Johnny Depp amused as witness mocks articles written about actor | LiveNOW from FOX
Вставка
- Опубліковано 1 тра 2022
- Johnny Depp witness Richard Edward Marks, an entertainment attorney hired by the actor to analyze the impact of ex-wife Amber Heard's op-ed in the Washington Post, was asked about negative stories written about Depp prior to Heard's story. When asked about The Sun article, for which Depp sued the newspaper in the UK and lost, Marks noted that the paper "came to prominence by publishing topless women on page 3."
Subscribe to LiveNOW from FOX! ua-cam.com/users/livenowfox?su...
Where to watch LiveNOW from FOX: www.livenowfox.com/
Follow us @LiveNOWFOX on Twitter: / livenowfox
Raw and unfiltered. Watch a non-stop stream of breaking news, live events and stories across the nation. Limited commentary. No opinion. Experience LiveNOW from FOX.
Since when has it been OK for lawyers to use magazine articles “gossip” magazines to argue a case, this is absolutely ridiculous!
I can’t agree MORE.
Quite right. But also very useful for team Depp .....Heard`s team damaging their own image , Funny really.
Wouldn't that be like hearsay evidence? Either way, it's a ridiculous way to gather information.
@@sweettrubble4635 That’s what I am say. They objected a lot to using articles, calling it hearsay, tsk tsk
When they need to link those gossips whit an effect on someone career, it is not that weird, now, the way they are doing it is dumb
Lawyer claiming that Disney can’t deal with Depp’s drunk behaviour because he’s in ’family films’ made by Disney is absurd. They’re making films about a drunken murderous pirate crew!!!
Lol right
Best comment! 🙌🏼
Not to mention they purchased the rights to air the salacious Pam and Tommy series on Disney Plus.
Boom!!!
Ikr!! And when was drugs and alcohol addiction a problem for actors/ actresses in hollywood? They make it seem like JD is the only actor with drug and alcohol problems! There are so many more and all of them get roles just fine and even wrote books and did interviews about it.
"I have a wife, two kids, a full-time job - I don't remember." I felt that in my soul.
I have none of that, save a great paying job. I have no regrets.
@Valu thats not right
🤣
@@indridcold8433 That you need to say this speaks volumes to your regrets. Take better mental care of yourself.
@Valu What nation do you reside that is so draconian? I did get vaccinated. Those that chose no vaccination simply went to a different floor to work. Nobody is forced here. However, we do still have a mask protocol. Businesses can decline to conduct business with unmasked individuals. That is about as bad as it gets here. I can not believe you live in a nation that fires people for no vaccinations. It may be time to move to a more free nation. Be careful. Since you stated you got fired for not being vaccinated, you may be on some sort of government watch.
This witness is under-rated. I thoroughly enjoyed him. He just speaks with authority. Very credible and a good sense of humour
@HotDog9 lol you're funny. Thanks 4 being the reminder that odd-balls abound. 😆 😆 🤣
@HotDog9 Being just a spectator in court is the only requirement that is good for you, in particular. I hope you'll never have to be a witness or a juror in any case, in any courtroom. You're NOT equipped!!
Agreed!
@HotDog9 wow there are dum* people in the world I just read a comment from one! Hot dog can I get your autograph
@@barbaramccormack5612 agreed!
The fact that a paper like The Sun can be used as evidence in a court of law is terrifying.
agreed being from the uk the sun in my opinion is bs that my opinion and to use it as evidence wow ok have they got nothing else that there grasping at straws and using the sun
So next time if I ever need to go to court, I'm stopping at the news stand and grabbing a copy of each. And they are googling him and getting every article written by every journalist, new and old. Unprofessional and not. Just stupid.
You should have heard the other clips when AH’s lawyer referenced other pop culture magazines 😂
They should of used National Enquirer instead 😂
no one with the right mind would read the sun.all it's good for is mopping up spillage.
This guy is reading gossip magazines as evidence with everyone on the witness stand. Her representation is absolutely terrible. The disrespect they treat everyone with shouldn’t be allowed in the courtroom.
not only gossip magazines, but also random blogs and such, which most likely is mainly opinions, and have no real facts
@@thortorin9954This man did an excellent job during his testimony stating just that: all the defense's resources are from sources that are not a legitimate source of information.
One was a blog called Behind the Magic where the author even stated she just used information from another tabloid article. It's absolutely pathetic the defense is relying on these blogs and tabloids .
Really just shows their desperation at all they have
They’re trying to say his name was deflamed before she accused him of abuse
Agreed! 💯
He asks truly with bewilderment "are you just gonna keep reading those?" It still makes me laugh!
Props to this witness for staying calm and not falling for verbal tricks in this, frankly, joke of a examination.
He was chilling
Brandon, this attorney is trying to push his buttons. He sees AH team is losing, drawing at straws
I agree Brandon this was so bad nasty disgusting
@@bec7839yes I agree with you. It was getting to the point that it wasn't working they were clasping at straws at this point jmo
Indeed, it was a joke of an examination.
Let’s be honest, we’re all watching now just to see how disgusting and stupid a group of people can possibly be. I support Johnny.
Exactly right. It's great entertainment to see how incompetent the defence is even if you hate Depp.
Exactly!
I completely agree. It's now become comical to see just how pathetic Amber's "attorneys" can get. Asking the same question 4 different ways shouldn't have cost hundreds of thousands in law school. I could do this if that's all it is! Reading trash tabloids are also a sad attempt at trying to make a point.
We ought to support the facts.
Love it how the attorney's voice went from overconfident to nervous 😂
I’ve never seen attorneys act this unprofessionally. This is an embarrassment to attorneys everywhere. Her team is awful
Well, the team reflects the defendant 🤷🏻♀️
I agree! Ive never seen a lawyer object to his own guestion. Laughable!
"You don't have a crystal ball, right?"
@@amymenjivar3489 😂😂 That was so stupid, honestly
Do you have experience with real-life lawyers? (note: my tone-of-voice is "sincere", not challenging.)
This guy's whole testimony is basically 'Hollywood does not care about tabloids and gossip. Johnny Depp's reputation in the industry was fine before the op-ed from AH." but the examination still took 20+ minutes because someone let the nonsense man near the microphone again.
Exactly because any and all of the negative publicity Depp had before the op-ed was completely commonplace, run of the mill negativity or gossip to the same degree if not less than other actors of his level of fame. It gets completely lost in the noise for audiences and producers when all of his contemporaries have a similar story running about the actor doing something embarrassing in public. When an actor is accused of rape and domestic violence, it stands out as a serious matter to everyone. And it was an enormous story. I remember feeling disgusted at Depp at the time, and no longer saw him as a person but as some kind of tyrannical monster. Now that it has come to light he was being abused at home by his wife and trying to protect his abuser as people do, that his accuser was this same ex wife that used to hit him for staying out too late, that his accuser was deeply abusive and domestically violent to him, and tried to flip the script as punishment for him wanting to end the relationship: Their grounds for defamation are staggering. Flatly untrue, intentional and malicious with indescribable damages
Lol, “the nonsense man…” 😂🙌🏼
This comment, here, 100% correct! 🙄🤪
Omg I'm giggling and now full on laughing outloud about letting the nonsense man near a microphone again 🤣🤣🤣
This witness was gold for Depp. As you would expect from a high powered experienced entertainment attorney. I enjoyed watching him testify, this is the way.
Railroadedspiked
Dr S was the icing on the cake pmsl!
This is pathetic why are they bringing up articles that are clearly not facts but opinions and rumours/speculations
Yes cheap shot
Objection, hearsay!
cheap shot
And hearsay! JD team needs to object with hearsay like they do. I'm sick of AH's team. Hearsay?
Exactly. And why aren't they objecting to this line of questioning
This is really going to hurt Amber’s lawyers career. He’s very rude, unprofessional, and seems confused a lot. He doesn’t want to let ppl finish if he doesn’t like what he’s hearing.
Objection Hearsay! Wait I asked the question!
@@derrickcarbona9245 "I'LL ASK THE QUESTIONS HERE! WAIT NO DONT ANSWER!,OBJECTION, HEARSAY!"
Interrupting whenever the answer witness provides does not line up with what he wants. Even when it's completely relevant to the question asked. The lawyer is such a clown
He sounds so nervous!
@@derrickcarbona9245 it leads to bias your honor
The guy does know that Disney have made some pretty horrific things right? Hiring a guy that drinks a little heavily isn't exactly the worst thing they've done
disney started with horrific..
Walt was a freaking racist and never denied it and didn't hide it!
oh! regarding disney, don't take my word for it, look it up!
Going all the way back to Snow White and Sleeping Beauty.
@@elenalatici9568 i was thinking more the nazi propaganda stuff
Walt Disney hated Jews lol
This guy shreds. Love him. He knows too much to be lead by anyone.
well he's an attorney himself, so he knew how to play the game.
@Savaial Addams "led" is the correct past tense of "to lead". Just an fyi.
@@lisahinton9682 thanks for that. I love a grammar corrector!
@@lisahinton9682 just an f.y.i. Don’t forget the periods
I'm not sure who he is..I must of missed that.
What kind of attorney just references articles and gossip as part of his defense? How can the judge allow it.
I think the speculation is that they're assuming Heard is going to lose, so they're trying to drag his career down as far as possible, to lower the amount of money he could win from it. I.e. "He claims this much damages, but through his own actions he already damaged his career, therefore X amount is excessive for damages from her Op Ed"
She’s giving them enough rope to hang themselves.
From the Sun! Lol I used to be obsessed with the Enquirer when I was way younger but I would never ever touch The Sun. Nothing but liessss
an arrogant condescending judge with no scruples.
@@makaylahollywood3677 this isn’t a criminal trial. In civil trials, there are looser standards for what can be entered as evidence. It’s not the judge’s fault. I think she’s doing an excellent job of controlling her courtroom. Given the sheer amount of objections alone, she’s doing her job quite well.
Her lawyers aren't doing her any favors. They have been extremely nasty and aggressive. There's no way the jury isn't paying attention to this.
My feelings from day one! Love it! Keep on beating-up every witness- huge points for Mr. Depp's side!!! 😎
They're the only kinda people that would defend a bully like amber
Exactly, her lawyers attitude makes you think they are bullies trying to yep ppl up.
Like a coyote stuck in a trap they know it's over so they get scared and try to go on the attack in a last chance attempt to evade the inevitable end
Their acting like her. 😆🤣😂
99.999% those articles he's asking about are someone's OPINION. THEY ARE OPINION BASED ARTICLES. Anyone could write an article saying this person or that person is overrated & overpaid. Such a waste of time with this BS.
I wanted him to say "at least he didn't poop in someones bed" but he is much smarter than me and knows better. Still it woule have been epic!!!
Master class on the redirect. Simple, concise, left the jury scratching their head, like, what was the point of the cross examination? Johnny's lawyers are gold.
Quoting an "article" from "Inside The Magic" should disqualify this lawyer from ever practicing law again.
It's not even a disney owned website!
@@joshdavies9237 none of those sources are Disney owned, it's mostly gossip magazines and some random website that every idiot can manage that have absolutely zilch credibility
Seriously lol
that he/she totally didn't write themselves 5 minutes before the trial
@@sidolanters1394 Exactly and that’s why Amber’s case is so garbage. It’s a literally a laughing stock to any lawyer. She’s gonna lose by a landslide
I really love this witness.. he's composed, sarcastic and didn't give the lawyer the reactions he wanted
Hes a big shark lawyer in movie industry, hes very savy and the most heavy weight of all lawyers in the court room.
Really, for the price he's being paid he didn't seem too well researched on Jhonny Depp
@@ivangutowski really?? That's his point. He doesn't know everything said or thought about him (to be clear.. johnny depp)
@@ivangutowski Why he will waste his time that is expensive as hell reading stupid tabloids? Of course he knows most actors use some kind of drugs or have some kind of behavior problem.
@@felipewerner6670 Would you mind sharing his name? I must’ve missed it earlier on in the video. Was curious since he’s an expert witness.
This guy didnt actually ask questions, he just used the witness to have his own run at Gossip articles, apparently his hobby reading those and he sounded very proud of having a whole Anti-Depp collection. And here I was thinking that separating between work and your free time was a golden rule of professionalism.
These lawyers are the most annoying interrogaters, always acting as if they're catching the witnesses in some type of lie but no real content to their argument
Yes they are
The same lawyer that objects to hearsay every 5 seconds is the same one that brings up just the titles of articles all on their own to use in court. What a joke
@@ambzerambzer8800 he doesnt sue for an article.. he sues Amber heard this time
Amber Heard is being sued for her part in putting together the first article which had Johnny's name and to some extent the "abuse" she suffered. However the article was edited the next day to exclude key details but the damage was already done. These lawyers are aware of this and have been trying desperately to get the witnesses to recognize that second article as fact rather than it's initial release.
In a very minor way the article reading makes sense, since Johnny is suing for an article that was written about him, not only due to the untruth in it but due to the fact it damaged his reputation.
And I guess it could be questioned why he didn’t sue the rest (though he did have a lawsuit with one or some)
And question why the other articles didn’t damage his rep etc
Idk just minorly I get it, but not really 😂 I wish the lawyer explained his reasoning for reading the titles the other day.
@@ambzerambzer8800 Yea, but the issue is that Hollywood doesn’t care about eccentric behaviour like drugs or alcohol or being difficult in sets. Heck, look at Christian Bale. The man was crazy in Terminator Salvation set, but no one would stop hiring him for work because of it. BUT, the me too stuff is what gets you thrown under the bus.
It’s pretty clear what they’re angling for. They are trying to convey that her oped was no more or less observant of Johnnys alleged behavior than hers. They’re trying to equivocate his eccentricities to his alleged abuse which we know is absurd but it’s about angling to a jury.
In other words, they’re trying the “Everyone’s hates Johnny, so is her op-ed so bad?” Except domestic abuse is not drug use. It’s a completely different and far worse problem as it involves abuse of another person other than yourself. But they want to equivocate and conflate the two.
It’s obvious why many lawyers wouldn’t want to take Heards case because this is a very flimsy farcical stance
All the witnesses see through this and go right back to “Domestic abuse is more severe and egregious than Johnny’s self inflicted drug abuse”.
That is why this case seems so ridiculous because it is.
I remember being scolded for doing book reports with suspect sources. I didn't realize I could have been a trial lawyer if I had ignored that advice.
😂
🤣😂😂😂
Right?! me too lol
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Could've made bank dawg, took that L
I can’t stand how rude and nasty this lawyer is , Stop getting in the middle of the witness unswers. OMG.
6:10. Depps reaction to hearing “most overpaid actor” is hilarious. He’s like “they do got a point”. 🤣
Lmao he’s like “eh, I’m already there”
I love his reaction here too.. he’s like ok Watever I maybe over paid but I’ll take it . Luv it !
He isn't talking about anything, the lawyer is talking about what was written about Depp. The lawyer is a joke. The judge allowing the badging of the man on the stand is insane.
Yep, "asked and answered" , should be used more often.
the judge has nothing to do with the lawyers and she cant reject a lawyer xd of course she cannot seem biased, thats unprofessional, she sustained just as many objections from johnnys as from ambers team so far. also johnnys team isnt objecting to almost everything so the jury can see what clowns ambers lawyers are i think
I am on JD's side here but the lawer, by pulling all the articles up, is trying to say that Amber didn't cause him millions (which she did. Those articles are bogus)
Although you are right, I think somehow its a good thing 4 Johnny Depp. Cuz it shows the damage her article has cost Johnny. Even if its on shady websites. So they wanna help Queen Turd, but instead of making her look better, its all about why Johnny started this lawsuit. His name and career were damaged because of her Miss Turd.
Badgering the witness*
Can't have a Pirates 6 without Depp. His performances have carried that franchise.
AND THIS IS A DOMESTIC abuse case... would if should of could of...WTH ..where is this going to prove Amber had a black eye.. etc....( I get the Disney issue..but seriously..)
J.D. is not a violent maniac. Amber Heard belongs in prison.
@@Dani-ICU-RN but this is the case for JD ... He is claiming that this article from amber brought him a major decrease in income .. so actually .. it is very important to prove or disprove if this was really the case .. and yeah the abuse is also part of all of this 🤷😅
I will start a campaign against Disney! They have parents paying hundreds a year, to "Disney's coffers" 💰, for their movies at theater's, video's, merchandise, and visits to their theme park, but they can't "give those same parents- their
"Depp" movie!!! The one movie series that adults have loved, and enjoyed- thru the years! Mr. Depp is...
"Irreplaceable"!
@@malted1961 Disney has always sucked, just look at how they treaded their comic artist for many years. From the 30s up until the 90s, the artists weren't allowed to sign their work and they were forced to sign it with "Walt Disney" instead. And they never got credit and just peanuts for their work. Look up Don Rosa's story (his "epilogue"), he explains the problems with Disney in detail.
He should have brought up how deceptive and untrustworthy the sun newspaper is by documenting what they wrote about Liverpudlians during the hillsborough disaster. The sun isn’t a rag, the sun isn’t even worthy of using as toilet paper.
I think it’s quite bizarre that lawyers are allowed to (idk if they actually are) use unreliable sources.
Watching this was like watching “Celebrities reading mean tweets about themselves”
Those kinds of articles are typically printed in what you probably characterize as an “unreliable source.”
@@sallymj8957 well, I would assume a vast majority of the people consider them to be unreliable sources. As someone studying English, I have done my fair share of research on whether or not a source is reliable
That's why their evidence is lacking any foundation. The articles are literally hearsay.
I worked for law firms for 10 years and I have never seen such unprofessional attorneys. They are rude, belligerent and argumentative with the witnesses. This is almost unheard of and I don't understand why the judge is not stepping in. I sincerely hope when this is over, these people are looking for new jobs. Their conduct reflects on their firm and firms are just as bad or worse than Hollywood about bad publicity. It is, after all, Hollywood.
Is this behaviour really uncommon cuz I don’t know nothing about court and attorney business.
@@nightcrawler9455 for the most part yes the way they are acting is out of behavior. It’s not unheard of for attorneys to attack and be a little unlikeable but it’s weird when it’s clear as day that they are going out of their way to attack the witness just based off of not getting the answer they want. It’s also weird and out of character to come at the characters of the witnesses left and right without it leading towards a question.
I certainly think they are not putting out great advertising for their services. I think the judge is just giving them enough rope.
I really do think it is because Heard is putting an incredible amount of pressure on them and probably also verbally abusing them. That’s what I think though!
They're probably this way cause they're grasping at straws. I'm so angry 😭😭😭
I love the fact every witness is being interrogated rudely because they are all so clever and funny they only embarrass the attorneys.
Especially Johnny ! They can never get him rattled. "A mega pint?"😅
All of Johnny's friends and employees are like him. Cool, calm, classy and collected.
AH's attorney are like her, bullying and rude.
JD's attorneys are like him, respectful and courteous.
It's amazing how much Disney has crossed that line
I am actually AMAZED that "objection, badgering the witness" never was said in this trial! This section would've been a great time for it!!
Im currently in law school and this is the single most shocking lawyer I've ever studied.. we study live cases and we argue them for practice of law. This lawyer gets laughed at so much by our full class im guessing we're not the only ones who find the whole approach bizzare..
Omg this is hilarious 😅
Tnx for sharing this with us lol
Objection, no reason
I can’t find good information about it anywhere but I’m curious, I thought past trials/instances independent of the current trial weren’t allowed to be used in the jury’s judgement? So why is the lawyer able to bring up the UK trial do try to spit on depp’s face
Super mega pint heresay objection to that claim your honor
This guy killed it. He made Heard’s lawyer look even more sleazy then he’s already presented himself. Bravo!
Ikr!!👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
I disagree with that, sorry. I hope Johnny wins, but the lawyer was good in this case.
@@pippiecarr9378 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️ bruh
@@pippiecarr9378 how is reading a bunch of sleazy headlines good? Witness already made it clear that Hollywood will tolerate any bad press to make $800 million per film, EXCEPT a cloud of sexual or domestic abuse.
He's not sleazy. He's a moron. A sleaze usually is manipulative and must be somewhat intelligent.
This lawyer is drowning in his own questions, unbelievable
The fact that Johnny's attorneys aren't objecting to any of this shows the jury that it's silly and irrelevant because bringing up a bunch of articles published of random people's opinions is absolutely absurd, nonsensical aaaand hearsay 😂
Yes true, but the court is allowing it because it is relevant in terms of reputation. We all know ‘The Sun’ is shite, and doesn’t even make a profit, but people do read it, sadly, and of course, other outlets comment on it, spreading its reach even further.
@@gee_emm valid point
I agree. They are just digging their graves one shovel of crap at a time.
I thought they objected a lot. Are we watching the same video?
Team Johnny all the way 💘
“Was that written by the second most underpaid actor or?” Beautiful. My favorite witness so far.
Edit: “It only made 800 million dollars” total bomb at that box office for sure.
And then he says, "any company would want a box office hit that made 800 million dollars 😏". Lol
It's just nearly a billion dollars. I mean, It was a failure, right?
I can’t wait for Amber’s testimony. It’ll be like an SNL skit.
I would have added that alot sequels typically make less money than their predecessors, so Pirates 5's box office decline was not altogether unexpected.
This one made me giggle snort because the lawyer thought he was just going to say it made less but then he threw out the amount. I doubt there is any franchise, aside from Harry Potter that made that much in the 5th installment.
The fact Depp's team doesn't object, for hearsay, everytime a random media article is referenced, tells me they're in firm control, and know not to get in the way of an enemy destroying itself.
Perfectly said !
Never interrupt an opponent while they're making mistakes.
Yep, they are allowing them to dig their own grave lol
@@m.m2701 Johnny lawyers may as well just take a nap
They hearsay them self
The fact that he just kept reading quotes from articles had me rolling.
I had a neighbor who owned his business. He repaired or replaced radiators in cars. Bobbi his wife loved him so much. he managed to work every day but also drank. When he went home from work he drank until he literally passed out. That was every day. She made sure she fed him dinner as soon as he got home from work to assure he ate. So many times she would look at him passed out and would say he is killing himself and I love him so much. I never saw him get mean, nasty, or violent with her or their kids. Not all that drink or do drugs are violent.
I hope he got help for his addiction eventually and is doing better.
Yes yes yes,all addicts are diffrent,bcs some of them have psycoligcal problems(sorry engl),and it is very very important how are you raised as a child,the company with you our,the pearson from inside you are, etc..
This lawyer is ridiculous 😀 I’m so surprised the witness didn’t lose his cool being disrespected like this
It's not disrespect, and if I'm being 1000% unbiased, it's because the lawyer doesn't want to let him articulate his point in context, because he knows that his VERY tedious and reaching questions are actually the opposite of reality, but he words them and speaks them in a way where he believes they are true, and to say the opposite is incorrect or heresay or speculation lol
@@shroud4269 That's disrespect lmao. Trying to make a person out to be incompetent, a liar, etc is disrespectful.
🌹🕊️
@@r.h.3084 except in court where it’s acceptable lol
The lawyer is countering that the reason Depp is cancelled is because of Amber. For doing that he is pointing out that Depp has had bad press for a while, so you can't prove Amber is the responsible. It's actually a good tactic.
I have never seen an “Attorney” be so insulting and disrespectful of a Witness EVER. This “Attorney” is not fit to practice law. He’s an EMBARRASSMENT. The most UNPROFESSIONAL and UNDER PREPARED crass individual ever. What a disgusting Team.
totally agree
Disbarment speedrun.
Badgering a witness for not reading rag magazines. What the heck
Yes and they have been this way for the entire case.
This attorney sounds like he could be the brother of Ben Shapiro. Shallow logic, no depth or understanding.
“Idunno.. was that written by the second overpaid actor?” HAHAHAH I love this guy.
Articles being used in the court room.. those articles are hearsay are they not?? This is just wild… Ambers legal team are really reachin here! It’s kinda embarrassing tbh. But what do they expect when everything coming out of her mouth is a lie?😂🤦🏻♀️
What is wrong with this lawyer?! Johnny Depp deserves honor and respect, he is an amazing actor and an incredible human being
The problem is that the judge allows this type of intimidation tactics in her court. I watch some other trials and judges normally lay ground rules for admissible behaviors. This judge from day 1 shows she has no control. It makes her court a circus. So embarrassing because this trial is also watched by people in other countries.
Hello from sweden
Anger Turd's team are disgustingly unprofessional 🇦🇺
I've been saying that from day one that this judge has no control over the courtroom that she's very biased towards Amber heard's team. Her attorneys act like her they all must have borderline personality disorder and they're definitely narcissistic!!
I thought I was the only one thinking that judge was biassed to AH's team.
And from Armenia
I love how the witnesses are always like "yeah, he was drinking, yeah he was doing coke, yeah he was smoking weed". It's amazing how Heard's lawyers are getting the exact answers they're fishing for so hard, and yet are achieving absolutely nothing. Justice for Johnny!
Cause at the end of the day, it's not a secret and it never was. Depp himself would tell people and never shied away from the fact that he did do all those things. He never tried to portray himself as a "holier than thou" saint that didn't abuse substances. It's nothing new so when you hear "Depp does a mega line of crack on the back of his yatch" almost everyone's reaction would be like "k" cause it's nothing we've never heard before. And better yet, everyone knew but still loved him cause he has done so much to help others and give back to people and the world that the simple fact he abuses substances doesn't make people forget all the good hes done. Obviously there's people who do see him as a monster or whatever due to the fact he uses drugs and drinks but the majority of the people couldn't care less about Depps substance abuse cause he's shown us time and time again, that his addictions aren't the only thing to Johnny Depp.
Using drugs is alot more socially accepted then before. and that acceptance is rapidly spreading every day. Many other witnesses testify that Johnny's use impacted only him, and he pretty much never acted out against others. The article mentioned was someone messing with him. They're doing Johnny's team a favor helping shape his reputation better than their lawyers could.
AH lawyers are doing exactly what they wanted to get. Depp looks like a drug addict, drunk, abuser and money hungry. This is the third gf/wife he’s sued and also his past managers and management. Depp is a train wreck.
His drug and alcohol abuse is his own. Trial is not about that. I don’t think the jurors believe he was physically abusing her. Her lawyers have failed badly so far.
@Victor B so do I.agree
Jack Nicholson is much calmer here than he was in Few Good Men 🙂
24:47 If Amber has serious mental health issues then it's very possible that she's not making accusations of abuse solely for personal gain but it could also be in effort to harm Depp. In some previous clips from the trial, I've noticed instances where she appears to enjoy Depps pain and will make efforts to watch Depp in times where there is a chance that he'll be hurt (e.g. audio recordings where he's being called a name, especially if he was unaware of the name calling such as the instance when a man calls him an "idiot" while Depp is unwell). Her behaviour suggests she indeed enjoys seeing Depp harmed which is unusual, in my experience, for an abused victim. Abused victims are more concerned with getting away from their abuser.
Well said and great observation! I agree, one of her many, many downfalls was her inability to hide her facial expressions and body language! Many elements to which helped bring her down!
Are you just figuring that out ? She needed him to open doors for her, and then she needed him to keep them open. She needed control. Not a nice person to live with.
I am an attorney, not from the US though. It baffles me how an attorney would resort to tabloids to subdue a witness to questioning. It's beyond ridiculous.
Makes me question my major even.
You should
Me too. The US law system is totally uncivilised. Even in civil cases. Th whole jury system is responsible fo that. No professionals and for that case a very rude and ruduculous atmosphere. This would not be possible in continental europe.
The defence is drowning ... grasping at straws.
I would Object Hearsay!! to AH lawyer. In Mr JD defence
I am not surprised because they are doing their jobs. But you can see how hard they have to reach to try and defend her.
They are clearly going for the argument that his reputation was already so bad that her accusations didn’t negatively affect him. That’s an… interesting approach.
It's like saying "as long as a person is down, it's totally OK to kick them."
Not like they have a better option for this loser case of theirs haha.
They have to do that though. For a guilty ruling for Amber, there has to be a lie, and it defamed him. So they argue its the truth and it didnt defame him. Even if the first one is only partially true, for the system the Op-ed had to have impact for it to be defamation.
His reputation was bad because of her 2016 false accusations
Agree with you. They are like: Amber didn't ruin his reputation nor arruined his carreer cuz Johnny himself did it.
This lawyer is special. How many times are you going to repeat the same question.
Coming to court and fighting with National Inquirer articles to PROVE A POINT!?!?
What a joke. Poor John
This is a very aggressive interrogation, judge shouldn’t nave allowed such abuse of the witnesses.
For the record, I am a bank auditor myself, and some would say that I am quite ruthless. But this process of interrogation does not let the facts to come to light completely and accurately. Which is AH’s attorneys’ whole point, I suppose. And this is why courts should not allow such an interrogation style to begin with - if their goal is to reveal the facts, that is.
He held his ground😆
The judge has just given up at this point, she does nothing
I like the witnesses NFG attitude to it
The judge is as stupid as Amber Heard. Maybe its strategy bc the JURY needs to hear how ridiculous they all sound. Will be interesting to see how she plays when Amber TURD takes the stand.
@@kandilynn214 she kinda seems like she just wants to hear all the juicy details. Can't blame her thats what we're all here to do.
"Don't answer the question, just say yes or no" Seriously? I literally pity the jurors having to deal with that and maintain a straight face! You know they HAVE to be sick of her shenanigans!
Well, the man still went ahead and answered in the end despite being told to say yes or no
If you notice, when the lawyers approach the bar he smiles at the jury meaning they catch on to the ridiculousness of the defense's arguments
Heard’s team mirrors her abusive personality disorder. Watch Depo’s team…they speak calmly and aren’t combative with their words or overly aggressive. Depp’s team mirrors his personality. I think it’s clear that Am Er Heard is the abuser in this case and her team is just all psychopaths on all the witnesses.
@@kimberlybecker9560 You are spot on!! Anyone else would have a problem with their attorney's acting like that, knowing it reflected on them especially in a public opinion forum...but she seems to get off on it!
In some cases is interesting asking just YES or NO answers. In this case, feels like "PLEASE DON'T RUIN MY CASE SAYING MORE THAN 1 WORD, K THANKS"
This lawyer is infuriating, both her lawyers appear to be so incompetent and just as incredibly ridiculous as she. I wonder after this spectacle of a case whether the outcome is in their favor or not if they get any work as high profile as this, or at all. Their professionalism waivers instead of just trying to prove the case it’s like they stand up there and appear to argue and lead all the witnesses into an argument and when it’s a witness for the other side they sit up there yelling heresy not letting anyone get a word in edge wise when they are able to sit up there and argue with witnesses
What a grueling, long, stand-off. I love how determined the lawyer is to force the witness to say what he wants to hear, but he's really pushing the interrogation-tactics.
It felt to me that this lawyer lost the plot and didn't know how to get back on track. He was lost. He lost me anyway.
I hate amberˋs laywers for their respectless behaviour.
Are you for real?
I like this witness he is not being cowed by aggressive questioning
yeah, this is brutal.. same with miss curry, she was so good on stand
And let’s not forget the guy that vapes and drives lol
It's because he does this for a living
Not his first rodeo. That why he's paid $1K an hour.
He's a LAWYER
Who the hell would bring up rumors in a court trial? I don’t know how he managed to stay so calm, freaking absurd
Where were the objections? Rumour ... i think ... i heard ... I was yelling objection from my armchair!!!!🤣 Johnny's lawyers must have decided to let AH's team dig their own graves.
Johnny's lawyers "give them enough rope ......." am sure you get the gist @@Noogsie_47245
That guy is a joke as a lawyer. Stupid, stupid, questions.
it's because they were talking about johnny depp's reputation at the time, so they were bringing up the stories from newspapers/magazines to sort of show what his reputation was. i agree that it is stupid, especially when they keep asking about different articles and the witness is like "i havent read it, but i'll accept what you say as the truth", seems like a waste of time lol but it makes sense why they couldnt object to the majority of this line of questioning
Because rumours can destroy Johnny's career as much as Amber hearts lies can. So if the press lies or does rumour articals that end up making Disney fire him before the op Ed then they can say the op Ed didn't do the harm the press tabloid rumours did the harm.
This lawyer's IQ is what's on trial.
"Would you agree this was written? That this article was written? That this was said?"
You could put a pumpkin on the stand and ask these questions. They're not questions, he's trading headlines anyone could write. Truth of them regardless.
Mr. Marks, Sir, take a bow you Absolute LEGEND!!
Why does the judge let the lawyer act this way? It is disgraceful.
It's not illegal to be rude.
The judge is biased. She wants AH to win. She lets her Team ask the most ridiculous questions and overrules objections. As soon as JD‘s Team asks a serious question, she sustains
Because they're all the same "community"
She wants to hear where this argument is heading the court needs to be privy to the relevant input
Bought n paid for, amber team member. Forgone conclusion amber wins. Not lawful but actual bs going on. Unprofessional in extremis.
I'm a UK resident and no respectful, educated person reads THE SUN news paper anyway. We all love Johnny and nobody gives a flying hoot what the tabloids print about him.
I don't read any newspapers never have and I've got by fine to 79 years old 😊
Well said x
Well said x
Well said
I agree
Camille smiling in the corner is everything 😂
"page 3 women, topless"
Lmao
This lawyer is badgering the witness. Terrible. He sounds terrible like a self righteous jerk.
He IS a self righteous jerk
He is a jerk!
Blame the Judge, She is makin a mockery out of her courtroom, for allowing this farse
The restraint from Depps lawyers is impressive, they could have objected successfully a lot more but instead chose to let Amber's lawyer destroy his own credibility
“Was that written by the 2nd UNDERPAID actor” lmfaooo I love this guys rebuttal. Smart man.
even the UK Sun joke lmao
Timestamp?
Timestamp??
Timestamp???
12:30 for "other husband"
13:30 for UK joke
I would have said "as you said they are *allegations* not fact, so yes, there were allegations" I would have said the same response over and over bc the dude is basically asking the same question over and over.
Everything that lawyer says is worse than useless and irrelevant. He will never live down being such a fool.
YES GIVE US THE SOURCE. Gossip and tabloids are not sources. Her whole legal team is a circus.
Anything written and/or spoken where public can read it is very important because the public judgement can either make or ruin someone's reputation. The elements of the law is what matters.
Exactly! Tabloids and Gossip are irrelevant in Hollywood scene (as the expert was trying to explain). It's like AH's lawyers aren't aware of the term "all publicity is good publicity", except when it comes to thing related to the Me Too movement.
Hearsay would have been much more believable.
I believe her team has scripts. Lol definitely low budget paid actors. Especially if she paid her assistant $25/hr 😂
Judge has lost complete control of this trial. Embarrassing that a witness undergoes this in the United States of America.
I believe it's a tactic, I believe that she allows this to happen because essentially the line of thinking is "If you want to treat the witnesses hostile on national tv then go ahead because it's most likely going to backfire on you." People see this and of course see how rude and disrespectful the lawyers are and if you look at comments that's exactly what's happening. Also I believe that Johnny's team is allowing it to happen for the same reason. It would be my guess that if this wasn't on tv then she wouldn't allow this type of crap to happen. Idk though but it's the only logical reason I can think of outside of the judge being "bought" or incompetent.
@@wesleydominguez9781 I'm glad this Is being aired on TV now eveyone can see the real shitty people that they are
@@wesleydominguez9781 Indeed, the Judge playing Pontius Pilatus: ego sum a sanguine iusti huius vos videriti
There is a thing called redirect and the judge knows this.
@@wesleydominguez9781 I agree . I think she’s letting them metaphorically hang themselves
During the trial I wondered why Amber would hire crappy lawyers. Then it became obvious. Top tier lawyers knew she was lying and didn't want to be apart of her BS
AH is one suitcase away from being Sarah Boone
The witness is so good. SO good.
For a lawyer who objects so strenuously about any kind of hearsay from Johnny's lawyers his questions to this man sure start with "did you hear about the article that said..." a hell of a lot
Yup, hearsay is their trademark weapon it seems
I get why he would ask these questions in the context of this guy being a "Hollywood Expert", whatever that means.
What I don't get is how he can be allowed to waste the Court's time banging away with irrelevant questions about articles relating to drunkenness after the witness said, *Hollywood drew a line when it comes to domestic violence and sexual assault".
Just pointless....
NAPOLEON BROH
Did you see when he objected his own line of questioning? It was hilarious. He was so used to saying “objection hearsay” that the judge had to remind him that he asked the question
I don’t understand why the judge is even allowing him to ask questions like “have you seen this article where they said this?”, “have you read this article?”, “are you aware of this article?”, etc. That proves nothing. It’s an article. It doesn’t mean that it’s true, and just because he knows about an article doesn’t mean that he’s agreeing with the article either. 🤦🏻♀️ The guy asking these dumb questions is also the “lawyer“ who objected to his own question regarding the tip of Johnny depp’s finger having been cut off. 🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️
She’s letting them bury their own grave and loose this case. They have no shocking new evidence
I think he said hearsay when they were talking about seeing Johnny's penis. Lol but besides that I'm so glad pretty much everyone is on his side. But ur right!
Unfortunately there are quite many comments who don't understand law but basically go super fanboying over Johnny. I support him too, but no, obviously the opposite side are not idiots. They actually follow a strategy. They are making it so that JD already had a bad publicity, so AH did not cause that big of a damage. And that strategy can actually work. But more than half of comments don't even realize that it is a court JD filed, let alone understand wtf is going on.
Bcoz Amber said 'Johny is a wifebeater and a leading publication printed it accusing him of the same' which dropped him from POC6, many new projects & brands and affected his reputation in the industry (according to my knowledge). This is why Johnny filed a defamation case against Amber!!
Now if Amber's lawyers are able to prove that either all that is ever written about him is true and should be considered or what the leading publication printed should not affect his status like the rest of them.
The judge really gives Heards team of lawyers a lot of freedom but seems to shut Depps team down quite a lot.
the expert says tabloids and articles about drug and alcohol abuse mean nothing but it means nothing until physical or sexual abuse comes up. this attorney literally spent this whole session proving the defamation case lol. nailed it
You can hear how heated and frustrated her attorney is getting
So gross, unprofessional, and annoying. Their reputation is going down with Amber Heard
Not much of a case for Amber heard. She should just wrap it up but pay Johnny for all his lost. Amber set up the trap 🪤 for Johnny to fall into. Justice 🦅🇺🇸
Yea it's great! He sound like he's about to come outta the closet
@@aogamikiku it’s also beautiful it’s just shows how much of a 🤡 he is
Of course they are, they know they are lossing this case, it's upsetting to watch, they speak on top of them, they don't let the witnesses finish their sentences, it's completely different from Johnny's Depp Team, they are calm, respectful. I wonder if Amber's lawyer's are going to act the same way when Amber is on the stand, or her witnesses. 🤔🤨
Richard is one of my favourite people to stand in for the trial alongside Doctor Shannon and Alejandro (the vaping doorman). The way he calmly let Amber's lawyers show their stupidity for using sensational gossip news as "evidence" and then professionally mocked The Sun, Netflix, and Hollywood is beautiful.
Yes he's one of my favourite to 😍
he's the dealmaker, every deal ever made in hollywood in the last 50 years?
All him
He's the reason Star Wars exists, he made that deal.
Getting Robert Downey Jr in Iron Man 1? All him.
He's the most powerful character we've seen so far in this arc
Isaac Baruch and Shawn Bett kicked butt too
I really liked Isaac Baruch, Johnnys friends and former tennant of the east columbia building in LA
And Isaac!🥰
This is the most ridiculous questioning I have ever seen! Let’s ask him about every article that’s ever been written and see if he’s ever read them?? 🤦🏻♀️
It annoyed me because when he would basically say no - regardless that everything he responded too sounded like heresy- the lawyer acted like he got the answer he was hoping for. The whole thing was weird.
Am I feeling correct here? AH's lawyers sound aggressive, rushing, annoyed and arrogant to me.
My personal experience with Johnny Depp is that he is one of the most caring, generous and funny souls I have had the pleasure to meet and work with. He volunteered for my non profit Make A Film Foundation and gave of himself completely selflessly for hours and hours- as a volunteer. One can never know the complete truth in scenarios like this- but he has seemingly been consistently kind in the world when he has all his wits about him. Clearly both need some mental and emotional help and support. I hope this gets healed somehow. He was outstanding with our kids and all of the people on the set. He will always hold a special place in my heart because of how he contributed to Anthony Conti in his final weeks of life. He helped make this kids film dream come true in the most brilliant way. A kid who was dying before our eyes with stage 4 Cancer. I hold a space of healing for this entire situation. 🙏🏽🖤
That's a beautiful story ❤️ And fits with everything I've ever heard about him. I live near Vancouver and he's filmed here quite often, and has always spent a lot of time volunteering in childrens' hospitals here too. I hope he gets the chance to heal and find peace soon 🇨🇦
Thank you for sharing…is there anywhere we can view Anthony’s film? JD’s capacity for love and generosity to others is endless, but especially kids, or ‘kiddies’ as he says. Sick kiddies totally grip his heart, there’s a long standing rumour that he Carries what he calls his ‘Jack in the box’ with him at all times- a box with his Capt Jack Sparrow costume, and will dress up and visit the kids hospitals without the cameras or media. Apparently it’s a regular thing that he’s been doing as long as Pirates has been a bit.
I also grew up on the sick kid wards. I saw some of my best friends dying to diseases which are beyond adult comprehension. JD carries himself with the spirit of his inner child- a child who is cloaked in deep thought and an always looming heaviness.
In many ways, he reminds me of MJ.
He has an organic ability to play, and to connect with children and young people on their level. He meets them -everyone, actually- where they’re at.
I’ve no doubt that just as Anthony’s family carries JD in their hearts always, JD carries Anthony and family in his own heart.
Rest brightly Anthony x
How truly wonderful. I have read positive stories of his kindness and generosity . It must have been tremendous to have been a part of this. Thank you for sharing.
@@ScoobyDoozy you can go to the make a film foundation website. We send it with a donation of any amount. Don’t want to post the website here as that wasn’t the purpose of the post. 🙏🏽
Thankyou so much for sharing this!
The judge should stop this Lawyer from asking the same question multiple times in different forms. Also no trial I have ever seen has allowed a lawyer to just read tabloid articles.
Sounds like the lawyer is rambling.
I agree 100%! It was a joke!
Isn't it ironic how an OP ED from the Washington Post is just an opinion piece and can't be under the purview of defamation accorfing to her defemse team, yet they are quoting tabloids as evidence in court that Depps reputation was allegedly demonstrably destroyed before the WaPo OP ED was published? Do they not realize that the entire country is embarrassed by their incompetence? Unbelievable.
Dan Wooton is a slime that follows a twisted a political agenda. His libellous article is the only tool the Defendant has at her disposal
I have wondered about this as well. I think her intention might be to be overcautious, to minimize appeals if this does not go in Amber's favor, but just speculation.
"And you would agree that there's an article that says...'
How is this allowed!?
It shouldn't be allowed. But it should go in Johnny's favor showing how baseless this case is.
His uno reverse respone however "if you say that exists, then im gonna take your word for it"
AND Dan W is now the headlines 😂😂😂
How did she manage to assemble such an extraordinarily annoying, unlikeable group of attorneys? Is unbelievable at this point . I hope is karma.
Lawyers take on the personality of their client!
Yes, it's excellent isn't it? Will be annoying the he'll out of the jury. Let it roll....
I heard Elon musk got them for her and paid for them lmao 🤣
They are just like her she attracted people who are the same as she is and have no morals
I think she knows that winning this is not possible, so she's hoping she can blame shitty lawyers and attempt some sort of damage control after the trial is over
These are not questions, he is basically testifying and adding “correct?” to make it seem like a question. Shouldn’t the judge stop this?
I'm sorry, but those were all proper questions, correct?
No that’s how cross examination works
It's allowed because the "correct?" can be answered with a negative, as in "no, not correct"
Attorneys use it all the time.
But it definitely got old here with hearing it 8363628362829 times in the span of 20 minuts
His double negative questions the other day were double annoying, like “Do you deny you weren’t there” Huh? 🤔😐
Yes, they've been doing that all the time.
Asserting narrative talking points into the minds of the jury, just using the magic word at the end "correct".
Never ruin a persons life based on lies. When yours can be ruined by the truth. Wishing you all the good this world has to offer. Godspeed JD
Well said! ❤
This judge seems so inexperienced, it’s really a shame Johnny has to participate in this circus act. She’s allowing whatever and whenever, and ALWAYS looks uncomfortable or confused. No respect in that courtroom, whatsoever!
So true!!!!
I can't stand this judge!!! And Turd's lawyers are a joke!
She's doing her job. No matter personal opinion. She is being professional. She has to be impartial. You seem like someone who can't comprehend this because you are too invested. I want johnny to win and believe amber heard is a manipulative skank but the judge can't do anything about this she has to let things preside. That's why she is a judge and we are not.
@@markredford84Mark Datimbecile you are the last person to speak on comprehension, darling. What I said was based on her ACTIONS!! She is allowing Amber’s team to use TABLOIDS, badger witnesses and cut them off, as well as let them spend long periods of time looking for paperwork or trying to get things in order. THAT is what I was speaking on. Read baby, read and stop trying to read me.
@@markredford84 I agree
"Johnny Depp ate peanut butter correct?"
Yes.
"So you saw him eat peanut butter correct?"
Yes.
"So you agree peanut butter was present right."
Yes.
Hahaha yes
🤣🤣🤣
pretty much rottenborns entire list of questions
😂😂
Thank you lol
This attorney's voice shaking after he feels his argument slipping away is so satisfying.
"Thank you, I have nothing." sums up large portion of this case from the side of the Amber's lawyer team.
Was her lawyer seriously trying to assert that Johnny had already been acting too much like a drunken pirate for Disney to allow him to play a drunken pirate, anyway? And that quite possibly false allegations of being physically & sexually abusive of his former spouse couldn't possibly have made the difference in his not being cast as the character he created & played in all of the previous movies of the Pirates franchise? Seriously? And thinks that if he gets this guy to falter, that he's made his case? Sheesh. Johnny was - is- the "pirate" in Pirates!
Why is a lawyer allowed to ask a witness questions about a handful of tabloid articles, yet completely shut down a witness's recollection of something they personally witnessed with "OBJECTION, HEARSAY!". This is an absolutely mockery of justice. The number of tabloid articles suggesting his career was in decline - and even that is JUST this lawyer's interpretation - is MEANINGLESS without the number of POSITIVE articles worldwide. This is bull.
Witness testimony is inadmissible in court
…..and they don’t even have to disclose the source of the article and whether or not it’s legit.
100%
Thank you for saying this! Omg do I despise the way her team is allowed to continue with their bs.
@riddle me this I hate how true your comment is. It's sickening and the courts/justice system is broken and is open for the highest bidder.
Seriously, reading articles from tabloids as evidence is ridiculous. This lawyer is so annoying I had to turn this thing off. Outrageous.
It's even more insane considering that all of these articles are valid references, yet a direct conversation with someone is hearsay. How is an article not hearsay? Especially these tabloid trash pieces
This Attorney is not Rottenborn it's Needlehof sumthn like that. He's the same Attorney that objected to his own question lol
Honestly was giving me family guy vibes for a second... absolute disgrace of a way of trying to defend her case.. My faith is fully in Johnny Depp!!!