simply a GMT Master with a fixed steel bezel and a different dial layout that included half-hour markers to further differentiate it from the GMT Master. The resemblance of the bezels was simply due to a switch from the GMT Master’s Bakelite bezel insert to steel. What may or may not have been inspired by the Airman are the half-hour markers of the original 1971 Exp II.
When I bought my Glycine Airman most models had screw down crowns and either 100 or 200m WR. Can't understand why they gave up on that with the more "original" looking models. It has no great horological virtues but because it was the first GMT (beating the GMT master by months I believe) and has Vietnam War connections it deserves a little more love. I welcome any video that doesn't start with "This watch was sent in for review by XXXX, I don't have to send it back blah di blah etc.". Long may you and the others like you thrive!!
Congratulations on the classiest channel to do with watches on YT. Your approach to content is intellectually interesting and without competition from other channels that I see. Superb work ... keep it up! Greetings from Greece. P.S. I have been meaning to make this comment for a while now.
Great content! Totally agree on the “get what you like” attitude. This should be a standard video as we ask you so many questions about watches. My question by the way to you would be, what do you think about Rado Captain Cook. Thanks !
Great video as always, I find you opinion refreshing. 1) Rolex explorer, I followed you advice and tried one on (39). As I always find with Rolex, it's amazing quality but it didn't 'want' it. 2) Tudor falls into the same category as Rolex for me. I want to like it, but it just does not feel special on the wrist. But I'll keep looking ! 3) Longines, last time I went to try one on I bought a Baume & Mercier Classima instead. Just seemed very over priced and did not interest me at all. 4) Omega speedmaster, I love this watch. Every angle is perfect and that dial. Love it. 5) AP, nope nope nope. Horrible 6) Omega seamaster, it's a great watch and the 007 variant is so nice. I have a seamaster from the 70's, it's one of favs. 7) GS, I've tried on quite a few over the years but never been inspired to buy one. Perhaps one day (The Farer Meredith GMT has a really nice salmon dial, and it looks amazing) 8) Zenith - Meh ! 9) Glycine - Now this looks amazing, it's going on the list. Thanks ! 10) Hamilton - I've had 3 now, and sold them all. Perhaps it was a phase ! Looking forward to the next video.
I appreciate your candor and that you don’t seem to pander to watch PR departments for access. In terms of feedback, all useful takes - but might not fit into the flow of how buyers consume content as they ‘research’. By contrast, multiple reviews within one category might have more longevity. ‘But that’s just my take and you should run the channel in the way that makes you most happy’
Thanks - Yes. I like to do my own thing video wise. By now I know what draws views but sometimes I just want to do something that suits me. Was actually surprised this video resonated as much as it did 😊😊
Great job. The shorter, to the pt videos certainly work. Obviously some aspects of the watch world need a more thorough investigation. The spec snobs who rip thicker watches are silly. Depending on your dress shirt even a 12 mm isn’t going to work. The BB Pro still has an incredible dial, markers, and GMT hand. Can’t wait for this yr’s update with a white dial 🙏
For me, the modern Explorer references are all flawed in different ways - design wise the 40mm is the best IMO but is simply too large for the design. The ultimate Explorer ref is the predecessor to the 39mm, the 114270 - 36mm without the bloated font and lugs.
Similarly, the modern Seamaster 300 references are flawed in several ways, notably the thickness, bracelet design, and the hollow hands. The older 2254.50 or 2230.50 are far superior and a new redesigned reference similar to those would be a huge hit, no doubt.
The seamaster 300 bracelet is such a deal breaker for me, otherwise it's a beautiful piece. I really don't get why they don't make a tapered version for it.
I bought the 39mm Explorer because I liked the watch-not the story. Every watch has a story-antiquated, overpriced, man jewelry. But I love a good looking watch!😎
Omega SM: I am oddly drawn to the 007 Specter version. It's unlike the current SM300's and I prefer it does not have the sandwich dial because the number cutouts are kind of thin and parts of it visually disappear at certain angles other than dead straight on. It's also the first I found that actually looks good on the grey and black Bond style NATO. Rolex Explorer: I'm still in camp that thinks that style looks best and proper in 36mm. Longines Spirit GMT Hodinkee LE: I think it looks really good and would take it over the current BB offerings. It's not nearly as thick. However, I do think it is a bit overpriced at encroaching $4k. Glycine Airman: I love this model line and have owned several. For a while, my favorite was also the 40mm Chief version which you showed. But, for my 7" wrist, I do find the lugs a bit too broad/wide spaced and on a slender wrist, it has to sit at specific area on my wrist otherwise they kind of stick out and hover above the wrist just a bit too much. My ideal size and style would be the Airman 18 which I owned. They should really bring that back. 39mm, 200m WR, still slim as most Airmans are, with display case back and sapphire on both front and back. Screwdown crowns. I also like the 24hr bezel action is bidirectional with notable clicks to precisely position the bezel and lock down with 2nd crown. Where as the free friction ones, mostly on the more vintage styles ones, just feel a bit too loose sometimes. They work ok. It's just a tactile thing which at least the Airman 18 and some of its other larger more modern styled brethren share a better bezel action, IMHO.
Agree with your take on SMP NTTD. The best in the lineup, but this price, gosh….😢 Other than price though - near perfect. Lightweight thanks to titanium, no date, not shiny. Love it. Same thing with Hamilton - you’ve nailed it. Now it’s not all roses - I can’t agree with you on Glycine Airman. 24h time marks are doubled and 12h markers are nowhere to be found. Strange. Also 30m water resistance is not enough to consider this piece as a travel companion. I’m not going to say a single word about Rolex, don’t want to get crucified 😂
Love your content. Agree with most opinions, disagree with some.. That's the beauty . Would love some patek commentary, how about A Lange vs Moritz grossmann? In other words.. would love some high horology episodes as well. Keep up the great work.
Another great video. I agree with just about every point. In relation to the Explorer, I owned the 124270 and sold it after a year. 80% of the time it looked and felt amazing but sometimes it just felt a bit small on my 18,5 cm wrist, so I sold it. I’m not a fan of AP sport watches, but I do love the code 11.59 even though it gets a lot of hate (I know this is a very unpopular opinion). On another topic I would really like to hear your opinion on silicon vs. non-silicon components in watches. Their seems to be a divide in the community about this topic and I would really like to hear your perspective.
Thanks. Silicon and synthetics? That's a tough one. There's no doubt that some materials contribute to better precision, durability etc. But anything "plastic" or "synthetic" comes with baggage in terms of perception. It also depends on "why" it's their. For Rolex it doesn't reduce longevity or quality of their movements that they use certain modern materials, but a ETA powermatic movement is to some extent leveraging materials of certain types purely from a cost perspective. There is a case to be made for there being less "romance" in the movement when it isn't fully made of classic materials (steel, gold, etc). The whole hand made, machine-lathe and what not means something to people. Long story - For me it would depend on the watch, the brand, the price and the function of the material in the larger context. cheers 😊😊
Would be interested to hear your take on Bremont. I have heard the brand gets a lot of hate. The ejection seat thing is gimmicky. But I like their designs, that they are made in England, and seem to be tough as nails. And the prices seem reasonable.
The Explorer 39 is my absolute favourite watch, because it's a little quirky, the Rolex snobs tend to ignore it and it's not often recognized when you wear it.
Completely agree. If you like a watch but nobody else does. It doesn’t matter. It’s still a good watch.
Spot on 😊
I love your videos. You are part of a very small community of UA-cam watch channels that don’t go for “reviews”, aka promoting in disguise. You express opinions that are valuable. Keep up the good work.
I try - Thanks. I do have the ambition of getting a hold of watches so I can get some better b-roll but I do intend to do it without losing my impartiality .😊
You are one of the most lucid, thoughtful, intelligent and articulate voices in this space. I’ve been following your videos for some time now and have found them to be really thought-provoking and illuminating discourses, whether it’s on the state of the watch industry or predictions for a certain brand. You’re doing great!
I love your content. Your pacing is perfect, and your words are carefully chosen and even handed.
Thanks. I try to be fair at least... 😊
I’m so glad I found this channel it’s so refreshing
Happy to have you on board 😊
Love listening to someone who isn't trying to sell me a watch. Really feels from the heart!
Thanks 😀
We need more people in the watch community who give clear, well-informed opinions while also emphasizing the importance of personal taste in decision making. Well stated.
Thanks a ton 😊😊
This has become my favourite watch channel. Insightful information that is well presented, with no vested interest in selling anything. Please keep doing what you do.
He is doing a very good job of promoting watches. Very well written. I hope he never releases a outtake video. He one takes a lot of this. Very difficult.
I will certainly try my very best 😊😊
I have the Omega NTTD and the Zenith Chronomaster Sport
Blue. Both of them are amazing. I traded my White Ceramic Chronomaster Sport for the Blue steel version, no regret at all.
Everyone has different tastes, which truly makes watch collecting so much fun! We can debate the +/-'s of all 10 in this video for hours. However, your keen eye for detail & specifications has enlightened me considerably! Keep these videos coming. Love to see your perspective on aventurine dials from different brands and choosing your favorites [I can't make up my mind].
Thanks for the feedback and always happy you take the time to contribute 😊😊
Been a watch collector for about a year and have viewed so many watch videos. You are a breath of fresh, honest air amidst the cookie cutter content. Love the hot take video. Please make more critical vids
Thanks - Glad you like my approach to youtube videos 😃😃
This is only the second videos I've viewed since I've subscribed to your channel and I can truly say you are now my go-to watch reviewer. Fine work and I look forward to working my way through your back video catalogue.
Welcome aboard and thanks a ton 😊
Extremely sensible, knowledgeable and thoughtful comments on this channel! Highly recommended!
The reference to the « size mafia » is spot on.
They are among us.... Just saying 😊
'If the story speaks to you, or the watch just speaks to your aesthetic, you're not going to be disappointed'.
Spot on Mike. Couldn't have put it better myself 😉
Glad it resonated 😊
Love what you said about the Speedmaster. I bought an older 1861 from 2020. It's my only watch apart from a G shock and an old cheap dress watch from the 1960s... the Speedy can still be bought for around £3800-4000 for the older versions and in my mind, it's just a better watch than the new one.... you are right - the prices unfortunately have climbed too far north...
I would recommend this version to anyone. The watch is superb and for me, it's the ultimate one watch to rule them all (and a G shock for anything really messy or wet)
Good call - The speedy is just great. I do like the new bracelet though, but tbh I always put it on a Nato or leather anyway... 😊😊
@@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch yes exactly. I wear mine on leather usually... the new bracelet pulled my hair a few times when trying it on, so I would never buy it on that bracelet anyway
I agree with the GS bracelet taper which is also true for most of the brands if they decide to do it. Tapering the bracelet does wonders.
A correction on the Glycine Airman. It is not a “explorer inspired watch”, rather its the inspiration for the Explorer 2!
Glycine Airman came out in 1953 and was the first GMT watch. The 1655 reference came out much later, in 1971, with its hand and bezel design clearly referencing the airman.
Any day where I learn something new is a good day. Thanks for letting me know about the error 😀😀
Cheers 😀
Actually Glycine’s fourth hand (the tail) was added in 1955 to the minute hand, and then moved to the hour hand in 1957 to enable tracking in 12-hour format (inspired by the 1954 GMT Master?); the 1953 original relied solely on the 24-hour bezel (and dial) and hour/minute hands. Rolex’ 1954 GMT Master was a functionally and aesthetically different design from the original Airman, using a dedicated fourth hand to track a second time zone and the rotatable bezel a third. The 1971 Explorer II followed the GMT Master format, not the Glycine; it was simply a GMT Master with a fixed steel bezel and a different dial layout that included half-hour markers to further differentiate it from the GMT Master. The resemblance of the bezels was simply due to a switch from the GMT Master’s Bakelite bezel insert to steel. What may or may not have been inspired by the Airman are the half-hour markers of the original 1971 Exp II.
Your intelligent and thoughtful insights on product and the watch industry as a whole have been incredibly refreshing. Your content is always relevant and unique. Keep up the fantastic work!!
I appreciate that! 😀
I have the Seamaster No Time to Die and find it awesome. The only gripe I have is that it could be 1mm thinner.
Liked it! I always say that to be a good watch for me, it needs to have the same personnality as me.
Mike is so honest that in 12 min does the job. Others would have done ten videos and played around...
Nice content! Keep it up!😊
Thanks! Will try 😀
I watch a lot of watch channels. This one is quickly becoming my fave. Keep up the high quality and thoughtful content, please.
Will try my best, thanks 😊😊
My Meistersinger Primatic 365 limited edition watch makes me go gooey every time I open my watch box. Love its looks love the build quality love the single hand and power indicator. Love it a lot it’s lovely 😊😊😊😊
This has become my favourite watch channel. Really good content. Thanks 👍
Enjoyed the takes. Thank you.
My favourite watch I own and wear most is the baby Alpinist from Seiko in the limited edition brown with the washi style dial. I put it on a leather strap and it has been a joy to wear at work and weekends. I scratch my head as to why it was a limited edition when the practicality of this is unmatched - 200m diver’s, 70-hour power reserve, all in a dress watch package (after I swapped out the strap that is).
So thank you for saying “wear what one likes, not one that you think others will like”. I think I got my money’s worth at USD300 from an official outlet. Best cost/performance in my mind.
Good call on the alpinist... A classic for a reason 😊
It is important to note that the original Glycine Airman, 36mm was the first GMT watch, released in 1953, 1 year before the GMT- Master. (1954)
The explorer though introduced in 1953, records show that it never summited Mt. Everest with Tenzing Norgay and Edmund Hillary. 🙌🏼
My daily watch currently is a 'Pre Bond' Mid sized Omega Seamaster Professional 200m. It's a 36-37mm watch. It's a little smaller than what I normally wear which would be a watch in the 40mm range but it's in near mint, works great and I enjoy it as it's a reflection of where Omega were in the 80s and early 90s. When the watch sizes were smaller than now, quite a lot smaller.
It's understated, clean and quite elegant. It's aged well.
On a recent trip, I was lucky enough to spend some time in a Grand Seiko Boutique. Got to hang out with the Shunbun, Snowflake, and White Birch. After years of being told how great the Snowflake was online, and how amazing the pink dial was on the Shunbun, I tried them both on, and simply could not get over the weight, it felt.....cheap. The Shunbun was in natural light, and even the sales guy admitted it wasn't as pink in person as its sold online. The moment I strapped the White Birch on, it was like shaking hands with an old friend, great weight, great dial, tasteful finishing. Not to discredit the snowflake/shunbun, they both looked amazing, but the White Birch takes this brand to another level. Looks like I'm a subscriber now.
Welcome on board - and fun to hear that you have a similar experience of the shunbun. The birch though... 😃😃
Best one of your videos I've watched in a while. I agree about the explorer 1, I recently declined one from WoS after waiting for a long time and I'm now in the market for a IWC Spitfire 39mm, but I'm holding out for the right deal preowned, since they have been discontinued.
Thanks - Hope you find the right model at the right price 😊
Your content is sincere, great and unique. You dont even need to show the actual watch or use gimmicks.. On point.
thanks 😊😊
Yes i did enjoy this episode, and mostly because we never know what we're going to get every Saturday morning. Good point on the Explorer, but I had the opposite reaction. I was more tepid at first, but i got "the call" at a very personally inconvenient time, december 2020, and I probably should have put off any decisions, but I was afraid i'd never get one otherwise so i bought it. I love it much more now than ever.
Thanks - Glad the vid resonated. I can't do a "deep dive analysis" type deal every week. Sometimes I just want to keep it a bit lighter and mix things up, so I am glad it was well received .😊😊
Thank you for yet another great video! This watch channel is certainly one of the better ones out there. I really appreciate your honest and insightful assessment on both different watches and the watch industry. Keep up the good work!
In my opinion, you are one of the best reviewers currently on UA-cam. Fantastic video. When you said “I don’t listen to Travis Scott”, that resonated with my soul 😂
Lol. 😂 I had to google who he was.... 😊
This is the best watch channel on youtube.
Very kind words. Thank YOU 😊😊
The best voice and the most intelligent takes on the tubes, right here.
Very very kind of you. Thanks 😊
I must agree with you on the Murph. Been considering getting a Hamilton for the longest time and if I were to finally take the plunge I'd do it with the Murph 42mm.
38 for me but otherwise totally on board 😊
Would LOVE a video exploring your interest in history and the watches that are part of it!
As a side note I enjoyed this curtailed take on likes and dislikes; it's like speed dating but for watches.
Thanks for the feedback. Will consider the history topic for sure (I have a very long long-list) 😊😊
Very good review!
One thing I definitely agree with is the titanium feel.
Like a toy.
Never have liked them.
I know I am not alone.
I have recently bought the Hodinkee x Longines Zulu. It is a fantastic watch and an improvement over the BB Pro in everyway.
Khaki Expedition is the best of the line up, IMO...
Great advice on the Explorer “size mafia.” I’m a huge fan of 36mm Rolex but, after trying on both the explorer 36 and 40, I decided on the 40 and am really enjoying it. If I were to have let the “explorer can only be 36mm” crowd get to my head, I’d have the wrong watch for me.
My experience with the OP was completely different as the 36mm felt better.
Very nice video. I own the Rolex Explorer 36 mm and the Tudor BBpro GMT and both are among my favourites.
As they should be 😊
Just found your channel and I am really enjoying it! Well reasoned knowledge with no bulls**t, refreshing!
glad you appreciate my approach 😀😀
I agree with most of your observations. However for some reason I love the Roles Air King very much. Especially the newest model. Looks different than the typical watch esthetics but in a measured and conservative Rolex fashion.
As always - You should only care about what you like, not what I like .😊😊
It's funny to see that out of four things you dislike about the Shunbun, three of those explicitly helped me choose and buy that watch. The box crystal gives it a vintage vibe that other spring drives from the Heritage series miss, and it makes the center of gravity low. The titanium is fantastic, because the watch is too large, that metal is a prerequisite for me to wear it comfortably. Lastly, Spring Drive isn't something you buy because the movement is a bit more pretty, it's a technologists' purchase. It is a collision-free escapement! How cool is that? I'll grant you the pink. It could have been a dash more.
Regarding Hamilton you are spot on. They invariably manage to cock up some detail to make the watch never perfect. On my 38mm mechanical, the one with the color scheme you like, the glass was so reflective it rendered the watch irritating. I think it's a shame. Would love to own a Hammie again, but the right one never exists.
Fair enough on the shunbun - It goes to show that there is no objective truth when it comes to watches. Only personal preference which is as it should be 😊
Always a pleasure watching your videos.
I love my two-tone Explorer 36. The fact that not many others do, only adds to its charm for me.
I love my 124273 as well!
A brilliant take as usual! Thanks for the really insightful content... I think of you as the Dr. Phil of watch enthusiasts... Don't stop...
Dr Phil? Arg... Is that a good thing? lol 😂😂😂
You nailed the shunbun description.
I find a lot of GS to be great on paper/pixels but lacking when you try them on. Rolex understands this better.
Thanks - GS is sometimes a hard sell for me. What they do well is usually 10/10 but then there are just some things where they fail to hit 6/10. At that price it needs to be 8/10 for me, personally 😊😊
A thought provoking topic (as usual?) Mike. I wholeheartedly agree about the Speedmaster. Love the classic minimalist design but it didn't pass the value test. Chose instead a NOS Racing Speedy from Japan at half the price; great watch, no regrets.
Very interesting to hear your thoughts on specific watches, I like the format 👍
I chose the Spirit Zulu time Hodinkee, because of a rotating bezel and TITANIUM 5… Longines is from the Swatch group, ETA Iis owned by the Swatch group… technically in house.
Johnny Rockets and Rolex.....classic pairing! Great content, me likey.
I agree with you on the Grand Seiko Shunbun. I like pink and when I saw it in person I was disappointed by its lack of pinkness. My guess is in the marketing photos they increase the pink, because in person it looks more white/silver.
The last watch you described is the Hanhart Pioneer Preventor9, except it’s 40mm. Check it out!
The old Seiko sneo95p2 solar. Accurate, understated, easy to read, utterly maintenance-free, and shockingly tough. (Also doesn't scream "look at my giant expensive watch!")
Someday I'll find and buy one of the Bond Sea masters. I like those watches more that I like the movies lol.
Wow with your polish and ability to be interesting with no music or video clips I thought you were a veteran bravo 👏
Very kind of you - thanks 😊
Spot on and shared feelings. Although the Explorer 40 has a piece of my heart.
Love the content. Agree w/your takes. Keep them coming. Have the Zulu x Hodinkee. Simply a superb watch. In that Grade 5 titanium it is the most comfortable wearing watch I own. Followed by Oris Pro Pilot X blue dial-also titanium.
Thanks. Like I said in the vid - It's an amazing watch. Stellar even. I just expected more from Hodinkee 😊
Yes, I like your quick thoughts on some of the watches and it is a nice change of pace while you are going deeper in other videos. Keep it coming!! 🏋️
Thanks - Yeah. I am trying to mix things up a bit. Like to try different things and TBH the longer videos are much harder work, so I have to pace myself 😊😊
Always so interesting… 👍😊
Agree Cactus Jack is great.
I own the Explorer 36 mm and 39 mm. They are pretty boring but I have them for sentimental reasons. I also own,the No Time to Die is an amazing watch, one of my favorites for sure.
Great content and one of my favorite channels to watch. One point of correction: the Glycine Airman isn’t an Explorer II inspired watch, neither is the Explorer II an Airman-inspired watch. Glycine’s fourth hand (the tail) was added in 1955 to the minute hand, and then moved to the hour hand in 1957 to enable tracking in 12-hour format (inspired by the 1954 GMT Master?); the 1953 original relied solely on the 24-hour bezel (and dial) and hour/minute hands. Rolex’ 1954 GMT Master was a functionally and aesthetically different design from the original Airman, using a dedicated fourth hand to track a second time zone and the rotatable bezel a third.
Both predate the 1971 Explorer II, which followed the GMT Master format, not the Glycine; it was simply a GMT Master with a fixed steel bezel and a different dial layout that included half-hour markers to further differentiate it from the GMT Master. The resemblance of the bezels was simply due to a switch from the GMT Master’s Bakelite bezel insert to steel. What may or may not have been inspired by the Airman are the half-hour markers of the original 1971 Exp II.
Thanks and thanks for the clarification. This was a history piece I was not aware of 😊😊
When I bought my Glycine Airman most models had screw down crowns and either 100 or 200m WR. Can't understand why they gave up on that with the more "original" looking models. It has no great horological virtues but because it was the first GMT (beating the GMT master by months I believe) and has Vietnam War connections it deserves a little more love. I welcome any video that doesn't start with "This watch was sent in for review by XXXX, I don't have to send it back blah di blah etc.". Long may you and the others like you thrive!!
Congratulations on the classiest channel to do with watches on YT. Your approach to content is intellectually interesting and without competition from other channels that I see. Superb work ... keep it up! Greetings from Greece. P.S. I have been meaning to make this comment for a while now.
Much appreciated and thanks for taking the time to comment 😊😊
If I had a large successful high end watch company you would be one of my top candidates for senior VP, Global Marketing. Best regards from Las Vegas.
Lol. Thank you 😂 Problem with that would be, I would have to actually do something and not just babble on. Can't have that.... 😂😂
I appreciate you insight into design and your presentation cadence. Don’t change.
Great content! Totally agree on the “get what you like” attitude. This should be a standard video as we ask you so many questions about watches. My question by the way to you would be, what do you think about Rado Captain Cook. Thanks !
Thank you to you too 😊😊
Great video as always, I find you opinion refreshing.
1) Rolex explorer, I followed you advice and tried one on (39). As I always find with Rolex, it's amazing quality but it didn't 'want' it.
2) Tudor falls into the same category as Rolex for me. I want to like it, but it just does not feel special on the wrist. But I'll keep looking !
3) Longines, last time I went to try one on I bought a Baume & Mercier Classima instead. Just seemed very over priced and did not interest me at all.
4) Omega speedmaster, I love this watch. Every angle is perfect and that dial. Love it.
5) AP, nope nope nope. Horrible
6) Omega seamaster, it's a great watch and the 007 variant is so nice. I have a seamaster from the 70's, it's one of favs.
7) GS, I've tried on quite a few over the years but never been inspired to buy one. Perhaps one day (The Farer Meredith GMT has a really nice salmon dial, and it looks amazing)
8) Zenith - Meh !
9) Glycine - Now this looks amazing, it's going on the list. Thanks !
10) Hamilton - I've had 3 now, and sold them all. Perhaps it was a phase !
Looking forward to the next video.
The Black Bay Pro wears perfectly and is very comfortable. You don't even see the faux rivets
I think the Airman preceeded the explorer II. Even if it were a "copy", they'd be totally entitled to make one
Love this content and always love your takes even when I don’t agree. You’re one the best. Thank you
So very kind of you 😊😊
I appreciate your candor and that you don’t seem to pander to watch PR departments for access. In terms of feedback, all useful takes - but might not fit into the flow of how buyers consume content as they ‘research’. By contrast, multiple reviews within one category might have more longevity. ‘But that’s just my take and you should run the channel in the way that makes you most happy’
Thanks - Yes. I like to do my own thing video wise. By now I know what draws views but sometimes I just want to do something that suits me. Was actually surprised this video resonated as much as it did 😊😊
Very fun video, always enjoy your videos & insight.
really, I'm watching you chanel because of you're voice (and it is very informative). good job Mike
NTTD is definitely the BEST!
I thinks it's fab for sure 😊
I only got the last one but I'm making my way to the top :)
Great job. The shorter, to the pt videos certainly work. Obviously some aspects of the watch world need a more thorough investigation.
The spec snobs who rip thicker watches are silly. Depending on your dress shirt even a 12 mm isn’t going to work. The BB Pro still has an incredible dial, markers, and GMT hand. Can’t wait for this yr’s update with a white dial 🙏
For me, the modern Explorer references are all flawed in different ways - design wise the 40mm is the best IMO but is simply too large for the design. The ultimate Explorer ref is the predecessor to the 39mm, the 114270 - 36mm without the bloated font and lugs.
Similarly, the modern Seamaster 300 references are flawed in several ways, notably the thickness, bracelet design, and the hollow hands. The older 2254.50 or 2230.50 are far superior and a new redesigned reference similar to those would be a huge hit, no doubt.
The seamaster 300 bracelet is such a deal breaker for me, otherwise it's a beautiful piece. I really don't get why they don't make a tapered version for it.
I bought the 39mm Explorer because I liked the watch-not the story. Every watch has a story-antiquated, overpriced, man jewelry.
But I love a good looking watch!😎
Omega SM: I am oddly drawn to the 007 Specter version. It's unlike the current SM300's and I prefer it does not have the sandwich dial because the number cutouts are kind of thin and parts of it visually disappear at certain angles other than dead straight on. It's also the first I found that actually looks good on the grey and black Bond style NATO.
Rolex Explorer: I'm still in camp that thinks that style looks best and proper in 36mm.
Longines Spirit GMT Hodinkee LE: I think it looks really good and would take it over the current BB offerings. It's not nearly as thick. However, I do think it is a bit overpriced at encroaching $4k.
Glycine Airman: I love this model line and have owned several. For a while, my favorite was also the 40mm Chief version which you showed. But, for my 7" wrist, I do find the lugs a bit too broad/wide spaced and on a slender wrist, it has to sit at specific area on my wrist otherwise they kind of stick out and hover above the wrist just a bit too much.
My ideal size and style would be the Airman 18 which I owned. They should really bring that back. 39mm, 200m WR, still slim as most Airmans are, with display case back and sapphire on both front and back. Screwdown crowns. I also like the 24hr bezel action is bidirectional with notable clicks to precisely position the bezel and lock down with 2nd crown. Where as the free friction ones, mostly on the more vintage styles ones, just feel a bit too loose sometimes. They work ok. It's just a tactile thing which at least the Airman 18 and some of its other larger more modern styled brethren share a better bezel action, IMHO.
Agree with your take on SMP NTTD. The best in the lineup, but this price, gosh….😢 Other than price though - near perfect. Lightweight thanks to titanium, no date, not shiny. Love it. Same thing with Hamilton - you’ve nailed it. Now it’s not all roses - I can’t agree with you on Glycine Airman. 24h time marks are doubled and 12h markers are nowhere to be found. Strange. Also 30m water resistance is not enough to consider this piece as a travel companion. I’m not going to say a single word about Rolex, don’t want to get crucified 😂
True point about the price of the NTTD. It is way off, I agree . Should probably have said so in the vid, but all the bonds are overpriced 😊
Great video and great content! Well done. Its a pleasure listening to you.
Thank you kindly 😃😃
Video by video this channel is becoming my favorite of all. Great takes and very informative.
Glad to hear it! 😊🔥
Great review
Thank you 😊
Good content and observations. Food for thought.
Glad it resonated with you 😀
Love your content. Agree with most opinions, disagree with some.. That's the beauty . Would love some patek commentary, how about A Lange vs Moritz grossmann? In other words.. would love some high horology episodes as well. Keep up the great work.
Thanks and will do my very best 😊
Love it, outstanding breakdown and refreshingly unbiased takes. Much appreciated
Thanks a ton 😊😊
The only Omega I need is a re-issue of the Peter Blake.
Another great video. I agree with just about every point. In relation to the Explorer, I owned the 124270 and sold it after a year. 80% of the time it looked and felt amazing but sometimes it just felt a bit small on my 18,5 cm wrist, so I sold it.
I’m not a fan of AP sport watches, but I do love the code 11.59 even though it gets a lot of hate (I know this is a very unpopular opinion).
On another topic I would really like to hear your opinion on silicon vs. non-silicon components in watches. Their seems to be a divide in the community about this topic and I would really like to hear your perspective.
Thanks.
Silicon and synthetics? That's a tough one. There's no doubt that some materials contribute to better precision, durability etc. But anything "plastic" or "synthetic" comes with baggage in terms of perception. It also depends on "why" it's their. For Rolex it doesn't reduce longevity or quality of their movements that they use certain modern materials, but a ETA powermatic movement is to some extent leveraging materials of certain types purely from a cost perspective.
There is a case to be made for there being less "romance" in the movement when it isn't fully made of classic materials (steel, gold, etc). The whole hand made, machine-lathe and what not means something to people.
Long story - For me it would depend on the watch, the brand, the price and the function of the material in the larger context. cheers 😊😊
Your channel is awesome; individual and that’s great.
Thank you so much 😊
Loving your channel
Getting the Speedy this Tuesday. Wish me luck. Going for the hesalite as well.
Excellent choice 😊
Love this format
Thanks for letting me know 😊
Would be interested to hear your take on Bremont. I have heard the brand gets a lot of hate. The ejection seat thing is gimmicky. But I like their designs, that they are made in England, and seem to be tough as nails. And the prices seem reasonable.
Every single watch has the Bond Omega half layered over it on the left. Probably slipped by when checking
You are correct. The idea was to have the watch talked about on the right and the previous watch on the left, but I forgot to move them. 😊😊
Nice takes. Thanks.
The Explorer 39 is my absolute favourite watch, because it's a little quirky, the Rolex snobs tend to ignore it and it's not often recognized when you wear it.
Non-recognition is a plus in large cities when you’re drunk…
Lol. True 😂