@@Glopbop Yes, and it lacks that extra "fluidness" when reloading. I found the sound for many of the compared weapons to be more realistic in Verdun, though.
BF reloads in general - the soldier is a professional and lives and breaths the gun and reloads it perfectly and timely Verdun - the soldier just got through basic training and only just understands the gun and needs to take time to reload to minimize mistakes.
I couldnt help but notice how every single weapon sounds more brutal in Verdun. Also, how the speed of the reload animations fit with the gameplay! Slower reloads for a methodical and slow paced game, quick reloads for a more run'n gun, point'n shoot gameplay
I'd honestly wish cod or bf would do a realistic fighter game not every one had lmg or submachine guns. I get to bored with today's shooters might have to check out Verdun.
same but in my case im waiting for bfV to be more fixed and im waiting for a good reason to bought the game the Stug IV sounds good but im waiting for something more M4 or T-34 and also more iconic weapons and less bf1 weapons
The reason reloading in Verdun is slower is because it's more detailed for some of the guns. For the BF5 Weebly the speed loader just disappears, while in Verdun it appears to be thrown on the ground. For the 1892 Winchester it seems like in Verdun it takes the time pulling shells out of the pouch into account, whilst in BF5 they just appear on your thumb
Someone has to say it one last time. Verdun's reload animations are slower than BFV ones just because of the realism. Infact WWI soldiers were young people sent to die after a little lesson on how to shoot someone. BFV instead, is an arcade game were you have to reload faster than your enemy does. They compared an arcade game to a simulator
Both is good. But Verdun could be better, the reloading animation is too calm and slow for a war game And why do you compare the Mannlicher M95 with the Mauser 98?
I honestly dont like bf5s reloads or sounds they are a downgrade from bf1s I see where I was wrong i revisited bf1 and I confused the m95 with the carcano my mistake
German Alonso clearly you haven’t played enough BF1, no matter how many shots you took when you ejected the enbloc clip it would always have the same full clip. In BF5 this was fixed with a dynamic clip that corresponds with the amount of shots taken
*Topping off rifle magazines* BF1 : rounds magically materialize from the soldier's palm Verdun : rounds are picked up from ammo pouches Both makes sense for the type of games they are though
The Real Pousini To be fair, these weapons aren’t as smooth in real life as they are in BFV. Stripper clips don’t go in that easily, and you definitely can’t unload a magazine from its pouch in 2 seconds. Verdun is at a much more realistic speed. But they are both different games and I like them both a lot.
PillzSufrie it’s more realistic sure, but the animations aren’t that good. They look like they were animated for a middle school project, shit my animations are prob better
HuneeBadgeR They’re like a 4-man dev team trying to make the only authentic WW1 shooter. I’m sure reload animations aren’t a priority on their list. But they get the job done.
While battlefield 5’s animations are not much better, verduns animations for reloading very visibly cut and switch in the sense the slide is suddenly back on the 1911 while it had not been right before the animation and it suddenly pops into the animation and it looks very unnatural. Then again battlefield v is very unnatural as well
Why the hell EA had to recycle so many guns from Battlefield 1? For example: RCS was in service until the late 1920s and just a few were used during Second World War. What about MAS36?
@@SpiderMan-xw8wh I know that some weapons were used during Second World War but while there are 47 guns in this game and 16 (1/3) of them were taken from Battlefield 1 and some other guns were never used in service, it could be called laziness.
I’ve loaded 10 rounds in to a Lee enfeild faster then verdun and bf5 on a flat range then in those games and I didn’t have a pouch for the ammo it was loose in my pocket
Well... Verdun in my opinion have good core gameplay and objective wise, good but most mistake details through out the game. No screaming womans so thats fine. Weapon and characters details are good so I give an 8/10. The game is fun but sometimes very dead. For battlefield5. I played it, it have an ok gameplay but same objective styles like past Battlefield. Amazing details but wacky glitches that irritated me through gameplay, womans that screams even through their wounded phased hurts my ears(Sorry if anyone who read this is a girl/Woman, it is fine for a female gen to be in a man only war. But, they should just leave the scream in the trash, it really hurts gameplay wise) weapons details are kinda ok but the Character models and designs, uhhh... I give it 4/10 for realism. Battlefield5 is a fast past objective forcus gameplay, fun and exciting to play with friends. But, they are deep flaws that spread in bf5 that hurts me the most. Like, searching for an Asian only server since Im Asian. One and a half hour later, puts me in an Europian server under an hour and get gangbang by players in tanks and plans that I deal no damage with any Anti weapon. Noisey female characters(Sorry) when they are dead as it keep me unfocus through gameplay. Sometimes joining the opposite team without my friends. Random bullshit *LAG* And finally, can't play battlefield 5 cause i'm fed up with it and delated. Tho, I'm a Battlefield veteran who played the ever first Battlefield game (Battlefield 1942) and that game is better then Battlefield 5 because of the core gameplay. Sigh... Why dose Game devs have to make their games so bad now, like... why? Don't they want their game title to stay in the right track? The right way? I remember how Battlefield BC2 was one of the most amazing battlefield because of its beautiful Frostbite engine that made the game beautiful. Battlefield 3 have its flaws too, but its gameplay and maps, weapons and vehicles were just top and it is still my favourt battlefield to this day. Battlefield 4? Totally my second, since it have the same core elements like battlefield 3. Instead, it have Enviermental Evolution, that is the battlefield I know and love. Battlefield 1, same but the details are breathtaking. Even when you play in a server alone, you can just roam around freely and listen to the world around. The soft breeze of Verdun hights, all the way to the shellshock bombarment of Fort De Foe. That, is called Battlefield Feel. It hit us like it was nothing, how we go take our controller and pkay through the many maps againist other players who want to win. To enjoy themselves and laugh to the core gamrplay of Battlefield. And thats how we players feel when we play battlefield, it is in our soul, it always want us to keep playing because of that feel. And then... theres Battlefield 5. The gunplay, the vehicles, the character models. The enviermant. It dosen't feel like battlefield anymore, it feels like all my money was spend on an unperfect game, I didn't feel the battlefield as i held on the controller, keys and mouse. All i felt was boredom. There were moments, but not the moments I always feel in past bettlefields. Its sad. I bet this is another failed battlefield title that they should just shut all its server down. They just waste they're money on a game that many of us were excited but show only boredom and uninterest to it. Though, its my opinion and many of my friends aswell. We all don't feel like playing battlefield that dosen't feel battlefield anymore. Unlike BF3 and 4, those two rules all from gameplay wise. Simple details made it have great gameplay. Not like Battlefield 5 or Hardline. It just dosen't feel anymore to us.
This is a public service anouncment If you ever shot a real gun you will see that bfV´s weapons are more accuret Verduns gun sounds are mostly base whitch is not how guns sound like, they dont blast out base at you they blast sound So bfV´s gun sounds sound weeker but they are true to life, the only way a game could show you how loud a gun in real life is would be to cause you permenent ear damage
Verdun is a WW1 FPS (more like a simulator) made in 2014 that takes place on the western front. The game tries to be as realistic as possible. Realistic armament, realistic maps, realistic gear, one shot one kill etc... Verdun was made by 2 people (now 20). The Maps are: Ypres, The Marne, The Somme, Vosges, Artois, Vuaquiois, The Fort Duoumont, Champagne, Saint Mihiel and Argonne. The game shows the horrors of ww1 very well: Gore, Screams and horrifying violence.
naio piaio Verdun was in development from wayyy back. 2006-2008 was their first Project and 2013 was when it’s starting to resemble Verdun we have now.
Verdun beat BFV at grenades for sure, cause while the stick grenade animation in Verdun seems a little fast, atleast one game actually put animations for them.
Battlefield V wins at reloading, in Verdun the way you reload just looks like the war isn't going on at all, i'm saying he looks calm, the fear of death would either make you shake or try to do it faster.
Pepe4358 _ Guns don't operate as smooth in BFV as they do irl. Reloads look a little more authentic in Verdun. You can't realistically reload a bolt action within 3 seconds unless you're a professional speedloader, which most soldiers weren't.
3:30 These are not even remotely the same gun. The actual gun would be in Tannenberg, the separate game they made, but BF5 doesnt really have a Gewehr 98
@@SpiderMan-xw8wh I don't give a fuck about people, human is more useful. Opinion of every single human matters, opinion of people doesn't. Still, I think Verdun is much better. What did EA give to us? All THEIR Battlefields - shit, EA destroyed history for two times, EA is on political mode, EA devs don't accept criticism on their new Unterfield V, EA destroyed Star Wars and logic, and I can continue.
Random Radek how are the animations better, the animations are stiff and clunky, and look like a middle school project. Slide releases have no jerkiness, mag pulls and bolt pulls don’t either, and they are way too slow. Battlefield 5 however takes a faster more unrealistic approach, sure but at least they get details like that. It looks like a character is using it, not a poorly animated robot
Not a real level playing field comparing a 2018 AAA title against an indie game from a 2015 company. Although I think Verdun actually has better sound on some guns like the Lee Enfield.
Its better to compare verdum with battlefield 1 OmG bcs battlefield V its Second World War and Battlefield 1 is in the First World War like verdum game
The bolt locking for pistols in verdun is awkward. Also, even if you have one round in the chamber left or half a mag the bolt still locks back. BFV is a shit game but at least the sounds and reloads are realistic.
BR-P-2001 // if you got to reload as fast as they do in the battlefield games, chances are it’s too late you already got a knife in the throat or chest lol
I don’t get this. Why do a Comparison of a WW2 game with a WW1 game? Between Wars don’t forget there was so many different makes and models and marks of weapons, why not do something like BF1 and Verdun?
If you're playing with someone using the Lee Enfield you can see that he uses his middle finger to pull the trigger, but you can't really do it in real life cause your aim won't be accurate at all. It's just a cool detail to fast the reload animation in BFV
@@gabriellamberti3240 i see, using the middle finger isn't very practical when firing the weapon IRL because the recoil is quite strong, i know because i've actually fired a real enfield
I mean, verdun sounds better and animates better, but if the guns in verdun (semi ald fully auto) didnt always reload like they were empty, It would be a easy win for verdun. Edit: Battlefield five gun sounds sound like computer made crap.
Computer Made crap? So people ran out of things to hate about the game. They used real weapons and recorded it, just watch this video. ua-cam.com/video/i-6OxRBHG3o/v-deo.html
The M98 from Battlefield and the M98 from Verdun are NOT the same weapons the M98 from BF ist the Mannlicher M98 from Austrian company Mannlicher and the M98 from Verdun is the Mauser gehwehr 98 so it's not the same weapon
Battlefield 5=more bass and echo
Verdun= more treble and reverb
They both need more cowbell.
Battlefield has more ammo for some of the guns
Gavin Fair Verdun is much more realistic
@@m4sherman926 not in graphics tho
@@Glopbop Yes, and it lacks that extra "fluidness" when reloading. I found the sound for many of the compared weapons to be more realistic in Verdun, though.
BF reloads in general - the soldier is a professional and lives and breaths the gun and reloads it perfectly and timely
Verdun - the soldier just got through basic training and only just understands the gun and needs to take time to reload to minimize mistakes.
@@thepunisher1176 okay nerd
Or For Short - Go Find in "BF1 vs Verdun" Find The Comment "BF1 - Professional Soldier Reload
Verdun - Average Soldier Reload"
@@howtogitgud Idk The "Nerd" Is Still Use In Modern Days...
Bf Arcade
Verdun more realistic
No, Verdun is just realistic
but isn't Verdun a WW1 Game, so it should be compared with BF1
Has been.
7:18 I love that you can hear the hissing of the fuse in the grenade
Animations: bf5
Sound: Verdun
Those battlefield guns animations are a joke. there are nothing realistic on them.
@@capscaps04 yes sir. the magazine falls out by itself on the luger, dude doesnt press the magazine release
Verdun is more real. Through BFV has better graphics
I couldnt help but notice how every single weapon sounds more brutal in Verdun. Also, how the speed of the reload animations fit with the gameplay! Slower reloads for a methodical and slow paced game, quick reloads for a more run'n gun, point'n shoot gameplay
day of infamy vs battlefield v please
Days of infamy of course
@@pyrs201 I think they both do different things better than each other.
DoI has somewhat better animation, and BFV has somewhat better sounds.
That ain't even a fair comparison.
@@jpegwithallthecrust2649 BFV is better in both imo
@@circumcizednun1814 nah mate ur generic the guns in bfv sound lound like pee shooters compared to verdun and day of infamy
Verdun looks good!
I remember I played it for many years ago when it was free. I might consider buy it some time.
kasztaniec
It is indeed
I played it when it was on Beta on Kongregate
DAMN! It has changed.
Servers are dead on ps4 :/
You really should. Verdun is epic these days
I'd honestly wish cod or bf would do a realistic fighter game not every one had lmg or submachine guns. I get to bored with today's shooters might have to check out Verdun.
I am neutral because I never played both of them. Reasons:
1-) Insufficient funds
2-) Never had a chance to play them in internet cafe.
same
but in my case im waiting for bfV to be more fixed and im waiting for a good reason to bought the game
the Stug IV sounds good but im waiting for something more M4 or T-34 and also more iconic weapons and less bf1 weapons
Battlefield 5 didnt just die
IT WAS MURDERED
Good
The reason reloading in Verdun is slower is because it's more detailed for some of the guns. For the BF5 Weebly the speed loader just disappears, while in Verdun it appears to be thrown on the ground. For the 1892 Winchester it seems like in Verdun it takes the time pulling shells out of the pouch into account, whilst in BF5 they just appear on your thumb
If you look closely in the bfv mark IV reload, they let the speed loader fall to the ground by itself.
7:06 That's a really small lethal range for a nade! Maybe the shockwave or the explosion would not get you but the shrapnel sure would
I honestly cannot understand how people can continue to support battlefield V after everything DICE and EA did.
I could give less of a shit about your politics, if you make a good product then I’ll buy it and play it. I don’t spend money on in-game items though.
Verdun has better graphics on the thumbnail
Austin Cohan nope
@@MW-ow8zh Nope
BFV has better gameplay in trailer
@@gezegenezen12 there was gameplay in battlefield 5s trailer
BFV revolver sounds like an artillery firing xD
It sounds like a sprinkler
Verdun’s right hand while removing stripper clips isn’t natural
But reloading a gun in less than 3 seconds is natural or what
The hand morphed into a fucking foot
@@elijahlurton3570 uh what i don't see any foots in the video ?
I wish Verdun added the empty and chambered reloads, instead if just empty.
Someone has to say it one last time.
Verdun's reload animations are slower than BFV ones just because of the realism. Infact WWI soldiers were young people sent to die after a little lesson on how to shoot someone. BFV instead, is an arcade game were you have to reload faster than your enemy does.
They compared an arcade game to a simulator
Yesssss. VERDUN. I have 300 hour on VERDUN on steam.
Hahaha 1000 hours 😎
@@gezegenezen12 damn
@@parkerkieswetter9027 😎
Measly 26 hours of fun from me. I cannot stop playing it.
3:35 you can here the ping of the clip ejecting.
Both is good. But Verdun could be better, the reloading animation is too calm and slow for a war game
And why do you compare the Mannlicher M95 with the Mauser 98?
Verdun is a WW1 shooter, and that time, most soldiers were farmers and young people who most never shot a gun, so that might explain the slow reloads.
Verdun Is just more realistic that's why It's slow.
Ikr, even though the Kar98k is literally a derivative of the G98.
@@daczechboi8644 your hands would shake then, you would see it.
@@Plaguebearer7 But it's still a game.
Verdun sounds more realistic
one question : How can a second world war game be compared to a first world war game?
Because they were only like 30 years apart so they used a lot of the same weapons. Plus they already compared Verdun to BF1.
Verdun - 2 genders
Battlefield 5 - 1879 genders
1:46 TACTICAL NUKE, INCO........
yay finally another comparison video!
battlefield has better animations but Verdun has more realistic realodes
I honestly dont like bf5s reloads or sounds they are a downgrade from bf1s
I see where I was wrong i revisited bf1 and I confused the m95 with the carcano my mistake
You can say the same from bf3 and bf4
seppe sneyers bf4 sounds we’re an improvement imo
German Alonso I disagree BFV improved over one as far as animation goes just look at the broken m95 reload on 1
@@ruhidmohamad I dont see how it was broken or how they improved at all
German Alonso clearly you haven’t played enough BF1, no matter how many shots you took when you ejected the enbloc clip it would always have the same full clip. In BF5 this was fixed with a dynamic clip that corresponds with the amount of shots taken
In verdun i feel like im holding an actual gun not like battlefield
When are we getting Battlefield 1 vs Tannenberg?
I need the m1 garand in this game
Nightmarish Bat it’s coming soon in bf5 in the tides of war but it’s when the Americans join the war then u can get it 😁
Nightmarish Bat omg your playing as a German soldier not a American soldier
@@d30n6 I fucking know that
Nightmarish Bat I’m jus saying fucking dingus
Aaron Formanekgibson I don’t know
BFV has more reverb and echo as well as having different echoing for different environments.
That lee enfield middle finger trigger technic
hmmmMMMMMMMMmmmmm
*Topping off rifle magazines*
BF1 : rounds magically materialize from the soldier's palm
Verdun : rounds are picked up from ammo pouches
Both makes sense for the type of games they are though
AWESOME VIDEO
YEP Can I get a a-man?
Ok a kid channel watch a adult video.. Wtf
If you are an adult
What are you doing with your life
SUB TO PEWDIEPIE
Battlefield V : Fast Reloading, trigger discipline
Verdun : Slow & steady reloading, no trigger discipline
Trigger discipline wasn’t a thing until near the end of the Vietnam War.
The Real Pousini To be fair, these weapons aren’t as smooth in real life as they are in BFV. Stripper clips don’t go in that easily, and you definitely can’t unload a magazine from its pouch in 2 seconds. Verdun is at a much more realistic speed. But they are both different games and I like them both a lot.
@The Real Pousini And now imagine trying to slide in a clip into your rifle while being under volleys of machine gun fire.
PillzSufrie it’s more realistic sure, but the animations aren’t that good. They look like they were animated for a middle school project, shit my animations are prob better
HuneeBadgeR They’re like a 4-man dev team trying to make the only authentic WW1 shooter. I’m sure reload animations aren’t a priority on their list. But they get the job done.
While battlefield 5’s animations are not much better, verduns animations for reloading very visibly cut and switch in the sense the slide is suddenly back on the 1911 while it had not been right before the animation and it suddenly pops into the animation and it looks very unnatural. Then again battlefield v is very unnatural as well
For my example go to 1:04
The Verdun ruby sounded like the Colt 45 from Cod WAW
Hehe no it really doesn’t
I think both game is good so I'm going to make Verdunfield 5
Or the war of Verdun 5
It should be battlefield 1 vs verdun
The Gewehr 95/1898 and the Gewehr 98 are different guns... They even have different loading mechanisms!
I love your videos very much
Honestly dont know why but Verdun sounds sounded more satisfying to me
Why the hell EA had to recycle so many guns from Battlefield 1? For example: RCS was in service until the late 1920s and just a few were used during Second World War. What about MAS36?
oh hello friend! they were used in the start of the war you see? there are also some that are simply for fan service. they like it.
@@SpiderMan-xw8wh I know that some weapons were used during Second World War but while there are 47 guns in this game and 16 (1/3) of them were taken from Battlefield 1 and some other guns were never used in service, it could be called laziness.
I liked comparing bf1 and Verdun myself all of he time
Wait wait wait
the m95 and the 1898 are not the same weapons. The kar98 and the 1898
The "Ruby" Pistol in BFV Looks Like Five Seven But in Ww2
Should’ve compared the chauchat too
Gewehr 98 is a Mauser though, the Gewehr 95 in BFV is a Mannlicher, two different actions. Would be better to compare Gewehr 98 to 98K.
I’ve loaded 10 rounds in to a Lee enfeild faster then verdun and bf5 on a flat range then in those games and I didn’t have a pouch for the ammo it was loose in my pocket
Well... Verdun in my opinion have good core gameplay and objective wise, good but most mistake details through out the game. No screaming womans so thats fine. Weapon and characters details are good so I give an 8/10. The game is fun but sometimes very dead.
For battlefield5. I played it, it have an ok gameplay but same objective styles like past Battlefield. Amazing details but wacky glitches that irritated me through gameplay, womans that screams even through their wounded phased hurts my ears(Sorry if anyone who read this is a girl/Woman, it is fine for a female gen to be in a man only war. But, they should just leave the scream in the trash, it really hurts gameplay wise) weapons details are kinda ok but the Character models and designs, uhhh... I give it 4/10 for realism.
Battlefield5 is a fast past objective forcus gameplay, fun and exciting to play with friends. But, they are deep flaws that spread in bf5 that hurts me the most.
Like, searching for an Asian only server since Im Asian. One and a half hour later, puts me in an Europian server under an hour and get gangbang by players in tanks and plans that I deal no damage with any Anti weapon.
Noisey female characters(Sorry) when they are dead as it keep me unfocus through gameplay.
Sometimes joining the opposite team without my friends.
Random bullshit *LAG*
And finally, can't play battlefield 5 cause i'm fed up with it and delated.
Tho, I'm a Battlefield veteran who played the ever first Battlefield game (Battlefield 1942) and that game is better then Battlefield 5 because of the core gameplay.
Sigh... Why dose Game devs have to make their games so bad now, like... why? Don't they want their game title to stay in the right track? The right way?
I remember how Battlefield BC2 was one of the most amazing battlefield because of its beautiful Frostbite engine that made the game beautiful.
Battlefield 3 have its flaws too, but its gameplay and maps, weapons and vehicles were just top and it is still my favourt battlefield to this day.
Battlefield 4? Totally my second, since it have the same core elements like battlefield 3. Instead, it have Enviermental Evolution, that is the battlefield I know and love.
Battlefield 1, same but the details are breathtaking. Even when you play in a server alone, you can just roam around freely and listen to the world around. The soft breeze of Verdun hights, all the way to the shellshock bombarment of Fort De Foe.
That, is called Battlefield Feel. It hit us like it was nothing, how we go take our controller and pkay through the many maps againist other players who want to win. To enjoy themselves and laugh to the core gamrplay of Battlefield. And thats how we players feel when we play battlefield, it is in our soul, it always want us to keep playing because of that feel.
And then... theres Battlefield 5. The gunplay, the vehicles, the character models. The enviermant. It dosen't feel like battlefield anymore, it feels like all my money was spend on an unperfect game, I didn't feel the battlefield as i held on the controller, keys and mouse. All i felt was boredom.
There were moments, but not the moments I always feel in past bettlefields. Its sad.
I bet this is another failed battlefield title that they should just shut all its server down. They just waste they're money on a game that many of us were excited but show only boredom and uninterest to it.
Though, its my opinion and many of my friends aswell. We all don't feel like playing battlefield that dosen't feel battlefield anymore. Unlike BF3 and 4, those two rules all from gameplay wise. Simple details made it have great gameplay.
Not like Battlefield 5 or Hardline. It just dosen't feel anymore to us.
Verdun: BANG BANG
Battlefield V: pew...pew
Stop bullshitting yourself, both sound great. If either of these games were compared to COD: WWII however...
I personally think BFV sounds better, not to discredit Verdun, which already does great.
This is a public service anouncment
If you ever shot a real gun you will see that bfV´s weapons are more accuret
Verduns gun sounds are mostly base whitch is not how guns sound like, they dont blast out base at you they blast sound
So bfV´s gun sounds sound weeker but they are true to life, the only way a game could show you how loud a gun in real life is would be to cause you permenent ear damage
PillzSufrie Oh god no. That game’s gun sounds sound like sprinklers.
@Gōdon Gurando Because of resources.
Compare arcade game vs simulator?Sure..
Stop in 4:35,he never put right hand on weapon body?:)
Tony Valdez he used his middle finger to pull the trigger. It results in much faster chambering times
_-__-_ also known as the mad minute finger
Verdun does look like a good competitor to me :/ apart from some animations and most feeling slightly boxy-er, it doesn't look bad
Verdun is a WW1 FPS (more like a simulator) made in 2014 that takes place on the western front. The game tries to be as realistic as possible. Realistic armament, realistic maps, realistic gear, one shot one kill etc... Verdun was made by 2 people (now 20). The Maps are: Ypres, The Marne, The Somme, Vosges, Artois, Vuaquiois, The Fort Duoumont, Champagne, Saint Mihiel and Argonne. The game shows the horrors of ww1 very well: Gore, Screams and horrifying violence.
naio piaio Verdun was in development from wayyy back. 2006-2008 was their first Project and 2013 was when it’s starting to resemble Verdun we have now.
Verdun beat BFV at grenades for sure, cause while the stick grenade animation in Verdun seems a little fast, atleast one game actually put animations for them.
Darth Caligo animation isn’t enough to beat the actual sound and physical effect a bf grenade has
@@ruhidmohamad But what if the nades in Verdun actually beat both in BF5?
@@theluiginoidperson1097 Then Verdun would be better in that aspect.
Why does the safety on the K98K wobble in BFV, I've got one and they are by no means that loose.
I wish more people played verdun
VERDUN
Battlefield got the Enfield hands positions way better.
Battlefield V soldier has a sense of urgency
It's too fast lmao
The Gewehr 95 and 98 shouldn't be compared.
One is from Austria and is a straight-pull
the other is the german ww1 standart
Verdun is a way better in every way mostly the reload speed
Nigga what the animations look like a high school project. No realistic weapon shaking for slide releases or bolt pulls, mag pulls, anything
Battlefield V wins at reloading, in Verdun the way you reload just looks like the war isn't going on at all, i'm saying he looks calm, the fear of death would either make you shake or try to do it faster.
Remember the soldier needs to find the bullets in the pouches
@@naiopiaio7125 you don't, you know where you put them, plus that's not the issue, the way he slowly inserts the bullets is the problem.
Pepe4358 _ Guns don't operate as smooth in BFV as they do irl. Reloads look a little more authentic in Verdun. You can't realistically reload a bolt action within 3 seconds unless you're a professional speedloader, which most soldiers weren't.
I'd say BFV wins slightly but if it were BF1 then this would be no contest.
no
How Verdun graphics looking better in the thumbnail lol
3:30 These are not even remotely the same gun. The actual gun would be in Tannenberg, the separate game they made, but BF5 doesnt really have a Gewehr 98
In WW1 standards, this is actually similar to comparing an M16 to a FAL.
They look similar at times, but they're definitely not the same gun.
Okay. ANOTHER fricking WW1 game compared to a WW2 game. Y tho?
bf5 needs to reduce their gun echo
Battlefield V= Boom Boom Boom
Verdun= Bang Bang Bang
COD= Pew Pew Pew
Post Scriptum vs BF V and PS vs CoD WW2
Virgin Battlefield 5 vs Chad Verdun/Tannenberg
Battlefield v is just good at graphics
Verdun has more realistic reload animations.
Day of infamy or battlefield 1 vs red orchestra 2, please!
@Engineer Engineer yes, pyosel
Verdun has better models and animations, as always. See EA, even 20 (starting at 2) people can do better game than you.
well... most people disagree with you.
@@SpiderMan-xw8wh I don't give a fuck about people, human is more useful. Opinion of every single human matters, opinion of people doesn't.
Still, I think Verdun is much better. What did EA give to us? All THEIR Battlefields - shit, EA destroyed history for two times, EA is on political mode, EA devs don't accept criticism on their new Unterfield V, EA destroyed Star Wars and logic, and I can continue.
Random Radek how are the animations better, the animations are stiff and clunky, and look like a middle school project. Slide releases have no jerkiness, mag pulls and bolt pulls don’t either, and they are way too slow. Battlefield 5 however takes a faster more unrealistic approach, sure but at least they get details like that. It looks like a character is using it, not a poorly animated robot
Not a real level playing field comparing a 2018 AAA title against an indie game from a 2015 company. Although I think Verdun actually has better sound on some guns like the Lee Enfield.
Squilliam Fancyson the Ross rifle sounds amazing in Verdun
Not gonna lie I like the BF1 1911 then the BFV 1911
Game made by big studio in 2018 or game made by smaller one in 2014... TOTALY FAIR
Battlefield 5 vs Call of Duty 2 weapons
The ruby gun looks like a
battlefield is bulky but verdun is more smooth
Its better to compare verdum with battlefield 1 OmG bcs battlefield V its Second World War and Battlefield 1 is in the First World War like verdum game
Verdun is the best WWI shooter and strategic game
Do people still play? Any full servers? Xbox one
The bolt locking for pistols in verdun is awkward. Also, even if you have one round in the chamber left or half a mag the bolt still locks back. BFV is a shit game but at least the sounds and reloads are realistic.
was there a straight pull bolt in WW1 or WW2?
Yea m95 was used by Austrians
Why does BF V look very bad.... Have you changed the settings to low?
BF1 is bet-
Wait...
Bf5 wins. Reloading in verdun looks like robot
Tobias Eickhoff no Verdun is shit and is how a robot
@BR-P-2001 // most if the soldier in war were farmers (you moron).
BR-P-2001 // if you got to reload as fast as they do in the battlefield games, chances are it’s too late you already got a knife in the throat or chest lol
Animation in bf5 for small kids
@BR-P-2001 // if you try doing it that fast, under fire, is more likely that you drop the ammo by accident
I don’t get this. Why do a Comparison of a WW2 game with a WW1 game? Between Wars don’t forget there was so many different makes and models and marks of weapons, why not do something like BF1 and Verdun?
Bad day to be a bird
If BF1 wasn't developed then Verdun would still have been worked on
Its still getting aton of updates. Console is literally getting a huge update is may or june.
Few issues with this statement
how does the BFV guy fire the lee enfield if his hand never leaves the bolt lmao
I think he’s using his middle finger for the trigger
If you're playing with someone using the Lee Enfield you can see that he uses his middle finger to pull the trigger, but you can't really do it in real life cause your aim won't be accurate at all. It's just a cool detail to fast the reload animation in BFV
@@gabriellamberti3240 i see, using the middle finger isn't very practical when firing the weapon IRL because the recoil is quite strong, i know because i've actually fired a real enfield
Insurgency sandstorm vs BF4
I think I don't like verdun cuz....
The iron sights are tenny tiny
Doesnt matter For that Issue
Realism.
I mean, verdun sounds better and animates better, but if the guns in verdun (semi ald fully auto) didnt always reload like they were empty, It would be a easy win for verdun.
Edit: Battlefield five gun sounds sound like computer made crap.
Computer Made crap? So people ran out of things to hate about the game. They used real weapons and recorded it, just watch this video. ua-cam.com/video/i-6OxRBHG3o/v-deo.html
Verdun realoder are more gentle to their guns
The M98 from Battlefield and the M98 from Verdun are NOT the same weapons the M98 from BF ist the Mannlicher M98 from Austrian company Mannlicher and the M98 from Verdun is the Mauser gehwehr 98 so it's not the same weapon
Actually he was comparing the M95 in bfv to the Gewehr 98 in verdun for some reason.
@@blakecacini8016 yeah youre right.
wtf you cant compare the Mannlicher 95 to the Gewehr 98
Mannlicher M95 vs Mauser M98? Why?