For those too young to know and understand the introductory joke, around 15-20yrs or so ago, YQ wrote a tongue in cheek article where it looked like he was going to renege on a belief, but it turned out to be windows and apple.
@@AbuYusha01to most Muslims *especially his harsh critics* don’t really understand their own faith especially the history and development of their Aqeedah. These *critics* most of them are not even scholars or even high level students of knowledge, it’s like they studied Islam for 5 years and all of a sudden they can criticise and make takfir of Yasir Qadhi subhanallah 🙄
It’s weird that if u can ask a sahaba what’s their aqeedah, they’d tell u a very simple aqeedah in a sentence. Yet they were extremely fruitful in their actions and behaviour. While we learn pages and still be confused, and not fruitful at all. What’s the problem with us? Maybe this should be explored
Indeded: "And be not as those who divided and differed among themselves after the clear proofs had come to them. It is they for whom there is an awful torment" 3:105 2:213 "And none differed over the Scripture except those who were given it - after the clear proofs came to them - out of jealous animosity among themselves." Allah never agrees to deviating from the straight path as those of us who try to unite the ummah upon falsehood. He only warns us all if we are amongst those who deviated from the path of the Prophet (pbuh) and his comnpanions.
I think you’re not contextualizing the environment these theologians faced during their times. The sahabas faced a Quraysh which were clear pagans so their message and belief were articulated simply. Fast forward where you are presented with several interpretations of monotheism baked into the complex belief systems inherited in the colonies. You need a much more refined explanation and understanding of your faith to differentiate and solidify why your path is the truth. Deeper articulation of the Quran and Sunnah needed to be applied to combat these foreign beliefs and be intellectually sound and superior to them to be legitimized as the absolute truth. Most Muslims do not see this as they live in theological bubbles completely absent of modern thought.
@@crazycrypto9454ur right that they had to protect the pure aqeedah. But it seems we the modern people, have to go over 1500 years of theological issues . We are handed the historical baggage and that’s not a good strategy. Aqeedah issues are like pandora boxes, when u open one, it creates other questions. I’d like to see a simple and updated aqeedah.
I trust this Sheikh. For one very simple reason. He tries to build bridges to unite the ummah, rather than ostracize and label sects. How can the one who tries to unite muslims be wrong? Nobody will be able to answer this.
You mix up two things brother. Uniting is obligatory in islam. Allah warned those who become sects, so did the Prophet (pbuh). But uniting upon falsehood is forbidden. All the deviated groups, ideas, innovators need go back to the authentic islam as was practised by the Prophet and his companions. Only then we can truly unite and achieve honor in the ummah.
@@Kbuit81 but what are you doing by labelling someone a kaafir or mushrik except distinguishing or creating the sect. You are the one who creates the sect by calling someone a kafir who believes in Allah and His Messenger. Do you get it?
I wouldn’t trust him with a bar of soap. He doesn’t believe in unity, because if he did, he should unite with Shia and every other deviant sect. But he won’t. He only believes in unity according to his own definition. My definition of unity is different to his.
@@Kbuit81 We can unite in cooperating in good and virtue (which is mentioned in the Qur'an), however, uniting in some thoughts and viewpoints would not be possible - because of the tendencies of human nature. What is to be noted here is that the aqeedah group, which belongs to the general body of ahle sunnah, differs on the secondary matter of Aqeedah and not the primary matters of Aqeedah. If someone differs on primary issues of aqeedah then they leave Islam and if someone someone differs in secondary aspects of aqeedah then they have erred or deviated or mistaken depending on their sincerity or metholodolgy they adhere to. But they are still Muslims and deserve all the rights of Muslims which are laid down by the Qur'an and sunnah. Allah knows the best
@@NobodySpecial420 Not sure what is going on here and thy you invent such lies against me, while my it was my first and very short comment. Where did i label someone kaafir or mushkreek?
It would be nice if Yasir Qadhi could give a talk on the definitions the various groups use and what the outcomes of these definitions amount to.And Salman Bhai, please let Yasir finish and make your questions more succinct. May Allah bless you all
@20:50 Good to see that the Ibadi are not being treated as a Pariah but people are beginning to see and understand. However, Shaykh Yasir Qadhi if someone can point out to him (he appreciates nuance) To say that Ibadi-aqidah is mutazilah is quite the misunderstanding. The Ibadi agree with the Ashari on the doctrine of kasb (acquisition) the Mutazali do not. The Ibadi agree with the Ashari that morality comes from revelation and not human reasoning. The Mutazali do not agree. Shaykh Salman Al Ouda (may Allah grant him release) he came to Oman. I hope one day the Oman's will invite Shaykh Yasir Qadhi because he believes in working across the board and rising above sectarianism. He is Most Welcome. Alas, he also has access to the Arabic language.
Please invite Tarek Ramadan again. His channel is mainly in french and it would be great to have his answers and thoughts also spread for the English speaking audience
Always was confused when people brought up schools of thought. As an African American Muslim, it's just quran and sunnah. I think the nation of Islam is a form of theology that we recognized was deviant. But as Yasir says understandable.
Yasir Qadhi is not mentioning the grave dangers these schools of aqeedah have, which involves trade offs in true tawhid. رسول صلى الله عليه وسلم has taught his companions in a very nderstandable way and this is not at all complicated.
All this fighting over Aqeedah is inherited from the Nations before Islam. It started in ancient Egypt, and moved to the Levant, to ancient Greece, to ancient Rome, to the Jews and Christians, and finally, to Muslims. This why we need to fill this gab of historical development of ideas to understand current theological differences.
I don’t follow any school of thought or sect I a nondenominational Muslim I follow core principles/ethics of Tawheed as far schools concerned I study all of them and take what I find rational.
I agree with Dr. Qadhi on most of the things, but the outward piety or acts of worship of the ibadiyah only reminds me of the Hadith about the khawarij wherein the prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa Salam) talks about their beautiful recitation and the Quran not going down inside them or something to that effect.
Saying be with the group that your heart settles is very problematic. Please when it comes to Aqidah is not like Fikh, so clarify your opinion on what is your position. We cannot say going to graves of Awliya and asking is ok. Allah doesn’t like for those who associate himself with others period.
How is everyone okay? And know that Allaah’s صلى الله عليه وسلم said, “My nation will divide into 73 sects; all of them shall be in the Fire except one, and it is the Jamaa`ah; the united body upon the truth.” It was said, “Who are they, O Messenger of Allaah?” He said, “That which I and my companions are upon today.” Reported by At-Tirmithee (2641) and by al-Haakim and by others, Al-Laalikaa’ee in As-Sunnah and by others besides from a hadeeth of `Abdullaah ibn `Amr ibn al `Aas radiyAllaahu `anhumaa. And Shaykh Al-Albaaniyy mentioned that this hadeeth is hasan; has supporting narrations for its final wording and declared it hasan.
@MAli99923 What is important to note here is that the criteria is to follow the sunnah of the Prophet (saw) and the methodology of the companions, and not the group. The way of the sahabas was not to make it a sectarian way. Rather, they focused on iman, ikhlas, ihsan, and Islam. One of the scholars beautifully said that you are not judged as a group but as an individual in the day of judgement, so from each group, there will be sincere people with good sincerity towards the truth (who do not follow the sectarian approach) and they will have good deeds - Allah swt would not count them among the sectarian people. On the day of judgement, you will be judged by your overall deeds. A person may be threatened with punishment because of certain deeds but may be forgiven because of his/her overall good deeds, or he/she may enter hell for a temporary period but then will come out eventually and be with the believers in the jannah. What matters is your deeds and not your slogans, labels, or attachments - yes, they may be important for distinction yourself in this dunya, but in they eyes of Allah what matters is our Ikhlas, iman, ihsan and amal.
@@faysalahmed9157 So what do we do with the hadeeth I presented? Did it mentioned the saved sect? It did right? Yes you're right, we are all judged individually, and therefore its incumbent we cling on to the right group, no? And thats the save sect mention in the hadeeth
Shaykh Yasir Qadhi should have been more open to give references to the other side and their articles (for the Istighaathah discussion). There was a subtle sense of him still censoring their legitimate scholarly conclusions.
48:50 Somalia has the same FiQi #shafici but different theologies Salafism and Sufism. They debated but Sufism is kind of crossing The Whole Suni to Shia. Asking dead for health.. taking Sh.Jaylani's more than the Prophet PBH.
So basically he is saying they were slaves of the ideas of their time But I am not 😅😅 I am your savior He uses modern philosophy of language as if there is consensus about it or as if it will never change He is actually so emerged and influenced by post modernism and progressivism and yet telling us that imams in the past felt into the trap of being influenced by the ideas of their time and that their ideas are only human interpretations, and his is what? Divine The golden double standard But this modern world is much better hence we will understand better If this is not post modernism and secularism i do not know what it is He says we do not know what the sahabas believed So when god says فَإِنْ آمَنُوا بِمِثْلِ مَا آمَنتُم بِهِ فَقَدِ اهْتَدَوا ۖ How am i supposed to follow what god commands me here yet he never guided me? This is belitering god's message. And the issue is that he does not accept natural language, that the asel is in the zaher of the word No he wanna use some modern philosophy of language yet the quran came in arabic with the mindset of none philosophers, but let us ignore that and believe that philosiphers will understand better. The guy is deep in tge mud and he does not see that, he does not see how much he has been influenced by modern philosophy He reminds me of woke leftist when they say we accept everybody unless they disagree with us Basicaly he refuses the hadith of the prophet خير القرون قرني ثم الذين يلونهم ثم الذين يلونهم And all these generations said that who ever says that the quran is created is a kafir. But qadhi is more versed than those.people who were indoctrinated and did not know how to understand the quran until our master the west developped the modern philosophy of language بئس المعتقد والمعتقد A side note: the guy says look at the ibadiya إباضية how they have better iman than sunnis in their salat and tahajod Does he not know that ibadiya are khawarej and that we have a direct hadith from the prophet saying تخرج خارجة من أمتي ليس صلاتكم إلى صلاتهم بشيء ، ولا صيامكم إلى صيامهم بشيء ، ولا قراءتكم إلى قراءتهم بشيء ، يقرأون [ ص: 593 ] القرآن يحسبون أنه لهم وهو عليهم ، لا يجاوز حناجرهم ، يمرقون من الإسلام مروق السهم من الرمية . وآية ذلك أن فيهم رجلا له عضد وليس لها ذراع ، عليها مثل حلمة الثدي ، عليها شعرات بيض ، لو يعلم الجيش الذين يصيبونهم ما لهم على لسان نبيهم لاتكلوا على العمل ، فسيروا على اسم الله So their actions from the outside are the best but deep down in their hearts they have zero iman Phd in doctrine? Really [This comment is by brother Abdulkader Sabsabi]
💯... The only protectors of this faith are those that emphasise Aqeedah and the statements of the Salaf. We'd be upon the path of the yahud and nasaara if it were left to the likes of yq etc. Ahlul Hadith/Athariyya/Ashaabul-Hadith/Salafis are the only group that Allah has made a means of protecting the asal of Islam. The rest keep deviating away, and salafis keep pulling them back to the Salaf.
@@NobodySpecial420 By the fact that they're the only ones upon the creed of Imam Ahmed (salaf). Either Imam Ahmed had the wrong Aqeedah, or those not upon the creed of Imam Ahmed are upon the wrong Aqeedah. Soo which is it?
@@spawnnpwn4166 "statements of the salaf". Did RasoolAllah S.A.W or the salaf teach Ruboobiyyah? Hakimiyyah? Asma as Sifaat? Did they argue about these categories of Tawheed? Did they argue about the attributes of Allah? Why don't you follow the salaf in this?
Allah (SWT) has cleared all doubt from our aqeedah and Has left no ambiguity correct Aqeedah is the guiding principles for our life, so there should be clarity with avoidance of doubts if you don't want to be misguided stick to the Qur'an and sound Sunnah which Allah Has protected as He promised Pray for His guidance to the correct path ٱهۡدِنَا ٱلصِّرَ ٰطَ ٱلۡمُسۡتَقِیمَ
It was a nice talk and shows how far Yasir qadhi has evolved in his understanding of what matter most in religion, but using words like “my dear brothers”, “mankind” which completely exclude female listeners, suggest that he has a a pretty long way to go. Perhaps reading Amina Wadud for starters may start his journey into how patriarchy has shaped religious understanding and committed a huge Zulm/injustice to women and then he can be equally vocal about women’s s rights too. Wishing him all the best. Sister Saba Muhammad.
"Muslim" channels be posting stuff from Anyone these days I Swear, if Ad-Dajjal came Today and gave a lecture, a 101 so-called "Islamic" channel would post it with titles like "Sheikh Dajjal gives great insight for why He and He Alone is God" and the comments would be filled with "mashallah ❤️❤️❤️" type stuff You may not realise it yet but on the Day of Judgement, you will finally realize the consequences of your promotion of these noorless reformists
THE WHOLE OF QURAN IS MAKHLUK NOT FROM GOD, IT IS STILL MIND, SOUND OF BELLS GO AND GOOGLE IT OUT MUHAMAD N SOUND OF BELLS.. THE REAL FULL NAMES, THE 100TH NAMES NOT REVEALED IN QURAN, THE 5 SELECTED SOUNDS NOT REVEALED AS NAMES IN ISLAM..
@@dpireader32 Just 1 example out of many He said ibn taymiyah is the first person in history to say شد الرحال إلي القبور is haram which is objectively false but his audience and followers don’t even know the Arabic language and even those who do have very little knowledge and follow whatever he says blindly. ذهب إمام دار الهجرة مالك بن أنس والقاضي عياض من أئمة المالكية إلى منع السفر لزيارة القبور، وكرهوها and you have from the حنابلة ابن عقيل وابن بطة Even الجويني said it by the way which many don’t know and you have القاضي حسين as well.
Bro In the middle needs to chill. Your interview style is kind of annoying a bit. Not letting someone land. Imposing your suggestions. Forcing a misinformed opinion.Ect.
This man is a wolf in sheep's clothing, spreading all forms of doubt regarding the authentic orthodox Sunni Islam. After this podcast you will be more confused than before. stay away from him!
Is this the same Yasir who says in front of the camera "i dont believe in ja'juj and ma'juj being alive today, thus going against the Quran, Sunnah and sixth pillar of eemaan. And yet he dares teach aqeedah. Run people, run!
@@abdurrahmanali24 Until, when he reached between two mountains, he found, before (near) them, a people who scarcely understood a word. They said, ‘O Dhu’l-Qarnayn! Verily! Yajuj and Majuj are doing great mischief in the land. Shall we then pay you a tribute in order that you might erect a barrier between us and them?’ -see Suratul Kahf from verse 93. Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him), who said: “The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said that Yajuj and Majuj are digging every day until they can almost see sunlight, then the one who is in charge of them says, “Go back, we will dig again tomorrow.” Then Allah restores (the barrier) and makes it stronger than it was. (This will continue) until the appointed time. When Allah wishes to send them against the people, they will dig until they can almost see sunlight, then the one who is in charge of them will say, “Go back, we will dig again tomorrow, in sha Allah.” This time he will say “in sha Allah”, so when they come back (the next day), they will find it as they left it, so they will dig their way out and emerge to attack the people. They will dry up water (by drinking it, because of their great numbers), and the people will seek to protect themselves from them in their fortresses. They will fire their arrows into the sky, and the arrows will come back down covered in blood (as a test for them), and they will say, “We have defeated the people of the earth and have gained the upper hand over the people of heaven.” Then Allah will send worms on the napes of their necks, which will kill them. The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “By the One in Whose hand is my soul, the beasts of the earth will grow fat from their flesh.” (Sahih Ibn Majah, 3298) Umm Habibah bint Abi Sufyan reported from Zaynab bint Jahsh (may Allah be pleased with them) that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) entered upon her in an agitated state and said, “La ilaha ill-Allah, woe to the Arabs from an evil that has approached! Today a hole like this has been opened in the barrier of Yajuj and Majuj ,” and he made a circle with his thumb and forefinger. Zaynab bint Jahsh said: “I said, ‘O Messenger of Allah, will we be destroyed even though there are righteous people among us?’ He said, ‘Yes, if evil becomes overwhelming.’” (Reported by al-Bukhari, 3097). Hadith of al-Nawwas ibn Sam'an, which says that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) told them about the Dajjal, and said: “Whilst he is like that, Allah will reveal to ‘Isa: ‘I have released slaves of Mine whom no one will be able to fight. Take My slaves to safety in al-Tur (Sinai),’ and Allah will send Yajuj and Majuj , who will come swarming down from every mound. The first of them will pass by Lake Tiberias and will drink the water in it, and the last of them will pass by it and will say, ‘There was water here once.’” Narrated by Muslim, no. 2937.
@@abdurrahmanali24 Yes i can show you, it is very easy and cleer. Let me begin with Quran in Surah Kahf, verse 94. Where Allah mentions Dhul Qarnayn travelling the world and the people come to him saying: "O Dhul-Qarnain! Verily! Ya'juj and Ma'juj are doing great mischief in the land. Shall we then pay you a tribute in order that you might erect a barrier between us and them?" Then after that Dhul Qarnayn builds the wall and locks them in. Then Allah continues in 18:97-99: "So they [Ya'juj and Ma'juj) were made powerless to scale it or dig through it. (Dhul-Qarnain) said: "This is a mercy from my Lord, but when the Promise of my Lord comes, He shall level it down to the ground. And the Promise of my Lord is ever true." And on that Day (i.e. the Day Ya'juj and Ma'juj come out), We shall leave them to surge like waves on one another, and the Trumpet will be blown, and We shall collect them all together." I do not think that any person with a right mind needs explanation for this, it is so clear. But according to yasir and his likes, when the Promise of Allah comes and te wall comes down it is "surprise, there is no one here, we fooled you all". We seek refuge in Allah from these people. Let's move on to the hadith: It was narrated from Abu Sa'eed Al-Khudri that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: "Gog and Magog people will be set free and they will emerge as Allah says: "swoop(ing) down from every mound."[21:96] They will spread throughout the earth, and the Muslims will flee from them until the remainder of the Muslims are in their cities and fortresses, taking their flocks with them. (hadith continues...) Sunan Ibn Majah 4079 In the long hadith in Sahih Muslim 2937a the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) says after mentioning the killing of the dajjal by Isa ibn Maryam (peace be upon him): "I have brought forth from amongst My servants such people against whom none would be able to fight; you take these people safely to Tur. And then Allah would send Gog and Magog and they would swarm down from every slope." And Narrated Zainab bint Jahsh: The Prophet (ﷺ) got up from his sleep with a flushed red face and said, "None has the right to be worshipped but Allah. Woe to the Arabs, from the Great evil that is nearly approaching them. Today a gap has been made in the wall of Gog and Magog like this." (Sufyan illustrated by this forming the number 90 or 100 with his fingers.) It was asked, "Shall we be destroyed though there are righteous people among us?" The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "Yes, if evil increased." Sahih al-Bukhari 7059 This matter is so clear, anyone can fully understand this. As for your second question. The 10 signs of the last hour are part of the 5th pillar in eemaan, which is believe in the last day. So denying this, is denying (part of) the 5th pillar. Hudhaifa b. Usaid al-Ghifari reported: Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) came to us all of a sudden as we were (busy in a discussion). He said: What do you discuss about? They (the Companions) said. We are discussing about the Last Hour. Thereupon he said: It will not come until you see ten signs before and (in this connection) he made a mention of the smoke, Dajjal, the beast, the rising of the sun from the west, the descent of Jesus son of Mary (Allah be pleased with him), the Gog and Magog, and land-slides in three places, one in the east, one in the west and one in Arabia at the end of which fire would burn forth from the Yemen, and would drive people to the place of their assembly. Sahih Muslim 2901a And Allah knows best
Yasir Qadhi is basically an agnostic when it comes to aqeedah. This is the product of his modernist strand of salafism, he has become post-modern - they’re all right in their own way, take your pick etc. sad to see.
SA This Ummah has major problems, if you go to a salafi group the first thing they ask you is where is Allah and try to convince you Allah is a body and if you go to a Sufi masjid you will end up talking to the dead for your needs and calling on prophets and awliya for help with Allah (if you don’t have knowledge) and these are the two main groups today, these differences MUST be resolved thus we can all unite. We have to be wise. There’s no need to delve into how Allah exists nor is there a need to go to graves and seek help or call remotely, we can put these issues down and focus on serving Allah ! allahuekber ! The big shayks from each group MUST sit down and resolve these ideas and make the appropriate joint announcement’s. Dr Brother Yasir it’s not good advice to tell people to go anywhere and believe anything. You are yielding to difficult circumstances. At least say learn the basics at each place like Arabic, Quran, Hadith, basic Fiqh etc. and regarding where there are differences in aqida just all say we believe as Allah intended it and move on… in sh Allah
What you say about salafi's is not true. Its not the first thing they ask and they dont try to convince you Allah has a body. The only ones who use the word body are those who deny Allah's attributes. Isn't that ironic. The only thing salafi's do is affirm Allah's ATTRIBUTES which He and His messenger (saw) affirmed for Him without any distortion, denial, asking about how these attributes are or likening Him to His creation. If you think that is bad, i think you have a problem, not the salafi's Unless you think it is good to meet Allah denying what He affirmed for Himself. And how can you speak about unite when you start your message with lies and attacks on people?! Makes no sense brother. In islam we do not mix truth with falsehood, cause when we do that, the truth is gone. Coming together like you suggest and solve the differences is wishfull thinking. Each group in islam thinks it is on the right path and dont see wrong in it. Even when Allah forbade it, even when the Messengegr (saw) forbade it and said 72 of 73 groups will be in hellfire, they still think they know better and invent new ideas and groups in islam. 6:159: Those who have divided their religion and become sects - you, [O Muhammad], are not [associated] with them in anything. Their affair is only [left] to Allah ; then He will inform them about what they used to do. 30-31:32: ...turning in repentance to Him, and fear Him and establish prayer and do not be of those who associate others with Allah. [Or] of those who have divided their religion and become sects, every faction rejoicing in what it has.
Or maybe just maybe you're intentionally misrepresenting Salafis?? Ibn ‘Abdul Barr رحمه الله on “Istiwa” وإنما يُوجَّهُ كلام الله عز وجل إلى الأشهر والأظهر من وجوهه، ما لم يمنع من ذلك ما يجب له التسليم، ولو ساغ ادّعاء المجاز لكل مدّع ما ثبت شيء من العبارات، وجل الله عز وجل عن أن يخاطب إلا بما تفهمه العرب في معهود مخاطباتها، مما يصح معناه عند السامعين. والاستواء معلوم في اللغة ومفهوم، وهو: العلو والارتفاع على الشيء، والاستقرار والتمكن فيه. قال أبو عبيدة في قوله تعالى: {اسْتَوَى} قال: علا. قال: وتقول العرب: استويت فوق الدابة، واستويت فوق البيت. وقال غيره: استوى، أي: انتهى شبابه واستقرّ، فلم يكن في شبابه مزيد قال أبو عمر: الاستواء: الاستقرار في العلو، وبهذا خاطبنا الله عز وجل، وقال: {لِتَسْتَوُوا عَلَى ظُهُورِهِ ثُمَّ تَذْكُرُوا نِعْمَةَ رَبِّكُمْ إِذَا اسْتَوَيْتُمْ عَلَيْهِ} [الزخرف: 13]، وقال: {وَاسْتَوَتْ عَلَى الجُودِيَّ} [هود: 44]، وقال: {فَإِذَا اسْتَوَيْتَ أَنتَ وَمَن مَّعَكَ عَلَى الفُلْكِ} [المؤمنون: 28]، وقال الشاعر فأوردتهم ماء بفيفاء قفرة وقد حلق النجم اليماني فاستوى “The words of Allah, the Almighty, should be understood according to the most common and apparent meanings unless something necessitates accepting an alternative interpretation. If the claim of metaphorical interpretation were allowed for anyone who wished to assert it, no statement would retain its intended meaning. Allah, the Almighty, is far above addressing us in a manner that the Arabs do not understand in their customary language, where the meaning is clear to the listeners. Istiwa’ in the language is well-known and understood; it means elevation and rising above something, as well as stability and establishment in it. Abu ‘Ubaydah, in explaining the verse {istawa}, said: ‘It means rose above.’ He also mentioned that the Arabs say: ‘I rose above the animal’ and ‘I rose above the house.’ Another scholar said: ‘Istawa means that one’s youth has reached its peak and stabilized, so there is no increase in it.’ Abu ‘Umar (Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr) said: Istiwa means stability at the highest point, and it is in this sense that Allah, the Almighty, addressed us. He said: {That you may settle yourselves upon their backs, then remember the favor of your Lord when you have settled upon them} [Al-Zukhruf: 13], and He said: {And it [the ship] settled on Mount Judi} [Hud: 44], and He said: {When you and those with you are settled on the Ark} [Al-Mu’minun: 28]. The poet said: 'I brought them to water in a desolate wasteland, and the Yemeni star rose high and settled.'" Al-Tamhīd (5/142)
We accept the Ahaadeeth upon the Apparent Meanings (Imām Aḥmad) said: And with us the aḥadīth (ie: narrations) are upon their dhāhir (ie: apparent meanings) as it came from the Prophet ﷺ, والحديث عندنا عَلَى ظاهره كما جاء عَنِ النَّبِيِّ - صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ - And kalām (ie: talk) about it is a bidaʿ (ie: innovation), والكلام فيه بدعة But we believe in it as it came upon its dhāhir. ولكن نؤمن به كما جاء عَلَى ظاهره Ibn Abī Yaʿlá, Ṭabaqāt al-Ḥanābilah 1/242 ابن أبي يعلى، طبقات الحنابلة ١/٢٤٢
if you can accept so much difference in tawheed like some people negating place/direction/literal body parts/limits for Allah and other people affirming these things. Then why not be lenient on the issue of Sahaba ? Even in the Sahihayn there are authentic hadith which affirm some companions are going to hell which is essentially the shia position that some companions are good and some are bad
We have only two Aqeedah, Ash’Hari and Maturidhi, rest of them deviant ones Others believe the God who sits on the throne, depending throne and organs and it’s not Allah
AlMuzani (student of AlShafi'i himself) said in Sharh' AlSunnah (the first sentence in the book) : "He is Himself Above the Throne (Dhat is used) while close to creation with His Knowledge." AlBukhari said in Khalq Af'aal Al'ibad: Ibn Mubarak said: The Jahmis are worst in claim than the Jews and the christians. The Jews, Christians and Muslims have agreed that Allah is Above the Throne, while they said that there is nothing on the Throne.
Ibn ‘Abdul Barr رحمه الله on Ahlul Bid’ah and Ahlul Kalaam Ibn Abdul-Barr Al-Māliki (rahimahullāh, d. 390H) quoted the saying of Imām Mālik: “It is not permitted to accept the witness of Ahlul-Bid’ah and Ahlul-Ahwā.” Then he explained: “The people of desires according to Mālik and all of our companions are Ahlul-Kalām (the people of theological rhetoric). So every mutakallim (one who resorts to theological rhetoric) is from the people of desires and Bid’ah whether he is an Ash’ari or other than an Ash’ari. His witness is never accepted in Islam. He is to be abandoned and disciplined for his innovation. And if he continues upon innovation, his repentance is sought [by those in authority].” (Jāmi’ Bayān Al-‘Ilm wa Fadlihi, 2/96)
So you claim the Prophet (pbuh) and his companions, and the 2 generations after that, and the 4 imams were all deviated? Or do you say they were ashari's and maturidis?
You would be amazed what the Prophet ﷺ and his companions would say about Ash'ari and Maturidhi. As a matter of fact, they didn't even hear about those things.
For those too young to know and understand the introductory joke, around 15-20yrs or so ago, YQ wrote a tongue in cheek article where it looked like he was going to renege on a belief, but it turned out to be windows and apple.
And where can we find this article??
Can you please clarify???
This podcast is really for an academic audience and not really for the masses
Mass don't have an intelect!
Alhamdullilah it's wonderful to see Shaikh Qadhi bravely speaking his mind.
Lol he's been speaking it since 2000. Bit too much. And all this levels talk is super basic.
@@AbuYusha01to most Muslims *especially his harsh critics* don’t really understand their own faith especially the history and development of their Aqeedah. These *critics* most of them are not even scholars or even high level students of knowledge, it’s like they studied Islam for 5 years and all of a sudden they can criticise and make takfir of Yasir Qadhi subhanallah 🙄
It’s weird that if u can ask a sahaba what’s their aqeedah, they’d tell u a very simple aqeedah in a sentence. Yet they were extremely fruitful in their actions and behaviour. While we learn pages and still be confused, and not fruitful at all. What’s the problem with us? Maybe this should be explored
Indeded: "And be not as those who divided and differed among themselves after the clear proofs had come to them. It is they for whom there is an awful torment" 3:105
2:213 "And none differed over the Scripture except those who were given it - after the clear proofs came to them - out of jealous animosity among themselves."
Allah never agrees to deviating from the straight path as those of us who try to unite the ummah upon falsehood. He only warns us all if we are amongst those who deviated from the path of the Prophet (pbuh) and his comnpanions.
I think you’re not contextualizing the environment these theologians faced during their times. The sahabas faced a Quraysh which were clear pagans so their message and belief were articulated simply. Fast forward where you are presented with several interpretations of monotheism baked into the complex belief systems inherited in the colonies. You need a much more refined explanation and understanding of your faith to differentiate and solidify why your path is the truth. Deeper articulation of the Quran and Sunnah needed to be applied to combat these foreign beliefs and be intellectually sound and superior to them to be legitimized as the absolute truth.
Most Muslims do not see this as they live in theological bubbles completely absent of modern thought.
@@crazycrypto9454ur right that they had to protect the pure aqeedah. But it seems we the modern people, have to go over 1500 years of theological issues . We are handed the historical baggage and that’s not a good strategy. Aqeedah issues are like pandora boxes, when u open one, it creates other questions. I’d like to see a simple and updated aqeedah.
"figment of the imagination of the critic" what a beautiful thought captured.
Salman was not asking clear and concise questions. It was very confusing. The other presenters questions were clear.
Salman's question @43 seconds or something was good
I trust this Sheikh. For one very simple reason. He tries to build bridges to unite the ummah, rather than ostracize and label sects. How can the one who tries to unite muslims be wrong? Nobody will be able to answer this.
You mix up two things brother. Uniting is obligatory in islam. Allah warned those who become sects, so did the Prophet (pbuh). But uniting upon falsehood is forbidden. All the deviated groups, ideas, innovators need go back to the authentic islam as was practised by the Prophet and his companions. Only then we can truly unite and achieve honor in the ummah.
@@Kbuit81 but what are you doing by labelling someone a kaafir or mushrik except distinguishing or creating the sect. You are the one who creates the sect by calling someone a kafir who believes in Allah and His Messenger. Do you get it?
I wouldn’t trust him with a bar of soap. He doesn’t believe in unity, because if he did, he should unite with Shia and every other deviant sect. But he won’t. He only believes in unity according to his own definition. My definition of unity is different to his.
@@Kbuit81 We can unite in cooperating in good and virtue (which is mentioned in the Qur'an), however, uniting in some thoughts and viewpoints would not be possible - because of the tendencies of human nature. What is to be noted here is that the aqeedah group, which belongs to the general body of ahle sunnah, differs on the secondary matter of Aqeedah and not the primary matters of Aqeedah. If someone differs on primary issues of aqeedah then they leave Islam and if someone someone differs in secondary aspects of aqeedah then they have erred or deviated or mistaken depending on their sincerity or metholodolgy they adhere to. But they are still Muslims and deserve all the rights of Muslims which are laid down by the Qur'an and sunnah.
Allah knows the best
@@NobodySpecial420 Not sure what is going on here and thy you invent such lies against me, while my it was my first and very short comment. Where did i label someone kaafir or mushkreek?
Unfortunately Dr Salman doesn't allow Sh Yasir to elaborate on some important and interesting points.
It would be nice if Yasir Qadhi could give a talk on the definitions the various groups use and what the outcomes of these definitions amount to.And Salman Bhai, please let Yasir finish and make your questions more succinct. May Allah bless you all
ua-cam.com/video/6Oi23YqfmU4/v-deo.htmlsi=Bz7_ccQuB2glN4hm
Here's a good introduction to differences in Aqeedah.
@20:50 Good to see that the Ibadi are not being treated as a Pariah but people are beginning to see and understand. However, Shaykh Yasir Qadhi if someone can point out to him (he appreciates nuance) To say that Ibadi-aqidah is mutazilah is quite the misunderstanding.
The Ibadi agree with the Ashari on the doctrine of kasb (acquisition) the Mutazali do not.
The Ibadi agree with the Ashari that morality comes from revelation and not human reasoning. The Mutazali do not agree.
Shaykh Salman Al Ouda (may Allah grant him release) he came to Oman. I hope one day the Oman's will invite Shaykh Yasir Qadhi because he believes in working across the board and rising above sectarianism. He is Most Welcome. Alas, he also has access to the Arabic language.
Please invite Tarek Ramadan again. His channel is mainly in french and it would be great to have his answers and thoughts also spread for the English speaking audience
Always was confused when people brought up schools of thought. As an African American Muslim, it's just quran and sunnah. I think the nation of Islam is a form of theology that we recognized was deviant. But as Yasir says understandable.
Yasir Qadhi is not mentioning the grave dangers these schools of aqeedah have, which involves trade offs in true tawhid. رسول صلى الله عليه وسلم has taught his companions in a very nderstandable way and this is not at all complicated.
What is Dr. Yasir Qadhi's definition of tawhid?
All this fighting over Aqeedah is inherited from the Nations before Islam. It started in ancient Egypt, and moved to the Levant, to ancient Greece, to ancient Rome, to the Jews and Christians, and finally, to Muslims. This why we need to fill this gab of historical development of ideas to understand current theological differences.
This interview is very insightful and rich Al-Hamdoullilah ! May Allah reward Dr. Yasir Qadhi with the highest level of Jannah, amin 🙏
I don’t follow any school of thought or sect I a nondenominational Muslim I follow core principles/ethics of Tawheed as far schools concerned I study all of them and take what I find rational.
I agree with Dr. Qadhi on most of the things, but the outward piety or acts of worship of the ibadiyah only reminds me of the Hadith about the khawarij wherein the prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa Salam) talks about their beautiful recitation and the Quran not going down inside them or something to that effect.
I thought Yasir decided to LEAVE social media. How about lecture to unite Muslims instead of division.
Oh yeah, here are the modern aqeedah sellers🙄
Saying be with the group that your heart settles is very problematic. Please when it comes to Aqidah is not like Fikh, so clarify your opinion on what is your position. We cannot say going to graves of Awliya and asking is ok. Allah doesn’t like for those who associate himself with others period.
Qadhi , a famous reformist , talking about aqeedah. This is gold
You know what sheeps do?
reformist lol, whats he reforming?
Hello unit 8200 zio-Jew.
How many shekels have they promised you for todays episode of divide and conquer?
I’m still confused what is he “reforming”? And you have no clue about Aqeedah brother
THE MIND HAD CREATED A DUSTBIN CALLED, AKHIRAT S DUSTBIN,, ANYTHING THAT MINDA DOES NOT KNOW WILL BE THROWN INTO THIS DUSTBIN
Forgot to take you're pills?
WHO CREATED AKHIRAT S DUSTBIN, REAL GOD, OR THE MINDA.. YES IT WAS THE MIND, THE KING OF 3 REALMS
Reformist
All the schools are not equal lol. Sunni or salafi is the correct school. May Allah keep us firm on the truth
The Athari aqidah is correct, not the salafi aqidah.
How is everyone okay?
And know that Allaah’s صلى الله عليه وسلم said,
“My nation will divide into 73 sects; all of them shall be in the Fire except one, and it is the Jamaa`ah; the united body upon the truth.” It was said, “Who are they, O Messenger of Allaah?” He said, “That which I and my companions are upon today.”
Reported by At-Tirmithee (2641) and by al-Haakim and by others, Al-Laalikaa’ee in As-Sunnah and by others besides from a hadeeth of `Abdullaah ibn `Amr ibn al `Aas radiyAllaahu `anhumaa. And Shaykh Al-Albaaniyy mentioned that this hadeeth is hasan; has supporting narrations for its final wording and declared it hasan.
@MAli99923 What is important to note here is that the criteria is to follow the sunnah of the Prophet (saw) and the methodology of the companions, and not the group. The way of the sahabas was not to make it a sectarian way. Rather, they focused on iman, ikhlas, ihsan, and Islam.
One of the scholars beautifully said that you are not judged as a group but as an individual in the day of judgement, so from each group, there will be sincere people with good sincerity towards the truth (who do not follow the sectarian approach) and they will have good deeds - Allah swt would not count them among the sectarian people.
On the day of judgement, you will be judged by your overall deeds. A person may be threatened with punishment because of certain deeds but may be forgiven because of his/her overall good deeds, or he/she may enter hell for a temporary period but then will come out eventually and be with the believers in the jannah. What matters is your deeds and not your slogans, labels, or attachments - yes, they may be important for distinction yourself in this dunya, but in they eyes of Allah what matters is our Ikhlas, iman, ihsan and amal.
@@faysalahmed9157 So what do we do with the hadeeth I presented?
Did it mentioned the saved sect? It did right?
Yes you're right, we are all judged individually, and therefore its incumbent we cling on to the right group, no? And thats the save sect mention in the hadeeth
Shaykh Yasir Qadhi should have been more open to give references to the other side and their articles (for the Istighaathah discussion). There was a subtle sense of him still censoring their legitimate scholarly conclusions.
He literally teaches this in his advanced Aqeedah course in the The Islamic Seminar of America and brings other scholars in different fields.
48:50 Somalia has the same FiQi #shafici but different theologies Salafism and Sufism.
They debated but Sufism is kind of crossing The Whole Suni to Shia. Asking dead for health.. taking Sh.Jaylani's more than the Prophet PBH.
The reality of sufis is they've been an inlet for Shi'a to spread their khurafaat and shirkiyaat amongst laymen sunnis.
What do you know about Somalia, Kid.
So basically he is saying they were slaves of the ideas of their time
But I am not 😅😅 I am your savior
He uses modern philosophy of language as if there is consensus about it or as if it will never change
He is actually so emerged and influenced by post modernism and progressivism and yet telling us that imams in the past felt into the trap of being influenced by the ideas of their time and that their ideas are only human interpretations, and his is what? Divine
The golden double standard
But this modern world is much better hence we will understand better
If this is not post modernism and secularism i do not know what it is
He says we do not know what the sahabas believed
So when god says فَإِنْ آمَنُوا بِمِثْلِ مَا آمَنتُم بِهِ فَقَدِ اهْتَدَوا ۖ
How am i supposed to follow what god commands me here yet he never guided me? This is belitering god's message.
And the issue is that he does not accept natural language, that the asel is in the zaher of the word
No he wanna use some modern philosophy of language yet the quran came in arabic with the mindset of none philosophers, but let us ignore that and believe that philosiphers will understand better.
The guy is deep in tge mud and he does not see that, he does not see how much he has been influenced by modern philosophy
He reminds me of woke leftist when they say we accept everybody unless they disagree with us
Basicaly he refuses the hadith of the prophet خير القرون قرني ثم الذين يلونهم ثم الذين يلونهم
And all these generations said that who ever says that the quran is created is a kafir.
But qadhi is more versed than those.people who were indoctrinated and did not know how to understand the quran until our master the west developped the modern philosophy of language
بئس المعتقد والمعتقد
A side note: the guy says look at the ibadiya إباضية how they have better iman than sunnis in their salat and tahajod
Does he not know that ibadiya are khawarej and that we have a direct hadith from the prophet saying
تخرج خارجة من أمتي ليس صلاتكم إلى صلاتهم بشيء ، ولا صيامكم إلى صيامهم بشيء ، ولا قراءتكم إلى قراءتهم بشيء ، يقرأون [ ص: 593 ] القرآن يحسبون أنه لهم وهو عليهم ، لا يجاوز حناجرهم ، يمرقون من الإسلام مروق السهم من الرمية . وآية ذلك أن فيهم رجلا له عضد وليس لها ذراع ، عليها مثل حلمة الثدي ، عليها شعرات بيض ، لو يعلم الجيش الذين يصيبونهم ما لهم على لسان نبيهم لاتكلوا على العمل ، فسيروا على اسم الله
So their actions from the outside are the best but deep down in their hearts they have zero iman
Phd in doctrine? Really
[This comment is by brother Abdulkader Sabsabi]
May Allah bless you
💯... The only protectors of this faith are those that emphasise Aqeedah and the statements of the Salaf.
We'd be upon the path of the yahud and nasaara if it were left to the likes of yq etc.
Ahlul Hadith/Athariyya/Ashaabul-Hadith/Salafis are the only group that Allah has made a means of protecting the asal of Islam.
The rest keep deviating away, and salafis keep pulling them back to the Salaf.
@@spawnnpwn4166where did you get that from? What's your evidence for this "protectors of this faith"?
@@NobodySpecial420 By the fact that they're the only ones upon the creed of Imam Ahmed (salaf). Either Imam Ahmed had the wrong Aqeedah, or those not upon the creed of Imam Ahmed are upon the wrong Aqeedah.
Soo which is it?
@@spawnnpwn4166 "statements of the salaf". Did RasoolAllah S.A.W or the salaf teach Ruboobiyyah? Hakimiyyah? Asma as Sifaat? Did they argue about these categories of Tawheed? Did they argue about the attributes of Allah? Why don't you follow the salaf in this?
Allah (SWT) has cleared all doubt from our aqeedah and Has left no ambiguity
correct Aqeedah is the guiding principles for our life, so there should be clarity with avoidance of doubts
if you don't want to be misguided stick to the Qur'an and sound Sunnah which Allah Has protected as He promised
Pray for His guidance to the correct path ٱهۡدِنَا ٱلصِّرَ ٰطَ ٱلۡمُسۡتَقِیمَ
It was a nice talk and shows how far Yasir qadhi has evolved in his understanding of what matter most in religion, but using words like “my dear brothers”, “mankind” which completely exclude female listeners, suggest that he has a a pretty long way to go.
Perhaps reading Amina Wadud for starters may start his journey into how patriarchy has shaped religious understanding and committed a huge Zulm/injustice to women and then he can be equally vocal about women’s s rights too.
Wishing him all the best.
Sister Saba Muhammad.
Mankind includes both men and women...
This comment is a joke
Expert of speaking from both sides of the mouth.
SubhanAllah, then don’t watch brother. Go pray 5 daily prayers and read Quran
How is he “speaking from both sides of the mouth”?
"Muslim" channels be posting stuff from Anyone these days
I Swear, if Ad-Dajjal came Today and gave a lecture, a 101 so-called "Islamic" channel would post it with titles like "Sheikh Dajjal gives great insight for why He and He Alone is God" and the comments would be filled with "mashallah ❤️❤️❤️" type stuff
You may not realise it yet but on the Day of Judgement, you will finally realize the consequences of your promotion of these noorless reformists
min 2:30; 13:50; 16:25; 18:40; 21:05; 23:00
What are these timestamps?
Wittgenstein didn't even understand himself.
JUST SITTING N WARMING YOUR BUTTS ON GOODNESS N BADNESS RELATED TOPIC ARE NOT ENOUGH. WITHOUT THE REAL NAMES THE WHOLE OF HUMAN BIRTH IS WASTED
You guys have no shame
THE WHOLE OF QURAN IS MAKHLUK NOT FROM GOD, IT IS STILL MIND, SOUND OF BELLS
GO AND GOOGLE IT OUT MUHAMAD N SOUND OF BELLS..
THE REAL FULL NAMES, THE 100TH NAMES NOT REVEALED IN QURAN, THE 5 SELECTED SOUNDS NOT REVEALED AS NAMES IN ISLAM..
The amount of lies spewed in this video is ridiculous.
Elobarate and please with timestamp where the lie and what lie has been said
@@dpireader32 Just 1 example out of many
He said ibn taymiyah is the first person in history to say شد الرحال إلي القبور is haram which is objectively false but his audience and followers don’t even know the Arabic language and even those who do have very little knowledge and follow whatever he says blindly.
ذهب إمام دار الهجرة مالك بن أنس والقاضي عياض من أئمة المالكية إلى منع السفر لزيارة القبور، وكرهوها and you have from the حنابلة ابن عقيل وابن بطة
Even الجويني said it by the way which many don’t know and you have القاضي حسين as well.
Bro In the middle needs to chill. Your interview style is kind of annoying a bit. Not letting someone land. Imposing your suggestions. Forcing a misinformed opinion.Ect.
Avoid listening to him
He will harm your religion
He said, everyone is okay, because at the end of the day they raise the hands to the same Allaah. Yet he excluded the extreme sufis? What gives?
There's 2 aqeda. Islam or kufr nothing else
This man is a wolf in sheep's clothing, spreading all forms of doubt regarding the authentic orthodox Sunni Islam. After this podcast you will be more confused than before. stay away from him!
Sus
But aqidah is important ! E.g. people who have aqidah like Sufis …. Who worship grave and call upon dead saints ! Are just mushrik
Ur right bro.
100%... They're dividing the Ummah by leading the awwaam towards misguidance.
Lol you are exactly the person he describes in this very same lecture.
@@NobodySpecial420 yea you must be the exactly same person who believes in saints have magical powers !
@@NobodySpecial420 So either grave worshippers are not comitting shirk or YQ is wrong. So which is it?
Is this the same Yasir who says in front of the camera "i dont believe in ja'juj and ma'juj being alive today, thus going against the Quran, Sunnah and sixth pillar of eemaan. And yet he dares teach aqeedah. Run people, run!
Can you show us which ayah from the Quran and which hadith from the Prophet ﷺ and which pillar of iman that says yajuj and majuj are alive today…
@@abdurrahmanali24
Until, when he reached between two mountains, he found, before (near) them, a people who scarcely understood a word.
They said, ‘O Dhu’l-Qarnayn! Verily! Yajuj and Majuj are doing great mischief in the land. Shall we then pay you a tribute in order that you might erect a barrier between us and them?’
-see Suratul Kahf from verse 93.
Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him), who said: “The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said that Yajuj and Majuj are digging every day until they can almost see sunlight, then the one who is in charge of them says, “Go back, we will dig again tomorrow.” Then Allah restores (the barrier) and makes it stronger than it was. (This will continue) until the appointed time. When Allah wishes to send them against the people, they will dig until they can almost see sunlight, then the one who is in charge of them will say, “Go back, we will dig again tomorrow, in sha Allah.” This time he will say “in sha Allah”, so when they come back (the next day), they will find it as they left it, so they will dig their way out and emerge to attack the people. They will dry up water (by drinking it, because of their great numbers), and the people will seek to protect themselves from them in their fortresses. They will fire their arrows into the sky, and the arrows will come back down covered in blood (as a test for them), and they will say, “We have defeated the people of the earth and have gained the upper hand over the people of heaven.” Then Allah will send worms on the napes of their necks, which will kill them. The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “By the One in Whose hand is my soul, the beasts of the earth will grow fat from their flesh.” (Sahih Ibn Majah, 3298)
Umm Habibah bint Abi Sufyan reported from Zaynab bint Jahsh (may Allah be pleased with them) that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) entered upon her in an agitated state and said, “La ilaha ill-Allah, woe to the Arabs from an evil that has approached! Today a hole like this has been opened in the barrier of Yajuj and Majuj ,” and he made a circle with his thumb and forefinger. Zaynab bint Jahsh said: “I said, ‘O Messenger of Allah, will we be destroyed even though there are righteous people among us?’ He said, ‘Yes, if evil becomes overwhelming.’” (Reported by al-Bukhari, 3097).
Hadith of al-Nawwas ibn Sam'an, which says that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) told them about the Dajjal, and said: “Whilst he is like that, Allah will reveal to ‘Isa: ‘I have released slaves of Mine whom no one will be able to fight. Take My slaves to safety in al-Tur (Sinai),’ and Allah will send Yajuj and Majuj , who will come swarming down from every mound. The first of them will pass by Lake Tiberias and will drink the water in it, and the last of them will pass by it and will say, ‘There was water here once.’” Narrated by Muslim, no. 2937.
@@abdurrahmanali24 Yes i can show you, it is very easy and cleer.
Let me begin with Quran in Surah Kahf, verse 94. Where Allah mentions Dhul Qarnayn travelling the world and the people come to him saying: "O Dhul-Qarnain! Verily! Ya'juj and Ma'juj are doing great mischief in the land. Shall we then pay you a tribute in order that you might erect a barrier between us and them?"
Then after that Dhul Qarnayn builds the wall and locks them in. Then Allah continues in 18:97-99: "So they [Ya'juj and Ma'juj) were made powerless to scale it or dig through it. (Dhul-Qarnain) said: "This is a mercy from my Lord, but when the Promise of my Lord comes, He shall level it down to the ground. And the Promise of my Lord is ever true." And on that Day (i.e. the Day Ya'juj and Ma'juj come out), We shall leave them to surge like waves on one another, and the Trumpet will be blown, and We shall collect them all together."
I do not think that any person with a right mind needs explanation for this, it is so clear. But according to yasir and his likes, when the Promise of Allah comes and te wall comes down it is "surprise, there is no one here, we fooled you all". We seek refuge in Allah from these people.
Let's move on to the hadith:
It was narrated from Abu Sa'eed Al-Khudri that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: "Gog and Magog people will be set free and they will emerge as Allah says: "swoop(ing) down from every mound."[21:96] They will spread throughout the earth, and the Muslims will flee from them until the remainder of the Muslims are in their cities and fortresses, taking their flocks with them. (hadith continues...)
Sunan Ibn Majah 4079
In the long hadith in Sahih Muslim 2937a the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) says after mentioning the killing of the dajjal by Isa ibn Maryam (peace be upon him): "I have brought forth from amongst My servants such people against whom none would be able to fight; you take these people safely to Tur. And then Allah would send Gog and Magog and they would swarm down from every slope."
And Narrated Zainab bint Jahsh:
The Prophet (ﷺ) got up from his sleep with a flushed red face and said, "None has the right to be worshipped but Allah. Woe to the Arabs, from the Great evil that is nearly approaching them. Today a gap has been made in the wall of Gog and Magog like this." (Sufyan illustrated by this forming the number 90 or 100 with his fingers.) It was asked, "Shall we be destroyed though there are righteous people among us?" The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "Yes, if evil increased." Sahih al-Bukhari 7059
This matter is so clear, anyone can fully understand this. As for your second question. The 10 signs of the last hour are part of the 5th pillar in eemaan, which is believe in the last day. So denying this, is denying (part of) the 5th pillar.
Hudhaifa b. Usaid al-Ghifari reported:
Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) came to us all of a sudden as we were (busy in a discussion). He said: What do you discuss about? They (the Companions) said. We are discussing about the Last Hour. Thereupon he said: It will not come until you see ten signs before and (in this connection) he made a mention of the smoke, Dajjal, the beast, the rising of the sun from the west, the descent of Jesus son of Mary (Allah be pleased with him), the Gog and Magog, and land-slides in three places, one in the east, one in the west and one in Arabia at the end of which fire would burn forth from the Yemen, and would drive people to the place of their assembly. Sahih Muslim 2901a
And Allah knows best
I for one don't believe in Jajuj whatever that is.
@@AbuYusha01 You're not muslim then. Take your Shahada again and read Surah Kahf verse 93. Hadith rejectors are also non muslim.
Yasir Qadhi is basically an agnostic when it comes to aqeedah. This is the product of his modernist strand of salafism, he has become post-modern - they’re all right in their own way, take your pick etc. sad to see.
This guy doesnt know how to stay in his lane, keep quiet on this Yasir
SA
This Ummah has major problems, if you go to a salafi group the first thing they ask you is where is Allah and try to convince you Allah is a body and if you go to a Sufi masjid you will end up talking to the dead for your needs and calling on prophets and awliya for help with Allah (if you don’t have knowledge) and these are the two main groups today, these differences MUST be resolved thus we can all unite. We have to be wise. There’s no need to delve into how Allah exists nor is there a need to go to graves and seek help or call remotely, we can put these issues down and focus on serving Allah ! allahuekber ! The big shayks from each group MUST sit down and resolve these ideas and make the appropriate joint announcement’s. Dr Brother Yasir it’s not good advice to tell people to go anywhere and believe anything. You are yielding to difficult circumstances. At least say learn the basics at each place like Arabic, Quran, Hadith, basic Fiqh etc. and regarding where there are differences in aqida just all say we believe as Allah intended it and move on… in sh Allah
What you say about salafi's is not true. Its not the first thing they ask and they dont try to convince you Allah has a body. The only ones who use the word body are those who deny Allah's attributes. Isn't that ironic. The only thing salafi's do is affirm Allah's ATTRIBUTES which He and His messenger (saw) affirmed for Him without any distortion, denial, asking about how these attributes are or likening Him to His creation.
If you think that is bad, i think you have a problem, not the salafi's Unless you think it is good to meet Allah denying what He affirmed for Himself. And how can you speak about unite when you start your message with lies and attacks on people?! Makes no sense brother.
In islam we do not mix truth with falsehood, cause when we do that, the truth is gone. Coming together like you suggest and solve the differences is wishfull thinking. Each group in islam thinks it is on the right path and dont see wrong in it. Even when Allah forbade it, even when the Messengegr (saw) forbade it and said 72 of 73 groups will be in hellfire, they still think they know better and invent new ideas and groups in islam.
6:159: Those who have divided their religion and become sects - you, [O Muhammad], are not [associated] with them in anything. Their affair is only [left] to Allah ; then He will inform them about what they used to do.
30-31:32: ...turning in repentance to Him, and fear Him and establish prayer and do not be of those who associate others with Allah. [Or] of those who have divided their religion and become sects, every faction rejoicing in what it has.
Or maybe just maybe you're intentionally misrepresenting Salafis??
Ibn ‘Abdul Barr رحمه الله on “Istiwa”
وإنما يُوجَّهُ كلام الله عز وجل إلى الأشهر والأظهر من وجوهه، ما لم يمنع من ذلك ما يجب له التسليم، ولو ساغ ادّعاء المجاز لكل مدّع ما ثبت شيء من العبارات، وجل الله عز وجل عن أن يخاطب إلا بما تفهمه العرب في معهود مخاطباتها، مما يصح معناه عند السامعين. والاستواء معلوم في اللغة ومفهوم، وهو: العلو والارتفاع على الشيء، والاستقرار والتمكن فيه. قال أبو عبيدة في قوله تعالى: {اسْتَوَى} قال: علا. قال: وتقول العرب: استويت فوق الدابة، واستويت فوق البيت. وقال غيره: استوى، أي: انتهى شبابه واستقرّ، فلم يكن في شبابه مزيد
قال أبو عمر: الاستواء: الاستقرار في العلو، وبهذا خاطبنا الله عز وجل، وقال: {لِتَسْتَوُوا عَلَى ظُهُورِهِ ثُمَّ تَذْكُرُوا نِعْمَةَ رَبِّكُمْ إِذَا اسْتَوَيْتُمْ عَلَيْهِ} [الزخرف: 13]، وقال: {وَاسْتَوَتْ عَلَى الجُودِيَّ} [هود: 44]، وقال: {فَإِذَا اسْتَوَيْتَ أَنتَ وَمَن مَّعَكَ عَلَى الفُلْكِ} [المؤمنون: 28]، وقال الشاعر
فأوردتهم ماء بفيفاء قفرة وقد حلق النجم اليماني فاستوى
“The words of Allah, the Almighty, should be understood according to the most common and apparent meanings unless something necessitates accepting an alternative interpretation. If the claim of metaphorical interpretation were allowed for anyone who wished to assert it, no statement would retain its intended meaning. Allah, the Almighty, is far above addressing us in a manner that the Arabs do not understand in their customary language, where the meaning is clear to the listeners. Istiwa’ in the language is well-known and understood; it means elevation and rising above something, as well as stability and establishment in it. Abu ‘Ubaydah, in explaining the verse {istawa}, said: ‘It means rose above.’ He also mentioned that the Arabs say: ‘I rose above the animal’ and ‘I rose above the house.’ Another scholar said: ‘Istawa means that one’s youth has reached its peak and stabilized, so there is no increase in it.’
Abu ‘Umar (Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr) said: Istiwa means stability at the highest point, and it is in this sense that Allah, the Almighty, addressed us. He said: {That you may settle yourselves upon their backs, then remember the favor of your Lord when you have settled upon them} [Al-Zukhruf: 13], and He said: {And it [the ship] settled on Mount Judi} [Hud: 44], and He said: {When you and those with you are settled on the Ark} [Al-Mu’minun: 28]. The poet said:
'I brought them to water in a desolate wasteland, and the Yemeni star rose high and settled.'"
Al-Tamhīd (5/142)
We accept the Ahaadeeth upon the Apparent Meanings
(Imām Aḥmad) said: And with us the aḥadīth (ie: narrations) are upon their dhāhir (ie: apparent meanings) as it came from the Prophet ﷺ,
والحديث عندنا عَلَى ظاهره كما جاء عَنِ النَّبِيِّ - صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ -
And kalām (ie: talk) about it is a bidaʿ (ie: innovation),
والكلام فيه بدعة
But we believe in it as it came upon its dhāhir.
ولكن نؤمن به كما جاء عَلَى ظاهره
Ibn Abī Yaʿlá, Ṭabaqāt al-Ḥanābilah 1/242
ابن أبي يعلى، طبقات الحنابلة ١/٢٤٢
if you can accept so much difference in tawheed like some people negating place/direction/literal body parts/limits for Allah and other people affirming these things. Then why not be lenient on the issue of Sahaba ? Even in the Sahihayn there are authentic hadith which affirm some companions are going to hell which is essentially the shia position that some companions are good and some are bad
Nice try rawafilth
Source for the hadiths about sahabah going to hell?
@@silkydude sahih muslim 2779a , sahih bukhari 6576 , sahih bukhari 6582 ....
We have only two Aqeedah, Ash’Hari and Maturidhi, rest of them deviant ones
Others believe the God who sits on the throne, depending throne and organs and it’s not Allah
AlMuzani (student of AlShafi'i himself) said in Sharh' AlSunnah (the first sentence in the book) :
"He is Himself Above the Throne (Dhat is used) while close to creation with His Knowledge."
AlBukhari said in Khalq Af'aal Al'ibad:
Ibn Mubarak said: The Jahmis are worst in claim than the Jews and the christians. The Jews, Christians and Muslims have agreed that Allah is Above the Throne, while they said that there is nothing on the Throne.
okey jahmi
Ibn ‘Abdul Barr رحمه الله on Ahlul Bid’ah and Ahlul Kalaam
Ibn Abdul-Barr Al-Māliki (rahimahullāh, d. 390H) quoted the saying of Imām Mālik: “It is not permitted to accept the witness of Ahlul-Bid’ah and Ahlul-Ahwā.” Then he explained:
“The people of desires according to Mālik and all of our companions are Ahlul-Kalām (the people of theological rhetoric). So every mutakallim (one who resorts to theological rhetoric) is from the people of desires and Bid’ah whether he is an Ash’ari or other than an Ash’ari. His witness is never accepted in Islam. He is to be abandoned and disciplined for his innovation. And if he continues upon innovation, his repentance is sought [by those in authority].” (Jāmi’ Bayān Al-‘Ilm wa Fadlihi, 2/96)
So you claim the Prophet (pbuh) and his companions, and the 2 generations after that, and the 4 imams were all deviated? Or do you say they were ashari's and maturidis?
You would be amazed what the Prophet ﷺ and his companions would say about Ash'ari and Maturidhi. As a matter of fact, they didn't even hear about those things.