Dean Radin - Does ESP Reveal the Nonphysical?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 вер 2024
- Free access to Closer to Truth's library of 5,000 videos: bit.ly/2UufzC7
Some claim their scientific study of ESP overturns the worldview of science. Should we take these startling pronouncements seriously? If so, what would it mean for events in the physical world to defy all known physical laws? Either there is something misleading about those events or something beyond those physical laws.
Watch more interviews on ESP: bit.ly/3aBeoIn
Watch more interviews with Dean Radin: bit.ly/2RBcChW
How you know it's real: if you experience it yourself and have an open enough mind to believe what you have experienced.
Exactly, just like with Jesus Christ.
@@alancollins8294 Yall will put religion into anything. Its so sad. Science is real. religion is not. You can believe it if you want but you cant measure it. Good luck with that.
@@vulkan8093 I pray that jesus will take your wet socks off your feet, dry them and put them back on while you sleep giving you a little kiss🙏🧦
I think Dr Radin is correct in saying that quantum effects can occur in biological tissues... Quantum tunnelling is important in photosynthesis, and there’s evidence of quantum level effects in olfaction. However, rather than appeal to QM and the laws of Physics, my own feeling is it more to do with the relationship of mind/consciousness to physical matter, which is beyond Physics, and into the realm of Philosophy.
“The universe begins to look more like a great thought than a great machine.”
~Sir James Jeans
If for a moment we assume mind/spirit and not space/time/matter/energy is the foundation of reality, as it is for instance, when we are dreaming, our subconscious could bend spoons, read minds and do all the things that Parapsychologists claim - as we do in our dreams. Indeed, all the characters we meet are aspects of ourselves. We are all brought up in Science to believe in materialism, but if we are to understand consciousness, we might need to challenge that assumption.
"But I was also troubled by a nagging sense that something important was missing from my university courses, something real that mythology and fairy tales were pointing to as metaphors. I later discovered to my surprise, and relief, that the same sense of loss was an unspoken secret among many of my colleagues at Bell Labs. I eventually found to my amazement that this was true also within the larger scientific world... I found that quiet interest in advanced human potentials, including psychic and mystical experiences, permeated the mainstream. And not just the industrial research mainstream, but also the academic, scientific, government, medical, and military mainstreams... So these interests percolate underground. Quietly. Persistently.
This odd state of affairs makes it possible in the Western world to advance from preschool through postdoctoral positions and never learn about -- or in many cases even hear about -- serious scientific investigations of psychic and mystical experiences." -Dean Radin, Supernormal
" There's a GOOD reasons why Dr Radins beliefs have faced such heavy criticism from the scientific ( And philosophical ) community.. First, there is zero VERIFIABLE evidence to support it, and secondly, it violates virtually EVERY pillar of modern physics.. The scientific method AND worldview, has enabled the technological civilization our species presently enjoys.. Unsubstantiated notions like those of Dr Radin, represent the antithesis of scientific reasoning." -- Bill Norris
ESP should stand for Emergent Sensory Perception
Consciousness is primordial, superintendent, executive, and creative of all other perceived forces. Your perception of the material world is real -- the material world is nothing more than asomatous, self-aware consciousness interacting with your consciousness. We are Conscious Consciousness. Nothing more than perception is required, so nothing more is extant. Parsimony rules.
@@billnorris1264 Sir, perhaps you should elucidate yourself of the vast empirical data available. You seem determined in your myopathy.
@@hydrorix1 Perhaps you should do the same sir. Many accolades including the Nobel Prize awaits any team that can demonstrate the reality of any paranormal abilities.. BUT you are free to continue with your myopic View friend. Peace.
I think Dean Radin and Donald Hoffman should have a discussion.
ikr, good call
This guy is remarkably brilliant.
Nice profile pic 👍 😃
@@harishmohan1 thnx, same for yours :-)
He's just well-practised at lying with a straight face about things that sound like science. His parapsychology research is full of errors. Have a look and see for yourself. I warn you though, he's good at making it sound like it's valid...that's why he's famous.
@@888thisthat Can you tell me what is wrong? Also please debunk Bem, Tart and all the evidence from the CIA using PSI to spy soviets
@@888thisthat Can you tell me what is wrong? Also please debunk Bem, Tart and all the evidence from the CIA using PSI to spy soviets
Dean Radin is spot on- you have to have had these experiences and have a good understanding to grasp what he’s laying out. He said everything just right.
I keep coming back to watch, but I'm fixated on the last part of the video, I don't know why.
I can't help but wonder if any of this research is truly getting a grasp on how ESP is possible. To demonstrate how it works, not that it is happening or showing it should be possible.
I'm sure there are several "illusionists" and "mentalists" that can easily demonstrate these type of "abilities".
If ESP is "proven" through research to the extent that I read people are claiming these studies seem to show then I have difficulty understanding how such people with "abilities" are not doing more to help their fellow humans in need. I would also like to include use of abilities for selfish gains but I assume that anyone who would use "abilities" selfishly would likely not be willing to be studied.
heckle9: Have you ever tried to "help" . . . a drug addict (?) If some people have the ESP ability to "help", why do you assume that other people (like the drug addict) wouldn't have the corresponding ESP ability to resist help (?) You don't seem to have "wondered" about this at any length or in any depth . . .
Psi-deniers are on par with evolution-deniers.
The effects are not that great, usually. So you wouldn't be able to do much with ESP practically. What scientists like Dean Radin show is that you get statistically significant results in experiments where people have to know something that they couldn't know any other way but they're still little effects. For example, you emotionally react to something before you see it. It doesn't happen 100% of the time, but more often than not. If you think about how practical would this be you would be getting a sense of something very emotionally stimulating that you don't necessarily know what it is and it doesn't happen every time. It's difficult to figure out a use for this.
Dean came prepared for this discussion.
Precognition and clairvoyance is real.
I wanna see him have a conversation with Dr. Steven Greer
I don't even believe Greer is a doctor. When he was at the "capital hill disclosure hearing" the example of all the examples out there that Greer used to try to convince about UFOs was of a 25-mile wide ship. He almost single handedly discredited the whole event.
@@savedfaves he _is_ a doctor, but he gave up to focus on the Disclosure Project and CSETI and stuff -- just frickin' watch _Unacknowledged._
@@savedfaves He's a medical doctor who used to work in ER. His doctorate has nothing to do with UFOs (but then again you can't study UFOs academically and so can't get a doctorate in it).
I've seen a clip of that hearing you're talking about. I highly doubt that was the only example he gave and he only measured it kind of in passing.
ABSALUTELY . . . imagine me saying that with Sly Stallone's voice. hahahahahah. A physical basis to which we are finding new descriptors for because they're modes we have not previously understood that way. Impossible you say ????? Obviously not.
What we think of as the non-physical world is as aspect of physicality . . . Is Radin a reductive materialist?
As for me it would be a very short minded way of thinking to think that there exists only 4 dimensions. What if there are other dimensions where time does not exist?
ESP should stand for Emergent Sensory Perception
Wasn't it more accepted in the past though?
@@savedfaves It was certainly more accepted in the late 19th Century. Once Quantum Physics became successfully established, the Feynman motto, "calculate, don't ask questions," became the operative mindset of most physicists. The nonphysical realm Tesla referred to was left unresearched.
Consciousness should be accepted as a fundamental universal force in the Standard Model, along with Gravity, Electromagnetism, and the Strong and Weak Nuclear Forces.
@@hydrorix1 100%
Who is the Jewish interviewer? I've seen him before! He's a very good interviewer.
His theory has Emanated from quantum observer effect, however, is the test itself not accurate ? Is anybody qualified and able to answer my question please ?
The very act of observation during the double slit test requires light. Therefore the photon of light hits the atom to determine its location to observe, which in turn, interferes with the atoms action not consciousness, frequency, resonance or anything else. Can somebody explain why my rational is incorrect ?
Dude is probably spot on.
Interesting
Whom should I believe Dean or Lawrence?
Dean.... but you would NEVER take my word for anything.... ever... nor should you. But I guess you would do your own research. ;-)
When did this interview take place?
2013 to 2016 maybe
First we should define what ESP is not, nobody was talking about all powerful magic, there are limits to all observable phenomena. I think psychical powers does diminish with distance and size, can't influence past events. It also depends on meditation depth and hyper sensitivity of a medium, it's more like they try to capture some natural flow than enforce physical changes by some magical powers. It doesn't need to be a direct effect, our technical imagination is very limited, medium can't imagine shooting laser beams with his eyes or something like that. Yet things sometimes happen when they shouldn't, body does what mind demands from it, same as acrobat can't explain his movements in the air, can just do it.
This is a good conversation, conclusions might be wrong, but physical world is like that, our body is emergent from force fields and phenomena is very real, persistent trough human evolution.
Maybe miracles are not so obvious this days, there are so many things embedded in every day technology. Why did people research and invent all this new gadgets, it seems like somebody had a dream innovation must be possible somehow.
Max Planck in his prime 👨
Genius!
I was met with heavy resistance just trying to watch this video. 😑 Evil presence must be around
OMG ... of course there's something to ESP. Wally Cox just came back from the other side to discuss the issue!
hah hah... He IS the "secret square"..... "psy researcher Underdog" hero for those ready to think outside the box.... just like Wally.
🇺🇳 6:34
The fact remains that not a SINGLE individual has EVER demonstrated paranormal abilities when tested with appropriate controls..Remote viewing has been outright falsified, and so has telekenisis.. Although fascinating, and the guest ADMIRABLY presented the argument, there is no verifiable evidence for the existence of ESP.. Peace.
Bill Norris, wrong. First, science doesn't "outright falsify" things. Second, Radin and others have conducted numerous controlled studies where the very things you claim not a SINGLE person has EVER demonstrated have in fact been demonstrated MULTIPLE times by MULTIPLE people. Please educate yourself and stop spreading misinformation.
@@greensleeves7165 Please educate yourself, and stop doing your research on UA-cam.. OF COURSE scientists falsify information! Where the heck did you go to school? The falsification of a hypothesis, is the MAIN method of determining ANY ideas veracity.. The rest of your comment lost all credibility with that absurd remark.. DEFINETLY you should stop spreading such uninformed misinformation..
@@greensleeves7165 PS.. I have spent a LIFETIME promoting the scientific method.. Based on your remark, I'm confident that you have little or NO scientific education.. No undue offense intended..
@@billnorris1264 then I assume that you will at least have a basic understanding that science is rooted in inductive method. Science never conclusively proves or disproves anything, but demonstrates it likely or unlikely at increasing degrees of credibility. You made false statements about the evidence based on ignorance with respect to the field you are attempting to discuss and tried to cover up your ignorance with more misdirection. Your original statement remains false. There is plenty of evdence if you undertake even a minimal effort to look, and some of this evidence is as robust as pretty much any inductive effect currently said to be "demonstrated" in the regular science disciplines. It has nothing to do with lack of evidence, but lack of will for people to accept something that they don't want.
@@billnorris1264 don't worry, none taken. The first ten years of my professional life were in science. I hold a science degree, an engineering degree, and a PhD. And it's undue, not undo.
The west has much to learn...
Unlike my comments on the other videos in this series, there is only one word that come to mind after watching this video.... Bllluuuuuuurrrrrrrggghhh
Radin, just another Coast to Coast guest...
Why is Radin wearing lipstick?
I regret watching as much of this as I did. Unless the interview ends with a resolute bashing of this fantasist and his inanities, its existence harms reason.
cringe