2:24 - Do you follow a madhab? 10:13 - What is the ruling on those that miss Salah ? 15:16 - Is the Niqab fardh? 21:28 - is Smoking haram? 23:35 - Is all seafood permissible? 25:43 - Is eating from McDonald's halal in the west? 32:16 - Fiqh of Divorce (3x talaq) 35:46 - Can we give salam to non-Muslims ? 36:35 - Do Salafis have respect for Madhabs? 40:33 - Would you give dawah or a talk in a Non-Salafi masjid? 45:59 - Can there be brotherhood with those that practice Istighstha or Mawlid etc ? 49:36 - Can there ever be unity with those who have a different Aqidah? 57:37 - His confrontation with Daniel Haqiqatjou last year. 1:04:53 - Can we unite behind a khalif with a different Aqidah ? 1:10:41 - issue of obeying the ruler 1:16:18 - Can you criticise the ruler ? 1:27:25 - Did you really get stabbed ?
Remember the path or manhajj the prophet of Islam left for the ummah are the TWO WEIGHTY MATTERS the Qur'an and Ahlulbayt Known is hadith Thaqalayn Thank you
Shaykh does good work defending Islam against the enemies of Islam, the muslim community appreciates this and hopes shaykh Uthman carries on with his work against the enemies of Islam
Remember brother, the prophet of Islam left TWO weighty matters the Qur'an and ahlulbayt for source of guidance after him Not the sahaabah. Pls check N Investigate
Sheikh uthman, you’re a good role model for the Muslims because you put in the work for Allah SWT, see how Allah has elevated you and made you loved worldwide, may Allah increase you in strength and guidance!
Allahumma baarik. Alhamdullah, Ya Allah. Many many so many syubhat that I have, Alhamdulillah with Allah's will, I come across this video and NOW, Alhamdulillah It make absolutely sense. It clear up of all my syubhat that I had Jazakallahu khayran sheikh Uthman, May Allah grant you jannah. - "May Allah unite us upon Quran, Sunnah and the way of salafulummah" (like sheikh Uthman said in closing of this video) ❤ -
@@AB-xx7hy And when the fitnah (trial, discord) occurred in the time of ʿUthmān, some people said to Usāmah bin Zayd , ‘Will you not speak to ʿUthmān?’ So he said, ‘Do you think that I have not spoken to him, just because you have not heard it from me? Verily I will speak to him concerning what is between him and me, without opening an affair which I would not like to be the first to open.’ [An authentic narration: Related by Ahmad (3/403) and Ibn Abī ʿĀsim (2/521) So when they (the Khārijites) opened it, evil took place in the time of ʿUthmān . They opposed ʿUthmān openly, thus completing the tribulations, fighting and corruption, which has not ceased to affect the people to this day, was brought about. And this caused the tribulation to occur between ʿAlī and Muʿāwiyah, and ʿUthmān was killed for these reasons …
On the issue of rebelling against rulers, I can respect the fact the shaykh did not blanketly deny its permissibility, like so many of these madkhalis, however he didn't make it clear what the conditions of rebellion and also criticism of rulers are. If this is something he studied in fiqh then it should be relatively easy to give an overview in this podcast, we will see if he does it in a second podcast...
Bro as always, such issues usually lie between the 2 extremes. I haven't seen that part yet where the sheikh said this, but my gut feel says on this matter the truth is somewhere in between what madkhalis and what Haqiqatjou and his gang say. Sheikh ibn uthaymeen actually said it was permissible but mentioned clear conditions. Its on the masjid dar us sunnah channel. A VERY CLEAR, PRECISE video mentioning 4-5 conditions
Ka’b ibn ‘Ujrah reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Verily, rulers will come after me and whoever enters their audience, affirms their lies, and supports their oppression, they are not part of me and I am not part of them. They will have no presence at the Fountain. Whoever does not enter their audience, does not support their oppression, and does not affirm their lies, he is part of me and I am part of him. He will be present at the Fountain.” Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhī 2190 Grade: Sahih (authentic)
@shoIslam - why is your name show Islam? Do you advice ppl to be open with Islam. If do good but be accurate in speech. Also you error on so called Madkhalis, they say you can rebel but has conditions... too
Do you not see what happened to the muslim countries recently that revolt the leader? Now they are dead, and the same people who revolt want them back. Crying because the life was better.
@@amdol the problem is they understood the problem but not the cure. They needed to replace the leadership with an Islamic caliphate and not another secular democratic regime.
Sheikh I am a Maldivian , love this podcast, n if you want to know if you want to a maldivian you have to be a muslim as far as I know n the country by law is an Islamic country. Hope you vist there soon😊
Masha Allah fantastic interview. Full of very very important information regarding the situation of the ummah. She is very learned but also very humble. Great man
As salaamu alaykum brothers, sisters, friends and foes. Please like, share and comment on this video, as well as subscribing to the 5Pillars UA-cam channel! Jazakallah khayran.
Faruq need to provide his Masters Degree and actually provide evidence that he has one. Shaykhs exposed him for not knowing basic Arabic and cant recite Quran properly. The proof is out there.
And when the fitnah (trial, discord) occurred in the time of ʿUthmān, some people said to Usāmah bin Zayd , ‘Will you not speak to ʿUthmān?’ So he said, ‘Do you think that I have not spoken to him, just because you have not heard it from me? Verily I will speak to him concerning what is between him and me, without opening an affair which I would not like to be the first to open.’ [An authentic narration: Related by Ahmad (3/403) and Ibn Abī ʿĀsim (2/521) So when they (the Khārijites) opened it, evil took place in the time of ʿUthmān . They opposed ʿUthmān openly, thus completing the tribulations, fighting and corruption, which has not ceased to affect the people to this day, was brought about. And this caused the tribulation to occur between ʿAlī and Muʿāwiyah, and ʿUthmān was killed for these reasons …
Masha’Allaah shaykh uthman dealt with the questions. You can’t be concerned that the rulers of Muslim countries are kaffir but your living under a kafir ruler in the UK 😂 🇬🇧
It is the mainly Salafi movement that have caused significant division's in the UK. No hanafi has ever gone to a Shafi and telling them they are deviant and need to follow 'quran & sunnah'. They have casues mass confusion and fitna amkngst the youth from the 1990's in the Uk.
I don’t think that’s true at all. No salafi goes around calling followers of the madahib deviants.. the only people they call deviants when applies to aqeedah which is a whole different topic.
@@aklimurraza2626 Sorry brother but you must be living under a rock if you think that is the case. I reside in Birmingham and since the the late 80's , we had literally salafis, almost militant into thier approach in our areas going around speaking to the youth telling them ridiculous things like imam Abu Hanifa only knew 40 hadiths ! Stating they are not following quran and sunnah. I have seen and experienced this personally so please stop with the nonsense
@@ragpaysever2260 4 mathhabs are Athari in Aqida & salafi in fiq... what's Numan's mom's mathhab? what is difference in Usul of 4 mathhab in fiq? Imam Ahmad made tabdi on kulabis who taught Mid life Hasan Ashari before he repented to Athari, proof he wrote Usul Dayana affirmed by Asakir, Dhahabi & I think Bayhaqi.
Masha Allah, very good interview. Thanks for clarifying on Daniel’s discussion, I have great respect now for YQ and Sheikh Uthman the both of them from different positions show sincere intentions to unite the Ummah. Ya Rabb, grant us Aafia 🤲🏾
Umm did you not hear the part where he mentioned sheikh Karim Abuzaid’s refutation on Yasir Qadhi? I think you should go watch that akhi May Allah bless you
I’m still unclear on that cuz at the event DH clearly told him that he would’ve preferred to be contacted privately on those questions. One of them must be lying.
@@ahmedyamani7388 Brother don’t accuse fellow Muslim brothers of potentially lying. There was some sort of misunderstanding and we should move on. Don’t let it distract us.
@@sammu Brother both of them have been exposed lying at different times. This is nothing new, so me claiming that one of them has to have lied here is not a stretch giving the contradictions displayed. Also everyone must be held to account, esp brothers with big platforms. We can’t just dismiss and sweep everything under the carpet.
Have you ever heard about the Arab Spring and how it was influenced by the Arab diaspora (mainly) on social media like Facebook or Reddit? Or were you too busy painting the walls of your cave?
@@human0_0skull akhi speak respectfully and show good manners, your meant to love me for the sake of Allah. The Arabs in those nations used social medias themselves to organise and take part in the Arab Spring. In Egypt, Tunisia there wasn't bloodshed, Libya has conspiracy theories surrounding it.
I love to listen to anyone who speaks the truth and brings evidence. Where is the evidence in what he said? Daniel made a video responding to this. Walahi it is depressing to see muslims engaged in this.
Sheikh Uthman speak with such clarity, simplicity, and kindness Alhumdulilah he is a blessing for the English speaking audience. May Allah bless him for all of his work.
In all respect... He's incorrect...imam Maliks usool is that he would give preferrence to Amal ahle madinah over a saheeh hadeeth that has singular narration . Also this was not the dawah of the 90s and early 2000... The salafis would denounce following Madhab completely ...some of the super salafis as they were known back then would call Umar a biddati...Inna lillahi...for the ijtihad of 20 rakas
This was an excellent episode, you really did your homework Dilly and asked precise, need to know questions He was very clear and we ended up seeing an authentic unequivocal discussion
I love sh Uthman. May Allah protect him and bless his work. The podcast was very beneficial as well msA. I'd really look forward to a 2nd podcast to drill down into the political side. While it's very clear in Islam that we shouldn't rebel against our rulers for oppression alone, we can definitely criticise them. Umar ibn Al'Khattab himself was criticised and allowed it. Imam Ahmed in Hanbal publicly spoke out against the fitna of khalq al-Quran. There are many other examples. However, rebellion is a different issue. The question here should be, is a ruler that actively *hates* Islam and Muslims still a Muslim ruler worth obeying? A ruler who's sole purpose is to shut down any and all Muslim work? At the end of the day, those who say rebellion is haram would still follow those who rebelled if their revolution is successful even if they think it's haram to do so.
Much of the salaf rebelled and fought against the rulers FOR OPPRESSION. For example Abdullah ibn Amr was being oppressed by having his property taken away by the Ummayyad rulers and when asked by someone to just let it go so he wouldn't die, he replied with the famous statement of the Prophet (saw) : "Whoever is killed defending his wealth, he is a martyr". There are many more examples from the tabieen who were in constant battles against the Ummayyads for their oppression The secular rulers of today that are consistently dismantling the Sharia and oppressing Muslims by killing and imprisoning them are much worse than the Ummayyads or Abbasids or Ottomans
I appreciate Sheikh Uthman and his desire to bring the ummah together. That being said, I find something very wrong with his stance on criticizing rulers. He switched back and forth between Khalifa and ruler. Then when he said "why don't you go to those countries and say the same thing" and the brother responded "well they will arrest and kill me", the sheikh responded "exactly". So we are just supposed to be completely silent (as the oppressors want) while they arrest and torture our scholars? While they sell out to the west? As they work with foreign intelligence agencies against the Muslims? As they destabilize other countries, installing and propping up more oppressors? Changing the school curriculum to pervert the masses? Introducing fitnah where it didnt exist before? All while inviting foreign soldiers to establish themselves on your land? If the argument is that blood will be shed, my response is that blood has already been shed and is being shed. I'm not saying that the people in any specific country should just get up and start fighting the government, but calling it out seems like a reasonable first step.
And when the fitnah (trial, discord) occurred in the time of ʿUthmān, some people said to Usāmah bin Zayd , ‘Will you not speak to ʿUthmān?’ So he said, ‘Do you think that I have not spoken to him, just because you have not heard it from me? Verily I will speak to him concerning what is between him and me, without opening an affair which I would not like to be the first to open.’ [An authentic narration: Related by Ahmad (3/403) and Ibn Abī ʿĀsim (2/521) So when they (the Khārijites) opened it, evil took place in the time of ʿUthmān . They opposed ʿUthmān openly, thus completing the tribulations, fighting and corruption, which has not ceased to affect the people to this day, was brought about. And this caused the tribulation to occur between ʿAlī and Muʿāwiyah, and ʿUthmān was killed for these reasons …
@pvcrma1 I understand, but what is the solution? Do we sit back and stay quiet while the ummah deteriorates? Our children continue being brainwashed in schools? Countries being destabilized? I'm not suggesting armed conflict. I'm not even claiming to have an answer, but is saying that allowing Halloween celebrations in the Arabian peninsula haram too far? Is saying that the rulers allowing clubs and bars in the land of the sahaba are wrong for doing so, being a khariji? Is speaking out against arresting, torturing, and executing scholars equivalent to calling for violence? I don't think so. Sitting silent and hoping for the best doesn't seem like an intelligent solution. If the people there know it but are unable to speak because of a direct threat of arrest or death, the rest of us have to be silent? If you run your country in such a way, armed rebellion is a NATURAL result. This is a rule that has been seen time and time again in history. Muslim lands or not.
@@Melhimri The solutions are many: - 01. Learn Aqeedah - 02. Return to the Sunnah - 03. Repentance - 04. Go back to the way of companions - 05. Change our condition [13.11] Let us be realistic. The masaajid are practically empty and the potential of the Muslims are only seen on Fridays/Ramadaan/Eed etc. We want victory whilst we are far away from the deen of Allaah! Does that even make sense?
@pvcrma1 that all sounds nice and I'm not discounting it. But, again, our scholars are being locked up. The scholars being promoted by the government are teaching government sponsored Islam. The companions challenged the oppressive rulers on many (and I mean MANY occasions). Many of our most famous scholars were arrested and tortured for publicly disagreeing with leaders. Let me just summarize the situation. The leaders are pushing the population into more and more western ways: introducing clubs, concerts, gambling, bars, mixed events, etc. They are also jailing, torturing, and killing anyone who criticizes them. Then you have a group of people who are saying criticizing them is haram and you are a khariji if you do it. The way of Islam is not to just sit at home and pray. It's قول و عمل. You speak and take action. The Prophet (pbuh) praised speaking a word of truth to a tyrant. If we just sit at home and pray (which was not the way of the Prophets or the companions), and forget about enjoining good and forbidding evil, you are just as blameworthy as the leader. Recall the hadith when Allah was going to destroy a city and the angels said there was a faithful man amongst them. Allah called for his destruction first. Go read about the sahaba and how they openly criticized Hajjaj ibn Yusuf on multiple occasions.
@@MAli99923jazakAllahu khairan for your concise answer. We often forget that to change a situation, we must change ourselves. Speaking out against rulers will change nothing, the best is to focus on yourself and leave the rest to Allah (سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى)
This was the loveliest and the most awaited discussion for me. My beloved Shaykh Uthman wearing cool 😎 1:34:00 I ask Allah to preserve him and reward him immensely for his knowledge and his works and his tireless efforts day in day out. Love you for the sake of Allah, Shaykh ❤ Furthermore, beloved brother Dilly Hussain - I almost forgot - may Allah reward you for being neutral and impartial yet again for hosting this discussion. As you did in the past between Shaykh Israr and Shaykh Abdurrahman. Some people are good at being neutral? 😂
MashaAllah very good and conscience explanation to all the questions brother dilly posed may Allah bless ustad Uthman Ibn Farooq. We need well educated and well spoken knowledgeable people giving dawah. People who give dawah please stop dividing the ummah and start explaining your points with wisdom and knowledge without the pantomime and theatrics its getting unbearable now.
SubhanAllah.... Questioner Got NO-*Chill for a Second* to Him... Lol * He Went RIGHT INTO Questions that Brothers who have BEEN Practicing Islam for DECADES Wouldn't Ask/ Concern themselves with. * Good in a Way * Then Again - Not So Good (in a Way,) ---------- Either-Way : It Is Allah(swt) That Guides Men & Women to the Straight Path. AlHumdulillah
Not ruling by the laws of Allah is considered Major Kufr according to many Scholars, so it’s not a condition that one expresses their disbelief verbally, also the view that we don’t live in those lands and therefore we shouldn’t comment on their affairs is incorrect since we are one Ummah and what happens around the World concerns us and affects Muslims in different ways both economically and politically, but he’s correct in that the right procedure should be followed in addressing the matter, unfortunately what we see in the Muslim lands is sad from both the ruling governments and the people.
Ka’b ibn ‘Ujrah reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Verily, rulers will come after me and whoever enters their audience, affirms their lies, and supports their oppression, they are not part of me and I am not part of them. They will have no presence at the Fountain. Whoever does not enter their audience, does not support their oppression, and does not affirm their lies, he is part of me and I am part of him. He will be present at the Fountain.” Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhī 2190 Grade: Sahih (authentic) according
Do you, your acquaintances, and the generality of myslim laymen rule by what Allah has ordered in your own homes these days?.. Hmm, yet here we are NOT making takfir on Muslims based on that. The rulers are a reflection of our own inner state as muslims. You want umar in charge act like those under umar at his time. We can complain all day, but NOTHING will change until we take accountability and apply the shari'ah to ourselves. There is no denying that there's corruption in land, but who is it to blame really? We've turned away from the shari'ah and we act like it isnt our fault.
@@pursueexcellence7737 that saying is well known from ibn Abbas (RA) but it’s context doesn’t apply to the one who makes laws to govern and judge the people in the land, what you are quoting is to do with judging in a matter away from the shariah, ie, not applying the command of Allah in a particular matter or so, not in cases where the actual laws are codified and are contrary to that of the shariah, this distinction is well known,
@@getout0101 Who before you preceded in this (wishy-washy) distinction of the difference between it being kufr Akbar and As-ghar being "judging in the land" and "judging in a particular matter"? Because there are over 30 salaf who have reported ijmaa' that a father not ruling by the ruling of Allah by allowing his child to have a girlfriend is commiting major kufr when he believes Allah has not made it haram, otherwise, it is only a sin.
As a defending for the Ottomans (as a non Turk): The Ottoman khulafa were highly educated and had really good Islamic education. Not only them, but their whole administration. The ulama had a lot of power and could prevent the khalifa from decisions.
Really enjoyed this podcast and learnt a lot. Going to stop criticising Muslim rulers as I agree it's not my place to say. Barakallahu Feekum to Shaykh Uthman, OMF, Dilly and the 5Pillars team.
I love this Shaykh just regarding ideology, which we have to separate from person. In general modern salafism and the line of scholars he follows. 1) Majority of ummah in Pakistan, Egypt, Syria, West and North and Africa including institutions within teach maturidi or ashari aqeedah. Are all these kufr? Some scolars in Mauriania desert have been teaching with sanad for centuries, jawhar al-tawhid for example. Also many well respected scholars in past zamakshari, fakhr al-din razi were quoted and referred by ulema. 2) Majority in (1) incorporate some form of sufism. Moreover, the modern day post-modernity sufism response with some circles is misrepresentation. Many of the Ottoman Khilafa, Omar al-Mukhtar, Abdul Qadir al-jazairi who fought and raised jihad again colonialist were part of sufi orders. Moreover many sufi or what call pseudo who follow more of a science than blind following to a shaykh are in tabligh jamaat (deoband, however, Ashraf Ali Thanvi has proper sanad, Muhammad Ilyas), west Africa, etc. With proper sanad chain in fiqh, aqeedah, arabic (preserved the arabic language) living the tradition. 2) 'Salafi' scholarship, such as Albani were known to have studied a few books actually hanafi fiqh and his father (Hanafi scholar) advised not to study hadith individually with no chain of sanad, so how can we guarantee authority? Anyone can open hadith and classify and interpret. This means in essence ISIS and modern muslim groups including ahbash, change the qibla, etc. can all be considered salafi as they are basing from Quran and Sunnah? As understand Hadith Scholars were Pharmacists ensuring the hadith narrative was pure and sahih, like a medicine, however, that particular medicine may not apply to a patient. The faqih (doctor) determines based on numerous factors of usool, stated in Quran (qati' absolute or 'dhanni' speculative proofs) hadith mentioned mutawaitr (many narrarators) khabar-ahad (one.nararator) to determine if is Halal, Haram, fardh, makruh (in Hanafi only?), mandub or mubah. Many new rulings were not available at the time so the usool allow us to determine new rulings. For example vaccine, if the components within are not haram, we will not find in quran/hadith, then qiyas (analogy) and muslah mursalah or benefit to society, which, since the vaccine does not contain haraam substance benefit is much greater than effects. Thus makes rulings problematic by not following fiqh and usools of the madhabs and in essence each salafi scholar can have their own madhab. A muhadith like Bukhari to my understanding was not a faqih and yet Salafi scholars shun negative light on Abu Hanifa (direct contact with tabi' tabi'een) form having no knowledge of hadith, when the root memory at the time was common to memorize hadith, however, the faqih laid usool for new rulings not found in quran/hadith based on usool and made it easier for us or the doctor prescription (haram, halal,.fardh,.mandub, Mubarak, etc). Example there is strong sahih in Bukhari book medicine about drinking camel urine, however for cures, no madhab will classify this as fardh! So how can Albani reclassify hadith with no sanad of learning 1400 years later and Abu Hanifa who had direct contact with tabi' tabi'een weak in hadith, obviously there were different considerations for new rulings Abu Hanifa codified via usool to ease and derive new rulings. Similarly taking previous knowledge in general the 'salafi' scholars regard plato, Greek philosophy, etc other 'foreign" or kufr. It was the muslims in the middle ages who considered history of Islam from the beginning of mankind as Islam and any knowledge of previous generations as sacred. Thus Muslims translated the works.of the Greeks and other works, while the church and other faith or movements (mongols) burned them. Hence muslims of middle ages unaffected by modern colonialism and nationalism, amalgated and expanded on previous knowledge understating as all were sacred and some from of divine, all knowledge is from Allah SWT and not the modern colonialist nation state infiltrated 20th century disease of east vs.west or Muslim world vs west kufar, dal al-islam vs dar al-kufr when in fact many Ottoman scholars and others acknowledge Dar.al-sulh, state of treaty as long as peace and agreed treaties are abid!ed, this is why Ottoman at one point had 70 treaties with other nations allowing for trade and even indirectly funding of Italian Renaissance by the venetians trading Egypt. Thus muslims in Spain and Baghdad amalgated knowledge for the Renaissance. From my perspective modern day salafism creates great confusion and misdirection
Asalamualaykum. Peace be upon you all. We need our brothers from other perspectives such as Shamsi and Abu Mussab to come on the Blood Brothers podcast. That would be box office. I think there is great good in these guys. May Allah bless Shaykh Uthman, amazing may Allah accept all our good deeds and erase our bad deeds. Ameen. Big up Dilly, 5 Pillars and the team.
what's wrong with salafi ? Aren't Salafi the ones who follow the Three first gen & against platonic Philosophy of Ashaira & Matruidhi ? Aren't Salafi following Athar of 3 first generation(which are the best generations according to Rassoul Allah ? ) Do modern Ashairah follow Abu hassan Al Ashari ? they oppose alot Aren't Ashairah similar to Jahmiya & Mutazila and many scholars repented from it & went back to Rassoul, Sahaba, Tabeen & 4 imam Aqeeda! Why would anyone follow abu hassan who came after 4 centuries with philosophy and Jahmiya Mutazila beliefs? Who himself repented from Philosophy:) (isn't that what made Nassara trinitarians ? by following philosophers who came after centuries ?) you never lean. Same with Abu Hamad Al Ghazali who dove into greek philosophy & made innovations, kufr beliefs & statements? but repented from it. Al Nawawi repented too. Isn't innovation into our Deen what caused division? Aren't people of desires & innovations who devided The Ummah ?+ hypoctis OFC@@suhaibsyed4152
@@dcanebreezy5784 bro I am a Salafi myself. I was just telling y Shamsi won’t come to a podast with an Ashari. A daee is not supposed to mix with deviants & be seen by his followers mixing & getting along with people of wrong beliefs. It sends a wrong message & causes confusion amongst the followers & seekers of true path
May Allah Reward Sheikh Uthman, Brother Dilly & all at 5 Pillars Is there a Hadith which says, IF RIBA BECOMES WIDE SPREAD IN MUSLIM LANDS ….It becomes COMPULSORY FOR EVERY MUSLIM MAN AND WOMAN MUST PERFORM JIHAD Until it is Removed…? Barak Allah o Fiqom…
May Allah reward you brother Dilly for bringing the case of brother Daniel's "inqusition". That scene had really left a bitter taste at us,it was really unnecessary putting brother Daniel into that situation.
Don't think it was unnecessary at all. It was better. Only ones who feel bad are hard-core Daniel fanboys. He was brought on stage to clarify his own stance to us laymen. That's what it was - a clarification IN HIS OWN words but fanboys understood it to be a humiliation of Daniel. The last part of Daniel taking shahadah with a salafi touch was just added as a light hearted joke to calm down super salafis
@@wally86_sorry brother, I doubt that. Everyone could clearly see Br Daniel schooled the panel trying to question him. The 'Sheikhs' tried to put Deobandis under the bus, but they got schooled about that also.
I'm not hanbali I'm shafii asharii. So I love hanbali and their schoolers. Not the khashawia(خشوية) like ibn taymiyya, Abdullah ibn abdulwahhab, ibn favzan, etc.
wdym by you have your evidences & other side has theirs ? Is adopting Greek philosophy is what Rassoul Allah, Sahaba, Tabeen & four imams were on ? People of desires & innovation will never change.
@@dcanebreezy5784the day you can explain to me that you are not even 2% of the Muslim population and the rest are on the sunnah are wrong I will give you time to speak. Otherwise without knowledge, listening to a few speeches - do not talk.
Again, most lay muslims are not aware of deep creedle issue so you rubbish unstatistics are not real. do u know islam more than Sahaba ? Quboori@@mnuhs5
Even sufi in my country knows that Allah swt is above his creation on his throne. Do u know that old ashairah believed that too ? :) won't waste my time with 2% rubbish stats ignorant@@mnuhs5
People in comments are jokes, judging the dude on anything and everything, you guys should focus on your own lives and if its that important to you maybe you should go put in the work like these dudes and then get on a podcast and say what you gotta say. go fix yourselves. Bunch of scholars in the comments .
I know right. No one is infallible at the end of the day. Shiekh Uthman says he is a student of knowledge at the end of the day. Arrogance has just increased with the internet and keyboard warriors. No one actually is humble enough to sit down with a scholar and learn from them. Anyone taking knowledge for the sake of Allah become more humble, any other motives and they became arrogant.
My brother, I have been following you for years. I think that Sheikh Othman dealt with some of the problems that some young Muslims fall into in the West. I think that the political journalist Salman Al-Ansari will be the best guest after Sheikh Othman bin Al-Faruq to talk about politics in the Middle East and how Muslim rulers deal with imperial powers. In the Western world, and how the Arab peoples deal specifically with the rulers, and the position of the Arab peoples towards the Muslim Brotherhood, as well as the Turkish, Persian and Zionist ambitions in the Arab world, as well as the reasons for the emergence of Al Qaeda and ISIS in the Islamic world, and how we build an Islamic civilization that advances among the countries of the civilized world. It is possible to talk about issues such as the Palestinian, Libyan, Yemeni, Syrian and Iraqi issues, and how Muslim rulers deal with them according to the law of security and political interest. And what hinders Muslims from scientific, civilizational, and military progress, etc.? And our problems are with the donkeys of colonialism and with the slaves of the occupiers, and they are known to every scholar of politics. Likewise, the problem of Islamic countries with left-liberal extremism in Western media and politics Likewise, how do we confront the media demonizing Islam in all means of channels and social communication that are led by international channels in the Western world, and many countries of the world copy Western news in Japan, Korea, etc.. Sharing your views with journalist Salman Al-Ansari will clarify a lot of understanding of the political reality as it is, and not as we dream or want to do it.
I’ve tried a couple of times to have Husn e zan about the Sheikh but he has acted as a Hizbi esp in Daneil’s case. He had a podcast with Mufti Tariq Masood n showed him great respect only to backbite the next time he was asked bout this session by Dawah man in an all inclusive Salafi gathering
When I get angry wanna slap in the face but control my self seek refuge from evil my self and satan.the minute I said the angry will go away..alhamdulilah the deen taught me a lot allahu akbar thank to allah swt.who send us our beloved prophet muhammad peace be upon.we love him more than our lives.because he sacrified his life for us.
Many of these comments hurt to read. Have shame people!! This is your brother, a very respectable brother at that subhan Allah! yet you call him names and critisize him. If this is how you treat a fellow muslim, i wouldn’t dare think how you'd treat an enemy.
Faruq need to provide his Masters Degree and actually provide evidence that he has one. Shaykhs exposed him for not knowing basic Arabic and cant recite Quran properly. The proof is out there.
I remember when i was in uel barking campus, uk in 1994, during univ time our imam was from middle east, and majority of followers were also from middle east, from saudi if not mistaken. They eaten kfc and mcd are just like nothing prohibitted them 🤣🤣🤣. We’re small community of muslim from malaysia didnt follow them but been teasing all the way of not eating kfc mcd and eat aiscream. But all of arab from middle east are pretend to understand islam better than us who is not from arabic speaking country. Alhamdulillah even though muslim from malaysia is not arabic speaking country but we adhere strictly to our understanding that we learnt in school that give yr best to find halal food so staying in east london during that time wasn’t hard to find halal meat and chicken but i have to travel of couse to get them from ilford lane. Jazakallah sheikh uthman. Assalamualaikum from malaysia.
Daies should just admit that almost all Muslim Ruler have not implemented the Shariah and are guilty of Istibdal(replacing the laws of Allah with other kufr secular laws and system) and Istihlal (Make halal what Allah made Haraam and Vice versa) which are MAJOR KUFR, BUT we are unable to remove them Physically and the harm outweighs the good hence we should not rebel. This could have been an honest point of view rather trying directly or INDIRECTLY trying to defend these rulers. Your gonna be questioned for that on the day of Judgement.
And when the fitnah (trial, discord) occurred in the time of ʿUthmān, some people said to Usāmah bin Zayd , ‘Will you not speak to ʿUthmān?’ So he said, ‘Do you think that I have not spoken to him, just because you have not heard it from me? Verily I will speak to him concerning what is between him and me, without opening an affair which I would not like to be the first to open.’ [An authentic narration: Related by Ahmad (3/403) and Ibn Abī ʿĀsim (2/521) So when they (the Khārijites) opened it, evil took place in the time of ʿUthmān . They opposed ʿUthmān openly, thus completing the tribulations, fighting and corruption, which has not ceased to affect the people to this day, was brought about. And this caused the tribulation to occur between ʿAlī and Muʿāwiyah, and ʿUthmān was killed for these reasons …
@@biggytough2586 Are you saying Islam changed?? Also do you know difference between Quran 5.44 - 47... 3 situations where they don't rule by Allah's law but three different rulings?
Subhan'Allah you will never find A true Muslim speak ill of his Muslim brother in public, no matter what happens, not to revile him or insult him. And if he finds a mistake or false information from him in the deen , then he corrects the matter without mentioning his name.... This is the path of our Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him, the companions,and the our salaf .. Now you find many who claim to be a Salafi while They even don't know what his Muslim brother right upon him !! backbites and hurts his Muslim brother, making a whole videos about only to convince ppl to get rid of him! Almost making him a kaifer!! Acting like they have good attantion! When they do nothing but fitnah and divided the ummah, they Only use the word Salafi to justify what they doing! May Allah deal them all.
"When Muslims will curse each other in public" This is one of the signs before day of judgment that will invite Allah's anger and lead to the destruction of the muslims. Your correct brother. The people of Iman control their anger and refrain from such backbiting/slandering of their Muslim brethren. Alhamdulillah, Salafists only makeup less than 2 percent of the Ummah, but they are platformed online and have incredible amounts of money at their disposal. I fear for the Ummah
@@AB-xi9im be exactly like a salaf, then go out and expose your brother. you cannot even pray like the salaf, fast like the salaf and you want to publicly criticize like the salaf, possibly this is what lead syrians to the complete disintegration of their nationm you still didn't learn from other's mistakes and you want badly to reproduce their same mistakes, walahi ajaeeb
@NejadIhsan I agree. In fact linguistically Aqeedah ends up meaning a contract between us and Allah in terms of the beliefs we hold, with the correct ones ending in Jannah and the false ones in Jahannam.
Very interesting podcast and fair play to you brother Dilly, you pushed back and questioned alot of the so called "salafi" ideology but i feel the brother was alot more PC than he is on his own platforms. With all due respect i have heard many of his talks and he is very divisive in his opinions on the aqidah of millions of muslims around the world, whos aqidah actually makes up the majority of the ummah today. Denial that the majority of the ummah have been upon Ashari wa Maturidi creed is quite worrying. We know the classical Atharis wa hanaabila held theological views generally inline with the mainstream ahlus sunnah Ashari view. Today unfortunately i feel alot of people who claim to be upon the Athari creed and Hanbali madhab have hijacked these titles to cling on to some tradition for more credibility. The Ottomans were far from perfect but any muslim who has read one book on islamic history will know that for approx. 1000 years they were definitely not "salafi". They promoted ahlus sunnah Ashari wa Maturidi creed, they promoted tasawwuf wa ihsaan within turuq. Calling istigaathah shirk when 1000s of ulema have stated it's permissibility with conditions is denial of basic islamic facts. Denying Salahuddin Ayyubi was an Ashari and promoted Ashari madaaris is again pure denial of facts. Just like we have "salafi" individuals who deny imam Nawawi and ibn Hajar al Asqalaani were upon Ashari aqidah. Atleast be honest and say yes we are a minority and have always been this way, we have a new creed that popped up in the last 2 centuries and we have a handful of scholars who we can turn too. Pure and simple, all mainstream muslims adhere to Quran wa Sunnah, yet we respect and concede in knowledge to the 1000s of scholars within the madhaahib who have scrutinised and meticulously researched masaail. Are we going to go above ibn aabidin, imam nawawi et al. ?? For the layman either we follow a fortified methodology within a madhab laid down by 1000s of scholars whos uprightness has been agreed upon or we follow a few modern day scholars with minority opinions that have arisen in the last 200 years. Many muslims cannot read Qur'an with correct tajweed, how then can we open Bukhaari wa Muslim etc. and find our wudu and prayer method? Practically people follow teachers, who follow their teachers, only a mujtahid will extract rulings directly from Qur'an wa Sunnah. Only jaahil people cling to their own madhab and state the rest are wrong, the ikhtilaaf within the ummah is a mercy as we know. The brother in essence said in his closing remarks we should unite the ummah if they agree on my narrow understanding of classical theology, this sounds disingenuous to me. May Allah forgive me if my comments are out turn or if i am mistaken. الله مستعان.
You took the words out of my mouth bro, well done. The islamic methodologies are at large, are long fruitful tradition & insyallah rooted upon the haq. To be united as the guest implied, is to in line with the conundrum of modern salafi ideology, which is different from the classical hanabila, thus It felt insincere..
Just imagine if Muslims stopped following the 4 schools of thought and joined Salafism. All the knowledge gained by sincere Ulema, would be lost forever. In Salafist ideology, burning of books not in accordance with their beliefs is common. Ignorance and confusion would prevail. The hadith mentioning knowledge being taken away is close.
@@kb4432If you had intellect you would know that there is no difference between Salafi and the 4 I'mmah of Ahl al-Sunnah who were Salafi. The issue is, when the false claimants of these madhhaibs use the madhhaibs as a means to spread their innovated and filthy creeds such as the Ash'ari, Maturidi and other Mutakallim filth.
LOL ? Aren't 4 imams on Salaf Athar aqeeda & fiqh? What knowledge ? greek philosophy & shirk ? Why would someone follow Aqeeda of people who came after centuries & leave Three first generations ? Isn't innovations what devided the Ummah ? @@kb4432
In the last section in Obedience to ruler section, this guy proves himself that his criteria come from the known Power sources, For him MBS and like are above all the rules.
The first part was just asking about Hanbali rulings and he went on a long rant about madhhabs. I would've appreciated to hear more about his Hanbalism.
@@Figleaf-Bicarbonate MBS is not infallible nor should he be judged with such a standard. First of all you don't know his intentions, it could be to purchase it so that it isn't on public display, seeing as the painting was supposed to be shown at a gallery in Abu Dhabi in 2018 but since MBS purchased it, nobody has laid eyes upon it to the public's knowledge since 2017. Making the volume of adhaan was in response to complaints from citizens, so your qualm on that issue is with the residents, not the one acting on ther complaints, and lowering the max volume affects someone's deen how? Does it go in the Qur'aan and Sunnaah to lower the volume of the adhaan? Aren't we supposed to be a considerate people? If everyone recited at the top of their lungs during salah nobody in the masjid would be able to concentrate. The clubs opening, I can only find news on a club opening in Jeddah in 2019, which the GEA of SA stated they did not authorise, but rather the organisers took advantage of a license granted for a different event altogether to open the club. So everything is not as it seems. Either way, it should be removed but again, that shouldn't effect your ability to practise your religion and be the best Muslim you can be. BaarakAllaahu feekum.
@@Figleaf-BicarbonateHow about you worried about your sister, your mom and dad at home. Why do you stretch your hand where it doesn’t reach?🤷🏽♂️ Does knowing him bought the picture increases your eman?? How about you leave things that concern you and focus on things that concern you. Just know that I love you for the sake of Allah.❤️❤️
The greater harm can often come from staying silent and letting the ruler secularise entire nations, rather than speaking up and criticising. This is why we have the crisis we have today. You have to look at the long-term picture on a case-by-case basis, rather than having a blanket rule “never criticise the ruler”.
@@AdamAliAden In many cases it can (and has) put pressure on the ruler, from inside and from outside, to make changes or not go too far. Wise rulers will pay attention to what others are saying, in order not to lose control. Muslim rulers are no different.
@@MAli99923 The hadith says IF one intends to advise a ruler, do so privately. But most criticism of rulers nowadays is to inform the public of the ruler's actions (for example, collaboration with Israel) rather than to advise the ruler. Secondly, the reason generally given to keep quiet in the ahadeeth is the greater harm to Muslims if they rebel or disobey. I am pointing out that in SOME cases at least, the greater harm can come from keeping quiet and letting the ruler do whatever he wants.
@@imranqqq7307 And when the fitnah (trial, discord) occurred in the time of ʿUthmān, some people said to Usāmah bin Zayd , ‘Will you not speak to ʿUthmān?’ So he said, ‘Do you think that I have not spoken to him, just because you have not heard it from me? Verily I will speak to him concerning what is between him and me, without opening an affair which I would not like to be the first to open.’ [An authentic narration: Related by Ahmad (3/403) and Ibn Abī ʿĀsim (2/521) So when they (the Khārijites) opened it, evil took place in the time of ʿUthmān . They opposed ʿUthmān openly, thus completing the tribulations, fighting and corruption, which has not ceased to affect the people to this day, was brought about. And this caused the tribulation to occur between ʿAlī and Muʿāwiyah, and ʿUthmān was killed for these reasons …
2:24 - Do you follow a madhab?
10:13 - What is the ruling on those that miss Salah ?
15:16 - Is the Niqab fardh?
21:28 - is Smoking haram?
23:35 - Is all seafood permissible?
25:43 - Is eating from McDonald's halal in the west?
32:16 - Fiqh of Divorce (3x talaq)
35:46 - Can we give salam to non-Muslims ?
36:35 - Do Salafis have respect for Madhabs?
40:33 - Would you give dawah or a talk in a Non-Salafi masjid?
45:59 - Can there be brotherhood with those that practice Istighstha or Mawlid etc ?
49:36 - Can there ever be unity with those who have a different Aqidah?
57:37 - His confrontation with Daniel Haqiqatjou last year.
1:04:53 - Can we unite behind a khalif with a different Aqidah ?
1:10:41 - issue of obeying the ruler
1:16:18 - Can you criticise the ruler ?
1:27:25 - Did you really get stabbed ?
Please pin this
@@imaadindoronly blood brothers admin can do that, im just a viewer
JazakAllah khair 🙌🙌
Jazak Allah Khairan
Remember the path or manhajj the prophet of Islam left for the ummah are the TWO WEIGHTY MATTERS the Qur'an and Ahlulbayt
Known is hadith Thaqalayn
Thank you
Shaykh does good work defending Islam against the enemies of Islam, the muslim community appreciates this and hopes shaykh Uthman carries on with his work against the enemies of Islam
But makes a grave mistake honouring leaders/ figures in the salafi community
@@jeje4042why?
@@jeje4042 nothing wrong with that
He isn't a sheikh/scholar
@@abdullahassaffah he says in the video he is not I said it out of respect
Great Podcast & a well respected & well knowledgeable guest. May Allah swt guide us on the path of the Sahabah & we follow the Quran & Sunnah….. Ameen
Ameen❤
Remember brother, the prophet of Islam left TWO weighty matters the Qur'an and ahlulbayt for source of guidance after him
Not the sahaabah.
Pls check N Investigate
Fear Allah YA KADDAB! Allah PRAISED the sahabah. U rafidhi kaddab. We love the Ahlul Bayt, u are an evil liar.
Sheikh uthman, you’re a good role model for the Muslims because you put in the work for Allah SWT, see how Allah has elevated you and made you loved worldwide, may Allah increase you in strength and guidance!
Allahumma baarik. Alhamdullah, Ya Allah. Many many so many syubhat that I have, Alhamdulillah with Allah's will, I come across this video and NOW, Alhamdulillah It make absolutely sense. It clear up of all my syubhat that I had
Jazakallahu khayran sheikh Uthman, May Allah grant you jannah.
-
"May Allah unite us upon Quran, Sunnah and the way of salafulummah"
(like sheikh Uthman said in closing of this video) ❤
-
MashaAllah love this shaykh. Came to my local masjid on his tour to the UK and hugged him. And like him, I work in the science field too
The quality of this is a pure diamond بارك الله فيكم اخوتنا
alhamdulillah i met this sheikh during one of his trips to mosque in scotland, asked about criticising of the saudi rulers. He had a good reply
What did he say?
@@AB-xx7hy And when the fitnah (trial, discord) occurred in the time of ʿUthmān, some people said to Usāmah bin Zayd , ‘Will you not speak to ʿUthmān?’ So he said, ‘Do you think that I have not spoken to him, just because you have not heard it from me? Verily I will speak to him concerning what is between him and me, without opening an affair which I would not like to be the first to open.’ [An authentic narration: Related by Ahmad (3/403) and Ibn Abī ʿĀsim (2/521)
So when they (the Khārijites) opened it, evil took place in the time of ʿUthmān . They opposed ʿUthmān openly, thus completing the tribulations, fighting and corruption, which has not ceased to affect the people to this day, was brought about. And this caused the tribulation to occur between ʿAlī and Muʿāwiyah, and ʿUthmān was killed for these reasons …
Bro don't leave us hanging like that 😂
On the issue of rebelling against rulers, I can respect the fact the shaykh did not blanketly deny its permissibility, like so many of these madkhalis, however he didn't make it clear what the conditions of rebellion and also criticism of rulers are. If this is something he studied in fiqh then it should be relatively easy to give an overview in this podcast, we will see if he does it in a second podcast...
Bro as always, such issues usually lie between the 2 extremes. I haven't seen that part yet where the sheikh said this, but my gut feel says on this matter the truth is somewhere in between what madkhalis and what Haqiqatjou and his gang say.
Sheikh ibn uthaymeen actually said it was permissible but mentioned clear conditions. Its on the masjid dar us sunnah channel. A VERY CLEAR, PRECISE video mentioning 4-5 conditions
Ka’b ibn ‘Ujrah reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Verily, rulers will come after me and whoever enters their audience, affirms their lies, and supports their oppression, they are not part of me and I am not part of them. They will have no presence at the Fountain. Whoever does not enter their audience, does not support their oppression, and does not affirm their lies, he is part of me and I am part of him. He will be present at the Fountain.”
Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhī 2190
Grade: Sahih (authentic)
@shoIslam - why is your name show Islam? Do you advice ppl to be open with Islam. If do good but be accurate in speech.
Also you error on so called Madkhalis, they say you can rebel but has conditions... too
Do you not see what happened to the muslim countries recently that revolt the leader? Now they are dead, and the same people who revolt want them back. Crying because the life was better.
@@amdol the problem is they understood the problem but not the cure. They needed to replace the leadership with an Islamic caliphate and not another secular democratic regime.
Wallahi, Shaykh Uthman does some really good work and is really the Lion of the Ummah in the West.
MashAllah Barakallah, may Allah swt bless this ummah and the people striving for goodness and the pleasure of Allah swt
Ma shaa Allah, may Allah bless both of you, one of the most intellectual podcast I have watched, love and respect.
Man, season 3 is off to an amazing start
Ya know that bro!!!,
Mashaallah my respect for sheikh uthman gets bigger every time i watch him
I love this guy. May bless his him abundanlty for his efforts. And you too dilly.
Amazing podcast. I love sheik Uthman and our brother Dilly for his amazing work. I am waiting for the 2nd part of the podcast.
Sheikh I am a Maldivian , love this podcast, n if you want to know if you want to a maldivian you have to be a muslim as far as I know n the country by law is an Islamic country. Hope you vist there soon😊
Mashallah a very calm and uniting discussion.
Just what we needed after the last Talk with Daniel Haqiqatjou didn't go well.
Which talk
Daniels has made a video as it seems like Uthman bin farooq is lying yet again.
ua-cam.com/video/8mTshPbfKzw/v-deo.html
@@MisterSolitudeua-cam.com/video/JUK_SRnRV7A/v-deo.htmlsi=4CHylinc62OZUXbP
Masha Allah, may Allah preserve brother Uthman. Very beneficial talk.
Masha Allah fantastic interview. Full of very very important information regarding the situation of the ummah. She is very learned but also very humble. Great man
May Allah preserve shaykh uthmaan
Ameen.
MashAllah, Great work Brother Dilly.
Great talk from Sheikh Uthman…
As salaamu alaykum brothers, sisters, friends and foes.
Please like, share and comment on this video, as well as subscribing to the 5Pillars UA-cam channel!
Jazakallah khayran.
Faruq need to provide his Masters Degree and actually provide evidence that he has one.
Shaykhs exposed him for not knowing basic Arabic and cant recite Quran properly.
The proof is out there.
Why allow this lying jaahil lie on Aimma of Islam?
And when the fitnah (trial, discord) occurred in the time of ʿUthmān, some people said to Usāmah bin Zayd , ‘Will you not speak to ʿUthmān?’ So he said, ‘Do you think that I have not spoken to him, just because you have not heard it from me? Verily I will speak to him concerning what is between him and me, without opening an affair which I would not like to be the first to open.’ [An authentic narration: Related by Ahmad (3/403) and Ibn Abī ʿĀsim (2/521)
So when they (the Khārijites) opened it, evil took place in the time of ʿUthmān . They opposed ʿUthmān openly, thus completing the tribulations, fighting and corruption, which has not ceased to affect the people to this day, was brought about. And this caused the tribulation to occur between ʿAlī and Muʿāwiyah, and ʿUthmān was killed for these reasons …
و عليك السلام و رحمة الله و بركاته
My first time listening to Shaykh Uthman and I’m blessed to do so. Jazakallah khair.
I know Shaykh Uthman personally and he is one of the most amazing, humble, caring people on Earth. One of my favorite human beings and teachers.
Masha’Allaah shaykh uthman dealt with the questions. You can’t be concerned that the rulers of Muslim countries are kaffir but your living under a kafir ruler in the UK 😂 🇬🇧
May Allah protect Shaykh Uthman and brother Dily
His trying
It is the mainly Salafi movement that have caused significant division's in the UK. No hanafi has ever gone to a Shafi and telling them they are deviant and need to follow 'quran & sunnah'. They have casues mass confusion and fitna amkngst the youth from the 1990's in the Uk.
I don’t think that’s true at all. No salafi goes around calling followers of the madahib deviants.. the only people they call deviants when applies to aqeedah which is a whole different topic.
@@aklimurraza2626 Sorry brother but you must be living under a rock if you think that is the case. I reside in Birmingham and since the the late 80's , we had literally salafis, almost militant into thier approach in our areas going around speaking to the youth telling them ridiculous things like imam Abu Hanifa only knew 40 hadiths ! Stating they are not following quran and sunnah. I have seen and experienced this personally so please stop with the nonsense
@@shaikhimi6458they still do it
@@shaikhimi6458
Some so called hanafis said a Shafii man can't marry a hanafi sister... like what?
@@ragpaysever2260
4 mathhabs are Athari in Aqida & salafi in fiq... what's Numan's mom's mathhab? what is difference in Usul of 4 mathhab in fiq?
Imam Ahmad made tabdi on kulabis who taught Mid life Hasan Ashari before he repented to Athari, proof he wrote Usul Dayana affirmed by Asakir, Dhahabi & I think Bayhaqi.
Very informative podcast brother. Learnt a lot
Masha Allah, very good interview. Thanks for clarifying on Daniel’s discussion, I have great respect now for YQ and Sheikh Uthman the both of them from different positions show sincere intentions to unite the Ummah. Ya Rabb, grant us Aafia 🤲🏾
Umm did you not hear the part where he mentioned sheikh Karim Abuzaid’s refutation on Yasir Qadhi? I think you should go watch that akhi May Allah bless you
@@longegg-wind9577 , Karim abuzaid is another boot licker.
I’m still unclear on that cuz at the event DH clearly told him that he would’ve preferred to be contacted privately on those questions. One of them must be lying.
@@ahmedyamani7388
Brother don’t accuse fellow Muslim brothers of potentially lying. There was some sort of misunderstanding and we should move on. Don’t let it distract us.
@@sammu Brother both of them have been exposed lying at different times. This is nothing new, so me claiming that one of them has to have lied here is not a stretch giving the contradictions displayed.
Also everyone must be held to account, esp brothers with big platforms. We can’t just dismiss and sweep everything under the carpet.
I want to see examples of Muslims critisizing rulers from the west that resulted in bloodshed in Muslim Countries.
They are just fear mongering, it was just a dumb argument.
They don’t have the guts bro unfortunately.. scared they’ll be called terrorists. What a joke
Have you ever heard about the Arab Spring and how it was influenced by the Arab diaspora (mainly) on social media like Facebook or Reddit? Or were you too busy painting the walls of your cave?
@@human0_0skull must have been in that cave you’re talking about
@@human0_0skull akhi speak respectfully and show good manners, your meant to love me for the sake of Allah. The Arabs in those nations used social medias themselves to organise and take part in the Arab Spring.
In Egypt, Tunisia there wasn't bloodshed, Libya has conspiracy theories surrounding it.
Insightful. Mashaallah.
I love listening to Shaykh Uthman. Clear, methodical, and always based upon evidence.
Yes. Alhamdulillah.
I love to listen to anyone who speaks the truth and brings evidence. Where is the evidence in what he said? Daniel made a video responding to this. Walahi it is depressing to see muslims engaged in this.
@@HumbleServantofAllah642 Uthman makes clear mistakes. The problem is he reads books with no teacher smh
@@m4fital2 no teacher?? don't about someone when u never really know them akhi.
We are truly blessed to have shiekhs like this. May Allah SWT reward Shiekh Uthman in abundance Allahumma Ameen ❤
Al-hamdulillah. Amazing guest you have here.
Sheikh Uthman speak with such clarity, simplicity, and kindness Alhumdulilah he is a blessing for the English speaking audience. May Allah bless him for all of his work.
Masha Allah, may Allah bless and guide you both.
In all respect... He's incorrect...imam Maliks usool is that he would give preferrence to Amal ahle madinah over a saheeh hadeeth that has singular narration . Also this was not the dawah of the 90s and early 2000... The salafis would denounce following Madhab completely ...some of the super salafis as they were known back then would call Umar a biddati...Inna lillahi...for the ijtihad of 20 rakas
@@043ash i dunno brother
This was an excellent episode, you really did your homework Dilly and asked precise, need to know questions
He was very clear and we ended up seeing an authentic unequivocal discussion
I love sh Uthman. May Allah protect him and bless his work. The podcast was very beneficial as well msA.
I'd really look forward to a 2nd podcast to drill down into the political side. While it's very clear in Islam that we shouldn't rebel against our rulers for oppression alone, we can definitely criticise them. Umar ibn Al'Khattab himself was criticised and allowed it. Imam Ahmed in Hanbal publicly spoke out against the fitna of khalq al-Quran. There are many other examples.
However, rebellion is a different issue. The question here should be, is a ruler that actively *hates* Islam and Muslims still a Muslim ruler worth obeying? A ruler who's sole purpose is to shut down any and all Muslim work?
At the end of the day, those who say rebellion is haram would still follow those who rebelled if their revolution is successful even if they think it's haram to do so.
Much of the salaf rebelled and fought against the rulers FOR OPPRESSION. For example Abdullah ibn Amr was being oppressed by having his property taken away by the Ummayyad rulers and when asked by someone to just let it go so he wouldn't die, he replied with the famous statement of the Prophet (saw) : "Whoever is killed defending his wealth, he is a martyr". There are many more examples from the tabieen who were in constant battles against the Ummayyads for their oppression
The secular rulers of today that are consistently dismantling the Sharia and oppressing Muslims by killing and imprisoning them are much worse than the Ummayyads or Abbasids or Ottomans
@@wakemeup38 what do you think criticism will lead to? you dont know what you are talking about
JazakAllah khair
I appreciate Sheikh Uthman and his desire to bring the ummah together. That being said, I find something very wrong with his stance on criticizing rulers. He switched back and forth between Khalifa and ruler. Then when he said "why don't you go to those countries and say the same thing" and the brother responded "well they will arrest and kill me", the sheikh responded "exactly". So we are just supposed to be completely silent (as the oppressors want) while they arrest and torture our scholars? While they sell out to the west? As they work with foreign intelligence agencies against the Muslims? As they destabilize other countries, installing and propping up more oppressors? Changing the school curriculum to pervert the masses? Introducing fitnah where it didnt exist before? All while inviting foreign soldiers to establish themselves on your land? If the argument is that blood will be shed, my response is that blood has already been shed and is being shed. I'm not saying that the people in any specific country should just get up and start fighting the government, but calling it out seems like a reasonable first step.
And when the fitnah (trial, discord) occurred in the time of ʿUthmān, some people said to Usāmah bin Zayd , ‘Will you not speak to ʿUthmān?’ So he said, ‘Do you think that I have not spoken to him, just because you have not heard it from me? Verily I will speak to him concerning what is between him and me, without opening an affair which I would not like to be the first to open.’ [An authentic narration: Related by Ahmad (3/403) and Ibn Abī ʿĀsim (2/521)
So when they (the Khārijites) opened it, evil took place in the time of ʿUthmān . They opposed ʿUthmān openly, thus completing the tribulations, fighting and corruption, which has not ceased to affect the people to this day, was brought about. And this caused the tribulation to occur between ʿAlī and Muʿāwiyah, and ʿUthmān was killed for these reasons …
@pvcrma1 I understand, but what is the solution? Do we sit back and stay quiet while the ummah deteriorates? Our children continue being brainwashed in schools? Countries being destabilized? I'm not suggesting armed conflict. I'm not even claiming to have an answer, but is saying that allowing Halloween celebrations in the Arabian peninsula haram too far? Is saying that the rulers allowing clubs and bars in the land of the sahaba are wrong for doing so, being a khariji? Is speaking out against arresting, torturing, and executing scholars equivalent to calling for violence? I don't think so. Sitting silent and hoping for the best doesn't seem like an intelligent solution. If the people there know it but are unable to speak because of a direct threat of arrest or death, the rest of us have to be silent? If you run your country in such a way, armed rebellion is a NATURAL result. This is a rule that has been seen time and time again in history. Muslim lands or not.
@@Melhimri The solutions are many:
- 01. Learn Aqeedah
- 02. Return to the Sunnah
- 03. Repentance
- 04. Go back to the way of companions
- 05. Change our condition [13.11]
Let us be realistic. The masaajid are practically empty and the potential of the Muslims are only seen on Fridays/Ramadaan/Eed etc.
We want victory whilst we are far away from the deen of Allaah! Does that even make sense?
@pvcrma1 that all sounds nice and I'm not discounting it. But, again, our scholars are being locked up. The scholars being promoted by the government are teaching government sponsored Islam. The companions challenged the oppressive rulers on many (and I mean MANY occasions). Many of our most famous scholars were arrested and tortured for publicly disagreeing with leaders.
Let me just summarize the situation. The leaders are pushing the population into more and more western ways: introducing clubs, concerts, gambling, bars, mixed events, etc. They are also jailing, torturing, and killing anyone who criticizes them. Then you have a group of people who are saying criticizing them is haram and you are a khariji if you do it. The way of Islam is not to just sit at home and pray. It's قول و عمل. You speak and take action. The Prophet (pbuh) praised speaking a word of truth to a tyrant. If we just sit at home and pray (which was not the way of the Prophets or the companions), and forget about enjoining good and forbidding evil, you are just as blameworthy as the leader. Recall the hadith when Allah was going to destroy a city and the angels said there was a faithful man amongst them. Allah called for his destruction first. Go read about the sahaba and how they openly criticized Hajjaj ibn Yusuf on multiple occasions.
@@MAli99923jazakAllahu khairan for your concise answer. We often forget that to change a situation, we must change ourselves. Speaking out against rulers will change nothing, the best is to focus on yourself and leave the rest to Allah (سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى)
Brother Dilly , very rarely u have disappointed in this interview.
Alhamdulillah for Islam
Wow this brother really impressed me. May Allah help him spread the deen.
The legend! 🙌🏽
We all agree on the unity of all Muslim ln Sha Allah
This was the loveliest and the most awaited discussion for me. My beloved Shaykh Uthman wearing cool 😎 1:34:00
I ask Allah to preserve him and reward him immensely for his knowledge and his works and his tireless efforts day in day out. Love you for the sake of Allah, Shaykh ❤
Furthermore, beloved brother Dilly Hussain - I almost forgot - may Allah reward you for being neutral and impartial yet again for hosting this discussion. As you did in the past between Shaykh Israr and Shaykh Abdurrahman.
Some people are good at being neutral? 😂
Masha Allah!!! That was neat!!! Thoroughly enjoyed it. Have great respect for Shaykh uthman. May Allah guide us all and keep us steadfast. Ameen.
Jazakallahu khair for such a knowledgeable and beneficial podcast,
As always sheikh rocks
May Allah bless Shaykh Uthman
MashaAllah very good and conscience explanation to all the questions brother dilly posed may Allah bless ustad Uthman Ibn Farooq. We need well educated and well spoken knowledgeable people giving dawah. People who give dawah please stop dividing the ummah and start explaining your points with wisdom and knowledge without the pantomime and theatrics its getting unbearable now.
SubhanAllah....
Questioner Got NO-*Chill for a Second* to Him...
Lol
* He Went RIGHT INTO Questions that Brothers who have BEEN Practicing Islam for DECADES Wouldn't Ask/ Concern themselves with.
* Good in a Way
* Then Again - Not So Good (in a Way,)
----------
Either-Way :
It Is Allah(swt) That Guides Men & Women to the Straight Path.
AlHumdulillah
Not ruling by the laws of Allah is considered Major Kufr according to many Scholars, so it’s not a condition that one expresses their disbelief verbally, also the view that we don’t live in those lands and therefore we shouldn’t comment on their affairs is incorrect since we are one Ummah and what happens around the World concerns us and affects Muslims in different ways both economically and politically, but he’s correct in that the right procedure should be followed in addressing the matter, unfortunately what we see in the Muslim lands is sad from both the ruling governments and the people.
My scholar, ibn Abbas رضي الله عنه said it is Kufr less than Kufr (I.e. minor kufr.).
Ka’b ibn ‘Ujrah reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Verily, rulers will come after me and whoever enters their audience, affirms their lies, and supports their oppression, they are not part of me and I am not part of them. They will have no presence at the Fountain. Whoever does not enter their audience, does not support their oppression, and does not affirm their lies, he is part of me and I am part of him. He will be present at the Fountain.”
Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhī 2190
Grade: Sahih (authentic) according
Do you, your acquaintances, and the generality of myslim laymen rule by what Allah has ordered in your own homes these days?.. Hmm, yet here we are NOT making takfir on Muslims based on that. The rulers are a reflection of our own inner state as muslims. You want umar in charge act like those under umar at his time. We can complain all day, but NOTHING will change until we take accountability and apply the shari'ah to ourselves. There is no denying that there's corruption in land, but who is it to blame really? We've turned away from the shari'ah and we act like it isnt our fault.
@@pursueexcellence7737 that saying is well known from ibn Abbas (RA) but it’s context doesn’t apply to the one who makes laws to govern and judge the people in the land, what you are quoting is to do with judging in a matter away from the shariah, ie, not applying the command of Allah in a particular matter or so, not in cases where the actual laws are codified and are contrary to that of the shariah, this distinction is well known,
@@getout0101 Who before you preceded in this (wishy-washy) distinction of the difference between it being kufr Akbar and As-ghar being "judging in the land" and "judging in a particular matter"?
Because there are over 30 salaf who have reported ijmaa' that a father not ruling by the ruling of Allah by allowing his child to have a girlfriend is commiting major kufr when he believes Allah has not made it haram, otherwise, it is only a sin.
Daniel Haqiqatjou has answered about the stuff that was discussed about him
May Allah bless you sheikh Uthman ❤
As a defending for the Ottomans (as a non Turk):
The Ottoman khulafa were highly educated and had really good Islamic education.
Not only them, but their whole administration. The ulama had a lot of power and could prevent the khalifa from decisions.
May Allah bless the Ulema of Deoband who upon the Quran and Sunnah
Ameen
They are not upon the quran and sunnah
Than why so many bidaah comes from them
@@maisamsadigi1658 Ikr
الْحَمْدُ لِلَّه
Unity is the key but we must unit on what is the solution to ummah situation of the question “how”
Back to Quran & Sunnah as our Salaf Al Salih.
Amazing and really useful podcast.
Cant wait for the second one
Really enjoyed this podcast and learnt a lot. Going to stop criticising Muslim rulers as I agree it's not my place to say. Barakallahu Feekum to Shaykh Uthman, OMF, Dilly and the 5Pillars team.
I love this Shaykh just regarding ideology, which we have to separate from person. In general modern salafism and the line of scholars he follows.
1) Majority of ummah in Pakistan, Egypt, Syria, West and North and Africa including institutions within teach maturidi or ashari aqeedah. Are all these kufr? Some scolars in Mauriania desert have been teaching with sanad for centuries, jawhar al-tawhid for example. Also many well respected scholars in past zamakshari, fakhr al-din razi were quoted and referred by ulema.
2) Majority in (1) incorporate some form of sufism. Moreover, the modern day post-modernity sufism response with some circles is misrepresentation. Many of the Ottoman Khilafa, Omar al-Mukhtar, Abdul Qadir al-jazairi who fought and raised jihad again colonialist were part of sufi orders. Moreover many sufi or what call pseudo who follow more of a science than blind following to a shaykh are in tabligh jamaat (deoband, however, Ashraf Ali Thanvi has proper sanad, Muhammad Ilyas), west Africa, etc. With proper sanad chain in fiqh, aqeedah, arabic (preserved the arabic language) living the tradition.
2) 'Salafi' scholarship, such as Albani were known to have studied a few books actually hanafi fiqh and his father (Hanafi scholar) advised not to study hadith individually with no chain of sanad, so how can we guarantee authority? Anyone can open hadith and classify and interpret. This means in essence ISIS and modern muslim groups including ahbash, change the qibla, etc. can all be considered salafi as they are basing from Quran and Sunnah? As understand Hadith Scholars were Pharmacists ensuring the hadith narrative was pure and sahih, like a medicine, however, that particular medicine may not apply to a patient. The faqih (doctor) determines based on numerous factors of usool, stated in Quran (qati' absolute or 'dhanni' speculative proofs) hadith mentioned mutawaitr (many narrarators) khabar-ahad (one.nararator) to determine if is Halal, Haram, fardh, makruh (in Hanafi only?), mandub or mubah. Many new rulings were not available at the time so the usool allow us to determine new rulings. For example vaccine, if the components within are not haram, we will not find in quran/hadith, then qiyas (analogy) and muslah mursalah or benefit to society, which, since the vaccine does not contain haraam substance benefit is much greater than effects. Thus makes rulings problematic by not following fiqh and usools of the madhabs and in essence each salafi scholar can have their own madhab. A muhadith like Bukhari to my understanding was not a faqih and yet Salafi scholars shun negative light on Abu Hanifa (direct contact with tabi' tabi'een) form having no knowledge of hadith, when the root memory at the time was common to memorize hadith, however, the faqih laid usool for new rulings not found in quran/hadith based on usool and made it easier for us or the doctor prescription (haram, halal,.fardh,.mandub, Mubarak, etc). Example there is strong sahih in Bukhari book medicine about drinking camel urine, however for cures, no madhab will classify this as fardh! So how can Albani reclassify hadith with no sanad of learning 1400 years later and Abu Hanifa who had direct contact with tabi' tabi'een weak in hadith, obviously there were different considerations for new rulings Abu Hanifa codified via usool to ease and derive new rulings. Similarly taking previous knowledge in general the 'salafi' scholars regard plato, Greek philosophy, etc other 'foreign" or kufr. It was the muslims in the middle ages who considered history of Islam from the beginning of mankind as Islam and any knowledge of previous generations as sacred. Thus Muslims translated the works.of the Greeks and other works, while the church and other faith or movements (mongols) burned them. Hence muslims of middle ages unaffected by modern colonialism and nationalism, amalgated and expanded on previous knowledge understating as all were sacred and some from of divine, all knowledge is from Allah SWT and not the modern colonialist nation state infiltrated 20th century disease of east vs.west or Muslim world vs west kufar, dal al-islam vs dar al-kufr when in fact many Ottoman scholars and others acknowledge Dar.al-sulh, state of treaty as long as peace and agreed treaties are abid!ed, this is why Ottoman at one point had 70 treaties with other nations allowing for trade and even indirectly funding of Italian Renaissance by the venetians trading Egypt. Thus muslims in Spain and Baghdad amalgated knowledge for the Renaissance. From my perspective modern day salafism creates great confusion and misdirection
Brother Dilly should’ve asked him about Shaykh Yasir Al-Hanafi responding to his invitation to sit with ulema
Now the steps of gaining power should be should be discussed and you will have to have a group that can fight
Asalamualaykum.
Peace be upon you all. We need our brothers from other perspectives such as Shamsi and Abu Mussab to come on the Blood Brothers podcast. That would be box office. I think there is great good in these guys.
May Allah bless Shaykh Uthman, amazing may Allah accept all our good deeds and erase our bad deeds. Ameen.
Big up Dilly, 5 Pillars and the team.
Difficult to get Shamsi. He only sits with and promotes Salafi speakers. :)
Shamsi has deep arrogance will never let Him to seat with alot of Muslims may Allah guide him
what's wrong with salafi ?
Aren't Salafi the ones who follow the Three first gen & against platonic Philosophy of Ashaira & Matruidhi ? Aren't Salafi following Athar of 3 first generation(which are the best generations according to Rassoul Allah ? )
Do modern Ashairah follow Abu hassan Al Ashari ? they oppose alot
Aren't Ashairah similar to Jahmiya & Mutazila and many scholars repented from it & went back to Rassoul, Sahaba, Tabeen & 4 imam Aqeeda!
Why would anyone follow abu hassan who came after 4 centuries with philosophy and Jahmiya Mutazila beliefs? Who himself repented from Philosophy:) (isn't that what made Nassara trinitarians ? by following philosophers who came after centuries ?) you never lean.
Same with Abu Hamad Al Ghazali who dove into greek philosophy & made innovations, kufr beliefs & statements? but repented from it.
Al Nawawi repented too.
Isn't innovation into our Deen what caused division?
Aren't people of desires & innovations who devided The Ummah ?+ hypoctis OFC@@suhaibsyed4152
@@dcanebreezy5784 bro I am a Salafi myself. I was just telling y Shamsi won’t come to a podast with an Ashari. A daee is not supposed to mix with deviants & be seen by his followers mixing & getting along with people of wrong beliefs. It sends a wrong message & causes confusion amongst the followers & seekers of true path
May Allah Reward Sheikh Uthman, Brother Dilly & all at 5 Pillars
Is there a Hadith which says, IF RIBA BECOMES WIDE SPREAD IN MUSLIM LANDS ….It becomes COMPULSORY FOR EVERY MUSLIM MAN AND WOMAN MUST PERFORM JIHAD Until it is Removed…?
Barak Allah o Fiqom…
May Allah reward you brother Dilly for bringing the case of brother Daniel's "inqusition". That scene had really left a bitter taste at us,it was really unnecessary putting brother Daniel into that situation.
Daniel put himself in that situation.
Daniel put himself in that situation and got schooled
@@ABC-wi6vt😂😂
Don't think it was unnecessary at all. It was better. Only ones who feel bad are hard-core Daniel fanboys. He was brought on stage to clarify his own stance to us laymen. That's what it was - a clarification IN HIS OWN words but fanboys understood it to be a humiliation of Daniel.
The last part of Daniel taking shahadah with a salafi touch was just added as a light hearted joke to calm down super salafis
@@wally86_sorry brother, I doubt that. Everyone could clearly see Br Daniel schooled the panel trying to question him. The 'Sheikhs' tried to put Deobandis under the bus, but they got schooled about that also.
May Allah bless Uthman
Try getting a proper Hanabli scholar on, that would be better and beneficial.
Facts.
Faruq has a fake Masters Degree
Hanbali scholar not the Wahhabis
jahil spotted 🚨 @khairt1731
Well he should try and get you instead...so that we will see what you have
I'm not hanbali I'm shafii asharii. So I love hanbali and their schoolers. Not the khashawia(خشوية) like ibn taymiyya, Abdullah ibn abdulwahhab, ibn favzan, etc.
Good interview by Dilly, even though he doesn't ascribe to the salafi manhaj he was fair and measured in his questions and responses
Shiekh Uthman has amazing knowledge, Alhamdulillah.
“Look at evidences”, you have your evidences, the other side has theirs.
wdym by you have your evidences & other side has theirs ?
Is adopting Greek philosophy is what Rassoul Allah, Sahaba, Tabeen & four imams were on ?
People of desires & innovation will never change.
@@dcanebreezy5784the day you can explain to me that you are not even 2% of the Muslim population and the rest are on the sunnah are wrong I will give you time to speak. Otherwise without knowledge, listening to a few speeches - do not talk.
Again, most lay muslims are not aware of deep creedle issue so you rubbish unstatistics are not real.
do u know islam more than Sahaba ? Quboori@@mnuhs5
Even sufi in my country knows that Allah swt is above his creation on his throne.
Do u know that old ashairah believed that too ? :)
won't waste my time with 2% rubbish stats ignorant@@mnuhs5
Love from Indonesia❤
People in comments are jokes, judging the dude on anything and everything, you guys should focus on your own lives and if its that important to you maybe you should go put in the work like these dudes and then get on a podcast and say what you gotta say. go fix yourselves. Bunch of scholars in the comments .
💯
I know right. No one is infallible at the end of the day. Shiekh Uthman says he is a student of knowledge at the end of the day. Arrogance has just increased with the internet and keyboard warriors. No one actually is humble enough to sit down with a scholar and learn from them. Anyone taking knowledge for the sake of Allah become more humble, any other motives and they became arrogant.
My brother, I have been following you for years. I think that Sheikh Othman dealt with some of the problems that some young Muslims fall into in the West. I think that the political journalist Salman Al-Ansari will be the best guest after Sheikh Othman bin Al-Faruq to talk about politics in the Middle East and how Muslim rulers deal with imperial powers. In the Western world, and how the Arab peoples deal specifically with the rulers, and the position of the Arab peoples towards the Muslim Brotherhood, as well as the Turkish, Persian and Zionist ambitions in the Arab world, as well as the reasons for the emergence of Al Qaeda and ISIS in the Islamic world, and how we build an Islamic civilization that advances among the countries of the civilized world.
It is possible to talk about issues such as the Palestinian, Libyan, Yemeni, Syrian and Iraqi issues, and how Muslim rulers deal with them according to the law of security and political interest.
And what hinders Muslims from scientific, civilizational, and military progress, etc.?
And our problems are with the donkeys of colonialism and with the slaves of the occupiers, and they are known to every scholar of politics.
Likewise, the problem of Islamic countries with left-liberal extremism in Western media and politics
Likewise, how do we confront the media demonizing Islam in all means of channels and social communication that are led by international channels in the Western world, and many countries of the world copy Western news in Japan, Korea, etc..
Sharing your views with journalist Salman Al-Ansari will clarify a lot of understanding of the political reality as it is, and not as we dream or want to do it.
I’ve tried a couple of times to have Husn e zan about the Sheikh but he has acted as a Hizbi esp in Daneil’s case. He had a podcast with Mufti Tariq Masood n showed him great respect only to backbite the next time he was asked bout this session by Dawah man in an all inclusive Salafi gathering
When I get angry wanna slap in the face but control my self seek refuge from evil my self and satan.the minute I said the angry will go away..alhamdulilah the deen taught me a lot allahu akbar thank to allah swt.who send us our beloved prophet muhammad peace be upon.we love him more than our lives.because he sacrified his life for us.
Many of these comments hurt to read. Have shame people!!
This is your brother, a very respectable brother at that subhan Allah! yet you call him names and critisize him. If this is how you treat a fellow muslim, i wouldn’t dare think how you'd treat an enemy.
Calling names, I agree maybe not but Shaykh Uthman and all scholars of Islam are fallible thus are not above criticism
Faruq need to provide his Masters Degree and actually provide evidence that he has one.
Shaykhs exposed him for not knowing basic Arabic and cant recite Quran properly.
The proof is out there.
jahil spotted 🚨@@khairt1731
He should not delve in issues that there is legitimate disputation and seek to sow discord and disunity.
I remember when i was in uel barking campus, uk in 1994, during univ time our imam was from middle east, and majority of followers were also from middle east, from saudi if not mistaken. They eaten kfc and mcd are just like nothing prohibitted them 🤣🤣🤣. We’re small community of muslim from malaysia didnt follow them but been teasing all the way of not eating kfc mcd and eat aiscream. But all of arab from middle east are pretend to understand islam better than us who is not from arabic speaking country. Alhamdulillah even though muslim from malaysia is not arabic speaking country but we adhere strictly to our understanding that we learnt in school that give yr best to find halal food so staying in east london during that time wasn’t hard to find halal meat and chicken but i have to travel of couse to get them from ilford lane. Jazakallah sheikh uthman. Assalamualaikum from malaysia.
1:26:39
The answer of the sheikh is very very dangerous. Accusing Ulamaa who are imprisoned is NOT ok!
Hasbounallahou wa ni’mal wakeel.
And accusing all activists is NOT ok neither!
Where are your HUJJAJ of these imprisoned people in the muslim world that they have taken the g&uns on the streets ???
Are you talking about Salman owdah
People only want to hear what their heart desire not based on what Quran and sunnah of the prophet based on.
Daies should just admit that almost all Muslim Ruler have not implemented the Shariah and are guilty of Istibdal(replacing the laws of Allah with other kufr secular laws and system) and Istihlal (Make halal what Allah made Haraam and Vice versa) which are MAJOR KUFR, BUT we are unable to remove them Physically and the harm outweighs the good hence we should not rebel.
This could have been an honest point of view rather trying directly or INDIRECTLY trying to defend these rulers. Your gonna be questioned for that on the day of Judgement.
And when the fitnah (trial, discord) occurred in the time of ʿUthmān, some people said to Usāmah bin Zayd , ‘Will you not speak to ʿUthmān?’ So he said, ‘Do you think that I have not spoken to him, just because you have not heard it from me? Verily I will speak to him concerning what is between him and me, without opening an affair which I would not like to be the first to open.’ [An authentic narration: Related by Ahmad (3/403) and Ibn Abī ʿĀsim (2/521)
So when they (the Khārijites) opened it, evil took place in the time of ʿUthmān . They opposed ʿUthmān openly, thus completing the tribulations, fighting and corruption, which has not ceased to affect the people to this day, was brought about. And this caused the tribulation to occur between ʿAlī and Muʿāwiyah, and ʿUthmān was killed for these reasons …
@@MAli99923 So are you Comparing the Khilafah of Uthman RA to the modern day western backed secularist nationalists rulers of the Muslim lands?
@@biggytough2586 Are you saying Islam changed??
Also do you know difference between Quran 5.44 - 47... 3 situations where they don't rule by Allah's law but three different rulings?
I don't think he does know it lol
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543
I hope u don't live in the west & criticizing muslim rulers :)@@biggytough2586
Jazakum allah khair
Subhan'Allah you will never find A true Muslim speak ill of his Muslim brother in public, no matter what happens, not to revile him or insult him. And if he finds a mistake or false information from him in the deen , then he corrects the matter without mentioning his name.... This is the path of our Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him, the companions,and the our salaf .. Now you find many who claim to be a Salafi while They even don't know what his Muslim brother right upon him !! backbites and hurts his Muslim brother, making a whole videos about only to convince ppl to get rid of him! Almost making him a kaifer!! Acting like they have good attantion! When they do nothing but fitnah and divided the ummah, they Only use the word Salafi to justify what they doing! May Allah deal them all.
ameen. unfortunately this is what we see today, bashing each other on a super public platform, these are serving themselves not Allah
making public amr bilma3ruh nahi 3an al-munkar is permissible and was done by the salaf
"When Muslims will curse each other in public" This is one of the signs before day of judgment that will invite Allah's anger and lead to the destruction of the muslims.
Your correct brother. The people of Iman control their anger and refrain from such backbiting/slandering of their Muslim brethren. Alhamdulillah, Salafists only makeup less than 2 percent of the Ummah, but they are platformed online and have incredible amounts of money at their disposal. I fear for the Ummah
@@AB-xi9im be exactly like a salaf, then go out and expose your brother. you cannot even pray like the salaf, fast like the salaf and you want to publicly criticize like the salaf, possibly this is what lead syrians to the complete disintegration of their nationm you still didn't learn from other's mistakes and you want badly to reproduce their same mistakes, walahi ajaeeb
@@HumbleServantofAllah642 what is this gibberish type english
Jazak Allah Khair brother Dilly for bringing shaykh uthman's perspective
Don’t eat McDonald’s regardless of where. Avoid fast food!
thenks for the video
Love the Shiekh. ❤❤❤
For the rulers issue, please watch an episode by Paul Williams.
He has a way with words.. the only point of unity of him is everyone uniting on the Salafi aqeeda.
And what's wrong with that?
Which is the only correct aqeedah.
@@SalafLBsaved sect syndrome
@@jacksparow25 *saved sect
@@jacksparow25tell me what you follow 😁
Jazaakumullaahu khayran
And were Saudi worried about Aqidah in Algeria, Egypt and Yemen?
@NejadIhsanBeliefs, theology
who is Saudi?
@NejadIhsan I agree. In fact linguistically Aqeedah ends up meaning a contract between us and Allah in terms of the beliefs we hold, with the correct ones ending in Jannah and the false ones in Jahannam.
*_Masha'Allah, a brilliant quest._*
Very interesting podcast and fair play to you brother Dilly, you pushed back and questioned alot of the so called "salafi" ideology but i feel the brother was alot more PC than he is on his own platforms.
With all due respect i have heard many of his talks and he is very divisive in his opinions on the aqidah of millions of muslims around the world, whos aqidah actually makes up the majority of the ummah today. Denial that the majority of the ummah have been upon Ashari wa Maturidi creed is quite worrying. We know the classical Atharis wa hanaabila held theological views generally inline with the mainstream ahlus sunnah Ashari view. Today unfortunately i feel alot of people who claim to be upon the Athari creed and Hanbali madhab have hijacked these titles to cling on to some tradition for more credibility. The Ottomans were far from perfect but any muslim who has read one book on islamic history will know that for approx. 1000 years they were definitely not "salafi". They promoted ahlus sunnah Ashari wa Maturidi creed, they promoted tasawwuf wa ihsaan within turuq. Calling istigaathah shirk when 1000s of ulema have stated it's permissibility with conditions is denial of basic islamic facts. Denying Salahuddin Ayyubi was an Ashari and promoted Ashari madaaris is again pure denial of facts.
Just like we have "salafi" individuals who deny imam Nawawi and ibn Hajar al Asqalaani were upon Ashari aqidah. Atleast be honest and say yes we are a minority and have always been this way, we have a new creed that popped up in the last 2 centuries and we have a handful of scholars who we can turn too. Pure and simple, all mainstream muslims adhere to Quran wa Sunnah, yet we respect and concede in knowledge to the 1000s of scholars within the madhaahib who have scrutinised and meticulously researched masaail. Are we going to go above ibn aabidin, imam nawawi et al. ?? For the layman either we follow a fortified methodology within a madhab laid down by 1000s of scholars whos uprightness has been agreed upon or we follow a few modern day scholars with minority opinions that have arisen in the last 200 years.
Many muslims cannot read Qur'an with correct tajweed, how then can we open Bukhaari wa Muslim etc. and find our wudu and prayer method? Practically people follow teachers, who follow their teachers, only a mujtahid will extract rulings directly from Qur'an wa Sunnah.
Only jaahil people cling to their own madhab and state the rest are wrong, the ikhtilaaf within the ummah is a mercy as we know.
The brother in essence said in his closing remarks we should unite the ummah if they agree on my narrow understanding of classical theology, this sounds disingenuous to me. May Allah forgive me if my comments are out turn or if i am mistaken. الله مستعان.
Good point. Misplaced adab maybe.
You took the words out of my mouth bro, well done. The islamic methodologies are at large, are long fruitful tradition & insyallah rooted upon the haq. To be united as the guest implied, is to in line with the conundrum of modern salafi ideology, which is different from the classical hanabila, thus It felt insincere..
Just imagine if Muslims stopped following the 4 schools of thought and joined Salafism. All the knowledge gained by sincere Ulema, would be lost forever. In Salafist ideology, burning of books not in accordance with their beliefs is common. Ignorance and confusion would prevail. The hadith mentioning knowledge being taken away is close.
@@kb4432If you had intellect you would know that there is no difference between Salafi and the 4 I'mmah of Ahl al-Sunnah who were Salafi.
The issue is, when the false claimants of these madhhaibs use the madhhaibs as a means to spread their innovated and filthy creeds such as the Ash'ari, Maturidi and other Mutakallim filth.
LOL ?
Aren't 4 imams on Salaf Athar aqeeda & fiqh?
What knowledge ? greek philosophy & shirk ?
Why would someone follow Aqeeda of people who came after centuries & leave Three first generations ?
Isn't innovations what devided the Ummah ?
@@kb4432
In the last section in Obedience to ruler section, this guy proves himself that his criteria come from the known Power sources, For him MBS and like are above all the rules.
The first part was just asking about Hanbali rulings and he went on a long rant about madhhabs. I would've appreciated to hear more about his Hanbalism.
Absolutely loved this Alhamdulillah. We are blessed to be able to attend this discussion. Jzk khair blessed brothers
The problem are the Madkhalis and many false Muslim rulers, do you not get that?
the problem is arrogance coupled with ignorance towards the Quran and sunnah.
@@muslimresponse103How do you feel about MBS buying a picture of Isa (AS) for millions? Also making the adhaan lowered and opening clubs?
@@Figleaf-Bicarbonatehow do you feel about your own sins and disregarding the Quran and sunnah to follow your own emotions and feelings?!
@@Figleaf-Bicarbonate MBS is not infallible nor should he be judged with such a standard. First of all you don't know his intentions, it could be to purchase it so that it isn't on public display, seeing as the painting was supposed to be shown at a gallery in Abu Dhabi in 2018 but since MBS purchased it, nobody has laid eyes upon it to the public's knowledge since 2017.
Making the volume of adhaan was in response to complaints from citizens, so your qualm on that issue is with the residents, not the one acting on ther complaints, and lowering the max volume affects someone's deen how? Does it go in the Qur'aan and Sunnaah to lower the volume of the adhaan? Aren't we supposed to be a considerate people? If everyone recited at the top of their lungs during salah nobody in the masjid would be able to concentrate.
The clubs opening, I can only find news on a club opening in Jeddah in 2019, which the GEA of SA stated they did not authorise, but rather the organisers took advantage of a license granted for a different event altogether to open the club. So everything is not as it seems. Either way, it should be removed but again, that shouldn't effect your ability to practise your religion and be the best Muslim you can be.
BaarakAllaahu feekum.
@@Figleaf-BicarbonateHow about you worried about your sister, your mom and dad at home. Why do you stretch your hand where it doesn’t reach?🤷🏽♂️ Does knowing him bought the picture increases your eman?? How about you leave things that concern you and focus on things that concern you.
Just know that I love you for the sake of Allah.❤️❤️
Long overdue!
The greater harm can often come from staying silent and letting the ruler secularise entire nations, rather than speaking up and criticising. This is why we have the crisis we have today.
You have to look at the long-term picture on a case-by-case basis, rather than having a blanket rule “never criticise the ruler”.
What benefits does criticising make?
@@AdamAliAden In many cases it can (and has) put pressure on the ruler, from inside and from outside, to make changes or not go too far. Wise rulers will pay attention to what others are saying, in order not to lose control. Muslim rulers are no different.
@@imranqqq7307 But what does the hadeeth say? Advise them in private, so lets stick to the hadeeth
@@MAli99923 The hadith says IF one intends to advise a ruler, do so privately. But most criticism of rulers nowadays is to inform the public of the ruler's actions (for example, collaboration with Israel) rather than to advise the ruler. Secondly, the reason generally given to keep quiet in the ahadeeth is the greater harm to Muslims if they rebel or disobey. I am pointing out that in SOME cases at least, the greater harm can come from keeping quiet and letting the ruler do whatever he wants.
@@imranqqq7307 And when the fitnah (trial, discord) occurred in the time of ʿUthmān, some people said to Usāmah bin Zayd , ‘Will you not speak to ʿUthmān?’ So he said, ‘Do you think that I have not spoken to him, just because you have not heard it from me? Verily I will speak to him concerning what is between him and me, without opening an affair which I would not like to be the first to open.’ [An authentic narration: Related by Ahmad (3/403) and Ibn Abī ʿĀsim (2/521)
So when they (the Khārijites) opened it, evil took place in the time of ʿUthmān . They opposed ʿUthmān openly, thus completing the tribulations, fighting and corruption, which has not ceased to affect the people to this day, was brought about. And this caused the tribulation to occur between ʿAlī and Muʿāwiyah, and ʿUthmān was killed for these reasons …
Masha Allah excellent podcast 👌