He was trying to get a mistrial to try him again because he saw his star witness got demolished on the stand. That case blew up for binger so he was literally trying to get a mistrial to try him again. If it was up to binger Kyle would be in prison for life.
Well, its up to the jury and the jury doesn't see when the judge yells at him so they could still win the case. It was fatal to their case in this instance because they didn't have ant evidence
Yeah at first I thought he was defending him, by making clear that Kyle really knew when to use his gun, while also subliminally painting a bad image of the protestors in the Jury's mind.
I think he feels a little braver than normal since the entire country is watching and he knows the Judge won't just call for a mistrial being the case is as high-profile as it is, so he's willing to take some extra chances.
Total prosecutorial misconduct. Every first year law student knows you can’t imply silence is an admission of guilt. And I went to law school 50 years ago.
@@onthetongue silence on a topic in court (which is what ken was talking about) is not an admission of guilt. the context is important when reading comments.
Prosecutors have been operating under the understanding that the people don’t have rights and it’s rare to get a judge to slap them down. But this judge has yet to slap them down by throwing the whole case out the window. Prosecutors know how to game the system and take the warning from the judge but still inserted the ideas he pull off during the cross in this case. This kid shoulda sat on the side lines and let it play out without having to take the standing. Sadly, when you are young, you wanna be truthful and for coming, it’s youths greatests down fall. Wanting to be honest and truthful. He seems like a good kid but easily misguided and maybe a bit slow at the time. He life will never be the same.
“Rarely do we find men who willingly engage in hard, solid thinking. There is an almost universal quest for easy answers and half-baked solutions. Nothing pains some people more than having to think.”
I'm beginning to be a big supporter of courtroom video proceedings being made public. The educational value for law students, and active atorneys seems to be well worth it, and I would think that it could help in cases of mistrial and appeal.
True... but you have to think about the privacy of those involved, especially the innocent. I would never want a court case about me to be studied in a classroom.
@@3NewDay true but at the same time it exonerates the innocent. There are plenty of cases where someone isn’t charged but initial biases are only cemented by their assumptions without seeing why some was or was not charged.
Should be a step further, ALL politics and law should be on 24/7 livestream for taxpayers to see all day long as long as they are in elected or appointed office.
@@3NewDay Court records are public information regardless, unless it's a closed-doors trial. There's no further harm to the privacy of those involved than what is already accepted today.
If you watch louder with crowder he did a live streaming of the opening statement and he joked the defense should say I agree with what most of the defense says
His lawyer has been asleep the entire trial, endless missed opportunities to object, and they completely screwed up gun ownerships laws that have been added as a lesser charge.
To be fair his lawyer are doing so good they recruited the judge as one of them. This one lawyer has to walk through the weeds just to ask a question and he has to use verbiage that isn’t insensitive to the kid
Defense seems to learn what the word objection means and use it. When the prosecutor was lying shaking his head no isn't going to cut it. Object, point out the prosecutor is lying. Impeach the prosecutor's credibility as much as possible.
@@bicameralmind6785 , Or the prosecutor knows Kyle isn't guilty of murder, but they had to charge him because of politics and the woke mob. He's literally doing the defense's job for them. ****edit**** I've been blocked from commenting by @Diane because she a Google GESTAPO, paid shill who hates the truth. Kyle was being chased by three men wielding weapons and threatening to kill him. Clear cut case of self defense. Censorship is only needed when one is trying to hide truth. We call this cheating. If you thought your imposed time out would shut me up, You've got another think coming. I'll be back to destroy you in about 6 hours, dear💩ing 🧱s of fear. ******End of edit*****
Of what caliber?? Open and shut self defense? The case is a joke and is just being used as entertainment and a tool for more division amungst the people of this country lmfao. People need to stop drinking the coolaid.
This prosecutor should be disbarred for misconduct. His behavior is outrageous. He was definitely trying to provoke a mistrial! To question the defendants right to remain silent?!
That's one of the many issues with our system right now. There is almost no recourse for this kind of thing. They are almost untouchable and thus not held accountable.
Yeah and now the jury can consider lesser charges in deliberation cuz this guy knew he blew it. That kind of sucks because he did everything by the book and the state has proven nothing but they’re incompetent
y’all he had no right to b there n feel the need to try n stop ppl from doin so, it might of been wrong, but he obviously provoked them enough to feel the need to want to charge @ him, it clearly states by law that u cant use deadly force period while trying to stop a situation from occurring.. unless u the police
When I’m having a truly terrible day, just before I cry I watch this video and I realize that no matter what I do in my life, I’ll never be as big of a failure as this attorney.🎉
@Paul Bickerson Paul, that may be so, but we also don’t know all the facts. Let’s hope the jury makes an unbias judgement. Evil is a harsh word for someone who killed people in defense who provoked him for having a gun. Just my unbias thoughts. I too was angry with the Jacob shooting.
If ANYONE IS CONFUSED I got you. Propensity Evidence is when you show a person's character or actions in past events is the real reason they did the current crime they are in court for. That basically means they are saying to the court "hey he's lying that he shot people in self defense. He really did it because he's itching to shoot someone, because if you look at what he did in this situation before, that's what he's been dying to do" The judge is saying "hey man i don't think this makes sense and that situation isn't similar enough to this current case to say that ... so you can't bring that argument in court to a jury because it's invalid " The guy brought it to court anyway without asking permission for it
@Teej "but there's a case to be made that he had absolutely no business playing army man" That's your opinion. The case was him killing in self defense had no relation to him defending property. That's why the Judge denied the use of it here. Unless you think you're smarter, more experienced, and knowledgeable than many Lawyers, the Judge and everyone else involved lol. It's not weird, it's actually not relevant at all. It's weird and makes sense to people like you who don't have a brain which is why he tried to bring the point up to the Jury even the Judge told him not to - hoping for people like you in the Jury to get on his side to think it is relevant when it is not relevant. "If he's agreeing that he's not allowed to use that gun to defend property, how did he plan to defend property?" Again he didn't kill someone to defend property, he killed someone because somebody was aggressive and physically chased him verbally shouting intent towards Kyle. You are the exact person the he was looking for lol. "He made clear he wished he could've shot shoplifters in the past" Was the guy he shot a shoplifter? No.
@Teej After finishing the video the Judge literally explains why it's not valid evidence, if you still don't understand after this you're on our own in this world kid lmao
The prosecutors point is a dead end. He says Kyle didn't have a gun and wished he could shoot shoplifters. Well, Kyle DID have a gun this time, and DIDN'T shot anyone committing property crimes. He only shot people trying to aggressively assault him. So this whole argument of his is a dead end. There's a difference between saying and doing. Kyle said it, but given the opportunity to DO it, he chose not too. Argument ended. 🤷♂️
@@jim5379 he’s implying the prosecution should have made the case about him being there in the first place and not about whether it was murder or not. Him wanting to play army man isn’t an opinion, you don’t go travel to another town with a gun to “defend people’s property” he definitely was looking for action.
Kyle RittenRacist should be in a prison cell with Bubba as his cellmate, Hambone as his left neighbor, and Skillet on his right, with each taking turns snuggling in his bunk as butt brothers on a weekly basis.
This guy is insufferable. He asked the same question worded in different ways 54 times over 5 hours this afternoon in an attempt to get Kyle to contradict himself.
@@user-ro9md9wp3j no he didn't. Not one of the questions was about what actually happened. Answer me this.. yes or no only. Do you still beat your wife and smoke crack
"Is one plus one really two? How about four minus two? Sixteen divided by eight? Are you sure? well then what is twelve divided by three divided by two? How about the square root of four? Cube root of eight? I'm going to keep giving you equations until you trip up and give me the wrong answer different from two."
I am 90% confident that at 5:15 when the judge says "and it gives the...well I'll leave it at that", he was going to say "it gives the impression that you're deliberately acting in a manner that forces a mistrial", or something to that effect
I cannot believe this prosecutor tried to use Kyle’s right to remain silent against him. This sneaky way of getting these questions in is unbelievable! I’m so happy the judge is so on the ball!! Simply having a gun on you is NOT deadly force, it’s simply being armed.
@@sskies4972 you believe wrong. You can most certainly plead the 5th under oath. That's not what happened here. A lawyer can't insinuate someone is guilty in front of a jury when someone didn't talk to the police. Noone should talk to police without an attorney
He's still going through all of the situations where you are not allowed to use deadly force still to this day. I believe the latest ones include "You'd agree with me, that you can't use deadly force to stop someone from putting ketchup on hotdogs, correct?" and "You'd agree with me, that you can't use deadly force to stop someone from singing baby shark, correct?"
Without commenting on guilt or innocence, I am encouraged that the Judge in this matter is protecting the concept of innocent until proven guilty. It should be the State's burden and it should be hard. That is the whole idea behind our justice system.
@@nosuchthing8 Why are you assuming that? The Judge is just doing his job and frankly the prosecution has shown only that Kyle did defend himself. He never shot someone to stop something from burning when he could have, he only went and stopped the burning. He only shot when he was in danger.
@@nosuchthing8 I don’t even think you came up with insult you intended since being bribed is not a crime. Accepting a bribe, however, would be criminal.
@@paulwblair the judge isn't really on his side. The judge is only furious with Binger because he is being very unprofessional and undertaking bad practises which could be almost illegal on itself (breaking the 5th amendment for example)
@@paulwblair prove the judge is a "right wing nut" then. And don't use the phone ring tone as a reason because its just a song, doesn't mean anything else but what his personal taste in ringtones is.
Thomas Binger is the type of lawyer who gets innocent people in trouble because he's doing anything to win, and attempting every angle that exists to support his case - regardless of the facts. Horrendous example of the worst of law! ☠
I only watched breaking bad and this kept reminding me of that I don’t even remember why at this point dude really seems like an actor it’s so over the top
Honestly, no matter if you think hes guilty or innocent, we all gotta agree that the trial is a complete joke. This'll be used as a example for what NOT to do during a case.
@@trawmmwart8149 innocent until proven guilty. Plus you can see the trials on UA-cam. This whole thing is a circus and you're one of the clowns who choose to participate
The prosecutor has made so many mistakes, they would love a mistrial so they could have a do-over. Notice the defense said 'with predjudice' meaning they cannot retry him on the same offences.
@@MoejiiOsmanTV you obviously do not know how the judicial system works honey , do some research before opening your mouth about things you have no knowledge of ..
@@rreagan007 in most cases yes its good for the defense but the prosecution basically will get a "do over" i dunno how alot of u folks think Rittenhouse is gonna walk Scott free, he for sure will be found guilty of several of the firearm charges since he was underage and couldn't legally obtain them
This lawyer is a good example of the corruption run rampart in our society. He was trying to add context to things already said and confirmed in attempts to draw conclusions and lead the jury.
What were the main arguments as to why Kyle Rittenhouse should not have used deadly force on others who were attempting to use deadly or very harmful force on him? How this was not deemed pure self defense? What did prosecutors want as punishment?
and the prosecution dared question his constitutional rights to do so... and they are trying to call the judge biased for defending the young mans rights
@Only2GenderKennder commonly used pic I've seen other users with, but I do comment on a lot of political stuff, music, and religious stuff? Maybe our interests overlap lol
Yeah. I don't really know if what he did was illegal assault or self defense, it's so confusing. But this prosecutor SUCKED, and that's probably one of the reasons why Kyle got acquitted. This whole thing looks like a complete political rabbit hole, but I'm just gonna take the not guilty and roll with it and assume he's not guilty.
@@richardcarter8751 just watch all the videos of the incident. It’s blatant self defense. Rittenhouse even went out of his way to disengage. If he was truly out for blood there would have been more bodies in the dirt
@@talltale9760 that's what I'm thinking. I don't know all the facts, but if he really only shot when he felt he was truly in danger, then he deserves to walk free imo. I don't know why people are obsessed with this case tbh.
Very likely. At this point the prosecutor may be hoping for a mistrial without prejudice so can fix all the mistakes they’ve made and take this to trial again.
What were the main arguments as to why Kyle Rittenhouse should not have used deadly force on others who were attempting to use deadly or very harmful force on him? How this was not deemed pure self defense? What did prosecutors want as punishment?
@@marybailey7881 The people he shot were all unarmed; he was using a gun illegally purchased for him (the person who bought the gun was convicted, but the judge here wouldn't allow that factor in this trial); and Kyle took the law into his own hands by being in a place of his own free will and seeking danger. No one asked him to be there, and he wasn't required to be there. He should have not been charged with murder, but with reckless homicide or manslaughter, along with reckless endangerment, public menacing, and use of an illegal weapon.
@@Jordan81577 Yes, and that doesn't change my view of it, because by that point, Rittenhouse had already killed two people. The fact that you refer to him as a "surviving witness" says a lot. He wasn't an "attacker" by any definition, and he's very lucky to be alive.
While two unarmed people died from an illegally obtained gun which the judge didn't rule on till the last minute so it couldn't be appealed and even apologized for.
@@nibcamp3958 they still threatened him so he bad every right to shoot them. If a crowd of people are running at you talking about killing you, you have the right to open fire.
Crazy how often a defendant invokes their right to silence, and yet it still gets brought up in court. Imagine the cases where the judge isn’t wary or unbiased enough to point this out?
Arguing with the judge was a gutsy move. I'm not a lawyer but I'm fully aware of the consequences of doing that. Jeopardizing both their client and reputation is one.
@@alexvanderben9682 When did Wisconsin become the plaintiff of that case, Mr. Smartypants? Or maybe you are mistaking it, "Thomas Binger" isn't a state, hon.
Happens a lot more than you think, the difference is that most prosecutors don't turn around and bring up prohibited "evidence" in court, especially on this level.
@@donovanmorris6080 well that’s not 100% true. The way of the law is innocent until proven guilty so usually judges side with the defendants until there’s enough evidence to prove he/she is guilty
@@TheJack4000111 He's awful, what are you talking about? He attempted to violate constitutional rights, was accused by a witness of attempting to get him to alter his official statement, and nearly had the case thrown out on mistrial without prejudice.
His star witness admitted to being the aggressor and his case was shot from there. He Knew this and was trying to get the mistrial so he could try the case again without that witness. The Judge recognized this and refused to allow it to happen.
@@redneckhippiefreakthe great irony of that moment is he dropped the felony firearms possession and concealment charges against Gage to use him as a witness. So he opted not to charge a felon for illegal possession just to have him destroy the prosecution in return.
What's scary is his bias to win here going beyond the scope of procedure - I hope he's being investigated because this smells like $$$ due to the high-profile nature of the case
@@oceaneuropa1117 LOL did you delete your own comment in shame, snowflake :) funny, considering how incorrect you were in your reply, you should be ashamed, little snowflake :)
His disrespect towards the judge is disgusting. How could he say that this person wished he had his gun is a means to say he’s guilty. That’s inappropriate
"The judge is yelling at me. I'd better correct him on something trivial. Then he'll know I have the power and he'll back down. Whose court does he think this is anyway?"
I don't think this DA believes Judge Bruce Shroeder presides within the court rather than the district attorney. This is horrid. He is going on evidence tried in a public court of social media and corrupt press rather than doing his own homework.
@@jlescoe21 The Prosecutor's conduct is "unethical" at best. Nobody should be able to refer to a defendant's silence as "wrongdoing". Has he ever heard of the Miranda Rights? "You have the right to remain silent......"
@@rawrbro69 I'm not saying I trust all Republicans as there are some I don't think are very moral at all but Its difficult to see any democrats with any morals or even common sense
No matter the jury can't forget it. The judge in all his ruling have shown bias for the defendant. The prosecuter put the wrong charges on the kid. The only thing they can hope for is illegal use and possession of a deadly weapon.
Prosecutors are the worst... Imagine having a profession where you only "win" if you ruin somebody's life, even if that person is innocent. It shouldn't be a win or lose system.
It happens at 4:04- for all that is only seeing this clip as context, judge Schroeder is very calm and nice throughout the whole trial with light hearted humor and remaining neutral at all times. He is incredibly professional so for those watching, please dont think this judge has ego, If watching the whole trial, you'd realize this is one of the best judges on this landmark case. This prosecutor has stepped over the prosecutorial misconduct line many many times in this trial. At this point hes already done it many times which is why judge is angry. With such an expensive case, any intention / precedence for mistrial , the judge , jury , tax payers should be upset that he would act so reckless to assume "open door' rule.
What were the main arguments as to why Kyle Rittenhouse should not have used deadly force on others who were attempting to use deadly or very harmful force on him? How this was not deemed pure self defense? What did prosecutors want as punishment?
wait, I was still siding with the judge on the idea that nothing could be brought in, but is there in fact a rule that you could open the door to something, and bring it in, even after the judge had ruled on it? Even then, it seems like a stretch in this situation, even though im pretty sure the judge already had mistrial with prejudice in his back pocket for a hung jury/guilty verdict.
I have literally never seen a prosecutor question a defendant's right to remain silent, or imply the exorcision of that right to mean something conclusive to their argument. I've never seen it because doing so is such a clear violation of constitutional law, that every lawyer knows not to even try it. It's literally among the things you'll learn about in your first year studying law. It's mind-boggling to me that he did this. Personal theory is that he was trying to force a mistrial, so they could try again and not let in their star witness who admitted to being the aggressive initiator
@@skepticalextraterrestrial2971 From what I see in Salinas v. Texas they were not read their Miranda rights when they chose to stay silent for certain questions, that allowed their silence to be questioned by the prosecution, nothing like the current video where a prosecutor questions a defendants silence POST arrest after they are read their Miranda rights.
What were the main arguments as to why Kyle Rittenhouse should not have used deadly force on others who were attempting to use deadly or very harmful force on him? How this was not deemed pure self defense? What did prosecutors want as punishment?
@@jalamanta Yeah, during our investigations portion they talked about post arrest silence and never assuming “they have something to hide.” Which then they showed examples of both, Binger was one of them.
Even then the prosecution would argue that he wouldn't have the right to shoot back because of supposed reckless endangerment or some other such nonsense like they already tried to submit yesterday.
@@colonelsmith7757 remember Gage had a small gun and Kyle had a big gun. Even though the .40 glock Gage had is a larger and technically more deadlier round the .223 AR-15 Kyle had
@@xcf5587 I could tell after 4 hours of watching the video footage, within a day or two, multiple videos that it was self defense, the fact they chose to fight on 1st degree was absurd from the beginning, I'm not really surprised that their lawyers suck and have to grasp straws
There are some prosecutors that are competent, understand the law, and pursue charges based on definition and evidence available, there are also some not as great, but far below the "not as great" crowd, is the one in the video. I don't know who had the idea to press charges, but if you're pressing charges in a case like this, you better have everything squared away and play by the rules.
Regardles of where you stand on whether you think Kyle is innocent or guilty, we can all agree that the prosecutor was an absolute disgrace. Everything he did seemed manipulative and dishonest, even when the facts seemed on his side. He literally gave the defense the win on a silver platter.
The prosecutor was so desperate with this case and it shows. Who in their right mind tries to imply that silence is an admission of guilt in court? He was aiming for a mistrial it's painfully obvious.
That Prosecutor is the greatest gift a defendant could ever have.
His sidekick gets flagged at buffets
A penis?
@@MrStukaju87d lmfao nice 😂
Unless they’re now trying to get a mistrial without prejudice..
Prosecutor is paid by the state. Defense raised MILLIONS of dollars. Alec Baldwin and Travis Scott both killed people this month. No charges even.
I didn't go to law school and I know you can't insinuate that a defendant remaining silent is a sign of guilt.
He knew it too and he didn’t care…he was trying to get away with what ever he could
You can't talk over people in a courtroom lmao, you probably should take law schoo
I think he knew he destroyed his case and wanted a mistrial
Binger knew that too. He was making a speech for the cameras. He was looking to get elected some day.
He was trying to get a mistrial to try him again because he saw his star witness got demolished on the stand. That case blew up for binger so he was literally trying to get a mistrial to try him again. If it was up to binger Kyle would be in prison for life.
"You'd agree that agreeing would be an agreement, correct?"
I think so
Correct
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Uhh yes?
Bingo
When a judge says “DONT GET BRAZEN WITH ME!” You lost your case bro.
false you could easily still win
@@evanfinch4987 nah
Well, its up to the jury and the jury doesn't see when the judge yells at him so they could still win the case. It was fatal to their case in this instance because they didn't have ant evidence
@@jill61421 Its up to the Jury to convince the JUDGE he is innocent. They do not themselves make someone guilty/not guilty.
This judge has issues
Man, this prosecutor was the best defense atorney for Kyle
That's great sarcasm! LOL I agree!
@@guitarttimman i mean its facts though
Yeah at first I thought he was defending him, by making clear that Kyle really knew when to use his gun, while also subliminally painting a bad image of the protestors in the Jury's mind.
@Sid- best attorney for Kyle. Judge Schroeder. Gave him a shutout .
Seriously. He did a terrible job.
I have NEVER seen an attorney talk to a judge like this. Wow.
It's like a comedy sketch of 'the scummy prosecutor', because no actual drama would write one that way.
He’s annoyingly cocky.
I think he feels a little braver than normal since the entire country is watching and he knows the Judge won't just call for a mistrial being the case is as high-profile as it is, so he's willing to take some extra chances.
@@plantedbytherivers96 he's desperate to win and lock him up
@Jean Lencar wait what does hair gel have to do with this
I genuinely thought that a lawyer annoying a judge to this level only happened in films.
that's what this is. are you not entertained?
Your needing to get out the house more often .
Annoying judges don't appear in films like this one. Schroeder ran a circus.
@@ohio hahaha youtdem
David vs Goliath!~!!!!!!
“Objection: your honor, he’s just yapping”
"He was just being silly!!"
Total prosecutorial misconduct. Every first year law student knows you can’t imply silence is an admission of guilt. And I went to law school 50 years ago.
Kyle isn't silent though, you doorknob.
@@onthetongue silence on a topic in court (which is what ken was talking about) is not an admission of guilt. the context is important when reading comments.
I haven't even taken a criminal law course and even I know that.
Prosecutors have been operating under the understanding that the people don’t have rights and it’s rare to get a judge to slap them down. But this judge has yet to slap them down by throwing the whole case out the window. Prosecutors know how to game the system and take the warning from the judge but still inserted the ideas he pull off during the cross in this case. This kid shoulda sat on the side lines and let it play out without having to take the standing. Sadly, when you are young, you wanna be truthful and for coming, it’s youths greatests down fall. Wanting to be honest and truthful. He seems like a good kid but easily misguided and maybe a bit slow at the time. He life will never be the same.
@@onthetongue The silence they are talking about is back when he turned himself in, not right now.
You’d agree that a comically large spoon still constitutes a spoon full, correct?
I have no argument case closed
Correct
I uphold my 5th amendment right not to answer that question
“Rarely do we find men who willingly engage in hard, solid thinking. There is an almost universal quest for easy answers and half-baked solutions. Nothing pains some people more than having to think.”
@James Ross w×333333333333333333333333333333333
You’d agree with me that you can’t use deadly force to stop someone from eating a grilled cheese sandwich is that correct?
👏😂
Correct
Depends on how good it is
Incorrect
Best comment 👌
I'm beginning to be a big supporter of courtroom video proceedings being made public. The educational value for law students, and active atorneys seems to be well worth it, and I would think that it could help in cases of mistrial and appeal.
I think that Kyle RittenRacist belongs in a prison cell with Bubba as his lifelong butt brother.
True... but you have to think about the privacy of those involved, especially the innocent. I would never want a court case about me to be studied in a classroom.
@@3NewDay true but at the same time it exonerates the innocent. There are plenty of cases where someone isn’t charged but initial biases are only cemented by their assumptions without seeing why some was or was not charged.
Should be a step further, ALL politics and law should be on 24/7 livestream for taxpayers to see all day long as long as they are in elected or appointed office.
@@3NewDay Court records are public information regardless, unless it's a closed-doors trial. There's no further harm to the privacy of those involved than what is already accepted today.
In law school we are taught NOT to argue with the judge like this. It is completely disrespectful. Must have court etiquette at all times👨⚖️
Most people suck and fail at their jobs and professions...
He’s a leftist lawyer, what do you expect??
@@GarrettPederson253 bruuuhhh
You'll learn the exceptions after you graduate. ;)
@@myblacklab7 I graduated a decade ago bud
I was thinking his lawyer was doing a pretty decent job, then I realized that it was the prosecutor
If you watch louder with crowder he did a live streaming of the opening statement and he joked the defense should say I agree with what most of the defense says
That was a good one
His lawyer has been asleep the entire trial, endless missed opportunities to object, and they completely screwed up gun ownerships laws that have been added as a lesser charge.
@@lorddiethorn Crowder’s a snowflake
To be fair his lawyer are doing so good they recruited the judge as one of them. This one lawyer has to walk through the weeds just to ask a question and he has to use verbiage that isn’t insensitive to the kid
Man he doesn't even need defense, the prosecutor is doing it for them
I was thinking the same thing
Defense seems to learn what the word objection means and use it. When the prosecutor was lying shaking his head no isn't going to cut it. Object, point out the prosecutor is lying. Impeach the prosecutor's credibility as much as possible.
I couldn't have said it any better, the prosecution are making fools of themselves.
@@robertthomas5906 Perhaps, but the defense could have been letting the prosecution dig the hole a bit deeper...
@@bicameralmind6785 , Or the prosecutor knows Kyle isn't guilty of murder, but they had to charge him because of politics and the woke mob.
He's literally doing the defense's job for them.
****edit**** I've been blocked from commenting by @Diane because she a Google GESTAPO, paid shill who hates the truth. Kyle was being chased by three men wielding weapons and threatening to kill him. Clear cut case of self defense.
Censorship is only needed when one is trying to hide truth. We call this cheating. If you thought your imposed time out would shut me up, You've got another think coming. I'll be back to destroy you in about 6 hours, dear💩ing 🧱s of fear.
******End of edit*****
You know it’s bad when the court reporter tries to tell you to shut up
hahahahah this
Not a reporter. a Stenographer.
@@vordt4139 acshually
@@vordt4139 well he called her « Madame court reporter »
@@MasonHatfieldLogorrheathat’s because this dude is a clown of a prosecutor. he’s be a worse defense attorney.
How does a prosecutor like this even end up dealing with a case of this caliber?
Best lawyers work in firms ,they pay more
I think he was hired to make it certain that Kyle went free. Like there is NO way that buddy here was actually trying.
@@ynotsammy He is the Assistant DA, elected, The DA probably saw the case/evidence and passed the buck not to mess with his record.
Cuz no one wants the case. It's an attempt at virtue signaling
Of what caliber?? Open and shut self defense? The case is a joke and is just being used as entertainment and a tool for more division amungst the people of this country lmfao. People need to stop drinking the coolaid.
“You’d agree that every 60 seconds a minute passes in Africa, correct?”
Yes, yes I would sir prosecutor
N O
actually, it's 5 children
This is the comment
Yes, but for the 750,000 child slaves in Africa, one minute seems like an eternity.
“You’d agree that you can’t use deadly force when they have been trying to reach you about your cars extended warranty, correct?”
@forseth11 Correct.
I’d disagree
No we need deadlier force
Funniest comment 😂
@@aarongamboa9768 a strong arguement for recreational nukes.
This prosecutor should be disbarred for misconduct. His behavior is outrageous. He was definitely trying to provoke a mistrial! To question the defendants right to remain silent?!
That's one of the many issues with our system right now. There is almost no recourse for this kind of thing. They are almost untouchable and thus not held accountable.
That's just Binger being Binger
'm not aware of US law, but, if a witness is under supeana (s) they would need to cooperate, yes? Not saying that is what happened here, curious...
Dude was so confident in himself like he was bouta make history. His career as a lawyer is the only thing that's history.
😂 Yup!
@knuggynug- Never underestimate your opponent.
he is a lawyer. they have no shame
Yeah and now the jury can consider lesser charges in deliberation cuz this guy knew he blew it. That kind of sucks because he did everything by the book and the state has proven nothing but they’re incompetent
@@JandJOutdoorsmen1 It's up to the defense to accept lesser charges. If they are so confident then why put Rittenhouse on the stand.
“You’d agree you can’t use deadly force if McDonald’s runs out of ketchup correct?”
Correct
What if the icecream machine is down
I mean i would
why wouldn't you you have to eat to survive
Why make light of this. Two men are dead.
You’d agree with me that you can’t use deadly force to stop someone from drinking water is that correct?
Correct. Then why did you point your gun at someone drinking water.
Gulp
Betty that’s not the question. Please listen again. Lol
@@fatghostboo8007 What do you mean?
y’all he had no right to b there n feel the need to try n stop ppl from doin so, it might of been wrong, but he obviously provoked them enough to feel the need to want to charge @ him, it clearly states by law that u cant use deadly force period while trying to stop a situation from occurring.. unless u the police
When I’m having a truly terrible day, just before I cry I watch this video and I realize that no matter what I do in my life, I’ll never be as big of a failure as this attorney.🎉
ikr I feel at even my lowest point I could be like this guy and bs my way into a law degree lmao
To even bring this to trial.....people have been disbarred for less....
💯🙌🏽
Little finger Binger
He wasn't that bad, he just had no case and so had to fabricate one.
This doesn’t even feel like a trial. This feels like mock trial where the attorney and judge have beef at school.
I did mock trials at my high school where folks got into slapping fights and screaming matches, and they were more professional than this.
My Cousin Vinny.
It looks like they must have a prior history of run-ins. They mix as well as oil and water.
@@libRteedude Literally fights where they were slapping each other? In what universe would that be _more_ professional than this?
@@libRteedude I highly doubt that anything even close to that happened, stick to the truth, maybe we'll believe it.
Never interrupt the enemy when he's making a mistake..... Perfect example
Enemy? Good thing you aren’t on the jury.
@Paul Bickerson Paul, that may be so, but we also don’t know all the facts. Let’s hope the jury makes an unbias judgement. Evil is a harsh word for someone who killed people in defense who provoked him for having a gun.
Just my unbias thoughts.
I too was angry with the Jacob shooting.
@@onelogue i dont think they were talking about kyle. Its the prosecutor binger
@@onelogue talkin about the prosecutor
@@moemohamed8891 no I get that. This video is about the prosecutor.
If ANYONE IS CONFUSED
I got you.
Propensity Evidence is when you show a person's character or actions in past events is the real reason they did the current crime they are in court for.
That basically means they are saying to the court "hey he's lying that he shot people in self defense. He really did it because he's itching to shoot someone, because if you look at what he did in this situation before, that's what he's been dying to do"
The judge is saying "hey man i don't think this makes sense and that situation isn't similar enough to this current case to say that ... so you can't bring that argument in court to a jury because it's invalid "
The guy brought it to court anyway without asking permission for it
@Teej "but there's a case to be made that he had absolutely no business playing army man" That's your opinion. The case was him killing in self defense had no relation to him defending property. That's why the Judge denied the use of it here. Unless you think you're smarter, more experienced, and knowledgeable than many Lawyers, the Judge and everyone else involved lol. It's not weird, it's actually not relevant at all. It's weird and makes sense to people like you who don't have a brain which is why he tried to bring the point up to the Jury even the Judge told him not to - hoping for people like you in the Jury to get on his side to think it is relevant when it is not relevant. "If he's agreeing that he's not allowed to use that gun to defend property, how did he plan to defend property?" Again he didn't kill someone to defend property, he killed someone because somebody was aggressive and physically chased him verbally shouting intent towards Kyle. You are the exact person the he was looking for lol.
"He made clear he wished he could've shot shoplifters in the past" Was the guy he shot a shoplifter? No.
@Teej After finishing the video the Judge literally explains why it's not valid evidence, if you still don't understand after this you're on our own in this world kid lmao
The prosecutors point is a dead end. He says Kyle didn't have a gun and wished he could shoot shoplifters. Well, Kyle DID have a gun this time, and DIDN'T shot anyone committing property crimes. He only shot people trying to aggressively assault him.
So this whole argument of his is a dead end. There's a difference between saying and doing. Kyle said it, but given the opportunity to DO it, he chose not too. Argument ended. 🤷♂️
@@jim5379 you should reread what he said
@@jim5379 he’s implying the prosecution should have made the case about him being there in the first place and not about whether it was murder or not. Him wanting to play army man isn’t an opinion, you don’t go travel to another town with a gun to “defend people’s property” he definitely was looking for action.
The fact that this young man was even brought to trial was a disgrace.
Agreed
@@human-xh6en he was defending himself.
@@human-xh6en self defense is a thing, you know.
He could have killed 15 people, doesn´t matter. If he was defending his life, it´s fair game.
@@human-xh6en You obviously don´t know how self defense works. Stop watching TYT, you will lose brain cells.
Kyle RittenRacist should be in a prison cell with Bubba as his cellmate, Hambone as his left neighbor, and Skillet on his right, with each taking turns snuggling in his bunk as butt brothers on a weekly basis.
This guy is insufferable. He asked the same question worded in different ways 54 times over 5 hours this afternoon in an attempt to get Kyle to contradict himself.
And Kyle did contradict himself, despite his attempts to avoid answering the simple yes/no questions
@@user-ro9md9wp3j no he didn't. Not one of the questions was about what actually happened.
Answer me this.. yes or no only.
Do you still beat your wife and smoke crack
"Is one plus one really two? How about four minus two? Sixteen divided by eight? Are you sure? well then what is twelve divided by three divided by two? How about the square root of four? Cube root of eight? I'm going to keep giving you equations until you trip up and give me the wrong answer different from two."
Have you never watched a trial before? This is a regular thing..:
Prosecutor: Objection your honor! I'm losing the case.
You’d agree with me in the statements:
Whom ever smelt it dealt it
Whom ever denied it supplied it
Whom ever made up the rhyme did the crime.
Correct
So.... You're guilty on all counts, sir. OFF TO JAIL
Whoever*, not whomever!
@@Karl_Kampfwagen you beat me to it
goat comment lol🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣💯🦾
I am 90% confident that at 5:15 when the judge says "and it gives the...well I'll leave it at that", he was going to say "it gives the impression that you're deliberately acting in a manner that forces a mistrial", or something to that effect
It gives.... the defense the rightful ability to declare a mistrial.
Well, you could be right, you could be wrong…but at least you answered my question…what did he stop himself from saying?
@@stuntmusicgameshow311 that is 100% what he was going to say
This incompetent biased judge is the one who is going to cause a mistrial.
agreed
If I’m ever on trial I hope Mr. Binger is the one prosecuting me
I cannot believe this prosecutor tried to use Kyle’s right to remain silent against him. This sneaky way of getting these questions in is unbelievable! I’m so happy the judge is so on the ball!!
Simply having a gun on you is NOT deadly force, it’s simply being armed.
He wanted a mistrial. He didn't want it to go to the jury. He knew it was self-defense
The Miranda Right of staying silent isn’t applicable when you’re under oath I believe.
Oh my gosh I should’ve watched the full video before replying, I thought you meant he could stay silent in the court
@@sskies4972 you believe wrong. You can most certainly plead the 5th under oath. That's not what happened here. A lawyer can't insinuate someone is guilty in front of a jury when someone didn't talk to the police. Noone should talk to police without an attorney
@@chrischurch4551 if prosecution deliberately causes a mistrial, double Jeopardy bars retrial
The prosecutor seems to have a significant amount of swagger for a person skating on thin ice.
😂😂 he seems to care less than the judge
It's probably not an unusual place for him to find himself in.
He's trying and failing to compensate for his complete lack of a case.
The exaggerated swagger of a lawyer skating on thin ice.
He reminds me of a douchy bad guy in an Iron Man movie, like Hammer in Iron Man 2
It’s hilarious that a judge has to tell the prosecutor multiple times what law’s and rules mean and what they imply.
it's depressing that there's prosecutors like this - textbook example of why people don't trust the system
The prosecutor is a leftist liberal. He thinks if he says it it must be true, because his mommy always let him have his own way!
@@billfrost5674 i think its common sense
More like depressing
Happens all the time
He's still going through all of the situations where you are not allowed to use deadly force still to this day. I believe the latest ones include "You'd agree with me, that you can't use deadly force to stop someone from putting ketchup on hotdogs, correct?" and "You'd agree with me, that you can't use deadly force to stop someone from singing baby shark, correct?"
Hotdogs no baby shark oh definitely
@@newt4949 Meh, I'd say Hamburgers and non-woke cartoons like chinchilla lol
Lmaooooo
I actually paused at the baby shark ...I'm a terrible person lol
I disagree on the baby shark part...
Without commenting on guilt or innocence, I am encouraged that the Judge in this matter is protecting the concept of innocent until proven guilty. It should be the State's burden and it should be hard. That is the whole idea behind our justice system.
So how much is the judge being bribed
@@nosuchthing8 Why are you assuming that? The Judge is just doing his job and frankly the prosecution has shown only that Kyle did defend himself. He never shot someone to stop something from burning when he could have, he only went and stopped the burning. He only shot when he was in danger.
@@nosuchthing8 his lively hood according to the Constitution of this land
@@nosuchthing8 I don’t even think you came up with insult you intended since being bribed is not a crime. Accepting a bribe, however, would be criminal.
@@Bit01ByBit01 , didn't he say that he left home with the gun to protect property?
Kyle will go down in history to have the prosecutor and defendent lawyers on his side
...and the judge.
@@paulwblair the judge isn't really on his side.
The judge is only furious with Binger because he is being very unprofessional and undertaking bad practises which could be almost illegal on itself (breaking the 5th amendment for example)
@@callummartin4697 I don't buy it. The judge is a right wing nut. The DA is probably throwing the case.
@@paulwblair I agree about the DA throwing the case. But how is the judge a right-wing nut?
@@paulwblair prove the judge is a "right wing nut" then.
And don't use the phone ring tone as a reason because its just a song, doesn't mean anything else but what his personal taste in ringtones is.
The fact Binger and Lunch Box are still allowed to prosecute people is disturbing
Thomas Binger is the type of lawyer who gets innocent people in trouble because he's doing anything to win, and attempting every angle that exists to support his case - regardless of the facts. Horrendous example of the worst of law! ☠
He even pulled out an AR15 and pointed it toward the jury to prove a point
Greasy as they come
but prosecutor is not a lawyer, and is not a party in the case; he cannot win nor lose, couse he is independent, impartial and neutral
In other words: he is a lawyer.
@@PrSndreLrsn as an advocat? no; as a man of law? yes
but he is totally different that an advocat or defender
The prosecutor is amazing. He’s on thin ice, but instead to walking carefully, he jumps up and down.
Lmfao
He’s doing it on purpose to try to get a mis-trial because he bungled this so badly.
The left always double downs.
He is great…..for the defence. Just about every witness he called worked out in favour of the defence. Not too bright! 😂🤣😂
@@TommyRibs At this point, a mistrial is the better option. Prosecution is F*ng up the case so bad. Not to mention the Judge was bias as heck.
I can't believe that prosecuter didn't get slapped with contempt of court.
He needs to be arrested for conspiracy
I say he was close
He should
Agreed
He needs to be disbarred
He was definitely trying to force a mistrial.
"you'd agree that the sky is blue, correct?"
"you'd agree that I look like Justin Hammer from Iron Man 2, released in 2010, correct? "
LOL
DUDE. YES!!
Killed it, lmfao!
Lollll
😂
This is the best episode of
Better Call Saul
I have ever seen
Good comedic timing
Good
For
You
HE DEFECATED THROUGH A SUNROOF!
You win
I only watched breaking bad and this kept reminding me of that I don’t even remember why at this point dude really seems like an actor it’s so over the top
Honestly, no matter if you think hes guilty or innocent, we all gotta agree that the trial is a complete joke. This'll be used as a example for what NOT to do during a case.
GUILTY
@@trawmmwart8149 innocent until proven guilty. Plus you can see the trials on UA-cam. This whole thing is a circus and you're one of the clowns who choose to participate
He is innocent tho
@@angelmelendez742 gonna repeat it to the other guy too?
@@TsdsxSansTSSunStone got an anime PFP and got Sans and sunstone on your account name. Comment invalidated or should I say don't care
I love how the Judge goes into full law school prof mode. It is such a power move.
The prosecutor has made so many mistakes, they would love a mistrial so they could have a do-over. Notice the defense said 'with predjudice' meaning they cannot retry him on the same offences.
They deffinetly can cuz there will be a new judge
@@MoejiiOsmanTV Not without new evidence...
A mistrial is usually considered to be good for the defense.
@@MoejiiOsmanTV you obviously do not know how the judicial system works honey , do some research before opening your mouth about things you have no knowledge of ..
@@rreagan007 in most cases yes its good for the defense but the prosecution basically will get a "do over" i dunno how alot of u folks think Rittenhouse is gonna walk Scott free, he for sure will be found guilty of several of the firearm charges since he was underage and couldn't legally obtain them
This lawyer is a good example of the corruption run rampart in our society. He was trying to add context to things already said and confirmed in attempts to draw conclusions and lead the jury.
@Nortius Maximus too many. Not all prosecutors behave this way. You can tell this guy is an arrogant know it all.
What were the main arguments as to why Kyle Rittenhouse should not have used deadly force on others who were attempting to use deadly or very harmful force on him? How this was not deemed pure self defense? What did prosecutors want as punishment?
This is exactly how Prosecution works, and it's all for the money.
Like it run ...rampart
I think there's corruption in every country bud
We’ve moved way beyond what the original trial was ever about on the night that he was arrested . This is why you invoke your right to stay silent.
A woke justice league would be the deepest state in the DCU
and the prosecution dared question his constitutional rights to do so... and they are trying to call the judge biased for defending the young mans rights
@@Autism_exe judge is obviously bias but then again most of these people are.
@@771shadowolf The judge isn't biased at all, you are used to seeing liberal bias so no bias looks like conservative bias to you
Forever
"these people"
Elaborate and clarify what you mean by "these people"
This trial was one of the great triumphs of good over evil. Whole thing was so perfectly cinematic. Gives me great hope
Bro I swear I've seen your pfp somewhere... Aren't you in a lot of comment sections? lol
@Only2GenderKennder commonly used pic I've seen other users with, but I do comment on a lot of political stuff, music, and religious stuff? Maybe our interests overlap lol
@@MrNU998 You sound pretty og my guy. I literally listen and watch ALL of that stuff lol god bless
@Only2GenderKennder Thank you man God bless you too I'm sure our paths will meet again in the comments 🫡
@@MrNU998wholesome
Whether he was guilty or not, you have to admit the prosecutor was in WAY over his head. He made sooo many mistakes during this trial
Yeah. I don't really know if what he did was illegal assault or self defense, it's so confusing. But this prosecutor SUCKED, and that's probably one of the reasons why Kyle got acquitted. This whole thing looks like a complete political rabbit hole, but I'm just gonna take the not guilty and roll with it and assume he's not guilty.
@@richardcarter8751 just watch all the videos of the incident. It’s blatant self defense. Rittenhouse even went out of his way to disengage. If he was truly out for blood there would have been more bodies in the dirt
@@talltale9760 that's what I'm thinking. I don't know all the facts, but if he really only shot when he felt he was truly in danger, then he deserves to walk free imo. I don't know why people are obsessed with this case tbh.
@@MrFusion because "gun bad" and "trumpism" according to the media.
@@richardcarter8751 jeez dude you can’t tell he was not guilty just through critical thinking? go watch the raw unedited video of him being attacked
Prosecutor is trying to trigger a mistrial so he doesn’t get the verdict he knows is coming. Very dangerous tactic.
Yup, the lengths these parasites will go to promote their careers.
What do you expect from Justin Hammer.
Very dirty trick
Very likely. At this point the prosecutor may be hoping for a mistrial without prejudice so can fix all the mistakes they’ve made and take this to trial again.
That's why defense countered with a mistrial with prejudice.
"You'd agree that everything tastes better with bacon, correct?"
Wrong, Beef stroganoff is not better with bacon. Trust me I tried it...
Ar15s are better with bacon.
@@LabelMeInfinity Blasfemy!
🤣 correct
@@LabelMeInfinity "Don't get brazen with me!" Lol
Talking to the judge with his hand in his pocket says it all.
I have a great deal of respect for this Judge. He's trying very hard to make sure this is a fair trial.
yes he did a good job
What were the main arguments as to why Kyle Rittenhouse should not have used deadly force on others who were attempting to use deadly or very harmful force on him? How this was not deemed pure self defense? What did prosecutors want as punishment?
@@marybailey7881 The people he shot were all unarmed; he was using a gun illegally purchased for him (the person who bought the gun was convicted, but the judge here wouldn't allow that factor in this trial); and Kyle took the law into his own hands by being in a place of his own free will and seeking danger. No one asked him to be there, and he wasn't required to be there. He should have not been charged with murder, but with reckless homicide or manslaughter, along with reckless endangerment, public menacing, and use of an illegal weapon.
@@mwhite6522You do realize the surviving witness admitted to pointing a gun first?
@@Jordan81577 Yes, and that doesn't change my view of it, because by that point, Rittenhouse had already killed two people. The fact that you refer to him as a "surviving witness" says a lot. He wasn't an "attacker" by any definition, and he's very lucky to be alive.
"You would agree that this is illegal, correct?"
_aims gun at jury_
Ritter-"Correct"
'Gun discharges'
You would agree that pointing you gun and discharging it like so *shoots in the air” ….this is illegal, is that correct?
@@andreipaulavets7234 It doesn't discharge by itself, you can see that this idiot had his finger on the trigger.
JAJAJAJAJA good one.
Good one lol...
The Rittenhouse challenge
Take a drink every time Thomas Binger says "You'd agree with me"
Nah man I'd end up as stupid as the prosecutor.
@@alfonsoarroyo3283 made me laugh!
you will be in the hospital you'd agree with me
We would all end up drunk. You’d agree with me? 😂😂😂
I'd tought that was when you would drink a chaser followed by 3 shots.
I'm so glad this young boy is free to live his life.
Same
Agreed. He had his rights to self defense. He was being rushed by multiple people trying to take his weapon so he responded appropriately.
While two unarmed people died from an illegally obtained gun which the judge didn't rule on till the last minute so it couldn't be appealed and even apologized for.
@@nibcamp3958 they still threatened him so he bad every right to shoot them. If a crowd of people are running at you talking about killing you, you have the right to open fire.
@@nibcamp3958Communists aren’t people.
Prosecutor: “I’d like to make a record without being interrupted”
Also prosecutor: *cuts off judge while judge explains why he’s wrong*
He better hope that judge retires soon lol
The prosecutor plays a typical leftist trick of double standards, but he chose a wrong place and a wrong person.
@@tomaswu8471 yes!
@@tomaswu8471 look at all the hate liberals are getting. They will get what’s coming to them in 2024
Don’t yell at a judge for interrupting you. Very bad move.
You'd agree with me, that you can't use deadly force on someone who doesn't give a courtesy flush, correct?
Hold up...that might actually be an offense worthy of death.
...so anyway, I started blastin
Jailhouse rules 🤣
I feel like you should be able to. Thats a crime against humanity. True monsters do not courtesy flush.
@@johnmaxwell1356 all depends on how.bad it smells 😆
The South Park episode is gonna be crazy
Family guy
southpark turned woke long ago
South Park has been dull and asinine since about season 8
@@B.D.E. season 11 was good but south park went on a sharp decline since then. Laughed more during season 5 than all of seasons 15-20s
@@B.D.E. I prefer the older episodes yeah but the new ones are pretty good
The judge should have intervened earlier while the prosecution was making a legal address rather than a question.
I've seen kids with a more convincing prosecution in amogus.
AMOGUS
Sus
"Don't get brazen with me." My new favorite quote.
That's what a boomer would say
@@serenity7725 Then we'll put it in the "oldies but goodies" category.
@@kennethmiller2333 "oldies but GOLDIES" lol.
@@serenity7725 calm down gen z
amazing word choice, I think that word needs to make a comeback outside of the courtroom.
You’d agree that my wife’s boyfriend should let me stay up after 9pm correct?
That’s good 😂
Incorrect
Crazy how often a defendant invokes their right to silence, and yet it still gets brought up in court. Imagine the cases where the judge isn’t wary or unbiased enough to point this out?
Arguing with the judge was a gutsy move. I'm not a lawyer but I'm fully aware of the consequences of doing that. Jeopardizing both their client and reputation is one.
Can you please ellaborate on the consequences? I'm very intrigued lol.
@@JonLopezOfficial being held in contempt. Then he would have gotten cuffed and taken to jail right there lol
His client? So....the state then? I hope the state is okay!
@@JonLopezOfficial If you are deliberately rude and outright disrespectful the Judge could have you arrested and taken to jail right then and there.
@@alexvanderben9682 When did Wisconsin become the plaintiff of that case, Mr. Smartypants? Or maybe you are mistaking it, "Thomas Binger" isn't a state, hon.
Its refreshing to see a prosecutor and a judge not see eye to eye.
Happens a lot more than you think, the difference is that most prosecutors don't turn around and bring up prohibited "evidence" in court, especially on this level.
A lot of judges don’t side with prosecutors
@@TheChosennn they also don't side with the defendant. But here we are!
@@donovanmorris6080 well that’s not 100% true. The way of the law is innocent until proven guilty so usually judges side with the defendants until there’s enough evidence to prove he/she is guilty
You kidding me? In a case like this? No contest.
And people thought criminal defense attorneys were sleezy……..what a joke of a prosecutor
Facts!!!
Prosecutors' lies are ridiculous.
I am not an attorney but when he started questioning Kyle on his 5th amendment rights I was wondering if the prosecutor even went to law school
But he is good, you've got to give him that lol.
@@TheJack4000111 He's awful, what are you talking about? He attempted to violate constitutional rights, was accused by a witness of attempting to get him to alter his official statement, and nearly had the case thrown out on mistrial without prejudice.
This is an experienced prosecutor is whats amazing to me. Why he thought he could continue to try and argue and bend the rules is beyond me....
His star witness admitted to being the aggressor and his case was shot from there. He Knew this and was trying to get the mistrial so he could try the case again without that witness. The Judge recognized this and refused to allow it to happen.
@@redneckhippiefreakthe great irony of that moment is he dropped the felony firearms possession and concealment charges against Gage to use him as a witness.
So he opted not to charge a felon for illegal possession just to have him destroy the prosecution in return.
What's scary is his bias to win here going beyond the scope of procedure - I hope he's being investigated because this smells like $$$ due to the high-profile nature of the case
You know you lost the case when the judge has to yell at you
Multiple times even
The judge obviously doesn't like people who behave like criminals or with evil thoughts, no matter who that person is.
@@oceaneuropa1117 the judge is unbiased, or at least should be. if you dont understand why he did what he did, than you are ignorant of your rights
@@oceaneuropa1117 LOL did you delete your own comment in shame, snowflake :)
funny, considering how incorrect you were in your reply, you should be ashamed, little snowflake :)
The judge looks like he wants to beat the prosecutor with his gavel.
He probably does
I want that too
I’d pay to see that if I’m going to be honest.
So then he’s bias, thanks for that
@@joecool2029 cope
His disrespect towards the judge is disgusting. How could he say that this person wished he had his gun is a means to say he’s guilty. That’s inappropriate
He would've been held contempt
I don’t think a DA can be held in contempt sadly.
This judge is absolutely honorable. I think we need more judges like him..fair and balanced.
“You’d agree that we should shake the coconut all up after adding the lime to it, correct?”
Lmfa000000
Underrated
"Yes, Dominic taught me so"
Correct
Lmao.....
"The judge is yelling at me. I'd better correct him on something trivial. Then he'll know I have the power and he'll back down. Whose court does he think this is anyway?"
He's hoping the Woke Providence will prove him right
I don't think this DA believes Judge Bruce Shroeder presides within the court rather than the district attorney. This is horrid. He is going on evidence tried in a public court of social media and corrupt press rather than doing his own homework.
The prosecutor is obviously a liberal Democrat trying to get points with the left on the national stage...that is all he is trying to do.
@@jlescoe21 The Prosecutor's conduct is "unethical" at best. Nobody should be able to refer to a defendant's silence as "wrongdoing". Has he ever heard of the Miranda Rights?
"You have the right to remain silent......"
The judge is clearly acting for the defence. Shocking.
"You'd agree that the McRib should be made available longer than 2 weeks during the year? "
Yes
Correct
The McRib is trash
@@ThatOneDude219 I denounce this statement and find it in contempt of the court! Judge I call for a motion to detract said statement.
Bruh… literally laughing out loud in a Starbucks line
I love this judge! What a country we would have, if we had more judges like him at all levels of the judiciary
WE already have tons of corrupt judges. This clown is not alone. Ignorant folks love the corruption.
The prosecution seems rather surprised that established rules/laws apply to them as well.
Lol sounds like democrats 😯. Sorry I couldn't help myself with the political jab but similarity was too easy to point out
Democrats usually do
@@jasonhayden5077 sir are we not seeing the same thing republicans in office are nutjobs
I Can't Believe It. Its Like Being A Truck Driver For 20 Years And All Of The Sudden You Forget How To Drive, While Being On The Road.
@@rawrbro69 I'm not saying I trust all Republicans as there are some I don't think are very moral at all but Its difficult to see any democrats with any morals or even common sense
"You'd agree that switching to Geico could save you 15% or more on car insurance, correct?"
Correct
Lol. Wow
ROFLMAO 😆 🤣 😂 😹
Bruh💀
That’s too much😂😂
Imagine Kyle at law school one day & his trial comes up as a case study.
Right? That would be really interesting.
"Hey guys look! I'm on TV!"
He won't even need to go to college he's gonna have half a billion dollars more than likely because of this.
Free 100%
If I was in that class, I'd get that autograph
He was not guilty on all charges
One of the best derssing downs of an Attorney I've ever seen. Never gets old.
"It's a bold strategy, Cotton, let's see how it pays off for 'em."
"Chuck Norris" 👍
"****ing A, Cotton"
completely forgot about that movie and now i gotta watch it again
Frick
No matter the jury can't forget it. The judge in all his ruling have shown bias for the defendant. The prosecuter put the wrong charges on the kid. The only thing they can hope for is illegal use and possession of a deadly weapon.
This lawyer would like to continue without being interrupted, if that's ok. He'd also like to break the rules, if that's ok.
🤣🤣 funny but exactly how this douche canoe of a prosecutor is acting
@@vgkstone9692 No kidding! He’s a complete POS.
Binger knows and understands that he's the prosecutor right?
@@kimr45 Shhhh…don’t tell him. It’ll ruin his lunch! 😂🤣
@@kimr45 He accidentally picked up the defense teams notes and has been arguing them.
If this is how they try to prosecute when the cameras are on for all to see; its scary to think how they behave behind closed doors.
Prosecutors are the worst... Imagine having a profession where you only "win" if you ruin somebody's life, even if that person is innocent. It shouldn't be a win or lose system.
@@TovenDo.O.Video- he's not innocent
@@michealolovue6930 Just like you then.
@@michealolovue6930 can you not read or are you living under a rock? its pretty much everywhere rn that hes been declared innocent lol
@@michealolovue6930 stop pretending that you are dumb bro....unless you actually are.
This never gets old.
It happens at 4:04- for all that is only seeing this clip as context, judge Schroeder is very calm and nice throughout the whole trial with light hearted humor and remaining neutral at all times. He is incredibly professional so for those watching, please dont think this judge has ego, If watching the whole trial, you'd realize this is one of the best judges on this landmark case. This prosecutor has stepped over the prosecutorial misconduct line many many times in this trial. At this point hes already done it many times which is why judge is angry. With such an expensive case, any intention / precedence for mistrial , the judge , jury , tax payers should be upset that he would act so reckless to assume "open door' rule.
Bless
What were the main arguments as to why Kyle Rittenhouse should not have used deadly force on others who were attempting to use deadly or very harmful force on him? How this was not deemed pure self defense? What did prosecutors want as punishment?
wait, I was still siding with the judge on the idea that nothing could be brought in, but is there in fact a rule that you could open the door to something, and bring it in, even after the judge had ruled on it? Even then, it seems like a stretch in this situation, even though im pretty sure the judge already had mistrial with prejudice in his back pocket for a hung jury/guilty verdict.
@@TheLeviclow of course a prosecutor cant go directly against a court ruling, thats the point of a court wtf are you talking about
This will be a great movie or mini series in the future.
content hog
unfortunately if theyre was in would definitely be bias against Kyle Rittenhouse this is hollywood were talking about here
Do you really think Hollywood would make a pro-Rittenhouse movie??
@@h.ar.2937 yes to sell to people like you
Sam Rockwell as Binger
I have literally never seen a prosecutor question a defendant's right to remain silent, or imply the exorcision of that right to mean something conclusive to their argument.
I've never seen it because doing so is such a clear violation of constitutional law, that every lawyer knows not to even try it. It's literally among the things you'll learn about in your first year studying law.
It's mind-boggling to me that he did this. Personal theory is that he was trying to force a mistrial, so they could try again and not let in their star witness who admitted to being the aggressive initiator
You should review Salinas v. Texas, then...
@@skepticalextraterrestrial2971 From what I see in Salinas v. Texas they were not read their Miranda rights when they chose to stay silent for certain questions, that allowed their silence to be questioned by the prosecution, nothing like the current video where a prosecutor questions a defendants silence POST arrest after they are read their Miranda rights.
@@dinghysupreme2972 My response was to the comment that went far beyond the scope of this case.
That has happened to me before, but the judge said something about it.
What were the main arguments as to why Kyle Rittenhouse should not have used deadly force on others who were attempting to use deadly or very harmful force on him? How this was not deemed pure self defense? What did prosecutors want as punishment?
Headline fix: “When a prosecutor is more of a criminal than the defendant”
“ A lie can run around the world before the truth has its boots on.”
That is why you manipulate time and freeze it so that the lie cannot move, thus if the lie cannot move, then, logically, it cannot spread.
The Flash: "Oh, really? Please tell me more."
Everyone knows the Truth™ wears Timbs
@@CeraphineLuna 🥶🥶🥶🥶
You’d agree that the quantity for the amount of wood that a wood chuck could chuck is undetermined, correct?
Bahahah
Its fortytwo
"May I respond?"
*Makes a ten minute statement.*
*Judge speaks two words and gets interrupted by the Prosecutor.*
"May I respond?"
What a circus.
When someone makes a point about being interrupted in a dialogue, you know this person has no weight to his argument.
@@065Tim exactly
Reminds me of Kamala Harris during the debates “IM SPEAKING! IM SPEAKING.. thaaanks”
Judge: "imma interrupt you now"
The fact that they now teach this as “what not to do” in Law Enforcement academies is hilarious lmfaooo
Do they really? I'd love to see that.
@@jalamanta Yeah, during our investigations portion they talked about post arrest silence and never assuming “they have something to hide.” Which then they showed examples of both, Binger was one of them.
@rbrick3685 that's brilliant
You'd agree with me that you can't use deadly force until AFTER they have shot you in the face?
And looted your corpse. Yes, yes indeed.
Even then the prosecution would argue that he wouldn't have the right to shoot back because of supposed reckless endangerment or some other such nonsense like they already tried to submit yesterday.
@@colonelsmith7757 That's pretty much what he said.
@@colonelsmith7757 remember Gage had a small gun and Kyle had a big gun.
Even though the .40 glock Gage had is a larger and technically more deadlier round the .223 AR-15 Kyle had
@@colonelsmith7757 He insinuated that using hollow-point ammo (forbidden by Geneva convention) would be more appropriate.
These guys are making the OJ Simpson prosecution team look like the greatest legal minds in the history of law
One was obviously guilty, the other obviously not guilty. And in both cases there is a very vocal mob wanting us to believe the opposite.
@@MrCmon113 I mean, OJ was clearly guilty, but the prosecution did drop the ball.
Tbf they have nothing to work with, absolutely ridiculous this was brought to trial.
@@xcf5587 I could tell after 4 hours of watching the video footage, within a day or two, multiple videos that it was self defense, the fact they chose to fight on 1st degree was absurd from the beginning, I'm not really surprised that their lawyers suck and have to grasp straws
There are some prosecutors that are competent, understand the law, and pursue charges based on definition and evidence available, there are also some not as great, but far below the "not as great" crowd, is the one in the video.
I don't know who had the idea to press charges, but if you're pressing charges in a case like this, you better have everything squared away and play by the rules.
Regardles of where you stand on whether you think Kyle is innocent or guilty, we can all agree that the prosecutor was an absolute disgrace. Everything he did seemed manipulative and dishonest, even when the facts seemed on his side. He literally gave the defense the win on a silver platter.
Well the facts did not add up to his side, it was pretty obvious that this was self defense
Yeah he really was just highlighting that Rittenhouse is fully aware of when and where to use his self-defense in terms of “deadly force”
The prosecutor was a absolute clown to be honest....
literally none of the facts were on his side
@Kelly Gayman ??
The prosecutor was so desperate with this case and it shows. Who in their right mind tries to imply that silence is an admission of guilt in court? He was aiming for a mistrial it's painfully obvious.
“You’d agree with me that this will eventually end up on youtube, correct?'
Correct
You’d agree it doesn’t seem like you know how trials work, correct? 🤡