there "comparisons" or better other youtubers fillings about this glasses vs top competitors, and what I notice those glasses are just same thing like xreal air2 for picture quality and with better app , and price is wow 200 euros lower. For me it is important that they are made by TCL, I have 75 inch mini-led tv from them and quality of black's and colors is same like my lg oled tv what is crazy, so I trust them with products they deliver. Im almost convinced to tap buy button but 450 euros is still alot for thing that I will use only in plane. But I think there is no reason to buy more expensive glasses than this, you cant find any negative opinion on UA-cam.
I was expecting them to do it without a cable attached to the glasses, maybe in the future, like wireless solution using your streaming services, also using mobildata with phone or Wifi at home. Prefer not to plug into a silly little lead/cable with the glasses, probably fuck my eyes up too since my eyes are blurry already, got to have an option incase your eyesight is weak than the perfect 20/20 vision as you see clearly.
NGL these look tempting and I've always scoffed at these types of products before (here's lookin' at you, way too plentiful Viture sponsored segments) Kinda hoping that these type of displays do become a sizable market so if for only one thing 3D content for "home" use can continue to live on and be accessible.
lol i actually love rhe cinematic feel of 24/30fps, im ok with 60, but unless im playing something thats supposed to be real like sports/racing, i hate how 120 makes things look fake. my friends 120htz samsung tv upscales movies to 120 and gives it that soap opera effect as it makes up frames. probably something i dont need to worry about with games that can pump 120, and probably dont need to make up frames, but still feels uncanny valley to me for some reason
I have the Viture, including their switch dock, and it's really not a "copy" just because they, - by functional design - MUST, have the same kind of basic operation.
I'm interested but I do want to know whether or not these support placing screens statically rather than having it stuck to one view at all times? I've noticed a trend among XR glasses that they require some form of external/accessary hardware in order to enable this. Assuming the same rule applies here?
There is an android app they're working on that can do multi-screen & relative positioning using 3DOF... Unfortunately I couldn't test it in time for this video. - if you want screens you can "stick" to an exact 6FOD position, like on a wall, you're gonna be paying a LOT more, and wearing something MUCH heavier, like actual AR glasses or a VR headset with passthough, like the Quest 3
Seems positive my only problem is that practically every review of the various AR/XR glasses is sponsored. Very few people buying them with their own money and then reviewing them. (Not a Blunty problem, more of a techtuber in general problem).
I honestly like these a little better (yes this is a sponsored video, so take whatever grain of salt you need) but, they really are a little lighter, more comfortable to wear, easier to adjust and have a slightly better viewing experience. The Virtue have a few more bells and whistles, like the EL Dimmable shade, and PIP mode with their Android neckband, weather that's 'worth it' is a personal choice... for me? nope.
As a lenovo legion go owner that loves the screen. I ordered the xreal air pro hopefully this will give me that big screen i want.😊
Would be nice to see a comparison from an xreal or rokid max. Great watch though!
But how do they compare to the XReal Air 2?
there "comparisons" or better other youtubers fillings about this glasses vs top competitors, and what I notice those glasses are just same thing like xreal air2 for picture quality and with better app , and price is wow 200 euros lower. For me it is important that they are made by TCL, I have 75 inch mini-led tv from them and quality of black's and colors is same like my lg oled tv what is crazy, so I trust them with products they deliver. Im almost convinced to tap buy button but 450 euros is still alot for thing that I will use only in plane. But I think there is no reason to buy more expensive glasses than this, you cant find any negative opinion on UA-cam.
I was expecting them to do it without a cable attached to the glasses, maybe in the future, like wireless solution using your streaming services, also using mobildata with phone or Wifi at home. Prefer not to plug into a silly little lead/cable with the glasses, probably fuck my eyes up too since my eyes are blurry already, got to have an option incase your eyesight is weak than the perfect 20/20 vision as you see clearly.
NGL these look tempting and I've always scoffed at these types of products before (here's lookin' at you, way too plentiful Viture sponsored segments)
Kinda hoping that these type of displays do become a sizable market so if for only one thing 3D content for "home" use can continue to live on and be accessible.
lol i actually love rhe cinematic feel of 24/30fps, im ok with 60, but unless im playing something thats supposed to be real like sports/racing, i hate how 120 makes things look fake. my friends 120htz samsung tv upscales movies to 120 and gives it that soap opera effect as it makes up frames. probably something i dont need to worry about with games that can pump 120, and probably dont need to make up frames, but still feels uncanny valley to me for some reason
Omg, everything is a copy of Viture, that dock and dock mount, exact copy of Viture...
I have the Viture, including their switch dock, and it's really not a "copy" just because they, - by functional design - MUST, have the same kind of basic operation.
I'm interested but I do want to know whether or not these support placing screens statically rather than having it stuck to one view at all times? I've noticed a trend among XR glasses that they require some form of external/accessary hardware in order to enable this. Assuming the same rule applies here?
There is an android app they're working on that can do multi-screen & relative positioning using 3DOF... Unfortunately I couldn't test it in time for this video. - if you want screens you can "stick" to an exact 6FOD position, like on a wall, you're gonna be paying a LOT more, and wearing something MUCH heavier, like actual AR glasses or a VR headset with passthough, like the Quest 3
Seems positive my only problem is that practically every review of the various AR/XR glasses is sponsored. Very few people buying them with their own money and then reviewing them. (Not a Blunty problem, more of a techtuber in general problem).
Wanna help me AFFORD to buy stuff like this independently? The Patreon's right there man ;P
@@BluntyTV Nah I'm good, I prefer to complain without offering any useful solutions ;)
These or Viture glasses ?? Which is the best
I honestly like these a little better (yes this is a sponsored video, so take whatever grain of salt you need) but, they really are a little lighter, more comfortable to wear, easier to adjust and have a slightly better viewing experience. The Virtue have a few more bells and whistles, like the EL Dimmable shade, and PIP mode with their Android neckband, weather that's 'worth it' is a personal choice... for me? nope.
They sound interesting, but I'd rather wait till I get home and play games on my tv. If I was traveling a lot, then maybe.
Woof!!