Why the US Doesn't Support Taiwanese Independence

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 сер 2021
  • If you're interested in tech, business, or finance, subscribe to Morning Brew for free: bit.ly/mbpolymatter
    Watch this video on Nebula: nebula.tv/videos/polymatter-w...
    Sources: pastebin.com/ZPmqBrew
    Twitter: / polymatters
    Patreon: / polymatter
    Pins & T-Shirts: standard.tv/collections/polym...
    Reddit: / polymatter
    Music by Graham Haerther (www.Haerther.net)
    Audio editing by Eric Schneider
    Motion graphics by Vincent de Langen
    Everything else by Evan
    This includes a paid sponsorship which had no part in the writing, editing, or production of the rest of the video.
    Music by Epidemic Sound: epidemicsound.com
    Video supplied by Getty Images

КОМЕНТАРІ • 12 тис.

  • @PolyMatter
    @PolyMatter  2 роки тому +1064

    If you enjoy these videos, there’s a very high probability you’d also like today’s sponsor, Morning Brew! I’ve been reading it for months now and would recommend it whether they were sponsoring or not. Plus it’s completely free! bit.ly/mbpolymatter

    • @rajeshsahu3574
      @rajeshsahu3574 2 роки тому +13

      Support from india

    • @arctic215
      @arctic215 2 роки тому +5

      I do

    • @Didacmmv
      @Didacmmv 2 роки тому +15

      Your clickbait title is disgusting, not gonna lie, playing with the lines on this topic to gain views makes something in my stomach turn upside down.
      There's many, to not say an infinite list of reasons why Strategically Taiwan can't fall in the hands of the Mainland communist government, anyone with half a brain with geopolitics can tell you that and this type of doubt and fear is exactly what the CCP feeds on in order to maintain the apparent supremacy of it's paper tiger. God it's disgusting how you mix tradeoffs made in the past with the current situation, sheesh.
      EDIT: Talk about Sensationalism, the irony lmao.
      Really, what's the point of this video but to grow FUD towards the entire situation did I miss something?

    • @Napoleonic_S
      @Napoleonic_S 2 роки тому

      I'm more curious on where did polymatter get those j-20 footage?

    • @tukiort4504
      @tukiort4504 2 роки тому

      Will you be doing Singapore waste management system?

  • @Veriox22
    @Veriox22 2 роки тому +16698

    "Does Taiwan exist!?!?"
    The USA: Yesn't.

  • @thegoodfolk
    @thegoodfolk 2 роки тому +2603

    Future historians will have a hard time keeping a straight face when they find out WW3 was started by a Tweet

    • @ScottRothsroth0616
      @ScottRothsroth0616 2 роки тому +121

      Search: “Assassination of Qasem Soleimani”

    • @chedkosovac8320
      @chedkosovac8320 2 роки тому +128

      You mean the next species. No one surviving a WW3

    • @willblack7353
      @willblack7353 2 роки тому +86

      @@ScottRothsroth0616 Trump was so bad at starting wars every time he tried he failed at doing so

    • @AlexanderMichelson
      @AlexanderMichelson 2 роки тому +93

      @@willblack7353 Trump never tried. The best president ever.

    • @thetimelapseguy8
      @thetimelapseguy8 2 роки тому +60

      ​@@AlexanderMichelson Ok that that drone assassination didn't happen

  • @motoko9176
    @motoko9176 2 роки тому +286

    One of the best English-speaking video on Taiwan-China relationship I have seen so far. The explanation of subtle language used in foreign policy is spot on. "A weird in-between state in which it can enjoy the freedom only if it pretends not to" is a precise snapshot on what's currently going on in Taiwan.

    • @leizhang2447
      @leizhang2447 2 роки тому +13

      It's weird that he only talking about history after the WW2, which totally ignored the reason why Taiwan got separated from China in the first place, and why it's called Republic of China even nowadays. Without understanding these, people will never understand China's reunification claim. Well maybe they are not bothered anyway..

    • @youngcitybandit
      @youngcitybandit 2 роки тому +9

      @@leizhang2447 does the history before ww2 matter? Only thing that matters is that china wants taiwan and taiwanese ppl do not want that...

    • @chubascomohd2688
      @chubascomohd2688 2 роки тому +2

      China airline is in Taipei and China press is in Malaysia.

    • @charlescook2078
      @charlescook2078 2 роки тому +6

      The stand of this video is seemingly neutral but it completely omitted the historical ties between two sides, making the claim of unification odd and hard to understand.

    • @charlescook2078
      @charlescook2078 2 роки тому +4

      @@youngcitybandit yeah tell that to Catalan people and see if Spain allows them to claim independence

  • @WhatIThoughtChannel
    @WhatIThoughtChannel 2 роки тому +73

    5:30 Wow, you managed to spell ‘Government’ 3 different ways in one screen 😂

  • @BrandonSchleifer
    @BrandonSchleifer 2 роки тому +4774

    I love Canada's policy: "we've taken note of your position."

    • @FOLIPE
      @FOLIPE 2 роки тому +411

      I went to see if maybe this is a language that was reproduced in many cases and in Brazil we use the exact same expression.
      "The government of the Federal Republic of Brazil recognizes that the government of the People's Republic of China is the only legal government of China. The Chinese government reaffirms that Taiwan is an inalienable part of the territory of the People's Republic of China. The Brazilian government takes note of this position."

    • @ronvara2929
      @ronvara2929 2 роки тому +116

      Canada's policy is the same as any other country in the world: cut the official relationship with Taiwan, meaning no taiwan flag on Canada's official site, just like the US

    • @aportfolio8324
      @aportfolio8324 2 роки тому +280

      Love Taiwan, though. I don't care what the authoritarian regime of "West Taiwan" says haha 🇹🇼🇹🇼

    • @user-pk2gq1ct1d
      @user-pk2gq1ct1d 2 роки тому +253

      @@aportfolio8324 supporting Taiwan independence from China🇹🇼❤️ Visited 3 years again and fell in love with the country! I hope it never changes into what the CCP has changed my country into!

    • @aportfolio8324
      @aportfolio8324 2 роки тому +148

      @@user-pk2gq1ct1d Be safe. I heard about the die hard Chinese nationalists that dox people who don't suckle up to the regime's narrative. But your support is very refreshing!

  • @beamerboy640
    @beamerboy640 2 роки тому +3660

    US: we do not support Taiwanese independence
    *also US:* hey Taiwan here’s a s-t load of weapons in case you need it 😉

    • @mankola
      @mankola 2 роки тому +451

      And here is the aircraft carrier USS Reagan near by just in case.

    • @georgewashington3918
      @georgewashington3918 2 роки тому +157

      @@mankola it’s also there to make sure China does not do anything

    • @mankola
      @mankola 2 роки тому +212

      @@georgewashington3918 No Sh!t Sherlock.

    • @hyuuganatsume2621
      @hyuuganatsume2621 2 роки тому +53

      tbh the USA are doing the same thing in SEA.. pretty damning imo

    • @crazychinese7315
      @crazychinese7315 2 роки тому +194

      If by a shit load of weapons you mean 30 years old ass fighter for the price of F22, then yes, you are correct..

  • @kafuukafuu2281
    @kafuukafuu2281 2 роки тому +108

    I died when Poly said USA panic more than us when the fighter Jets knock on our door, can't be more accurate.

    • @RahzeeAlibaba
      @RahzeeAlibaba 2 роки тому +2

      It does because we'll have to fight the actual war, so yeah its scary...

    • @firewoodloki
      @firewoodloki 2 роки тому +10

      @Sen While I know you are just trying to crack a joke, it is obviously not a good thing to continue a constant military threat, at all. It is high chance that eventually it will turn into a real war. Also the joke is not exactly funny from Taiwan's point of view, as it sounds like a joke told by a raper towards his victims.

    • @turnpike9680
      @turnpike9680 2 роки тому +19

      At the very least, getting triggered by fighter jets isn't as cringey as getting triggered by seeing the Taiwanese flag.

    • @KDH-br6hy
      @KDH-br6hy 2 роки тому +1

      @@turnpike9680 🤣

    • @damonedrington3453
      @damonedrington3453 2 роки тому +3

      @Sen Honestly I’ll never understand it here. Taiwan and mainland china are both happy with the status quo, but Americans here want to storm in and kick chinas door down for some reason

  • @BamBamGT1
    @BamBamGT1 2 роки тому +25

    Here's another point of view. Both PRC and ROC position was that there is only one China, and that Taiwan is part of it. That's not favoring any side, that's what both sides believed. And it doesn't say PRC is the only government, or the only legitimate one, but the only legal one. This still leaves room to accept the ROC claim as being the true government of China, even if for al intents and purposes PRC is the actual government.

    • @blackmmmblackmmm
      @blackmmmblackmmm 2 роки тому

      Yes, you’re right about this, so that comes with two results, one the KMT is losing their election because of it, two that’s also why president 蔡 has no any action on declaring “independent” because she was elected by ROC’s law

    • @chuamengkim6020
      @chuamengkim6020 2 роки тому +4

      USA should help Taiwan to reconcile with the mainland China to show USA in support of one China .

    • @xwqi
      @xwqi 2 роки тому

      The territorial issue of the Diaoyu Islands between China and Japan is the same. The Diaoyu Islands have always been the inherent territory of China and belong to the jurisdiction of Taiwan. At the end of the Qing Dynasty, Japan still had official documents to steal the Diaoyu Islands. At the end of World War II, Japan should have returned the occupied territory, but the Diaoyu Islands were under the jurisdiction of the U.S. military to be used as a target for training shelling, while the United States handed over the Diaoyu Islands to Japan because the United States had a military base in Japan.

  • @ngp9609
    @ngp9609 2 роки тому +1480

    Moral of the video: Procrastination is bad

    • @AxxLAfriku
      @AxxLAfriku 2 роки тому +9

      WOAH WOAH WOAH!!! Let me get this perfectly straight: You comment something that is completely unrelated to the fact that I have two HAZARDOUSLY HOT girlfriends? Considering that I am the unprettiest UA-camr worldwide, it is really incredible. Yet you did not mention it at all. I am VERY disappointed, dear ngü

    • @ald1050
      @ald1050 2 роки тому +21

      @NGP Not really as it is better than war. Timing is everything in war.

    • @Blanksmithy123
      @Blanksmithy123 2 роки тому +39

      Fence sitting can be a powerful diplomatic tool. It's not like the US is putting it off for no reason lmao

    • @Kriae
      @Kriae 2 роки тому +1

      Reminds me a lot of the issues Hong Kong is facing

    • @Blanksmithy123
      @Blanksmithy123 2 роки тому +24

      @@Kriae the difference is that there's no hope for Hong Kong. Taiwan is still an open question.

  • @AG-pm3tc
    @AG-pm3tc 2 роки тому +1723

    World wide, this era will be called "the can kicking era".

    • @ILovePancakes24
      @ILovePancakes24 2 роки тому +171

      The US is appeasing China, like the Brits appeased nazi Germany. If this nonsense continues the US will be inevitably drawn into a fight, one which it may not win.
      If the US wants any hope of remaining the world power, appeasing China virtually guarantees defeat

    • @pokalorentz9363
      @pokalorentz9363 2 роки тому +63

      Back in WWII there was a period called the "phoney war"

    • @frenchbreadstupidity7054
      @frenchbreadstupidity7054 2 роки тому +18

      So... Cold War 2.0

    • @ArawnOfAnnwn
      @ArawnOfAnnwn 2 роки тому +144

      @@ILovePancakes24 Ordinary Americans are often so vociferously in support of Taiwanese independence because for them it's part of a grand moral crusade, one that they see themselves standing for globally (look up 'American civil religion' on Wikipedia, and take note of the 12th Tenet). But most importantly, because they don't have to live with the consequences. America can drop bombs on a country, killing literally millions, for the cause of 'freedom (tm)', but if it fails they don't have to deal with the mess cos they're safe in their homes half a world away. The Taiwanese are more circumspect, because they know they WILL have to deal with the consequences, unlike the Americans. They know the cost.
      Also, consider this - China has been threatening Taiwan for 70 years, a country with close ties to a rival power (and even that only because of US communist worries following the Korean war), yet today it's a prosperous country that trades extensively with China. By contrast, the equivalent right next to America is Cuba - another island who rejected its powerful neighbour to ally with a rival power. The US has never laid claim to Cuba directly, but rather preferred it be led by a puppet dictator (Batista). And yet, the US has embargoed, sanctioned, blockaded and even once invaded Cuba for daring to defy it. Comparing the two, it certainly doesn't look like the Chinese who've treated their island worse...

    • @Nainara32
      @Nainara32 2 роки тому +1

      Eh. Not every international disagreement needs to be settled.

  • @MoeMisakaMikoto
    @MoeMisakaMikoto 2 роки тому +77

    4:52 "承认" is actually an accurate and the most common Chinese translation
    of the English word "acknowledge". The word "recognize" can be also translated as "承认", but a more common translation would be "认识(到)".

    • @jeanpetersen1294
      @jeanpetersen1294 2 роки тому +7

      In Oxford dictionary, Acknowledge is defined as "accept or admit the existence or truth of."

    • @jevoudraisphoque997
      @jevoudraisphoque997 2 роки тому +4

      No, "recognize" is almost always translated as "承认," whereas "acknowledge" is not.

    • @hedition9346
      @hedition9346 2 роки тому +4

      "I hear you" is the most accurate lol.

    • @user-fe7lh7wp4o
      @user-fe7lh7wp4o Рік тому

      no recognize is mean 承认 no 认识

    • @Iakner
      @Iakner Рік тому

      @@jevoudraisphoque997 Are you for real? Do you recognize this person? in Chinese is 你'认知' 这个人吗?Do you acknowledge the fact? in Chinese is 你'承认' 这个事实吗?I doubt you know any Chinese.

  • @zhangyuqi9604
    @zhangyuqi9604 2 роки тому +107

    8:59 Correction, it’s Taiwan’s Air Defence Identification Zone (ADIZ) that the Liberation army aviation crosses, not their actual air space. In addition, ADIZ of Taiwan is a concept that was proposed by US, and half of its zoning covers the land mass of Mainland China (So I suppose the aircrafts taking off in that area would immediately be considered a threat?).

    • @cpob2013
      @cpob2013 2 роки тому +12

      yeah its bullshit. meanwhile 6 nations sailed warships off china's coastline

    • @zhangyuqi9604
      @zhangyuqi9604 2 роки тому +18

      @@cpob2013 And that’s the part of the story that’s missing from main stream media in global north countries

    • @tweedy4sg
      @tweedy4sg 2 роки тому +1

      @@cpob2013 what does 'off' actually mean....1km or 100km ?

    • @benxinghai8649
      @benxinghai8649 2 роки тому +3

      @@tweedy4sg better question, where does china draw its "coastline"?

    • @FOLIPE
      @FOLIPE 2 роки тому +2

      People only consider that the ADIZ was violated if the plane crosses the Taiwan Straight Meridian line.

  • @TagetesAlkesta
    @TagetesAlkesta 2 роки тому +1641

    I like Canada's "takes note" phrasing more.

    • @giantWario
      @giantWario 2 роки тому +279

      I know right? It basically just means: '' we know that this is what you said''. It's about as non-committal as can be.

    • @dirtypure2023
      @dirtypure2023 2 роки тому +15

      It's pretty limp-wristed tbh

    • @no3ironman11100
      @no3ironman11100 2 роки тому +131

      @@dirtypure2023 That's how good political talk goes.
      You either blow it all or you go full limp noodle. Most efficient way of talking. Of course people being used to it means intermediate modes are usefull too but... even if you're a politician who's trying to do good you gotta maneuver around angering dictatorships across the globe, other party members or the people themselves with the wrong words.

    • @dirtypure2023
      @dirtypure2023 2 роки тому +18

      @@no3ironman11100 This attitude among our political class is part of the problem (or maybe it would be more accurate to say it's a symptom of a larger problem). This kind of slippery speech is inherently dishonest. Politicians are constantly hedging. I'd rather have politicians with backbone who aren't afraid to speak from a strong position of principle, and who state their beliefs and intentions clearly, without trying to play all sides at once. The rarest Pokemon of them all.

    • @no3ironman11100
      @no3ironman11100 2 роки тому +46

      @@dirtypure2023 If you don't play dirty with people you'll see them mob up on you. I'm sure you've seen it happen in real life. Unless you have a really healthy environment. Which isn't the case when you have to deal with a whole population with varied views & clickbait money scrouging journalists.
      If you've seen youtube, People who are straight up honest with their sins and flaws tend to get more severe hate. Those who try to please everyone create cleaner communities. until they're exposed on their mistakes I guess but that's not the point.
      Real humans don't say "it's ok how you are, we'll accept it, it's all about loving eachother"
      it's "HOW DARE YOU ? WE HAVE TO LYNCH THIS PERSON, HE DISRESPECTS MY GOD GIVEN RIGHT TO AUTHORITY!"

  • @L0stEngineer
    @L0stEngineer 2 роки тому +1937

    The American diplomats are lawyer poets with their subtle word selection. It must drive non-english speakers absolutely nuts.

    • @MrOzzification
      @MrOzzification 2 роки тому +277

      That's just being good at diplomacy regardless of nationality or native language.

    • @Kriae
      @Kriae 2 роки тому +122

      Most countries do the same thing

    • @duckymomo7935
      @duckymomo7935 2 роки тому +11

      the whole concept of the law of excluded middle in logic isn't necessarily true and you can have fuzzy logic or neutral or even null truth value

    • @leorkoubi4626
      @leorkoubi4626 2 роки тому +7

      As a hopeful lawyer I lookatthem with worship in my eyes.

    • @ezioauditore7636
      @ezioauditore7636 2 роки тому +8

      It just reminds me of chess, the same methods are taken in it.

  • @Campaigner82
    @Campaigner82 2 роки тому +82

    We’ve heard about Taiwan belonging to China or not for a long time but I never hear about Hawaii. The US just went in and took over and completely suppressed their independence movement.
    Catalonia (province of Spain) was not allowed to become independent, Spain said.
    So why do we only ever hear about Taiwan..?

    • @stuka80
      @stuka80 2 роки тому +6

      because those areas are alrdy integrated into the nation for generations. Taiwan is currently not and is in active defiance and autonomous.

    • @nirehytls6706
      @nirehytls6706 2 роки тому +20

      @@stuka80 not for generations tho. Hawaii was forced into statehood in 1959, which is comparably more recent when CCP became the leader of China/KMT went to Taiwan. Catalonia is not that far off either. People who were in their 20s back then are more or less in their 70s to 80s now, so that would be at MOST 2 generations. But hey, Hawaii is just too important for the US (since it is situated right in the middle of the Pacific) to allow independence.

    • @stuka80
      @stuka80 2 роки тому +7

      @@nirehytls6706 Hawaii has been an administered territory since 1900 its entire infrastructure built by the US with a major naval base there. There is no clamoring for independence in the residents, most are happy being part of the US and moreover the majority of its residents dont consider themselves as a separate nation the way virtually all of Taiwanese do. I dont know about the Spanish incident to speak about it but i suspect its the same situation there as in Hawaii.
      My point is the situation of Taiwan and the other 2 regions mentioned are not the same at all, the circumstances are totally different. If both of those regions right now were independent and separate you would be seeing the issue on the news.

    • @cstrutherskgs
      @cstrutherskgs 2 роки тому +12

      @@nirehytls6706 Hawaii is already controlled in practice and officially by the US. Taiwan is its own de facto nation. China claims Taiwan but doesn’t have practical day to day control. That is a important distinction.

    • @jjsamuelgunn1136
      @jjsamuelgunn1136 2 роки тому +2

      @@stuka80 Shut up. The invasion of Hawaii was in the turn of the century whereas the issue with Taiwan arose from the days of the Qing dynasty several CENTURIES before that.

  • @user-dx3jg6er1m
    @user-dx3jg6er1m 2 роки тому +134

    "unofficial relations" = we want to trade with China & don't want to risk them being angry with us but ideologically we agree with Taiwan
    face facts: it's never been about whether people agree Taiwan should be independent or not. if China remained at the same power/economic levels as it were three decades ago this would be a non-issue.

    • @larghedoggo9607
      @larghedoggo9607 2 роки тому +5

      China had grown and change much compare to decades ago.
      However, as we can see, China has slowed its growing velocity since trade war with the U.S and Australia.
      Interbational companies start to retreat along with salary growth slowing down, it happens too early as a developing country.
      China has to face this challenge before even become a developed country.

    • @utobesuckslol6687
      @utobesuckslol6687 2 роки тому +5

      @@larghedoggo9607 Companies start to retreat? To where? LOL

    • @greenteasunferncello
      @greenteasunferncello 2 роки тому +7

      @@utobesuckslol6687 To Vietnam, Malaysia, India, South Korea to name a few.

    • @patrickforrest4899
      @patrickforrest4899 2 роки тому +6

      China is committing atrocities as we speak (look up uyghurs) and we ignore it. They're a cash cow for american corporations and consumers.

    • @user-uc5jz1ty6c
      @user-uc5jz1ty6c 2 роки тому +7

      @@patrickforrest4899 I am a Chinese.I have some Uyghurs friends.I can approve there is no slavery in Xinjiang.It is a beautiful part of china and we have no reason to slavery.

  • @Bill-ou7zp
    @Bill-ou7zp 2 роки тому +3252

    It's fascinating to me that such huge and complex matters of international relations hinge on the delicate use of language.

    • @chunchuanlv3211
      @chunchuanlv3211 2 роки тому +130

      Welcome to East Asian politics. Although, the mainland Chinese never understand the one China policy of US as pro-CCP. It has always been understood as a deliberate ambiguity. My high school teacher discussed this point in class room. In general, East Asian politicians have been working on the delicacy of language for centuries so that there are always rooms for re-negotiation, while passing the message.

    • @luiso2166
      @luiso2166 2 роки тому +43

      @Jack Hui How's Winnie the Pooh?

    • @MrLee4747
      @MrLee4747 2 роки тому +6

      It is very very simple, don't cross the red line, if you cross then who ever did it will face the consequences.!

    • @arthas640
      @arthas640 2 роки тому +24

      I think that's why Biden is careful to not state any coherent opinion on many things and usually dances around the issue. He won't say "Cain shouldn't have killed Able" or "Able deserved to die", he'll say "it's sad when brothers fight" that way he doesnt have to offend anyone and doesnt have an opinion he needs to support since otherwise the Able or Cain supporters would expect Biden to back them later

    • @yosefyonin6824
      @yosefyonin6824 2 роки тому +4

      wouldn't call it complex, it's just fear from communist hurt feelings because they are extremely violent

  • @Jose04537
    @Jose04537 2 роки тому +408

    "Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind” George Orwell.

    • @deisk2707
      @deisk2707 2 роки тому

      Political language? Seems new

    • @jimilindley4422
      @jimilindley4422 2 роки тому +5

      @@deisk2707 Please read a book. I don't think you realize how naive and ignorant this comment of yours exposes you to be. Not trying to be mean, just bringing it to your attention.

    • @aguywithananimeprofile8950
      @aguywithananimeprofile8950 2 роки тому +1

      Long live ol George

    • @deisk2707
      @deisk2707 2 роки тому +2

      @@jimilindley4422 ik, this is really a stupid comment. As a non-english speaker, I can't think other words to form something like neutral.

    • @jimilindley4422
      @jimilindley4422 2 роки тому +3

      @@deisk2707 I'm sorry man. I didn't realize English wasn't your first language or I wouldn't of said anything. I hope I didn't discourage you from continuing to try and communicate in English. I know how hard learning a new language can be and how immersion and getting out of your comfort zone is necessary. Sorry for being rude I assumed you to be a young American unaware or even embracing their own lack of knowledge it's becoming an epidemic here but I should know better than to make such assumptions. ✌️

  • @niel.h4184
    @niel.h4184 Рік тому +5

    ROC is free China, but sadly Taiwanese nowadays mostly avoid being considered as Chinese. Much more like giving up a bigger cause then live it up on the island forever.😢

    • @user-oq1oc4qx4p
      @user-oq1oc4qx4p Місяць тому

      Taiwan and Penghu are leftover issues from World War II. See Treaty of San Francisco.
      At the time, the U.S. government helped the Chinese Nationalist Party (Republic of China), which had been defeated in the Chinese Civil War, escape to Taiwan, which was then a Japanese colony. See Formosa betrayed.
      After the Chinese Kuomintang came to Taiwan, it still maintained dictatorial rule, but moved towards democracy under pressure from the United States, and the Taiwanese entered the Republic of China to fight for their rights.
      The Chinese who lost their privileges in Taiwan united with the People's Republic of China to steal Taiwan and Penghu.

  • @ciciyuan4173
    @ciciyuan4173 2 роки тому

    Hi, thanks for the great video. Just want to ask if I can put this on a Chinese streaming platform. I will attach the link to this original video.

  • @user-ef7hl4tu7k
    @user-ef7hl4tu7k 2 роки тому +618

    It’s strange to see your own house in one of the stock footage…

    • @ilikepiedontu
      @ilikepiedontu 2 роки тому +31

      You’re one in a million then

    • @liuhc
      @liuhc 2 роки тому +18

      For a moment I thought your name is 简伯承

    • @buhairaiza6625
      @buhairaiza6625 2 роки тому +2

      Which part lol

    • @neonbunnies9596
      @neonbunnies9596 2 роки тому +7

      Timestamp?

    • @magicmagus1459
      @magicmagus1459 2 роки тому +3

      bots arent you supposed to spam ccp talking points...how come the boss is allowing you to do this as well...business must be going good...

  • @rolerroleris533
    @rolerroleris533 2 роки тому +3122

    Most (western) people think that the world is now a peaceful place, but these kinds of videos show just how delicate this balance may be, and just how much shit is stirring behind the peaceful facade. The recent shit with Ukraine and Russia is one good example of how this peace can easily crumble...

    • @absolutefocus2749
      @absolutefocus2749 2 роки тому +399

      I mean objectively we are living in the most peaceful time in human history, for 99% of our species's lifetime war between the major players was happening, now not so much.

    • @udhayakumarMN
      @udhayakumarMN 2 роки тому +59

      afghanistan??

    • @neeneko
      @neeneko 2 роки тому +72

      Which is why talk of trade wars, returns to mercantilism, or even nationalistic isolation are so scary. trade and economic interdependence give the major powers a huge incentive to keep that balance. But generations who grew up without war are growing restless and are pushing to make sure the next generation get an education compatible with destablizing things for emotional reasons.

    • @shotsniper009
      @shotsniper009 2 роки тому +48

      I think it's more accurate to say """peace""". Major powers simply just refuse to acknowledge the suffering they inflict on their out groups especially while erasing their culture from existence

    • @nickyliu8762
      @nickyliu8762 2 роки тому +122

      When I saw the USA invading Afghanistan in 2001, I did not think that the world was a peaceful place. When I'm seeing the US withdrawing from Afghanistan in 2021, I do not think that the world has become a more peaceful place.

  • @khpc82
    @khpc82 2 роки тому +45

    I love how neutral this reporting is. Instead of all the mainstream media's biased reporting. Good job!

    • @akiuta4
      @akiuta4 7 місяців тому

      There's no unbiased reporting you can just pretend to be unbiased. Right in the video you can see how he says that "China exploited" the wording thus painting China as malicious or opportunistic. From his other videos you can see that he is quite right leaning. It's important to declare your bias when reporting.

  • @user-qr2lp2ij6n
    @user-qr2lp2ij6n 2 роки тому

    Does anyone know where the video resources are coming from in this video? Are they copyright free?

  • @nlpnt
    @nlpnt 2 роки тому +603

    "We acknowledge your position" means "Yep, that's your position all right."

    • @__europa
      @__europa 2 роки тому +2

      definitely.

    • @user-bn6uv8ym3x
      @user-bn6uv8ym3x 2 роки тому +56

      The video is misleading. The agreement between USA and China is written in 2 languages: English and Chinese, if the chinese version is not right, why USA doesn't correct it? The only explanation is USA intended to exploit this mis-understanding, it offered a false promise to China to trade for a common frontline facing Soviet Union, and hold back a "backdoor" to compromise the promise it made to china.

    • @niu-3-
      @niu-3- 2 роки тому +9

      @@user-bn6uv8ym3x exactly

    • @JohnDoe-qu2dr
      @JohnDoe-qu2dr 2 роки тому +7

      @@user-bn6uv8ym3x You know that English is the only language that some people can read and often without saying, in their mind, that is the only language that should be used and other languages are all shit.
      "What? Chinese? Blah, barbarian language that should go extinct."

    • @user-bn6uv8ym3x
      @user-bn6uv8ym3x 2 роки тому +13

      @@JohnDoe-qu2dr That's exactly the problem, in the western-central narrative, only english matters, while the truth is UN has 5 official languages including Chinese.
      Western media has successfully created a black box that majority of the audience lack basic common sense and don't care reality beyond what they are fed.

  • @vokzaal
    @vokzaal 2 роки тому +1397

    Isn’t it great that there’s no way you can address Taiwan without offending somebody

    • @EwingTaiwan
      @EwingTaiwan 2 роки тому +129

      It's sad, isn't it? Now imagine you're the center of that s**t show.

    • @AkamiChannel
      @AkamiChannel 2 роки тому +86

      No problem if you don't mind offending losers, idiots, and babies

    • @BlackWinds
      @BlackWinds 2 роки тому +99

      Israel's kind of the same way. Let people be offended.

    • @violethaye6987
      @violethaye6987 2 роки тому +40

      i don't care at this point, life's too short to obsess about who gets offended over what these days.

    • @shepherdlavellen3301
      @shepherdlavellen3301 2 роки тому +8

      good thing that UA-cam algorithm is keeping both factions apart...mostly, but on the other hand being neutral means algorithm will bring you both sides' opinions, which means instead of seeing one group of idiots, you get to see two..

  • @thepeero9670
    @thepeero9670 2 роки тому +3

    aged like a fine wine

  • @justinyang21114798
    @justinyang21114798 Рік тому +40

    I don't think anyone has brought this up yet. I just want to highlight the footages you used to depict the lives in Taiwan. You did such a good job in selecting and editing them into your video that as a Taiwanese, seeing them feels just like home. I can't express how intimate they feel to me and how at times it almost feels like you are viewing it as a Taiwanese native and just seeing these images like our day-to-day life. I just want to point this out because I think it reflects the amount of thoughtfulness and care you put into understanding and explaining the situation in Taiwan and in some sense just the care you have for the Taiwanese people. So often, Taiwan is reduced to an abstract concept, a footnote in the greater fight between the US and China. As a Taiwanese, I am often really annoyed by this narrative. Taiwan is 23.5 million people and, if war breaks out, I am and also we are not just some number but a human who can easily be killed. I apologize for going on a bit of a tangent. Coming back to my original point, I want to thank you again for your amazing work. Even it's just a tiny detail, it really means a lot to me.

    • @anubizz3
      @anubizz3 Рік тому

      @Chris Sushi They will always lose, it's Murican that win. Taiwan is just a pawn for Murica to assert their dominant.

    • @aa951742
      @aa951742 Рік тому

      Unless you are from the south😂.
      The only footage from the south is our aircraft carrier.

    • @JohnSmith-nz2yq
      @JohnSmith-nz2yq Рік тому +1

      but your comment is saying that because you are 23 million people, war and death and casualties matter.
      so if it is a small island nation with less than 1 million people... then they don't matter?

  • @Ellipsis115
    @Ellipsis115 2 роки тому +650

    "[Taiwan] can enjoy freedom only if it pretends not to" is such a killer quote!

    • @rocappreciater5540
      @rocappreciater5540 2 роки тому +22

      The Republic of China will give freedom to all Chinese people one day.

    • @ciaranthompson3375
      @ciaranthompson3375 2 роки тому +44

      @@rocappreciater5540 it's a nice dream my friend

    • @kyriakos232
      @kyriakos232 2 роки тому +3

      @@rocappreciater5540 people from Taiwan should choose their fate, so as people from mainland China, the division is there and better not to impose your will on us.

    • @Mr_DPZ
      @Mr_DPZ 2 роки тому

      I just imagine a bunch of people at the polls sarcastically saying "oh man, I hate being able to make decisions and have opinions. Can't there just be some guy to tell me what to do and how to feel?"

    • @Yddp3307
      @Yddp3307 2 роки тому +15

      @@rocappreciater5540 sorry, nobody in China would want ROC to rule. If Roc is there in the first place, China would never ever as advanced as they are now, and decision making process will only be heavily influenced by the west, as ROC will only become a lapdog of US eventually, but you could continue to dream about it

  • @ntumed2799
    @ntumed2799 2 роки тому +1944

    7:39 For someone who does not grow up in Taiwan, such objective insights on the two political parties is simply amazing.
    Yes both sides agree that maintaining the status quo is the best short term immediate strategy, but both parties marketed it so poorly that it seemed as if one stands for unification, while the other stands for independence.

    • @orionstark
      @orionstark 2 роки тому +55

      In the short term, mainland China is going to have a crisis which will cause the CCP to reform or break. What the PRC looks like after the demographic implosion has taken full effect is anyone's guess. Eventually the threat from the CCP will vanish. What Taiwan does then will depend on what things look like on the ground in Shanghai.

    • @12vtbfx37
      @12vtbfx37 2 роки тому +134

      @@orionstark less Read about falungong news , Even We Taiwanese don't believe this news
      The main purpose of these news is to demonize China
      Many of the video clip are not from China
      Even the translation of their video was wrong

    • @ethanfoo9154
      @ethanfoo9154 2 роки тому +106

      @@user-tz6px4rn6n it’s not that the CCP is bad, every government is terrible, it’s that it’s very close minded. It would be better if more conversation and critique was allowed. It would help everyone. But the issue is the CCP won’t allow that because it’ll weaken their power slightly. It wouldn’t be a big deal since there would still be many supporters. But it’s the belief that they would lose support. Not the reality.

    • @onyxrafle8066
      @onyxrafle8066 2 роки тому +95

      The problem is that China is a one party state. Every country with only one dominant party becomes oppressive over time. No matter what their ideals were at the beginning.

    • @orionstark
      @orionstark 2 роки тому +28

      @@12vtbfx37 Wu Mao.

  • @fallencobra5197
    @fallencobra5197 2 роки тому +6

    This title aged like milk

  • @kaiserzero1077
    @kaiserzero1077 2 роки тому +2

    Don’t need no 13 minute video, just spend half one scrolling down the comments

  • @Leanzazzy
    @Leanzazzy 2 роки тому +1533

    Shopkeeper: Wait a second, you didn't pay for that!
    Me: I acknowledge that 😌

    • @arniesawfularmchair
      @arniesawfularmchair 2 роки тому +89

      "I acknowledge your position on that"

    • @pneudmatic
      @pneudmatic 2 роки тому +5

      Yusuf, your lawyer Harry K wishes you had exercised your Miranda Rights.

    • @Leanzazzy
      @Leanzazzy 2 роки тому +12

      @@pneudmatic Does that mean I'm supposed to stay silent because anything I say can and will be used against me in a court of the law?🤔

    • @theguyfromtech4090
      @theguyfromtech4090 2 роки тому

      Epik

    • @pneudmatic
      @pneudmatic 2 роки тому +1

      @@Leanzazzy Yes. "I acknowledge that you believe you saw me take that" would be pretty hard to interpret as an admission of guilt.

  • @stevelucky7579
    @stevelucky7579 2 роки тому +3011

    “Unofficial relations with its government” is just another way of saying, “we recognize you, we just don’t want to anger the people who disagree with us.”

    • @beatlejuice7755
      @beatlejuice7755 2 роки тому +63

      The US just wants oil, no oil in Taiwan

    • @stevelucky7579
      @stevelucky7579 2 роки тому +278

      @@beatlejuice7755 Ha ha US just want oil 😂 you should be a comedian. Very original joke 10/10

    • @bigmanroadman3910
      @bigmanroadman3910 2 роки тому +121

      “China will bully us if we recognise you. sorry.”

    • @GyacoYu
      @GyacoYu 2 роки тому +51

      Yesn't, just like the US also maintains an unofficial relationship with the Talibans.

    • @michaelwang6125
      @michaelwang6125 2 роки тому +6

      @@beatlejuice7755 There is some oil but I think Taiwan consumes more than the amount the country generates.
      Marble probably is the main natural resource Taiwan exports since it has over 30 billion metric tons of deposits, one of the largest in the world.

  • @jamesdspaderf2883
    @jamesdspaderf2883 2 роки тому

    Fascinating analysis from a perspective I had not previously appreciated. Nice job.

  • @francissantos7448
    @francissantos7448 2 роки тому +5

    Excellent analysis. Makes my Taiwan issue awareness up to date. Thanks.

  • @gwyn.
    @gwyn. 2 роки тому +380

    US on China: *"We know China exists and there's only one China. Yup, that's about it."*
    US on UFO & Taiwan: *"Perhaps... Maybe... It's classified."*

  • @AlturoChen
    @AlturoChen 2 роки тому +1985

    "Ironically, it's most often Americans halfway across the globe, who panic when China flies fighter jets through Taiwanese airspace, not the Taiwanese public" Nicely said

    • @sterius5098
      @sterius5098 2 роки тому +162

      @@Demicleas without even spelling it right, that truely said something

    • @dingdongpong748
      @dingdongpong748 2 роки тому +17

      @@sterius5098 how low can u be?

    • @sterius5098
      @sterius5098 2 роки тому +29

      @@dingdongpong748 almost as low as u 😊

    • @kuro_5537
      @kuro_5537 2 роки тому +116

      Unfortunately, this is true. Taiwan has been abused by the Chinese fighter jets too many times that Taiwanese tend to get used to it

    • @Nron-ni4gj
      @Nron-ni4gj 2 роки тому +147

      @@Demicleas The last time u guys care about Iraq, Afghanistan, it didn't end up well.

  • @legendepic9009
    @legendepic9009 2 роки тому

    Fascinating to see the content creator realize such huge and complex matters of international relations hinge on the delicate use of a word yet fail to realize the significance of the symbol change/listing them with other countries in a tweet's impact on the delicate balance.

  • @hudsonflores5478
    @hudsonflores5478 2 роки тому +2

    I didn't know that Canada was also The Dominion of Canada and now every time I think of it it will sound so much more menacing.

  • @salokin3087
    @salokin3087 2 роки тому +189

    Lesson: stop posting on twitter. Can you imagine the history books on WW3 discussing a July Crisis event because of a tweet?

    • @ravenlord4
      @ravenlord4 2 роки тому +9

      Yeah -- kind of like the US entry into WW1 over the Zimmermann telegram, eh?

    • @ChenAnPin
      @ChenAnPin 2 роки тому +7

      @@ravenlord4 the Zimmerman telegram at least took a few days to figure out and some exchange and clarification before coming to a conclusion. At least it wasn't a spontaneous midnight toilet seat twitter post that could be too easily interpreted as a decision.

    • @ravenlord4
      @ravenlord4 2 роки тому +1

      @@ChenAnPin I serious doubt an infograph detailing vaccine by nation was a "spontaneous midnight toilet seat" communique. If anything, a quicker response and replay time granted by modern technology favors diffusing ambiguous or dangerous situations. Hence the "red phones" between hostile governments.

    • @PrograError
      @PrograError 2 роки тому +1

      i mean... wars had been started over google maps...

    • @ravenlord4
      @ravenlord4 2 роки тому +3

      @@PrograError Does not surprise me. Wars over maps is one of the oldest and most cherished reasons for a call of arms :)

  • @NinjaMomtastic
    @NinjaMomtastic 2 роки тому +539

    I kinda feel like the Taiwan Semiconductor deciding to build up to six factories in Arizona is kinda like a canary in a coal mine for the long-term stability of the region.

    • @dknowles60
      @dknowles60 2 роки тому +25

      Good idea can't trust china china only killed 10k. People for protesting If tiawan goes who is next

    • @carso1500
      @carso1500 2 роки тому +29

      @@adrianramos4400 in a way the problem was that having all the semi conductor industry in a single country was and is a... problem, like just a bunch of errors caused a mayor chip shortage worldwide soo sorry for Taiwan but yeah the US needs it's own semi conductor factories

    • @dknowles60
      @dknowles60 2 роки тому +12

      @@tl4172 i hope so you would have thought the Us would have learned from its 1973 OPEC spanking

    • @fanily4072
      @fanily4072 2 роки тому +1

      @@carso1500 There are multiple fabs all over the world by different companies but only one ASML. That is a very critical bottleneck.

    • @iix23
      @iix23 2 роки тому +22

      ​@@tl4172 Yes and no. The first reason for the AZ chip factories is to alleviate tariffs on Taiwan's export like the car companies did in the 70's.
      Reason #2 is the global chip shortage. Taiwan's science parks are running out of land to build, electricity to operate ( the closing of 2 nuclear powerplant without replacing the production capacity) and the water supply to feed these plants (Taiwan had droughts in the last 3 years and had to divert water from citizens to keep the plants running leaving the citizens without waters for days.)
      Taiwan specializes in new chip making technologies and sends older machinery like 5/8/12 inch wafers to other less developed countries like Thailand, India and even China as they aren't concerned with IP theft for those less profitable and old techs.
      I have been living in Taiwan for the past 20 years and operate businesses here as well. TSMC and Power chip are some of my biggest customers.

  • @catherinel.3551
    @catherinel.3551 2 роки тому +22

    The translation differences are fairly good points most media didn’t point out

  • @Eyl279
    @Eyl279 Рік тому

    What does ‘Acknowledge’ mean in this context?

  • @sierranexi
    @sierranexi 2 роки тому +229

    Tweeting a picture that can be slightly misinterpreted and triggering a meltdown. Isn't that what Twitter is for?

    • @Kevin-cw8of
      @Kevin-cw8of 2 роки тому +2

      People tend to forget that these two *entities* are still at war.

    • @xuanquang9815
      @xuanquang9815 2 роки тому +1

      Chinese Nationalist on steroid tbh. funny how Taiwan was once Nationalist and China mainland was communist

    • @supernenechi
      @supernenechi 2 роки тому +5

      In the distant future, after world war 3 is over and I can tell people about having lived through it (if I do of course) then we can say how WW1's tipping point was an assassination, WW2 was started because of a Nazi uprising and WW3 was started because some tweet

    • @jamesj5565
      @jamesj5565 2 роки тому +8

      @@supernenechi or some Asacoco UA-cam statistics

    • @yafethtb
      @yafethtb 2 роки тому +4

      @@jamesj5565 a certain vtuber that innocently read what Google tell them

  • @odahimaable
    @odahimaable 2 роки тому +348

    They should write international treaties in emojis it would be much simpler.

    • @theMcWOPPER
      @theMcWOPPER 2 роки тому +8

      Wouldn't have been simpler. It would lead to a lot of interpretation.

    • @kridhay
      @kridhay 2 роки тому +17

      @@theMcWOPPER bruh he’s joking

    • @George83_Thomas
      @George83_Thomas 2 роки тому +99

      Munich Agreement
      🇬🇧 + 🇫🇷 🎁 🇦🇹 👉 🇩🇪
      🔵 : 😤 ☑️ ❗️ 🚫⚔️❓
      🔴 : 😅 ☑️
      🇩🇪 💥 🇵🇱 🤫

    • @triton62674
      @triton62674 2 роки тому +17

      @@George83_Thomas top tier

    • @macmarc6661
      @macmarc6661 2 роки тому +36

      @@George83_Thomas Have you considered a career in geopolitics?

  • @user-cd4bx6uq1y
    @user-cd4bx6uq1y Рік тому +2

    Yep, I remember watching this

  • @jensenliu8894
    @jensenliu8894 2 роки тому +4

    No matter how good the rapport between brothers is, it can’t resist someone who keeps instigating you to go it alone

  • @sharifsazal
    @sharifsazal 2 роки тому +420

    "When Taiwan's president proposed a referendum in 2003, the US was caught between a rock and a hard place"
    At first I heard 'caught between Iraq and a hard place' 😂 which would have been funny and accurate.

    • @APersonOnYouTubeX
      @APersonOnYouTubeX 2 роки тому +10

      I mean pretty much sums it up for vets in America, die for ya country, get some honours or survive with ptsd n be treated NICELY by YOUR country

    • @phillipmargrave
      @phillipmargrave 2 роки тому +6

      Between Iraq and Afghanistan. Yup checks out.

    • @kurtpunchesthings2411
      @kurtpunchesthings2411 2 роки тому

      America literally were caught between Iraq and a hard place during that war

    • @EAdano77
      @EAdano77 2 роки тому

      Was that not an intentional pun on Polymatter's part?

    • @ScottyShaw
      @ScottyShaw 2 роки тому

      Taiwan, province of Iraq... wait... 🤔

  • @dorivaldojunior2254
    @dorivaldojunior2254 2 роки тому +125

    7:10 Kuomitang "you've become the very thing you swore to destroy."

    • @jonsong4592
      @jonsong4592 2 роки тому +30

      ironically the KMT did it in the 1930s too when Chiang Kai Shek took over the republic after the death of Sun Yat Sen. Turning the democratic republic into a military dictatorship. Sun Yat Sen was probably rolling in his grave.

    • @kevinwijaya9613
      @kevinwijaya9613 2 роки тому +27

      @@jonsong4592 but china was fractured at the time. He had to conquer local warlords one by one to reunify china. Don't forget they were the ones who fought against the japanese forces while CCP barely lifted a finger. CCP is only in power now because Mao seized an opportunity from a weakened KMT force that took the full brunt of Japan's imeprial army.

    • @isaakwang750
      @isaakwang750 2 роки тому +22

      @@kevinwijaya9613 KMT was certainly no angels back then. The regime was brutal and its army was so corrupt that officers could turn a profit from maximizing casulties so a lot of their soldiers defected to the communists.
      So yea, back then you were stuck between two shit choices. One just happened to be red while the other was blue, but there were no winners during the civil war, no matter the outcome. The civilian would be the losers either way

    • @colin-onioin
      @colin-onioin 2 роки тому +6

      KMT is a party from China. It may vow to defeat communist party but it never cares the independent status of Taiwan.

    • @bctvanw
      @bctvanw 2 роки тому

      @@jonsong4592
      SYS received USSR's aid before his death, so KMT could grow and overthrew the legitimate Beiyang government of China at the time in 1928. KMT and CCP were SYS and USSR's babies.

  • @MizMite2002
    @MizMite2002 2 роки тому +22

    America is getting a state of the art semiconductor plant in Arizona. The chips are needed for the f35 and right now Taiwan is the only supplier. Plant open in 2024.

    • @anti-bullingjames
      @anti-bullingjames 2 роки тому +1

      Completely bs. Military equipment and small gadget have different requirements on chips. Az plant produces 5nm chips for phone and other small gadgets. Military equipment needs high tolerance in different environment and stable chips rather than more smaller (high density) chips. That's why China, though have no abilities to produce chips less than 28 nm but still able to manufacture 5th fighter jets and hypersonic missiles.

    • @Hybred
      @Hybred 2 роки тому

      I thought lays were made in the US? And why are chips so important for international relations to the point the US has to keep a good relationship with China & Taiwan just because chip companies make them there? I can do without chips, American's must really be obese if the government is kissing China's ass just so their citizens can have their chips. This is pathetic

    • @AnAZPatriot
      @AnAZPatriot 2 роки тому

      The US mitary and the DOD source their semiconductors across multiple suppliers. Intel, Samsung, TSMC, Xilinx, and Qualcom all provide glass (that's what we in the semiconductor manufacturing industry call microchips) to the US military...and the F-35. You think there is only 1 computer or type of computer on board? One type of sensor? One type of communication device? One type of data device? And all the different types of glass are made by one company??? I mean, I know beaurocrats are pretty stupid...do you really think they're THAT stupid?

  • @melimsah
    @melimsah 2 роки тому +1

    All I can think is the image was thrown together by a junior designer who had no idea that including that flag was a no go.

  • @coolieo2222
    @coolieo2222 2 роки тому +744

    Question: does the fact that taiwan has a massive semi conductor factory play into Americas and Chinas decision on how aggressive/Defensive they should be? If so did Taiwan know this when they allowed the factory to be built?

    • @ooooneeee
      @ooooneeee 2 роки тому +275

      Definitely. TSMC is their insurance against getting invaded.

    • @the_zsriverpanda
      @the_zsriverpanda 2 роки тому +279

      I don't think the government foresaw that TSMC could grow to become one of the leading forces of the semi-conductor industry. That would've been uber impressive. They definitely know its strategic importance now tho

    • @linpaul1970
      @linpaul1970 2 роки тому +17

      I don’t think so. From China perspective, they will try as hard as they can to invade and communistzed TSMC.

    • @the_zsriverpanda
      @the_zsriverpanda 2 роки тому +269

      @@linpaul1970 Well, first of all, the PRC is communist in name only. But more importantly: A blackout for a few hours caused by an earthquake in Taiwan could shake the stock market in New York for a few days. A war will definitely do much more. This means that if the PRC does invade, not only will it harm its own economy, it will also harm the economy of other countries, giving them the incentive to intervene before that happens. This is why the TSMC has been described as Taiwan's "insurance."

    • @absolutefocus2749
      @absolutefocus2749 2 роки тому +67

      @@the_zsriverpanda exactly, China would have to first fill TSMC's role before even thinking of invading, China is the country with the biggest need for chips, in 1 part due to their domestic market (see Huawei having to completely restructure everything over the US's trade ban) and in the other because of their future wish to unify Taiwan with the mainland, both big reasons why they're investing ludicrous amounts of money into the industry.

  • @thelastcube.
    @thelastcube. 2 роки тому +434

    Do you support Taiwanese Independence?
    US: yes but actually no

    • @nevreiha
      @nevreiha 2 роки тому +26

      USA: hmm, maybe - depends what answer you're looking for

    • @inigobantok1579
      @inigobantok1579 2 роки тому +3

      But if war goes it will be

    • @colin-onioin
      @colin-onioin 2 роки тому +20

      Somehow it is fundamentally a thing between China and Taiwan. However, everyone keeps asking the USA's opinion.

    • @FynnRosenzweig
      @FynnRosenzweig 2 роки тому +3

      @@inigobantok1579 nope, look at what happened to Ukraine lol both NATO and EU dont wanna get involved

    • @spidey5324
      @spidey5324 2 роки тому +1

      Yes, but half of my aircraft carriers will be destroyed in the process so no.....

  • @87711jimmy
    @87711jimmy 2 роки тому +16

    Fun fact: KMT is the party who fights against the CPC during the china civil war, but they lost and force back to Taiwan.

    • @cpob2013
      @cpob2013 2 роки тому +5

      thats not so much a fun fact as just history...
      a fun fact would be that taiwan wasnt considered part of china until after ww2 and it was ceded from japanese control. the KMT is just an occupying force from the mainland. the native taiwanese didnt give a shit about the civil war and were actively oppressed by the KMT troops and refugees

    • @user-kf5nx9tc2p
      @user-kf5nx9tc2p 2 роки тому +3

      @@cpob2013 Taiwan is actually part of Fujian Province before Sino-Japanese War of 1894-1895 and then ceded by Qing dynasty after. You can think it's part of China before then.

    • @user-oq1oc4qx4p
      @user-oq1oc4qx4p Місяць тому

      Taiwan and Penghu are leftover issues from World War II. See Treaty of San Francisco.
      At the time, the U.S. government helped the Chinese Nationalist Party (Republic of China), which had been defeated in the Chinese Civil War, escape to Taiwan, which was then a Japanese colony. See Formosa betrayed.
      After the Chinese Kuomintang came to Taiwan, it still maintained dictatorial rule, but moved towards democracy under pressure from the United States, and the Taiwanese entered the Republic of China to fight for their rights.
      The Chinese who lost their privileges in Taiwan united with the People's Republic of China to steal Taiwan and Penghu.

  • @801180111108
    @801180111108 2 роки тому +80

    As a taiwanese person it’s incredibly impressive how you captured the nuance of the situation and represented all the stances fairly. Thank you for a good informative video.

    • @Thewiseleopard
      @Thewiseleopard 2 роки тому +3

      There is no “taiwanese” and no taiwan. Taiwan doesn’t exist

    • @sak_1017
      @sak_1017 2 роки тому +19

      @@Thewiseleopard +50 social credits

    • @justmyedits6596
      @justmyedits6596 2 роки тому +8

      @@Thewiseleopard Taiwan numba one ! Taiwan's a great country !! MilkteaAlliance !

    • @Jon-eo9zf
      @Jon-eo9zf 2 роки тому +2

      -1000 social credit points.

    • @RahzeeAlibaba
      @RahzeeAlibaba 2 роки тому +3

      REAL Americans recognize Taiwan as a independent country.

  • @gkprivate433
    @gkprivate433 2 роки тому +862

    The USA changed its public position on Taiwan back in the 70s when Nixon was preparing to travel to mainland China. And the UN went along with it

    • @petersinclair3997
      @petersinclair3997 2 роки тому +63

      Sort of true. The UN only recognised the Mainland. The representatives of Chiang Kai Shek were expelled. Taiwan was ignored. Resolution 2857.

    • @petersinclair3997
      @petersinclair3997 2 роки тому +23

      Sort of true. UN Resolution 2857 recognised PRC rule of the Mainland. The representatives of Chiang Kai Shek were expelled. Taiwan isn’t mentioned.

    • @xxxcool2565
      @xxxcool2565 2 роки тому +7

      @@petersinclair3997 then you know none of them will come to Taiwan's aid. I mean how do they even convince their parliament and electorate to send its own troops to defend a place they don't acknowledge in the first place? Sounds dumb af, right? Opposition will have a field day. For e.g. Imagine if Biden and democrats proposed to send american troops to defend Taiwan. Farking Republicans will have a field day shooting down the proposal and Biden.

    • @xxxcool2565
      @xxxcool2565 2 роки тому +4

      @Damian Kyle republicans will object for objection sake.

    • @beatlejuice7755
      @beatlejuice7755 2 роки тому +14

      The US only wants oil and business in China. They don't care about Democracy.

  • @iamcoober
    @iamcoober 2 роки тому +10

    The reason for aggression is never important, because the aggressor always finds the reason

  • @joey3291
    @joey3291 Рік тому

    "Recognize" and "acknowledge" are similar in meaning, but there are some subtle differences between the two terms.
    To "recognize" something means to identify it or to be aware of its existence. It can also refer to giving credit or praise to someone for their achievements or accomplishments.
    To "acknowledge" something means to admit or accept its existence, often by making a statement or gesture of recognition. It can also refer to expressing gratitude or appreciation for something.
    So while they both involve acknowledging the existence of something, "recognize" often focuses on identifying or giving credit, while "acknowledge" often involves accepting or expressing gratitude.

  • @user-xh1em5bh4n
    @user-xh1em5bh4n 2 роки тому +242

    USA : Taiwan is a country
    Also USA : We don’t acknowledge Taiwan as an independent country officially

    • @marshallgoggins5450
      @marshallgoggins5450 2 роки тому +11

      and Taiwan: Our undying loyalty will serve US to the end of the time.

    • @user-ze9me9bn8d
      @user-ze9me9bn8d 2 роки тому +7

      你問台灣人香港人新加坡人回答一定是本地不會加上中國畢竟地緣政治關係每個地方民情會不同,但你問他們自己是不是中華民族百分百認同當你查詢中華航空或者中國信託其實都是台灣的公司但語言上的隔閡翻譯到英文就一樣明明普通話概念就是不同詞彙

    • @Brian82406
      @Brian82406 2 роки тому +7

      @@user-ze9me9bn8d 中華民族是個噁心的政治口號, 不會有美國人英國人到處跑去跟人家噁心自己是大不列顛民族。講這種東西在台灣只會被嗆爆而已。

    • @yudao8125
      @yudao8125 2 роки тому +6

      @@Brian82406 你们用的旗子还是民国旗,有什么好扯的

    • @nisstw
      @nisstw 2 роки тому

      @@yudao8125 所以嘞? 你們旗子是打土豪,分田地嗎?? 田誰的,地誰的?? 呵呵呵!!

  • @vennstudios9885
    @vennstudios9885 2 роки тому +933

    in the future
    "Grandpa how did the third world war happened?"
    "Oh sonny it's ALL because of a tweet"
    "Really"

    • @roxylius7550
      @roxylius7550 2 роки тому +17

      The result would be ugly but I don't think america would risk all out nuclear war because of taiwan. Likewise, I don't think China would risk attacking taiwan anyway. Even without US's help, taiwan is still powerful enough to cause serious damage before going down. Just imagine 1 of those modern missiles hitting multi billion dollar skyscrapper in shanghai. It's simply too expensive for modern developed nations to fight each other

    • @Daddy-ko2jn
      @Daddy-ko2jn 2 роки тому +39

      @@roxylius7550 if you lose Taiwan’s massive microchip production that America depends on then we will have no new cars, computers, electronics, military advancements and if China takes Taiwan then they will dictate the price of these chips and control the market.

    • @roxylius7550
      @roxylius7550 2 роки тому +13

      @@Daddy-ko2jn nope, if china tried to take taiwan by force, most of those factories would be turned into rubble from all the fighting. That includes hundres of factories and skyscrappers on mainland as well. it's basic logic

    • @Daddy-ko2jn
      @Daddy-ko2jn 2 роки тому +15

      @@roxylius7550 China has their own semiconductor microchip manufacturing facilities spread out through the county so unless you take out every single one of those then yes they would most likely be the leading market producer, Taiwan already produces about half of the entire worlds output on semiconductor microchips. And The U.S government literally thought up the idea of Nuking Beijing and Shanghai over fears of China trying to attack and take Taiwan in the late 1950s, 1958 I think. But sadly I think our new administration would be to cowardice and weak to stand up to China

    • @roxylius7550
      @roxylius7550 2 роки тому +4

      @@Daddy-ko2jn lol, do you get org45m from wanting to go to war or something? What's up with the obsession?

  • @FrankTheUnknown
    @FrankTheUnknown Рік тому +2

    The fact that a year later the us is saying “Oh Taiwan isn’t separate from China but we’re still gonna defend it militarily.” As if we need that

  • @basedandbiasedkakampink
    @basedandbiasedkakampink 2 роки тому +26

    Imagine being so fragile a flag makes you wanna declare war lmao
    Edit : I'm Chinese and my grandparents came straight from mainland China intending to escape communism, No I am not racist, No I am not in America

    • @pugga__2609
      @pugga__2609 2 роки тому +5

      -1300000 social crédits

    • @MrGadu95
      @MrGadu95 2 роки тому +4

      Support for Taiwan from Germany!! 🇩🇪🇹🇼

    • @benghaziwarrior3687
      @benghaziwarrior3687 2 роки тому +1

      Supporting China from America 🇺🇸🇨🇳

    • @real_dddf
      @real_dddf 2 роки тому

      @Heizeinburg Support FLQ from China!

  • @EvanQiu
    @EvanQiu 2 роки тому +731

    I'm a Taiwanese born in the States, studying university in Hong Kong, and had been to Mainland China so many times, and I absolutely approve this video.

    • @No-day-off
      @No-day-off 2 роки тому +39

      I mean. For me, politics are so far away and we can’t do nothing. I just wanna make friends without boarders and politics.

    • @EvanQiu
      @EvanQiu 2 роки тому +13

      FYI, units in the black tall residential building on the left boundary at 12:08 were recently bought at the price tag of 14M USD, with floor spaces of approximately 5250 sqft.

    • @joemammon6149
      @joemammon6149 2 роки тому +4

      Do they have General Tao chicken over there or is that only in the West like chop suey?

    • @superchatoalien4905
      @superchatoalien4905 2 роки тому +7

      台日友好!!

    • @cybersentient4758
      @cybersentient4758 2 роки тому +10

      Mr Worldwide

  • @meMajorLazor
    @meMajorLazor 2 роки тому +113

    USA: *Sorry democracy is currently out of stock*

    • @mt8956
      @mt8956 2 роки тому +15

      RIP
      Afghanistan

    • @hewhohasnoidentity4377
      @hewhohasnoidentity4377 2 роки тому +6

      We left all of our Democracy seeds in Iraq ll

    • @andrewjgrimm
      @andrewjgrimm 2 роки тому +5

      Must have been because of panic buying.

    • @TheMusicalFruit
      @TheMusicalFruit 2 роки тому +23

      USA: Please call back if you discover oil in your country.

    • @CountDraccula
      @CountDraccula 2 роки тому +5

      The US is not a Democracy it is a Republic.

  • @claudehuang5626
    @claudehuang5626 2 роки тому +6

    Great video with reasonable arguments. But I just wanna point out that '承认' is in fact the accurate translation of 'acknowledge'. You can verify this with google translate. On the other hand, we don't have an accurate translation for 'recognize' because it has multiple meanings that cannot be mapped to a single Chinese word. In terms of English, my understanding is that 'recognize' has a bit of meaning of 'think' ('认为'). That's why you said using a Chinese word closer to 'recognise' would be an exploited translation. There isn't a single Chinese word that can capture this subtle difference tho. Since 'recognize' is still closer to 'acknowledge' than 'think', we tend to also translate 'recognize' to '承认' if it is used in this context. So I don't think the CCP is exploiting the translation here.

    • @yopyop3241
      @yopyop3241 2 роки тому

      Nah. It's a document written in English by the American side. The Americans get to decide what the words mean, not the people who translated it into Chinese. And besides, who cares? It's from a Communique, not from any sort of a signed and confirmed treaty. That means it was only a moment in time, one almost 50 years in the past, not something binding that either side promised to uphold in perpetuity.

    • @claudehuang5626
      @claudehuang5626 2 роки тому +6

      ​@@yopyop3241 Maybe I didn't express quite well. My point is that the translation made by CCP is linguistically unbiased no matter what the Americans mean by that word. And yea I do agree with you that no one cares about the real meaning since it's made ambiguous on purpose in a document that has no legal effect lol.

    • @markmark3315
      @markmark3315 2 роки тому

      @@yopyop3241 It's a Communiqués but on both sides. On the Chinese side the Chinese gets to decide what the words mean, and they were not exploiting the translation. Surely a Communiqués binds no legal effect with any party, but the information sent out is clear: the American's position on Taiwan is ambiguous now (in 1972) compared to whatever it was previous. Time can change and so is a country 's political stands, and U.S. can change it's position any time it wants, but that would need something equal or more important than a Communiqués. We have not seen anything on that regard yet.

  • @markgreiser464
    @markgreiser464 2 роки тому +2

    You Title is misleading.

  • @mugy9049
    @mugy9049 2 роки тому +114

    Sometimes I click on this type of videos and pause at the start just to read the amazing fights in the comment sections

  • @sundalongpatpat
    @sundalongpatpat 2 роки тому +127

    Is Taiwan a country or not?
    USA: Of course

    • @madden8021
      @madden8021 2 роки тому +4

      Is Taiwan a country or not?
      USA: Well, Uhh, Maybe? Idk? I have nuclear weapons aimed at me from the Chinese mainland so I can't chose my own foreign policy anymore.

    • @FynnRosenzweig
      @FynnRosenzweig 2 роки тому +11

      @@madden8021 China cant do anything to USA lmao, USA doesn't want Taiwan to be independent because if so they cant sell weapons to them anymore. its all about money.

    • @FynnRosenzweig
      @FynnRosenzweig 2 роки тому +9

      @Lianhua Xin exactly. same for middle east. they just want people there to fight 24/7.

    • @freeskier64
      @freeskier64 2 роки тому +5

      @@FynnRosenzweig nah, it’s not that simple.Taiwan is the last trump card for US to contain China. A hidden trump card is better than a used trump card. Also god knows what will happen if this card is played poorly. Granting Taiwan independence will certainly led to war, and put US in a dilemma. People who incite or support Taiwan to gain independence have no idea of what they are doing. They are risking their lives , their families’ lives and most lives on earth for something that doesn’t benefit them. It is either their unification or their war, bystanders should just keep their mouth shut and mind their own business.

    • @FynnRosenzweig
      @FynnRosenzweig 2 роки тому

      @@freeskier64 I see.....

  • @user-og9nl5mt1b
    @user-og9nl5mt1b 2 роки тому

    Is this the guy baki is from?

  • @jiajungeorgemei7674
    @jiajungeorgemei7674 2 роки тому +1

    “周德雖衰,天命未改,鼎之輕重,未可問也”; this quote from "Zuozhuan" is suitable for describing KMT's condition facing both external threat from mainland and DPP's act of taking power inside.

  • @phatkid6811
    @phatkid6811 2 роки тому +35

    USA: "We support One China Policy"
    Narrator: "Where is the Capital - Beijing or Taipei?
    USA: (Wink)

    • @paulricky9340
      @paulricky9340 2 роки тому

      Taipei is able to realise ONE CHINA?

    • @JNJNRobin1337
      @JNJNRobin1337 2 роки тому

      Whats The US Capital

    • @oogdhugee_3072
      @oogdhugee_3072 2 роки тому

      I support 1-China-PRC policy, i also support independent China-ROC policy.
      China-PRC is one De Jure
      China-ROC is one De facto
      I support Two China-1 policies.
      Just as there are Two Americas USA and Latin .

  • @jinzhanghsu4253
    @jinzhanghsu4253 2 роки тому +1339

    As a Taiwanese, I think this is a really well made video. It clarifies many things that some Taiwanese dont even seems to recognize😂 the comments here are also far more peaceful then those made by Taiwanese UA-cam channels

    • @G-Mastah-Fash
      @G-Mastah-Fash 2 роки тому +131

      You guys do have a good reason to be riled up and aggressive, you're basically in as much danger as Poland in 1938.

    • @user-gb2yb8nb7d
      @user-gb2yb8nb7d 2 роки тому +95

      Hahaha I am from Mainland China. Yes I agree non-biased and non aggressive comments are always appreciated.

    • @DC-bf4fz
      @DC-bf4fz 2 роки тому +121

      @@G-Mastah-Fash Are you saying they should go in to a war? You the not the one gonna suffer so you wouldn’t care, would you? Besides, Taiwan’s situation is nothing like where Poland was. It started from a civil war while in Poland’s case it’s a complete invasion. Learn some history before posting irresponsible BS.

    • @kei2142
      @kei2142 2 роки тому +11

      Let's bring in some 50 cents

    • @dillontuan121
      @dillontuan121 2 роки тому +4

      We are survived from to be careless about something seems need to be really care. Which means 认真你就输了.

  • @user-rf4kj1pl3b
    @user-rf4kj1pl3b 2 роки тому +52

    As a fellow Taiwanese, I really appreciate everyone watching this. Thanks for taking some of your time to understand our situation, no matter what you think.😊

    • @elnorton7113
      @elnorton7113 2 роки тому +1

      Hello, my 🐕

    • @coldbattery
      @coldbattery 2 роки тому +1

      understand for what?
      that there's an island to protect America before war?

    • @silvershark6403
      @silvershark6403 2 роки тому +3

      Personally, I support Taiwanese independence. No one should be under the thumb of someone else, no matter what. Best of luck, and I hope my stupid-ass government doesn't turn a blind eye.

    • @Allan-zu4is
      @Allan-zu4is 2 роки тому +4

      @@silvershark6403 Can a state legally secede from the union? Oh wait, there was a civil war

    • @henryshen1156
      @henryshen1156 2 роки тому +13

      I am from mainland China. But I support whatever people from Taiwan choose. But I wish someday, the social and political system in Taiwan CAN BE applied to Mainland China. CCP does not represent China.

  • @NewAmericanIn2007
    @NewAmericanIn2007 Рік тому +1

    Very good job on this. Although this is educational for the general public, these facts are obvious to the elites in politics and media, but many people chose to pretend not to know the facts, for political purposes.

  • @matt9887
    @matt9887 2 роки тому +451

    The term “democracy” is being used so loosely these days. Just because you can cast your vote once in every few years, does not grant it democracy by default.

    • @script_na
      @script_na 2 роки тому +69

      It actually means you can purchase a gun pretty conveniently and shoot whoever you want.

    • @LarryWater
      @LarryWater 2 роки тому +17

      @@script_na That sounds like a dictatorship.

    • @jameshdr5583
      @jameshdr5583 2 роки тому +68

      @@LarryWater that’s US guns policy...

    • @TheSilverazo
      @TheSilverazo 2 роки тому +12

      Certainly better than having a 100 year dictatorship

    • @LarryWater
      @LarryWater 2 роки тому +23

      To me, guns are partly important to democracy. If the US didn’t have guns, they wouldn’t be able to overthrow King George’s rule over the colonies.

  • @bomber001
    @bomber001 2 роки тому +29

    The PolyMatter cycle:
    Video about China
    Video about China
    Video about China
    Other video
    Video about Singapore
    Video about Singapore
    rinse and repeat

    • @Legion849
      @Legion849 2 роки тому +1

      Not yet still waiting for part 5 of China's reckoning.

    • @CyanTeamProductions
      @CyanTeamProductions 2 роки тому +5

      @@Legion849 I think the last part will be the collapse of the US.

    • @lmcguiness5476
      @lmcguiness5476 2 роки тому

      @@CyanTeamProductions we will never collapse. We'll outlive you and your country

    • @CyanTeamProductions
      @CyanTeamProductions 2 роки тому +3

      @@lmcguiness5476 I am from the United States too lmao. I choose not to lie to myself.

    • @lmcguiness5476
      @lmcguiness5476 2 роки тому

      @@CyanTeamProductions oh really? You're one of those self guilt people!

  • @user-yo7fx2xn8m
    @user-yo7fx2xn8m Рік тому +1

    Korea , Japan , Singapore, ……your voice against 100
    Others save me

  • @gr8potatosaurusofthunderfart
    @gr8potatosaurusofthunderfart 2 роки тому +1

    The next time someone calls me out on being indecisive, I'll send them this video...

  • @specialted1
    @specialted1 2 роки тому +22

    A diplomat who says “yes” means “maybe”, a diplomat who says “maybe” means “no”, and a diplomat who says “no” is not a diplomat!

    • @mountainous_port
      @mountainous_port 2 роки тому

      Haha yeah

    • @mobiuscoreindustries
      @mobiuscoreindustries 2 роки тому

      Extremely accurate... I mean when every single thing you say will trigger a tantrum in at least someone, honesty becomes a really rare premium.

  • @user-we3eg9vs8z
    @user-we3eg9vs8z 2 роки тому +133

    "...mutually enforced facade of resolution"
    I like that.

  • @fishchang1522
    @fishchang1522 2 роки тому

    What difference between support and refuse?

  • @rick25810
    @rick25810 2 роки тому

    The clip at 6:36 confused me......
    No one is legally allowed to film the voting process, wondering where the clip comes from.

  • @MY-zj8pb
    @MY-zj8pb 2 роки тому +68

    Is taiwan a country
    America: *SWEATING*
    China: *gives it a look*
    America: "next question thanks"

    • @jhunemallare2457
      @jhunemallare2457 2 роки тому +1

      Taiwan is an independent democratic country, a friend of US
      TAIWAN’s monitors Beijing it’s capital

    • @krossfield9139
      @krossfield9139 2 роки тому

      @@jhunemallare2457 Good wish~😉

  • @Checkmate1138
    @Checkmate1138 2 роки тому +153

    "Does Taiwan exist!?!?"
    Obi-Wan: "From a certain point of view..."

    • @RazSkull673
      @RazSkull673 2 роки тому +6

      The real question is, does Taiwan have the high ground?

    • @Anthony305ttt
      @Anthony305ttt 2 роки тому +3

      @@RazSkull673 yep! we have lots of mountains and canyons in this small island nation.

    • @aratirao9007
      @aratirao9007 2 роки тому

      @@Anthony305ttt 🔹SERCH ADITYA RATHORE, HE ALSO MAKES INFORMATIVE CONTENT LIKE POLYMATTER

    • @alohacnnew
      @alohacnnew 2 роки тому +1

      @Liang in USA美國亮 Just open your eyes. It's not TAIWAN passport. It's Republic of China passport.

    • @docjaji5071
      @docjaji5071 2 роки тому

      @Liang in USA美國亮 ever heard of one country, two systems? If Taiwan wants to point their guns at us, the country’s unification must be issued, peacefully. Westerners can back off.

  • @ziyoulu8891
    @ziyoulu8891 2 роки тому

    ...but acknowledge in Chinese translation is 承认(recognize, confirm or cognition in noun). You can find it in google translate.

  • @digitalformosan9330
    @digitalformosan9330 Рік тому +1

    You should make a video what the status quo actually is. It’s simply a continuous of the civil war which government may represent China until total elimination of the other site.

  • @Thebester3
    @Thebester3 2 роки тому +230

    I have lived in Taiwan 4 years and it is a beautiful place
    Looking at those videos just bring back memories

    • @ryanp8925
      @ryanp8925 2 роки тому +47

      I also lived Taiwan but before that I lived in China. The move was absolutely wonderful. I now understand why China is so jealous of Taiwan. Mao literally wiped China out, even their language is the Walmart version of the traditional Chinese characters Taiwan uses.

    • @vintnerw1087
      @vintnerw1087 2 роки тому +18

      @@ryanp8925 Jealous of Taiwan? As a Chinese I would have wholeheartedly agreed with you 30 years ago, dreamed of immigrating to a western country 20 years ago, and felt neutral about your statement 10 years ago. But now, I can only consider what you said funny. My life in China is so much more comfortable than any where I have ever been, and oh boi I've been to places.
      Chinese. Are. Now. Rich. lol. Suck on that.

    • @eisenhowerlau1153
      @eisenhowerlau1153 2 роки тому +10

      @@ryanp8925 Taiwan only let us feel amusing instead of jealous. Ahhhhh.

    • @ryanp8925
      @ryanp8925 2 роки тому +37

      @@vintnerw1087 Chinese are now rich? HAHAHAHA. Is that a new thing in the past 2 years because as of 2 years ago China does not even supply tissue or soap in public bathrooms. I guess that is why people still poop in public. HAHAHAHAHA @ Chinese being rich. Suck on that.

    • @ryanp8925
      @ryanp8925 2 роки тому +31

      @@eisenhowerlau1153 How Ironic is that statement about being amused. I mean when we talk about these kind of things both myself and my Taiwanese friends just laugh at the toxic land of China and how all the people are basically walking robots. Now that is both sad and amusing.

  • @jjc1347
    @jjc1347 2 роки тому +577

    It pretty much shows how the US is run by lawyers.

    • @dirtypure2023
      @dirtypure2023 2 роки тому +39

      It's far worse than that, but I think you have the gist of it.

    • @dunnowy123
      @dunnowy123 2 роки тому +100

      Well...yeah. why wouldn't that be the case? Lawyers are the most likely to understand law and policy. That's the case in every country that isn't a dictatorship. Naturally lawyers will gravitate towards government.

    • @PhysicsGamer
      @PhysicsGamer 2 роки тому +34

      Yes, rule of law tends to work out better in the long run than the alternative.

    • @ooooneeee
      @ooooneeee 2 роки тому +11

      Accurate, most politicians are lawyers.

    • @whoisjoe5610
      @whoisjoe5610 2 роки тому +5

      Here we fucking go with JQ for god's sake

  • @MrJdm119
    @MrJdm119 2 роки тому +2

    The fact the fates of nations can come down to a twitter post shows how dystopian and absurd our society is 🤦🏽‍♂️

  • @considerthis7712
    @considerthis7712 2 роки тому +1

    11 May 2022. Moving forward , US State Dept website has removed US recognises Taiwan is part of China!

  • @hugonongbri8100
    @hugonongbri8100 2 роки тому +82

    Media: Whats your stance on Taiwan ?
    US govt: _And what is a Taiwan ???_

  • @jeremydien5744
    @jeremydien5744 2 роки тому +150

    5:27 I was pretty astonished by the name "Dominion of Canada" as it is so rarely used.

    • @reillywalker195
      @reillywalker195 2 роки тому +11

      It's also obsolete, at least since 1982.

    • @leojei
      @leojei 2 роки тому +5

      The name "Dominion of Canada" simply tells you how long ago that policy was drafted.

    • @awesomemantm2000
      @awesomemantm2000 2 роки тому +1

      The Kingdom of Canada

    • @NoVisionGuy
      @NoVisionGuy 2 роки тому +3

      @@leojei also Canada being a domain of UK

    • @georgevirtus
      @georgevirtus 2 роки тому +6

      It was a Dominion along with South Africa, Australia, New Zealand etc. Meaning it had its own government but the UK Parliament handles foreign affairs.
      There were the normal colonies but there were special some places that were classified as Protectorates (Palestine/Israel, Iraq, Syria, Jordan) which is protected by Britain. The British Raj (India, Bangladesh, Pakistan and Myanmar) was the Crown jewel of the Empire.

  • @kanlu5199
    @kanlu5199 2 роки тому +1

    Words are powerless when there is no gun to support it

  • @ariccy
    @ariccy Рік тому +2

    This video truly described the political circumstance of Taiwan most accurately and precisely. It is really difficult for people outside to understand how and why Taiwanese says they prefer independence while maintaining the status quo, other than just go ahead to change the ROC constitution.

  • @IIIUMlNATI
    @IIIUMlNATI 2 роки тому +223

    When flyovers are normalized though... thats an issue.

    • @tomxiao1
      @tomxiao1 2 роки тому +1

      What flyover lol

    • @dr.woozie7500
      @dr.woozie7500 2 роки тому +38

      The PRC Air Force doesn’t actually fly OVER Taiwan. They fly into the airspace in the Taiwan strait which is the ocean. Don’t be misleading.

    • @kaixuanjaw3173
      @kaixuanjaw3173 2 роки тому +17

      Lol Taiwan claim the airspace of shanghai as theirs. There is no way China is going to care what Taiwan define as "their airspace"

    • @ArawnOfAnnwn
      @ArawnOfAnnwn 2 роки тому +12

      The flyovers are typically done in response to some American action or the other. They've become more frequent since 2016, when Trump stepped up pressure on China. It isn't really directed at the Taiwanese so much as it is to America.

    • @PolarTw
      @PolarTw 2 роки тому +6

      @@dr.woozie7500 they also dont fly into AIRSPACE of Taiwan often. they fly into ADIZ which is even further out than airspace. Taiwanese airspace are rarely violated and if so, jets and missles are locked on to expel immediately.

  • @ComedyJakob
    @ComedyJakob 2 роки тому +90

    The US and China have very successfully maintained detente for 50 years.

    • @wlot28
      @wlot28 2 роки тому +22

      Globalism is much more profitable than war nowadays

    • @bigbeartanner
      @bigbeartanner 2 роки тому

      @@wlot28 well China has been in a different kinds war with the rest of the world.

    • @hellosirhowcaniscamyoutoda8105
      @hellosirhowcaniscamyoutoda8105 2 роки тому +2

      @Done Busy It's a good thing that happened otherwise pro demoncrazy cults might have overthrew the ccp

    • @hellosirhowcaniscamyoutoda8105
      @hellosirhowcaniscamyoutoda8105 2 роки тому +4

      @Done Busy Most Chinese support the ccp like it or not.

    • @sxli3340
      @sxli3340 2 роки тому

      Taiwanese cjhina

  • @Mr.Nichan
    @Mr.Nichan 2 роки тому

    5:27 Now you've made me feel like we need to go word-for-word through the Hebrew and Spanish versions of these texts.

  • @freeman2take
    @freeman2take 9 місяців тому +1

    I believe US wants some of TW's unique resource (TSMC/Mask during COVID/other important tech brands), yet don't want to upset the economic benefit with China also. US wants to benefit from both ends that's why the ambiguity. This is a similar position UN took because China had much more resource/cheaper labor to exploit by UN members during their earlier days as a developing country. Money talks, doesn't matter what international body. US also benefits greatly from 'allowing Taiwan to defend themselves' by selling older gen weapons at a premium.