Dean Radin: The Global Consciousness Project

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 лют 2008
  • Laboratory scientist Dean Radin describes an experiment testing the relationship between mind and matter. In this experiment, random number generators are used to test whether collective human attention corresponds to a change in the physical environment.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 330

  • @CommunistCookie
    @CommunistCookie 9 років тому +192

    It would be interesting to know what would happen if everyone in the world prayed for one flower to grow faster watching a live feed of it's progress

    • @carlgreen8608
      @carlgreen8608 9 років тому +17

      Oh man that'd be so easy to publicize.

    • @brianlink391
      @brianlink391 8 років тому +13

      +Carl Green They have done something like that. Its been brought up in the documentary call "What the bleep do we know". They said - They have bought monks together to meditate in a room with positive thoughts and it deceased crime by some percentage. 10%? can't remember but it was a cool fact.

    • @tristanhoward9190
      @tristanhoward9190 7 років тому

      CommunistCookie Prayer has been shown to be ineffective maybe a better experiment would be to try to make the flower grow.

    • @nicholaslindley1982
      @nicholaslindley1982 6 років тому +23

      Thinking that prayer is ineffective has been shown to be ineffective.

    • @spaceedementia
      @spaceedementia 6 років тому +5

      CommunistCookie if we could gwt everyone in the world to concentrate on something productive and peaceful like that, we wouldnt even be in this mess

  • @sarahknight6627
    @sarahknight6627 5 років тому +28

    I swear the morning of 9/11/01 when I got on the school bus (I was in 8th grade at the time), I felt this eerie calmness in the air kinda like the calm before the storm. I just knew something would happen that day, maybe it was intuition, I don't know. But I didn't imagine it would be history in the making.

    • @alexriddles492
      @alexriddles492 3 роки тому +2

      I have seen graphs of the EGG data from 9/11 and the change from random does start a few hours before the event.

    • @MeridianOfficial
      @MeridianOfficial 2 роки тому +1

      Appeal to emotion

  • @TheLisa-Al-Gaib
    @TheLisa-Al-Gaib 4 роки тому +32

    I’m furious that this project has been de-funded! This research is SO important and needs to continue. (This turned out to be wrong--see edits below)

    • @amyp.575
      @amyp.575 3 роки тому

      What?!?!

    • @TheLisa-Al-Gaib
      @TheLisa-Al-Gaib 3 роки тому +2

      @@amyp.575 I actually had a quick online chat with Dr. Radin and he told me that the project was defunded. I didn't get any more details than that unfortunately, but I am very disappointed. That was extremely important research in my opinion.

    • @liberationwasalie2982
      @liberationwasalie2982 3 роки тому

      Gematria effect news

    • @TheLisa-Al-Gaib
      @TheLisa-Al-Gaib 3 роки тому +10

      Actually, I have a correction. The Global Consciousness Project is up and running with current reports available online.
      noosphere.princeton.edu/
      So I don’t know what happened exactly. I was live chatting with Dr Radin at his official site awhile back trying to get data from the 2016 election. I don’t know if I was tricked or if new funding appeared in the interim. Either way, I wanted to correct my statement and not spread incorrect information. Have a great day!!💕

    • @harpleblues
      @harpleblues 3 роки тому +1

      Who funded it in the first place?

  • @gyromurphy
    @gyromurphy 5 років тому +7

    The fact that this doesn't have millions of views is disturbing to me.

    • @kristiejackson3240
      @kristiejackson3240 5 місяців тому

      Bc we all heard the same thing right?!

    • @longboardwoddy
      @longboardwoddy 8 днів тому

      for majortiy of people this is too high, they still live in their psychological trap with a strong EGO

  • @GeetarAdam
    @GeetarAdam 8 років тому +47

    Dude is hacking the Matrix, real-life!

    • @kajallison8896
      @kajallison8896 4 роки тому +1

      GeetarAdam haha

    • @Felewin
      @Felewin 4 роки тому +2

      You would also like Randonautica

    • @monicamir
      @monicamir 3 роки тому +2

      He's hacking human brains for his experiments.
      They want to know how mind is connected to brain.
      They discovered the particle Psy/J at CERN in 1976 and i guess it's not a particle at all.
      They defined a Algebra at CERN called Supersymmetry.
      There's a video made by CERN called Simmetry.
      Those people are crossbreeding between human and Rhesus monkeys.
      They want to become humans. They put lots of humans to work for them. Some not knowing , some unwillingly.
      Drugs are part of their business.
      Those people have no soul. They have a digital model of their minds called silhouette.
      The psychotronic generators are people they kill in their experiments.
      They are seek.
      Buhr is hell or fire in Sanskrit.
      They use the Sanskrit language in their researches.
      They made me have nightmares about 911 since 1978 or 1979. They have stolen my journal of this time.
      I had many nightmares with 911. It's synthetic dreams. They have produced those dreams.
      They produce events. Large scale events for their psychotronic generators.
      They are into noetics, occult , etc
      They are satanists.

    • @GeetarAdam
      @GeetarAdam 3 роки тому +2

      Mônica Miranda Indeed. Modern day alchemists. But rather than investigating how to turn lead into gold, they want to know how matter begets mind. Of course, they’ve got it bass-ackwards. Matter proceeds from mind. All matter in the universe was willed into existence by the mind of Yahweh.

  • @dharmacharinipasadanandi7110
    @dharmacharinipasadanandi7110 4 роки тому +5

    Wondering what random number generators are doing during Covid... I was captivated by "what the bleep" film this guy spoke in, with other scientists. Intriguing.

  • @davidcraigthor
    @davidcraigthor 10 років тому +21

    For maximum benefit, it is essential for those manipulating things (all of us), to be happy. Happiness is a crucial factor in determining whether those changes are beneficial or detrimental. For someone with a lot of "influence" torturing & tormenting them could mean disaster for everyone.

    • @majji8604
      @majji8604 5 років тому

      Fuck trump though

    • @tiddlecast
      @tiddlecast 2 роки тому

      Well I love that idea. I think he alluded that the phenomenon’s causation is still under investigation.

  • @jayumble8390
    @jayumble8390 2 роки тому +4

    This is fantastic, thank you!!! There is a collective consciousness that is indeed totally real and these REG's prove it...period. We just need to keep studying this. Once this concept is accepted around the world, the responsibility is on us, as a collective people, to make the difference. This is so deep and points to a different reality for generations to come.

  • @Paddyllfixit
    @Paddyllfixit 11 років тому +4

    This vid only gives a mere overview of the project. Have you read any of Dean's books or checked out his research? This is only a tiny snippet of a much larger and more complex issue.

  • @fremmed1
    @fremmed1 14 років тому +1

    @Dewillough This raises the question: Does our thoughts matter or are we just matter....? Yes, our bodies are matter, but thoughts decides if we live in love or fear. This (and many other) experiences proves that our attitude/thoughts matter in a unified way. Witch means that we should care about what we do cause what we do to another we also do to ourself. Its about responsibility to create a more loving world.

  • @SAlexanderHardison
    @SAlexanderHardison 12 років тому +1

    Fair enough; I will agree with that. The larger effects for what we're talking about are often more difficult to demonstrate adequately though.
    If even one of the many poltergeist cases, for example, is a genuine example of large scale psi at work, then it's been demonstrated; I tend to think that there are many genuine cases of notable phenomena occurring that we can't explain. Thanks for the response!

  • @KnowL-oo5po
    @KnowL-oo5po Рік тому +1

    give this man all the resources he needs

  • @robertwalker3500
    @robertwalker3500 10 років тому +2

    I have written a book called Remember the Rainbow: An Instinctive Sense for Grasping the nature of things. In the book, I write about one of my experiences that caused me to raised the very same questions with regard to "intention and attention." I found myself having the ability to manifest objects into existence. To hear Dean Radin speak to this question via scientific experimentation tells me he is far more superior, intellectually, than he himself may realize. While I have been gifted in knowing, that is, by means of time travel, he has the ability to comprehend scientific data through experimentation. What he doesn't know is that his desire for discovering answers to his most puzzling question are found in the complexities of time travel. I'm currently writing a second edition that will bring my perspective, a new light, of understanding of how consciousness works in the paradigm of time to answer some of these kinds of questions [04/20/2014].

  • @tiddlecast
    @tiddlecast 2 роки тому +2

    Here we are with this magnificent power and we’re praying for 1’s and 0’s 😅😉

  • @amyleigh7660
    @amyleigh7660 3 роки тому +1

    Six days before 911, I was burdened with excruciating sensations of utter doom. These feelings would grab me unexpectedly and throughout these days, I’d told a total of 7 people - neighbors, friends and family about it. No matter how hard I tried, I could not pinpoint it. Late at night, on September 10th, 2001, it all disappeared. And of course the next day, horror. I didn’t understand until that moment and at the time, I was an extreme skeptic.
    After that, no more.

    • @WHDRWN
      @WHDRWN 2 роки тому

      emotion grab

  • @brianlink391
    @brianlink391 8 років тому +2

    Love it, thanks. Great video!

  • @elfman5150
    @elfman5150 15 років тому +3

    Wow this is extremely interesting stuff! I'll be sure to look it up; thanks for your suggestion! It is amazing how different "true" reality (though I suppose I must use the word "true" very loosely) is from what the majority of people think it to be. And from what you have said, regarding prerecorded data, how consciousness can effect past events and data possibly. Truly fascinating stuff - better than science fiction, because it is real!

    • @sunofx4142
      @sunofx4142 2 роки тому

      Reality is what's around you. There's no evidence otherwise. This is all confirmation bias garbage

  • @Mrpjm200
    @Mrpjm200 13 років тому +2

    This work needs to be taken seriously by the world and academia! At least decades have been spent working on this research. Double blind experiments reveal that this is fact.

  • @derekfish7768
    @derekfish7768 4 роки тому +1

    This absolutely fascinating!

  • @rocco7755
    @rocco7755 7 років тому +4

    This is the power they don't want you to understand.

  • @qorilla
    @qorilla 9 років тому +26

    I'm manipulating matter right now with my mind. I'm pulling my finger muscles by just thinking of moving them with my mind.

    • @harishmohan1
      @harishmohan1 3 роки тому +2

      Me too ☺

    • @sunofx4142
      @sunofx4142 2 роки тому

      Now try manipulating matter outside of your body with just your mind.

  • @temporaryexistence1974
    @temporaryexistence1974 3 роки тому +1

    On the day of 9/11 I was 15 and I am from central Europe. I came back from school that day and suddenly a thought came to my mind. Turn on CNN, maybe there is some breaking news. So I did and CNN was like, there was an accident and a plane just crashed into WTC. Man, I watched it all and it changed my life. A truthseeker was born.

    • @negus3530
      @negus3530 3 місяці тому +1

      There is no CNN in central europe

    • @temporaryexistence1974
      @temporaryexistence1974 3 місяці тому

      w@@negus3530 yes, as well as no flush toilets, you backwater retard.

  • @avidclip
    @avidclip 13 років тому

    Two notable quotes from the brilliant German physicist, Max Planck, relevant to the topic and to some of the comments: 1. "I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness." 2. "Science advances one funeral at a time." This latter quote has proven itself true way too many times., and I think will do so in Radin's case too.

  • @AstroSquid
    @AstroSquid 3 роки тому +2

    will Benford's law help an individual know if they are being honest in their projection on the random numbers?

  • @PinballDave72
    @PinballDave72 9 років тому +1

    A noticeable byproduct of personal battles between Love of Life vs. Fear of Change, or something to that effect. :-) ☆ ♡

  • @jessepoulin
    @jessepoulin 13 років тому +3

    I wonder if the experimenter's expectation of the effect of events on random number generation is the driving factor of this experiment. Though it's still astonishing that they might affect the machine with their mind...

    • @sunofx4142
      @sunofx4142 2 роки тому

      Exactly, its confirmation bias. The human mind is built to find the patterns it wants to see. There's 0 evidence you can affect anything outside your body with your mind

  • @djdavidj5531
    @djdavidj5531 3 роки тому +1

    Would be interesting so to see the same experiments done using quantum computers as "random" number generators. I wonder if the entanglement factor is changed...

  • @SAlexanderHardison
    @SAlexanderHardison 11 років тому

    I'm not speaking of the GCP specifically, but rather psi research in general, specifically the Ganzfeld. You can test numerous hypotheses at once and see which one works. If the same hypothesis is found to fit the data across the board, that hypothesis might be justified. If we claim that anomalous communication occurs (i.e. mind to mind communication), finding supporting data that fits the concept and not others (i.e. sensory leakage, etc), we can presume AC is a reasonable explanation.

  • @Jeevanm71
    @Jeevanm71 3 роки тому +1

    What the physical systems being triggered by?

  • @bilbobaggins3333
    @bilbobaggins3333 2 роки тому +1

    I thoroughly enjoyed listening in on this discussion. On the part of the poster of this content there are far too many advertisements embedded. There were between 10 &15 planted into this presentation. It’s disruptive and impedes the absorption of the content.

  • @Mrpjm200
    @Mrpjm200 13 років тому +1

    @Dewillough - All great discoveries in science begin with people not being able to see the practical significance. When people begin to understand the implications of Dean Radin's research there will be significant changes in our society.

  • @mihaitusnea504
    @mihaitusnea504 8 років тому +1

    Has this experiment been tried at a music concert? I would be curious if the same behaviour occurs.

    • @jancko995
      @jancko995 8 років тому +1

      +Mihai Tusnea they tried it at a sport afair, and nothing hapens.
      but I would sugest u take a look at Roger Nelson. He's too is a part of these experiments.

  • @archdeaconj
    @archdeaconj 14 років тому

    @MaBu888 Can we establish what you mean by the 5th dimension? The 4th dimension is time, of course (the other three being the spatial dimensions of the everyday world). This is standard physics. Are you postulating a 5th dimension which is a realm of possibilities?

  • @SAlexanderHardison
    @SAlexanderHardison 12 років тому

    I know what you mean. :p And I agree, wholeheartedly! Most people simply dismiss the study of the claimed phenomena, because of its nature and potential implications. The evidence shouldn't be ignored -rather we should seek to evaluate the quality of that evidence.

  • @EchadLevShtim
    @EchadLevShtim 13 років тому +1

    @shizzleman8 Biochemistry in generational trauma outlines memory processes which are classified in folders outlined with emotional tags. The whole imprint of observed thought is an emotional response from the frontal lobe(creativity) or Amygdalla (fear/anger). These images are burnt into recognition with increased emotional intensity. Otherwise we only hold less emotional memory in short term in most cases, as they draw less interest to the observer. Synchronicity shock of pre-memory, deja vue

  • @pauldrake1858
    @pauldrake1858 6 років тому +3

    I used to do will power exercises from a book by professor Alexander Power of the Mind and you get yourself into a state of apperception (self awareness)and you focus on a small cloud and you can make the cloud disappear. I have done this a number of times. I think the global consciousness movement need to look at this. Clouds and vapour could be a good medium to work with.

  • @somuchinfo
    @somuchinfo 8 років тому +6

    Before 9 11, during and after... how could something that runs randomly change before anyone is even aware that the event is about to happen? This suggests that something or someone else was focusing in on the event before it actually began, not random human beings but something else had turned its energy toward that specific event and possibly others.

    • @spaceedementia
      @spaceedementia 6 років тому +1

      joseph wall while i do believe 9/11 was a definite inside job, i think this precognition could be achieved by something like the inertia of a cosmic event. This event changed everything in our realm. It had to have some _major_ things (shifts in consciousness) leading up to it... whether 19 hijackers with box cutters carried it out or not

    • @reneeboley
      @reneeboley 6 років тому

      Because our hearts have been shown to know when something bad is going to happen before it happens. Time is man created.

  • @Candyliz2003
    @Candyliz2003 13 років тому

    @Mrpjm200
    Then WHERE IS IT?

  • @Pendulum_Swings
    @Pendulum_Swings 13 років тому

    @bowenstudios ever heard of quantum entanglement?

  • @paulflute
    @paulflute 5 років тому

    he didn't mention the experimenter effect..

  • @hibarahman7593
    @hibarahman7593 7 років тому

    What quantifies orderedness in the RNG?? Like is there a pattern 0000011111, 01010101??

  • @serg8004
    @serg8004 11 років тому

    does he somewhere else show the rogher data?

  • @CW4RUNNER
    @CW4RUNNER 13 років тому +1

    This is very much like 'the secret'. Think positive and you'll be rewarded with great things.

  • @stephenm6137
    @stephenm6137 4 роки тому +1

    Mind blowing literally.

  • @archdeaconj
    @archdeaconj 14 років тому

    @MaBu888 What do you mean 'if the tapes have 5d'? The tapes are just ordinary tapes, like any other except that the data on them is unobserved. It has recorded data generated by the RNG but in the absence of any observer. The data exists in a state of quantum indeterminacy until it is collapsed by an observer. What would be acceptable to you as determining that the tapes 'have 5d'?

  • @porticopadre1
    @porticopadre1 Рік тому

    But what does it mean for the number generators to have order?

  • @Balla4life3
    @Balla4life3 12 років тому +8

    This guy is my new hero!

  • @da-hn
    @da-hn 13 років тому

    Is there any video / text with discussion on this topic?

  • @Mrpjm200
    @Mrpjm200 13 років тому

    @phookadude - You need to check out the earlier work that was done at Princeton Uni. They performed studies on individual volunteers who's attention was focussed on an REG (e.g. they were trying to consciously influence the outcome). This later research using EGGs is like a scaled up version of the earlier research.

  • @ff-1971
    @ff-1971 Рік тому

    Is it possible to be every conscious being? To experience all lives linearly but at the same time simultaneously and outside of time

  • @someguyinsantaclara
    @someguyinsantaclara 3 роки тому

    Double slit experiment being affected by the problem of observation. Perhaps it's not so much the physical observation but the focus of attention on a set of wave functions that compose a real world event that cause the output of the waves functions to be manipulated.

  • @dennistucker1153
    @dennistucker1153 4 роки тому

    Amazing stuff.

  • @DoctorTachyon
    @DoctorTachyon 14 років тому

    I dont understand. Pls explain

  • @revolutiongames2004
    @revolutiongames2004 15 років тому

    how does one determine whether randomness goes down?
    i ask because, like scientists should, i would like to repeat the experiment. how does one define a decrease in randomness?

    • @sunofx4142
      @sunofx4142 2 роки тому

      Exactly why its a garbage study.
      Randomness is a lack of pattern. So if you see more patterns, you can reasonably claim there is less randomness. But if you look for more patterns, you will see more patterns. (The #1 job of the human mind is to recognize the patterns it wants to see). This is all obviously confirmation bias. But if you wanted to recreate it, look for patterns in the numbers. Eg 0000 0000 0000 0000 is less random than 1001 1100 1010 0010

  • @alexanderstanza
    @alexanderstanza 5 років тому

    Can we use the machine to predict the winning soccer team in a world cup? Example: Germany vs France, deploy machines in Germany and in France and see how the deviation different between the two countries. Who knows the winning team will show positive deviation and the losing one will show negative deviation.

  • @Fangornmmc
    @Fangornmmc 14 років тому

    @Fangornmmc
    ups. The quantum mechanical effect was also scientific. Almost forgot that.

  • @theconsciousmovement9669
    @theconsciousmovement9669 4 роки тому

    sorry for sealing your views, I had to re-post this

  • @DrewDienno
    @DrewDienno 4 роки тому

    I wonder if the scientists who ran the 1950s acid studies on those housewives were trying to learn about this global consciousness thing, seeing if the drug effects were linked to getting in touch with the universal community, or if the two had nothing to do with each other.

  • @huni54
    @huni54 9 років тому

    we could also try a youtube experiment with this.. since a lot of people watched it we could try to focus real hard on a thought and see if the random number generator is disturbed by it or not.

    • @Nasko86
      @Nasko86 9 років тому

      For this you need a big mass of people to pay attention to it. Since only 77 000 people saw this.
      How big is the number you think of the people actually interested in this video/information. Since it is from 2008. If you are interested in the subject or at least openhanded as I pretend to be you could tap by accident on it.
      Or maybe people don't care. Couse they are scared, that if we have missed this, there could be so much more?
      I am not critical. I just say, that the problem is not technology, the problem are we. Of course we can. But we just don't! People don't want to know. Some of was do. But here we are. 77 000 peope + some maybe 100 000 who have not found this video yet. Now who is going to organize them? For free, cause anything else would be appearing the same as all this "I will tell you a secret which will make you endlessly happy, rich, or sexy, only for 99$ for a cd, or book".
      I would be happy to find out a way to change that. How to make people curious ? How to make them want to know?
      We need an Idea here. Big bang kind of Idea.

  • @archdeaconj
    @archdeaconj 14 років тому +2

    @MaBu888 Well hang on a minute. You're saying the there is a 5th dimention (and maybe more) which is all possible events - all the roads we didn't go down, as well as the one we did. Also you're saying all these possible events EXIST somewhere, in some way (it's not just metaphorical). You're also saying, I think, that Radin's (and Helmut's) tape has 5th dimensional data on it (many possibilities) that is collapsed into lower dimentional data by the consciousness of the observer. Yes?

  • @laelwerner5441
    @laelwerner5441 3 роки тому

    Any scientific papers on this?

  • @cfrancisco74
    @cfrancisco74 13 років тому

    That's analyzing data & establishing a link between the data and an event, but it's all after the fact. How much of a diffrence is there between the randomness & order during the event? Does it go from totally random to 1,2,3,4,5,6,7...? He never says. He just says that there is a clear change. How so?

  • @redbeakman
    @redbeakman 10 років тому +10

    The Force.

  • @galacticswan
    @galacticswan 11 років тому

    Of course, but what I was trying to say beyond this triviality is that we naturally accept to use different tools for different practicle problems, while we find strange to accept different way of thinking for different levels of conception of our environment. And that IMO only comes from the fact that we can fool ourselves much longer vis-à-vis the field of application of a theory, than vis-à-vis the one of a material tool (sorry for my poor english).

  • @Fangornmmc
    @Fangornmmc 14 років тому

    Everything comes together. I mean, you have that series called "The Secret" which comes down to: you can make your own reality. You also have that quantum mechanical effect that the molecules of water form up beatifully when exposed to the written word love and becoma a ugly mess when exposed to the written words hate and anger. This is yet another proof that our minds have a huge impact on the world. The only difference with other expiriments is that this one is scientific

  • @bowenstudios
    @bowenstudios 13 років тому

    @1234stives I do know a bit about it. Quantum physics in no way supports such a claim. I'm assuming you're referring to entanglement - in which two particles can be 'contected' to each other althought they may be physcially far from each other. When entangled one of the particles can effect the other partical instantly over a large distance. ONLY entangled particles effect each other in such a way. NOT all particles are entangled, in fact almost none are. (continued...)

  • @knightxc
    @knightxc 14 років тому

    There have been plenty of other tests that seem to support some inter-connectedness bewtween everything, not a god, just a connection. The double slit experiment, entanglement theory, and chaos theory all seem to suggest a higher conscious or at least suggests that there is some hidden reality that we cannot observe. Yes, maybe this test has a variable unaccounted for but that does not mean we should discard the theory all together.

  • @motownbiker92
    @motownbiker92 8 років тому +1

    It seems that the random number generator on 911 started to spike 3 hours before the 1st plane struck the towers.

  • @seyoumeye
    @seyoumeye 15 років тому

    What about before the death of Michael Jackson? Has any mental coherence affected randomness?

  • @Paddyllfixit
    @Paddyllfixit 11 років тому +1

    what are you talking about? Did you watch the same video? There is absolutely no data-dredging, the results speak for itself. The "randomness" becomes coherent during world events with peoples attention being focused. It is what it is! There is no misinterpretation other than perhaps some other cause being responsible for the change in the RNGs which is highly unlikely as no other factors are involved. Did you not hear Dean state that the odds against it being chance are 1000000/1?

  • @stauffap
    @stauffap 13 років тому

    @IceAges14Aces You're right and that's why i always read about the discussion on wikipedia and the changes that were made. Wikipedia is great because you can always find both sides of the coin. But come on, just look at the experiment and the results...sometimes the random number generator reacted before and sometimes after and event...and sometimes not at all. And sometimes the RNG gets highly unproable results without anything happening. What should that be proving? unconnnectedness imho

  • @Candyliz2003
    @Candyliz2003 14 років тому

    @vman456
    1. What are they (studies) and where can they be found?
    2. Being a skeptic has nothing to do with bigotry or arrogance.
    3. Didn't he fail with James Randi? Or did he not accept the challenge (like all but one psychic)?

  • @jeremybronson7
    @jeremybronson7 12 років тому

    This is very exciting... Is it me or Does anyoneelse think that there may be a relation between the results of testing being done at LHC in Switzerland and Global Conciousness Project..
    1- Some particles may travel faster than light..
    2- Information may travel faster than light..
    3- Some events may be foreseen before it happen..
    4- Is the cause and effect principle becoming history-- at a certain level??
    These i would love to know... :))

  • @FortYeah
    @FortYeah 13 років тому

    No matter how quantic or not this is, Radin talks here about the data he collected. So to all of you who don't agree that this is a quantic phenomenon, fine.
    But Radin's experience surely shakes the materialistic theory of consciousness...

  • @DoctorTachyon
    @DoctorTachyon 14 років тому

    @Candyliz2003 How would you know the details of the experiments from a 10min interview clip? You may be psychic or maybe you are a remote viewer. You seem to know things that no one could know from the information presented here. Wow. A real life remote viewer!

  • @michaeldunworth2194
    @michaeldunworth2194 2 роки тому

    Electricity which our bodies run on, are all thinking of the same thing, which would be like drawing a similar pathway of electricity that fires through your synapses. Given that humans are all similar enough, it would be electricity flowing through everyone’s brain thinking of the same thing (thinking of different things, or feeling different emotions will have electricity flowing through them depending on the emotion. So if we’re all happy, then it’s likely that we will all think of a happy thought, and thus light up areas of the brain which represent happiness (be it dopamine or whatever the specific scientific ingredient is)… This means that the energy signature, will be similar at a large scale (eg an event like 9-11 where the larger majority of the measured group, is experiencing the same energy signature (emotion). This would then have a huge pull on the way energy is flowing through the random number generators. If everyone is feeling a similar emotion, and our brains light up similar areas when we feel that emotion, then at scale, this effects an invisible magnetic field, which will change the current flow of energy through the wires, and into the random number generators.

  • @Wstreak91
    @Wstreak91 5 років тому +3

    "The system that should be behaving randomly are no more behaving random"; if this doesn't inspirs you to know more about YOU I do not know what will!

    • @davemwangi05
      @davemwangi05 4 роки тому +1

      I'm trying so hard to look for the link between the current global covid pandemic and this global consciousness project but there's nothing anywhere. Even in their website Jeez. if you find anything hit me upz. People have forgotten this and they're caught up in fear now LOL.

    • @liberationwasalie2982
      @liberationwasalie2982 4 роки тому

      @@davemwangi05 are you alive

    • @davemwangi05
      @davemwangi05 4 роки тому

      @@liberationwasalie2982 I've just been taken to a morgue, they've labelled me a covid death.

  • @archdeaconj
    @archdeaconj 15 років тому

    Yes, it's truly mindblowing. I got so into it I got the original papers out to the library. I'm still reading up on it. The implications are that the data is not on the tape until it is observed, that is to say until the quantum indeterminacy is collapsed by the observer (of course, once it is collapsed, you cannot change it). Matter would seem to be a construct of consciousnes, not objectively real. QM vindicates (more or less) Kant as well as Buddhism and much oriental philosophy.

    • @adbrooks95
      @adbrooks95 Рік тому

      Like what happens in the double slit?

  • @terrapin52
    @terrapin52 14 років тому

    This is a good example of academics falsely trying to find cause and effect relationships where they don't exist. So many countless doctoral theses written for the same reason never advance human knowledge because they are "reaching" for something that isn't there. If he'd publish his findings, I'm sure you'd find an error coefficient which is perfectly plausible and could not be attributed to anything other than normal variance.

  • @anarelle
    @anarelle 7 місяців тому

    This is definitely what Jacobo Grinberg was talking about with his "lattice" and syntergic theory.

  • @DoctorTachyon
    @DoctorTachyon 15 років тому

    Interesting that 2 hours before 911 the random generators stopped running randomly. The cause could not be "collective mind" because the event had not happened yet. Something else was affecting the generators...

  • @Donnnny2010
    @Donnnny2010 5 років тому

    Entrainement of global conciousness (Hive) in motion

  • @ChiefBiggM
    @ChiefBiggM 13 років тому

    @LucasI3434 Well i guess that the generators started to show the same numbers more often, or something like that. Maybe i should read this man's books. Brilliant stuff!

  • @tristanhoward9190
    @tristanhoward9190 7 років тому

    Try the retropsychokinesesexperiements.

  • @Wstreak91
    @Wstreak91 6 років тому +3

    Listen to 2:33 - 3:16 1000x !!!! IF YOU GET IT CONGRATS!!

  • @Dewillo344
    @Dewillo344 14 років тому

    This theory appears ridiculous yet plausible and understandable. However, what are the practical implications of a global consciousness interconnected with all of global matter? I can't think of any.

  • @DoctorTachyon
    @DoctorTachyon 14 років тому

    @Vernonpaddy Regardless if they are negligible or not is beside the point. They are there. The unexplained parts of science can be ignores? Science doesn't ignore what it can not explain. It charges at the things it cannot explain. Whether there is practical applications are not are beside the point. Science is the search for knowledge.

  • @cricketjam
    @cricketjam 13 років тому

    @Vernonpaddy right on.

  • @Nowitzki25
    @Nowitzki25 15 років тому

    collective consciousness is like sunyata in Buddhism which means emptiness; or for better words emptiness of consciousness. Because Buddha taught that we are all one in a void state/place. "Emptiness is form and form is emptiness" Not a Buddhist just found it interesting.

  • @EchadLevShtim
    @EchadLevShtim 13 років тому +1

    I wouldnt sum up Dean Radins career on RNG alone, he's done a few doozies. But nothing was more profound than Time Reversed Human Experience in Precognitive studies, where EEG brainscans monitor brainwave function during response of emotional stimuli, This test has been practiced at campuses globally as scaring & arousing patients shows significant brain activity. RNG is no more validating than the old card guessing trials. For the simple reason of synchronicity & lack of stimuli.

  • @jimeaglesmith
    @jimeaglesmith 11 років тому +1

    agreed. For the moment anyhow! ;)

  • @tjmac7
    @tjmac7 16 років тому

    Electronic number generators. Maybe the link is between consciousness and electronics. Im sure the prana and chi proponents would love this angle.

  • @metaRising
    @metaRising 13 років тому

    I've just posted a vido response to this video that people interested in the GCP may find interesting. -thanks

  • @Markisagoodboy
    @Markisagoodboy 16 років тому

    When someone is reported missing on the television news, or there is a war, perhaps the news should adopt a biased approach now and present it in such as way that the viewers are encouraged to send love and safety to the victims - instead of have everyone think the worst and give it more negative attention.

  • @SammyJayJay
    @SammyJayJay 6 років тому

    I think this is the secret of professional gamblers. Have you ever wondered how professional gamblers seem to keep winning more than they lose while everybody else loses more than they win? I think it's because they do it all the time, day after day. After a while the constant attention and intention to winning starts to favor the odds to their advantage.

  • @galacticswan
    @galacticswan 11 років тому

    Or maybe not so strange. Maybe it is our conception of separation witch is strange, being just a usefull tool to concieve reallity at a certain level, but quiet inadequat to concive it at other levels.
    A pair of binoculars, a telescope, a magnifying glass, a microscope, different subjects, different tools.

  • @RayneMa
    @RayneMa Рік тому

    Yes there is a direct link between consciousness and matter around you. But you will only notice it if you have extremely high consciousness at the time but you will only be the one that experiences it as no one else will be there ready to measure your consciousness when it is being experienced. I do not think you can directly measure it. But it is there. I will be interested in the results that happen a day before the global tsunamis in 2004.

  • @greenelf12
    @greenelf12 14 років тому

    @decepticonsofnwo yay, thankyou!

  • @coolduderyan07
    @coolduderyan07 13 років тому

    So I've gathered that we have 0's and 1's peaking in times of collective consciousness.
    So this, hypothetically, could be measuring a force that bridges our minds in an interconnected consciousness. So, we would all be one mind, separated by different physical realities. So, it's almost like friends sitting in a car. Kickin in the front seat. Sittin in the back seat. Gotta make my mind up... WHICH SEAT SHOULD I TAKE?!
    ITS FRIDAY, FRIDAY

  • @DoctorTachyon
    @DoctorTachyon 14 років тому

    @ikvsabre This is an interview cut into a 10min clip. You want details? And how would you know he has not submitted his work for peer review from this clip? Search Dean Radin speaks at google here on youtube or on my page. You will find names, places, and all the other information you need. Now the question is are you brave enough to leave your bias at the door and deal wit the data honestly? Probably not. You skeptics are really like the religious. I've done this dance many times.