New Experiments Show Consciousness Affects Matter ~ Dean Radin, PhD
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 вер 2024
- Dean Radin, PhD, chief scientist at the Institute of Noetic Sciences (IONS), speaking at the 2016 Science of Consciousness Conference in Tucson, AZ.
Our new e-course dives deeper into Consciousness and other fascinating noetic topics. Register for free today: noetic.org/exp...
"The day science begins to study non physical phenomena,it will make more progress in one decade than in all the previous centuries of it's existence." Nikola Tesla
This statement shows that Tesla had a wacky side.
@@DavidFMayerPhD the guy was smarter than all this
Which is a plain bs if you are using a common sense definition of physics - meaning "everything that exists". There is per definition no non-physical phenomenon.
And by the way, science has indeed made enormous progress in the last decades and centuries: It's the very reason you and I can write comments
Imagination with emotion can and does create reality. This is the first that is beaten and or bullied out of us when we are children...resultantly most children give in to this crime in order to fit in. The worst thing is that it is mostly the children’s very parents who force mediocrity opon them.
The result of this is that the very best, most imaginative and emotionally strongest children are made into their own worst enemy in this way... when they could have gone on to make a better world for everyone, including themselves.
Best,
A guy trying to reprogram himself after decades of suffering this type of abuse.
@@lukidurer28 I think by physical he meant "local" meaning directly linked. So he's talking about things that interact non locally like quantum entanglement. So maybe don't come here claiming genius's are talking "bullshit". Just a word of advice.
I am a believer in Quantum Physics to help lift our world up. Dr. Radin, you are the first who show experiments to help show that consciousness creates reality. Thanks.
Joseph and Kevin
The physicist Barbara Brennan has not disappeared. She proved in 1987 when she published her book "Hands of Light" that we are holographic projections. Before then, the writer Jane Roberts proved that reality IS consciousness itself. How else could quarks be constantly bursting forth as energy and light forming 3 points of light called protons and neutrons? This by itself proves constant creation AND the fact that death is a lie. They can't hide this because we are measured in clinics and hospitals with electricity.
It was proven a long time ago that we are not physical or solid or material or biological. When you speak of suppression, it is the federal reserve cartel and the medical cartel and the military industrial cartel that you speak of. True they want to rule the world because they don't know it is a holographic projection. I have read about Bohm. He spoke of explicate and implicate dimensions. Jane Roberts channeled Seth whom spoke of unlimited dimensions. Barbara Brennan says we are multidimensional. There will always be coming forth "people" like me that have had NDEs or near death experiences to keep this knowledge alive.
@@hummingbirdbumblebee4618 *You guys get this all wrong. The 'Holographic' Universe concept presents a MODEL. It is not to say literally that 'We are Holographic Projections.' Physics presents MODELS to communicate concepts much in the same way the New Testament presents Parables. IT is a MODEL.*
@@thetruthchannel349 Physics says quarks and the atoms they are creating constantly are neither solid or physical. In the book Hands of Light are many pictures/diagrams of what we look like as holograms. Barbara Brennan is the physicist that has spent many studying this subject. She has built a college system around the world proving it.
@@hummingbirdbumblebee4618 *A quark is theoretical. They are hypothesized to be the build blocks of subatomic particles that 'create' protons & neutrons or 'hadrons.' The simplest way to look at the 'Holographic' Model is to understand that during the 19th & very early 20th centuries the Universe was thought to be Naturalistic or comprised of different kinds of Matter. The Holographic Model is based on a Plasma or Energy based Universe who's fundamental essence or Quantum 'substance' is actually interacting with Our Space/Time from a source outside of our Space/Time. Thats why its called 'Projection.' Quantum Gravity is a great example. What we experience of Gravity & how we interact with Gravity in our Space/Time is the result of something else happening somewhere 'else.' Our Gravity isn't simply a function of Mass. Mass causes an interaction WITH Gravity that we can measure & it can interact with space/time by warping it & doing other things BUT Gravity as far as what Gravity IS? It is QUANTUM & being 'Projected' into our Space/Time from outside.*
@@hummingbirdbumblebee4618 'quarks and the atoms they are creating constantly are neither solid or physical' *Right. Energy not matter & in some cases Quantum Energy Fields which can be measured but we know virtually nothing about. We can barely detect their presence. We know virtually nothing about them other than the are Quantum Energy Fields*
Is Dean Radin the Einstein of this era, and no-one is recognising him?. This is ground-breaking real science at the boundary between mind and matter!!
During a paradigm shift they attack the people like him. Radin made a huge step in a new field of science ❤
No he is not. He is unable to adequately prove his claims and preys on people that don't understand how to properly read a methodology.
@@CarloRossiTheGreat Are you able to defend the claim that "He is unable to adequately prove his claims". Which is btw an overtstement when using the term "prove". He and some others have replicated his findings with standards accepted on many other theoretical stances accepted by the scientific comunity and the basis of further investigation. These standard put down claims is not working. Have you actually read any of his statistical output with rigorous scientific attention to anything that may influence? What's with the ego-centred sh*t? Where's the SCIENCE in refuting his claims?
He is the Einstein of this era and the CIA knew it, but the CIA smeared his name in the name of secrecy.
Because it's Robert Lanza's theory... the guy that invented stem cell research...sorry.
I believe there may be a big flaw in all of those tests. You may have shielded it against selective-reporting, but it doesn’t look like you have shield it against *selective-testing*. Except in case of robot testings, where all tests are previously scheduled, and even worse if robot tests were performed subsequently.
I’ll explain what seems to have happened.
1) Subsequent testing: First, the double slit unit is subjected an increase in temperature of its components along the 30 seconds of testing. However, if those tests are done subsequently, then this effect will be cancelled, since the unit will just “keep warm” through the entire set of tests. The unit may also be subjected to other changes along the test, such as the accumulation of static, but that also tends to stabilise at given level when a subsequent set of tests are performed.
So one hypothesis is that all robot testings were done subsequently, while human testings were not.
2) Scheduled testing:
Second, we know that there are a number of external factors which may interfere with the double slit unit results, possibly reducing the interference pattern along the test. Examples are:
- ambient temperature
- electromagnetic force of the moon (depending on it's phase)
- moisture?
I’m assuming the testings took weeks or months and during this period, the external factors above fluctuated in magnitude. Now the thing is that robot observers were not choosing when to perform their tests, while human observers can always make a choice. So the second hypothesis is that human observers were making choices about when to start their tests, and how many tests to perform, and their choices were made based on the feedback they got, biasing the test schedule towards ways that provide positive feedbacks.
In other words, when receiving a positive feedback, humans became more exited about repeating it, and even about inviting other test candidates. By contrast, when receiving negative feedbacks, the test participants would become frustrated and then tend to withdraw from the experiment. The Linux robot observers, however, are not subjected to that because they have no feelings and no freedom of choice about their schedules.
Now why did meditators perform better? Well they have strong faith in the power of meditation, so their motivation to do more tests was being more strongly modulated by the test’s feedback. Hence, they increased the test schedule selectiveness.
To eliminate all of those experiment biases, my suggestion is to always use two double slit units, both at the same time, one being observed by a human, and the other being observed by Linux robot. This way, the robot schedule and testing selectivity will precisely match with the corresponding human choices of when to perform the test and how many times to perform it.
Additionally, to avoid any possible difference between those two units, the choice of which unit will be observed by humans and which will be observed by the linux robot must be an alternated choice. That means humans will observe unit A in all odd numbered tests and unit B in all even numbered tests.
I predict that in such case robot results will match with human results and you’ll, both of them apparently influencing the test results in the way they were instructed to do. But don’t jump into the conclusion that linux robots do have consciousness too. It’s just that their results are also biased by selective-testing.
Please do tell me if my hypothesis might be acceptable.
This ^ One of the few comment with an impressive amount of thought put into it.
@Sepher Agon hi please clarify if your comment was directed to my original comment or to Dean Radin, the speaker in the video.
Did you even watch the entire video?
@Sepher Agon biased? I won't report your comments because I undertand your anger, and it won't affect me. Instead, I bring something that can be useful for you. This is not a provocation, just a sincere effort to help:
"Social psychologists have identified two tendencies in the way people seek or interpret information about themselves. Self-verification is the drive to reinforce the existing self-image and self-enhancement is the drive to seek positive feedback. Both are served by confirmation biases." Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias#Social_psychology
@@MuriloPerrone "I won't report your comments because I understand your anger"
Dude could you try harder to appear to be taking the moral high ground?
When I studied tom Campbell’s stuff I liked the idea that the universe exists as a probability field until we measure it and it then has to become something. This reminds me of that.
That is... EXACTLY correct according to all peer reviews. The thing already is, even if we don't know it. Think of it like this, there are no such thing as colors; it's just light at different points of a wavelength. It represents our measurement at a given moment. Can consciousness affect certain things? OF Course it can, but it cannot change all things universally.
@@downwithputinsaveukraine1313 Spirit can, say, stop the earth from rotating or dematerialise the moon if it can BELIEVE for those things.
Maybe both the observers and the electrons are the product of a Cosmic Mind
It'd be interesting to test whether the number of people focusing their attention on a single device at once affects the results.
But how do i 'influence' my bank account? I just want to collapse my ' debt wave function' into a positive money mass.
(PS this comment was mend to be cynical and fun , so please stop giving me law of attraction advise or that i need a 2nd job )
Spiritual Anarchist you can, I have, it's called law of attraction. Many great books on this. Get in touch if you are serious and want some book recommendations, I've collected all books on law of attraction.
Lenus Tek Typs it doesn't matter what money is, reality is a holographic simulation, you can create anything in the simulation
EnigMa AGODAMi You need to deeply understand law of attraction. There is plenty of basic mainstream info on this. But it's not detailed enough. Most books and courses just cover the basics. Mainstream stuff like "the secret" DO NOT tell you the exact techniques and practical method.
The most *** detailed *** best law of attraction book / course is by Stuart lichtman, " How to get lots of money fast ". Don't be fooled by the simple title. This is the most detailed practical course I have found, and I've got all of them! ua-cam.com/video/UTtpcnZLrI8/v-deo.html
I'm quite happy to send you the book. My Skype chat ID is : " Haniff Din".
It's a tough read, and even tougher to learn and apply. But I absolutely guarantee if you follow the instructions in the book, your life will completely change. Most people don't understand or Apply the techniques in the book. They are too lazy.
I know plenty of wealthy people and they all do what's described in the book NATURALLY ! That really is the only difference. They build it into their daily routine. Most people won't have the patience and focus required to read this book, never mind apply the techniques daily!
But the few 1% that make all the wealth on earth, I guarantee you apply the principles in this book. Once you focus, apply the techniques in the book,get results, those people who have put the effort in keep applying the principles daily.
It's not easy because you have to understand yourself, as well do plenty of other work, but it describes the core practical principles.
I've made 1 million in 18 months. Trust me, virtually no one recommend this book, because most people have no clue what law attraction really is, or have seriously researched it, or seriously asked the question what is the best practical guaranteed method.
Would i be able to grab a copy? Im very interested
Ruby well get your email to me, I can send you a digital copy. Get in touch via Skype chat if you can, my ID is " haniffdin ", you can get my smart phone there and use other chat apps too ! Always happy to help a serious law of attraction person ! 😎😎😎👍👍👍
Thank You ... All of you who are/where involved and to those who brings it here. Standing ovations!!!!! This was posted 2 years ago ... so now I get to look around to see what has happened since then ... really hoping the guy in France has had significant results by now. Love & Peace to All
The University of São Paulo guy's name is Gabriel Guerrer, he actually crowdfounded this Project and it's running tests about this experiment.
no wonder they weren't being honest
I know it’s considered a bit woo woo but it’s worth looking at the work on esoteric chemistry by Annie Besant. Through meditation she was able to observe elements at atomic level, some of which had not been discovered at the time. It would be amazing to do these experiments with people who are very advanced meditators.
This is all delusional meaningless psuedoscience that is a waste of time
Journal articles associated with the work described in this video:
Radin, D. I., Michel, L, Wendland, P., Rickenbach, R., Delorme, A., Galdamez, K. (2012). Consciousness and the double-slit interference pattern: Six experiments. Physics Essays, 25 (2), 157-171.
Radin, D. I., Delorme, A.., Michel, L., Johnston, J. (2013). Psychophysical interactions with a double-slit interference pattern: Experiments and a model. Physics Essays. 26 (4), 553-566.
Radin, D. Michel, L., Delorme, A. (2016). Psychophysical modulation of fringe visibility in a distant double-slit optical system. Physics Essays. 29 (1), 14-22.
Radin, D. Michel, L., Pierce, A. Delorme, A. (2015). Psychophysical interactions with a single-photon double-slit optical system. Quantum Biosystems. 6 (1), 82-98.
Radin, D. Michel, L., Delorme, A. (2015). Reassessment of an independent verification of psychophysical interactions with a double-slit interference pattern. Physics Essays. 28 (4), 415-416.
Radin, D. Michel, L., Delorme, A. (2016). Psychophysical modulation of fringe visibility in a distant double-slit optical system. Physics Essays. 29 (1), 14-22.
Good stuff Dean. Your work is important, and you are more of a 'real' scientist than most of those who call themselves that.
Absolutely excellent work and presentation, Dean! I hope these research results will put the right amount of stress and embarrassment onto the mainstream physicists that they deserve after decades of ducking away from their responsibility to conduct these obvious kinds of experiments themselves.
do not use linux as observer - use some neuron network algotihm that make some prediction based on what foton do, it should work.
Consciousness is back prop algorithm
Universe is one big neuron network (class of neutrons) of smaller classes of neuron networks connected whithin
Quantum physics is result of that
Variance is result of that everything interact with each other and there is delay in adjusting one class of neuron network with each other
Big Bang - consiousness got a neural network to work on
Universe can be just small neuron network of some bigger neuron network
It expands until it gets more energy that it uses, then it will shrink until it dies back to Consciousness (back prop algorithm that may be thought oh as energy governing that algorithm)
Clairvoyance is just efficient neuron network of our brain (some people have better than others)
It's an interesting suggestion. The Linux control was, of course, testing the null hypothesis that the form of the observer makes no difference.
Sure. And it should be easy to get good sample size quick as alorithm do not have to meditate and focus:)
If the claimed results of 5-8 sigma in dozens of rounds and variations of the experiment is accurate, then these guys are onto something. Before anyone calls "woo," they need to examine the results and attempt to replicate them. I'm not going to make a judgement either way, but I really hope we see experiments follow these results.
You have the best user name ever. Also, I think Dean Radin mentioned in a comment that this experiment has been replicated at other labs.
Fuck You Google this exact experiment was replicated twice at the time of video. Over 60 times in other experiments over past 30 yrs.
www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01891/full
According to this, there is nothing.
@liquidbraino where are the published study and the replication
@@brubrusuryoutubeIt has been eight years, so if they were really onto something, we would know by now.
I got a OH MY GOD feeling too when I was watching this.
I feel I am blessed by the fact that I had the chance to watch this observation by Dr. Radin. Thank you doctor for your enthusiasm and your effort to take advantage of your knowledge and the current technology to decode our universe. It demystifies the once mystical and illustrates that our minds are far more powerful than we thought. I am hopeful about our future after watching your study!
Nope, this is just meaningless psuedoscience
This is great information! Here is something EVERYONE can do. I show all the kids on holiday get-together days (usually pool parties here in Florida) that they can directly control matter in their universe. I show them that they can evaporate condensed clouds (make them disappear through evaporation) in under 5 to 6 minutes 98% of the time. Try it yourself, and get witnesses for the SHOCK & AWE value (grin). Find 3 or 4 small SLOW moving clouds (not touching each other) and pick one of them (and make sure everyone knows what cloud you selected), then literally stare at that particular cloud and tell it to evaporate, disappear, go away! Repeat it aloud to ensure no one interrupts your thought processes (not needed when you are alone, obviously). You must set your honest intention that the cloud WILL EVAPORATE and disappear. And it does, sometimes as quickly as 3 to 4 minute, but usually 5 minutes on average, a few can take as long as 7 minutes (larger clouds). You could do one cloud by itself, but it is better to have "Control" clouds next to your cloud (that disappears). Sometimes we try to cut a cloud in half (and state that is what we are doing) then do each half. If there are planes with grayish exhausts (yes, "chem-trails") and this is mixed in with the clouds, don't bother since you will NOT evaporate metal particulates no matter how much you concentrate. It is called "Cloud Busting" and my theory is that we radiate vibrations in the ether (aether, source field - pick your favorite name) from our eyes and also from the crown of our heads and this energy (and your emotion) is absorbed in the condensed water. I suspect that most of you have heard recent discoveries on the ability of water to become structured and hold energy (and specific emotions, as well)? If not, search the Internet and learn. As long as they are old enough to have the patience, children are usually VERY good at it. Keep in mind that a small cloud may contain several gallons of water! That is a lot of energy you are controlling. And one good thing is, even people who are not sure they can do it (and state so), almost always CAN do it. "Try it, You'll like it!"
How very interesting. If someone can figure how, (and why) the Universe is doing this, well there is a Nobel Prize waiting for you. It's simply mind boggling.
Dean Radin proved law of assumption whilst replicating proof of the Kochen-Specker Theorem.
You’re an intelligent man. Keep up the good work
You might be interested to know that there is a type of buddhist meditation, where some monk might imagine an image in their mind, and suddenly, all the other meditators in the room pop the same image in their minds later on. After the meditation session, they get together and discuss about their visions and this is how they found it out.
Whatttttt. Why don't they study that.
When we start developing AI, this will be a good way to test whether they are actually becoming conscious.
AI won't exist :(
LinX Dogmátic That remains to be seen.
Quantum Mechanics? At this point, we really can't say whether self-aware robots are possible, whether QM is involved or not. Our brain does it, so why couldn't we reverse engineer the brain?
even with classic cognitive impression modelling alone, an AI is pretty much viable, if not inefficient. I do agree with you. anything exist can be reverse engineered.
LinX Dogmátic How are you so sure? There may yet be some paradigms that haven't even been imagined yet that will allow us to do it. I'm just wondering where your confidence is coming from?
"If you think you understand quantum theory . . . you don't understand quantum theory." -Richard Feynman
Brayden
Argue that with Barbara Brennan, the physicist and healer that has trained herself to see people as holograms. You should read the book Hands of Light.
“WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF WE COULD REARRANGE ATOMS ONE BY ONE, THE WAY WE WANT THEM?” -RICHARD FEYNMAN
They want your freewill completely. The people follow down the path they are led...
Because "The only true knowledge is knowing you know nothing." - Socrates
@@jjk2one Yes,b exactly what we are doing! ♡
because it's a hoax. let that sink in a minute.
The 'DOUBLE SLIT ' Experiment result is shown beautifully and symbolically in the HINDU temple in INDIA specially in "SHIVA TEMPLE". The Conscious observer is depicted as "NANDI, The Bull. "THE SHIVLING " inside the sanctum sanatorium is the union of SHIV- SHAKTI that is Mass and Energy leading to particle form which in turn gives rise to this Universe.
This result is amazing. People who meditate know that clearing your mind brings you into an immediate awareness of the moment. Thoughts are like a smoke screen that conceals reality. I wonder if this awareness of whatever is occurring in the moment increases the probability of collapsing the wave function...which suggests that mental activity which is involved with the usual flow of abstract thoughts actually negates our awareness of momentary reality. In other words, we only observe the real world (collapsing the wave function) when our minds are clear and we are focused on the moment....not the future or the past or abstract thoughts.
We can be free from the veil of Maya through meditation or by death or with pure DMT crystals.
Nothing exists except consciousness. Consciousness creates the illusion of existence, and they will never know how that happens
I hosetly believe Dean Radin will bring Remote Viewing to the forefront of the science community...Such an incredibly smart n astute man to lead this to the very front of non locality & Quantum Entanglement!! Always interesting & intelligent presentations done by this man right here!!! Thanks for all your endless & painstaking experiments!!!
This is a fascinating and excellent talk. Regarding the pyramid model shown towards the end: To understand how we get from consciousness to physics it would be necessary to pass through metaphysics. Specifically, it would be necessary to study a neutral metaphysical theory, the theory required for non-dualism, and explore its implications for physics. This builds a bridge between the two levels of the model. which otherwise are very difficult to connect.
Perhaps research of this sort will eventually lead physicists to overcome their fears and prejudices and start to take the Buddha's description of reality seriously. It surely ought to lead to renewed interest in metaphysics and a wider recognition that the phrase 'fundamental physics' is an oxymoron.
It is a strange world in which scientists are surprised to discover that consciousness is an active participant in reality. Future generations will shake their heads in wonder that anyone ever thought otherwise.
This confirms my belief that our thoughts do affect the outside world and how are lives progress with conscious direction, or lack of. This has been proven itself many times over in my life. Exciting stuff.
Here is an interesting thing to try: have each person participating in the experiment create a profile then see if some users generate better results more consistently. Ideally that profile would be connected to a bunch of data about them preferably including how large their frontal cortex is, how meditative, intelligent, empathetic, etc they are, how high of a concentration of rose-hip neurons they have, probably include their genome. If these experiments mean anything we could effectively quantify the potency of a soul and perhaps determine if that potency is related to physical factors.
The variables are infinite and the number ways to arrange the experiment is infinite therefore it will take infinite amount of time to compute something meaningful out of it
I don't think you understand the way science works. The variables in ANY experiment are potentially infinite. The question is which are the significant variables? The phases of the moon at the time of the experiment might be significant; the time of day might be significant; whether or not they drank a cup of coffee before the experiment might be significant. I'm pretty sure the size of the turd that came out of his dogs ass three days prior to the experiment are not going to be significant to the experiment.
Even if there are two thousand different variables that they want to look at, it's not like a person is going to have to sit there reading over these variables for the next thirty years in order to determine which ones seem to play a role in the outcome - because there this thing called "computers". They can punch all of that data into a database and have the computer automatically look for the common denominators where the participants get a high score.
Why? This is an absolutely horrendous idea that most probably will give even more reasons for people to discriminate each other. Hierachies are superficial anyway. In addition, IQ tests results suffer greatly from confirmation bias and this is like an IQ test on steroids. Including one's genome in a database that is coupled to your mental score? Are you insane?!
Imagine if all of humanity stopped and meditated for world peace
Excelent video. Have you tried asking the meditators questions to try to narrow who is most likely to have an effect?
1. Are you a spiritual person?
2. Do you believe in God?
3. Do you pray?
4. Are you creative?
5. Are you a scientist?
6. Do you believe in free will?
Etc.
Perhapse a pattern can be found…
To identify Precogs?
Then a study conducted with highly effective minds only…
If this is something that interests you, you should look up John Vervaeke's Awakening From The Meaning Crisis Series. He founded the department of Cognitive Science in Toronto, and he's approaching problems related to this from the other way: Consciousness -> Material.
Question: if we attach a photon detector to each individual slit, but do NOT record the result (or record and immediately delete it again before any human can read it), will this collapse the wave function or not?
This is really interesting. The fact that "distance" doesnt seem to affect the experiment is a clue itself. Maye "distance" is becoming more of "classical physics", we dont understand how two things can affect each other when they are faraway, but thats is a classical physics concept, that was born out of our common sense. I dont know if if common sense works very good in the quatum level. There must be a new way to think this, a change in paradigm.
Jarry Smith take some LSD to truly understand everything is connected
Maybe DMT is ever better (tried psilocibine long time ago)
How to make a bond between two distance systems. IE bonding an idea vs bonding two physical objects. Shouldn't there be something to make a stronger connection? Connection by feeling...
Nonlocality has been proven. What one photon knows, they all know. We are saturated in a oneness existence. E=mcsquared. Energy equals mass equals energy. They are interchangeable.
what about testing 3 meditators focusing all at once?
I do Trial Design and Analysis for a fortune 15 company and I can tell you all that we rarely if ever see 5 Sigma results. 5 Sigma is only 233 DPMO (Defects per Million Opportunities). He has checked for p-hacking and moved the experiment to the internet to remove possible Trial Group interactions. This is very persuasive.
Extremely fascinating. I'm curious to see a double-slit experiment done with observers placed within a sensory deprivation tank while the experiment is conducted, so as to remove sensory distortion to one's consciousness and focus.
Cant believe I have only just found this experiment showing Consciousness affecting Matter. Nice to know I am not mad!
There's also other experiment you could do with your friend. Wigner's friend -experiment, just do it like this: Start the experiment and both look at the same monitor which tells you where in the detection screen the electron hits. If you both see different outcome, then your minds were able to affect quantum mechanics. If not, well, bad news for mr. Dean.
Oh one more thing, Id like to see the results with people on psychedelics, specifically dmt
you mean "above normale, elevated levels of dmt" since the brain already creates the so-called 'spirit molecule'?
same here ! it woukd be off rhe charts ! I have lots of experience with both
i wuz thinkin the same
yaaas this!
It seems to me that one important aspect in these studies was that the subjects were well able to focus on a single spot in space or a mental idea for a prolonged period of time, at least that's what is suggested by the fact that the overall effect size of experienced meditators was well above that of non-meditators. I wonder how well this ability is available when on psychedelics?
This was 7 years ago.
A more recent experiment showed that consciousness can extent.
This by testing and monitoring neuron activity by having people work on something together, like a puzzle or maybe even watching a movie together.
Now we always assumed people copy behavior to improve cooperation for example, but this isn’t what happens.
What happens is that the brain synchronizes like a clock.. this means very specifically that somehow one consciousness has to tell the other what it’s clock is saying.
The illusion of consciousness seems to be that it’s individual.
When in reality it’s part of a larger whole, almost like an eco system.
You can also test this rather easily, done decades ago, by splitting the left and right half of the brain. (Which in severe epilepsy cases has to be done)
You now quite literally see 2 consciousness reactions from the same person even though the individual isn’t aware of this.
So, Linux is not conscious - yet. That's good to know. We should test Linux yearly and Windows every ten years just to be safe.
..Every ten years, nice one ;)
Can Hal run program? ☺
Don't worry, if Windows handles too many complex tasks, it will just blue screen instead.
With decent graphics drivers still over the horizon, I'm not holding my breath for a Linux consciousness driver anytime soon.
But it has to be started by someone or a self time test standard for a conscience to consciousness.
i'd love to see someone like Wim Hof, the _Dutch extreme athlete noted for his ability to withstand freezing temperatures,_ participate in this experiment! he has _amazing_ control over his own body's response to the cold and could possibly use those same capabilities to affect the results in _this_ experiment as well.
yoga
Is tu
Awareness of multiple levels of reality is awesome, its like the brink of anxiety. Its a systemic overload of feelings
(synaptic information) within 1 millisecond. Only "Lucy" knows or those who have felt this.
what do you mean by this? I've experienced this.
As a scientifically educated materialist, I never believed in metaphysics until I learned spiritual techniques and accidentally tested telekinesis and mind control. I succeeded in performing small tasks in telekinesis and predicting details like shapes and colors with closed eyes. Over the past decade, I conducted extensive research on both quantum physics and the spirituality of consciousness powers. It's worth noting that certain authorities may suppress knowledge about these abilities. Even chatbots like GPT dismiss them due to lack of scientific evidence."
Interesting
After watching this, it made me think of all of the talk about thoughts, and how positive/negative thoughts can manifest positive/negative outcomes in our lives. If I take what I learned from this video, and break down my comment based off this videos explanations, then if everything are waves (Random outcomes), until a conscious observation of it ('It' being thoughts about a situation in my life), then this could be the reason why, if what we give thought to (i.e., a conscious observation to a possible outcome of a current situation in our lives), then we stop the randomness, and pull into our lives the quantum's that we see (Or in most cases fear). So if we choose to see things (Or give conscious observation), to positive outcomes, then the latter is what we will pull into our lives to manifest..... very interesting.
Nice comment. Not just a shit post. This troll approves
Same line of thought as "The Secret", and way before that was "Think and Grow Rich" in 1937 by Napolean Hill, and there's been a bunch of other material on the same idea. It's interesting to note that the only way Napolean Hill got rich was from selling self-help books, and before that, he was a failed businessman who was accused of fraud on multiple occasions. So it's best to be cautious of 'law of attraction' type stuff, even if there's some degree of truth to it.
@@01107345 The Bible originated this concept. The secret just replaced God with "The universe". Basically ask God and accept it in your mind and heart without doubt and prepare for it because if you're not prepared it could happen a dozen times and you won't be ready to accept.
Same concept of faith vs fear. Manifesting your thoughts and heart into reality.
@@01107345 an important distinction is "prepare for it". It isn't just wishful thinking. If you're sitting in your mom's basement thinking I'm a loser no one will ever love me, you're manifesting that reality out of fear. If you set your mind on "I want a life partner" you just believe that is in the cards and prepare for it. Clean your room if you'd be to embarrassed to show a potential partner, or work on getting a job and moving out of you feel that is necessary. Shower / hygiene if that makes you insecure and unable to socialize. Exercise if you feel that's necessary. All the things you would do if by chance someone gave you a chance. So when you finally to meet him or her by chance you're clean and feel okay about yourself and not insecure and embarrassed about your current state. If they say it doesn't bother them that you live with your mom and want to come hang out in your room it's not in utter disarray to the point you'd be embarrassed and would rather make up an excuse not to. Instead although not ideal (having a job and your own place) by working towards something (basic hygiene and getting out of the house to give yourself a chance of meeting someone) you've now accepted that this is going to happen and prepared for it as best you could. This is just an example to illustrate the difference between wishful thinking and hoping magically a partner will just fall into your lap and accept that you haven't cleaned your room in months or showered in days and developing this routine of maintaining basic hygiene and sanitation practices. Ultimately it may end up being that the person would accept you even being over weight and not showing for 3 days living in your mom's basement which you haven't cleaned in months, but you would allow fear and insecurity to ruin that opportunity if it came or simply wouldn't put yourself out there for it to happen in the first place and the only reason you needed to prepare was for your own insecurities and fear to take a back seat to your faith and positive attributes and allow those to shine through just long enough for that person to see something in you. It may be that having that person around motivates you to do the bigger steps of finding work and getting stable income, losing weight, practicing daily basic hygiene, getting your own place etc. And those can all be individual things you ask for / focus on, have faith in, prepare for, and in a couple years you might even exceed those basic minimums you're asking for but not by just wishing it'll happen magically but by having faith and preparing.
That and your brain wires itself as you think, so we really do create reality but then so does everything else. We and everything else equally. We shouldn't put ourselves on top we are only a tiny fraction of an astounding whole. Which is another piece.
This is so far outside classical physics and the understanding it has given us that its blowing my face off that more resources haven’t been allocated to checking verifying and then expanding on these findings. If there is something here, it tells us something incredible about reality. That needs more examination.
hello good day i just want to share my Good news with you
my husband left me for 4 years i was hope less until i found dr muazu , who help me got my husband back to me he can help you with all problems
+234
9155
40
2898
Sooo... As people concentrate more and more as to which slit the photon passed through, it sounds like the theory is human consciousness would be able to collapse the wave function and create a non interference pattern simply by meditating. Is that the theory? That would be most impressive!
"The institute is on Stephen Barrett's Quackwatch list of questionable organizations.[27]"
The results show that introducing a human observer to the double slit experiment causes an average of 1% difference in collapse of interference vs no human observers.
James Last Light and matter. you need a witness to turn light into matter. The father is the light and Jesus is the witness or vice versa E=mc2 light and matter is squared because at any time light can be matter and matter can be light. Jesus hung on the cross in the flesh/matter and asked Light to forgive matter for He and his father are one I am living in the actual body of Christ:-)
1%? 5 sigma results suggest a 1:3.5million chance.
pitthepig have you heard of the quantum eraser experiment?
Of course observation causes the wave function, and observation is Consciousness. Without consciousness i;e; the waking state, nothing exists.
I can't help noticing that they sought repetition and confirmation from some outside scientist who seemed excited about the results, but who seems yet to have published anything. You'd think that such astonishing initial results would be discussed everywhere by now.
They can't replicate the Creator. That why they are in the mess there in.
Let me guess without watching this video. It talks about quantum physics experiments while misinterpreting what physicists mean by the word "observer" when they talk about how the wave function collapses when observed.
Bingo. It even uses anecdotes of what sciencetists think is going on after the experiment and presenting it as truth even though this was disproven long ago.
@@Museko where was this disproved
@@alwaysright237 In a lot of places? Any scientist with quantum physics knowledge who is worth their salt knows this is nonsense. You can learn about this from any physics textbook that covers quantum.
Any experiment that uses a camera "observes" the experiment and changes the result. A camera observes no differently from a human. If the experiment is performed with no interference, you'll see the electrons behave as a wave. If you observe them with either a human or ANY OTHER observation device, interference is introduced, collapsing the wave equation and producing results that appear akin to classical physics.
Here's a version of the experiment you can perform at home: ua-cam.com/video/kKdaRJ3vAmA/v-deo.html
This modifies the experiment a bit but still maintains the concept in a smart way that doesn't require hard-to-acquire equipment. One way to perform this is to only fire one electron at a time so a multitude of electrons won't interfere with each other and collapse the wave equation. Firing many can collapse it and allow one to obtain the classical results. By interference, I mean anything that causes an interaction between particles, whether that is a collision or a force via some field. You can also think of this as anything that can be used to obtain information about the particle.
@@Museko very good and detailed response , thank you ....question...do you believe this is a simulation/V.R. or not and why ?
@@alwaysright237 I have no idea, I've thought about that a lot several times though. It's kind of a cop-out reply, but I have no way of knowing. I've tried arguing for and against and it just feels improbable that we will ever know without outside help. It gets especially strange to think about when you consider that if we are in a simulation, the physics of the universe "above" ours could be completely different. What if that universe is also simulated and the one above it? How far would this chain of simulation continue?
It is odd how our universe is so finely-tuned for life. However, it's a little less odd if you think about how we are only here due to the fact that our universe can support life. There are some great PBS Space Time videos that cover some of these topics that you may be interested in. Some of them cover some hypotheses about how universes can birth new universes, but whether that's true or not is highly debateable.
Off the top of my head, these ones are particularly interesting, but I always find every video pretty entertaining:
ua-cam.com/video/T4oYvSH6jJ8/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/rFgpKlcpzNM/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/K8gV05nS7mc/v-deo.html
You may want to check out some of their videos about theories for the structure of our universe. Without getting a masters in physics or studying hardcore physics textbooks, this is a pretty good alternative to learn about the basics of our universe. I feel that this is the best way at the moment to satiate the how, what, why, and where of life.
Consciousness is fundamental, as in a mind and agency...wow.
I’m not gonna say it but I’m sure some people are thinking the same thing.
During a paradigm shift they attack the people like him. Radin made a huge step in a new field of science ❤
This is huge. How is it not talked aboout more ?!!
this can't be real
Cuz people are delusional
does this mean that light and all forms of energy "act" differently when we either don't know if them or don't think of them?
The Theorist of Everything YES
No
I've known for a long time that our consciousness filters our reality. For example, when you look at a blue sky, that's filtered by our consciousness. Put a color-analyzer on the sky, at it will tell you the sky is green. Further, I discovered while connected to a heart monitor, the feedback enabled me to control my heart rate. Gawd we live in a wonderful reality.
Hi, can you describe where can one get such a device? and what type of technique did you use to control your heart or is it intuitive and comes naturally once you have the feedback?
The fact that the sky is blue doesn’t mean our consciousness filters reality as you consciousness is not the reason for why you see the sky as blue, it is your visual cortex which is a part of your physical brain. Your brain is not consciousness, we only know that it resides somewhere IN the brain, and anyway the fact that science knows so little about consciousness does not mean you can make claims like this. PROPER studies have to be done to address this problem.
Einaras
Study the book "Hands of Light" written by the physicist and healer Barbara Brennan. Consciousness creates everything. That is evident in E=mcsquared. Nothing is solid. Classical physics is being pushed onto so many people that the fact atoms spin super fast as light is being forgotten.
Brennan proved that we are holograms. She trained herself to see people as holograms. Science has been talking about consciousness at least since 1918 when Max Planck won his Nobel Prize for his work with quanta.
the examples you've given are nothing like the results found in this experiment.
Pure Energy
Look dude, saying consciousness creates everything is like saying eyes create light, or ears create sound.
What does Einstein's equation, or atomic spin for that matter, have to do with the effects of the mind on the universe?
Consciousness is simply a tool our minds use to experience reality.
Just because you can see color doesn't mean it's there to be seen.
Just because you can hear sound doesn't mean it's there to be heard.
Just because you can experience reality doesn't mean it's there to be experienced. Or measured for that matter.
This is one of the core philosophies of a true scientist. You must completely remove yourself from the experiment otherwise bias is inevitable. To say consciousness creates everything... it's like saying
"Cars exist, and people only exist to drive them".
I think it is more accurate to conclude consciousness, is an electromagnetic spectral interference that is in a penetrating energetic state similar to an x-ray. I.E is able to pass soft material, and Or to the way a neutrino is able to pass through the earth. The the mind "bending" the wave like water does to light via refraction.
waiting for light switches having double slit systems installed, concentrate on it and a light goes on, telekinesis!
Yaaas
You don't need that to do telekinesis. You can switch on or off any light simply with intent if you believe.
Thank you Institute of Noetic Sciences!!!! I appreciate this type of science being explained in a beautifully understandable manner. I am a nurse and a believer in consciousness" affects on a quantum level. You have scientifically moved forward the theory surrounding how thoughts become things, basically. I would love to furher understand how vibrations, especially Solfeggio frequencies opposed to other frequencies, affect our physical and consciousness selfs, anyone working on something like this?
😉
Wow finally ! Humanity may make that next leap in evolution. There are a few that discovered this fact many years ago I am happy to say I am able to follow the path set by one.
We always knew that consciousness affects matter. Say you have a conscious thought to snap your fingers, and than SNAP, matter moves!
I tried cloudbusting and found it quite easy to do, and every time I did it it worked on the cloud I was focused on and not the surrounding clouds, so the chances that the wind caused the exact same cloud I was focusing on to dissipate and not to effect the clouds around it is very slim
😆, you have brain powers . Lol. Still gotta pay your taxes bro. Bunch of mumbo jumbo
I have experienced mind/matter results in my life. This is absolutely true.
That’s purely psychosomatic, its the placebo effect. “The secret” is a load of nonsense. This came from “The Kybalion”, and “The Master Key System”; the authors simply took theurgy out of Neoplatonic metaphysics to sell books during the New Thought Movement.
Very very interesting. There does seem to be a statistical trend in consciousness being able to collapse a wave function. Why use one observer? Hire 100 meditators, have them all work at the same time, and collapse those wave functions!
Consciousness can become entangled with other parts of the universe within the universal mind. Everything is connected to everything else. We only see things as separate entities because time separates things in space. Everything was once packed into an unimaginably small space, therefore everything is entangled from the beginning. So payer works, positive thoughts work, forgiveness works, compassion works, and all of these are entangled with Love. Thankyou Jesus.
First, thank you for using physics to explore the relationship between matter and consciousness, expanding our understanding of consciousness and reality. That is quite an achievement! I'm curious to know if you've conducted studies where there are longer periods of time for the meditator to focus on a task. As mentioned in your talk, there is an adjustment period between resting and focusing, each fluctuation will dampen the intensity of the meditative state. As a long term meditator, (20 years with anywhere from 1-16 hours per day), I've learned that the deeper meditative state takes time to achieve, and that this state progressively deepens to a certain point until you start to leave the meditative state, or start to ascend--sort of surface from the depths. I find that if I'm in a very deep meditative state, when something outside of myself interrupts the meditation, it can be extremely jarring--like a very loud and unexpected noise would jolt you from a deep sleep--almost painful, and you can't just pop back to the same depth instantaneously. You have to descend. So going quickly from resting to observing would greatly weaken the intensity and focus of the meditative state, making it fairly superficial. Yet even that yields remarkable results. Would those results change significantly if you removed the fluctuations in and out of the meditative states?
Also, there is a lot of variation in meditators. Some people are naturals, some meditate for half an hour a few days a week, some for 16 or more hours daily. Some people meditate and access the exact same information (a lot of quantum mechanics) people accessed thousands of years ago, as documented in Vedic scriptures. And others meditate all their lives and never reach that place. It would be really interesting to see a study comparing the magnitude of change registered while very skilled, experienced meditators--like monks--are deeply immersed in the meditative state, without the fluctuation (between focus and resting) deadening the intensity or depth of the meditation. Would the depth of the meditation affect the magnitude of the change? Is the magnitude of change affected by the skill level of the meditator? What happens if you have many meditators at the same time focus on the same thing?
This video disappeared when I focused on it.
Only when I started thinking did that happen
So thoughts and prayers matter.
Anything you believe to be true
Thoughts ARE images. Each time someone thinks, they are imaging with the energy frequencies we are, which form into pictures. We are some of the pictures we are forming with our own thought images. We are literally holograms creating our own selves.
@Zeek Banistor
We ARE gods. Every frequency we consist of vibrates into the images we are. We are holographic projections. We are not creating energy itself.
@Zeek Banistor
We are the Lord you speak of. So you are waiting on yourself.
I would just stick with "thoughts"...........as prayers may just be "thoughts"....
I hope more physicists investigate this phenomena. I know this is not a very scientific statement though my sense of all of this is "Everything is connected." Consciousness is part of reality and you cannot separate them.
lots of us around! I've always been an intuitive type and have questioned this even in the 4th grade. There seems to be a function within us that pushes us toward the "connectedness" of everything. As if the universe sought to know itself very well, as if already connected at the same time.
I can see this is his passion. More than anything he wants the results he is getting. Every paragraph he reads proudly confirms his wishes. His loving bias shines like a star, like a parent's hopes for their child. At 39:35 we even see him self-prime for a future test mothodology enhancement which he hopes will "strengthen" the results he needs. We all have passions and I have only respect for his passion.
Hanniffy Dinn - A million in 18 months. Are you a child? Only a child would feel the need to talk like that. Is your daddy stronger than my daddy? You severely exposed yourself today. Keep that little red book safe and perhaps you'll get another million :))
+Hanniffy Dinn we will always win. that drip is set to lose. this experiment is getting to the truth to why when i wanted a barbershop of my own one fell in my lap and so on believe and receive x
Long after the apocalypse, the last remnant of humanity before the collapse is found: A fracture of a database, designated Googl, showing what communication was really like back in the time of war. And it's this "conversation".
and your username taken out of context
@@hanniffydinn6019 You seem like a very educated person. At least regarding swear words. Your aproach seems to be bullying ppl into agreeing with you.
To answer the second gentleman's question at the end, is "intent".
The action of "intent" is what influences the outcome.
how about attention?
Incog
Exactly what I have been reading for the last 40 years. Intent is why quarks burst forth spinning billions of times a second as 3 points of light forming protons and neutrons. We are in the middle of constant creation as we are projected holograms of our own electrical selves.
With each thought image we have, we create our own selves as holograms. We spin and pulsate so fast, that we don't even know we are creating our own blood vessels, etc. We are NOT physical or biological or material or solid. Therefore, covid is a lie with a patent created with intent to scare people into compliance. What I say is "what is there to own?"
Imagine oligarchs managing holographic "people" with fear when the whole time we are not even solid and don't even die.
Intent is decidedly not the same thing as consciousness. In any case, this experiment is fraudulent.
Doesn't this mean people could break quantum computers by thought alone?
yes, if you have enough "faith" or mental ability to "know" how to do these things. There are recorded "pieces of history" in which men have done "supernatural" feats with their consciousness, as mentioned in Egyptian lore. Now we know that not everybody was able to do this by simply "thinking", however. Take a look at the "eye of Horus". it should be noted that the Eye of Horus symbol corresponds to the location of the Third Eye, represented by the sixth chakra. The sixth chakra represents the seat of intuition and clairvoyance (including the ability to “see” things usually hidden). Consciousness is often associated with the called "Third Eye", aka the Pineal Gland. People who have taken psilocybin or other substances that alter this organ have seen many subjective experiences they claim to be metaphysical but is then taken with a grain of salt because it is purely anecdotal. Perhaps it will all by connected now, in this age, and we just might witness it unfold in our lifetime!
This aligns with Vedanta philosophy.
This should be front page news. I’m stunned it’s even here on YT.
I think what we miss is that consciousness affects all experiments.
And all experiments effect consciousness. Collapse duality and see the whole. Which is still just another piece.
Good point. Least I think so.
im not going to acknowledge your statement's existence therefore it is not true.
Exactly. Isn't that called the "Recursion problem"? Consciousness is exactly what we use to look at the experimental results. If you weren't conscious you wouldn't even be able to think of an experiment - much less conduct it and observe the results. Observation is a function of consciousness.
Hahahahaha hohohoho!!
I think Dr. Radin should do an experiment with Psychics which I think have more powerful minds than the meditators. There are some people who strongly believe psychics have extraordinary mind powers.
Lol "psychics" are frauds.
Measurement doesn't have to be conscious. It doesn't even have to be a traditional measurement system, but merely something that forces the probability space to collapse to a resolution, due to the laws of physics.
A photon hitting a back screen is a good example of forcing the probability space to collapse to a resolution. Remember, once the interference pattern hits the backplate, the wave equation is collapsed. It does this regardless of us looking or not. The backplate isn't conscious.
KanedaSyndrome, thanks for your intelligent comments ..... you interest me ... what place, if any, do you think quantum physics / computing will hold in the future ? ..
@@Angela-iq7cm, I think quantum physics will open a new chapter in human technology. Besides of quantum computing being able to solve certain problems way faster than classical computers, there will probably also be other technology to come from quantum physics, stuff that we consider science-fiction in these times. These things will probably be discovered/invented earlier than people expect (see AI exponential growth, the singularity, human lifespan of years 150+).
Thanks KanedaSyndrome, ... I hope you keep communicating on discussions such as this. You are at the very least highly impressionable and " a great upload ". Love Angie x
It’s the system of measurement that affects the outcome. It’s not magic.
The decoherence theory is admitted to be incomplete even by advocates of this theory.
@@mcawesomeytyo3312 can you say that as if I were 9 years old?
To confirm your findings, independent researchers must run the experiment with their own equipment. Analyzing your generated data doesn't count.
Therefore, where is the white paper that describes how to reproduce the experiment? For instance, where can we buy the equipment? Also, where did you publish your equations and programs, etc?
If you want it to be completely independent, let the independent researchers source their own equipment. After all, they are RESEARCHERS. I'm sure they're very capable of finding or building their own.
This was sooooo PERFECT 👌!!! I loved it !!! I’ve been waiting for an explanation like this for a long time !!! Many thanks 🙏
If we consider the perspective that this world was created by a Creator, meaning all of us are essentially pieces of code, then in the context of the double-slit interference experiment, the behavior of photons could be seen as follows: when a human observes and measures their trajectory, photons behave as if they pass through both slits without interference. However, when their path is not observed by a human, even if someone is looking at them, they interfere.
Similarly, when we write code, for instance for a game, certain AI, NPCs, or monsters are programmed to appear within your field of vision or interact with you before they start to operate. Of course, they can also be set to run when they are far away and out of sight. But to save on performance, we usually set a distance within which they will operate. This conserves computational resources.
Therefore, the "code" that the Creator uses to determine whether humans have detected the photon's path may well be consciousness. This consciousness acts as a condition for a Boolean value. It's this Boolean value that decides the outcome, right? While programmers destroy objects to save on performance, what purpose does the photon’s interference serve?
I wonder whether they can time shift the experiment so their conscious thoughts can travel backwards and forwards in time to affect the experiment in the past as well as the future.
Nope cause consciousness has nothing to do with wave function collapse
Tom Campbell talks about experiments that have tested & confirmed these kind of effects.
@@censorthis-uu6cc tom campbell isnt reliable
What?
Quantum physics says time is simultaneous. So it is images that would seem to shift/ travel within dimensions, the whole time always staying within simultaneous time. We are holograms vibrating/spinning within a holodeck always existing within the now. Time seems to exist when energy slows down into the forms we are now. Clocks are about the earth spinning always in the now.
These experiments are always so intriguing. Double slit gets me every time!
I observed changes with an ICP atomic spectrometer during analysis of specific metal impurities in water if certain individuals came into my lab during testing. I always found that to be odd. There was always variation in the number of photon count.
In digital radionics using TRNG this phenomena is already used since decades for analysis. Interesting is, that when you don't analyze a person / animal / agriculture aera, then the result really makes no sense, it tends always to show a normal random distribution. But if you for example analyze a person or animal then the result deviates from random chance and it represents a meaning inside of a specific context.
This, to me, is more significant than any rocket lanches yet it's not covered by the mainstream news at all.
Sets humanity back a few hundred, if not thousand years.
Totally agree. IMHO, This information will come to light to public relatively soon.
That's because the claim is almost certainly false.
I did something about it .when I Meditate, I go inside my self and look around at my anatomy. Actually seeing my heart pumping , lungs , digestive tract, liver and spleen, kidneys and adrenal gland‘s etc. etc. etc. I do this by changing my consciousness to see inside rather than outside . It’s a pretty cool trick .
Now try to wander outside and meld with someone else's consciousness.
I remember the future it is like it happened before i was born.I can only remember big events and only 1 or 2 days before they happen.
Very interesting. You could do a hack on meditators. Maybe a way to optimize results is telling the meditators "a lie", I mean, tell them that the results of meditating on the experiment is very strong, and results show it clearly. I mean, that way maybe that's an Inspiration for the meditators to keep concentrated(because of the reward), and that could be interesting in measuring the power of what we can call it some kind of faith. If they believe their influence on the experiment is bigger than the results actually show when they concentrate, that could lead to a "real" bigger influence on the results. At the end, nobody knows what mind mechanism is leading to those mind- matter results, it could be any. If the mediator is part of the double slit experiment, why not tunning them?
Anyway, I studied this in my physics career, quantum mechanics is... Nobody knows!
I agree this would be an interesting variable to test for. I'd even argue to test the opposite. Make them feel like they are doing poorly, to see how that variable influences the results over the time period. I feel like this could also improve the results. They may want to do really well, and focus even more so than they were.
I always (equally) appreciated the experiment where the amount of light passing through water was found to vary depending on the material *beneath* the waters surface. According to the experiment, the light "knows" before it hits the water, what is beneath the water, and reflects at different rates depending on the sub-surface material, or so it would appear.
On a side note: I often feel we would have answers to many problems if governments were more transparent with respect to testing done in the name of the defense sector. Though it's possible these entities feel they have little use for understanding quantum mechanics.
When someone asks about quantum physics, I tell them the little I know, then tell them: even the experts don't "know" what's going on.
I am now sending a mental image that the presenter is Donald Duck.....not working yet but I'm going to keep trying.
Your post makes you seem a fool of the highest order. I guess we should all just ignore science, the bible tells you all you need to know, right? Don't be afraid to learn about science. The more you learn the more you will understand. People involved in science usually love to share so there is no excuse to be ignorant of facts.
It was just a joke. I am an atheist. I love science and I believe the discipline of science has delivered far more in the past 200 years than over 2000 years of mythology.
You should imagine a sense of humor...
Eitherway, if possible, I'd love to attend a talk/setup/convention whatever where you're showcasing this experiment.
So mind over matter really does mean exactly that. More than mere perseverance.
Exactly. But many don't want us to know that, because it'd invalidate the reigning view of reality, that is, physicalism/materialism/naturalism, and has huge implications for a spiritual reality and God.
@@jonyxy777 Many don't want to know that, because untill this moment all 'evidence' for these effects are produced by pseudoscience.
@@C45p3r well, no, period.
@@jonyxy777 Convincing argument mr. tin foil hat.
This suggests that entanglement and observation are the same thing
I wish I could give you a thousand thumbs up.
@@carmellacandy509 - thank you- check out Chant Live on FB If you get a minute...Dan
@@carmellacandy509 potentially consciousness could be what holds the universe open which creates the appearance of distance
@@chantlive24 you keep blowing my mind.
@@chantlive24 and I think that universal expansion is experience.
Uncomfortably, this suggests to me, many aspects of Humanity that are pushed aside as nonsense, are in fact, going to be proved as true. Maybe the words passed down, are more relevant than what we are trying to understand.
Well quantum physics already proved there is a multi verse
Meaning our universe with its laws are only one of many different variations
Not sure if there are infinite universes out there or what but I heard there are at least 7 or so(forgot exactly)
Its just we only know our own universe with our limited senses and limited mind.
Of course if you tell anyone this they'll probably think your insane, but that is their own limited mind
Many people are asleep to this idea until they see it
@X X Yep you are seeing yourself essentially in another human being
@@justin5033 there is an infinite number of universes. Every thought has already been thought of and lived out. You live inside me and I live inside you, just like you live inside you. Well if you are living that is. And for all people out there that think a virgin "Mary" couldn't have a child without physical sex is is mistaken. And yes your thoughts are very very powerful if you have a pure heart a good intentions. Message me back if you wanna know a little more.
You are exactly right friend, at least that's how it seems to me
Dean, you are deeply appreciated and Miceal says, "Hello!"
Is there any followup on this? More independent replications, critic...etc?
33:16
Idealism
Any of various systems of thought in which the objects of knowledge are held to be in some way dependent on the activity of mind.
Often contrasted with realism.
Panpsychism
The doctrine or belief that everything material, however small, has an element of individual consciousness.
Neutral monism
The theory, first associated with Bertrand Russell and William James, that the world consists of one kind of primal entity or stuff which is fundamentally neither mental nor physical in character.
collective Imagineering is creating the universe of which we are the eyes and ears.
The tone system may actually give observation/solution effects due to leaking information about the state inside the box. In this case it would be the mind acting as the resolutor. I don't think that this necessarily proves that consciousness is affecting quantum states inherently.
Most underrated comment here. The experiment and the conclusion are flawed due to the tone system providing feedback to the observer.
Interesting. Sound wave observation causing partial wave function collapse?
Excellent presentation and thought provoking, well researched findings. I believe that consciousness will be proven to be a quantum force that is every bit as real as the other four known forces of physics. We just don't understand it well enough yet, but leading edge work such as yours is helping to resolve that. Thanks and keep up the great work!
I think that consciousness is a fundamental force in the universe, and brains act like radios that receives this signal.
LOL
@@CounterFlow64 I also think brain is a kind of antenna.
man, this comment section is full of you morons
@@vibaj16 says the child who i bet lives in video games.
I have been saying for over 20 years that the next great leap in science will be the through study of consciousness. Looks like my hunch was correct.
We all need a shift of spiritual growth and understand from ancient truths
This is not a correct representation of quantum mechanics. Consciousness does not effect anything. The slit experiment simply shows that fundamental particles act like waves of probabilistic outcomes. They do not actually exist as finite objects with definite positions. The act of measuring appears to make the particle choose a position or a path through space, but really what is happening is you are disrupting the system and adding new energy into the system by measuring it. In order to measure something you must interact with the particle and it is this interaction that breaks the particles probabilistic nature and collapses the wave function. It is not consciousness obversing the particle that causes this. It is simply a disruption caused by energy being added into the system. Anything can do this. It is not dependent on a conscious observer.
Listen to his explanation of the equipment they use for the test. It's an enclosed system with a camera at the end. The camera is recording (measuring, observing) the photons passing through the slits. And yet the photons are still creating an interference pattern. If the camera is recording the photons, should their wave function not collapse?
This is very interesting. I wonder if we also have the ability to turn particles back into waves in addition to the converse? Telekinesis?
I’m imaging a traveler on a train journey around the world. He has his eyes closed. For one second he is allowed to open his eyes. After the journey he is asked to describe the world based on what he saw. Is this where we are? It’s a start and utterly exhilarating.