Jordan Peterson - Women in Positions of Power
Вставка
- Опубліковано 17 тра 2018
- original source: • College Conservatism 2...
The expression of the masculine spirit in women isn't denigrated like it is in men.
If you want to support Dr. Peterson's work,
you can make a donation on his website:
www.jordanbpeterson.com/donate
If you like his lectures, you will enjoy his recent book:
12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos: amzn.to/2yvJf9L
The oppressed, once freed, are apt to quickly forget how it felt to be oppressed, and turn on the former oppressor, becoming the new oppressor. It's difficult to forgive, impossible to forget, but absolutely crucial to do both.
Everyone was oppress only the rich was free
With that logic, when minorities are no longer oppressed are they going to treat their oppressors (men, white people, etc.) they same way that they've been treated for centuries?
Women were never oppressed
Brilliant comment
🎉
So much respect for Mr. Peterson. However I am a female in a senior executive position, leading technical teams within a software company in FinTech. I don't work 70 hours a week and I believe firmly that quality of work is what is key - not quantity. Effective leadership does not equate to a loss of work life balance. Of the four IT Service delivery teams I lead - 98% of teams are male - and I have no hostility from them whatsoever. I am not that special actually, my point is that it is possible for women to lead effectively without compromising their work life balance - or having hostility from the teams (male) they lead. I am one of many women I am sure...
I believe Dr. Peterson I referring to the women who are at the corporate CEO level, who execute the corporate lay-offs and hostile corporate takeovers, and somehow remain lefists in their minds. As a veteran (no war exp.) I realize that we are the government.
The failure of US citizens to be able to articulate their own country's foreign policy, 2011-2015 Lybia, Syria, East Ukraine, etc. is the real tragedy.
Paying bills is slave activity. Both men and women are guilty of this ignorance, and irresponsibility.
What's the use of domestic policy then?
Male domination; Source: Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars(1979); Paraphrasing a later chapter: p_whip the man in the home, and the situation will make the daughter expect the same sissy to marry her.
You lady, are the exception, not the rule. Thank you.
Investigate Israeli men in Israel. Their wives or girlfriends can falsely accuse them of rape or beating them, and get away with it.
Men have done hard prison sentences. 1, 2, 10 years for "her" lie.
I would love to work for you!
Shalom sister.
@@701delbronx8
Give her time, sleepers can legally commit murder within a few minutes after being awaken violently lol.
I am Flowers for a Warlock too. I love the name. I have a stupid idea. I think that a 30 minute conversation with me, a Muslim Moor, will give you the keys to unlock the Bible for others. I love Jesus Christ. Not the image, but the teachings.
yesusministries@gmail.com
Shalom
There is much to question concerning her claim. What, precisely, is your senior executive position? Are you leading the day to day activities? Or simply a weekly status taker/powerpoint slide maker? What is the period of performance on a given project? It's cost structure? It's profit margin? It's risk profile? How many project tasks are there? How many task dependencies, float, critical path logistics? What constitutes customer acceptance, quality, payment? How many technical requirements are there? Do you work for a company that has female management quotas? Did you get your position by filling such quotas? I worked for many "senior" execs who rarely worked 40 hours and had a wonderfully balanced life; and did so off the backs of their project managers who could not possibly do their jobs in 40 hours -- or sometimes in 70 hours. This is not to question Tasil Last's credibility, but I have only ever heard the "work smarter, not harder" platitude from folks who never had to actually ... work harder.
why would you have so much respect for mr. peterson, if he is against everything that you are?
Love this! Mr Peterson is simply spouting outdated "perceived dilemmas for women"... he may identify other real psychological dilemmas, but this is not one of them.
"Today you’ve got endless women in their 20’s and 30’s who don’t know if they want to be a mother, have lunch, or be secretary of state."
Jack Nicholson
@M Muss No shit
you can be a mother and a secretary of state. someone can mention that to jack. current finland heads of political parties are women and prime minister is a woman and i think they are all mothers, too.
@@Redmanticore Yes, but every decision has a consequence. Consideration for others. Previous generations did not have the opportunities we have now be it fifty, hundred years ago or beyond it.
@@panokostouros7609 Yes...Dumb...See Jacinda Arden...
Men also have a role in fatherhood, but many tend to ignore that and push all responsibilities to the women which puts pressure on them. If men partook in raising children, a balance between work and family can be achieved.
To be quite frank I feel very sad by this and just realised I already live in a very liberated environment. I get the points he was trying to make, but let me speak honestly from a woman‘s personal perspective and experience: I work in a tech company and I wish to get in a higher position by time, but not to steel power! That‘s never what my motivation was. I rather want to be able to execute the job I love and challenge myself. I believe I can be a very good team leader because of my qualities, which I wouldn’t define as feminine nor masculine but just emphatic and analytical, which I have gathered throughout many life lessons and experiences, where I had to reflect on myself as a HUMAN. If you have to choose between a career and a family it will always be a challenge for men and woman. My ideal is to have a partner which I can talk things out with and just see whatever fits our life‘s state. I still can’t believe people have to separate between woman and men so much. It‘s a shared decision and not about providing or any of that power issue....or at least it should be in my believe.
Appreciate you expressing your views, but I don’t think it will work.
Exactly!! Not sure why there's so much man vs woman in today's world when the iron clad gender roles are all redundant. Why can't we live as complementary to each other rather than competition. Maybe the men are not liking this idea of sharing power with the other gender who has been house bound, subservient and dependent on them all this while.
@ArmoredSoldier76 You leave that to us 🤣 We'll make sure your misogynist ass follows our lead. Or go join the Taliban lol. You'll find a lot of like minded brothers there. No place in the free world for people like you
@ArmoredSoldier76 I’m a big Jordan Peterson fan and I think on a average spectrum he’s right. But you sound so bigoted and sorry if I am out of context (as you wrote 4 or 5 comments in a row I don’t know if you were replying to a person who deleted his or her comments) but if you look deep within history there have been plenty of woman who have led their people to victory from vikings to Egyptians…. So what you’re saying is so dried in the grass that you won’t admit that a WOMAN can lead you are gravely mistaken….. I do agree that their are less amount of woman who are WILLING or CAPABLE to lead…… but you sir sound so bigoted
When I look around I see so many areas in which women have power. I can't fathom why the main emphasis on equality is more centred on the workforce in most discussion. Take the home example, there is a huge assymetry, women hold lots of power, we don't consider it because it tends to not be measureable materially. Characters are formed in the home, order starts there, psycholoical development which goes with nutrition and a careful monitoring of developing minds of the young.
In the fight for equality, aren't we to a certain extent building and tearing at the same time. Because if the home is left unattended then how is the foundation of society laid?
I fail to see how that role is inferior.
I am a mom and wife who works in tech. I work 2 jobs at only about 6 hours a day and make a very good income. You CAN have both sometimes if you are lucky and careful.
Your a traditional modern female or interdependent. Have career but still have traditional values congrats on you in Asia it is normal because family and love is not about money. Because of good family role modela
0:25 good point
Man or woman, every decision has a consequence, at every level, so do I, actually, for we are all human beings.
The feminist you recently spoke with on the BBC political show is a prime example. She is in a very powerful government position making policies, which at face value empower women in the workplace, but have unintended consequences in the rather more important family life.
undertakersarmpit men always say is an honour for a woman to be a housewife, now he can experience this. And mayne that woman worked really hard for her position. Wanting to be something different from a housewife is not like those women will look or behave like men. In old days women were forced to be housewives, it was not a choice
undertakersarmpit Then this is another problem. Is very good to be housewife if you want to do this and not being forced or you can do both. Every couple decides what is the best option.
Ffs
why is it rather more important? surely affecting the whole nation is a bit more important? if family life is rather more important, why historically men never choose to do it, unless specifically taught so in feminist societies? dont men like to be logical and do important things?
undertakersarmpit how about you making fun of stay at home fathers? dont you find distaste in that? if the woman is pretending to be a big boy, what is the man pretending to be? can you morally argue against something being made fun of, when you are doing it yourself?
Is she charming and chasmatic to be a leader? Or she just used the same trump care that has been used for 40 years of "not being equal"?
I like this guy but every time he says "That's correct" to Dr. Peterson, I cringe.
Plenty of feminists criticize the celebration of female CEOs on exactly the basis Peterson mentions. His claim that we don't is either a lie or the result of him not seeing much material from feminists.
@@stijnvanbrakel23 It depends on the feminist. Centrist and liberal feminists celebrate female CEO's, but leftist and socialist ones mostly won't. They basically each behave the way you would expect them to based on their economic beliefs.
Feminist are 💩 stain on society. I am a proud woman who is NOT a feminist.
Makes me think of Indian mother in laws. They are so masculine and pushing patriarchy so strongly but no one bats an eyelid because she is a woman.
Women operating with male levels of competitiveness if opposed to their cultural programming does suggest that masculine virtues aren't totally a conspiracy. It does imply aggression, competition as natural traits. And a corporate role is a limited version of this. there's no shortage of women who voluntarily participate in contact sports, even when there are minimal supporters, no financial incentives and risk of serious injury. But discussing it in terms of women wanting to have it all might seem limited. I don't not want to have it all. I think there's a way to talk about this fairly rather than with some sense of being a gotcha for feminists.
Or maybe it's archaic to suggest that traits like aggression and competitiveness are more inherently male than female, especially considering the aggression and competitiveness of females of other species compared to their male counterparts. Mama bears are the most dangerous. Aggression can be just as inherently female as male, and while my example is a result of maternal instinct, keep in mind that if I am to draw an accurate line of comparison, I have to work with what I'm given, and as far as I know, mama bears don't apply for corporate positions.
idk I'm drunk, I'm not really invested in this argument
I'm not even disagreeing with you I think, I can't tell
Ergo Toxicosis
Not sure you are disagreeing. Increased opportunities and less requirement to adhere to gendered norms means increased aggression. Not being familiar with bears, I'd point to Elizabeth Lambert as an illustration of female aggression. She is (or was) a soccer player who seemed to confuse soccer and UFC. The university she represented reportedly made her get psychiatric help after multiple instances of striking and throwing an opponent to the ground by the ponytail in a single match.
I agree with you, and I think I kind of get what I was trying to say above. Also, there's definitely something about female soccer players and aggression. Correlation does not equal causation, but it's a neat correlation.
0:22 what was the question?
This exemplifies the defensive position of the person responding - formulating the answer before the question is asked, and/or refuting, rebutting the statement before the question is delivered.
Right I thought I skipped to another video.
Exceptions always prove the rule
Dang! If that's an original thought, you are a bleeping GENIUS!👍👍
Not at all. "Rules" don't have to be 100% accurate and therefore exceptions DON'T NECESSARILY prove that the rules are wrong. But they NEVER prove that the rule is right
That’s because post modernists don’t represent most women though they claim they do.
About 10 % of women are exposed to more testosterone in their mothers' womb. These women gave more masculine brains and leadership qualities. The problem is that they set the agenda for other women to follow and look down on women who have more feminized brains. Just because you have more masculine traits doesn't make you superior.
The public sphere should mimic the natural world and as well our own conscious constructions. The more you empower women in the symbolic sense, the more powerful they can become on the mundane level. “You should listen to your mother” is echoed by women in positions of authority elsewhere. It creates a constellation deeply imprinted in the human mind that their mother as a woman is powerful because as you can see, women can conduct power. Of course problems arise but the idea is sound. The problems have to do with materialism, greed, chaotic minds, pain…
What to say.... exciting "changes". Cos play. Don't take social roles too seriously.
Women want children and careers. Thank God they can have both. I don’t think it has anything to do with the patriarchy. Women want to feel fulfilled independently. Not just by having children but by doing something for themselves. Family is important but women are individuals who want to feel fulfilled in some way. This is why they do better at school and become lawyers and doctors. They want to create something for themselves indiependantly. Many women are successful professionally and have a family. I have a problem with Jordan because he looked at lawyer women in law firms and uses that example every time. No one truly understands what it is to be a women in this world unless you are one. Enough said. This is the problem with sociologists and psychologists, they think they can answer everything with data. Sometimes you just cant
No they cannot have both. If you pursue career, you do it at the cost of not providing a good upbringing to your children.
They are the ones becoming lawyers and doctors?
What world do you live in!?
60-70% of doctors and lawyers are men.
Women are nurses, teachers and cleaners. Not all, but they are certainly in high majority there.
Bishal Adhikary not true, there are sacrifices that are made regardless if you are a working women or not. But there are plenty of women. Who have careers that raise good children. You sound like children are absurd or neglected because the mother works. It’s 2020 most households have two working adults in them. Mom guilt is real, I’m not denying that but like every decision in life there is a cost. If the mother stays home, it costs her her independence and her ability to make something of herself. It’s a weird feeling that all women have. Of course you want a family but you also want something of your own. Men don’t struggle with the guilt because they have always been able to have a career without guilt. It’s a difficult situation but women deserve independent fulfillment and the feeling of autonomy and a lot of the time they don’t feel that if they are just staying at home and taking care of children
Robert of course it doesn’t I’m not saying that. It’s not always about money either. Individual autonomy exists in a career, the capability to make something of yourself. It’s hard to explain but women have those feelings inside them. I know I do, and it is possible to have both a family and a career but it takes sacrifice from both parents to do that not just one.
Robert not really, this really has nothing to do with men, it’s simply about a woman’s identity and who she is independently from anyone else.
The dude on the left is pure evil
I have watched a lot of Jordan Peterson and like him, but let us remember that he is a man of a certain generation talking about young women as if they are all 19-year-old, privileged students lacking life experience and knowledge of their ancestors.
Some of his INTERPRETATIONS REFLECT THE COLONIZER. In another video he talked about the dragon from a colonial (versus indigenous) perspective. Indigenous people understand hierarchy just like him, but their interpretation of the dragon differs. The dragon is a woman, more precisely the earth herself, the ground on which we stand, the integrated response, our fears, our shadow. The only sustainable way to respond is through acknowledgement and respect. The fear should not elicit a kill and cut into pieces response. The treasure she holds is peace and plenty.
Peterson’s INTERPRETATIONS ARE INCOMPLETE, and he is influencing the men who make themselves available to women today. I think the men are better for it (and they certainly need some guidance), but will they try to tell their partners that having a career isn’t realistic? They need to look beyond Peterson for interpretation and uplift the dreams of women in their life.
What does Jordan Peterson have to say about the many American who choose to have children without the accompaniment of a man? Why does he FAIL TO DEFINE career work vs job work (does it come down to hours and predictable schedules or meaning itself?) He said in another video that women can’t have careers while raising families. Why is it not the same for men, partnered or single?
There are so many women who live autonomously, managing careers and families. Peterson LOSES A LITTLE CREDIBILITY with them, an increasing population. As a single mother and the sole provider for my child, I am here to say women are stronger than men when they start off independent and career focused. We go through hell with men in our 20s (who actually grow up in a male adolescent culture, not female adolescent culture), but we still come out with families and meaningful careers, businesses and nonprofits. Peterson should stick to guiding the boys.
Men and women should be allowed to step back into careers after time off with family. The new economy will come around to facilitating men and women as equals in this way. Not every career is as cut throat as his law profession example. He’s right that mothers can’t have 80 hour per week work obligations.
If Peterson want to say that HE’S IN THE BUSINESS OF HUMAN TRANSFORMATION, let’s not assume that humans can’t create more sex equity systems for the purpose of generating more PEACE between the sexes and in families. He implies that women should sacrifice where men don’t. Well, women like me aren’t looking for a man like Peterson, but a man who will SACRIFICE EQUALLY. He is rare indeed, but if you’re willing to go without, you could have stability, happy children and meaningful work. That’s better than a misogynist man and NO WORLD OF YOUR OWN.
I don’t know too many moms who want to be a mom 100% of the time. Work is a relief from children and children are a relief from work. It’s best this way. It’s traditional, as much as women are immersed in work and children.
WOMEN ARE HUMAN BEINGS WITH A MULTITUDE OF NEEDS, including social and intellectual. WHEN THE BREADTH AND DEPTH OF OUR NEEDS ARE FULLFILLED, WE’LL BE BETTER MOTHERS.
Here, you heard it from a woman - 37, feminist, American, single mother and sole provider, on the hero’s (not heroine’s) journey.
Honestly, some of the stuff he says sounds convincing but when you look into it...it lacks credibility.. I mean , him talking about how women are appreciated for being competitive and such is a fascinating point because men are also eulogized when they partake in traditionally feminine activities- cooking , nurturing etc. It is out of the norm and is thus appreciated.
However, how much does that translate to real life is the question? I believe it is the internet that appreciates that
In my country, a research should that 7 out of 10 companies weren't ready to hire women.
Where I am from , either the woman is supposed to unconditionally offer herself to the well being of the husband( prevalant among the uneducated people ) or the urban moms need to manage work and cooking and nurturing.
Work is more than just an attempt to displace men. It is about a feeling of accomplishment and of contributing to the society.
@EJ Everlast Haven't women contributed to the economy? In addition to that , women have worked arduously since ages. It just so happens that they are being listened to , now.
Most young women tend to lack true self awareness and just want to have fun in their best years when they are the most good looking and able to have kids
@@gbd-oq1rz its their choice to marry and have kids when they want, Ur not the one who will dictate it.
The nuns don’t get accused of abuse, when they can do just as much damage as the priests.
Right. Even these nuns can escape their lower nature
Cant*
@@gbd-oq1rz Imagine correcting somebody and then you STILL misspell a simple word like "can't". 😆 😂 🤣
@@Khalfrank he corrected himself.
@@catspjs6229 Not exactly 😆😂🤣
Women who have a masculine spirit just come across as nasty to me.
This is a significant contribution. I read a matching book that altered my life in a positive way. "The Hidden Empire: Inside the Private Worlds of Elite CEOs" by Adam Skylight
This is an exceptional collection of insights. A similar book I read was a powerhouse of knowledge. "The Hidden Empire: Inside the Private Worlds of Elite CEOs" by Adam Skylight
I and my lover was talking about a debate you suffer from a problem in the work and is fierce competition that I can't handle with it and because of my withdrawal of environment of competition I started to loose this is not only indeed something else forfamily and I'm one of the type forgive quickly and a very nice, but my beloved said to me as well it week he feels pressure in the work and it feels as compared and it's attic responsibilities many made him neglected in his health and somethings else after a long discussion between us I told him women must be show 20% qualities man had so you can live balanced and a way that a healthy and men must possess 20% of the qualities of the female to last long and keeps his longevity and do not die early and actually I began to competition and hes began governing the assignment made for some responsibilities so I got a better work and he's it got time to rest
When you play the video to hear Jordan Patterson talk and ignore whatever Charlie Kirk has to say.
Lol ohh Jordan
He read my mind
What about women bosses of artist verses boss women in ceo positions
We’re not trying to take power away from men, we want to be seen and treated as equals. Big difference. The fact this man is afraid of a woman in power shows that he is a man that likes women subservient so he can control them. Someone like that has a toxic relationship to their own inner feminine and to mama Gaia and needs to do some inner work and healing.
The fuck did you just say? 🤣🤣
Are you a wicken, bitch? Or are you just in high-school? The fact is that women don't want to be in positions of power, they want to be with men in positions of power,have their babies and be taken care of. Feminism has brain washed you. You will understand when you grow up.
@@adrianmargean3402 You're so wrong. Not all women want to be taken care of by men, not all women want to have babies. Have you ever considered that you're the brainwashed one?
Him talking about how women are rewared for their competitive yearning was interesting to me. In the country where I live , women are expected to either take care of their young ones ( which any person - man or woman must ) and are treated as solely responsible for them and if they still work alongside all that , they are still expected to put their children above it all , something which is not expected from men. Even if the woman works , she is expected to take care of her family but these don't apply to men.
Here , women are curtailed from education and following their ambitions by their families and society.
However, that being said , we have made progress. We are working on it. Women do have rights. These are some internalized norms that can be found in many places
Basically, serve your family to the moon and back or
Do a job + serve your family...which can be found in some modern areas.
@@hannaheve868 please, I'm not talking about the 1% of women who don't. I'm talking about most women. You realize that some people eat their own shit right? Does that apply to the majority of society? Women always do this when arguing their point, they become selective about objective truths or when it is acceptable to generalise. And no, I don't think that I am brainwashed, I think that the human animal is built in a certain way and we know that there are biological differences between the males of the species and the females. Biological differences that affect our behaivior and choices.
Most people have low emotional intelligence and more likely females will become emotional therefore less stability. Simple
Do you think with the new technology and the capacity to freeze eggs, they will postpone further their desire to have kids? (today, the mean age at which they have their 1st kid is 29-30) will they reach the same age as men (which is 34 I believe) or go even further?
yeah, if the age gap between couples would be closed, i guess we would so many less problems and most of all happier couples.
@@zhabo3963 not really I’ve seen more when there are close to same age they hate each other more so
Lol Good one
Women want equality or equal representation in high position(pollitical,management) but they never demand equal represent in construction ,sewer technician,mine, teacher ,nurse.
We can draw a parrallel in court system and divorce .
So it about privileges not equality.
Women are not fighting for equality in statistcs. Women are fighting for equality in the magnitude and depth of „opportunity“ or an upward path with no bigger obstacles than that of men assuming everything else (including the need of child bearing) were equal.
How do you know what women the world over have demanded? I guarantee that there are women in every discipline pushing for equality where it’s seen as missing.
And just because something is demanded doesn’t mean you get it. It has taken decades of effort by multiple generations to generate change.
This doesn’t just apply to women it applies to every entity that is treated unequally by society.
Eg Race, poverty, bottom rung of the ladder in any company.
Anyone dedicating themselves to influenzing change in society has my respect. I think these 2 middle class white men should try putting themselves in the shoes of others rather than judging and waffling on.
@@raven-kn6lv what less privilege can u plz explain??
Women main role is to look after kids when they are mothers. That’s their role as defined by god. U can’t be a manager and a mother at same time. A mother puts her children as first priority. That’s true femininity
MR. Peterson , if you had to get pregnant to be able to have children , you would understand woman !,
U did not understand anything idiot
@@ManishSharma-tc2ue resoect others opinion.
@@ManishSharma-tc2ue that is true. empathy is not obvious. not everything can be rationalized. some things can only be felt.
“Look deep into nature, and you’ll understand everything better” A.E.
Attempts to generalize the behavior of any people group are stereotypical, and, ironically, quite myopic. Every single individual is, well, individual...🤔
Then how will Peterson whitewash patriarchy and portray women from his Conservative Christianity bullshit lens? 🤣🤣
I don’t view this as a zero sum game. I personally am not out to take power away from men, I simply want the chance to grow and develop in my career and realize as fully as possible that part of my identity. If women gain, that should not automatically mean a loss for men. I believe there is room for us all. I have sons. I want them to excel in school and achieve all they can, and I would hope I’m working to ensure a world that provides that opportunity to them.
This thinking is part of the problem. Inclusion is an artificial construct but life doesn't reflect this b/c its inherently competitive. Someone wins b/c of someone else's loss. You really see this play out in the corporate world. As you go up the job hierarchy there's less and less positions b/c of competition. Women are very uncomfortable with this b/c it goes against their psyche which is primed towards inclusion and making sure "everyone wins." Its really why you see a shift in happiness when a woman hits her late 20s. Its at this point that she realizes that the prospect of working for several decades under increased competition and a greater demand on her time isn't worth it despite the fact that her earnings have increased. This is compounded by the biological desire to start having children. Its at this age that women start to subjectively become unhappy which gets worse over time the longer she stays single...
Why men always speak for women and their feelings? 😂😂
He's a psychologist, he's qualified to speak on human-female or not-psychology, and one could argue much more so than individual women that don't consider the clinical studies or the feelings of *other* women that shift the averages in female personality away from their own.
This would've been a good question if it wasn't implicitly demeaning Dr. Peterson's qualifications and right to speak on matters related to the field he's studied for several decades.
@@SkyTheGuy8 No he is not, there is a difference between populus science and academic science. He rejects academic science because they don't agree with him since they have actual studies not anecdotal lawyer incidence. Everything he ever mentions is half supported by science. Because he choose to show the half truth.
Name atleast 10 successful Male leaders:
1. Elon Musk (CEO of Tesla)
2. Joe Biden
3. Vladamir Putin
4. Donald Trump
5. Felix Arvid Ulf Kjellberg (Why not)
6. Andrew Wilson (CEO of Battlefield)
7. Markuss Persson (CEO of Minecraft)
8. Sam Houser (CEO of RockStar games)
9. Bob Chapek (CEO of Disney)
10.Bhushan Kumar (CEO of Tseries)
Donald Trump 😀😀😀
@@vsreelekshmi591 You may hate him, but you can't deny he is successful.
1)Susan Wojcicki- youtube
2) Indra Nooyi-pepsico
3) Angela Merkel-PM Germany
4) Mary Barra- CEO General Motors
5) Adena T. Friedman- CEO NASDAQ
6) Sonia Singhal- GAP
7)Jane Fraser- Citigroup
8) Madam Lovelace- wrote the first machine algorithm
9)Lisa Su- CEO AMD
10)Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw - CEO BIOCON. world's 6% generic medicine are produced by biocon.
Mr. peterson has a biased notion on this, no one wants to be alone. It takes time and efforts to build something and men like younger women. Nobody made it in their 20s. So they usually feel alone at times, when Mr. Musk was asked this question even he said he always felt alone surrounded by a lot of people. So yeah it's alone at the top but you can't blame it on feminism. Mr. Peterson always gives one example for this notion, the corporate lawyer he worked with. Women leaders don't get as much screen time as male leader. And yes I agree with you women still has a lot of work to do. But this irrational balancing every single woman on the same scale as that lawyer. Also Mikhalia Peterson wouldn't make it if it weren't for Mr. Peterson. She is a single mom running a business that promotes unqualified dietary products that are usually good for autoimmune diseases but could be terrible for a normal individual. Words don't matter, actions do.
all of these are terrible leaders. I mean they suck to the point they shouldn't be at that position. There are so many better male leaders out there, I am sorry but the ones you mentioned are famous leaders not successful. If everyone's definition of success has become so shallow to the point they think famous+money=successful leader. Even Jeff Bezos is better than every single one of them. At least the guy knows ecommerce even though he is cruel and spiteful for treating his workers like crap but he knows ecommerce.
@@ghostofantarctica8216 no he is not he is famous, that's about it. He will be remembered as the most terrible president US has ever had and Biden would take the second position or they might even share the 1st one.
God this is a lot of straw manning.What world to these guys live in? Sorry straw womanning.
I don’t think they want to be mothers, they want to be teenagers
will Nill notice how women are allowed to have a career, social life, motherhood, and anything else they expect from the world and their society. Yet when men expect just to have a career and social life we are labeled "selfish" and narcissistic by women who expect us to provide only and then die off so they can get remarried to superior men. Women expect their cake and to eat it too without any compromise or negotiation for the benefit of their partners. Supposedly this makes the men selfish and evil. Strange minds women have.
Robert Nexion I wonder if most woman are Conscious of their actions or completely oblivious.
Robert Nexion what type of women do you know. Cuz this is isn’t how anyone I know thinks
Nexion Nekros I don’t really get it. Men have all these things too, but if women want it you start complaining that we are oppressing you? you sound like a big baby
Ok hold up. A man can have 20 girlfriends and a career and be praised. A girl in science is “wasting her youth” women don’t get the privilege ofhavubg whatever you want with work. Stfu
This is hilarious. I have witnessed my share of 30-something roasties panicking that they are getting too old to have children, realizing only then that they had been conned into being just another wage slave. But now, they don't even get the family. Stock Pro tip: go long on Purina and Tidy Cats.
Black Pill Ghost lol yep
Early adolescent andis problem poor health nature gives you time. Mother is cause and leader.She has to have a life, a business for you to do so: inheritance or wisdom
Not everyone wants to have children and many choose not to. No one’s panicking seems like the only one panicking is your incel ass.
He lied about the post modernist.
Yep women are doing SO well these days, to the point whereby they're pretty much in charge of the planet. Oh no wait that's not right at all
is that really what he's saying ?
@@Femmeaesthetic Jes you're an idiot.
Two men sitting and discussing what woman wants .. ironic 🙄
Really 😂
It's ironic how resentful you are and how you wish you were in the room...
yes because mens who build things and mens who tell womens what do to with these things they build. fact🙂
They are delivering what data shows. By the way what a woman wants?
The capacity of a mind collect and understand data is not limited by the personal experience of the person collecting and analysing all the information. Let alone deep abstract thinking.
This focus on the necessity of "feel in your skin" is very low level thinking.
British and Irish society is gynnocentric meaning it prioritises the care of women over men
The Original Suffragent don’t let the “new age” feminist know
Women are receptive. They are the selectors. They all want to be loved differently, are "unique." Their power comes from how they react. Many times their reaction not about you, it's about them. They can react as though you are hurting them and turn lies to the truth. Men acting receptively and "hurt" would not be tolerated amongst men. A society led by the reactions of women leads to chaos.
That is a pretty sexist comment. I hope you change your mind eventually and grow out of that mindset.
@@Darcy000 Men and women are not the same. Men are natural givers while women natural takers and selectors. They are givers only to their offspring.
@@hordevran and you say that based on which data? Which statistics? Which facts?
Men, especially in honor cultures, act "hurt" and offended all the time.
@@Darcy000 he lives in a delusion that he created for himself. Let him.
These comments are cancer
spark There's only 5 lol
Sciurus Rubrum in particular.
Does that comment make you feel self righteous
you triggered? if you are a kid go watch Logan Paul , adults watching political stuff here.
this is an adult discussion. if you can't handle it, go back to the playground.
Another great video of men saying to women what is exactly that they want 🤡
I have never seen him addressing the exceptions. I do agree that is the case for like 97% of women but what if there are exceptions to this rule? Does that mean they have actual mental or emotional issues? I really think the exceptions are interesting cases to analyze.
Um, you know all rules have exceptions right?
"Wow, this river is flowing pretty hard, we should dam it up!"
"The river isn't flowing 100%, look at the rock in the middle blocking it up!"
Thanks for your input.
2:36 he says usually but dont go in to that any further. %97 is more important and worth talking.
he acknowledges the exceptions all the time, but focuses on what matters statistically
Lol none of you got it. I said I am interesting in his view on the exception cases as interesting cases to analyze, psychologists treat mostly people that belongs to the exceptions. It's an intellectual curiosity of mine.
The more I see women in positions of power, Dr. Theresa Tam, Minister of Health, Patty Hajdu, the Minister of Employment and many others, I am reminded of one big mess. In many cases they are in those positions because it's now fashionable to appoint females. Just consider Justinass Trudeau making his cabinet 50% women "because it's 2017" or something this absurd. Forget merit. And I'm not forgetting how much I admired Britain's Margaret Thatcher!
No. They're in positions of power because they are just as competent as their male counterparts.
@@hannaheve868 No, when push through quotas and because 'it's 2022'. Women act differently ,they have different emotional stability and are natural givers only to their offsprings. Women can act really cruel in position of power. this was all known before this woke agenda that men and women are same. They are not and our entire history depended on it.
For all the wise shit Jordan Peterson says he looks miserable AF. Never seen the dude smile. Live a little Jordan. Want a hug bruh?
philhellmuff he takes anti-depressants too
Why should he smile? The Millennials destroyed our western civilization.
There is nothing why we should smile about this.
philhellmuff I'm pretty sure you haven't seen him bathing, sleeping or using the toilet either etc... Doesn't mean he's not content with living or getting enjoyment from life. Many people cry today so they can laugh tomorrow.
Real leaders find happiness within. He notices a lot of stuff but doesn't seem to practice self love and gratitude which the markers of actual divine leaders....
He's successful both in family and career what about you hahahah
Very intelligent man. Too bad religion got a hold of him and stuck to his shoes.
You can have the western world or women. but not both.
I long for the days when men worked, provided, and protected, and women took pride in keeping a clean home, cooking meals for family, and raising well-adjusted children.
Daisy
Why where they the good old days?By no means, oppressing women in ways that are easily and perfectly comparable to those of simple animals is nothing good. When women lived in such society it was primarily such a hierarchy because nothing else was permitted and women were told from infancy what their place was. This was oppression.
I'm no sjw, i personally am with Jordan on a majority of political views and do not believe women to be oppressed anymore. No, they have simply attempted to create an uproar about their nonexistent continued oppression. But anyway, those weren't the good old days.
@Pseudonymous Being, They were the good old days, afterall, women created children and raised good strong men. Today, women are not having children or are raising perpetual soy boys.
Bring back the good old days!
Pseudonymous Being How do you know? The minority of women wanted "rights". This idea of being equal was thrust onto women. A lot of women have an innate feeling of wanting to do the things the original commenter said but don't want to admit it because feminism
Men play an important role in raising well adjusted children as well
AWResistance the good strong man shit is just plain bullshit. Men of old times were just as fucked up as they are now. It was just seen as a sign of weakness to show it.
Jordan Peterson will go down as one of
The greatest thinkers of our time!
Jordan Peterson should wear a large, red nose like other clowns.
When Mohammad prophet had heard that Persia is ruled by a queen at that time , said “Never will succeed such a nation as makes a woman their ruler." However, he didn’t exclude women from being leaders in other aspects of life.
I dont know whether you are supporting women in ruling or not but you didnt understand a single thing about islam.what fields prophet muhammad give women roles to play?iam ex_muslim and i know in which fields that rapist give women opportunity
Don’t quote religions without context, pls. A well known queen in Islam, Queen Sheeba, is respected in the religion.
@@prettyme4387 sahih bukhari 7066
Sehrish Shah Bangladeshi PM is a woman and so is New Zealand Pm and both countries are prospering.
@@prettyme4387 hmm. What about the hadith then?
Women shouldn't be in politics. Talk about 'equality of opportunity' all you like, but men MUST run society. Patriarchy is actually a good thing.
AWResistance and that’s why you’re single
Camila, You're part of the problem. Men preserve civilisation, women capitulate to new ideas. The ancients warned against this and now we're learning the hard way.
Arguing with holes: Women don't respond by calling someone a 'faggot' or some other quick insult. They instead "argue with holes" to insult, like saying "you're just saying that because you [don't have access to a female hole]" or "that's why you [don't have access to a female hole]". It proves the notion that women see themselves as nothing more than holes to fill penises, so a man not willing to grant them that role will somehow be opposed to filling holes.
If an individual has merit they should do the job. A competent female in politics can still adhere to patriarchal traits.
@Lorem Ipsum, Nice.