Sony a6400 VS Canon M50 - HANDS ON COMPARISON REVIEW!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 вер 2024
- UPDATE: The new Canon R50 is here! How does it stack up to the Canon M50?
Click here to find out: • Budget 4K Camera King?...
Canon M50: amzn.to/40fkdVA
Sony A6400: amzn.to/42CDUrX
The Canon M50 has been one of the most requested and viewed cameras on this channel. We were lucky enough to get some early access to the Sony a6400 and immediately wanted to put it to the test with the M50. Let us know your thoughts on which one you think is best for 2019 in the comments below!
Connect with Dave:
» WEBSITE - davemaze.com/
» TWITTER - geni.us/davema...
» INSTAGRAM - geni.us/davema...
» UA-cam - / davemaze222
In the Thumbnail, he looks like Hrithik Roshan from Koi Mil Gaya. 😂
Bidda Niketon 😂😂
Ailaaaa
i was goin to say that!
😂😂😂😂😂
😂😂
6:00 the a6400 was focused on the approaching woman that’s why it didn’t grab you.
There's probably gender priority mode somewhere deep in the menus - set to W (obviously). There is/was one for babies/adults.
a6400 is feminist
I think his glasses, which had a reflection, caused the sony a6400 to miss the eye AF.
the a6400 has AI for the autofocus, so it can recognize a face if the eye is not available
Probably a 1st person to get focus keeps focus thing, keeping photobombers in check 👊
Canon M50 = economical 1080p UA-cam camera. Sony a6400 = still learning but have extra money to spend.
I have the M50 and it's a great all purpose camera for the price. Everyone focuses on it's video capabilities and forget to mention that it actually takes great photos.
It's because most camera users are hybrid shooters these days. I too have the M50 and love everything about it. But to be honest I wish it had better video features.
@@snowwalker9999 hopefully a software patch could fix that??
Except A6400 also takes better pictures.😂
My gripe with this video is that is not a fair comparison in any way. The Sony is double the price. What I love most about my M50 is the adaptability to all my L glass.
@@IsmaelMartinezPR Also, the exposures weren't always the same. For example, you might notice a nice rich blue sky on the Sony next to a weaker blue sky on the Canon, but this was just a distraction from the fact the face (the main subject!) was correctly exposed on the Canon and very underexposed on the Sony. I prefer my subject exposed correctly, personally.
As for custom profiles, why was one not used on the M50? Free profiles are readily available for Canon, I downloaded over 200 of them, including Fuji Astia and other Fuji film simulations.
I think I might get the M50 and use the money to buy a nice lens or two. Total cost will probably be less than the 6400 body.
Sean7 that is exactly what I did.. And I do not regret my decision one bit👍🏻 all the best to you 😊
intheworldofmari what lenses did you buy?
Jason Rai i bought the Canon 10-18mm lens and next up is the 50mm lens..
that's true, also sony lenses are extremely expensive, almost as a body price
I just bought the M50 yesterday. Can’t wait to shoot some footage in 4K. I have to save up for a another lens though.
ANYONE ELSE NOTICE THAT GIRLS SHOE CAME OFF AT 6:07 LOL
Lol
She's stupid lol
A&B omg lolololol stapppp
good eyes
Thanks for the review. Well done and I genuinely appreciate it. I own the Canon M50 and absolutely love it. I would say I still love it's dual pixel auto focus over Sony's, however, it's undeniable that the A6400 edges out the M50 in a couple categories. But, in fairness, there is still about a 400 dollar difference in price between these two, not really an apples to apples comparison. I think that when considering the huge price difference, an argument could be made for either of these two taking home the bang for buck award. Thanks again for the review.
❤️Canon M50 - for beginners and on a budget. GET IT HERE: amzn.to/2ZGGHlB
❤️Sony A6400 - for advance users and better quality videos GET IT HERE: amzn.to/2OPVAMd
Thinking a lot about getting A6400 since it came out for the 120 FPS, useable 4K and that color plus dynamic range... but the hustle to have the mic on the body keeps turning me off.. used eos M3 before and was tired of putting on the bracket all the time plus the bracket is not as stable as it has to..
A cage is a nice solution!
Sony 4k is one of the best out there.
And my condolences for that plastic mount of M50.
Ngpain lu disini bang?😂
Really happy Sony upgraded the auto-focus. That and the unlimited video recording time and clean HDMI output with autofocus is why I’m picking it over the M50. It’s just more versatile: I can use this to vlog, livestream, and other long form content. Hope they are able to utilize the touchscreen more in future firmware updates. Great video!!
Thanks Brendan! I agree! It's really an amazing package. I kinda want one for personal use now! Lol
Magic Lantern is under testing since April for the M50. It would be interesting to have that test again once ML is fully released. I hope they enable DPAF for 4K and 120fps for 1080.
ML can’t add DPAF and more frame rate
They add raw video functionality
Correct me if I’m wrong
I'm youtuber n want to purchase camera for youtube videos,
Thinking about
200Dii or M50 or sony
Big confusion my budget
50K +
Pls reply or sujjest, I'm not used any DSLR till now also I'm don't know about dslr or mirrorless,
Till today I got 62k subscriber by my poco F1 mobile's camera, I shoot my videos for technical channel, but I want to start blogging channel also
So please reply / guide for camera
I do actually use an M50 as my main camera these day, and the AF on mine seems to work better than the example used for your test. The results straight out of my camera seem to be significantly sharper than yours.
Its sharper when you watch the video on your computer ?
You are watching youtube dude... everything is 10x compressed, the fact that we can actually see a difference in sharpness and noise just show how much better the A6400 is.
@@JetBen555 the M50 was badly let down by the lens used on it for this demonstration, which is not generally reckoned to be particularly sharp. The compression on UA-cam won't affect the sharpness - 1080P is 1080P, whatever the compression ratio. I've had the opportunity to feed both of these cameras directly into my 50" 1080P monitor, but with an L Series lens on the M50. Shooting at 50P on both cameras, there was next to no difference between them.
@@keithspillett7312 im sorry but you are wrong. Look at any gopro7 video, it shot in "4K" ... yet the M50 completly destroy it in image quality at just 1080P. Because of the bitrate.
3:10 Sooooo cool how you managed to get Jared Letto to feature in this video. He seems like a really down to earth guy
Sony seems to have better af. More shoots were in focused.
6:04 Sony was too busy tracking the pretty lady in the back.
Sony is just following etiquette:
• 1st come, 1st serve.
• Ladies 1st.
• Ignore the random photobomber in the foreground that popped-up from the bottom.
+++points sony👍.
@MrChad97Z These guys are a bunch of basement simps lol.
See why I LOOOOVE this channel?
It's videos like these.
The perfect video camera:
- dual pixel AF
- ibis
- 1080p 120fps
- fully articulating touch screen
How hard can it be?!
I just don't want to go without the dual pixel autofocus from Canon! I'm torn! Want either the M50 or the 6400 but Sony lenses are more expensive as is the body and I'm still not sold on the auto focus there which is a big deal for what I'd use it for!
@ant billionz That's really good info that we can buy an adaptor for the Sony and use less expensive Cannon lenses. I'll do some more research about that to make sure it will work for me, but this might be the information that pushes me over the edge to get the Sony. Thanks!
@ant billionz Does that adaptor thing affects the photo quality or focal length? I have never used one and I thinking to get on for my Sony camera.
It's called a6600
That’s the perfect UA-cam camera for people who want to film themselves. For others, 1080p sucks. Flip screen is “who cares”.
Can you shoot Livestream video to UA-cam with an external power adapter that plugs into the wall with the M50? We do livestreams that go 3-4 hours at times and swapping batteries would be a deal killer for us. We understand that the 6400 can be plugged into the wall and will stream and charge the battery? Can the M50 do that? Thanks for the help. J&B
look for a Dummy battery on amazon
Great Video! Signed, a somewhat envious M50 owner.
This video is amazing! Comparison is amazing!! Can you please do 250D and m50 comparison!! Trust me this video has not good comparison, do it!🥰
spent a lot of time deciding between the M50 and Sony 6400, ultimately opted for the Canon. They both have their peaks and valleys and in the end, I would say they are both great. 4K was pushing me towards the Sony but the lens options, cost and software bugs got me to choose the M50. Neither was a bad choice but in the end, it was based on confidence. if both bodies were 100% equal I suspect everyone would opt for the Canon.
I just sold my Canon 80D and ordered a Sony a6400. It will be here tomorrow! I’m super excited!
I have a canon 80d and im selling it to you recommend me to buy the sony a6400???
top corner football yes, I do recommend it! The hardest thing to get used to is the size difference, but buy the smallrig cage for it and it feels much better. If you go to amazon or smallrig.com and type in 2310 cage you’ll see it. The photos it takes are cleaner, it shoots 4K, higher 1080 frame rate, and 11fps stills. I would definitely say it’s much better then the 80D. The only down side is battery life. I hope this helped! Definitely pick up the sigma 16mm 1.4 and the sigma 30mm 1.4. They are amazing lenses on the a6400!!!
@@TJuice1986
What about display resolution? I went to sony mall some days back, checked out a series cameras, and I found the display is not crisp at all. I got confused.
Just the review i was looking for. Comparing all footage side by side at diff timeframes and color throughout the entire video. Great work!
A6400's color looks too digital and smartphone-like, also has a slight green tinge. I think canon is the winner here in terms of color, specially the skin color tones
Esp if you tweak the the colour profile.
One thing you didn’t cover is stabilization... what did you think of the Canon’s Digital Image stabilization? It has a crop and I’m curious if you find it valuable for vlogging vs. not having it. Both cameras offer optical lens stabilization but it doesn’t seem to be enough to make either great for vlogging on its own. Does optical stabilization work better for either camera? To me the Sony would be a no-brainer for vlogging if it wasn’t so damn shaky.
👍 Thanks! This video helped me to avoid buyers remorse. The M50 is $550 with a kit lens; The A6400 is $1,000 with a kit lens and it comes with lots of accessories. I bought the Sony. The 6400 has better color, is much more versatile and does a great job with 4K. My gaming PC can handle editing 4K; I'm a student, so, Adobe CC is dirt cheap for me... With a gimbal, a kit lens, and an ultra wide-angle lens, I can recoup my investment by shooting upscale real estate pics and video: Large commissions = large marketing budgets. If I tried to use the Canon for the same purpose, the only realtors that would hire me, wouldn't pay much, because they'd be marketing first-time homebuyer houses.
Anyone with professional prospects should obviously buy the sony over the canon. But for the rest of us...
Really wanted to get a6400 but was just out of budget. Just got M50 brand-new with lens kit from target for $375. Good enough to begin my photography journey!
Am confused between picking up M50 or A6400 as my first serious cam...
Priority for me currently are
1. User friendly operation ( Canon Touchscreen??)
2. Good availability of lens selection (budget being a consideration)
My usage will typically be over weekends into landscapes, people and street photography...
Can you recommend one option between the two of these please?..
Are M50 colors quite dull wrt A6400?
Hello how are you doing? I have the same doubt. What did you buy at the end? I am between the canon m50 and the sony
@@carlitosan1299 not bought anything yet...
Both systems have different advantages..
@@kanchisharma130
I believe that I will decide for the canon m50
I just bought the Sony A6400 with the 16-50mm kit lens for 850€ on e-infinity. It's also going to be my first camera ever. I did a lot of research and i think the A6400 is currently the best camera for content creators.The M50 and A6400 are both quite easy to use. One downside of the sony camera is, that sony lenses in general are a lot more expensive, but there are also good budget options from sony or sigma. For 850€, i think it makes sense going for the sony6400,because it's not that much more expensive than the M50.
after watching over 100 videos and doing weeks of research, I bought M50 and I'm really happy with it. 😊
Hey man, great video! If you don't mind, how did you get connected with Squarespace as a sponsor? I've got 100k subs on my channel and am looking into connecting with sponsors.
Dave, with the 4K crop on the m50 How then does it compare to the image size of 4K with MFT?
Thanks,
Adam
G85 with smaller MFT sensor, outperforms the Canon in 4k by a full stop. Plus the G85 has much wider FOV than M50 in 4k.
Great comparison. You showed that the A6400 is a great camera and the M50 is also a great camera for its price. I bought an M50 for street photography and it's surprisingly good for the price. I customised my buttons such that manual mode is a dream to use now and nearly every common setting has fast access.
I'd love to play with the A6400 to test its AF.
Going back to the M50, you really have to know it to get the most out of it. You need to know where AF tracking mode will excel and when to switch to zone AF or single-point AF or even small AF single-point too. Get to know these and you'll rarely ever misfocus a shot.
I prefer the M50 colors. I think I will get one...seems really amazing.
The moire in the hat in the iso test started almost immediately for the sony. Great comparison. Top notch content upload
I just picked up the m50 creator kit this past weekend! Thank you for your videos and reviews, it helped me pick this camera. Love Cannons color compared to Sony.
i enjoyed this video. thank you for putting the comparison shots at the beginning then talking about the specs. watched the whole way through got great info.
As i red the comments, i really find it hard what camera should i buy lol
Then use another color
0:22 -- "To the other APS-C king, the M50" said no one who cares about their reputation in the industry. Fuji XT-20/30 and Sony-A6*** are the APS-C kings hands down. Everyone else is playing catch up or unsure if it's worth staying/entering the market.
I appreciate the honesty in the review overall though and it was solid. I think in future reviews should be more pragmatic in a few ways. First, stop talking about rolling shutter as a comparison or test. All mirrorless cameras are bad at it. Until a camera does something substantially different (faster) while reading out the pixel data from the sensor, it'll be a reality. I'd just say "it's there, this camera is no better or worse than others out there so if you were expecting this to solve it, you'll be disappointed". Rolling shutter is also something most people don't notice unless they know what to look for while the camera is panning like a maniac. Most natural/real footage won't ever pan that fast while having the noticeable edges too.
Second, a major element and feature of portrait photography is eye auto focus. Conveniently, (I hear) it is one of the substantially sub-par features in the M50 where it basically never finds the eye outside of close up and wide open eyes. Older Sony A6*** and Fuji XT cameras are great finding the eye even when the subject is at a distance. The A6400 improves on what was already great and gives you A7III/A9 like accuracy and speed for acquiring eyes and putting it in a $900 camera body, and adds behavior which knows how to gracefully fall back from eye, to face, to object tracking so you don't have to do much at all and have correct focus for continuous photo shooting.
Color science I've realized is kind of a BS topic for comparison. For photography basic raw processing can/should be adjusting colors anyways. Video is tougher to correct colors, but if your standard workflow has to using a log color format with color grading later, then the colors out of camera doesn't really matter. Super casual videographers would care that colors out of camera with no work may look better to some folks, but if you're sensitive enough notice the difference between two solid colors, you should
I realize this review focused entirely on the video capabilities of both cameras, so it would be fair to point out that both cameras are actually hybrid cameras which are supposed to be fairly solid in both video and photo capabilities. If you're going to cut it out, make mention of that. The M50 seems to be a better camera if you're on a tighter budget (or looking for better value) if you're sticking to 1080p vlogging (better setup with front facing flip screen not getting blocked by hot shoe mics). Outside of that, A6*** series tend to beats it in almost every other relevant way possible. Another area might be lens lineup if you already have and investment in Canon lenses, but if that's you, then you've been doing video or photography long enough to not need this kind of review to make a decision.
EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW ] A6400 is much more better camera than A6300 & A6500 because:
1. No 30 minutes record limit: A6300 &A6500 will not get this update do the old tax issue,
2. No overheat (better image processor) like A6300/A6500,
3. Longer battery life 1 hour 30 minutes,
4. Image process from A9 = amazing fast AF better than A6300/A6500,
5. TIME LAPSE build in,
6. Full Flip Screen,
7. A6500 has got IBIS but in video in motion is very bad - you need gimbal and without it you get better price for A6400 $899 (A6400 + gimbal = a bit more than A6500 price),
8. New Hight Dynamic Range picture profile,
9. 2 New AF engines that are only in A6400 - old cameras don't have this (you need this new image processor),
10. Better build in microphone at the front - it offer very nice audio if you are not in wind area,
11. Support for higher iSO,
12. During recording screen doesn't dim.
Summarizing: A6400 is better than A6300/A6500 in everthing 😊
how about a6400 compare with a6600?
@Jerome what?
Can we sue SquareSpace for ad abuse?? Seriously they make random ads that have nothing to do with squarespace then boom they sneak in square space. Evil just evil.
I tried my best to watch this review unbiased (i recently bought the A6400), but to be honest the video quality throughout the entire test and all the modes was clearly superior on the A6400. Which makes sense, given that its new and its over 300 dollars more expensive than the M50. The high iso performance looked awesome, and overall 4K shots were stunning. Autofocus is a beast, i can confirm that.
I have an M50 as my backup cam and it´s great for the price. I paid 480 Euros where the Sony is 880 at Amazon (both excl. VAT). So you still compare two cameras that are not that close in terms of price. And of course an almost double priced camera should (and has) better features. On the other hand the Speedbooster at the M50 opens up a whole new world because I have a lot of EF glass (Don´t know if that´s available for the Sony as well). To cut a long story short: The Sony has the better specs but the Canon is almost half the price and does also a great job. Depends on what you need and willing to pay.
DER PRiNZ - Photography aaaannnddd that is exactly why I went for the Canon M50.. The price was great for such am awesome little camera 😊
Based on your excellent review, i Just ordered M50. Happy days!
this is the best video for me who confused to buy either one of these, (focused on videography). i've just only found video that conclude the specs, features and everything, but what i really need is the comparison LIKE THIS (that you packed so beautifully, easy to compare with each of the features (like 4k, 120fps, stuff)). so i really know which one is the best for me. thank you very much for making this video. thank you for the effort! great video! first video ever that i watched from your channel, liked this video and subscribed to this channel.
I like the A6400, it creates stunning images. However, the M50 is well under $1000, about $400 less expensive , is not a similar comparison. Perhaps, price wise, the A6400 is more closely compared to a GH5 or the M50 w/a speed booster? That would be a very interesting video.
And because the flip screen on the A6400 is blocked by adding a Mic, it needs a cage. Which may not be a big deal, just noteworthy.
Sony surprisingly has more native lenses than Canon.
at 6:13, the focus test, I think the Sony was locked onto the face of the woman in the background, in the second test she turns around and walks away, and then it picks you up (not sure if this has been commented before)
The sony is double the price of the m50... so if someone wants a recommendation, you first ask what their budget is,... otherwise i would recommend a leica Q or sony A7R etc. lol
i have no idea what camera to buy for youtube now. so lost
@Phil Rennie Hadou Shoryuken!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This video was really helpful. It's 2023 and I'm looking to get one of these cameras (I'm on a budget) and can't make up my mind! But this helps!
Question is. WHAT CAMERA DO YOU USE TO MAKE THIS VIDEO?? ????
expensive ones that you will not buy
probably the Pany GH5.
I was wondering aswell! I think it's the A7II or III
@@user-lh1jb2xm3z Haha nice1
@@user-lh1jb2xm3z this is what flat nose people mind set
This comparison review isn't a fair one because he's using a custom color profile to enhance colors with the Sony a6400. Should have used standard manufacturer settings, or matching color profiles on both cameras.
No doubt the A6400 is way better than the M50 and well worth the extra money.
The M50 was already obsolete when it came out in 2018, it was originally priced at 900$, same as the A6300 (a 2015 camera with better spec) but they had to cut the price (almost immediately) by about 35-40% to stay competitive. Not only that, but the lens selection for
EF-M is terrible.
The EF-M selection of lenses is indeed a bad bank for the buck, but you could just buy an adapter and get access to all the EF-S lenses, in which case, you get access to lenses that are cheaper than the ones for Sony and feature reliable and silent STM motors. Besides, I think people that buy Canon are just different. We value reliability, longevity, colors that are spot on out of camera, a very forgiving codec and most of all - the user interface on Canon cameras is just better. There is a reason, why so many photographers choose Canon and that is the ease of use. So yeah, although the Sony is technically the better camera, I would still go with Canon.
i have my canon m50 for two months now and its super amazing .. video and photos are superb .. shes great pro camera for a buck ,, this camera wont fail you ❤️❤️
You should add speedbooster, a mic, a light, and perhaps a better lens to M50 to match the price and then compare the two. :)
Lol there is nothing to compare. The 6400 is light years ahead of that canon toy
M50 is made up plastic and the mount feels like breaking anytime.
@@shaolin95 right... it's even better than the EOS R toy... I mean, better low light, no 4K crop, 1080p, at 120fps, etc... Sony Cameras keep on spanking Canon cameras :) Even Dual Pixel is now far behind from Sony superior AF performance
@@frankfeng2701 That's a straight out lie. The mount feels like any other metal mount, so stop talking crap.
@@shaolin95 Grow up, fool. Prefer what you like, but no need to call a perfectly capable camera a toy. I see you in all the camera channels typing childish nonsense.
Nice video! A lot of information there. The general purpose usable 4k/120fps and better high ISO noise performance would be good reasons for some people to go the Sony route. The M50 might have had a slightly better time in autofocus with an EF-M lens, but the adapter does tend to work pretty well (the only lens I've tried on mine so far is a EF 135mm f2.8 SF. So far it stopped focusing once, but cycling the power corrected that). On a side note, when I was testing out the 11-22mm vs the 22mm f2 lens I did notice that the M50 focuses a lot more consistently in 4k mode with the zoom lens rather than the 22mm f2.
You just answered to my dilemma! I was between those two, because of the low budget 4K canon, but now I know! Sony for sure! Thanks a lot!
If you're a beginner, go for M50. Except for it's user friendly features, the most important thing is that canon's lenses are way more cheaper than the Sony's. You'll just need an EF/EFs to EOS-M adapter.
I came to early. Video only allows 360 p. I’ll be back
Also I already know the 6400 is better but I still watch anyway
Ya sorry! Thought it was done processing. Guess not!!
It’s done processing now
I'm new to photography and suggestions are highly appreciated. Which one is a better buy for lowlight photography and a better bang for my buck? A6400 or M50 + another lens? I want it to be usable for northern lights so if ever I'm going to purchase A6400, I'd still probably buy sigma 16/30mm f/1.4.
If you want something cheap to get by with, the M50 is for you. But if you want something with better video quality and a little more future proof, the A6400 is the one.
Exactly right!
Absolutely.
As someone who used the M50 as my YT video camera for a year, I found my videos looking more crispy and better straight out of camera on the A6400 which I prefer for YT. For filming cinematic sequences, I prefer m50’s Color science but the 4K crop is the death knell sooner or later.
When recommending cameras, I always take into account lens prices depending on what someone likes to take photos/videos of. So if someone wants to get a wide angle in the future, but one brand sells it for 200-300 and the other for 500+$, it makes a huge difference for a lot of people. If they just plan to stick to the kit lens, then comparing cameras alone makes sense.
Spicy comments, but I like the comparison. A lot of people seem to be caught up on the initial price of the cameras which has merit. The actual cost however adding all the gear used in this video however? It’s actually really similar. If I got to BH the M50 body has been stuck at $630 USD for months, the speed booster is $160 (2 month back order), and $450 for the Ef-s STM 18-135 (STM is a must for video). So in total if I was buying everything brand new at retail $1240~. The Sony a6400 w/ that 18-135 (both have same 3.5-5.6) is $1298.
So for the US atm, the difference in total price of the kits being used is about $60. While it’s definitely easier to piece a kit together over time, and that does have a lot of merit to it (it’s what I do); the total price of this comparison is 100% fair imo if you’re basing it off each ones “sweet spot” for video at regular retail pricing.
Already have the m50, the sony got more vibrant colour on that vid test
If u use color profile on Sony, u should also use one for canon. That’s better for comparison
I really think I found a vlogging camera for myself! The Canon M50 thanks for sharing!
Thanks for watching!
Siva Jnana same here.. I love my Canon M50 😊 All the best to you 😊
intheworldofmari yeeeah!
Kinotika thank you also. I have subscribing long time ago!
Shortly after buying my first digital camera(just for fun), I found myself rapidly shooting: Events, Food, Real Estate, Marking, Promotions, Video, even fiction and short films. I had no idea of how much I would grow as a content creator. I feel that if you are a creative person you will outgrow the M50 pretty soon. The Sony's in general, because they are so packed with features, are hard to outgrow. You even get an early exposure to log and advanced color profiles. In case you end up shooting hollywood ARRI and RED.
I just broke my RX100V and since I still have my 7D with my lenses, id have to say I’m going back to the canon Fam starting with the m50
Im not a camera geek or anything, but I think all matters on what you want to get out of it. for what I want I will go with the m50, plus the price is just too good for that and the aftermarket canon lens prices. It would all be different if the a6400 screen was flipped sideways and a little bigger. Plus one thing you didn't really go over is Canon Camera Connect, I am in love with that app, as a solo vlogger. I am not sure how Sony's compares (I think it is called PlayMemories)
Lens prices are definitely a big plus for Canon. If you want to buy a few more lenses the Canon generally comes out a lot cheaper.
Yo buddy what gear are you using to shoot your talking scenes in the red sweater. Thats killer footage
Thank you Kinotika! you are awesome and truth personnel youtuber b/c there are sooo many youtube maker talk about a6400, they all talk the same content. But you are the ONLY ONCE who is talking the HDMI OUTPUT. Thank you!. I want to buy this camera but there are no important or specification statement about HDMI Out. Finally, you are on top of everyone. Much appreciated for your time to do this Video.
Before watching: I'm definitely buying the M50
During this video: 🥴🤯 for sure getting the A6400
Thank you for the video! The comparison looks so obvious and helpful! And I am going to get SONY a6400 now!
just find the no flippy screen a deal breaker FOR ME and how I use a camera , flip up just puts it behind the mic and therefore useless , dunno why sony persist with this no flip screen nonsense . . .
Sony A6400 has a flip screen.
I'm planning which one to buy. M50 Mii or Sony ZVE10/a6400
Better auto focus for me is a plus and this video gives me a better idea to buy which one.
Thanks DAVE!
I will buy m50 soon! Gonna be my first camera 😂 hope I make a good choice !!
If I'm not mistaken, the M50 doesn't have a dial, so you can't adjust any of the settings like you would with a dslr. Some people critisize the sony alpha series for still sticking to one dial, whiile Fuji cameras have two, and yet the M50 does't even have 1!
I have an m50 and the lowlight is just not for me. Anything in photos above 200 iso has noticeable grain. The video is decent though, just want 120 FPS in 1080p, so the a6400 would be my choice as an m50 owner.
You need to learn to expose properly. ISO 200 is BS. I get relatively clean images at ISO 800, still relatively clean at ISO 1600, grain noticeable but not bad at ISO 3200 then a big jump to ISO 6400, but still usable. Too noisy at ISO 12800 except in rare circumstances.
Here are 2 images, one at ISO 800 and one at ISO 3200 proving noise is not only usable up to ISO 200. Images are 100% crops to keep file size down:
1drv.ms/f/s!As2bMg5NOx76rJMacLueQOeCsTqsjw
One thing beginners probably don't know is what resolution they need to print images at common sizes, such as 12" x 8". That particular sized print at photo quality (300ppi) would need 3600px x 2400px. If you have a little grain in the original image, it will mostly vanish if you downsample your image to those dimensions and there will be no grain at all in the print. If you pixel peep then noise is visible at ISO 3200 on the most expensive DSLRs and mirrorless cameras. Don't expect too much from a camera, especially a cheap one!
Gee, the strawberry pic I just added to the folder I linked you to (in another post) must be a throw away image due to excessive noise then. OMG it was shot at ISO 1600 under a 5W LED desk lamp.
Learn to use your camera before misinforming the public with very inaccurate information.
cooloox I simply said the lowlight is not for me. I do notice grain at 200 iso, I never said it was the end of the world, but it’s just a fact that some cameras are going to perform better in lowlight and the a6400 is one of those cameras. Also, the m50 is aimed at beginners. Not saying I’m a complete beginner, but you can always harp someone for “not knowing there camera enough”, while other tools will help them accomplish there goals easier. Why jump through hoops when you know which one is better for you and your workflow. Plus lack of 120 frames is honestly a deal breaker, and the native lenses for the m50 are just not what I’m looking for. I respect your opinion, and thanks for the info on pixel peeping and exposure. I’m just a hobbyist and the m50 just isn’t for me. I’m glad you’re enjoying it though! I’ve definitely taken some good images on it.
cooloox also great images man! Love the cat pictures. 🙏
Do you think there is a difference in image quality on Sony A5100 & the EOS M50? I record sound with an external mic on my PC and sync it in POST, so I don't necessarily need the 3.5mm audio jack on camera. You guys have some awesome videos.
Great video comparison between two very appealing APS-C cameras on the market, thanks !
A6400 is incomparable. It focus within 0.02 sec which is really nice. It fires everything 🔥
The quality is pretty similar until you realize the M50 is doing a lot of the tests at a lower quality. For me it’s no question the extra money is worth it. Great comparison
Not just extra money, it's a lot of money right there
Hi, I really enjoy your camera reviews. I was wondering what camera you would recommend for all around videos. I have been looking at the Canon M50 mark ii, Canon 200d mark ii and a few others. Thanks
You guys are awesome!!! So cool connecting with you!! 😎🤙
Stefanie and Caleb same!!! Great meeting! Let’s stay in touch!
u r the best nd youtuber i have ever witnessed in my life... Keep it up !
Hey Kinotika! Great comparission video! Still got one more question: how does it look like with the battery life?
Interestingly enough the battery life has improved with the Sony quite a bit compared to the older models. I would say that the Sony actually has better battery life than the Canon
Kinotika not what he was looking for I think!
Can’t decide what to get
M50 Portrait color. Thats the color pattern i like. HLG of the Sony is also good but i prefer the portrait pattern by the canon.
The low light test....substantial difference! I have an M50 and always hate bumping up the ISO for pics, I ASSuMEd it was an aps c thing😳 It's probably a good thing I haven't gone crazy with lenses yet.
Please make a video for photography review also...
Nice very Use Full This Video
I am Confused Witch Came Buy m50 Vs A6400..???? Realy
the Canon just looks unprofessional, blurry
the Sony looks totally different
Great comparison. I was searching for Canon RP vs a6400 but this is sufficient. I wouldn’t mind getting an m50 but, given a choice, I’d take the a6400. Only $350 difference with the kit lenses.
Unbelievable. Not a single phrase about what they are initially made for - a STILL PHOTOS!
ONLY buy Canon m50 of you have budget constraint. Sony a6400 is way ahead. Just got my a6400 with sigma 16mm f1.4. best of luck
And you need articulated screen
@@GungKrisna12 the quality Sony offers compensates far more than the articulating screen for sure, at least for me.
I prefer m50 cos, I can throw viltrox speedboster and voila the smallest fullframe on earth
you can use speedboosters on sony aps-c and sony rx1 is the smallest full frame camera
M50 needs a speed booster and a heavy ass EF 24 1.4 to achieve the same look as Sigma 16 1.4😂.
@@dominick3579 but I heard that for video, the auto focus function is not working =(
vinza pramana putra autofocus is working in sony body but kinda hit and miss sometimes. In canon its “very like native” experience.
@@gusti46 Yeah I have one, and it working beautifully
well. i understand the sony can actually do 4k with no crop. but it's not really a fair comparison when i'm trying to see what the image looks like at 4k. and you used a custom profile on the sony.
I think the reason why the a6400 didn't focus is that it picked up the woman behind you, but when it did pick you up her head was turned so your face was the only one identifiable in the shot. 🤷♂️
Good point! Maybe!!
@@connormccaskill replied to my comment... MADE MY DAY!!!!!!!!!! :-) :-) :-)
@@connormccaskill I am pre-ordering the a6400 tomorrow and will use your link to support. Thanks for the videos you produce.
Perfect caught
Naah. Was for sure at trees and car behind him. Maybe it is lacking when it is too contrasty or subject is not light properly.
Excellent comparison sir, I have not such a comparison video like this.
A6400 is perfect for my hand.
The automatic focalizing system is very important when you create a vlog or shout the designated target. And we can see it, the sony it's better.
After watching this video, i'll buy Canon EOS M50 and a lens adapter to be paired with my old Canon DSLR lenses 😁
Pak Tris that is exactly what I did.. And i dont regret it one bit👍🏻 such an awesome little camera... All the best to you 😊
@@intheworldofmari Thank you 😀 another reason is i can't afford buying Sony lenses, they're quite expensive for me.
Pak Tris my thoughts exactly..
Hi Pak!
As I'm also considering to buy M50, currently having Slr 60D. May I ask you what kind of adapter does a man need in order to reuse the lenses? I will make a research on that!
@@bozhidarabozhilova5067 you can use original Canon EF to EFM adapter but it's rather expensive. For cheaper adapter there are Viltrox or Meike, i currently using Viltrox EF to EFM adapter for my new Canon EOS M6 Mark II and it works well with my old Canon EF lenses.
The A6400 is better but it is also $400 more. With those $400 you can buy a speed booster and some other accessories for the Cannon to make it more competitive.